Jump to content

Wikiversity/Logo/archive-vote-4

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Logo discussions & votes


  • Logo (current logos, guidelines, localisation)

Welcome to the process for finding a logo for Wikiversity!

Phase 1 of the logo contest has been finished (archive); we have our three finalists! The finalists were determined by taking the logo group with the most votes and eliminating all logo groups which didn't have more than half of that amount. I arranged the various designs from the winning logo groups by similarity; if you disagree with my classification, please say so on the talk page.

In phase 2, which lasted from 22 September until 30 September, there was an opportunity to refine the existing designs and propose new ones which had to be based on the basic design of the finalist logos.

Phase 3 (1 October until 15 October) determined which logo was deemed the best of its group of similar logos.

In phase 4, which lasts from 16 October until 31 October, you can now determine the winning logo! Vote for ONE logo only. Please note that if the winning logo should happen to use Wikimedia colours or have blue as its most prominent colour, those colours will have to be changed afterwards to something which is okay with the Wikimedia Marketing Department.

If you have any questions, suggestions or complaints, please contact me on this page's or my own talk page. Thanks for participating!

Nightstallion (?) 09:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply

Overview (35px Thumbnails):


#A (Learning together) -- colours will have to be changed to non-Wikimedia colours

  1. 16 Strchoumpf 21:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  2. Nightstallion (?) 09:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  3. Risk 17:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  4. Leftmostcat 18:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  5. Pepetps 18:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  6. #18 -- Reswik 20:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  7. --WarX 20:37, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  8. #13 Donarreiskoffer 07:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  9. #18--Jorgechp 14:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  10. 朝彦 (Asahiko) 14:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  11. #13 Aldenis 16:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  12. --Schüler 19:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  13. Support Support (no 16) --Alfakim 21:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  14. --Taichi - (あ!) 03:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  15. --Dante, the Wicked 06:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  16. --Hartz 09:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  17. #18 --84.58.189.85 10:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  18. --Conti 17:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  19. --Delta Tango 18:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  20. Mailer Diablo 19:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  21. Quiddity 21:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  22. --Tone 22:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  23. the wub 23:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  24. Erik Zachte 00:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  25. #17 is the most effective imo 87.82.10.23 15:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  26. Support Support esp. 17 & 18 -- Alarob 20:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  27. Preferably #18. Cormaggio @ 21:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  28. Support Support I like the first one. JohannesBuchner
  29. Indech 22:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  30. Support Support #13. Youngvalter 23:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  31. No 18 hopefullyShushruth 06:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  32. mostly the first or #17 --Habakuk 11:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  33. Support Support — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Amire80 (talk) 04:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  34. Preferably 17 or 18 --Javier Carro 12:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  35. Londenp 12:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  36. #17 represents the world wide diverse and spontaneous reach of WU. 207.174.249.2 15:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  37. Support Support - #18! - Jeroenvrp 15:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  38. #17   <STyx 17:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  39. #13 --Nampelkafe 17:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  40. --Storkk 17:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  41. --Lijealso 19:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  42. Support Support Much more stylistic and creative than #B. #B is too formal.--Exir Kamalabadi 23:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  43. Support Support #16 --JB82 00:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  44. Support Support FlipDarius 01:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  45. Support Support SARAzyn diSK 20:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  46. Support Support EyOne 21:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  47. Support Support --Olli 21:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  48. Support Support Kerowyn 05:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  49. Support Support Prefer #13, #17 and #18. -- Mithent 01:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  50. Support Support Prefer #13, #17 and #18 --Malene Thyssen 14:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  51. Support Support #15, 16, 17, or 18 (except remove "beta") Pcu123456789 17:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  52. Support Support Smurrayinchester 18:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  53. Support Support Works well with the three things motto.--Rayd 19:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  54. Support Support --71.231.203.169 06:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  55. Support Support #18 --BeJotHaDe 87.122.53.84 18:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  56. Support Support #13 Yuval Y 19:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  57. Support SupportDuccio 21:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  58. Support Support I really do not like the others, although if the colors are changed, this logo could end up looking awful. -- Kjkolb 01:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  59. Support Support I like most especially #17, and I share Kjkolb's concern that the logos of this set are such that certain color schemes would be particularly, well, awful. Jahiegel 06:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  60. Support Support #16 -- 217.91.99.93 12:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  61. Support Support #15 --Neo139 18:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  62. Support Support #13 --Nico Düsing (Diskussion) 17:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  63. Support Support --Kwekubo 17:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  64. Support Support --220.254.0.4 Ninomy 14:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC) I've forgot that I hadn't logged in. I'm sorry...--Ninomy 15:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  65. Support Support #15 71.161.9.206 01:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC) (mirwin@wikiversity)reply
  66. Support Support #16 Er Komandante 03:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  67. Support Support Petr K 23:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  68. Support Support #16, 17 Mion 18:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  69. Support Support #18 --LBMixPro 02:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  70. Support Support #17 --JonathanLivingston 11:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  71. Möchtegern

