Jump to content

Peer review: Difference between revisions

From Wikiquote, the free quote compendium
Content deleted Content added
Mdd (talk | contribs)
m Some more data
CensoredScribe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{sci-stub}}
{{sci-stub}}
== Quotes ==
== Quotes ==

* Have you ever read a Michael Crichton novel, or seen one of his movies, in which the hubristic scientist actually paused and declared: "Hey, science shouldn't be done in shadows. If I keep this new thing secret I'll probably do something gruesomely stupid. But if I discuss this innovation with hundreds of peers, some of them will catch my mistakes and things won't get out of hand. Nobody will die.
** David Brin [http://www.davidbrin.com/idiotplot.html]

* Dear Sir,<br>We ([[w:Nathan Rosen|Mr. Rosen]] and I) had sent you our manuscript for publication and had not authorized you to show it to specialists before it is printed. I see no reason to address the in any case erroneous comments of your anonymous expert. On the basis of this incident I prefer to publish the paper elsewhere.<br>Respectfully,
* Dear Sir,<br>We ([[w:Nathan Rosen|Mr. Rosen]] and I) had sent you our manuscript for publication and had not authorized you to show it to specialists before it is printed. I see no reason to address the in any case erroneous comments of your anonymous expert. On the basis of this incident I prefer to publish the paper elsewhere.<br>Respectfully,
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to ''[[w:Physical Review|Physical Review]]'' (1936)
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to ''[[w:Physical Review|Physical Review]]'' (1936)

Revision as of 15:22, 26 December 2015

Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work (peers).

Quotes

  • Have you ever read a Michael Crichton novel, or seen one of his movies, in which the hubristic scientist actually paused and declared: "Hey, science shouldn't be done in shadows. If I keep this new thing secret I'll probably do something gruesomely stupid. But if I discuss this innovation with hundreds of peers, some of them will catch my mistakes and things won't get out of hand. Nobody will die.
  • Dear Sir,
    We (Mr. Rosen and I) had sent you our manuscript for publication and had not authorized you to show it to specialists before it is printed. I see no reason to address the in any case erroneous comments of your anonymous expert. On the basis of this incident I prefer to publish the paper elsewhere.
    Respectfully,
  • An authority isn't a person or institution who is always right – ain't no such animal. An authority is a person or institution who has a process for lowering the likelihood that they are wrong to acceptably low levels. [...] And this is what I think is really worth celebrating as Wikipedia begins its second decade. It took one of the best ideas of the last 500 years – peer review – and expanded its field of operation so dramatically that it changed the way authority is configured.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipedia has an article about: