Steward requests/Global

← Requests and proposals

Steward requests (Global)

latest archive→

This page hosts requests for requesting Global (un)blocks, (un)locks and hidings. Note that requests for global permissions are now handled at Steward requests/Global permissions. Proposals for new groups should be made on Meta:Babel.

• For global IP block requests, read the guideline and make a request below. Indicate why a global block is necessary and for how long.
• For account lock requests, read the guideline and post under Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding.
• For local requests here on Meta, see Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat

Cross-wiki requests
CheckUser information Global blocks/locks Permissions (global) Permissions (bot) Permissions (other) Username changes/ usurpation requests Miscellaneous requests URL blacklisting Title/username blacklisting Email blacklisting
Meta-Wiki requests
CheckUser information Deletion Permissions Requests for help

Requests for global (un)block

<translate>

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.

Please also review Global blocking .

Global blocks don't affect Meta-Wiki, so if your IP address or account is blocked, you can still appeal here. IP addresses or accounts that cause disruption on Meta should be reported at [[<tvar name=rfh>Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat</tvar>|Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat]] instead of here so that they can be blocked locally.</translate>

<translate> Please describe the kind of cross wiki abusive activity you see from the IP or account. Saying an IP or account is a long term abuser is not helpful, but saying "IP vandalizes at ban.wikipedia, no.wikipedia and vi.wikipedia" is. This is especially important for range blocks. If you do not provide enough details, your request might be declined.</translate>

<translate> Instructions for making a request</translate>

<translate> Before requesting, make sure that: You know the IP address(es) or accounts you wish to have globally blocked or unblocked. For blocks, the global blocking criteria are met. For unblocks, your request addresses the original reason for blocking the IP or account, if any. To make a request for the address(es) or account(s) to be blocked or unblocked Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why the address(es) or account(s) should be blocked/unblocked.</translate> === Global block/unblock for <translate><!--T:5--> [[Special:Contributions/Some IP address or account|Some IP address or account]]</translate> === {{Status}} <!-- Do not remove this template --> * {{Luxotool|<translate><!--T:6--> IP address/username</translate>}} <translate><!--T:7--> Description, evidence, diffs, etc.</translate> --~~~~ <translate> When requesting that your IP be unblocked, note that stewards need to know your IP address to even consider a request. To find your IP, please visit <tvar name=whatismyip>https://www.whatismyip.com/</tvar> You are not required to disclose your IP in public - you may make requests privately to any steward on <tvar name=IRC>IRC</tvar> or by email at: <tvar name=address>stewardswikimediaorg</tvar></translate>

Global block/unblock for 82.193.109.249/19

Status:    In progress

The range was globally blocked by Vituzzu for 6 months in connection with "cross-wiki spam". Since this is a typical IP range belonging to a popular Ukrainian provider, I doubt this measure was optimal. There are two ways to go, either to block the provider for a short period to stop the hooligan, or to complain to the ISP if the disruption was long-term and left no other way. Therefore I kindly ask to unblock the range to let other users edit from it. I would also like to know more detail about the issue, such as when the vandalism began and what measures had been taken before the clampdown. (My yesterday's message to Vituzzu, still unanswered.) --Microcell (talk) 20:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Global block for 77.165.243.110 & 62.131.119.55

Status:    In progress

• 77.165.243.110 global-contribs ^(old) • xwiki blocks • IP lookup • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye • IP info • lwcheckuser & 62.131.119.55 global-contribs ^(old) • xwiki blocks • IP lookup • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye • IP info • lwcheckuser

These Dutch IP's keep on spamming my talk pages after I reverted some of their vandalism. They were already blocked for about 30 spam-edits with nasty, insulting and immature comments about me (with this as final result). Now they have started again (1, 2 and 3) and request a block so they will not be able to spam me on any of my talk pages. Regards, Kippenvlees1 (talk) 10:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Global block for 78.85.0.0/16

Status:    Done

global blocks for 78.85.0.0/16

I know it's a bit unusual but would you please consider globally blocking 78.85.0.0/16 for some period? It belongs to en:Udmurtia and is currently blocked for 2 weeks in Russian Wikipedia. The problem is, this vandal is bragging how he vandalizes other projects.
Some of his edits (and I wasn't looking very hard): two weeks ago en:78.85.75.42, en:78.85.139.170, en:78.85.240.166, recently pl:78.85.78.122, fr:78.85.22.180, es:78.85.94.38.
— AlexSm 05:21, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

