Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Battle for Dream Island
From Wikiquote, the free quote compendium
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: Consensus to delete. HouseOfChange (talk) 22:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC).reply
Not sufficiently notable for this site or even Wikipedia. Article has been subject to a number of recreations and deletions-- if you were to look in the page creation log or deletion log, you'll see at least one other "Battle for Dream Island" or "BDFI" article there. — 03isrflo62410 (talk) 01:18, 21 February 2025 (UTC)reply
Vote closes: 02:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, nom. 03isrflo62410 (talk) 01:18, 21 February 2025 (UTC)reply
- Delete, per nom. Seems completely unnecessary. Markjoseph125 (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2025 (UTC)reply
- Delete. Having a lengthy Wikipedia essay about why it is not notable does not make it notable. ~ Ningauble (talk) 23:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)reply
- Keep. Its lack of notability matters because you can't write an article about it; Wikiquote doesn't have "articles." Plus, on WP:BFDI, it states that Henry Stickmin also falls under the "not notable" umbrella, and it has a page here. Sumaesioso (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2025 (UTC)reply
- Existence of other pages is not a good reason to keep another. Anyone could nominate The Henry Stickmin Collection for deletion as well. ObserveOwl (talk) 12:23, 26 March 2025 (UTC)reply
- Delete. 132.181.47.7 04:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)reply
- Delete see WQ:Q criteria 3,4 and 6. Its also an example of cross wiki low scale disruption, the creation of the quote list was done to essentially circumvent its blacklisted creations at en.wikipedia, further even if kept the list of quotes needs tnting, its too long and lists hundreds of quotes most of which are probably not really WQ worthy. Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2025 (UTC)reply
- Also how has this been open for over a month passed the date it should have been closed by with nearly all votes (only the nom and the first del vote were made before the vote closure) made after said time? Lavalizard101 (talk) 17:16, 4 April 2025 (UTC)reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.