Steward requests/Checkuser/2019-01

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in January 2019, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Requests

Latest comment: 7 years ago143 comments29 people in discussion

Picksve@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Picksve (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 反赤共復民國 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); SKlQUob0 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); HD0xycvbgY (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Qubotan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Topsun888 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Choasppp (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Cynthia liu123 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); XJGF (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); FfairsCouncil (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Picksve

Reason(s): First six is ducks of local admin via Copyangry7fcvc(C7),XJGF and FfairsCouncil are confirmed in m:Steward_requests/Checkuser/2018-11#GSfERpSA(Copyangry7fcvc_1)@zh.wikipedia and m:Steward_requests/Checkuser/2018-11#Bikinootag(Copyangry7fcvc_2)@zh.wikipedia,I hope to check it and find more sleepers if there have.--MCC 214 #aut viam inveniam aut faciam 10:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Chengmorgan is Stale.--MCC 214 #aut viam inveniam aut faciam 06:49, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
[1] and [2],add Choasppp and Cynthia liu123。--MCC 214 #aut viam inveniam aut faciam 09:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Done, For Picksve, 反赤共復民國, Topsun888, Choasppp, Cynthia liu123 the CU evidence is inconclusive. All other accounts confirmed. No other unlocked sleeping account. Linedwell ^[talk] 19:14, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks User:Linedwell. Reported back.--Cohaf (talk) 19:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

@Linedwell:Sorry to reopen thus but can I seek a quick clarification, is this account linked to the confirmed group RegisterZ (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser). They made an unblock request immediately after the results are out. Thanks--Cohaf (talk) 19:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

@Cohaf: No problem. I checked but I can't link it to any of the previous accounts. Regards, Linedwell ^[talk] 19:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

@Linedwell:. Thanks much!--Cohaf (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

珍珠鮮奶茶@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 珍珠鮮奶茶 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); A20181231 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sosotimes (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 5133times (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Aoao1234 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 食貨的人 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 也者乎之 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Maybebypeoplelikeyou (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Goldmetals (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Qwu105730 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#珍珠鮮奶茶

Reason(s): Qwu105730 is sock blocked as a sock of LTA Jesschi but gave an unblock request here，claiming innocence. CU requested for unblock. The rest of the accounts are globally locked socks of Jesschi. Given for data comparison. Cohaf (talk) 07:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Ang hope find more sleepers if there have.--MCC 214 #aut viam inveniam aut faciam 11:42, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
某個中國人,Yesisyes,Stopwrite,Rofovo and 2018a1010 are Stale.--MCC 214 #aut viam inveniam aut faciam 10:42, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Noted.--Cohaf (talk) 10:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Inconclusive from my POV. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks MarcoAurelio. Reported back.--Cohaf (talk) 17:20, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

TLPG@en.wikiquote

Status: Not done

List of users: TLPG (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Spartacus6000 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 1.152.104.83 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: q:Talk:Jonathan Mitchell

Reason(s): Well it seems definitely either meat puppetry or sock puppetry. Seems likely related to the saga of KrazyKlimber on en.wiki, who showed up as an IP from the same geographic location (1.152.96.233) before registering an account to grind an ax against Jonathan Mitchell and try to get the article deleted. Eventually blocked for harassment and then for block evasion as an IP (101.182.100.189). The situation on quote is apparently a edit war two years in the making that recently exploded. But similar pattern overall, grinding an ax and then trying to get the article deleted when it becomes apparent that it's not working as intended. How fortunate for them that so much spontaneous support has arisen so suddenly on a page with barely any edits by anyone ever. TLPG is a much older account though, so at least that bit I don't understand. GMG ^talk 13:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Not done Do not see any reason for checkuser. If an account misbehave, just block it. Ruslik (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Umm...Ruslik...Is there some reason to perform a CU other than someone abusively and obviously using multiple accounts? GMG ^talk 01:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Haled R@ro.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Haled R (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Gbarbu22 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: ro:Wikipedia:Pagini de șters/Arabii și Occidentul