In the last 5 days vandal made these numbers of edits, constantly changing IPs:

en: 38 (blocks)

de: 160 (blocks)

fr: 80 (blocks)

it: 104 (no blocks)

pl: 400 (blocks)

es: 406 (blocks)

— AlexSm 17:25, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Since we can't really know how much impact it'll have over good faith users I've set it anon. only for three days. Of course if the vandalism returns, reblocking can be considered. Regards, — MA (audiencia) 17:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please block it for at least 2 weeks to avoid another "wave" after August 4. When I checked ranged IP contribs on different projects I saw virtually zero constructive edits from this range. Also if global blocks don't affect Meta (see 78.85.90.190 & 78.85.78.25) please also block this range on Meta. — AlexSm 15:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Range looks to host a large number of open proxies too. Now it's one month. — MA (audiencia) 10:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Global block for 188.2.229.78

Status:    Done

• 188.2.229.78 global-contribs ^(old) • xwiki blocks • IP lookup • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye • IP info • lwcheckuser

Vandalism on sr and sh wiki, several time we have to revert his changes. --Zarathushtra (talk) 13:31, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Vandalism-only account on two wikis. --Millosh (talk) 09:53, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Global block for 80.255.80.91

Status:    Done

• 80.255.80.91 global-contribs ^(old) • xwiki blocks • IP lookup • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye • IP info • lwcheckuser

Cross wiki spambot, just blocked it here and the global contribs suggests this is worth a gblock - thanks. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Hecho. — MA (audiencia) 11:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Global block for 91.237.249.93

Status:    Done

• 91.237.249.93 global-contribs ^(old) • xwiki blocks • IP lookup • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye • IP info • lwcheckuser

Cross wiki spambot, just blocked it here and the global contribs suggests this is worth a gblock - thanks. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:05, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Hecho. — MA (audiencia) 11:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Global block for 109.87.146.37

Status:    Done

• 109.87.146.37 global-contribs ^(old) • xwiki blocks • IP lookup • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye • IP info • lwcheckuser

Cross-wiki vandalism.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Matanya blocked user for one day. --Millosh (talk) 07:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Global block for 203.104.11.12

Status:    Done

• 203.104.11.12 global-contribs ^(old) • xwiki blocks • IP lookup • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye • IP info • lwcheckuser

Cross-wiki vandalism, blocked on two wikis, latest known vandalism as of this edit was on simplewiki.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Matanya blocked user for one day. --Millosh (talk) 07:52, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Global block for 92.146.9.44

Status:    In progress

• 92.146.9.44 global-contribs ^(old) • xwiki blocks • IP lookup • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye • IP info • lwcheckuser

Please block this new incarnation of Olha. Mathonius (talk) 09:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Global block for 2001:1af8::/32

Status:    In progress

• 2001:1af8::/32 global-contribs ^(old) • xwiki blocks • IP lookup • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye • IP info • lwcheckuser

Webhost per WHOIS, contains the open proxy 2001:1AF8:4300:A023:1:0:0:2 which is currently blocked on enwiki.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:02, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Be sure to follow the instructions below:

• Your request might be rejected if it doesn't include the necessary information.
• Warning! This page is publicly viewable. If the account name is grossly insulting or contains personal information please contact a steward privately in #wikimedia-stewards^connect or email your request to the stewards VRT queue at stewards-oversightwikimediaorg (direct wiki interface) but do not post it here. Thanks.
• Warning! This is not the place to ask for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because of content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.
• If you are globally locked, you should appeal your lock to stewards-appealswikimediaorg.

Please describe abusive activity of an account before reporting them here. Since stewards are often not active at projects the reported accounts are, things that seem obvious to you may not be equally obvious to the reviewing steward.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting that a global account be (un)locked, please be sure that: You have evidence of cross-wiki disruption from the account(s). You can show that it is not feasible to use local-only blocks or other measures like page protection to combat the disruption. You have considered making the request in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, especially for account names which will be hidden, or for urgent requests. To make a request for an account to be locked or unlocked Copy one of the codes below to the bottom of this section and explain why the account(s) should be locked/unlocked. === Global lock/unlock for Foo === {{status}} <!-- do not remove this template --> * {{LockHide|username}} * {{LockHide|username|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the name to be visible on this page --> *... Reasons, etc. --~~~~ For many accounts: === Global lock for spambots/vandals === {{status}} <!-- do not remove this template --> {{MultiLock|username|username2|username3}} {{MultiLock|username|username2|username3|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the names to be visible on this page --> *... Reasons, etc, --~~~~

