Jump to content

Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Robert McClenon in topic Sockpuppetry
SCP-2000 (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edit by Gnizia (talk) to last revision by SCP-2000
Tag: Rollback
NDG (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by Ahmadsanusiyusuf (talk) to last revision by Tenshi Hinanawi
Tag: Rollback
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 22:31, 18 August 2026

Misrepresentations or disinformation not covered?

I have been dealing with a user who makes personal attacks, but also surely deliberate misrepresentations of my contributions. I notified him of numerous failures to respect the CoC, yet I ended up failing to show clear violations of the CoC for both of these issues, which I consider the gravest. In particular, I am surprised the Code does not explicitly prohibit misrepresentations of actions of colleagues, or at least―more generally―disinformation. Wikipedia does have a guideline against misrepresentation, but for Meta-Wiki behavior, I ended up with nothing stronger/clearer than the last paragraph, which merely invokes section 2 (expectation of collegiality).

Am I missing something, or does the CoC not declare misrepresentation nor disinformation in general as unacceptable? Chealer (talk) 02:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Deimmunization

One problem I've faced is when a user is warned against or prevented from pursuit of a remedy for offensive comments by someone in a position of power. Does this need to be included in a bullet point itself:

  • Endorsing uncivility: Intentionally deterring or stopping another user from dealing with comments they could reasonably perceive as uncivil. We expect that users are able to respond reasonably to comments that they object to and that their concerns are validated if reasonable, particularly by people with community authority because unaddressed uncivil comments may harm the health of the community.

Or is this already implied by the existing points?

Consider these declined and U4C-misinterpreted cases:

Faster than Thunder (talk) 00:55, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry

I have a question. Where in the Universal Code of Conduct is sockpuppetry forbidden? I see sections forbidding harassment and content vandalism. Sockpuppetry isn't either harassment or vandalism, although sockpuppets are often used to harass or vandalize. Have I missed something, or is there another code, or is sockpuppetry only forbidden in all of the local projects? Robert McClenon (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply