Steward requests/Checkuser: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:29, 22 January 2012

Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}: Confirmed	{{MoreInfo}}: Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely	{{Deferred}}: Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible	{{Completed}}: Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely	{{TakeNote}}: Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated	{{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive	{{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}: Declined	{{Fishing}}: CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: CheckUser is not magic pixie dust	{{8ball}}: The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}: It looks like a duck to me	{{Crystalball}}: CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
Make sure there are no local checkusers.
- Wikimedia: meta • commons • species • data
- Wikipedia: ar • bn • ca • cs • da • de • en • es • fa • fi • fr • he • hu • id • it • ja • ko • nl • pl • pt • ru • simple • sl • sr • sv • th • tr • uk • vi
- Wikibooks: en
- Wikivoyage: en
- Wiktionary: en
Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:

How to make a request

How to make a request:

Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help).

=== Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Add more if necessary -->
 |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

For example:

=== Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Add more if necessary -->
 |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.

Cross-wiki requests
CheckUser information Global blocks/locks Permissions (global) Permissions (bot) Permissions (other) Username changes/ usurpation requests Miscellaneous requests URL blacklisting Title/username blacklisting Email blacklisting
Meta-Wiki requests
CheckUser information Deletion Permissions Requests for help

Requests

Sansoorchi@fa.wikisource

Status: Not done

List of users: Bellavista1957 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Rostamdastan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Solhosafa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): A very important RfA is taking place on Persian Wikisourec that is scheduled to be finished tomorrow. Today a user has appeared and voted in favor of Bellavista1957. Please have a look at his contributions which shows he is definitely not a newbie (moving the page and voting in an RfA). User:Sansoorchi uses the "Wikisource Farsi" phrase rather than "Persian Wikisource" or "Farsi Wikisource" that you can see at the above link (Bellavista1957 RfA which is in Both Persian and English). AMERICOPHILE 16:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply

This is rather inappropriate considering your dispute, but this check is mainly Not done per the results of this request. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply

I am not talking about checking Bellavista1957, Rostamdastan and Solhosafa against each other, but I made a request to check Sansoorchi to make it clear who really is (Bellavista1957 or Rostamdastan or Solhosafa)? Thanks AMERICOPHILE 16:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply

CheckUser is not for fishing. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Sofiandreazza@pt.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: Sofiandreazza (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); BiaGagliardi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); BR101 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: pt:Augusto Branco

Reason(s): The three users are doing the same edits in the same article. View [1], [2] and [3]. Sorry for bad English. Pc^Talk 18:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Confirmed, no other socks found.　Bencmq 12:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Gd.duraes@pt.wikipedia

Status: Not done

List of users: Gd.duraes (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Dd.duraes (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion: Buritis (Minas Gerais)

Reason(s): Block evasion / succesive saves without using "preview" button. Francisco 18:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)reply

It looks like a duck to me--Vituzzu 12:02, 21 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Higor Douglas@pt.wikipedia

Status: In progress

List of users: Gustavo Siqueira (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Marcus Luccas (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Rcandre (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

CU log
Discussion:

Reason(s): All four share edit patterns with Quintinense and his many socks (carnival and shopping center articles and its related requests for deletion). Higor Douglas already reveled on this request for bureaucrats that he is a meatpuppet (edit summary: "they called me, so i'm here"). Gustavo Siqueira is also a suspected meatpuppet of Quintinense, and Marcus Luccas itself was blocked for being a sock of Quintinense. Higor, Gustavo and Rcandre are now voting on a request for adminship, where at least three other users said they were suspicious of Higor sudden appearance. viniciusmc 22:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Doing... @Vituzzu, I already performed a CheckUser, but I'd like to hear your opinion. Trijnstel 22:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)reply

I'll review my results on tomorrow, I'm too tired now. --Vituzzu 00:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)reply

체크유절@ko.wikipedia

Status: Done

List of users: 체크유절 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 체크유절2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); 체크유우절 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Pesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Eesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Esodara2 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Aesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Hesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Besodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser); Fesodara (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)

Reason(s): I request that checking these users now. All 10 users edit patterns with 체크유절. These user had insisted that 정현규 has monopolized some admin, bureaucrat and member of Arbitration Committee. These links are clue. [4], [5], [6], [7] etc. RedMosQ 06:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)reply

All users have been blocked, and apparently last 7 users are {{duck}}. Any other reasons to check? --Bencmq 06:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Besodara is first user and the other users are blocked because of name's resemblance. I will talk another reason. korean wikipedia has been trolled by similar 체크유절's pattern. the pattern is that specific users has insisted admins of korean wikipedia rule with an iron hand. We think that those users are one of the specific users. --RedMosQ 06:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Confirmed. This user uses very dynamic IP and open proxies. No other obvious socks found. Bencmq 07:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Esodara and Cesodara too, but you already got them. Bencmq 07:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)reply

Ὥσπερ γὰρ ἀφ' ἑκατέρων@el.wikipedia