Reason(s): The only edit of Haled R (until then and ever since), mere minutes after registering the account, was to oppose the deletion of the article initiated by Gbarbu22. Andrei Stroe (talk) 16:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Not done - no check needed here. That account hasn't edited in nearly a month, so checking it would not assist in preventing any abuse. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

MTR 558391@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: MTR 558391 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Shek Ming Fai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#MTR 553891

Reason(s): Both users have done coloring vadalism. Although Shek Ming Fai does not continue this action, please check for any sleepers for MTR 558391 cause their editing habits are similar (mainly railway related articles). Iswjy1mcb (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Comment. No local consensus to check, they have clear editorial disputes with the rest and send the 2 to zhwiki AIV but was declined and ask to engage in village pump discussion. However, they don't wish to engage in meaningful discussion at village pump and wow, here they are. Forumshopping indeed.--Cohaf (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Comment No, we have local consensus to chack because some administrators in zh RFCUHAM agree to check due to their editing habit are similar and we are already discussed in the disscussion page. Iswjy1mcb (talk) 22:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment@Iswjy1mcb:. May I understand which zhwiki administrator agreed to the check? And may I know what consensus there are. In addition, it'll be wise to use the preview button rather than editing a sentence 10 times. Best Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
  - Let me make this clear: No administrators were involved in local discussion, and forum shopping is not allowed at Meta. Your request is likely to be rejected. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 00:27, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Cohaf: Sanmosa agreed to check Iswjy1mcb (talk) 02:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  - Sanmosa is NOT an administrator.--Cohaf (talk) 02:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  - Comment @Cohaf: It is suspected that MTR 558391 is used for vandalism and Shek Ming Fai for normal editing, checking for sleepers is needed. It looks like a duck to meIswjy1mcb (talk) 03:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
    - My goodness. You reported to AIV and an administrator told you to start a discussion at Village Pump and determined it as a content dispute but you didn't. And now you are at meta saying the same. What grounds are there for a sleepers check? I will strongly encourage you to drop the stick before I push for sanctions for forumshopping at zhwiki. If you want the check, fine go ahead, but I request the steward to check this account also to make sure it isn't a good hand bad hand account and they seems to have very similar interests to the above 2 as well as editing tendencies. --Cohaf (talk) 03:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
    - Why on earth are you so stubborn, Iswjy1mcb? Stewards will not check until a local consensus comes into being. Why not follow zh.wiki administrator's advice? Do you think you are superior to admins or what?! Stop your rudeness. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 09:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Could a steward or meta admin close this request as premature and lacking consensus from local discussion? Alex Shih (talk) 09:38, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Alex Shih:. I would rather the closing reason being invalid, forum shopping, SNOW and disruptive checking. But yes, this needs to be closed by a steward as soon as possible. I'm not sure whether a meta admin could do it or not.--Cohaf (talk) 13:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Not done - checkuser isn't a weapon to use against the other side of a content dispute. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Andyccr@zh.wikiversity

Status: Done

List of users: Andyccr (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); AndyUSWCAX (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); AndyUSD (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: N.A. This isn't zhwiki.

Reason(s): I reference to this enwiki SPI, accordingly blocked the accounts active also on zhwikiversity, some are blocked before the SPI. Behaviourally very similar, however, the English Wikipedia SPI doesn't have the last account. Seeking CU clarification as well as to see are there anymore sleepers over at zhwikiversity (I note some accounts found in enwiki isn't found in zhwikiversity, the vice versa maybe applicable) as well as range block if applicable. Thanks. Cohaf (talk) 10:08, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

@Bbb23: as enwiki CU who conducted the check that this is a crosswiki issue. Possibly commons also, see SUL of accounts.--Cohaf (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Well, even if it is not zhwiki, local discussion is always preferred since we are not expert on all the local projects and your fellow editors might be able to detect new CU target. Will do in few minutes after I am done with other stuff. — regards, Revi 12:43, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

