Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Viswaprabha

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Viswaprabha (Viswanathan Prabhakaran)

[edit]
ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: ml, en-4, hi-2, sa-2, ur-1, ta-1, ar-1.
  • Personal info: (English)
    I am Viswaprabha, A biomedical engineer, project manager and IT expert, having lived abroad for more than 25 years with many cultures, now stationed in Kerala, India, spending most of my time for activism and evangelism of Wikimedia, open education and other knowledge and language empowerment missions, particularly among the rural masses who are yet to embark upon the digital age.

    With my credentials several of which are indicated below, I would like to be an effective steward for the Wikimedia projects:

    • I have been a registered user of Wikipedia at least since February 2005 (and as an unregistered user since much earlier).
    • Have been the first (and continuing)administrator of ml Wiktionary (2005) as also a current Administrator at ml.wikipedia.org
    • Have more than 37,000 Global edit count, mostly attributed in ml (wikipedia, wiktionary, wikisource), sa (wikipedia), Wikimedia commons and en (wikipedia). Besides, I also have a Bot user ID (ViswaBot).
    • Have been a board member of Wikimedia India Chapter (2012-2014) and also the treasurer in 2014. During my tenure in the Chapter as a Board member, I was also the principal person to take care of the technical and administrative tasks pertaining to the Chapter's internal and open wikis, the Mediawiki installation and other server maintenance.
    • Have been well accepted in my communities as a veteran editor, policy guide, mentor and outreach program advisory.
    • Well versed with the scenarios and critical handling of moderation, consensus formation and user rights management within the ecology of my Wikimedia communities.
    • Have contributed and involved otherwise (such as Outreach Workshops, editathons, GLAM, conferences, media exposure, legal compliance etc.) with ml, en, sa, WMIN chapter and CIS-A2K significantly and other Indic Wikimedia projects moderately.
    • Have been an instrumental resource person for several Hackathons, workshops, conferences and 'Train the trainer' programs conducted within India.
    • Have almost two decades of wide experience on user rights management in other social networks, mail groups, blogs, forums and such collaborative projects.
    • Have met and interacted with a wide array of users, tool makers and administrators and other key persons of Wikimedia ecology during three Wikimania events (held in 2012, 2014 and 2015).
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Viswaprabha

