Wikisource:Proposed deletions: Difference between revisions
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
Brackets mean that poetry hasn't any title. There is first sentence of poetry in the brackets.--[[User:Antonio|Antonio]] 10:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC) |
Brackets mean that poetry hasn't any title. There is first sentence of poetry in the brackets.--[[User:Antonio|Antonio]] 10:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Well, Ant wrote all already. Also, jkb, merry Christmas, as Georgians celebrate on the 7-th if January. :)--[[User:Gaeser|Gaeser]] 19:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:52, 29 December 2009
This page collects requests for deleting specific articles from Wikisource. If you want a page deleted for copyright reasons please list it at Wikisource:Possible copyright violations. If you think a page should be deleted for any other reason, please list it here so it can be discussed. Articles remaining on this page should be deleted if there is no significant opposition. Use {{delete}}.
See also Category:Deletion requests
October 2006
Please note that Category:Edmeston, New York Images have lots of images never moved to en. 555 16:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- it is difficult to do something, as there are mostly no sources and licences giver; probably it can be PD, but commons would not keep them I am afraid. -jkb- 08:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- I will try to have a look when I get the time. Mainwhile if somebody else want to do it, go! ;o) Yann 00:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- it is difficult to do something, as there are mostly no sources and licences giver; probably it can be PD, but commons would not keep them I am afraid. -jkb- 08:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all that have no source and no license, especially if they're also unused. —Angr 11:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
- Intêrnacyjanal and Category:Czornaruski - non-existent language as far as I can tell. —Angr 19:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- See #Delete the project Czornaruski here above (I guess I delete it soon anyway), regards -jkb- 19:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
deleted -jkb- 09:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Great; could you also delete Broken/cz:Intêrnacyjanal, which is a redirect to the now deleted page? —Angr 06:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
This isn't a text, only a collection of links (both internal and external). Anrie 13:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- deleted. – Innv 09:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Source: [1])
This text is copied from a self-publication. Besides that, the source text makes no claim that it is in the public domain or that it is available under a free license (but even if it was, it would still not qualify for inclusion, since it does not seem to have appeared in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls and is purely an expression of opinion. Anrie 08:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- delete, -jkb- 17:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Source: [2]
This text is from a forum posting. It has not been published in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls and is purely an expression of opinion. It also makes no claim that it is available under a free license or has been released into the public domain. I would suggest the information be inserted into a Wikipedia article (the text discusses the Old Apostolic Church), but the source wouldn't even qualify as a reliable one. Anrie 08:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- delete, -jkb- 17:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Dezember 2009
Nopetro's edits
I gues that the User:Nopetro [edited here on December 1st] without the knowledge which domain he is logged in. I questioned him about the sence of the new pages but there is no answer. I propose the Edits should be deleted. -jkb- 17:29, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Galaktion Tabidze
I am afraid that all texts from this author here - see Galaktion Tabidze - are copyvios as the author died 1959 (see e.g. w:en:Galaktion Tabidze). I contacted the users User talk:Antonio and User talk:Tokoko. If there will be no answer we have to delete them all (but possibly in some 3 weeks they could be published on Wikilivres anyway). -jkb- 14:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- You're right, but I as a citizen of Georgia can confirm that the Government, the Council of writers and poets, the Patriarchate, and many other institutions have opened creativity Tabidze in the public domain, because Taidze very famous and beloved poet of all Georgians.--თეკა 14:57, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Difficult to understand what you mean. What some councils, Patriarchate or some institutions do is one point. The other one is the fact that (as far as I know) the Georgian copyright law protect work 70 years after the death of the author. Some institution, a Patriarch, council or even the government cannot open a protected work into the public domain (the legislative can do it). The holder of the copyright title can do it, and this is the author itself or the testamentary heir. If you have some links that provide the text PD so please let us know. Regards, -jkb- 17:49, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- I won't be saying that the tests are in PD. Unfortunately, I have to agree that 70 years haven't paseed. But this human is a classic of Georgian literature, who had greatly influenced Georgian Culture , and who is considered to be the King of Georgian Poets. Also, I can assure you that there won't be problems with relatives of Galaktion. Please remember, that the main purpose of policies of Wikimedia Foundation is protecting it's projects. In this case bureaucracy is not clever, as we will lose a lot, and won't get anything back. --Gaeser 18:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Difficult to understand what you mean. What some councils, Patriarchate or some institutions do is one point. The other one is the fact that (as far as I know) the Georgian copyright law protect work 70 years after the death of the author. Some institution, a Patriarch, council or even the government cannot open a protected work into the public domain (the legislative can do it). The holder of the copyright title can do it, and this is the author itself or the testamentary heir. If you have some links that provide the text PD so please let us know. Regards, -jkb- 17:49, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well. The point is not that the author is considered to be a very important poet, and not that probably nobody would make troubles here. The point is (and it is not bureaucracy but the very copyright policy of the WM Foundation) that the texts are not legally PD but protected and copyrighted. They will be deleted on this domain. As I mentioned above, the texts could be presented after January 1st 2010 on the project Wikilivres as we have the protection of 50 years after the death there. You should let me know. Regards, -jkb- 18:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- This case is not as easy as it would first seem. Some of the poems were first published before 1923, and to that extent there should be no problem with these under US law. These should be identified. Beyond that it would certainly be the easiest course to transfer the rest to Wikilivres at the end of the month when these works become PD in Canada. That Tabidze's poems would be a welcome cultural addition to Wikisource is not to be doubted; unfortunately, that is not a point that has much weight in copyright discussions. In Soviet times many of these works might not have retained their copyright protection, and this has been a source of much debate with regard to works of Russian authors. These would have received the most attention because Russia was clearly the most populous of the Soviet republics. The question here becomes whether post-Soviet Georgian law would have restored copyrights to authors whose works had gone into the public domain during Soviet times. Who were Tabidze's heirs? If there are none in accordance with Georgian inheritance law, does the copyright default to the state? If that is the case the Georgian government, and others noted above, may very well have the right to put the material in the public domain or provide some other kind of licensing. Eclecticology 19:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I tried to investigate a bit and then I asked on Commons on Commons:Commons talk:Licensing#Georgian copyright law, the answer came from Lupo here. The Georgian Copyright law 1999 says 70 years post mortem, and short terms copyright of the SU has been restored to 70 years as well, i.e. generally 70 years p.m. That means: all texts shall be moved to WL and deleted here after January 1st (I will do it). If there are some texts published prior to 1923 so somebody who knows the language and the sources (that should be given) can let me know and such texts will stay here, naturally. For details see article 67(2, 3, 4, 5) of the Georgian Copyright Law 1999. -jkb- 18:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- All right - let it be so, but I hope that they'll be moved to WL.--Gaeser 19:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Well, really sorry, but the most texts from him here are copyvios. Anyway: the texts can be imported to Wikilivres and you can link to it from here and from your Wikipedia project as well. I will start to move the texts by import after January 1st 2010. But however, I will need some help. Firstly, the texts that have been published outside the territory of the USA prior to 1923 can stay here, but we need all details about it (year of publishing, place, title of the book). Secondly, the titles of some more texts are with brackets like (): what does it mean? I think I will move them without the bracktes. Thirdly, on Wikilivres we use internationalized templates so that the most of them will have to be changed. For the first, you can have a look at User:-jkb-/Moving Tabidze - make there notice for all works published before 1923, please. Regards and nice post-X-mas days and a happy New Year - wished by -jkb- 17:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Brackets mean that poetry hasn't any title. There is first sentence of poetry in the brackets.--Antonio 10:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well, Ant wrote all already. Also, jkb, merry Christmas, as Georgians celebrate on the 7-th if January. :)--Gaeser 19:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)