Jump to content

Project:New contributors: Difference between revisions

From mediawiki.org
Content deleted Content added
Activities: "Developers" link to footer of Wikimedia wikis
Boldly blank, as this is misleading nowadays and I will not see that {{historical}} on top when I end up at an anchor link
Tag: Replaced
 
(40 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{draft}}
{{historical}}
[[File:Nemzszinh-spiralcivertan.jpg|thumb]] [[File:Sustainability tech contributors.png|thumb|How to engage new volunteers?]]
'''After the feedback received we are re-purposing completely this space ([[Project_talk:New_contributors#Changes_after_the_first_round_of_feedback_25911|more]]).
'''How to attract volunteers and connect them with interesting people and activities?'''
== The problem ==
[[File:Nemzszinh-spiralcivertan.jpg|thumb|x240px]]
We have a problem engaging volunteers and motivating them to stay. The amount of documentation, tools and channels is so overwhelming that even we have a hard time following it all. Because we're in the shadow of Wikipedia, we could generate massive interest from tech-friendly users, and we could offer them suitable technical tasks. In reality, we miss many newcomers, and our community efforts don't scale.

In more detail:

* '''[[Wikipmediawiki]]''': what you need to know as a tech contributor is spread out over 3 or more wikis...
* '''Plain text identification''': it's 2013 and our user profiles consist of a textarea.
* '''Memory in spreadsheets''': all we have are lists of contributors maintained (or not) manually by various people.
* '''Inefficient mass promotion''': every time we start almost from scratch, unable to selectively reach target audiences.
* '''Inefficient personal promotion''': manual pokes in Talk pages + emails from those spreadsheets won't get you far.
* '''Difficult to propose a first task''': it's difficult for us - imagine how it is for new volunteers alone. After 1-2 attempts, they're gone.
* '''Difficult to find peers''': ''"ask in wikitech-l or #mediawiki"'' is not the answer.
* '''English only''': all of the above only gets worse when writing English is not your strength.

== The solution ==

* Better landing pages for contributors, including
** http://mediawiki.org and http://wikitech.wikimedia.org main pages.
** [[How to contribute]] and the pages linking directly from there.
** [[Developer hub]] and the pages linking directly from there.
* Cutting edge use of projects developed for [[onboarding new Wikipedians]]: [[Account creation user experience]], [[Extension:GettingStarted|GettingStarted]], [[Guided tours]].
* Also for subscriptions and notifications: [[Echo]] & [[Flow]].
* Encouraging users to define their interests through subscriptions and user profiles.
* Thematic nodes aggregating key information around popular topics.

We are the MediaWiki experts and we can iterate fast eating our own dog food. We have a tradition of betatesting new developments and helping out polishing tools by using them.

== Activities ==

Ongoing work. Check the [[/Roadmap/]] for more ideas.

=== [[Requests for comment/Add developer link to footer of Wikimedia wikis|"Developers" link to footer of Wikimedia wikis]] ===
{{tracked|33464}}
A link to [[How to contribute]] from the footer of all pages in Wikimedia sites.

As a way to catch potential technical contributors reading Wikipedia etc and let them know about possibilities to contribute their tech skills.

=== [[/One ontology/]] ===

A common vocabulary to classify items across all our tools.

Call it ''categories'', ''keywords'', ''topics'', ''tags'', ''metadata''... What we need is one set of words applied consistently to wiki content, helping to connect related people, nodes, projects, tasks and events.

Latest revision as of 11:17, 22 March 2023

How to engage new volunteers?