<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Spafky</id>
	<title>Wikiquote - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Spafky"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Spafky"/>
	<updated>2026-08-23T02:35:05Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.16</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=User:Spafky&amp;diff=3160994</id>
		<title>User:Spafky</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=User:Spafky&amp;diff=3160994"/>
		<updated>2022-09-02T18:29:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Francisco de Goya y Lucientes - Saturn Devouring One of his Children - WGA10109.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt;II.IX.MMXXII&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;MEMENTO MORI&amp;lt;/h1&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Work&amp;diff=3153484</id>
		<title>Work</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Work&amp;diff=3153484"/>
		<updated>2022-08-11T07:14:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* K */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Lewis Hine Power house mechanic working on steam pump.jpg|thumb|Work that is pure toil, done solely for the sake of the [[money]] it earns, is also sheer drudgery because it is stultifying rather than self improving. ~ [[Mortimer Adler]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Parc de Versailles, Rond-Point des Philosophes, Apollonius, Barthélemy de Mélo inv1850n°9449 02.jpg|thumb|[[Plato]] said that virtue has no master. If a person does not honor this principle and rejoice in it, but is purchasable for money, he creates many masters for himself. ~ [[Apollonius of Tyana]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;{{w|Work}}&#039;&#039;&#039; or labor is intentional activity people perform to support themselves, others, or the needs and wants of a wider community.  Work is fundamental to all societies, but can vary widely within and between them, from gathering in natural resources by hand, to operating complex technologies that substitute for physical or even mental effort by many human beings. &#039;&#039;&#039;{{w|Labor}}&#039;&#039;&#039; is [[effort]] expended on a [[task]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha|&#039;&#039;[[#Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations|Hoyt&#039;s&amp;amp;nbsp;New&amp;amp;nbsp;Cyclopedia&amp;amp;nbsp;Of&amp;amp;nbsp;Practical&amp;amp;nbsp;Quotations]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations (1989)|Respectfully&amp;amp;nbsp;Quoted]]&#039;&#039;}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quotes=&lt;br /&gt;
==A==&lt;br /&gt;
* No single event has influenced the history of labor in Illinois, the United States, and even the world, more than the Chicago Haymarket Affair. It began with a rally on May 4, 1886, but the consequences are still being felt today. Although the rally is included in American history textbooks, very few present the event accurately or point out its significance.&lt;br /&gt;
** William J. Adelman &amp;quot;The Haymarket Affair&amp;quot;. illinoislaborhistory.org. Retrieved March 19, 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Work that is pure toil, done solely for the sake of the money it earns, is also sheer drudgery because it is stultifying rather than self improving.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mortimer Adler]], &#039;&#039;A Vision of the Future : Twelve Ideas for a Better Life and a Better Society&#039;&#039; (1984).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Since the heart is an accumulator and transmuter of various energies, there must be more favorable conditions for arousing and attracting these energies. The most fundamental condition is work, mental as well as physical. In the motion of work, energies are gathered from space; but one must understand work as a natural process that enriches life. Thus, every kind of work is a [[Blessings|blessing]], while the vagaries of [[Idleness|inaction]] are extremely harmful in a cosmic sense. Love for the endlessness of labor is in itself an initiation of considerable degree; it prepares you for the conquest of [[time]]. Being in a condition where you have conquered [[time]] guarantees you a place in the Subtle World, where work is an unavoidable condition, just as it is in the body. A complaint about having to work can only come from a slave of the body.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]], &#039;&#039;Heart&#039;&#039;, 79. (1932)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t want to achieve immortality through my work... I want to achieve immortality through not dying.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Silent Strength&#039;&#039; (1990) by Lloyd John Ogilvie, p. 111.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Zeal is proper for a task, time-wasting is taboo; anyone who wastes time on his task is neglecting his task.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anonymous]], &#039;&#039;[http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/section5/tr513.htm The advice of a supervisor to a younger scribe]&#039;&#039; ({{w|Eduba}} C), late third or early second millennium BCE, at {{w|The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The land of easy mathematics where he who works adds up and he who retires subtracts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Núria Añó]], in the short story &#039;&#039;2066. Beginning the age of correction&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not demand equal pay for any women save those who do equal work in value. Scorn to be coddled by your employers; make them understand that you are in their service as workers, not as women.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Susan B. Anthony]], &#039;&#039;The Revolution&#039;&#039;, Women&#039;s Suffrage Newspaper (Oct. 8, 1868)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Plato]] said that [[virtue]] has no master. If a person does not honor this principle and rejoice in it, but is purchasable for money, he creates many masters for himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Apollonius of Tyana]], letter to Euphrates, &#039;&#039;Epp. Apoll.&#039;&#039; 15&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Our characters are the result of our conduct.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aristotle]], &#039;&#039;Nicomachean Ethics&#039;&#039;,  Book 3, chapter 5, section 12 (c. 335 BC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==B==&lt;br /&gt;
* And the one carried in the current said, &amp;quot;I am no more messiah than you. The river delights to lift us free, if only we dare let go. &#039;&#039;&#039;Our true work is this voyage, this adventure.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Bach]], &#039;&#039;Illusions : The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah&#039;&#039; (1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The more I want to get something done, the less I call it work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Bach]], &#039;&#039;Illusions : The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah&#039;&#039; (1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it true.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;You may have to work for it, however.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Bach]], &#039;&#039;Illusions : The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah&#039;&#039; (1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a strange desire which men have, to seek power and lose liberty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Ornamenta Rationalia&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure not the work &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Until the day&#039;s out and the labour done, &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Then bring your gauges.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1857), Book V.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. M. Barrie]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The new dictionary of thoughts: a Cyclopedia of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1930) edited by [[Tryon Edwards]], C. N. Catrevas, Jonathan Edwards, and Ralph Emerson Browns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ninety-five percent of all jobs suck, Jones. That’s why people get paid to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Barry]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Company (novel)|Company]]&#039;&#039; (2006), {{ISBN|0-385-51439-5}}, p. 112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There’s no requirement that jobs be meaningful, Jones. If there was, half the country would be unemployed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Barry]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Company (novel)|Company]]&#039;&#039; (2006), {{ISBN|0-385-51439-5}}, p. 334&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Unless we abandon the work ethic of [[the past|another era]], ... lives may be wasted because of blind insistence that everyone must have a &amp;quot;job&amp;quot; even if the job is useless.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Pierre Berton|Pierre Berton]], &#039;&#039;The Smug Minority&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;You&#039;ve achieved success in your field when you don&#039;t know whether what you&#039;re doing is work or play.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Warren Beatty}}, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Best Liberal Quotes Ever : Why The Left Is Right&#039;&#039; (2004) by William Martin, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is healthy, you can hardly put more upon a man than he can bear. It is not work that kills men; it is worry. Worry is rust upon the blade.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ward Beecher]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Teachers&#039; Institute&#039;&#039;, Vol. 18, No. 1 (September 1895), p. 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When God wanted sponges and oysters, He made them and put one on a rock and the other in the mud. When He made man, He did not make him to be a sponge or an oyster; He made him with feet and hands, and head and heart, and vital blood, and a place to use them, and He said to him, Go Work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ward Beecher]], &#039;&#039;Royal Truths&#039;&#039; (1862), p. 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*LABOR, &#039;&#039;n.&#039;&#039; One of the processes by which A acquires property for B.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ambrose Bierce]], [https://books.google.com/books?id=CboOAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA213 &#039;&#039;The Cynic&#039;s Word Book&#039;&#039;] (1906); republished as &#039;&#039;The Devil&#039;s Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1911).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No one should ever work. &#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world. Almost all the evil you&#039;d care to name comes from working or from living in a world designed for work. &#039;&#039;&#039;In order to stop suffering, we have to stop working.&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; That doesn&#039;t mean we have to stop doing things. It does mean creating a new way of life based on play; in other words, a &#039;&#039;ludic&#039;&#039; revolution. By &amp;quot;play&amp;quot; I mean also festivity, creativity, conviviality, commensality, and maybe even art. There is more to play than child&#039;s play, as worthy as that is. I call for a collective adventure in generalized joy and freely interdependent exuberance. Play isn&#039;t passive.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bob Black]], &#039;&#039;The Abolition of Work&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wealth is the offspring of intelligence and of work, the soul and the life of humanity. But these two forces can act only with the help of a passive element, the soil, which they make productive by their combined efforts.It would seem, therefore, that this indispensable instrument should belong to all men.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Louis Blanc|Louis Blanc]], &amp;quot;The Man Who Makes the Soup Should Get to Eat It&amp;quot;, (1834).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Striving for success without hard work is like trying to harvest where you haven&#039;t planted.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:David Bly|David Bly]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Peace of Mind : Daily Meditations for Easing Stress&#039;&#039; (1995) by Amy Dean, p. 187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The reign of capital, which denies our very existence as human beings and reduces us to ‘things’, seems very serious, methodical and disciplined. But its possessive paroxysm, its ethical rigour, its obsession with ‘doing’ all hide a great illusion: the total emptiness of the commodity spectacle, the uselessness of indefinite accumulation and the absurdity of [[exploitation]]. So the great seriousness of the world of work and productivity hides a total lack of seriousness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfredo M. Bonanno]], &#039;&#039;Armed Joy&#039;&#039; (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work to me is a sacred thing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Margaret Bourke-White|Margaret Bourke-White]], &#039;&#039;Portrait of Myself&#039;&#039; (1963), Ch. 30.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers at the University of Oxford [recently] published the results of a survey of the world’s best artificial intelligence experts, who predicted that there was a 50 percent chance of AI outperforming humans in all tasks within 45 years...the immediate concern for most people is that they will be losing their jobs... That helps explain the recent interest in a [[universal basic income|universal basic income (UBI)]] – a sum of money distributed equally to everyone.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ellen Brown]] in [https://www.globalresearch.ca/how-to-fund-a-universal-basic-income-without-increasing-taxes-or-inflation/5611947 How to Fund a Universal Basic Income Without Increasing Taxes or Inflation, Global Research&#039;&#039;] (4 October 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By the way,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The works of women are symbolical.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We sew, sew, prick our ringers, dull our sight,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Producing what? A pair of slippers, sir,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To put on when you&#039;re weary—or a stool&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To tumble over and vex you  *  *  *  curse that stool!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Or else at best, a cushion where you lean&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And sleep, and dream of something we are not,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But would be for your sake. Alas, alas!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This hurts most, this  *  *  *  that, after all, we are paid&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The worth of our work, perhaps.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1856), Book I, line 465.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get leave to work&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In this world,—&#039;tis the best you get at all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1856), Book III, line 164.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let no one till his death&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Be called unhappy. Measure not the work&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Until the day&#039;s out and the labour done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1856), Book V, line 78.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Free men freely work:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Whoever fears God, fears to sit at ease.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1856), Book VIII, line 784.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we see a great man desiring power instead of his real goal we soon recognize that he is sick, or more precisely that his attitude to his work is sick. He overreaches himself, the work denies itself to him, the incarnation of the spirit no longer takes place, and to avoid the threat of senselessness he snatches after empty power. This sickness casts the genius on to the same level as those hysterical figures who, being by nature without power, slave for power, in order that they may enjoy the illusion that they are inwardly powerful, and who in this striving for power cannot let a pause intervene, since a pause would bring with it the possibility of self-reflection and self-reflection would bring collapse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;Between Man and Man&#039;&#039; (1965), p. 151.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* … productivity gains frequently cause upheaval: Both [[capital]] and labor can pay a terrible price when innovation or new efficiencies upend their worlds.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We need shed no tears for the capitalists (whether they be private owners or an army of public shareholders). It’s their job to take care of themselves. ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A long-employed worker faces a different equation. When innovation and the market system interact to produce efficiencies, many workers may be rendered unnecessary, their talents obsolete. Some can find decent employment elsewhere; for others, that is not an option.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;…&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The answer in such disruptions is not the restraining or outlawing of actions that increase productivity. Americans would not be living nearly as well as we do if we had mandated that 11 million people should forever be employed in farming.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The solution, rather, is a variety of safety nets aimed at providing a decent life for those who are willing to work but find their specific talents judged of small value because of market forces. (I personally favor a reformed and expanded Earned Income Tax Credit that would try to make sure America works for those willing to work.) The price of achieving ever-increasing prosperity for the great majority of Americans should not be penury for the unfortunate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Warren Buffett]], {{cite web|title=Chairman&#039;s Letter - 2015|website=Berkshire Hathaway|date=February 27, 2016|url=https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2015ltr.pdf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How in the hell could a man enjoy being awakened at 6:30 a.m. by an alarm clock, leap out of bed, dress, force-feed, shit, piss, brush teeth and hair, and fight traffic to get to a place where essentially you made lots of money for somebody else and were asked to be grateful for the opportunity to do so?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Bukowski]], &#039;&#039;Factotum&#039;&#039; (1975).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Any damn fool can beg up some kind of job; it takes a wise man to make it without working.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Bukowski]], &#039;&#039;Post Office&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And still be doing, never done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (poet)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;Hudibras&#039;&#039;, Part I (1663-64), Canto I, line 204.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Such hath it been—shall be—beneath the sun&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The many still must labour for the one.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;The Corsair&#039;&#039; (1814), Canto I, Stanza 8.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Productivity and wages in the United States.svg|right|thumb|Workers, the most absolutely necessary part of the whole social structure, without whose services none can either eat, or clothe, or shelter himself, are just the ones who get the least to eat, to wear, and to be housed withal — to say nothing of their share of the other social benefits which the rest of us are supposed to furnish, such as education and artistic gratification. ~ [[Voltairine de Cleyre]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ccoolidge.jpeg|right|thumb|Do the day&#039;s work. If it be to protect the rights of the weak, whoever objects, do it. If it be to help a powerful corporation better to serve the people, whatever the opposition, do that. Expect to be called a stand-patter, but don&#039;t be a stand-patter. Expect to be called a demagogue, but don&#039;t be a demagogue. Don&#039;t hesitate to be as revolutionary as science. Don&#039;t hesitate to be as reactionary as the multiplication table. Don&#039;t expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. Don&#039;t hurry to legislate. Give administration a chance to catch up with legislation. ~ [[Calvin Coolidge]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Auschwitz entrance.JPG|thumb|Work makes one free. ~ [[w:Lorenz Diefenbach|Lorenz Diefenbach]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Edison-at home in Ft. Myers Florida 1914 detail LC-LC-USZ62-131044, adjusted.jpg|thumb|Being busy does not always mean real work. The object of all work is production or accomplishment and to either of these ends there must be forethought, system, planning, intelligence, and honest purpose, as well as perspiration. Seeming to do is not doing. ~ [[Thomas Edison]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Einstein gyro gravity probe b.jpg|thumb|Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom. ~ [[Albert Einstein]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Einstein 1921 by F Schmutzer - restoration.jpg|thumb|If A equals success, then the formula is: A equals X plus Y plus Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut. ~ [[Albert Einstein]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Caspar David Friedrich - Wanderer above the sea of fog.jpg|thumb|The reward of a thing well done, is to have done it. ~ [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Friedrich Engels.jpg|thumb|The only difference as compared with the old, outspoken slavery is this, that the worker of today seems to be free because he is not sold once for all, but piecemeal by the day, the week, the year, and because no one owner sells him to another, but he is forced to sell himself in this way instead, being the slave of no particular person, but of the whole property-holding class. ~ [[Friedrich Engels]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki Israel 3290 Picking Cotton.jpg|thumb|Men work together, wether they work together or apart. ~ [[Robert Frost]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ansel Adams - Farm workers and Mt. Williamson.jpg|thumb|The world is full of willing people, some willing to work, the rest willing to let them. ~ [[Robert Frost]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein - Goethe in der roemischen Campagna.jpg|thumb|right|A man who works at another’s will, not for his own [[passion]] or his own [[need]], but for [[money]] or [[honor]], is always a [[fool]]. ~ [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:António Guterres 2012.jpg|thumb|The very nature of work will [[change]]. The governments may have to consider stronger social safety nets, and eventually [[Basic income|universal basic income.]] ~ [[António Guterres]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Da Vinci Vitruve Luc Viatour.jpg |thumb|One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man. ~ [[Elbert Hubbard]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kierkegaard 1902 by Luplau Janssen.jpg|thumb|To work for a living certainly cannot be the meaning of life, since it is indeed a contradiction that the continual production of the conditions is supposed to be the answer to the question of the meaning of that which is conditional upon their production. ~ [[Søren Kierkegaard]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==C==&lt;br /&gt;
* Work — other people&#039;s work — is an intolerable idea to a cat. Can you picture cats herding sheep or agreeing to pull a cart? They will not inconvenience themselves to the slightest degree.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Louis J. Camuti}}, as quoted in &#039;&#039;On the Art of Business&#039;&#039; (2004) by James H Merkel and Abdul Wahad Al-Falaij, p. 257.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is the grand cure of all the maladies and miseries that ever beset mankind — honest work, which you intend getting done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;On the Choice of Books : The Inaugural Address of Thomas Carlyle, Lord Rector of the University of Edinburgh&#039;&#039; (1866).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There&#039;s a time when you have to separate yourself from what other people expect of you, and do what you love. Because if you find yourself 50 years old and you aren&#039;t doing what you love, then what&#039;s the point?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jim Carrey]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;A Touch of Class&#039;&#039; (2003) by Carol Vanderheyden, p. 70.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every one is the son of his own works.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039; (1605-15), Part I, Book IV, Chapter XX.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is discovered to be the grand conqueror, enriching and building up nations more surely than the proudest battles.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], &#039;&#039;War&#039;&#039; (1816).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A rational, moral being cannot, without infinite wrong, be converted into a mere instrument of others’ gratification. He is necessarily an end, not a means. A mind, in which are sown the seeds of wisdom, disinterestedness, firmness of purpose, and piety, is worth more than all the outward material interests of a world. It exists for itself, for its own perfection, and must not be enslaved to its own or others’ animal wants.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Self-Culture” (1838)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The consistent [[anarchist]], then, should be a socialist, but a socialist of a particular sort. He will not only oppose alienated and specialized labor and look forward to the appropriation of [[capital]] by the whole body of workers, but he will also insist that this appropriation be direct, not exercised by some elite force acting in the name of the proletariat.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], &#039;&#039;Notes On Anarchism&#039;&#039; (1970).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Remember, work, well done, does good to the man who does it. It makes him a better man.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|George S. Clason}}, &#039;&#039;The Richest Man in Babylon&#039;&#039; (1930).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is the Rent we pay for our time on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Tubby Clayton}}, Anglican clergyman, as quoted by [[David Frost]] in an interview in &#039;&#039;Saga&#039;&#039; magazine (January 2009).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Workers, the most absolutely necessary part of the whole social structure, without whose services none can either eat, or clothe, or shelter himself, are just the ones who get the least to eat, to wear, and to be housed withal — to say nothing of their share of the other social benefits which the rest of us are supposed to furnish, such as education and artistic gratification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Voltairine de Cleyre]], &amp;quot;Direct Action&amp;quot; (1912), in &#039;&#039;Exquisite Rebel: The Essays of Voltairine de Cleyre -- Anarchist, Feminist, Genius&#039;&#039;, SUNY Press, 10 February 2005, p. [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=z82d_8aEI4oC&amp;amp;pg=PA280 280].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you work hard, you do your part, you should be able to give your children all the opportunities they deserve. That is the basic bargain of America.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hillary Clinton]], speech in {{w|Warren, Michigan}}. Transcript by &#039;&#039;{{w|Newsweek}}&#039;&#039; [http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-full-transcript-economic-speech-489602] (August 11, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that every employee, from the CEO suite to the factory floor, contributes to a business’ success, so everybody should share in the rewards – especially those putting in long hours for little pay.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hillary Clinton]], speech in {{w|Warren, Michigan}}. Transcript by &#039;&#039;{{w|Newsweek}}&#039;&#039; [http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-full-transcript-economic-speech-489602] (August 11, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==D==&lt;br /&gt;
* Though thousands of people indulge themselves in it regularly, and even develop a taste for it, there is no doubt in my mind (and that of scientists whom I employ to prove it) that Work is a dangerous and destructive drug, and should be called by its right name, which is Fatigue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robertson Davies|Robertson Davies]], &#039;&#039;The Diary of Samuel Marchbanks&#039;&#039; (1947).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I spent a busy day today, but got little done. This is because I am at last becoming perfect in the art of seeming busy, even when very little is going on in my head or under my hands. This is an art which every man learns, if he does not intend to work himself to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robertson Davies|Robertson Davies]], &#039;&#039;The Table Talk of Samuel Marchbanks&#039;&#039; (1949).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To fulfill a dream, to be allowed to sweat over lonely labor, to be given a chance to create, is the meat and potatoes of life. The money is the gravy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bette Davis]], &#039;&#039;The Lonely Life : An Autobiography&#039;&#039; (1962).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attempt the impossible in order to improve your work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bette Davis]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Quotable Woman, 1800-1975&#039;&#039; (1977) by Elaine Partnow, p. 315.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Working class in the United States|Workingmen]] of the country ... toil for a pittance at the pleasure of their masters and are bludgeoned, jailed or shot when they protest — this is the central, controlling, vital issue of the hour, and neither of the [[Two-party system|old party]] platforms has a word or even a hint about it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eugene V. Debs]], &amp;quot;Outlook for Socialism in the United States&amp;quot; (1900)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[w:Arbeit macht frei|Arbeit macht frei]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Work makes (one) free.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** Title of a 1873 novel by [[w:Lorenz Diefenbach|Lorenz Diefenbach]], which became an infamous slogan above the gates of several Nazi concentration camps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The phrase &amp;quot;work-life balance&amp;quot; tells us that people think that work is the opposite of life. We should be talking about life-life balance.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Patrick Dixon]], &#039;&#039;Building a Better Business&#039;&#039; (2005) p. 182.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==E==&lt;br /&gt;
* All things are full of labour; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ecclesiastes]] 1:8, [[King James Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For what profit comes to mortals from all the toil and anxiety of heart with which they toil under the sun? Every day sorrow and grief are their occupation; even at night their hearts are not at rest. This also is vanity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ecclesiastes]] 2:22-23 (New American Bible Revised Edition)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The grinders cease because they are few.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ecclesiastes]] 12:3, [[New International Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;An Enemy Called Average&#039;&#039; (1990) by John L. Mason, p. 55.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Being busy does not always mean real work.&#039;&#039;&#039; The object of all work is production or accomplishment and to either of these ends there must be forethought, system, planning, intelligence, and honest purpose, as well as perspiration. &#039;&#039;&#039;Seeming to do is not doing.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Ford Times&#039;&#039;, Vol. 6, (1912), p. 136.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I owe my success to the fact that I never had a clock in my workroom. Seventy-five of us worked twenty hours every day and slept only four hours — and thrived on it. An hardwork can make you to have a successfull future.There can be many fails maybe in our life but have to ready to face it for a hardworked work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], diary entry quoted in &#039;&#039;Defending and Parenting Children Who Learn Differently : Lessons from Edison&#039;s Mother&#039;&#039; (2007) by Scott Teel, p. 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When modern men and women insist that they feel completely free in their work, they are in a sense telling the truth, for the triumph of conformity lies in the crushing of all resistance, all experience of conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Edwards]], &#039;&#039;Burning All Illusions&#039;&#039; (Boston: 1996), p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every individual should have the opportunity to develop the gifts which may be latent in him. Alone in that way can the individual obtain the satisfaction to which he is justly entitled; and alone in that way can the community achieve its richest flowering. For everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Educational Trends : Journal of Research and Interpretation&#039;&#039; (June 1936), p. 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If A equals success, then the formula is: A equals X plus Y plus Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Kiplinger&#039;s Personal Finance&#039;&#039;, Vol. 11, No. 7 (July 1957), p. 48&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The reward of a thing well done, is to have done it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &amp;quot;Nominalist and Realist&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Essays: Second Series&#039;&#039; (1844).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The only difference as compared with the old, outspoken slavery is this, that the worker of today seems to be free because he is not sold once for all, but piecemeal by the day, the week, the year, and because no one owner sells him to another, but he is forced to sell himself in this way instead, being the slave of no particular person, but of the whole property-holding class.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &#039;&#039;{{w|The Condition of the Working Class in England}}&#039;&#039; (1845)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There have always been poor and working classes; and the working class have mostly been poor. But there have not always been workers and poor people living under conditions as they are today.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &#039;&#039;{{w|Principles of Communism}}&#039;&#039; (1847)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The capitalists soon had everything in their hands and nothing remained to the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &#039;&#039;{{w|Principles of Communism}}&#039;&#039; (1847)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The costs of production of labor consist of precisely the quantity of means of subsistence necessary to enable the worker to continue working, and to prevent the working class from dying out. The worker will therefore get no more for his labor than is necessary for this purpose; the price of labor, or the wage, will, in other words, be the lowest, the minimum, required for the maintenance of life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &#039;&#039;{{w|Principles of Communism}}&#039;&#039; (1847)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Personally, I have nothing against work, particularly when performed, quietly and unobtrusively, by someone else. I just don&#039;t happen to think it&#039;s an appropriate subject for an &amp;quot;ethic.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Barbara Ehrenreich]], &amp;quot;Goodbye to the Work Ethic&amp;quot; (1988), in &#039;&#039;The Worst Years of Our Lives: Irreverent Notes from a Decade of Greed&#039;&#039; (1991).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He who understands the limits of life knows how easy it is to procure enough to remove the pain of want and make the whole life complete and perfect. Hence he has no longer any need of things which are not to be won save by labor and conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Epicurus]], “Principal Doctrines,” 21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F==&lt;br /&gt;
* Every employee in an undertaking, then, takes a larger or smaller share in the work of administration, and has, therefore, to use and display his administrative faculties. This is why we often see men, who are specially gifted, gradually rise from the lowest to the highest level of the industrial hierarchy, although they have only had an elementary education. But young men, who begin practical work as engineers soon after leaving industrial schools, are in a particularly good position both for learning administration and for showing their ability in this direction, for in administration, as in all other branches of industrial activity, a man’s work is judged by its results.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henri Fayol]], (1900) &#039;&#039;Henri Fayol addressed his colleagues in the mineral industry 23 June 1900&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea that to make a man work you&#039;ve got to hold gold in front of his eyes is a growth, not an axiom. We&#039;ve done that for so long that we&#039;ve forgotten there&#039;s any other way.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[F. Scott Fitzgerald]], &amp;quot;Amory Blaine&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;This Side of Paradise&#039;&#039; (1920) Bk. 2, Ch. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It&#039;s a living.&lt;br /&gt;
** Animals, [[The Flintstones]], created by William Hanna and Joseph Barbera&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Peacefulness to be found in writing. Why do I not write every day? Partly because I feel I ought to write well and know I can&#039;t. But that is not a good enough reason for not writing, if it gains me poise &amp;amp; peace.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[E. M. Forster]], &#039;&#039;Commonplace Book&#039;&#039;, p. 219 (1960).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I urge you to work together in promoting a [[true]], worldwide [[ethical]] mobilization which, beyond [[all]] differences of [[religious]] or [[political]] convictions, will spread and put into practice a shared [[ideal]] of fraternity and solidarity, especially with regard to the poorest and those most excluded.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Francis]], as quoted in an [http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2014/may/documents/papa-francesco_20140509_consiglio-nazioni-unite.html address to the UN system chief executives board for coordination, Consistory Hall (9 May 2014)].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People have been known to achieve more as a result of working with others than against them.&lt;br /&gt;
** Allan Fromme, as quoted in [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE0DB1538F931A35751C0A9659C8B63 &amp;quot;Allan Fromme, Psychologist And Writer, 87&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (2 February 2003) ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “&#039;&#039;&#039;Men work together&#039;&#039;&#039;,” I told him from the [[heart]], &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; “&#039;&#039;&#039;Whether they work together or apart.&#039;&#039;&#039;”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Frost]], [http://www.sparknotes.com/poetry/frost/section2.rhtml The Tuft of Flowers] (1915)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The world is full of willing people, some willing to work, the rest willing to let them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Frost]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Speaker&#039;s Treasury of Wit and Wisdom&#039;&#039; (1958) edited by Herbert Victor Prochnow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==G==&lt;br /&gt;
* I need to wake out of my stupor and begin work. ...my body stands frozen in a snow packed tundra waiting for rescue. It may take a few days before that happens, since my mind is on vacation in Alberta right now.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Scott Gallegos]], &amp;quot;Alligator&amp;quot; (Nov 5, 2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;My grandfather once told me that there were two kinds of people: those who do the work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was much less competition.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Indira Gandhi]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Taking Charge : Every Woman&#039;s Action Guide to Personal, Political and Professional Success&#039;&#039; (1996) by Joan Steinau Lester, p. 76.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[God]] designed man for work--work for his own sustenance; he who does not work shall not eat.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Genesis Rabbah}} 14&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For as labor cannot produce without the use of land, the denial of the equal right to the use of land is necessarily the denial of the right of labor to its own produce.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry George]], &#039;&#039;Progress and Poverty&#039;&#039; (1879), Book VII, Ch. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ein Mensch, der um anderer willen, ohne dass es seine eigene Leidenschaft, sein eigenes Bedürfnis ist, sich um Geld oder Ehre oder sonst etwas abarbeitet, ist immer ein Tor&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A man who works at another’s will, not for his own passion or his own need, but for money or honor, is always a [[fool]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], &#039;&#039;Die Leiden des Jungen Werthers&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;The Sorrows of Young Werther&#039;&#039;), p. 46&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Insofar as our culture conventionally construes technical, scientific, and professional roles as those that obligate men to ignore all but the technical implications of their work, the very social structure itself is inherently [[pathogenic]]. The social function of such a segmented role structure is akin to that of the  [[Unconscious|reflexive]]  [[obedience]] induced by [[military]] training. The function of such a technical role structure, as of military discipline, is to [[Eliminate|sever]] the normal [[Morality|moral sensibilities]] and [[responsibilities]] of civilians and soldiers and to enable them to be used as [[Zombies|deployables]], willing to pursue practically any objective. In the last analysis, such arrangements produce an unthinking readiness to [[kill]] or to hurt others - or to produce things that do so - on order.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alvin Ward Gouldner]], &#039;&#039;The Coming Crisis in Sociology&#039;&#039; (1970), p. 13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing is more laborious for you than not to labor at all&amp;amp;mdash;in other words, to despise everything that gives rise to our labors, which means all that is subject to [[change]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Guigo I]], &#039;&#039;The Meditations of Guigo I, Prior of the Charterhouse&#039;&#039;, as translated by A. Gordon Mursell (1995), #50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The very nature of work will [[change]]. The governments may have to consider stronger social safety nets, and eventually [[universal basic income]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[António Guterres]], [http://webtv.un.org/watch/secretary-general-addresses-general-debate-73rd-session/5839802857001/ &#039;&#039;Secretary-General Addresses General Debate, 73rd Session&#039;&#039;] of the General Assembly of the UN, 15:25, (25 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H==&lt;br /&gt;
* If one man has a dollar he didn&#039;t work for, some other man worked for a dollar he didn&#039;t get.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Haywood]], &#039;&#039;Roughneck, The Life and Times of Big Bill Haywood&#039;&#039; (1983) by Peter Carlson, p. 146&lt;br /&gt;
** Paraphrased variant: For every man who gets a dollar he didn&#039;t sweat for, someone else sweated to produce a dollar he never received.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark this well, you proud men of action: You are nothing but the unwitting agents of the men of thought who often, in quiet self-effacement, mark out most exactly all your doings in advance.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heinrich Heine]], &#039;&#039;History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany&#039;&#039;, Vol. III (1834).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One of the curious features of [[Impressionism]]... was the casualness of their work. ...[T]he painters gave the impression of hastily concocted canvases... more... inspiration than... patient labor. The effortless stroke of genius became a leading measure of artistic quality, partly because it denied mere &amp;quot;work.&amp;quot; ...&amp;quot;Art for art&#039;s sake&amp;quot; was an invention of the [[Romanticism|romantic]] era in France. ...They looked towards a mythical past in which the &amp;quot;natural&amp;quot; person could cultivate self-expression, free of the claims of social utility. This fantasized past... had an anti-industrial character. ...Work was despised because the growing industrial revolution was separating it from inventiveness, originality, and individualism. ...The inventiveness and spontaneity that independent artists sought were... opposed to industrial work,... products (with which they associated academic art) and for many... cities... Women and men held parasols and croquet mallets, not sickles and hoes, and dahlias were more attractive than cabbages. (It is true that Pissarro retained much of the outlook of Barbizon artists...) The work ethic implicit in [[Barbizon school|Barbizon]] art... was done away with by the impressionists. The suburb and the coastal resort, not the farm, is the landscape of [[Berthe Morisot|Morisot]], [[Pierre-Auguste Renoir|Renoir]], [[Édouard Manet|Manet]], and [[Claude Monet|Monet]]. ...The Impressionists ...joined other middle-class vacationers (except for [[Paul Cézanne|Cézanne]] and [[Camille Pissarro|Pissarro]], so little in sympathy with Parisian society).&lt;br /&gt;
** Robert L. Herbert, &#039;&#039;Impressionism: Art, Leisure, and Parisian Society&#039;&#039; (1988) p. 304-306.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If little labour, little are our gaines: &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Man&#039;s fortunes are according to his paines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Herrick]], &#039;&#039;Hesperides&#039;&#039; (1648), &amp;quot;No Paines, No Gaines&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The economic system denies the right of the sincerest and most sympathetic to keep their hands out of the blood of their brothers. We may not go to our rest at night, or waken to our work in the morning, without bearing the burden of the communal guilt; without being ourselves creators and causes of the wrongs we seek to bear away. At every step, when we would do good, evil is present with us, and exacts its tribute from the very citadel of the soul. ... If we stay at our posts, in order that we may [[change]] the system, we are on the backs of our brothers; if we desert our posts, in order that we may get off our brothers&#039; backs, we take bread from their mouths, from the mouths of their children, and add to the army of the workless and hopeless.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George D. Herron]], &#039;&#039;Between Caesar and Jesus&#039;&#039; (1899) pp. 24-25&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hillel the Elder|Hillel]] stood in the gate of Jerusalem one day and saw the people on their way to work. &amp;quot;How much,&amp;quot;​ he asked, &amp;quot;will you earn today?&amp;quot;​ One said: &amp;quot;A {{w|denarius}}&amp;quot;​; the second: &amp;quot;Two denarii&amp;quot;​ &amp;quot;What will you do with the money?&amp;quot;​ he inquired. &amp;quot;We will provide for the necessities of life.&amp;quot;​ Then he said to them: &amp;quot;Would you not rather come and make the Torah your possession, that you may possess both this world and the world to come?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;The Jewish Encyclopedia&#039;&#039;, Volume 6, p. 399&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our fruitless labours mourn, &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; And only rich in barren fame return.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;Odyssey&#039;&#039; (c. 7th century BC); tr. [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;[[The Odyssey of Homer (Alexander Pope)|The Odyssey of Homer]]&#039;&#039; (1725), Book X, line 46.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To labour is the lot of man below; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; And when Jove gave us life, he gave us woe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;Iliad&#039;&#039; (c. 7th century BC); tr. [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;[[The Iliad of Homer (Alexander Pope)|The Iliad of Homer]]&#039;&#039; (1715–1720), Book X, Line 78.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that the best way to prepare for a Future Life is to be kind, live one day at a time, and do the work you can do best, doing it as well as you can.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &amp;quot;Credo&amp;quot;, as published in &#039;&#039;A Message to Garcia, and Thirteen Other Things&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &#039;&#039;A Thousand and One Epigrams&#039;&#039; (1911).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you want work well done, select a busy man ‚ the other kind has no time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &#039;&#039;The Note Book&#039;&#039; (1927).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The highest reward that God gives us for good work, is the ability to do better work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &#039;&#039;The Note Book of Elbert Hubbard&#039;&#039; (1927), p. 125.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I==&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;ve had the best possible chance of learning that what the working-classes really need is to be allowed some part in the direction of public affairs, Doctor—to develop their abilities, their understanding and their self-respect.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henrik Ibsen]], &#039;&#039;An Enemy of the People&#039;&#039;, English adaptation by Max Faber (1970), act II, p. 28. Mr. Hovstad is speaking.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Morocco Africa Flickr Rosino December 2005 83965745.jpg|thumb|A master in the art of living draws no sharp distinction between his work and his play; his labor and his leisure; his mind and his body; his education and his recreation. He hardly knows which is which. He simply pursues his vision of excellence through whatever he is doing, and leaves others to determine whether he is working or playing. To himself, he always appears to be doing both. ~ [[L. P. Jacks]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==J==&lt;br /&gt;
* The philosopher bent on the enlargement of experience perceives at once that his work cannot be done, cannot even be commenced, until he has cleared away the heaps of verbal detritus under which the bedrocks of experience lie buried.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[L. P. Jacks]], &#039;&#039;The Usurpation Of Language&#039;&#039; (1910).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are the children of an age which spends the best energies of its life in the discussion of life, in an atmosphere of deferred fulfillment, continually postponing the act of living to the work of mentally preparing to live.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[L. P. Jacks]], &#039;&#039;The Usurpation Of Language&#039;&#039; (1910).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A master in the art of living draws no sharp distinction between his work and his play; his labor and his leisure; his mind and his body; his education and his recreation. He hardly knows which is which.&#039;&#039;&#039; He simply pursues his vision of excellence through whatever he is doing, and leaves others to determine whether he is working or playing. &#039;&#039;&#039;To himself, he always appears to be doing both.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[L. P. Jacks]], &#039;&#039;Education through Recreation&#039;&#039; (1932), p. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We do 30 to 40 percent of the nation&#039;s work for 1 percent of the returns, and a huge pool of us is always kept unemployed to reduce the value of the labor of those who are.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George L. Jackson]], &#039;&#039;Blood in My Eye&#039;&#039; (1971), p. 24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It always does seem to me that I am doing more work than I should do. It is not that I object to the work, mind you; I like work; it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. I love to keep it by me; the idea of getting rid of it nearly breaks my heart.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jerome K. Jerome]], English author. &#039;&#039;Three Men in a Boat&#039;&#039; (1889), Ch. 15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work and play they&#039;re never okay to mix.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jimmy Eat World]] taken from their song &amp;quot;[[w: Work (Jimmy Eat World song)|Work]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The error of early capitalism can be repeated wherever man is in a way treated on the same level as the whole complex of the material means of production, as an instrument and not in accordance with the true dignity of his work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope John Paul II]], &#039;&#039;Laborem Exercens&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==K==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jesus]] ... combines all duties (1) in one universal rule (which includes within itself both the inner and the outer moral relations of men), namely: Perform your [[duty]] for no motive other than unconditioned esteem for duty itself, i.e., [[Love of God|love God]] (the Legislator of all duties) above all else; and (2) in a particular rule, that, namely, which concerns man’s external relation to other men as universal duty: [[Great Commandment|Love every one as yourself]], i.e., further his welfare from [[good-will]] that is immediate and not derived from motives of [[greed|self-advantage]]. These commands are not mere laws of [[virtue]] but precepts of [[holiness]] which we ought to pursue, and the very pursuit of them is called virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Immanuel Kant]], &#039;&#039;Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone&#039;&#039;, Book IV, Part 1, Section 1, “The Christian religion as a natural religion”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is so easy to be immature. If I have a book to serve as my understanding, a pastor to serve as my conscience, a physician to determine my diet for me, and so on, I need not exert myself at all. I need not think, if only I can pay: others will readily undertake the irksome work for me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Immanuel Kant]], &amp;quot;What is Enlightenment?&amp;quot; (1784)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To work for a living certainly cannot be the meaning of life, since it is indeed a contradiction that the continual production of the conditions is supposed to be the answer to the question of the meaning of that which is conditional upon their production.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Søren Kierkegaard]], &#039;&#039;Either-Or&#039;&#039;, H. Hong, trans. (1987), part 1 (I 15), p. 31.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the last analysis, what is the significance of life? If we divide mankind into two great classes, we may say that one works for a living, the other does not need to. But working for a living cannot be the meaning of life, since it would be a contradiction to say that the perpetual production of the conditions for subsistence is an answer to the question about its significance which, by the help of this, must be conditioned. The lives of the other class have in general no other significance than that they consume the conditions of subsistence. And to say that the significance of life is death, seems again a contradiction.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Søren Kierkegaard]] &#039;&#039;Either/Or Part I&#039;&#039;, Swenson p. 30.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Translated quote&lt;br /&gt;
| quote = You can do it quickly, but badly, or you can do it slowly, but well. After a while, everyone will forget that it was fast, but will remember that it was bad. And vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
| original =  Можно сделать быстро, но плохо, а можно — медленно, но хорошо. Через некоторое время все забудут, что было быстро, но будут помнить, что было плохо. И наоборот.| comment = }} &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergei Korolev]], quoted in [https://books.google.be/books?id=VyvLDgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT311&amp;amp;lpg=PT311&amp;amp;dq=%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE+%D1%81%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C+%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE,+%D0%BD%D0%BE+%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE,+%D0%B0+%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE+%E2%80%94+%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE,+%D0%BD%D0%BE+%D1%85%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%BE.+%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7+%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5+%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8F+%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B5+%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%82,+%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE+%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE+%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE,+%D0%BD%D0%BE+%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%82+%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C,+%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE+%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE+%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE.+%D0%98&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=BByEGl1rb_&amp;amp;sig=ACfU3U3PHhA9hcx-JhymDEXCw3AAIFw-2Q&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwiop6_-nb75AhVJdcAKHSgtASAQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D1%81%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%20%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%2C%20%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE%2C%20%D0%B0%20%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%E2%80%94%20%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%2C%20%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D1%85%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%BE.%20%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%20%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%20%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8F%20%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B5%20%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%82%2C%20%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE%20%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE%20%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%2C%20%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%82%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C%2C%20%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE%20%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE%20%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE.%20%D0%98&amp;amp;f=false &amp;quot;Leadership in the Russian way&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;(Лидерство по-русски)&#039;&#039;] (2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the picture I’ve drawn is at all right, the only way we could have anything resembling a middle-class society — a society in which ordinary citizens have a reasonable assurance of maintaining a decent life as long as they work hard and play by the rules — would be by having a strong social safety net, one that guarantees not just health care but a minimum income, too.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Krugman]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/opinion/krugman-sympathy-for-the-luddites.html &#039;&#039;Sympathy for the Luddites&#039;&#039;], The New York Times (13 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ancient Garden.png|thumb|No thoroughly occupied man was ever yet very miserable. ~ [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Inventions of Modern Times -Nova Reperta-, The Invention of Distillation, plate 7 MET DP841129.jpg|thumb|Labor is prior to, and independent of, [[capital]]. [[Capital]] is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bernard Lietaer - PopTech 2011 - Camden Maine USA.jpg|thumb|Instead of pitting people against each other, the (local currency) system... &#039;&#039;&#039;enables us to consciously design [[money]] to work for us, instead of us for it.&#039;&#039;&#039; ~ [[Bernard Lietaer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==L==&lt;br /&gt;
* Men are like handsome race horses who first bite the bit and later like it, and rearing under the saddle a while soon learn to enjoy displaying their harness and prance proudly beneath their trappings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Étienne de La Boétie]], &#039;&#039;[[Discourse of Voluntary Servitude]]&#039;&#039;, Part 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The philosophers of antiquity taught contempt for work, that degradation of the free man, the poets sang of idleness, that gift from the Gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Lafargue]], &#039;&#039;The Right to Be Lazy&#039;&#039; (1883), H. Kerr, trans. (1907), pp. 11-12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No thoroughly occupied man was ever yet very miserable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]] &#039;&#039;Romance and Reality&#039;&#039; (1831) Vol. II, page 108&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A full-fledged [[UBI]] — one that unconditionally provides every person with enough income to meet their basic needs—would fundamentally alter the paradigm of capitalism that has locked workers into the dominant system ever since its inception. Capitalism has endured by commoditizing people’s lives, forcing them to sell the bulk of their available time and energy, or else face destitution and starvation. A true UBI would transform the relationship between labor and capital and weaken the power of the wealthy elite to control the population.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Lent]] in [https://greattransition.org/gti-forum/basic-income-lent A Cornerstone of a Moral Economy,  &#039;&#039;Great Transition Initiative,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;GTI Forum&#039;&#039;] (November 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Computers and robots replace humans in the exercise of mental functions in the same way as mechanical power replaced them in the performance of physical tasks. As time goes on, more and more complex mental functions will be performed by machines. Any worker who now performs his task by following specific instructions can, in principle, be replaced by a machine. This means that the role of humans as the most important factor of production is bound to diminish—in the same way that the role of horses in agricultural production was first diminished and then eliminated by the introduction of tractors.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wassily Leontief]], &amp;quot;[http://books.google.nl/books?id=hS0rAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA3 National perspective: The definition of problem and opportunity]&amp;quot;, in: National Academies, &#039;&#039;The Long-term Impact of Technology on Employment and Unemployment: A National Academy of Engineering Symposium&#039;&#039;, p. 3. (30 June 1983)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Local [[currency]] creates work, and I make a distinction between work and jobs. A job is what you do for a living; work is what you do because you like to do it. I expect jobs to increasingly [[Universal basic income|become obsolete]], but there is still an almost infinite amount of fascinating work to be done... What&#039;s nice about local currency is that when people create their own money, they don&#039;t need to build in a [[scarcity]] factor. And they don&#039;t need to get currency from elsewhere in order to have a means of making an exchange with a neighbor... As soon as you have an agreement between two people about a transaction... they literally create the necessary &amp;quot;money&amp;quot; in the process; there&#039;s no [[scarcity]] of money. That does not mean there&#039;s an infinite amount of this currency, either; you cannot give me 500,000 hours - nobody has 500,000 hours to give. So there&#039;s a ceiling on it, yes, but there&#039;s no artificial [[scarcity]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bernard Lietaer]], [https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Money_and_Economics/Bernard_Lietaer/Interview_Yes%21.pdf Beyond Greed and Scarcity, &#039;&#039;YES! A Journal of Positive Futures&#039;&#039;], (Spring 1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Instead of pitting people against each other, the (local currency) system actually ... &#039;&#039;&#039;enables us to consciously design [[money]] to work for us, instead of us for it.&#039;&#039;&#039; ..These objectives are in our grasp within less than one generation&#039;s time. Whether we materialize them or not will depend on our capacity to [[cooperate]] with each other to consciously reinvent our money... For the first time in human history we have available the production technologies to create unprecedented abundance...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bernard Lietaer]], [https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Money_and_Economics/Bernard_Lietaer/Interview_Yes%21.pdf Beyond Greed and Scarcity, &#039;&#039;YES! A Journal of Positive Futures&#039;&#039;], (Spring 1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I agree with you, Mr. Chairman, that the working men are the basis of all governments, for the plain reason that they are the more numerous, and as you added that those were the sentiments of the gentlemen present, representing not only the working class, but citizens of other callings than those of the mechanic, I am happy to concur with you in these sentiments, not only of the native born citizens, but also of the Germans and foreigners from other countries.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], speech to Germans at Cincinnati, Ohio (February 12, 1861) [Commercial version]; in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 4, p. 202.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the early days of the world, the Almighty said to the first of our race &amp;quot;In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread&amp;quot;; and since then, if we except the light and the air of heaven, no good thing has been, or can be enjoyed by us, without having first cost labour. And inasmuch [as] most good things are produced by labour, it follows that [all] such things of right belong to those whose labour has produced them. But it has so happened in all ages of the world, that some have labored, and others have, without labour, enjoyed a large proportion of the fruits. This is wrong, and should not continue. To [secure] to each labourer the whole product of his labour, or as nearly as possible, is a most worthy object of any good government.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], fragments of a tariff discussion (c. December 1, 1847); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 1, p. 407–8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is better, then, to save the work while it is begun. You have done the labor; maintain it—keep it. If men choose to serve you, go with them; but as you have made up your organization upon principle, stand by it; for, as surely as God reigns over you, and has inspired your mind, and given you a sense of propriety, and continues to give you hope, so surely will you still cling to these ideas, and you will at last come back after your wanderings, merely to do your work over again.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], speech at Chicago, Illinois (July 10, 1858); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 2, p. 498.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Labor is prior to, and independent of, [[capital]]. [[Capital]] is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], First State of the Union Address (December 3, 1861); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 5, p. 52.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The most notable feature of a disturbance in your city last summer, was the hanging of some working people by other working people. It should never be so. &#039;&#039;&#039;The strongest bond of human sympathy, outside of the family relation, should be one uniting all working people, of all nations, and tongues, and kindreds.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], reply to New York Workingmen&#039;s Democratic Republican Association (March 21, 1864); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 7, p. 259.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From labor there shall come forth rest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &amp;quot;To a Child&amp;quot;, line 162; in &#039;&#039;The Belfry of Bruges and Other Poems&#039;&#039; (1845).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Adam]] was created righteous, acceptable, and without sin. He had no need from his labor in the garden to be made righteous and acceptable to God. Rather, the Lord gave Adam work in order to cultivate and protect the garden. This would have been the freest of all works because they were done simply to please God and not to obtain righteousness. … The works of the person who trusts God are to be understood in a similar manner. Through faith we are restored to paradise and created anew. We have no need of works in order to be righteous; however, in order to avoid idleness and so that the body might be cared for an disciplined, works are done freely to please God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;The Freedom of a Christian&#039;&#039; (1520), M. Tranvik, trans. (Minneapolis: 2008), pp. 73-74.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is always necessary that the substance or essence of a person be good before there can be any good works and that good works follow and proceed from a person who is already good. Christ says in Matthew 7:18: “A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.” ... The fruit does not make the tree good or bad but the tree itself is what determines the nature of the fruit. In the same way, a person first must be good or bad before doing a good or bad work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;The Freedom of a Christian&#039;&#039; (1520), M. Tranvik, trans. (Minneapolis: 2008), pp. 74-75.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Many have been deceived by outward appearances and have proceeded to write and teach about good works and how they justify without even mentioning faith. … Wearying themselves with many works, they never come to righteousness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;The Freedom of a Christian&#039;&#039; (1520), M. Tranvik, trans. (Minneapolis: 2008), p. 75.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Herman Melville 1860.jpg|thumb|99 hundreths of all the work done in the world is either foolish and unnecessary, or harmful and wicked. ~ [[Herman Melville]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:A monument of working class.JPG|thumb|It has become an article of the creed of modern morality that all labour is good in itself — a convenient belief to those who live on the labour of others. ~ [[William Morris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==M==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The man who is possessed of wealth, who lolls on his sofa or rolls in his carriage, cannot judge the wants or feelings of the day-laborer.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Madison]], Statement (1787-06-26) as quoted in [http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/yates.asp &#039;&#039;Notes of the Secret Debates of the Federal Convention of 1787&#039;&#039;] by [[w:Robert Yates (politician)|Robert Yates]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tonio ... worked withdrawn out of sight and sound of the small men, for whom he felt nothing but contempt, who, whether they were poor or not, went about ostentatiously shabby or else flaunted startling cravats, all the time taking jolly good care to amuse themselves, to be artistic and charming without the smallest notion of the fact that good work comes out only under pressure of a bad life; that he who lives does not work; the one must die to life in order to be utterly a creator.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Mann]], &#039;&#039;Tonio Kröger&#039;&#039;, H. Lowe-Porter, trans., modified, in Death in Venice and Seven Other Stories (1930), p. 94&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Passing alongside the Sea of Galilee, Jesus saw Simon and Andrew the brother of Simon casting a net into the sea, for they were fishermen. And Jesus said to them, “Follow me, and I will make you become fishers of men.” And immediately they left their nets and followed. And going on a little farther, he saw James the son of Zebedee and John his brother, who were in their boat mending the nets. And immediately he called them, and they left their father Zebedee in the boat with the hired servants and followed Jesus.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 1:16-20 [[w:English Standard Version|ESV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The worker puts his life into the object; but now it no longer belongs to him, it belongs to the object.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Alienated Labor,” &#039;&#039;Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts&#039;&#039; (1844), &#039;&#039;The Potable Karl Marx&#039;&#039; (1983), p. 134.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The better shaped his product, the more mis-shapen the worker; the more civilized his object, the more barbaric the worker; the more powerful the work, the more powerless the worker.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Alienated Labor,” &#039;&#039;Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts&#039;&#039; (1844), &#039;&#039;The Potable Karl Marx&#039;&#039; (1983), p. 135.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor produces marvels for the rich but it produces deprivation for the worker. It produces palaces, but hovels for the worker. It produces beauty, but deformity for the worker. It replaces labor by machines, but it throws one section of the workers back to barbaric labor, and it turns the remainder into machines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Alienated Labor,” &#039;&#039;Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts&#039;&#039; (1844), &#039;&#039;The Potable Karl Marx&#039;&#039; (1983), p. 135.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What, then, constitutes the alienation of labor? First, in the fact that labor is external to the worker, that is, that it does not belong to his essential being; that in his work, therefore, he does not affirm himself but denies himself, does not feel well but unhappy, does not freely develop his physical and mental energy but mortifies his body and ruins his mind. The worker, therefore, feels himself only outside his work, and feels beside himself in his work. He is at home when he is not working, and when he is working he is not at home. His work therefore is not voluntary, but coerced; it is forced labor. It is therefore not the satisfaction of a need, but only a means for satisfying needs external to it. Its alien character emerges clearly in the fact that labor is shunned like the plague as soon as there is no physical or other compulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Alienated Labor,” &#039;&#039;Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts&#039;&#039; (1844), &#039;&#039;The Potable Karl Marx&#039;&#039; (1983), p. 136.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we have weighed everything, and when our relations in life permit us to choose any given position, we may take that one which guarantees us the greatest dignity, which is based on ideas of whose truth we are completely convinced, which offers the largest field to work for mankind and approach the universal goal for which every position is only a means: [[perfection]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Reflections of a Youth on Choosing an Occupation” (1835), &#039;&#039;Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society&#039;&#039;, L. Easton, trans. (1967), p. 38.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Capital is dead labor,that vampire-like, only lives by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], {{w|Capital: Critique of Political Economy}}, [[w:Capital, Volume I|Vol. I]], Ch. 10, Section 1, p. 257. (1867)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He that would enjoy life and act with freedom must have the work of the day continually before his eyes. Not yesterday&#039;s work, lest he fall into despair; nor to-morrow&#039;s, lest he become a visionary—not that which ends with the day, which is a worldly work; nor yet that only which remains to eternity, for by it he cannot shape his actions.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Happy is the man who can recognise in the work of to-day a connected portion of the work of life and an embodiment of the work of Eternity. The foundations of his confidence are unchangeable, for he has been made a partaker of Infinity. He strenuously works out his daily enterprises because the present is given him for a possession.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Thus ought Man to be an impersonation of the divine process of nature, and to show forth the union of the infinite with the finite, not slighting his temporal existence, remembering that in it only is individual action possible; nor yet shutting out from his view that which is eternal, knowing that Time is a mystery which man cannot endure to contemplate until eternal Truth enlighten it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Clerk Maxwell]], Paper communicated to {{w|Frederic Farrar}}&amp;lt;!--F. W. Farrar--&amp;gt; (1854) Æt. 23, as quoted in Lewis Campbell, William Garnett, &#039;&#039;The Life of James Clerk Maxwell: With Selections from His Correspondence and Occasional Writings&#039;&#039; (1884) [https://books.google.com/books?id=B7gEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA144 pp. 144-145,] and in Richard Glazebrook, &#039;&#039;James Clerk Maxwell and Modern Physics&#039;&#039; (1896) [https://books.google.com/books?id=hbcEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA39 pp. 39-40.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* True Work is the necessity of poor humanity&#039;s earthly condition. The dignity is in leisure. Besides, &#039;&#039;&#039;99 hundreths of all the work done in the world is either foolish and unnecessary, or harmful and wicked.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herman Melville]], in a letter to Catherine G. Lansing (5 September 1877), published in &#039;&#039;The Melville Log : A Documentary Life of Herman Melville, 1819-1891&#039;&#039; (1951) by Jay Leyda, Vol. 2, p. 765.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man hath his daily work of body or mind&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Appointed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book IV, line 618.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The work under our labour grows&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Luxurious by restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book IX, line 208.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is assumed by most people nowadays that all work is useful, and by most &#039;&#039;well-to-do&#039;&#039; people that all work is desirable.&#039;&#039;&#039; Most people, well-to-do or not, believe that, even when a man is doing work which appears to be useless, he is earning his livelihood by it — he is &amp;quot;employed,&amp;quot; as the phrase goes; and most of those who are well-to-do cheer on the happy worker with congratulations and praises, if he is only &amp;quot;industrious&amp;quot; enough and deprives himself of all pleasure and holidays — in the sacred cause of labour. &#039;&#039;&#039;In short, it has become an article of the creed of modern morality that all labour is good in itself — a convenient belief to those who live on the labour of others.&#039;&#039;&#039; But as to those on whom they live, I recommend them not to take it on trust, but to look into the matter a little deeper.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Morris]], &amp;quot;Useful Work vs Useless Toil&amp;quot; (1885); later published in &#039;&#039;Signs of Change : Seven Lectures, Delivered on Various Occasions&#039;&#039; (1896).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is of the nature of man, when he is not diseased, to take pleasure in his work under certain conditions.&#039;&#039;&#039; And, yet, we must say in the teeth of the hypocritical praise of all labour, whatsoever it may be, of which I have made mention, that there is some labour which is so far from being a blessing that it is a curse; that it would be better for the community and for the worker if the latter were to fold his hands and refuse to work, and either die or let us pack him off to the workhouse or prison — which you will.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Here, you see, are two kinds of work — one good, the other bad; one not far removed from a blessing, a lightening of life; the other a mere curse, a burden to life.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What is the difference between them, then ? This: one has hope in it, the other has not. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is manly to do the one kind of work, and manly also to refuse to do the other.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Morris]], &amp;quot;Useful Work vs Useless Toil&amp;quot; (1885); later published in &#039;&#039;Signs of Change : Seven Lectures, Delivered on Various Occasions&#039;&#039; (1896).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In his discussion on [[slavery]] [[Aristotle]] said that when the shuttle wove by itself and the [[w:Plectrum|plectrum]] played by itself chief workmen would not need helpers nor masters slaves. At the time he wrote, he believed that he was establishing the eternal validity of slavery; but for us today he was in reality justifying the existence of the [[machine]]. Work, it is true, is the constant form of man&#039;s interaction with his environment, if by work one means the sum total of exertions necessary to maintain life; and the lack of work usually means an impairment of function and a breakdown in organic relationship that leads to substitute forms of work, such as invalidism and neurosis. But work in the form of unwilling drudgery or of that sedentary routine which... the Athenians so properly despised—work in these forms is the true province of machines. Instead of reducing human beings to work-mechanisms, we can now transfer the main part of burden to automatic machines. This potentially... is perhaps the largest justification of the mechanical developments of the last thousand years.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lewis Mumford]], &#039;&#039;Technics and Civilization&#039;&#039; (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==N==&lt;br /&gt;
* Early to bed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Early to rise,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work like hell —&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And advertise!&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Old slogan&amp;quot; quoted in &#039;&#039;The National Provisioner&#039;&#039;, Vol. 44 (June 1911), p. 35; this has since become misattributed to many people who might have quoted it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Democratic presidential hopeful [[Joe Biden]] unveiled a $2 trillion energy plan Tuesday with a heavy focus on the [[Green New Deal]] agenda... Speaking in Wilmington, Del., Biden promised a “clean energy revolution,” which he said would deliver millions of jobs... Biden detailed what he called a pro-union platform that would replace the US government’s car fleet with American-made electric vehicles... The former veep on Tuesday promised to “create millions of high-paying union jobs by building a modern infrastructure and a clean energy future” and described his vision of a US covered in 500,000 electric car charging stations and thriving factories producing green products.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nypost.com/2020/07/14/joe-biden-unveils-his-2t-aoc-fueled-green-new-deal-energy-agenda/ &#039;&#039;New York Post,&#039;&#039; Joe Biden unveils his $2T AOC-fueled Green New Deal energy agenda, by Ebony Bowden], (14 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Whoever does not have two-thirds of his day for himself, is a slave, whatever he may be: a statesman, a businessman, an official, or a scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;Human, All Too Human&#039;&#039; (1878)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Looking for work in order to be paid: in civilized countries today almost all men are at one in doing that. For all of them work is a means and not an end in itself. Hence they are not very refined in their choice of work, if only it pays well. But there are, if only rarely, men who would rather perish than work without any pleasure in their work. They are choosy, hard to satisfy, and do not care for ample rewards, if the work itself is not to be the reward of rewards. Artists and contemplative men of all kinds belong to this rare breed, but so do even those men of leisure who spend their lives hunting, traveling, or in love affairs and adventures. All of these desire work and misery only if it is associated with pleasure, and the hardest, most difficult work if necessary. Otherwise their idleness is resolute, even if it spells impoverishment, dishonor, and danger to life and limb. They do not fear boredom as much as work without pleasure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), [[Walter Kaufmann (philosopher)|W. Kaufmann]], trans, § 42.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I propose a new approach that will make it more attractive to go to work than to go on welfare, and will establish a nationwide minimum payment to dependent families with children. I propose that the Federal government pay a [[basic income]] to those American families who cannot care for themselves in whichever State they live. ... I propose that we make available an addition to the incomes of the &amp;quot;working poor,&amp;quot; to encourage them to go on working, and to eliminate the possibility of making more from welfare than from wages. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Nixon]], [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=2194 Special Message to the Congress on Reform of the Nation&#039;s Welfare System] (11 August 1969)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==O==&lt;br /&gt;
* Artificial intelligence is here and it is accelerating, and you&#039;re going to have driverless cars, and you&#039;re going to have more and more automated services, and that&#039;s going to make the job of giving everybody work that is meaningful, tougher and we&#039;re going to have to be more imaginative, and the pact of [[change]] is going to require us to do more fundamental reimagining of our social and political arrangements, to protect the economic security and the dignity that comes with a job. It&#039;s not just money that a job provides; it provides dignity and structure and a sense of place and a sense of purpose. And so we&#039;re going to have to consider new ways of thinking about these problems, like a [[universal income]], review of our workweek, how we retrain our young people, how we make everybody an entrepreneur at some level. But we&#039;re going to have to worry about economics if we want to get democracy back on track.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Barack Obama]], &#039;&#039;[https://www.npr.org/2018/07/17/629862434/transcript-obamas-speech-at-the-2018-nelson-mandela-annual-lecture 2018 Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture]&#039;&#039; [speech] (17 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I found it hard working really long hours when I was my own boss. The boss kept giving me the afternoon off.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John O&#039;Farrell|John O&#039;Farrell]]{{Disambiguation needed}}, &#039;&#039;The Best a Man Can Get&#039;&#039; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Charles peguy.jpg|thumb|right|Towards this fine honor of a trade converged all the finest, all the most noble sentiments—dignity, pride. ... In those days a workman did not know what it was to solicit. It is the [[bourgeoisie]] who, turning the workmen into bourgeois, have taught them to solicit. ~ [[Charles Péguy]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==P==&lt;br /&gt;
* Questioning global stereotypes on economic responses to [[globalisation]], I argue that labour becomes actively involved in the very &#039;&#039;process&#039;&#039; of globalisation and the [[w:Growth capital|expansion of capital]]. [...] Although it would seem a simple proposition to suggest that working class people and their organisations affect the ways in which the landscapes of capitalism are made, until recently, there has been little work, even within economic geography, addressing this issue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Neethi Padmanabhan]], &#039;&#039;[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263155852_Globalisation_Lived_Locally_A_Labour_Geography_Perspective_on_Control_Conflict_and_Response_among_Workers_in_Kerala Globalisation Lived Locally: A Labour Geography Perspective on Control, Conflict and Response among Workers in Kerala]&#039;&#039;, 2012, at {{w|ResearchGate}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Low labour cost, along with ﬂexibility in labour use, has become a key source of competitive advantage for ﬁrms. As external competition intensiﬁes, the domestic industry has come under great pressure to restructure itself, to become more competitive and to adopt ﬂexible policies with regard to production and labour. With a view to increasing global competitiveness, investors are moving more towards countries that either have low labour costs, or are shifting to informal employment arrangements. These [[change]]s create an entirely different political-economic environment for workers around the world. Greater international mobility of capital relative to labour puts workers from a given location at an immediate disadvantage, both in terms of bargaining power with the owners of capital (whose threat to move gains greater credibility) and with respect to the State&amp;lt;!--(Milberg 2004)--&amp;gt;. Thus the removal of domestic entry barriers and movement of capital to areas of cheap labour have caused intensiﬁcation of domestic competition in many developing countries— especially those with surplus labour supply and those where labour is a major factor of production. This has been accentuated by potential investors citing the lack of ﬂexibility in hiring and laying off workers as a concern, while targeting a developing country in which to invest. [...] [[Optimism]] with regard to labour as an agency of social progress has been replaced by pessimism that sees little prospect of workers acting on their own behalf.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Neethi Padmanabhan]], &#039;&#039;[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263155852_Globalisation_Lived_Locally_A_Labour_Geography_Perspective_on_Control_Conflict_and_Response_among_Workers_in_Kerala Globalisation Lived Locally: A Labour Geography Perspective on Control, Conflict and Response among Workers in Kerala]&#039;&#039;, 2012, at {{w|ResearchGate}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.&lt;br /&gt;
** Jack Torrance played by Jack Nicholson, [[The Shining (film)|The Shining]] screenplay by Stanley Kubrick and Diane Johnson&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious people must be brought to a vivid realization of their awful guilt in sanctioning and supporting an economic system that is the direct antithesis of their religious ideals.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kirby Page]], &#039;&#039;Individualism and Socialism&#039;&#039; (1933)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Pride in one’s work carries with it a determination to accept the demands imposed by that work: in the case of philosophy to follow the argument where it leads, in the case of history to discover what actually happened, in the case of literature to explore to its depths a particular theme. In consequence, this sort of pride demands freedom: it has to be laid low in any authoritarian State. The historian, in such a system, has to conform to official interpretations of the past, the philosopher to dogmas, the writer to stereotypes of human action, the craftsman to “production-schedules.” More subtly, attempts are made to lay pride low in a consumer’s society: the film-director, the novelist, the craftsman are called upon to produce “what will sell” at whatever cost to their pride in workmanship.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Passmore]], &#039;&#039;The Perfectibility of Man&#039;&#039; (1971), p. 290&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A man succeeds in completing a work only when his qualities transcend that work.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Cesare Pavese]], &#039;&#039;This Business of Living&#039;&#039;, {{#dateformat:1940-08-14}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These bygone workmen did not serve, they worked. They had an absolute honor, which is honor proper. A chair rung had to be well made. That was an understood thing. That was the first thing. It wasn’t that the chair rung had to be well made for the salary or on account of the salary. It wasn’t that it was well made for the boss, nor for connoisseurs, nor for the boss’ clients. It had to be well made itself, in itself, for itself, in its very self. A tradition coming, springing from deep within the race, a history, an absolute, an honor, demanded that this chair rung be well made. Every part of the chair which could not be seen was just as perfectly made as the parts which could be seen. The was the selfsame principal of cathedrals. … There was no question of being seen or of not being seen. It was the innate being of work which needed to be well done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Péguy]], &#039;&#039;Basic Verities&#039;&#039;, A. &amp;amp; J. Green, trans. (New York: 1943), pp. 82-85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Towards this fine honor of a trade converged all the finest, all the most noble sentiments—dignity, pride. Never ask anything of anyone, they used to say. … In those days a workman did not know what it was to solicit. It is the bourgeoisie who, turning the workmen into bourgeois, have taught them to solicit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Péguy]], &#039;&#039;Basic Verities&#039;&#039;, A. &amp;amp; J. Green, trans. (New York: 1943), p. 83.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Don&#039;t sacrifice your life to work and ideals. The most important things in life are human relations. I found that out too late.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Katharine Susannah Prichard}}, as quoted in &#039;&#039;100 Great Australians&#039;&#039; (1983) by Robert Macklin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The man who by his labour gets &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; His bread, in independent state, &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Who never begs, and seldom eats, &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Himself can fix or change his fate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Matthew Prior]] (1664–1721), &#039;&#039;The Old Gentry&#039;&#039; (posthumous), St. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The trouble with Opportunity is that it always comes disguised as hard work.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Herbert V. Prochnow}}, &#039;&#039;1001 Ways to Improve your Conversation &amp;amp; Speeches?&#039;&#039; (1952).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To depend on another&#039;s nod for a livelihood, is a sad destiny.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Publius Syrus]], &#039;&#039;The Moral Sayings of Publius Syrus&#039;&#039;, # 501&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Teslathinker.jpg |thumb|Let the future tell the truth and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine. ~ [[Nikola Tesla]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:A Wilde time 3.jpg|thumb|right|We live in the age of the overworked, and the under-educated; the age in which people are so industrious that they become absolutely stupid. ~ [[Oscar Wilde]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:THE WOMEN&#039;S WORK IN THE WAR INDUSTRY, 1914-1918 Q109920.jpg|thumb|It is amazing what can be accomplished when nobody cares about who gets the credit. ~ [[w:Robert Yates (politician)|Robert Yates]] ]] &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Howard Yoder, 1971 (6215609410).jpg|thumb|Let us reserve our limited creativity for functions that will not be taken care of if we do not to it. ~ [[John Howard Yoder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William Edmonson.jpg|thumb|The land belongs to those who work it with their hands. ~ [[Emiliano Zapata]] ]] &lt;br /&gt;
==R==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John_Henry-27527.jpg|thumb|Modern technique has made it possible for leisure, within limits, to be not the prerogative of small privileged classes, but a right evenly distributed throughout the community. The morality of work is the morality of slaves, and the modern world has no need of slavery. ~ [[Bertrand Russell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1927 Boris Bilinski (1900-1948) Plakat für den Film Metropolis, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin.jpg|thumb|It is clear that mechanistic, biologically unsatisfying work is a product of the widespread mechanistic view of life and the machine civilization. Can the biologic function of work be reconciled with the social function of work? This is possible, but firmly entrenched ideas and institutions must be radically corrected first. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The craftsman of the nineteenth century still had a full relationship to the product of his work. But when, as in a Ford factory, a worker has to perform one and the same manipulation year in and year out, always working on one detail and never the product as a whole, it is out of the question to speak of satisfying work. The specialized and mechanized division of labour, together with the system of paid labour in general, produce the effect that the working man has no relationship to the [[machine]]. ~ [[Wilhelm Reich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Did you get your [[money]] by fraud? By pandering to men’s vices or men’s stupidity? By catering to fools, in the hope of getting more than your ability deserves? By lowering your standards? By doing work you despise for purchasers you scorn? If so, then your money will not give you a moment’s or a penny’s worth of joy. Then all the things you buy will become, not a tribute to you, but a reproach; not an achievement, but a reminder of shame. Then you’ll scream that money is evil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ayn Rand]], Francisco d’Anconia in &#039;&#039;[[Atlas Shrugged]]&#039;&#039; (New York: 1992), p. 384.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is the basis of man’s social existence. This is stressed by every social theory. In this respect, however, the problem is not that work is the basis of human existence. The problem relates to the nature of work: Is it in opposition to or in harmony with the biologic needs of masses of people? Marx’s economic theory proved that everything that is produced in the way of economic values comes about through the expenditure of man’s living working power, and not through the expenditure of dead material.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is clear that mechanistic, biologically unsatisfying work is a product of the widespread mechanistic view of life and the machine civilization. Can the biologic function of work be reconciled with the social function of work? This is possible, but firmly entrenched ideas and institutions must be radically corrected first. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The craftsman of the nineteenth century still had a full relationship to the product of his work. But when, as in a Ford factory, a worker has to perform one and the same manipulation year in and year out, always working on one detail and never the product as a whole, it is out of the question to speak of satisfying work. The specialized and mechanized division of labour, together with the system of paid labour in general, produce the effect that the working man has no relationship to the [[machine]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 10, p. 287.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only when one is objectively and intimately related to one’s work is one capable of comprehending just how destructive the dictatorial and formal democratic forms of work are, not only for work itself but also for the [[pleasure]] of work. When a man takes pleasure in his work, we call his relationship to it ‘libidinous’. Since work and sexuality (in both the strict and broad senses of the word) are intimately interwoven, man’s relationship to work is also a question of the sex-economy of masses of people. The hygiene of the work process is dependent upon the way masses of people use and gratify their biologic energy. Work and sexuality derive from the same biologic energy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 10, p. 293.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The relationship between the worker’s [[sexual]] life and the performance of his work is of decisive importance. It is not as if work diverted sexual energy from gratification, so that the more one worked the less need one would have for sexual gratification. The opposite of this is the case: The more gratifying one’s sexual life is, the more fulfilling and pleasurable is one ’s work, if all external conditions are fulfilled. Gratified sexual energy is spontaneously converted into an interest in work and an urge for activity. In contrast to this, one’s work is disturbed in various ways if one’s sexual need is not gratified and is suppressed. Hence, a basic principle of the work hygiene of a work-democratic society is: It is necessary to establish not only the best external conditions of work, but also to create the inner biologic preconditions to allow the fullest unfolding of the biologic urge for activity. Hence, the safeguarding of a completely satisfying sexual life for the working masses is the most important precondition of pleasurable work. In any society the degree to which work kills the joy of life, the degree to which it is represented as a [[duty]] (whether to a ‘fatherland’, the ‘proletariat’, the ‘nation’ or whatever other names these [[illusions]] may have), is a sure yardstick on which to measure the anti-[[democratic]] character of the [[ruling class]] of this [[society]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 10, p. 295.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The working [[men]] and [[women]] who [[think]] and [[act]] in a work-[[democratic]] way do not come out against the [[politician]]. It is not his fault or his intention that the practical result of his work exposes the illusionary and irrational character of politics. Those who are engaged in [[practical]] work, regardless what field they are in, are intensely concerned with practical tasks in the improvement of [[life]]. Those who are engaged in practical work are not against one thing or another. It is only the politician who, having no practical tasks is always against and never for something. Politics in general is characterized by this ‘being against’ one thing or another. That which is productive in a practical way is not accomplished by politicians, but by working men and women, whether it is in accord with the politicians’ [[ideologies]] or not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 11, p. 368.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For centuries on end it has been precisely vitally necessary work that the political [[ideology]] of the ruling but nonworking classes has depreciated. On the other hand, it has represented non-work as a sign of noble blood. All [[socialist]] ideologies reacted to this appraisal with a mechanistic and rigid reversal of valuations. The socialists conceived of ‘work’ as relating solely to those activities that had been looked down upon in feudalism, i.e., essentially to manual labour; whereas the activity of the ruling classes was represented as non-work. To be sure, this mechanical reversal of ideologic valuations was wholly in keeping with the political concept of the two economically and personally sharply demarcated [[social classes]], the ruling and the ruled. From a purely [[economic]] point of view, society could indeed be divided into ‘those who possessed [[capital]]’ and ‘those who possessed the commodity, working power’ . From the point of view of bio-sociology, however, there could be no clear-cut division between one class and another, neither [[ideologically]] nor [[psychologically]], and certainly not on the basis of work. The discovery of the fact that the ideology of a group of people does not necessarily have to coincide with its economic situation, indeed, that economic and ideologic situation are often sharply opposed to one another, enabled us to understand the [[fascist]] movement, which had remained uncomprehended until then. In 1930 it became dear that there is a ‘cleavage’ between ideology and economy, and that the ideology of a certain class can develop into a social force, a social force that is not confined to that one class.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 11, p. 383&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For one human being to love another: that is perhaps the most difficult of our tasks; the ultimate, the last test and proof, the work for which all other work is but preparation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Letters to a Young Poet|Letters to a Young Poet]]&#039;&#039; (1934) Letter Seven (14 May 1904).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When men are rightly occupied, their amusement grows out of their work, as the colour-petals out of a fruitful flower;—when they are faithfully helpful and compassionate, all their emotions become steady, deep, perpetual, and vivifying to the soul as the natural pulse to the body. But now, having no true business, we pour our whole masculine energy into the false business of money-making; and having no true emotion, we must have false emotions dressed up for us to play with, not innocently, as children with dolls, but guiltily and darkly.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Ruskin]], “Sesame and Lilies” (1865)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Work is of two kinds: first, altering the position of matter at or near the earth&#039;s surface relatively to other such matter; second, telling other people to do so. The first kind is unpleasant and ill paid; the second is pleasant and highly paid.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.zpub.com/notes/idle.html In Praise of Idleness]&#039;&#039; (1932).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Modern technique has made it possible for leisure, within limits, to be not the prerogative of small privileged classes, but a right evenly distributed throughout the community. The morality of work is the morality of slaves, and the modern world has no need of slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.zpub.com/notes/idle.html In Praise of Idleness]&#039;&#039; (1932).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A narcissist, for example, inspired by the homage paid to great painters, may become an art student; but, as painting is for him a mere means to an end, the technique never becomes interesting … The result is failure and disappointment, with ridicule instead of the expected adulation. … All serious success in work depends upon some genuine interest. … Consequently, the man whose sole concern with the world is that is shall admire him is not likely to achieve his object.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;The Conquest of Happiness&#039;&#039;, p. 20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==S==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Solon.jpg|thumb|You made your rulers mighty, gave them guards, so now you groan &#039;neath slavery&#039;s heavy rod. ~ [[Solon|Solon of Athens]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John_Lancaster_Spalding.png|thumb|The work whereby men gain a livelihood involves mental and moral mutilation, unless it be done in the spirit of religion and culture. ~ [[John Lancaster Spalding]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I won&#039;t take my religion from any man who never works except with his mouth and never cherishes any memory except the face of the woman on the American silver dollar.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I ask you to come through and show me where you&#039;re pouring out the blood of your life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carl Sandburg]], &amp;quot;To a Contemporary Bunkshooter&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Chicago Poems&#039;&#039; (1916), p. 63.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What would you do if your country&#039;s welfare depended on labor? When a ship is in a storm it requires one captain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fritz Sauckel]], To Leon Goldensohn, February 9, 1946, from &amp;quot;The Nuremberg Interviews&amp;quot; by Leon Goldensohn, Robert Gellately - History (2004), p. 209.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;When I was young I observed that nine out of ten things I did were failures, so I did ten times more work.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bernard Shaw]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Appropriate Technology : A Focus for the Nineties&#039;&#039; (1991) by Robert William Stevens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nobody would work for starvation [[wages]] if he were not in a situation in which he preferred such wages to not working at all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Simmel]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Money&#039;&#039; (1907).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Have you beheld a man skillful in his work? Before kings is where he will station himself; he will not station himself before commonplace men.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Solomon]], [http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/pr/chapter_022.htm Proverbs 22: 29]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You made your rulers mighty, gave them guards,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;So now you groan &#039;neath slavery&#039;s heavy rod.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Solon|Solon of Athens]], as reported by [[Diogenes Laërtius]] (trans. [[w:Charles Duke Yonge|C. D. Yonge]]) &#039;&#039;The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers&#039;&#039; (1853), &amp;quot;Solon&amp;quot;, sect. 5, p. 25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We have lost the old love of work, of work which kept itself company, which was fair weather and music in the heart, which found its reward in the doing, craving neither the flattery of vulgar eyes nor the gold of vulgar men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lancaster Spalding]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The work whereby men gain a livelihood involves mental and moral mutilation, unless it be done in the spirit of religion and culture.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lancaster Spalding]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Things may be traded in the city but it is the fisherman who brings in the food supply.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sumerian proverb]], [http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/proverbs/t.6.1.01.html Collection I] at {{w|The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature}}, {{w|3rd millennium BCE}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is valued by the social value of the worker.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gloria Steinem]], &#039;&#039;Moving Beyond Words&#039;&#039; (1994), Part 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The men at the factory are old and cunning&lt;br /&gt;
:You don&#039;t owe nothing, so boy get running&lt;br /&gt;
:It&#039;s the best years of your life they want to steal.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Joe Strummer]], “Clampdown” (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Understanding how the [[w:Agricultural revolution|agricultural revolution]] transformed [[human]] [[societies]] was once no more than a question of [[intellectual]] [[curiosity]]. Now, though, it has taken on a more [[practical]] and [[urgent]] aspect. Many of the [[challenges]] created by the agricultural revolution, such as the [[problem]] of [[w:Scarcity|scarcity]], have largely been solved by [[technology]] – yet our preoccupation with hard work and unrestrained [[economic growth]] remains undimmed.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[James Suzman]], [https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/dec/05/how-neolithic-farming-sowed-the-seeds-of-modern-inequality-10000-years-ago “How Neolithic farming sowed the seeds of modern inequality 10,000 years ago”], &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, (5 Dec, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I just don&#039;t understand the world&#039;s unhealthy obsession with work. Its all about vanity anyway. Ooh, look how hard I worked! And what a good work I did. Well screw you, workie. Get lost. Shut up. We&#039;re trying to listen to records here.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John Swartzwelder}}, &#039;&#039;Detective Made Easy&#039;&#039; (2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==T==&lt;br /&gt;
* I suddenly felt insecure and feared becoming an employee of some firm that would turn me into a corporate slave with &amp;quot;work ethics&amp;quot; (whenever I hear the word &#039;&#039;work ethics&#039;&#039; I interpret &#039;&#039;inefficient mediocrity&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nassim Nicholas Taleb]], &#039;&#039;Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets&#039;&#039; (2001) Seven: The Problem of Induction | Sir Karl&#039;s Promoting Agent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Laborare est orare&#039;&#039;. [To work is to pray.] By the Puritan moralist the ancient maxim is repeated with a new and intenser significance. The labor which he idealizes is not simply a requirement imposed by nature, or a punishment for the sin of Adam. It is itself a kind of [[asceticism|ascetic]] discipline, more rigorous than that demanded of any order of [[w:Mendicant|mendicants]]—a discipline imposed by the will of God, and to be undergone, not in solitude, but in the punctual discharge of secular duties. It is not merely an economic means, to be laid aside when physical needs have been satisfied. It is a spiritual end, for in it alone can the soul find health, and it must be continued as an ethical duty long after it has ceased to be a material necessity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[R. H. Tawney]], &#039;&#039;Religion and the Rise of Capitalism&#039;&#039; (1926), p. 242&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am credited with being one of the hardest workers and perhaps I am, if thought is the equivalent of labour, for I have devoted to it almost all of my waking hours. But if work is interpreted to be a definite performance in a specified time according to a rigid rule, then I may be the worst of idlers. Every effort under compulsion demands a sacrifice of life-energy. I never paid such a price. On the contrary, I have thrived on my thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nikola Tesla]], in [http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1919-00-00.htm &amp;quot;My Inventions&amp;quot;] first published in &#039;&#039;Electrical Experimenter&#039;&#039; magazine (1919); republished as &#039;&#039;My Inventions : The Autobiography of Nikola Tesla&#039;&#039; (1983).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let the future tell the truth and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nikola Tesla]], on patent controversies regarding the [[w:Invention of radio|invention of Radio]] and other things, as quoted in &amp;quot;A Visit to Nikola Tesla&amp;quot; by Dragislav L. Petkovic in &#039;&#039;Politika&#039;&#039; (April 1927);&amp;lt;!-- Perhaps from an interview in January 1927 --&amp;gt; as quoted in &#039;&#039;Tesla, Master of Lightning&#039;&#039; (1999) by Margaret Cheney, Robert Uth, and Jim Glenn, p. 73 &amp;lt;!-- Barnes &amp;amp; Noble Publishing --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; {{ISBN|0760710058}} &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ; also in &#039;&#039;Tesla: Man Out of Time&#039;&#039; (2001) by Margaret Cheney, p. 230 &amp;lt;!-- Simon and Schuster --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; {{ISBN|0743215362}} &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The scientific man does not aim at an immediate result. He does not expect that his advanced ideas will be readily taken up. His work is like that of the planter — for the future. His duty is to lay the foundation for those who are to come, and point the way. He lives and labors and hopes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nikola Tesla]], &amp;quot;Radio Power Will Revolutionize the World&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Modern Mechanics and Inventions&#039;&#039; (July 1934).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This world is a place of business. What an infinite bustle! ... It would be glorious to see mankind at [[leisure]] for once. It is nothing but work, work, work. I cannot easily buy a blank-book to write thoughts in; they are commonly ruled for dollars and cents. ... If a man was tossed out of a window when an infant, and so made a cripple for life, … it is regretted chiefly because he was thus incapacitated for—business! I think there is nothing, not even crime, more opposed to [[poetry]], to [[philosophy]], ay, to life itself, than this incessant business.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry David Thoreau]], “Life without Principle,” 1.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Drive a nail home and clinch it so faithfully that you can wake up in the night and think of your work with satisfaction,—a work at which you would not be ashamed to invoke the Muse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry David Thoreau]], &#039;&#039;Walden&#039;&#039;, chapter 18, p. 436 (1966). Originally published in 1854.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not enough to be industrious; so are the ants. What are you industrious about?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry David Thoreau]], letter to Harrison Blake (16 November 1857).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing tends to materialize man and to deprive his work of the faintest trace of mind more than the extreme [[division of labor]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexis de Tocqueville]], Democracy in America, vol. 1, chapter 18 (1835).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work consists of whatever a [[body]] is OBLIGED to do, and...[[Play]] consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mark Twain]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Adventures of Tom Sawyer|The Adventures of Tom Sawyer]]&#039;&#039; (1876), Ch. 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==V==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Il est bien malaisé (puisqu’il faut enfin m’expliquer) d’ôter à des insensés des chaînes qu’ils révèrent.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Le dîner du comte de Boulainvilliers&#039;&#039; (1767): Troisième Entretien&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==W==&lt;br /&gt;
* The bourgeoisie first betrayed society through capitalism and finance, and now labor betrays it by embracing a scheme of things which sees profit only, not duty and honor, in work. This view will seem hopelessly unrealistic to those who do not admit that sentiment toward the whole is the only ultimate means of measuring value.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Weaver]], &#039;&#039;Ideas Have Consequences&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1948), p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea that work is something apportioned out by men leaves people discontent with their portion and dubious about whether work is a good thing at all. … The ancient injunction to labor fades when we regard our work as cut out for us by men, who, by present dogma, are no better than ourselves. That curious modern [[wikt:hypostatization|hypostatization]] “service” is often called in to substitute for the now incomprehensible doctrine of vocation. It tries to secure subordination by hypothesizing something larger than the self, which turns out, however, to be only a multitude of selfish selves. The familiar change from quality to quantity may again be noted; one serves not the higher part of the self (this entails hierarchy) … but merely consumer demand. And who admires those at the top of a hierarchy of consumption? Man as a consuming animal is thus seen to be not enough.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Weaver]], &#039;&#039;Ideas Have Consequences&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1948), p. 77&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor in this country is independent and proud. It has not to ask the patronage of [[capital]], but capital solicits the aid of labor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel Webster]], &#039;&#039;A discourse, delivered at Plymouth, December 22, 1820. In commemoration of the first settlement of New-England&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They are usually denominated labor-saving machines, but it would be more just to call them labor-doing machines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel Webster]], remarks in the Senate (March 12, 1838); &#039;&#039;The Writings and Speeches of Daniel Webster&#039;&#039; (1903), vol. 8, p. 177.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*America has lost more than 12 million jobs in the last six months. An estimated 12 million people have lost their employer-sponsored health insurance during the worst pandemic in a century. Tens of millions report not having enough to eat. But one month ago, tens of millions of unemployed Americans lost... a $600 weekly federal unemployment insurance benefit that Congress failed to renew... How can this happen in a democracy? This is a question that everyone who works for a living... might want to consider on this Labor Day... If the facts of this political disaster were more widely known and understood, Republicans could lose not only the presidency but also the Senate in November. After all, millions of unemployed Republicans lost most of their income as a result of what their political party...did... Republican senators repeatedly expressed worries that the unemployment benefits created a &amp;quot;disincentive to work.&amp;quot; But economists have found no evidence of this; on the contrary, millions of workers who were receiving these benefits returned to work in May through July, and there are more than 11 million more workers and there are more than 11 million more workers unemployed than there are job openings.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mark Weisbrot]], [https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/opinion/times-commentary/story/2020/sep/06/weisbrot-whour-government-doing-labor/531611/ What is our government doing to labor?], [[w:Chattanooga Times Free Press|Times Free Press]], (6 September 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul of Tarsus|Paul&#039;s]] ... [[w:He who does not work, neither shall he eat|no-work-no-eat doctrine]] was directed by him only against the poor. All around him were the rich, virginally innocent of toil, and yet who were gorged to the gullet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bouck White]], &#039;&#039;The Call of the Carpenter&#039;&#039; (1914), p. 238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We live in the age of the overworked, and the under-educated; the age in which people are so industrious that they become absolutely stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oscar Wilde]], Gilbert, in &#039;&#039;The Critic as Artist&#039;&#039;, pt. 2 (1891)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Y==&lt;br /&gt;
