Jump to content

Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat

Add topic
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 1 hour ago by NDG in topic Report concerning User:~2026-53629-66
Shortcut:
WM:RFH
Meta-Wiki has a small active community. When a normal user requires the assistance of an administrator or bureaucrat for some particular task, it is not always easy to find one. This page helps users find one when they need one; asking specific admins directly via their talk pages is one way to elicit a fast response. It is only for assistance required at Meta-Wiki, help for other wikis needs to be requested at those wikis.

See also: Stewards' noticeboard, Access to nonpublic personal data policy noticeboard, Category:Meta-Wiki policies, Category:Global policies

Meta-Wiki maintenance announcements [edit]
General maintenance announcements:
(as of 06 October 2026)

Discussions:
(as of 06 October 2026)

None currently.

(Last updated: 2025-08-27)
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Please find answered requests in the archives (this month).

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day and sections whose most recent comment is older than 10 days.

Blacklist shortcuts

[edit]

@Lp0 on fire recently retargeted SBL to Talk:Spam blacklist. It used to be a disambiguation page, which is now at SBL (disambiguation) (the {{disambiguation}} does not seem to support "(disambiguation)" titles), but that page is not even linked from anywhere. Meanwhile, TBL links to Title blacklist (rather than the talk page), which has a notice about MediaWiki:Titleblacklist at the top. Would it be better to point SBL to Spam blacklist with a similar note to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
20:44, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I targeted SBL to the talk page because as a shortcut I felt it should point to the page that people are likely to want to navigate to. It's not obvious to me what benefit there would be to adding an extra click to the workflow of reporting a URL (and if an admin wants to action a request, including a request of their own, they're still likely to go to the talk page first, either to see the report or to document their addition and provide a comment to be given to {{sbl-log}}). Retargeting the shortcut to the page itself would be neater but I'm not sure it would be helpful. The title blacklist is a much lower-traffic page and not one I have really engaged with, so I can't say whether it's more helpful to have a shortcut for the page itself or the talk page. lp0 on fire () 20:52, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
At least as an admin, when I enter "SBL" I would want to get to the blacklist, e.g. to check what domain is on it (though personally I mostly interact with the title blacklist). To me it seems more intuitive. At least the note about MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist should be added at Spam blacklist, and the disambiguation page should probably be deleted. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
04:03, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Event organizer for Jemima2019

[edit]

3,995 Jemima2019 (talk) 14:23, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Jemima2019 This is a malformed request, please fix. Veritas Sapientiae (talk | email) 14:59, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Bureaucrats

[edit]

Meta:Administrators/Removal (inactivity)/October 2026 needs some attention. A bureaucrat should take care of it. Thanks! -Barras talk 21:48, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pinging @M7, @MF-Warburg, @Sotiale and @Xaosflux; y'all know the drill. Codename Noreste /// ⭐️✨ 23:43, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Note that I have prepared some users based on User:Krd/inactive admins, with some manual checking.
  • For automatic removal: TheSandDoctor (3 edits)
  • For proposed removal: Amire80 (4 actions), Anthere (1 action), Base (4 actions), Beetstra (4 actions, all editing protected pages), Ferien (3 actions - note that if removed, should stay as limited admin as member of the U4C), Kaganer (0 actions), Leaderboard (3 actions), Lustiger seth (4 actions), TenWhile6 (1 action), Красный (2 actions - is a limited admin but goes under regular inactivity policy as a permanent such admin)
Rest of users on the list are either limited admins or have other rights that don't go under the regular inactivity policies. EPIC (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Barras talk 14:21, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Report concerning User:~2026-53565-62

[edit]

~2026-53565-62 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport --Làm Việc Thiện (talk) 13:59, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done by EPIC. Neriah - 💬 - 14:07, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Neriah - 💬 - 14:07, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Report concerning User:~2026-53629-66

[edit]

~2026-53629-66 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport --Pristome 05:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Blocked NDG (talk) 05:44, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. NDG (talk) 05:44, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Report concerning User:Fan shahbaz

[edit]

Fan shahbaz (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA) — Reasons: Spam / spambot XReport --Pristome 05:40, 6 October 2026 (UTC)Reply