Jump to content

Learning patterns/Git repository for software: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
FuzzyBot (talk | contribs)
m FuzzyBot moved page Grants:Learning patterns/Git repository for software to Learning patterns/Git repository for software without leaving a redirect: Part of translatable page "Grants:Learning patterns"
NF Ford (talk | contribs)
m shorten links
Line 55: Line 55:
=== Related patterns ===
=== Related patterns ===
<!--optional. a bulleted list of related patterns. See Programs:Evaluation_portal/Library#Learning_patterns for ideas-->
<!--optional. a bulleted list of related patterns. See Programs:Evaluation_portal/Library#Learning_patterns for ideas-->
*[[Grants:Learning patterns/Tracking user contributions by chapter]]
*[[Learning patterns/Tracking user contributions by chapter|Tracking user contributions by chapter]]
*[[Grants:Learning patterns/Set up a GitHub profile for your hack-a-thons]]
*[[Learning patterns/Set up a GitHub profile for your hack-a-thons|Set up a GitHub profile for your hack-a-thons]]


=== External links ===
=== External links ===

Revision as of 07:14, 22 December 2018

A learning pattern forOnline engagement patterns‎
Git repository for software
problemDealing with multiple versions of software or components of it can easily become messy
solutionUsing a Git repository, having a clone of it publicly available on a service that is known for its speed and stability solves several challenges, including versioning, speed, attribution, availability and tidiness at once.
creatorRillke
endorse
created on17 September, 2014


What problem does this solve?

  • In-transparent code development using funds spent for software is disadvantageous as it does not allow tracking activity and progress by the grant maker.
  • Collaborative software engineering easily becomes messy without a source code management system.
  • Most source code management systems require an internet connection to submit.
  • A good way to find out which solution is the best is try&fail but most source code management systems do not have the concept of offline-branches.


What is the solution?

Git and having a repository online, publicly available.


General considerations

  • Git is probably less intuitive to use than SVN or other popular source code revision management systems. It comes with a lot of features but also has a steep learning curve.
  • All contributors who want to contribute will have to have a basic understanding how to use Git in order to submit a patch or to clone a repo in order to test.
  • Review & Merge frequently if you have multiple collaborators. Otherwise you'll run into merge conflicts and manual re-basing can consume enormous parts of your time.
  • GitHub Desktop is an easy, GUI-based tool for new users who are unfamiliar with Git commands. This may reduce the learning curve involved.

When to use

  • Almost all bigger successful opensource projects host their source code with either git or SVN now: MediaWiki, DokuWiki, WordPress, Drupal.

Examples

  • GitHub is especially useful, as it does not only enable version control and external contributions, but also a lightweight yet effective system to manage technical activities.[1][2] It also integrates issue tracking and feature requests, providing a platform for developers, volunteers, and users to collaborate.[3]

See also

References

Endorsements