* If we expand the notion of work, which is something that a [[universal basic income]] would help us do, it would begin to compensate parents and caregivers; it would begin to recognize different forms of work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Yang]], in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfDpS5w3wUw&amp;amp;t=43m59s Is our economy totally screwed? Andrew Yang and I debate], &#039;&#039;The Ezra Klein Show&#039;&#039;, 43:59 (20 August 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [A universal basic income] would be one of the greatest catalysts to entrepreneurship and creativity we have ever seen, and I&#039;ve worked with hundreds of entrepreneurs over the years. We have to put more Americans in position to do work that they value [[essentially|intrinsically]], instead of as a necessary means to [[survival]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Yang]], in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfDpS5w3wUw&amp;amp;t=47m54s Is our economy totally screwed? Andrew Yang and I debate], &#039;&#039;The Ezra Klein Show&#039;&#039;, 47:54 (20 August 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you care about children, then [UBI] is the best way to make household and families stronger; if you care about women and economic empowerment, this is a way to make it so that women can walk away from abusive or exploitative employers; if you care about communities of color, they would benefit much more proportionally from a thousand dollars a month than other communities, because they have lower access to various jobs and opportunities. This is the way that we can reform society in a way that actually serves all of our goals, our collective goals. And at least one study showed that if you would alleviate [[child poverty]], you would increase GDP by 700 billion dollars, because of better health outcomes, [[Education|educational]] outcomes, higher worker [[productivity]], better [[mental health]]... We have to start investing in our [[people]], intrinsically. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Yang]], in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfDpS5w3wUw&amp;amp;t=53m30s Is our economy totally screwed? Andrew Yang and I debate], &#039;&#039;The Ezra Klein Show&#039;&#039;, 53:30 (20 August 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have to say &amp;quot;we are the citizens and owners and stakeholders of this society, we can vote ourselves a dividend, and it&#039;s up to us to build an economy that serves us, because... this economy is not designed to serve human beings. It is designed to serve [[Capitalism|capital efficiency]]. And for a long time, that also served human beings, but increasingly it&#039;s going to be that having lots of humans working for a company is irrelevant, or even negative, for [[Profit|corporate success]]. And we can see this by the fact that &#039;&#039;&#039;94% of the new jobs created since 2005 to 2015, were [[W:gig economy|gig economy]], temp and contractor jobs, because the employer said &amp;quot;you know what? I&#039;d rather not have a full-time employee, I&#039;d rather not pay health care benefits&amp;quot;, and that&#039;s why so many Americans right now are in that position.&#039;&#039;&#039; So we have to start recognizing that the economy is changing for good, and that it&#039;s up to us, the citizens of this country, to rewrite the rules the economy to serve us. We have to make the market serve us, and not have us all be [[slaves]] to the market, because the market is not going to care one whit about [[Working class|us]] increasingly over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Yang]], in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfDpS5w3wUw&amp;amp;t=53m30s Is our economy totally screwed? Andrew Yang and I debate], &#039;&#039;The Ezra Klein Show&#039;&#039;, 53:30 (20 August 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is amazing what can be accomplished when nobody cares about who gets the credit.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Robert Yates (politician)|Robert Yates]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Team Selling Solution : Creating and Managing Teams That Win&#039;&#039; (2003) by Steve Waterhouse, p. 51.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jesus once said that the dead should let to bury the dead (Luke 9:60). This shows no disrespect for the dead. It shows an awareness that there are some functions in society that will be well taken care of without Christians investing their creativity in those functions. Someone else, in meeting such needs, can make a stable living. Burying the dead is still one of the businesses in which you can make a stable living. There are other such services that we can count on society handling by itself. Leadership in government and business are among these. Let us reserve our limited creativity for functions that will not be taken care of if we do not to it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Howard Yoder]], &#039;&#039;Radical Christian Discipleship&#039;&#039; (2012), p. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Z==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;La tierra es de quien la trabaja con sus manos.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;The land belongs to those who work it with their hands.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Emiliano Zapata]], quoted as a slogan of the revolutionaries in &#039;&#039;Shirt-Sleeve Diplomat&#039;&#039; (1947) Vol. 5, p. 199, by Josephus Daniels, and specifically attributed to Zapata by Ángel Zúñiga in 1998, as quoted in &#039;&#039;Mexican Social Movements and the Transition to Democracy&#039;&#039; (2005), by John Stolle-McAllister&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 907-11.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labour in vain; or coals to Newcastle.&lt;br /&gt;
** Anon. In a sermon to the people of Queen-Hith. Advertised in the Daily Courant, Oct. 6, 1709. Published in Paternoster Row, London. &amp;quot;Coals to Newcastle,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;from Newcastle,&amp;quot; found in Heywood—If you Know Not Me, Part II. (1606). Gaunt—Bills of Mortality. (1661). Middleton—Phœnix, Act I, scene 5. R. Thoresby—Correspondence. Letter June 29, 1682. Owls to Athens. (Athenian coins were stamped with the owl.) Aristophanes—Aves. 301. Diogenes Laertius—Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Plato, XXXII. You are importing pepper into Hindostan. From the Bustan of Sadi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Qui laborat, orat.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** He who labours, [[Prayer|prays]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Attr. to [[St. Augustine]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When Adam dolve, and Eve span,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who was then the gentleman?&lt;br /&gt;
** Lines used by John Ball in Wat Tyler&#039;s Rebellion. See Hume, &#039;&#039;History of England&#039;&#039;, Volume I, Chapter XVII. Note 8. So Adam reutte, und Eva span, Wer war da ein eddelman? (Old German saying).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Qui orat et laborat, cor levat ad Deum cum manibus.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** He who prays and labours lifts his heart to God with his hands.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[St. Bernard]], &#039;&#039;Ad sororem&#039;&#039;. A similar expression is found in the works of Gregory the Great—Moral in Libr. Job, Book XVIII. Also in Pseudo-Hieron, in Jerem., Thren. III. 41. See also &amp;quot;What worship, for example, is there not in mere washing!&amp;quot; Carlyle—Past and Present, Chapter XV., referring to &amp;quot;Work is prayer&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tools were made and born were hands,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Every   understands.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Blake]], &#039;&#039;Proverbs&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Hâtez-vous lentement; et, sans perdre courage,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Vingt fois sur le métier remettez votre ouvrage.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Hasten slowly, and without losing heart, put your work twenty times upon the anvil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux]], &#039;&#039;L&#039;Art Poétique&#039;&#039; (1674), I, 171.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The dog that trots about finds a bone.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Borrow]], &#039;&#039;Bible in Spain&#039;&#039;, Chapter XLVII. (Cited as a gipsy saying).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The best verse hasn&#039;t been rhymed yet,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The best house hasn&#039;t been planned,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The highest peak hasn&#039;t been climbed yet,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The mightiest rivers aren&#039;t spanned;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Don&#039;t worry and fret, faint-hearted,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The chances have just begun&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For the best jobs haven&#039;t been started,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The best work hasn&#039;t been done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Berton Braley]], &#039;&#039;No Chance&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not all the labor of the earth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is done by hardened hands.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Will Carleton]], &#039;&#039;A Working Woman&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And yet without labour there were no ease, no rest, so much as conceivable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, Characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the first of all problems for a man to find out what kind of work he is to do in this universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], address at Edinburgh (1866).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genuine Work alone, what thou workest faithfully, that is eternal, as the Almighty Founder and World-Builder himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Past and Present&#039;&#039;, Book II, Chapter XVII.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All work, even cotton-spinning, is noble; work is alone noble.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Past and Present&#039;&#039;, Book III, Chapter IV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With hand on the spade and heart in the sky&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Dress the ground and till it;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Turn in the little seed, brown and dry,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Turn out the golden millet.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work, and your house shall be duly fed:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Work, and rest shall be won;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I hold that a man had better be dead&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Than alive when his work is done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alice Cary]], &#039;&#039;Work&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They can expect nothing but their labor for their pains.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;{{w|Don Quixote}}&#039;&#039;, Author&#039;s Preface. [[Edward Moore]], &#039;&#039;The Boy and the Rainbow&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Earned with the sweat of my brows.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039; (1605-15), Part I, Book I, Chapter 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Quanto mas que cada uno es hijo de sus obras.&lt;br /&gt;
** The rather since every man is the son of his own works.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039; (1605-15), Book I, Chapter 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is discovered to be the grand conqueror, enriching and building up nations more surely than the proudest battles.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], &#039;&#039;War&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Each natural agent works but to this end,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To render that it works on like itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Chapman]], &#039;&#039;Bussy d&#039;Ambois&#039;&#039;, Act III, scene 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ther n&#039; is no werkman whatever he be,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That may both werken wel and hastily.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This wol be done at leisure parfitly.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Chaucer]], &#039;&#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;&#039;, The Merchantes Tale, line 585.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nowher so besy a man as he ther was,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And yet he semed bisier than he was.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Chaucer]], &#039;&#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;&#039;, Prologue, line 321.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let us take to our hearts a lesson—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; No lesson could braver be—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;From the ways of the tapestry weavers&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; On the other side of the sea.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anson G. Chester]], &#039;&#039;Tapestry Weavers&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Penelopæ telam retexens.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Unravelling the web of Penelope.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;Acad. Quæst&#039;&#039;, Book IV. 29. 95.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Vulgo enim dicitur, Jucundi acti labores: nec male Euripides: concludam, si potero, Latine: Græcum enim hunc versum nostis omnes: Suavis laborum est præteritorum memoria.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** It is generally said, &amp;quot;Past labors are pleasant,&amp;quot; Euripides says, for you all know the Greek verse, &amp;quot;The recollection of past labors is pleasant.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum&#039;&#039;, II. 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Le fruit du travail est le plus doux des plaisirs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The fruit derived from labor is the sweetest of pleasures.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Luc de Clapiers, Marquis de Vauvenargues]], &#039;&#039;Réflexions&#039;&#039;, 200.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A truly American sentiment recognises the dignity of labor and the fact that honor lies in honest toil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Grover Cleveland]], letter accepting the nomination for President. Aug. 18, 1884.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* American labor, which is the [[capital]] of our workingmen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Grover Cleveland]], Annual Message. Dec., 1885.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All Nature seems at work, slugs leave their lair—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The bees are stirring—birds are on the wing—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And Winter, slumbering in the open air,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Wears on his smiling face a dream of Spring!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And I the while, the sole unbusy thing,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nor honey make, nor pair, nor build, nor sing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]], &#039;&#039;Work Without Hope&#039;&#039;, Stanza 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Their work will be shown for what it is, because the [[Day of Judgement|Day]] will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each person’s work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[First Epistle to the Corinthians|I Corinthians]] [[w:1 Corinthians 3|3]]:13, [[New International Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Each one’s work will become obvious. For the day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire; the fire will test the quality of each one’s work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work thou for pleasure—paint or sing or carve&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The thing thou lovest, though the body starve—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who works for glory misses oft the goal;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who works for money coins his very soul.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work for the work&#039;s sake, then, and it may be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That these things shall be added unto thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kenyon Cox]], &#039;&#039;Our Motto&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When admirals extoll&#039;d for standing still,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of doing nothing with a deal of skill.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Table Talk&#039;&#039;, line 192.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Better to wear out than to rust out.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bishop Cumberland]], to one who urged him not to wear himself out with work. See Horne, &#039;&#039;Sermon on the Duty of Contending for the Truth&#039;&#039;. Boswell, &#039;&#039;Tour to the Hebrides&#039;&#039;, p. 18. Note. Said by George Whitefield, according to Southey, &#039;&#039;Life of Wesley&#039;&#039;, II, p. 170. (Ed. 1858).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Honest labour bears a lovely face.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Dekker (writer)|Thomas Dekker]], &#039;&#039;Patient Grissell&#039;&#039; (1599), Act I, scene 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Lord had a job for me, but I had so much to do,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I said, &amp;quot;You get somebody else—or wait till I get through.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I don&#039;t know how the Lord came out, but He seemed to get along:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But I felt kinda sneakin&#039; like, &#039;cause I know&#039;d I done Him wrong.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One day I needed the Lord—needed Him myself—needed Him right away,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And He never answered me at all, but I could hear Him say&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Down in my accusin&#039; heart, &amp;quot;Nigger, I&#039;se got too much to do,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;You get somebody else or wait till I get through.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Laurence Dunbar]], &#039;&#039;The Lord had a Job&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All play and no work makes Jack a mere toy.&lt;br /&gt;
** Quoted by [[Maria Edgeworth]], &#039;&#039;Henry and Lucy&#039;&#039;, Volume II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;Tis toil&#039;s reward, that sweetens industry,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As love inspires with strength the enraptur&#039;d thrush.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ebenezer Elliot]], &#039;&#039;Corn Law Rhymes&#039;&#039;. No. 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too busy with the crowded hour to fear to live or die.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Quatrains&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A woman&#039;s work, grave sirs, is never done.&lt;br /&gt;
** Mr. [[Eusden]], &#039;&#039;Poem&#039;&#039;, Spoken at a Cambridge Commencement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labour itself is but a sorrowful song,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The protest of the weak against the strong.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frederick William Faber]], &#039;&#039;The Sorrowful World&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Chacun son métier;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Les vaches seront bien gardées.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Each one to his own trade; then would the cows be well cared for.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Florian]], &#039;&#039;Le Vacher et le Garde-chasse&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A ploughman on his legs is higher than a gentleman on his knees.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], &#039;&#039;Poor Richard&#039;&#039; (1758), Preface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Handle your tools without mittens.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], &#039;&#039;Poor Richard&#039;&#039; (1758), Preface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plough deep while sluggards sleep.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], &#039;&#039;Poor Richard&#039;&#039; (1758), Preface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Men work together,&amp;quot; I told him from the heart,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Whether they work together or apart.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Frost]], &#039;&#039;Tuft of Flowers&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is so far from being needless pains, that it may bring considerable profit, to carry Charcoals to Newcastle.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Fuller]], &#039;&#039;Pisgah&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Sight of Palestine&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1650), p. 128. Worthies, p. 302. (Ed. 1661).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In every rank, or great or small,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;Tis industry supports us all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Gay]], &#039;&#039;Man, Cat, Dog, and Fly&#039;&#039;, line 63.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Genesis|Genesis]], III. 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For as labor cannot produce without the use of land, the denial of the equal right to the use of land is necessarily the denial of the right of labor to its own produce.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry George]], &#039;&#039;Progress and Poverty&#039;&#039;, Book VII, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;So eine Arbeit wird eigentlich nie fertig; man muss sie für fertig erklären, wenn man nach Zeit und Umstand das Möglichste getan hat.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Properly speaking, such work is never finished; one must declare it so when, according to time and circumstances, one has done one&#039;s best.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], &#039;&#039;Italienische Reise&#039;&#039; (March 16, 1787).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How blest is he who crowns in shades like these,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A youth of labour with an age of ease.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oliver Goldsmith]], &#039;&#039;The Deserted Village&#039;&#039; (1770), line 99.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He that well his warke beginneth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rather a good ende he winneth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Gower]], &#039;&#039;Confessio Amantis&#039;&#039; (c.1386–1393).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Vitam perdidi laboricose agendo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I have spent my life laboriously doing nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** Quoted by [[Grotius]] on his death bed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warke it ys as easie to be done&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As tys to saye Jacke! robys on.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|James Halliwell-Phillipps}}, &#039;&#039;Archæological Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Quoted from an old Play. See Grose—Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar tongue. Hudson, the English singer, made popular the refrain, &amp;quot;Before ye could cry &#039;Jack Robinson.&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joy to the Toiler!—him that tills&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The fields with Plenty crowned;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Him with the woodman&#039;s axe that thrills&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The wilderness profound.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Hathaway]], &#039;&#039;Songs of the Toiler&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If little labour, little are our gaines:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Man&#039;s fortunes are according to his paines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Herrick (poet)|Robert Herrick]], &#039;&#039;Hesperides&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;No Paines, No Gaines&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Haste makes waste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Heywood]], &#039;&#039;Proverbs&#039;&#039;, Part I, Chapter II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The &amp;quot;value&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;worth&amp;quot; of a man is, as of all other things, his price; that is to say, so much as would be given for the use of his power.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Hobbes]], &#039;&#039;Leviathan&#039;&#039;, Chapter X.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To labour is the lot of man below;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And when Jove gave us life, he gave us woe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Iliad&#039;&#039;, Book X, line 78. Pope&#039;s translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Light is the task when many share the toil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Iliad&#039;&#039;, Book XII, line 493. Bryant&#039;s translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our fruitless labours mourn,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And only rich in barren fame return.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book X, line 46. Pope&#039;s translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The fiction pleased; our generous train complies,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Nor fraud mistrusts in [[virtue]]&#039;s fair disguise.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The work she plyed, but, studious of delay,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Each following night reversed the toils of day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book XXIV, line 164. Pope&#039;s translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When Darby saw the setting sun&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He swung his scythe, and home he run,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sat down, drank off his quart and said,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My work is done, I&#039;ll go to bed.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My work is done!&amp;quot; retorted Joan,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My work is done! Your constant tone,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But hapless woman ne&#039;er can say&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;My work is done&#039; till judgment day.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[St. John Honeywood]], &#039;&#039;Darby and Joan&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With fingers weary and worn,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With eyelids heavy and red,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A woman sat in unwomanly rags,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plying her needle and thread.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Hood]], &#039;&#039;Song of the Shirt&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Qui studet optatam cursu contingere metam&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Multa tulit fecitque puer, sudavit et alsit.&lt;br /&gt;
** He who would reach the desired goal must, while a boy, suffer and labor much and bear both heat and cold.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Horace]], &#039;&#039;Ars Poetica&#039;&#039; (18 BC), CCCCXII.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;O laborum&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dulce lenimen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** O sweet solace of labors.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Horace]], &#039;&#039;Carmina&#039;&#039;, I. 32. 14.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;In silvam ligna ferre.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** To carry timber into the wood.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Horace]], &#039;&#039;Satires&#039;&#039;, I. 10. 24.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Facito aliquid operis, ut semper te diabolus inveniat occupatum.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Keep doing some kind of work, that the devil may always find you employed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[St. Jerome]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I like work; it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. I love to keep it by me: the idea of getting rid of it nearly breaks my heart.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jerome K. Jerome]], &#039;&#039;Three Men in a Boat&#039;&#039;, Chapter XV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Cur quæris quietem, quam natus sis ad laborem?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Why seekest thou rest, since thou art born to labor?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas á Kempis]], &#039;&#039;De Imitatione Christi&#039;&#039;, II. 10. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tho&#039; we earn our bread, Tom,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; By the dirty pen,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What we can we will be,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Honest Englishmen.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Do the work that&#039;s nearest&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Though it&#039;s dull at whiles,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Helping, when we meet them,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Lame dogs over stiles.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Kingsley]], Letter. To Thomas Hughes (1856), inviting Hughes and Tom Taylor to go fishing. See Memoirs of Kingsley, by his wife, Chapter XV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For men must work and women must weep,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the sooner it&#039;s over the sooner to sleep,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And good-bye to the bar and its moaning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Kingsley]], &#039;&#039;Three Fishers&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But till we are built like angels, with hammer and chisel and pen,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We will work for ourself and a woman, for ever and ever, Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;Imperial Rescript&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The gull shall whistle in his wake, the blind wave break in fire.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He shall fulfill God&#039;s utmost will, unknowing His desire,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And he shall see old planets pass and alien stars arise,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And give the gale his reckless sail in shadow of new skies.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Strong lust of gear shall drive him out and hunger arm his hand,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To wring his food from a desert nude, his foothold from the sand.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Fareloper (Interloper)&#039;&#039;. Pub. in Century Magazine, April, 1909. First pub. in London Daily Telegraph, Jan. 1, 1909. Title given as Vortrekker in his Songs From Books.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And only the Master shall praise us, and only the Master shall blame;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And no one shall work for money, and no one shall work for fame;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But each for the joy of the working, and each, in his separate star,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shall draw the Thing as he sees It, for the God of Things as They Are!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;L&#039;Envoi&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;In Seven Seas&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And the Sons of Mary smile and are blessed—they know the angels are on their side;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;They know in them is the Grace confessed, and for them are the Mercies multiplied;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;They sit at the Feet, they hear the Word, they see how truly the Promise runs;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;They have cast their burden upon the Lord, and—the Lord He lays it on Martha&#039;s Sons!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Sons of Mary&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Who first invented work, and bound the free&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And holyday-rejoicing spirit down  *  *  *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To that dry drudgery at the desk&#039;s dead wood?  *  *  *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sabbathless Satan!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;Work&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The finest eloquence is that which gets things done; the worst is that which delays them.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[D. Lloyd George]], at the Conference of Paris (Jan., 1919).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Unemployment, with its injustice for the man who seeks and thirsts for employment, who begs for labour and cannot get it, and who is punished for failure he is not responsible for by the starvation of his children—that torture is something that private enterprise ought to remedy for its own sake.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[D. Lloyd George]], speech (Dec. 6, 1919).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The heights by great men reached and kept&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Were not attained by sudden flight,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But they, while l heir companions slept,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Were toiling upward in the night.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;Birds of Passage&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Ladder of St. Augustine&#039;&#039;, Stanza 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taste the joy&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That springs from labor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;Masque of Pandora&#039;&#039;, Part VI. In the Garden. &amp;quot;From labor there shall come forth rest.&amp;quot;--Longfellow—To a Child, line 162.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Never idle a moment, but thrifty and thoughtful of others.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;The Courtship of Miles Standish&#039;&#039; (1858), Part VIII, line 46.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No man is born into the world whose work&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is not born with him; there is always work,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And tools to work withal, for those who will;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And blessed are the horny hands of toil!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Russell Lowell]], &#039;&#039;A Glance Behind the Curtain&#039;&#039;, line 202. &amp;quot;Horny-handed sons of toil.&amp;quot; Popularized by Denis Kearney (Big Denny), of San Francisco.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Labor est etiam ipsa voluptas.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Labor is itself a pleasure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, IV. 155.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How bething the, gentliman,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; How Adam dalf, and Eve span.&lt;br /&gt;
** Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century. British Museum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bowed by the weight of centuries he leans&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Upon his hoe and gazes on the ground,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The emptiness of ages in his face,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on his back the burden of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edwin Markham]], &#039;&#039;The Man with the Hoe&#039;&#039;. Written after seeing Millet&#039;s picture &amp;quot;Angelus&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Divisum sic breve fiet opus.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Work divided is in that manner shortened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martial]], &#039;&#039;Epigrams&#039;&#039; (c. 80-104 AD), Book IV. 83. 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why do strong arms fatigue themselves with frivolous dumb-bells? To dig a vineyard is a worthier exercise for men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martial]], &#039;&#039;Epigrams&#039;&#039; (c. 80-104 AD), Book XIV, Epigram 49.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God be thank&#039;d that the dead have left still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Good undone for the living to do—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Still some aim for the heart and the will&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And the soul of a man to pursue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Owen Meredith]] (Lord Lytton), &#039;&#039;Epilogue&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But now my task is smoothly done,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I can fly, or I can run.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Comus (John Milton)|Comus]]&#039;&#039; (1637), line 1,012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am of nothing and to nothing tend,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; On earth I nothing have and nothing claim,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Man&#039;s noblest works must have one common end,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And nothing crown the tablet of his name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Moore]], &#039;&#039;Ode upon Nothing&#039;&#039;. Appeared in Saturday Magazine about 1836. Not in Collected Works.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lo! all life this truth declares,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Laborare est orare;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the whole earth rings with prayers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miss Mulock]], &#039;&#039;Labour is Prayer&#039;&#039;, Stanza 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Has it ever been really noted to what extent a genuinely religious life … requires a leisure class, or half-leisure—I mean leisure with a good conscience, from way back, by blood, to which the aristocratic feeling that work disgraces is not altogether alien—the feeling that it makes soul and body common. And that consequently our modern, noisy, time-consuming industriousness, proud of itself, stupidly proud, educates and prepares people, more than anything else does, precisely for “unbelief.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;Beyond Good and Evil&#039;&#039;, W. Kauffman, trans. (New York: 1992), § 58.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is life! &#039;Tis the still water faileth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Idleness ever despaireth, bewaileth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Keep the watch wound, for the dark rust assaileth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frances S. Osgood]], &#039;&#039;To Labor is to Pray&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is rest—from the sorrows that greet us;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Rest from all petty vexations that meet us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Rest from sin-promptings that ever entreat us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Rest from the world-sirens that hire us to ill.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work—and pure slumbers shall wait on thy pillow;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work—thou shalt ride over Care&#039;s coming billow;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Lie not down wearied &#039;neath Woe&#039;s weeping willow!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work with a stout heart and resolute will!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frances S. Osgood]], &#039;&#039;To Labor is to Pray&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The uselessness of men above sixty years of age and the incalculable benefit it would be in commercial, in political, and in professional life, if as a matter of course, men stopped work at this age.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Osler]], address, at Johns Hopkins University (Feb. 22, 1905).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Study until twenty-five, investigation until forty, profession until sixty, at which age I would have him retired on a double allowance.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Osler]]. The statement made by him which gave rise to the report that he had advised chloroform after sixty. Denied by him in &#039;&#039;Medical Record&#039;&#039; (March 4, 1905).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Dum vires annique sinunt, tolerate labores.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jam veniet tacito curva senecta pede.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** While strength and years permit, endure labor; soon bent old age will come with silent foot.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Ars Amatoria&#039;&#039;, II. 669.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And all labour without any play, boys,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Makes Jack a dull boy in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
** H. A. Page (pseudonym of {{w|Alexander Hay Japp}}), &#039;&#039;Vers de Société&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Many hands make light work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Patten|William Patten]]{{Disambiguation needed}}. &#039;&#039;Expedition into Scotland&#039;&#039; (1547). In Arber&#039;s Reprint of 1880.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing is impossible to industry.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Periander of Corinth]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Grex venalium.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The herd of hirelings. (A venal pack.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Cistellaria&#039;&#039;, IV. 2. 67.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Oleum et operam perdidi.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I have lost my oil and my labor. (Labored in vain.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Pœnulus&#039;&#039;, I. 2. 119.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ease and speed in doing a thing do not give the work lasting solidity or exactness of beauty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plutarch]], &#039;&#039;Life of Pericles&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man goeth forth unto his work and to his labour until the evening.&lt;br /&gt;
** Psalms. CIV. 23.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When Adam dalfe and Eve spane&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; So spire if thou may spede,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Where was then the pride of man,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That nowe merres his mede?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Rolle de Hampole]], &#039;&#039;Early English Text Society Reprints&#039;&#039;, No. 26, p. 79.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The man who by his labour gets&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His bread, in independent state,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who never begs, and seldom eats,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Himself can fix or change his fate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Matthew Prior]], &#039;&#039;The Old Gentry&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Der Mohr hat seine Arbeit gethan, der Mohr kann gehen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The Moor has done his work, the Moor may go.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Fiesco&#039;&#039;, III. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hard toil can roughen form and face,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And want can quench the eye&#039;s bright grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walter Scott]], &#039;&#039;Marmion&#039;&#039; (1808), Canto I, Stanza 28.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why, universal plodding poisons up&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The nimble spirits in the arteries,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As motion and long-during action tires&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The sinewy vigour of the traveller.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Love&#039;s Labour&#039;s Lost]]&#039;&#039; (c. 1595-6), Act IV, scene 3, line 305.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why, Hal, &#039;tis my vocation. Hal: &#039;tis no sin for a man to labour in his vocation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry IV, Part 1|&#039;&#039;Henry IV&#039;&#039;, Part I]] (c. 1597), Act I, scene 2, line 116.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Another lean, unwashed artificer.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[King John]]&#039;&#039; (1598), Act IV, scene 2, line 201.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have had my labour for my travail.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Troilus and Cressida]]&#039;&#039; (c. 1602), Act I, scene 1, line 72.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The labour we delight in physics pain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Macbeth]]&#039;&#039; (1605), Act II, scene 3, line 55.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What work&#039;s, my countrymen, in hand? where go you&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With bats and clubs? The matter? speak, I pray you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Coriolanus]]&#039;&#039; (c. 1607-08), Act I, scene 1, line 55.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man who has no office to go to—I don&#039;t care who he is—is a trial of which you can have no conception.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Irrational Knot&#039;&#039;, Chapter XVIII.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am giving you examples of the fact that this creature man, who in his own selfish affairs is a coward to the backbone, will fight for an idea like a hero…. I tell you, gentlemen, if you can shew a man a piece of what he now calls God&#039;s work to do, and what he will later call by many new names, you can make him entirely reckless of the consequences to himself personally.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Man and Superman&#039;&#039; (1903), Act III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A day&#039;s work is a day&#039;s work, neither more nor less, and the man who does it needs a day&#039;s sustenance, a night&#039;s repose, and due leisure, whether he be painter or ploughman.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Unsocial Socialist&#039;&#039;, Chapter V.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Many faint with toil,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That few may know the cares and woe of sloth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;Queen Mab&#039;&#039; (1813), Canto III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many a rustic Milton has passed by,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Stifling the speechless longings of his heart,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In unremitting drudgery and care!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;How many a vulgar Cato has compelled&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His energies, no longer tameless then,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To mould a pin, or fabricate a nail!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;Queen Mab&#039;&#039; (1813), Part V, Stanza 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing can be done at once hastily and prudently.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Syrus]], &#039;&#039;Maxims&#039;&#039;. 357.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** Labour of love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[First Epistle to the Thessalonians|I Thessalonians]]. I. 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ne laterum laves.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Do not wash bricks. (Waste your labor).&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terence]], &#039;&#039;Phormio&#039;&#039;, I, IV. 9. A Greek proverb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With starving labor pampering idle waste;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To tear at pleasure the defected land.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], Liberty, Part IV, line 1,160.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The labourer is worthy of his reward.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[First Epistle to Timothy|I Timothy]]. V. 18; Luke. X. 7. (hire).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A workman that needeth not to be ashamed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Second Epistle to Timothy|II Timothy]], II. 15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Clamorous pauperism feasteth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;While honest Labor, pining, hideth his sharp ribs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Tupper]], &#039;&#039;Of Discretion&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Heaven is blessed with perfect rest but the blessing of earth is toil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Van Dyke]], &#039;&#039;Toiling of Felix&#039;&#039;, last line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor omnia vincit improbus.&lt;br /&gt;
** Stubborn labor conquers everything.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Virgil]], &#039;&#039;Georgics&#039;&#039; (c. 29 BC), I. 145.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work spares us from three [[evils]]: [[boredom]], &#039;&#039;&#039;vice&#039;&#039;&#039; and [[Poverty|need]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]],&#039;&#039;Candide, ou l&#039;Optimisme&#039;&#039; (1759) Chapter 30. Conclusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too long, that some may rest,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tired millions toil unblest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;New National Anthem&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But when dread Sloth, the Mother of Doom, steals in,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And reigns where Labour&#039;s glory was to serve,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Then is the day of crumbling not far off.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;The Mother of Doom&#039;&#039; (August 28, 1919).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In books, or work, or healthful play.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Watts]], &#039;&#039;Divine Songs&#039;&#039;, XX.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor in this country is independent and proud. It has not to ask the patronage of [[capital]], but capital solicits the aid of labor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel Webster]], speech, April, 1824.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There will be little drudgery in this better ordered world. Natural power harnessed in machines will be the general drudge. What drudgery is inevitable will be done as a service and duty for a few years or months out of each life; it will not consume nor degrade the whole life of anyone.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. G. Wells]], &#039;&#039;Outline of History&#039;&#039;, Chapter XLI. Par. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ah, little recks the laborer,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;How near his work is holding him to God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The loving Laborer through space and time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walt Whitman]], &#039;&#039;Song of the Exposition&#039;&#039;, I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thine to work as well as pray,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Clearing thorny wrongs away;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plucking up the weeds of sin,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Letting heaven&#039;s warm sunshine in.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;The Curse of the Charter-Breakers&#039;&#039;, Stanza 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ah vitam perdidi operse nihil agendo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Ah, my life is lost in laboriously doing nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Josiah Woodward]], &#039;&#039;Fair Warnings to a Careless World&#039;&#039;, p. 97. Ed. 1736, quoting Merick Casaubon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989)==&lt;br /&gt;
* The day is short, the labor long, the workers are idle, and reward is great, and the Master is urgent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aboth]], 2:15, saying of Rabbi Tarfon. Pirkay Avot, often known in English as the &amp;quot;Chapters of the Fathers&amp;quot;, is the best known of the books of the Mishnah, first part of the Talmud. Translations vary; that above is from A Treasury of Jewish Quotations, ed. Joseph L. Baron, p. 277 (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to Sir [[James Matthew Barrie]], &#039;&#039;The International Encyclopedia of Quotations&#039;&#039;, comp. John P. Bradley, Leo F. Daniels, and Thomas C. Jones, p. 781 (1978). Reported as unverified in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The most unhappy of all men is the man who cannot tell what he is going to do, who has got no work cut-out for him in the world, and does not go into it. For work is the grand cure of all the maladies and miseries that ever beset mankind,—honest work, which you intend getting done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], inaugural address as rector of the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, April 2, 1866.—Carlyle, Critical and Miscellaneous Essays, vol. 6 (vol. 29 of The Works of Thomas Carlyle), p. 455 (1899, reprinted 1969).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Do the day&#039;s work. If it be to protect the rights of the weak, whoever objects, do it. If it be to help a powerful corporation better to serve the people, whatever the opposition, do that. Expect to be called a stand-patter, but don&#039;t be a stand-patter. Expect to be called a demagogue, but don&#039;t be a demagogue. Don&#039;t hesitate to be as revolutionary as science. Don&#039;t hesitate to be as reactionary as the multiplication table. Don&#039;t expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. Don&#039;t hurry to legislate. Give administration a chance to catch up with legislation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Calvin Coolidge]], speech to the Massachusetts state Senate on being elected its president, Boston, Massachusetts, January 7, 1914.—Coolidge, Have Faith in Massachusetts, p. 7–8 (1919).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our greatest weariness comes from work not done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eric Hoffer]], &amp;quot;Thoughts of Eric Hoffer&amp;quot;, Including: &#039;Absolute Faith Corrupts Absolutely,&#039;&amp;quot; The New York Times Magazine, April 25, 1971, p. 55.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you work for a man, in heaven&#039;s name work for him!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If he pays you [[wages]] that supply you your bread and butter, work for him—speak well of him, think well of him, stand by him and stand by the institution he represents.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I think if I worked for a man I would work for him. I would not work for him a part of the time, and the rest of the time work against him. I would give an undivided service or none.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If put to the pinch, an ounce of loyalty is worth a pound of cleverness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &amp;quot;Get Out or Get in Line&amp;quot;, Selected Writings of Elbert Hubbard, p. 59–60 (1928).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the Great Society, work shall be an outlet for man&#039;s interests and desires. Each individual shall have full opportunity to use his capacities in employment which satisfies personally and contributes generally to the quality of the Nation&#039;s life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lyndon B. Johnson]], Manpower Report of the President, March 5, 1965. &#039;&#039;Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1965&#039;&#039;, book 1, p. 262.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I long to accomplish a great and noble task, but it is my chief duty to accomplish humble tasks as though they were great and noble. The world is moved along, not only by the mighty shoves of its heroes, but also by the aggregate of the tiny pushes of each honest worker.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Helen Keller]], Charles L. Wallis, The Treasure Chest, p. 240 (1983). Reported as unverified in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As good play for nothing, you know, as work for nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Walter Scott]], letter to Charles Kirkpatrick Sharpe, December 30, 1808.—John Gibson Lockhart, The Life of Sir Walter Scott, vol. 3, p. 144 (1902, reprinted 1983). Another use of this proverb was attributed, in an obituary, to [[[[Sir Alexander Cockburn, 12th Baronet|Sir Alexander Cockburn]], Lord Chief Justice of England. &amp;quot;He subsequently acquired a large practice in London in railway and election cases. Although he did his best for his clients, he was careful that they should do their duty by him, and the story is told that on one occasion, when an election committee met, Mr. Cockburn, the counsel for one of the parties, was absent because his fee had not accompanied the brief and the only message left was that he had gone to the Derby, with the remark that &#039;a man might as well play for nothing as work for nothing.&#039;&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Canada Law Journal&#039;&#039;, January 1, 1881, p. 11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[w:Workers of the world, unite!|Workers of the world, unite!]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The Communist Manifesto (1848), by [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Russian: &#039;&#039;Proletarii vsekh stran, soyedinyaytes!&#039;&#039; The phrase later appeared in the State Emblem of the Soviet Union, starting in 1919.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You must obey this now for a Law, that he that will not worke shall not eate (except by sicknesse he be disabled:) for the labours of thirtie or fortie honest and industrious men shall not be consumed to maintaine an hundred and fiftie idle loyterers.&lt;br /&gt;
** Captain [[John Smith]], advice to his company when he was governor of Jamestown Colony, Virginia, 1608.—Smith, The Generall Historie of Virginia, New England &amp;amp; The Summer Isles, vol. 1, chapter 10, p. 174 (1907). The preceding paragraph notes that &amp;quot;six houres each day was spent in worke, the rest in Pastime and merry exercises, but the untowardnesse of the greatest number caused the President [to] advise as followeth&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Dictionary of Legal Quotations&#039;&#039; (1904)==&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in James William Norton-Kyshe, &#039;&#039;Dictionary of Legal Quotations&#039;&#039; (1904), p. 164-165.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The power of arbitrarily dismissing those in one&#039;s employ, is a power exercised in a great degree over a vast number of persons in this country, without their having any redress at law. Put the case of a day labourer or ordinary servant. You may refuse to give him a character, and he has no redress. If you give him a false character, he has the means of redress, but that is of a very different kind. And this is the law of the land.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadwell, V.-C, &#039;&#039;Ranger v. Great Western Rail. Co.&#039;&#039; (1838), 2 Jur. (0. S.) 789.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The possession of the servant is the possession of the master.&lt;br /&gt;
** Hide, C.J., &#039;&#039;King v. Burgess&#039;&#039; (1663), Ray. (Sir Thos.) Rep. 85.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apprentices and servants are characters perfectly distinct: the one receives instruction, the other a stipulated price for his labour.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lloyd Kenyon, 1st Baron Kenyon|Lord Kenyon]], C.J., &#039;&#039;The King v. Inhabitants of St. Paul&#039;s&#039;&#039;, Bedford (1797), 6 T. R. 454.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers&#039;&#039; (1895)==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in Josiah Hotchkiss Gilbert, &#039;&#039;Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers&#039;&#039; (1895).&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No man is born into the world whose work is not born with him. There is always work, and tools to work withal, for those who will.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ward Beecher]], p. 368.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let parents who hate their offspring rear them to hate labor, and to inherit riches; and before long they will be stung by every vice, racked by its poison, and damned by its penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ward Beecher]], p. 438.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Blessed is the man who has found his work; let him ask no other blessedness. Know thy work, and do it; and work at it like Hercules. One monster there is in the world, the idle man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is sweet, for Thou hast toiled,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And care is light, for Thou hast cared;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Let not our works with self be soiled,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Nor in unsimple ways ensnared.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Through life&#039;s long day and death&#039;s dark night,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O gentle Jesus! be our light.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frederick William Faber]], p. 369.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No man is base who does a true work; for true action is the highest being. No man is miserable that does a true work; for right action is the highest happiness. No man is isolated that does a true work; for useful action is the highest harmony — it is the highest harmony with nature and with souls — it is living association with men — and it is practical fellowship with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Giles]], p. 369.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man must work. That is certain as the sun. But he may work grudgingly, or he may work gratefully; he may work as a man, or he may work as a machine. He cannot always choose his work, but he can do it in a generous temper, and with an up-looking heart. There is no work so rude, that he may not exalt it; there is no work so impassive, that he may not breathe a soul into it; there is no work so dull, that he may not enliven it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Giles]], p. 369.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man&#039;s labors must pass like the sunrises and sunsets of the world. The next thing, not the last, must be his care.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George MacDonald]], p. 369.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is not, as some have erroneously supposed, a penal clause of the original curse. There was labor, bright, healthful, unfatiguing, in unfallen Paradise. By sin, labor became drudgery — the earth was restrained from her spontaneous fertility, and the strong arm of the husbandman was required, not to develop, but to &amp;quot;subdue&amp;quot; it. But labor in itself is noble, and is necessary for the ripe unfolding of the highest life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Morley Punshon]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is the true alchemist that beats out in patient transmutation the baser metals into gold.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Morley Punshon]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God does not give excellence to men but as the reward of labor.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Joshua Reynolds]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing is denied to well-directed labor; nothing is ever to be attained without it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Joshua Reynolds]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Virtue|virtues]], like the body,become strong more by labor than by nourishment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Paul]], p. 368.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
{{col-begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{col-2}} &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Basic income]] (Universal basice income)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Career]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Employment]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Exploitation]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Division of labor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greed]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[General strike]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Human rights]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Labour movement|Labor movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oligarchy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Retirement]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Self respect]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Servility]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scarcity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slavery]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vocation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wage slavery]]  &lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary|work|labor}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Labor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[ko:노동]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Work&amp;diff=3153483</id>
		<title>Work</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Work&amp;diff=3153483"/>
		<updated>2022-08-11T07:14:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* K */ if you can fix the bullet layout, it would be cool&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Lewis Hine Power house mechanic working on steam pump.jpg|thumb|Work that is pure toil, done solely for the sake of the [[money]] it earns, is also sheer drudgery because it is stultifying rather than self improving. ~ [[Mortimer Adler]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Parc de Versailles, Rond-Point des Philosophes, Apollonius, Barthélemy de Mélo inv1850n°9449 02.jpg|thumb|[[Plato]] said that virtue has no master. If a person does not honor this principle and rejoice in it, but is purchasable for money, he creates many masters for himself. ~ [[Apollonius of Tyana]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;{{w|Work}}&#039;&#039;&#039; or labor is intentional activity people perform to support themselves, others, or the needs and wants of a wider community.  Work is fundamental to all societies, but can vary widely within and between them, from gathering in natural resources by hand, to operating complex technologies that substitute for physical or even mental effort by many human beings. &#039;&#039;&#039;{{w|Labor}}&#039;&#039;&#039; is [[effort]] expended on a [[task]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha|&#039;&#039;[[#Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations|Hoyt&#039;s&amp;amp;nbsp;New&amp;amp;nbsp;Cyclopedia&amp;amp;nbsp;Of&amp;amp;nbsp;Practical&amp;amp;nbsp;Quotations]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations (1989)|Respectfully&amp;amp;nbsp;Quoted]]&#039;&#039;}}&lt;br /&gt;
=Quotes=&lt;br /&gt;
==A==&lt;br /&gt;
* No single event has influenced the history of labor in Illinois, the United States, and even the world, more than the Chicago Haymarket Affair. It began with a rally on May 4, 1886, but the consequences are still being felt today. Although the rally is included in American history textbooks, very few present the event accurately or point out its significance.&lt;br /&gt;
** William J. Adelman &amp;quot;The Haymarket Affair&amp;quot;. illinoislaborhistory.org. Retrieved March 19, 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Work that is pure toil, done solely for the sake of the money it earns, is also sheer drudgery because it is stultifying rather than self improving.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mortimer Adler]], &#039;&#039;A Vision of the Future : Twelve Ideas for a Better Life and a Better Society&#039;&#039; (1984).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Since the heart is an accumulator and transmuter of various energies, there must be more favorable conditions for arousing and attracting these energies. The most fundamental condition is work, mental as well as physical. In the motion of work, energies are gathered from space; but one must understand work as a natural process that enriches life. Thus, every kind of work is a [[Blessings|blessing]], while the vagaries of [[Idleness|inaction]] are extremely harmful in a cosmic sense. Love for the endlessness of labor is in itself an initiation of considerable degree; it prepares you for the conquest of [[time]]. Being in a condition where you have conquered [[time]] guarantees you a place in the Subtle World, where work is an unavoidable condition, just as it is in the body. A complaint about having to work can only come from a slave of the body.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]], &#039;&#039;Heart&#039;&#039;, 79. (1932)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t want to achieve immortality through my work... I want to achieve immortality through not dying.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Silent Strength&#039;&#039; (1990) by Lloyd John Ogilvie, p. 111.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Zeal is proper for a task, time-wasting is taboo; anyone who wastes time on his task is neglecting his task.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anonymous]], &#039;&#039;[http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/section5/tr513.htm The advice of a supervisor to a younger scribe]&#039;&#039; ({{w|Eduba}} C), late third or early second millennium BCE, at {{w|The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The land of easy mathematics where he who works adds up and he who retires subtracts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Núria Añó]], in the short story &#039;&#039;2066. Beginning the age of correction&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not demand equal pay for any women save those who do equal work in value. Scorn to be coddled by your employers; make them understand that you are in their service as workers, not as women.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Susan B. Anthony]], &#039;&#039;The Revolution&#039;&#039;, Women&#039;s Suffrage Newspaper (Oct. 8, 1868)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Plato]] said that [[virtue]] has no master. If a person does not honor this principle and rejoice in it, but is purchasable for money, he creates many masters for himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Apollonius of Tyana]], letter to Euphrates, &#039;&#039;Epp. Apoll.&#039;&#039; 15&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Our characters are the result of our conduct.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aristotle]], &#039;&#039;Nicomachean Ethics&#039;&#039;,  Book 3, chapter 5, section 12 (c. 335 BC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==B==&lt;br /&gt;
* And the one carried in the current said, &amp;quot;I am no more messiah than you. The river delights to lift us free, if only we dare let go. &#039;&#039;&#039;Our true work is this voyage, this adventure.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Bach]], &#039;&#039;Illusions : The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah&#039;&#039; (1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The more I want to get something done, the less I call it work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Bach]], &#039;&#039;Illusions : The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah&#039;&#039; (1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You are never given a wish without also being given the power to make it true.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;You may have to work for it, however.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Bach]], &#039;&#039;Illusions : The Adventures of a Reluctant Messiah&#039;&#039; (1977).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a strange desire which men have, to seek power and lose liberty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Ornamenta Rationalia&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Measure not the work &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Until the day&#039;s out and the labour done, &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Then bring your gauges.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1857), Book V.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. M. Barrie]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The new dictionary of thoughts: a Cyclopedia of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1930) edited by [[Tryon Edwards]], C. N. Catrevas, Jonathan Edwards, and Ralph Emerson Browns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ninety-five percent of all jobs suck, Jones. That’s why people get paid to do them.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Barry]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Company (novel)|Company]]&#039;&#039; (2006), {{ISBN|0-385-51439-5}}, p. 112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There’s no requirement that jobs be meaningful, Jones. If there was, half the country would be unemployed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Barry]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Company (novel)|Company]]&#039;&#039; (2006), {{ISBN|0-385-51439-5}}, p. 334&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Unless we abandon the work ethic of [[the past|another era]], ... lives may be wasted because of blind insistence that everyone must have a &amp;quot;job&amp;quot; even if the job is useless.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Pierre Berton|Pierre Berton]], &#039;&#039;The Smug Minority&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;You&#039;ve achieved success in your field when you don&#039;t know whether what you&#039;re doing is work or play.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Warren Beatty}}, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Best Liberal Quotes Ever : Why The Left Is Right&#039;&#039; (2004) by William Martin, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is healthy, you can hardly put more upon a man than he can bear. It is not work that kills men; it is worry. Worry is rust upon the blade.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ward Beecher]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Teachers&#039; Institute&#039;&#039;, Vol. 18, No. 1 (September 1895), p. 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When God wanted sponges and oysters, He made them and put one on a rock and the other in the mud. When He made man, He did not make him to be a sponge or an oyster; He made him with feet and hands, and head and heart, and vital blood, and a place to use them, and He said to him, Go Work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ward Beecher]], &#039;&#039;Royal Truths&#039;&#039; (1862), p. 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*LABOR, &#039;&#039;n.&#039;&#039; One of the processes by which A acquires property for B.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ambrose Bierce]], [https://books.google.com/books?id=CboOAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA213 &#039;&#039;The Cynic&#039;s Word Book&#039;&#039;] (1906); republished as &#039;&#039;The Devil&#039;s Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1911).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No one should ever work. &#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world. Almost all the evil you&#039;d care to name comes from working or from living in a world designed for work. &#039;&#039;&#039;In order to stop suffering, we have to stop working.&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; That doesn&#039;t mean we have to stop doing things. It does mean creating a new way of life based on play; in other words, a &#039;&#039;ludic&#039;&#039; revolution. By &amp;quot;play&amp;quot; I mean also festivity, creativity, conviviality, commensality, and maybe even art. There is more to play than child&#039;s play, as worthy as that is. I call for a collective adventure in generalized joy and freely interdependent exuberance. Play isn&#039;t passive.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bob Black]], &#039;&#039;The Abolition of Work&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wealth is the offspring of intelligence and of work, the soul and the life of humanity. But these two forces can act only with the help of a passive element, the soil, which they make productive by their combined efforts.It would seem, therefore, that this indispensable instrument should belong to all men.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Louis Blanc|Louis Blanc]], &amp;quot;The Man Who Makes the Soup Should Get to Eat It&amp;quot;, (1834).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Striving for success without hard work is like trying to harvest where you haven&#039;t planted.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:David Bly|David Bly]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Peace of Mind : Daily Meditations for Easing Stress&#039;&#039; (1995) by Amy Dean, p. 187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The reign of capital, which denies our very existence as human beings and reduces us to ‘things’, seems very serious, methodical and disciplined. But its possessive paroxysm, its ethical rigour, its obsession with ‘doing’ all hide a great illusion: the total emptiness of the commodity spectacle, the uselessness of indefinite accumulation and the absurdity of [[exploitation]]. So the great seriousness of the world of work and productivity hides a total lack of seriousness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfredo M. Bonanno]], &#039;&#039;Armed Joy&#039;&#039; (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work to me is a sacred thing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Margaret Bourke-White|Margaret Bourke-White]], &#039;&#039;Portrait of Myself&#039;&#039; (1963), Ch. 30.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers at the University of Oxford [recently] published the results of a survey of the world’s best artificial intelligence experts, who predicted that there was a 50 percent chance of AI outperforming humans in all tasks within 45 years...the immediate concern for most people is that they will be losing their jobs... That helps explain the recent interest in a [[universal basic income|universal basic income (UBI)]] – a sum of money distributed equally to everyone.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ellen Brown]] in [https://www.globalresearch.ca/how-to-fund-a-universal-basic-income-without-increasing-taxes-or-inflation/5611947 How to Fund a Universal Basic Income Without Increasing Taxes or Inflation, Global Research&#039;&#039;] (4 October 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By the way,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The works of women are symbolical.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We sew, sew, prick our ringers, dull our sight,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Producing what? A pair of slippers, sir,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To put on when you&#039;re weary—or a stool&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To tumble over and vex you  *  *  *  curse that stool!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Or else at best, a cushion where you lean&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And sleep, and dream of something we are not,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But would be for your sake. Alas, alas!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This hurts most, this  *  *  *  that, after all, we are paid&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The worth of our work, perhaps.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1856), Book I, line 465.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get leave to work&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In this world,—&#039;tis the best you get at all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1856), Book III, line 164.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let no one till his death&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Be called unhappy. Measure not the work&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Until the day&#039;s out and the labour done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1856), Book V, line 78.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Free men freely work:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Whoever fears God, fears to sit at ease.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Barrett Browning]], &#039;&#039;Aurora Leigh&#039;&#039; (1856), Book VIII, line 784.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we see a great man desiring power instead of his real goal we soon recognize that he is sick, or more precisely that his attitude to his work is sick. He overreaches himself, the work denies itself to him, the incarnation of the spirit no longer takes place, and to avoid the threat of senselessness he snatches after empty power. This sickness casts the genius on to the same level as those hysterical figures who, being by nature without power, slave for power, in order that they may enjoy the illusion that they are inwardly powerful, and who in this striving for power cannot let a pause intervene, since a pause would bring with it the possibility of self-reflection and self-reflection would bring collapse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;Between Man and Man&#039;&#039; (1965), p. 151.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* … productivity gains frequently cause upheaval: Both [[capital]] and labor can pay a terrible price when innovation or new efficiencies upend their worlds.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We need shed no tears for the capitalists (whether they be private owners or an army of public shareholders). It’s their job to take care of themselves. ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A long-employed worker faces a different equation. When innovation and the market system interact to produce efficiencies, many workers may be rendered unnecessary, their talents obsolete. Some can find decent employment elsewhere; for others, that is not an option.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;…&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The answer in such disruptions is not the restraining or outlawing of actions that increase productivity. Americans would not be living nearly as well as we do if we had mandated that 11 million people should forever be employed in farming.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The solution, rather, is a variety of safety nets aimed at providing a decent life for those who are willing to work but find their specific talents judged of small value because of market forces. (I personally favor a reformed and expanded Earned Income Tax Credit that would try to make sure America works for those willing to work.) The price of achieving ever-increasing prosperity for the great majority of Americans should not be penury for the unfortunate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Warren Buffett]], {{cite web|title=Chairman&#039;s Letter - 2015|website=Berkshire Hathaway|date=February 27, 2016|url=https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2015ltr.pdf}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How in the hell could a man enjoy being awakened at 6:30 a.m. by an alarm clock, leap out of bed, dress, force-feed, shit, piss, brush teeth and hair, and fight traffic to get to a place where essentially you made lots of money for somebody else and were asked to be grateful for the opportunity to do so?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Bukowski]], &#039;&#039;Factotum&#039;&#039; (1975).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Any damn fool can beg up some kind of job; it takes a wise man to make it without working.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Bukowski]], &#039;&#039;Post Office&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And still be doing, never done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (poet)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;Hudibras&#039;&#039;, Part I (1663-64), Canto I, line 204.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Such hath it been—shall be—beneath the sun&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The many still must labour for the one.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;The Corsair&#039;&#039; (1814), Canto I, Stanza 8.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Productivity and wages in the United States.svg|right|thumb|Workers, the most absolutely necessary part of the whole social structure, without whose services none can either eat, or clothe, or shelter himself, are just the ones who get the least to eat, to wear, and to be housed withal — to say nothing of their share of the other social benefits which the rest of us are supposed to furnish, such as education and artistic gratification. ~ [[Voltairine de Cleyre]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ccoolidge.jpeg|right|thumb|Do the day&#039;s work. If it be to protect the rights of the weak, whoever objects, do it. If it be to help a powerful corporation better to serve the people, whatever the opposition, do that. Expect to be called a stand-patter, but don&#039;t be a stand-patter. Expect to be called a demagogue, but don&#039;t be a demagogue. Don&#039;t hesitate to be as revolutionary as science. Don&#039;t hesitate to be as reactionary as the multiplication table. Don&#039;t expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. Don&#039;t hurry to legislate. Give administration a chance to catch up with legislation. ~ [[Calvin Coolidge]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Auschwitz entrance.JPG|thumb|Work makes one free. ~ [[w:Lorenz Diefenbach|Lorenz Diefenbach]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Edison-at home in Ft. Myers Florida 1914 detail LC-LC-USZ62-131044, adjusted.jpg|thumb|Being busy does not always mean real work. The object of all work is production or accomplishment and to either of these ends there must be forethought, system, planning, intelligence, and honest purpose, as well as perspiration. Seeming to do is not doing. ~ [[Thomas Edison]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Einstein gyro gravity probe b.jpg|thumb|Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom. ~ [[Albert Einstein]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Einstein 1921 by F Schmutzer - restoration.jpg|thumb|If A equals success, then the formula is: A equals X plus Y plus Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut. ~ [[Albert Einstein]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Caspar David Friedrich - Wanderer above the sea of fog.jpg|thumb|The reward of a thing well done, is to have done it. ~ [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Friedrich Engels.jpg|thumb|The only difference as compared with the old, outspoken slavery is this, that the worker of today seems to be free because he is not sold once for all, but piecemeal by the day, the week, the year, and because no one owner sells him to another, but he is forced to sell himself in this way instead, being the slave of no particular person, but of the whole property-holding class. ~ [[Friedrich Engels]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki Israel 3290 Picking Cotton.jpg|thumb|Men work together, wether they work together or apart. ~ [[Robert Frost]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ansel Adams - Farm workers and Mt. Williamson.jpg|thumb|The world is full of willing people, some willing to work, the rest willing to let them. ~ [[Robert Frost]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein - Goethe in der roemischen Campagna.jpg|thumb|right|A man who works at another’s will, not for his own [[passion]] or his own [[need]], but for [[money]] or [[honor]], is always a [[fool]]. ~ [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:António Guterres 2012.jpg|thumb|The very nature of work will [[change]]. The governments may have to consider stronger social safety nets, and eventually [[Basic income|universal basic income.]] ~ [[António Guterres]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Da Vinci Vitruve Luc Viatour.jpg |thumb|One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man. ~ [[Elbert Hubbard]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kierkegaard 1902 by Luplau Janssen.jpg|thumb|To work for a living certainly cannot be the meaning of life, since it is indeed a contradiction that the continual production of the conditions is supposed to be the answer to the question of the meaning of that which is conditional upon their production. ~ [[Søren Kierkegaard]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==C==&lt;br /&gt;
* Work — other people&#039;s work — is an intolerable idea to a cat. Can you picture cats herding sheep or agreeing to pull a cart? They will not inconvenience themselves to the slightest degree.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Louis J. Camuti}}, as quoted in &#039;&#039;On the Art of Business&#039;&#039; (2004) by James H Merkel and Abdul Wahad Al-Falaij, p. 257.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is the grand cure of all the maladies and miseries that ever beset mankind — honest work, which you intend getting done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;On the Choice of Books : The Inaugural Address of Thomas Carlyle, Lord Rector of the University of Edinburgh&#039;&#039; (1866).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There&#039;s a time when you have to separate yourself from what other people expect of you, and do what you love. Because if you find yourself 50 years old and you aren&#039;t doing what you love, then what&#039;s the point?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jim Carrey]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;A Touch of Class&#039;&#039; (2003) by Carol Vanderheyden, p. 70.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every one is the son of his own works.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039; (1605-15), Part I, Book IV, Chapter XX.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is discovered to be the grand conqueror, enriching and building up nations more surely than the proudest battles.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], &#039;&#039;War&#039;&#039; (1816).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A rational, moral being cannot, without infinite wrong, be converted into a mere instrument of others’ gratification. He is necessarily an end, not a means. A mind, in which are sown the seeds of wisdom, disinterestedness, firmness of purpose, and piety, is worth more than all the outward material interests of a world. It exists for itself, for its own perfection, and must not be enslaved to its own or others’ animal wants.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Self-Culture” (1838)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The consistent [[anarchist]], then, should be a socialist, but a socialist of a particular sort. He will not only oppose alienated and specialized labor and look forward to the appropriation of [[capital]] by the whole body of workers, but he will also insist that this appropriation be direct, not exercised by some elite force acting in the name of the proletariat.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], &#039;&#039;Notes On Anarchism&#039;&#039; (1970).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Remember, work, well done, does good to the man who does it. It makes him a better man.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|George S. Clason}}, &#039;&#039;The Richest Man in Babylon&#039;&#039; (1930).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is the Rent we pay for our time on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Tubby Clayton}}, Anglican clergyman, as quoted by [[David Frost]] in an interview in &#039;&#039;Saga&#039;&#039; magazine (January 2009).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Workers, the most absolutely necessary part of the whole social structure, without whose services none can either eat, or clothe, or shelter himself, are just the ones who get the least to eat, to wear, and to be housed withal — to say nothing of their share of the other social benefits which the rest of us are supposed to furnish, such as education and artistic gratification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Voltairine de Cleyre]], &amp;quot;Direct Action&amp;quot; (1912), in &#039;&#039;Exquisite Rebel: The Essays of Voltairine de Cleyre -- Anarchist, Feminist, Genius&#039;&#039;, SUNY Press, 10 February 2005, p. [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=z82d_8aEI4oC&amp;amp;pg=PA280 280].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you work hard, you do your part, you should be able to give your children all the opportunities they deserve. That is the basic bargain of America.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hillary Clinton]], speech in {{w|Warren, Michigan}}. Transcript by &#039;&#039;{{w|Newsweek}}&#039;&#039; [http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-full-transcript-economic-speech-489602] (August 11, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that every employee, from the CEO suite to the factory floor, contributes to a business’ success, so everybody should share in the rewards – especially those putting in long hours for little pay.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hillary Clinton]], speech in {{w|Warren, Michigan}}. Transcript by &#039;&#039;{{w|Newsweek}}&#039;&#039; [http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-full-transcript-economic-speech-489602] (August 11, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==D==&lt;br /&gt;
* Though thousands of people indulge themselves in it regularly, and even develop a taste for it, there is no doubt in my mind (and that of scientists whom I employ to prove it) that Work is a dangerous and destructive drug, and should be called by its right name, which is Fatigue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robertson Davies|Robertson Davies]], &#039;&#039;The Diary of Samuel Marchbanks&#039;&#039; (1947).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I spent a busy day today, but got little done. This is because I am at last becoming perfect in the art of seeming busy, even when very little is going on in my head or under my hands. This is an art which every man learns, if he does not intend to work himself to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robertson Davies|Robertson Davies]], &#039;&#039;The Table Talk of Samuel Marchbanks&#039;&#039; (1949).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To fulfill a dream, to be allowed to sweat over lonely labor, to be given a chance to create, is the meat and potatoes of life. The money is the gravy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bette Davis]], &#039;&#039;The Lonely Life : An Autobiography&#039;&#039; (1962).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attempt the impossible in order to improve your work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bette Davis]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Quotable Woman, 1800-1975&#039;&#039; (1977) by Elaine Partnow, p. 315.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Working class in the United States|Workingmen]] of the country ... toil for a pittance at the pleasure of their masters and are bludgeoned, jailed or shot when they protest — this is the central, controlling, vital issue of the hour, and neither of the [[Two-party system|old party]] platforms has a word or even a hint about it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eugene V. Debs]], &amp;quot;Outlook for Socialism in the United States&amp;quot; (1900)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[w:Arbeit macht frei|Arbeit macht frei]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Work makes (one) free.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** Title of a 1873 novel by [[w:Lorenz Diefenbach|Lorenz Diefenbach]], which became an infamous slogan above the gates of several Nazi concentration camps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The phrase &amp;quot;work-life balance&amp;quot; tells us that people think that work is the opposite of life. We should be talking about life-life balance.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Patrick Dixon]], &#039;&#039;Building a Better Business&#039;&#039; (2005) p. 182.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==E==&lt;br /&gt;
* All things are full of labour; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ecclesiastes]] 1:8, [[King James Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For what profit comes to mortals from all the toil and anxiety of heart with which they toil under the sun? Every day sorrow and grief are their occupation; even at night their hearts are not at rest. This also is vanity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ecclesiastes]] 2:22-23 (New American Bible Revised Edition)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The grinders cease because they are few.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ecclesiastes]] 12:3, [[New International Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;An Enemy Called Average&#039;&#039; (1990) by John L. Mason, p. 55.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Being busy does not always mean real work.&#039;&#039;&#039; The object of all work is production or accomplishment and to either of these ends there must be forethought, system, planning, intelligence, and honest purpose, as well as perspiration. &#039;&#039;&#039;Seeming to do is not doing.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Ford Times&#039;&#039;, Vol. 6, (1912), p. 136.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I owe my success to the fact that I never had a clock in my workroom. Seventy-five of us worked twenty hours every day and slept only four hours — and thrived on it. An hardwork can make you to have a successfull future.There can be many fails maybe in our life but have to ready to face it for a hardworked work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], diary entry quoted in &#039;&#039;Defending and Parenting Children Who Learn Differently : Lessons from Edison&#039;s Mother&#039;&#039; (2007) by Scott Teel, p. 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When modern men and women insist that they feel completely free in their work, they are in a sense telling the truth, for the triumph of conformity lies in the crushing of all resistance, all experience of conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Edwards]], &#039;&#039;Burning All Illusions&#039;&#039; (Boston: 1996), p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every individual should have the opportunity to develop the gifts which may be latent in him. Alone in that way can the individual obtain the satisfaction to which he is justly entitled; and alone in that way can the community achieve its richest flowering. For everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Educational Trends : Journal of Research and Interpretation&#039;&#039; (June 1936), p. 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If A equals success, then the formula is: A equals X plus Y plus Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Kiplinger&#039;s Personal Finance&#039;&#039;, Vol. 11, No. 7 (July 1957), p. 48&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The reward of a thing well done, is to have done it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &amp;quot;Nominalist and Realist&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Essays: Second Series&#039;&#039; (1844).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The only difference as compared with the old, outspoken slavery is this, that the worker of today seems to be free because he is not sold once for all, but piecemeal by the day, the week, the year, and because no one owner sells him to another, but he is forced to sell himself in this way instead, being the slave of no particular person, but of the whole property-holding class.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &#039;&#039;{{w|The Condition of the Working Class in England}}&#039;&#039; (1845)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There have always been poor and working classes; and the working class have mostly been poor. But there have not always been workers and poor people living under conditions as they are today.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &#039;&#039;{{w|Principles of Communism}}&#039;&#039; (1847)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The capitalists soon had everything in their hands and nothing remained to the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &#039;&#039;{{w|Principles of Communism}}&#039;&#039; (1847)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The costs of production of labor consist of precisely the quantity of means of subsistence necessary to enable the worker to continue working, and to prevent the working class from dying out. The worker will therefore get no more for his labor than is necessary for this purpose; the price of labor, or the wage, will, in other words, be the lowest, the minimum, required for the maintenance of life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &#039;&#039;{{w|Principles of Communism}}&#039;&#039; (1847)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Personally, I have nothing against work, particularly when performed, quietly and unobtrusively, by someone else. I just don&#039;t happen to think it&#039;s an appropriate subject for an &amp;quot;ethic.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Barbara Ehrenreich]], &amp;quot;Goodbye to the Work Ethic&amp;quot; (1988), in &#039;&#039;The Worst Years of Our Lives: Irreverent Notes from a Decade of Greed&#039;&#039; (1991).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He who understands the limits of life knows how easy it is to procure enough to remove the pain of want and make the whole life complete and perfect. Hence he has no longer any need of things which are not to be won save by labor and conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Epicurus]], “Principal Doctrines,” 21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F==&lt;br /&gt;
* Every employee in an undertaking, then, takes a larger or smaller share in the work of administration, and has, therefore, to use and display his administrative faculties. This is why we often see men, who are specially gifted, gradually rise from the lowest to the highest level of the industrial hierarchy, although they have only had an elementary education. But young men, who begin practical work as engineers soon after leaving industrial schools, are in a particularly good position both for learning administration and for showing their ability in this direction, for in administration, as in all other branches of industrial activity, a man’s work is judged by its results.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henri Fayol]], (1900) &#039;&#039;Henri Fayol addressed his colleagues in the mineral industry 23 June 1900&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea that to make a man work you&#039;ve got to hold gold in front of his eyes is a growth, not an axiom. We&#039;ve done that for so long that we&#039;ve forgotten there&#039;s any other way.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[F. Scott Fitzgerald]], &amp;quot;Amory Blaine&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;This Side of Paradise&#039;&#039; (1920) Bk. 2, Ch. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It&#039;s a living.&lt;br /&gt;
** Animals, [[The Flintstones]], created by William Hanna and Joseph Barbera&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Peacefulness to be found in writing. Why do I not write every day? Partly because I feel I ought to write well and know I can&#039;t. But that is not a good enough reason for not writing, if it gains me poise &amp;amp; peace.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[E. M. Forster]], &#039;&#039;Commonplace Book&#039;&#039;, p. 219 (1960).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I urge you to work together in promoting a [[true]], worldwide [[ethical]] mobilization which, beyond [[all]] differences of [[religious]] or [[political]] convictions, will spread and put into practice a shared [[ideal]] of fraternity and solidarity, especially with regard to the poorest and those most excluded.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Francis]], as quoted in an [http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2014/may/documents/papa-francesco_20140509_consiglio-nazioni-unite.html address to the UN system chief executives board for coordination, Consistory Hall (9 May 2014)].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People have been known to achieve more as a result of working with others than against them.&lt;br /&gt;
** Allan Fromme, as quoted in [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE0DB1538F931A35751C0A9659C8B63 &amp;quot;Allan Fromme, Psychologist And Writer, 87&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (2 February 2003) ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “&#039;&#039;&#039;Men work together&#039;&#039;&#039;,” I told him from the [[heart]], &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; “&#039;&#039;&#039;Whether they work together or apart.&#039;&#039;&#039;”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Frost]], [http://www.sparknotes.com/poetry/frost/section2.rhtml The Tuft of Flowers] (1915)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The world is full of willing people, some willing to work, the rest willing to let them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Frost]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Speaker&#039;s Treasury of Wit and Wisdom&#039;&#039; (1958) edited by Herbert Victor Prochnow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==G==&lt;br /&gt;
* I need to wake out of my stupor and begin work. ...my body stands frozen in a snow packed tundra waiting for rescue. It may take a few days before that happens, since my mind is on vacation in Alberta right now.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Scott Gallegos]], &amp;quot;Alligator&amp;quot; (Nov 5, 2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;My grandfather once told me that there were two kinds of people: those who do the work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was much less competition.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Indira Gandhi]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Taking Charge : Every Woman&#039;s Action Guide to Personal, Political and Professional Success&#039;&#039; (1996) by Joan Steinau Lester, p. 76.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[God]] designed man for work--work for his own sustenance; he who does not work shall not eat.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Genesis Rabbah}} 14&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For as labor cannot produce without the use of land, the denial of the equal right to the use of land is necessarily the denial of the right of labor to its own produce.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry George]], &#039;&#039;Progress and Poverty&#039;&#039; (1879), Book VII, Ch. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ein Mensch, der um anderer willen, ohne dass es seine eigene Leidenschaft, sein eigenes Bedürfnis ist, sich um Geld oder Ehre oder sonst etwas abarbeitet, ist immer ein Tor&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* A man who works at another’s will, not for his own passion or his own need, but for money or honor, is always a [[fool]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], &#039;&#039;Die Leiden des Jungen Werthers&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;The Sorrows of Young Werther&#039;&#039;), p. 46&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Insofar as our culture conventionally construes technical, scientific, and professional roles as those that obligate men to ignore all but the technical implications of their work, the very social structure itself is inherently [[pathogenic]]. The social function of such a segmented role structure is akin to that of the  [[Unconscious|reflexive]]  [[obedience]] induced by [[military]] training. The function of such a technical role structure, as of military discipline, is to [[Eliminate|sever]] the normal [[Morality|moral sensibilities]] and [[responsibilities]] of civilians and soldiers and to enable them to be used as [[Zombies|deployables]], willing to pursue practically any objective. In the last analysis, such arrangements produce an unthinking readiness to [[kill]] or to hurt others - or to produce things that do so - on order.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alvin Ward Gouldner]], &#039;&#039;The Coming Crisis in Sociology&#039;&#039; (1970), p. 13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing is more laborious for you than not to labor at all&amp;amp;mdash;in other words, to despise everything that gives rise to our labors, which means all that is subject to [[change]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Guigo I]], &#039;&#039;The Meditations of Guigo I, Prior of the Charterhouse&#039;&#039;, as translated by A. Gordon Mursell (1995), #50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The very nature of work will [[change]]. The governments may have to consider stronger social safety nets, and eventually [[universal basic income]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[António Guterres]], [http://webtv.un.org/watch/secretary-general-addresses-general-debate-73rd-session/5839802857001/ &#039;&#039;Secretary-General Addresses General Debate, 73rd Session&#039;&#039;] of the General Assembly of the UN, 15:25, (25 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H==&lt;br /&gt;
* If one man has a dollar he didn&#039;t work for, some other man worked for a dollar he didn&#039;t get.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Haywood]], &#039;&#039;Roughneck, The Life and Times of Big Bill Haywood&#039;&#039; (1983) by Peter Carlson, p. 146&lt;br /&gt;
** Paraphrased variant: For every man who gets a dollar he didn&#039;t sweat for, someone else sweated to produce a dollar he never received.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark this well, you proud men of action: You are nothing but the unwitting agents of the men of thought who often, in quiet self-effacement, mark out most exactly all your doings in advance.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heinrich Heine]], &#039;&#039;History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany&#039;&#039;, Vol. III (1834).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One of the curious features of [[Impressionism]]... was the casualness of their work. ...[T]he painters gave the impression of hastily concocted canvases... more... inspiration than... patient labor. The effortless stroke of genius became a leading measure of artistic quality, partly because it denied mere &amp;quot;work.&amp;quot; ...&amp;quot;Art for art&#039;s sake&amp;quot; was an invention of the [[Romanticism|romantic]] era in France. ...They looked towards a mythical past in which the &amp;quot;natural&amp;quot; person could cultivate self-expression, free of the claims of social utility. This fantasized past... had an anti-industrial character. ...Work was despised because the growing industrial revolution was separating it from inventiveness, originality, and individualism. ...The inventiveness and spontaneity that independent artists sought were... opposed to industrial work,... products (with which they associated academic art) and for many... cities... Women and men held parasols and croquet mallets, not sickles and hoes, and dahlias were more attractive than cabbages. (It is true that Pissarro retained much of the outlook of Barbizon artists...) The work ethic implicit in [[Barbizon school|Barbizon]] art... was done away with by the impressionists. The suburb and the coastal resort, not the farm, is the landscape of [[Berthe Morisot|Morisot]], [[Pierre-Auguste Renoir|Renoir]], [[Édouard Manet|Manet]], and [[Claude Monet|Monet]]. ...The Impressionists ...joined other middle-class vacationers (except for [[Paul Cézanne|Cézanne]] and [[Camille Pissarro|Pissarro]], so little in sympathy with Parisian society).&lt;br /&gt;
** Robert L. Herbert, &#039;&#039;Impressionism: Art, Leisure, and Parisian Society&#039;&#039; (1988) p. 304-306.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If little labour, little are our gaines: &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Man&#039;s fortunes are according to his paines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Herrick]], &#039;&#039;Hesperides&#039;&#039; (1648), &amp;quot;No Paines, No Gaines&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The economic system denies the right of the sincerest and most sympathetic to keep their hands out of the blood of their brothers. We may not go to our rest at night, or waken to our work in the morning, without bearing the burden of the communal guilt; without being ourselves creators and causes of the wrongs we seek to bear away. At every step, when we would do good, evil is present with us, and exacts its tribute from the very citadel of the soul. ... If we stay at our posts, in order that we may [[change]] the system, we are on the backs of our brothers; if we desert our posts, in order that we may get off our brothers&#039; backs, we take bread from their mouths, from the mouths of their children, and add to the army of the workless and hopeless.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George D. Herron]], &#039;&#039;Between Caesar and Jesus&#039;&#039; (1899) pp. 24-25&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hillel the Elder|Hillel]] stood in the gate of Jerusalem one day and saw the people on their way to work. &amp;quot;How much,&amp;quot;​ he asked, &amp;quot;will you earn today?&amp;quot;​ One said: &amp;quot;A {{w|denarius}}&amp;quot;​; the second: &amp;quot;Two denarii&amp;quot;​ &amp;quot;What will you do with the money?&amp;quot;​ he inquired. &amp;quot;We will provide for the necessities of life.&amp;quot;​ Then he said to them: &amp;quot;Would you not rather come and make the Torah your possession, that you may possess both this world and the world to come?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;The Jewish Encyclopedia&#039;&#039;, Volume 6, p. 399&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our fruitless labours mourn, &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; And only rich in barren fame return.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;Odyssey&#039;&#039; (c. 7th century BC); tr. [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;[[The Odyssey of Homer (Alexander Pope)|The Odyssey of Homer]]&#039;&#039; (1725), Book X, line 46.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To labour is the lot of man below; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; And when Jove gave us life, he gave us woe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;Iliad&#039;&#039; (c. 7th century BC); tr. [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;[[The Iliad of Homer (Alexander Pope)|The Iliad of Homer]]&#039;&#039; (1715–1720), Book X, Line 78.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that the best way to prepare for a Future Life is to be kind, live one day at a time, and do the work you can do best, doing it as well as you can.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &amp;quot;Credo&amp;quot;, as published in &#039;&#039;A Message to Garcia, and Thirteen Other Things&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &#039;&#039;A Thousand and One Epigrams&#039;&#039; (1911).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you want work well done, select a busy man ‚ the other kind has no time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &#039;&#039;The Note Book&#039;&#039; (1927).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The highest reward that God gives us for good work, is the ability to do better work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &#039;&#039;The Note Book of Elbert Hubbard&#039;&#039; (1927), p. 125.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I==&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;ve had the best possible chance of learning that what the working-classes really need is to be allowed some part in the direction of public affairs, Doctor—to develop their abilities, their understanding and their self-respect.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henrik Ibsen]], &#039;&#039;An Enemy of the People&#039;&#039;, English adaptation by Max Faber (1970), act II, p. 28. Mr. Hovstad is speaking.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Morocco Africa Flickr Rosino December 2005 83965745.jpg|thumb|A master in the art of living draws no sharp distinction between his work and his play; his labor and his leisure; his mind and his body; his education and his recreation. He hardly knows which is which. He simply pursues his vision of excellence through whatever he is doing, and leaves others to determine whether he is working or playing. To himself, he always appears to be doing both. ~ [[L. P. Jacks]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==J==&lt;br /&gt;
* The philosopher bent on the enlargement of experience perceives at once that his work cannot be done, cannot even be commenced, until he has cleared away the heaps of verbal detritus under which the bedrocks of experience lie buried.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[L. P. Jacks]], &#039;&#039;The Usurpation Of Language&#039;&#039; (1910).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are the children of an age which spends the best energies of its life in the discussion of life, in an atmosphere of deferred fulfillment, continually postponing the act of living to the work of mentally preparing to live.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[L. P. Jacks]], &#039;&#039;The Usurpation Of Language&#039;&#039; (1910).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A master in the art of living draws no sharp distinction between his work and his play; his labor and his leisure; his mind and his body; his education and his recreation. He hardly knows which is which.&#039;&#039;&#039; He simply pursues his vision of excellence through whatever he is doing, and leaves others to determine whether he is working or playing. &#039;&#039;&#039;To himself, he always appears to be doing both.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[L. P. Jacks]], &#039;&#039;Education through Recreation&#039;&#039; (1932), p. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We do 30 to 40 percent of the nation&#039;s work for 1 percent of the returns, and a huge pool of us is always kept unemployed to reduce the value of the labor of those who are.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George L. Jackson]], &#039;&#039;Blood in My Eye&#039;&#039; (1971), p. 24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It always does seem to me that I am doing more work than I should do. It is not that I object to the work, mind you; I like work; it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. I love to keep it by me; the idea of getting rid of it nearly breaks my heart.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jerome K. Jerome]], English author. &#039;&#039;Three Men in a Boat&#039;&#039; (1889), Ch. 15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work and play they&#039;re never okay to mix.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jimmy Eat World]] taken from their song &amp;quot;[[w: Work (Jimmy Eat World song)|Work]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The error of early capitalism can be repeated wherever man is in a way treated on the same level as the whole complex of the material means of production, as an instrument and not in accordance with the true dignity of his work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope John Paul II]], &#039;&#039;Laborem Exercens&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==K==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jesus]] ... combines all duties (1) in one universal rule (which includes within itself both the inner and the outer moral relations of men), namely: Perform your [[duty]] for no motive other than unconditioned esteem for duty itself, i.e., [[Love of God|love God]] (the Legislator of all duties) above all else; and (2) in a particular rule, that, namely, which concerns man’s external relation to other men as universal duty: [[Great Commandment|Love every one as yourself]], i.e., further his welfare from [[good-will]] that is immediate and not derived from motives of [[greed|self-advantage]]. These commands are not mere laws of [[virtue]] but precepts of [[holiness]] which we ought to pursue, and the very pursuit of them is called virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Immanuel Kant]], &#039;&#039;Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone&#039;&#039;, Book IV, Part 1, Section 1, “The Christian religion as a natural religion”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is so easy to be immature. If I have a book to serve as my understanding, a pastor to serve as my conscience, a physician to determine my diet for me, and so on, I need not exert myself at all. I need not think, if only I can pay: others will readily undertake the irksome work for me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Immanuel Kant]], &amp;quot;What is Enlightenment?&amp;quot; (1784)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To work for a living certainly cannot be the meaning of life, since it is indeed a contradiction that the continual production of the conditions is supposed to be the answer to the question of the meaning of that which is conditional upon their production.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Søren Kierkegaard]], &#039;&#039;Either-Or&#039;&#039;, H. Hong, trans. (1987), part 1 (I 15), p. 31.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the last analysis, what is the significance of life? If we divide mankind into two great classes, we may say that one works for a living, the other does not need to. But working for a living cannot be the meaning of life, since it would be a contradiction to say that the perpetual production of the conditions for subsistence is an answer to the question about its significance which, by the help of this, must be conditioned. The lives of the other class have in general no other significance than that they consume the conditions of subsistence. And to say that the significance of life is death, seems again a contradiction.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Søren Kierkegaard]] &#039;&#039;Either/Or Part I&#039;&#039;, Swenson p. 30.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Translated quote&lt;br /&gt;
| quote = You can do it quickly, but badly, or you can do it slowly, but well. After a while, everyone will forget that it was fast, but will remember that it was bad. And vice versa.&lt;br /&gt;