I duck blocked all and had discussed this case with community members offline so I think we did all we could here. The rest really require a CU to ensure all is taken care off. If there is a range, do feel free to do a checkuser block. Thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 13:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

I request that a CU block should be imposed at the same time because of Autoblock #31 concering User:AndyUSWCAX. Since he has a history of copyright violation on zhwikiversity, I would argue thet it is necessary. --Mend My Way 05:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Now my fellow sysop had concurred a check is necessary, I hope we can have the results soon. Thanks!--Cohaf (talk) 06:34, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Extended content
I'm starting doubting if we live on the same planet. Is "a few minutes" that long? (Joke→) You don't live on Mercury, do you? --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 12:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC) "A few" is not few, man. Sæn mō sà 14:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC) I konw. I think Revi meant "a lot of". --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 00:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Done - all three accounts are

Confirmed, no sleepers. – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ajraddatz:. Thanks, is there any range to be blocked?.--Cohaf (talk) 03:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

At this stage I think the account blocks should cover it. There has been no further abuse since the request was filed. – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ajraddatz: Thanks so much, appreciate your help for this. Will go through the accounts to see any SRG requests need to be filled or not. Thanks anyway --Cohaf (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

AryaHindu@hi.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: AryaHindu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); देशी छोरा (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: local policy

Reason(s): Advert. Starting same articles which have been created by long term abuser "मनोज जाट" in the past. --SM7^--talk-- 18:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Done there is inconclusive technical evidence. Please use behavioural evidence to evaluate next steps. – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

MeritTim@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: MeritTim (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Responsibility330 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#MeritTim

Reason(s):

It looks like a duck to meblocked but 2nd account wants a block review --Cohaf (talk) 15:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks MarcoAurelio. Reported Back.--Cohaf (talk) 18:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

X028887@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: X028887 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sedrtt (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Tessa0622 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Zerosu0221 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Peace465 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#X028887

Reason(s):

It looks like a duck to me User:X028887. All these accounts have only edited zh:尹子夜 and zh:小峰峰, some of their edits are removed per BLP. Per local request, I think that more socket puppets should be found and whether they are abusing IPs should be checked. --Mend My Way 04:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Done all accounts are

Confirmed, no sleepers found. – Ajraddatz (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

MTR 553891@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: MTR 553891 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Shek Ming Fai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#MTR 553891

Reason(s): It is suspected that MTR 553891 is used for vandalism and Shek Ming Fai for normal editing due to similar editing habits (mainly railway related articles) Iswjy1mcb (talk) 00:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

I'd throw swear words at you if not for urbanity's sake. This is a repetitive request. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 01:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
I would like to find out whether MTR 553891 is used for vandalism and Shek Ming Fai for normal editing or not due to frequent editing on such articles. It looks like a duck to me Iswjy1mcb (talk) 01:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for disturbing, as this is a disruption made by Iswjy1mcb, per IAR, I should rapidly close it. Explanation is made in zhwiki RFCUHAM. Sæn mō sà 03:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Side note: this one is a repeated report of the above one. Sæn mō sà 03:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Please view it as a withdrawal. Many thanks. Sæn mō sà 03:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Not disruption Iswjy1mcb (talk) 03:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- BOOMERANG, OP block for DE locally.--Cohaf (talk) 04:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Side note: Iswjy1mcb is blocked in zhwiki for 24 hours. Sæn mō sà 04:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

A few time@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: A few time (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); A few weeks (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#A few time

Reason(s):

It looks like a duck to me, both accounts have similar names and editing habits， violated Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts of Wikipedia:ILLEGIT. Iswjy1mcb (talk) 02:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for disturbing, as this is a disruption made by Iswjy1mcb,per IAR, I should rapidly close it. Explanation is made in zhwiki RFCUHAM. Sæn mō sà 03:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Please view it as a withdrawal. Many thanks. Sænmōsà 03:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not disruption Iswjy1mcb (talk) 04:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- BOOMERANG, OP blocked for DE locally.--Cohaf (talk) 04:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Side note: Iswjy1mcb is blocked in zhwiki for 24 hours. Sæn mō sà 04:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Side note 2: Techyan turned down the request locally per zh:WP:DISRUPT. --Mend My Way 04:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- And Techyan is also the one who blocked Iswjy1mcb. Sæn mō sà 06:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikiobai@ro.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Wikiobai (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); BAICAN_XXX (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Centurrion (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); ValydinDD (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discu%C8%9Bie_Utilizator:Victor_Blacus