Global unlock for Si Gam Acèh

Status:    In progress

• Si Gam Acèh (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Muhammad Nabil Berri (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Si Gam Aceh (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Khevezyern (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)

This user has agreed not to attack other Wikimedia projects. -- Si Gam (talk) 09:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Several users, including me, have been involved in discussion during the past 6 months in ace.wp. Basically, Si Gam Acèh, who previously have been globally blocked ([1]), has showed willingness to follow the guideline set by Wikipedia and is asking to use his old account to edit at ace.wp again. During this last couple months, using the account he's using right now I see no disruptive behaviour other than several heated debate over a new proposed policy in ace.wp. He mainly writes about Acehnese language, and doing some interwiki in several projects. Therefore I think the user could be given a second chance, with a note that if he keep pushing his old agenda, the account will be locked for good. (Other restrictions may apply).

Since there's no need to use multiple account to edit Wikipedia, you should choose one account. Either Si Gam Acèh (since 7 October 2009, home wiki ace.wp, 2,079 edits) or Muhammad Nabil Berri (since 6 August 2008, home wiki id.wp, 1,147 edits). And since I'm partially having conflict of interest, it will be up to other stewards to close this request either yes or no, while I can only give my opinion about the case. ✒ Bennylin 14:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I want to merge all accounts into one account, Si Gam Acèh. -- Si Gam (talk) 19:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello Si Gam. I agree with Bennylin above. However, we don't have the technical possibility of merging accounts yet. What I generally advise when somebody asks to merge two (or more) accounts is to simply keep one and redirect the user pages of the second ones to the main account's user page. Regards, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 06:26, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

"Since there's no need to use multiple account to edit Wikipedia" – Fwiw, there's no obligation to use the same username in every project. If Si Gam has used one account to edit id.wp and another to edit ace.wp (for example), I don't see why stewards should prevent that by unlocking one account and keeping the other locked. Jafeluv (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

So, Si Gam, you can use your current account, or, if you have strong reason, Si Gam Acèh would be unlocked (remember, that account has history of being blocked). But account merging is not possible. ✒ Bennylin 06:20, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

My former accounts Si Gam Acèh (ace, en) and Muhammad Nabil Berri (id) are my first accounts in Wikipedia and they have more than 2.000 and 1.000 contributions. And also those accounts are full with history for me. So it's impossible for me to forget those accounts. Btw, why account merging is not possible? -- Si Gam (talk) 16:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

It is not technically possible to merge accounts. There is no such feature in mediawiki. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 02:30, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

I suggest you choose either Si Gam Acèh or Muhammad Nabil Berri. (the technical limitation has nothing to do with your request, btw, it cannot be done whether you ask it or other people ask it) ✒ Bennylin 08:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, I choose Si Gam Acèh except for id.wp I use Muhammad Nabil Berri. Is it allowed? -- Si Gam (talk) 05:37, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I think that the easiest way will be to unmerge the local idwp account of Muhammad Nabil Berri. What's others opinion ? -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 06:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quentin, is it possible to unmerge Si_Gam_Acèh@idwp which only has 39 edits, then usurp that name for Muhammad_Nabil_Berri@idwp which has 1053 edits? ✒ Bennylin 08:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

What's wrong with just unlocking the Muhammad Nabil Berri account? Surely that's preferable to forcing the user to unmerge a local account from their SUL. Jafeluv (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

@Bennylin : Of course it is. He just needs to ask the idwp bureaucrats for that.