| original =  Можно сделать быстро, но плохо, а можно — медленно, но хорошо. Через некоторое время все забудут, что было быстро, но будут помнить, что было плохо. И наоборот.| comment = }} &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergei Korolev]], quoted in [https://books.google.be/books?id=VyvLDgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT311&amp;amp;lpg=PT311&amp;amp;dq=%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE+%D1%81%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C+%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE,+%D0%BD%D0%BE+%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE,+%D0%B0+%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE+%E2%80%94+%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE,+%D0%BD%D0%BE+%D1%85%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%BE.+%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7+%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5+%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8F+%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B5+%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%82,+%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE+%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE+%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE,+%D0%BD%D0%BE+%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%82+%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C,+%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE+%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE+%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE.+%D0%98&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=BByEGl1rb_&amp;amp;sig=ACfU3U3PHhA9hcx-JhymDEXCw3AAIFw-2Q&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwiop6_-nb75AhVJdcAKHSgtASAQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D1%81%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C%20%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%2C%20%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE%2C%20%D0%B0%20%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%E2%80%94%20%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%2C%20%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D1%85%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%BE.%20%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%20%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%20%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8F%20%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%B5%20%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%82%2C%20%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE%20%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE%20%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%2C%20%D0%BD%D0%BE%20%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%82%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C%2C%20%D1%87%D1%82%D0%BE%20%D0%B1%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE%20%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%85%D0%BE.%20%D0%98&amp;amp;f=false Leadership in the Russian way (Лидерство по-русски)] (2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the picture I’ve drawn is at all right, the only way we could have anything resembling a middle-class society — a society in which ordinary citizens have a reasonable assurance of maintaining a decent life as long as they work hard and play by the rules — would be by having a strong social safety net, one that guarantees not just health care but a minimum income, too.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Krugman]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/opinion/krugman-sympathy-for-the-luddites.html &#039;&#039;Sympathy for the Luddites&#039;&#039;], The New York Times (13 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ancient Garden.png|thumb|No thoroughly occupied man was ever yet very miserable. ~ [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Inventions of Modern Times -Nova Reperta-, The Invention of Distillation, plate 7 MET DP841129.jpg|thumb|Labor is prior to, and independent of, [[capital]]. [[Capital]] is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bernard Lietaer - PopTech 2011 - Camden Maine USA.jpg|thumb|Instead of pitting people against each other, the (local currency) system... &#039;&#039;&#039;enables us to consciously design [[money]] to work for us, instead of us for it.&#039;&#039;&#039; ~ [[Bernard Lietaer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==L==&lt;br /&gt;
* Men are like handsome race horses who first bite the bit and later like it, and rearing under the saddle a while soon learn to enjoy displaying their harness and prance proudly beneath their trappings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Étienne de La Boétie]], &#039;&#039;[[Discourse of Voluntary Servitude]]&#039;&#039;, Part 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The philosophers of antiquity taught contempt for work, that degradation of the free man, the poets sang of idleness, that gift from the Gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Lafargue]], &#039;&#039;The Right to Be Lazy&#039;&#039; (1883), H. Kerr, trans. (1907), pp. 11-12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No thoroughly occupied man was ever yet very miserable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]] &#039;&#039;Romance and Reality&#039;&#039; (1831) Vol. II, page 108&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A full-fledged [[UBI]] — one that unconditionally provides every person with enough income to meet their basic needs—would fundamentally alter the paradigm of capitalism that has locked workers into the dominant system ever since its inception. Capitalism has endured by commoditizing people’s lives, forcing them to sell the bulk of their available time and energy, or else face destitution and starvation. A true UBI would transform the relationship between labor and capital and weaken the power of the wealthy elite to control the population.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Lent]] in [https://greattransition.org/gti-forum/basic-income-lent A Cornerstone of a Moral Economy,  &#039;&#039;Great Transition Initiative,&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;GTI Forum&#039;&#039;] (November 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Computers and robots replace humans in the exercise of mental functions in the same way as mechanical power replaced them in the performance of physical tasks. As time goes on, more and more complex mental functions will be performed by machines. Any worker who now performs his task by following specific instructions can, in principle, be replaced by a machine. This means that the role of humans as the most important factor of production is bound to diminish—in the same way that the role of horses in agricultural production was first diminished and then eliminated by the introduction of tractors.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wassily Leontief]], &amp;quot;[http://books.google.nl/books?id=hS0rAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA3 National perspective: The definition of problem and opportunity]&amp;quot;, in: National Academies, &#039;&#039;The Long-term Impact of Technology on Employment and Unemployment: A National Academy of Engineering Symposium&#039;&#039;, p. 3. (30 June 1983)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Local [[currency]] creates work, and I make a distinction between work and jobs. A job is what you do for a living; work is what you do because you like to do it. I expect jobs to increasingly [[Universal basic income|become obsolete]], but there is still an almost infinite amount of fascinating work to be done... What&#039;s nice about local currency is that when people create their own money, they don&#039;t need to build in a [[scarcity]] factor. And they don&#039;t need to get currency from elsewhere in order to have a means of making an exchange with a neighbor... As soon as you have an agreement between two people about a transaction... they literally create the necessary &amp;quot;money&amp;quot; in the process; there&#039;s no [[scarcity]] of money. That does not mean there&#039;s an infinite amount of this currency, either; you cannot give me 500,000 hours - nobody has 500,000 hours to give. So there&#039;s a ceiling on it, yes, but there&#039;s no artificial [[scarcity]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bernard Lietaer]], [https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Money_and_Economics/Bernard_Lietaer/Interview_Yes%21.pdf Beyond Greed and Scarcity, &#039;&#039;YES! A Journal of Positive Futures&#039;&#039;], (Spring 1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Instead of pitting people against each other, the (local currency) system actually ... &#039;&#039;&#039;enables us to consciously design [[money]] to work for us, instead of us for it.&#039;&#039;&#039; ..These objectives are in our grasp within less than one generation&#039;s time. Whether we materialize them or not will depend on our capacity to [[cooperate]] with each other to consciously reinvent our money... For the first time in human history we have available the production technologies to create unprecedented abundance...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bernard Lietaer]], [https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/Money_and_Economics/Bernard_Lietaer/Interview_Yes%21.pdf Beyond Greed and Scarcity, &#039;&#039;YES! A Journal of Positive Futures&#039;&#039;], (Spring 1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I agree with you, Mr. Chairman, that the working men are the basis of all governments, for the plain reason that they are the more numerous, and as you added that those were the sentiments of the gentlemen present, representing not only the working class, but citizens of other callings than those of the mechanic, I am happy to concur with you in these sentiments, not only of the native born citizens, but also of the Germans and foreigners from other countries.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], speech to Germans at Cincinnati, Ohio (February 12, 1861) [Commercial version]; in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 4, p. 202.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the early days of the world, the Almighty said to the first of our race &amp;quot;In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread&amp;quot;; and since then, if we except the light and the air of heaven, no good thing has been, or can be enjoyed by us, without having first cost labour. And inasmuch [as] most good things are produced by labour, it follows that [all] such things of right belong to those whose labour has produced them. But it has so happened in all ages of the world, that some have labored, and others have, without labour, enjoyed a large proportion of the fruits. This is wrong, and should not continue. To [secure] to each labourer the whole product of his labour, or as nearly as possible, is a most worthy object of any good government.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], fragments of a tariff discussion (c. December 1, 1847); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 1, p. 407–8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is better, then, to save the work while it is begun. You have done the labor; maintain it—keep it. If men choose to serve you, go with them; but as you have made up your organization upon principle, stand by it; for, as surely as God reigns over you, and has inspired your mind, and given you a sense of propriety, and continues to give you hope, so surely will you still cling to these ideas, and you will at last come back after your wanderings, merely to do your work over again.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], speech at Chicago, Illinois (July 10, 1858); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 2, p. 498.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Labor is prior to, and independent of, [[capital]]. [[Capital]] is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], First State of the Union Address (December 3, 1861); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 5, p. 52.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The most notable feature of a disturbance in your city last summer, was the hanging of some working people by other working people. It should never be so. &#039;&#039;&#039;The strongest bond of human sympathy, outside of the family relation, should be one uniting all working people, of all nations, and tongues, and kindreds.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], reply to New York Workingmen&#039;s Democratic Republican Association (March 21, 1864); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 7, p. 259.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From labor there shall come forth rest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &amp;quot;To a Child&amp;quot;, line 162; in &#039;&#039;The Belfry of Bruges and Other Poems&#039;&#039; (1845).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Adam]] was created righteous, acceptable, and without sin. He had no need from his labor in the garden to be made righteous and acceptable to God. Rather, the Lord gave Adam work in order to cultivate and protect the garden. This would have been the freest of all works because they were done simply to please God and not to obtain righteousness. … The works of the person who trusts God are to be understood in a similar manner. Through faith we are restored to paradise and created anew. We have no need of works in order to be righteous; however, in order to avoid idleness and so that the body might be cared for an disciplined, works are done freely to please God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;The Freedom of a Christian&#039;&#039; (1520), M. Tranvik, trans. (Minneapolis: 2008), pp. 73-74.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is always necessary that the substance or essence of a person be good before there can be any good works and that good works follow and proceed from a person who is already good. Christ says in Matthew 7:18: “A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.” ... The fruit does not make the tree good or bad but the tree itself is what determines the nature of the fruit. In the same way, a person first must be good or bad before doing a good or bad work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;The Freedom of a Christian&#039;&#039; (1520), M. Tranvik, trans. (Minneapolis: 2008), pp. 74-75.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Many have been deceived by outward appearances and have proceeded to write and teach about good works and how they justify without even mentioning faith. … Wearying themselves with many works, they never come to righteousness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;The Freedom of a Christian&#039;&#039; (1520), M. Tranvik, trans. (Minneapolis: 2008), p. 75.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Herman Melville 1860.jpg|thumb|99 hundreths of all the work done in the world is either foolish and unnecessary, or harmful and wicked. ~ [[Herman Melville]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:A monument of working class.JPG|thumb|It has become an article of the creed of modern morality that all labour is good in itself — a convenient belief to those who live on the labour of others. ~ [[William Morris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==M==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The man who is possessed of wealth, who lolls on his sofa or rolls in his carriage, cannot judge the wants or feelings of the day-laborer.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Madison]], Statement (1787-06-26) as quoted in [http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/yates.asp &#039;&#039;Notes of the Secret Debates of the Federal Convention of 1787&#039;&#039;] by [[w:Robert Yates (politician)|Robert Yates]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tonio ... worked withdrawn out of sight and sound of the small men, for whom he felt nothing but contempt, who, whether they were poor or not, went about ostentatiously shabby or else flaunted startling cravats, all the time taking jolly good care to amuse themselves, to be artistic and charming without the smallest notion of the fact that good work comes out only under pressure of a bad life; that he who lives does not work; the one must die to life in order to be utterly a creator.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Mann]], &#039;&#039;Tonio Kröger&#039;&#039;, H. Lowe-Porter, trans., modified, in Death in Venice and Seven Other Stories (1930), p. 94&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Passing alongside the Sea of Galilee, Jesus saw Simon and Andrew the brother of Simon casting a net into the sea, for they were fishermen. And Jesus said to them, “Follow me, and I will make you become fishers of men.” And immediately they left their nets and followed. And going on a little farther, he saw James the son of Zebedee and John his brother, who were in their boat mending the nets. And immediately he called them, and they left their father Zebedee in the boat with the hired servants and followed Jesus.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 1:16-20 [[w:English Standard Version|ESV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The worker puts his life into the object; but now it no longer belongs to him, it belongs to the object.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Alienated Labor,” &#039;&#039;Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts&#039;&#039; (1844), &#039;&#039;The Potable Karl Marx&#039;&#039; (1983), p. 134.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The better shaped his product, the more mis-shapen the worker; the more civilized his object, the more barbaric the worker; the more powerful the work, the more powerless the worker.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Alienated Labor,” &#039;&#039;Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts&#039;&#039; (1844), &#039;&#039;The Potable Karl Marx&#039;&#039; (1983), p. 135.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor produces marvels for the rich but it produces deprivation for the worker. It produces palaces, but hovels for the worker. It produces beauty, but deformity for the worker. It replaces labor by machines, but it throws one section of the workers back to barbaric labor, and it turns the remainder into machines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Alienated Labor,” &#039;&#039;Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts&#039;&#039; (1844), &#039;&#039;The Potable Karl Marx&#039;&#039; (1983), p. 135.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What, then, constitutes the alienation of labor? First, in the fact that labor is external to the worker, that is, that it does not belong to his essential being; that in his work, therefore, he does not affirm himself but denies himself, does not feel well but unhappy, does not freely develop his physical and mental energy but mortifies his body and ruins his mind. The worker, therefore, feels himself only outside his work, and feels beside himself in his work. He is at home when he is not working, and when he is working he is not at home. His work therefore is not voluntary, but coerced; it is forced labor. It is therefore not the satisfaction of a need, but only a means for satisfying needs external to it. Its alien character emerges clearly in the fact that labor is shunned like the plague as soon as there is no physical or other compulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Alienated Labor,” &#039;&#039;Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts&#039;&#039; (1844), &#039;&#039;The Potable Karl Marx&#039;&#039; (1983), p. 136.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we have weighed everything, and when our relations in life permit us to choose any given position, we may take that one which guarantees us the greatest dignity, which is based on ideas of whose truth we are completely convinced, which offers the largest field to work for mankind and approach the universal goal for which every position is only a means: [[perfection]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], “Reflections of a Youth on Choosing an Occupation” (1835), &#039;&#039;Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society&#039;&#039;, L. Easton, trans. (1967), p. 38.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Capital is dead labor,that vampire-like, only lives by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], {{w|Capital: Critique of Political Economy}}, [[w:Capital, Volume I|Vol. I]], Ch. 10, Section 1, p. 257. (1867)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He that would enjoy life and act with freedom must have the work of the day continually before his eyes. Not yesterday&#039;s work, lest he fall into despair; nor to-morrow&#039;s, lest he become a visionary—not that which ends with the day, which is a worldly work; nor yet that only which remains to eternity, for by it he cannot shape his actions.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Happy is the man who can recognise in the work of to-day a connected portion of the work of life and an embodiment of the work of Eternity. The foundations of his confidence are unchangeable, for he has been made a partaker of Infinity. He strenuously works out his daily enterprises because the present is given him for a possession.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Thus ought Man to be an impersonation of the divine process of nature, and to show forth the union of the infinite with the finite, not slighting his temporal existence, remembering that in it only is individual action possible; nor yet shutting out from his view that which is eternal, knowing that Time is a mystery which man cannot endure to contemplate until eternal Truth enlighten it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Clerk Maxwell]], Paper communicated to {{w|Frederic Farrar}}&amp;lt;!--F. W. Farrar--&amp;gt; (1854) Æt. 23, as quoted in Lewis Campbell, William Garnett, &#039;&#039;The Life of James Clerk Maxwell: With Selections from His Correspondence and Occasional Writings&#039;&#039; (1884) [https://books.google.com/books?id=B7gEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA144 pp. 144-145,] and in Richard Glazebrook, &#039;&#039;James Clerk Maxwell and Modern Physics&#039;&#039; (1896) [https://books.google.com/books?id=hbcEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA39 pp. 39-40.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* True Work is the necessity of poor humanity&#039;s earthly condition. The dignity is in leisure. Besides, &#039;&#039;&#039;99 hundreths of all the work done in the world is either foolish and unnecessary, or harmful and wicked.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herman Melville]], in a letter to Catherine G. Lansing (5 September 1877), published in &#039;&#039;The Melville Log : A Documentary Life of Herman Melville, 1819-1891&#039;&#039; (1951) by Jay Leyda, Vol. 2, p. 765.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man hath his daily work of body or mind&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Appointed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book IV, line 618.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The work under our labour grows&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Luxurious by restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book IX, line 208.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is assumed by most people nowadays that all work is useful, and by most &#039;&#039;well-to-do&#039;&#039; people that all work is desirable.&#039;&#039;&#039; Most people, well-to-do or not, believe that, even when a man is doing work which appears to be useless, he is earning his livelihood by it — he is &amp;quot;employed,&amp;quot; as the phrase goes; and most of those who are well-to-do cheer on the happy worker with congratulations and praises, if he is only &amp;quot;industrious&amp;quot; enough and deprives himself of all pleasure and holidays — in the sacred cause of labour. &#039;&#039;&#039;In short, it has become an article of the creed of modern morality that all labour is good in itself — a convenient belief to those who live on the labour of others.&#039;&#039;&#039; But as to those on whom they live, I recommend them not to take it on trust, but to look into the matter a little deeper.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Morris]], &amp;quot;Useful Work vs Useless Toil&amp;quot; (1885); later published in &#039;&#039;Signs of Change : Seven Lectures, Delivered on Various Occasions&#039;&#039; (1896).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is of the nature of man, when he is not diseased, to take pleasure in his work under certain conditions.&#039;&#039;&#039; And, yet, we must say in the teeth of the hypocritical praise of all labour, whatsoever it may be, of which I have made mention, that there is some labour which is so far from being a blessing that it is a curse; that it would be better for the community and for the worker if the latter were to fold his hands and refuse to work, and either die or let us pack him off to the workhouse or prison — which you will.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Here, you see, are two kinds of work — one good, the other bad; one not far removed from a blessing, a lightening of life; the other a mere curse, a burden to life.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What is the difference between them, then ? This: one has hope in it, the other has not. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is manly to do the one kind of work, and manly also to refuse to do the other.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Morris]], &amp;quot;Useful Work vs Useless Toil&amp;quot; (1885); later published in &#039;&#039;Signs of Change : Seven Lectures, Delivered on Various Occasions&#039;&#039; (1896).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In his discussion on [[slavery]] [[Aristotle]] said that when the shuttle wove by itself and the [[w:Plectrum|plectrum]] played by itself chief workmen would not need helpers nor masters slaves. At the time he wrote, he believed that he was establishing the eternal validity of slavery; but for us today he was in reality justifying the existence of the [[machine]]. Work, it is true, is the constant form of man&#039;s interaction with his environment, if by work one means the sum total of exertions necessary to maintain life; and the lack of work usually means an impairment of function and a breakdown in organic relationship that leads to substitute forms of work, such as invalidism and neurosis. But work in the form of unwilling drudgery or of that sedentary routine which... the Athenians so properly despised—work in these forms is the true province of machines. Instead of reducing human beings to work-mechanisms, we can now transfer the main part of burden to automatic machines. This potentially... is perhaps the largest justification of the mechanical developments of the last thousand years.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lewis Mumford]], &#039;&#039;Technics and Civilization&#039;&#039; (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==N==&lt;br /&gt;
* Early to bed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Early to rise,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work like hell —&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And advertise!&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Old slogan&amp;quot; quoted in &#039;&#039;The National Provisioner&#039;&#039;, Vol. 44 (June 1911), p. 35; this has since become misattributed to many people who might have quoted it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Democratic presidential hopeful [[Joe Biden]] unveiled a $2 trillion energy plan Tuesday with a heavy focus on the [[Green New Deal]] agenda... Speaking in Wilmington, Del., Biden promised a “clean energy revolution,” which he said would deliver millions of jobs... Biden detailed what he called a pro-union platform that would replace the US government’s car fleet with American-made electric vehicles... The former veep on Tuesday promised to “create millions of high-paying union jobs by building a modern infrastructure and a clean energy future” and described his vision of a US covered in 500,000 electric car charging stations and thriving factories producing green products.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nypost.com/2020/07/14/joe-biden-unveils-his-2t-aoc-fueled-green-new-deal-energy-agenda/ &#039;&#039;New York Post,&#039;&#039; Joe Biden unveils his $2T AOC-fueled Green New Deal energy agenda, by Ebony Bowden], (14 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Whoever does not have two-thirds of his day for himself, is a slave, whatever he may be: a statesman, a businessman, an official, or a scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;Human, All Too Human&#039;&#039; (1878)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Looking for work in order to be paid: in civilized countries today almost all men are at one in doing that. For all of them work is a means and not an end in itself. Hence they are not very refined in their choice of work, if only it pays well. But there are, if only rarely, men who would rather perish than work without any pleasure in their work. They are choosy, hard to satisfy, and do not care for ample rewards, if the work itself is not to be the reward of rewards. Artists and contemplative men of all kinds belong to this rare breed, but so do even those men of leisure who spend their lives hunting, traveling, or in love affairs and adventures. All of these desire work and misery only if it is associated with pleasure, and the hardest, most difficult work if necessary. Otherwise their idleness is resolute, even if it spells impoverishment, dishonor, and danger to life and limb. They do not fear boredom as much as work without pleasure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), [[Walter Kaufmann (philosopher)|W. Kaufmann]], trans, § 42.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I propose a new approach that will make it more attractive to go to work than to go on welfare, and will establish a nationwide minimum payment to dependent families with children. I propose that the Federal government pay a [[basic income]] to those American families who cannot care for themselves in whichever State they live. ... I propose that we make available an addition to the incomes of the &amp;quot;working poor,&amp;quot; to encourage them to go on working, and to eliminate the possibility of making more from welfare than from wages. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Nixon]], [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=2194 Special Message to the Congress on Reform of the Nation&#039;s Welfare System] (11 August 1969)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==O==&lt;br /&gt;
* Artificial intelligence is here and it is accelerating, and you&#039;re going to have driverless cars, and you&#039;re going to have more and more automated services, and that&#039;s going to make the job of giving everybody work that is meaningful, tougher and we&#039;re going to have to be more imaginative, and the pact of [[change]] is going to require us to do more fundamental reimagining of our social and political arrangements, to protect the economic security and the dignity that comes with a job. It&#039;s not just money that a job provides; it provides dignity and structure and a sense of place and a sense of purpose. And so we&#039;re going to have to consider new ways of thinking about these problems, like a [[universal income]], review of our workweek, how we retrain our young people, how we make everybody an entrepreneur at some level. But we&#039;re going to have to worry about economics if we want to get democracy back on track.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Barack Obama]], &#039;&#039;[https://www.npr.org/2018/07/17/629862434/transcript-obamas-speech-at-the-2018-nelson-mandela-annual-lecture 2018 Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture]&#039;&#039; [speech] (17 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I found it hard working really long hours when I was my own boss. The boss kept giving me the afternoon off.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John O&#039;Farrell|John O&#039;Farrell]]{{Disambiguation needed}}, &#039;&#039;The Best a Man Can Get&#039;&#039; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Charles peguy.jpg|thumb|right|Towards this fine honor of a trade converged all the finest, all the most noble sentiments—dignity, pride. ... In those days a workman did not know what it was to solicit. It is the [[bourgeoisie]] who, turning the workmen into bourgeois, have taught them to solicit. ~ [[Charles Péguy]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
==P==&lt;br /&gt;
* Questioning global stereotypes on economic responses to [[globalisation]], I argue that labour becomes actively involved in the very &#039;&#039;process&#039;&#039; of globalisation and the [[w:Growth capital|expansion of capital]]. [...] Although it would seem a simple proposition to suggest that working class people and their organisations affect the ways in which the landscapes of capitalism are made, until recently, there has been little work, even within economic geography, addressing this issue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Neethi Padmanabhan]], &#039;&#039;[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263155852_Globalisation_Lived_Locally_A_Labour_Geography_Perspective_on_Control_Conflict_and_Response_among_Workers_in_Kerala Globalisation Lived Locally: A Labour Geography Perspective on Control, Conflict and Response among Workers in Kerala]&#039;&#039;, 2012, at {{w|ResearchGate}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Low labour cost, along with ﬂexibility in labour use, has become a key source of competitive advantage for ﬁrms. As external competition intensiﬁes, the domestic industry has come under great pressure to restructure itself, to become more competitive and to adopt ﬂexible policies with regard to production and labour. With a view to increasing global competitiveness, investors are moving more towards countries that either have low labour costs, or are shifting to informal employment arrangements. These [[change]]s create an entirely different political-economic environment for workers around the world. Greater international mobility of capital relative to labour puts workers from a given location at an immediate disadvantage, both in terms of bargaining power with the owners of capital (whose threat to move gains greater credibility) and with respect to the State&amp;lt;!--(Milberg 2004)--&amp;gt;. Thus the removal of domestic entry barriers and movement of capital to areas of cheap labour have caused intensiﬁcation of domestic competition in many developing countries— especially those with surplus labour supply and those where labour is a major factor of production. This has been accentuated by potential investors citing the lack of ﬂexibility in hiring and laying off workers as a concern, while targeting a developing country in which to invest. [...] [[Optimism]] with regard to labour as an agency of social progress has been replaced by pessimism that sees little prospect of workers acting on their own behalf.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Neethi Padmanabhan]], &#039;&#039;[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263155852_Globalisation_Lived_Locally_A_Labour_Geography_Perspective_on_Control_Conflict_and_Response_among_Workers_in_Kerala Globalisation Lived Locally: A Labour Geography Perspective on Control, Conflict and Response among Workers in Kerala]&#039;&#039;, 2012, at {{w|ResearchGate}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.&lt;br /&gt;
** Jack Torrance played by Jack Nicholson, [[The Shining (film)|The Shining]] screenplay by Stanley Kubrick and Diane Johnson&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious people must be brought to a vivid realization of their awful guilt in sanctioning and supporting an economic system that is the direct antithesis of their religious ideals.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kirby Page]], &#039;&#039;Individualism and Socialism&#039;&#039; (1933)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Pride in one’s work carries with it a determination to accept the demands imposed by that work: in the case of philosophy to follow the argument where it leads, in the case of history to discover what actually happened, in the case of literature to explore to its depths a particular theme. In consequence, this sort of pride demands freedom: it has to be laid low in any authoritarian State. The historian, in such a system, has to conform to official interpretations of the past, the philosopher to dogmas, the writer to stereotypes of human action, the craftsman to “production-schedules.” More subtly, attempts are made to lay pride low in a consumer’s society: the film-director, the novelist, the craftsman are called upon to produce “what will sell” at whatever cost to their pride in workmanship.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Passmore]], &#039;&#039;The Perfectibility of Man&#039;&#039; (1971), p. 290&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A man succeeds in completing a work only when his qualities transcend that work.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Cesare Pavese]], &#039;&#039;This Business of Living&#039;&#039;, {{#dateformat:1940-08-14}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These bygone workmen did not serve, they worked. They had an absolute honor, which is honor proper. A chair rung had to be well made. That was an understood thing. That was the first thing. It wasn’t that the chair rung had to be well made for the salary or on account of the salary. It wasn’t that it was well made for the boss, nor for connoisseurs, nor for the boss’ clients. It had to be well made itself, in itself, for itself, in its very self. A tradition coming, springing from deep within the race, a history, an absolute, an honor, demanded that this chair rung be well made. Every part of the chair which could not be seen was just as perfectly made as the parts which could be seen. The was the selfsame principal of cathedrals. … There was no question of being seen or of not being seen. It was the innate being of work which needed to be well done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Péguy]], &#039;&#039;Basic Verities&#039;&#039;, A. &amp;amp; J. Green, trans. (New York: 1943), pp. 82-85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Towards this fine honor of a trade converged all the finest, all the most noble sentiments—dignity, pride. Never ask anything of anyone, they used to say. … In those days a workman did not know what it was to solicit. It is the bourgeoisie who, turning the workmen into bourgeois, have taught them to solicit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Péguy]], &#039;&#039;Basic Verities&#039;&#039;, A. &amp;amp; J. Green, trans. (New York: 1943), p. 83.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Don&#039;t sacrifice your life to work and ideals. The most important things in life are human relations. I found that out too late.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Katharine Susannah Prichard}}, as quoted in &#039;&#039;100 Great Australians&#039;&#039; (1983) by Robert Macklin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The man who by his labour gets &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; His bread, in independent state, &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Who never begs, and seldom eats, &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Himself can fix or change his fate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Matthew Prior]] (1664–1721), &#039;&#039;The Old Gentry&#039;&#039; (posthumous), St. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The trouble with Opportunity is that it always comes disguised as hard work.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Herbert V. Prochnow}}, &#039;&#039;1001 Ways to Improve your Conversation &amp;amp; Speeches?&#039;&#039; (1952).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To depend on another&#039;s nod for a livelihood, is a sad destiny.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Publius Syrus]], &#039;&#039;The Moral Sayings of Publius Syrus&#039;&#039;, # 501&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Teslathinker.jpg |thumb|Let the future tell the truth and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine. ~ [[Nikola Tesla]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:A Wilde time 3.jpg|thumb|right|We live in the age of the overworked, and the under-educated; the age in which people are so industrious that they become absolutely stupid. ~ [[Oscar Wilde]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:THE WOMEN&#039;S WORK IN THE WAR INDUSTRY, 1914-1918 Q109920.jpg|thumb|It is amazing what can be accomplished when nobody cares about who gets the credit. ~ [[w:Robert Yates (politician)|Robert Yates]] ]] &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Howard Yoder, 1971 (6215609410).jpg|thumb|Let us reserve our limited creativity for functions that will not be taken care of if we do not to it. ~ [[John Howard Yoder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William Edmonson.jpg|thumb|The land belongs to those who work it with their hands. ~ [[Emiliano Zapata]] ]] &lt;br /&gt;
==R==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John_Henry-27527.jpg|thumb|Modern technique has made it possible for leisure, within limits, to be not the prerogative of small privileged classes, but a right evenly distributed throughout the community. The morality of work is the morality of slaves, and the modern world has no need of slavery. ~ [[Bertrand Russell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1927 Boris Bilinski (1900-1948) Plakat für den Film Metropolis, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin.jpg|thumb|It is clear that mechanistic, biologically unsatisfying work is a product of the widespread mechanistic view of life and the machine civilization. Can the biologic function of work be reconciled with the social function of work? This is possible, but firmly entrenched ideas and institutions must be radically corrected first. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The craftsman of the nineteenth century still had a full relationship to the product of his work. But when, as in a Ford factory, a worker has to perform one and the same manipulation year in and year out, always working on one detail and never the product as a whole, it is out of the question to speak of satisfying work. The specialized and mechanized division of labour, together with the system of paid labour in general, produce the effect that the working man has no relationship to the [[machine]]. ~ [[Wilhelm Reich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Did you get your [[money]] by fraud? By pandering to men’s vices or men’s stupidity? By catering to fools, in the hope of getting more than your ability deserves? By lowering your standards? By doing work you despise for purchasers you scorn? If so, then your money will not give you a moment’s or a penny’s worth of joy. Then all the things you buy will become, not a tribute to you, but a reproach; not an achievement, but a reminder of shame. Then you’ll scream that money is evil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ayn Rand]], Francisco d’Anconia in &#039;&#039;[[Atlas Shrugged]]&#039;&#039; (New York: 1992), p. 384.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is the basis of man’s social existence. This is stressed by every social theory. In this respect, however, the problem is not that work is the basis of human existence. The problem relates to the nature of work: Is it in opposition to or in harmony with the biologic needs of masses of people? Marx’s economic theory proved that everything that is produced in the way of economic values comes about through the expenditure of man’s living working power, and not through the expenditure of dead material.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is clear that mechanistic, biologically unsatisfying work is a product of the widespread mechanistic view of life and the machine civilization. Can the biologic function of work be reconciled with the social function of work? This is possible, but firmly entrenched ideas and institutions must be radically corrected first. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The craftsman of the nineteenth century still had a full relationship to the product of his work. But when, as in a Ford factory, a worker has to perform one and the same manipulation year in and year out, always working on one detail and never the product as a whole, it is out of the question to speak of satisfying work. The specialized and mechanized division of labour, together with the system of paid labour in general, produce the effect that the working man has no relationship to the [[machine]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 10, p. 287.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only when one is objectively and intimately related to one’s work is one capable of comprehending just how destructive the dictatorial and formal democratic forms of work are, not only for work itself but also for the [[pleasure]] of work. When a man takes pleasure in his work, we call his relationship to it ‘libidinous’. Since work and sexuality (in both the strict and broad senses of the word) are intimately interwoven, man’s relationship to work is also a question of the sex-economy of masses of people. The hygiene of the work process is dependent upon the way masses of people use and gratify their biologic energy. Work and sexuality derive from the same biologic energy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 10, p. 293.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The relationship between the worker’s [[sexual]] life and the performance of his work is of decisive importance. It is not as if work diverted sexual energy from gratification, so that the more one worked the less need one would have for sexual gratification. The opposite of this is the case: The more gratifying one’s sexual life is, the more fulfilling and pleasurable is one ’s work, if all external conditions are fulfilled. Gratified sexual energy is spontaneously converted into an interest in work and an urge for activity. In contrast to this, one’s work is disturbed in various ways if one’s sexual need is not gratified and is suppressed. Hence, a basic principle of the work hygiene of a work-democratic society is: It is necessary to establish not only the best external conditions of work, but also to create the inner biologic preconditions to allow the fullest unfolding of the biologic urge for activity. Hence, the safeguarding of a completely satisfying sexual life for the working masses is the most important precondition of pleasurable work. In any society the degree to which work kills the joy of life, the degree to which it is represented as a [[duty]] (whether to a ‘fatherland’, the ‘proletariat’, the ‘nation’ or whatever other names these [[illusions]] may have), is a sure yardstick on which to measure the anti-[[democratic]] character of the [[ruling class]] of this [[society]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 10, p. 295.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The working [[men]] and [[women]] who [[think]] and [[act]] in a work-[[democratic]] way do not come out against the [[politician]]. It is not his fault or his intention that the practical result of his work exposes the illusionary and irrational character of politics. Those who are engaged in [[practical]] work, regardless what field they are in, are intensely concerned with practical tasks in the improvement of [[life]]. Those who are engaged in practical work are not against one thing or another. It is only the politician who, having no practical tasks is always against and never for something. Politics in general is characterized by this ‘being against’ one thing or another. That which is productive in a practical way is not accomplished by politicians, but by working men and women, whether it is in accord with the politicians’ [[ideologies]] or not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 11, p. 368.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For centuries on end it has been precisely vitally necessary work that the political [[ideology]] of the ruling but nonworking classes has depreciated. On the other hand, it has represented non-work as a sign of noble blood. All [[socialist]] ideologies reacted to this appraisal with a mechanistic and rigid reversal of valuations. The socialists conceived of ‘work’ as relating solely to those activities that had been looked down upon in feudalism, i.e., essentially to manual labour; whereas the activity of the ruling classes was represented as non-work. To be sure, this mechanical reversal of ideologic valuations was wholly in keeping with the political concept of the two economically and personally sharply demarcated [[social classes]], the ruling and the ruled. From a purely [[economic]] point of view, society could indeed be divided into ‘those who possessed [[capital]]’ and ‘those who possessed the commodity, working power’ . From the point of view of bio-sociology, however, there could be no clear-cut division between one class and another, neither [[ideologically]] nor [[psychologically]], and certainly not on the basis of work. The discovery of the fact that the ideology of a group of people does not necessarily have to coincide with its economic situation, indeed, that economic and ideologic situation are often sharply opposed to one another, enabled us to understand the [[fascist]] movement, which had remained uncomprehended until then. In 1930 it became dear that there is a ‘cleavage’ between ideology and economy, and that the ideology of a certain class can develop into a social force, a social force that is not confined to that one class.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], &#039;&#039;The Mass Psychology of Fascism&#039;&#039;, (1933), ch. 11, p. 383&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For one human being to love another: that is perhaps the most difficult of our tasks; the ultimate, the last test and proof, the work for which all other work is but preparation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Letters to a Young Poet|Letters to a Young Poet]]&#039;&#039; (1934) Letter Seven (14 May 1904).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When men are rightly occupied, their amusement grows out of their work, as the colour-petals out of a fruitful flower;—when they are faithfully helpful and compassionate, all their emotions become steady, deep, perpetual, and vivifying to the soul as the natural pulse to the body. But now, having no true business, we pour our whole masculine energy into the false business of money-making; and having no true emotion, we must have false emotions dressed up for us to play with, not innocently, as children with dolls, but guiltily and darkly.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Ruskin]], “Sesame and Lilies” (1865)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Work is of two kinds: first, altering the position of matter at or near the earth&#039;s surface relatively to other such matter; second, telling other people to do so. The first kind is unpleasant and ill paid; the second is pleasant and highly paid.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.zpub.com/notes/idle.html In Praise of Idleness]&#039;&#039; (1932).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Modern technique has made it possible for leisure, within limits, to be not the prerogative of small privileged classes, but a right evenly distributed throughout the community. The morality of work is the morality of slaves, and the modern world has no need of slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.zpub.com/notes/idle.html In Praise of Idleness]&#039;&#039; (1932).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A narcissist, for example, inspired by the homage paid to great painters, may become an art student; but, as painting is for him a mere means to an end, the technique never becomes interesting … The result is failure and disappointment, with ridicule instead of the expected adulation. … All serious success in work depends upon some genuine interest. … Consequently, the man whose sole concern with the world is that is shall admire him is not likely to achieve his object.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;The Conquest of Happiness&#039;&#039;, p. 20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==S==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Solon.jpg|thumb|You made your rulers mighty, gave them guards, so now you groan &#039;neath slavery&#039;s heavy rod. ~ [[Solon|Solon of Athens]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John_Lancaster_Spalding.png|thumb|The work whereby men gain a livelihood involves mental and moral mutilation, unless it be done in the spirit of religion and culture. ~ [[John Lancaster Spalding]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I won&#039;t take my religion from any man who never works except with his mouth and never cherishes any memory except the face of the woman on the American silver dollar.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I ask you to come through and show me where you&#039;re pouring out the blood of your life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carl Sandburg]], &amp;quot;To a Contemporary Bunkshooter&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Chicago Poems&#039;&#039; (1916), p. 63.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What would you do if your country&#039;s welfare depended on labor? When a ship is in a storm it requires one captain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fritz Sauckel]], To Leon Goldensohn, February 9, 1946, from &amp;quot;The Nuremberg Interviews&amp;quot; by Leon Goldensohn, Robert Gellately - History (2004), p. 209.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;When I was young I observed that nine out of ten things I did were failures, so I did ten times more work.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bernard Shaw]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Appropriate Technology : A Focus for the Nineties&#039;&#039; (1991) by Robert William Stevens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nobody would work for starvation [[wages]] if he were not in a situation in which he preferred such wages to not working at all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Simmel]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Money&#039;&#039; (1907).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Have you beheld a man skillful in his work? Before kings is where he will station himself; he will not station himself before commonplace men.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Solomon]], [http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/pr/chapter_022.htm Proverbs 22: 29]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You made your rulers mighty, gave them guards,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;So now you groan &#039;neath slavery&#039;s heavy rod.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Solon|Solon of Athens]], as reported by [[Diogenes Laërtius]] (trans. [[w:Charles Duke Yonge|C. D. Yonge]]) &#039;&#039;The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers&#039;&#039; (1853), &amp;quot;Solon&amp;quot;, sect. 5, p. 25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We have lost the old love of work, of work which kept itself company, which was fair weather and music in the heart, which found its reward in the doing, craving neither the flattery of vulgar eyes nor the gold of vulgar men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lancaster Spalding]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The work whereby men gain a livelihood involves mental and moral mutilation, unless it be done in the spirit of religion and culture.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lancaster Spalding]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Things may be traded in the city but it is the fisherman who brings in the food supply.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sumerian proverb]], [http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/proverbs/t.6.1.01.html Collection I] at {{w|The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature}}, {{w|3rd millennium BCE}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work is valued by the social value of the worker.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gloria Steinem]], &#039;&#039;Moving Beyond Words&#039;&#039; (1994), Part 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The men at the factory are old and cunning&lt;br /&gt;
:You don&#039;t owe nothing, so boy get running&lt;br /&gt;
:It&#039;s the best years of your life they want to steal.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Joe Strummer]], “Clampdown” (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Understanding how the [[w:Agricultural revolution|agricultural revolution]] transformed [[human]] [[societies]] was once no more than a question of [[intellectual]] [[curiosity]]. Now, though, it has taken on a more [[practical]] and [[urgent]] aspect. Many of the [[challenges]] created by the agricultural revolution, such as the [[problem]] of [[w:Scarcity|scarcity]], have largely been solved by [[technology]] – yet our preoccupation with hard work and unrestrained [[economic growth]] remains undimmed.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[James Suzman]], [https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/dec/05/how-neolithic-farming-sowed-the-seeds-of-modern-inequality-10000-years-ago “How Neolithic farming sowed the seeds of modern inequality 10,000 years ago”], &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, (5 Dec, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I just don&#039;t understand the world&#039;s unhealthy obsession with work. Its all about vanity anyway. Ooh, look how hard I worked! And what a good work I did. Well screw you, workie. Get lost. Shut up. We&#039;re trying to listen to records here.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John Swartzwelder}}, &#039;&#039;Detective Made Easy&#039;&#039; (2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==T==&lt;br /&gt;
* I suddenly felt insecure and feared becoming an employee of some firm that would turn me into a corporate slave with &amp;quot;work ethics&amp;quot; (whenever I hear the word &#039;&#039;work ethics&#039;&#039; I interpret &#039;&#039;inefficient mediocrity&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nassim Nicholas Taleb]], &#039;&#039;Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets&#039;&#039; (2001) Seven: The Problem of Induction | Sir Karl&#039;s Promoting Agent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Laborare est orare&#039;&#039;. [To work is to pray.] By the Puritan moralist the ancient maxim is repeated with a new and intenser significance. The labor which he idealizes is not simply a requirement imposed by nature, or a punishment for the sin of Adam. It is itself a kind of [[asceticism|ascetic]] discipline, more rigorous than that demanded of any order of [[w:Mendicant|mendicants]]—a discipline imposed by the will of God, and to be undergone, not in solitude, but in the punctual discharge of secular duties. It is not merely an economic means, to be laid aside when physical needs have been satisfied. It is a spiritual end, for in it alone can the soul find health, and it must be continued as an ethical duty long after it has ceased to be a material necessity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[R. H. Tawney]], &#039;&#039;Religion and the Rise of Capitalism&#039;&#039; (1926), p. 242&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am credited with being one of the hardest workers and perhaps I am, if thought is the equivalent of labour, for I have devoted to it almost all of my waking hours. But if work is interpreted to be a definite performance in a specified time according to a rigid rule, then I may be the worst of idlers. Every effort under compulsion demands a sacrifice of life-energy. I never paid such a price. On the contrary, I have thrived on my thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nikola Tesla]], in [http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1919-00-00.htm &amp;quot;My Inventions&amp;quot;] first published in &#039;&#039;Electrical Experimenter&#039;&#039; magazine (1919); republished as &#039;&#039;My Inventions : The Autobiography of Nikola Tesla&#039;&#039; (1983).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let the future tell the truth and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nikola Tesla]], on patent controversies regarding the [[w:Invention of radio|invention of Radio]] and other things, as quoted in &amp;quot;A Visit to Nikola Tesla&amp;quot; by Dragislav L. Petkovic in &#039;&#039;Politika&#039;&#039; (April 1927);&amp;lt;!-- Perhaps from an interview in January 1927 --&amp;gt; as quoted in &#039;&#039;Tesla, Master of Lightning&#039;&#039; (1999) by Margaret Cheney, Robert Uth, and Jim Glenn, p. 73 &amp;lt;!-- Barnes &amp;amp; Noble Publishing --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; {{ISBN|0760710058}} &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ; also in &#039;&#039;Tesla: Man Out of Time&#039;&#039; (2001) by Margaret Cheney, p. 230 &amp;lt;!-- Simon and Schuster --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; {{ISBN|0743215362}} &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The scientific man does not aim at an immediate result. He does not expect that his advanced ideas will be readily taken up. His work is like that of the planter — for the future. His duty is to lay the foundation for those who are to come, and point the way. He lives and labors and hopes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nikola Tesla]], &amp;quot;Radio Power Will Revolutionize the World&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Modern Mechanics and Inventions&#039;&#039; (July 1934).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This world is a place of business. What an infinite bustle! ... It would be glorious to see mankind at [[leisure]] for once. It is nothing but work, work, work. I cannot easily buy a blank-book to write thoughts in; they are commonly ruled for dollars and cents. ... If a man was tossed out of a window when an infant, and so made a cripple for life, … it is regretted chiefly because he was thus incapacitated for—business! I think there is nothing, not even crime, more opposed to [[poetry]], to [[philosophy]], ay, to life itself, than this incessant business.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry David Thoreau]], “Life without Principle,” 1.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Drive a nail home and clinch it so faithfully that you can wake up in the night and think of your work with satisfaction,—a work at which you would not be ashamed to invoke the Muse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry David Thoreau]], &#039;&#039;Walden&#039;&#039;, chapter 18, p. 436 (1966). Originally published in 1854.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not enough to be industrious; so are the ants. What are you industrious about?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry David Thoreau]], letter to Harrison Blake (16 November 1857).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing tends to materialize man and to deprive his work of the faintest trace of mind more than the extreme [[division of labor]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexis de Tocqueville]], Democracy in America, vol. 1, chapter 18 (1835).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work consists of whatever a [[body]] is OBLIGED to do, and...[[Play]] consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mark Twain]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Adventures of Tom Sawyer|The Adventures of Tom Sawyer]]&#039;&#039; (1876), Ch. 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==V==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;Il est bien malaisé (puisqu’il faut enfin m’expliquer) d’ôter à des insensés des chaînes qu’ils révèrent.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Le dîner du comte de Boulainvilliers&#039;&#039; (1767): Troisième Entretien&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==W==&lt;br /&gt;
* The bourgeoisie first betrayed society through capitalism and finance, and now labor betrays it by embracing a scheme of things which sees profit only, not duty and honor, in work. This view will seem hopelessly unrealistic to those who do not admit that sentiment toward the whole is the only ultimate means of measuring value.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Weaver]], &#039;&#039;Ideas Have Consequences&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1948), p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea that work is something apportioned out by men leaves people discontent with their portion and dubious about whether work is a good thing at all. … The ancient injunction to labor fades when we regard our work as cut out for us by men, who, by present dogma, are no better than ourselves. That curious modern [[wikt:hypostatization|hypostatization]] “service” is often called in to substitute for the now incomprehensible doctrine of vocation. It tries to secure subordination by hypothesizing something larger than the self, which turns out, however, to be only a multitude of selfish selves. The familiar change from quality to quantity may again be noted; one serves not the higher part of the self (this entails hierarchy) … but merely consumer demand. And who admires those at the top of a hierarchy of consumption? Man as a consuming animal is thus seen to be not enough.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Weaver]], &#039;&#039;Ideas Have Consequences&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1948), p. 77&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor in this country is independent and proud. It has not to ask the patronage of [[capital]], but capital solicits the aid of labor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel Webster]], &#039;&#039;A discourse, delivered at Plymouth, December 22, 1820. In commemoration of the first settlement of New-England&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They are usually denominated labor-saving machines, but it would be more just to call them labor-doing machines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel Webster]], remarks in the Senate (March 12, 1838); &#039;&#039;The Writings and Speeches of Daniel Webster&#039;&#039; (1903), vol. 8, p. 177.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*America has lost more than 12 million jobs in the last six months. An estimated 12 million people have lost their employer-sponsored health insurance during the worst pandemic in a century. Tens of millions report not having enough to eat. But one month ago, tens of millions of unemployed Americans lost... a $600 weekly federal unemployment insurance benefit that Congress failed to renew... How can this happen in a democracy? This is a question that everyone who works for a living... might want to consider on this Labor Day... If the facts of this political disaster were more widely known and understood, Republicans could lose not only the presidency but also the Senate in November. After all, millions of unemployed Republicans lost most of their income as a result of what their political party...did... Republican senators repeatedly expressed worries that the unemployment benefits created a &amp;quot;disincentive to work.&amp;quot; But economists have found no evidence of this; on the contrary, millions of workers who were receiving these benefits returned to work in May through July, and there are more than 11 million more workers and there are more than 11 million more workers unemployed than there are job openings.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mark Weisbrot]], [https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/opinion/times-commentary/story/2020/sep/06/weisbrot-whour-government-doing-labor/531611/ What is our government doing to labor?], [[w:Chattanooga Times Free Press|Times Free Press]], (6 September 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul of Tarsus|Paul&#039;s]] ... [[w:He who does not work, neither shall he eat|no-work-no-eat doctrine]] was directed by him only against the poor. All around him were the rich, virginally innocent of toil, and yet who were gorged to the gullet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bouck White]], &#039;&#039;The Call of the Carpenter&#039;&#039; (1914), p. 238&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We live in the age of the overworked, and the under-educated; the age in which people are so industrious that they become absolutely stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oscar Wilde]], Gilbert, in &#039;&#039;The Critic as Artist&#039;&#039;, pt. 2 (1891)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Y==&lt;br /&gt;
* If we expand the notion of work, which is something that a [[universal basic income]] would help us do, it would begin to compensate parents and caregivers; it would begin to recognize different forms of work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Yang]], in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfDpS5w3wUw&amp;amp;t=43m59s Is our economy totally screwed? Andrew Yang and I debate], &#039;&#039;The Ezra Klein Show&#039;&#039;, 43:59 (20 August 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [A universal basic income] would be one of the greatest catalysts to entrepreneurship and creativity we have ever seen, and I&#039;ve worked with hundreds of entrepreneurs over the years. We have to put more Americans in position to do work that they value [[essentially|intrinsically]], instead of as a necessary means to [[survival]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Yang]], in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfDpS5w3wUw&amp;amp;t=47m54s Is our economy totally screwed? Andrew Yang and I debate], &#039;&#039;The Ezra Klein Show&#039;&#039;, 47:54 (20 August 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you care about children, then [UBI] is the best way to make household and families stronger; if you care about women and economic empowerment, this is a way to make it so that women can walk away from abusive or exploitative employers; if you care about communities of color, they would benefit much more proportionally from a thousand dollars a month than other communities, because they have lower access to various jobs and opportunities. This is the way that we can reform society in a way that actually serves all of our goals, our collective goals. And at least one study showed that if you would alleviate [[child poverty]], you would increase GDP by 700 billion dollars, because of better health outcomes, [[Education|educational]] outcomes, higher worker [[productivity]], better [[mental health]]... We have to start investing in our [[people]], intrinsically. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Yang]], in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfDpS5w3wUw&amp;amp;t=53m30s Is our economy totally screwed? Andrew Yang and I debate], &#039;&#039;The Ezra Klein Show&#039;&#039;, 53:30 (20 August 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have to say &amp;quot;we are the citizens and owners and stakeholders of this society, we can vote ourselves a dividend, and it&#039;s up to us to build an economy that serves us, because... this economy is not designed to serve human beings. It is designed to serve [[Capitalism|capital efficiency]]. And for a long time, that also served human beings, but increasingly it&#039;s going to be that having lots of humans working for a company is irrelevant, or even negative, for [[Profit|corporate success]]. And we can see this by the fact that &#039;&#039;&#039;94% of the new jobs created since 2005 to 2015, were [[W:gig economy|gig economy]], temp and contractor jobs, because the employer said &amp;quot;you know what? I&#039;d rather not have a full-time employee, I&#039;d rather not pay health care benefits&amp;quot;, and that&#039;s why so many Americans right now are in that position.&#039;&#039;&#039; So we have to start recognizing that the economy is changing for good, and that it&#039;s up to us, the citizens of this country, to rewrite the rules the economy to serve us. We have to make the market serve us, and not have us all be [[slaves]] to the market, because the market is not going to care one whit about [[Working class|us]] increasingly over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Yang]], in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfDpS5w3wUw&amp;amp;t=53m30s Is our economy totally screwed? Andrew Yang and I debate], &#039;&#039;The Ezra Klein Show&#039;&#039;, 53:30 (20 August 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is amazing what can be accomplished when nobody cares about who gets the credit.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Robert Yates (politician)|Robert Yates]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Team Selling Solution : Creating and Managing Teams That Win&#039;&#039; (2003) by Steve Waterhouse, p. 51.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Jesus once said that the dead should let to bury the dead (Luke 9:60). This shows no disrespect for the dead. It shows an awareness that there are some functions in society that will be well taken care of without Christians investing their creativity in those functions. Someone else, in meeting such needs, can make a stable living. Burying the dead is still one of the businesses in which you can make a stable living. There are other such services that we can count on society handling by itself. Leadership in government and business are among these. Let us reserve our limited creativity for functions that will not be taken care of if we do not to it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Howard Yoder]], &#039;&#039;Radical Christian Discipleship&#039;&#039; (2012), p. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Z==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;La tierra es de quien la trabaja con sus manos.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;The land belongs to those who work it with their hands.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Emiliano Zapata]], quoted as a slogan of the revolutionaries in &#039;&#039;Shirt-Sleeve Diplomat&#039;&#039; (1947) Vol. 5, p. 199, by Josephus Daniels, and specifically attributed to Zapata by Ángel Zúñiga in 1998, as quoted in &#039;&#039;Mexican Social Movements and the Transition to Democracy&#039;&#039; (2005), by John Stolle-McAllister&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 907-11.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labour in vain; or coals to Newcastle.&lt;br /&gt;
** Anon. In a sermon to the people of Queen-Hith. Advertised in the Daily Courant, Oct. 6, 1709. Published in Paternoster Row, London. &amp;quot;Coals to Newcastle,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;from Newcastle,&amp;quot; found in Heywood—If you Know Not Me, Part II. (1606). Gaunt—Bills of Mortality. (1661). Middleton—Phœnix, Act I, scene 5. R. Thoresby—Correspondence. Letter June 29, 1682. Owls to Athens. (Athenian coins were stamped with the owl.) Aristophanes—Aves. 301. Diogenes Laertius—Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Plato, XXXII. You are importing pepper into Hindostan. From the Bustan of Sadi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Qui laborat, orat.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** He who labours, [[Prayer|prays]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Attr. to [[St. Augustine]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When Adam dolve, and Eve span,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who was then the gentleman?&lt;br /&gt;
** Lines used by John Ball in Wat Tyler&#039;s Rebellion. See Hume, &#039;&#039;History of England&#039;&#039;, Volume I, Chapter XVII. Note 8. So Adam reutte, und Eva span, Wer war da ein eddelman? (Old German saying).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Qui orat et laborat, cor levat ad Deum cum manibus.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** He who prays and labours lifts his heart to God with his hands.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[St. Bernard]], &#039;&#039;Ad sororem&#039;&#039;. A similar expression is found in the works of Gregory the Great—Moral in Libr. Job, Book XVIII. Also in Pseudo-Hieron, in Jerem., Thren. III. 41. See also &amp;quot;What worship, for example, is there not in mere washing!&amp;quot; Carlyle—Past and Present, Chapter XV., referring to &amp;quot;Work is prayer&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tools were made and born were hands,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Every   understands.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Blake]], &#039;&#039;Proverbs&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Hâtez-vous lentement; et, sans perdre courage,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Vingt fois sur le métier remettez votre ouvrage.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Hasten slowly, and without losing heart, put your work twenty times upon the anvil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nicolas Boileau-Despréaux]], &#039;&#039;L&#039;Art Poétique&#039;&#039; (1674), I, 171.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The dog that trots about finds a bone.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Borrow]], &#039;&#039;Bible in Spain&#039;&#039;, Chapter XLVII. (Cited as a gipsy saying).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The best verse hasn&#039;t been rhymed yet,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The best house hasn&#039;t been planned,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The highest peak hasn&#039;t been climbed yet,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The mightiest rivers aren&#039;t spanned;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Don&#039;t worry and fret, faint-hearted,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The chances have just begun&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For the best jobs haven&#039;t been started,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The best work hasn&#039;t been done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Berton Braley]], &#039;&#039;No Chance&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not all the labor of the earth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is done by hardened hands.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Will Carleton]], &#039;&#039;A Working Woman&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And yet without labour there were no ease, no rest, so much as conceivable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, Characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the first of all problems for a man to find out what kind of work he is to do in this universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], address at Edinburgh (1866).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genuine Work alone, what thou workest faithfully, that is eternal, as the Almighty Founder and World-Builder himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Past and Present&#039;&#039;, Book II, Chapter XVII.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All work, even cotton-spinning, is noble; work is alone noble.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Past and Present&#039;&#039;, Book III, Chapter IV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With hand on the spade and heart in the sky&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Dress the ground and till it;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Turn in the little seed, brown and dry,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Turn out the golden millet.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work, and your house shall be duly fed:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Work, and rest shall be won;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I hold that a man had better be dead&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Than alive when his work is done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alice Cary]], &#039;&#039;Work&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They can expect nothing but their labor for their pains.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;{{w|Don Quixote}}&#039;&#039;, Author&#039;s Preface. [[Edward Moore]], &#039;&#039;The Boy and the Rainbow&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Earned with the sweat of my brows.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039; (1605-15), Part I, Book I, Chapter 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Quanto mas que cada uno es hijo de sus obras.&lt;br /&gt;
** The rather since every man is the son of his own works.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039; (1605-15), Book I, Chapter 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is discovered to be the grand conqueror, enriching and building up nations more surely than the proudest battles.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], &#039;&#039;War&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Each natural agent works but to this end,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To render that it works on like itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Chapman]], &#039;&#039;Bussy d&#039;Ambois&#039;&#039;, Act III, scene 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ther n&#039; is no werkman whatever he be,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That may both werken wel and hastily.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This wol be done at leisure parfitly.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Chaucer]], &#039;&#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;&#039;, The Merchantes Tale, line 585.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nowher so besy a man as he ther was,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And yet he semed bisier than he was.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Chaucer]], &#039;&#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;&#039;, Prologue, line 321.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let us take to our hearts a lesson—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; No lesson could braver be—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;From the ways of the tapestry weavers&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; On the other side of the sea.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anson G. Chester]], &#039;&#039;Tapestry Weavers&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Penelopæ telam retexens.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Unravelling the web of Penelope.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;Acad. Quæst&#039;&#039;, Book IV. 29. 95.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Vulgo enim dicitur, Jucundi acti labores: nec male Euripides: concludam, si potero, Latine: Græcum enim hunc versum nostis omnes: Suavis laborum est præteritorum memoria.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** It is generally said, &amp;quot;Past labors are pleasant,&amp;quot; Euripides says, for you all know the Greek verse, &amp;quot;The recollection of past labors is pleasant.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum&#039;&#039;, II. 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Le fruit du travail est le plus doux des plaisirs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The fruit derived from labor is the sweetest of pleasures.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Luc de Clapiers, Marquis de Vauvenargues]], &#039;&#039;Réflexions&#039;&#039;, 200.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A truly American sentiment recognises the dignity of labor and the fact that honor lies in honest toil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Grover Cleveland]], letter accepting the nomination for President. Aug. 18, 1884.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* American labor, which is the [[capital]] of our workingmen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Grover Cleveland]], Annual Message. Dec., 1885.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All Nature seems at work, slugs leave their lair—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The bees are stirring—birds are on the wing—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And Winter, slumbering in the open air,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Wears on his smiling face a dream of Spring!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And I the while, the sole unbusy thing,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nor honey make, nor pair, nor build, nor sing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]], &#039;&#039;Work Without Hope&#039;&#039;, Stanza 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Their work will be shown for what it is, because the [[Day of Judgement|Day]] will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each person’s work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[First Epistle to the Corinthians|I Corinthians]] [[w:1 Corinthians 3|3]]:13, [[New International Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Each one’s work will become obvious. For the day will disclose it, because it will be revealed by fire; the fire will test the quality of each one’s work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work thou for pleasure—paint or sing or carve&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The thing thou lovest, though the body starve—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who works for glory misses oft the goal;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who works for money coins his very soul.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work for the work&#039;s sake, then, and it may be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That these things shall be added unto thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kenyon Cox]], &#039;&#039;Our Motto&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When admirals extoll&#039;d for standing still,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of doing nothing with a deal of skill.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Table Talk&#039;&#039;, line 192.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Better to wear out than to rust out.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bishop Cumberland]], to one who urged him not to wear himself out with work. See Horne, &#039;&#039;Sermon on the Duty of Contending for the Truth&#039;&#039;. Boswell, &#039;&#039;Tour to the Hebrides&#039;&#039;, p. 18. Note. Said by George Whitefield, according to Southey, &#039;&#039;Life of Wesley&#039;&#039;, II, p. 170. (Ed. 1858).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Honest labour bears a lovely face.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Dekker (writer)|Thomas Dekker]], &#039;&#039;Patient Grissell&#039;&#039; (1599), Act I, scene 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Lord had a job for me, but I had so much to do,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I said, &amp;quot;You get somebody else—or wait till I get through.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I don&#039;t know how the Lord came out, but He seemed to get along:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But I felt kinda sneakin&#039; like, &#039;cause I know&#039;d I done Him wrong.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One day I needed the Lord—needed Him myself—needed Him right away,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And He never answered me at all, but I could hear Him say&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Down in my accusin&#039; heart, &amp;quot;Nigger, I&#039;se got too much to do,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;You get somebody else or wait till I get through.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Laurence Dunbar]], &#039;&#039;The Lord had a Job&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All play and no work makes Jack a mere toy.&lt;br /&gt;
** Quoted by [[Maria Edgeworth]], &#039;&#039;Henry and Lucy&#039;&#039;, Volume II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;Tis toil&#039;s reward, that sweetens industry,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As love inspires with strength the enraptur&#039;d thrush.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ebenezer Elliot]], &#039;&#039;Corn Law Rhymes&#039;&#039;. No. 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too busy with the crowded hour to fear to live or die.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Quatrains&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Nature&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A woman&#039;s work, grave sirs, is never done.&lt;br /&gt;
** Mr. [[Eusden]], &#039;&#039;Poem&#039;&#039;, Spoken at a Cambridge Commencement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labour itself is but a sorrowful song,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The protest of the weak against the strong.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frederick William Faber]], &#039;&#039;The Sorrowful World&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Chacun son métier;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Les vaches seront bien gardées.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Each one to his own trade; then would the cows be well cared for.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Florian]], &#039;&#039;Le Vacher et le Garde-chasse&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A ploughman on his legs is higher than a gentleman on his knees.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], &#039;&#039;Poor Richard&#039;&#039; (1758), Preface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Handle your tools without mittens.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], &#039;&#039;Poor Richard&#039;&#039; (1758), Preface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Plough deep while sluggards sleep.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], &#039;&#039;Poor Richard&#039;&#039; (1758), Preface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Men work together,&amp;quot; I told him from the heart,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Whether they work together or apart.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Frost]], &#039;&#039;Tuft of Flowers&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is so far from being needless pains, that it may bring considerable profit, to carry Charcoals to Newcastle.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Fuller]], &#039;&#039;Pisgah&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Sight of Palestine&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1650), p. 128. Worthies, p. 302. (Ed. 1661).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In every rank, or great or small,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;Tis industry supports us all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Gay]], &#039;&#039;Man, Cat, Dog, and Fly&#039;&#039;, line 63.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Genesis|Genesis]], III. 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For as labor cannot produce without the use of land, the denial of the equal right to the use of land is necessarily the denial of the right of labor to its own produce.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry George]], &#039;&#039;Progress and Poverty&#039;&#039;, Book VII, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;So eine Arbeit wird eigentlich nie fertig; man muss sie für fertig erklären, wenn man nach Zeit und Umstand das Möglichste getan hat.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Properly speaking, such work is never finished; one must declare it so when, according to time and circumstances, one has done one&#039;s best.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], &#039;&#039;Italienische Reise&#039;&#039; (March 16, 1787).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How blest is he who crowns in shades like these,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A youth of labour with an age of ease.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oliver Goldsmith]], &#039;&#039;The Deserted Village&#039;&#039; (1770), line 99.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He that well his warke beginneth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rather a good ende he winneth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Gower]], &#039;&#039;Confessio Amantis&#039;&#039; (c.1386–1393).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Vitam perdidi laboricose agendo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I have spent my life laboriously doing nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** Quoted by [[Grotius]] on his death bed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A warke it ys as easie to be done&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As tys to saye Jacke! robys on.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|James Halliwell-Phillipps}}, &#039;&#039;Archæological Dictionary&#039;&#039;. Quoted from an old Play. See Grose—Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar tongue. Hudson, the English singer, made popular the refrain, &amp;quot;Before ye could cry &#039;Jack Robinson.&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Joy to the Toiler!—him that tills&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The fields with Plenty crowned;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Him with the woodman&#039;s axe that thrills&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The wilderness profound.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Hathaway]], &#039;&#039;Songs of the Toiler&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If little labour, little are our gaines:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Man&#039;s fortunes are according to his paines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Herrick (poet)|Robert Herrick]], &#039;&#039;Hesperides&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;No Paines, No Gaines&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Haste makes waste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Heywood]], &#039;&#039;Proverbs&#039;&#039;, Part I, Chapter II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The &amp;quot;value&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;worth&amp;quot; of a man is, as of all other things, his price; that is to say, so much as would be given for the use of his power.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Hobbes]], &#039;&#039;Leviathan&#039;&#039;, Chapter X.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To labour is the lot of man below;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And when Jove gave us life, he gave us woe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Iliad&#039;&#039;, Book X, line 78. Pope&#039;s translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Light is the task when many share the toil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Iliad&#039;&#039;, Book XII, line 493. Bryant&#039;s translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our fruitless labours mourn,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And only rich in barren fame return.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book X, line 46. Pope&#039;s translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The fiction pleased; our generous train complies,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Nor fraud mistrusts in [[virtue]]&#039;s fair disguise.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The work she plyed, but, studious of delay,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Each following night reversed the toils of day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book XXIV, line 164. Pope&#039;s translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When Darby saw the setting sun&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He swung his scythe, and home he run,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sat down, drank off his quart and said,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My work is done, I&#039;ll go to bed.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My work is done!&amp;quot; retorted Joan,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My work is done! Your constant tone,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But hapless woman ne&#039;er can say&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;My work is done&#039; till judgment day.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[St. John Honeywood]], &#039;&#039;Darby and Joan&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With fingers weary and worn,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With eyelids heavy and red,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A woman sat in unwomanly rags,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plying her needle and thread.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Hood]], &#039;&#039;Song of the Shirt&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Qui studet optatam cursu contingere metam&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Multa tulit fecitque puer, sudavit et alsit.&lt;br /&gt;
** He who would reach the desired goal must, while a boy, suffer and labor much and bear both heat and cold.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Horace]], &#039;&#039;Ars Poetica&#039;&#039; (18 BC), CCCCXII.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;O laborum&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dulce lenimen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** O sweet solace of labors.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Horace]], &#039;&#039;Carmina&#039;&#039;, I. 32. 14.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;In silvam ligna ferre.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** To carry timber into the wood.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Horace]], &#039;&#039;Satires&#039;&#039;, I. 10. 24.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Facito aliquid operis, ut semper te diabolus inveniat occupatum.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Keep doing some kind of work, that the devil may always find you employed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[St. Jerome]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I like work; it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. I love to keep it by me: the idea of getting rid of it nearly breaks my heart.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jerome K. Jerome]], &#039;&#039;Three Men in a Boat&#039;&#039;, Chapter XV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Cur quæris quietem, quam natus sis ad laborem?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Why seekest thou rest, since thou art born to labor?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas á Kempis]], &#039;&#039;De Imitatione Christi&#039;&#039;, II. 10. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tho&#039; we earn our bread, Tom,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; By the dirty pen,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What we can we will be,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Honest Englishmen.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Do the work that&#039;s nearest&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Though it&#039;s dull at whiles,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Helping, when we meet them,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Lame dogs over stiles.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Kingsley]], Letter. To Thomas Hughes (1856), inviting Hughes and Tom Taylor to go fishing. See Memoirs of Kingsley, by his wife, Chapter XV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For men must work and women must weep,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the sooner it&#039;s over the sooner to sleep,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And good-bye to the bar and its moaning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Kingsley]], &#039;&#039;Three Fishers&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But till we are built like angels, with hammer and chisel and pen,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We will work for ourself and a woman, for ever and ever, Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;Imperial Rescript&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The gull shall whistle in his wake, the blind wave break in fire.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He shall fulfill God&#039;s utmost will, unknowing His desire,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And he shall see old planets pass and alien stars arise,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And give the gale his reckless sail in shadow of new skies.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Strong lust of gear shall drive him out and hunger arm his hand,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To wring his food from a desert nude, his foothold from the sand.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Fareloper (Interloper)&#039;&#039;. Pub. in Century Magazine, April, 1909. First pub. in London Daily Telegraph, Jan. 1, 1909. Title given as Vortrekker in his Songs From Books.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And only the Master shall praise us, and only the Master shall blame;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And no one shall work for money, and no one shall work for fame;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But each for the joy of the working, and each, in his separate star,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shall draw the Thing as he sees It, for the God of Things as They Are!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;L&#039;Envoi&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;In Seven Seas&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And the Sons of Mary smile and are blessed—they know the angels are on their side;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;They know in them is the Grace confessed, and for them are the Mercies multiplied;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;They sit at the Feet, they hear the Word, they see how truly the Promise runs;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;They have cast their burden upon the Lord, and—the Lord He lays it on Martha&#039;s Sons!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Sons of Mary&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Who first invented work, and bound the free&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And holyday-rejoicing spirit down  *  *  *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To that dry drudgery at the desk&#039;s dead wood?  *  *  *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sabbathless Satan!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;Work&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The finest eloquence is that which gets things done; the worst is that which delays them.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[D. Lloyd George]], at the Conference of Paris (Jan., 1919).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Unemployment, with its injustice for the man who seeks and thirsts for employment, who begs for labour and cannot get it, and who is punished for failure he is not responsible for by the starvation of his children—that torture is something that private enterprise ought to remedy for its own sake.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[D. Lloyd George]], speech (Dec. 6, 1919).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The heights by great men reached and kept&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Were not attained by sudden flight,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But they, while l heir companions slept,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Were toiling upward in the night.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;Birds of Passage&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Ladder of St. Augustine&#039;&#039;, Stanza 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taste the joy&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That springs from labor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;Masque of Pandora&#039;&#039;, Part VI. In the Garden. &amp;quot;From labor there shall come forth rest.&amp;quot;--Longfellow—To a Child, line 162.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Never idle a moment, but thrifty and thoughtful of others.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;The Courtship of Miles Standish&#039;&#039; (1858), Part VIII, line 46.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No man is born into the world whose work&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is not born with him; there is always work,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And tools to work withal, for those who will;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And blessed are the horny hands of toil!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Russell Lowell]], &#039;&#039;A Glance Behind the Curtain&#039;&#039;, line 202. &amp;quot;Horny-handed sons of toil.&amp;quot; Popularized by Denis Kearney (Big Denny), of San Francisco.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Labor est etiam ipsa voluptas.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Labor is itself a pleasure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, IV. 155.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How bething the, gentliman,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; How Adam dalf, and Eve span.&lt;br /&gt;
** Manuscript of the Fifteenth Century. British Museum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bowed by the weight of centuries he leans&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Upon his hoe and gazes on the ground,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The emptiness of ages in his face,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on his back the burden of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edwin Markham]], &#039;&#039;The Man with the Hoe&#039;&#039;. Written after seeing Millet&#039;s picture &amp;quot;Angelus&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Divisum sic breve fiet opus.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Work divided is in that manner shortened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martial]], &#039;&#039;Epigrams&#039;&#039; (c. 80-104 AD), Book IV. 83. 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why do strong arms fatigue themselves with frivolous dumb-bells? To dig a vineyard is a worthier exercise for men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martial]], &#039;&#039;Epigrams&#039;&#039; (c. 80-104 AD), Book XIV, Epigram 49.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God be thank&#039;d that the dead have left still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Good undone for the living to do—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Still some aim for the heart and the will&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And the soul of a man to pursue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Owen Meredith]] (Lord Lytton), &#039;&#039;Epilogue&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But now my task is smoothly done,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I can fly, or I can run.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Comus (John Milton)|Comus]]&#039;&#039; (1637), line 1,012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am of nothing and to nothing tend,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; On earth I nothing have and nothing claim,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Man&#039;s noblest works must have one common end,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And nothing crown the tablet of his name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Moore]], &#039;&#039;Ode upon Nothing&#039;&#039;. Appeared in Saturday Magazine about 1836. Not in Collected Works.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lo! all life this truth declares,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Laborare est orare;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the whole earth rings with prayers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miss Mulock]], &#039;&#039;Labour is Prayer&#039;&#039;, Stanza 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Has it ever been really noted to what extent a genuinely religious life … requires a leisure class, or half-leisure—I mean leisure with a good conscience, from way back, by blood, to which the aristocratic feeling that work disgraces is not altogether alien—the feeling that it makes soul and body common. And that consequently our modern, noisy, time-consuming industriousness, proud of itself, stupidly proud, educates and prepares people, more than anything else does, precisely for “unbelief.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;Beyond Good and Evil&#039;&#039;, W. Kauffman, trans. (New York: 1992), § 58.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is life! &#039;Tis the still water faileth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Idleness ever despaireth, bewaileth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Keep the watch wound, for the dark rust assaileth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frances S. Osgood]], &#039;&#039;To Labor is to Pray&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is rest—from the sorrows that greet us;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Rest from all petty vexations that meet us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Rest from sin-promptings that ever entreat us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Rest from the world-sirens that hire us to ill.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work—and pure slumbers shall wait on thy pillow;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work—thou shalt ride over Care&#039;s coming billow;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Lie not down wearied &#039;neath Woe&#039;s weeping willow!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Work with a stout heart and resolute will!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frances S. Osgood]], &#039;&#039;To Labor is to Pray&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The uselessness of men above sixty years of age and the incalculable benefit it would be in commercial, in political, and in professional life, if as a matter of course, men stopped work at this age.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Osler]], address, at Johns Hopkins University (Feb. 22, 1905).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Study until twenty-five, investigation until forty, profession until sixty, at which age I would have him retired on a double allowance.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Osler]]. The statement made by him which gave rise to the report that he had advised chloroform after sixty. Denied by him in &#039;&#039;Medical Record&#039;&#039; (March 4, 1905).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Dum vires annique sinunt, tolerate labores.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jam veniet tacito curva senecta pede.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** While strength and years permit, endure labor; soon bent old age will come with silent foot.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Ars Amatoria&#039;&#039;, II. 669.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And all labour without any play, boys,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Makes Jack a dull boy in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
** H. A. Page (pseudonym of {{w|Alexander Hay Japp}}), &#039;&#039;Vers de Société&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Many hands make light work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Patten|William Patten]]{{Disambiguation needed}}. &#039;&#039;Expedition into Scotland&#039;&#039; (1547). In Arber&#039;s Reprint of 1880.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing is impossible to industry.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Periander of Corinth]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Grex venalium.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The herd of hirelings. (A venal pack.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Cistellaria&#039;&#039;, IV. 2. 67.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Oleum et operam perdidi.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I have lost my oil and my labor. (Labored in vain.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Pœnulus&#039;&#039;, I. 2. 119.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ease and speed in doing a thing do not give the work lasting solidity or exactness of beauty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plutarch]], &#039;&#039;Life of Pericles&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man goeth forth unto his work and to his labour until the evening.&lt;br /&gt;
** Psalms. CIV. 23.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When Adam dalfe and Eve spane&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; So spire if thou may spede,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Where was then the pride of man,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That nowe merres his mede?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Rolle de Hampole]], &#039;&#039;Early English Text Society Reprints&#039;&#039;, No. 26, p. 79.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The man who by his labour gets&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His bread, in independent state,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who never begs, and seldom eats,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Himself can fix or change his fate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Matthew Prior]], &#039;&#039;The Old Gentry&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Der Mohr hat seine Arbeit gethan, der Mohr kann gehen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The Moor has done his work, the Moor may go.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Fiesco&#039;&#039;, III. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hard toil can roughen form and face,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And want can quench the eye&#039;s bright grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walter Scott]], &#039;&#039;Marmion&#039;&#039; (1808), Canto I, Stanza 28.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why, universal plodding poisons up&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The nimble spirits in the arteries,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;As motion and long-during action tires&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The sinewy vigour of the traveller.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Love&#039;s Labour&#039;s Lost]]&#039;&#039; (c. 1595-6), Act IV, scene 3, line 305.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why, Hal, &#039;tis my vocation. Hal: &#039;tis no sin for a man to labour in his vocation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry IV, Part 1|&#039;&#039;Henry IV&#039;&#039;, Part I]] (c. 1597), Act I, scene 2, line 116.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Another lean, unwashed artificer.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[King John]]&#039;&#039; (1598), Act IV, scene 2, line 201.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have had my labour for my travail.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Troilus and Cressida]]&#039;&#039; (c. 1602), Act I, scene 1, line 72.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The labour we delight in physics pain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Macbeth]]&#039;&#039; (1605), Act II, scene 3, line 55.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What work&#039;s, my countrymen, in hand? where go you&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With bats and clubs? The matter? speak, I pray you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Coriolanus]]&#039;&#039; (c. 1607-08), Act I, scene 1, line 55.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man who has no office to go to—I don&#039;t care who he is—is a trial of which you can have no conception.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Irrational Knot&#039;&#039;, Chapter XVIII.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am giving you examples of the fact that this creature man, who in his own selfish affairs is a coward to the backbone, will fight for an idea like a hero…. I tell you, gentlemen, if you can shew a man a piece of what he now calls God&#039;s work to do, and what he will later call by many new names, you can make him entirely reckless of the consequences to himself personally.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Man and Superman&#039;&#039; (1903), Act III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A day&#039;s work is a day&#039;s work, neither more nor less, and the man who does it needs a day&#039;s sustenance, a night&#039;s repose, and due leisure, whether he be painter or ploughman.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Unsocial Socialist&#039;&#039;, Chapter V.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Many faint with toil,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That few may know the cares and woe of sloth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;Queen Mab&#039;&#039; (1813), Canto III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many a rustic Milton has passed by,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Stifling the speechless longings of his heart,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In unremitting drudgery and care!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;How many a vulgar Cato has compelled&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His energies, no longer tameless then,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To mould a pin, or fabricate a nail!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;Queen Mab&#039;&#039; (1813), Part V, Stanza 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing can be done at once hastily and prudently.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Syrus]], &#039;&#039;Maxims&#039;&#039;. 357.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** Labour of love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[First Epistle to the Thessalonians|I Thessalonians]]. I. 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ne laterum laves.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Do not wash bricks. (Waste your labor).&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terence]], &#039;&#039;Phormio&#039;&#039;, I, IV. 9. A Greek proverb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With starving labor pampering idle waste;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To tear at pleasure the defected land.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], Liberty, Part IV, line 1,160.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The labourer is worthy of his reward.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[First Epistle to Timothy|I Timothy]]. V. 18; Luke. X. 7. (hire).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A workman that needeth not to be ashamed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Second Epistle to Timothy|II Timothy]], II. 15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Clamorous pauperism feasteth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;While honest Labor, pining, hideth his sharp ribs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Tupper]], &#039;&#039;Of Discretion&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Heaven is blessed with perfect rest but the blessing of earth is toil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Van Dyke]], &#039;&#039;Toiling of Felix&#039;&#039;, last line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor omnia vincit improbus.&lt;br /&gt;
** Stubborn labor conquers everything.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Virgil]], &#039;&#039;Georgics&#039;&#039; (c. 29 BC), I. 145.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Work spares us from three [[evils]]: [[boredom]], &#039;&#039;&#039;vice&#039;&#039;&#039; and [[Poverty|need]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]],&#039;&#039;Candide, ou l&#039;Optimisme&#039;&#039; (1759) Chapter 30. Conclusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too long, that some may rest,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tired millions toil unblest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;New National Anthem&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But when dread Sloth, the Mother of Doom, steals in,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And reigns where Labour&#039;s glory was to serve,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Then is the day of crumbling not far off.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;The Mother of Doom&#039;&#039; (August 28, 1919).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In books, or work, or healthful play.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Watts]], &#039;&#039;Divine Songs&#039;&#039;, XX.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor in this country is independent and proud. It has not to ask the patronage of [[capital]], but capital solicits the aid of labor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel Webster]], speech, April, 1824.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There will be little drudgery in this better ordered world. Natural power harnessed in machines will be the general drudge. What drudgery is inevitable will be done as a service and duty for a few years or months out of each life; it will not consume nor degrade the whole life of anyone.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. G. Wells]], &#039;&#039;Outline of History&#039;&#039;, Chapter XLI. Par. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ah, little recks the laborer,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;How near his work is holding him to God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The loving Laborer through space and time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walt Whitman]], &#039;&#039;Song of the Exposition&#039;&#039;, I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thine to work as well as pray,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Clearing thorny wrongs away;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plucking up the weeds of sin,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Letting heaven&#039;s warm sunshine in.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;The Curse of the Charter-Breakers&#039;&#039;, Stanza 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ah vitam perdidi operse nihil agendo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Ah, my life is lost in laboriously doing nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Josiah Woodward]], &#039;&#039;Fair Warnings to a Careless World&#039;&#039;, p. 97. Ed. 1736, quoting Merick Casaubon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989)==&lt;br /&gt;
* The day is short, the labor long, the workers are idle, and reward is great, and the Master is urgent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aboth]], 2:15, saying of Rabbi Tarfon. Pirkay Avot, often known in English as the &amp;quot;Chapters of the Fathers&amp;quot;, is the best known of the books of the Mishnah, first part of the Talmud. Translations vary; that above is from A Treasury of Jewish Quotations, ed. Joseph L. Baron, p. 277 (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to Sir [[James Matthew Barrie]], &#039;&#039;The International Encyclopedia of Quotations&#039;&#039;, comp. John P. Bradley, Leo F. Daniels, and Thomas C. Jones, p. 781 (1978). Reported as unverified in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The most unhappy of all men is the man who cannot tell what he is going to do, who has got no work cut-out for him in the world, and does not go into it. For work is the grand cure of all the maladies and miseries that ever beset mankind,—honest work, which you intend getting done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], inaugural address as rector of the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, April 2, 1866.—Carlyle, Critical and Miscellaneous Essays, vol. 6 (vol. 29 of The Works of Thomas Carlyle), p. 455 (1899, reprinted 1969).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Do the day&#039;s work. If it be to protect the rights of the weak, whoever objects, do it. If it be to help a powerful corporation better to serve the people, whatever the opposition, do that. Expect to be called a stand-patter, but don&#039;t be a stand-patter. Expect to be called a demagogue, but don&#039;t be a demagogue. Don&#039;t hesitate to be as revolutionary as science. Don&#039;t hesitate to be as reactionary as the multiplication table. Don&#039;t expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. Don&#039;t hurry to legislate. Give administration a chance to catch up with legislation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Calvin Coolidge]], speech to the Massachusetts state Senate on being elected its president, Boston, Massachusetts, January 7, 1914.—Coolidge, Have Faith in Massachusetts, p. 7–8 (1919).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our greatest weariness comes from work not done.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eric Hoffer]], &amp;quot;Thoughts of Eric Hoffer&amp;quot;, Including: &#039;Absolute Faith Corrupts Absolutely,&#039;&amp;quot; The New York Times Magazine, April 25, 1971, p. 55.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you work for a man, in heaven&#039;s name work for him!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If he pays you [[wages]] that supply you your bread and butter, work for him—speak well of him, think well of him, stand by him and stand by the institution he represents.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I think if I worked for a man I would work for him. I would not work for him a part of the time, and the rest of the time work against him. I would give an undivided service or none.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If put to the pinch, an ounce of loyalty is worth a pound of cleverness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &amp;quot;Get Out or Get in Line&amp;quot;, Selected Writings of Elbert Hubbard, p. 59–60 (1928).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the Great Society, work shall be an outlet for man&#039;s interests and desires. Each individual shall have full opportunity to use his capacities in employment which satisfies personally and contributes generally to the quality of the Nation&#039;s life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lyndon B. Johnson]], Manpower Report of the President, March 5, 1965. &#039;&#039;Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1965&#039;&#039;, book 1, p. 262.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I long to accomplish a great and noble task, but it is my chief duty to accomplish humble tasks as though they were great and noble. The world is moved along, not only by the mighty shoves of its heroes, but also by the aggregate of the tiny pushes of each honest worker.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Helen Keller]], Charles L. Wallis, The Treasure Chest, p. 240 (1983). Reported as unverified in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As good play for nothing, you know, as work for nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Walter Scott]], letter to Charles Kirkpatrick Sharpe, December 30, 1808.—John Gibson Lockhart, The Life of Sir Walter Scott, vol. 3, p. 144 (1902, reprinted 1983). Another use of this proverb was attributed, in an obituary, to [[[[Sir Alexander Cockburn, 12th Baronet|Sir Alexander Cockburn]], Lord Chief Justice of England. &amp;quot;He subsequently acquired a large practice in London in railway and election cases. Although he did his best for his clients, he was careful that they should do their duty by him, and the story is told that on one occasion, when an election committee met, Mr. Cockburn, the counsel for one of the parties, was absent because his fee had not accompanied the brief and the only message left was that he had gone to the Derby, with the remark that &#039;a man might as well play for nothing as work for nothing.&#039;&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Canada Law Journal&#039;&#039;, January 1, 1881, p. 11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;[[w:Workers of the world, unite!|Workers of the world, unite!]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The Communist Manifesto (1848), by [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Russian: &#039;&#039;Proletarii vsekh stran, soyedinyaytes!&#039;&#039; The phrase later appeared in the State Emblem of the Soviet Union, starting in 1919.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You must obey this now for a Law, that he that will not worke shall not eate (except by sicknesse he be disabled:) for the labours of thirtie or fortie honest and industrious men shall not be consumed to maintaine an hundred and fiftie idle loyterers.&lt;br /&gt;
