Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Rawls, John
Tools
Actions
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikiquote, the free quote compendium
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: Keep. ~ Ningauble (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)reply
Unnecessary redirect — W\|/haledad (Talk to me) 05:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)reply
- Vote closes: 06:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. These redirect are useful (for example because they expand the search function) and quite common on Wikiquote: For example, since Jan 2008 BD2412 alone created over 700 of these "last-name-first redirect". See also User talk:Ningauble#Rawls, John. -- Mdd (talk) 09:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)reply
- Keep: Sorry, I fail to see why you would want to delete these. ~ Daniel Tomé (talk) 10:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)reply
- Keep · Though I generally don't find such redirects worth creating, I personally find less worth in efforts to eliminate them where others believe they might be useful. ~ ♞☤☮♌Kalki·†·⚓⊙☳☶⚡ 11:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)reply
- Keep - I don't see any harm in having these redirects since they help some search for pages. ~ UDScott (talk) 18:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)reply
- Keep per above; may be useful.--Abramsky (talk) 13:28, 1 March 2013 (UTC)reply
- Keep per longstanding practice of reference works to list subjects by last name first, which would lead readers to have a reasonable expectation that such a search would return the person searched for in this way. BD2412 T 00:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.