Wiki Workers United/Claims and responses: Revision history

14 August 2026

• curprev 13:5513:55, 14 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 38,072 bytes +137 →Response: ref archives undo
• curprev 13:5313:53, 14 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 37,935 bytes +366 →Response: ref archives undo

13 August 2026

• curprev 07:3507:35, 13 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 37,569 bytes +10 →Response: copyedit - since this is worded about votes being unfair rather than card checks being fair undo
• curprev 07:3207:32, 13 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 37,559 bytes +7 →Response: copyedit undo
• curprev 07:3207:32, 13 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 37,552 bytes +21 →Response: May the source be with you, Luke! undo
• curprev 07:3007:30, 13 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 37,531 bytes +120 more relevant to unfairness than usualness undo
• curprev 07:2707:27, 13 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 37,411 bytes +273 →Response: May the source be with you, Luke! undo

8 August 2026

• curprev 07:5107:51, 8 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 37,138 bytes +7 →Response: we don't actually know if there were repercussions for non-attendance or not; we know that there was a *promise* that there would be no repercussions undo

7 August 2026

• curprev 20:1520:15, 7 August 2026 Femke talk contribs 37,131 bytes +147 →Response: false -> neutral undo
• curprev 12:4612:46, 7 August 2026 Matma Rex talk contribs 36,984 bytes −1,514 →Claim: WMF included all requested staff for NLRB vote eligibility.: This doesn't seem right, see Talk:Wiki Workers United/Claims and responses#"WMF included all requested staff for NLRB vote eligibility" undo

6 August 2026

• curprev 21:3821:38, 6 August 2026 Femke talk contribs 38,498 bytes +629 →Response: put in the statistics. Apparently, even I was misled, as I thought it would be a minority undo
• curprev 20:5420:54, 6 August 2026 GorillaWarfare talk contribs 37,869 bytes +97 →Response: clarify in-text for those who don't click into the citation undo
• curprev 20:1920:19, 6 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 37,772 bytes +13 →Response: 3 March 2026 undo
• curprev 20:0820:08, 6 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 37,759 bytes +1,513 →Response: major rewrite using the French Wikipedia interviews at Wikimania 2026 undo
• curprev 15:2615:26, 6 August 2026 GorillaWarfare talk contribs 36,246 bytes −4 indentfix undo
• curprev 15:0715:07, 6 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 36,250 bytes +54 →See also: assuming good faith, link to w:misinformation, not w:disinformation, i.e. accidental rather than deliberate distribution of false or misleading information undo
• curprev 14:4414:44, 6 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 36,196 bytes +1,013 →Claim: WMF did not hold any captive audience meetings.: initial draft; thematically this is a subsection of the no union-busting tactics section, but upgrade it to h2 if you wish undo
• curprev 14:2114:21, 6 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 35,183 bytes +1,514 →Claim: WMF included all requested staff for NLRB vote eligibility.: initial draft undo
• curprev 06:3706:37, 6 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 33,669 bytes +10 →Claim: It's unclear how many US-based WMF employees support unionization.: global majority qmark icon undo
• curprev 06:3306:33, 6 August 2026 Boud talk contribs m 33,659 bytes −2 →Response: there is a strong US focus to this topic, but easier to stick to a single style; a U.S. vs US battle can be done on the talk page to seek rough consensus if needed undo

