Jump to content

Generalization: Difference between revisions

From Wikiquote, the free quote compendium
Content deleted Content added
G - L: added reference in support
Spinoziano (talk | contribs)
m fix link
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:RWEmerson.jpg|thumb|right|''Only the great generalizations survive.'' - [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]]]
[[File:RWEmerson.jpg|thumb|Only the great generalizations survive. ~ [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]]]
A '''[[:w:Generalization|generalization|]]''' (or '''generalisation''') of a concept is an extension of the concept to less-specific criteria.
'''[[:w:Generalization|Generalization]]''' is a form of [[abstraction]] whereby common [[properties]] of specific instances are formulated as general [[concepts]] or claims.
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
:<small>'''CONTENT'''</small> : [[#A - F|A - F]] , [[#G - L|G - L]] , [[#M - R|M - R]] , [[#S - Z|S - Z]] , [[#See also|See also]] , [[#External links|External links]]
:<small>'''CONTENT'''</small> : [[#A - F|A - F]] , [[#G - L|G - L]] , [[#M - R|M - R]] , [[#S - Z|S - Z]] , [[#See also|See also]] , [[#External links|External links]]


== Quotes ==
== Quotes ==
:''Quotes are arranged alphabetically by author''
:<small>Sorted alphabetically by author or source</small>

=== A - F ===
=== A - F ===
*I think women are really good at making friends and not good at networking. Men are good at networking and not necessarily making friends. That's a gross generalization, but I think it holds in many ways.
*I think women are really good at making friends and not good at networking. Men are good at networking and not necessarily making friends. That's a gross generalization, but I think it holds in many ways.
**[[Madeleine Albright]] in: ''[http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304746604577383721974234282 Madeleine Albright on Barriers Broken and Barriers that Remain]'', The wall Street Journal, 7 May 2012.
**[[Madeleine Albright]], in [http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304746604577383721974234282 "Madeleine Albright on Barriers Broken and Barriers that Remain", ''The Wall Street Journal'' (7 May 2012)]

*'''{{anchor|All generalizations are false}}All generalizations are false, including this one'''.
** [[Anonymous]] remark; widely quoted, but with no definite source located as yet, sometimes attributed to [[Alexandre Dumas|Alexandre Dumas Père]], [[Aristotle]] and [[Mark Twain]].


*An [[aphorism]] is a generalization of sorts, and our present-day writers seem more at home with the particular.
*An [[aphorism]] is a generalization of sorts, and our present-day writers seem more at home with the particular.
** [[Anatole Broyard]] ‘Wisdom of Aphorisms’, New York Times, 30th April 1983.
** [[Anatole Broyard]], "Wisdom of Aphorisms", ''The New York Times'' (30 April 1983)


*As the generalization goes about the art industry, people can be really challenging and thought-provoking in their thinking and questioning the status quo, and it's really important that the status quo can be questioned and that there are people doing that.
*As the generalization goes about the art industry, people can be really challenging and thought-provoking in their thinking and questioning the status quo, and it's really important that the status quo can be questioned and that there are people doing that.
**[[w:Lily Cole|Lily Cole]] in: ''[http://www.interviewmagazine.com/culture/lily-cole-snow-white-and-the-huntsman-impossible-com/print/ Lily Cole's Mission Impossible]'', Interview Magazine.
** [[Lily Cole]], in [https://www.interviewmagazine.com/culture/lily-cole-snow-white-and-the-huntsman-impossible-com "Lily Cole's Mission Impossible", ''Interview'' magazine (5 June 2012)]


*'''All generalizations are dangerous, even this one'''.
*'''All generalizations are dangerous, even this one'''.
**[[Alexandre Dumas|Alexandre Dumas Père]] in Jennifer J. Deal: ''[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=QKWzUsOve8AC&pg=PA9 Retiring the Generation Gap: How Employees Young and Old Can Find Common Ground]'', John Wiley & Sons, 31 March 2007, p. 9.
**[[Alexandre Dumas|Alexandre Dumas Père]], as quoted in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=QKWzUsOve8AC&pg=PA9 ''Retiring the Generation Gap: How Employees Young and Old Can Find Common Ground'' (2007) by Jennifer J. Deal, p. 9]<!-- John Wiley & Sons -->


