Jump to content

Wikimania 2016 jury: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
selection process summary
m Selection process: paragraphs, links, first person
Line 16: Line 16:
From the [http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.wikimania/6367/focus=6413 relevant thread]:
From the [http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.wikimania/6367/focus=6413 relevant thread]:


In the past the jury was selected by a moderator - we had Joseph Seddon,
In the past the jury was selected by a moderator: we had Joseph Seddon, James Forrester and others sending out the invitations and reminders, collecting the applications, making a selection and announcing it. From that point on, the jury took on the work.
James Forrester and others sending out the invitations and reminders,
collecting the applications, making a selection and announcing it. From
that point on the jury took on the work.


Now we have a Wikimania Committee, which only took one decision so far: re-defining the [[Wikimania 2016 bids|bidding schedule]] to give more time to organise. Ellie and Manuel were looking to move forward with the coming bidding process. The only process we actually had was this reviewed and rescheduled timeline.
Now we have a Wikimania Committee which so far has not yet found its
mode to work - it only took one decision so far, and that was
re-defining the bidding schedule to give more time to organise - Ellie
and me were looking to move forward with the coming bidding process. The
only process we actually had was said reviewed and rescheduled timeline.


As we were actually already approaching the approved deadlines without anyone acting up, Manuel took initiative to put the new timeline together on Meta, [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.wikimania/6282 send out an invitation] and had all applications going to Ellie. Manuel also sent out reminders before the deadline, so everyone should have been informed and was invited to participate.
As we were actually already approaching the approved deadlines without
anyone acting up, I took initiative to put the new timeline together on
Meta, send out and invitation and had all applications going to Ellie.
I also sent out reminders before the deadline, so everyone should have
been informed and was invited to participate.


Ellie made a pre-selection which I reviewed and discussed with her, after some slight adjustments Manuel brought the selection forward the [[Wikimania Committee]], asking for feedback. One response was received, from someone who wanted to be included which Ellie denied with good arguments as we need this person take responsibility in other areas (e.g. strengthen the Committee).
Ellie made a pre-selection which I reviewed and discussed with her,
after some slight adjustments I brought the selection forward the
Wikimania Committee, asking for feedback. We received one response from
someone who wanted to be included which Ellie denied with good arguments
as we need this person take responsibility in other areas (eg.
strengthen the Committee).

After all selected persons agreed to become the new Jury I sent out the
announcement.


After all the selected persons agreed to become the new Jury, Manuel [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.wikimania/6367/ sent out the announcement].


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 12:17, 7 October 2014

Bids
Main page
Timeline
Judging
Jury
Criteria
Past events
Wikimania 2005 (site)
Wikimania 2006 (site)
Wikimania 2007 (site)
Wikimania 2008 (site)
Wikimania 2009 (site)
Wikimania 2010 (site)
Wikimania 2011 (site)
Wikimania 2012 (site)
Wikimania 2013 (site)
Wikimania 2014 (site)
Wikimania 2015 (site)

The Wikimania 2016 jury is the group which leads the process to evaluate the proposals received to host the Wikimania 2016 conference. (See Wikimania jury for general information about this committee.)

Voting members of the Jury

  1. Richard Symonds
  2. Stuart Prior
  3. Claudia Garad
  4. Esteban Zarate
  5. Daniel Bryant
  6. Finne Boonen
  7. Ellie Young

Selection process

From the relevant thread:

In the past the jury was selected by a moderator: we had Joseph Seddon, James Forrester and others sending out the invitations and reminders, collecting the applications, making a selection and announcing it. From that point on, the jury took on the work.

Now we have a Wikimania Committee, which only took one decision so far: re-defining the bidding schedule to give more time to organise. Ellie and Manuel were looking to move forward with the coming bidding process. The only process we actually had was this reviewed and rescheduled timeline.

As we were actually already approaching the approved deadlines without anyone acting up, Manuel took initiative to put the new timeline together on Meta, send out an invitation and had all applications going to Ellie. Manuel also sent out reminders before the deadline, so everyone should have been informed and was invited to participate.

Ellie made a pre-selection which I reviewed and discussed with her, after some slight adjustments Manuel brought the selection forward the Wikimania Committee, asking for feedback. One response was received, from someone who wanted to be included which Ellie denied with good arguments as we need this person take responsibility in other areas (e.g. strengthen the Committee).

After all the selected persons agreed to become the new Jury, Manuel sent out the announcement.

See also

2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  |  2012  |  2013  |  2014  |  2015  |  2016  |  2017