Talk:Movement Charter
Appearance
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Nosebagbear in topic Feedback on non-question areas note
Below are questions related to the ongoing Community Consultation about a proposal for the Movement Charter ratification methodology. Feel free to share your input on the questions below! --Abbad (WMF) (talk) 15:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC).
Question 1: To ensure a fair and inclusive election for a vote that impacts the whole movement, what methodology should chapters and thematic organizations use to vote on the ratification of the Movement Charter?
Please select one of the following options:
- Their entire membership (as of 3 months prior to the vote) cast a vote.
- The decision-making body of each chapter and thematic organization cast a vote on behalf of their respective entity.
- Some other way – please share proposals.
Question 2: To ensure a fair and inclusive election for a vote that impacts the whole movement, what methodology should UGs use to vote on the ratification of the Movement Charter?
Please select one of the following options:
- UGs will determine the voting method themselves and report back only on the results of the vote.
- UGs will submit to the Charter Electoral Commission evidence that their full membership has been consulted when they report back on the results of the vote.
- The Charter Electoral Commission will specify the voting method to be applied to all UGs.
Question 3: What percentage of individuals should vote in favor of ratification to ratify?
Please select one of the following options:
- 50%+1
- 55%
- 60%
- Other – please share what percentage.
Questions about the Charter Electoral Commission (CEC)
Question 1: How will the members of the CEC be recruited?
Question 2: Who will select the 5 members of the CEC out of all eligible candidates?
Question 3: What types of experience would you like to see from members of the Charter Electoral Commission? Should there be any formal minimum criteria for eligibility?
Feedback on non-question areas note
Hi all - just want to stress that we'll gladly receive and consider feedback on any portion of the draft methodology! The questions above are just areas where we specifically wanted more community consideration :) Nosebagbear (talk) 17:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