* In generalizing lies the difficulty of scientific [[map]]-making, for it no longer allows the cartographer to rely merely on objective facts but requires him to interpret them subjectively. To be sure the selection of the subject matter is controlled by considerations regarding its suitability and value, but the manner in which this material is to be rendered graphically depends on personal and subjective feeling. But the latter must not predominate: the dictates of science will prevent any erratic flight of the imagination and impart to the map a fundamentally objective character in spite of all subjective impulses. It is in this respect that maps are distinguished from fine products of art. Generalized maps and, in fact, all abstract maps should, therefore, be products of art clarified by science.
* In generalizing lies the difficulty of scientific [[map]]-making, for it no longer allows the cartographer to rely merely on objective facts but requires him to interpret them subjectively. To be sure the selection of the subject matter is controlled by considerations regarding its suitability and value, but the manner in which this material is to be rendered graphically depends on personal and subjective feeling. But the latter must not predominate: the dictates of science will prevent any erratic flight of the imagination and impart to the map a fundamentally objective character in spite of all subjective impulses. It is in this respect that maps are distinguished from fine products of art. Generalized maps and, in fact, all abstract maps should, therefore, be products of art clarified by science.
** Max Eckert, "[https://archive.org/stream/jstor-198027/198027#page/n1/mode/2up On the Nature of Maps and Map Logic]," in: ''Bulletin of the American Geographical Society,'' Volume 40, (1908), p. 347; Cited in: McMaster, Robert Brainerd, and K. Stuart Shea. "[http://geoinformatics.ntua.gr/courses/admcarto/lecture_notes/generalisation/bibliography/mcmaster_shea_1992.pdf Generalization in digital cartography]." Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers, 1992.
** Max Eckert, "[https://archive.org/stream/jstor-198027/198027#page/n1/mode/2up On the Nature of Maps and Map Logic]," in: ''Bulletin of the American Geographical Society,'' Volume 40, (1908), p. 347; cited in "[http://geoinformatics.ntua.gr/courses/admcarto/lecture_notes/generalisation/bibliography/mcmaster_shea_1992.pdf ''Generalization in Digital Cartography'' (1992) by Robert Brainerd McMaster and K. Stuart Shea (PDF)] <!-- Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers -->


*Crime seems to change character when it crosses a bridge or a tunnel. In the city, crime is taken as emblematic of class and race. In the suburbs, though, it's intimate and psychological / resistant to generalization, a mystery of the individual soul.
*Crime seems to change character when it crosses a bridge or a tunnel. In the city, crime is taken as emblematic of class and race. In the suburbs, though, it's intimate and psychological / resistant to generalization, a mystery of the individual soul.
**[[Barbara Ehrenreich]] in: Michael Crane ''[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=2ChqGIvW-rsC&pg=PA72 The Political Junkie Handbook]'', SP Books, 2004, p. 72.
**[[Barbara Ehrenreich]] in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=2ChqGIvW-rsC&pg=PA72 ''The Political Junkie Handbook''] (2004) by Michael Crane, p. 72<!-- SP Books -->


* Only the great generalizations survive. The sharp words of the Declaration of Independence, lampooned then and since as 'glittering generalities,' have turned out blazing ubiquities that will burn forever and ever.
* Only the great generalizations survive. The sharp words of the [[Declaration of Independence]], lampooned then and since as "glittering generalities," have turned out blazing ubiquities that will burn forever and ever.
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]. A lecture on 'Books' delivered in 1864; the quoted phrase 'glittering generalities' had been used by [[w:Rufus Choate|Rufus Choate]] to describe the declaration of the rights of man in the Preamble to the Constitution (''The Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson'' (1903-4) Vol. 10, p. 88, note 1).
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], in a lecture "Books" (1864); the quoted phrase "glittering generalities" had been used by [[w:Rufus Choate|Rufus Choate]] to describe the declaration of the rights of man in the Preamble to the Constitution, in ''The Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson'' (1903-4) Vol. 10, p. 88, note 1


