UserWiki - Revision history

Koavf: Reverted changes by Alifsamad1 (talk) to last version by Tacsipacsi

2024-01-19T04:58:56Z

Reverted changes by Alifsamad1 (talk) to last version by Tacsipacsi

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:58, 19 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{New sister project proposal		{{New sister project proposal
	\| status = ~~approved~~		\| status = procedurally closed
	\| comments = Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].--[[User:~~Muhammad~~ ~~Alif~~ ~~Adha Bin Samad~~]]		\| comments= Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].--[[User:GZWDer\|GZWDer]] ([[User talk:GZWDer\|talk]]) 12:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
	\| project_name = UserWiki		\| project_name = UserWiki}}
	}}
	<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->		<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->

	[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:		[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:
			:*<s>The home wiki userpage would move to become the new '''single userpage''', eliminating the '''hundreds''' of '''[[redlink]]ed''' userpages on other wikis. Userpages would no longer be ''[[en:WP:USERNOCAT\|categorised]]'' in '''articlespace categories''', removing a common bugbear.</s>
	:*
	:*'''One talkpage''', eliminating the need to check and respond on several talkpages. Active talkpages could be gradually archived with notices to redirect to the central talkpage.		:*'''One talkpage''', eliminating the need to check and respond on several talkpages. Active talkpages could be gradually archived with notices to redirect to the central talkpage.
	:*<s>'''One set of preferences''' without having to set them individually on each wiki.</s>		:*<s>'''One set of preferences''' without having to set them individually on each wiki.</s>
Line 18:		Line 16:
	:*<s>If a separate userwiki isn't feasible, then all the user accounts could be moved to '''meta-wiki'''?</s>		:*<s>If a separate userwiki isn't feasible, then all the user accounts could be moved to '''meta-wiki'''?</s>

			:*Thank you to User:Quiddity, who has highlighted that some of these features are being developed separately. See [[#Pointers to related efforts]].
	:*

	==Proposed by==		==Proposed by==

Alifsamad1 at 04:55, 19 January 2024

2024-01-19T04:55:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 19 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{New sister project proposal		{{New sister project proposal
	\| status = ~~procedurally closed~~		\| status = approved
	\| comments= Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].--[[User:~~GZWDer\|GZWDer]]~~ ~~([[User~~ ~~talk:GZWDer\|talk~~]]~~) 12:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)~~		\| comments = Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].--[[User:Muhammad Alif Adha Bin Samad]]
	\| project_name = UserWiki}}		\| project_name = UserWiki
			}}
	<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->		<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->

	[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:		[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:
			:*
	:*<s>The home wiki userpage would move to become the new '''single userpage''', eliminating the '''hundreds''' of '''[[redlink]]ed''' userpages on other wikis. Userpages would no longer be ''[[en:WP:USERNOCAT\|categorised]]'' in '''articlespace categories''', removing a common bugbear.</s>
	:*'''One talkpage''', eliminating the need to check and respond on several talkpages. Active talkpages could be gradually archived with notices to redirect to the central talkpage.		:*'''One talkpage''', eliminating the need to check and respond on several talkpages. Active talkpages could be gradually archived with notices to redirect to the central talkpage.
	:*<s>'''One set of preferences''' without having to set them individually on each wiki.</s>		:*<s>'''One set of preferences''' without having to set them individually on each wiki.</s>
Line 16:		Line 18:
	:*<s>If a separate userwiki isn't feasible, then all the user accounts could be moved to '''meta-wiki'''?</s>		:*<s>If a separate userwiki isn't feasible, then all the user accounts could be moved to '''meta-wiki'''?</s>

			:*
	:*Thank you to User:Quiddity, who has highlighted that some of these features are being developed separately. See [[#Pointers to related efforts]].

	==Proposed by==		==Proposed by==

Tacsipacsi: remove unnecessary {{TNT}}, subst {{#ifexist:}}

2023-12-25T22:28:03Z

remove unnecessary {{TNT}}, subst {{#ifexist:}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 25 December 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~TNT\|~~New sister project proposal		{{New sister project proposal
	\| status = procedurally closed		\| status = procedurally closed
	\| comments= Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].--[[User:GZWDer\|GZWDer]] ([[User talk:GZWDer\|talk]]) 12:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)		\| comments= Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].--[[User:GZWDer\|GZWDer]] ([[User talk:GZWDer\|talk]]) 12:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Line 44:		Line 44:


	~~{{#ifexist: {{PAGENAME}}/supporters \|~~ {{/supporters}} \|		{{/supporters}}
	==People interested==
	<inputbox>
	type=create
	preload=Proposals for new projects/supporters-preload
	editintro=Proposals for new projects/supporters-intro
	default={{PAGENAME}}/supporters
	hidden=yes
	break=no
	buttonlabel=Add your signature
	</inputbox> }}

	==Comments==		==Comments==

WikiCleanerBot: v2.05b - Fix CW error #16 - WCW (Unicode control characters)

2023-04-20T16:13:30Z

v2.05b - Fix CW error #16 - WCW (Unicode control characters)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 20 April 2023
Line 87:		Line 87:
	*{{support}}--Seems to be reasonable one. <font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0em 0em 0.8em,#FF4500 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#90EE90 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#696969"><span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;color:blue"><big>[[User:The Herald\|The Herald]]</big></span></font> 14:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)		*{{support}}--Seems to be reasonable one. <font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0em 0em 0.8em,#FF4500 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#90EE90 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#696969"><span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;color:blue"><big>[[User:The Herald\|The Herald]]</big></span></font> 14:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
	*{{support}}. I support this proposal, I think that advantages are much more than disadvantages or possible complaints. --[[User:Nastoshka\|Nastoshka]] ([[User talk:Nastoshka\|talk]]) 19:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)		*{{support}}. I support this proposal, I think that advantages are much more than disadvantages or possible complaints. --[[User:Nastoshka\|Nastoshka]] ([[User talk:Nastoshka\|talk]]) 19:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
	*nice {{unsigned2\|12:43, 27 April ~~2014‎~~\|Partha jojo}}		*nice {{unsigned2\|12:43, 27 April 2014\|Partha jojo}}
	* {{support}} I support this. It's bothersome to have several talk pages in different wikis. --[[User:Ricky Setiawan\|Ricky Setiawan]] ([[User talk:Ricky Setiawan\|talk]]) 15:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)		* {{support}} I support this. It's bothersome to have several talk pages in different wikis. --[[User:Ricky Setiawan\|Ricky Setiawan]] ([[User talk:Ricky Setiawan\|talk]]) 15:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
	* {{support}} I hope in the future can manage my personal accounts with greater ease and fun. [[User:Wagino 20100516\|Wagino 20100516]] ([[User talk:Wagino 20100516\|talk]]) 05:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)		* {{support}} I hope in the future can manage my personal accounts with greater ease and fun. [[User:Wagino 20100516\|Wagino 20100516]] ([[User talk:Wagino 20100516\|talk]]) 05:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Amire80: TNT

2020-05-26T04:57:52Z

TNT

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:57, 26 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{New sister project proposal		{{TNT\|New sister project proposal
	\| status = procedurally closed		\| status = procedurally closed
	\| comments= Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].--[[User:GZWDer\|GZWDer]] ([[User talk:GZWDer\|talk]]) 12:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)		\| comments= Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].--[[User:GZWDer\|GZWDer]] ([[User talk:GZWDer\|talk]]) 12:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

GZWDer at 12:16, 10 February 2017

2017-02-10T12:16:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 10 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{New sister project proposal		{{New sister project proposal
	\| status = procedurally closed		\| status = procedurally closed
	\| ~~comment~~= Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].		\| comments= Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].--[[User:GZWDer\|GZWDer]] ([[User talk:GZWDer\|talk]]) 12:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
	\| project_name = UserWiki}}		\| project_name = UserWiki}}
	<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->		<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->

GZWDer at 12:16, 10 February 2017

2017-02-10T12:16:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 10 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{New sister project proposal
			\| status = procedurally closed
			\| comment= Some are implementated, other duplicated to [[Global-Wiki]], tracked at [[phab:T66475]].
			\| project_name = UserWiki}}
	<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->		<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->
	[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:		[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:

Liuxinyu970226 at 02:53, 10 February 2017

2017-02-10T02:53:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 10 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Merge\|Global-Wiki}}~~<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->		<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->
	[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:		[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:
	:*<s>The home wiki userpage would move to become the new '''single userpage''', eliminating the '''hundreds''' of '''[[redlink]]ed''' userpages on other wikis. Userpages would no longer be ''[[en:WP:USERNOCAT\|categorised]]'' in '''articlespace categories''', removing a common bugbear.</s>		:*<s>The home wiki userpage would move to become the new '''single userpage''', eliminating the '''hundreds''' of '''[[redlink]]ed''' userpages on other wikis. Userpages would no longer be ''[[en:WP:USERNOCAT\|categorised]]'' in '''articlespace categories''', removing a common bugbear.</s>

Cromium: /* top */ global userpages are here

2015-02-26T01:34:49Z

top: global userpages are here

Nemo bis: /* Comments */ paste fail

2015-02-06T22:12:19Z

Comments: paste fail

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 6 February 2015
Line 99:		Line 99:
	:::::Wow! It only took 9 months to find out who you are referring to. I am aware of this person and that the same question has been asked on their most [[Stewards/Elections_2015/Questions#Cekli829\|recent application to be a steward]]. However, I still fail to see how this relates to this proposal. What part of the proposal says that it involves stewardship? In response to people putting objectionable material on their userpages, I don't see why such pages couldn't be blocked locally if they are contravening local policies. I am perplexed by your assertion about nudity on Acehnese WP, because as far as I can see that "policy" is still only a proposal that hasn't had a single edit in 18 months. If it is a policy then it has not been implemented properly because it is possible to view Commons files locally, and they include nude images. I can't see how Acehnese WP can do this without locally blocking Commons images. Anyway, you need not worry about this proposal, because it appears that elements of the proposal will probably be implemented separately anyway (see the comments by Quiddity below). Furthermore the proposal is going to be merged to Global-wiki sometime soon. '''<span style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">[[User:Green Giant\|<span style="color:#0F0;">Green Giant</span>]] ([[User talk:Green Giant\|<span style="color:#00F;">talk</span>]])</span>''' 19:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)		:::::Wow! It only took 9 months to find out who you are referring to. I am aware of this person and that the same question has been asked on their most [[Stewards/Elections_2015/Questions#Cekli829\|recent application to be a steward]]. However, I still fail to see how this relates to this proposal. What part of the proposal says that it involves stewardship? In response to people putting objectionable material on their userpages, I don't see why such pages couldn't be blocked locally if they are contravening local policies. I am perplexed by your assertion about nudity on Acehnese WP, because as far as I can see that "policy" is still only a proposal that hasn't had a single edit in 18 months. If it is a policy then it has not been implemented properly because it is possible to view Commons files locally, and they include nude images. I can't see how Acehnese WP can do this without locally blocking Commons images. Anyway, you need not worry about this proposal, because it appears that elements of the proposal will probably be implemented separately anyway (see the comments by Quiddity below). Furthermore the proposal is going to be merged to Global-wiki sometime soon. '''<span style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">[[User:Green Giant\|<span style="color:#0F0;">Green Giant</span>]] ([[User talk:Green Giant\|<span style="color:#00F;">talk</span>]])</span>''' 19:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
	::::::Of course it took 9 months because I just saw the change on recent changes (this userwiki pages been dormant for a long time until Base edit it), also "nudity" here is only one such example, other reason : Nationalism, ethnic hatred, forbidden symbol used on userpages, but, be free my son, I don't care anymore, it's funny seeing many user got blocked locally on many wikis anyways.--<font style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #FF0000; color: #ffffff;">[[User:Aldnonymous\|AldNon]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Aldnonymous\|Bicara?]]</sup> 15:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)		::::::Of course it took 9 months because I just saw the change on recent changes (this userwiki pages been dormant for a long time until Base edit it), also "nudity" here is only one such example, other reason : Nationalism, ethnic hatred, forbidden symbol used on userpages, but, be free my son, I don't care anymore, it's funny seeing many user got blocked locally on many wikis anyways.--<font style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #FF0000; color: #ffffff;">[[User:Aldnonymous\|AldNon]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Aldnonymous\|Bicara?]]</sup> 15:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
	:::::ace.wikipedia [[Requests for comment/ace.wikipedia and Prophet Muhammad images\|was overridden in the past by stewards]], for abuse of local flags, so I wouldn't mention it as an example of local practices to avoid overriding. ~~Requests~~ ~~for~~ ~~comment/ace.wikipedia~~ ~~and~~ ~~Prophet~~ ~~Muhammad~~ ~~images~~		:::::ace.wikipedia [[Requests for comment/ace.wikipedia and Prophet Muhammad images\|was overridden in the past by stewards]], for abuse of local flags, so I wouldn't mention it as an example of local practices to avoid overriding. No subdomain is safe haven to national or religious discriminations.