Reason(s): BAICAN XXX has been blocked indefinitely on ro.wiki and lately also globally; his persistent wiki-pattern is a mix of sometimes useful copy-edits but also many trivial errors and occasionally big ones; he is also a prolific sockpuppeteer; seeing that he has had recent activity globally, it would be nice if you could investigate further beyond Wikiobai. --Mihai P. (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous Comment: Have you to look for further evidence? You should mean discussion here which has occured at appropiate section below: see Cross-wiki LTA vandal for understanding such situation. 86.126.100.159 16:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

I added the name of Centurrion, a new user with a very similar pattern of behavior. Some other sleepers or active accounts may also be found. --Pafsanias (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
ValydinDD added for the same reasons. Please see the complete (?) list of known sockpuppets of BAICAN XXX. --Pafsanias (talk) 13:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

@Pafsanias: Indeed for some purposes. Does really the accounts are related to BAICAN XXX? If they are same person, please provide additional consensus details as to convince stewards to assist check for others, otherwise this CU action wouldn't be so accurate for Community's privacy rule. 86.126.112.251 17:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

BAICAN_XXX is

Stale. Wikiobai, Centurrion and ValydinDD are

Confirmed to be the same user. Additional socks are Thingorest, BAICAN X, Paltini, Successore and Grreuglisse. Ruslik (talk) 20:54, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much, Ruslik, for your useful information. However, the account BAICAN XXX has been blocked globally by MarcoAurelio on December 30, 2018. The last contributions seem to be those of December 28 (some other edits have been deleted afterwards). It is hard to believe that this account appears to be stale. Sorry to insist, but for us it is very important to clarify the relation between the main sockpuppeteer and the newer sockpuppets. --Pafsanias (talk) 23:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

The last edit on rowiki was on 14 April 2014. Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

I see. You probably mean that you cannot carry out any crosswiki checking. Let me put it a little bit differently, then. BAICAN XXX is globally locked as of December 30, 2018, for crosswiki vandalism. Nevertheless, we have strong reasons to believe that the edits made by User:Thingorest on Wikidata belong to the same person, therefore representing an evasion of the global lock. Am I wrong? May I ask for a check concerning those two accounts (BAICAN XXX and Thingorest) on that particular Wikimedia project? Should I submit a separate request? Thank you once again for your kind help. --Pafsanias (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Comment in Response to @Pafsanias: If it is possible, the meaning of reference results as per Ruslik0 might have been revealed. I think it not need second check. Please leave it in order to see benefits of both cross-wiki checking and such actions as well; also you known claim what you requested evidence than other option did you agree. It so never forget to mention that response advice. 86.122.247.207 17:39, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed on roa-rupwiki. Ruslik (talk) 20:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!--Mihai P. (talk) 21:15, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Chihhua,chuang@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Chihhua,chuang (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Angelolu0520 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Chihhua,chuang

Reason(s): Chihhua,chuang created the page zh:明新科技大學旅館事業管理系 and Angelolu0520 also created the nearly identical page at zh:明新科技大學旅館事業管理系 (note: same title with just the extra space). As the content of these two pages are nearly identical, they are suspected to be the same person (note: the account of Angelolu0520 was created back in November and created similar spam page; the account of Chihuahua,chuang was created less than an hour after the latest spam page was created by the other account). Alex Shih (talk) 21:26, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

@Alex Shih: Is it related to a long-term vandal? RadiX ∞ 01:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@RadiX: I don't think that was suspected, but I wouldn't be surprised if the findings have some overlap with some zhwiki LTA? Pinging original filer Techyan for more input. Alex Shih (talk) 01:08, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Nope. It isn't a LTA case. Just a normal CU @RadiX and Alex Shih:.--Cohaf (talk) 03:21, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

It looks like a duck to me. I think that may not warrant a check. Should you have more information on this, please feel free to add it. RadiX ∞ 04:10, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@RadiX:. Sorry I'm not into this case and now read the files, the filter, a local sysop feels it's duckable, I also concur with this assessment. The local sysop just wish to do a sleeper check. No comment on that per say.--Cohaf (talk) 04:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Ok then. I think they can just be blocked as vandalism only accounts. File another CU request in case a sleeper check is needed. Thanks, RadiX ∞ 02:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

@RadiX:Noted with thanks.--Cohaf (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Dragoon17cc@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Hactlcpslaat (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Warmercities (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 暖城2016-02-06 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Vengence2018 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Lhrediedilcy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); HKGSINSINLHR (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Dragoon17cc

Reason(s): Request to compare with Dragoon17cc (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log • CentralAuth • AllContribs • checkuser • investigate), and find out if there are any other sleepers. Both editing in aviation-realted articles with similar patterns, such as emptying entire sections. Dragoon17cc itself may be stale, but here are some other recently created puppets that still have data available:

Also, IP addresses listed here may be useful.

Techyan（Talk） 18:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Results

Confirmed group I:
暖城2016-02-06
Vengence2018
Lhrediedilcy
Expertiaman

Possible group 2:
Warmercities
Hactlcpslaat

It is Possible that group 1 and group 2 accounts and Dragoon17cc are related.

RadiX ∞ 00:33, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

RadiX,HKGSINSINLHR relationship on list of users?--MCC 214 #aut viam inveniam aut faciam 08:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Mr./Mrs. MCC214, You behaviour had made me wonder if you have any basic communication ability in English...
- Dear stewards, I wonder if User:HKGSINSINLHR has any technical relation to above 2 groups because their contribution seems similar to Dragon17cc, and it seems that this account had been left forgotten during the check. --云间守望 15:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
@WQL: Sorry, my fault. It is very Likely that HKGSINSINLHR and group 1 are related. RadiX ∞ 03:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- @RadiX:Noted and report back.--Cohaf (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks to RadiX for doing the check. --云间守望 04:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Ngjunkaiha@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Ngjunkaiha (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 哈哈者 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sadakohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sadakohahaha (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Ngjunkaiha

Reason(s): Request to compare these users and find out if there are any sleepers. All accounts listed above have some sort of "ha" in usernames, with similar editing preferences on Marvel-related articles. --Techyan（Talk） 02:45, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Could you please explain what is the grounds for checking? Vandalism? (only two of the listed accounts are currently blocked) Is there any concerns about bad-faith editing? Is there evidence that they are related to a long-term abuser? RadiX ∞ 02:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@RadiX: Just replying for the LTA part, nope. --Cohaf (talk) 03:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- @-revi: User name of 1 seems similar in pattern to OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOObnm1234. Just in case it isn't LTA only. And they are from Malaysia, the 1st few account, can there be a link, I think it's weak but worth a look--Cohaf (talk) 06:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
RadiX, this user is not listed on zh:WP:LTA at this time. However, because they had done disruputive edits (per FrankD666, one of the targets once claimed himself to be a sysop, patroller and rollbacker for no reason), since they all claimed that they comes from Malaysia, putting his Youtube channel links on user pages. Ngjunkaiha and Sadakohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh all claims that his name is Ng Jun-kai（黄浚凯） or including his name into usernames, so I think it worth a look, same to Cohaf. --云间守望 15:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Doing.... RadiX ∞ 02:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

From a technical point of view

Group 1: Sadakohahaha and Sadakohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh: Confirmed
Ngjunkaiha and Group 1: Likely
??pyphp?? and Group 1: Likely
Ngjunkaiha and ??pyphp??: Possible
哈哈者 and others: Unrelated