* A poet once said, "The whole universe is in a glass of wine." We will probably never know in what sense he meant that, for poets do not write to be understood. But it is true that if we look at a glass of wine closely enough we see the entire universe. There are the things of physics: the twisting liquid which evaporates depending on the wind and weather, the reflections in the glass, and our imagination adds the atoms. The glass is a distillation of the Earth's rocks, and in its composition we see the secrets of the universe's age, and the evolution of stars. What strange arrays of chemicals are in the wine? How did they come to be? There are the ferments, the enzymes, the substrates, and the products. There in wine is found the great generalization: all life is fermentation.
* A poet once said, "The whole universe is in a glass of wine." We will probably never know in what sense he meant that, for poets do not write to be understood. But it is true that if we look at a glass of wine closely enough we see the entire universe. There are the things of physics: the twisting liquid which evaporates depending on the wind and weather, the reflections in the glass, and our imagination adds the atoms. The glass is a distillation of the Earth's rocks, and in its composition we see the secrets of the universe's age, and the evolution of stars. What strange arrays of chemicals are in the wine? How did they come to be? There are the ferments, the enzymes, the substrates, and the products. There in wine is found the great generalization: all life is fermentation.
** [[Richard Feynman]], volume I; lecture 3, "The Relation of Physics to Other Sciences"; section 3-7, "How did it get that way?"; p. 3-10.
** [[Richard Feynman]], in ''The Feynman Lectures on Physics'' (1964), Vol. I; Lecture 3, "The Relation of Physics to Other Sciences"; section 3-7, "How did it get that way?"; p. 3-10


*Even the recognition of an individual whom we see every day is only possible as the result of an abstract idea of him formed by generalization from his appearances in the past.
*Even the recognition of an individual whom we see every day is only possible as the result of an abstract idea of him formed by generalization from his appearances in the past.
**[[w:James George Frazer|James G. Frazer]] in : Charles H. Lineweaver et al. '' [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=tiIYVyHdI1gC&pg=PA243 Complexity and the Arrow of Time]'', Cambridge University Press, 8 August 2013, p. 243.
**[[w:James George Frazer|James G. Frazer]] in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=tiIYVyHdI1gC&pg=PA243 ''Complexity and the Arrow of Time (2013) edited by Charles H. Lineweaver et al, p. 243<!-- Cambridge University Press -->


* The word generalization in literature usually means covering too much territory too thinly to be persuasive, let alone convincing. In science, however, a generalization means a principle that has been found to hold true in every special case. … The principle of leverage is a scientific generalization.
* The word generalization in literature usually means covering too much territory too thinly to be persuasive, let alone convincing. In science, however, a generalization means a principle that has been found to hold true in every special case. … The principle of leverage is a scientific generalization.
** [[Buckminster Fuller]], ''Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking'' (1975).
** [[Buckminster Fuller]], ''Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking'' (1975)


* '''The highest of generalizations is the synergetic integration of [[truth]] and [[love]].'''
* '''The highest of generalizations is the synergetic integration of [[truth]] and [[love]].'''
** [[Buckminster Fuller]] in: ''[http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s10/p0520.html#1005.50 1005.56 Quotes about synergetics]'' at ''rwgrayprojects.com,'' Estate of R. Buckminster Fuller, 1997.
** [[Buckminster Fuller]], in [http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s10/p0520.html#1005.50 1005.56 "Quotes about synergetics" at ''rwgrayprojects.com,'' Estate of R. Buckminster Fuller (1997)]


=== G - L ===
=== G - L ===
* People who like quotations love meaningless generalizations.
* People who like quotations love meaningless generalizations.
** [[Graham Greene]], ‎Philip Stratford (1973) ''The Portable Graham Greene,'' p. 133; Cited in: Susan Ratcliffe ed. ''Oxford Essential Quotations.'' 2012.
** [[Graham Greene]], in ''The Portable Graham Greene'' (1973), edited by Philip Stratford, p. 133; cited in ''Oxford Essential Quotations'' (2012), Susan Ratcliffe


* A single observation that is inconsistent with some generalization points to the falsehood of the generalization, and thereby 'points to itself'.
* A single observation that is inconsistent with some generalization points to the falsehood of the generalization, and thereby 'points to itself'.
Line 49: Line 51:


* All sweeping assertions are erroneous.
* All sweeping assertions are erroneous.
** [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]], ''[[Romance and Reality]]'' (1831) Vol I, Chapter 22
** [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]], ''[[Romance and Reality]]'' (1831) Vol I, Chapter 22; the author understood the irony and felt no necessity to explain it. She also wrote the following:
** General assertions, like general truths, are not always applicable to individual cases; though Fortune's wheel is generally on the turn, sometimes when it gets into the mud, it sticks there.
** The author understood the irony and felt no necessity to explain. Compare Landon's quote on 'Wit'.
*** [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]], ''Romance and Reality'' (1831) Vol II, Chapter 5

[[File:Generalization_process_using_trees_PNG_version.png|right|thumb|A diagram illustrating graphically the generalization process, using trees.]]


[[File:Generalization_process_using_trees.svg|thumb|A diagram illustrating graphically the generalization process, using trees.]]
=== M - R ===
=== M - R ===
*Men are more apt to be mistaken in their generalizations than in their particular observations.
*Men are more apt to be mistaken in their generalizations than in their particular observations.
**[[Niccolo Machiavelli]] in: Charles Kegley, Shannon Blanton ''[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=2c8WAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA494 World Politics: Trend and Transformation, 2013 - 2014 Update Edition]'', Cengage Learning, 3 January 2013, p. 494.
**[[Niccolo Machiavelli]], as quoted in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=2c8WAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA494 ''World Politics : Trend and Transformation 2013 - 2014 Update Edition'' (2013) by Charles Kegley and Shannon Blanton, p. 494]<!-- Cengage Learning -->


*The English have all the material requisites for the revolution. What they lack is the spirit of generalization and revolutionary ardour.
*The English have all the material requisites for the revolution. What they lack is the spirit of generalization and revolutionary ardour.
**[[Karl Marx]] in: John Kenneth Turner ''[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=GA0eAAAAIAAJ Challenge to Karl Marx, Volume 25]'', Reynal & Hitchcock, 1941, p. 219.
**[[Karl Marx]] as quoted in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=GA0eAAAAIAAJ ''Challenge to Karl Marx'' (1941), Vol. 25 <!-- John Kenneth Turner -->, p. 219]<!-- Reynal & Hitchcock -->


* Law is the continuous manifestation of God's presence — not reason for believing him absent. <br> Great confusion arises from our using the same word law in two totally distinct senses … as the cause and the effect. It is said that to "''explain away''" everything by law is to enable us to do without God. <br> '''But law is no explanation of anything; law is simply a generalization, a category of facts. Law is neither a cause, nor a reason, nor a power, nor a coercive force.''' It is nothing but a general formula, a statistical table. Law brings us continually back to God instead of carrying us away from him.
* Law is the continuous manifestation of God's presence — not reason for believing him absent. <br> Great confusion arises from our using the same word law in two totally distinct senses … as the cause and the effect. It is said that to "''explain away''" everything by law is to enable us to do without God. <br> '''But law is no explanation of anything; law is simply a generalization, a category of facts. Law is neither a cause, nor a reason, nor a power, nor a coercive force.''' It is nothing but a general formula, a statistical table. Law brings us continually back to God instead of carrying us away from him.
** [[Florence Nightingale]] ''Suggestions for Thought : Selections and Commentaries'' (1994), edited by Michael D. Calabria and Janet A. MacRae, p. 41.
** [[Florence Nightingale]], as quoted in ''Suggestions for Thought : Selections and Commentaries'' (1994), edited by Michael D. Calabria and Janet A. MacRae, p. 41