  • Yes

    [edit]
    1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --6AND5 (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    2. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Holder (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC) We need more native speakers of non-European languages.reply
    3. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    4. Sujalajus (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Sujalajus (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    5. Deryck Chan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Viswa's participation of offline Wikimedia activities gives me confidence that he'll be a responsible steward. Deryck C. 17:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    6. Vikashegde (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Vikashegde (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    7. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    8. LavaBaron (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   LavaBaron (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    9. MADe (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   MADe (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    10. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ejensyd (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Andrewredk (Not eligible, checked by Stryn)   Andrewredk (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    11. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mscuthbert (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Dig deeper (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Seems like a well rounded, intelligent individual. I think he'll do us proud. Dig deeper (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    12. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Work2win (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    13. Elkan76 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Elkan76 (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    14. Prof tpms (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   He is very active with Malayalam language Wikipedia Prof tpms (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    15. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Zeljko (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    16. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    17. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    18. Rsmn (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Rsmn (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    19. Sayant Mahato (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Sayant Mahato (talk) 04:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    20. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    21. Adv.tksujith (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Good Viswa is a great Malayalee having international outlook. Definitely he will be an asset of Stewards Group!. Adv.tksujith (talk) 09:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Lalsinbox (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Lalsinbox (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    22. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    23. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Assianir (talk) 11:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    24. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    25. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    26. Vinayaraj (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   His Enthusiasm and Sincerity to Wikipedia is sufficient to give him this Responsibility. Vinayaraj (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    27. தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    28. Bff (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Bff (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    29. Drajay1976 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   I have full confidence in him. Drajay1976 (talk) 18:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    30. Irvin calicut (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Irvin calicut (talk) 18:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    31. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   CLCStudent (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    32. Jayantanth (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   although less activity in crosswiki Jayantanth (talk) 20:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    33. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   I'm not actually opposed. Ghiutun 22:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Risk Engineer (talk) 00:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    34. VanEman (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016   VanEman (talk) 05:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Gaurav Pruthi (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   I have received +ve response for him from Mumbai based wiki community of which I was a part sometime back. So, I am voting him positively. Gaurav Pruthi (talk) 08:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    35. Ranjithsiji (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   Plus one for his endless attempt to better wikipedia and attempts to build a community around it. Ranjithsiji (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    36. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veleius
         VickRomanoff (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   VickRomanoff (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    37. Tonynirappathu (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   tony 13:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    38. Vengolis (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Vengolis (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    39. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    40. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   MelanieN (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    41. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   loupgarous (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    42. Vijayakumarblathur (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   hard working, intelligent individual. I think he'll do us proud. Vijayakumarblathur (talk) 10:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    43. Sreejithkoiloth (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Sreejithkoiloth (talk) 10:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    44. విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 11:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    45. Lombanto (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Lombanto (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    46. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Seasoned Wikipedian with understanding of Indic language problems. Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    47. Fotokannan (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Fotokannan (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    48. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Fernando2812l (talk) 19:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    49. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Ascánder (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    50. Clivemacd (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Clivemacd (talk) 10:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    51. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   Rberchie (talk) 11:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    52. Neddy1234 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Neddy1234 (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    53. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by )2016   Xoegki (talk) 04:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    54. Munci (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   Munci (talk) 13:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    55. හරිත (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   හරිත (talk) 14:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    56. Drcenjary (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Experienced and matured wikipedian with huge familiarity with Indic languages Drcenjary (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    57. Msannakoval (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Msannakoval (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    58. Balajijagadesh (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Balajijagadesh (talk) 04:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    59. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Carlotm (talk) 04:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    60. बिप्लब आनन्द (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    61. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ferran Mir (talk) 08:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    62. Akbarali (Eligible, checked by Melos)2016   Akbarali (talk) 11:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    63. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Gag0409 (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    64. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    65. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Fuxx (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    66. לערי ריינהארט (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 00:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    67. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    68. Puranastudy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Puranastudy (talk) 04:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    69. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   - Because of his good understanding about smaller wikis and also his global outlook. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 07:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    70. Fraxinus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Fraxinus (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    71. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Antoine.01 (talk) 15:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    72. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wonderful experience and language knowledge! Fadesga (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    73. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    74. Dvellakat (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   very good candidate, wish him all success and good perfomance pakalon (talk) (talk) 07:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    75. Irshadpp (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Irshadpp (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    76. AlfredoGMx (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   AlfredoGMx (talk) 11:59, 16 February 2016