RadiX ∞ 03:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

@RadiX:. Thanks, reported back.--Cohaf (talk) 03:39, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks and I will report to other sysops locally then. --云间守望 04:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

MeritTim@zh.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: MeritTim (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Responsibility330 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): Since the two accounts are located at the same IP address for editing, and MeritTim claims that this IP is used in a shared form, it is necessary to verify whether the two accounts are related.In addition, MeritTim also suspects that his colleagues often see him editing Wikipedia, so his colleagues are also interested in editing.Hence, his colleagues modified and commented on the edited items which are from MeritTim. MeritTim (talk) 18:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Discussion on Chinese Wikipedia is de facto must have (and cannot be None) unless you have a good reason not to. I don't see a good reason not to require it. Please discuss it on zh:WP:RFCUHAM and get back to us after then. — regards, Revi 19:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@-revi:Isn't self requested CU not allowed no matter what, the requestor is basically requesting to do a CU on themselves, the 2nd account was indef blocked locally as a sock to the 1st account which is currently just serve 1 week sock block. --Cohaf (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Global CheckUser policy doesn't explicitly prohibit this practice (It says "some wikis" might allow it), but I usually don't do this kind of self-requested checks, as the policy says, it is too prone to abuse. — regards, Revi 08:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

@-revi:According to zhwiki w:zh:WP:CUP

有一些计划允许编辑者自主提出对本账号的IP地址进行查核，例如在被他人指责使用傀儡时证明清白。但是在这种情况下，很多时候请求本身可能会是扰乱行为的一部分

Translated

Some projects allow users to carry out self checks to prove innocence if there are accused of socking, but normally this is seen as DE

. 2 points, you are the steward so you decide whether is this disruption or not, and can you give us your assessment. 2nd, as given in the link below, the 2 accounts are confirmed in a CU earlier this month by MarcoAurelio. Do we have to continue this? Thanks much! Best Regards,--Cohaf (talk) 09:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

@MeritTim: Per local consensus, requests for providing evidence of innocence for yourself would not be approved in most time. --云间守望 04:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Updated. But it was the previous discussion.MeritTim (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Note to Stewards the link provided by our dear friend above is discussion for Steward_requests/Checkuser/2019-01#MeritTim@zh.wikipedia in which MarcoAurelio had confirmed the relationship between account 1 and 2 (referring to then and now). --Cohaf (talk) 05:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
I feel it is Possible is MEAT of MeritTim(Responsibility330),also this case is similar to zh:Wikipedia:用戶查核請求/2018/1#At_sb's_disposal_&_disposable and zh:Wikipedia:用戶查核請求/2018/2#It's_gonna_be_awesome.--MCC 214 #aut viam inveniam aut faciam 05:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- It may be useful to investigate the two accounts' edits regarding the page name issue of zh:Niconico靜畫. - まっすろな未来 (talk) 12:24, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

NOTE: SRCU is not a place to investigate editors' behavioral data: SRCU is strictly for requesting (and delivering) CheckUser data. — regards, Revi 21:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

With ^ and Cohaf's discovery of prior case, declining. — regards, Revi 21:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Febydhani Pribadi@ms.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Febydhani Pribadi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Sariningrum (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 180.246.15.2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Egawijaya (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Arthadwhmd (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: This is an immediate request so currently have no dicussion.

Reason(s): I think three of them is the same user that misuse Wikipedia by creating adversite articles in Wikipedia Bahasa Melayu to promote his bussiness. I need the confirmation either they are the same person before blocking. Please response as soon as possible. This is related article created by them. ms:Gedung perkhahwinan and ms:Gerai foto. The other one had been deleted. Thank you. CyberTroopers (talk) 09:00, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Not doing check right now but

No comment with respect to IP address(es). Please note that checks cannot be run on an IP address under the CheckUser policy. — regards, Revi 10:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

@-revi: Maybe you can check on the registered account listed? CyberTroopers (talk) 22:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Doing... for registered accounts only --Alaa :)..! 13:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Completed..
Confirmed Febydhani Pribadi, Rheynapril, Egawijaya, Sariningrum

Unrelated Arthadwhmd

--Alaa :)..! 13:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you User:علاء for the effort. CyberTroopers (talk) 09:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Ayratayrat@tt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: 2605:F700:40:400:0:0:1EF6:D93B (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 31.186.241.7 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 109.187.11.32 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 31.186.241.87 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Ayratayrat (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example

Reason(s): en:Wikipedia:Harassment. For example the latest case: [3] Here this user sends mailing to many tt-wiki users were shows my personal information, spread the defamatory information about me and my family. Derslek (talk) 09:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Not done We do not associate specific IP addresses with user accounts. Ruslik (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

郭宜睿@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 郭宜睿 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 李典諺 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Oval face (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#郭宜睿

Reason(s): All three accounts add unnecessary categories to articles. Appeared at roughly the same time, with the 2nd account created the very next day after the 1st stop editing. Request to compare the 2nd and 3rd to the 1st, find out if there are any sleepers, and prolong autoblock to their IP addresses if applicable. --Techyan（Talk） 03:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Completed..
Likely 李典諺, Oval face

Possible 李典諺, 郭宜睿

However, there's no enough data sample, so make your decision with behavioral data ---Alaa :)..! 21:10, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

3GFRIENDSNSD@zh.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 3GFRIENDSNSD (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Y55555555 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); CX449 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Protectseulgi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Protectjoy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); PS497 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Iswjy1mcb (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#3GFRIENDSNSD

Reason(s): Both the first and last accounts edited railway-related articles (side notes: [4][5][6]) and Korean entertainer groups-related articles (side notes: [7]), and Iswjy1mcb had frequent edits in the page zh:Wikipedia:持续出没的破坏者 (i.e. LTA page, references: [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], side notes: [17][18][19][20] and the edit history of Tsiusing106's (i.e. 3GFRIENDSNSD's) LTA page). Also, both the 2 accounts would start edit wars and report the others when their edits were reverted, in order to rationalize their edits. Not to mention their edits in the articles of train models in Chinese Wikipedia. There's a strong relation among the accounts (esp. between the first one and the last one), checked by Intersect Contribs (i.e. Editor Interaction Analyser, references: [21][22]). Sæn mō sà 06:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Add.--MCC 214 #aut viam inveniam aut faciam 07:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
What goes around comes around. What a pathetic user. XD --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 07:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

It's quite useless to include zhwiki pages/diffs into SRCU since we don't read Chinese. Just include summaries of the discussion.

Doing... nonthless. — regards, Revi 12:12, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Yeah, we all know you don't speak Chinese. What a proud thing to say. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 12:35, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Remember Meta:Urbanity. — regards, Revi 12:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

As you wish. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 12:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Was doing a CU but not interested with zhwiki requests for the time being with ^. I'm not willing to do something if I am treated with sarcasm like this. Stewards: The data I gathered is available on CUwiki revision 29699 should you wish to complete the request. — regards, Revi 12:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

A warm tip: It's nonetheless, not nonthless. Correct your words at your own wish, PLEASE. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 12:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

You're just being blatantly uncivil now. Vermont (talk) 12:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Then could you tell me why you made that conclusion please? Is just pointing out other's spelling mistake uncivil? --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 13:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

@Vermont:. This requires all parties to step away, de-escalate. Also noted the 1 day block for Super Wang by Marco. I think we really need to calm things down. -revi Still thanks for putting data on Cuwiki. I sincerely hope all can reconcile and end this. --Cohaf (talk) 13:20, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

There's no content or decision based disagreement. It was solved by a block. Vermont (talk) 13:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Note : so is it possible for any steward to help conclude this case, from cuwiki revision 29699 (yes, you see how uncivilised people ruin the community)--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 07:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@-revi: are you still on it? RadiX ∞ 17:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

@RadiX, I think I told you not (offwiki), but just in case. — regards, Revi 13:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Doing... --Alaa :)..! 21:11, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed (No sleepers) --Alaa :)..! 21:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)