** Captain [[John Smith]], advice to his company when he was governor of Jamestown Colony, Virginia, 1608.—Smith, The Generall Historie of Virginia, New England &amp;amp; The Summer Isles, vol. 1, chapter 10, p. 174 (1907). The preceding paragraph notes that &amp;quot;six houres each day was spent in worke, the rest in Pastime and merry exercises, but the untowardnesse of the greatest number caused the President [to] advise as followeth&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Dictionary of Legal Quotations&#039;&#039; (1904)==&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in James William Norton-Kyshe, &#039;&#039;Dictionary of Legal Quotations&#039;&#039; (1904), p. 164-165.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The power of arbitrarily dismissing those in one&#039;s employ, is a power exercised in a great degree over a vast number of persons in this country, without their having any redress at law. Put the case of a day labourer or ordinary servant. You may refuse to give him a character, and he has no redress. If you give him a false character, he has the means of redress, but that is of a very different kind. And this is the law of the land.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadwell, V.-C, &#039;&#039;Ranger v. Great Western Rail. Co.&#039;&#039; (1838), 2 Jur. (0. S.) 789.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The possession of the servant is the possession of the master.&lt;br /&gt;
** Hide, C.J., &#039;&#039;King v. Burgess&#039;&#039; (1663), Ray. (Sir Thos.) Rep. 85.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apprentices and servants are characters perfectly distinct: the one receives instruction, the other a stipulated price for his labour.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lloyd Kenyon, 1st Baron Kenyon|Lord Kenyon]], C.J., &#039;&#039;The King v. Inhabitants of St. Paul&#039;s&#039;&#039;, Bedford (1797), 6 T. R. 454.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers&#039;&#039; (1895)==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in Josiah Hotchkiss Gilbert, &#039;&#039;Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers&#039;&#039; (1895).&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No man is born into the world whose work is not born with him. There is always work, and tools to work withal, for those who will.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ward Beecher]], p. 368.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let parents who hate their offspring rear them to hate labor, and to inherit riches; and before long they will be stung by every vice, racked by its poison, and damned by its penalty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ward Beecher]], p. 438.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Blessed is the man who has found his work; let him ask no other blessedness. Know thy work, and do it; and work at it like Hercules. One monster there is in the world, the idle man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is sweet, for Thou hast toiled,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And care is light, for Thou hast cared;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Let not our works with self be soiled,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Nor in unsimple ways ensnared.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Through life&#039;s long day and death&#039;s dark night,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O gentle Jesus! be our light.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frederick William Faber]], p. 369.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No man is base who does a true work; for true action is the highest being. No man is miserable that does a true work; for right action is the highest happiness. No man is isolated that does a true work; for useful action is the highest harmony — it is the highest harmony with nature and with souls — it is living association with men — and it is practical fellowship with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Giles]], p. 369.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man must work. That is certain as the sun. But he may work grudgingly, or he may work gratefully; he may work as a man, or he may work as a machine. He cannot always choose his work, but he can do it in a generous temper, and with an up-looking heart. There is no work so rude, that he may not exalt it; there is no work so impassive, that he may not breathe a soul into it; there is no work so dull, that he may not enliven it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Giles]], p. 369.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man&#039;s labors must pass like the sunrises and sunsets of the world. The next thing, not the last, must be his care.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George MacDonald]], p. 369.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is not, as some have erroneously supposed, a penal clause of the original curse. There was labor, bright, healthful, unfatiguing, in unfallen Paradise. By sin, labor became drudgery — the earth was restrained from her spontaneous fertility, and the strong arm of the husbandman was required, not to develop, but to &amp;quot;subdue&amp;quot; it. But labor in itself is noble, and is necessary for the ripe unfolding of the highest life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Morley Punshon]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Labor is the true alchemist that beats out in patient transmutation the baser metals into gold.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Morley Punshon]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God does not give excellence to men but as the reward of labor.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Joshua Reynolds]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing is denied to well-directed labor; nothing is ever to be attained without it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Joshua Reynolds]], p. 367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Virtue|virtues]], like the body,become strong more by labor than by nourishment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Paul]], p. 368.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
{{col-begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{col-2}} &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Basic income]] (Universal basice income)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Career]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Employment]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Exploitation]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Division of labor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greed]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[General strike]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Human rights]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Labour movement|Labor movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oligarchy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Retirement]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Self respect]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Servility]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scarcity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slavery]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vocation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wage slavery]]  &lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary|work|labor}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Labor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[ko:노동]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Turkey&amp;diff=3152710</id>
		<title>Turkey</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Turkey&amp;diff=3152710"/>
		<updated>2022-08-08T18:06:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Quotes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:&#039;&#039;This entry is about the country; for the bird, see [[Turkeys]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Turkey.svg|thumb|I love Turkey. I first traveled there in my early twenties, when I was obsessed by the 1915 Dardanelles campaign. I immediately liked the people — brave, stoical, generous, hospitable and patriotic, if a little inclined to conspiracy theories. I saw Turkey as a model for the region. ~ [[Daniel Hannan]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Turkey emblem round.svg|thumb|Understand this: Turkey is a country whose warnings should be taken seriously and listened to. Don&#039;t test Turkey&#039;s patience. Try to win its friendship. ~ [[w:Serdar Kılıç|Serdar Kılıç]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Turkey|Turkey]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (Turkish: &#039;&#039;Türkiye&#039;&#039;), officially the &#039;&#039;&#039;Republic of Turkey&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;Türkiye&#039;&#039;&#039;,  is a [[w:Eurasian|Eurasian]] country that stretches across the [[w:Anatolian peninsula|Anatolian peninsula]] in southwestern [[Asia]] and the [[w:Balkan region|Balkan region]] of southeastern [[Europe]].&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha|[[#Disputed|Disputed]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ankara Train Station.JPG|thumb|Your Majesty may think me an impatient sick man, and that the Turks are even sicker. ~ [[Voltaire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hagia Sophia Mars 2013.jpg|thumb|All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit. ~ [[Thomas Paine]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Turkish Court of Cassation.jpg|thumb|Corruption and bribery have ceased to be criminal acts in Turkey. ~ Tim Franks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the Ottoman Empire (1844–1922).svg|thumbnail|I think that I have said that at three or four meetings before rather than us talking about the problem of Cyprus which makes that it becomes a problem for the Republic as it is worldwide known we ought to talk about the problem of Turkey, it is really a 100% Turkish problem that they&#039;re not acting in the way in which they should be acting and if that&#039;s the case well &#039;&#039;shove it to them&#039;&#039;. ~ [[Rudi Vis]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hereunder is the [[w:Student Oath (Turkey)|Student Oath]] that all Turkish students had to recite at the beginning of each schoolday until 2013. The original was written in 1933 by [[w:Reşit Galip|Reşit Galip]], the Minister of Education at the time. It has been changed a few times since then, the version that follows is from 1997. &amp;quot;How happy is the one who says I am a Turk&amp;quot; ([[w:Ne mutlu Türküm diyene|Ne mutlu Türküm diyene]]) is a quote from a speech by [[Atatürk]]. The references to Atatürk were not present in the original, they were added in 1972, by then the Turkish military had performed two coups (in [[w:1960 Turkish coup d&#039;état|1960]] and [[w:1971 Turkish military memorandum|1971]]), partly due to them fearing the country was veering away from Atatürk&#039;s ideals. (In Turkey, the military traditionally views itself as a guardian of Atatürk&#039;s legacy.)&lt;br /&gt;
*I am a Turk, honest and hardworking.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My principle is to protect the younger, to respect the elder, &#039;&#039;to love my homeland and my nation more than myself.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My ideal is to rise, to progress.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;O Great [[Atatürk]] !&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;On the path that you have paved, I swear to walk incessantly toward the aims that you have set.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Let my existence be a gift to the Turkish existence.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[w:Ne mutlu Türküm diyene|How happy is the one who says &amp;quot;I am a Turk!&amp;quot;]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Türk&#039;üm, doğruyum, çalışkanım,&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;İlkem: küçüklerimi korumak, büyüklerimi saymak, yurdumu, milletimi özümden çok sevmektir.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ülküm: yükselmek, ileri gitmektir.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ey Büyük Atatürk!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Açtığın yolda, gösterdiğin hedefe durmadan yürüyeceğime ant içerim.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Varlığım Türk varlığına armağan olsun.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;[[w:Ne mutlu Türküm diyene|Ne mutlu Türk&#039;üm diyene!]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes about ==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
* Turkey does not leave the rights in Azerbaijan, Syria, Libya, and the East Mediterranean to the mercy of the powerful and unjust, who have grand statements to say; it accumulates the power it needs to claim its rights where necessary. The spectacular performances demonstrated by the armed UAVs, Kirpis (“Hedgehogs,” heavy armored troop carriers), Turkish canons, and all products of the defense industry, were only showing the power of justice.&lt;br /&gt;
**  [[Yasin Aktay]] [https://www.yenisafak.com/en/columns/yasinaktay/baku-sends-loud-and-clear-message-to-whole-world-after-karabakh-war-2047694 Baku sends &#039;loud and clear&#039; message to whole world after Karabakh war (13 December 2020)]&lt;br /&gt;
* ...O Turkish child of future generations! As you see, even under these circumstances and conditions, it is your duty to save the Turkish Independence and the Republic! The strength that you will need is present in the noble blood which flows in your veins!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk]], [http://web.archive.org/web/20190110093404/http://www.ataturksociety.org/about-ataturk/ataturks-speech-to-youth/ Address To Turkish Youth] (20 October 1927)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Republic of Turkey cannot be a country of sheikhs, dervishes, and disciples. The truest, most real order is the order of civilisation.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Atatürk&#039;ün Söylev ve Demeçleri&#039;&#039;, Volume II, p. 215&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The torch that the Turkish nation holds in her hand and in her mind, while marching on the road of progress and civilisation, is positive sciences.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk]], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atat%C3%BCrk%27s_Tenth_Year_Speech speech on the tenth anniversary of the Republic, 1933]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Turkey&#039;s true master is the [[peasant]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.co.in/books?id=H9ao45JHuVAC&amp;amp;pg=PT27 U.S.A. Toddler Importing as a Turkish Businessman]&#039;&#039; by Thomas Chi, OilUSA.Co, 1 June 2011, p. 27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
*Turks can be killed, but they can never be conquered.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Napoleon I of France]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.com/books?id=3MJVAAAAYAAJ NAPOLEON In His Own Words]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*There are two great virtues that glorify people: The brave woman and the honorable man. Besides these two virtues, there is a virtue that honors both men and women. To be loyal to his country enough to be able to sacrifice his life without hesitation. Turks are heroes with these virtues and virtues. For this reason, Turks can be killed but not defeated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Napoleon Bonaparte]] {{source}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Give me an army of Turks, I will make the entire world your prisoner.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Napoleon Bonaparte]] {{source}}&lt;br /&gt;
*The hand of the Turk, who wields the sword with ruthless skill, is a great master in healing the wounds of those he defeated.&lt;br /&gt;
**Lord Byron {{source}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
*Turkey is the norm in Islam. Turkey has a secular constitution. It&#039;s a democratic society where you have gender equality between men and women. It&#039;s a member of NATO and is in accession talks with the European Union. It&#039;s a friend.&lt;br /&gt;
**Soner Cagaptay, [http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/turkeys-istanbul-attack-vengeance-will-be-like-rain-from-hell &amp;quot;Turkey&#039;s Istanbul Attack Vengeance Will Be Like &#039;Rain From Hell&#039;&amp;quot;] (29 June 2016), &#039;&#039;CNN&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the Ottoman Empire, the Turks were &#039;an inferior race.&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
* People in the judiciary and the police carried out investigations and launched this case, as their duties normally require. &#039;&#039;&#039;Apparently they weren&#039;t informed of the fact that corruption and bribery have ceased to be criminal acts in Turkey&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tim Franks, [http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25909139 &amp;quot;Turkey&#039;s Fethullah Gulen denies corruption probe links&amp;quot;] (27 January 2014), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: British Broadcasting Corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*I love Turkey. I first traveled there in my early twenties, when I was obsessed by the 1915 Dardanelles campaign. I immediately liked the people — brave, stoical, generous, hospitable and patriotic, if a little inclined to conspiracy theories. I saw Turkey as a model for the region, a successful, Western-oriented Muslim democracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Hannan]], [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/dan-hannan-the-republic-will-survive-trump-but-will-the-republicans &amp;quot;The republic will survive Trump, but will the Republicans?&amp;quot;] (3 September 2018), &#039;&#039;The Washington Examiner&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Turkey had been our ally in the [[World War I|World War]]. Its unfortunate result was as heavy a burden for Turkey as it was for us. [[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk|The great and ingenious reconstructor of the new Turkey]] gave his Allies, beaten by fate, the first example of resurrection. While Turkey, thanks to the realistic attitude of her State leadership, preserved her independent attitude Yugoslavia fell a victim to British intrigues.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Adolf Hitler]], [[s:Adolf Hitler&#039;s Address to the Reichstag (4 May 1941)|addressed to the Reichstag on 4 May 1941]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
*Relations between Turkey and [[Greece]] are the most fractious of any pair of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) 29 member countries. Disputes range from contested offshore hydrocarbon exploration to Athens granting political refugee status to two of eight Turkish officers who fled to Greece after the failed July 2016 coup attempt (Hürriyet Daily News, May 24, 2018). Now, Turkey is protesting Greece’s activities off its Aegean coast. On May 12, Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hami Aksoy stated that Turkey claims Greece does not respect the demilitarized status of its islands in the eastern Aegean, adding that NATO warships operating in the Aegean should not use Greek ports there for visits and refueling (Mfa.gov.tr, May 12, 2019). Aksoy’s concerns mask a broader anxiety in Ankara that NATO and the United States may be planning to deepen their military presence in the eastern Mediterranean to include more bases in Greece and its [[w:Aegean islands|Aegean islands]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://jamestown.org/program/turkey-fumes-as-greece-offers-use-of-eastern-aegean-islands-to-nato-us/  &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Turkey Fumes as Greece Offers Use of Eastern Aegean Islands to NATO,&#039;&#039;&#039; US Eurasia Daily Monitor,] Volume: 16 Issue: 80,[[w: Jamestown Foundation|(The Jamestown Foundation&#039;&#039;]]],  by [https://jamestown.org/analyst/john-c-k-daly/ John C. K. Daly],  (31 May 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
*Understand this: Turkey is a country whose warnings should be taken seriously and listened to. Don&#039;t test Turkey&#039;s patience. Try to win its friendship.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Serdar Kılıç|Serdar Kılıç]], [http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/24/middleeast/warplane-crashes-near-syria-turkey-border/ &#039;&#039;Twitter&#039;&#039;] (24 November 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[European Union]] and many of its countries, which used to take initiatives in the [[United Nations]] for [[Conflict resolution|peaceful settlements of conflict]], are now one of the most important war assets of the [[NATO|U.S./NATO front]].  Many countries have also been drawn into complicity in breaking [[international law]] through [[w:Category:Wars involving NATO|U.S./U.K./NATO wars]] in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/10/14/disturbing-expansion-military-industrial-complex &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Disturbing Expansion of the Military-Industrial Complex&#039;&#039;&#039;, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;,]  (14 October 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
* Turkey, like every country, has a right to defend its territory and its airspace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Barack Obama|Barack H. Obama II]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/11/24/remarks-president-obama-and-president-hollande-france-joint-press Remarks by President Obama and President Hollande of France in Joint Press Conference] (24 November 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
* All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Thomas Paine]], &#039;&#039;The Age of Reason&#039;&#039; (1793), Part I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*[I]n [[Germany]] we are giving work to two million people from Turkey.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Uli Stielike|Uli Stielike]], as quoted in [http://www.abendblatt.de/daten/2003/11/20/232266.html &#039;&#039;Hamburger Abendblatt&#039;&#039;] 20 November 2003&lt;br /&gt;
**Original German: &#039;&#039;[I]n Deutschland zwei Millionen Menschen aus der Türkei Arbeit geben.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We all know the Turkish state is in a position to control its borders. It is not failed state, it is a proper functioning state so we have to negotiate with Turkey for its responsibilities. It is not like Libya which is ungovernable.&lt;br /&gt;
**EU Leader, Krzysztof Szczerski, quoted on &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039; (February 18, 2016), [http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/feb/18/poland-will-not-accept-cut-in-benefits-for-those-already-in-uk-says-aide &amp;quot;Poland will not accept cut in benefits for those already in UK, says aide&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“…the planet from which the little prince came is the asteroid known as B-612.  This asteroid has only once been seen through a telescope.  That was by a Turkish astronomer, in 1909.  On making his discovery, the astronomer had presented it to the International Astronomical Congress, in a great demonstration.  But he was in Turkish costume, and so nobody would believe what he said. …Fortunately, however, for the reputation of Asteroid B-612, a Turkish dictator made a law that his subjects, under pain of death, should change to European costume.  So in 1920 the astronomer gave his demonstration all over again, dressed with impressive style and elegance.  And this time everybody accepted his report.”&lt;br /&gt;
**The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (translated by Katherine Woods), Piccolo Books in association with Heinemann, Pan Books, London, 1974 (first 1945).  Quoted in Talageri, S. (2000). The Rigveda: A historical analysis. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===U===&lt;br /&gt;
*Turkey doesn’t understand that, for the United States, buying a sophisticated Russian air defense system is a major national security issue that can’t be papered over. But Americans don’t understand that all their tough talk about leveling sanctions against Turkey if the Russian arms sale goes through only plays into Turkish leaders’ hands politically...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Speaking at a forum on Ankara-Washington relations hosted by the [[W:Hudson Institute|Hudson Institute in Washington]], Hudson fellow Blaise Misztal said that, to [[W:Tayyip Erdogan|President Tayyip Erdogan]] and his political coalition partners, “sanctions and kicking you out of &#039;[[NATO]] is a winning policy” because it fuels long-standing and growing [[anti-Americanism]] in their nationalist-leaning array of parties.  Since 2014, and particularly after a [[W:2016 Turkish coup d&#039;état attempt|failed coup attempt in 2016]] that many Turks believe was known in Washington before it was launched, Erdogan “is becoming closer to [[Vladimir Putin|[Vladimir] Putin]], [[Bashar al-Assad|Bashir al Assad]], [[Iran]] and [[China]]” to burnish his [[nationalist]] credentials, Misztal said. As an example of how this plays out, Erdogan told his parliament Wednesday the nation is “passing through a very critical period, from economy to security.”  He warned about plotters still inside its borders and their outside supporters. At the same time as Erdogan spoke, a Turkish newspaper reported the defense ministry is sending troops to [[Russia]] to receive familiarization training for the [[W:S-400 missile system|S-400 air defense system]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:The U.S. Naval Institute|The U.S. Naval Institute]] News, [https://news.usni.org/2019/05/22/panel-us-turkey-dispute-over-buying-russian-air-defense-system-has-deeper-roots &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Panel: US/Turkey Dispute Over Buying Russian Air Defense System Has Deeper Roots&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;]   by   [https://news.usni.org/author/jgrady John Grady], (22 May 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*...&#039;&#039;&#039;I think that I have said that at three or four meetings before rather than us talking about the problem of Cyprus which makes that it becomes a problem for the Republic as it is worldwide known we ought to talk about the problem of Turkey, it is really a 100% Turkish problem that they&#039;re not acting in the way in which they should be acting and if that&#039;s the case well &#039;&#039;shove it to them&#039;&#039;!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudi Vis]], &#039;&#039;[At the Friends of Cyprus meeting in the Jubilee Room at the House of Commons, 3rd July 2007]&#039;&#039; (see [[Rudi Vis#External links|External links]] for transcript).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I hate calumny so much that I do not want even to impute foolishness to the Turks, although I detest them as tyrants over women and enemies of the arts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;[http://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volmoham.html The Philosophical Dictionary]&#039;&#039; selected and translated by H.I. Woolf (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===W===&lt;br /&gt;
* We became acquainted we found the people, whether Christian or Turkish, prevailingly of a friendly, kindly, progressive type, as is often the case with simple-minded people in times of peace.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | author = George Edward White&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Adventuring with Anatolia College&lt;br /&gt;
  | year = 1940&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Herald-Register&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = p. 18&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I always liked the common Turkish people unless they were stirred to passion by militarists.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | author = George Edward White&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Adventuring with Anatolia College&lt;br /&gt;
  | year = 1940&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Herald-Register&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = p. 18&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the College two classes were called preparatory, while four bore the ordinary college class names. The schools from which our students came did not carry them far. When Americans first came to Turkey, hardly any vernacular was taught anywhere. Instruction was in classic tongues and religious lore. But our students for the most part came with a purpose in modern life. They wanted to attain a worth-while and useful manhood and they felt that the College could give them a start.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | author = George Edward White&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Adventuring with Anatolia College&lt;br /&gt;
  | year = 1940&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Herald-Register&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = p. 19&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One student told me in after years that when he came to Marsovan [a city in Turkey] he was really illiterate, that is, he could not fairly read his native tongue, or any other. But he had no chance of learning more in his native village. For a number of months he was cow-boy for an American family, and eagerly studying too.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | author = George Edward White&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Adventuring with Anatolia College&lt;br /&gt;
  | year = 1940&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Herald-Register&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = p. 19&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Another time I was riding alone with a Circassian, and in the talk of man to man in such companionship, asked him a bit about his occupation and his affairs. &amp;quot;Sometimes I get a traveller to escort, like you&amp;quot;, he replied, &amp;quot;and then I take him, but my regular business is smuggling tobacco. Every man in our village has a regular job, some are smugglers, some are farmers, and some are thieves&amp;quot;. I asked him about his chance of getting caught, and he promptly said, &amp;quot;There are two kinds of smugglers; one kind gets caught and one kind doesn&#039;t get caught&amp;quot;, and he added a pious expression of gratitude to the good Lord that he never had been put to shame yet. We knew very well that the mounted police of Anatolia were largely recruited from among the robbers and smugglers of the mountain roads. One of the most effective ways of securing official employment, and who knows what promotion later, was to acquire the reputation of a daring hold-up man on the mountains.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | author = George Edward White&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Adventuring with Anatolia College&lt;br /&gt;
  | year = 1940&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Herald-Register&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = p. 25&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 823.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The unspeakable Turk should be immediately struck out of the question, and the country be left to honest European guidance.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], letter to a meeting at St. James Hall, London, 1876. See also his article on &#039;Das Niebelungen Lied&#039;&#039; in Westminster Review. 1831. No. 29. Also his Letter to George Howard, Nov. 24, 1876.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [Turks] one and all, bag and baggage, shall I hope clear out from the province they have desolated and profaned.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Gladstone]], speech (May 7, 1877).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Lofty Gate of the Royal Tent.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Mahomet II&#039;&#039;. It was translated &amp;quot;La Porte Sublima&amp;quot; by the Italians. See E. S. Creasy, &#039;&#039;History of the Ottoman Turks&#039;&#039;, p. 96, ed. 1877.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [The Ottoman Empire] whose sick body was not supported by a mild and regular diet, but by a powerful treatment, which continually exhausted it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Montesquieu]], &#039;&#039;Persian Letters&#039;&#039;, I, 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We have on our hands a sick man,—a very sick man. [The sick man of Europe, the Turk.]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nicholas I]], of Russia. Conversation with Sir George Hamilton Seymour. (1853). See &#039;&#039;Blue Book&#039;&#039; (1854).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [The Ottoman Empire] has the body of a sick old man, who tried to appear healthy, although his end was near.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Thomas Roe]], Ambassador to Constantinople. See Buchanan, Letter, 375.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Your Majesty may think me an impatient sick man, and that the Turks are even sicker.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]] to Catherine II. In the Rundschau (April, 1878).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Disputed begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Disputed==&lt;br /&gt;
*For nearly five hundred years, these rules and theories of an Arab Shaikh and the interpretations of generations of lazy and good-for-nothing priests have decided the civil and criminal law of Turkey. They have decided the form of the Constitution, the details of the lives of each Turk, his food, his hours of rising and sleeping the shape of his clothes, the routine of the midwife who produced his children, what he learned in his schools, his customs, his thoughts-even his most intimate habits. Islam – this theology of an immoral Arab – is a dead thing. Possibly it might have suited tribes in the desert. It is no good for modern, progressive state. God’s revelation! There is no God! These are only the chains by which the priests and bad rulers bound the people down. A ruler who needs religion is a weakling. No weaklings should rule.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mustafa Kemal Atatürk]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Grey Wolf: Mustafa Kemal – An intimate study of a dictator&#039;&#039; (1932) by Harold Courtenay Armstrong, pp. 199-200&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Disputed end}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Europe|European Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/Turkey}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wiktionary-inline|Turkey}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{commonscat-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikisource-inline|Category:Turkey}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.oswego.edu/~baloglou/anatolia/anat-5.html &amp;quot;Ottoman Anatolia: #5: Mountain life (1892)&amp;quot;], George Baloglou, Associate Professor of Mathematics, [[w:State University of New York|State University of New York]] - Oswego&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Turkey| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Anatoly_Shariy&amp;diff=3152694</id>
		<title>Anatoly Shariy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Anatoly_Shariy&amp;diff=3152694"/>
		<updated>2022-08-08T16:45:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Anatoly Shariy 2018.jpg|thumb|Anatoly Shariy in 2018]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Anatoly Shariy|Anatoly Anatolyevich Shariy]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (born August 20, 1978) is a Ukrainian journalist, videoblogger and politician. Ukrainian media commonly refer to him as &amp;quot;pro-Russian&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;anti-Ukrainian&amp;quot;, labels he denies and has started defamation lawsuits over. In June 2019 he founded a party, Party of Shariy, which participated in that year&#039;s parliamentary election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* The danger is that sometimes skinheads want to join the movement, [our] movement has nothing to do with that… They [homosexual people] should sit and be happy that they are not getting killed. (…) From their side should be respect; on my part there is nothing to respect them for, [they are] sick people. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{Cite web|url=https://ge.boell.org/sites/default/files/final_publication_-eng_gender_1.pdf|title=Manifold Angels of Gender|website=www.ge.boell.org|access-date=2019-10-05}}, &#039;&#039;Heinrich Böll Foundation&#039;&#039;. p. 42-43. (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not so long ago, I got into an argument with one of the readers, who is also my friend. She ardently defends the rights of gays and lesbians, whom I, in her words, “unjustly insulted” in many articles.&amp;quot;What do you care about them ?!&amp;quot; - once again, like hundreds of commentators on articles before her, the girl asked. And for the umpteenth time, like hundreds of commentators, I answered - I don&#039;t care about them. I do not distinguish them from the dog shit on the side of the road, I do not care about them, but I do care about my children and the future of the territory with which my life is connected... &lt;br /&gt;
** [http://web.archive.org/web/20100622051511/https://www.obozrevatel.com/news/2010/3/22/357746.htm Голубая ржавчина] (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I hate [[Adolf Hitler|Adolf Schicklgruber]]. This is a vile rascal and all that. But was he really wrong, sending this abomination [homosexuals] together with gypsies [...] into gas chambers and for sterilization???!!! What do you think - return the article for sodomy now - will then the number of sick youngsters and &amp;quot;stars&amp;quot; with broken asses decrease?&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://web.archive.org/web/20190223060741/https://politiko.ua/blogpost17024 А если гомосексуалистов кастрировать?]&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite web|url=https://m.censor.net.ua/ua/news/3204930/shariyi_vyhvalyaye_gitlera_gazovi_kamery_zaklykaye_do_znyschennya_natsmenshyn_i_gomoseksualiv_yes_scho|title=Шарій вихваляє Гітлера, газові камери, закликає до знищення нацменшин і гомосексуалів. ЄС, що надав йому притулок, має про це знати, - Іванов. Скриншот|publisher=censor.net|date=2020-06-29}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gypsies are the filth of the world. Europe is gradually waking up, and under the outraged cries of tolerasts, it begins to clean the dirt. When will we wake up? &lt;br /&gt;
** [https://web.archive.org/web/20101113231235/http://asharij.hiblogger.net/963461.html Цыгане - грязь мира]&lt;br /&gt;
**{{cite web|url=https://m.censor.net.ua/ua/news/3204930/shariyi_vyhvalyaye_gitlera_gazovi_kamery_zaklykaye_do_znyschennya_natsmenshyn_i_gomoseksualiv_yes_scho|title=Шарій вихваляє Гітлера, газові камери, закликає до знищення нацменшин і гомосексуалів. ЄС, що надав йому притулок, має про це знати, - Іванов. Скриншот|publisher=censor.net|date=2020-06-29}} (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In Iran, after the 1979 Islamic revolution, over 4,000 lesbians and homosexuals were sentenced to death. The clerical regime also executed many women for extramarital sex. [...] I believe that in Iran with prostitution, pedophilia and rape the situation is hundreds of times better than in our extremely cultured and civilized country. &lt;br /&gt;
** [http://prochurch.info/index.php/more/16607 Голубая ржавчина. Часть-3]&lt;br /&gt;
** {{Cite web|url=https://ge.boell.org/sites/default/files/final_publication_-eng_gender_1.pdf|title=Manifold Angels of Gender|website=www.ge.boell.org|access-date=2019-10-05}}, &#039;&#039;Heinrich Böll Foundation&#039;&#039;. p. 46-47 and p. 57. (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Unpleasant information came to me that in [[Kyiv]], the inhabitants of Western Ukraine suddenly began to tell the people of Kyiv how they should behave, how they have to love Ukraine, how they need to sing the anthem, walk with the flag. I have several friends from Western Ukraine, I respect these people, I am proud of friendship with them, these are quite sane people. I ask my appeal to the irresponsible women not to consider him chauvinism and racism and something else. In fact, until the 39th year you were nobody. You were instead of oxen, you were like marmots on their holes dug in the mountains. Or buried, you were dug in the 39th. Do you understand? The regions of Kyiv, Zaporizhzhya, Poltava have something to hate Stalin. You do not, you have to put Stalin a golden monument in one of your villages. And you have to pray at this monument in fact, because you saw civilization in the 39th year. You started to wipe your ass in the 39th. When they tell me they served soups to the Poles, I say this is impossible. They served soups to farm laborers of the Poles. Because no one would have allowed them to the Poles. You did not have land. You... I am Ukrainian, and you are not Ukrainians. You second... there, second... well, I don’t say second grade, no, you are just half-breeds. Three-timers, foursquads. You are half fucking Poles, half you are Hungarians, half you the devil knows what you are really. Do not tell the people of Kyiv how they should behave, how they need to love the country, love their flag. Because it is not your flag. You have no flag. You are not Ukrainians. &lt;br /&gt;
** [https://24tv.ua/ru/anatolij_sharij_biografija_kandidata_partija_kto_takoj_sharij_n1174287 Кто такой Анатолий Шарий: биография скандального видеоблоггера] (2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On March 24, Anatoly Shariy published a post with a spontaneous confession about his old statements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|date=2021-03-24|title=Шарий извинился за свои высказывания касательно геев и ромов|url=https://vesti.ua/politika/sharij-izvinilsya-za-svoe-proshloe|access-date=2021-03-24|website=ВЕСТИ|language=ru}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://t.me/ASupersharij/6278]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: {{Cquote|It&#039;s funny when the [[Office of the President of Ukraine|Office of the President]] tries to throw in my statements that were made 11 years ago (generously sprinkled with fakes, fabricated at quick fix) about [[Gay|gays]] or [[Romani people|Roma]]. Like, look, he&#039;s a Nazi, what&#039;s more, he&#039;s a real fascist. I never apologized for those statements. Because I &#039;apologized&#039; with a couple hundred quality Nazi investigations, not with idle chatter. I &#039;apologized&#039; when I covered the smashing of a camp or the murder of a Romani man in a train station. In a few years I have become the Nazi&#039;s number one enemy, and I am quite satisfied with that. As for gay people. I&#039;m just a guy from Karavaevka. I spent my childhood in the [[Soviet Union]]. I had never seen these gays in my life, I had never been to [[European Union|Europe]], and I was sure they would attack me with obscene suggestions as soon as I stepped off the ladder. As a [[Christians|Christian]] I will always stand by my opinion, but I must say that I have never had a problem with a gay man in my life. [...] I&#039;ve been living in a different world for 10 years. And for a long time I have demonstrated by deeds, not by talking, how you can change yourself in your head, in your priorities, in your goals, and even in your appearance, and, of course, in your attitude toward certain things. Thus [[Volodymyr Zelensky|Zelensky&#039;s]] employees, who are quite lacking in intelligence, do not understand that they, once again, create a plus instead of a mythical minus for me. I was able to transcend this and become cleaner, calmer and more humane. I personally always remember [[Saul]], who persecuted the first Christians, imprisoning them, and then went blind and had an epiphany. And he became [[Paul the Apostle|Paul]], the apostle. Shariy is fully apologetic about his past. He digested it some time ago and moved on. And has gone very far in 11 years. This is quite noticeable by the barely audible bark sounding deaf somewhere dozens of miles behind him&amp;quot;.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Shariy, Anatoly}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ukrainian politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1978 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Living people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Investigative journalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bloggers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Businesspeople]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Refugees]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Kyiv]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Anonymity&amp;diff=3149878</id>
		<title>Anonymity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Anonymity&amp;diff=3149878"/>
		<updated>2022-07-31T09:12:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Quotes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Anon mossos retallades.jpg|244px|thumb|right|Many of the bravest never are known, and get no praise. That does not lessen their [[beauty]]… ~ [[Louisa May Alcott]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Anonymity|Anonymity]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is derived from the [[w:Koine Greek|Greek]] word &#039;&#039;&#039;ἀνωνυμία&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;anonymia&#039;&#039;, meaning &amp;quot;without a [[name]]&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;namelessness&amp;quot;. In colloquial use, anonymity typically refers to the state of an individual&#039;s personal identity, or personally identifiable information, being publicly unknown.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page contains quotes on the subject of anonymity; for quotes for which the author is not publicly known, see &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Anonymous]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, and for quotes by or about the social action group see &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Anonymous (group)‎‎]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Eliot grave -Highgate Cemetery, London, England-25May2009.jpg|246px|thumb|right|The growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs. ~  [[George Eliot]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Printing4 Walk of Ideas Berlin.JPG|246px|thumb|right|Anonymity thereby provides a way for a writer who may be personally unpopular to ensure that readers will not prejudge her message simply because they do not like its proponent. ~  [[John Paul Stevens]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens - 1976 official portrait.jpg|246px|thumb|right|Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. ~  [[John Paul Stevens]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Occupy Wall Street Anonymous 2011 Shankbone.JPG |244px|thumb|right|[[Man]] is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a [[mask]], and he will tell you the [[truth]]. ~  [[Oscar Wilde]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We [[share]] the collective [[idea]] of [[Anonymous (group)‎‎|ANONYMOUS]] worldwide; we are the [[people]]. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  We [[believe]] in non-violent, [[Peace|peaceful]] [[civil disobedience]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anonymous]] introductory page for [http://www.anonymousuk.org/about.htm Anonymous UK]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We are Anonymous.&#039;&#039;&#039; We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. &#039;&#039;&#039;Expect us.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anonymous]] representative of the activist group [[Anonymous (group)‎‎|Anonymous]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Yale Law and Technology&#039;&#039; (9 November 2009).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;People who make sacrifices are very much loved and admired, aren&#039;t they? &amp;quot; she asked, earnestly. &amp;quot;If the sacrifice is a true one. But &#039;&#039;&#039;many of the bravest never are known, and get no praise. That does not lessen their [[beauty]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, though perhaps it makes them harder, for we all like sympathy,&amp;quot; and Dr. Alec sighed a patient sort of sigh.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Louisa May Alcott]], &#039;&#039;Eight Cousins, or, The Aunt-hill&#039;&#039; (1875), p. 106.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My efforts have gone through many incarnations, and at one time, I would not post the face of the female, I wouldn’t post her name, and I wouldn’t post any information. [But] many times, family members get in touch with me because they’ve lost touch with this person and are trying to locate them. Sometimes, law enforcement will say that it’s a runaway that they’ve been trying to locate. I just found that there was no reason to maintain their anonymity.&lt;br /&gt;
** Brian Bates [http://motherboard.vice.com/read/drone-vigilante-brian-bates-johntv-oklahoma-spies-on-sex-workers?trk_source=popular Drone Vigilante Brian Bates JohnTV Oklohoma Spies on Sex Workers] [[w:VICE|VICE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Never answer an anonymous letter.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Yogi Berra]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;He Who Laughs, Lasts&#039;&#039; (2004) by Anson R. Nash, Jr., p. 108.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We talked of the casuistical question, Whether it was allowable at any time to depart from [[Truth]]? [[Samuel Johnson|JOHNSON.]]&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;The general rule is, that Truth should never be violated, because it is of the utmost importance to the comfort of life, that we should have a full security by mutual faith; and occasional inconveniences should be willingly suffered that we may preserve it.&#039;&#039;&#039; There must, however, be some exceptions. &#039;&#039;&#039;If, for instance, a murderer should ask you which way a man is gone, you may tell him what is not true, because you are under a previous obligation not to betray a man to a murderer&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039; BOSWELL. &#039;Supposing the person who wrote &#039;&#039;[[Junius]]&#039;&#039; were asked whether he was the authour, might he deny it?&#039; JOHNSON. &#039;I don&#039;t know what to say to this. If you were sure that he wrote &#039;&#039;Junius&#039;&#039;, would you, if he denied it, think as well of him afterwards? Yet it may be urged, that what a man has no right to ask, you may refuse to communicate; and there is no other effectual mode of preserving a secret and an important secret, the discovery of which may be very hurtful to you, but a flat denial; for if you are silent, or hesitate, or evade, it will be held equivalent to a confession. But stay, Sir; here is another case. Supposing the authour had told me confidentially that he had written &#039;&#039;Junius&#039;&#039;, and I were asked if he had, I should hold myself at [[liberty]] to deny it, as being under a previous promise, express or implied, to conceal it. Now what I ought to do for the authour, may I not do for myself?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Boswell]] in &#039;&#039;Life Of Johnson&#039;&#039; (1794), Vol. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A factor that is almost indispensable to this kind of behavior [serial killing] is &#039;&#039;&#039;the mobility of contemporary American life&#039;&#039;&#039;. Living in large centers of population, and living with lots of people, you can get used to dealing with strangers. It&#039;s the anonymity factor, and it has a twofold effect. First of all if you&#039;re among strangers you&#039;re less likely to remember them, or care what they&#039;re doing or what they should, or should not, be doing. If they should or shouldn&#039;t be there. Secondly, you&#039;re conditioned almost not to be afraid of strangers. Mobility is very important here. As we&#039;ve seen...the individual&#039;s [himself in third person] modus operandi was moving large distances in an attempt to camouflage what he was doing. Moving these distances, he was able to take advantage of the anonymity factor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ted Bundy]], quoted in Michaud, Stephen; Aynesworth, Hugh (1999) The Only Living Witness: The True Story of Serial Sex Killer Ted Bundy (Paperback; revised ed.). Irving, Texas: Authorlink Press. pg. 326&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We are clandestine because we refuse the spectacle of celebrity and we are everyone. Because without real names, faces or noses, we show that our words, dreams, and desires are more important than our biographies.&#039;&#039;&#039; Because we reject the society of surveillance that watches, controls, spies upon, records and checks our every move. Because by hiding our identity we recover the power of our acts. Because with greasepaint we give resistance a funny face and become visible once again.&lt;br /&gt;
** Official statement of the [[Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army]] at [http://www.clownarmy.org/about/about.html ClownArmy.org, the official CIRCA site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Eliot]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Middlemarch|Middlemarch : A Study of Provincial Life ]]&#039;&#039; (1871).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Faith]] lived in the incognito is one which is located outside the [[criticism]] coming from [[society]], from [[politics]], from [[history]], for the very reason that it has itself the vocation to be a source of criticism. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is faith (lived in the incognito) which triggers the issues for the others, which causes everything seemingly established to be placed in [[doubt]], which drives a wedge into the [[world]] of false assurances.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;L&#039;espérance oubliée&#039;&#039; (1972) [&#039;&#039;Hope in Time of Abandonment&#039;&#039;] as translated by C. Edward Hopkin (1973).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Inigo Montoya|Inigo Montoya]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: Who are you? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Dread Pirate Roberts|Man in Black]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: No one of consequence.  &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Inigo Montoya&#039;&#039;&#039;: I must know...  &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Man in Black&#039;&#039;&#039;: Get used to disappointment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Goldman|William Goldman]], &#039;&#039;[[The Princess Bride (film)|The Princess Bride]]&#039;&#039; (1987).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Sacrificing anonymity may be the next generation&#039;s price for keeping precious [[liberty]], as prior generations paid in blood.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Hal Norby, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom?&#039;&#039; (1998), by [[David Brin]], p. 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Fear names. Names have power in identity. Others can use names as weapons. Names are a hook that can be used to track you across the planes. Remain nameless, and you shall be safe. I am the Nameless One.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Planescape: Torment]]&#039;&#039; (1999). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, they will trample me underfoot, the numbers marching one two three, four hundred million, five hundred six, reducing me to specks of voiceless dust, just as, in all good time, they will trample my son who is not my son, and his son who will not be his, and his who will not be his, until the thousand and first generation, until a thousand and one midnights have bestowed their terrible gifts and a thousand and one children have died, because &#039;&#039;&#039;it is the privilege and the curse of midnight’s children to be both masters and victims of their times, to forsake privacy and be sucked into the annihilating whirlpool of the multitudes, and to be unable to live or die in peace.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Salman Rushdie]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Midnight&#039;s Children|Midnight&#039;s Children]]&#039;&#039; (1980).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I had remained invisible, the truth would have stayed hidden. &#039;&#039;&#039;I couldn&#039;t allow that.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sonmi-451, in &#039;&#039;[[Cloud_Atlas_(film)#Sonmi-451|Cloud Atlas]]&#039;&#039; (2012) based on the novel by [[David Mitchell (author)|David Mitchell]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Great works of literature have frequently been produced by authors writing under assumed names. &#039;&#039;&#039;Despite readers&#039; curiosity and the public&#039;s interest in identifying the creator of a work of art, an author generally is free to decide whether or not to disclose her true identity. The decision in favor of anonymity may be motivated by fear of economic or official retaliation, by concern about social ostracism, or merely by a desire to preserve as much of one&#039;s privacy as possible. Whatever the motivation may be, at least in the field of literary endeavor, the interest in having anonymous works enter the marketplace of ideas unquestionably outweighs any public interest in requiring disclosure as a condition of entry.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Paul Stevens]], &#039;&#039;[[w:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission|McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (Majority opinion]]&#039;&#039;, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On occasion, &#039;&#039;&#039;quite apart from any threat of persecution, an advocate may believe her ideas will be more persuasive if her readers are unaware of her identity. Anonymity thereby provides a way for a writer who may be personally unpopular to ensure that readers will not prejudge her message simply because they do not like its proponent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Paul Stevens]], &#039;&#039;[[w:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission|McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (Majority opinion]]&#039;&#039;, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. … It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the [[United States Bill of Rights|Bill of Rights]], and of the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation--and their ideas from suppression--at the hand of an intolerant society. The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. But political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Paul Stevens]], &#039;&#039;[[w:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission|McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (Majority opinion]]&#039;&#039;, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;You know [[C. S. Lewis]], whom I greatly admire, said there’s no such thing as creative writing. … He said there is, in [[fact]], only one Creator and we mix. That’s our function, to mix the elements He has given us.&#039;&#039;&#039; See how wonderfully [[anonymous]] that leaves us? You can’t say, “&#039;&#039;I&#039;&#039; did this; this gross matrix of flesh and blood and sinews and nerves did this.” &#039;&#039;&#039;What nonsense! I’m given these things to make a [[pattern]] out of. Something gave it to me. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; I’ve always loved the idea of the craftsman, the anonymous man.&#039;&#039;&#039; For instance, I’ve always wanted my books to be called the work of [[Anon]], because &#039;&#039;&#039;Anon is my favorite literary character.&#039;&#039;&#039; If you look through an anthology of poems that go from the far past into the present time, you’ll see that all the poems signed “Anon” have a very specific flavor that is one flavor all the way through the centuries. &#039;&#039;&#039;I think, perhaps arrogantly, of myself as “Anon.” I would like to think that &#039;&#039;Mary Poppins&#039;&#039; and the other books could be called back to make that change. But I suppose it’s too late for that.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[P. L. Travers]], author of the [[w:Mary Poppins|Mary Poppins]] stories, in [http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/3099/the-art-of-fiction-no-63-p-l-travers &#039;&#039;The Paris Review&#039;&#039; No. 86 (Winter 1982)].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Man]] is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a [[mask]], and he will tell you the [[truth]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oscar Wilde]], &#039;&#039;The Critic as Artist&#039;&#039; (1891).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I would venture to guess that Anon, who wrote so many poems without signing them, was often a woman.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Virginia Woolf]], in  &#039;&#039;[[w:A Room of One&#039;s Own|A Room of One&#039;s Own]]&#039;&#039; (1929), Ch. 3; very often misquoted as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;For most of [[history]], Anonymous was a woman.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I have many [[names]], and none of them matter.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No word matters. But man forgets reality and remembers words.&#039;&#039;&#039; The more words he remembers, the cleverer do his fellows esteem him. He looks upon the great transformations of the world, but he does not see them as they were seen when man looked upon reality for the first time. Their names come to his lips and he smiles as he tastes them, thinking he knows them in the naming. &#039;&#039;&#039;The thing that has never happened before is still happening. It is still a miracle.&#039;&#039;&#039; The great burning blossom squats, flowing, upon the limb of the world, excreting the ash of the world, and being none of these things I have named and at the same time all of them, and &#039;&#039;this&#039;&#039; is reality — the Nameless.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I charge you — forget the names you bear, forget the words I speak as soon as they are uttered. Look, rather, upon the Nameless within yourselves, which arises as I address it.&#039;&#039;&#039; It hearkens not to my words, but to the reality within me, of which it is part. This is the &#039;&#039;[[atman]]&#039;&#039;, which hears &#039;&#039;me&#039;&#039; rather than my words. All else is unreal.&#039;&#039;&#039; To define is to lose. The essence of all things is the Nameless. The Nameless is unknowable, mightier even than [[w:Brahma|Brahma]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Things pass, but the essence remains. You sit, therefore, in the midst of a dream. &amp;quot;Essence dreams it a dream of form. Forms pass, but the essence remains, dreaming new dreams. Man names these dreams and thinks to have captured the essence, not knowing that he invokes the unreal. These stones, these walls, these bodies you see seated about you are poppies and water and the sun. They are the dreams of the Nameless.&#039;&#039;&#039; They are fire, if you like. &amp;lt;!-- p. 35 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To struggle against the dreamers who dream ugliness, be they men or gods, cannot but be the will of the Nameless.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Death and Light are everywhere, always, and they begin, end, strive, attend, into and upon the Dream of the Nameless that is the world, burning words within [[w:Saṃsāra|Samsara]], perhaps to create a thing of [[beauty]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary|anonymity}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Themes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Anonymity&amp;diff=3149877</id>
		<title>Anonymity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Anonymity&amp;diff=3149877"/>
		<updated>2022-07-31T09:11:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: ted bundy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Anon mossos retallades.jpg|244px|thumb|right|Many of the bravest never are known, and get no praise. That does not lessen their [[beauty]]… ~ [[Louisa May Alcott]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Anonymity|Anonymity]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is derived from the [[w:Koine Greek|Greek]] word &#039;&#039;&#039;ἀνωνυμία&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;anonymia&#039;&#039;, meaning &amp;quot;without a [[name]]&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;namelessness&amp;quot;. In colloquial use, anonymity typically refers to the state of an individual&#039;s personal identity, or personally identifiable information, being publicly unknown.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page contains quotes on the subject of anonymity; for quotes for which the author is not publicly known, see &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Anonymous]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, and for quotes by or about the social action group see &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Anonymous (group)‎‎]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Eliot grave -Highgate Cemetery, London, England-25May2009.jpg|246px|thumb|right|The growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs. ~  [[George Eliot]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Printing4 Walk of Ideas Berlin.JPG|246px|thumb|right|Anonymity thereby provides a way for a writer who may be personally unpopular to ensure that readers will not prejudge her message simply because they do not like its proponent. ~  [[John Paul Stevens]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens - 1976 official portrait.jpg|246px|thumb|right|Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. ~  [[John Paul Stevens]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Occupy Wall Street Anonymous 2011 Shankbone.JPG |244px|thumb|right|[[Man]] is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a [[mask]], and he will tell you the [[truth]]. ~  [[Oscar Wilde]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We [[share]] the collective [[idea]] of [[Anonymous (group)‎‎|ANONYMOUS]] worldwide; we are the [[people]]. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  We [[believe]] in non-violent, [[Peace|peaceful]] [[civil disobedience]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anonymous]] introductory page for [http://www.anonymousuk.org/about.htm Anonymous UK]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We are Anonymous.&#039;&#039;&#039; We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. &#039;&#039;&#039;Expect us.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anonymous]] representative of the activist group [[Anonymous (group)‎‎|Anonymous]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Yale Law and Technology&#039;&#039; (9 November 2009).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;People who make sacrifices are very much loved and admired, aren&#039;t they? &amp;quot; she asked, earnestly. &amp;quot;If the sacrifice is a true one. But &#039;&#039;&#039;many of the bravest never are known, and get no praise. That does not lessen their [[beauty]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, though perhaps it makes them harder, for we all like sympathy,&amp;quot; and Dr. Alec sighed a patient sort of sigh.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Louisa May Alcott]], &#039;&#039;Eight Cousins, or, The Aunt-hill&#039;&#039; (1875), p. 106.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My efforts have gone through many incarnations, and at one time, I would not post the face of the female, I wouldn’t post her name, and I wouldn’t post any information. [But] many times, family members get in touch with me because they’ve lost touch with this person and are trying to locate them. Sometimes, law enforcement will say that it’s a runaway that they’ve been trying to locate. I just found that there was no reason to maintain their anonymity.&lt;br /&gt;
** Brian Bates [http://motherboard.vice.com/read/drone-vigilante-brian-bates-johntv-oklahoma-spies-on-sex-workers?trk_source=popular Drone Vigilante Brian Bates JohnTV Oklohoma Spies on Sex Workers] [[w:VICE|VICE]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Never answer an anonymous letter.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Yogi Berra]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;He Who Laughs, Lasts&#039;&#039; (2004) by Anson R. Nash, Jr., p. 108.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We talked of the casuistical question, Whether it was allowable at any time to depart from [[Truth]]? [[Samuel Johnson|JOHNSON.]]&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;The general rule is, that Truth should never be violated, because it is of the utmost importance to the comfort of life, that we should have a full security by mutual faith; and occasional inconveniences should be willingly suffered that we may preserve it.&#039;&#039;&#039; There must, however, be some exceptions. &#039;&#039;&#039;If, for instance, a murderer should ask you which way a man is gone, you may tell him what is not true, because you are under a previous obligation not to betray a man to a murderer&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039; BOSWELL. &#039;Supposing the person who wrote &#039;&#039;[[Junius]]&#039;&#039; were asked whether he was the authour, might he deny it?&#039; JOHNSON. &#039;I don&#039;t know what to say to this. If you were sure that he wrote &#039;&#039;Junius&#039;&#039;, would you, if he denied it, think as well of him afterwards? Yet it may be urged, that what a man has no right to ask, you may refuse to communicate; and there is no other effectual mode of preserving a secret and an important secret, the discovery of which may be very hurtful to you, but a flat denial; for if you are silent, or hesitate, or evade, it will be held equivalent to a confession. But stay, Sir; here is another case. Supposing the authour had told me confidentially that he had written &#039;&#039;Junius&#039;&#039;, and I were asked if he had, I should hold myself at [[liberty]] to deny it, as being under a previous promise, express or implied, to conceal it. Now what I ought to do for the authour, may I not do for myself?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Boswell]] in &#039;&#039;Life Of Johnson&#039;&#039; (1794), Vol. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A factor that is almost indispensable to this kind of behavior [serial killing] is the mobility of contemporary American life. Living in large centers of population, and living with lots of people, you can get used to dealing with strangers. It&#039;s the anonymity factor, and it has a twofold effect. First of all if you&#039;re among strangers you&#039;re less likely to remember them, or care what they&#039;re doing or what they should, or should not, be doing. If they should or shouldn&#039;t be there. Secondly, you&#039;re conditioned almost not to be afraid of strangers. Mobility is very important here. As we&#039;ve seen...the individual&#039;s [himself in third person] modus operandi was moving large distances in an attempt to camouflage what he was doing. Moving these distances, he was able to take advantage of the anonymity factor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ted Bundy]], quoted in Michaud, Stephen; Aynesworth, Hugh (1999) The Only Living Witness: The True Story of Serial Sex Killer Ted Bundy (Paperback; revised ed.). Irving, Texas: Authorlink Press. pg. 326&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We are clandestine because we refuse the spectacle of celebrity and we are everyone. Because without real names, faces or noses, we show that our words, dreams, and desires are more important than our biographies.&#039;&#039;&#039; Because we reject the society of surveillance that watches, controls, spies upon, records and checks our every move. Because by hiding our identity we recover the power of our acts. Because with greasepaint we give resistance a funny face and become visible once again.&lt;br /&gt;
** Official statement of the [[Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army]] at [http://www.clownarmy.org/about/about.html ClownArmy.org, the official CIRCA site].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Eliot]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Middlemarch|Middlemarch : A Study of Provincial Life ]]&#039;&#039; (1871).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Faith]] lived in the incognito is one which is located outside the [[criticism]] coming from [[society]], from [[politics]], from [[history]], for the very reason that it has itself the vocation to be a source of criticism. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is faith (lived in the incognito) which triggers the issues for the others, which causes everything seemingly established to be placed in [[doubt]], which drives a wedge into the [[world]] of false assurances.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;L&#039;espérance oubliée&#039;&#039; (1972) [&#039;&#039;Hope in Time of Abandonment&#039;&#039;] as translated by C. Edward Hopkin (1973).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Inigo Montoya|Inigo Montoya]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: Who are you? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Dread Pirate Roberts|Man in Black]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: No one of consequence.  &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Inigo Montoya&#039;&#039;&#039;: I must know...  &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Man in Black&#039;&#039;&#039;: Get used to disappointment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Goldman|William Goldman]], &#039;&#039;[[The Princess Bride (film)|The Princess Bride]]&#039;&#039; (1987).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Sacrificing anonymity may be the next generation&#039;s price for keeping precious [[liberty]], as prior generations paid in blood.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Hal Norby, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom?&#039;&#039; (1998), by [[David Brin]], p. 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Fear names. Names have power in identity. Others can use names as weapons. Names are a hook that can be used to track you across the planes. Remain nameless, and you shall be safe. I am the Nameless One.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Planescape: Torment]]&#039;&#039; (1999). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, they will trample me underfoot, the numbers marching one two three, four hundred million, five hundred six, reducing me to specks of voiceless dust, just as, in all good time, they will trample my son who is not my son, and his son who will not be his, and his who will not be his, until the thousand and first generation, until a thousand and one midnights have bestowed their terrible gifts and a thousand and one children have died, because &#039;&#039;&#039;it is the privilege and the curse of midnight’s children to be both masters and victims of their times, to forsake privacy and be sucked into the annihilating whirlpool of the multitudes, and to be unable to live or die in peace.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Salman Rushdie]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Midnight&#039;s Children|Midnight&#039;s Children]]&#039;&#039; (1980).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I had remained invisible, the truth would have stayed hidden. &#039;&#039;&#039;I couldn&#039;t allow that.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sonmi-451, in &#039;&#039;[[Cloud_Atlas_(film)#Sonmi-451|Cloud Atlas]]&#039;&#039; (2012) based on the novel by [[David Mitchell (author)|David Mitchell]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Great works of literature have frequently been produced by authors writing under assumed names. &#039;&#039;&#039;Despite readers&#039; curiosity and the public&#039;s interest in identifying the creator of a work of art, an author generally is free to decide whether or not to disclose her true identity. The decision in favor of anonymity may be motivated by fear of economic or official retaliation, by concern about social ostracism, or merely by a desire to preserve as much of one&#039;s privacy as possible. Whatever the motivation may be, at least in the field of literary endeavor, the interest in having anonymous works enter the marketplace of ideas unquestionably outweighs any public interest in requiring disclosure as a condition of entry.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Paul Stevens]], &#039;&#039;[[w:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission|McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (Majority opinion]]&#039;&#039;, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On occasion, &#039;&#039;&#039;quite apart from any threat of persecution, an advocate may believe her ideas will be more persuasive if her readers are unaware of her identity. Anonymity thereby provides a way for a writer who may be personally unpopular to ensure that readers will not prejudge her message simply because they do not like its proponent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Paul Stevens]], &#039;&#039;[[w:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission|McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (Majority opinion]]&#039;&#039;, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. … It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the [[United States Bill of Rights|Bill of Rights]], and of the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation--and their ideas from suppression--at the hand of an intolerant society. The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. But political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Paul Stevens]], &#039;&#039;[[w:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission|McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (Majority opinion]]&#039;&#039;, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;You know [[C. S. Lewis]], whom I greatly admire, said there’s no such thing as creative writing. … He said there is, in [[fact]], only one Creator and we mix. That’s our function, to mix the elements He has given us.&#039;&#039;&#039; See how wonderfully [[anonymous]] that leaves us? You can’t say, “&#039;&#039;I&#039;&#039; did this; this gross matrix of flesh and blood and sinews and nerves did this.” &#039;&#039;&#039;What nonsense! I’m given these things to make a [[pattern]] out of. Something gave it to me. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; I’ve always loved the idea of the craftsman, the anonymous man.&#039;&#039;&#039; For instance, I’ve always wanted my books to be called the work of [[Anon]], because &#039;&#039;&#039;Anon is my favorite literary character.&#039;&#039;&#039; If you look through an anthology of poems that go from the far past into the present time, you’ll see that all the poems signed “Anon” have a very specific flavor that is one flavor all the way through the centuries. &#039;&#039;&#039;I think, perhaps arrogantly, of myself as “Anon.” I would like to think that &#039;&#039;Mary Poppins&#039;&#039; and the other books could be called back to make that change. But I suppose it’s too late for that.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[P. L. Travers]], author of the [[w:Mary Poppins|Mary Poppins]] stories, in [http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/3099/the-art-of-fiction-no-63-p-l-travers &#039;&#039;The Paris Review&#039;&#039; No. 86 (Winter 1982)].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Man]] is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a [[mask]], and he will tell you the [[truth]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oscar Wilde]], &#039;&#039;The Critic as Artist&#039;&#039; (1891).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I would venture to guess that Anon, who wrote so many poems without signing them, was often a woman.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Virginia Woolf]], in  &#039;&#039;[[w:A Room of One&#039;s Own|A Room of One&#039;s Own]]&#039;&#039; (1929), Ch. 3; very often misquoted as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;For most of [[history]], Anonymous was a woman.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I have many [[names]], and none of them matter.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No word matters. But man forgets reality and remembers words.&#039;&#039;&#039; The more words he remembers, the cleverer do his fellows esteem him. He looks upon the great transformations of the world, but he does not see them as they were seen when man looked upon reality for the first time. Their names come to his lips and he smiles as he tastes them, thinking he knows them in the naming. &#039;&#039;&#039;The thing that has never happened before is still happening. It is still a miracle.&#039;&#039;&#039; The great burning blossom squats, flowing, upon the limb of the world, excreting the ash of the world, and being none of these things I have named and at the same time all of them, and &#039;&#039;this&#039;&#039; is reality — the Nameless.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I charge you — forget the names you bear, forget the words I speak as soon as they are uttered. Look, rather, upon the Nameless within yourselves, which arises as I address it.&#039;&#039;&#039; It hearkens not to my words, but to the reality within me, of which it is part. This is the &#039;&#039;[[atman]]&#039;&#039;, which hears &#039;&#039;me&#039;&#039; rather than my words. All else is unreal.&#039;&#039;&#039; To define is to lose. The essence of all things is the Nameless. The Nameless is unknowable, mightier even than [[w:Brahma|Brahma]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Things pass, but the essence remains. You sit, therefore, in the midst of a dream. &amp;quot;Essence dreams it a dream of form. Forms pass, but the essence remains, dreaming new dreams. Man names these dreams and thinks to have captured the essence, not knowing that he invokes the unreal. These stones, these walls, these bodies you see seated about you are poppies and water and the sun. They are the dreams of the Nameless.&#039;&#039;&#039; They are fire, if you like. &amp;lt;!-- p. 35 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To struggle against the dreamers who dream ugliness, be they men or gods, cannot but be the will of the Nameless.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Death and Light are everywhere, always, and they begin, end, strive, attend, into and upon the Dream of the Nameless that is the world, burning words within [[w:Saṃsāra|Samsara]], perhaps to create a thing of [[beauty]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Roger Zelazny]], &#039;&#039;[[Lord of Light]]&#039;&#039; (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary|anonymity}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Themes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Tobacco&amp;diff=3148458</id>
		<title>Tobacco</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Tobacco&amp;diff=3148458"/>
		<updated>2022-07-27T20:15:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Quotes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Papierosa 1 ubt 0069.jpeg|thumb|I am of course notoriously hooked on cigarettes. I keep hoping the things will kill me. A fire at one end and a fool at the other. ~ [[Kurt Vonnegut]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Drum Original Tobacco.jpg|thumb|Generally, the control freaks only increase control.  Take cigarettes.  At first it was just warning labels.  Then, bans on t.v. ads.  Then they required restaurants to have no-smoking sections.  Then came the bans on airplanes, schools, workplaces, entire restaurants, then bars, too—and now, sometimes, apartments and outdoor spaces, even. ~ [[John Stossel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smoking pipe bent.jpg|thumb|And then he&#039;d light his pipe, and then&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He&#039;d let it go clean out again. ~ [[James Stephens (author)|James Stephens]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Tobacco|Tobacco]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is a product prepared from the leaves of the tobacco plant by [[w:curing of tobacco|curing]] them. The plant is part of the genus &#039;&#039;[[w:Nicotiana|Nicotiana]]&#039;&#039; and of the [[w:Solanaceae]] (nightshade) family. Tobacco contains the [[w:alkaloid|alkaloid]] [[w:nicotine|nicotine]], which is a [[w:stimulant|stimulant]]. Dried tobacco leaves are mainly used for [[w:Tobacco smoking|smoking]] in [[w:cigarette|cigarette]]s, [[w:cigar|cigar]]s, [[w:pipe smoking|pipe tobacco]], and flavored [[w:Mu&#039;assel|shisha tobacco]]. They can be also consumed as [[w:Snuff (tobacco)|snuff]], [[w:chewing tobacco|chewing tobacco]], [[w:dipping tobacco|dipping tobacco]] and [[w:snus|snus]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;ll tell you why I like the cigarette business. It cost a penny to make. Sell it for a dollar. It&#039;s addictive. And there&#039;s a fantastic brand loyalty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Warren Buffett]], [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/jul/23/ethicalliving.lifeandhealth Where should I invest my savings?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He who doth not smoke hath either known no great griefs, or refuseth himself the softest consolation, next to that which comes from heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Bulwer-Lytton]], &#039;&#039;What Will He Do With It?&#039;&#039; (1858), Book I, Chapter VI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Woman in this scale, the weed in that, Jupiter, hang out thy balance, and weigh them both; and if thou give the preference to woman, all I can say is, the next time Juno ruffles thee—O Jupiter, try the weed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Bulwer-Lytton]], &#039;&#039;What Will He Do With It?&#039;&#039; (1858), Book I, Chapter VI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tobacco, divine, rare superexcellent tobacco, which goes far beyond all panaceas, potable gold and philosopher&#039;s stones, a sovereign remedy to all diseases.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Burton]], &#039;&#039;Anatomy of Melancholy&#039;&#039; (1621).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After he had administer&#039;d a dose&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of snuff mundungus to his nose;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And powder&#039;d th&#039; inside of his skull,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Instead of th&#039; outward jobbernol,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He shook it with a scornful look&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;On th&#039; adversary, and thus he spoke.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (poet)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;Hudibras&#039;&#039;, Part III (1678), Canto II, line 1,005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Divine in hookas, glorious in a pipe &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;When tipp&#039;d with amber, mellow, rich, and ripe; … &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;Yet thy true lovers more admire by far &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt; Thy naked beauties - give me a cigar!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;The Island&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;m gettin&#039; tired of guys who smoke pipes. When are they gonna outlaw this shit? Guy with a fuckin&#039; pipe! It&#039;s an arrogant thing to place a burning barrier between you and the rest of the world. It&#039;s supposed to imply thoughtfulness or intelligence. It&#039;s not intelligent to stand around with a controlled fire sticking out of your mouth. I say, &amp;quot;Hey, professor! You want somethin&#039; hot to suck on? Call me! I&#039;ll give ya somethin&#039; to put in your mouth!&amp;quot; I think these pipe-smokers oughta just move to the next level and go ahead and suck a dick. There&#039;s nothing wrong with suckin&#039; dicks. Men do it, women do it; can&#039;t be all bad if everybody&#039;s doin&#039; it. I say, Drop the pipe, and go to the dick! That&#039;s my advice. I&#039;m here to help.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Carlin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Brain Droppings|Brain Droppings]]&#039;&#039; (1997), pp. 3–4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Haven&#039;t we had about enough of this cigar smoking shit? When are these fat, arrogant, overfed, white-collar business criminals going to extinguish their cigars and move along to their next abomination? Soft, white, business pussies suckin&#039; on a big brown dick. That&#039;s all it is, folks, a big, brown dick. You know, Freud used to say, &amp;quot;Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.&amp;quot; Yeah? Well, sometimes it&#039;s a big brown dick! With a fat, criminal business asshole sucking on the wet end of it! But, hey. The news is not all bad for me. Not all bad. Want to hear the good part? Cancer of the mouth. Good! Fuck &#039;em! Makes me happy; it&#039;s an attractive disease. So light up, suspender-man, and suck that smoke deep down into your empty suit. And blow it out your ass, you miserable cocksucker!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Carlin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Napalm and Silly Putty|Napalm &amp;amp; Silly Putty]]&#039;&#039; (2001), p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As the most powerful state, the U.S. makes its own laws, using force and conducting economic warfare at will. It also threatens sanctions against countries that do not abide by its conveniently flexible notions of &amp;quot;free trade.&amp;quot; In one important case, Washington has employed such threats with great effectiveness (and GATT approval) to force open Asian markets for U.S. tobacco exports and advertising, aimed primarily at the growing markets of women and children. The U.S. Agriculture Department has provided grants to tobacco firms to promote smoking overseas. Asian countries have attempted to conduct educational anti-smoking campaigns, but they are overwhelmed by the miracles of the market, reinforced by U.S. state power through the sanctions threat. Philip Morris, with an advertising and promotion budget of close to $9 billion in 1992, became China&#039;s largest advertiser. The effect of Reaganite sanction threats was to increase advertising and promotion of cigarette smoking (particularly U.S. brands) quite sharply in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea, along with the use of these lethal substances. In South Korea, for example, the rate of growth in smoking more than tripled when markets for U.S. lethal drugs were opened in 1988. The Bush Administration extended the threats to Thailand, at exactly the same time that the &amp;quot;war on drugs&amp;quot; was declared; the media were kind enough to overlook the coincidence, even suppressing the outraged denunciations by the very conservative Surgeon-General. Oxford University epidemiologist Richard Peto estimates that among Chinese children under 20 today, 50 million will die of cigarette-related diseases, an achievement that ranks high even by 20th century standards.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], In Tony Evans (ed.), Human Rights Fifty Years on: A Reappraisal, 1997  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The pipe, with solemn interposing puff,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Makes half a sentence at a time enough;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The dozing sages drop the drowsy strain,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Then pause, and puff—and speak, and pause again.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Conversation&#039;&#039; (1782), line 245.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Pernicious weed! whose scent the fair annoys&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Unfriendly to society&#039;s chief joys,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thy worst effect is banishing for hours&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The sex whose presence civilizes ours.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Conversation&#039;&#039; (1782), line 251.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco was the major model used to establish the principals and methods of plant somatic cell genetics including in vitro propagation of cells and tissues, totipotency of somatic cells, doubled haploid production and genetic transformation.&lt;br /&gt;
** Christiane Gebhardt: {{cite journal|title=The historical role of species from the Solanaceae plant family in genetic research|journal=Theoretical and Applied Genetics|volume=129|issue=12|year=2016|pages=2281–2294|issn=0040-5752|doi=10.1007/s00122-016-2804-1|pmid=27744490|pmc=5121179}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The money expended for liquor and tobacco is the difference between a young man making a success in life and making a failure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heber J. Grant]], [https://archive.org/details/conferencereport1937sa/page/n17 Conference Report], October 1937&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1987-0703-506, Adolf Hitler vor Rundfunk-Mikrofon retouched.jpg|thumb|I am convinced that if I had been a smoker I would never have been able to withstand the worries that have burdened me for so long.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps thanks to that the German people owes its salvation to me.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Adolf Hitler]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* I am convinced that if I had been a smoker I would never have been able to withstand the worries that have burdened me for so long.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps thanks to that the German people owes its salvation to me.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Ich bin überzeugt, wenn ich Raucher gewesen wäre, nie würde ich den Sorgen standgehalten haben, die mich seit so langer Zeit belasten. Vielleicht verdankt dem das deutsche Volk mir seine Rettung.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Adolf Hitler]] at the [[w:Wolfsschanze|Wolfsschanze]] on the night of 11 March 1942, [https://archive.org/details/hitlers-tischgespraeche/page/126/mode/2up?q=Eckart as quoted] in &#039;&#039;[[w:Hitler&#039;s Table Talk|Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier]]&#039;&#039; by [[w:Henry Picker|Henry Picker]], published in 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
* And a woman is only a woman, but a good cigar is a smoke.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Betrothed&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For I hate, yet love thee, so,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That, whichever thing I show,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The plain truth will seem to be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A constrained hyperbole,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the passion to proceed&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;More from a mistress than a weed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For thy sake, tobacco, I&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Would do anything but die.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nay, rather,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plant divine, of rarest virtue;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Blisters on the tongue would hurt you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou in such a cloud dost bind us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That our worst foes cannot find us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And ill fortune, that would thwart us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shoots at rovers, shooting at us;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;While each man, through thy height&#039;ning steam,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Does like a smoking Etna seem.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou through such a mist dost show us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That our best friends do not know us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What this country needs is a really good 5-cent cigar.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Thomas Riley Marshall|Thomas Riley Marshall]], Vice President under [[Woodrow Wilson]], to Henry M. Rose, the assistant secretary of the Senate, while Marshall was presiding as president of the Senate. Reported in the &#039;&#039;New York Tribune&#039;&#039; (January 4, 1920), part 7, p. 1. Confirmed in Marshall&#039;s autobiography, &#039;&#039;Recollections of Thomas R. Marshall&#039;&#039; (1925), caption facing p. 244; and in Charles M. Thomas, &#039;&#039;Thomas Riley Marshall&#039;&#039; (1939), p. 175.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A good cigar is like a beautiful chick with a great body who also knows the [[w:American League|American League]] box scores.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[M*A*S*H (TV series)|M*A*S*H]], Klinger, &#039;&#039;Bug-Out&#039;&#039; 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They threaten me with lung cancer, and still I smoke and smoke.  If they&#039;d only threaten me with hard work, I might stop.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mignon McLaughlin]] , &#039;&#039;The Second Neurotic&#039;s Notebook&#039;&#039;, 1966.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Good food, good sex, good digestion, good sleep: to these basic animal pleasures, man has added nothing but the good cigarette.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mignon McLaughlin]], &#039;&#039;The Second Neurotic&#039;s Notebook&#039;&#039; (1966).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Life without smoking is like the smoke without the roast.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Cesare Pavese]], &#039;&#039;This Business of Living&#039;&#039;, {{#dateformat:1935-12-20}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sir Plume, of amber snuff-box justly vain,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the nice conduct of a clouded cane.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;The Rape of the Lock&#039;&#039; (1712), Canto IV, line 122.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Just where the breath of life his nostrils drew,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A charge of snuff the wily virgin threw;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The [[gnomes]] direct, to every atom just,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The pungent grains of titillating dust,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sudden, with starting tears each eye o&#039;erflows,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the high dome re-echoes to his nose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;The Rape of the Lock&#039;&#039; (1712), Canto V, line 81.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Few people on this planet know what it is to be truly despised. Can you blame them? I earn a living fronting an organizing that kills one thousand two hundred human beings a day; 1200 people. We&#039;re talking two jumbo jet plane loads of men, women, and children. I mean there&#039;s [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila]], [[w:Genghis Khan|Genghis]], and me, Nick Naylor the face of cigarettes, the [[w:Colonel Saunders|Colonel Saunders]] of nicotine. This is where I work, the Academy of Tobacco Studies. It was established by seven gentlemen you may recognize from C-Span. These guys realized quick if they were gonna claim cigarettes were not addictive they better have proof. This is the man they rely on, Erhardt Von Grupten Mundt. They found him in Germany. I won&#039;t go into the details, he&#039;s been testing the link between nicotine and lung cancer for thirty years, and hasn&#039;t found any conclusive results. The man&#039;s a genius, he could disprove gravity. Then we got our sharks. We draft them out of [[w:Ivory League|Ivy League]] law schools and give them timeshares and sports cars. It&#039;s just like a [[John Grisham]] novel. Well you know without all the espionage. Most importantly we got spin control. That&#039;s where I come in. I get paid to talk. I don&#039;t have an MD or law degree. I have a baccalaureate in kicking ass and taking names. You know that guy who can pick up any girl?  I&#039;m him, on crack.&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1910, the US was producing ten billion cigarettes a year, by 1930 we were up to one hundred twenty three billion, what happened in between? Three things: a World War, Dieting and movies. [...] 1927, talking pictures are born. Suddenly directors need to give their actors something to do while they&#039;re talking. Cary Grant and Carole Lombard are lighting up, Bette Davis, a chimney, and Bogart, remember the first picture with him and Lauren Bacall? [...] She sort of shimmies in through the doorway. Nineteen years old. Pure sex. She says &amp;quot;Anyone got a match?&amp;quot; and Bogie throws the matches at her... and she catches them. Greatest romance in the century, how did it start? Lighting a cigarette. In these days, when someone smokes in the movies, they&#039;re either a psychopath... or an European. The message that Hollywood needs to send out is &amp;quot;Smoking is Cool!&amp;quot;. We need the cast of, uh, Will &amp;amp; Grace smoking in their living room, Forrest Gump puffing away between his box of chocolates, Hugh Grant earning back the love of Julia Roberts by buying her favorite brand - her Virginia Slims. Most of the actors smoke already. If they start doing it on screen... We can put the sex back into cigarettes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Jason Reitman|Jason Reitman]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Thank You for Smoking (film)|Thank You for Smoking]]&#039;&#039;, (2006), based on the novel by [[w:Christopher Buckley|Christopher Buckley]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And &#039;twixt his finger and his thumb he held&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A pouncet-box, which ever and anon&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He gave his nose and took &#039;t away again;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who therefor angry, when it next came there,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Took it in snuff.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry IV, Part 1|&#039;&#039;Henry IV&#039;&#039;, Part I]] (c. 1597), Act I, scene 3, line 37.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Smoking can kill you. And if you&#039;ve been killed you&#039;ve lost a very important part of your life.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Brook Shields|Brooke Shields]], testimony before a [[w:U.S. House of Representatives|House]] subcommittee, as reported in the [https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1981/06/26/smoke-screening/033de10e-2427-490c-94bd-dee8060727e2/ Washington Post, June 21, 1981]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Divine Tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edmund Spenser]], &#039;&#039;The Faerie Queene&#039;&#039; (1589-96), Book III, Canto V, Stanza 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* His pipe was always going out,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And then he&#039;d have to search about&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In all his pockets, and he&#039;d mow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O, deary me! and, musha now!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And then he&#039;d light his pipe, and then&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He&#039;d let it go clean out again.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Stephens (author)|James Stephens]], &amp;quot;Danny Murphy&amp;quot;, from &#039;&#039;Collected Poems&#039;&#039; (1926).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Generally, the control freaks only &#039;&#039;increase&#039;&#039; [[control]].&amp;amp;nbsp; Take cigarettes.&amp;amp;nbsp; At first it was just warning [[labels]].&amp;amp;nbsp; Then, bans on [[t.v.]] [[ads]].&amp;amp;nbsp; Then they required restaurants to have no-smoking &#039;&#039;sections&#039;&#039;.&amp;amp;nbsp; Then came the &#039;&#039;bans&#039;&#039; on airplanes, [[schools]], [[workplaces]], &#039;&#039;entire&#039;&#039; restaurants, then bars, &#039;&#039;too&#039;&#039;—and now, sometimes, apartments and outdoor &#039;&#039;spaces&#039;&#039;, even.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Stossel]], &amp;quot;Control Freaks,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Stossel&#039;&#039; (4 December 2014), 9:56 PM ET&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you have a compulsive behavior pattern such as smoking... this is what you can do: When you notice the compulsive need arising in you, stop and take three conscious breaths. This generates awareness. Then for a few minutes be aware of the compulsive urge itself as an energy field inside you. Consciously feel that need to physically or mentally ingest or consume a certain substance or the desire to act out some form of compulsive behavior. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then take a few more conscious breaths... As awareness grows, addictive patterns will weaken and eventually dissolve. Remember, however, to catch any thoughts that justify the addictive behavior, sometimes with clever arguments, as they arise in you mind. Ask yourself, Who is talking here? And you will realize the addiction is talking. As long as you know that, as long as you are present as the observer of your mind, it is less likely to trick you into doing what it wants.  p. 149&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;[[A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose]]&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am of course notoriously hooked on cigarettes. I keep hoping the things will kill me. A fire at one end and a fool at the other.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Kurt Vonnegut]], &amp;quot;Cold Turkey&amp;quot; (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes about secondhand smoke===&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;There is &amp;quot;no clear link&amp;quot; between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, a study led by researchers at Stanford University has found.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;After a decade-long study of more than 76,000 women, the researchers concluded that while there is still a strong association between smoking and lung cancer, there is no significant relationship between the cancer and exposure to passive smoke.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Max Benwell]], [http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/study-finds-no-clear-link-between-lung-cancer-and-secondhand-smoke-9004077.html &amp;quot;Study finds no clear link between lung cancer and second-hand smoke,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;The Independent&#039;&#039; (13 December 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The results of the California CPS I cohort do not support a causal relation between exposure to environental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality, although they do not rule out a small effect.&amp;amp;nbsp; Given the limitations of the underlying data in this and the other studies of environmental tobacco smoke and the small size of the risk, it seems premature to conclude that environmental tobacco smoke causes death from coronary heart disease and lung cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[James E. Enstrom]], [[Geoffrey C. Kabat]], [[Davey Smith]], [http://www.bmj.com/content/326/7398/1057 &amp;quot;Environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality in a prospective study of Californians, 1960-98,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;British Medical Journal&#039;&#039; (15 May 2003).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A large-scale study found no clear link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, undercutting the premise of years of [[Lawsuit|litigation]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Fisher]], [http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2013/12/12/study-finds-no-link-between-secondhand-smoke-and-cancer/ &amp;quot;Study Finds No Link Between Secondhand Smoke And Cancer,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Forbes&#039;&#039; (12 December 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A large prospective cohort study of more than 76,000 women confirmed a strong association between cigarette smoking and lung cancer but found no link between the disease and secondhand smoke.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Judy Peres]], [http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/12/05/jnci.djt365.extract &amp;quot;No Clear Link Between Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Journal of the National Cancer Institute&#039;&#039; (6 December 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 803-06.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It&#039;s all one thing—both tend into one scope—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To live upon Tobacco and on Hope,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  The one&#039;s but smoke, the other is but wind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Robert Aytoun]], &#039;&#039;Sonnet on Tobacco&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Elizabethan age might be better named the beginning of the smoking era.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. M. Barrie]], &#039;&#039;My Lady Nicotine&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Little tube of mighty pow&#039;r,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Charmer of an idle hour,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  Object of my warm desire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Hawkins Browne]], &#039;&#039;A Pipe of Tobacco&#039;&#039;. Parody in imitation of A. Phillips.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The man who smokes, thinks like a sage and acts like a Samaritan!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Bulwer-Lytton]], &#039;&#039;Night and Morning&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter VI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco, divine, rare superexcellent tobacco, which goes far beyond all panaceas, potable gold and philosopher&#039;s stones, a sovereign remedy to all diseases.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Burton]], &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Melancholy&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sublime tobacco! which from east to west,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Cheers the tar&#039;s labour or the Turkman&#039;s rest;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Which on the Moslem&#039;s ottoman divides&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His hours, and rivals opium and his brides;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Magnificent in Stamboul, but less grand,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though not less loved, in Wapping or the Strand:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Divine in hookas, glorious in a pipe,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;When tipp&#039;d with amber, mellow, rich, and ripe;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Like other charmers wooing the caress,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;More dazzlingly when daring in full dress;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet thy true lovers more admire by far&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thy naked beauties—Give me a cigar!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;The Island&#039;&#039;, Canto II, Stanza 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Contented I sit with my pint and my pipe,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Puffing sorrow and care far away,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And surely the brow of grief nothing can wipe,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Like smoking and moist&#039;ning our clay;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;    *    *    *    *    *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For tho&#039; at my simile many may joke,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Man is but a pipe—and his life but smoke.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Content and a Pipe&#039;&#039;. Old ballad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Indian weed, withered quite,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Green at noon, cut down at night,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Shows thy decay.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;All flesh is hay.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thus think, then drink tobacco.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; *    *    *    *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And when the smoke ascends on high,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Then thou behold&#039;st vanity&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of worldly stuff,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Gone at a puff.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thus think, then drink tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Erskine]], &#039;&#039;Gospel Sonnets&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Meditations on Tobacco&#039;&#039;, Part I. Printed in a Collection &#039;&#039;Two Broadsides against Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1672). Erskine claimed only Part II, Part I. is from an old poem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco, an outlandish weed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Doth in the land strange wonders breed;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It taints the breath, the blood it dries,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It burns the head, it blinds the eyes;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It dries the lungs, scourgeth the lights,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It &#039;numbs the soul, it dulls the sprites;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It brings a man into a maze,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And makes him sit for others&#039; gaze;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It mars a man, it mars a purse,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A lean one fat, a fat one worse;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A white man black, a black man white,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A night a day, a day a night;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It turns the brain like cat in pan,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And makes a Jack a gentleman.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fairholt]], &#039;&#039;J. Payne Collier&#039;s MS&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With pipe and book at close of day,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Oh, what is sweeter? mortal say.&lt;br /&gt;
** It matters not what book on knee,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  Old Isaak or the Odyssey,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It matters not meerschaum or clay.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Le Gallienne]], in volumes in Folio. See Cope&#039;s &#039;&#039;Smoker&#039;s Garland&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco is a traveler,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Come from the Indies hither;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; It passed sea and land&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ere it came to my hand,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And &#039;scaped the wind and weather.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tobacco&#039;s a musician.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And in a pipe delighteth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; It descends in a close,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Through the organ of the nose,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; With a relish that inviteth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Barten Holiday]], &#039;&#039;Texnotamia&#039;&#039; (1630).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some sigh for this and that;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; My wishes don&#039;t go far;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The world may wag at will,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; So I have my cigar.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Hood]], &#039;&#039;The Cigar&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Neither do thou lust after that tawney weed tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ben Jonson]], &#039;&#039;Bartholomew Fair&#039;&#039;, Act II, scene 6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ods me I marle what pleasure or felicity they have in taking their roguish tobacco. It is good for nothing but to choke a man, and fill him full of smoke and embers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ben Jonson]], &#039;&#039;Every Man in His Humour&#039;&#039;, Act III, scene 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And a woman is only a woman, but a good cigar is a smoke.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Betrothed&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For Maggie has written a letter to give me my choice between&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The wee little whimpering Love and the great god Nick O&#039;Teen.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And I have been servant of Love for barely a twelvemonth clear,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But I have been priest of Partagas a matter of seven year.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the gloom of my bachelor days is flecked with the cherry light&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of stumps that I burned to friendship, and pleasure and work and fight.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Betrothed&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Tobac! dont mon âme est ravie,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Lorsque je te vois te perdre en l&#039;air,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Aussi promptement q&#039;un éclair,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Je vois l&#039;image de ma vie.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Tobacco, charmer of my mind,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; When like the meteor&#039;s transient gleam,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Thy substance gone to air I find,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I think, alas! my life&#039;s the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** Misson, &#039;&#039;Memoirs of his travels over England&#039;&#039; (1697). Translation by Ozell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I would I were a cigarette&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Between my Lady&#039;s lithe sad lips,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Where Death like Love, divinely set.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With exquisite sighs and sips,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Feeds and is fed.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*    *    *    *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For life is Love and Love is death,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It was my hap, a well-a-day!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To burn my little hour away.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. A. Page]], &#039;&#039;Vers de Société&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Madonna Mia&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Old man, God bless you, does your pipe taste sweetly?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A beauty, by my soul!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A ruddy flower-pot, rimmed with gold so neatly,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; What ask you for the bowl?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O sir, that bowl for worlds I would not part with;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A brave man gave it me,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who won it—now what think you—of a bashaw?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; At Belgrade&#039;s victory.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gottfried Konrad Pfeffel]], &#039;&#039;The Tobacco Pipe&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco&#039;s but an Indian weed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Grows green at morn, cut down at eve;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; It shows our decay, we are but clay.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Think on this when you smoak Tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted by [[Walter Scott]], &#039;&#039;Rob Roy&#039;&#039;. First printed in Wit and Mirth, or Pills to Purge Melancholy, Volume I, p. 315. (Ed. 1707).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, social friend, I love thee well,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; In learned doctors&#039; spite;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thy clouds all other clouds dispel&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And lap me in delight.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sprague]], &#039;&#039;To My Cigar&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not for nothing that this &amp;quot;ignoble tabagie,&amp;quot; as Michelet calls it, spreads over all the world. Michelet rails against it because it renders you happily apart from thought or work;… Whatever keeps a man in the front garden, whatever checks wandering fancy and all inordinate ambition, whatever makes for lounging and contentment, makes just so surely for domestic happiness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Louis Stevenson]], &#039;&#039;Virginibus Puerisque&#039;&#039;, I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Am I not—a smoker and a brother?&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;A Veteran of Smokedom&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Smoker&#039;s Guide&#039;&#039;, Chapter IV. Last line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Look at me—follow me—smell me! The &amp;quot;stunning&amp;quot; cigar I am smoking is one of a sample intended for the Captain General of Cuba, and the King of Spain, and positively cost a shilling! Oh!  *  *  *  I have some dearer at home. Yes, the expense is frightful, but——it! who can smoke the monstrous rubbish of the shops?&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;A Veteran of Smokedom&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Smoker&#039;s Guide&#039;&#039;, Chapter IV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To smoke a cigar through a mouthpiece is equivalent to kissing a lady through a respirator.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;A Veteran of Smokedom&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Smoker&#039;s Guide&#039;&#039;, Chapter V.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The cigarettes Mr. Slump smoked were prepared by doctors, so the advertisements declared, with the sole purpose of protecting his respiratory system. Yet Mr. Slump suffered and the young secretary suffered with him, hideously. For the first hours of every day he was possessed by a cough which arose from tartarean depths and was relieved only by whisky.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Evelyn Waugh]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Loved One|The Loved One]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dick Stoype&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Was a dear friend and lover of the pipe.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He used to say one pipe of Wishart&#039;s best&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Gave life a zest.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To him &#039;twas meat and drink and physic,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To see the friendly vapor&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Curl round his midnight taper,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the black fume&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Clothe all the room,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  In clouds as dark as sciences metaphysic.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Westmacott]], &#039;&#039;Points of Misery&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A cigarette is the perfect type of a perfect pleasure. It is exquisite, and it leaves one unsatisfied. What more can you want?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oscar Wilde]], &#039;&#039;Picture of Dorian Gray&#039;&#039;, Chapter IV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lastly, the ashes left behind,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;May daily show to move the mind,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  That to ashes and dust return we must:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Then think, and drink tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** G. W. Probably [[George Withers]], in Manuscript of 17th. Cent. owned by J. Payne Collier. Printed in My Little Book of Songs and Ballads from Ancient Musick Books Manuscript (1851). &amp;quot;Drink tobacco&amp;quot; means drinking in, or smoking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alcoholic beverages]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Imperialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lung cancer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drugs]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tobacco industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary|tobacco}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Drugs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Plants]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Tobacco&amp;diff=3148456</id>
		<title>Tobacco</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Tobacco&amp;diff=3148456"/>
		<updated>2022-07-27T20:12:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Quotes */ Hitler&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Papierosa 1 ubt 0069.jpeg|thumb|I am of course notoriously hooked on cigarettes. I keep hoping the things will kill me. A fire at one end and a fool at the other. ~ [[Kurt Vonnegut]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Drum Original Tobacco.jpg|thumb|Generally, the control freaks only increase control.  Take cigarettes.  At first it was just warning labels.  Then, bans on t.v. ads.  Then they required restaurants to have no-smoking sections.  Then came the bans on airplanes, schools, workplaces, entire restaurants, then bars, too—and now, sometimes, apartments and outdoor spaces, even. ~ [[John Stossel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smoking pipe bent.jpg|thumb|And then he&#039;d light his pipe, and then&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He&#039;d let it go clean out again. ~ [[James Stephens (author)|James Stephens]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Tobacco|Tobacco]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is a product prepared from the leaves of the tobacco plant by [[w:curing of tobacco|curing]] them. The plant is part of the genus &#039;&#039;[[w:Nicotiana|Nicotiana]]&#039;&#039; and of the [[w:Solanaceae]] (nightshade) family. Tobacco contains the [[w:alkaloid|alkaloid]] [[w:nicotine|nicotine]], which is a [[w:stimulant|stimulant]]. Dried tobacco leaves are mainly used for [[w:Tobacco smoking|smoking]] in [[w:cigarette|cigarette]]s, [[w:cigar|cigar]]s, [[w:pipe smoking|pipe tobacco]], and flavored [[w:Mu&#039;assel|shisha tobacco]]. They can be also consumed as [[w:Snuff (tobacco)|snuff]], [[w:chewing tobacco|chewing tobacco]], [[w:dipping tobacco|dipping tobacco]] and [[w:snus|snus]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;ll tell you why I like the cigarette business. It cost a penny to make. Sell it for a dollar. It&#039;s addictive. And there&#039;s a fantastic brand loyalty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Warren Buffett]], [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/jul/23/ethicalliving.lifeandhealth Where should I invest my savings?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He who doth not smoke hath either known no great griefs, or refuseth himself the softest consolation, next to that which comes from heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Bulwer-Lytton]], &#039;&#039;What Will He Do With It?&#039;&#039; (1858), Book I, Chapter VI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Woman in this scale, the weed in that, Jupiter, hang out thy balance, and weigh them both; and if thou give the preference to woman, all I can say is, the next time Juno ruffles thee—O Jupiter, try the weed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Bulwer-Lytton]], &#039;&#039;What Will He Do With It?&#039;&#039; (1858), Book I, Chapter VI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tobacco, divine, rare superexcellent tobacco, which goes far beyond all panaceas, potable gold and philosopher&#039;s stones, a sovereign remedy to all diseases.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Burton]], &#039;&#039;Anatomy of Melancholy&#039;&#039; (1621).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After he had administer&#039;d a dose&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of snuff mundungus to his nose;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And powder&#039;d th&#039; inside of his skull,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Instead of th&#039; outward jobbernol,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He shook it with a scornful look&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;On th&#039; adversary, and thus he spoke.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (poet)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;Hudibras&#039;&#039;, Part III (1678), Canto II, line 1,005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Divine in hookas, glorious in a pipe &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;When tipp&#039;d with amber, mellow, rich, and ripe; … &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;Yet thy true lovers more admire by far &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt; Thy naked beauties - give me a cigar!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;The Island&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;m gettin&#039; tired of guys who smoke pipes. When are they gonna outlaw this shit? Guy with a fuckin&#039; pipe! It&#039;s an arrogant thing to place a burning barrier between you and the rest of the world. It&#039;s supposed to imply thoughtfulness or intelligence. It&#039;s not intelligent to stand around with a controlled fire sticking out of your mouth. I say, &amp;quot;Hey, professor! You want somethin&#039; hot to suck on? Call me! I&#039;ll give ya somethin&#039; to put in your mouth!&amp;quot; I think these pipe-smokers oughta just move to the next level and go ahead and suck a dick. There&#039;s nothing wrong with suckin&#039; dicks. Men do it, women do it; can&#039;t be all bad if everybody&#039;s doin&#039; it. I say, Drop the pipe, and go to the dick! That&#039;s my advice. I&#039;m here to help.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Carlin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Brain Droppings|Brain Droppings]]&#039;&#039; (1997), pp. 3–4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Haven&#039;t we had about enough of this cigar smoking shit? When are these fat, arrogant, overfed, white-collar business criminals going to extinguish their cigars and move along to their next abomination? Soft, white, business pussies suckin&#039; on a big brown dick. That&#039;s all it is, folks, a big, brown dick. You know, Freud used to say, &amp;quot;Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.&amp;quot; Yeah? Well, sometimes it&#039;s a big brown dick! With a fat, criminal business asshole sucking on the wet end of it! But, hey. The news is not all bad for me. Not all bad. Want to hear the good part? Cancer of the mouth. Good! Fuck &#039;em! Makes me happy; it&#039;s an attractive disease. So light up, suspender-man, and suck that smoke deep down into your empty suit. And blow it out your ass, you miserable cocksucker!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Carlin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Napalm and Silly Putty|Napalm &amp;amp; Silly Putty]]&#039;&#039; (2001), p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As the most powerful state, the U.S. makes its own laws, using force and conducting economic warfare at will. It also threatens sanctions against countries that do not abide by its conveniently flexible notions of &amp;quot;free trade.&amp;quot; In one important case, Washington has employed such threats with great effectiveness (and GATT approval) to force open Asian markets for U.S. tobacco exports and advertising, aimed primarily at the growing markets of women and children. The U.S. Agriculture Department has provided grants to tobacco firms to promote smoking overseas. Asian countries have attempted to conduct educational anti-smoking campaigns, but they are overwhelmed by the miracles of the market, reinforced by U.S. state power through the sanctions threat. Philip Morris, with an advertising and promotion budget of close to $9 billion in 1992, became China&#039;s largest advertiser. The effect of Reaganite sanction threats was to increase advertising and promotion of cigarette smoking (particularly U.S. brands) quite sharply in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea, along with the use of these lethal substances. In South Korea, for example, the rate of growth in smoking more than tripled when markets for U.S. lethal drugs were opened in 1988. The Bush Administration extended the threats to Thailand, at exactly the same time that the &amp;quot;war on drugs&amp;quot; was declared; the media were kind enough to overlook the coincidence, even suppressing the outraged denunciations by the very conservative Surgeon-General. Oxford University epidemiologist Richard Peto estimates that among Chinese children under 20 today, 50 million will die of cigarette-related diseases, an achievement that ranks high even by 20th century standards.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], In Tony Evans (ed.), Human Rights Fifty Years on: A Reappraisal, 1997  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The pipe, with solemn interposing puff,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Makes half a sentence at a time enough;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The dozing sages drop the drowsy strain,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Then pause, and puff—and speak, and pause again.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Conversation&#039;&#039; (1782), line 245.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Pernicious weed! whose scent the fair annoys&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Unfriendly to society&#039;s chief joys,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thy worst effect is banishing for hours&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The sex whose presence civilizes ours.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Conversation&#039;&#039; (1782), line 251.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco was the major model used to establish the principals and methods of plant somatic cell genetics including in vitro propagation of cells and tissues, totipotency of somatic cells, doubled haploid production and genetic transformation.&lt;br /&gt;
** Christiane Gebhardt: {{cite journal|title=The historical role of species from the Solanaceae plant family in genetic research|journal=Theoretical and Applied Genetics|volume=129|issue=12|year=2016|pages=2281–2294|issn=0040-5752|doi=10.1007/s00122-016-2804-1|pmid=27744490|pmc=5121179}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The money expended for liquor and tobacco is the difference between a young man making a success in life and making a failure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heber J. Grant]], [https://archive.org/details/conferencereport1937sa/page/n17 Conference Report], October 1937&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1987-0703-506, Adolf Hitler vor Rundfunk-Mikrofon retouched.jpg|thumb|I am convinced that if I had been a smoker I would never have been able to withstand the worries that have burdened me for so long.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps thanks to that the German people owes its salvation to me.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Adolf Hitler]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* I am convinced that if I had been a smoker I would never have been able to withstand the worries that have burdened me for so long.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps thanks to that the German people owes its salvation to me.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Ich bin überzeugt, wenn ich Raucher gewesen wäre, nie würde ich den Sorgen standgehalten haben, die mich seit so langer Zeit belasten. Vielleicht verdankt dem das deutsche Volk mir seine Rettung.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Adolf Hitler]] at the [[w:Wolfsschanze|Wolfsschanze]] on the night of 11 March 1942, [https://archive.org/details/hitlers-tischgespraeche/page/126/mode/2up?q=Eckart as quoted] in &#039;&#039;Hitlers Tischgespräche im Führerhauptquartier&#039;&#039; by [[w:Henry Picker|Henry Picker]], published in 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
* And a woman is only a woman, but a good cigar is a smoke.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Betrothed&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For I hate, yet love thee, so,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That, whichever thing I show,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The plain truth will seem to be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A constrained hyperbole,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the passion to proceed&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;More from a mistress than a weed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For thy sake, tobacco, I&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Would do anything but die.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nay, rather,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plant divine, of rarest virtue;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Blisters on the tongue would hurt you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou in such a cloud dost bind us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That our worst foes cannot find us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And ill fortune, that would thwart us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shoots at rovers, shooting at us;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;While each man, through thy height&#039;ning steam,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Does like a smoking Etna seem.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou through such a mist dost show us,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That our best friends do not know us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Lamb]], &#039;&#039;A Farewell to Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1805).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What this country needs is a really good 5-cent cigar.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Thomas Riley Marshall|Thomas Riley Marshall]], Vice President under [[Woodrow Wilson]], to Henry M. Rose, the assistant secretary of the Senate, while Marshall was presiding as president of the Senate. Reported in the &#039;&#039;New York Tribune&#039;&#039; (January 4, 1920), part 7, p. 1. Confirmed in Marshall&#039;s autobiography, &#039;&#039;Recollections of Thomas R. Marshall&#039;&#039; (1925), caption facing p. 244; and in Charles M. Thomas, &#039;&#039;Thomas Riley Marshall&#039;&#039; (1939), p. 175.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A good cigar is like a beautiful chick with a great body who also knows the [[w:American League|American League]] box scores.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[M*A*S*H (TV series)|M*A*S*H]], Klinger, &#039;&#039;Bug-Out&#039;&#039; 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They threaten me with lung cancer, and still I smoke and smoke.  If they&#039;d only threaten me with hard work, I might stop.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mignon McLaughlin]] , &#039;&#039;The Second Neurotic&#039;s Notebook&#039;&#039;, 1966.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Good food, good sex, good digestion, good sleep: to these basic animal pleasures, man has added nothing but the good cigarette.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mignon McLaughlin]], &#039;&#039;The Second Neurotic&#039;s Notebook&#039;&#039; (1966).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Life without smoking is like the smoke without the roast.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Cesare Pavese]], &#039;&#039;This Business of Living&#039;&#039;, {{#dateformat:1935-12-20}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sir Plume, of amber snuff-box justly vain,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the nice conduct of a clouded cane.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;The Rape of the Lock&#039;&#039; (1712), Canto IV, line 122.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Just where the breath of life his nostrils drew,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A charge of snuff the wily virgin threw;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The [[gnomes]] direct, to every atom just,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The pungent grains of titillating dust,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sudden, with starting tears each eye o&#039;erflows,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the high dome re-echoes to his nose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;The Rape of the Lock&#039;&#039; (1712), Canto V, line 81.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Few people on this planet know what it is to be truly despised. Can you blame them? I earn a living fronting an organizing that kills one thousand two hundred human beings a day; 1200 people. We&#039;re talking two jumbo jet plane loads of men, women, and children. I mean there&#039;s [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila]], [[w:Genghis Khan|Genghis]], and me, Nick Naylor the face of cigarettes, the [[w:Colonel Saunders|Colonel Saunders]] of nicotine. This is where I work, the Academy of Tobacco Studies. It was established by seven gentlemen you may recognize from C-Span. These guys realized quick if they were gonna claim cigarettes were not addictive they better have proof. This is the man they rely on, Erhardt Von Grupten Mundt. They found him in Germany. I won&#039;t go into the details, he&#039;s been testing the link between nicotine and lung cancer for thirty years, and hasn&#039;t found any conclusive results. The man&#039;s a genius, he could disprove gravity. Then we got our sharks. We draft them out of [[w:Ivory League|Ivy League]] law schools and give them timeshares and sports cars. It&#039;s just like a [[John Grisham]] novel. Well you know without all the espionage. Most importantly we got spin control. That&#039;s where I come in. I get paid to talk. I don&#039;t have an MD or law degree. I have a baccalaureate in kicking ass and taking names. You know that guy who can pick up any girl?  I&#039;m him, on crack.&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1910, the US was producing ten billion cigarettes a year, by 1930 we were up to one hundred twenty three billion, what happened in between? Three things: a World War, Dieting and movies. [...] 1927, talking pictures are born. Suddenly directors need to give their actors something to do while they&#039;re talking. Cary Grant and Carole Lombard are lighting up, Bette Davis, a chimney, and Bogart, remember the first picture with him and Lauren Bacall? [...] She sort of shimmies in through the doorway. Nineteen years old. Pure sex. She says &amp;quot;Anyone got a match?&amp;quot; and Bogie throws the matches at her... and she catches them. Greatest romance in the century, how did it start? Lighting a cigarette. In these days, when someone smokes in the movies, they&#039;re either a psychopath... or an European. The message that Hollywood needs to send out is &amp;quot;Smoking is Cool!&amp;quot;. We need the cast of, uh, Will &amp;amp; Grace smoking in their living room, Forrest Gump puffing away between his box of chocolates, Hugh Grant earning back the love of Julia Roberts by buying her favorite brand - her Virginia Slims. Most of the actors smoke already. If they start doing it on screen... We can put the sex back into cigarettes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Jason Reitman|Jason Reitman]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Thank You for Smoking (film)|Thank You for Smoking]]&#039;&#039;, (2006), based on the novel by [[w:Christopher Buckley|Christopher Buckley]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And &#039;twixt his finger and his thumb he held&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A pouncet-box, which ever and anon&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He gave his nose and took &#039;t away again;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who therefor angry, when it next came there,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Took it in snuff.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry IV, Part 1|&#039;&#039;Henry IV&#039;&#039;, Part I]] (c. 1597), Act I, scene 3, line 37.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Smoking can kill you. And if you&#039;ve been killed you&#039;ve lost a very important part of your life.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Brook Shields|Brooke Shields]], testimony before a [[w:U.S. House of Representatives|House]] subcommittee, as reported in the [https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1981/06/26/smoke-screening/033de10e-2427-490c-94bd-dee8060727e2/ Washington Post, June 21, 1981]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Divine Tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edmund Spenser]], &#039;&#039;The Faerie Queene&#039;&#039; (1589-96), Book III, Canto V, Stanza 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* His pipe was always going out,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And then he&#039;d have to search about&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In all his pockets, and he&#039;d mow&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O, deary me! and, musha now!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And then he&#039;d light his pipe, and then&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He&#039;d let it go clean out again.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Stephens (author)|James Stephens]], &amp;quot;Danny Murphy&amp;quot;, from &#039;&#039;Collected Poems&#039;&#039; (1926).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Generally, the control freaks only &#039;&#039;increase&#039;&#039; [[control]].&amp;amp;nbsp; Take cigarettes.&amp;amp;nbsp; At first it was just warning [[labels]].&amp;amp;nbsp; Then, bans on [[t.v.]] [[ads]].&amp;amp;nbsp; Then they required restaurants to have no-smoking &#039;&#039;sections&#039;&#039;.&amp;amp;nbsp; Then came the &#039;&#039;bans&#039;&#039; on airplanes, [[schools]], [[workplaces]], &#039;&#039;entire&#039;&#039; restaurants, then bars, &#039;&#039;too&#039;&#039;—and now, sometimes, apartments and outdoor &#039;&#039;spaces&#039;&#039;, even.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Stossel]], &amp;quot;Control Freaks,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Stossel&#039;&#039; (4 December 2014), 9:56 PM ET&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you have a compulsive behavior pattern such as smoking... this is what you can do: When you notice the compulsive need arising in you, stop and take three conscious breaths. This generates awareness. Then for a few minutes be aware of the compulsive urge itself as an energy field inside you. Consciously feel that need to physically or mentally ingest or consume a certain substance or the desire to act out some form of compulsive behavior. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then take a few more conscious breaths... As awareness grows, addictive patterns will weaken and eventually dissolve. Remember, however, to catch any thoughts that justify the addictive behavior, sometimes with clever arguments, as they arise in you mind. Ask yourself, Who is talking here? And you will realize the addiction is talking. As long as you know that, as long as you are present as the observer of your mind, it is less likely to trick you into doing what it wants.  p. 149&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;[[A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose]]&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am of course notoriously hooked on cigarettes. I keep hoping the things will kill me. A fire at one end and a fool at the other.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Kurt Vonnegut]], &amp;quot;Cold Turkey&amp;quot; (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes about secondhand smoke===&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;There is &amp;quot;no clear link&amp;quot; between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, a study led by researchers at Stanford University has found.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;After a decade-long study of more than 76,000 women, the researchers concluded that while there is still a strong association between smoking and lung cancer, there is no significant relationship between the cancer and exposure to passive smoke.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Max Benwell]], [http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/study-finds-no-clear-link-between-lung-cancer-and-secondhand-smoke-9004077.html &amp;quot;Study finds no clear link between lung cancer and second-hand smoke,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;The Independent&#039;&#039; (13 December 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The results of the California CPS I cohort do not support a causal relation between exposure to environental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality, although they do not rule out a small effect.&amp;amp;nbsp; Given the limitations of the underlying data in this and the other studies of environmental tobacco smoke and the small size of the risk, it seems premature to conclude that environmental tobacco smoke causes death from coronary heart disease and lung cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[James E. Enstrom]], [[Geoffrey C. Kabat]], [[Davey Smith]], [http://www.bmj.com/content/326/7398/1057 &amp;quot;Environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality in a prospective study of Californians, 1960-98,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;British Medical Journal&#039;&#039; (15 May 2003).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A large-scale study found no clear link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, undercutting the premise of years of [[Lawsuit|litigation]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Fisher]], [http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2013/12/12/study-finds-no-link-between-secondhand-smoke-and-cancer/ &amp;quot;Study Finds No Link Between Secondhand Smoke And Cancer,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Forbes&#039;&#039; (12 December 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A large prospective cohort study of more than 76,000 women confirmed a strong association between cigarette smoking and lung cancer but found no link between the disease and secondhand smoke.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Judy Peres]], [http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/12/05/jnci.djt365.extract &amp;quot;No Clear Link Between Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer,&amp;quot;] &#039;&#039;Journal of the National Cancer Institute&#039;&#039; (6 December 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 803-06.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It&#039;s all one thing—both tend into one scope—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To live upon Tobacco and on Hope,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  The one&#039;s but smoke, the other is but wind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Robert Aytoun]], &#039;&#039;Sonnet on Tobacco&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Elizabethan age might be better named the beginning of the smoking era.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. M. Barrie]], &#039;&#039;My Lady Nicotine&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Little tube of mighty pow&#039;r,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Charmer of an idle hour,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  Object of my warm desire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Hawkins Browne]], &#039;&#039;A Pipe of Tobacco&#039;&#039;. Parody in imitation of A. Phillips.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The man who smokes, thinks like a sage and acts like a Samaritan!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Bulwer-Lytton]], &#039;&#039;Night and Morning&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter VI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco, divine, rare superexcellent tobacco, which goes far beyond all panaceas, potable gold and philosopher&#039;s stones, a sovereign remedy to all diseases.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Burton]], &#039;&#039;Anatomy of a Melancholy&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sublime tobacco! which from east to west,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Cheers the tar&#039;s labour or the Turkman&#039;s rest;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Which on the Moslem&#039;s ottoman divides&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His hours, and rivals opium and his brides;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Magnificent in Stamboul, but less grand,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though not less loved, in Wapping or the Strand:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Divine in hookas, glorious in a pipe,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;When tipp&#039;d with amber, mellow, rich, and ripe;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Like other charmers wooing the caress,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;More dazzlingly when daring in full dress;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet thy true lovers more admire by far&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thy naked beauties—Give me a cigar!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;The Island&#039;&#039;, Canto II, Stanza 19.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Contented I sit with my pint and my pipe,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Puffing sorrow and care far away,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And surely the brow of grief nothing can wipe,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Like smoking and moist&#039;ning our clay;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;    *    *    *    *    *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For tho&#039; at my simile many may joke,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Man is but a pipe—and his life but smoke.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Content and a Pipe&#039;&#039;. Old ballad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Indian weed, withered quite,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Green at noon, cut down at night,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Shows thy decay.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;All flesh is hay.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thus think, then drink tobacco.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; *    *    *    *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And when the smoke ascends on high,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Then thou behold&#039;st vanity&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of worldly stuff,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Gone at a puff.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thus think, then drink tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Erskine]], &#039;&#039;Gospel Sonnets&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Meditations on Tobacco&#039;&#039;, Part I. Printed in a Collection &#039;&#039;Two Broadsides against Tobacco&#039;&#039; (1672). Erskine claimed only Part II, Part I. is from an old poem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco, an outlandish weed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Doth in the land strange wonders breed;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It taints the breath, the blood it dries,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It burns the head, it blinds the eyes;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It dries the lungs, scourgeth the lights,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It &#039;numbs the soul, it dulls the sprites;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It brings a man into a maze,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And makes him sit for others&#039; gaze;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It mars a man, it mars a purse,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A lean one fat, a fat one worse;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A white man black, a black man white,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A night a day, a day a night;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It turns the brain like cat in pan,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And makes a Jack a gentleman.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fairholt]], &#039;&#039;J. Payne Collier&#039;s MS&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With pipe and book at close of day,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Oh, what is sweeter? mortal say.&lt;br /&gt;
** It matters not what book on knee,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  Old Isaak or the Odyssey,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It matters not meerschaum or clay.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Le Gallienne]], in volumes in Folio. See Cope&#039;s &#039;&#039;Smoker&#039;s Garland&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco is a traveler,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Come from the Indies hither;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; It passed sea and land&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ere it came to my hand,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And &#039;scaped the wind and weather.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tobacco&#039;s a musician.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And in a pipe delighteth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; It descends in a close,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Through the organ of the nose,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; With a relish that inviteth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Barten Holiday]], &#039;&#039;Texnotamia&#039;&#039; (1630).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some sigh for this and that;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; My wishes don&#039;t go far;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The world may wag at will,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; So I have my cigar.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Hood]], &#039;&#039;The Cigar&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Neither do thou lust after that tawney weed tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ben Jonson]], &#039;&#039;Bartholomew Fair&#039;&#039;, Act II, scene 6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ods me I marle what pleasure or felicity they have in taking their roguish tobacco. It is good for nothing but to choke a man, and fill him full of smoke and embers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ben Jonson]], &#039;&#039;Every Man in His Humour&#039;&#039;, Act III, scene 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And a woman is only a woman, but a good cigar is a smoke.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Betrothed&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For Maggie has written a letter to give me my choice between&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The wee little whimpering Love and the great god Nick O&#039;Teen.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And I have been servant of Love for barely a twelvemonth clear,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But I have been priest of Partagas a matter of seven year.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the gloom of my bachelor days is flecked with the cherry light&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of stumps that I burned to friendship, and pleasure and work and fight.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudyard Kipling]], &#039;&#039;The Betrothed&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Tobac! dont mon âme est ravie,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Lorsque je te vois te perdre en l&#039;air,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Aussi promptement q&#039;un éclair,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Je vois l&#039;image de ma vie.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Tobacco, charmer of my mind,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; When like the meteor&#039;s transient gleam,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Thy substance gone to air I find,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I think, alas! my life&#039;s the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** Misson, &#039;&#039;Memoirs of his travels over England&#039;&#039; (1697). Translation by Ozell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I would I were a cigarette&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Between my Lady&#039;s lithe sad lips,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Where Death like Love, divinely set.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With exquisite sighs and sips,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Feeds and is fed.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*    *    *    *&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For life is Love and Love is death,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It was my hap, a well-a-day!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To burn my little hour away.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. A. Page]], &#039;&#039;Vers de Société&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Madonna Mia&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Old man, God bless you, does your pipe taste sweetly?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A beauty, by my soul!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A ruddy flower-pot, rimmed with gold so neatly,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; What ask you for the bowl?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;O sir, that bowl for worlds I would not part with;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A brave man gave it me,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who won it—now what think you—of a bashaw?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; At Belgrade&#039;s victory.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gottfried Konrad Pfeffel]], &#039;&#039;The Tobacco Pipe&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tobacco&#039;s but an Indian weed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Grows green at morn, cut down at eve;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; It shows our decay, we are but clay.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Think on this when you smoak Tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted by [[Walter Scott]], &#039;&#039;Rob Roy&#039;&#039;. First printed in Wit and Mirth, or Pills to Purge Melancholy, Volume I, p. 315. (Ed. 1707).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, social friend, I love thee well,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; In learned doctors&#039; spite;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thy clouds all other clouds dispel&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And lap me in delight.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sprague]], &#039;&#039;To My Cigar&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not for nothing that this &amp;quot;ignoble tabagie,&amp;quot; as Michelet calls it, spreads over all the world. Michelet rails against it because it renders you happily apart from thought or work;… Whatever keeps a man in the front garden, whatever checks wandering fancy and all inordinate ambition, whatever makes for lounging and contentment, makes just so surely for domestic happiness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Louis Stevenson]], &#039;&#039;Virginibus Puerisque&#039;&#039;, I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Am I not—a smoker and a brother?&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;A Veteran of Smokedom&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Smoker&#039;s Guide&#039;&#039;, Chapter IV. Last line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Look at me—follow me—smell me! The &amp;quot;stunning&amp;quot; cigar I am smoking is one of a sample intended for the Captain General of Cuba, and the King of Spain, and positively cost a shilling! Oh!  *  *  *  I have some dearer at home. Yes, the expense is frightful, but——it! who can smoke the monstrous rubbish of the shops?&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;A Veteran of Smokedom&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Smoker&#039;s Guide&#039;&#039;, Chapter IV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To smoke a cigar through a mouthpiece is equivalent to kissing a lady through a respirator.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;A Veteran of Smokedom&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Smoker&#039;s Guide&#039;&#039;, Chapter V.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The cigarettes Mr. Slump smoked were prepared by doctors, so the advertisements declared, with the sole purpose of protecting his respiratory system. Yet Mr. Slump suffered and the young secretary suffered with him, hideously. For the first hours of every day he was possessed by a cough which arose from tartarean depths and was relieved only by whisky.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Evelyn Waugh]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Loved One|The Loved One]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dick Stoype&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Was a dear friend and lover of the pipe.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He used to say one pipe of Wishart&#039;s best&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Gave life a zest.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To him &#039;twas meat and drink and physic,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To see the friendly vapor&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Curl round his midnight taper,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And the black fume&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Clothe all the room,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  In clouds as dark as sciences metaphysic.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Westmacott]], &#039;&#039;Points of Misery&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A cigarette is the perfect type of a perfect pleasure. It is exquisite, and it leaves one unsatisfied. What more can you want?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oscar Wilde]], &#039;&#039;Picture of Dorian Gray&#039;&#039;, Chapter IV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lastly, the ashes left behind,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;May daily show to move the mind,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  That to ashes and dust return we must:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Then think, and drink tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
** G. W. Probably [[George Withers]], in Manuscript of 17th. Cent. owned by J. Payne Collier. Printed in My Little Book of Songs and Ballads from Ancient Musick Books Manuscript (1851). &amp;quot;Drink tobacco&amp;quot; means drinking in, or smoking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alcoholic beverages]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Imperialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lung cancer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drugs]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tobacco industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary|tobacco}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Drugs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Plants]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3138986</id>
		<title>Mikheil Saakashvili</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3138986"/>
		<updated>2022-07-08T11:03:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Speech at the UN General Assembly, 25 September 2013. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili in Tbilisi, March 22, 2008.jpg|thumb|If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Mikheil Saakashvili|Mikheil Saakashvili]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (born [[21 December]] [[1967]]) is a former Georgian politician. He was the third President of [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] for two consecutive terms from 25 January 2004 to 17 November 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia does not need Russia as an enemy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.irishtimes.com/news/eu-integration-a-key-aim-of-saakashvili-1.1131478 &amp;quot;EU integration a key aim of Saakashvili&amp;quot;] (26 January 2004), &#039;&#039;Irish Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the first time in 15 years, Georgia this winter has its electric power guaranteed without deficit. This is a historic achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.deseretnews.com/article/635179976/Ebullience-in-Georgia-replaced-by-energy-crisis.html &amp;quot;Ebullience in Georgia replaced by energy crisis&amp;quot;] (29 January 2006), by Mike Eckel, &#039;&#039;Deseret News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A united Georgia needs our unity now, to work together towards our many common goals.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://civil.ge/archives/114132 Inaugural address] (21 January 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We must create the Georgia that our ancestors dreamed of, the Georgia that we dream of.&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted in [http://old.themoscowtimes.com/sitemap/free/2012/11/article/selling-the-georgian-dream/471822.html &amp;quot;Selling the Georgian Dream&amp;quot;] (23 November 2012), by Luka Oreskovic, &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inaugural address (2004)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia is the country of unique culture. We are not only old Europeans, we are the very first Europeans, and therefore Georgia holds special place in European civilization. Georgia should serve as a paragon for democracy where all citizens are equal before the law, where every citizen will have an equal opportunity for the pursuit of success and realization of his or her possibilities. Georgia should become and will become a homeland for independent, educated and proud people.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://old.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=26694 Inaugural address] (25 January 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
**Also quoted as: &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Georgia is not just a European country, but one of the most ancient European countries.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; in [https://books.google.com/books?id=XYPX1JmlIrsC&amp;amp;pg=PT274&amp;amp;lpg=PT274&amp;amp;dq=%22Georgia+is+not+just+a+European+country,+but+one+of+the+most+ancient+European+countries.%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=DSgcjrMGnd&amp;amp;sig=UyRLUFf5UzUR4KAVB96bGGSBm4o&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwje9JG-wOveAhXNmeAKHXnuAqEQ6AEwCnoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22Georgia%20is%20not%20just%20a%20European%20country%2C%20but%20one%20of%20the%20most%20ancient%20European%20countries.%22&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;A World of Curiosities: Surprising, Interesting, and Downright Unbelievable&#039;&#039;] (2012), by John Oldale, p. 274&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is time we Georgians did not depend only on others, it is time we asked what Georgia will do for the world.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our steady course is towards European integration. It is time Europe finally saw and valued Georgia and took steps towards us.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Standing at David&#039;s tomb, we must say Georgia will unite, Georgia will become strong and will restore its integrity... I want all of us to do it together and I promise not to become a source of shame for you. &lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Remarks to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2005)===&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hen the people of Georgia rose up to defend their freedom - they also rose up to reclaim their future. A future that would no longer be defined by the false promises, wholesale decay, and state disintegration of the recent past. A future no longer dominated by the politics of division, state-sanctioned theft and disregard for the poorest parts of society.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia&#039;s character - now and forever - celebrates tolerance, embraces diversity, relishes lively and open debate, and above all, respects liberty and human dignity. Georgia is a democracy, because above all - its national identity is rooted in the traditions of democracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First and foremost - our vision for a united and peaceful Georgia is based on respect for the desire - and respect for the right - to South Ossetian autonomy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview with the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; (2008)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Look, the rift with [[Russia]] is not connected to Georgia. It is connected to values. Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept free speech or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, killing me makes no sense because Georgia already has a Western-educated political class.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin told several Western leaders, “I want Saakashvili’s head.” If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4vSocpB9no Speech] at the [[UN]] General Assembly, 25 September 2013. ===&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript [https://civil.ge/archives/186792 here].&lt;br /&gt;
*If the West is outdated, then why do millions of [[Poland|Poles]], [[Czechia|Czech]], [[Estonia]]ns, [[Romania]]ns, and others cherish so much the day they entered [[NATO]]? And why are millions of [[Ukraine|Ukrainians]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgians]], [[Moldova]]ns, and others desperately knocking on the doors of the [[European Union]]?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If [[freedom]] is no longer fashionable, how do we explain that the suicide of [[w:Mohamed Bouazizi|an unknown citizen]] in a remote [[Tunisia]]n town has [[w:Arab Spring|changed the map of the world]]?&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Armenia]] has been cornered and forced to sign Customs Union, which is not in this nation’s interest or in the interest of our region.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Moldova]] is being blockaded, Ukraine is under constant attack, [[Azerbaijan]] faces extraordinary pressure, and [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] is occupied.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Why? Because an old Empire is trying to reclaim its bygone borders. And ‘borders’ is actually not the right word, since this Empire – be it the [[Russian Empire]], the [[Soviet Union]], the [[Russian Federation]], or the [[w:Eurasian Union|Eurasian Union]] – never had borders. It only had margins.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I came today to speak in the name of these margins.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Unlike most nations, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russian Federation has no interest in having stable states around it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Neighboring countries in constant turmoil is what the Kremlin is seeking.&#039;&#039;&#039; It rejects the very idea of strong governments in Georgia, Ukraine, or Moldova, even ones that try to be friendly to its interests.&amp;lt;Br/&amp;gt;I was never a great fan of what the French call &#039;&#039;La langue de bois&#039;&#039;, but as my second term nears its end, I feel more than before the urge to speak my mind. So let us be concrete.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think that [[Vladimir Putin]] wants Armenia to decisively [[w:Nagorno-Karabakh conflict|triumph over Azerbaijan]], for instance? No. This would make Armenia too strong and potentially too independent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think then that the contrary is true, that Moscow wants Baku to prevail over Yerevan? Obviously not. The current rise of a modernized, dynamic Azerbaijan is a nightmare for the Russian leaders.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;No, they do not want anyone to prevail and the conflict itself is their objective, since it keeps both nations dependent and blocks their integration into the European common space.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think that the electoral defeat of the forces that led the [[w:Orange Revolution|Orange Revolution]] in Ukraine has led the Kremlin to take a softer approach to this country?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;To the contrary. I spoke yesterday to my colleague [[Viktor Yanukovych]]; his government is under constant attack and pressure from Russia and that’s what’s happening on the daily basis ahead of the European [Union Eastern Partnership] Summit of Vilnius and Russian officials now speak openly about dismembering this nation – I just heard speech two days ago.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think the Kremlin would agree to discuss the de-occupation of our regions of [[w:Abkhazia|Abkhazia]] and [[w:South Ossetia|South Ossetia]], now that the government has changed in Tbilisi? Far from it.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The annexation of Georgian lands by Russian troops continues.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yesterday, the occupants have expelled again Georgian citizens from their houses and are destroying them, are destroying their villages, homes and houses of their parents and grand-parents, [inaudible] their cemeteries in total impunity, water systems.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Despite the friendly statements made by the new Georgian government in the recent weeks and months, the Russian military keeps advancing its positions, dividing communities with new barbwires, threatening our economy, moving towards the vital [[w:Baku-Supsa pipeline|Baku-Supsa pipeline]], approaching more and more the main highway of Georgia and thus putting into question the very sustainability of our country. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[...]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;. My predecessor, President [[Shevardnadze, Eduard|Shevardnadze]], came from the highest Soviet nomenklatura. He was returned to power in Georgia with direct Russian help in the 90s, through a military coup. He was well known for his Soviet diplomatic skills unlike me. And yet, Russia has constantly undermined his authority and even tried to assassinate him several times.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is not about [[w:Gamsakhurdia|Gamsakhurdia]] – the first Georgian President, Shevardnadze, Saakashvili, or present Prime Minister [[w:Bidzina Ivanishvili|Ivanishvili]].&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;Those names actually do not matter when the stakes are so high. This is about the possibility or not of true statehood in Georgia, and beyond.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Why? Because the current Russian authorities know perfectly well that as soon as strong institutions are built in Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, or any other place, as soon as functioning states emerge, such institutions, such states will reflect and enforce the will of their people, which is to become fully independent and move towards Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tbilisi Courtroom Address (2021)===&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not recognise the Prosecutor’s Office and the Georgian judiciary, I am not here to be part of a pre-written comedy &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(before adress) &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* I am Mikheil Saakashvili and Georgia did not have a criminal president [talks about himself]. I want every Georgian to know this. The founder of the Georgian state could not have been a criminal, because criminals do not establish states, they instead destroy them and you are [now] witnessing a classic example of that, as Georgia has fallen into the hands of bandits.&lt;br /&gt;
* Of course, I was in a hurry to develop Georgia and anyone who is in a rush makes mistakes. I knew that we had little time, I know that many things needed to be done. But I was speaking with my doctor, who was able to arrive from a village and enroll in the medical university, only because there were national exams. Otherwise, there were no chances to enroll, and when they were coming [to Tbilisi in the past] people used to question them if they knew how much [the bribe for] enrolling would cost. [My doctor] arrived, believed in me and enrolled. The program of American teachers – many of the young generation can speak English, because we used to bring over 2,500 teachers a year. Not only my or [[Bidzina Ivanishvili]]’s son were able to study, but any Georgian, from Lesichini village to Khulo and Zemo and Kveda Machkhaani. This was my concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* While I have told about my successes, did I make mistakes? [I made] more than enough; many mistakes that I bitterly regret. First of all, my mistake was the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Saakashvili, Mikheil}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1967 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Living people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lawyers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Prisoners]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Tbilisi]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3135837</id>
		<title>Mikheil Saakashvili</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3135837"/>
		<updated>2022-06-30T19:08:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Speech at the UN General Assembly, 25 September 2013. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili in Tbilisi, March 22, 2008.jpg|thumb|If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Mikheil Saakashvili|Mikheil Saakashvili]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (born [[21 December]] [[1967]]) is a former Georgian politician. He was the third President of [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] for two consecutive terms from 25 January 2004 to 17 November 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia does not need Russia as an enemy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.irishtimes.com/news/eu-integration-a-key-aim-of-saakashvili-1.1131478 &amp;quot;EU integration a key aim of Saakashvili&amp;quot;] (26 January 2004), &#039;&#039;Irish Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the first time in 15 years, Georgia this winter has its electric power guaranteed without deficit. This is a historic achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.deseretnews.com/article/635179976/Ebullience-in-Georgia-replaced-by-energy-crisis.html &amp;quot;Ebullience in Georgia replaced by energy crisis&amp;quot;] (29 January 2006), by Mike Eckel, &#039;&#039;Deseret News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A united Georgia needs our unity now, to work together towards our many common goals.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://civil.ge/archives/114132 Inaugural address] (21 January 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We must create the Georgia that our ancestors dreamed of, the Georgia that we dream of.&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted in [http://old.themoscowtimes.com/sitemap/free/2012/11/article/selling-the-georgian-dream/471822.html &amp;quot;Selling the Georgian Dream&amp;quot;] (23 November 2012), by Luka Oreskovic, &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inaugural address (2004)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia is the country of unique culture. We are not only old Europeans, we are the very first Europeans, and therefore Georgia holds special place in European civilization. Georgia should serve as a paragon for democracy where all citizens are equal before the law, where every citizen will have an equal opportunity for the pursuit of success and realization of his or her possibilities. Georgia should become and will become a homeland for independent, educated and proud people.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://old.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=26694 Inaugural address] (25 January 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
**Also quoted as: &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Georgia is not just a European country, but one of the most ancient European countries.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; in [https://books.google.com/books?id=XYPX1JmlIrsC&amp;amp;pg=PT274&amp;amp;lpg=PT274&amp;amp;dq=%22Georgia+is+not+just+a+European+country,+but+one+of+the+most+ancient+European+countries.%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=DSgcjrMGnd&amp;amp;sig=UyRLUFf5UzUR4KAVB96bGGSBm4o&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwje9JG-wOveAhXNmeAKHXnuAqEQ6AEwCnoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22Georgia%20is%20not%20just%20a%20European%20country%2C%20but%20one%20of%20the%20most%20ancient%20European%20countries.%22&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;A World of Curiosities: Surprising, Interesting, and Downright Unbelievable&#039;&#039;] (2012), by John Oldale, p. 274&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is time we Georgians did not depend only on others, it is time we asked what Georgia will do for the world.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our steady course is towards European integration. It is time Europe finally saw and valued Georgia and took steps towards us.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Standing at David&#039;s tomb, we must say Georgia will unite, Georgia will become strong and will restore its integrity... I want all of us to do it together and I promise not to become a source of shame for you. &lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Remarks to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2005)===&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hen the people of Georgia rose up to defend their freedom - they also rose up to reclaim their future. A future that would no longer be defined by the false promises, wholesale decay, and state disintegration of the recent past. A future no longer dominated by the politics of division, state-sanctioned theft and disregard for the poorest parts of society.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia&#039;s character - now and forever - celebrates tolerance, embraces diversity, relishes lively and open debate, and above all, respects liberty and human dignity. Georgia is a democracy, because above all - its national identity is rooted in the traditions of democracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First and foremost - our vision for a united and peaceful Georgia is based on respect for the desire - and respect for the right - to South Ossetian autonomy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview with the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; (2008)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Look, the rift with [[Russia]] is not connected to Georgia. It is connected to values. Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept free speech or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, killing me makes no sense because Georgia already has a Western-educated political class.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin told several Western leaders, “I want Saakashvili’s head.” If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4vSocpB9no Speech] at the [[UN]] General Assembly, 25 September 2013. ===&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript [https://civil.ge/archives/186792 here].&lt;br /&gt;
*If the West is outdated, then why do millions of [[Poland|Poles]], [[Czechia|Czech]], [[Estonia]]ns, [[Romania]]ns, and others cherish so much the day they entered [[NATO]]? And why are millions of [[Ukraine|Ukrainians]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgians]], [[Moldova]]ns, and others desperately knocking on the doors of the [[European Union]]?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If [[freedom]] is no longer fashionable, how do we explain that the suicide of [[w:Mohamed Bouazizi|an unknown citizen]] in a remote [[Tunisia]]n town has [[w:Arab Spring|changed the map of the world]]?&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Armenia]] has been cornered and forced to sign Customs Union, which is not in this nation’s interest or in the interest of our region.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Moldova]] is being blockaded, Ukraine is under constant attack, [[Azerbaijan]] faces extraordinary pressure, and [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] is occupied.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Why? Because an old Empire is trying to reclaim its bygone borders. And ‘borders’ is actually not the right word, since this Empire – be it the [[Russian Empire]], the [[Soviet Union]], the [[Russian Federation]], or the [[w:Eurasian Union|Eurasian Union]] – never had borders. It only had margins.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I came today to speak in the name of these margins.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Unlike most nations, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russian Federation has no interest in having stable states around it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Neighboring countries in constant turmoil is what the Kremlin is seeking.&#039;&#039;&#039; It rejects the very idea of strong governments in Georgia, Ukraine, or Moldova, even ones that try to be friendly to its interests.&amp;lt;Br/&amp;gt;I was never a great fan of what the French call &#039;&#039;La langue de bois&#039;&#039;, but as my second term nears its end, I feel more than before the urge to speak my mind. So let us be concrete.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think that [[Vladimir Putin]] wants Armenia to decisively [[w:Nagorno-Karabakh conflict|triumph over Azerbaijan]], for instance? No. This would make Armenia too strong and potentially too independent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think then that the contrary is true, that Moscow wants Baku to prevail over Yerevan? Obviously not. The current rise of a modernized, dynamic Azerbaijan is a nightmare for the Russian leaders.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;No, they do not want anyone to prevail and the conflict itself is their objective, since it keeps both nations dependent and blocks their integration into the European common space.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think that the electoral defeat of the forces that led the [[w:Orange Revolution|Orange Revolution]] in Ukraine has led the Kremlin to take a softer approach to this country?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;To the contrary. I spoke yesterday to my colleague [[Viktor Yanukovych]]; his government is under constant attack and pressure from Russia and that’s what’s happening on the daily basis ahead of the European [Union Eastern Partnership] Summit of Vilnius and Russian officials now speak openly about dismembering this nation – I just heard speech two days ago.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think the Kremlin would agree to discuss the de-occupation of our regions of [[w:Abkhazia|Abkhazia]] and [[w:South Ossetia|South Ossetia]], now that the government has changed in Tbilisi? Far from it.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The annexation of Georgian lands by Russian troops continues.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yesterday, the occupants have expelled again Georgian citizens from their houses and are destroying them, are destroying their villages, homes and houses of their parents and grand-parents, [inaudible] their cemeteries in total impunity, water systems.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Despite the friendly statements made by the new Georgian government in the recent weeks and months, the Russian military keeps advancing its positions, dividing communities with new barbwires, threatening our economy, moving towards the vital [[w:Baku-Supsa pipeline|Baku-Supsa pipeline]], approaching more and more the main highway of Georgia and thus putting into question the very sustainability of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tbilisi Courtroom Address (2021)===&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not recognise the Prosecutor’s Office and the Georgian judiciary, I am not here to be part of a pre-written comedy &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(before adress) &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* I am Mikheil Saakashvili and Georgia did not have a criminal president [talks about himself]. I want every Georgian to know this. The founder of the Georgian state could not have been a criminal, because criminals do not establish states, they instead destroy them and you are [now] witnessing a classic example of that, as Georgia has fallen into the hands of bandits.&lt;br /&gt;
* Of course, I was in a hurry to develop Georgia and anyone who is in a rush makes mistakes. I knew that we had little time, I know that many things needed to be done. But I was speaking with my doctor, who was able to arrive from a village and enroll in the medical university, only because there were national exams. Otherwise, there were no chances to enroll, and when they were coming [to Tbilisi in the past] people used to question them if they knew how much [the bribe for] enrolling would cost. [My doctor] arrived, believed in me and enrolled. The program of American teachers – many of the young generation can speak English, because we used to bring over 2,500 teachers a year. Not only my or [[Bidzina Ivanishvili]]’s son were able to study, but any Georgian, from Lesichini village to Khulo and Zemo and Kveda Machkhaani. This was my concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* While I have told about my successes, did I make mistakes? [I made] more than enough; many mistakes that I bitterly regret. First of all, my mistake was the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Saakashvili, Mikheil}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1967 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Living people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lawyers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Prisoners]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Tbilisi]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3135836</id>
		<title>Mikheil Saakashvili</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3135836"/>
		<updated>2022-06-30T19:04:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Speech at the UN General Assembly, 25 September 2013. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili in Tbilisi, March 22, 2008.jpg|thumb|If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Mikheil Saakashvili|Mikheil Saakashvili]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (born [[21 December]] [[1967]]) is a former Georgian politician. He was the third President of [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] for two consecutive terms from 25 January 2004 to 17 November 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia does not need Russia as an enemy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.irishtimes.com/news/eu-integration-a-key-aim-of-saakashvili-1.1131478 &amp;quot;EU integration a key aim of Saakashvili&amp;quot;] (26 January 2004), &#039;&#039;Irish Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the first time in 15 years, Georgia this winter has its electric power guaranteed without deficit. This is a historic achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.deseretnews.com/article/635179976/Ebullience-in-Georgia-replaced-by-energy-crisis.html &amp;quot;Ebullience in Georgia replaced by energy crisis&amp;quot;] (29 January 2006), by Mike Eckel, &#039;&#039;Deseret News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A united Georgia needs our unity now, to work together towards our many common goals.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://civil.ge/archives/114132 Inaugural address] (21 January 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We must create the Georgia that our ancestors dreamed of, the Georgia that we dream of.&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted in [http://old.themoscowtimes.com/sitemap/free/2012/11/article/selling-the-georgian-dream/471822.html &amp;quot;Selling the Georgian Dream&amp;quot;] (23 November 2012), by Luka Oreskovic, &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inaugural address (2004)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia is the country of unique culture. We are not only old Europeans, we are the very first Europeans, and therefore Georgia holds special place in European civilization. Georgia should serve as a paragon for democracy where all citizens are equal before the law, where every citizen will have an equal opportunity for the pursuit of success and realization of his or her possibilities. Georgia should become and will become a homeland for independent, educated and proud people.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://old.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=26694 Inaugural address] (25 January 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
**Also quoted as: &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Georgia is not just a European country, but one of the most ancient European countries.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; in [https://books.google.com/books?id=XYPX1JmlIrsC&amp;amp;pg=PT274&amp;amp;lpg=PT274&amp;amp;dq=%22Georgia+is+not+just+a+European+country,+but+one+of+the+most+ancient+European+countries.%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=DSgcjrMGnd&amp;amp;sig=UyRLUFf5UzUR4KAVB96bGGSBm4o&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwje9JG-wOveAhXNmeAKHXnuAqEQ6AEwCnoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22Georgia%20is%20not%20just%20a%20European%20country%2C%20but%20one%20of%20the%20most%20ancient%20European%20countries.%22&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;A World of Curiosities: Surprising, Interesting, and Downright Unbelievable&#039;&#039;] (2012), by John Oldale, p. 274&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is time we Georgians did not depend only on others, it is time we asked what Georgia will do for the world.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our steady course is towards European integration. It is time Europe finally saw and valued Georgia and took steps towards us.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Standing at David&#039;s tomb, we must say Georgia will unite, Georgia will become strong and will restore its integrity... I want all of us to do it together and I promise not to become a source of shame for you. &lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Remarks to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2005)===&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hen the people of Georgia rose up to defend their freedom - they also rose up to reclaim their future. A future that would no longer be defined by the false promises, wholesale decay, and state disintegration of the recent past. A future no longer dominated by the politics of division, state-sanctioned theft and disregard for the poorest parts of society.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia&#039;s character - now and forever - celebrates tolerance, embraces diversity, relishes lively and open debate, and above all, respects liberty and human dignity. Georgia is a democracy, because above all - its national identity is rooted in the traditions of democracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First and foremost - our vision for a united and peaceful Georgia is based on respect for the desire - and respect for the right - to South Ossetian autonomy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview with the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; (2008)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Look, the rift with [[Russia]] is not connected to Georgia. It is connected to values. Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept free speech or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, killing me makes no sense because Georgia already has a Western-educated political class.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin told several Western leaders, “I want Saakashvili’s head.” If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4vSocpB9no Speech] at the [[UN]] General Assembly, 25 September 2013. ===&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript [https://civil.ge/archives/186792 here].&lt;br /&gt;
*If the West is outdated, then why do millions of [[Poland|Poles]], [[Czechia|Czech]], [[Estonia]]ns, [[Romania]]ns, and others cherish so much the day they entered [[NATO]]? And why are millions of [[Ukraine|Ukrainians]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgians]], [[Moldova]]ns, and others desperately knocking on the doors of the [[European Union]]?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If [[freedom]] is no longer fashionable, how do we explain that the suicide of [[w:Mohamed Bouazizi|an unknown citizen]] in a remote [[Tunisia]]n town has [[w:Arab Spring|changed the map of the world]]?&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Armenia]] has been cornered and forced to sign Customs Union, which is not in this nation’s interest or in the interest of our region.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Moldova]] is being blockaded, Ukraine is under constant attack, [[Azerbaijan]] faces extraordinary pressure, and [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] is occupied.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Why? Because an old Empire is trying to reclaim its bygone borders. And ‘borders’ is actually not the right word, since this Empire – be it the [[Russian Empire]], the [[Soviet Union]], the [[Russian Federation]], or the [[w:Eurasian Union|Eurasian Union]] – never had borders. It only had margins.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I came today to speak in the name of these margins.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Unlike most nations, the Russian Federation has no interest in having stable states around it.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Neighboring countries in constant turmoil is what the Kremlin is seeking. It rejects the very idea of strong governments in Georgia, Ukraine, or Moldova, even ones that try to be friendly to its interests.&amp;lt;Br/&amp;gt;I was never a great fan of what the French call &#039;&#039;La langue de bois&#039;&#039;, but as my second term nears its end, I feel more than before the urge to speak my mind. So let us be concrete.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think that [[Vladimir Putin]] wants Armenia to decisively [[w:Nagorno-Karabakh conflict|triumph over Azerbaijan]], for instance? No. This would make Armenia too strong and potentially too independent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think then that the contrary is true, that Moscow wants Baku to prevail over Yerevan? Obviously not. The current rise of a modernized, dynamic Azerbaijan is a nightmare for the Russian leaders.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;No, they do not want anyone to prevail and the conflict itself is their objective, since it keeps both nations dependent and blocks their integration into the European common space.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think that the electoral defeat of the forces that led the [[w:Orange Revolution|Orange Revolution]] in Ukraine has led the Kremlin to take a softer approach to this country?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;To the contrary. I spoke yesterday to my colleague [[Viktor Yanukovych]]; his government is under constant attack and pressure from Russia and that’s what’s happening on the daily basis ahead of the European [Union Eastern Partnership] Summit of Vilnius and Russian officials now speak openly about dismembering this nation – I just heard speech two days ago.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think the Kremlin would agree to discuss the de-occupation of our regions of [[w:Abkhazia|Abkhazia]] and [[w:South Ossetia|South Ossetia]], now that the government has changed in Tbilisi? Far from it.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The annexation of Georgian lands by Russian troops continues.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yesterday, the occupants have expelled again Georgian citizens from their houses and are destroying them, are destroying their villages, homes and houses of their parents and grand-parents, [inaudible] their cemeteries in total impunity, water systems.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Despite the friendly statements made by the new Georgian government in the recent weeks and months, the Russian military keeps advancing its positions, dividing communities with new barbwires, threatening our economy, moving towards the vital [[w:Baku-Supsa pipeline|Baku-Supsa pipeline]], approaching more and more the main highway of Georgia and thus putting into question the very sustainability of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tbilisi Courtroom Address (2021)===&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not recognise the Prosecutor’s Office and the Georgian judiciary, I am not here to be part of a pre-written comedy &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(before adress) &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* I am Mikheil Saakashvili and Georgia did not have a criminal president [talks about himself]. I want every Georgian to know this. The founder of the Georgian state could not have been a criminal, because criminals do not establish states, they instead destroy them and you are [now] witnessing a classic example of that, as Georgia has fallen into the hands of bandits.&lt;br /&gt;
* Of course, I was in a hurry to develop Georgia and anyone who is in a rush makes mistakes. I knew that we had little time, I know that many things needed to be done. But I was speaking with my doctor, who was able to arrive from a village and enroll in the medical university, only because there were national exams. Otherwise, there were no chances to enroll, and when they were coming [to Tbilisi in the past] people used to question them if they knew how much [the bribe for] enrolling would cost. [My doctor] arrived, believed in me and enrolled. The program of American teachers – many of the young generation can speak English, because we used to bring over 2,500 teachers a year. Not only my or [[Bidzina Ivanishvili]]’s son were able to study, but any Georgian, from Lesichini village to Khulo and Zemo and Kveda Machkhaani. This was my concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* While I have told about my successes, did I make mistakes? [I made] more than enough; many mistakes that I bitterly regret. First of all, my mistake was the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Saakashvili, Mikheil}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1967 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Living people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lawyers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Prisoners]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Tbilisi]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3135835</id>
		<title>Mikheil Saakashvili</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3135835"/>
		<updated>2022-06-30T19:03:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Speech at the UN General Assembly, 25 September 2013. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili in Tbilisi, March 22, 2008.jpg|thumb|If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Mikheil Saakashvili|Mikheil Saakashvili]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (born [[21 December]] [[1967]]) is a former Georgian politician. He was the third President of [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] for two consecutive terms from 25 January 2004 to 17 November 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia does not need Russia as an enemy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.irishtimes.com/news/eu-integration-a-key-aim-of-saakashvili-1.1131478 &amp;quot;EU integration a key aim of Saakashvili&amp;quot;] (26 January 2004), &#039;&#039;Irish Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the first time in 15 years, Georgia this winter has its electric power guaranteed without deficit. This is a historic achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.deseretnews.com/article/635179976/Ebullience-in-Georgia-replaced-by-energy-crisis.html &amp;quot;Ebullience in Georgia replaced by energy crisis&amp;quot;] (29 January 2006), by Mike Eckel, &#039;&#039;Deseret News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A united Georgia needs our unity now, to work together towards our many common goals.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://civil.ge/archives/114132 Inaugural address] (21 January 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We must create the Georgia that our ancestors dreamed of, the Georgia that we dream of.&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted in [http://old.themoscowtimes.com/sitemap/free/2012/11/article/selling-the-georgian-dream/471822.html &amp;quot;Selling the Georgian Dream&amp;quot;] (23 November 2012), by Luka Oreskovic, &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inaugural address (2004)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia is the country of unique culture. We are not only old Europeans, we are the very first Europeans, and therefore Georgia holds special place in European civilization. Georgia should serve as a paragon for democracy where all citizens are equal before the law, where every citizen will have an equal opportunity for the pursuit of success and realization of his or her possibilities. Georgia should become and will become a homeland for independent, educated and proud people.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://old.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=26694 Inaugural address] (25 January 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
**Also quoted as: &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Georgia is not just a European country, but one of the most ancient European countries.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; in [https://books.google.com/books?id=XYPX1JmlIrsC&amp;amp;pg=PT274&amp;amp;lpg=PT274&amp;amp;dq=%22Georgia+is+not+just+a+European+country,+but+one+of+the+most+ancient+European+countries.%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=DSgcjrMGnd&amp;amp;sig=UyRLUFf5UzUR4KAVB96bGGSBm4o&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwje9JG-wOveAhXNmeAKHXnuAqEQ6AEwCnoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22Georgia%20is%20not%20just%20a%20European%20country%2C%20but%20one%20of%20the%20most%20ancient%20European%20countries.%22&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;A World of Curiosities: Surprising, Interesting, and Downright Unbelievable&#039;&#039;] (2012), by John Oldale, p. 274&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is time we Georgians did not depend only on others, it is time we asked what Georgia will do for the world.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our steady course is towards European integration. It is time Europe finally saw and valued Georgia and took steps towards us.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Standing at David&#039;s tomb, we must say Georgia will unite, Georgia will become strong and will restore its integrity... I want all of us to do it together and I promise not to become a source of shame for you. &lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Remarks to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2005)===&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hen the people of Georgia rose up to defend their freedom - they also rose up to reclaim their future. A future that would no longer be defined by the false promises, wholesale decay, and state disintegration of the recent past. A future no longer dominated by the politics of division, state-sanctioned theft and disregard for the poorest parts of society.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia&#039;s character - now and forever - celebrates tolerance, embraces diversity, relishes lively and open debate, and above all, respects liberty and human dignity. Georgia is a democracy, because above all - its national identity is rooted in the traditions of democracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First and foremost - our vision for a united and peaceful Georgia is based on respect for the desire - and respect for the right - to South Ossetian autonomy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview with the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; (2008)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Look, the rift with [[Russia]] is not connected to Georgia. It is connected to values. Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept free speech or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, killing me makes no sense because Georgia already has a Western-educated political class.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin told several Western leaders, “I want Saakashvili’s head.” If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4vSocpB9no Speech] at the [[UN]] General Assembly, 25 September 2013. ===&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript [https://civil.ge/archives/186792 here].&lt;br /&gt;
*If the West is outdated, then why do millions of [[Poland|Poles]], [[Czechia|Czech]], [[Estonia]]ns, [[Romania]]ns, and others cherish so much the day they entered [[NATO]]? And why are millions of [[Ukraine|Ukrainians]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgians]], [[Moldova]]ns, and others desperately knocking on the doors of the [[European Union]]?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If [[freedom]] is no longer fashionable, how do we explain that the suicide of [[w:Mohamed Bouazizi|an unknown citizen]] in a remote [[Tunisia]]n town has [[w:Arab Spring|changed the map of the world]]?&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Armenia]] has been cornered and forced to sign Customs Union, which is not in this nation’s interest or in the interest of our region.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Moldova]] is being blockaded, Ukraine is under constant attack, [[Azerbaijan]] faces extraordinary pressure, and [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] is occupied.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Why? Because an old Empire is trying to reclaim its bygone borders. And ‘borders’ is actually not the right word, since this Empire – be it the [[Russian Empire]], the [[Soviet Union]], the [[Russian Federation]], or the [[w:Eurasian Union|Eurasian Union]] – never had borders. It only had margins.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I came today to speak in the name of these margins.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Unlike most nations, the Russian Federation has no interest in having stable states around it.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Neighboring countries in constant turmoil is what the Kremlin is seeking. It rejects the very idea of strong governments in Georgia, Ukraine, or Moldova, even ones that try to be friendly to its interests.&amp;lt;Br/&amp;gt;I was never a great fan of what the French call &#039;&#039;La langue de bois&#039;&#039;, but as my second term nears its end, I feel more than before the urge to speak my mind. So let us be concrete.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think that [[Vladimir Putin]] wants Armenia to decisively [[w:Nagorno-Karabakh conflict|triumph over Azerbaijan]], for instance? No. This would make Armenia too strong and potentially too independent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think then that the contrary is true, that Moscow wants Baku to prevail over Yerevan? Obviously not. The current rise of a modernized, dynamic Azerbaijan is a nightmare for the Russian leaders.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;No, they do not want anyone to prevail and the conflict itself is their objective, since it keeps both nations dependent and blocks their integration into the European common space.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think that the electoral defeat of the forces that led the [[w:Orange Revolution|Orange Revolution]] in Ukraine has led the Kremlin to take a softer approach to this country?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;To the contrary. I spoke yesterday to my colleague [[Viktor Yanukovych]]; his government is under constant attack and pressure from Russia and that’s what’s happening on the daily basis ahead of the European [Union Eastern Partnership] Summit of Vilnius and Russian officials now speak openly about dismembering this nation – I just heard speech two days ago.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you think the Kremlin would agree to discuss the de-occupation of our regions of [[w:Abkhazia|Abkhazia]] and [[w:South Ossetia|South Ossetia]], now that the government has changed in Tbilisi? Far from it.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The annexation of Georgian lands by Russian troops continues.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yesterday, the occupants have expelled again Georgian citizens from their houses and are destroying them, are destroying their villages, homes and houses of their parents and grand-parents, [inaudible] their cemeteries in total impunity, water systems.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Despite the friendly statements made by the new Georgian government in the recent weeks and months, the Russian military keeps advancing its positions, dividing communities with new barbwires, threatening our economy, moving towards the vital Baku-Supsa pipeline, approaching more and more the main highway of Georgia and thus putting into question the very sustainability of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tbilisi Courtroom Address (2021)===&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not recognise the Prosecutor’s Office and the Georgian judiciary, I am not here to be part of a pre-written comedy &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(before adress) &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* I am Mikheil Saakashvili and Georgia did not have a criminal president [talks about himself]. I want every Georgian to know this. The founder of the Georgian state could not have been a criminal, because criminals do not establish states, they instead destroy them and you are [now] witnessing a classic example of that, as Georgia has fallen into the hands of bandits.&lt;br /&gt;
* Of course, I was in a hurry to develop Georgia and anyone who is in a rush makes mistakes. I knew that we had little time, I know that many things needed to be done. But I was speaking with my doctor, who was able to arrive from a village and enroll in the medical university, only because there were national exams. Otherwise, there were no chances to enroll, and when they were coming [to Tbilisi in the past] people used to question them if they knew how much [the bribe for] enrolling would cost. [My doctor] arrived, believed in me and enrolled. The program of American teachers – many of the young generation can speak English, because we used to bring over 2,500 teachers a year. Not only my or [[Bidzina Ivanishvili]]’s son were able to study, but any Georgian, from Lesichini village to Khulo and Zemo and Kveda Machkhaani. This was my concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* While I have told about my successes, did I make mistakes? [I made] more than enough; many mistakes that I bitterly regret. First of all, my mistake was the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Saakashvili, Mikheil}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1967 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Living people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lawyers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Prisoners]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Tbilisi]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3135832</id>
		<title>Mikheil Saakashvili</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Mikheil_Saakashvili&amp;diff=3135832"/>
		<updated>2022-06-30T18:42:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: 2013 UN speech&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili in Tbilisi, March 22, 2008.jpg|thumb|If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Mikheil Saakashvili|Mikheil Saakashvili]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (born [[21 December]] [[1967]]) is a former Georgian politician. He was the third President of [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]] for two consecutive terms from 25 January 2004 to 17 November 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia does not need Russia as an enemy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.irishtimes.com/news/eu-integration-a-key-aim-of-saakashvili-1.1131478 &amp;quot;EU integration a key aim of Saakashvili&amp;quot;] (26 January 2004), &#039;&#039;Irish Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the first time in 15 years, Georgia this winter has its electric power guaranteed without deficit. This is a historic achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.deseretnews.com/article/635179976/Ebullience-in-Georgia-replaced-by-energy-crisis.html &amp;quot;Ebullience in Georgia replaced by energy crisis&amp;quot;] (29 January 2006), by Mike Eckel, &#039;&#039;Deseret News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A united Georgia needs our unity now, to work together towards our many common goals.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://civil.ge/archives/114132 Inaugural address] (21 January 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We must create the Georgia that our ancestors dreamed of, the Georgia that we dream of.&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted in [http://old.themoscowtimes.com/sitemap/free/2012/11/article/selling-the-georgian-dream/471822.html &amp;quot;Selling the Georgian Dream&amp;quot;] (23 November 2012), by Luka Oreskovic, &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inaugural address (2004)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia is the country of unique culture. We are not only old Europeans, we are the very first Europeans, and therefore Georgia holds special place in European civilization. Georgia should serve as a paragon for democracy where all citizens are equal before the law, where every citizen will have an equal opportunity for the pursuit of success and realization of his or her possibilities. Georgia should become and will become a homeland for independent, educated and proud people.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://old.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=26694 Inaugural address] (25 January 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
**Also quoted as: &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Georgia is not just a European country, but one of the most ancient European countries.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; in [https://books.google.com/books?id=XYPX1JmlIrsC&amp;amp;pg=PT274&amp;amp;lpg=PT274&amp;amp;dq=%22Georgia+is+not+just+a+European+country,+but+one+of+the+most+ancient+European+countries.%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=DSgcjrMGnd&amp;amp;sig=UyRLUFf5UzUR4KAVB96bGGSBm4o&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwje9JG-wOveAhXNmeAKHXnuAqEQ6AEwCnoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22Georgia%20is%20not%20just%20a%20European%20country%2C%20but%20one%20of%20the%20most%20ancient%20European%20countries.%22&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;A World of Curiosities: Surprising, Interesting, and Downright Unbelievable&#039;&#039;] (2012), by John Oldale, p. 274&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is time we Georgians did not depend only on others, it is time we asked what Georgia will do for the world.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our steady course is towards European integration. It is time Europe finally saw and valued Georgia and took steps towards us.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Standing at David&#039;s tomb, we must say Georgia will unite, Georgia will become strong and will restore its integrity... I want all of us to do it together and I promise not to become a source of shame for you. &lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3426977.stm &amp;quot;Georgia swears in new president&amp;quot;] (25 January 2004), &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Remarks to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (2005)===&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hen the people of Georgia rose up to defend their freedom - they also rose up to reclaim their future. A future that would no longer be defined by the false promises, wholesale decay, and state disintegration of the recent past. A future no longer dominated by the politics of division, state-sanctioned theft and disregard for the poorest parts of society.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Georgia&#039;s character - now and forever - celebrates tolerance, embraces diversity, relishes lively and open debate, and above all, respects liberty and human dignity. Georgia is a democracy, because above all - its national identity is rooted in the traditions of democracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First and foremost - our vision for a united and peaceful Georgia is based on respect for the desire - and respect for the right - to South Ossetian autonomy.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://reliefweb.int/report/georgia/remarks-president-georgia-he-mikheil-saakashvili-parliamentary-assembly-council &amp;quot;Remarks of the President of Georgia H.E. Mikheil Saakashvili to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe&amp;quot;] (26 January 2005), &#039;&#039;ReliefWeb&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview with the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; (2008)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Look, the rift with [[Russia]] is not connected to Georgia. It is connected to values. Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept free speech or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, killing me makes no sense because Georgia already has a Western-educated political class.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin told several Western leaders, “I want Saakashvili’s head.” If they want my head, for me it’s more funny than troubling.&lt;br /&gt;
**As quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4vSocpB9no Speech] at the [[UN]] General Assembly, 25 September 2013. ===&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript [https://civil.ge/archives/186792 here].&lt;br /&gt;
*If the West is outdated, then why do millions of [[Poland|Poles]], [[Czechia|Czech]], [[Estonia]]ns, [[Romania]]ns, and others cherish so much the day they entered [[NATO]]? And why are millions of [[Ukraine|Ukrainians]], [[Georgia (country)|Georgians]], [[Moldova]]ns, and others desperately knocking on the doors of the [[European Union]]?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If [[freedom]] is no longer fashionable, how do we explain that the suicide of [[w:Mohamed Bouazizi|an unknown citizen]] in a remote [[Tunisia]]n town has [[w:Arab Spring|changed the map of the world]]?&lt;br /&gt;
===Tbilisi Courtroom Address (2021)===&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not recognise the Prosecutor’s Office and the Georgian judiciary, I am not here to be part of a pre-written comedy &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(before adress) &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* I am Mikheil Saakashvili and Georgia did not have a criminal president [talks about himself]. I want every Georgian to know this. The founder of the Georgian state could not have been a criminal, because criminals do not establish states, they instead destroy them and you are [now] witnessing a classic example of that, as Georgia has fallen into the hands of bandits.&lt;br /&gt;
* Of course, I was in a hurry to develop Georgia and anyone who is in a rush makes mistakes. I knew that we had little time, I know that many things needed to be done. But I was speaking with my doctor, who was able to arrive from a village and enroll in the medical university, only because there were national exams. Otherwise, there were no chances to enroll, and when they were coming [to Tbilisi in the past] people used to question them if they knew how much [the bribe for] enrolling would cost. [My doctor] arrived, believed in me and enrolled. The program of American teachers – many of the young generation can speak English, because we used to bring over 2,500 teachers a year. Not only my or [[Bidzina Ivanishvili]]’s son were able to study, but any Georgian, from Lesichini village to Khulo and Zemo and Kveda Machkhaani. This was my concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* While I have told about my successes, did I make mistakes? [I made] more than enough; many mistakes that I bitterly regret. First of all, my mistake was the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Saakashvili, Mikheil}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1967 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Living people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lawyers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Prisoners]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Tbilisi]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135709</id>
		<title>Israel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135709"/>
		<updated>2022-06-30T08:42:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* K */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Coatrack|date=July 2021|details=a potential majority of quotes and sum of their text relate to [[w:Israeli-Palestinian conflict|global political debates of much recency]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{for|Patriarch of the Israelites|Jacob}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Israel.svg|thumb|It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. ~ [[David Ben-Gurion]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Israel|Israel]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, officially the &#039;&#039;&#039;State of Israel&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country in the [[Middle East]], situated at the southeastern shore of the [[w:Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean Sea]] and the northern shore of the [[w:Gulf of Aqaba|Gulf of Aqaba]] in the [[w:Red Sea|Red Sea]]. It shares land borders with [[w:Lebanon|Lebanon]] to the north, [[w:Syria|Syria]] in the northeast, [[w:Jordan|Jordan]] on the east, [[w:Judea and Samaria|Judea and Samaria]] and the [[w:Gaza Strip|Gaza Strip]] to the east and west, respectively, which are claimed by the [[w:State of Palestine|State of Palestine]], and [[Egypt]] to the southwest. It contains geographically diverse features within its relatively small area. Israel&#039;s [[w:Financial centre|financial]] and [[w:List of technology centers|technology]] center is [[w:Tel Aviv|Tel Aviv]], while [[Jerusalem]] is both its self-designated capital (though unrecognised by the [[United Nations]]) and its [[w:List of cities in Israel|most populous individual city]] under the country&#039;s governmental administration. Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem is [[w:Positions on Jerusalem|internationally disputed]]. In its [[w:Basic Laws of Israel|Basic Laws]], Israel defines itself as a &amp;quot;[[Jewish and Democratic State]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emblem of Israel.svg|thumb|The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems... But only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki_Israel_7238_Cities_in_Israel.JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to do nation building in Israel, we&#039;re already built. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Knesset_Building_(South_Side).JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to export democracy to Israel, we&#039;ve already got it. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Israel - Tel Aviv Beach 001.JPG|thumb|Israel is not what is wrong about the Middle East, Israel is what is &#039;&#039;right&#039;&#039; about the Middle East. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rabin_Squre_eco_pool.jpg|thumb|For the rest of our lives, and the lives of our children, we are going to be confronted by people who don&#039;t want to live peacefully in a secular pluralistic world because they are desperate to get to paradise, and they are willing to destroy the very possibility of human happiness along the way. The truth is, we are all living in Israel; it&#039;s just that some of us haven&#039;t realized it yet. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel_Aviv_Skyline_(night)_-_2.jpg|thumb|If the light of Israel is extinguished, we will all face darkness... That is why we are all Israel. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(2691) Tel Aviv.jpg|thumb|Israel remains and embattled democracy in the midst of authoritarian states, and the birthplace of the kibbutz to which tens of thousands of youth from around the world have turned for a living lesson in human equality. ~ Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki Israel 6097 Environment of Israel.JPG|thumb|Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality. ~ [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel-aviv-playa.JPG|thumb|What would the Israelis do if they could do what they want? They would live in peace with their neighbors. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brother%27s_Keeper_Operation_in_Judea_%26_Samaria_(14255641587).jpg|thumb|The Israeli people understand now what I always say... We will defend ourselves on every front, defensively and offensively. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Standing Guard in Nablus.jpg|thumb|Israel is not just fighting for itself. Israel is fighting for all of us. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - IAF Flight for Israel&#039;s 63rd Independence Day.jpg|thumb|Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants. The Israelis do not want to kill non-combatants, because they could kill as many as they want, and they’re not doing it. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Orrling of Palestine.jpg|thumb|You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public. ~ [[Bashar al-Assad]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*If you want to see the picture, you have to see whole picture, if you talked about violence, let&#039;s talk about 4000 Palestinians killed during the last five years while from Israeli side a few hundreds killed. So, if you want to talk about the violence and you called this violence &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot; Israel kills more, more Palestinian than Palestinian kills on Israel, Second, You have to see both sides. You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public, they said &amp;quot;we&#039;re going to kill...&amp;quot; It&#039;s the whole picture. Anyway, doesn&#039;t matter what label we put, if you want to have the solution, we have to deal with the facts, not the terms. whether they are terrorists or not, this is not the problem. we have to deal with the facts, and the facts if you don&#039;t have peace, you will have more blood-letting&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bashar al-Assad]], &#039;&#039;Interview with Charlie Rose&#039;&#039;, (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
* If the Jewish state becomes a [[fact]], and this is realized by the Arab peoples, they will drive the Jews who live in their midst into the sea.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hassan Banna]], [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10E13FF385A157B93C0A91783D85F4C8485F9 AIM TO OUST JEWS PLEDGED BY SHEIKH, New York Times, August 02, 1948]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The citizens of Israel were the first in the world to receive the third dose of the [[Covid-19 vaccine]] and we are continuing to [[pioneer]] with the fourth dose as well,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bennett]]  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/21/middleeast/israel-fourth-covid-vaccine-booster-intl/index.html Israel begins fourth Covid-19 dose vaccine rollout for people 60 and over as Omicron cases surge]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (December 21, 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. And unless we show the Arabs that there is a high price to pay for murdering Jews, we won&#039;t survive.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], as quoted by [[Ariel Sharon]], in the documentary &#039;&#039;The 50 Years War : Israel &amp;amp; The Arabs&#039;&#039; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This life as a simple citizen and laborer has its benefits not only for the person himself but perhaps also for his country. After all, there is room for only one Prime Minister, but for those who make the desert bloom there is room for hundreds, thousands and even millions. And the destiny of the state is in the hands of the many rather than of a single individual. There are times when an individual feels he should do those things which only can and should be done by the many.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], &amp;quot;Why I Retired to the Desert&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (28 March 1954), p. 47.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In Israel, in order to be a realist you must believe in miracles.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], interview on CBS (5 October 1956), as quoted in &#039;&#039;Israel: Years of Crisis Years of Hope&#039;&#039; (1973) by Roman Frister, p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel has fought one battle after another, clinging to survival in the decades after its people were systematically murdered during the [[Holocaust]]. But the story of self-determination and Arab-Israeli conflicts spills out far beyond the borders of the Middle East. Israel wasn’t just the site of regional disputes—it was a [[Cold War]] satellite, wrapped up in the interests of the [[Soviets]] and the [[Americans]]. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The U.S.S.R. started exerting regional influence in a meaningful way in 1955, when it began supplying [[Egypt]] with military equipment. The next year, [[Britain]] and the U.S. withdrew financing for Egypt’s Aswan High Dam project over the country’s ties with the U.S.S.R. That move triggered the Suez Crisis of 1956, in which Egypt, with the support of the USSR, [[nationalized]] the [[w:Suez Canal|Suez Canal]], which had previously been controlled by [[French]] and British interests.&lt;br /&gt;
** Lorraine Boissoneault, [https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-six-day-war-tells-us-about-cold-war-180963590/ “What the Six-Day War Tells Us About the Cold War”], &#039;&#039;Smithsonian.com&#039;&#039;, (June 6, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel and its Arab neighbours had plenty of reasons for hatred or mutual suspicion. But the Cold War in the 1950s and 1960s added extra fuel. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The Soviet Union provided Egypt with a modern air force. Israel had warm relations with the United States], but it was not yet the biggest recipient of American military aid; in the 1960s Israel also bought aircraft from France and tanks from Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
** Jeremy Bowen, [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39960461 &amp;quot;1967 war: Six days that changed the Middle East&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;BBC&#039;&#039;, (5 June 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is in an existential crisis. It can wall itself off and annex what it wants on the West Bank, and leave Palestinians in tiny truncated, nonviable bantustans that will become the spawning pools of terror. Or it can give the Palestinians what Oslo, Camp David, Taba and the &#039;roadmap&#039; promised; a homeland, a nation and a state of their own. Israel is free to choose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pat Buchanan]], Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a country in which a clear majority of the population, battered by wars and terrorism and heartbreak and frustration, still wants to see negotiations leading to a Palestinian state alongside Israel, and an end to occupation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bradley Burston]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/a-special-place-in-hell/what-does-death-to-israel-mean-to-you-1.393497 What Does &#039;Death to Israel&#039; Mean to You?]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;{{w|Haaretz}}&#039;&#039; (November 03, 2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
*You mess with Israel, you are messing with the United States of America. It&#039;s that simple.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herman Cain]], as quoted in [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/05/20/herman_cain_obama_threw_israel_under_the_bus.html &#039;&#039;Real Clear Politics&#039;&#039;] (20 May 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel will never find peace until it is willing to withdraw from its neighbors’ land and to permit the Palestinians to exercise their basic human and political rights... The current policies are leading toward an immoral outcome that is undermining Israel’s standing in the world and is not bringing security to the people of Israel.... These same premises, of recognizing Israel, acceptance of all past agreements, and the rejection of violence, will have to be accepted by Hamas and any government that represents the Palestinians. The long-term prospects are not discouraging... an overwhelming majority of Palestinians and Israelis support peace for Israel based on the acceptance of Israel of its international borders with some modifications, with justice and peace for the Palestinians. An early exchange of the three Israeli soldiers for some of the 10,000 Palestinian prisoners will expedite the peace process. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jimmy Carter]]  in [[Palestine Peace Not Apartheid|&#039;&#039;Palestine Peace Not Apartheid&#039;&#039;]] (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And Israel is not only our ally; it is a beacon of what democracy can and should mean… If the people of the Middle East are not sure what democracy means, let them look to Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
* In defeating terror, Israel’s cause is our cause.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hillary Clinton]], [http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0550,lombardi,70903,2.html Hanukkah dinner speech] at [[w:Yeshiva University|Yeshiva University]] (December 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
* We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state here. In considerable areas of the country we bought lands from the Arabs. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist; not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal arose in the place of Mahalul, Gevat — in the place of Jibta, Sarid — in the place of Haneifs and Kefar Yehoshua — in the place of Tell Shaman. There is no one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moshe Dayan]], From an address given to Technion University students (19 March 1969), a transcription of which appeared in &#039;&#039;Ha&#039;aretz&#039;&#039; (4 April 1969), quoted in [http://books.google.com.br/books?id=Pa89AAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA14#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;The Question of Palestine&#039;&#039; (1980) by Edward Said, p. 14]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It would have seemed more sensible to me to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically-burdened land….I can raise no sympathy at all for the misdirected piety which transforms a piece of a Herodian wall into a national relic, thereby offending the feelings of the natives.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sigmund Freud ]] Letter to Dr. Chaim Koffler Keren Ha Yassod, Vienna: Feburary, 26, 1930&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not even a state. From an international law viewpoint, the existence of the so-called Israel is illegal. Israelis and Palestinians live on the same piece of land namely; Palestine that is located between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean. This is a disputed land. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Muammar Gaddafi]], [http://english.algaddafi.org/the-address-of-brother-leader-to-the-students-and-faculty-of-meiji-university-japan.html The Address of Brother Leader to the Students and Faculty of Meiji University, Japan] (15 December 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;I urge Israel to cease demolitions and evictions in the [[Palestine|Occupied Palestinian Territory]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, including East Jerusalem, in line with its obligations under [[rule of law|international humanitarian and human rights law]]. All settlement activities, including evictions and demolitions, are illegal under [[international law]]. A revitalized peace process is the only route to a just and lasting solution...Only through renewing our commitment and redoubling our efforts towards a negotiated solution can we bring this [[Cruelty|cruel]] violence and [[hatred]] to a definitive end.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[António Guterres]],  Secretary-General’s Remarks to the General Assembly Meeting on the Situation in the Middle East and Palestine, United Nations Secretary-General, Statements, (20 May 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel isn&#039;t &#039;Jewish&#039; in the sense that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are &#039;Muslim&#039;... Israel is actually less religious than the U.S., and it guarantees freedom of religion to its citizens. Israel is not a theocracy, and one could easily argue that its Jewish identity is more cultural than religious. However, if we ask why the Jews wouldn’t move to British Columbia if offered a home there, we can see the role that religion still plays in their thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sam Harris]], [http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/why-dont-i-criticize-israel &amp;quot;Why Don&#039;t I Criticize Israel?&amp;quot;] (27 July 2014), &#039;&#039;Sam Harris&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
*WE DECLARE that, with effect from the moment of the termination of the Mandate being tonight, the eve of Sabbath, the 6th Iyar, 5708 (15th May, 1948), until the establishment of the elected, regular authorities of the State in accordance with the Constitution which shall be adopted by the Elected Constituent Assembly not later than the 1st October 1948, the People&#039;s Council shall act as a Provisional Council of State, and its executive organ, the People&#039;s Administration, shall be the Provisional Government of the Jewish State, to be called &amp;quot;Israel&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*THE STATE OF ISRAEL will be open for Jewish immigration and for the Ingathering of the Exiles; it will foster the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants; it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel; it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex; it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions; and it will be faithful to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