    77. Shubha (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Shubha (talk) 14:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC) (UTC)reply
    78. Kew Gardens 613 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    79. Rodrigo Padula (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Rodrigo Padula (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    80. Pcnavod (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Pcnavod (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Hollingsworth (talk) 21:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    81. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Berlin-George (talk) 23:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    82. Naveenpf (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   naveenpf (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    83. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Aydinsalis (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    84. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   --عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    85. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   This candidate has a wide knowledge base and it seems he wants to steer a reasonable path. Wpollard (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    86. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Dbastro (talk) 12:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Utkarshsingh.1992 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Utkarshsingh.1992 (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    87. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Xatian11968 (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    88. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Mirer (talk) 21:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Kiranravikumar (Not eligible, checked by Syum90)   Kiranravikumar (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    89. Saileshpat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Sailesh Patnaik (Talk2Me|Contribs) 11:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    90. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Octahedron80 (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    91. വരി വര (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   വരി വര (talk) 14:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    92. P.T. Aufrette (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   P.T. Aufrette (talk) 18:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Chrishitch (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Chrishitch (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    93. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Jusjih (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    94. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   +1 uses lists properly, +1 near my timezone (southwest china), +1 offline work Pratyeka (talk) 06:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   good candidate. Pradeepabk (talk) 11:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    95. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Srikant Kedia 14:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    96. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Rich Farmbrough 18:03 20 February 2016 (GMT). 18:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    97. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Ford MF (talk) 06:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Stalinsunnykvj (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Stalinsunnykvj (talk) 09:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    98. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Popo le Chien (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    99. Yogwi21 (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Yogwi21 (talk) 11:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    100. Nabin K. Sapkota (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Support Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 16:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    101. Armineaghayan (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   He has a big input in Malayalam langǃ ArmAg 17:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    102. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   BluesyPete (talk) 17:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         DracoEssentialis (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   An evangelist and a veteran. How wonderful. DracoEssentialis (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    103. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Yair rand (talk) 20:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    104. Leništudent (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   good candidate Leništudent (talk) 07:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    105. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bogger (talk) 08:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    106. Cuaxdon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   accepted--owing to his good understanding of how to deal with the wikimedia and also global outlook.--Cuaxdon (talk) 13:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    107. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   The Traditionalist (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    108. Ganesh Paudel (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Ganesh Paudel (talk) 00:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    109. Rpclod (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Rpclod (talk) 00:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    110. Jorval (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jorval (talk) 01:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    111. Sidheeq (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Sidheeq (talk) 09:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    112. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Kadavr2000 (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Ananth subray (talk) 12:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    113. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   The Banner (talk) 14:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    114. Jayen466 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Andreas JN466 18:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    115. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Strong support at first, but move to weak support due to Ajraddatz and MF-Warburg's comments Bennylin 04:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    116. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    117. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Bio06940 (talk) 12:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         WriterListener (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   WriterListener (talk) 20:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Tripallokavipasek (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Perhaps it's a little naif, but I love the things you say in your personal page. Undoubtedly, you have my vote. Tripallokavipasek (talk) 23:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    118. Rijinatwiki (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Rijinatwiki (talk) 09:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    119. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   NoychoH (talk) 11:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    120. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Interesting background and experiences. --ContributorQ (talk) 18:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    121. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   NeoLexx (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    122. Mehdi ghaed (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   [[مهدی فیلو]] (talk) 19:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    123. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lutzv (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    124. MirkoS18 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   MirkoS18 (talk) 21:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Romayan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Romayan (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    125. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    126. J7729 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   J7729 (talk) 08:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Lawrencedepe (talk) 09:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    127. محمد الفلسطيني (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --محمد الفلسطيني (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Proektir (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    128. BORGATO Pierandrea (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   BORGATO Pierandrea (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    129. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Infernus (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Infernus (talk) 19:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    130. NehalDaveND (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   He helped sa.wikipedia very much. I hope he will do so in future too. NehalDaveND (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    131. TillF (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   TillF (talk) 20:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    132. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Defrenrokorit (talk) 06:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Mallikarjunasj (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Mallik (talk) 08:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    133. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 12:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply

    No

    [edit]
    1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   The answer to the question from Rschen7754 appalls me. It is full of business-speech ("typically local but rather well-performing", "a step-by-step gradual approach of progressing", "peer stewards"), and also not very logical. First he states an order by which he wants to start doing steward actions (where CU actions is the last item of the "maturing curve"), and then in the next sentence he suddenly says "I see no reason to stay away from the main actions stewards do in a routine basis - blocks, rights and CU". — Also, he did not sign the Confidentiality agreement in time and was only allowed to run because ElectCom strangely decided to bend the rules [1]. It was clearly written in the Guidelines that the agreement needs to be signed before February 8. This alone is a reason for me to oppose. A steward should at least be able to read a simple guideline before he candidates for something. --MF-W 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Insufficient global experience for me --Herby talk thyme 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    3. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    4. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    5. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Gereon K. (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    6. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per MF-Warburg and no activists als steward please. Natuur12 (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    7. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   shows very little relevant experience, with little use of their administrator flags on the wikis that they have them. I do not think they would use the tools much if elected. Rschen7754 15:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    8. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    9. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   As per MF-Warburg. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC).reply
    10. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    11. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Little crosswiki experience and not convinced with answers Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    12. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Why do you even want to be a steward? Your statement says nothing about actual steward areas of responsibility. If you want to expand open education and knowledge, this is certainly a role which can help do that, but there are specific things that we do along those lines. So it's a "not now" from me, given the candidate's lack of relevant experience. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    13. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    14. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Vogone (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    15. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Alan (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    16. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Nrautava (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    17. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Asav (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    18. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Armbrust (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    19. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Doesn't seem well suited to be a steward and doesn't have enough crosswiki experience. Reguyla (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    20. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Doesn't sit well with me. OlEnglish (Talk) 20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    21. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Not enough relevant experience. Miniapolis 20:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    22. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Wolmar (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    23. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Farin12 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   Farin12 (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    24. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Laberinto16 (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    25. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Per above Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    26. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   White Master (es) 22:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    27. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hubertl (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    28. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    29. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         WikiMichel (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   WikiMichel (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    30. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    31. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    32. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    33. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    34. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    35. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   eurodyne (talk) 08:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    36. Rcsprinter123 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Rcsprinter123 (talk) 09:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    37. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    38. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    39. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 12:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    40. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Hmmm. Stewards may need to be bold at times, however, running into hot water is not a smart trait. Neutrality and letting communities make their decisions is important.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    41. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    42. Bodhisattwa (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Cross-wiki experience is not good Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    43. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   No cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 16:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    44. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    45. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   DCB (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    46. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Ernstol (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    47. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    48. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Timothycrice (talk) 06:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    49. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   cyrfaw (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    50. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Far away from enough understanding of the steward role and also per MF-W and Ajraddatz. — T. 13:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    51. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   see above Holmium (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    52. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    53. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    54. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   per MF-Warburg. Being instrumental in the project doesn't mean you "merit" a flag as a reward. Make the case why we benefit with you as steward or go back to your home wiki where you're doing a great job. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    55. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 01:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    56. 레몬이 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   레몬이 (talk) 06:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    57. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   FASTILY 09:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    58. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   no global rights, has only created self steward requests as of feb 1.--Snaevar (talk) 19:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    59. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    60. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 05:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    61. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Hampcky (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    62. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Explanations given with "No Vote" serial number-1 Nannadeem (talk) 07:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    63. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Az1568 (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    64. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Insufficient global activity, and per MF-W. — regards, Revi 07:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    65. Caliburn (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lack of cross-wiki experience. Caliburn (talk) 09:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    66. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Magawla61 (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    67. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Rax (talk) 22:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    68. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Fdssdf (talk) 23:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    69. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   თოგო (D) 23:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    70. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Hemeier (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    71. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ringbang (talk) 21:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    72. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   CaZeRillo (talk) 09:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    73. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   SideshowBob7 (talk) 13:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    74. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   ZERO contributions to any Wikiversities. --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Qewr4231 (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    75. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   MBurch (talk) 03:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    76. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   KTo288 (talk) 16:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    77. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   Wikifreund (talk) 16:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   No, thanks. VisaBlack (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    78. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Goombiis (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    79. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   MZaplotnik (contribs) 11:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    80. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Maleine258 (talk) 13:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    81. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   --DerekvG (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    82. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   A bit preoccupied by the concerns raised. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    83. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   DangSunM (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    84. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   —Ah3kal (talk) 08:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    85. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Glaisher (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    86. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Geoff Who, me? 22:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    87. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Styko (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    88. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Hobbamock (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    89. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mazuritz (talk) 11:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    90. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   per MF-Warburg Pratyya (Hello!) 12:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    91. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I have talked with the user in off-wiki media relatively and I know that he has rather good perception of Wikimedia projects (though I am not checking the questions now, I see from comments that there is what to look at) which left a very good impression in my mind, but I see that contributions are too Malayalam centred and almost no x-wiki activity is observed :( Base (talk) 12:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    92. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nnemo (talk) 13:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    93. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   Ireas (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply

    Neutral

    [edit]
    1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Cannot make my mind. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    2. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Jahaza (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    3. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    4. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Arbnos (talk) 16:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    5. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   hmm.... Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    6. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   I don't dislike your profile, but maybe you should ask for this flag next year. Alexmar983 (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    7. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    8. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Don't know him. Neutral for now. Trijnsteltalk 13:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    9. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I have met Viswaprabha during Wikimania and I found him a nice, responsible and very motivated person. I am not convinced that he is interested in steward duties, however — NickK (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    10. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   It doesn't become clear to me why the user applies for steward ship, however, I don't really see a reason to oppose the candidature but I'm also sadly not convinced enough to support. -Barras talk 13:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    11. B25es (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   B25es (talk) 09:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    12. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Wikibenchris (talk) 11:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    13. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   GZWDer (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    14. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   AdiMind (talk) 18:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    15. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Stang 05:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    16. Indu (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Indu (talk) 22:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    17. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Höyhens (talk) 23:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    18. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   ~Cybularny Speak? 23:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    19. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Bmhs823 (talk) 08:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    20. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   VictorBrice (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)reply
         Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
    21. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   ysjbserver (talk) 07:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)reply