#B (University) -- colours will have to be changed to non-Wikimedia colours

  1. TZM talk at de.wp 12:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  2. Timichal 18:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  3. #3 --Snorky 18:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  4. Eyu100 18:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  5. #3 Rholton 01:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  6. (!) Looks too much like MIT.Hillgentleman 02:15, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
    I presume this is a comment - certainly not a vote for - I've moved it down here from originally being within the votes section. Cormaggio @ 21:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
    I think the exclamation mark in front meant Hillgentleman was expressing enthusiasm about the logo, not disapproval – I read it as "This is too much like MIT's dome to not vote it." I'm moving it back for now and I've contacted Hillgentleman about this vote. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 02:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
    (+)(#3) I admit that I prefer number three. Thank you, folks.Hillgentleman 04:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
    Oops - sorry - looks like I completely misinterpreted. Thanks for your vigilance, Minh. Cormaggio @ 17:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
    I am sorry to have confused.--Hillgentleman 09:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  7. #3 Metoc 14:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  8. #3 --Dewatts 15:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  9. #4 Kyle_the_hacker 16:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  10. Amalas 16:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  11. #3 --Bertrand GRONDIN 07:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  12. #3 Lcarsdata 17:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  13. --Shogun 18:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  14. #3 Dav 59 18:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
  15. #3 Grandmasterka 10:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  16. --Frank Schulenburg 12:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  17. #3 --84.56.150.123 18:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  18. #3 --Marbot 18:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  19. #3. Titoxd(?!?) 18:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  20. #3 Tarret 19:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  21. #3 --Gray Porpoise 20:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  22. #3  — MrDolomite | Talk 20:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  23. Trodel 21:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  24. #3 Gurch 22:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  25. #3 --Sasa Stefanovic 22:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  26. #3 --Valley2city 22:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  27. #3 --Kaldari 22:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  28. #3 Badbilltucker 23:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  29. #3 Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  30. #3 Chlewey 03:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  31. -- MichaelFrey 05:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  32. #3 --Jacopo86 09:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  33. #3 --TOR 12:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  34. definitely #3 --Hardern 14:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  35. #3 --Schildwaechter 19:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
  36. --alexscho 20:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  37. Support Support #3 --Rbraunwa 22:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  38. Support Support #3 Axxgreazz (talk?) 03:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  39. EBOLA rulez 06:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  40. #3 -- BlueRbt 08:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  41. Support Support #3, no text or translated to each language. --Sanbec 11:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
    Of course, there will be a version without text. But will it be necessary to translate the name to other languages? (In german, it's also "Wikiversity" e.g.) --80.171.127.26 15:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
    Well, it'll probably be ウィキバーシティ in Japanese and 维基学院 in Chinese, just to name a few possibilities ;-) --朝彦 (Asahiko) 15:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  42. Support Support #3 - It's the closest Wikiversity will get to becoming a brick-and-mortar institution - 87.82.30.157 12:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  43. Achates 15:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  44. Support Support #4 69.251.20.244 16:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  45. Support Support Laurent Bouvier 20:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  46. #3, but what the heck's wrong with that color? LtPowers 22:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  47. un logo qui reflete bien l'esprit 'versity --80.8.34.116 04:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  48. Support Support --Dijan 08:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  49. Support Support -- marilyn.hanson 13:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  50. #3 --Mipago 12:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  51. Support Support -- IvanLanin 14:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  52. Support Support -moyogo 15:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  53. I like #3 better, but either one would be ok. Philbert2.71828 23:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  54. Support Support #3 Greudin 11:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  55. #3 --Pill δ 12:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  56. Support Support the combination.--HereToHelp (talk) 19:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  57. Support Support SatyrTN 03:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  58. #3 Marcos 16:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  59. #3 Nortonthe1st
  60. #3 Tryggvia 07:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  61. #3 Derbeth 17:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  62. #3 Meithal 19:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC) clear and tidyreply
  63. #3 Support Support Lincher 00:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  64. #3 Support Support Jgrullon88 10:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  65. Erwin85 15:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  66. #3 --Erkan Yilmaz 22:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  67. Support Support Dilaudid 02:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  68. #4 Support Support Szumyk 06:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  69. #3-- bs (talk) 19:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  70. #3 --66.30.106.141 19:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  71. Support Support #3 looks the best of all Bastique 19:36, 26 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  72. #3 --Nessie 11:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  73. #4 FoX 14:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  74. #3 Simple and elegant.66.71.42.128 02:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  75. #3 Support Support Suto 02:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  76. #3 Support Support - Airridi 03:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  77. #3 Support Support - RT 02:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  78. Support Support #3 -- Micha2564 14:49, 28 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  79. Support Support #3 -- CharlieCLC
  80. #3 --Rory096 19:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  81. #3Support Support Grimlock 09:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  82. #3 Support Support--Hanlong 11:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  83. #3 Support Support Wolvenraider 11:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  84. #3 Support Support Karimarie 16:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  85. Support Support #3, though I suggest changing the pillars to a different shade/color and reducing their relative size somewhat. —Lifeisunfair (David Levy at the English Wikipedia) 02:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  86. #4 Support Support PDD 12:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  87. #3 Support Support Davodd | Talk 21:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  88. #3 Support Support Rakela 22:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  89. #3 Support. BenduKiwi - 23:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  90. #4 Support Support --romanm (talk) 12:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
  91. #3 Support Support --Fbi429 13:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply

#C (Child, Earth & Question mark)

  1. Imoeng 13:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  2. 555 19:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  3. Support Support Supporting "Zaniumum blues" again. Is anyone still in favor of this original "inverted land/sea" version? – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 03:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  4. This works best in all sizes! Awolf002 22:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  5. Zanimum blues ---Californiacondor 01:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  6. Support Support Enni84 14:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  7. Support Support Zanimum blues - Sdorrance 19:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  8. Support Support AdamWalker 20:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
  9. Support Support Stefan Majewsky 14:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  10. Support Support CaseInPoint 00:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  11. Support Support Zanimum blues --Paginazero - Ø 07:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  12. Support Support -- Zanimum 17:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  13. Support Support Zanimum blues --PabloBD 17:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  14. Support Support Daniel () Check out Wikiscope! 11:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  15. Support Support Zanimum blues--Wikiphilia
  16. Support Support --ExpImp 20:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  17. Support Support --Tosca 18:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  18. Support Support --Leighblackall 08:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  19. Support Support -- The only one that is somehow feasible. The others have a lot of visual noice. Teemul 10:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  20. Support Support -- This is the cleanest, most 'worldwide education' focused logo of those presented.
  21. Support Support-- --Walter 11:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  22. Support Support -- WindRunner 01:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  23. Support Support 'Zanimum blues' looks great. -- Yarin Kaul 21:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  24. Support Support Zanimum blues looks briliant! Mindofzoo999 03:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  25. Support Support IlyaHaykinson 03:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  26. Support Support I love colorings ... --Aphaia 15:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
  • Motto and slogan contest for English Wikiversity - Please help select a motto and a slogan.
  • Wikiversity mission - We can use ideas from the motto, slogan and logo contests to help refine the mission statement. Feel free to post English Wikiversity mission statement revisions.