* It had a great and lofty wall and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names were inscribed which are those of the twelve tribes of the sons of Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John the Evangelist]], Revelation 21:12, [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Like prosperous and peaceful Japan on the one hand, and war-torn and poverty-wracked Armenia on the other, Israel is a classic national-ethnic organism. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Robert D. Kaplan|Robert D. Kaplan]], [https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/02/the-coming-anarchy/304670/ &amp;quot;The Coming Anarchy&amp;quot;] (1994), &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], March 25, 1968, less than 2 weeks before his death&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Translated quote|quote=I am a [[Jew]] and want to live in a Jewish state. This is my inalienable right, the same as the right of a [[w:Ukrainians|Ukrainian]] to live in [[Ukraine]], the right of a [[Russians|Russian]] to live in [[Russia]], the right of a [[w:Georgian people|Georgian]] to live in [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. I want to live in Israel. This is my dream, this is the goal not only of my life, but of the lives of hundreds of generations of my forerunners… I want my children to learn [[w:Hebrew|Hebrew]], I want to read Hebrew newspapers, I want to go to the [[w:Jewish theater|Jewish theater]]. What&#039;s bad in this? Where am I to blame? .. As long as I&#039;m alive, I will devote all my efforts to obtaining permission to leave for Israel. And if you see fit to put me in jail, it won&#039;t change anything for me. And if I live to see my release, I will be ready to go to the homeland of my ancestors, even if for this I need to go by foot|original= |comment=Cited [http://kosharovsky.com/%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B8/%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC-1/%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C-iii-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%B8-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81/%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0-12-%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D1%8C-%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE/ here] by [https://he-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/%D7%99%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99_%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%91%D7%A1%D7%A7%D7%99?_x_tr_sl=iw&amp;amp;_x_tr_tl=en&amp;amp;_x_tr_hl=en&amp;amp;_x_tr_pto=wapp Yuli Kosharkovsky].|author=[[w:Kyiv|Kievan]] Jew Boris Kochubievsky, in a letter to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU [[Leonid Brezhnev]] after having been [[w:Refusenik|refused permission to leave for Israel]], November 1968. For this prose, he was [https://ru.openlist.wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81_%D0%9B%D1%8C%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_(1936) awarded] with 3 years in a [[w:Corrective labor colony|penal labor colony]].}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[P]eople misunderstand Israel, and see it now in colonial, imperialist terms is because it’s a unique event in human history. The British colonization of North America, New Zealand, Australia, the Dutch in South Africa, they came to places that they had never been to. That’s colonialism. You put your people in there. You takeover.  You marginalize the natives if you can.  You may not succeed. In South Africa, that’s colonialism. So they see the Jews arriving in what’s called Palestine, and that’s the parallel, the only one they understand. They can’t put their heads around the fact that this is a people returning to their home. That they never gave up title to. They never gave up their longing for. It was repeated in their rituals three times a day, it wasn’t like once a year, let’s remember the homeland.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Krauthammer]], [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/charles-krauthammer/ interview with Bill Kristol] (13 March 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We have always said that in our war with the Arabs we had a secret weapon — no alternative.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Egyptians could run to Egypt, the Syrians into Syria. The only place we could run was into the sea, and before we did that we might as well fight.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;LIFE&#039;&#039; magazine (3 October 1969), p. 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let me tell you something that we Israelis have against Moses. He took us 40 years through the desert in order to bring us to the one spot in the Middle East that has no oil!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], at a dinner honoring West German Chancellor Willy Brandt, as reported in &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (10 June 1973).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ladies and gentlemen, the people of Israel have come home never to be uprooted again.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Netanyahu]], [https://archive.is/hZjh9#selection-723.6-723.114 address to the United Nations General Assembly] (1 October 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Since Israel is a democratic state surrounded by essentially undemocratic states which have sworn her destruction, those interested in democracy everywhere must support Israel’s existence.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bayard Rustin]], [https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/history/articles/bayard-rustin-mlk Civil Rights Hero Bayard Rustin]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel is not consistent in its new anti-[[apartheid]] attitude... they took Israel away from the Arabs after the Arabs lived there for a thousand years. In that, I agree with them. Israel, like South Africa, is an apartheid state.&lt;br /&gt;
**H.F. Verwoerd, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Empire&#039;s New Walls: Sovereignty, Neo-liberalism, and the Production of Space in Post-apartheid South Africa and Post-Oslo Palestine/Israel.&#039;&#039;, by Andrew James Clarno. 2009. pp. 66–67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===W===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If it is proper to ’reconstitute’ a Jewish State which has not existed for two thousand years, why not go back another thousand years and reconstitute the Canaanite state? The Canaanites, unlike the Jews, are still there. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.G. Wells]], Palestine Dilemma, Sakran, Frank C., p.204&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is a Western democracy … The so-called &#039;Middle East conflict&#039; is not about land at all. It is not a territorial conflict. It&#039;s a conflict about ideologies; it&#039;s a battle between Islam and freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geert Wilders]], [http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=1604:speech-geert-wilders-mp--columbia-university-new-york-october-21-2009&amp;amp;catid=87:news remarks at the Free Speech Summit] Columbia University, New York (21 October 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Israel and the apartheid analogy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jewish and Democratic State]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Palestine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Zionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/Israel}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/israel Quotes About Israel] on GoodReads&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://jerusalemprayerteam.org/famous-quotes.asp Famous Quotes About Israel From World Leaders]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.tlvfaces.com/the-18-most-inspiring-quotes-about-israel/ The 18 Most Inspiring Quotes about Israel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Israel| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135708</id>
		<title>Israel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135708"/>
		<updated>2022-06-30T08:40:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* K */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Coatrack|date=July 2021|details=a potential majority of quotes and sum of their text relate to [[w:Israeli-Palestinian conflict|global political debates of much recency]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{for|Patriarch of the Israelites|Jacob}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Israel.svg|thumb|It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. ~ [[David Ben-Gurion]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Israel|Israel]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, officially the &#039;&#039;&#039;State of Israel&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country in the [[Middle East]], situated at the southeastern shore of the [[w:Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean Sea]] and the northern shore of the [[w:Gulf of Aqaba|Gulf of Aqaba]] in the [[w:Red Sea|Red Sea]]. It shares land borders with [[w:Lebanon|Lebanon]] to the north, [[w:Syria|Syria]] in the northeast, [[w:Jordan|Jordan]] on the east, [[w:Judea and Samaria|Judea and Samaria]] and the [[w:Gaza Strip|Gaza Strip]] to the east and west, respectively, which are claimed by the [[w:State of Palestine|State of Palestine]], and [[Egypt]] to the southwest. It contains geographically diverse features within its relatively small area. Israel&#039;s [[w:Financial centre|financial]] and [[w:List of technology centers|technology]] center is [[w:Tel Aviv|Tel Aviv]], while [[Jerusalem]] is both its self-designated capital (though unrecognised by the [[United Nations]]) and its [[w:List of cities in Israel|most populous individual city]] under the country&#039;s governmental administration. Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem is [[w:Positions on Jerusalem|internationally disputed]]. In its [[w:Basic Laws of Israel|Basic Laws]], Israel defines itself as a &amp;quot;[[Jewish and Democratic State]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emblem of Israel.svg|thumb|The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems... But only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki_Israel_7238_Cities_in_Israel.JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to do nation building in Israel, we&#039;re already built. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Knesset_Building_(South_Side).JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to export democracy to Israel, we&#039;ve already got it. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Israel - Tel Aviv Beach 001.JPG|thumb|Israel is not what is wrong about the Middle East, Israel is what is &#039;&#039;right&#039;&#039; about the Middle East. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rabin_Squre_eco_pool.jpg|thumb|For the rest of our lives, and the lives of our children, we are going to be confronted by people who don&#039;t want to live peacefully in a secular pluralistic world because they are desperate to get to paradise, and they are willing to destroy the very possibility of human happiness along the way. The truth is, we are all living in Israel; it&#039;s just that some of us haven&#039;t realized it yet. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel_Aviv_Skyline_(night)_-_2.jpg|thumb|If the light of Israel is extinguished, we will all face darkness... That is why we are all Israel. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(2691) Tel Aviv.jpg|thumb|Israel remains and embattled democracy in the midst of authoritarian states, and the birthplace of the kibbutz to which tens of thousands of youth from around the world have turned for a living lesson in human equality. ~ Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki Israel 6097 Environment of Israel.JPG|thumb|Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality. ~ [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel-aviv-playa.JPG|thumb|What would the Israelis do if they could do what they want? They would live in peace with their neighbors. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brother%27s_Keeper_Operation_in_Judea_%26_Samaria_(14255641587).jpg|thumb|The Israeli people understand now what I always say... We will defend ourselves on every front, defensively and offensively. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Standing Guard in Nablus.jpg|thumb|Israel is not just fighting for itself. Israel is fighting for all of us. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - IAF Flight for Israel&#039;s 63rd Independence Day.jpg|thumb|Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants. The Israelis do not want to kill non-combatants, because they could kill as many as they want, and they’re not doing it. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Orrling of Palestine.jpg|thumb|You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public. ~ [[Bashar al-Assad]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*If you want to see the picture, you have to see whole picture, if you talked about violence, let&#039;s talk about 4000 Palestinians killed during the last five years while from Israeli side a few hundreds killed. So, if you want to talk about the violence and you called this violence &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot; Israel kills more, more Palestinian than Palestinian kills on Israel, Second, You have to see both sides. You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public, they said &amp;quot;we&#039;re going to kill...&amp;quot; It&#039;s the whole picture. Anyway, doesn&#039;t matter what label we put, if you want to have the solution, we have to deal with the facts, not the terms. whether they are terrorists or not, this is not the problem. we have to deal with the facts, and the facts if you don&#039;t have peace, you will have more blood-letting&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bashar al-Assad]], &#039;&#039;Interview with Charlie Rose&#039;&#039;, (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
* If the Jewish state becomes a [[fact]], and this is realized by the Arab peoples, they will drive the Jews who live in their midst into the sea.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hassan Banna]], [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10E13FF385A157B93C0A91783D85F4C8485F9 AIM TO OUST JEWS PLEDGED BY SHEIKH, New York Times, August 02, 1948]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The citizens of Israel were the first in the world to receive the third dose of the [[Covid-19 vaccine]] and we are continuing to [[pioneer]] with the fourth dose as well,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bennett]]  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/21/middleeast/israel-fourth-covid-vaccine-booster-intl/index.html Israel begins fourth Covid-19 dose vaccine rollout for people 60 and over as Omicron cases surge]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (December 21, 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. And unless we show the Arabs that there is a high price to pay for murdering Jews, we won&#039;t survive.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], as quoted by [[Ariel Sharon]], in the documentary &#039;&#039;The 50 Years War : Israel &amp;amp; The Arabs&#039;&#039; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This life as a simple citizen and laborer has its benefits not only for the person himself but perhaps also for his country. After all, there is room for only one Prime Minister, but for those who make the desert bloom there is room for hundreds, thousands and even millions. And the destiny of the state is in the hands of the many rather than of a single individual. There are times when an individual feels he should do those things which only can and should be done by the many.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], &amp;quot;Why I Retired to the Desert&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (28 March 1954), p. 47.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In Israel, in order to be a realist you must believe in miracles.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], interview on CBS (5 October 1956), as quoted in &#039;&#039;Israel: Years of Crisis Years of Hope&#039;&#039; (1973) by Roman Frister, p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel has fought one battle after another, clinging to survival in the decades after its people were systematically murdered during the [[Holocaust]]. But the story of self-determination and Arab-Israeli conflicts spills out far beyond the borders of the Middle East. Israel wasn’t just the site of regional disputes—it was a [[Cold War]] satellite, wrapped up in the interests of the [[Soviets]] and the [[Americans]]. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The U.S.S.R. started exerting regional influence in a meaningful way in 1955, when it began supplying [[Egypt]] with military equipment. The next year, [[Britain]] and the U.S. withdrew financing for Egypt’s Aswan High Dam project over the country’s ties with the U.S.S.R. That move triggered the Suez Crisis of 1956, in which Egypt, with the support of the USSR, [[nationalized]] the [[w:Suez Canal|Suez Canal]], which had previously been controlled by [[French]] and British interests.&lt;br /&gt;
** Lorraine Boissoneault, [https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-six-day-war-tells-us-about-cold-war-180963590/ “What the Six-Day War Tells Us About the Cold War”], &#039;&#039;Smithsonian.com&#039;&#039;, (June 6, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel and its Arab neighbours had plenty of reasons for hatred or mutual suspicion. But the Cold War in the 1950s and 1960s added extra fuel. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The Soviet Union provided Egypt with a modern air force. Israel had warm relations with the United States], but it was not yet the biggest recipient of American military aid; in the 1960s Israel also bought aircraft from France and tanks from Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
** Jeremy Bowen, [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39960461 &amp;quot;1967 war: Six days that changed the Middle East&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;BBC&#039;&#039;, (5 June 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is in an existential crisis. It can wall itself off and annex what it wants on the West Bank, and leave Palestinians in tiny truncated, nonviable bantustans that will become the spawning pools of terror. Or it can give the Palestinians what Oslo, Camp David, Taba and the &#039;roadmap&#039; promised; a homeland, a nation and a state of their own. Israel is free to choose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pat Buchanan]], Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a country in which a clear majority of the population, battered by wars and terrorism and heartbreak and frustration, still wants to see negotiations leading to a Palestinian state alongside Israel, and an end to occupation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bradley Burston]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/a-special-place-in-hell/what-does-death-to-israel-mean-to-you-1.393497 What Does &#039;Death to Israel&#039; Mean to You?]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;{{w|Haaretz}}&#039;&#039; (November 03, 2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
*You mess with Israel, you are messing with the United States of America. It&#039;s that simple.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herman Cain]], as quoted in [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/05/20/herman_cain_obama_threw_israel_under_the_bus.html &#039;&#039;Real Clear Politics&#039;&#039;] (20 May 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel will never find peace until it is willing to withdraw from its neighbors’ land and to permit the Palestinians to exercise their basic human and political rights... The current policies are leading toward an immoral outcome that is undermining Israel’s standing in the world and is not bringing security to the people of Israel.... These same premises, of recognizing Israel, acceptance of all past agreements, and the rejection of violence, will have to be accepted by Hamas and any government that represents the Palestinians. The long-term prospects are not discouraging... an overwhelming majority of Palestinians and Israelis support peace for Israel based on the acceptance of Israel of its international borders with some modifications, with justice and peace for the Palestinians. An early exchange of the three Israeli soldiers for some of the 10,000 Palestinian prisoners will expedite the peace process. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jimmy Carter]]  in [[Palestine Peace Not Apartheid|&#039;&#039;Palestine Peace Not Apartheid&#039;&#039;]] (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And Israel is not only our ally; it is a beacon of what democracy can and should mean… If the people of the Middle East are not sure what democracy means, let them look to Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
* In defeating terror, Israel’s cause is our cause.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hillary Clinton]], [http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0550,lombardi,70903,2.html Hanukkah dinner speech] at [[w:Yeshiva University|Yeshiva University]] (December 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
* We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state here. In considerable areas of the country we bought lands from the Arabs. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist; not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal arose in the place of Mahalul, Gevat — in the place of Jibta, Sarid — in the place of Haneifs and Kefar Yehoshua — in the place of Tell Shaman. There is no one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moshe Dayan]], From an address given to Technion University students (19 March 1969), a transcription of which appeared in &#039;&#039;Ha&#039;aretz&#039;&#039; (4 April 1969), quoted in [http://books.google.com.br/books?id=Pa89AAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA14#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;The Question of Palestine&#039;&#039; (1980) by Edward Said, p. 14]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It would have seemed more sensible to me to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically-burdened land….I can raise no sympathy at all for the misdirected piety which transforms a piece of a Herodian wall into a national relic, thereby offending the feelings of the natives.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sigmund Freud ]] Letter to Dr. Chaim Koffler Keren Ha Yassod, Vienna: Feburary, 26, 1930&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not even a state. From an international law viewpoint, the existence of the so-called Israel is illegal. Israelis and Palestinians live on the same piece of land namely; Palestine that is located between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean. This is a disputed land. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Muammar Gaddafi]], [http://english.algaddafi.org/the-address-of-brother-leader-to-the-students-and-faculty-of-meiji-university-japan.html The Address of Brother Leader to the Students and Faculty of Meiji University, Japan] (15 December 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;I urge Israel to cease demolitions and evictions in the [[Palestine|Occupied Palestinian Territory]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, including East Jerusalem, in line with its obligations under [[rule of law|international humanitarian and human rights law]]. All settlement activities, including evictions and demolitions, are illegal under [[international law]]. A revitalized peace process is the only route to a just and lasting solution...Only through renewing our commitment and redoubling our efforts towards a negotiated solution can we bring this [[Cruelty|cruel]] violence and [[hatred]] to a definitive end.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[António Guterres]],  Secretary-General’s Remarks to the General Assembly Meeting on the Situation in the Middle East and Palestine, United Nations Secretary-General, Statements, (20 May 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel isn&#039;t &#039;Jewish&#039; in the sense that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are &#039;Muslim&#039;... Israel is actually less religious than the U.S., and it guarantees freedom of religion to its citizens. Israel is not a theocracy, and one could easily argue that its Jewish identity is more cultural than religious. However, if we ask why the Jews wouldn’t move to British Columbia if offered a home there, we can see the role that religion still plays in their thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sam Harris]], [http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/why-dont-i-criticize-israel &amp;quot;Why Don&#039;t I Criticize Israel?&amp;quot;] (27 July 2014), &#039;&#039;Sam Harris&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
*WE DECLARE that, with effect from the moment of the termination of the Mandate being tonight, the eve of Sabbath, the 6th Iyar, 5708 (15th May, 1948), until the establishment of the elected, regular authorities of the State in accordance with the Constitution which shall be adopted by the Elected Constituent Assembly not later than the 1st October 1948, the People&#039;s Council shall act as a Provisional Council of State, and its executive organ, the People&#039;s Administration, shall be the Provisional Government of the Jewish State, to be called &amp;quot;Israel&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*THE STATE OF ISRAEL will be open for Jewish immigration and for the Ingathering of the Exiles; it will foster the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants; it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel; it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex; it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions; and it will be faithful to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
* It had a great and lofty wall and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names were inscribed which are those of the twelve tribes of the sons of Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John the Evangelist]], Revelation 21:12, [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Like prosperous and peaceful Japan on the one hand, and war-torn and poverty-wracked Armenia on the other, Israel is a classic national-ethnic organism. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Robert D. Kaplan|Robert D. Kaplan]], [https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/02/the-coming-anarchy/304670/ &amp;quot;The Coming Anarchy&amp;quot;] (1994), &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], March 25, 1968, less than 2 weeks before his death&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Translated quote|quote=I am a Jew and want to live in a Jewish state. This is my inalienable right, the same as the right of a [[w:Ukrainians|Ukrainian]] to live in [[Ukraine]], the right of a [[Russians|Russian]] to live in [[Russia]], the right of a [[w:Georgian people|Georgian]] to live in [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. I want to live in Israel. This is my dream, this is the goal not only of my life, but of the lives of hundreds of generations of my forerunners… I want my children to learn [[w:Hebrew|Hebrew]], I want to read Hebrew newspapers, I want to go to the [[w:Jewish theater|Jewish theater]]. What&#039;s bad in this? Where am I to blame? .. As long as I&#039;m alive, I will devote all my efforts to obtaining permission to leave for Israel. And if you see fit to put me in jail, it won&#039;t change anything for me. And if I live to see my release, I will be ready to go to the homeland of my ancestors, even if for this I need to go by foot|original= |comment=Cited [http://kosharovsky.com/%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B8/%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC-1/%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C-iii-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%B8-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81/%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0-12-%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D1%8C-%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE/ here] by [https://he-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/%D7%99%D7%95%D7%9C%D7%99_%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%91%D7%A1%D7%A7%D7%99?_x_tr_sl=iw&amp;amp;_x_tr_tl=en&amp;amp;_x_tr_hl=en&amp;amp;_x_tr_pto=wapp Yuli Kosharkovsky].|author=Jewish resident of Kiev Boris Kochubievsky, in a letter to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU [[Leonid Brezhnev]] after having been [[w:Refusenik|refused permission to leave for Israel]], November 1968. For this prose, he was [https://ru.openlist.wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81_%D0%9B%D1%8C%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_(1936) awarded] with 3 years in a [[w:Corrective labor colony|penal labor colony]].}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[P]eople misunderstand Israel, and see it now in colonial, imperialist terms is because it’s a unique event in human history. The British colonization of North America, New Zealand, Australia, the Dutch in South Africa, they came to places that they had never been to. That’s colonialism. You put your people in there. You takeover.  You marginalize the natives if you can.  You may not succeed. In South Africa, that’s colonialism. So they see the Jews arriving in what’s called Palestine, and that’s the parallel, the only one they understand. They can’t put their heads around the fact that this is a people returning to their home. That they never gave up title to. They never gave up their longing for. It was repeated in their rituals three times a day, it wasn’t like once a year, let’s remember the homeland.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Krauthammer]], [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/charles-krauthammer/ interview with Bill Kristol] (13 March 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We have always said that in our war with the Arabs we had a secret weapon — no alternative.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Egyptians could run to Egypt, the Syrians into Syria. The only place we could run was into the sea, and before we did that we might as well fight.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;LIFE&#039;&#039; magazine (3 October 1969), p. 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let me tell you something that we Israelis have against Moses. He took us 40 years through the desert in order to bring us to the one spot in the Middle East that has no oil!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], at a dinner honoring West German Chancellor Willy Brandt, as reported in &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (10 June 1973).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ladies and gentlemen, the people of Israel have come home never to be uprooted again.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Netanyahu]], [https://archive.is/hZjh9#selection-723.6-723.114 address to the United Nations General Assembly] (1 October 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Since Israel is a democratic state surrounded by essentially undemocratic states which have sworn her destruction, those interested in democracy everywhere must support Israel’s existence.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bayard Rustin]], [https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/history/articles/bayard-rustin-mlk Civil Rights Hero Bayard Rustin]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel is not consistent in its new anti-[[apartheid]] attitude... they took Israel away from the Arabs after the Arabs lived there for a thousand years. In that, I agree with them. Israel, like South Africa, is an apartheid state.&lt;br /&gt;
**H.F. Verwoerd, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Empire&#039;s New Walls: Sovereignty, Neo-liberalism, and the Production of Space in Post-apartheid South Africa and Post-Oslo Palestine/Israel.&#039;&#039;, by Andrew James Clarno. 2009. pp. 66–67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===W===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If it is proper to ’reconstitute’ a Jewish State which has not existed for two thousand years, why not go back another thousand years and reconstitute the Canaanite state? The Canaanites, unlike the Jews, are still there. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.G. Wells]], Palestine Dilemma, Sakran, Frank C., p.204&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is a Western democracy … The so-called &#039;Middle East conflict&#039; is not about land at all. It is not a territorial conflict. It&#039;s a conflict about ideologies; it&#039;s a battle between Islam and freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geert Wilders]], [http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=1604:speech-geert-wilders-mp--columbia-university-new-york-october-21-2009&amp;amp;catid=87:news remarks at the Free Speech Summit] Columbia University, New York (21 October 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Israel and the apartheid analogy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jewish and Democratic State]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Palestine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Zionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/Israel}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/israel Quotes About Israel] on GoodReads&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://jerusalemprayerteam.org/famous-quotes.asp Famous Quotes About Israel From World Leaders]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.tlvfaces.com/the-18-most-inspiring-quotes-about-israel/ The 18 Most Inspiring Quotes about Israel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Israel| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135707</id>
		<title>Israel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135707"/>
		<updated>2022-06-30T08:39:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* K */ hmmm in the end, i don&amp;#039;t think the original is needed, because my translation captures it correctly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Coatrack|date=July 2021|details=a potential majority of quotes and sum of their text relate to [[w:Israeli-Palestinian conflict|global political debates of much recency]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{for|Patriarch of the Israelites|Jacob}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Israel.svg|thumb|It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. ~ [[David Ben-Gurion]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Israel|Israel]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, officially the &#039;&#039;&#039;State of Israel&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country in the [[Middle East]], situated at the southeastern shore of the [[w:Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean Sea]] and the northern shore of the [[w:Gulf of Aqaba|Gulf of Aqaba]] in the [[w:Red Sea|Red Sea]]. It shares land borders with [[w:Lebanon|Lebanon]] to the north, [[w:Syria|Syria]] in the northeast, [[w:Jordan|Jordan]] on the east, [[w:Judea and Samaria|Judea and Samaria]] and the [[w:Gaza Strip|Gaza Strip]] to the east and west, respectively, which are claimed by the [[w:State of Palestine|State of Palestine]], and [[Egypt]] to the southwest. It contains geographically diverse features within its relatively small area. Israel&#039;s [[w:Financial centre|financial]] and [[w:List of technology centers|technology]] center is [[w:Tel Aviv|Tel Aviv]], while [[Jerusalem]] is both its self-designated capital (though unrecognised by the [[United Nations]]) and its [[w:List of cities in Israel|most populous individual city]] under the country&#039;s governmental administration. Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem is [[w:Positions on Jerusalem|internationally disputed]]. In its [[w:Basic Laws of Israel|Basic Laws]], Israel defines itself as a &amp;quot;[[Jewish and Democratic State]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emblem of Israel.svg|thumb|The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems... But only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki_Israel_7238_Cities_in_Israel.JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to do nation building in Israel, we&#039;re already built. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Knesset_Building_(South_Side).JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to export democracy to Israel, we&#039;ve already got it. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Israel - Tel Aviv Beach 001.JPG|thumb|Israel is not what is wrong about the Middle East, Israel is what is &#039;&#039;right&#039;&#039; about the Middle East. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rabin_Squre_eco_pool.jpg|thumb|For the rest of our lives, and the lives of our children, we are going to be confronted by people who don&#039;t want to live peacefully in a secular pluralistic world because they are desperate to get to paradise, and they are willing to destroy the very possibility of human happiness along the way. The truth is, we are all living in Israel; it&#039;s just that some of us haven&#039;t realized it yet. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel_Aviv_Skyline_(night)_-_2.jpg|thumb|If the light of Israel is extinguished, we will all face darkness... That is why we are all Israel. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(2691) Tel Aviv.jpg|thumb|Israel remains and embattled democracy in the midst of authoritarian states, and the birthplace of the kibbutz to which tens of thousands of youth from around the world have turned for a living lesson in human equality. ~ Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki Israel 6097 Environment of Israel.JPG|thumb|Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality. ~ [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel-aviv-playa.JPG|thumb|What would the Israelis do if they could do what they want? They would live in peace with their neighbors. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brother%27s_Keeper_Operation_in_Judea_%26_Samaria_(14255641587).jpg|thumb|The Israeli people understand now what I always say... We will defend ourselves on every front, defensively and offensively. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Standing Guard in Nablus.jpg|thumb|Israel is not just fighting for itself. Israel is fighting for all of us. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - IAF Flight for Israel&#039;s 63rd Independence Day.jpg|thumb|Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants. The Israelis do not want to kill non-combatants, because they could kill as many as they want, and they’re not doing it. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Orrling of Palestine.jpg|thumb|You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public. ~ [[Bashar al-Assad]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*If you want to see the picture, you have to see whole picture, if you talked about violence, let&#039;s talk about 4000 Palestinians killed during the last five years while from Israeli side a few hundreds killed. So, if you want to talk about the violence and you called this violence &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot; Israel kills more, more Palestinian than Palestinian kills on Israel, Second, You have to see both sides. You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public, they said &amp;quot;we&#039;re going to kill...&amp;quot; It&#039;s the whole picture. Anyway, doesn&#039;t matter what label we put, if you want to have the solution, we have to deal with the facts, not the terms. whether they are terrorists or not, this is not the problem. we have to deal with the facts, and the facts if you don&#039;t have peace, you will have more blood-letting&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bashar al-Assad]], &#039;&#039;Interview with Charlie Rose&#039;&#039;, (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
* If the Jewish state becomes a [[fact]], and this is realized by the Arab peoples, they will drive the Jews who live in their midst into the sea.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hassan Banna]], [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10E13FF385A157B93C0A91783D85F4C8485F9 AIM TO OUST JEWS PLEDGED BY SHEIKH, New York Times, August 02, 1948]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The citizens of Israel were the first in the world to receive the third dose of the [[Covid-19 vaccine]] and we are continuing to [[pioneer]] with the fourth dose as well,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bennett]]  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/21/middleeast/israel-fourth-covid-vaccine-booster-intl/index.html Israel begins fourth Covid-19 dose vaccine rollout for people 60 and over as Omicron cases surge]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (December 21, 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. And unless we show the Arabs that there is a high price to pay for murdering Jews, we won&#039;t survive.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], as quoted by [[Ariel Sharon]], in the documentary &#039;&#039;The 50 Years War : Israel &amp;amp; The Arabs&#039;&#039; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This life as a simple citizen and laborer has its benefits not only for the person himself but perhaps also for his country. After all, there is room for only one Prime Minister, but for those who make the desert bloom there is room for hundreds, thousands and even millions. And the destiny of the state is in the hands of the many rather than of a single individual. There are times when an individual feels he should do those things which only can and should be done by the many.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], &amp;quot;Why I Retired to the Desert&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (28 March 1954), p. 47.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In Israel, in order to be a realist you must believe in miracles.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], interview on CBS (5 October 1956), as quoted in &#039;&#039;Israel: Years of Crisis Years of Hope&#039;&#039; (1973) by Roman Frister, p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel has fought one battle after another, clinging to survival in the decades after its people were systematically murdered during the [[Holocaust]]. But the story of self-determination and Arab-Israeli conflicts spills out far beyond the borders of the Middle East. Israel wasn’t just the site of regional disputes—it was a [[Cold War]] satellite, wrapped up in the interests of the [[Soviets]] and the [[Americans]]. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The U.S.S.R. started exerting regional influence in a meaningful way in 1955, when it began supplying [[Egypt]] with military equipment. The next year, [[Britain]] and the U.S. withdrew financing for Egypt’s Aswan High Dam project over the country’s ties with the U.S.S.R. That move triggered the Suez Crisis of 1956, in which Egypt, with the support of the USSR, [[nationalized]] the [[w:Suez Canal|Suez Canal]], which had previously been controlled by [[French]] and British interests.&lt;br /&gt;
** Lorraine Boissoneault, [https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-six-day-war-tells-us-about-cold-war-180963590/ “What the Six-Day War Tells Us About the Cold War”], &#039;&#039;Smithsonian.com&#039;&#039;, (June 6, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel and its Arab neighbours had plenty of reasons for hatred or mutual suspicion. But the Cold War in the 1950s and 1960s added extra fuel. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The Soviet Union provided Egypt with a modern air force. Israel had warm relations with the United States], but it was not yet the biggest recipient of American military aid; in the 1960s Israel also bought aircraft from France and tanks from Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
** Jeremy Bowen, [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39960461 &amp;quot;1967 war: Six days that changed the Middle East&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;BBC&#039;&#039;, (5 June 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is in an existential crisis. It can wall itself off and annex what it wants on the West Bank, and leave Palestinians in tiny truncated, nonviable bantustans that will become the spawning pools of terror. Or it can give the Palestinians what Oslo, Camp David, Taba and the &#039;roadmap&#039; promised; a homeland, a nation and a state of their own. Israel is free to choose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pat Buchanan]], Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a country in which a clear majority of the population, battered by wars and terrorism and heartbreak and frustration, still wants to see negotiations leading to a Palestinian state alongside Israel, and an end to occupation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bradley Burston]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/a-special-place-in-hell/what-does-death-to-israel-mean-to-you-1.393497 What Does &#039;Death to Israel&#039; Mean to You?]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;{{w|Haaretz}}&#039;&#039; (November 03, 2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
*You mess with Israel, you are messing with the United States of America. It&#039;s that simple.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herman Cain]], as quoted in [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/05/20/herman_cain_obama_threw_israel_under_the_bus.html &#039;&#039;Real Clear Politics&#039;&#039;] (20 May 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel will never find peace until it is willing to withdraw from its neighbors’ land and to permit the Palestinians to exercise their basic human and political rights... The current policies are leading toward an immoral outcome that is undermining Israel’s standing in the world and is not bringing security to the people of Israel.... These same premises, of recognizing Israel, acceptance of all past agreements, and the rejection of violence, will have to be accepted by Hamas and any government that represents the Palestinians. The long-term prospects are not discouraging... an overwhelming majority of Palestinians and Israelis support peace for Israel based on the acceptance of Israel of its international borders with some modifications, with justice and peace for the Palestinians. An early exchange of the three Israeli soldiers for some of the 10,000 Palestinian prisoners will expedite the peace process. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jimmy Carter]]  in [[Palestine Peace Not Apartheid|&#039;&#039;Palestine Peace Not Apartheid&#039;&#039;]] (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And Israel is not only our ally; it is a beacon of what democracy can and should mean… If the people of the Middle East are not sure what democracy means, let them look to Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
* In defeating terror, Israel’s cause is our cause.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hillary Clinton]], [http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0550,lombardi,70903,2.html Hanukkah dinner speech] at [[w:Yeshiva University|Yeshiva University]] (December 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
* We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state here. In considerable areas of the country we bought lands from the Arabs. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist; not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal arose in the place of Mahalul, Gevat — in the place of Jibta, Sarid — in the place of Haneifs and Kefar Yehoshua — in the place of Tell Shaman. There is no one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moshe Dayan]], From an address given to Technion University students (19 March 1969), a transcription of which appeared in &#039;&#039;Ha&#039;aretz&#039;&#039; (4 April 1969), quoted in [http://books.google.com.br/books?id=Pa89AAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA14#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;The Question of Palestine&#039;&#039; (1980) by Edward Said, p. 14]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It would have seemed more sensible to me to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically-burdened land….I can raise no sympathy at all for the misdirected piety which transforms a piece of a Herodian wall into a national relic, thereby offending the feelings of the natives.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sigmund Freud ]] Letter to Dr. Chaim Koffler Keren Ha Yassod, Vienna: Feburary, 26, 1930&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not even a state. From an international law viewpoint, the existence of the so-called Israel is illegal. Israelis and Palestinians live on the same piece of land namely; Palestine that is located between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean. This is a disputed land. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Muammar Gaddafi]], [http://english.algaddafi.org/the-address-of-brother-leader-to-the-students-and-faculty-of-meiji-university-japan.html The Address of Brother Leader to the Students and Faculty of Meiji University, Japan] (15 December 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;I urge Israel to cease demolitions and evictions in the [[Palestine|Occupied Palestinian Territory]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, including East Jerusalem, in line with its obligations under [[rule of law|international humanitarian and human rights law]]. All settlement activities, including evictions and demolitions, are illegal under [[international law]]. A revitalized peace process is the only route to a just and lasting solution...Only through renewing our commitment and redoubling our efforts towards a negotiated solution can we bring this [[Cruelty|cruel]] violence and [[hatred]] to a definitive end.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[António Guterres]],  Secretary-General’s Remarks to the General Assembly Meeting on the Situation in the Middle East and Palestine, United Nations Secretary-General, Statements, (20 May 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel isn&#039;t &#039;Jewish&#039; in the sense that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are &#039;Muslim&#039;... Israel is actually less religious than the U.S., and it guarantees freedom of religion to its citizens. Israel is not a theocracy, and one could easily argue that its Jewish identity is more cultural than religious. However, if we ask why the Jews wouldn’t move to British Columbia if offered a home there, we can see the role that religion still plays in their thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sam Harris]], [http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/why-dont-i-criticize-israel &amp;quot;Why Don&#039;t I Criticize Israel?&amp;quot;] (27 July 2014), &#039;&#039;Sam Harris&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
*WE DECLARE that, with effect from the moment of the termination of the Mandate being tonight, the eve of Sabbath, the 6th Iyar, 5708 (15th May, 1948), until the establishment of the elected, regular authorities of the State in accordance with the Constitution which shall be adopted by the Elected Constituent Assembly not later than the 1st October 1948, the People&#039;s Council shall act as a Provisional Council of State, and its executive organ, the People&#039;s Administration, shall be the Provisional Government of the Jewish State, to be called &amp;quot;Israel&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*THE STATE OF ISRAEL will be open for Jewish immigration and for the Ingathering of the Exiles; it will foster the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants; it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel; it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex; it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions; and it will be faithful to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
* It had a great and lofty wall and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names were inscribed which are those of the twelve tribes of the sons of Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John the Evangelist]], Revelation 21:12, [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Like prosperous and peaceful Japan on the one hand, and war-torn and poverty-wracked Armenia on the other, Israel is a classic national-ethnic organism. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Robert D. Kaplan|Robert D. Kaplan]], [https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/02/the-coming-anarchy/304670/ &amp;quot;The Coming Anarchy&amp;quot;] (1994), &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], March 25, 1968, less than 2 weeks before his death&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Translated quote|quote=I am a Jew and want to live in a Jewish state. This is my inalienable right, the same as the right of a [[w:Ukrainians|Ukrainian]] to live in [[Ukraine]], the right of a [[Russians|Russian]] to live in [[Russia]], the right of a [[w:Georgian people|Georgian]] to live in [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. I want to live in Israel. This is my dream, this is the goal not only of my life, but of the lives of hundreds of generations of my forerunners… I want my children to learn [[w:Hebrew|Hebrew]], I want to read Hebrew newspapers, I want to go to the [[w:Jewish theater|Jewish theater]]. What&#039;s bad in this? Where am I to blame? .. As long as I&#039;m alive, I will devote all my efforts to obtaining permission to leave for Israel. And if you see fit to put me in jail, it won&#039;t change anything for me. And if I live to see my release, I will be ready to go to the homeland of my ancestors, even if for this I need to go by foot|original= |comment=Cited [http://kosharovsky.com/%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B8/%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC-1/%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C-iii-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%B8-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81/%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0-12-%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D1%8C-%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE/ here] by [[w:ru:Кошаровский, Юлий Михайлович|Yuli Kosharkovsky]].|author=Jewish resident of Kiev Boris Kochubievsky, in a letter to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU [[Leonid Brezhnev]] after having been [[w:Refusenik|refused permission to leave for Israel]], November 1968. For this prose, he was [https://ru.openlist.wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81_%D0%9B%D1%8C%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_(1936) awarded] with 3 years in a [[w:Corrective labor colony|penal labor colony]].}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[P]eople misunderstand Israel, and see it now in colonial, imperialist terms is because it’s a unique event in human history. The British colonization of North America, New Zealand, Australia, the Dutch in South Africa, they came to places that they had never been to. That’s colonialism. You put your people in there. You takeover.  You marginalize the natives if you can.  You may not succeed. In South Africa, that’s colonialism. So they see the Jews arriving in what’s called Palestine, and that’s the parallel, the only one they understand. They can’t put their heads around the fact that this is a people returning to their home. That they never gave up title to. They never gave up their longing for. It was repeated in their rituals three times a day, it wasn’t like once a year, let’s remember the homeland.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Krauthammer]], [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/charles-krauthammer/ interview with Bill Kristol] (13 March 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We have always said that in our war with the Arabs we had a secret weapon — no alternative.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Egyptians could run to Egypt, the Syrians into Syria. The only place we could run was into the sea, and before we did that we might as well fight.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;LIFE&#039;&#039; magazine (3 October 1969), p. 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let me tell you something that we Israelis have against Moses. He took us 40 years through the desert in order to bring us to the one spot in the Middle East that has no oil!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], at a dinner honoring West German Chancellor Willy Brandt, as reported in &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (10 June 1973).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ladies and gentlemen, the people of Israel have come home never to be uprooted again.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Netanyahu]], [https://archive.is/hZjh9#selection-723.6-723.114 address to the United Nations General Assembly] (1 October 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Since Israel is a democratic state surrounded by essentially undemocratic states which have sworn her destruction, those interested in democracy everywhere must support Israel’s existence.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bayard Rustin]], [https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/history/articles/bayard-rustin-mlk Civil Rights Hero Bayard Rustin]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel is not consistent in its new anti-[[apartheid]] attitude... they took Israel away from the Arabs after the Arabs lived there for a thousand years. In that, I agree with them. Israel, like South Africa, is an apartheid state.&lt;br /&gt;
**H.F. Verwoerd, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Empire&#039;s New Walls: Sovereignty, Neo-liberalism, and the Production of Space in Post-apartheid South Africa and Post-Oslo Palestine/Israel.&#039;&#039;, by Andrew James Clarno. 2009. pp. 66–67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===W===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If it is proper to ’reconstitute’ a Jewish State which has not existed for two thousand years, why not go back another thousand years and reconstitute the Canaanite state? The Canaanites, unlike the Jews, are still there. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.G. Wells]], Palestine Dilemma, Sakran, Frank C., p.204&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is a Western democracy … The so-called &#039;Middle East conflict&#039; is not about land at all. It is not a territorial conflict. It&#039;s a conflict about ideologies; it&#039;s a battle between Islam and freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geert Wilders]], [http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=1604:speech-geert-wilders-mp--columbia-university-new-york-october-21-2009&amp;amp;catid=87:news remarks at the Free Speech Summit] Columbia University, New York (21 October 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Israel and the apartheid analogy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jewish and Democratic State]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Palestine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Zionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/Israel}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/israel Quotes About Israel] on GoodReads&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://jerusalemprayerteam.org/famous-quotes.asp Famous Quotes About Israel From World Leaders]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.tlvfaces.com/the-18-most-inspiring-quotes-about-israel/ The 18 Most Inspiring Quotes about Israel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Israel| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135705</id>
		<title>Israel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135705"/>
		<updated>2022-06-30T08:27:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* K */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Coatrack|date=July 2021|details=a potential majority of quotes and sum of their text relate to [[w:Israeli-Palestinian conflict|global political debates of much recency]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{for|Patriarch of the Israelites|Jacob}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Israel.svg|thumb|It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. ~ [[David Ben-Gurion]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Israel|Israel]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, officially the &#039;&#039;&#039;State of Israel&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country in the [[Middle East]], situated at the southeastern shore of the [[w:Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean Sea]] and the northern shore of the [[w:Gulf of Aqaba|Gulf of Aqaba]] in the [[w:Red Sea|Red Sea]]. It shares land borders with [[w:Lebanon|Lebanon]] to the north, [[w:Syria|Syria]] in the northeast, [[w:Jordan|Jordan]] on the east, [[w:Judea and Samaria|Judea and Samaria]] and the [[w:Gaza Strip|Gaza Strip]] to the east and west, respectively, which are claimed by the [[w:State of Palestine|State of Palestine]], and [[Egypt]] to the southwest. It contains geographically diverse features within its relatively small area. Israel&#039;s [[w:Financial centre|financial]] and [[w:List of technology centers|technology]] center is [[w:Tel Aviv|Tel Aviv]], while [[Jerusalem]] is both its self-designated capital (though unrecognised by the [[United Nations]]) and its [[w:List of cities in Israel|most populous individual city]] under the country&#039;s governmental administration. Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem is [[w:Positions on Jerusalem|internationally disputed]]. In its [[w:Basic Laws of Israel|Basic Laws]], Israel defines itself as a &amp;quot;[[Jewish and Democratic State]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emblem of Israel.svg|thumb|The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems... But only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki_Israel_7238_Cities_in_Israel.JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to do nation building in Israel, we&#039;re already built. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Knesset_Building_(South_Side).JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to export democracy to Israel, we&#039;ve already got it. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Israel - Tel Aviv Beach 001.JPG|thumb|Israel is not what is wrong about the Middle East, Israel is what is &#039;&#039;right&#039;&#039; about the Middle East. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rabin_Squre_eco_pool.jpg|thumb|For the rest of our lives, and the lives of our children, we are going to be confronted by people who don&#039;t want to live peacefully in a secular pluralistic world because they are desperate to get to paradise, and they are willing to destroy the very possibility of human happiness along the way. The truth is, we are all living in Israel; it&#039;s just that some of us haven&#039;t realized it yet. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel_Aviv_Skyline_(night)_-_2.jpg|thumb|If the light of Israel is extinguished, we will all face darkness... That is why we are all Israel. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(2691) Tel Aviv.jpg|thumb|Israel remains and embattled democracy in the midst of authoritarian states, and the birthplace of the kibbutz to which tens of thousands of youth from around the world have turned for a living lesson in human equality. ~ Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki Israel 6097 Environment of Israel.JPG|thumb|Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality. ~ [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel-aviv-playa.JPG|thumb|What would the Israelis do if they could do what they want? They would live in peace with their neighbors. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brother%27s_Keeper_Operation_in_Judea_%26_Samaria_(14255641587).jpg|thumb|The Israeli people understand now what I always say... We will defend ourselves on every front, defensively and offensively. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Standing Guard in Nablus.jpg|thumb|Israel is not just fighting for itself. Israel is fighting for all of us. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - IAF Flight for Israel&#039;s 63rd Independence Day.jpg|thumb|Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants. The Israelis do not want to kill non-combatants, because they could kill as many as they want, and they’re not doing it. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Orrling of Palestine.jpg|thumb|You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public. ~ [[Bashar al-Assad]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*If you want to see the picture, you have to see whole picture, if you talked about violence, let&#039;s talk about 4000 Palestinians killed during the last five years while from Israeli side a few hundreds killed. So, if you want to talk about the violence and you called this violence &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot; Israel kills more, more Palestinian than Palestinian kills on Israel, Second, You have to see both sides. You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public, they said &amp;quot;we&#039;re going to kill...&amp;quot; It&#039;s the whole picture. Anyway, doesn&#039;t matter what label we put, if you want to have the solution, we have to deal with the facts, not the terms. whether they are terrorists or not, this is not the problem. we have to deal with the facts, and the facts if you don&#039;t have peace, you will have more blood-letting&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bashar al-Assad]], &#039;&#039;Interview with Charlie Rose&#039;&#039;, (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
* If the Jewish state becomes a [[fact]], and this is realized by the Arab peoples, they will drive the Jews who live in their midst into the sea.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hassan Banna]], [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10E13FF385A157B93C0A91783D85F4C8485F9 AIM TO OUST JEWS PLEDGED BY SHEIKH, New York Times, August 02, 1948]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The citizens of Israel were the first in the world to receive the third dose of the [[Covid-19 vaccine]] and we are continuing to [[pioneer]] with the fourth dose as well,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bennett]]  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/21/middleeast/israel-fourth-covid-vaccine-booster-intl/index.html Israel begins fourth Covid-19 dose vaccine rollout for people 60 and over as Omicron cases surge]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (December 21, 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. And unless we show the Arabs that there is a high price to pay for murdering Jews, we won&#039;t survive.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], as quoted by [[Ariel Sharon]], in the documentary &#039;&#039;The 50 Years War : Israel &amp;amp; The Arabs&#039;&#039; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This life as a simple citizen and laborer has its benefits not only for the person himself but perhaps also for his country. After all, there is room for only one Prime Minister, but for those who make the desert bloom there is room for hundreds, thousands and even millions. And the destiny of the state is in the hands of the many rather than of a single individual. There are times when an individual feels he should do those things which only can and should be done by the many.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], &amp;quot;Why I Retired to the Desert&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (28 March 1954), p. 47.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In Israel, in order to be a realist you must believe in miracles.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], interview on CBS (5 October 1956), as quoted in &#039;&#039;Israel: Years of Crisis Years of Hope&#039;&#039; (1973) by Roman Frister, p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel has fought one battle after another, clinging to survival in the decades after its people were systematically murdered during the [[Holocaust]]. But the story of self-determination and Arab-Israeli conflicts spills out far beyond the borders of the Middle East. Israel wasn’t just the site of regional disputes—it was a [[Cold War]] satellite, wrapped up in the interests of the [[Soviets]] and the [[Americans]]. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The U.S.S.R. started exerting regional influence in a meaningful way in 1955, when it began supplying [[Egypt]] with military equipment. The next year, [[Britain]] and the U.S. withdrew financing for Egypt’s Aswan High Dam project over the country’s ties with the U.S.S.R. That move triggered the Suez Crisis of 1956, in which Egypt, with the support of the USSR, [[nationalized]] the [[w:Suez Canal|Suez Canal]], which had previously been controlled by [[French]] and British interests.&lt;br /&gt;
** Lorraine Boissoneault, [https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-six-day-war-tells-us-about-cold-war-180963590/ “What the Six-Day War Tells Us About the Cold War”], &#039;&#039;Smithsonian.com&#039;&#039;, (June 6, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel and its Arab neighbours had plenty of reasons for hatred or mutual suspicion. But the Cold War in the 1950s and 1960s added extra fuel. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The Soviet Union provided Egypt with a modern air force. Israel had warm relations with the United States], but it was not yet the biggest recipient of American military aid; in the 1960s Israel also bought aircraft from France and tanks from Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
** Jeremy Bowen, [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39960461 &amp;quot;1967 war: Six days that changed the Middle East&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;BBC&#039;&#039;, (5 June 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is in an existential crisis. It can wall itself off and annex what it wants on the West Bank, and leave Palestinians in tiny truncated, nonviable bantustans that will become the spawning pools of terror. Or it can give the Palestinians what Oslo, Camp David, Taba and the &#039;roadmap&#039; promised; a homeland, a nation and a state of their own. Israel is free to choose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pat Buchanan]], Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a country in which a clear majority of the population, battered by wars and terrorism and heartbreak and frustration, still wants to see negotiations leading to a Palestinian state alongside Israel, and an end to occupation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bradley Burston]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/a-special-place-in-hell/what-does-death-to-israel-mean-to-you-1.393497 What Does &#039;Death to Israel&#039; Mean to You?]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;{{w|Haaretz}}&#039;&#039; (November 03, 2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
*You mess with Israel, you are messing with the United States of America. It&#039;s that simple.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herman Cain]], as quoted in [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/05/20/herman_cain_obama_threw_israel_under_the_bus.html &#039;&#039;Real Clear Politics&#039;&#039;] (20 May 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel will never find peace until it is willing to withdraw from its neighbors’ land and to permit the Palestinians to exercise their basic human and political rights... The current policies are leading toward an immoral outcome that is undermining Israel’s standing in the world and is not bringing security to the people of Israel.... These same premises, of recognizing Israel, acceptance of all past agreements, and the rejection of violence, will have to be accepted by Hamas and any government that represents the Palestinians. The long-term prospects are not discouraging... an overwhelming majority of Palestinians and Israelis support peace for Israel based on the acceptance of Israel of its international borders with some modifications, with justice and peace for the Palestinians. An early exchange of the three Israeli soldiers for some of the 10,000 Palestinian prisoners will expedite the peace process. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jimmy Carter]]  in [[Palestine Peace Not Apartheid|&#039;&#039;Palestine Peace Not Apartheid&#039;&#039;]] (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And Israel is not only our ally; it is a beacon of what democracy can and should mean… If the people of the Middle East are not sure what democracy means, let them look to Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
* In defeating terror, Israel’s cause is our cause.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hillary Clinton]], [http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0550,lombardi,70903,2.html Hanukkah dinner speech] at [[w:Yeshiva University|Yeshiva University]] (December 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
* We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state here. In considerable areas of the country we bought lands from the Arabs. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist; not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal arose in the place of Mahalul, Gevat — in the place of Jibta, Sarid — in the place of Haneifs and Kefar Yehoshua — in the place of Tell Shaman. There is no one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moshe Dayan]], From an address given to Technion University students (19 March 1969), a transcription of which appeared in &#039;&#039;Ha&#039;aretz&#039;&#039; (4 April 1969), quoted in [http://books.google.com.br/books?id=Pa89AAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA14#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;The Question of Palestine&#039;&#039; (1980) by Edward Said, p. 14]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It would have seemed more sensible to me to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically-burdened land….I can raise no sympathy at all for the misdirected piety which transforms a piece of a Herodian wall into a national relic, thereby offending the feelings of the natives.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sigmund Freud ]] Letter to Dr. Chaim Koffler Keren Ha Yassod, Vienna: Feburary, 26, 1930&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not even a state. From an international law viewpoint, the existence of the so-called Israel is illegal. Israelis and Palestinians live on the same piece of land namely; Palestine that is located between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean. This is a disputed land. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Muammar Gaddafi]], [http://english.algaddafi.org/the-address-of-brother-leader-to-the-students-and-faculty-of-meiji-university-japan.html The Address of Brother Leader to the Students and Faculty of Meiji University, Japan] (15 December 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;I urge Israel to cease demolitions and evictions in the [[Palestine|Occupied Palestinian Territory]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, including East Jerusalem, in line with its obligations under [[rule of law|international humanitarian and human rights law]]. All settlement activities, including evictions and demolitions, are illegal under [[international law]]. A revitalized peace process is the only route to a just and lasting solution...Only through renewing our commitment and redoubling our efforts towards a negotiated solution can we bring this [[Cruelty|cruel]] violence and [[hatred]] to a definitive end.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[António Guterres]],  Secretary-General’s Remarks to the General Assembly Meeting on the Situation in the Middle East and Palestine, United Nations Secretary-General, Statements, (20 May 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel isn&#039;t &#039;Jewish&#039; in the sense that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are &#039;Muslim&#039;... Israel is actually less religious than the U.S., and it guarantees freedom of religion to its citizens. Israel is not a theocracy, and one could easily argue that its Jewish identity is more cultural than religious. However, if we ask why the Jews wouldn’t move to British Columbia if offered a home there, we can see the role that religion still plays in their thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sam Harris]], [http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/why-dont-i-criticize-israel &amp;quot;Why Don&#039;t I Criticize Israel?&amp;quot;] (27 July 2014), &#039;&#039;Sam Harris&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
*WE DECLARE that, with effect from the moment of the termination of the Mandate being tonight, the eve of Sabbath, the 6th Iyar, 5708 (15th May, 1948), until the establishment of the elected, regular authorities of the State in accordance with the Constitution which shall be adopted by the Elected Constituent Assembly not later than the 1st October 1948, the People&#039;s Council shall act as a Provisional Council of State, and its executive organ, the People&#039;s Administration, shall be the Provisional Government of the Jewish State, to be called &amp;quot;Israel&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*THE STATE OF ISRAEL will be open for Jewish immigration and for the Ingathering of the Exiles; it will foster the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants; it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel; it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex; it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions; and it will be faithful to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
* It had a great and lofty wall and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names were inscribed which are those of the twelve tribes of the sons of Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John the Evangelist]], Revelation 21:12, [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Like prosperous and peaceful Japan on the one hand, and war-torn and poverty-wracked Armenia on the other, Israel is a classic national-ethnic organism. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Robert D. Kaplan|Robert D. Kaplan]], [https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/02/the-coming-anarchy/304670/ &amp;quot;The Coming Anarchy&amp;quot;] (1994), &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], March 25, 1968, less than 2 weeks before his death&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Translated quote|quote=I am a Jew and want to live in a Jewish state. This is my inalienable right, the same as the right of a [[w:Ukrainians|Ukrainian]] to live in [[Ukraine]], the right of a [[Russians|Russian]] to live in [[Russia]], the right of a [[w:Georgian people|Georgian]] to live in [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. I want to live in Israel. This is my dream, this is the goal not only of my life, but of the lives of hundreds of generations of my forerunners… I want my children to learn [[w:Hebrew|Hebrew]], I want to read Hebrew newspapers, I want to go to the [[w:Jewish theater|Jewish theater]]. What&#039;s bad in this? Where am I to blame? .. As long as I&#039;m alive, I will devote all my efforts to obtaining permission to leave for Israel. And if you see fit to put me in jail, it won&#039;t change anything for me. And if I live to see my release, I will be ready to go to the homeland of my ancestors, even if for this I need to go by foot|original=Я еврей и хочу жить в еврейском государстве. Это мое неотъемлемое право, такое же, как право украинца жить на Украине, право русского жить в России, право грузина жить в Грузии. Я хочу жить в Израиле. Это моя мечта, это цель не только моей жизни, но и жизней сотен поколений моих предшественников… Я хочу, чтобы мои дети изучали ив­рит, я хочу читать ивритские газеты, я хочу ходить в еврейский театр. Что в этом плохого? В чем состоит моя вина?.. Пока я жив, я посвящу все мои усилия для получения разре­шения на выезд в Израиль. И если вы сочтете нужным посадить меня в тюрьму, для меня это ничего не изменит. И если я доживу до своего освобождения, я буду готов направиться на родину мо­их предков, даже если для этого мне понадобится идти пешком |commentary=Cited [http://kosharovsky.com/%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B8/%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC-1/%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C-iii-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%B8-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81/%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0-12-%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D1%8C-%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE/ here] by [[w:ru:Кошаровский, Юлий Михайлович|Yuli Kosharkovsky]].|author=Jewish resident of Kiev Boris Kochubievsky, in a letter to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU [[Leonid Brezhnev]] after having been [[w:Refusenik|refused permission to leave for Israel]], November 1968. For this prose, he was [https://ru.openlist.wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81_%D0%9B%D1%8C%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_(1936) awarded] with 3 years in a [[w:Corrective labor colony|penal labor colony]].}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[P]eople misunderstand Israel, and see it now in colonial, imperialist terms is because it’s a unique event in human history. The British colonization of North America, New Zealand, Australia, the Dutch in South Africa, they came to places that they had never been to. That’s colonialism. You put your people in there. You takeover.  You marginalize the natives if you can.  You may not succeed. In South Africa, that’s colonialism. So they see the Jews arriving in what’s called Palestine, and that’s the parallel, the only one they understand. They can’t put their heads around the fact that this is a people returning to their home. That they never gave up title to. They never gave up their longing for. It was repeated in their rituals three times a day, it wasn’t like once a year, let’s remember the homeland.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Krauthammer]], [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/charles-krauthammer/ interview with Bill Kristol] (13 March 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We have always said that in our war with the Arabs we had a secret weapon — no alternative.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Egyptians could run to Egypt, the Syrians into Syria. The only place we could run was into the sea, and before we did that we might as well fight.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;LIFE&#039;&#039; magazine (3 October 1969), p. 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let me tell you something that we Israelis have against Moses. He took us 40 years through the desert in order to bring us to the one spot in the Middle East that has no oil!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], at a dinner honoring West German Chancellor Willy Brandt, as reported in &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (10 June 1973).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ladies and gentlemen, the people of Israel have come home never to be uprooted again.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Netanyahu]], [https://archive.is/hZjh9#selection-723.6-723.114 address to the United Nations General Assembly] (1 October 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Since Israel is a democratic state surrounded by essentially undemocratic states which have sworn her destruction, those interested in democracy everywhere must support Israel’s existence.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bayard Rustin]], [https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/history/articles/bayard-rustin-mlk Civil Rights Hero Bayard Rustin]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel is not consistent in its new anti-[[apartheid]] attitude... they took Israel away from the Arabs after the Arabs lived there for a thousand years. In that, I agree with them. Israel, like South Africa, is an apartheid state.&lt;br /&gt;
**H.F. Verwoerd, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Empire&#039;s New Walls: Sovereignty, Neo-liberalism, and the Production of Space in Post-apartheid South Africa and Post-Oslo Palestine/Israel.&#039;&#039;, by Andrew James Clarno. 2009. pp. 66–67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===W===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If it is proper to ’reconstitute’ a Jewish State which has not existed for two thousand years, why not go back another thousand years and reconstitute the Canaanite state? The Canaanites, unlike the Jews, are still there. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.G. Wells]], Palestine Dilemma, Sakran, Frank C., p.204&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is a Western democracy … The so-called &#039;Middle East conflict&#039; is not about land at all. It is not a territorial conflict. It&#039;s a conflict about ideologies; it&#039;s a battle between Islam and freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geert Wilders]], [http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=1604:speech-geert-wilders-mp--columbia-university-new-york-october-21-2009&amp;amp;catid=87:news remarks at the Free Speech Summit] Columbia University, New York (21 October 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Israel and the apartheid analogy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jewish and Democratic State]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Palestine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Zionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/Israel}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/israel Quotes About Israel] on GoodReads&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://jerusalemprayerteam.org/famous-quotes.asp Famous Quotes About Israel From World Leaders]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.tlvfaces.com/the-18-most-inspiring-quotes-about-israel/ The 18 Most Inspiring Quotes about Israel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Israel| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135704</id>
		<title>Israel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&amp;diff=3135704"/>
		<updated>2022-06-30T08:26:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* K */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Coatrack|date=July 2021|details=a potential majority of quotes and sum of their text relate to [[w:Israeli-Palestinian conflict|global political debates of much recency]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{for|Patriarch of the Israelites|Jacob}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Israel.svg|thumb|It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. ~ [[David Ben-Gurion]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Israel|Israel]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, officially the &#039;&#039;&#039;State of Israel&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country in the [[Middle East]], situated at the southeastern shore of the [[w:Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean Sea]] and the northern shore of the [[w:Gulf of Aqaba|Gulf of Aqaba]] in the [[w:Red Sea|Red Sea]]. It shares land borders with [[w:Lebanon|Lebanon]] to the north, [[w:Syria|Syria]] in the northeast, [[w:Jordan|Jordan]] on the east, [[w:Judea and Samaria|Judea and Samaria]] and the [[w:Gaza Strip|Gaza Strip]] to the east and west, respectively, which are claimed by the [[w:State of Palestine|State of Palestine]], and [[Egypt]] to the southwest. It contains geographically diverse features within its relatively small area. Israel&#039;s [[w:Financial centre|financial]] and [[w:List of technology centers|technology]] center is [[w:Tel Aviv|Tel Aviv]], while [[Jerusalem]] is both its self-designated capital (though unrecognised by the [[United Nations]]) and its [[w:List of cities in Israel|most populous individual city]] under the country&#039;s governmental administration. Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem is [[w:Positions on Jerusalem|internationally disputed]]. In its [[w:Basic Laws of Israel|Basic Laws]], Israel defines itself as a &amp;quot;[[Jewish and Democratic State]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emblem of Israel.svg|thumb|The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems... But only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki_Israel_7238_Cities_in_Israel.JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to do nation building in Israel, we&#039;re already built. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Knesset_Building_(South_Side).JPG|thumb|You don&#039;t need to export democracy to Israel, we&#039;ve already got it. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Israel - Tel Aviv Beach 001.JPG|thumb|Israel is not what is wrong about the Middle East, Israel is what is &#039;&#039;right&#039;&#039; about the Middle East. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rabin_Squre_eco_pool.jpg|thumb|For the rest of our lives, and the lives of our children, we are going to be confronted by people who don&#039;t want to live peacefully in a secular pluralistic world because they are desperate to get to paradise, and they are willing to destroy the very possibility of human happiness along the way. The truth is, we are all living in Israel; it&#039;s just that some of us haven&#039;t realized it yet. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel_Aviv_Skyline_(night)_-_2.jpg|thumb|If the light of Israel is extinguished, we will all face darkness... That is why we are all Israel. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(2691) Tel Aviv.jpg|thumb|Israel remains and embattled democracy in the midst of authoritarian states, and the birthplace of the kibbutz to which tens of thousands of youth from around the world have turned for a living lesson in human equality. ~ Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PikiWiki Israel 6097 Environment of Israel.JPG|thumb|Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality. ~ [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tel-aviv-playa.JPG|thumb|What would the Israelis do if they could do what they want? They would live in peace with their neighbors. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brother%27s_Keeper_Operation_in_Judea_%26_Samaria_(14255641587).jpg|thumb|The Israeli people understand now what I always say... We will defend ourselves on every front, defensively and offensively. ~ [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Standing Guard in Nablus.jpg|thumb|Israel is not just fighting for itself. Israel is fighting for all of us. ~ [[Geert Wilders]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - IAF Flight for Israel&#039;s 63rd Independence Day.jpg|thumb|Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants. The Israelis do not want to kill non-combatants, because they could kill as many as they want, and they’re not doing it. ~ [[Sam Harris]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Orrling of Palestine.jpg|thumb|You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public. ~ [[Bashar al-Assad]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*If you want to see the picture, you have to see whole picture, if you talked about violence, let&#039;s talk about 4000 Palestinians killed during the last five years while from Israeli side a few hundreds killed. So, if you want to talk about the violence and you called this violence &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot; Israel kills more, more Palestinian than Palestinian kills on Israel, Second, You have to see both sides. You talk about Hamas, what they did in Israel but don&#039;t talk about Israel and what they did in Palestinian Territories, and they commit assassinations from time to time and in public, they said &amp;quot;we&#039;re going to kill...&amp;quot; It&#039;s the whole picture. Anyway, doesn&#039;t matter what label we put, if you want to have the solution, we have to deal with the facts, not the terms. whether they are terrorists or not, this is not the problem. we have to deal with the facts, and the facts if you don&#039;t have peace, you will have more blood-letting&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bashar al-Assad]], &#039;&#039;Interview with Charlie Rose&#039;&#039;, (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
* If the Jewish state becomes a [[fact]], and this is realized by the Arab peoples, they will drive the Jews who live in their midst into the sea.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hassan Banna]], [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10E13FF385A157B93C0A91783D85F4C8485F9 AIM TO OUST JEWS PLEDGED BY SHEIKH, New York Times, August 02, 1948]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The citizens of Israel were the first in the world to receive the third dose of the [[Covid-19 vaccine]] and we are continuing to [[pioneer]] with the fourth dose as well,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bennett]]  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/21/middleeast/israel-fourth-covid-vaccine-booster-intl/index.html Israel begins fourth Covid-19 dose vaccine rollout for people 60 and over as Omicron cases surge]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (December 21, 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It doesn&#039;t matter what the world says about Israel; it doesn&#039;t matter what they say about us anywhere else. The only thing that matters is that we can exist here on the land of our forefathers. And unless we show the Arabs that there is a high price to pay for murdering Jews, we won&#039;t survive.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], as quoted by [[Ariel Sharon]], in the documentary &#039;&#039;The 50 Years War : Israel &amp;amp; The Arabs&#039;&#039; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This life as a simple citizen and laborer has its benefits not only for the person himself but perhaps also for his country. After all, there is room for only one Prime Minister, but for those who make the desert bloom there is room for hundreds, thousands and even millions. And the destiny of the state is in the hands of the many rather than of a single individual. There are times when an individual feels he should do those things which only can and should be done by the many.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], &amp;quot;Why I Retired to the Desert&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (28 March 1954), p. 47.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In Israel, in order to be a realist you must believe in miracles.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Ben-Gurion]], interview on CBS (5 October 1956), as quoted in &#039;&#039;Israel: Years of Crisis Years of Hope&#039;&#039; (1973) by Roman Frister, p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel has fought one battle after another, clinging to survival in the decades after its people were systematically murdered during the [[Holocaust]]. But the story of self-determination and Arab-Israeli conflicts spills out far beyond the borders of the Middle East. Israel wasn’t just the site of regional disputes—it was a [[Cold War]] satellite, wrapped up in the interests of the [[Soviets]] and the [[Americans]]. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The U.S.S.R. started exerting regional influence in a meaningful way in 1955, when it began supplying [[Egypt]] with military equipment. The next year, [[Britain]] and the U.S. withdrew financing for Egypt’s Aswan High Dam project over the country’s ties with the U.S.S.R. That move triggered the Suez Crisis of 1956, in which Egypt, with the support of the USSR, [[nationalized]] the [[w:Suez Canal|Suez Canal]], which had previously been controlled by [[French]] and British interests.&lt;br /&gt;
** Lorraine Boissoneault, [https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-six-day-war-tells-us-about-cold-war-180963590/ “What the Six-Day War Tells Us About the Cold War”], &#039;&#039;Smithsonian.com&#039;&#039;, (June 6, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel and its Arab neighbours had plenty of reasons for hatred or mutual suspicion. But the Cold War in the 1950s and 1960s added extra fuel. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The Soviet Union provided Egypt with a modern air force. Israel had warm relations with the United States], but it was not yet the biggest recipient of American military aid; in the 1960s Israel also bought aircraft from France and tanks from Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
** Jeremy Bowen, [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39960461 &amp;quot;1967 war: Six days that changed the Middle East&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;BBC&#039;&#039;, (5 June 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is in an existential crisis. It can wall itself off and annex what it wants on the West Bank, and leave Palestinians in tiny truncated, nonviable bantustans that will become the spawning pools of terror. Or it can give the Palestinians what Oslo, Camp David, Taba and the &#039;roadmap&#039; promised; a homeland, a nation and a state of their own. Israel is free to choose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pat Buchanan]], Where the Right Went Wrong: How Neoconservatives Subverted the Reagan Revolution and Hijacked the Bush Presidency (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a country in which a clear majority of the population, battered by wars and terrorism and heartbreak and frustration, still wants to see negotiations leading to a Palestinian state alongside Israel, and an end to occupation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bradley Burston]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/a-special-place-in-hell/what-does-death-to-israel-mean-to-you-1.393497 What Does &#039;Death to Israel&#039; Mean to You?]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;{{w|Haaretz}}&#039;&#039; (November 03, 2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
*You mess with Israel, you are messing with the United States of America. It&#039;s that simple.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herman Cain]], as quoted in [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/05/20/herman_cain_obama_threw_israel_under_the_bus.html &#039;&#039;Real Clear Politics&#039;&#039;] (20 May 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel will never find peace until it is willing to withdraw from its neighbors’ land and to permit the Palestinians to exercise their basic human and political rights... The current policies are leading toward an immoral outcome that is undermining Israel’s standing in the world and is not bringing security to the people of Israel.... These same premises, of recognizing Israel, acceptance of all past agreements, and the rejection of violence, will have to be accepted by Hamas and any government that represents the Palestinians. The long-term prospects are not discouraging... an overwhelming majority of Palestinians and Israelis support peace for Israel based on the acceptance of Israel of its international borders with some modifications, with justice and peace for the Palestinians. An early exchange of the three Israeli soldiers for some of the 10,000 Palestinian prisoners will expedite the peace process. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jimmy Carter]]  in [[Palestine Peace Not Apartheid|&#039;&#039;Palestine Peace Not Apartheid&#039;&#039;]] (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And Israel is not only our ally; it is a beacon of what democracy can and should mean… If the people of the Middle East are not sure what democracy means, let them look to Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
* In defeating terror, Israel’s cause is our cause.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hillary Clinton]], [http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0550,lombardi,70903,2.html Hanukkah dinner speech] at [[w:Yeshiva University|Yeshiva University]] (December 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
* We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state here. In considerable areas of the country we bought lands from the Arabs. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist; not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal arose in the place of Mahalul, Gevat — in the place of Jibta, Sarid — in the place of Haneifs and Kefar Yehoshua — in the place of Tell Shaman. There is no one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moshe Dayan]], From an address given to Technion University students (19 March 1969), a transcription of which appeared in &#039;&#039;Ha&#039;aretz&#039;&#039; (4 April 1969), quoted in [http://books.google.com.br/books?id=Pa89AAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA14#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;The Question of Palestine&#039;&#039; (1980) by Edward Said, p. 14]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It would have seemed more sensible to me to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically-burdened land….I can raise no sympathy at all for the misdirected piety which transforms a piece of a Herodian wall into a national relic, thereby offending the feelings of the natives.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sigmund Freud ]] Letter to Dr. Chaim Koffler Keren Ha Yassod, Vienna: Feburary, 26, 1930&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not even a state. From an international law viewpoint, the existence of the so-called Israel is illegal. Israelis and Palestinians live on the same piece of land namely; Palestine that is located between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean. This is a disputed land. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Muammar Gaddafi]], [http://english.algaddafi.org/the-address-of-brother-leader-to-the-students-and-faculty-of-meiji-university-japan.html The Address of Brother Leader to the Students and Faculty of Meiji University, Japan] (15 December 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;I urge Israel to cease demolitions and evictions in the [[Palestine|Occupied Palestinian Territory]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, including East Jerusalem, in line with its obligations under [[rule of law|international humanitarian and human rights law]]. All settlement activities, including evictions and demolitions, are illegal under [[international law]]. A revitalized peace process is the only route to a just and lasting solution...Only through renewing our commitment and redoubling our efforts towards a negotiated solution can we bring this [[Cruelty|cruel]] violence and [[hatred]] to a definitive end.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[António Guterres]],  Secretary-General’s Remarks to the General Assembly Meeting on the Situation in the Middle East and Palestine, United Nations Secretary-General, Statements, (20 May 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel isn&#039;t &#039;Jewish&#039; in the sense that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are &#039;Muslim&#039;... Israel is actually less religious than the U.S., and it guarantees freedom of religion to its citizens. Israel is not a theocracy, and one could easily argue that its Jewish identity is more cultural than religious. However, if we ask why the Jews wouldn’t move to British Columbia if offered a home there, we can see the role that religion still plays in their thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sam Harris]], [http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/why-dont-i-criticize-israel &amp;quot;Why Don&#039;t I Criticize Israel?&amp;quot;] (27 July 2014), &#039;&#039;Sam Harris&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
*WE DECLARE that, with effect from the moment of the termination of the Mandate being tonight, the eve of Sabbath, the 6th Iyar, 5708 (15th May, 1948), until the establishment of the elected, regular authorities of the State in accordance with the Constitution which shall be adopted by the Elected Constituent Assembly not later than the 1st October 1948, the People&#039;s Council shall act as a Provisional Council of State, and its executive organ, the People&#039;s Administration, shall be the Provisional Government of the Jewish State, to be called &amp;quot;Israel&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*THE STATE OF ISRAEL will be open for Jewish immigration and for the Ingathering of the Exiles; it will foster the development of the country for the benefit of all its inhabitants; it will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel; it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or sex; it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions; and it will be faithful to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Israeli Declaration of Independence&#039;&#039; (1948).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
* It had a great and lofty wall and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names were inscribed which are those of the twelve tribes of the sons of Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John the Evangelist]], Revelation 21:12, [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Like prosperous and peaceful Japan on the one hand, and war-torn and poverty-wracked Armenia on the other, Israel is a classic national-ethnic organism. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Robert D. Kaplan|Robert D. Kaplan]], [https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/02/the-coming-anarchy/304670/ &amp;quot;The Coming Anarchy&amp;quot;] (1994), &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Peace for Israel means security, and we must stand with all our might to protect its right to exist, its territorial integrity. I see Israel as one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done, how desert land can be transformed into an oasis of brotherhood and democracy. Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], March 25, 1968, less than 2 weeks before his death&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Translated quote|quote=I am a Jew and want to live in a Jewish state. This is my inalienable right, the same as the right of a Ukrainian to live in Ukraine, the right of a Russian to live in Russia, the right of a Georgian to live in Georgia. I want to live in Israel. This is my dream, this is the goal not only of my life, but of the lives of hundreds of generations of my forerunners… I want my children to learn [[w:Hebrew|Hebrew]], I want to read Hebrew newspapers, I want to go to the [[w:Jewish theater|Jewish theater]]. What&#039;s bad in this? Where am I to blame? .. As long as I&#039;m alive, I will devote all my efforts to obtaining permission to leave for Israel. And if you see fit to put me in jail, it won&#039;t change anything for me. And if I live to see my release, I will be ready to go to the homeland of my ancestors, even if for this I need to go by foot|original=Я еврей и хочу жить в еврейском государстве. Это мое неотъемлемое право, такое же, как право украинца жить на Украине, право русского жить в России, право грузина жить в Грузии. Я хочу жить в Израиле. Это моя мечта, это цель не только моей жизни, но и жизней сотен поколений моих предшественников… Я хочу, чтобы мои дети изучали ив­рит, я хочу читать ивритские газеты, я хочу ходить в еврейский театр. Что в этом плохого? В чем состоит моя вина?.. Пока я жив, я посвящу все мои усилия для получения разре­шения на выезд в Израиль. И если вы сочтете нужным посадить меня в тюрьму, для меня это ничего не изменит. И если я доживу до своего освобождения, я буду готов направиться на родину мо­их предков, даже если для этого мне понадобится идти пешком |commentary=Cited [http://kosharovsky.com/%D0%BA%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B8/%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BC-1/%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C-iii-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%B8-%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81/%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0-12-%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%82%D1%8C-%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE/ here] by [[w:ru:Кошаровский, Юлий Михайлович|Yuli Kosharkovsky]].|author=Jewish resident of Kiev Boris Kochubievsky, in a letter to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU [[Leonid Brezhnev]] after having been [[w:Refusenik|refused permission to leave for Israel]], November 1968. For this prose, he was [https://ru.openlist.wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%87%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%91%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81_%D0%9B%D1%8C%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_(1936) awarded] with 3 years in a [[w:Corrective labor colony|penal labor colony]].}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[P]eople misunderstand Israel, and see it now in colonial, imperialist terms is because it’s a unique event in human history. The British colonization of North America, New Zealand, Australia, the Dutch in South Africa, they came to places that they had never been to. That’s colonialism. You put your people in there. You takeover.  You marginalize the natives if you can.  You may not succeed. In South Africa, that’s colonialism. So they see the Jews arriving in what’s called Palestine, and that’s the parallel, the only one they understand. They can’t put their heads around the fact that this is a people returning to their home. That they never gave up title to. They never gave up their longing for. It was repeated in their rituals three times a day, it wasn’t like once a year, let’s remember the homeland.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles Krauthammer]], [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/charles-krauthammer/ interview with Bill Kristol] (13 March 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We have always said that in our war with the Arabs we had a secret weapon — no alternative.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Egyptians could run to Egypt, the Syrians into Syria. The only place we could run was into the sea, and before we did that we might as well fight.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;LIFE&#039;&#039; magazine (3 October 1969), p. 32.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Let me tell you something that we Israelis have against Moses. He took us 40 years through the desert in order to bring us to the one spot in the Middle East that has no oil!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Golda Meir]], at a dinner honoring West German Chancellor Willy Brandt, as reported in &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (10 June 1973).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ladies and gentlemen, the people of Israel have come home never to be uprooted again.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Netanyahu]], [https://archive.is/hZjh9#selection-723.6-723.114 address to the United Nations General Assembly] (1 October 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Since Israel is a democratic state surrounded by essentially undemocratic states which have sworn her destruction, those interested in democracy everywhere must support Israel’s existence.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Bayard Rustin]], [https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/history/articles/bayard-rustin-mlk Civil Rights Hero Bayard Rustin]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Israel is not consistent in its new anti-[[apartheid]] attitude... they took Israel away from the Arabs after the Arabs lived there for a thousand years. In that, I agree with them. Israel, like South Africa, is an apartheid state.&lt;br /&gt;
**H.F. Verwoerd, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Empire&#039;s New Walls: Sovereignty, Neo-liberalism, and the Production of Space in Post-apartheid South Africa and Post-Oslo Palestine/Israel.&#039;&#039;, by Andrew James Clarno. 2009. pp. 66–67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===W===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If it is proper to ’reconstitute’ a Jewish State which has not existed for two thousand years, why not go back another thousand years and reconstitute the Canaanite state? The Canaanites, unlike the Jews, are still there. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.G. Wells]], Palestine Dilemma, Sakran, Frank C., p.204&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Israel is a Western democracy … The so-called &#039;Middle East conflict&#039; is not about land at all. It is not a territorial conflict. It&#039;s a conflict about ideologies; it&#039;s a battle between Islam and freedom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geert Wilders]], [http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=1604:speech-geert-wilders-mp--columbia-university-new-york-october-21-2009&amp;amp;catid=87:news remarks at the Free Speech Summit] Columbia University, New York (21 October 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Israel and the apartheid analogy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jewish and Democratic State]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Palestine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Zionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/Israel}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/israel Quotes About Israel] on GoodReads&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://jerusalemprayerteam.org/famous-quotes.asp Famous Quotes About Israel From World Leaders]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.tlvfaces.com/the-18-most-inspiring-quotes-about-israel/ The 18 Most Inspiring Quotes about Israel]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Israel| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Arthur_Schopenhauer&amp;diff=3133418</id>
		<title>Arthur Schopenhauer</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Arthur_Schopenhauer&amp;diff=3133418"/>
		<updated>2022-06-24T13:31:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Aphorisms on the Wisdom of Life */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Arthur Schopenhauer Portrait by Ludwig Sigismund Ruhl 1815.jpeg|thumb|right|[[Life]] is short and [[truth]] works far and lives long: let us speak the truth.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Arthur Schopenhauer|Arthur Schopenhauer]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[22 February]] [[1788]] – [[21 September]] [[1860]]) was a German philosopher, most famous for his work &#039;&#039;[[w:The World as Will and Representation|The World as Will and Representation]]&#039;&#039; (1819).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes == &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Schopenhauer.jpg|thumb|right|Boundless compassion for all living beings is the surest and most certain guarantee of pure moral conduct, and needs no casuistry.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is the [[courage]] to make a clean breast of it in the face of every question that makes the [[Philosophy|philosopher]].&#039;&#039;&#039; He must be like [[Sophocles]]&#039; [[w:Oedipus|Oedipus]], who, seeking enlightenment concerning his terrible fate, pursues his indefatigable inquiry even though he divines that appalling horror awaits him in the answer. But most of us carry with us the [[w:Jocasta|Jocasta]] in our hearts, who begs Oedipus, for God&#039;s sake, not to inquire further. &lt;br /&gt;
** Letter to [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]] (November 1819)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Obit anus, abit onus.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The old woman dies, the burden is lifted.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Statement Schopenhauer wrote in Latin into his account book, after the death of a seamstress to whom he had made court-ordered payments of 15 [[w:Thaler|thalers]] a quarter for over twenty years, after she had accused him of having injured her arm; as quoted in &#039;&#039;Modern Philosophy: From Descartes to Schopenhauer and Hartmann&#039;&#039; (1877) by [[w:Francis Bowen|Francis Bowen]], p. 392. Schopenhauer had won the original case, and, being  assured by the head of the &#039;&#039;Kammergericht&#039;&#039; that the original judgment would be upheld, he left Berlin. In his absence, the judgement was overturned. Schopenhauer believed that the seamstress was feigning her injuries and that she would be sly enough to do so for the remainder of her life. The only visible signs of the assault were a few minor bruises. ; as quoted in &#039;&#039;A Biography&#039;&#039; (2010) by David E. Cartwright, p. 408-411.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forfeit three-fourths of ourselves in order to be like other people.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** As attributed in &#039;&#039;Dictionary of Quotations from Ancient and Modern English and Foreign Sources&#039;&#039; (1899) by James Wood, p. 624&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;When the Church says that, in the dogmas of [[religion]], reason is totally incompetent and blind, and its use to be reprehended, this really attests the fact that these dogmas are allegorical in their nature, and are not to be judged by the standard which reason, taking all things &#039;&#039;sensu proprio&#039;&#039;, can alone apply. Now the absurdities of a dogma are just the mark and sign of what is allegorical and mythical in it.&#039;&#039;&#039; In the case under consideration, however, the absurdities spring from the fact that two such heterogeneous doctrines as those of the Old and New Testaments had to be combined. The great allegory was of gradual growth. Suggested by external and adventitious circumstances, it was developed by the interpretation put upon them, an interpretation in quiet touch with certain deep-lying truths only half realised. &#039;&#039;&#039;The allegory was finally completed by [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]], who penetrated deepest into its meaning, and so was able to conceive it as a systematic whole and supply its defects.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;The Christian System&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;&#039;Religion: A Dialogue, and Other Essays&#039;&#039; (1910) as translated by Thomas Bailey Saunders, p. 105&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The bad thing about all religions is that, instead of being able to confess their allegorical nature, they have to conceal it&#039;&#039;&#039;; accordingly, they parade their doctrines in all seriousness as true &#039;&#039;sensu proprio&#039;&#039;, and as absurdities form an essential part of these doctrines we have the great mischief of a continual fraud. Nay, what is worse, the day arrives when they are no longer true &#039;&#039;sensu proprio&#039;&#039;, and then there is an end of them; so that, in that respect, it would be better to admit their allegorical nature at once. But the difficulty is to teach the multitude that something can be both true and untrue at the same time. Since all religions are in a greater or less degree of this nature, &#039;&#039;&#039;we must recognise the fact that mankind cannot get on without a certain amount of absurdity, that absurdity is an element in its existence, and illusion indispensable; as indeed other aspects of life testify.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;The Christian System&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;&#039;Religion: A Dialogue, and Other Essays&#039;&#039; (1910) as translated by Thomas Bailey Saunders, p. 106&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is anything in the world that can really be called a man’s property, it is surely that which is the result of his mental activity.&lt;br /&gt;
** Unverified attribution noted in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1993), ed. Suzy Platt, Library of Congress, p. 227&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Change alone is eternal, perpetual, immortal.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Unverified attribution noted in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1993), ed. Suzy Platt, Library of Congress, p. 39; compare [[Heraclitus]]: &#039;&#039;&#039;Nothing endures but change.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Christianity taught only what the whole of Asia knew already long before and even better.&lt;br /&gt;
** quoted in Londhe, S. (2008). A tribute to Hinduism: Thoughts and wisdom spanning continents and time about India and her culture. New Delhi: Pragun Publication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How every line is of such strong, determined, and consistent meaning! And on every page we encounter deep, original, lofty thoughts, while the whole world is suffused with a high and holy seriousness. &lt;br /&gt;
**About Indian sacred scriptures. quoted in Londhe, S. (2008). A tribute to Hinduism: Thoughts and wisdom spanning continents and time about India and her culture. New Delhi: Pragun Publication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;[[w:The World as Will and Representation|The World as Will and Representation]]&#039;&#039; (1819; 1844; 1859) ===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotations from translations of &#039;&#039;Welt als Wille und Vorstellung&#039;&#039; (first edition published in 1819, the second in 1844, the third in 1859; &#039;&#039;certain quotes appear only in specific editions&#039;&#039;) – Also translated as &#039;&#039;The World as Will and Idea&#039;&#039; – [[s:The World as Will and Representation|Full translation online at Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The philosophy of Kant, then, is the only philosophy with which a thorough acquaintance is directly presupposed in what we have to say here. But if, besides this, the reader has lingered in the school of the divine Plato, he will be so much the better prepared to hear me, and susceptible to what I say. And if, indeed, in addition to this he is a partaker of the benefit conferred by the Vedas, the access to which, opened to us through the Upanishads, is in my eyes the greatest advantage which this still young century enjoys over previous ones, because &#039;&#039;&#039;I believe that the influence of the Sanscrit literature will penetrate not less deeply than did the revival of Greek literature in the fifteenth century&#039;&#039;&#039;: if, I say, the reader has also already received and assimilated the sacred, ancient Indian wisdom, then is he best of all prepared to hear what I have to say to him. My work will not speak to him, as to many others, in a strange and even hostile tongue; for, if it does not sound too vain, I might express the opinion that each one of the individual and disconnected aphorisms which make up the Upanishads may be deduced as a consequence from the thought I am going to impart, though the converse, that my thought is to be found in the Upanishads, is by no means the case.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:s:The World as Will and Representation/Preface to the First Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Kants Philosophie also ist die einzige, mit welcher eine gründliche Bekanntschaft bei dem hier Vorzutragenden gradezu vorausgesetzt wird. — Wenn aber überdies noch der Leser in der Schule des göttlichen Platon geweilt hat; so wird er um so besser vorbereitet und empfänglicher seyn mich zu hören. Ist er aber gar noch der Wohllhat der Veda&#039;s theilhaft geworden, deren uns durch die Upanischaden eröfneter Zugang, in meinen Augen, der größte Vorzug ist, den dieses noch junge Jahrhundert vor den früheren aufzuweisen hat, indem ich vermuthe, daß der Einfluß der Samskrit-Litteratur nicht weniger tief eingreifen wird, als im 14ten Jahrhundert die Wiederbelebung der Griechischen: hat also, sage ich, der Leser auch schon die Weihe uralter Indischer Weisheit empfangen und empfänglich aufgenommen; dann ist er auf das allerbeste bereitet zu hören, was ich ihm vorzutragen habe. Ihn wird es dann nicht, wie manchen Andern fremd, ja feindlich ansprechen; da ich, wenn es nicht zu stolz klänge, behaupten möchte, daß jeder von den einzelnen und abgerissenen Aussprüchen, welche die Upanischaden ausmachen, sich als Folgesatz aus dem von mir mitzutheilenden Gedanken ableiten ließe, obgleich keineswegs auch umgekehrt dieser schon dort zu finden ist.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Leipzig 1819. Vorrede. [https://books.google.de/books?id=0HsPAAAAQAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PR12 pp.XII-XIII books.google]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And now that I have allowed myself the jest to which in this two-sided life hardly any page can be too serious to grant a place, I part with the book with deep seriousness, in the sure hope that sooner or later it will reach those to whom alone it can be addressed; and for the rest, patiently resigned that the same fate should, in full measure, befall it, that in all ages has, to some extent, befallen &#039;&#039;&#039;all knowledge, and especially the weightiest knowledge of the truth, to which only a brief triumph is allotted between the two long periods in which it is condemned as paradoxical or disparaged as trivial.&#039;&#039;&#039; The former fate is also wont to befall its author. But &#039;&#039;&#039;life is short, and truth works far and lives long: let us speak the truth.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:s:The World as Will and Representation/Preface to the First Edition]], last paragraph.&lt;br /&gt;
** Mostly quoted rather incorrectly as: &#039;&#039;&#039;All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Und so, nachdem ich mir den Scherz erlaubt, dem eine Stelle zu gönnen, in diesem durchweg zweideutigen Leben kaum irgend ein Blatt zu ernsthaft seyn kann, gebe ich mit innigem Ernst das Buch hin, in der Zuversicht, daß es früh oder spät diejenigen erreichen wird, an welche es allein gerichtet seyn kann, und übrigens gelassen darin ergeben, daß auch ihm in vollem Maaße das Schicksal werde, welches in &#039;&#039;&#039;jeder Erkenntniß&#039;&#039;&#039;, also um so mehr in der wichtigsten, allezeit der Wahrheit zu Theil ward, der &#039;&#039;&#039;nur ein kurzes Siegesfest beschieden ist, zwischen den beiden langen Zeiträumen, wo sie als paradox verdammt und als trivial geringgeschätzt wird.&#039;&#039;&#039; Auch pflegt das erstere Schicksal ihren Urheber mitzutreffen.— Aber &#039;&#039;&#039;das Leben ist kurz und die Wahrheit wirkt ferne und lebt lange: sagen wir die Wahrheit.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Leipzig 1819. Vorrede. [https://books.google.de/books?id=0HsPAAAAQAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PR16 p.XVI books.google]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Just as the witticism brings two very different real objects under one concept, the pun brings two different concepts, by the assistance of accident, under one word.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://books.google.com/books?id=US0bhPS4h2UC&amp;amp;pg=PA79 Volume I, Book I]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The effect of music is so very much more powerful and penetrating than is that of the other arts, for these others speak only of the shadow, but music of the essence.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. I, Ch. II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This art is &#039;&#039;music&#039;&#039;. It stands quite apart from all the others. In it we do not recognize the copy, the repetition, of any Idea of the inner nature of the world. Yet it is such a great and exceedingly fine art, its effect on man&#039;s innermost nature is so powerful, and it is so completely and profoundly understood by him in his innermost being as an entirely universal language, whose distinctness surpasses even that of the world of perception itself, that in it we certainly have to look for more than that &#039;&#039;exercitium arithmeticae occultum nescientis se numerare animi&#039;&#039; [exercise in [[arithmetic]] in which the mind does not know it is counting] which [[Gottfried Leibniz|Leibniz]] took it to be.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. I, Ch. III, The World As Representation: Second Aspect, as translated by Eric F. J. Payne (1958)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The method of viewing things which proceeds in accordance with the principle of sufficient reason is the rational method, and it alone is valid and of use in practical life and in science. The method which looks away from the content of this principle is the method of genius, which is only valid and of use in art.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Die dem Satz vom Grunde nachgehende ist die vernünftige Betrachtungsart, welche im praktischen Leben, wie in der Wissenschaft, allein gilt und hilft: die vom Inhalt jenes Satzes wegsehende ist die geniale Betrachtungsart, welche in der Kunst allein gilt und hilft.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung&#039;&#039;, Zweiter Band, &#039;&#039;Ergänzungen zum dritten Buch&#039;&#039;, para. 36 (1859)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;For what is modesty but hypocritical humility, by means of which, in a world swelling with vile envy, a man seeks to beg pardon for his excellences and merits from those who have none? For whoever attributes no merit to himself because he really has none is not modest, but merely honest.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. I, Ch. III, The World As Representation: Second Aspect&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The composer reveals the innermost nature of the world, and expresses the profoundest wisdom in a language that his reasoning faculty does not understand&#039;&#039;&#039;, just as a magnetic somnambulist gives information about things of which she has no conception when she is awake. Therefore in the composer, more than in any other artist, the man is entirely separate and distinct from the artist.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. I, Ch. III, The World As Representation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;This actual world of what is knowable, in which we are and which is in us, remains both the material and the limit of our consideration.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol I, Ch. 4, The World As Will: Second Aspect, § 53, as translated by Eric F. J. Payne (1958)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every time a man is begotten and born, the clock of human life is wound up anew to repeat once more its same old tune that has already been played innumerable times, movement by movement and measure by measure, with insignificant variations.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. I, Ch. 4, The World As Will: Second Aspect, as translated by Eric F. J. Payne (1958) p. 322&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Correct and accurate conclusions may be arrived at if we carefully observe the relation of the spheres of concepts&#039;&#039;&#039;, and only conclude that one sphere is contained in a third sphere, when we have clearly seen that this first sphere is contained in a second, which in its turn is contained in the third. On the other hand, the art of sophistry lies in casting only a superficial glance at the relations of the spheres of the concepts, and then manipulating these relations to suit our purposes, generally in the following way: — When the sphere of an observed concept lies partly within that of another concept, and partly within a third altogether different sphere, we treat it as if it lay entirely within the one or the other, as may suit our purpose. &lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. I, Ch. 10, as translated by R. B. Haldane&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Reason is feminine in nature; it can only give after it has received. Of itself it has nothing but the empty forms of its operation.&#039;&#039;&#039; There is no absolutely pure rational knowledge except the four principles to which I have attributed metalogical truth; the principles of identity, contradiction, excluded middle, and sufficient reason of knowledge. For even the rest of logic is not absolutely pure rational knowledge. It presupposes the relations and the combinations of the spheres of concepts. But concepts in general only exist after experience of ideas of perception, and as their whole nature consists in their relation to these, it is clear that they presuppose them.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. I, Ch. 10, as translated by R. B. Haldane&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translations:&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Reason is feminine in nature; it can give only after it has received. Of itself alone, it has nothing but the empty forms of its operation.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** As translated by Eric F. J. Payne (1958) Vol. II, p. 50&lt;br /&gt;
** Reason is feminine in nature: it will give only after it has received.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Das Talent gleicht dem Schützen, der ein Ziel trifft, welches die Uebrigen nicht erreichen können; das Genie dem, der eines trifft, bis zu welchem sie nicht ein Mal zu sehn vermögen...&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. II, Ch. III, para. 31 (On Genius), 1844&lt;br /&gt;
** As cited in &#039;&#039;The Little Book of Bathroom Philosophy: Daily Wisdom from the Greatest Thinkers‎&#039;&#039; (2004) by Gregory Bergman, p. 137&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My body and my will are one.&lt;br /&gt;
** Book 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We see in tragedy the noblest men, after a long conflict and suffering, finally renounce forever all the pleasure of life and the aims till then pursued so keenly, or cheerfully and willingly give up life itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** Book 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That books do not take the place of experience, and that learning is no substitute for genius, are two kindred phenomena; their common ground is that the abstract can never take the place of the perceptive.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans., Vol. II, Ch. 7, p. 74&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is only one inborn erroneous notion … that we exist in order to be happy … So long as we persist in this inborn error … the world seems to us full of contradictions. For at every step, in great things and small, we are bound to experience that the world and life are certainly not arranged for the purpose of maintaining a happy existence … hence the countenances of almost all elderly persons wear the expression of … disappointment.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol II &amp;quot;On the Road to Salvation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; Life is a business that does not cover the costs.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol II &amp;quot;On the Vanity and Suffering of Life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Consider the [[Koran]]... this wretched book was sufficient to start a world-religion, to satisfy the metaphysical need of countless millions for twelve hundred years, to become the basis of their morality and of a remarkable contempt for death, and also to inspire them to bloody wars and the most extensive conquests. In this book we find the saddest and poorest form of theism. Much may be lost in translation, but I have not been able to discover in it one single idea of value.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans., Vol. II, Ch. XVII: On Man&#039;s Need for Metaphysics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If a person is stupid, we excuse him by saying that he cannot help it; but if we attempted to excuse in precisely the same way the person who is bad, we should be laughed at.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans., vol. 2, p. 230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All religions promise a reward for excellences of the will or heart, but none for excellences of the head or understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans., vol. 2, p. 230&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Wirklich ist jedes Kind gewissermaßen ein Genie, und jedes Genie gewissermaßen ein Kind.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Every child is in a way a genius; and every genius is in a way a child.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Bd. 2, § 3.31, p. 451&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At the age of five years to enter a spinning-cotton or other factory, and from that time forth to sit there daily, first ten, then twelve, and ultimately fourteen hours, performing the same mechanical labour, is to purchase dearly the satisfaction of drawing breath. But this is the fate of millions, and that of millions more is analogous to it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol II: &amp;quot;On the Vanity and Suffering of Life&amp;quot;, as translated by R. B. Haldane, and J. Kemp in &#039;&#039;The World as Will and Idea&#039;&#039; (1886), p. 389&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Unplaced by section or chapter:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Cited as from &#039;&#039;Welt als Wille und Vorstellung&#039;&#039;, but without further information as to volume or chapter.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;...this our world, which is so real, with all its suns and milky ways is—nothing.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Whoever heard me assert that the grey cat playing just now in the yard is the same one that did jumps and tricks there five hundred years ago will think whatever he likes of me, but it is a stranger form of madness to imagine that the present-day cat is fundamentally an entirely different one.&lt;br /&gt;
**Quoted by [[Jorge Luis Borges]] in his essay &amp;quot;A History of Eternity&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In every page of [[David Hume]], there is more to be learned than from [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel&#039;s]], [[Johann Friedrich Herbart|Herbart]]&#039;s and Schleiermacher&#039;s complete philosophical works. - vol. II, p. 582 (as cited on p. 177 of Schopenhauer: A Biography)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Spinoza says that if a stone which has been projected through the air, had consciousness, it would believe that it was moving of its own free will. I add this only, that the stone would be right. The impulse given it is for the stone what the motive is for me, and what in the case of the stone appears as cohesion, gravitation, rigidity, is in its inner nature the same as that which I recognise in myself as will, and what the stone also, if knowledge were given to it, would recognise as will.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We, on the contrary, now send to the Brahmans English clergymen and evangelical linen-weavers, in order out of sympathy to put them right, and to point out to them that they are created out ofnothmg, and that they ought to be grateful and pleased about it. But it is Just the same as if we fired a bullet at a cliff. &amp;quot; In India, our religions wIll never at any time take root; the ancient wisdom of the human race will not be supplanted by the events in Galilee. On the contrary, Indian Wisdom flows back to Europe, and will produce a fundamental change in our knowledge and thought.&lt;br /&gt;
**Schopenhauer, Arthur The world as will and representation. Translated from the German by E. F. J. Payne. New York, Dover Publications [c1969 - Volume I, &amp;amp; 63 p. 356-357. quoted in Londhe, S. (2008). A tribute to Hinduism: Thoughts and wisdom spanning continents and time about India and her culture. New Delhi: Pragun Publication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;[[w:On the Basis of Morality|On the Basis of Morality]]&#039;&#039; (1840) ===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/n3/mode/2up Full text online at the Internet Archive], trans. Arthur Brodrick Bullock, London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1903.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, because Christian morals leave [[animals]] out of consideration … therefore in philosophical morals they are of course at once outlawed; they are merely &amp;quot;things,&amp;quot; simply means to ends of any sort; and so they are good for vivisection, for deer-stalking, bull-fights, horse-races, etc., and they may be whipped to death as they struggle along with heavy quarry carts. Shame on such a morality … which fails to recognize the Eternal Reality immanent in everything that has life, and shining forth with inscrutable significance from all eyes that see the sun!&lt;br /&gt;
** Part II, Ch. VI, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/94/mode/2up pp. 94]-95&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Boundless [[compassion]] for all living beings is the surest and most certain guarantee of pure [[moral]] conduct, and needs no casuistry. Whoever is filled with it will assuredly injure no one, do harm to no one, encroach on no man&#039;s rights; he will rather have regard for every one, forgive every one, help every one as far as he can, and all his actions will bear the stamp of justice and loving-kindness. … In former times the English plays used to finish with a petition for the King. The old Indian dramas close with these words: &amp;quot;May all living beings be delivered from pain.&amp;quot; Tastes differ; but in my opinion there is no more beautiful prayer than this.&lt;br /&gt;
** Part III, Ch. VIII, 4, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/213/mode/2up pp. 213]-214&lt;br /&gt;
*** First line often paraphrased as: &#039;&#039;&#039;Compassion is the basis of all morality.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is asserted that [[animals|beasts]] have no [[Animal rights|rights]]; the illusion is harboured that our conduct, so far as they are concerned, has no moral significance, or, as it is put in the language of these codes, that &amp;quot;there are no duties to be fulfilled towards animals.&amp;quot; Such a view is one of revolting coarseness, a barbarism of the West, whose source is Judaism. In philosophy, however, it rests on the assumption, despite all evidence to the contrary, of the radical difference between man and beast,—a doctrine which, as is well known, was proclaimed with more trenchant emphasis by [[Descartes]] than by any one else: it was indeed the necessary consequence of his mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
** Part III, Ch. VIII, 7, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/218/mode/2up p. 218]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Compassion for animals is intimately connected with goodness of character, and it may be confidently asserted that he, who is cruel to living creatures, cannot be a good man. Moreover, this compassion manifestly flows from the same source whence arise the virtues of justice and loving-kindness towards men.&lt;br /&gt;
** Part III, Ch. VIII, 7, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/223/mode/2up p. 223]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Europeans are awakening more and more to a sense that beasts have rights, in proportion as the strange notion is being gradually overcome and outgrown, that the animal kingdom came into existence solely for the benefit and pleasure of man. This view, with the corollary that non-human living creatures are to be regarded merely as things, is at the root of the rough and altogether reckless treatment of them, which obtains in the West.&lt;br /&gt;
** Part III, Ch. VIII, 7, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/225/mode/2up p. 225]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My basis is supported by the authority of the greatest moralist of modern times; for such, undoubtedly, [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau|J. J. Rousseau]] is,—that profound reader of the human heart, who drew his wisdom not from books, but from life, and intended his doctrine not for the professorial chair, but for humanity; he, the foe of all prejudice, the foster-child of nature, whom alone she endowed with the gift of being able to moralise without tediousness, because he hit the truth and stirred the heart.&lt;br /&gt;
** Part III, Ch. VIII, 9, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/230/mode/2up p. 230]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The view of things [called [[Pantheism]]] … — that all plurality is only apparent, that in the endless series of individuals, passing simultaneously and successively into and out of life, generation after generation, age after age, there is but one and the same entity really existing, which is present and identical in all alike; — this theory … may be carried back to the remotest antiquity. It is the alpha and omega of the oldest book in the world, the sacred [[Vedas]], whose dogmatic part, or rather esoteric teaching, is found in the [[Upanishads]]. There, in almost every page this profound doctrine lies enshrined; with tireless repetition, in countless adaptations, by many varied parables and similes it is expounded and inculcated. That such was, moreover, the fount whence [[Pythagoras]] drew his wisdom, cannot be doubted … That it formed practically the central point in the whole philosophy of the [[w:Eleatics|Eleatic School]], is likewise a familiar fact. Later on, the [[w:Neoplatonism|New Platonists]] were steeped in the same … In the ninth century we find it unexpectedly appearing in Europe. It kindles the spirit of no less a divine than [[Johannes Scotus Erigena]], who endeavours to clothe it with the forms and terminology of the Christian religion. Among the Mohammedans we detect it again in the rapt mysticism of the [[Sufi]]. In the West [[Giordano Bruno]] cannot resist the impulse to utter it aloud; but his reward is a death of shame and torture. And at the same time we find the Christian Mystics losing themselves in it, against their own will and intention, whenever and wherever we read of them! [[Spinoza]]&#039;s name is identified with it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Part IV, Ch. 2, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/269/mode/2up pp. 269]-272&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Now if plurality and difference belong only to the appearance-form; if there is but one and the same Entity manifested in all living things: it follows that, when we obliterate the distinction between the ego and the non-ego, we are not the sport of an illusion. Rather are we so, when we maintain the reality of individuation, — a thing the Hindus call [[Maya]], that is, a deceptive vision, a phantasma. The former theory we have found to be the actual source of the phaenomenon of Compassion; indeed Compassion is nothing but its translation into definite expression. This, therefore, is what I should regard as the metaphysical foundation of Ethics, and should describe it as the sense which identifies the ego with the non-ego, so that the individual directly recognises in another his own self, his true and very being. From this standpoint the profoundest teaching of theory pushed to its furthest limits may be shown in the end to harmonise perfectly with the rules of justice and loving-kindness, as exercised; and conversely, it will be clear that practical philosophers, that is, the upright, the beneficent, the magnanimous, do but declare through their acts the same truth as the man of speculation wins by laborious research … He who is morally noble, however deficient in mental penetration, reveals by his conduct the deepest insight, the truest wisdom; and puts to shame the most accomplished and learned genius, if the latter&#039;s acts betray that his heart is yet a stranger to this great principle, — the metaphysical unity of life.&lt;br /&gt;
** Part IV, Ch. 2, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/273/mode/2up pp. 273]-274&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here the institution that compels is the state, the only purpose of which is to protect individuals from one another and the whole from external enemies. Some German philosophasters of this mercenary age would like to twist it into an institution for education and edification in morality; in the background of this lurks the Jesuitical purpose of eliminating personal freedom and the individual’s personal development in order to make him into a mere cog in a Chinese machine of state and religion. But this is the path by which in the past one has arrived at the inquisitions, burning of heretics, and religious wars; Frederick the Great’s pledge, ‘In my country, each shall be able to tend to his salvation in his own fashion’, indicated that he never wanted to tread that path.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** Part III, Ch. VI, [https://archive.org/stream/basisofmorality00schoiala#page/273/mode/2up p. 184]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Parerga and Paralipomena&#039;&#039; (1851) ===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Various portions of this large work have been translated and published in English under various titles. It is here divided up into sections corresponding to those of the original volumes and some of the cited translations. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Philosophy … is a science, and as such has no articles of faith; accordingly, in it nothing can be assumed as existing except what is either positively given empirically, or demonstrated through indubitable conclusions.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol I&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No difference of rank, position, or birth, is so great as the gulf that separates the countless millions who use their head only in the service of their belly, in other words, look upon it as an instrument of the will, and those very few and rare persons who have the courage to say: No! my head is too good for that; it shall be active only in its own service; it shall try to comprehend the wondrous and varied spectacle of this world and then reproduce it in some form, whether as art or as literature, that may answer to my character as an individual. &lt;br /&gt;
** On Genius, &#039;&#039;Parerga and Paralipomena&#039;&#039;, Chapter III, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A mother gave her children Aesop’s fables to read, in the hope of educating and improving their minds; but they very soon brought the book back, and the eldest, wise beyond his years, delivered himself as follows: This is no book for us; it’s much too childish and stupid. You can’t make us believe that foxes and wolves and ravens are able to talk; we’ve got beyond stories of that kind! In these young hopefuls you have the enlightened Rationalists of the future.&lt;br /&gt;
**“Similes, Parables and Fables” &#039;&#039;Parerga and Paralipomena&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a field of ripening corn I came to a place which had been trampled down by some ruthless foot; and as I glanced amongst the countless stalks, every one of them alike, standing there so erect and bearing the full weight of the ear, I saw a multitude of different flowers, red and blue and violet. How pretty they looked as they grew there so naturally with their little foliage! But, thought I, they are quite useless; they bear no fruit; they are mere weeds, suffered to remain only because there is no getting rid of them. And yet, but for these flowers, there would be nothing to charm the eye in that wilderness of stalks. They are emblematic of poetry and art, which, in civic life—so severe, but still useful and not without its fruit—play the same part as flowers in the corn.&lt;br /&gt;
** “Similes, Parables and Fables” &#039;&#039;Parerga and Paralipomena&#039;&#039;, vol. 2, § 380A&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The charlatan takes very different shapes according to circumstances; but at bottom he is a man who cares nothing about knowledge for its own sake, and only strives to gain the semblance of it that he may use it for his own personal ends, which are always selfish and material.&lt;br /&gt;
** “Similes, Parables and Fables” &#039;&#039;Parerga and Paralipomena&#039;&#039;, vol. 2, § 394&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every true thinker for himself is so far like a monarch; he is absolute, and recognises nobody above him. His judgments, like the decrees of a monarch, spring from his own sovereign power and proceed directly from himself. He takes as little notice of authority as a monarch does of a command; nothing is valid unless he has himself authorised it. On the other hand, those of vulgar minds, who are swayed by all kinds of current opinions, authorities, and prejudices, are like the people which in silence obey the law and commands.&lt;br /&gt;
** “Thinking for Oneself,” H. Dirks, trans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man’s body and the needs of his body are now everywhere treated with a tender indulgence. Is the thinking mind then, to be the only thing that is never to obtain the slightest measure of consideration or protection, to say nothing of respect?&lt;br /&gt;
** “On Noise”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Sketch of a History of the Doctrine of the Ideal and the Real&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Descartes is rightly regarded as the father of modern philosophy primarily and generally because he helped the faculty of reason to stand on its own feet by teaching men to use their brains in place whereof the Bible, on the one hand, and Aristotle, on the other, had previously served.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be a philosopher, that is to say, a lover of wisdom (for wisdom is nothing but truth), it is not enough for a man to love truth, in so far as it is compatible with his own interest, with the will of his superiors, with the dogmas of the church, or with the prejudices and tastes of his contemporaries; so long as he rests content with this position, he is only a &#039;&#039;philautos&#039;&#039;, not a &#039;&#039;philosophos&#039;&#039; [a lover of self, not a lover of wisdom]. For this title of honor is well and wisely conceived precisely by its stating that one should love the truth earnestly and with one’s whole heart, and thus unconditionally and unreservedly, above all else, and, if need be, in defiance of all else. Now the reason for this is the one previously stated that the intellect has become free, and in this state it does not even know or understand any other interest than that of truth.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, pp. 21–22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The auspices for philosophy are bad if, when proceeding ostensibly on the investigation of truth, we start saying farewell to all uprightness, honesty and sincerity, and are intent only on passing ourselves off for what we are not. We then assume, like those three sophists [Fichte, Schelling and Hegel], first a false pathos, then an affected and lofty earnestness, then an air of infinite superiority, in order to impose where we despair of ever being able to convince.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If, while hurrying ostensibly to the temple of truth, we hand the reins over to our personal interests which look aside at very different guiding stars, for instance at the tastes and foibles of our contemporaries, at the established religion, but in particular at the hints and suggestions of those at the head of affairs, then how shall we ever reach the high, precipitous, bare rock whereon stands the temple of truth?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, pp. 22–23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An unbiased reader, on opening one of their [Fichte’s, Schelling’s or Hegel’s] books and then asking himself whether this is the tone of a thinker wanting to instruct or that of a charlatan wanting to impress, cannot be five minutes in any doubt. … The tone of calm investigation, which had characterized all previous philosophy, is exchanged for that of unshakeable certainty, such as is peculiar to charlatanry of every kind and at all times. … From every page and every line, there speaks an endeavor to beguile and deceive the reader, first by producing an effect to dumbfound him, then by incomprehensible phrases and even sheer nonsense to stun and stupefy him, and again by audacity of assertion to puzzle him, in short, to throw dust in his eyes and mystify him as much as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;On Philosophy in the Universities&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ueberhaupt aber bin ich allmälig der Meinung geworden, daß der erwähnte Nutzen der Kathederphilosophie von dem Nachtheil überwogen werde, den die Philosophie als Profession der Philosophie als freier Wahrheitsforschung, oder die Philosophie im Auftrage der Regierung der Philosophie im Auftrage der Natur und der Menschheit bringt.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Chair-philosophy is burdened with the disadvantage which philosophy as a profession imposes on philosophy as the free investigation of truth, or which philosophy by government order imposes on philosophy in the name of nature and mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, p. 151, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 139&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Zuvörderst nämlich wird eine Regierung nicht Leute besolden, um Dem, was sie durch tausend von ihr angestellte Priester, oder Religionslehrer, von allen Kanzeln verkünden läßt, direkt, oder auch nur indirekt, zu widersprechen. … Daher der Grundsatz improbant secus docentes.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A government will not pay people to contradict directly, or even only indirectly, what it has had promulgated from all the pulpits by thousands of its appointed priests or religious teachers. … Hence the maxim improbant secus docentes [We reject and condemn the man who teaches something different].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, pp. 152–153, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 139&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;... deshalb ich diese als die Metaphysik des Volkes bezeichnet habe.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I have described religion as the metaphysics of the people.&lt;br /&gt;
*** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 140&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Man sieht daraus, daß in der Universitäts-philosophie die Wahrheit nur eine sekundäre Stelle einnimmt und, wenn es gefordert wird, aufstehn muß, einer andern Eigenschaft Platz zu machen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** In philosophy at the universities truth occupies only a secondary place and, if called upon, she must get up and make room for another attribute.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, p. 152, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 140&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;In Folge hievon wird, so lange die Kirche besteht, auf den Universitäten stets nur eine solche Philosophie gelehrt werden dürfen, welche, mit durchgängiger Rücksicht auf die Landesreligion abgefaßt, dieser im Wesentlichen parallel läuft und daher stets,—allenfalls kraus figurirt, seltsam verbrämt und dadurch schwer verständlich gemacht,—doch im Grunde und in der Hauptsache nichts Anderes, als eine Paraphrase und Apologie der Landesreligion ist. Den unter diesen Beschränkungen Lehrenden bleibt sonach nichts Anderes übrig, als nach neuen Wendungen und Formen zu suchen, unter welchen sie den in abstrakte Ausdrücke verkleideten und dadurch fade gemachten Inhalt der Landesreligion aufstellen, der alsdann Philosophie heißt.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Framed with regard to the established religion, this philosophy runs essentially parallel thereto; and so, being perhaps intricately composed, curiously trimmed, and thus rendered difficult to understand, it is always at bottom and in the main nothing but a paraphrase and apology of the established religion. Accordingly, for those teaching under these restrictions, there is nothing left but to look for new turns of phrase and forms of speech by which they arrange the contents of the established religion. Distinguished in abstract expressions and thereby rendered dry and dull, they then go by the name of philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, pp. 152–153, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 140&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Inzwischen bleiben die solchermaaßen beschränkten Universitätsphilosophie bei der Sache ganz wohlgemuth; weil ihr eigentlicher Ernst darin liegt, mit Ehren ein redliches Auskommen für sich, nebst Weib und Kind, zu erwerben, auch ein gewisses Ansehn vor den Leuten zu genießen; hingegen das tiefbewegte Gemüth eines wirklichen Philosophen, dessen ganzer und großer Ernst im Aufsuchen eines Schlüssels zu unserm, so rätselhaften wie mißlichen Daseyn liegt, von ihnen zu den mythologischen Wesen gezählt wird; wenn nicht etwa» gar der damit Behaftete, sollte er ihnen je vorkommen, ihnen als von Monomanie besessen erscheint. Denn daß es mit der Philosophie so recht eigentlicher, bitterer Ernst seyn könne, läßt wohl, in der Regel, kein Mensch sich weniger träumen, als ein Docent derselben; gleichwie der ungläubigste Christ der Papst zu seyn pflegt. Daher gehört es denn auch zu den seltensten Fällen, daß ein wirklicher Philosoph zugleich ein Docent der Philosophie gewesen wäre.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** University professors, restricted in this way, are quite happy about the matter, for their real concern is to earn with credit an honest livelihood for themselves and also for their wives and children and moreover to enjoy a certain prestige in the eyes of the public. On the other hand, the deeply stirred mind of the real philosopher, whose whole concern is to look for the key to our existence, as mysterious as it is precarious, is regarded by them as something mythological, if indeed the man so affected does not even appear to them to be obsessed by a monomania, should he ever be met with among them. For that a man could really be in dead earnest about philosophy does not as a rule occur to anyone, least of all to a lecturer thereon; just as the most sceptical Christian is usually the Pope. It has, therefore, been one of the rarest events for a genuine philosopher to be at the same time a lecturer in philosophy. &lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, p. 153, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 141&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Das Bedenkliche bei der Sache ist auch bloß die doch einzuräumende Möglichkeit, daß die letzte dem Menschen erreichbare Einsicht in die Natur der Dinge, in sein eigenes Wesen und das der Welt nicht gerade zusammenträfe mit den Lehren, welche theils dem ehemaligen Völkchen der Juden eröffnet worden, theils vor 1800 Jahren in Jerusalem aufgetreten sind.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The hazardous part of the business is also the mere possibility, still to be admitted, that the ultimate insight into the nature of things attainable by man, into his very being and that of the world, might not coincide exactly with the doctrines which were in part made known to the former little race of the Jews and in part appeared in Jerusalem eighteen hundred years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, p. 154, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 142&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Andere wieder, von diesen Wahrheitsforschern, schmelzen Philosophie und Religion zu einem Kentauren zusammen, den sie Religionsphilosophie nennen; Pflegen auch zu lehren, Religion und Philosophie seien eigentlich das Selbe;—welcher Sah jedoch nur in dem Sinne wahr zu seyn scheint, in welchem Franz I., in Beziehung auf Karl V., sehr versöhnlich gesagt haben soll: „was mein Bruder Karl will, das will ich auch,”—nämlich Mailand, Wieder andere machen nicht so viele Umstände, sondern reden geradezu von einer Christlichen Philosophie;—welches ungefähr so herauskommt, wie wenn man von einer Christlichen Arithmetik reden wollte, die fünf gerade seyn ließe. Dergleichen von Glaubenslehren entnommene Epitheta sind zudem der Philosophie offenbar unanständig, da sie sich für den Versuch der Vernunft giebt, aus eigenen Mitteln und unabhängig von aller Auktorität das Problem des Daseyns zu lösen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Others … are in the habit of teaching that religion and philosophy are really the same thing. Such a statement, however, appears to be true only in the sense in which Francis I is supposed to have said in a very conciliatory tone with reference to Charles V: ‘what my brother Charles wants is also what I want’, namely Milan. Others again do not stand on such ceremony, but talk bluntly of a Christian philosophy, which is much the same as if we were to speak of a Christian [[arithmetic]], and this would be stretching a point. Moreover, epithets taken from such dogmas are obviously unbecoming of philosophy, for it is devoted to the attempt of the faculty of reason to solve by its own means and independently of all authority the problem of existence.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, p. 155, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, pp. 142-143&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Man wolle nicht scheinen was man nicht ist. Das Vorgeben unbefangener Wahrheitsforschung, mit dem Entschluß, die Landesreligion zum Resultat, ja zum Maaßstabe und zur Kontrole derselben zu machen, ist unerträglich, und eine solche, an die Landesreligion, wie der Kettenhund an die Mauer, gebundene Philosophie ist nur das ärgerliche Zerrbild der höchsten und edelsten Bestrebung der Menschheit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** We should not pretend to be what we are not. The pretence of the impartial investigation of truth, with the resolve to make the established religion the result, indeed the measure and control of truth, is intolerable and such a philosophy, tied to the established religion like a dog to a chain, is only the vexatious caricature of the highest and noblest endeavor of mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, pp. 155–156, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 143&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Philosophy of religion … really amounts to … philosophizing on certain favorite assumptions that are not confirmed at all.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 143&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ja, bisweilen fühlt man sich versucht zu glauben, daß sie ihre ernstlich gemeinten philosophischen Forschungen schon vor ihrem zwölften Jahre abgethan und bereits damals ihre Ansicht vom Wesen der Welt, und was dem anhängt, auf immer festgestellt hätten; weil sie, nach allen philosophischen Diskussionen und halsbrechenden Abwegen, unter verwegenen Führern, doch immer wieder bei Dem anlangen, was uns in jenem Alter plausibel gemacht zu werden pflegt, und es sogar als Kriterium der Wahrheit zu nehmen scheinen. Alle die heterodoren philosophischen Lehren, mit welchen sie dazwischen, im Laufe ihres Lebens, sich haben beschäftigen müssen, scheinen ihnen nur dazu- seyn, um widerlegt zu werben und dadurch jene ersteren desto fester zu etabliren.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Indeed at times we feel tempted to think that they had finished with their seriously meant philosophical investigations ever before their twelfth year and that at that age they had for the rest of their lives settled their view on the nature of the world and on everything pertaining thereto. We feel so tempted because after all the philosophical discussions and dangerous deviations, … they always come back to what is usually made plausible to us at that tender age and appear to accept this even as the criterion of truth. All heterodox philosophical doctrines, with which they must at times be concerned in the course of their lives, appear to them to exist merely to be refuted and this to establish those others the more firmly.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, p. 156, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, pp. 143-144&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Inzwischen verlangt die Billigkeit, daß man die Universitätsphilosophie nicht bloß, wie hier gescheht!, aus dem Standpunkte des angeblichen, sondern auch aus dem des wahren und eigentlichen Zweckes derselben beurtheile. Dieser nämlich läuft darauf hinaus, daß die künftigen Referendarien, Advokaten, Aerzte, Kandidaten und Schulmänner auch im Innersten ihrer Ueberzeugungen diejenige Richtung erhalten, welche den Absichten, die der Staat und seine Regierung mit ihnen haben, angemessen ist. Dagegen habe ich nichts einzuwenden, bescheide mich also in dieser Hinsicht. Denn über die Nothwendigkeit, oder Entbehrlichkeit eines solchen Staatsmittels zu urtheilen, halte ich mich nicht für kompetent; sondern stelle es denen anheim, welche die schwere Aufgabe haben, Menschen zu regieren, d. h. unter vielen Millionen eines, der großen Mehrzahl nach, gränzenlos egoistischen, ungerechten, unbilligen, unredlichen, neidischen, boshaften und dabei sehr beschränkten und querköpfigen Geschlechtes, Gesetz, Ordnung, Ruhe und Friede aufrecht zu erhalten und die Wenigen, denen irgend ein Besitz zu Theil geworden, zu schützen gegen die Unzahl Derer, welche nichts, als ihre Körperkräfte haben. Die Aufgabe ist so schwer, daß ich mich wahrlich nicht vermesse, über die dabei anzuwendenden Mittel mit ihnen zu rechten. Denn „ich danke Gott an jedem Morgen, daß ich nicht brauch’ für’s Röm’sche Reich zu sorgen,”—ist stets mein Wahlspruch gewesen. Diese Staatszwecke der Universitätsphilosophie waren es aber, welche der Hegelei eine so beispiellose Ministergunft verschafften. Denn ihr war der Staat „der absolut vollendete ethische Organismus,” und sie ließ den ganzen Zweck des menschlichen Daseyns im Staat aufgehn. Konnte es eine bessere Zurichtung für künftige Referendarien und demnächst Staatsbeamte geben, als diese, in Folge welcher ihr ganzes Wesen und Seyn, mit Leib und Seele, völlig dem Staat verfiel, wie das der Biene dem Bienenstock, und sie auf nichts Anderes, weder in dieser, noch in einer andern Welt hinzuarbeiten hatten, als daß sie taugliche Räder würden, mitzuwirken, um die große Staatsmaschine, diesen &#039;&#039;ultimus finis bonorum&#039;&#039;, im Gange zu erhalten? Der Referendar und der Mensch war danach Eins und das Selbe. Es war eine rechte Apotheose der Philisterei.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** We should judge university philosophy … by its true and proper aim: … that the junior barristers, solicitors, doctors, probationers, and pedagogues of the future should maintain, even in their innermost conviction, the same line of thought in keeping with the aims and intentions that the State and its government have in common with them. I have no objection to this and so in this respect have nothing to say. For I do not consider myself competent to judge of the necessity or needlessness of such a State expedient, but rather leave it to those who have the difficult task of governing men, that is to say, of maintain law and order, … and of protecting the few who have acquired property from the immense number of those who have nothing but their physical strength. … I certainly do not presume to argue with them over the means to be employed in this case; for my motto has always been: “Thank God, each morning, therefore, that you have not the Roman realm to care for!” [Goethe, Faust] But it was these constitutional aims of university philosophy which procured for Hegelry such an unprecedented ministerial favor. For it the State was “the absolute perfect ethical organism,” and it represented as originating in the State the whole aim of human existence. Could there be for future junior barristers and thus for state officials a better preparation than this, in consequence whereof their whole substance and being, their body and soul, were entirely forfeited to the State, like bees in a beehive, and they had nothing else to work for … except to become efficient wheels, cooperating for the purpose of keeping in motion the great State machine, that &#039;&#039;ultimus finis bonorum&#039;&#039; [ultimate good]? The junior barrister and the man were accordingly one and the same. It was a real apotheosis of philistinism.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, p. 159, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, pp. 146-147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Als auf die große Masse des Menschengeschlechts berechnet und derselben angemessen, kann bloß allegorische Wahrheit enthalten, welche sie jedoch als &#039;&#039;sensu proprio&#039;&#039; wahr geltend zu machen hat.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dogma is intended for, and suited to, the great mass of the human race; and as such it can contain merely allegorical truth that it nevertheless has to pass off as truth &#039;&#039;sensu proprio&#039;&#039; [in the proper sense].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, p. 160, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If from the wilderness the righteous and honest John were actually to come who, clothed in skins and living on locusts and untouched by all the terrible mischief, were meanwhile to apply himself with a pure heart and in all seriousness to the investigation of truth and to offer the fruits thereof, what kind of reception would he have to expect from those businessmen of the chair, who are hired for State purposes and with wife and family have to live on philosophy, and whose watchword is, therefore, Primum vivere, deinde philosophari [first live and then philosophize]? These men have accordingly taken possession of the market and have already seen to it that here nothing is of value except what they allow; consequently merit exists only in so far as they and their mediocrity are pleased to acknowledge it. They thus have on a leading rein the attention of that small public, such as it is, that is concerned with philosophy. For on matters that do not promise, like the productions of poetry, amusement and entertainment but only instruction, and financially unprofitable instruction at that, that public will certainly not waste its time, effort, and energy, without first being thoroughly assured that such efforts will be richly rewarded. Now by virtue of its inherited belief that whoever lives by a business knows all about it, this public expects an assurance from the professional men who from professor’s chairs and in compendiums, journals, and literary periodicals, confidently behave as if they were the real masters of the subject. Accordingly, the public allows them to sample and select whatever is worth noting and what can be ignored. My poor John from the wilderness, how will you fare if, as is to be expected, what you bring is not drafted in accordance with the tacit convention of the gentlemen of the lucrative philosophy? They will regard you as one who has not entered in the spirit of the game and thus threatens to spoil the fun for all of them; consequently, they will regard you as their common enemy and antagonist. Now even if what you bring were the greatest masterpiece of the human mind, it could never find favor in their eyes. For it would not be drawn up ad normam conventionis [according to the current pattern]; and so it would not be such as to enable them to make it the subject of their lectures from the chair in order to make a living from it. It never occurs to a professor of philosophy to examine a new system that appears to see whether it is true; but he at once tests it merely to see whether it can be brought into harmony with the doctrines of the established religion, with government plans, and with the prevailing views of the times.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, pp. 160-161, E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, pp. 148-149&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Aphorisms on the Wisdom of Life&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
Read it online [https://monadnock.net/schopenhauer/wisdom-of-life.html here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes from &#039;&#039;Aphorismen zur Lebensweisheit&#039;&#039;, using various translations, also translated as &#039;&#039;On The Wisdom of Life: Aphorisms&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The cheapest sort of pride is national pride; for if a man is proud of his own nation, it argues that he has no qualities of his own of which he can be proud; otherwise he would not have recourse to those which he shares with so many millions of his fellowmen. The man who is endowed with important personal qualities will be only too ready to see clearly in what respects his own nation falls short, since their failings will be constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud adopts, as a last resource, pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and glad to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 1, Ch. 3, Section 2: Pride&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No doubt, when modesty was made a virtue, it was a very advantageous thing for the fools, for everybody is expected to speak of himself as if he were one.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 1, Ch. 3, Section 2: Pride&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ruhm muß daher erst erworben werden: die Ehre hingegen braucht bloß nicht verloren zu gehen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Fame is something which must be won; honor, only something which must not be lost.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** Vol. 1. Ch. 4: Position, or a Man&#039;s Place in the Estimation of Others, §4-Honor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Pride&#039;&#039; is an established conviction of one’s own paramount worth in some particular respect, while &#039;&#039;vanity&#039;&#039; is the desire of rousing such a conviction in others, and it is generally accompanied by the secret hope of ultimately coming to the same conviction oneself. Pride works &#039;&#039;from within&#039;&#039;; it is the direct appreciation of oneself. Vanity is the desire to arrive at this appreciation indirectly, &#039;&#039;from without&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 1, Ch. 4, § 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On the other hand, the cheapest form of pride is national pride; for the man affected therewith betrays a want of individual qualities of which he might be proud, since he would not otherwise resort to that which he shares with so many millions. The man who possesses outstanding personal qualities will rather see most clearly the faults of his own nation, for he has them constantly before his eyes. But every miserable fool, who has nothing in the world whereof he could be proud, resorts finally to being proud of the very nation to which he belongs. In this he finds compensation and is now ready and thankful to defend, … all the faults and follies peculiar to it. (From &#039;Parerga and Paralipomena&#039;, Vol. 1, Aphorisms on the Wisdom of Life, &#039;What A Man Represents&#039;, pp. 360)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rascals are always sociable — more’s the pity!&#039;&#039;&#039; and the chief sign that a man has any nobility in his character is the little pleasure he takes in others’ company.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 1, Ch. 5, § 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Not as yet placed by section or chapter:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Cited as from &#039;&#039;Aphorismen zur Lebensweisheit&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Aphorisms on the Wisdom of Life&#039;&#039; or &amp;quot;The Wisdom of Life&amp;quot; but without further information; some of the quotes in this section are of the original German phrase, with only improvised English translation, addition of published English translations is welcomed.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Childish and altogether ludicrous is what you yourself are and all philosophers; and if a grown-up man like me spends fifteen minutes with fools of this kind, it is merely a way of passing the time. I&#039;ve now got more important things to do. Goodbye!&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Thrasymachus&#039;&#039;, in &#039;&#039;On the Indestructibility of our Essential Being by Death&#039;&#039;, in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970) as translated by R. J. Hollingdale, p. 76&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A reproach can only hurt if it hits the mark. Whoever knows that he does not deserve a reproach can treat it with contempt.&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;!-- p. 383 in Oxford University Press edition of &#039;&#039;Parerga and Paralipomena: Short Philosophical Essays&#039;&#039; (1974) --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The brain may be regarded as a kind of parasite of the organism, a pensioner, as it were, who dwells with the body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* National character is only another name for the particular form which the littleness, perversity and baseness of mankind take in every country. Every nation mocks at other nations, and all are right.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: Every nation criticizes every other one — and they are &#039;&#039;all&#039;&#039; correct.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As quoted by [[Wolfgang Pauli]] in a letter to [[w:Abraham Pais|Abraham Pais]] (17 August 1950) published in &#039;&#039;The Genius of Science&#039;&#039; (2000) by Abraham Pais, p. 242&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Im allgemeinen freilich haben die Weisen aller Zeiten immer dasselbe gesagt, und die Toren, d.h. die unermessliche Majorität aller Zeiten, haben immer dasselbe, nämlich das Gegenteil getan; und so wird es denn auch ferner bleiben.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** In general admittedly the Wise of all times have always said the same thing, and the fools, that is to say the vast majority of all times, have always done the same thing, i.e. the opposite; and so it will remain in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Die Gegenwart eines Gedankens ist wie die Gegenwart einer Geliebten.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The presence of a thought is like the presence of a lover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Die Erinnerung wirkt wie das Sammlungsglas in der Camera obscura: Sie zieht alles zusammen und bringt dadurch ein viel schöneres Bild hervor, als sein Original ist.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Memory works like the collection glass in the Camera obscura: it gathers everything together and therewith produces a far more beautiful picture than was present originally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Alles, alles kann einer vergessen, nur nicht sich selbst, sein eigenes Wesen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** One can forget everything, everything, only not oneself, one&#039;s own being.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Zu unserer Besserung bedürfen wir eines Spiegels.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** For our improvement we need a mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Meistens belehrt uns erst der Verlust über den Wert der Dinge.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Mostly it is loss which teaches us about the worth of things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Die wohlfeilste Art des Stolzes hingegen ist der Nationalstolz. Denn er verrät in dem damit Behafteten den Mangel an individuellen Eigenschaften, auf die er stolz sein könnte, indem er sonst nicht zu dem greifen würde, was er mit so vielen Millionen teilt. Wer bedeutende persönliche Vorzüge besitzt, wird vielmehr die Fehler seiner eigenen Nation, da er sie beständig vor Augen hat, am deutlichsten erkennen. Aber jeder erbärmliche Tropf, der nichts in der Welt hat, darauf er stolz sein könnte, ergreift das letzte Mittel, auf die Nation, der er gerade angehört, stolz zu sein. Hieran erholt er sich und ist nun dankbarlich bereit, alle Fehler und Torheiten, die ihr eigen sind, mit Händen und Füßen zu verteidigen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The cheapest form of pride however is national pride. For it reveals in the one thus afflicted the lack of individual qualities of which he could be proud, while he would not otherwise reach for what he shares with so many millions. He who possesses significant personal merits will rather recognise the defects of his own nation, as he has them constantly before his eyes, most clearly. But that poor blighter who has nothing in the world of which he can be proud, latches onto the last means of being proud, the nation to which he belongs to. Thus he recovers and is now in gratitude ready to defend with hands and feet all errors and follies which are its own.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Kap. II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je weniger einer, in Folge objektiver oder subjektiver Bedingungen, nötig hat, mit den Menschen in Berührung zu kommen, desto besser ist er daran.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The less one, as a result of objective or subjective conditions, has to come into contact with people, the better off one is for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Was nun andrerseits die Menschen gesellig macht, ist ihre Unfähigkeit, die Einsamkeit und in dieser sich selbst zu ertragen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** What now on the other hand makes people sociable is their incapacity to endure solitude and thus themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our moral virtues benefit mainly other people; intellectual virtues, on the other hand, benefit primarily ourselves; therefore the former make us universally popular, the latter unpopular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The result of this mental dullness is that inner vacuity and emptiness that is stamped on innumerable faces and also betrays itself in a constant and lively attention to all events in the external world, even the most trivial. This vacuity is the real source of boredom and always craves for external excitement in order to set the mind and spirits in motion through something. Therefore in the choice thereof it is not fastidious, as is testified by the miserable and wretched pastimes to which people have recourse. … The principal result of this inner vacuity is the craze for society, diversion, amusement, and luxury of every kind which lead many to extravagance and so to misery. Nothing protects us so surely from this wrong turning as inner wealth, the wealth of the mind, for the more eminent it becomes, the less room does it leave for boredom. The inexhaustible activity of ideas, their constantly renewed play with the manifold phenomena of the inner and outer worlds, the power and urge always to make different combinations of them, all these put the eminent mind, apart from moments of relaxation, quite beyond the reach of boredom.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, pp. 329–330&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Der Philister … ist demnach ein Mensch ohne geistige Bedürfnisse. Hieraus nun folgt gar mancherlei: erstlich, in Hinsicht auf ihn selbst, daß er ohne geistige Genüsse bleibt; nach dem schon erwähnten Grundsatz:&#039;&#039; il n’est pas de vrais plaisirs qu’avec de vrais besoins.&lt;br /&gt;
** The Philistine … is a man without intellectual needs. Now it follows from this that, as regards himself, he is left without any intellectual pleasures in accordance with the principle, &#039;&#039;il n’est pas de vrais plaisirs qu’avec de vrais besoins&#039;&#039;. [There are no true pleasures without true needs.]&lt;br /&gt;
*** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 344&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Kein Drang nach Erkenntniß und Einsicht, um ihrer selbst Willen, belebt sein [des Philisters] Daseyn, auch keiner nach eigentlich ästhetischen Genüssen, als welcher dem ersteren durchaus verwandt ist. Was dennoch von Genüssen solcher Art etwan Mode, oder Auktorität, ihm aufdringt, wird er als eine Art Zwangsarbeit möglichst kurz abthun.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** His [the Philistine’s] existence is not animated by any keen desire for knowledge and insight for their own sake, or by any desire for really aesthetic pleasures which is so entirely akin to it. If, however, any pleasures of this kind are forced on him by fashion or authority, he will dispose of them as briefly as possible as a kind of compulsory labour.&lt;br /&gt;
*** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 344&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Sich Alles, was zum leiblichen Wohlseyn beiträgt, zu verschaffen, ist der Zweck seines Lebens. Glücklich genug, wenn dieser ihm viel zu schaffen macht! Denn, sind jene Güter ihm schon zum voraus oktroyirt; so fällt er unausbleiblich der Langenweile anheim.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The purpose of his [the Philistine’s] life is to procure for himself everything that contributes to bodily welfare. He is happy enough when this causes him a lot of trouble. For if those good things are heaped on him in advance, he will inevitably lapse into boredom.&lt;br /&gt;
*** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 344&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ball, Theater, Gesellschaft, Kartenspiel, Hasardspiel, Pferde, Weiber, Trinken, Reisen, … reicht dies Alles gegen die Langeweile nicht aus, wo Mangel an geistigen Bedürfnissen die geistigen Genüsse unmöglich macht. Daher auch ist dem Philister ein dumpfer, trockener Ernst, der sich dem thierischen nähert, eigen und charakteristisch.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dancing, the theatre, society, card-playing, games of chance, horses, women, drinking, traveling, and so on … are not enough to ward off boredom where intellectual pleasures are rendered impossible by lack of intellectual needs. Thus a peculiar characteristic of the Philistine is a dull, dry seriousness akin to that of animals.&lt;br /&gt;
*** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 344&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From the fundamental nature of the Philistine, it follows that, in regard to others, as he has no intellectual but only physical needs, he will seek those who are capable of satisfying the latter not the former. And so of all the demands he makes of others the very smallest will be that of any outstanding intellectual abilities. On the contrary, when he comes across these they will excite his antipathy and even hatred. For here he has a hateful feeling of inferiority and also a dull secret envy which he most carefully attempts to conceal even from himself; but in this way it grows sometimes into a feeling of secret rage and rancour. Therefore it will never occur to him to assess his own esteem and respect in accordance with such qualities, but they will remain exclusively reserved for rank and wealth, power and influence, as being in his eyes the only real advantages to excel in which is also his desire.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, pp. 344–345&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A great affliction of all Philistines is that idealities afford them no entertainment, but to escape from boredom they are always in need of realities.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 345&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Epicurus, the great teacher of happiness, has correctly and finely divided human needs into three classes. First there are the natural and necessary needs which, if they are not satisfied, cause pain. Consequently, they are only victus et amictus [food and clothing] and are easy to satisfy. Then we have those that are natural yet not necessary, that is, the needs for sexual satisfaction. … These needs are more difficult to satisfy. Finally, there are those that are neither natural nor necessary, the needs for luxury, extravagance, pomp, and splendour, which are without end and very difficult to satisfy.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 346&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is difficult, if not impossible, to define the limit of our reasonable desires in respect of possessions.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 346&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Wealth is like sea-water; the more we drink, the thirstier we become.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 347&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the purpose of acquiring gain, everything else is pushed aside or thrown overboard, for example, as is philosophy by the professors of philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 347&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People are often reproached because their desires are directed mainly to money and they are fonder of it than of anything else. Yet it is natural and even inevitable for them to love that which, as an untiring Proteus, is ready at any moment to convert itself into the particular object of our fickle desires and manifold needs. Thus every other blessing can satisfy only one desire and one need; for instance, food is good only to the hungry, wine only for the healthy, medicine for the sick, a fur coat for winter, women for youth, and so on. Consequently, all these are only … relatively good. Money alone is the absolutely good thing because it meets not merely one need in concreto, but needs generally in abstracto.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 347&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Means at our disposal should be regarded as a bulwark against the many evils and misfortunes that can occur. We should not regard such wealth as a permission or even an obligation to procure for ourselves the pleasures of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 348&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People who originally have no means but are ultimately able to earn a great deal, through whatever talents they may possess, almost always come to think that these are permanent capital and that what they gain through them is interest. Accordingly, they do not put aside part of their earnings to form a permanent capital, but spend their money as fast as they earn it. But they are then often reduced to poverty because their earnings decrease or come to an end after their talent, which was of a transitory nature, is exhausted, as happens, for example, in the case of almost all the fine arts; or because it could be brought to bear only under a particular set of circumstances that has ceased to exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** E. Payne, trans. (1974) Vol. 1, p. 348&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Counsels and Maxims&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:CL0024+17.jpg|thumb|right|The fundament upon which all our knowledge and learning rests is the inexplicable.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/counsels/ Counsels and Maxims], as translated by T. Bailey Saunders (also on Wikisource: [[s:Counsels and Maxims|Counsels and Maxims]]).&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the teaching of my philosophy... that our whole existence is something which had better not have been, and that to disown and disclaim it is the highest wisdom.&lt;br /&gt;
** Ch 1&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Schopenhauer&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/counsels/chapter1.html Counsels and Maxims] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201131253/http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/counsels/chapter1.html |date=2017-12-01 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The fundament upon which all our knowledge and learning rests is the inexplicable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 1, § 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Do not shorten the morning by getting up late, or waste it in unworthy occupations or in talk; look upon it as the quintessence of life, as to a certain extent sacred.&#039;&#039;&#039; Evening is like old age: we are languid, talkative, silly. &#039;&#039;&#039;Each day is a little life: every waking and rising a little birth, every fresh morning a little youth, every going to rest and sleep a little death.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[s:Counsels and Maxims/Chapter II#SECTION 13.|Vol. 2, Ch. 2]]: [http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/counsels/chapter2.html Our Relation To Ourselves]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All the cruelty and torment of which the world is full is in fact merely the necessary result of the totality of the forms under which the will to live is objectified.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 14, § 164&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The discovery of truth is prevented more effectively, not by the false appearance things present and which mislead into error, not directly by weakness of the reasoning powers, but by preconceived opinion, by prejudice.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 1, § 17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you feel irritated by the absurd remarks of two people whose conversation you happen to overhear, you should imagine that you are listening to a dialogue of two fools in a comedy.&lt;br /&gt;
** T. B. Saunders, trans., § 38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How very paltry and limited the normal human intellect is, and how little lucidity there is in the human consciousness, may be judged from the fact that, despite the ephemeral brevity of human life, the uncertainty of our existence and the countless enigmas which press upon us from all sides, everyone does not continually and ceaselessly philosophize, but that only the rarest of exceptions do.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 3, § 39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Suicide may also be regarded as an experiment — a question which man puts to Nature, trying to force her to answer. The question is this: What change will death produce in a man’s existence and in his insight into the nature of things? &#039;&#039;&#039;It is a clumsy experiment to make; for it involves the destruction of the very consciousness which puts the question and awaits the answer.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 13, § 160&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Newspapers are the second hand of history. This hand, however, is usually not only of inferior metal to the other hands, it also seldom works properly.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 19, § 233&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Great minds are related to the brief span of time during which they live as great buildings are to a little square in which they stand: you cannot see them in all their magnitude because you are standing too close to them.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 20, § 242&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Patriotism, when it wants to make itself felt in the domain of learning, is a dirty fellow who should be thrown out of doors.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 21, § 255&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As the biggest library if it is in disorder is not as useful as a small but well-arranged one, so you may accumulate a vast amount of knowledge but it will be of far less value to you than a much smaller amount if you have not thought it over for yourself; because only through ordering what you know by comparing every truth with every other truth can you take complete possession of your knowledge and get it into your power. You can think about only what you know, so you ought to learn something; on the other hand, you can know only what you have thought about.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 22, § 257 &amp;quot;On Thinking for Yourself&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039;(1970) as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: Just as the largest library, badly arranged, is not so useful as a very moderate one that is well arranged, so the greatest amount of knowledge, if not elaborated by our own thoughts, is worth much less than a far smaller volume that has been abundantly and repeatedly thought over.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Truth that has been merely learned is like an  artificial limb, a false tooth, a waxen nose; at best, like a nose made out of another&#039;s flesh; it adheres to us only because it is put on. &#039;&#039;&#039;But truth acquired by  thinking of our own is like a natural limb; it alone really belongs to us.&#039;&#039;&#039; This is the fundamental difference between the thinker and the mere man of learning. The intellectual attainments of a man who thinks for himself resemble a fine painting, where the light and shade are correct, the tone sustained, the colour perfectly harmonised; it is true to life. On the other hand, the intellectual attainments of the mere man of learning are like a large palette, full of all sorts of colours, which at most are systematically arranged, but devoid of harmony, connection and meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 22, § 261&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reading is merely a surrogate for thinking for yourself; it means letting someone else direct your thoughts. Many books, moreover, serve merely to show how many ways there are of being wrong, and how far astray you yourself would go if you followed their guidance. You should read only when your own thoughts dry up, which will of course happen frequently enough even to the best heads; but to banish your own thoughts so as to take up a book is a sin against the holy ghost; it is like deserting untrammeled nature to look at a herbarium or engravings of landscapes.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 22, § 261&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translations:&lt;br /&gt;
** Reading is thinking with some one else&#039;s head instead of one&#039;s own.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As translated by T. Bailey Saunders&lt;br /&gt;
** Reading is equivalent to thinking with someone else’s head instead of with one’s own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Buying books would be a good thing if one could also buy the time to read them in: but as a rule the purchase of books is mistaken for the appropriation of their contents.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 23, § 296a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hatred is a thing of the heart, contempt a thing of the head.&#039;&#039;&#039; Hatred and contempt are decidedly antagonistic towards one another and mutually exclusive. A great deal of hatred, indeed, has no other source than a compelled respect for the superior qualities of some other person; conversely, if you were to consider hating every miserable wretch you met you would have your work cut out: it is much easier to despise them one and all. True, genuine contempt, which is the obverse of true, genuine pride, stays hidden away in secret and lets no one suspect its existence: for if you let a person you despise notice the fact, you thereby reveal a certain respect for him, inasmuch as you want him to know how low you rate him — which betrays not contempt but hatred, which excludes contempt and only affects it. &#039;&#039;&#039;Genuine contempt, on the other hand, is the unsullied conviction of the worthlessness of another.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 24, § 324&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: &#039;&#039;&#039;Hatred is an affair of the heart; contempt that of the head.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** As translated by Eric F. J. Payne&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The word of man is the most durable of all material.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 25, sect. 298&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Jede Trennung gibt einen Vorgeschmack des Todes und jedes Wiedersehen einen Vorgeschmack der Auferstehung.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Every parting gives a foretaste of death, every reunion a hint of the resurrection.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 26, § 310, as translated by Eric F. J. Payne&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We can come to look upon the deaths of our enemies with as much regret as we feel for those of our friends, namely, when we miss their existence as witnesses to our success.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 26, sect. 311a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Money is human happiness in the abstract: he, then, who is no longer capable of enjoying human happiness in the concrete devotes his heart entirely to money.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 26, § 320&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Obstinacy is the result of the will forcing itself into the place of the intellect.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 26, § 321&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only a male intellect clouded by the sexual drive could call the stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped and short-legged sex the fair sex.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 27, § 369&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In our monogamous part of the world, to marry means to halve one’s rights and double one’s duties.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 27, § 370&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: To marry is to halve your rights and double your duties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A man’s face as a rule says more, and more interesting things, than his mouth, for it is a compendium of everything his mouth will ever say, in that it is the monogram of all this man’s thoughts and aspirations.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 29, § 377&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That the outer man is a picture of the inner, and the face an expression and revelation of the whole character, is a presumption likely enough in itself, and therefore a safe one to go on; borne out as it is by the fact that people are always anxious to see anyone who has made himself famous .... Photography … offers the most complete satisfaction of our curiosity.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2, Ch. 29, § 377&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As the strata of the earth preserve in succession the living creatures of past epochs, so the shelves of libraries preserve in succession the errors of the past and their expositions, which like the former were very lively and made a great commotion in their own age but now stand petrified and stiff in a place where only the literary palaeontologist regards them.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2 &amp;quot;On Books and Writing&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970), as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Two Chinamen visiting Europe went to the theatre for the first time. One of them occupied himself with trying to understand the theatrical machinery, which he succeeded in doing. The other, despite his ignorance of the language, sought to unravel the meaning of the play. The former is like the astronomer, the latter the philosopher.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2 &amp;quot;On Various Subjects&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970), as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The animals are much more content with mere existence than we are; the plants are wholly so; and man is so according to how dull and insensitive he is. The animal’s life consequently contains less suffering but also less pleasure than the human’s, the direct reason being that on the one hand it is free from care and anxiety and the torments that attend them, but on the other is without hope and therefore has no share in that anticipation of a happy future which, together with the enchanting products of the imagination which accompany it, is the source of most of our greatest joys and pleasures. &#039;&#039;&#039;The animal lacks both anxiety and hope because its consciousness is restricted to what is clearly evident and thus to the present moment: the animal is the present incarnate.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2 &amp;quot;On the Suffering of the World&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970), as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Talent works for money and fame; the motive which moves genius to productivity is, on the other hand, less easy to determine.&#039;&#039;&#039; It isn’t money, for genius seldom gets any. It isn’t fame: fame is too uncertain and, more closely considered, of too little worth. Nor is it strictly for its own pleasure, for the great exertion involved almost outweighs the pleasure. It is rather an instinct of a unique sort by virtue of which the individual possessed of genius is impelled to express what he has seen and felt in enduring works without being conscious of any further motivation. &#039;&#039;&#039;It takes place, by and large, with the same sort of necessity as a tree brings forth fruit, and demands of the world no more than a soil on which the individual can flourish.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2 &amp;quot;On Philosophy and the Intellect&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970), as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Acrux.png|thumb|right|Writers may be classified as meteors, planets, and fixed stars...]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The poet presents the imagination with images from life and human characters and situations, sets them all in motion and leaves it to the beholder to let these images take his thoughts as far as his mental powers will permit.&#039;&#039;&#039; This is why he is able to engage men of the most differing capabilities, indeed fools and sages together. The philosopher, on the other hand, presents not life itself but the finished thoughts which he has abstracted from it and then demands that the reader should think precisely as, and precisely as far as, he himself thinks. That is why his public is so small.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2 &amp;quot;On Philosophy and the Intellect&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970), as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Opinion is like a pendulum and obeys the same law. If it goes past the centre of gravity on one side, it must go a like distance on the other; and it is only after a certain time that it finds the true point at which it can remain at rest.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2 &amp;quot;Further Psychological Observations&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970), as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Men are by nature merely indifferent to one another; but women are by nature enemies.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2 &amp;quot;On Women&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970), as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only a male intellect clouded by the sexual drive could call the stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped and short-legged sex the fair sex: for it is with this drive that all its beauty is bound up. More fittingly than the fair sex, women could be called the unaesthetic sex. Neither for music, nor poetry, nor the plastic arts do they possess any real feeling or receptivity: if they affect to do so, it is merely mimicry in service of their effort to please. This comes from the fact that they are incapable of taking a purely objective interest in anything whatever, and the reason for this is, I think, as follows. Man strives in everything for a direct domination over things, either by comprehending or by subduing them. But woman is everywhere and always relegated to a merely indirect domination, which is achieved by means of man, who is consequently the only thing she has to dominate directly. Thus it lies in the nature of women to regard everything simply as a means of capturing a man, and their interest in anything else is only simulated, is no more than a detour, i.e. amounts to coquetry and mimicry.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2 &amp;quot;On Women&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970), as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Writers may be classified as meteors, planets, and fixed stars.&#039;&#039;&#039; A meteor makes a striking effect for a moment. You look up and cry “There!” and it is gone forever. Planets and wandering stars last a much longer time. They often outshine the fixed stars and are confounded by them by the inexperienced; but this only because they are near. It is not long before they must yield their place; nay, the light they give is reflected only, and the sphere of their influence is confined to their orbit — their contemporaries. Their path is one of change and movement, and with the circuit of a few years their tale is told. Fixed stars are the only ones that are constant; their position in the firmament is secure; they shine with a light of their own; their effect today is the same as it was yesterday, because, having no parallax, their appearance does not alter with a difference in our standpoint. &#039;&#039;&#039;They belong not to one system, one nation only, but to the universe. And just because they are so very far away, it is usually many years before their light is visible to the inhabitants of this earth.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Vol. 2 &amp;quot;The Art of Literature&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Essays and Aphorisms&#039;&#039; (1970), as translated by R. J. Hollingdale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For an author to write as he speaks is just as reprehensible as the opposite fault, to speak as he writes; for this gives a pedantic effect to what he says, and at the same time makes him hardly intelligible.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;The Art of Literature&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Not as yet placed by section or chapter:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Cited as from &#039;&#039;Counsels and Maxims&#039;&#039; but without further information&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man of intellect is like an artist who gives a concert without any help from anyone else, playing on a single instrument — a piano, say, which is a little orchestra in itself. Such a man is a little world in himself; and the effect produced by various instruments together, he produces single-handed, in the unity of his own consciousness. Like the piano, he has no place in a symphony; he is a soloist and performs by himself — in solitude, it may be; or if in the company with other instruments, only as principal; or for setting the tone, as in singing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In youth it is the outward aspect of things that most engages us; while in age, thought or reflection is the predominating quality of the mind. Hence, youth is the time for poetry, and age is more inclined to philosophy. In practical affairs it is the same: a man shapes his resolutions in youth more by the impression that the outward world makes upon him; whereas, when he is old, it is thought that determines his actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Allerdings ist das Leben nicht eigentlich da, um genossen, sondern um überstanden, abgethan zu werden...&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is no doubt that life is given us, not to be enjoyed, but to be overcome — to be got over.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Studies in Pessimism&#039;&#039;====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Castle using eye for wide angle lens.jpg|thumb|Every man takes the limits of his own field of [[vision]] for the limits of the [[world]].]] &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[s:Studies in Pessimism|Full text online on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you try to imagine, as nearly as you can, what an amount of misery, pain and suffering of every kind the sun shines upon in its course, you will admit that it would be much better if, on the earth as little as on the moon, the sun were able to call forth the phenomena of life; and if, here as there, the surface were still in a crystalline state.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;On the Sufferings of the World&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There are two things which make it [[impossible]] to [[believe]] that this [[world]] is the successful work of an all-wise, all-good, and, at the same time, all-powerful Being; firstly, the misery which abounds in it everywhere; and secondly, the obvious imperfection of its highest product, [[man]], who is a burlesque of what he should be.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;[[s:On the Sufferings of the World|On the Sufferings of the World]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If two men who were friends in their youth meet again when they are old, after being separated for a life-time, the chief feeling they will have at the sight of each other will be one of complete disappointment at [[life]] as a whole; because their [[thoughts]] will be carried back to that earlier time when life seemed so fair as it lay spread out before them in the rosy light of dawn, promised so much — and then performed so little.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;On the Sufferings of the World&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In early youth, as we contemplate our coming life, we are like children in a theatre before the curtain is raised, sitting there in high spirits and eagerly waiting for the play to begin.&#039;&#039;&#039; It is a blessing that we do not know what is really going to happen. Could we foresee it, there are times when children might seem like innocent prisoners, condemned, not to death, but to life, and as yet all unconscious of what their sentence means.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;On the Sufferings of the World&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hatred]] comes from the [[heart]]; [[contempt]] from the head; and neither [[feeling]] is quite within our control.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;[[s:Psychological Observations (Studies in Pessimism)|Psychological Observations]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Every man takes the limits of his own field of [[vision]] for the limits of the [[world]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Psychological Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every parting gives a foretaste of [[death]]; every coming together again a foretaste of the [[resurrection]].&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Psychological Observations&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dissimulation is innate in woman, and almost as much a quality of the stupid as of the clever.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;[[s:Of Women|Of Women]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are 80,000 prostitutes in London alone and what are they, if not bloody sacrifices on the altar of monogamy?&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Of Women&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Noise is the most impertinent of all forms of interruption. It is not only an interruption, but also a disruption of thought.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;[[s:On Noise|On Noise]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;Religion: A Dialogue&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;[[s:Religion: A Dialogue|Religion: A Dialogue]]&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Monotheistic religions alone furnish the spectacle of religious wars, religious persecutions, heretical tribunals, that breaking of idols and destruction of images of the gods, that razing of Indian temples and Egyptian colossi, which had looked on the sun 3,000 years: just because a jealous god had said, &#039;Thou shalt make no graven image.&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;On Books and Reading&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;[[s:On Books and Reading|On Books and Reading]]&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Ueber Lesen und Bücher&#039;&#039;)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Chapter XXIV from &#039;&#039;Parerga und Paralipomena II&#039;&#039; (1851)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The heavy armor becomes the light dress of childhood; the pain is brief, the joy unending.&lt;br /&gt;
*:Original:&lt;br /&gt;
*:&#039;&#039;Der schwere Panzer wird zum Flügelkleide&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*:&#039;&#039;Kurz ist der Schmerz, unendlich ist die Freude.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*::Literally:&lt;br /&gt;
*::The heavy armor becomes the winged dress&lt;br /&gt;
*::brief is the pain, unending is the joy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Not yet placed by volume, chapter or section ====&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes cited as from &#039;&#039;Parerga and Paralipomena&#039;&#039;, but without further translation or section information.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because people have no thoughts to deal in, they deal cards, and try and win one another’s money. Idiots!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;...in der ganzen Natur, mit dem Grad der Intelligenz die Fähigkeit zum Schmerze sich steigert, also ebenfalls erst hier ihre höchste Stufe erreicht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nature shows that with the growth of intelligence comes increased capacity for pain, and it is only with the highest degree of intelligence that suffering reaches its supreme point.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;The Wisdom of Life&#039;&#039;. Chapter II. Personality, or What a Man Is: Footnote 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Die Wahrheit kann warten: denn sie hat ein langes Leben vor sich.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;The truth can wait, for she lives a long life.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** &#039;&#039;Willen in der Natur&#039;&#039; (On the Will in Nature), 1836; in the chapter &#039;&#039;Einleitung&#039;&#039; (Introduction)&lt;br /&gt;
*** &#039;&#039;Variant translation&#039;&#039; by Karl Hillebrand:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Truth can bide its time, for it has a long life before it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If at times I have thought myself unfortunate, it is because of a confusion, an error. I have mistaken myself for someone else... Who am I really? I am the author of The World as Will and Representation, I am the one who has given an answer to the mystery of Being that will occupy the thinkers of future centuries. That is what I am, and who can dispute it in the years of life that still remain for me?&lt;br /&gt;
** From &#039;&#039;The Total Library&#039;&#039; by Jorge Luis Borges, 1999&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As my own father was sick, and miserably tied to his invalid&#039;s chair, he would have been abandoned had not an old servant performed for him a so-called service of love. My mother gave parties while he was perishing in solitude, and amused herself while he was suffering bitter agonies&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Schopenhauer and the Wild Years of Philosophy&#039;&#039; by Rüdiger Safranski (trans. Ewald Osers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Essays ===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes sourced to various essays, not yet sourced to the original German volumes. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Der allgemeine Ueberblick&amp;lt;!--[sic]--&amp;gt; zeigt uns, als die beiden Feinde des menschlichen Glückes, den Schmerz und die Langeweile.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The two foes of human happiness are pain and boredom.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Personality; or, What a Man Is&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man who has no mental needs, because his intellect is of the narrow and normal amount, is, in the strict sense of the word, what is called a philistine.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Personality; or, What a Man Is&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Intellect is invisible to the man who has none.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Our Relation to Others&#039;&#039;, § 23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no more mistaken path to happiness than [[worldliness]], revelry, high life.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Our Relation to Others&#039;&#039;, § 24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To free a man from error is to give, not to take away. Knowledge that a thing is false is a truth. Error always does harm; sooner or later it will bring mischief to the man who harbors it.&#039;&#039;&#039; Then give up deceiving people; confess ignorance of what you don&#039;t know, and leave everyone to form his own articles of faith for himself. Perhaps they won&#039;t turn out so bad, especially as they&#039;ll rub one another&#039;s corners down, and mutually rectify mistakes. The existence of many views will at any rate lay a foundation of tolerance. Those who possess knowledge and capacity may betake themselves to the study of philosophy, or even in their own persons carry the [[history of philosophy]] a step further.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;[[s:Religion: A Dialogue|Religion: A Dialogue]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: &#039;&#039;&#039;To free a man from error does not mean to take something from him, but to give him something.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Men of learning are those who have read the contents of books. Thinkers, geniuses, and those who have enlightened the world and furthered the race of men, are those who have made direct use of the book of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/chapter8.html &amp;quot;Thinking for Oneself&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the sphere of thought, absurdity and perversity remain the masters of the world, and their dominion is suspended only for brief periods.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;[[s:The Art of Controversy|The Art of Controversy]]&amp;quot; as translated by T. Bailey Saunders&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The chief objection I have to Pantheism is that it says nothing. To call the world &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; is not to explain it; it is only to enrich our language with a superfluous synonym for the word &amp;quot;world&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;On Pantheism&#039;&#039; as quoted in &#039;&#039;Faiths of Famous Men in Their Own Words&#039;&#039; (1900) by John Kenyon Kilbourn; also in &#039;&#039;Religion: A Dialogue and Other Essays&#039;&#039; (2007), p. 40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Jede menschliche Vollkommenheit ist einem Fehler verwandt, in welchen überzugehn sie droht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Every human perfection is linked to an error which it threatens to become.&lt;br /&gt;
*** &#039;&#039;Zur Ethik&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Alles Wollen entspringt aus Bedürfnis, also aus Mangel, also aus Leiden.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** All wanting comes from need, therefore from lack, therefore from suffering.&lt;br /&gt;
*** &#039;&#039;Welt und Mensch&#039;&#039; II, p. 230ff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Es gibt nur eine Heilkraft, und das ist die Natur; in Salben und Pillen steckt keine. Höchstens können sie der Heilkraft der Natur einen Wink geben, wo etwas für sie zu tun ist.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is only one healing force, and that is nature; in pills and ointments there is none. At most they can give the healing force of nature a hint about where there is something for it to do.&lt;br /&gt;
*** &#039;&#039;Neue Paralipomena&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If a big diamond is cut up into pieces, it immediately loses its value as a whole; or if an army is scattered or divided into small bodies, it loses all its power; and in the same way a great intellect has no more power than an ordinary one as soon as it is interrupted, disturbed, distracted, or diverted; for its superiority entails that it concentrates all its strength on one point and object, just as a concave mirror concentrates all the rays of light thrown upon it. Noisy interruption prevents this concentration. This is why the most eminent intellects have always been strongly averse to any kind of disturbance, interruption and distraction, and above everything to that violent interruption which is caused by noise; other people do not take any particular notice of this sort of thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**On Noise&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character of women is that they have no “sense of justice .” This arises from their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and reflection, but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an ineradicable tendency to lie.&lt;br /&gt;
**On Women&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;On Authorship and Style&#039;&#039; ====&lt;br /&gt;
{{smallcite|[http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/essays/complete.html#chapter3 &amp;quot;On Authorship and Style&amp;quot;] as translated by Mrs. Rudolf Dircks; [[s:On Authorship|On Authorship]] and [[s:On Style|On Style]] translated by T. B. Saunders on Wikisource.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:La Vérité, par Jules Joseph Lefebvre.jpg|thumb|right|[[Truth]] that is naked is the most beautiful, and the simpler its expression the deeper is the impression it makes...]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are, first of all, two kinds of authors: those who write for the subject’s sake, and those who write for writing’s sake. The first kind have had thoughts or experiences which seem to them worth communicating, while the second kind need money and consequently write for money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No greater mistake can be made than to imagine that what has been written latest is always the more correct; that what is written later on is an improvement on what was written previously; and that every change means progress. Men who think and have correct judgment, and people who treat their subject earnestly, are all exceptions only. Vermin is the rule everywhere in the world: it is always at hand and busily engaged in trying to improve in its own way upon the mature deliberations of the thinkers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A book can never be anything more than the impression of its author’s thoughts [&#039;&#039;Ein Buch kann nie mehr seyn, als der Abdruck der Gedanken des Verfassers&#039;&#039;]. The value of these thoughts lies either in the &#039;&#039;matter about which&#039;&#039; he has thought, or in the &#039;&#039;form&#039;&#039; in which he develops his matter — that is to say, &#039;&#039;what&#039;&#039; he has thought about it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For a work to become immortal it must possess so many excellences that it will not be easy to find a man who understands and values them all; so that there will be in all ages men who recognise and appreciate some of these excellences; by this means the credit of the work will be retained throughout the long course of centuries and ever-changing interests, for, as it is appreciated first in this sense, then in that, the interest is never exhausted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The little honesty that exists among authors is discernible in the unconscionable way they misquote from the writings of others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Truth that is naked is the most beautiful, and the simpler its expression the deeper is the impression it makes&#039;&#039;&#039;; this is partly because it gets unobstructed hold of the hearer’s mind without his being distracted by secondary thoughts, and partly because he feels that here he is not being corrupted or deceived by the arts of rhetoric, but that the whole effect is got from the thing itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The law of simplicity and naïveté applies to all fine art, for it is compatible with what is most sublime. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;True brevity of expression consists in a man only saying what is worth saying, while avoiding all diffuse explanations of things which every one can think out for himself&#039;&#039;&#039;; that is, it consists in his correctly distinguishing between what is necessary and what is superfluous. On the other hand, one should never sacrifice clearness, to say nothing of grammar, for the sake of being brief. To impoverish the expression of a thought, or to obscure or spoil the meaning of a period for the sake of using fewer words shows a lamentable want of judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Disputed begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Attributed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Der Mensch kann tun was er will; er kann aber nicht wollen was er will.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Man can do what he wills but he cannot will what he wills.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** Einstein paraphrasing Schopenhauer. Reportedly from &#039;&#039;[[w:On the Freedom of the Will|On The Freedom Of The Will]]&#039;&#039; (1839), as translated in &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of American History: The Historical Field Theory&#039;&#039; (1945) by Morris Zucker, p. 531 &amp;lt;!-- plus many other published works --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translations: &lt;br /&gt;
*** Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.&lt;br /&gt;
**** As quoted in &#039;&#039;The Motivated Brain: A Neurophysiological Analysis of Human Behavior&#039;&#039; (1991) by Pavel Vasilʹevich Simonov, p. 198&lt;br /&gt;
*** We can do what we wish, but we can only wish what we must.&lt;br /&gt;
**** As quoted by Einstein in &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Saturday Evening Post&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929) p. 17. A scan of the article is available online [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf here] (see p. 114).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- UNSOURCED variants:&lt;br /&gt;
*** Man can control what he wills, but not how he wills.&lt;br /&gt;
*** Man can indeed do what he wants, but he cannot control what it is that he wants. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Disputed end}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes about Schopenhauer==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Einstein gyro gravity probe b.jpg|thumb|right|Schopenhauer&#039;s saying, that &amp;quot;a man can do as he will, but not will as he will,&amp;quot; has been an inspiration to me since my youth up, and a continual consolation and unfailing well-spring of patience in the face of the hardships of life, my own and others&#039;. ~ [[Albert Einstein]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Schopenhauer-ffm001.jpg|thumb|right| When I met [[Jorge Luis Borges|Borges]] some time ago and remarked that I was about to embark on writing a book about Schopenhauer, he became excited and started talked volubly about how much Schopenhauer had meant to him… ~ [[Bryan Magee]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Arthur-schopenhauer-denkmal-ffm-002.jpg|thumb|right|I have read Schopenhauer at the age of twelve with no bewilderment and no contempt of his contempt for the world and its strange inhabitants, and no contempt for the strange inhabitant himself. ~ [[William Saroyan]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Alphabetized by author &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Who knew that if you merely represent the thought of Nietzsche or Schopenhauer in a fun way it would find such an audience? Some things, it seems, are always green.&lt;br /&gt;
** BAP, [https://americanmind.org/salvo/americas-delusional-elite-is-done/ America’s Delusional Elite Is Done], &#039;&#039;The American Mind&#039;&#039;, 22 October 2019&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bold theories and opinions expressed in Schopenhauer&#039;s works differ widely with those of the majority of our orthodox scientists... Every new phenomenon which they find themselves unable to explain, is triturated, compounded into incense, and burned on the altar of the goddess who patronizes modern scientists. No one can better treat his subject than does Schopenhauer in his &#039;&#039;Parerga&#039;&#039;. In this work he discusses at length animal magnetism, clairvoyance, sympathetic cures, seership, magic, omens, ghost-seeing, and other spiritual matters. &amp;quot;All these manifestations,&amp;quot; he says, &amp;quot;are branches of one and the same tree, and furnish us with irrefutable proofs of the existence of a chain of beings...&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]], &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1, Chapter 2, p. 59, Schopenhauer&#039;s Great &#039;&#039;Parerga&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Keats|Keats]], entirely a stranger to error, could believe that the nightingale enchanting him was the same one [[w:Book of Ruth|Ruth]] heard amid the alien corn of Bethlehem in Judah; [[Robert Louis Stevenson|Stevenson]] posits a single bird that consumes the centuries: &amp;quot;the nightingale that devours time.&amp;quot; Schopenhauer — impassioned, lucid Schopenhauer — provides a reason: the pure corporeal immediacy in which animals live, oblivious to death and memory. He then adds, not without a smile: &#039;&#039;&#039;Whoever hears me assert that the grey cat playing just now in the yard is the same one that did jumps and tricks there five hundred years ago will think whatever he likes of me, but it is a stranger form of madness to imagine that the present-day cat is fundamentally an entirely different one.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jorge Luis Borges]] in &amp;quot;A History of Eternity&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Selected Non-Fictions&#039;&#039; Vol. 1, (1999), edited by Eliot Weinberger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In human freedom in the philosophical sense I am definitely a disbeliever. Everybody acts not only under external compulsion but also in accordance with inner necessity. &#039;&#039;&#039;Schopenhauer&#039;s saying, that &amp;quot;a man can do as he will, but not will as he will,&amp;quot; has been an inspiration to me since my youth up, and a continual consolation and unfailing well-spring of patience in the face of the hardships of life, my own and others&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;This feeling mercifully mitigates the sense of responsibility which so easily becomes paralyzing, and it prevents us from taking ourselves and other people too seriously; it conduces to a view of life in which humor, above all, has its due place.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]] in &amp;quot;Mein Weltbild&amp;quot; (1931) [&amp;quot;My World-view&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;My View of the World&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;The World As I See It&amp;quot;], translated as the title essay of the 1949 book &#039;&#039;The World As I See It&#039;&#039;. Various translated editions have been published of this essay; or portions of it, including one titled &amp;quot;What I Believe&amp;quot;; another compilation which includes it is &#039;&#039;Ideas and Opinions&#039;&#039; (1954)&lt;br /&gt;
** Variants: &#039;&#039;Ich glaube nicht an die Freiheit des Willens. Schopenhauers Wort: »Der Mensch kann wohl tun was er will, aber er kann nicht wollen, was er will.« begleitet mich in allen Lebenslagen und versöhnt mich mit den Handlungen der Menschen, auch wenn sie mir recht schmerzlich sind. Diese Erkenntnis von der Unfreiheit des Willens schützt mich davor, mich selbst und die Mitmenschen als handelnde und urteilende Individuen allzu ernst zu nehmen und den guten Humor zu verlieren.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** I do not believe in freedom of will. Schopenhauer&#039;s words, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Man can indeed do what he wants, but he cannot want what he wants&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, accompany me in all life situations and console me in my dealings with people, even those that are really painful to me. This recognition of the unfreedom of the will protects me from taking myself and my fellow men too seriously as acting and judging individuals and losing good humour.&lt;br /&gt;
*** &#039;&#039;Mein Glaubensbekenntnis&#039;&#039; (August 1932) &amp;lt;!-- Caputh --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Part of the cause of pessimism, in Schopenhauer and his contemporaries, lay in their romantic attitudes and expectations. Youth expects too much of the· world; pessimism is the morning after optimism, just as 1815 had to pay for 1789. The romantic exaltation and liberation of feeling, instinct and will, and the romantic contempt for intellect, restraint, and order, brought their natural penalties; for “the world,” as Horace Walpole said, “is a comedy for those who think, but a tragedy for those who feel.”… Is it true that ”he that increaseth lmowledge increaseth sorrow,” and that it is the most highly organized beings that suffer most? Yes; but it is also true that the growth of knowledge increases joy as well as sorrow, and that the subtlest delights, as well as the keenest pains, are reserved for the developed soul. Voltaire rightly preferred the Brahmin’s ”unhappy” to the blissful ignorance of the peasant woman; we wish to experience life keenly and deeply, even at the cost of pain; we wish to venture into its innermost secrets, even at the cost of disillusionment… There are other difficulties, more technical and less vital, in this remarkable and stimulating philosophy. How can suicide ever occur in a world where the only real force is the will to live? How can the intellect, begotten and brought up as servant of the will, ever achieve independence and objectivity? Does genius lie in knowledge divorced from will, or does it contain, as its driving force” an immense power of will, even a large alloy of personal ambition and. conceit? Is madness connected with genius in general, or rather with only the “romantic” type of genius (Byron, Shelley, Poe, Heine, Swinburne, Strindberg, Dostoievski, etc.); and is not the “classic” and profounder type of genius exceptionally sound (Socrates, Plato, Spinoza, Bacon, Newton, Voltaire, Goethe, Darwin, Whitman, etc.)? What if the proper function of intellect and philosophy is not the denial of the will but the coordination of desires into a united and harmonious, will? What if “will” itself, except as the unified product of such coordination, is a mythical abstraction, as shadowy as “force”?…&lt;br /&gt;
**Will Durant, Story of Philosophy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He was the first to speak of the suffering of the world, which visibly and glaringly surrounds us, and of confusion, passion, evil — all those things which the [other philosophers] hardly seemed to notice and always tried to resolve into all-embracing harmony and comprehensiblility. Here at last was a philosopher who had the courage to see that all was not for the best in the fundaments of the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carl Jung]], in &#039;&#039;Memories, Dreams, Reflections&#039;&#039; (1961), p. 69&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One who believes that the pain in the world outweighs the joy, and expresses that unhappy conviction, only adds to the pain. Schopenhauer is an enemy to the race. Even if he earnestly believed that this is the most wretched of possible worlds, he should not promulgate a doctrine which robs men of the incentive to fight with circumstance. If Life gave him ashes for bread, it was his fault. Life is a fair field, and the right will prosper if we stand by our guns.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Helen Keller]], in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Optimism|Optimism]]&#039;&#039; (1903)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He speaks to me as no other philosopher does, direct and in his own human voice, a fellow spirit, a penetratingly perceptive friend, with a hand on my elbow and a twinkle in his eye. &#039;&#039;&#039;Although I frequently do not agree with what he says, I always listen to him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bryan Magee]], in &#039;&#039;Confessions of a Philosopher: A Personal Journey through Western Philosophy from Plato to Popper&#039;&#039; (1999), p. 373&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When I met [[Jorge Luis Borges|Borges]] some time ago and remarked that I was about to embark on writing a book about Schopenhauer, he became excited and started talked volubly about how much Schopenhauer had meant to him. It was the desire to read Schopenhauer in the original, he said, that had made him learn German; and &#039;&#039;&#039;when people asked him, which they often had, why he with his love of intricate structure had never attempted a systematic exposition of the [[world-view]] which underlay his writings, his reply was that he did not do it because it had already been done by Schopenhauer.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bryan Magee]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Schopenhauer&#039;&#039;, p. 389&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are struck by the psychological force and even fierceness with which he reveals the deepest recesses of the human heart.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.lib.uiowa.edu/spec-coll/MSC/ToMsc500/MsC488/MsC488.htm Eric F. J. Payne], in his introduction to his 1958 translation of [http://books.google.com/books?id=pvnAL_fReokC&amp;amp;pg=PR7&amp;amp;lpg=PR7&amp;amp;dq=%22are+struck+by+the+psychological+force+and+even+fierceness+with+which+he+reveals%22&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=WnaEBkLd8b&amp;amp;sig=csLo1q_4YXZae7AmaboIQ6eCfLA &#039;&#039;The World as Will and Representation&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Schopenhauer went on from there to vindicate Indian philosophy&#039;s rightful place in the world. He even went so far as to express pleasure at the continuous failure of West-Christian proselytism in Asia .... His anti-Christianism was largely based on a fierce anti-Biblism; ... he attributed systematically to subtle influences originating on the &amp;quot;holy-banks of the Ganges.&lt;br /&gt;
**De Riencourt, Amaury The soul of India Harper &amp;amp; Brothers, Publishers, New York 1960 p274-275  quoted in Londhe, S. (2008). A tribute to Hinduism: Thoughts and wisdom spanning continents and time about India and her culture. New Delhi: Pragun Publication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I have read Schopenhauer at the age of twelve with no bewilderment and no contempt of his contempt for the world and its strange inhabitants, and no contempt for the strange inhabitant himself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Saroyan]], in &#039;&#039;Hello Out There&#039;&#039; (1941)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Criminal history shows us how many torturers of men, and murderers, have first been torturers of [[animals]]. The manner in which a nation in the aggregate treats animals, is one chief measure of its real civilization. The Latin races, as we know, come forth badly from this examination; we Germans, not half well enough. Buddhism has done more in this direction than Christianity, and Schopenhauer more than all ancient and modern philosophers together. The warm sympathy with sentient Nature which pervades all the writings of Schopenhauer, is one of the most pleasing aspects of his thoroughly intellectual, yet often unhealthy and unprofitable philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Strauss]], &#039;&#039;The Old Faith and the New&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Der alte und der neue Glaube&#039;&#039;, translated from the 6th edition by [[w:Mathilde Blind|M. Blind]], New York: Henry Holt &amp;amp; Co., 1873), vol. II, part IV, ch. 71, [https://archive.org/stream/oldfaithnewconfe01stra#page/59/mode/2up pp. 59]-60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You are not an evil human; you are not without intellect and education; you have everything that could make you a credit to human society. Moreover, I am acquainted with your heart and know that few are better, but you are nevertheless irritating and unbearable, and I consider it most difficult to live with you.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;All of your good qualities become obscured by your super-cleverness and are made useless to the world merely because of your rage at wanting to know everything better than others; of wanting to improve and master what you cannot command. With this you embitter the people around you, since no one wants to be improved or enlightened in such a forceful way, least of all by such an insignificant individual as you still are; no one can tolerate being reproved by you, who also still show so many weaknesses yourself, least of all in your adverse manner, which in oracular tones, proclaims this is so and so, without ever supposing an objection.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If you were less like you, you would only be ridiculous, but thus as you are, you are highly annoying.&lt;br /&gt;
** Letter from Schopenhauer&#039;s mother, Johanna Schopenhauer, to her son.  November 6, 1807.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Antinatalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philosophical pessimism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links == &lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikisource|Author:Arthur Schopenhauer|Arthur Schopenhauer}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commonscat}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/schopenhauer/ Schopenhauer at Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.friesian.com/arthur.htm Schopenhauer at the Friesian School]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.blupete.com/Literature/Biographies/Philosophy/Schopenhauer.htm Brief profile at Blue Pete]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.island-of-freedom.com/SCHOPEN.HTM Brief profile at Island of Freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/schopenbio.html Brief profile at Brandeis University]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.iep.utm.edu/g/germidea.htm &amp;quot;German Idealism&amp;quot; at The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Works online:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopenhauer/arthur/ Etexts at The University of Adelaide]&lt;br /&gt;
* {{gutenberg author| id=Arthur+Schopenhauer | name=Arthur Schopenhauer}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.archive.org/details/theworldaswillan01schouoft The World as Will and Idea Volume I - at Internet Archive]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.archive.org/details/theworldaswill02schouoft The World as Will and Idea Volume II - at Internet Archive]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.archive.org/details/theworldaswillan03schouoft The World as Will and Idea Volume III - at Internet Archive]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Schopenhauer,+Arthur/Die+Welt+als+Wille+und+Vorstellung &#039;&#039;Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung&#039;&#039;, complete text in German]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schopenhauer, Arthur}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1788 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1860 deaths]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:19th-century philosophers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Antinatalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Aphorists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Academics from Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophers from Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophical idealists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophical pessimists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German logicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Eugenicists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essayists from Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Social critics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cultural critics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Critics of religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Monarchists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3126314</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3126314"/>