@Jafeluv : If there is an other solution, I prefer not to unlock accounts previously locked by other stewards. I don't plan to force anyone to do something, but if Si Gam Acèh just needs this account on idwp there is no need to give him this account on other projects, especially because it has been abused in the past. Regards, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 14:01, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Global lock for МИКИЦЗВ02

Status:    Done

• КИМИЦЗБГ02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Mikidelija02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Kimicz02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Kimi02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Kimiczv02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Micky02car (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Miloscar02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Mickyczv02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• MilosCoca colaczv (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Milosmikiczv02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Milosmiki02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• МИКИЗВЕЗДАШ02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)

Constant abuse of spam accounts. Abuse of multiple accounts. --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Would you please be able to provide further detail or indicate specific edits for further investigation. The accounts can be managed and blocked locally, so we need stronger information to undertake a global lock of so many accounts. I will alert all stewards to this request to seek further information. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

The first came on Serbian Wikipedia and when he opened the first order entered by the inaccurate information. When he warned there was still continued to work, got a block on one day. After the block and still continued to do the same to enter false information. After the third block began to open other accounts that have been permanently blocked by the Serbian, Croatian and Serbo-Croatian wikipedia reasonably MORE ABUSE ORDER. Greeting! --Kolega2357 (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

I believe that there is no need for global locking. It all can be managed locally because the user is active on three or four projects only. micki 21:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

This number of user accounts were opened with the IP address 178.148.245.30. Evident that with the IP address opens. Greeting! --Kolega2357 (talk) 10:45, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Done. Blocked on multiple wikis. Not done just for Kimi02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser), because the account doesn't appear to be a global one. --Millosh (talk) 10:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Also blocks for ЗВЕЗДА ЈЕ ЖИВОТ МОЈ (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser) and МИКИЦЗБГ02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser). --Millosh (talk) 10:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Делије са Севера (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser) and ДЕЛИЈЕ СЕВЕР 1989 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser), as well. Thanks Herbythyme :) --Millosh (talk) 10:27, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Global unlock for gilchristr

Status:    In progress

• gilchristr (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)

I received two automatic emails generated by users MoiraMoira and TBloemink telling me that my account was locked. There is a discussion of this here: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg_gebruiker:MoiraMoira#You_have_blocked_me

Both users have joined in to tell me that I am globally locked, but that they did not do it! All I was trying to do was give wikipedia users who are interested in the Tour de France the opportunity to ride the stages by helicopter on Google Earth; they would have a free download of all the stages with helicopter tours. Global locking is an extreme measure which is completely inappropriate in this case. I would like to be unlocked! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.26.85.125 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 29 June 2012‎ (UTC).

See here the account was not locked by tbloemink nor me nor did we write an email at all. The account was rightfully globally locked upon request done in the steward channel by wiki13. The account was spamming a link cross wiki. The person involved does not see from the conversation on my talk page (see link given) that this is unwanted here. MoiraMoira (talk) 12:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks MoiraMoira. What is "spamming a link cross wiki?" Is it a sin to update more than one wiki page if they are in different languages? If I had added the reference in only one language set, would that have been ok? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.26.85.125 (talk)

The issue is the link that you have added to multiple wikis would seem to not be an encyclopaedic link, and would actually seem to promote an interest contrary to the interests of the wikis. I would suggest that reading w:en:Wikipedia:External links would be relevant. I would think that we would be willing to remove the global lock, though it would be conditional on following the guidance of the wikis around suitable editing. To note that any removal of a global lock would not override any local blocks. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:05, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Global unlock for Rolandhelper

Status:    Not done

• Rolandhelper (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)

Please unlock this user. I will not MAKE any damages to cross-wiki!--112.215.64.179 10:07, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Please DUNGODUNG,UNLOCK me!!!!!--182.9.40.210 11:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

No. -Barras talk 05:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Global lock for Autocrib

Status:    Done

• Autocrib (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)

Please lock this cross-wiki spam-only account. Mathonius (talk) 07:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -Barras talk 05:32, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Global lock for ДЕЛИЈА

Status:    Done

• ДЕЛИЈА (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• ДЕЛИЈА СА СЕВЕРА (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• ДЕЛИЈЕ СЕВЕР (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Kimidelija02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• ЗВЕЗДА ЈЕ ЖИВОТ (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)
• Miloscocacolaczv02 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)

These accounts are also used МИКИЦЗВ02. Blocked with reason giving the use of false or incorrect information, it is also blocked at several Wikipedia. Greeting! --Kolega2357 (talk) 18:54, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Done--Shizhao (talk) 07:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Global lock for Candiny

Status:    Done

• Candiny (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^{(alt • mw)} • CA • gblock • xwiki blocks • SC • lwcheckuser)

Cross-wiki spam-only account. --Chiak (talk) 08:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Done -- Tegel _(Talk) 08:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Requests for global permissions

This section has been moved to Steward requests/Global permissions.

See also

• User groups — Information on user groups

General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map

Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation