Wikisource:Proposed deletions: Difference between revisions
→October 2009: nominate Ds. Denzel Dick: Wat elkeen van die Ou Apostel-kerk moet wees for deletion |
→October 2009: Add source text for Ds. Denzel Dick: Wat elkeen van die Ou Apostel-kerk moet wees |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== October 2009 == |
== October 2009 == |
||
===[[Ou Apostoliese Kerk]]=== |
|||
This isn't a text, only a collection of links (both internal and external). [[User:Anrie|Anrie]] 13:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
===[[Ds. Denzel Dick: Wat elkeen van die Ou Apostel-kerk moet wees]]=== |
|||
:''Source: [http://www.kies.co.za/wat%20elkeen%20van%20die%20ou%20apostel-kerk%20moet%20weet%20%28db%20dick%29.pdf])'' |
|||
This text is copied from a self-publication. Besides that, the source text makes no claim that it is in the public domain or that it is available under a free license (but even if it was, it would still not qualify for inclusion, since it does not seem to have appeared in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls and is purely an expression of opinion. |
|||
Revision as of 08:25, 12 October 2009
This page collects requests for deleting specific articles from Wikisource. If you want a page deleted for copyright reasons please list it at Wikisource:Possible copyright violations. If you think a page should be deleted for any other reason, please list it here so it can be discussed. Articles remaining on this page should be deleted if there is no significant opposition. Use {{delete}}.
See also Category:Deletion requests
October 2006
Please note that Category:Edmeston, New York Images have lots of images never moved to en. 555 16:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- it is difficult to do something, as there are mostly no sources and licences giver; probably it can be PD, but commons would not keep them I am afraid. -jkb- 08:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- I will try to have a look when I get the time. Mainwhile if somebody else want to do it, go! ;o) Yann 00:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- it is difficult to do something, as there are mostly no sources and licences giver; probably it can be PD, but commons would not keep them I am afraid. -jkb- 08:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all that have no source and no license, especially if they're also unused. —Angr 11:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
- Intêrnacyjanal and Category:Czornaruski - non-existent language as far as I can tell. —Angr 19:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- See #Delete the project Czornaruski here above (I guess I delete it soon anyway), regards -jkb- 19:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
deleted -jkb- 09:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Great; could you also delete Broken/cz:Intêrnacyjanal, which is a redirect to the now deleted page? —Angr 06:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
This isn't a text, only a collection of links (both internal and external). Anrie 13:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Source: [1])
This text is copied from a self-publication. Besides that, the source text makes no claim that it is in the public domain or that it is available under a free license (but even if it was, it would still not qualify for inclusion, since it does not seem to have appeared in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls and is purely an expression of opinion.