5 August 2026

• curprev 21:4421:44, 5 August 2026 WhatamIdoing talk contribs 33,661 bytes +69 →Response: This is only about US staff undo Tag: 2017 source edit
• curprev 10:0210:02, 5 August 2026 Newslinger talk contribs 33,592 bytes −4 →Claim: The WMF has not hired a union-busting law firm.: Fix link undo
• curprev 09:4909:49, 5 August 2026 Newslinger talk contribs 33,596 bytes +530 →Claim: The WMF has not hired a union-busting law firm.: Add quote from BMeehan-WMF and rebuttal undo
• curprev 09:3109:31, 5 August 2026 Newslinger talk contribs m 33,066 bytes +1 →Claim: The card check was presented as (only) initiating an election process.: Comma undo
• curprev 09:3009:30, 5 August 2026 Newslinger talk contribs 33,065 bytes +18 Add M:WWUFACTCHECK shortcut undo
• curprev 08:0108:01, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 33,047 bytes +6 →Response: clarify the summary undo
• curprev 08:0108:01, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 33,041 bytes −3 →Claim: The WMF has not hired a union-busting law firm.: clarify the summary undo
• curprev 08:0008:00, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 33,044 bytes +6 →Response: follow the pattern of the other summaries undo
• curprev 07:5907:59, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 33,038 bytes +6 →Response: follow the pattern of the other summaries undo
• curprev 07:5907:59, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 33,032 bytes −4 →Response: clearer without the italics undo
• curprev 07:5907:59, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 33,036 bytes +6 →Response: clarify that "unfair" is part of the claim, not the assessment of the claim undo
• curprev 07:3007:30, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 33,030 bytes +215 →Response: no evidence of confusing information undo
• curprev 07:1507:15, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 32,815 bytes +87 →Response: WMF did not use union-busting rhetoric: false claim undo
• curprev 07:1307:13, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 32,728 bytes +52 →Claim: The WMF is neutral on whether its employees unionize.: false claim undo
• curprev 07:1207:12, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 32,676 bytes +70 →Claim: The WMF has not hired a union-busting law firm.: clearly false (double negative: the claim of a negative is false) undo
• curprev 07:0707:07, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 32,606 bytes −3 →Claim: The card check and voluntary recognition method of unionization is unfair.: "less" in the title is unclear, and the key implied claim is that the card check + voluntary path is fundamentally unfair, not that the NLRB vote is just marginally better undo
• curprev 07:0507:05, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 32,609 bytes +58 →Response: summary: no evidence for the card check + voluntary recognition being unfair undo
• curprev 07:0107:01, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 32,551 bytes +33 →Response: summary with icon undo
• curprev 07:0007:00, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 32,518 bytes +661 →Response: copyedit, text and source more or less from w:Blue shift (politics), per CC BY-SA undo
• curprev 06:4806:48, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 31,857 bytes +54 →Response: summary with icon undo
• curprev 06:4606:46, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 31,803 bytes +18 →Response: w:WP:RELTIME undo
• curprev 06:4406:44, 5 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 31,785 bytes +248 →Response: more nuance to the pre-CWA card check; icons: aye, nay undo
• curprev 00:0500:05, 5 August 2026 Newslinger talk contribs 31,537 bytes +60 →Claim: The card check and voluntary recognition method of unionization is less fair.: Section link undo
• curprev 00:0100:01, 5 August 2026 Newslinger talk contribs 31,477 bytes −85 Remove stray subsections after merge undo

4 August 2026

• curprev 23:0223:02, 4 August 2026 Newslinger talk contribs 31,562 bytes +880 →Response: Volkswagen example undo
• curprev 22:5722:57, 4 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 30,682 bytes +96 →Response: more of the CWA-only card that removes any hint of "I'm looking forward to a formal vote later to make my decision" undo
• curprev 22:5222:52, 4 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 30,586 bytes 0 →Claim: The card check was presented as (only) initiating an election process.: syn:tax/ not syn/tax: undo
• curprev 22:5122:51, 4 August 2026 Boud talk contribs 30,586 bytes +3,560 →Claim: The card check was presented as (only) initiating an election process. undo
• curprev 22:1422:14, 4 August 2026 Newslinger talk contribs 27,026 bytes −870 Merge Jimbo Wales's claim into the "less fair" section undo
• curprev 21:5521:55, 4 August 2026 Newslinger talk contribs 27,896 bytes −30 →Response: More appropriate quoting of the source undo