*An extra-terrestrial philosopher, who had watched a single youth up to the age of twenty-one and had never come across any other human being, might conclude that it is the nature of human beings to grow continually taller and wiser in an indefinite progress towards perfection; and this generalization would be just as well founded as the generalization which evolutionists base upon the previous history of this planet.
*An extra-terrestrial philosopher, who had watched a single youth up to the age of twenty-one and had never come across any other human being, might conclude that it is the nature of human beings to grow continually taller and wiser in an indefinite progress towards perfection; and this generalization would be just as well founded as the generalization which evolutionists base upon the previous history of this planet.
**[[Bertrand Russell]] in : ''[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=gapyT3R0n3kC&pg=PA127 Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays]'', The Floating Press, 1 August 2010, p. 127.
**[[Bertrand Russell]], in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=gapyT3R0n3kC&pg=PA127 ''Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays'' (2010), p. 127]<!-- The Floating Press -->


*'''For my part I distrust all generalizations about women, favorable and unfavorable, masculine and feminine, ancient and modern; all alike, I should say, result from paucity of experience.'''
*'''For my part I distrust all generalizations about women, favorable and unfavorable, masculine and feminine, ancient and modern; all alike, I should say, result from paucity of experience.'''
**[[Bertrand Russell]] in: Christopher Hitchens ''[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=UFY18Bep5ygC&pg=PA200 The Portable Atheist: Essential Readings for the Non-believer]'', Da Capo Press, 2007m p. 200.
**[[Bertrand Russell]], as quoted in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=UFY18Bep5ygC&pg=PA200 ''The Portable Atheist : Essential Readings for the Non-believer'' (2007)] by [[Christopher Hitchens]], p. 200<!-- Da Capo Press -->


=== S - Z ===
=== S - Z ===
*Crude classifications and false generalizations are the curse of organized life.
*Crude classifications and false generalizations are the curse of organized life.
**[[George Bernard Shaw]] in: ''[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=OmDXTJd7jAIC&pg=PA237 Bridges to Better Writing]'', Cengage Learning, 15 January 2009, p. 237.
**[[George Bernard Shaw]], as quoted in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=OmDXTJd7jAIC&pg=PA237 ''Bridges to Better Writing'' (2009, p. 237<!-- Cengage Learning -->


* We generalize from one situation to another not because we cannot tell the difference between the two situations but because we judge that they are likely to belong to a set of situations having the same consequence.
*'''All generalizations are false, including this one'''.
** [[Roger N. Shepard]], "Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science", ''Science'' 237.4820 (1987) p. 1322
**Sometimes attributed to [[Mark Twain]] (as in Normand Baillargeon's ''[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=S2nh2Ffds7gC&pg=PA61 A Short Course in Intellectual Self Defense]'', Seven Stories Press, 4 January 2011, p. 61.)


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Abstraction]]
* [[Abstraction]]
* [[Aphorisms]]
* [[Aphorisms]]
* [[Citation]]
* [[Quotations]]
* [[Stereotypes]]
* [[Stereotypes]]



Latest revision as of 12:49, 10 April 2024

Only the great generalizations survive. ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

Generalization is a form of abstraction whereby common properties of specific instances are formulated as general concepts or claims.

CONTENT : A - F , G - L , M - R , S - Z , See also , External links

Quotes

[edit]
Sorted alphabetically by author or source

A - F

[edit]
  • An aphorism is a generalization of sorts, and our present-day writers seem more at home with the particular.
  • In generalizing lies the difficulty of scientific map-making, for it no longer allows the cartographer to rely merely on objective facts but requires him to interpret them subjectively. To be sure the selection of the subject matter is controlled by considerations regarding its suitability and value, but the manner in which this material is to be rendered graphically depends on personal and subjective feeling. But the latter must not predominate: the dictates of science will prevent any erratic flight of the imagination and impart to the map a fundamentally objective character in spite of all subjective impulses. It is in this respect that maps are distinguished from fine products of art. Generalized maps and, in fact, all abstract maps should, therefore, be products of art clarified by science.
  • Crime seems to change character when it crosses a bridge or a tunnel. In the city, crime is taken as emblematic of class and race. In the suburbs, though, it's intimate and psychological / resistant to generalization, a mystery of the individual soul.
  • Only the great generalizations survive. The sharp words of the Declaration of Independence, lampooned then and since as "glittering generalities," have turned out blazing ubiquities that will burn forever and ever.
    • Ralph Waldo Emerson, in a lecture "Books" (1864); the quoted phrase "glittering generalities" had been used by Rufus Choate to describe the declaration of the rights of man in the Preamble to the Constitution, in The Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson (1903-4) Vol. 10, p. 88, note 1
  • A poet once said, "The whole universe is in a glass of wine." We will probably never know in what sense he meant that, for poets do not write to be understood. But it is true that if we look at a glass of wine closely enough we see the entire universe. There are the things of physics: the twisting liquid which evaporates depending on the wind and weather, the reflections in the glass, and our imagination adds the atoms. The glass is a distillation of the Earth's rocks, and in its composition we see the secrets of the universe's age, and the evolution of stars. What strange arrays of chemicals are in the wine? How did they come to be? There are the ferments, the enzymes, the substrates, and the products. There in wine is found the great generalization: all life is fermentation.
    • Richard Feynman, in The Feynman Lectures on Physics (1964), Vol. I; Lecture 3, "The Relation of Physics to Other Sciences"; section 3-7, "How did it get that way?"; p. 3-10
  • The word generalization in literature usually means covering too much territory too thinly to be persuasive, let alone convincing. In science, however, a generalization means a principle that has been found to hold true in every special case. … The principle of leverage is a scientific generalization.

G - L

[edit]
  • People who like quotations love meaningless generalizations.
    • Graham Greene, in The Portable Graham Greene (1973), edited by Philip Stratford, p. 133; cited in Oxford Essential Quotations (2012), Susan Ratcliffe
  • A single observation that is inconsistent with some generalization points to the falsehood of the generalization, and thereby 'points to itself'.
    • Ian Hacking, The Emergence Of Probability Chapter 4, Evidence, p. 34
  • All sweeping assertions are erroneous.
    • Letitia Elizabeth Landon, Romance and Reality (1831) Vol I, Chapter 22; the author understood the irony and felt no necessity to explain it. She also wrote the following:
    • General assertions, like general truths, are not always applicable to individual cases; though Fortune's wheel is generally on the turn, sometimes when it gets into the mud, it sticks there.
A diagram illustrating graphically the generalization process, using trees.

M - R

[edit]
  • Law is the continuous manifestation of God's presence — not reason for believing him absent.
    Great confusion arises from our using the same word law in two totally distinct senses … as the cause and the effect. It is said that to "explain away" everything by law is to enable us to do without God.
    But law is no explanation of anything; law is simply a generalization, a category of facts. Law is neither a cause, nor a reason, nor a power, nor a coercive force. It is nothing but a general formula, a statistical table. Law brings us continually back to God instead of carrying us away from him.
    • Florence Nightingale, as quoted in Suggestions for Thought : Selections and Commentaries (1994), edited by Michael D. Calabria and Janet A. MacRae, p. 41
  • An extra-terrestrial philosopher, who had watched a single youth up to the age of twenty-one and had never come across any other human being, might conclude that it is the nature of human beings to grow continually taller and wiser in an indefinite progress towards perfection; and this generalization would be just as well founded as the generalization which evolutionists base upon the previous history of this planet.

S - Z

[edit]
  • We generalize from one situation to another not because we cannot tell the difference between the two situations but because we judge that they are likely to belong to a set of situations having the same consequence.
    • Roger N. Shepard, "Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science", Science 237.4820 (1987) p. 1322

See also

[edit]
[edit]
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipedia has an article about: