Jump to content

Steward requests/Checkuser

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Ggia (talk | contribs) at 17:47, 11 April 2012 (Κάρυστος50@el.wikipedia). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Shortcut:
SRCU
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}:  Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  2. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  3. Make sure there are no local checkusers.
  4. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help).
    === Username@xx.project ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = 
     |project shortcut= 
     |user name1      = 
     |user name2      = 
     |user name3      = 
    <!-- Add more if necessary -->
     |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    

    For example:

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = en
     |project shortcut= w
     |user name1      = Example
     |user name2      = Foo
     |user name3      = Bar
    <!-- Add more if necessary -->
     |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests

Diablo3897@mediawikiwiki

Those three accounts are  Confirmed.
It is Likely Likely to belong to this group :
  • Thuydungims11
  • Iwantpatient
  • Katewinlest88
  • Thiephong
  • Mattroi88
  • Xuanhoa
and to this one :
  • Agulal
  • Phamsofia811
  • Signsapr2
  • Facup0980
  • Majgoaye90
  • Vimegu990
  • Vimegu90
  • Pitivi90
  • London578
  • Florist26th
  • Lasermarking546
  • Pourboir
  • Lisimsta229
  • LeHanhNga
  • Kevilcuongpro
  • Thongkaka71
  • Thongkaka66
  • Thongkaka61
  • Katanara
  • Thongkaka58
  • Thongkaka50
  • Dienthoai9
  • Tuixachs90
  • Thongkaka44
  • Leeena77
  • Phonglan90
  • Thuyenbien89
  • Lili887
  • Thongkaka28
  • Thongkaka27
  • Thongkaka26
  • Liliseos6
  • Xuan12
  • Noithat12
All of them are more or less spammers, anyway. I blocked the ones that were not already blocked. Cordially, Quentinv57 (talk) 06:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)reply
At Q's request I have done further digging. All  Confirmed and if you look at the block log you will see the problematic ranges have been blocked for the medium term. I only saw 1 possible account that would take collateral damage. I have notified CU to see if others are having similar issues. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinghurst (talk • contribs) 09:24, 7 April 2012‎.
First of all, wow. Nice work uncovering this everyone. Billinghurst, you say one account could take collateral damage. I think it can just be given the IP block exemption flag? --Krenair (talkcontribs) 12:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Zero edits anywhere,, and I couldn't be sure that it is a good account, so I wasn't overly fussed. If MW thinks that it should be, then I can dig it out and grant exclusion. billinghurst sDrewth 12:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Thanks a lot! I have to say that since your blocks we have received at least 90% less spam!--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)reply

Andrade Lira Brun@pt.wikipedia

Please check w:pt:User:Simone Lira. Simone Lira is a "false cousin" of Bruno Leonard. Karyne Lira Dias, Simone Lira and Dias Lira Leonard Bruno has a identic surname. Bytes (talk) 14:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)reply

Usuário Bytes nada mais é que o bloqueado Electro Static Jolt 15:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Eu solicito a imediata suspensão da verificação: eu não tenho nenhuma coneção com essas contas. Esse covarde (usa nome Byte pra fazer acusações infundadas) usa meu nome pra me prejudicar na Wikipédia e por culpa dele estou bloqueado na Wikipédia. E ponto final.
Translate to English: I request the immediate suspension of the check: I no have connection with these accounts. This coward (use the name Byte to make unfounded accusations) use my name to harm me in Wikipedia because of him and I am blocked on Wikipedia. That's it. Bruno Leonard (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Not done at this stage. Hold over for appointment of CU atptWP. billinghurst sDrewth 13:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)reply

ElectroStatic Jolt@pt.wikipedia

Well, I know ip's can not do requests. Then ask them to do in my name, because the pattern is very similar issues. Thank you.Érico msg 22:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I'd say  Confirmed, based on the evidence and the checkuser results. No more sockpuppets found. Trijnsteltalk 17:12, 8 April 2012 (UTC)reply

Conde Nolasco@pt.wikipedia

Small note: I blocked the Lord Nolasco for being DUCK obvious user. The editions of the users are really like.Érico msg 22:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)reply

1 & 2 Likely Likely or greater so, call it  It looks like a duck to me, remainder are Stale. I would keep a watch on Waleran Bigot, and George Fitzalan as Possible Possible (both have zero edits). billinghurst sDrewth

ElectroStatic Jolt@pt.wikipedia

Bruno Leonard (talk) 01:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)reply

Lord Mota is a well known editor at wikipt, as is Luizpuodzius. There are very few evidences to warrant a check as inclusive as this, based only on geo info. Be careful, please. José Luiz talk 02:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Not done. Previous checks done in this area, and has level of tit for tat. Further efforts can await appointment of CU at ptWP. billinghurst sDrewth

Luke7956@zh.wikipedia

Best I can tell Inconclusive Inconclusive compared to historical data billinghurst sDrewth 14:01, 10 April 2012 (UTC)reply

HTFFanBrandon04@global/BrandonSkyPimenta@global

I'm not a steward or checkuser, but this one might be related. Mathonius (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I'm not either, but mw:Special:Contributions/201.8.22.209 might be related. πr2 (tc) 05:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply
IP blocked on MediaWiki.org.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply

Unsurprisingly  Confirmed User is using what looks like dynamically assigned IP addresses from the one ISP (9 IPs identified on mw alone) and these IP are at least over 3 /8 ranges. Looking to manage this by blocking IP ranges would be problematic and have broader consequences and collateral damage. billinghurst sDrewth 15:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)reply

Κάρυστος50@el.wikipedia

See also