	:::::In general, Meta-Wiki is more permissive than most wikis on many things, but also has precedents of bending to local sensibilities. The most famous example is one deletion request some years ago where the en.wiki community got a Meta-Wiki page deleted as offensive to them (a sysop of theirs), even though the Meta-Wiki community wouldn't normally have deleted such a page. --[[User:Nemo_bis\|Nemo]] 22:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)		:::::In general, Meta-Wiki is more permissive than most wikis on many things, but also has precedents of bending to local sensibilities. The most famous example is one deletion request some years ago where the en.wiki community got a Meta-Wiki page deleted as offensive to them (a sysop of theirs), even though the Meta-Wiki community wouldn't normally have deleted such a page. --[[User:Nemo_bis\|Nemo]] 22:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
	* {{support}} I'd prefer to just have one user page and one user talk as the default. But maybe allow people to create separate ones on separate projects (the different languages being an obvious example). The name resolution would be straightforward if a link to a User or User Talk page occurred on a project, it would first attempt to resolve locally on the project and if not onto the "global" User Wiki. [[User:Kerry Raymond\|Kerry Raymond]] ([[User talk:Kerry Raymond\|talk]]) 22:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)		* {{support}} I'd prefer to just have one user page and one user talk as the default. But maybe allow people to create separate ones on separate projects (the different languages being an obvious example). The name resolution would be straightforward if a link to a User or User Talk page occurred on a project, it would first attempt to resolve locally on the project and if not onto the "global" User Wiki. [[User:Kerry Raymond\|Kerry Raymond]] ([[User talk:Kerry Raymond\|talk]]) 22:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
	* {{support}} I think it is important to centralize the user pages and the user discussions. So I strongly support this proposal. [[User:Stiegenaufgang\|Stiegenaufgang]] ([[User talk:Stiegenaufgang\|talk]]) 16:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)		* {{support}} I think it is important to centralize the user pages and the user discussions. So I strongly support this proposal. [[User:Stiegenaufgang\|Stiegenaufgang]] ([[User talk:Stiegenaufgang\|talk]]) 16:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 20 April 2023
Line 87:		Line 87:
	*{{support}}--Seems to be reasonable one. <font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0em 0em 0.8em,#FF4500 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#90EE90 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#696969"><span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;color:blue"><big>[[User:The Herald\|The Herald]]</big></span></font> 14:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)		*{{support}}--Seems to be reasonable one. <font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0em 0em 0.8em,#FF4500 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#90EE90 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#696969"><span style="font-family:Old English Text MT;color:blue"><big>[[User:The Herald\|The Herald]]</big></span></font> 14:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
	*{{support}}. I support this proposal, I think that advantages are much more than disadvantages or possible complaints. --[[User:Nastoshka\|Nastoshka]] ([[User talk:Nastoshka\|talk]]) 19:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)		*{{support}}. I support this proposal, I think that advantages are much more than disadvantages or possible complaints. --[[User:Nastoshka\|Nastoshka]] ([[User talk:Nastoshka\|talk]]) 19:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
	*nice {{unsigned2\|12:43, 27 April ~~2014‎~~\|Partha jojo}}		*nice {{unsigned2\|12:43, 27 April 2014\|Partha jojo}}
	* {{support}} I support this. It's bothersome to have several talk pages in different wikis. --[[User:Ricky Setiawan\|Ricky Setiawan]] ([[User talk:Ricky Setiawan\|talk]]) 15:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)		* {{support}} I support this. It's bothersome to have several talk pages in different wikis. --[[User:Ricky Setiawan\|Ricky Setiawan]] ([[User talk:Ricky Setiawan\|talk]]) 15:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
	* {{support}} I hope in the future can manage my personal accounts with greater ease and fun. [[User:Wagino 20100516\|Wagino 20100516]] ([[User talk:Wagino 20100516\|talk]]) 05:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)		* {{support}} I hope in the future can manage my personal accounts with greater ease and fun. [[User:Wagino 20100516\|Wagino 20100516]] ([[User talk:Wagino 20100516\|talk]]) 05:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 6 February 2015
Line 99:		Line 99:
	:::::Wow! It only took 9 months to find out who you are referring to. I am aware of this person and that the same question has been asked on their most [[Stewards/Elections_2015/Questions#Cekli829\|recent application to be a steward]]. However, I still fail to see how this relates to this proposal. What part of the proposal says that it involves stewardship? In response to people putting objectionable material on their userpages, I don't see why such pages couldn't be blocked locally if they are contravening local policies. I am perplexed by your assertion about nudity on Acehnese WP, because as far as I can see that "policy" is still only a proposal that hasn't had a single edit in 18 months. If it is a policy then it has not been implemented properly because it is possible to view Commons files locally, and they include nude images. I can't see how Acehnese WP can do this without locally blocking Commons images. Anyway, you need not worry about this proposal, because it appears that elements of the proposal will probably be implemented separately anyway (see the comments by Quiddity below). Furthermore the proposal is going to be merged to Global-wiki sometime soon. '''<span style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">[[User:Green Giant\|<span style="color:#0F0;">Green Giant</span>]] ([[User talk:Green Giant\|<span style="color:#00F;">talk</span>]])</span>''' 19:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)		:::::Wow! It only took 9 months to find out who you are referring to. I am aware of this person and that the same question has been asked on their most [[Stewards/Elections_2015/Questions#Cekli829\|recent application to be a steward]]. However, I still fail to see how this relates to this proposal. What part of the proposal says that it involves stewardship? In response to people putting objectionable material on their userpages, I don't see why such pages couldn't be blocked locally if they are contravening local policies. I am perplexed by your assertion about nudity on Acehnese WP, because as far as I can see that "policy" is still only a proposal that hasn't had a single edit in 18 months. If it is a policy then it has not been implemented properly because it is possible to view Commons files locally, and they include nude images. I can't see how Acehnese WP can do this without locally blocking Commons images. Anyway, you need not worry about this proposal, because it appears that elements of the proposal will probably be implemented separately anyway (see the comments by Quiddity below). Furthermore the proposal is going to be merged to Global-wiki sometime soon. '''<span style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">[[User:Green Giant\|<span style="color:#0F0;">Green Giant</span>]] ([[User talk:Green Giant\|<span style="color:#00F;">talk</span>]])</span>''' 19:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
	::::::Of course it took 9 months because I just saw the change on recent changes (this userwiki pages been dormant for a long time until Base edit it), also "nudity" here is only one such example, other reason : Nationalism, ethnic hatred, forbidden symbol used on userpages, but, be free my son, I don't care anymore, it's funny seeing many user got blocked locally on many wikis anyways.--<font style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #FF0000; color: #ffffff;">[[User:Aldnonymous\|AldNon]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Aldnonymous\|Bicara?]]</sup> 15:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)		::::::Of course it took 9 months because I just saw the change on recent changes (this userwiki pages been dormant for a long time until Base edit it), also "nudity" here is only one such example, other reason : Nationalism, ethnic hatred, forbidden symbol used on userpages, but, be free my son, I don't care anymore, it's funny seeing many user got blocked locally on many wikis anyways.--<font style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #FF0000; color: #ffffff;">[[User:Aldnonymous\|AldNon]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Aldnonymous\|Bicara?]]</sup> 15:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
	:::::ace.wikipedia [[Requests for comment/ace.wikipedia and Prophet Muhammad images\|was overridden in the past by stewards]], for abuse of local flags, so I wouldn't mention it as an example of local practices to avoid overriding. ~~Requests~~ ~~for~~ ~~comment/ace.wikipedia~~ ~~and~~ ~~Prophet~~ ~~Muhammad~~ ~~images~~		:::::ace.wikipedia [[Requests for comment/ace.wikipedia and Prophet Muhammad images\|was overridden in the past by stewards]], for abuse of local flags, so I wouldn't mention it as an example of local practices to avoid overriding. No subdomain is safe haven to national or religious discriminations.
	:::::In general, Meta-Wiki is more permissive than most wikis on many things, but also has precedents of bending to local sensibilities. The most famous example is one deletion request some years ago where the en.wiki community got a Meta-Wiki page deleted as offensive to them (a sysop of theirs), even though the Meta-Wiki community wouldn't normally have deleted such a page. --[[User:Nemo_bis\|Nemo]] 22:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)		:::::In general, Meta-Wiki is more permissive than most wikis on many things, but also has precedents of bending to local sensibilities. The most famous example is one deletion request some years ago where the en.wiki community got a Meta-Wiki page deleted as offensive to them (a sysop of theirs), even though the Meta-Wiki community wouldn't normally have deleted such a page. --[[User:Nemo_bis\|Nemo]] 22:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
	* {{support}} I'd prefer to just have one user page and one user talk as the default. But maybe allow people to create separate ones on separate projects (the different languages being an obvious example). The name resolution would be straightforward if a link to a User or User Talk page occurred on a project, it would first attempt to resolve locally on the project and if not onto the "global" User Wiki. [[User:Kerry Raymond\|Kerry Raymond]] ([[User talk:Kerry Raymond\|talk]]) 22:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)		* {{support}} I'd prefer to just have one user page and one user talk as the default. But maybe allow people to create separate ones on separate projects (the different languages being an obvious example). The name resolution would be straightforward if a link to a User or User Talk page occurred on a project, it would first attempt to resolve locally on the project and if not onto the "global" User Wiki. [[User:Kerry Raymond\|Kerry Raymond]] ([[User talk:Kerry Raymond\|talk]]) 22:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
	* {{support}} I think it is important to centralize the user pages and the user discussions. So I strongly support this proposal. [[User:Stiegenaufgang\|Stiegenaufgang]] ([[User talk:Stiegenaufgang\|talk]]) 16:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)		* {{support}} I think it is important to centralize the user pages and the user discussions. So I strongly support this proposal. [[User:Stiegenaufgang\|Stiegenaufgang]] ([[User talk:Stiegenaufgang\|talk]]) 16:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 26 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Merge\|Global-Wiki}}<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->		{{Merge\|Global-Wiki}}<!-- Enter an overview of the proposed project here -->
	[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:		[[Help:Unified login\|Unified login]] should be expanded by moving all existing user accounts from within wikis to a central '''UserWiki'''. It would involve a significant software change but the benefits would be considerable:
	:*The home wiki userpage would move to become the new '''single userpage''', eliminating the '''hundreds''' of '''[[redlink]]ed''' userpages on other wikis. Userpages would no longer be ''[[en:WP:USERNOCAT\|categorised]]'' in '''articlespace categories''', removing a common bugbear.		:*<s>The home wiki userpage would move to become the new '''single userpage''', eliminating the '''hundreds''' of '''[[redlink]]ed''' userpages on other wikis. Userpages would no longer be ''[[en:WP:USERNOCAT\|categorised]]'' in '''articlespace categories''', removing a common bugbear.</s>
	:*'''One talkpage''', eliminating the need to check and respond on several talkpages. Active talkpages could be gradually archived with notices to redirect to the central talkpage.		:*'''One talkpage''', eliminating the need to check and respond on several talkpages. Active talkpages could be gradually archived with notices to redirect to the central talkpage.
	:*'''One set of preferences''' without having to set them individually on each wiki.		:*<s>'''One set of preferences''' without having to set them individually on each wiki.</s>
	:*'''One watchlist''' to keep an eye on changes in several wikis at once, with an option to filter results by wiki.		:*'''One watchlist''' to keep an eye on changes in several wikis at once, with an option to filter results by wiki.
	:*'''One contributions list''' with an option to filter by wiki.		:*'''One contributions list''' with an option to filter by wiki.
	:*Edits on a particular wiki would still be '''credited''' there but '''reported''' centrally.		:*Edits on a particular wiki would still be '''credited''' there but '''reported''' centrally.
	:*User-related content would be centralised, e.g. '''user categories''', '''guidelines''', '''templates''', '''user boxes''' etc.		:*User-related content would be centralised, e.g. '''user categories''', '''guidelines''', '''templates''', '''user boxes''' etc.
	:*Anti-vandalism work would be enhanced by allowing users to see if content has been '''vandalized''' elsewhere.		:*</s>Anti-vandalism work would be enhanced by allowing users to see if content has been '''vandalized''' elsewhere.</s>
	:*Bring the User Community '''together''' with a central forum to discuss user-related matters.		:*<s>Bring the User Community '''together''' with a central forum to discuss user-related matters.</s>
	:*If a separate userwiki isn't feasible, then all the user accounts could be moved to '''meta-wiki'''?		:*<s>If a separate userwiki isn't feasible, then all the user accounts could be moved to '''meta-wiki'''?</s>

	:*Thank you to User:Quiddity, who has highlighted that some of these features are being developed separately. See [[#Pointers to related efforts]].		:*Thank you to User:Quiddity, who has highlighted that some of these features are being developed separately. See [[#Pointers to related efforts]].