Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Mock the Week (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Delete: Copyvio; re-creation of a repeatedly deleted article.--Abramsky (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Mock the Week

This title was previously deleted pursuant to Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Mock the Week because contributors could not restrain themselves from adding an overabundance of copyrighted material. The problem persists in this recreated article.   Quotability is also a concern because the show consists primarily of silly, mocking ephemera of no enduring interest for a compendium of quotations. The article has also become a magnet for silly lads to make up their own mockery, or "things we'd like to see on Mock the Week". — Ningauble (talk) 16:49, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

• Vote closes: 17:00, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:49, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
• Keep. NoseNuggets (talk) 3:55 PM US EDT Oct 5 2013.
• Delete Massive amounts of non-notable quotes that are amounting to a huge copyright violation. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:26, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
• Delete As said, it's mostly copyrighted and numerous times have I had to remove some quotes or change them because someone just wants to add what they want to say. Yoshi58724 (talk) 20:44, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
• Delete, per prior precedent at Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Mock the Week, which was then apparently ignored. -- Cirt (talk) 01:11, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

  At it took a couple of years after it was deleted before it was recreated. EVula // talk // ☯ // 02:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

• Keep and improve I don't find anything truly notible in this article. But, I don't see any reason to delete it, either. WIth some improvements this could become a featured article. --Jdaniels15 (talk) 16:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Wikiquote doesn't have a featured article system. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.