		<updated>2022-06-11T17:12:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* B */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. &#039;&#039;&#039;When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life&#039;&#039;&#039; that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [http://web.archive.org/web/20200928053316/https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne-znaet-rossii-ivan-ilin &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]] is recognized as the most threatened part of Russia in terms of secession and conquest. Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real grounds. It arose from the ambition of the leaders and the international intrigue of conquest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russians are a branch of a single, Slavic-Russian people.&#039;&#039;&#039; This branch has no reason to be at enmity with other branches of the same people and to separate into a separate state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Having seceded, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russia and Great Russia are bound together by faith, tribe, historical fate, geographical location, economy, culture and politics.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The foreigners who are preparing the dismemberment must remember that they are declaring by this to the whole of Russia a centuries-old struggle. There will be no peace and no economic prosperity under such a dismemberment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russia will turn into a source of civil and international wars for centuries. The dismembering power will become the most hated of the enemies of national Russia.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the struggle against it, all alliances and all means will be used. Russia will shift its center to the Urals, gather all its huge forces, develop its technology, find powerful allies for itself and fight until it completely and forever undermines the power of the dismembering power.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Russia is not looking for anyone&#039;s death, but it will be able to respond in time to any attempt at dismemberment and will fight to the end. It is more profitable for any power to have Russia as a friend, not an enemy. History hasn&#039;t said its last word yet...&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], &amp;quot;Fundamentals of the struggle for national Russia&amp;quot; (Основы борьбы за национальную Россию), 1938. Interestingly quoted in [https://rg.ru/2022/05/25/prorochestva-ilina.html this May 25, 2022 article] by [[w:ru:Звягинцев, Александр Григорьевич|Alexander Zvyagintsev]] published in [[w:Rossiiskaya gazeta|Rossiiskaya gazeta]], the Russian Federation&#039;s own government gazette.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In it, Zvyagintsev draws a parallel between the [[w:Livonian Brothers of the Sword|Livonian Brothers of the Sword]], the [[w:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], the [[w:Swedish Empire|Swedish Empire]], the [[w:Greater Germanic Reich|Nazis]] and (more subtly) the present-day [[European Union]] by putting them all under a same umbrella term: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Several years passed, and the diabolical fascist &#039;&#039;&#039;machine of a united Europe&#039;&#039;&#039; fell upon our country. She, like once the hordes of swordsmen, Poles and Swedes, Frederick and Napoleon, was defeated.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://web.archive.org/web/20190601230800/http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]], [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russian people will suffer a blow, it will leave the cities for fields, forests ... It will pick mushrooms, berries, nuts - the Russian people is ready in a moment of great sorrow to turn into a chipmunk people, a hamster people, it will store up for the winter all sorts of roots, all sorts of onions.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Русский народ перебьётся, он уйдёт из городов в поля, в леса... Будет собирать грибы, ягоды, орехи — русский народ готов в минуту больших печалей превратиться в народ-бурундук, народ-хомяк, он будет запасать на зиму всякие корешки, всякие луковки.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Prokhanov|Alexander Prokhanov]] on the sanctions Russia faces following the 2022 invasion of [[Ukraine]], from the interview [https://aif.ru/politics/world/pisatel_aleksandr_prohanov_mirovoy_perekur_konchilsya Writer Alexander Prokhanov: &amp;quot;The global smoke break is over&amp;quot;] (6 April 2022), &#039;&#039;[[w:Argumenty i fakty|Argumenty i fakty]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Europe&amp;diff=3124142</id>
		<title>Europe</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Europe&amp;diff=3124142"/>
		<updated>2022-06-08T20:53:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* E */ einstein&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Europe land use map.png|thumb|Whoever speaks of Europe is wrong: it is a geographical expression. ~ [[Otto von Bismarck]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Europe|Europe]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is a [[w:continent|continent]] that comprises the westernmost part of [[w:Eurasia|Eurasia]]. Europe is bordered by the [[w:Arctic Ocean|Arctic Ocean]] to the north, the [[w:Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic Ocean]] to the west, and the [[w:Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean Sea]] to the south. To the east and southeast, Europe is generally considered as [[w:Borders of the continents#Europe and Asia|separated from Asia]] by the [[w:drainage divide|watershed divides]] of the [[w:Ural Mountains|Ural]] and [[w:Caucasus Mountains|Caucasus Mountains]], the [[w:Ural River|Ural River]], the [[w:Caspian Sea|Caspian]] and [[w:Black Sea|Black]] Seas, and the waterways of the [[w:Turkish Straits|Turkish Straits]]. Europe, in particular [[w:ancient Greece|ancient Greece]] and [[Roman Empire|ancient Rome]], was the birthplace of [[w:Western civilization|Western civilization]]. The [[w:fall of the Western Roman Empire|fall of the Western Roman Empire]], during the [[w:migration period|migration period]], marked the end of [[Antiquity|ancient history]] and the beginning of an era known as the [[Middle Ages]]. [[Renaissance]], [[w:Renaissance Humanism|humanism]], [[w:Renaissance exploration|exploration]], [[w:Renaissance art|art]], and [[w:Renaissance science|science]] led to the [[Modernity|modern era]]. From the [[w:Age of Discovery|Age of Discovery]] onwards, Europe played a predominant role in global affairs. Between the 16th and 20th centuries, European powers controlled at various times the [[w:Americas|Americas]], most of [[Africa]], [[w:Oceania|Oceania]], and the majority of Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
* Unless we act, events that we Europeans will be unable to influence will overtake us. I believe we Europeans feel far too safe. Europe’s political and economic leadership in the world, which was still unchallenged at the beginning of the century, has long since ceased to exist. Will the dominant cultural influence of Europe be maintained? I think not, unless we defend it and adjust ourselves to new conditions; history has shown that civilisations are all too perishable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Konrad Adenauer]], [https://www.cvce.eu/obj/address_given_by_konrad_adenauer_on_continuing_european_integration_brussels_25_september_1956-en-ea27a4e3-4883-4d38-8dbc-5e3949b1145d.html Address on continuing European integration at the Grandes Conférences Catholiques] (25 September 1956)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* European integration should not be rigid but as flexible as we can possibly make it. It should not be a straitjacket for the peoples of Europe but should be their common mainstay, a common support for the healthy, individual development of each of them.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Konrad Adenauer]], [https://www.cvce.eu/obj/address_given_by_konrad_adenauer_on_continuing_european_integration_brussels_25_september_1956-en-ea27a4e3-4883-4d38-8dbc-5e3949b1145d.html Address on continuing European integration at the Grandes Conférences Catholiques] (25 September 1956)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
* Whoever speaks of Europe is wrong: it is a geographical expression.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Otto von Bismarck]], speech to Reichstag, 14 May 1872&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I have always found the word Europe on the lips of those politicians who wanted something from other Powers which they dared not demand in their own names.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Otto von Bismarck]], quoted in A. J. P. Taylor, &#039;&#039;Bismarck: The Man and the Statesman&#039;&#039; (1955), p. 167&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The global role of the United States is perhaps the ultimate chapter in that long period of European expansion which had begun in western Europe, and especially on the Atlantic seaboard, during the 15th century. Europe slowly had outgrown its homeland. Its cultural empire eventually formed a long band traversing most of the Northern Hemisphere and dipping far into the Southern. The modern hub of the peoples and ideas of European origin is now New York as much as Paris, or Los Angeles as much as London. In the history of the European peoples the city of Washington is perhaps what Constantinople - the infant city of Emperor Constantine - was to the last phase of the Roman Empire; for it is unlikely that Europeans, a century hence, will continue to stamp the world so decisively with their ideas and inventions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Geoffrey Blainey]], &#039;&#039;A Short History of the World&#039;&#039; (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[United States|USA]] will remain the only superpower. [[China]] is becoming an economic giant. [[Eurabia|Europe is being Islamicized]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frits Bolkestein]], address at the opening of courses at the University of Leiden (2004), as quoted in [http://web.archive.org/web/20041010004408/http://www.theweeklystandard.com:80/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/685ozxcq.asp &amp;quot;Islamic Europe?&amp;quot;] (4 October 2004), by [[Christopher Caldwell]], &#039;&#039;The Weekly Standard&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russia]]&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas [[Ukraine]] can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stonehenge, Condado de Wiltshire, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 09.JPG|thumb|Soon nostalgia will be another name for Europe. ~ [[Angela Carter]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Terroranschlag-Berlin-Breitscheidplatz-2016_(2)_(31731061626)_(square_crop).jpg|thumb|It was the fate of Europe to be always a battleground. Differences in race, in religion, in political genius and social ideals, seemed always... to be invitations to contest by battle. ~ [[Calvin Coolidge]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My conclusion will be simple. It will consist of saying, in the very midst of the sound and the fury of our history: &amp;quot;Let us rejoice.&amp;quot; Let us rejoice, indeed, at having witnessed the death of a lying and comfort-loving Europe and at being faced with cruel truths.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Camus]], &amp;quot;Create Dangerously,&amp;quot; lecture given at the University of Uppsala, Sweden (December 1957); republished by Camus in &#039;&#039;Resistance, Rebellion and Death&#039;&#039; (1961), Justin O&#039;Brien, translator, p. 270.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Soon [[nostalgia]] will be another name for Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Angela Carter]] (1940–92), British postmodern novelist. repr. Vintage (1992). Expletives Deleted, review of John Berger, Once in Europa, The Washington Post (1989)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If we&#039;re leaving our fate to [[Sociopath|sociopathic]] buffoons, we&#039;re finished... [[Donald Trump|Trump]] is the worst, that&#039;s because of US power which is overwhelming.  We are talking about [[w:American decline|U.S. decline]] but you just look at the world, you don&#039;t see that when the U.S. imposes [[Economic sanctions|sanctions]], murders, devastating sanctions, that&#039;s the only country that can do that, but everyone has to follow. [[Europe]] may not like, in fact  [[hate]] actions on [[Iran]], but they have to follow, they have to follow the master, or else they get kicked out of the [[Global financial system|international financial system]]. That&#039;s not a law of nature, it&#039;s a decision in Europe to be subordinate to the master in [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]]. Other countries don&#039;t even have a choice....&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the most ironic elements of today&#039;s virus crisis, is that [[Cuba|Cuba]] is helping Europe. I mean this is so shocking, that you don&#039;t know how to describe it.   That [[Germany]] can&#039;t help [[Greece]], but Cuba can help the European countries. If you stop to think about what that means, all words fail, just as when you see thousands of people  dying in the [[w:Mediterranean Basin|Mediterranean]], fleeing from a region that has been devastated... and being sent to the deaths in the Mediterranean, you don&#039;t know what words to use.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Crisis, the civilizational crisis of the West at this point is devastating... it does bring up childhood memories of listening to [[Hitler]] raving on the [[radio]] to raucous crowds... it makes you wonder if this [[species]] is even viable. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-N3In2rLI4 Coronavirus - What is at stake?] | [[W:Democracy in Europe Movement 2025|&#039;&#039;Democracy in Europe Movement 2025&#039;&#039; (DiEM25) ]]     Mar 28, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]]&#039;s [[Battle of Waterloo|1815 defeat at Waterloo]], Europeans had created [[w:Nation-state|nation-states]] in the image and likeness of Napoleon. The new states became the foci of popular affection, even [[worship]]. All organized themselves as Napoleon had [[France]], and as [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]] had prescribed, with every house numbered so that bureaucratic government could pass its science to and collect sustenance from each. The states became the purveyors of education and sources of authority. They fostered the myth that people within their borders formed distinct races with different geniuses and destinies. All partook of [[Charles Darwin]]&#039;s ideology that life is an [[Evolution|evolutionary]] struggle in which the fittest survive.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Angelo Codevilla|Angelo Codevilla]], &#039;&#039;To Make and Keep Peace Among Ourselves and with All Nations&#039;&#039; (2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Africa|African]] [[Citizenship|citizens]] are certainly better off in countries that support their aspirations and communities rather than becoming 3rd or 4th class citizens in Europe... When did Europe ever operate on behalf of African people except when Africa or its people were used to benefit the goals and priorities of Europe?&lt;br /&gt;
**Marsha Coleman-Adebayo, [http://archive.is/9YLa9 &amp;quot;Negroes Need Not Apply: The EU-Africa Malta Conference&amp;quot;] (1 December 2015), &#039;&#039;Black Agenda Report&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Many of the traits on which modern Europe prides itself came to it from [[Muslim]] [[Spain]]. [[Diplomacy]], [[free trade]], open borders, the techniques of academic research, of [[anthropology]], [[etiquette]], [[fashion]], various types of [[medicine]], hospitals, all came from this great city of cities. (...) The surprise is the extent to which [[Islam]] has been a part of Europe for so long, first in Spain, then in the [[Balkans]], and the extent to which it has contributed so much towards the civilisation which we all too often think of, wrongly, as entirely Western. Islam is part of our past and our present, in all fields of human endeavour. It has helped to create modern Europe. It is part of our own inheritance, not a thing apart.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles, Prince of Wales]], 27th October 1993, [http://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/speechesandarticles/a_speech_by_hrh_the_prince_of_wales_titled_islam_and_the_wes_425873846.html Islam and the West]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It was the fate of Europe to be always a battleground. Differences in [[race]], in [[religion]], in political genius and social ideals, seemed always... to be invitations to contest by battle.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Calvin Coolidge]], [https://archive.org/stream/foundationsofrep00unit/foundationsofrep00unit_djvu.txt The Genius of America] (16 October 1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*Europe tears itself apart in moral confusion and historical guilt.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Janet Daley|Janet Daley]], [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/september-11-attacks/8754523/911-The-dark-day-that-brought-out-the-worst-in-Britain.html &amp;quot;9/11: The dark day that brought out the worst in Britain&amp;quot;] (10 September 2011), &#039;&#039;The Telegraph&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of [[Russia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yes, it is &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Europe]], from the Atlantic to the Urals&#039;&#039;&#039;, it is Europe, it is the whole of Europe, that will decide the fate of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;Oui, c&#039;est l&#039;Europe, depuis l&#039;Atlantique jusqu&#039;à l&#039;Oural, c&#039;est toute l&#039;Europe, qui décidera du destin du monde.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Charles de Gaulle]], University of Strasbourg speech (23 November 1959). The phrase shown in bold is the most often quoted excerpt. De Gaulle was expressing his vision of Europe&#039;s future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in [[history]]. The [[Russia]]ns especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As to the territorial limits of Europe, they may seem relatively clear on its seaward flanks, but many island groups far to the north and west—[[w:Svalbard|Svalbard]], the [[w:Faroe Islands|Faroes]], [[w:Iceland|Iceland]], and the [[w:Madeira Islands|Madeira]] and [[w:Canary islands|Canary islands]]—are considered European, while [[w:Greenland|Greenland]] (though tied politically to [[Denmark]]) is conventionally allocated to [[North America]]. Furthermore, the Mediterranean coastlands of [[w:North Africa|North Africa]] and [[w:Southwestern Asia|southwestern Asia]] also exhibit some European physical and cultural affinities. Turkey and Cyprus in particular, while geologically Asian, possess elements of European culture and may be regarded as parts of Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:w:Encyclopædia Britannica|Encyclopædia Britannica]], [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/195686/Europe Europe]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
* Like the [[Roman Empire]] in the early [[w:5th century|fifth century]], Europe has allowed its defenses to crumble. As its [[wealth]] has grown, so its [[military]] prowess has shrunk, along with its self-belief. It has grown decadent in its shopping malls and sports stadiums. At the same time, it has opened its gates to outsiders who have coveted its wealth without renouncing their ancestral faith.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Niall Ferguson]], [https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/11/16/paris-and-fall-rome/ErlRjkQMGXhvDarTIxXpdK/story.html &amp;quot;Paris and the fall of Rome&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Boston Globe&#039;&#039;, November 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Purity of race does not exist. Europe is a continent of energetic mongrels.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Albert Laurens Fisher]], &#039;&#039;A history of Europe&#039;&#039;, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1939, p.14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Europe dominated the world, but it failed to dominate itself. For five hundred years Europe tore itself apart in [[w:Civil war|civil wars]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Friedman]], [https://www.amazon.com/Next-100-Years-Forecast-Century/dp/038551705X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1498628991&amp;amp;sr=1-1 &#039;&#039;The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century&#039;&#039;] (2009), Doubleday, p. 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Contemporary Europe is a search for an exit from [[hell]]... Europe has always been a bloody place. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Friedman]], [https://web.archive.org/web/20170628201538/http://81.47.175.201/flagship/attachments/19691_WM--Next%20Decade%202nd%20pass--fm%20+%20pp%201-165.pdf &#039;&#039;The Next Decade: Where We&#039;ve Been ... And Where We&#039;re Going&#039;&#039;] (2010), Doubleday, pp. 142&amp;amp;ndash;143&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No continent is as small and fragmented as Europe. Only [[Australia]] is smaller, yet Europe consists of fifty independent nations (including [[Turkey]] and the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]], for reasons explained later). Crowded with nations, it is also crowded with people. Europe&#039;s population density is 72.5 people per square kilometer. The European Union&#039;s density is 112 people per square kilometer. Asia has 86 people per square kilometer. Europe is crowded and fragmented.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Friedman]], [https://books.google.com/books?id=Svk2BAAAQBAJ&amp;amp;dq=038553633X&amp;amp;q=crowded#v=snippet&amp;amp;q=crowded&amp;amp;f=false &#039;&#039;Flashpoints: The Emerging Crisis in Europe&#039;&#039;] (2015), New York: Doubleday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jean-Baptiste Oudry - Allegory of Europe - BF.1987.2 - Museum of Fine Arts.jpg|thumb|Yes, it is Europe, from the Atlantic to the [[w:Ural Mountains|Urals]], it is Europe, it is the whole of Europe, that will decide the fate of the world. ~ [[Charles de Gaulle]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Oui, c&#039;est l&#039;Europe, depuis l&#039;Atlantique jusqu&#039;à l&#039;Oural, c&#039;est l&#039;Europe, c&#039;est toute l&#039;Europe, qui décidera du destin du monde!&lt;br /&gt;
**Translation: Yes, it is Europe, from the Atlantic to the [[w:Ural Mountains|Urals]], it is Europe, it is the whole of Europe, that will decide the fate of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles de Gaulle]], 23 November 1959, Strasbourg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The peoples of Europe are a work in progress and always must be... The history of the people of Europe has not ended -- it never will. Ethnogenesis is a process of the present and future as much as it is the past. No efforts of [[Romanticism|romantics]], [[politicians]], or [[Social science|social scientists]] can preserve once and for all some essential soul of a people or nation. Nor can any effort ensure that [[nations]], [[Ethnicity|ethnic groups]], and communities of today will not vanish utterly in the future. The past may have set the parameters within which one can build the [[future]], but it cannot determine what that future must be. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Patrick J. Geary]], &#039;&#039;The Myth of Nations: The Medieval Origins of Europe&#039;&#039;, Princeton University Press, 2003&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Europe is not really even a geographic entity; it is separated from [[Asia]] only at one point, the [[w:Bosporus|Bosphorus]], by a small stretch of water. North of that there is continuity over the russians steppes, a complete terrestrial flow. I suggest that is also true of culture, and indeed of social organization. Indeed Europe has never been purely isolated, purely [[Christianity|Christian]]. Instead of Christian Europe, one has to see the continent as penetrated by the three world religions that originated in the [[Middle East|Near East]] and which indeed had a common mythology or sacred text; in order of arrival these were [[Judaism]], [[Christianity]] and Islam. (...) All have equal entitlements to be present, and in this general (&#039;objective&#039;) sense none can be considered only as the Other; they are part of Europe, part of our heritage.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jack Goody]], &#039;&#039;Islam in Europe&#039;&#039;, Polity, 2004, p. 14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is time to consign to oblivion the [[cold war]] postulates when Europe was viewed as an arena of confrontation divided into &amp;quot;spheres of influence&amp;quot; and someone else&#039;s &amp;quot;forward-based defences&amp;quot;, as an object of military confrontation — namely a theatre of war.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/address_given_by_mikhail_gorbachev_to_the_council_of_europe_6_july_1989-en-4c021687-98f9-4727-9e8b-836e0bc1f6fb.html Speech to the Council of Europe (6 July 1989)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Now it is up to all of us, all the participants in the European process, to make the best possible use of the groundwork laid down through our common efforts. Our idea of a common European home serves the same purpose too. It was born out of our realization of new realities, of our realization of the fact that the linear continuation of the path, along which inter-European relations have developed until the last quarter of the twentieth century, is no longer consonant with these realities. The idea is linked with our domestic economic and political &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; which called for new relations above all in that part of the world to which we, the Soviet Union, belong, and with which we have been tied most closely over the centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/address_given_by_mikhail_gorbachev_to_the_council_of_europe_6_july_1989-en-4c021687-98f9-4727-9e8b-836e0bc1f6fb.html Speech to the Council of Europe (6 July 1989)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As far as the economic content of the common European home is concerned, we regard as a realistic prospect — though not a close one — the emergence of a vast economic space from the Atlantic to the Urals where Eastern and Western parts would be strongly interlocked. In this sense, the Soviet Union’s transition to a more open economy is essential; and not only for ourselves, for a higher economic effectiveness and for meeting consumer demands. Such a transition will increase East-West economic interdependence and, thus, will tell favorably on the entire spectrum of European relations.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/address_given_by_mikhail_gorbachev_to_the_council_of_europe_6_july_1989-en-4c021687-98f9-4727-9e8b-836e0bc1f6fb.html Speech to the Council of Europe (6 July 1989)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious pan-European integration process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and Germany may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have seen the Capitols and most of the principle towns and people, of every Country in Europe. I have not yet seen any to be jealous of.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ulysses S. Grant]], [https://books.google.com/books?id=3zBLjHeAGB0C&amp;amp;pg=PA20&amp;amp;lpg=PA20&amp;amp;dq=%22the+most+progressive,+freest+and+richest+people+on+earth%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=EZbrD41i4x&amp;amp;sig=ACfU3U0Vq__Pkv3W9ZmVO99jsFly6HM32g&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwiY0JHLwpnoAhXbgnIEHcJzAekQ6AEwB3oECAwQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22the%20most%20progressive%2C%20freest%20and%20richest%20people%20on%20earth%22&amp;amp;f=false letter to Edward F. Beale] (6 December 1878), Paris, France&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Europe has not been a continent of [[Immigration|immigrants]]... It lacks the ingredients necessary to assimilate, integrate, and intermarry large numbers of newcomers each year: There is no dynamic and fluid economy, no confidence in its own values, no belief that class and race are incidental, not essential, to one&#039;s persona, no courage to assume that an immigrant made a choice to leave a worse place for a better one. And all this is in the context of a class-bound hierarchy...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Victor Davis Hanson]], [http://victorhanson.com/wordpress/europe-at-the-edge-of-the-abyss/#more-9204 &amp;quot;Europe at the Edge of the Abyss&amp;quot;] (29 March 2016), &#039;&#039;National Review Online&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The expansion of Europe was the transforming force in human history of the last 500 years, and yet the modern academy looks for reasons not to study it. In the era of [[Decolonization|decolonisation]] the new nations want to stress their indigenous roots and sympathetic scholars explain that European influence was not overwhelming, but that it was used and subverted by locals for local purposes. To concentrate on Europe is criticised as &#039;[[Eurocentrism|Eurocentric]]&#039;. But to ignore Europe makes the history of any part of the globe unintelligible.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Hirst]], &#039;&#039;Sense and Nonsense in Australian History&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*European civilisation is unique because it is the only civilisation which has imposed itself on the rest of the world. It did this by conquest and settlement; by its economic power; by the power of its ideas; and because it had things that everyone else wanted. Today every country on earth uses the discoveries of science and the technologies that flow from it, and science was a European invention.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Hirst]], &#039;&#039;The Shortest History of Europe&#039;&#039; (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A [[Russia]]n person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne- &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
* Europe. Their political interests are entirely distinct from ours. Their mutual jealousies, their balance of power, their complicated alliances, their forms and principles of government, are all foreign to us. They are nations of eternal war. All their energies are expended in the destruction of the labor, property and lives of their people.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], from Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 11 June 1823, online in [From Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 11 June 1823 founders.archive.gov]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become corrupt as in Europe, and go to eating one another as they do there.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], letter to [[James Madison]] (20 December 1787), [http://books.google.com/books?id=5iUWAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA332&amp;amp;dq=%22When+we+get+piled+upon+one%22+inauthor:jefferson&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;num=50&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;hl=sv &#039;&#039;The Writings of Thomas Jefferson&#039;&#039; (19 Vols., 1905) edited by [[w:Andrew A. Lipscomb|Andrew A. Lipscomb]] and Albert Ellery Bergh, Vol. VI, p. 392.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The reality is that, since the fall of Rome, no power has come near to ruling this continent. Charlemagne did not do so, nor did the Habsburg Holy Roman Emperors, nor France&#039;s Napoleon, nor Germany&#039;s Hitler, nor yet the commissioners of the European Union. If history teaches anything, it is that all attempts to straighten Kant&#039;s &#039;crooked timber of humanity&#039; will fail. Europe&#039;s peoples will not be put in bondage to a superior state, however liberal its intentions.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Simon Jenkins|Simon Jenkins]], &#039;&#039;A Short History of Europe: From Pericles to Putin&#039;&#039; (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
*[Y]ou don’t have to talk about [[Nazism|Nazis]] or [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] or any of that to say the norm in Europe is competition, conflict. And if we think that that’s over, I think that history tells us otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Robert Kagan]], [https://conversationswithbillkristol.org/transcript/robert-kagan-transcript/ interview with Bill Kristol] (March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Europe, there exist no borders. The people I spoke to all agreed that their quality of life was enhanced in many ways after unification of the continent. We saw the amazing synergy effects of European union.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Kim Wan-ju|Wan-ju Kim]], [https://web.archive.org/web/20041018203940/http://www.jeonju.go.kr/eng2004/110.asp &#039;&#039;Mayor&#039;s Greetings&#039;&#039;] (October 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Europe’s political stability, social cohesion, economic prosperity and security are more threatened today than at any point since the [[Cold War]], Russia is destabilizing the Continent on every front. Indigenous factors – whether long-extant [[nationalism]], design flaws in the [[Euro|Eurozone]] lack of a common [[foreign policy]], or incapability at assimilating immigrants – certainly lie at the root of these crises.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:James Kirchick|James Kirchick]], [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;Politico&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In recent decades, Europe has retreated to the conduct of soft power. But besieged as it is on almost all frontiers by upheavals and migration, Europe, including [[United Kingdom|Britain]], can avoid turning into a victim of circumstance only by assuming a more active role.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger|Henry Kissinger]], [https://www.wsj.com/articles/out-of-the-brexit-turmoil-opportunity-1467151419 &amp;quot;Out of the Brexit Turmoil: Opportunity&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Wall Street Journal&#039;&#039;, June 28, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For 400 years, world history was made by Europeans. Many of the great ideas by which we live — [[Constitutional democracy|constitutional government]], freedom of the individual, the ideas of the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] — originated in Europe and were spread by Europe around the world. Now this region, which was dynamic and built the world, has become too preoccupied with itself. It confines itself basically to the exercise of soft power. At present, no European government has the capacity to ask its people for sacrifices on behalf of foreign policy. Unless Europe can recover some of its historic dynamism, there will be a big hole in the world system as it has until now manifested itself.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger|Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
* Even if Europe&#039;s decline is now irreversible, there is no reason that it should become a collapse. There is, however, a precondition: facing realities at long last, something that has been postponed in many parts of Europe to this day. The debate should be about which of Europe&#039;s traditions and values can still be saved, not about Europe as a shining example for all mankind, the moral superpower of the [[21st century|twenty-first century]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Walter Laqueur|Walter Laqueur]], &#039;&#039;The Last Days of Europe: Epitaph for an Old Continent&#039;&#039; (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no place for concern that it would change the structure and operation of the EU in a radical way. 90% of the constitution agreement is already in the current agreements. The innovations in the draft will clarify the structure of the EU and make its activity more efficient, as well as strengthen citizens’ rights.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Egils Levits]] (Latvian ECJ Judge), Quoted in “Latvijas avize”, 21 June 2004&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Europe orthographic Caucasus Urals boundary (with borders).svg|thumb|There is no single European people. There is no single all-embracing community of culture and tradition among, say, Warsaw, Amsterdam, Berlin and Belgrade. ~ [[Geert Mak]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*As we have seen over the last seven years, time and time again, the European countries and many others, do not have the political will or clout to stand up for what they know is right, and will eventually cave into the Unites States’ will. We have watched [[Chelsea Manning]] being returned to jail and to solitary confinement, so we must not  be naive in our thinking: surely, this is the future for [[Julian Assange]]. By Julian’s courageous actions and others like him, we could see full well the [[war crimes|atrocities of war]]. The release of the files brought to our doors the atrocities our governments carried out through media. It is my strong belief that this is the true essence of an activist...  It is my great shame I live in an era where people like [[Julian Assange]], [[Edward Snowden]], [[Chelsea Manning]] and anyone willing to open our eyes to the [[War crime|atrocities of war]], is likely to be hunted like an animal by governments, punished and silenced.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mairead Maguire]], [https://www.globalresearch.ca/mairead-maguire-requests-permission-visit-assange  &#039;&#039;Requests Permission to Visit Assange, Nominated for Nobel Prize,  Global Research&#039;&#039;,]   (14 April 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* So there is no single European people. There is no single all-embracing community of culture and tradition among, say, [[w:Warsaw|Warsaw]], [[w:Amsterdam|Amsterdam]], [[Berlin]] and [[Belgrade]]. In fact, there are at least four communities: the Northern [[Protestantism|Protestant]], the [[Latin]] [[Catholic Church|Catholic]], the [[Greeks|Greek]] [[Orthodoxy|Orthodox]], and the [[Muslim]] [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]]. There is no single language - there are more than twenty. (...) There are no real European political parties (...). And most significantly of all: unlike the United States, Europe still does not have a common story.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geert Mak]], [http://www.eurocult.org/uploads/docs/712.pdf Europe as a cultural project], 2005&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I&#039;m worried about moving in the direction of [[w:Western Europe|Western Europe]], because I believe that the higher taxes in Western Europe are one of the reasons that those economies aren&#039;t as rich as we are and why people don&#039;t work as much in Western Europe as they do in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:N. Gregory Mankiw|N. Gregory Mankiw]], [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/n-gregory-mankiw/ interview with Bill Kristol] (2 February 2017), [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/transcript/n-gregory-mankiw-transcript/ full transcript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What has made the European family of nations an improving, instead of a stationary portion of mankind? Not any superior excellence in them, which, when it exists, exists as the effect, not as the cause; but their remarkable diversity of character and culture. Individuals, classes, nations, have been extremely unlike one another: they have struck out a great variety of paths, each leading to something valuable; and although at every period those who travelled in different paths have been intolerant of one another, and each would have thought it an excellent thing if all the rest could have been compelled to travel his road, their attempts to thwart each other&#039;s development have rarely had any permanent success, and each has in time endured to receive the good which the others have offered. Europe is, in my judgment, wholly indebted to this plurality of paths for its progressive and many-sided development.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Stuart Mill]]. &#039;&#039;[[On Liberty]]&#039;&#039; (1859) Chapter III. Of individuality, as one of the elements of well-Being p.136&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* More than any other continent or culture in the world today, Europe is now deeply weighed down with guilt for its past. Alongside this outgoing version of self-distrust runs a more introverted version of the same guilt. For there is also the problem in Europe of an existential tiredness and a feeling that perhaps for Europe the story has run out and a new story must be allowed to begin. Mass immigration — the replacement of large parts of the European populations by other people — is one way in which this new story has been imagined: a change, we seemed to think, was as good as a rest. Such existential civilizational tiredness is not a uniquely modern-European phenomenon, but the fact that a society should feel like it has run out of steam at precisely the moment when a new society has begun to move in cannot help but lead to vast, epochal changes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Douglas Murray]], &#039;&#039;The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam&#039;&#039; (2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
* In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments of the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by [[terrorist]] attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with the guns of [[America]] or [[China]] or [[Japan]].&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[wikisource:The_Protocols_of_the_Meetings_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion/Protocols_of_the_Meetings_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion|The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion]]&#039;&#039; (1934) published by [[w:Sergei Nilus|Sergei Nilus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with Europe, in other continents also, we must create ferments, discords and hostility. Therein we gain a double advantage.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[wikisource:The_Protocols_of_the_Meetings_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion/Protocols_of_the_Meetings_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion|The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion]]&#039;&#039; (1934) published by [[w:Sergei Nilus|Sergei Nilus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[I]n Europe, faced with the choice between human rights and gas, many politicians pick gas.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Nemtsov]], [https://web.archive.org/web/20190128170527/http://magnitskybook.com/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Nemtsov.pdf interview with Elena Servettaz] (April 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
* People often think that Europeans are homogeneous group that arrived in a simple way there maybe 40 or 50 thousand years ago maybe based on the archaeology and just kind of sat there until they became the Europeans they are today, but that&#039;s probably not true: the Europeans today are a replacement population who came in much more recently and replaced the people who were there originally 40 thousand years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Reich (geneticist)|David Reich]], [http://www.livescience.com/21740-history-aids-understanding-diseases-today.html History Aids Understanding Diseases Today], National Science Foundation (20 July 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Europe has produced certain ideas and institutions, has been able, on and off, and with varying degrees of means, to blend them, purify them, make them work effectively, and has been able also to spread them around the world.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:John Roberts (historian)|J. M. Roberts]], &#039;&#039;A History of Europe&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
* Europe owes its greatness to the fact that the primary loyalties of the European people have been detached from religion and re-attached to the land. Those who believe that the division of Europe into nations has been the primary cause of European wars should remember the devastating wars of religion that national loyalties finally brought to an end. And they should study our art and literature for its inner meaning. In almost every case, they will discover, it is an art and literature not of war but of peace, an invocation of home and the routines of home, of gentleness, everydayness and enduring settlement... The idea that the citizen owes loyalty to a country, a territory, a jurisdiction and all those who reside within it — the root assumption of democratic politics, and one that depends upon the nation as its moral foundation - that idea has no place in the minds and hearts of many who now call themselves citizens of European states.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Roger Scruton]], &#039;&#039;England and the Need for Nations&#039;&#039; (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There are only two kinds of states in Europe: small states, and small states that have not yet realised they are small.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul-Henri Spaak]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The odd thing about modern Europe is that, if you look at the borders, you might think that Germany had won the First World War... The European Union and the old Soviet states are associated with a Europe that feels as if it is run from Berlin. From Scandinavia to Turkey, lorries trundle back and forth with German industrial goods; the euro is mainly German, the Deutsche Bank dominates the eurozone.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Norman Stone|Norman Stone]], [https://www.standard.co.uk/comment/norman-stone-germany-today-is-what-we-fought-the-great-war-to-create-9642363.html &amp;quot;Germany today is what we fought the Great War to create&amp;quot;] (1 August, 2014), &#039;&#039;Evening Standard&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Europeans believe that people from other cultures are threatening their national identities and livelihoods... Europe is rediscovering nationalism... Europeans have long defined themselves by a strong sentiment of national belonging, often linked to language, ethnicity and religion, and distrust of foreigners. The love for the place you were born, the trust of the people who surround you, and the fear of what strangers could do to you and your community is a basic human feeling. But in Europe, nationalism is particularly notable for the sheer scale of death and destruction it historically has brought.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:STRATFOR|STRATFOR]], [https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20150329191544/https://www.stratfor.com/node/213581 &amp;quot;Europe Rediscovers Nationalism&amp;quot;] (January 2015), &#039;&#039;STRATFOR: Global Intelligence&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*But there is no point in indulging in wishful thinking about the past. The changes were brought about by the [[World War I|World War]] and its repercussions. The war tore Europe from its previous position and transformed it into a continent bleeding from many wounds and left impoverished – not only in Germany – valuable segments of the population. “Where iron grows in the mountain shafts, the masters of the Earth arise.&amp;quot; Europe is no longer the main source of the world’s raw materials, and we can no longer delude ourselves that Europe is the leader of the world. For this reason the peoples of Europe are drawing closer together to protect themselves against conquest and inundation. And inasmuch as [[economics]] has an effect on politics, this drawing together, even though it might be questionable from the standpoint of economics, does constitute progress toward international understanding and peace. Even though the psychology of this process, which involves billions, causes sociologists to have reason for misgiving, the process is still an asset to mutual understanding among the nations.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Gustav Stresemann]], [https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1926/stresemann/lecture/ Nobel Lecture], (29 June 1927)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the heart of Europe runs the purest stream of human love, of justice, of spirit of self-sacrifice for higher ideals. The [[Christianity|Christian]] culture of centuries has sunk deep in her life&#039;s core. In Europe we have seen noble minds who have ever stood up for the rights of man irrespective of colour and creed.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Rabindranath Tagore]]. &amp;quot;Nationalism in the West&amp;quot;, 1917. Reprinted in Rabindranath Tagore and Mohit K. Ray, &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (2007, p. 475). Also cited in John Jesudason Cornelius, &#039;&#039;Rabindranath Tagore: India&#039;s Schoolmaster&#039;&#039;, (1928, p. 83).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Static inequality is a snapshot view of inequality; it does not reflect what will happen to you in the course of your life.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Consider that about 10 percent of [[United States of America|Americans]] will spend at least a year in the top 1 percent, and more than half of all Americans will spent a year in the top 10 percent.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; This is visibly not the same for the more static—but nominally more equal—Europe. For instance, only 10 percent of the wealthiest five hundred American people or dynasties were so thirty years ago; more than 60 percent on the French list are heirs and a third of the richest Europeans were the richest centuries ago. In Florence, it was just revealed that things are even worse: the same handful of families have kept the wealth for five centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nassim Nicholas Taleb]], &#039;&#039;Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life&#039;&#039; (2018, Random House)&lt;br /&gt;
*From these shores, it may seem to some of you that by comparison with the risk and sacrifice which America has borne through four decades and the courage with which you have shouldered unwanted burdens, Europe has not fully matched your expectations. Bear with me if I dwell for a moment on the Europe to which we now belong. It is not the Europe of ancient Rome, of [[Charlemagne]], of Bismarck. We who are alive today have passed through perhaps the greatest transformation of human affairs on the Continent of Europe since the fall of Rome. In but a short chapter of its long history, Europe lost the position which it had occupied for two thousand years -- and it is your history as much as ours. For five centuries, that small continent had extended its authority over islands and continents the world over. For the first forty years of [[20th century|this century]], there were seven great powers: [[United States]], [[United Kingdom|Great Britain]], [[Germany]], [[France]], [[w:Russian Empire|Russia]], [[Japan]], [[Italy]]. Of those seven, two now tower over the rest -- United States and the [[Soviet Union]]. To that swift and historic change Europe -- a Europe of many different histories and many different nations -- has had to find a response. It has not been an easy passage to blend this conflux of [[nationalism]], [[patriotism]], [[sovereignty]], into a [[European Union|European Community]], yet I think that our children and grandchildren may see this period -- these birth pangs of a new Europe -- more clearly than we do now. They will see it as a visionary chapter in the creation of a Europe able to share the load alongside you. Do not doubt the firmness of our resolve in this march towards this goal, but do not underestimate what we already do. Today, out of the forces of the [[NATO|Alliance in Europe]], 95%; of the divisions, 85%; of the tanks, 80%; of the combat aircraft, and 70%; of the fighting ships are provided, manned and paid for by the European Allies and Europe has more than three million men under arms and more still in reserve. We have to. We are right in the front line. The frontier of freedom cuts across our continent. Members of [[United States Congress|Congress]], the defense of that frontier is as vital to you as it is to us.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Margaret Thatcher]], [https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/margaretthatcherjointsessioncongress.htm Address to a Joint Session of Congress], 20 February 1985&lt;br /&gt;
*What we should grasp, however, from the lessons of European history is that, first, there is nothing necessarily benevolent about programmes of European integration; second, the desire to achieve grand utopian plans often poses a grave threat to freedom; and third, European unity has been tried before, and the outcome was far from happy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Margaret Thatcher]], &#039;&#039;Statecraft: Strategies for a Changing World&#039;&#039; (2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would rather visit Latin America or the [[Middle East]] than Europe. The people – especially Arabs and Kurds – are more pleasant to be around.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Michael Totten|Michael Totten]], [http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/michael-j-totten/51-facts-about-me &amp;quot;51 Facts About Me&amp;quot;] (26 June 2006), &#039;&#039;World Affairs Journal&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===W===&lt;br /&gt;
* In the European century that began in the 1840s from Engels&#039;s article of 1849 down to the death of Hitler, everyone who advocated genocide called himself a socialist, and no exception has been found.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:George Watson|George Watson]], &#039;&#039;The Lost Literature of Socialism&#039;&#039;, Cambridge: England, The Lutterworth Press (1998) p. 80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Z===&lt;br /&gt;
* Europe is and will be a Union of States.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero]], speech (15 June 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Disputed begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Disputed==&lt;br /&gt;
* I am a citizen of the greatest Republic of Mankind. I see the human race united like a huge family by brotherly ties. We have made a sowing of liberty which will, little by little, spring up across the whole world. One day, on the model of the United States of America, a United States of Europe will come into being. The United States will legislate for all its nationalities.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[George Washington]], in [http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-europefuture/article_344.jsp &amp;quot;Farewell to the United States of Europe: long live the EU!&amp;quot; by André Fontaine at &#039;&#039;Open Democracy&#039;&#039; (29 November 2001)]. This is declared spurious by an [[anonymous]] blogger in [http://racehist.blogspot.com/2010/01/did-george-washington-predict-united.html &amp;quot;Did George Washington predict a &amp;quot;United States of Europe&amp;quot;? (30 January 2010)] who believes it derives from statements in [http://books.google.com/books?id=b8Y9AAAAYAAJ &amp;quot;The People of Action : An Essay on American Idealism&amp;quot; (1918)] by Gustave Rodrigues and James Mark Baldwin, as translated by Louise Seymour Houghton: &lt;br /&gt;
:::Washington wrote to Lafayette that he considered himself a &amp;quot;citizen of the great republic of humanity,&amp;quot;  adding: &amp;quot;I see the human race a great family, united by fraternal bonds.&amp;quot; Elsewhere he wrote prophetically: &amp;quot;We have sown a seed of liberty and union that will gradually germinate throughout the earth. Some day, on the model of the United States of America, will be constituted the United States of Europe.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:: Presented as the actual letter cited is [http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/04-04-02-0200 this letter] to the [[Marquis de Lafayette]] (15 August 1786), which contains general assertions of Humanity&#039;s unity, but without any predictions of a &amp;quot;United States of Europe&amp;quot;: &lt;br /&gt;
::: Altho&#039; I pretend to no peculiar information respecting commercial affairs, nor any foresight into the scenes of futurity; yet as the member of an infant empire, &#039;&#039;&#039;as a Philanthropist by character, and (if I may be allowed the expression) as a Citizen of the great republic of [[humanity]] at large; I cannot help turning my attention sometimes to this subject.&#039;&#039;&#039; I would be understood to mean, I cannot avoid reflecting with pleasure on the probable influence that commerce may hereafter have on human manners and society in general. On these occasions &#039;&#039;&#039;I consider how mankind may be connected like one great family in fraternal ties. I indulge a fond, perhaps an enthusiastic idea, that as the world is evidently much less barbarous than it has been, its melioration must still be [[progressive]]; that nations are becoming more [[humanized]] in their policy, that the subjects of [[ambition]] and causes for hostility are daily diminishing, and, in fine, that the period is not very remote, when the benefits of a liberal and free commerce will, pretty generally, succeed to the devastations and horrors of war.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:::* [https://www.loc.gov/resource/mgw2.013/?sp=155 Library of Congress scan of letter]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Disputed end}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[World]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Official website|https://europa.eu/european-union/index_en}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Europe| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[bg:Европа — Европейци]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[bs:Evropa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[cs:Evropa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Europa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[es:Europa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Europe]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[hy:Եվրոպա]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[it:Europa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[lt:Europa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[pl:Europa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[pt:Europa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[ru:Европа]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[sk:Európa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[uk:Європа]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=History&amp;diff=3124141</id>
		<title>History</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=History&amp;diff=3124141"/>
		<updated>2022-06-08T20:52:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* E */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:International Human Rights Day protest march against war and against deportations (24109135727).jpg|thumb|There have always been wars, [[tyrannies]] and [[scarcity|privations]].  [[Escapism|Escapists]] take refuge in [[Cliché|cliches]] such as “Human nature will never change” and “History always repeats itself!” Nevertheless, [[human nature]] is changing before our eyes,  and quite new history is being made... It is a new procedure  when a large and ever growing section of the public begins to take [[responsibility]] for the trend of [[evolution]] to such  purpose that the community is increasingly honeycombed with [[Progressivism|progressive movements]] of every possible kind.  This is the new element in history which constitutes a  mighty landmark in the [[development]] of [[humanity|mankind]]. ~ [[Vera Stanley Alder]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:History|History]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (from [[w:Ancient Greek|Greek]], &#039;&#039;historia&#039;&#039;, meaning &amp;quot;inquiry, knowledge acquired by investigation&amp;quot;) is the study of the past, particularly how it relates to humans. It is an [[w:umbrella term|umbrella term]] that relates to past events as well as the memory, discovery, collection, organization, presentation, and interpretation of information about these events. Scholars who write about history are called [[historian]]s. Events occurring prior to written record are considered [[prehistory]].&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha|extsource=yes|hoyt=yes|[[#Misattributed|Misattributed]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:History-Dielman-Highsmith.jpeg|thumb|Man is a history-making creature who can neither repeat his past nor leave it behind. ~ [[W. H. Auden]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A ==&lt;br /&gt;
* History is the sum total of things that could have been avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Konrad Adenauer]] (attributed), &#039;&#039;Lend Me Your Ears: Oxford Dictionary of Political Quotations&#039;&#039; (2010), 4th edition, edited by Antony Jay&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Escapism|Escapists]] take refuge in [[Cliché|cliches]] such as “Human nature will never change” and “History always repeats itself!” Nevertheless, [[human nature]] is changing before our eyes,  and quite new history is being made.   This century has seen [[World War I|world war]] for the first time. It has seen a world [[civilization]] threatened with self-destruction, not only through war but through the exploitation of  all [[Mother Nature|the kingdoms in nature]]. It has also seen the beginnings  of [[Internationalism|international alignment]] and [[collaboration]]. It has seen  the [[Leadership|leaders]] of the people struggling with great [[patience]] to  work out a new political approach from the ‘world’ angle.  It has seen the people themselves taking increasing individual and collective [[activism|action]] in order to obtain a world organization or government, a universal religion, or a universal language. Let us avoid being misled by the apparent irresponsibility of the crowd with its absorption in [[horror|crime films]], dog racing and [[gambling]], and its immorality and [[apathy]]!... It is traditional for the outstanding [[Leadership|leaders]] of humanity  to work for the shaping of history. It is a new procedure  when a large and ever growing section of the public begins to take [[responsibility]] for the trend of [[evolution]] to such  purpose that the community is increasingly honeycombed with [[Progressivism|progressive movements]] of every possible kind.  This is the new element in history which constitutes a  mighty landmark in the [[development]] of [[humanity|mankind.]] &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vera Stanley Alder]] in [[Vera_Stanley_Alder#Humanity_Comes_of_Age,_A_study_of_Individual_and_World_Fulfillment_(1950)|&#039;&#039;Humanity Comes of Age, A study of Individual and World Fulfillment&#039;&#039;]] (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There are two ways of summing up world history, the inner way and the outer way. Both have been at the mercy of scribes and policies. We must use our divinely-given intuition in order to arrive near to the truth. Let us begin by realizing that the story of human evolution has progressed steadily from complete exclusiveness to an ever broadening inclusiveness. At first it was built up around the self-interest of the family unit. Later the ring-pass-not enlarged to include the tribe. The tribal communities finally produced the small state or nation. The aggressive self-interest of nations eventually produced Empires. Everything outside of the Empire was potential enemy or potential prey.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Finally came the conceptions of [[unity|Federation]] and of [[Commonwealth]]. This saw the emergence of a new concept of co-operation instead of tyranny, and of the rights of the individual instead of those of the autocrat. Nevertheless, even the most benign and powerful of these nation-groups had still to consider everything outside of itself as potential enemy, and therefore self-interest still ruled. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vera Stanley Alder]] in [[Vera_Stanley_Alder#Humanity_Comes_of_Age,_A_study_of_Individual_and_World_Fulfillment_(1950)|&#039;&#039;Humanity Comes of Age, A study of Individual and World Fulfillment&#039;&#039;]] (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past is a pointer to the future. If we can understand  the past and follow the trend of development throughout  history we shall be more sure of where we are going. History tells us of wars and conquests and empires and  revolutions, of cities and cultures, and of religions and persecutions. Yet actually it is a rather superficial survey. It leaves out almost entirely one vital part of the picture — the most important part. It has very little to say of man’s purpose in living, of his understanding of the reason of his existence and of his conception of life around him, and his interpretation of the mysteries of creation and evolution. So little does history say about this aspect of man — the mainspring and motive of his living — that we are left guessing about the most important part of the story — the extent of man’s actual knowledge throughout the ages... We are given superficial and rather materialistic details of the outward forms and the bitter strife which accompanied the development of the various religions as they  were interpreted and practised by the people, much of which leaves us with an impression of brutal and bigoted primitiveness. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vera Stanley Alder]] in [[Vera_Stanley_Alder#Humanity_Comes_of_Age,_A_study_of_Individual_and_World_Fulfillment_(1950)|&#039;&#039;Humanity Comes of Age, A study of Individual and World Fulfillment&#039;&#039;]] (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[sciences]] we are familiar with have been installed in a number of great &#039;continents&#039;. Before [[Karl Marx|Marx]], two such continents had been opened up to scientific knowledge: the continent of Mathematics and the continent of Physics. The first by the Greeks ([[Thales]]), the second by [[Galileo]]. [[Karl Marx|Marx]] opened up a third continent to scientific knowledge: the continent of History.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Louis Althusser]], &amp;quot;Philosophy as a Revolutionary Weapon&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;{{w|Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays}}&#039;&#039; (1968) as translated by Ben Brewster (Monthly Review Press: 1971), p. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I was not speaking of minor ripples in the mainstream of history—certainly those are ruled by chance. But the broad current moves quite inexorably, I assure you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Poul Anderson]], &#039;&#039;Cold Victory,&#039;&#039; in [[w:George H. Scithers|George H. Scithers]] &amp;amp; [[w:Darrell Schweitzer|Darrell Schweitzer]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;Another Round at the Spaceport Bar,&#039;&#039; p. 181. Originally appeared in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_Science_Fiction Venture Science Fiction], May 1957&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History repeats itself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anonymous]] proverb; popularized since the mid-1800s; already considered clichéd by 1865. &amp;quot;The most solemn humbug which does duty as a profound historical reflection is, that history repeats itself.&amp;quot; Harper&#039;s, volume 30, [http://books.google.com/books?id=tX8CAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA124&amp;amp;dq=%22history+repeats+itself%22 p. 124], 1865&lt;br /&gt;
** Widely attributed to various famous authors, who expressed similar sentiments – see [[#Marx|Marx]] and [[#Hegel|Hegel]] quotes below.&lt;br /&gt;
** An early attested form is &amp;quot;history repeats itself never&amp;quot; (reversing it), 1854, [[William Howitt]] &#039;&#039;The history of magic, Volume 2,&#039;&#039; by Joseph Ennemoser, translation William Howitt, 1854, [http://books.google.com/books?id=zgXuzN2ZRtoC&amp;amp;pg=PA86#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=history%20repeats%20itself p. 86]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is about the past. Yet it exists only in the present – the moment of its creation as history provides us with a narrative constructed after the events with which it is concerned. The narrative must then relate to the moment of its creation as much as its historical subject. History presents an historian with the task of producing a dialogue between the past and the present. But as these temporal co-ordinates cannot be fixed, history becomes a continuous interaction between the historian and the past. As such, history can be seen as a process of evaluation whereby the past is always coloured by the intellectual fashions and philosophical concerns of the present. This shifting perspective on the past is matched by the fluid status of the past itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dana Arnold]], &#039;&#039;Reading Architectural History&#039;&#039; (2002), Ch. 1 : Reading the past : What is architectural history?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The recognition of the role and importance of subjectivity in the construction of histories does, by implication, negate the possibility for objectivity in the writing of history. But there will always be historical narrative and, consequently, a narrative voice, be it hidden in the syntactical structure of the writing by, for instance, the absence of first person or the use of simple past tense. But this is a sleight of hand which gives the reader a sense of immediate  contact  with  the  past  without  the  presence  of  an  interlocutor.  This  apparently ‘unmediated’ contact gives history a kind of privileged status of objective knowledge&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dana Arnold]] &#039;&#039;Reading Architectural History&#039;&#039; (2002), Ch. 1 : Reading the past : What is architectural history?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Historical reality is then a &#039;referential illusion&#039;, in which we try to grasp the reality (the referent of language) that we believe lies beyond the barrier of the linguistic construction of its narratives. In this way history becomes a Myth or an ideology as it purports to be reality. Indeed, storytelling is often seen as one of the most important functions of writing histories and fundamental to the nature of the discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dana Arnold]], &#039;&#039;Reading Architectural History&#039;&#039; (2002), Ch. 1 : Reading the past : What is architectural history?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man is a history-making creature who can neither repeat his past nor leave it behind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. H. Auden]], &#039;&#039;The Dyers Hand&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;D.H. Lawrence&amp;quot; (1962)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Political history is far too criminal and pathological to be a fit subject of study for the young. Children should acquire their heroes and villains from fiction.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. H. Auden]], &#039;&#039;A Certain World&#039;&#039; (1970)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All things from eternity are of like forms and come round in a circle.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Aurelius]], &#039;&#039;Meditations&#039;&#039;, Bk. II, Ch. 14 (c. 121–180 AD)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==B==&lt;br /&gt;
*History is of two kinds—there is the official history taught in schools, a lying compilation &#039;&#039;ad usum delphini&#039;&#039;; and there is the secret history which deals with the real causes of events—a scandalous chronicle.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Honoré de Balzac]], in [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1639/1639-h/1639-h.htm &#039;&#039;Eve and David (Lost Illusions Part III)&#039;&#039;], Translated by Ellen Marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Journalism is the first rough draft of history.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Originally stated in slightly different forms “News/The press [is the] … first rough draft of history”, this form dates at least to the 1940s, and was most likely popularized by {{w|Alan Barth}}, as an editorial writer for the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; in the 1940s. The sentiment appears several times in the editorial pages of the &#039;&#039;Post&#039;&#039; in that era, with the earliest citation from Barth being 1943:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shafer2010&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:: News is only the first rough draft of history.&lt;br /&gt;
::* {{w|Alan Barth}}, review of &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of a Curmudgeon&#039;&#039; by {{w|Harold L. Ickes}} in &#039;&#039;{{w|New Republic}},&#039;&#039; 1943, collected in &#039;&#039;The New Republic,&#039;&#039; Volume 108, [http://books.google.com/books?id=cDgQAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;q=%22draft+of+history%22 p. 677]&lt;br /&gt;
:* This quote is generally incorrectly credited to {{w|Philip L. Graham}}, in an address to &#039;&#039;Newsweek&#039;&#039; correspondents in London (1963):&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shafer2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;“[http://www.slate.com/id/2265540/pagenum/all Who Said It First? Journalism is the &#039;first rough draft of history.’]” by {{w|Jack Shafer}}, &#039;&#039;Slate&#039;&#039; (30 August 2010)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Personal History&#039;&#039; (1997) by {{w|Katharine Graham}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The end of history is, alas, also the end of the dustbins of history. There are no longer any dustbins for disposing of old ideologies, old regimes, old values. Where are we going to throw Marxism, which actually invented the dustbins of history? (Yet there is some justice here since the very people who invented them have fallen in.) Conclusion: if there are no more dustbins of history, &#039;&#039;this is because History itself has become a dustbin.&#039;&#039; It has become its own dustbin, just as the planet itself is becoming its own dustbin.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Baudrillard]], &#039;&#039;The Illusion of the End&#039;&#039; (1992), &amp;quot;The Event Strike&amp;quot;, p. 26.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Take one of [[Voltaire]]&#039;s swift shining shafts of wit: &amp;quot;History is after all only a pack of tricks we play on the dead.&amp;quot; Ah, yes, how true it is, we say; and we are astonished that Voltaire could have been so profound. Then we realize that he did not really mean it. To him it was a witticism intended to brand dishonest historians, whereas we perceive that it formulated, in the neatest possible way, a profound truth — the truth that all historical writing, even the most honest, is unconsciously subjective, since every age is bound, in spite of itself, to make the dead perform whatever tricks it finds necessary for its own peace of mind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carl L. Becker]], &#039;&#039;The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers&#039;&#039; (1932), Ch. II. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971, pp. 43–4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mrs. Lintott&#039;&#039;&#039;: Now. How do you define history, Mr. Rudge?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Rudge&#039;&#039;&#039;: Can I speak freely, Miss? Without being hit?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Mrs. Lintott&#039;&#039;&#039;: I will protect you.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Rudge&#039;&#039;&#039;: How do I define history? It&#039;s just one fucking thing after another.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alan Bennett]], &#039;&#039;[[The History Boys]]&#039;&#039; (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History must not be written with bias, and both sides must be given, even if there is only one side.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Betjeman]], &#039;&#039;First and Last Loves&#039;&#039; (1952)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*HISTORY, &#039;&#039;n.&#039;&#039; An account mostly false, of events mostly unimportant, which are brought about by rulers, mostly knaves, and soldiers, mostly fools. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ambrose Bierce]], [https://archive.org/details/cynicswordbook00bier/page/160/mode/2up &#039;&#039;The Cynic&#039;s Word Book&#039;&#039;] (1906); republished as &#039;&#039;The Devil&#039;s Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1911).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we disown history we are at its mercy. To have a reasonable knowledge of the past is to possess an anchor which is likely to prevent us from being swept towards false ideas about the present and future.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Blainey]], &#039;&#039;The Great Seesaw: A New View of the Western World, 1750-2000&#039;&#039; (1988)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Unpredictable events, or the coincidence of vital events happening side by side, play their part in history. In the emerging of the United States of America, the South American nations, South Africa, Canada and Australia the unforeseen mixture of events was especially powerful in the final decades of the 18th century.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Blainey]], &#039;&#039;A Short History of the World&#039;&#039; (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The essence of studying history is that, as best we can, we try to wear the shoes and put on the spectacles worn by people of the past. We try to see the obstacles and dilemmas they struggled against or evaded. We also hope that the future will try to understand why we made blunders, and learn from failures and achievements of our era.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Blainey]], [https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/no-point-in-ignoring-facts-and-history/news-story/aaf4faf43dfb6c31bcecb635fba09e2c &amp;quot;No point in ignoring facts and history&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The Australian&#039;&#039; (June 14, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With all regimes, there is what might be called an official interpretation of the past that makes it appear defective or just a step on the way to the present regime.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Allan Bloom]], &#039;&#039;[[The Closing of the American Mind]]&#039;&#039; (New York: 1988), p. 249&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have read somewhere or other, in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, I think, that &#039;&#039;&#039;history is philosophy teaching by examples.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke]], &#039;&#039;On the Study and Use of History&#039;&#039;, Letter 2. Also quoted by [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;History&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The dignity of history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke]], &#039;&#039;On the Study and Use of History&#039;&#039;. Letter V. Fielding, &#039;&#039;Tom Jones&#039;&#039;, Book XI, Chapter II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On September 20, 1792, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (who had accompanied the Duke of Weimar on a military expedition to Paris) saw the finest army of Europe inexplicably repulsed at Valmy by some French militiamen, and said to his disconcerted friends, “In this place and on this day, a new epoch in the history of the world is beginning, and we shall be able to say that we have been present at its origin.” Since that time historic days have been numerous, and one of the tasks of the governments has been to fabricate them or to simulate them with an abundance of preconditioning propaganda followed by relentless publicity. &lt;br /&gt;
** The Modesty of History by Jorge Luis Borges from Borges, a reader: a selection from the writings of Jorge Luis Borges by Borges p. 246&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Always the victor writes the history of the vanquished. He who beats distorts the faces of the beaten. The weaker depart from this world and the lies remain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertolt Brecht]], &#039;&#039;{{w|The Trial of Lucullus}}&#039;&#039; (1940), &#039;&#039;Brecht Collected Plays&#039;&#039;, vol. 4, p. 386.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Papa [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]] he say that all we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history. &#039;&#039;I&#039;&#039; know people who can&#039;t even learn from what happened this morning. Hegel must have been taking the long view.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Brunner]], &#039;&#039;Stand on Zanzibar&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
** See [[#Hegel|Hegel quote]], below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is much more the product of chaos than of conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [[w:The New York Times|The New York Times]], January 18, 1981 [http://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/18/nyregion/quotation-of-the-day-227621.html?scp=28&amp;amp;sq=Brzezinski&amp;amp;st=nyt Quotation of the Day].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History gives us a kind of chart, and we dare not surrender even a small rushlight in the darkness. The hasty reformer who does not remember the past will find himself condemned to repeat it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Buchan]], general introduction to &#039;&#039;The Nations of Today&#039;&#039;, a series of popular histories published in 1923–1924 under Buchan&#039;s editorship. Each work contained Buchan&#039;s introduction. Reported in &#039;&#039;Great Britain&#039;&#039; (1923), vol. 1, p. 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What we learn from history is that people don&#039;t learn from history — and you certainly see that in [[w:Financial market|financial market]]s all the time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Warren Buffett]], {{cite journal|title=Warren Buffett: 2004 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting Part 1|date=August 2, 2018|journal=Hioim, YouTube|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cayxcPyQoAc}} (quote at 1:24:47 of 2:33:25)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is on every occasion the record of what one age finds worthy of note in another.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Jacob Burckhardt|Jacob Burckhardt]], &#039;&#039;Judgements on History and Historians&#039;&#039; (1929), Section 84: Introduction to the History of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What want these outlaws conquerors should have&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But History&#039;s purchased page to call them great?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;[[Childe Harold&#039;s Pilgrimage]]&#039;&#039;, Canto III (1816), Stanza 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And history with all her volumes vast,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hath but one page.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;[[Childe Harold&#039;s Pilgrimage]]&#039;&#039;, Canto IV (1818), Stanza 108.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==C==&lt;br /&gt;
* History does not always repeat itself. Sometimes it just yells, &#039;Can&#039;t you remember anything I told you?&#039; and lets fly with a club.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John W. Campbell]], &#039;&#039;Analog Science Fiction/Fact magazine&#039;&#039;(1965)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, a distillation of rumor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;The French Revolution, A History&#039;&#039; (1837), Part I, Book VII, Chapter V.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Happy the people whose annals are tiresome.&lt;br /&gt;
** Thomas Carlyle, &#039;&#039;The French Revolution, A History&#039;&#039; (1837), Part I, Book II, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No great man lives in vain. The history of the world is but the biography of great men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;[[w:On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and The Heroic in History|Heroes and Hero Worship]]&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;The Hero as Divinity&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Histories are as perfect as the Historian is wise, and is gifted with an eye and a soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Cromwell&#039;s Letters and Speeches&#039;&#039;, Introduction, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is the essence of innumerable Biographies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, On History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, as it lies at the root of all science, is also the first distinct product of man&#039;s spiritual nature; his earliest expression of what can be called Thought.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, On History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All history … is an inarticulate Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], Latter Day Pamphlets. 405.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All history is a Bible—a thing stated in words by me more than once.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Quoted in Froude&#039;s Early Life of Carlyle&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Happy the People whose Annals are blank in History-Books.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], Life of Frederick the Great, Book XVI, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The historian and the facts of history are necessary to one another. The historian without his facts is rootless and futile; the facts without their historian are dead and meaningless. My first answer therefore to the question, What is History?, is that it is a continuous process of interaction between the historian and his facts, an unending dialogue between the present and the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. H. Carr]], &#039;&#039;What is History?&#039;&#039; (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The historian, then, is an individual human being. Like other individuals, he is also a social phenomenon, both the product and the conscious or unconscious spokesman of the society to which he belongs; it is in this capacity that he approaches the facts of the historical past. We sometimes speak of the course of history as a ‘moving procession’. The metaphor is fair enough, provided it does not tempt the historian to think of himself as an eagle surveying the scene from a lonely crag or as a V.I.P. at the saluting base. Nothing of the kind! The historian is just another dim figure trudging along in another part of the procession. And as the procession winds along, swerving now to the right and now to the left, and sometimes doubling back on itself, the relative positions of different parts of the procession are constantly changing, so that it may make perfectly good sense to say, for example, that we are nearer today to the Middle Ages than were our great-grandfathers a century ago, or that the age of Caesar is nearer to us than the age of Dante. New vistas, new angles of vision, constantly appear as the procession – and the historian with it – moves along. The historian is part of history. The point in the procession at which he finds himself determines his angle of vision over the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. H. Carr]], &#039;&#039;What is History?&#039;&#039; (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History therefore is a process of selection in terms of historical significance. To borrow [[Talcott Parsons]]’s phrase once more, history is ‘a selective system’ not only of cognitive, but of causal, orientations to reality. Just as from the infinite ocean of facts the historian selects those which are significant for his purpose, so from the multiplicity of sequences of cause and effect he extracts those, and only those, which are historically significant; and the standard of historical significance is his ability to fit them into his pattern of rational explanation and interpretation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. H. Carr]], &#039;&#039;What is History?&#039;&#039; (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The history of every country begins in the heart of a man or woman.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Willa Cather]], &#039;&#039;{{W|O Pioneers!}}&#039;&#039;, Pt. I, Ch. 5 (1913)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Woe to the vanquished&amp;quot; ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vae_victis Vae victis]) in history as on the battle-field.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Emanuele Celesia, &#039;&#039;The Conspiracy of Gianluigi Fieschi: or, Genoa in the Sixteenth Century.&#039;&#039; (1866), [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=dHsKAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;dq=%22Woe%20to%20the%20vanquished%20in%20history%20as%20on%20the%20battle-field.%22&amp;amp;pg=PR24#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22Woe%20to%20the%20vanquished%20in%20history%20as%20on%20the%20battle-field.%22&amp;amp;f=false p.xxiv]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The one-sided class war of the last 40 years is becoming two-sided. &#039;&#039;&#039;The population is actually beginning to participate instead of just accepting the hammer blows. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://lauraflanders.org/2021/10/aoc-noam-chomsky/ AOC &amp;amp; Noam Chomsky: The Way Forward + transcript]    (October 28, 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We should recognize that [[white supremacy|white male supremacy]] is a deep current in American history. It’s not gonna go away immediately. But there have been dents, significant ones. So for example, even in the mainstream, when the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; ran the 1619 Project, it couldn’t have happened a couple of years earlier. And it’s because of changes in general [[consciousness]] and [[awareness]]. Of course, there was an immediate backlash, strong backlash, and you’re gonna expect that, white male supremacy is a deep part of American history and culture. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://lauraflanders.org/2021/10/aoc-noam-chomsky/ AOC &amp;amp; Noam Chomsky: The Way Forward + transcript]    (October 28, 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Coronavirus]] is serious enough but it&#039;s worth recalling that there is a much greater horror approaching, we are racing to the edge of disaster, far worse than anything that&#039;s ever happened in human history.... [[Donald Trump]] &amp;amp; his minions are in the lead, in racing to the abyss.  In fact there are two immense threats that we are facing. One is the growing threat of [[Nuclear war]], which has exacerbated it by the tearing what&#039;s left of the [[W:arms control|arms control regime]] and the other of course is the growing threat of [[global warming]]. Both threats can be dealt with but there isn&#039;t a lot of time... the corona virus is a horrible... can have terrifying consequences but there will be recovery, while the others won&#039;t be recovered, it&#039;s finished. If we don&#039;t deal with them we&#039;re done.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-N3In2rLI4 Coronavirus - What is at stake?] | [[W:Democracy in Europe Movement 2025|&#039;&#039;Democracy in Europe Movement 2025&#039;&#039; (DiEM25) ]]  Mar 28, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Presidency of Donald Trump|current administration]] had ample [[w:COVID-19 pandemic in the United States#Reports predicting global pandemics|warning about a likely pandemic]]. In fact, [[w:Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security#Event 201|a high-level simulation]] was run as recently as last October. Trump has reacted during his years in office in the manner to which we have become accustomed: by defunding and dismantling every relevant part of government and assiduously implementing the instructions of his [[Corporatocracy|corporate masters]] to eliminate the regulations that impede profits while saving lives — and leading the race to the abyss of {{w|environmental catastrophe}}, by far his greatest [[crime]] — in fact, the greatest crime in history when we consider the consequences. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],  &#039;&#039;Chomsky: Ventilator Shortage Exposes the Cruelty of Neoliberal Capitalism&#039;&#039;, Interview with C.J. Polychroniou, &#039;&#039;[https://truthout.org/articles/chomsky-ventilator-shortage-exposes-the-cruelty-of-neoliberal-capitalism/ Chomsky: Ventilator Shortage Exposes the Cruelty of Neoliberal Capitalism]&#039;&#039; (April 1, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you look over the history of regulation — railroad regulation, financial regulation and so on — you find that, quite commonly, it&#039;s either initiated by the economic concentrations that are being regulated, or it&#039;s supported by them. And the reason is because they know that, sooner or later, they can take over the regulators and essentially run what they do. They can offer what amounts to bribes — offer them jobs or whatever it may be — it&#039;s an advantage to the regulators to accommodate themselves to the will of the powerful. It happens naturally in many ways, and ends up with what&#039;s called “regulatory capture.” The business being regulated is in fact running the regulators. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],  quoted by [[Bill Moyers]] in [https://billmoyers.com/story/noam-chomskys-requiem-american-dream/ &#039;&#039;In His New Book, Noam Chomsky Takes a Look at Income Inequality,&#039;&#039;] (11 May 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The threat of China is not military. The threat of China is they can&#039;t be intimidated... Europe you can intimidate. When the US tries to get people to stop investing in Iran, European companies pull out, China disregards it. You look at history and understand why — they&#039;ve been around for 4,000 years, they have contempt for the barbarians, they just don&#039;t give a damn... of all the major powers, they&#039;ve been the least aggressive militarily.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], Discussion with [[w:Robert Trivers|Robert Trivers]], September 6, 2006 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Clinton, Kennedy, they all carried out mass murder, but they didn&#039;t think that that was what they were doing - nor does Bush. You know, they were defending justice and democracy from greater evils. And in fact I think you&#039;d find it hard to discover a mass murderer in history who didn&#039;t think that.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://chomsky.info/wp-content/uploads/20040917.pdf interview by  Wallace Shawn] , October 19, 2004  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There&#039;s a good reason why nobody studies history. It just teaches you too much.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],  KGNU benefit, [[w:University of Colorado at Boulder|University of Colorado at Boulder]], April 5, 2003  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There&#039;s one white powder which is by far the most lethal known. It&#039;s called sugar. If you look at the history of [[imperialism]], a lot of it has to do with that. A lot of the imperial conquest, say in the Caribbean, set up a kind of a network... The Caribbean back in the 18th century was a soft drug producer: sugar, rum, tobacco, chocolate. And in order to do it, they had to enslave Africans, and it was done largely to pacify working people in England who were being driven into awful circumstances by the early industrial revolution. That&#039;s why so many wars took place around the Caribbean.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [http://www.kpftx.org/archive.htm Talk at the  University of Houston], Texas, October 18, 2002 &lt;br /&gt;
*Armies usually aren&#039;t interested in wars. They like preparation for war. But they have an understandable reluctance to fight a war. So I think if you look at, at least the history that I know, &#039;&#039;&#039;it&#039;s usually the civilian leadership who is pushing the military to do something. It was the case in the early days of the [[Vietnam War]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], Interview by Hugh Gusterson, November 2000 [https://web.archive.org/web/20051210055017/http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/2002----.pdf].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before there were any suicide bombers, it was also reported by the same sources that &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Saddam Hussein]] was giving $10,000 to the families of anyone who was killed by Israeli atrocities, and there were plenty of them.&#039;&#039;&#039; Well, should he&#039;ve been doing that? So let&#039;s take the first month of the [[w:Second Intifada|current intifada]]. I&#039;m just relying now on IDF sources. What they say is, that in the first few days of the intifada, the Israeli army fired a million bullets. One of the high military officers said &#039;that means one bullet for every child&#039;. Within the first month of the intifada, they killed about 70 people. Using U.S. helicopters, and in fact &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] shipped new helicopters to Israel as soon as they started using them against civilians.&#039;&#039;&#039; That&#039;s just the first month. And it goes on, no suicide bombers. &#039;&#039;&#039;At the time, it was reported that Saddam Hussein was giving $10,000 to every family. Well, is that supporting terror? It seems to me, sending helicopters to Israel when they&#039;re using them to attack apartment complexes, that&#039;s supporting terror.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],  [https://archive.org/details/NoamChomsky-2002-11-04-WhyIraqincludesShortDebateWithTedSorensen &amp;quot;Why Iraq?&amp;quot;] talk at [[w:Harvard University|Harvard University]], November 4, 2002 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Pointing to the massive amounts of propaganda spewed by government and institutions around the world, observers have called our era the age of Orwell. But the fact is that Orwell was a latecomer on the scene. &#039;&#039;&#039;As early as World War I, American historians offered themselves to President [[Woodrow Wilson]] to carry out a task they called &amp;quot;historical engineering,&amp;quot; by which they meant designing the facts of history so that they would serve state policy.&#039;&#039;&#039; In this instance, the U.S. government wanted to silence opposition to the war. This represents &#039;&#039;&#039;a version of Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four|1984]]&#039;&#039;, even before Orwell was writing.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], in: Wendy McElroy, ‎Carl Watner (1987) &#039;&#039;The Voluntaryist,&#039;&#039; Nr. 23-41 (1987), p. 120; Republished in: &amp;quot;[http://www.zpub.com/un/chomsky.html Propaganda Review, 1987],&amp;quot; at &#039;&#039;zpub.com,&#039;&#039; accessed May 23, 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Every year thousands of people, mostly children and poor farmers, are killed in the [[w:Plain of Jars|Plain of Jars]] in Northern Laos, the scene of the heaviest bombing of civilian targets in history it appears, and arguably the most cruel: Washington&#039;s furious assault on a poor peasant society had little to do with its wars in the region. The worst period was from 1968, when Washington was compelled to undertake negotiations (under popular and business pressure), ending the regular bombardment of North Vietnam. Kissinger-Nixon then decided to shift the planes to bombardment of Laos and Cambodia. The deaths are from &amp;quot;bombies,&amp;quot; tiny anti-personnel weapons, far worse than land-mines: they are designed specifically to kill and maim, and have no effect on trucks, buildings, etc. The Plain was saturated with hundreds of millions of these criminal devices, which have a failure-to-explode rate of 20%-30% according to the manufacturer, [[w:Honeywell|Honeywell]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://chomsky.info/199903__/ The Current Bombings: Behind the Rhetoric]  March 1999  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet to enter approved memory is the &amp;quot;finale&amp;quot; described in the official Air Force history, a 1000-plane raid on civilian targets organized by General [[w:Henry H. Arnold|&amp;quot;Hap&amp;quot; Arnold]] to celebrate the war&#039;s end, five days after Nagasaki. According to survivors, leaflets were dropped among the bombs announcing the surrender.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] Z Magazine, July 1995 [https://web.archive.org/web/20001002121936/http://zena.secureforum.com/Znet/zmag/articles/chommemories.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Want of foresight, unwillingness to act when action would be simple and effective, lack of clear thinking, confusion of counsel until the emergency comes, until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong—these are the features which constitute the endless repetition of history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], speech, House of Commons (May 2, 1935); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; (1974), vol. 6, p. 5592. Quoted by Senator John Tower in an address delivered before the American Defense Preparedness Association (April 14, 1983); &#039;&#039;Congressional Record&#039;&#039; (April 20, 1983), vol. 129, p. S4989 (daily edition).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nescire autem quid ante quam natus sis acciderit, id est semper esse puerum.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Not to know what happened before you were born is to remain forever a child.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;M. Tulli Ciceronis Orator Ad M. Brutum&#039;&#039; (46 B.C.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Isn&#039;t history ultimately the result of our fear of boredom?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emil Cioran]], &#039;&#039;Histoire et utopie&#039;&#039; (&amp;quot;History and Utopia&amp;quot;) (1960)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I turn to the past to learn its story without any preconceived opinion what that story may be. I do not assume that one period or one line of study is more instructive than another, but I am ready to recognise the real identity of man&#039;s aspiration at all times. Some episodes in history are regarded as profoundly modern; others are dismissed contemptuously as concerned with trifles. In some ages there are great heroes, in others the actors are sunk in indolence and sloth. For my own part I do not recognise this great distinction.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mandell Creighton]], &#039;&#039;The teaching of ecclesiastical history&#039;&#039;, Inaugural lecture, [[w:Dixie Professor of Ecclesiastical History|Dixie Chair of Ecclesiastical History]], [[w:University of Cambridge|University of Cambridge]] (23 January 1885).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every decade or so, the world is tested by a crisis so grave that it breaks the mould: one so horrific and inhumane that the response of politicians to it becomes emblematic of their generation —their moral leadership or cowardice, their resolution or incompetence. It is how history judges us. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jo Cox]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-don-t-leave-syria-to-become-a-graveyard-this-generation-s-responsibility-to-the-world-1-7512876 Don’t leave Syria to become a graveyard — this generation’s responsibility to the world]&#039;&#039; (13 October 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Those who cannot forget the past, are doomed to repeat it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**  [[CrimethInc.]], &#039;&#039;Days of War, Nights of Love&#039;&#039; (2001)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we say, “That’s history,” it’s a pejorative. Well, the rest of the world takes history pretty seriously.&lt;br /&gt;
** Ryan Crocker, [https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/the-frontline-interview-ryan-crocker/&amp;quot;The FRONTLINE Interview: Ryan Crocker&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Frontline&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;PBS&#039;&#039;, (February 20, 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While we read history we make history... Every great crisis of human history is a pass of [[w:Battle of Thermopylae|Thermopylae]], and there is always a [[w:Leonidas I|Leonidas]] and his three hundred to die in it, if they can not conquer.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George William Curtis]], &#039;&#039;The Call of Freedom&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==D==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Inundation of the Nile (4904849744).jpg|thumb|right|History has been too often a picture of the bloody stream. The history of civilization is a record of what happened on the banks. ~ [[Will Durant]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Historians usually focus their attention on the past of countries that still exist, writing hundreds and thousands of books on British history, French history, German history, Russian history, American history, Chinese history, Indian history, Brazilian history or whatever. Whether consciously or not, they are seeking the roots of the present, thereby putting themselves in danger of reading history backwards. As soon as great powers arise, whether the United States in the twentieth century or China in the twenty-first, the call goes out for offerings on American History or Chinese History, and siren voices sing that today’s important countries are also those whose past is most deserving of examination, that a more comprehensive spectrum of historical knowledge can be safely ignored.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Vanished Kingdoms: The History of Half-Forgotten Europe&#039;&#039; (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is easy to argue persuasively the truism that the lessons of history are best derived from what actually happened, rather than from what nearly happened. It should be added, however, that what happened becomes more fully comprehensible in the light of the contending forces that existed at moments of decision. Understanding of the total historical setting is bound to contribute to a clearer view of the actual course of affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:w:de:Harold C. Deutsch|Harold C. Deutsch]], introduction to &#039;&#039;What If? Strategic Alternatives of WWII&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:Assassination|Assassination]] has never changed the history of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Disraeli]], Addressing the House of Commons after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln (1 May 1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only understand the present by continually referring to and studying the past; when any one of the intricate phenomena of our daily life puzzles us; when there arises religious problems, political problems, race problems, we must always remember that while their solution lies in the present, their cause and their explanation lie in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. E. B. DuBois]], “The Beginnings of Slavery,” &#039;&#039;Voice of the Negro&#039;&#039;, vol. 2 (1905), p. 104, as cited in James B. Stewart, “The Field and Function of Black Studies,” in &#039;&#039;The African American Studies Reader&#039;&#039;, edited by Nathaniel Norment, Jr. (Carolina Academic Press: 2007), p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The difference of development, North and South, is explained as a sort of working out of cosmic social and economic law. ... In this sweeping mechanistic interpretation, there is no room for the real plot of the story, for the clear mistake and guilt of building a new slavery of the working class in the midst of a fateful experiment in democracy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. E. B. Du Bois]], &#039;&#039;Black Reconstruction in America, 1860-1880&#039;&#039; (1935), pp. 714-715&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Perhaps the cause of our contemporary pessimism is our tendency to view history as a turbulent stream of conflicts — between individuals in economic life, between groups in politics, between creeds in religion, between states in war.&#039;&#039;&#039; This is the more dramatic side of history; it captures the eye of the historian and the interest of the reader. But if we turn from that Mississippi of strife, hot with hate and dark with blood, to look upon the banks of the stream, we find quieter but more inspiring scenes: women rearing children, men building homes, peasants drawing food from the soil, artisans making the conveniences of life, statesmen sometimes organizing peace instead of war, teachers forming savages into citizens, musicians taming our hearts with harmony and rhythm, scientists patiently accumulating knowledge, philosophers groping for truth, saints suggesting the wisdom of love. &#039;&#039;&#039;History has been too often a picture of the bloody stream. The history of civilization is a record of what happened on the banks.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Will Durant]], as quoted in &amp;quot;The Gentle Philosopher&amp;quot; (2006) by John Little at Will Durant Foundation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LOVE one another ... my final lesson of history, ... is the same as that of Jesus. . . . just try it. Love is the most practical thing in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Will Durant]], cited in &#039;&#039;Love—The “Surpassing Way”&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; magazine, 4/15, 1980.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Note: A 92-year-old historian summed up his long study of human events by giving that short piece of advice. When asked, at the age of 92, if he could summarize the lessons of history into a single sentence. As quoted in &amp;quot;Durants on History from the Ages, with Love,&amp;quot; by Pam Proctor, &#039;&#039;Parade&#039;&#039; (6 August 1978) p. 12. Durant is quoting The Gospel of John from Gospel of John 13:34, here, and might also be quoting Jiddu Krishnamurti: &amp;quot;Love is the most practical thing in the world. To love, to be kind, not to be greedy, not to be ambitious, not to be influenced by people but to think for yourself — these are all very practical things, and they will bring about a practical, happy society.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[War]] is one of the constants of history ... and has not diminished with [[civilization]] or [[democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Wrote historians Will and Ariel Durant, cited in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; 2004, 4/1, &#039;&#039;[http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2004241?q=durant&amp;amp;p=par Identifying the Wild Beast and Its Mark]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is [[philosophy]] [[teaching]] by [[examples]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Dionysius of Halicarnassus|Dionysius of Halicarnassus]], &#039;&#039;Ars rhetorica (The Art of Rhetoric)&#039;&#039;, XI:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The contact with manners then is education; and this Thucydides appears to assert when he says history is philosophy learned from examples.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dionysius of Halicarnassus, &#039;&#039;Ars Rhetorica&#039;&#039;, XI. 2, p. 212. (Tauchnitz Ed.) See Thucydides, &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039;, I. 22.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Que voulez-vous de plus? Il a inventé l&#039;histoire.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** What more would you have? He has invented history.&lt;br /&gt;
** Madame Du Deffand of Voltaire, who was accused by critics of lack of invention. See Fourier, &#039;&#039;L&#039;Esprit dans Histoire&#039;&#039;, p. 141.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is an endless repetition of the wrong way of living.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lawrence Durrell]], &#039;&#039;The Listener&#039;&#039; (1978)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==E==&lt;br /&gt;
* History teaches us that [[men]] and [[nations]] behave [[wisely]] once they have exhausted all other alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abba Eban]], Speech in London (16 December 1970); as quoted in The Times [London] (17 December 1970) and in Great Jewish Quotations (1996) by Alfred J. Kolatch, p. 115.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Psychology]] has a long [[past]], but only a short history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herman Ebbinghaus]], cited in: [[Edwin Boring]] (1929) &#039;&#039;A History of Experimental Psychology&#039;&#039; p. ix.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The [[Russia]]ns especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, [[Europe]] would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History does not long entrust the care of [[freedom]] to the [[weak]] or the timid. We must acquire proficiency in defense and display stamina in [[purpose]]. We must be willing, individually and as a [[Nation]], to accept whatever [[sacrifices]] may be required of us. A people that values its [[privileges]] above its [[principles]] soon loses both.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], in his First Inaugural address (20 January 1953)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We, as we [[read]], must become [[Greeks]], [[Romans]], [[Turks]], [[priest]] and [[king]], [[martyr]] and [[w:Executioner|executioner]], must fasten these [[images]] to some [[reality]] in our [[secret]] [[experience]], or we shall [[see]] [[nothing]], [[learn]] nothing, keep nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], “History”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When a [[thought]] of [[Plato]] becomes a thought to me, when a truth that fired the soul of [[Gospel of John|St. John]], fires mine, [[time]] is no more.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], “History”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is properly no history, only biography.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Historians&#039; History of the World - Title Page.jpg|thumb|right|Good history is a good foundation for a better present and future. ~ [[w:John Hope Franklin|John Hope Franklin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Le bon historien n&#039;est d&#039;aucun temps ni d&#039;aucun pays: quoiqu&#039;il aime sa patrie, il ne la flatte jamais en rien.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, however, is not a linear narrative of progress. Rights may be won and taken away; gains are never complete or uncontested, and popular movements generate their own countervailing pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eric Foner]], [http://ericfoner.com/articles/121002nation.html &amp;quot;The Century: A Nation&#039;s-Eye View&amp;quot;] (10 December 2002), &#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t know much about history, and I wouldn&#039;t give a nickel for all the history in the [[world]]. It means [[nothing]] to me. &#039;&#039;&#039;History is more or less bunk.&#039;&#039;&#039; It&#039;s [[tradition]]. We don&#039;t want tradition. We want to live in the [[present]] and the only history that is worth a tinker&#039;s damn is the history we make [[today]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ford]], interview in &#039;&#039;Chicago Tribune&#039;&#039; (25 May 1916).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic history is not politically correct. Many on the left therefore struggle with its findings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Niall Ferguson]], [https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/on-being-called-a-racist &amp;quot;On being called a racist&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;&#039; (17 December 2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Today]] is [[Yesterday]]&#039;s Pupil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], &#039;&#039;[[Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack]]&#039;&#039; (1751).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[T]his historian who seeks to mine the various quarries of the past in the belief that &#039;&#039;&#039;good history is a good foundation for a better present and future.&#039;&#039;&#039;”&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John Hope Franklin}}, Preface to &#039;&#039;Race and History: Selected Essays 1938-1988,&#039;&#039; Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, c1989. As quoted by [http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/John_Hope_Franklin.aspx encyclopedia.com (2005): Franklin, John Hope 1915– by Thomson Gale].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==G==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ogrod Saski Historia.jpg|thumb|right|History does not belong to us, we belong to it. ~ [[Hans-Georg Gadamer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* History does not belong to us, we belong to it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hans-Georg Gadamer]], &#039;&#039;Truth and Method&#039;&#039;, p. 276.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “It can’t make things any worse.”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“If there’s one thing that a study of history has taught us, it is that things can always get worse,” said my friend.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Neil Gaiman]], ‘’[[w:A Study in Emerald|A Study in Emerald]]’’ in [[w:Paula Guran|Paula Guran]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;[[w:Cthulhu Mythos anthology|New Cthulhu: The Recent Weird]],&#039;&#039; p. 205 (originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Shadows Over Baker Street|Shadows Over Baker Street]],&#039;&#039; 2003)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are moments in history when brooding tragedy and its dark shadows can be lightened by recalling great moments of the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Indira Gandhi]], Letter to Richard Nixon (December 15, 1971) [http://www.thehindu.com/thehindu/mag/2005/07/03/stories/2005070300090100.htm].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History never looks like history when you are living through it. It always looks confusing and messy, and it always feels uncomfortable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John W. Gardner]], &#039;&#039;No Easy Victories&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The reign of Antoninus is marked by the rare advantage of furnishing very few materials for history, which is indeed little more than the register of the crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Gibbon]], &#039;&#039;[[The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. III (1776), [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/gibbon/decline/files/volume1/chap3.htm Vol. 1, Ch. 3 &amp;quot;Of the Constitution of the Roman Empire, in the Age of the Antonines&amp;quot;] &lt;br /&gt;
** This has often been paraphrased: &#039;&#039;&#039;History is indeed little more than the register of crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is not the past but a map of the past, drawn from a particular point of view, to be useful to the modern traveller.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Henry Glassie|Henry Glassie]], &#039;&#039;Passing the Time in Ballymenone&#039;&#039; (1982)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History teaches, but it has no pupils.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Gramsci]], Letter from Prison (21 June 1919), translated by Hamish Henderson, {{w|Edinburgh University Student Publications}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is at once [[freedom]] and [[necessity]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Gramsci]], &#039;&#039;Selections from the Prison Notebooks&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Revolutionaries]] see history as a creation of their own [[spirit]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Gramsci]], &#039;&#039;Selections from the Prison Notebooks&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And read their history in a [[nation]]&#039;s [[eyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Gray]], &#039;&#039;Elegy in a Country Churchyard&#039;&#039;, Stanza 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The great Russian dissident Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said that the first step a tyrant takes toward enslaving a people is to steal their history, for in that case, no one has anything from the past with which to compare the present, and any horror can be normalized. ... It was once said, as a commercial joke, that it’s not nice to fool Mother Nature. The same is true in this case, but not as a joke: It’s not nice to fool with history.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Allen C. Guelzo]], [https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/05/new-york-times-1619-project-narrative-of-despair/ &amp;quot;1619 and the Narrative of Despair&amp;quot;] (11 May 2020), &#039;&#039;National Review&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, if it should serve its purpose of stirring emotion, instigating inquiry and directing thought, must first of all be exciting. Is it impossible to be both truthful and warm-hearted, both factual and moving? Are imagination and conscience necessarily enemies to each other? In reconciling them is the art of the true historian. The flow of the story must be swift, vivid, vibrant.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[D.V. Gundappa]], ‘The Classical Age’, All India Radio, Mysore, 26 July 1954. Reprinted in Triveni Journal, October 1954. quoted from Balakrishna, S. Invaders and infidels: From Sindh to Delhi : the 500- year journey of Islamic invasions. New Delhi : Bloomsbury, 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H==&lt;br /&gt;
* {{anchor|Hegel}} What experience and history teach is this — that nations and governments have never learned anything from history, or acted upon any lessons they might have drawn from it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on the Philosophy of History&#039;&#039; (1832), Introduction, [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel#Volume 1|Volume 1]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A generation which ignores history has no past — and no future.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough For Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The expansion of Europe was the transforming force in human history of the last 500 years, and yet the modern academy looks for reasons not to study it. In the era of decolonisation the new nations want to stress their indigenous roots and sympathetic scholars explain that European influence was not overwhelming, but that it was used and subverted by locals for local purposes. To concentrate on Europe is criticised as &#039;Eurocentric&#039;. But to ignore Europe makes the history of any part of the globe unintelligible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Hirst]], &#039;&#039;Sense and Nonsense in Australian History&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not the neutrals or the lukewarm who make history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Adolf Hitler]], Speech in Berlin (23 April 1933)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the end, [[young]] people are at risk of being [[w:Inheritance|disinherited]] from their [[community]] if that community lacks the [[courage]] and [[confidence]] to teach its history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Howard]] Australia Day Address, (January 25, 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most historical facts are unpleasant.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], &#039;&#039;[[Brave New World]]&#039;&#039;, (1932), [http://www.huxley.net/bnw/one.html ch.2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I==&lt;br /&gt;
* What we know of the past is mostly not worth knowing. What is worth knowing is mostly uncertain. Events in the past may roughly be divided into those which probably never happened and those which do not matter.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dean Inge]], &#039;&#039;Assessments and Anticipations&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Prognostications&amp;quot; (1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History does not relate any true revolution which came from power.  All began with education and meant in essence a moral summons.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alija Izetbegović]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Islamic Declaration|The Islamic Declaration]]&#039;&#039; (1970), p. 53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==J==&lt;br /&gt;
* Today&#039;s banalities apparently gain in profundity if one states that the wisdom of the past, for all its virtues, belongs to the past. The arrogance of those who come later preens itself with the notion that the past is dead and gone.  … The modern mind can no longer think thought, only can locate it in time and space. The activity of thinking decays to the passivity of classifying.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Russell Jacoby]], &#039;&#039;Social Amnesia&#039;&#039; (1975), p. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It takes a great deal of history to produce a little [[literature]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry James]], &#039;&#039;Life of Nathaniel Hawthorne&#039;&#039;, Ch. I: The Early Years (1879).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I like the [[dreams]] of the [[future]] better than the history of the [[past]], — so [[good]] [[night]]!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Letter to [[John Adams]] (1 August 1816).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;History,&amp;quot; Stephen said, &amp;quot;is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Joyce]], &#039;&#039;[[Ulysses (novel)|Ulysses]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 2: Nestor (1922)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==K==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Robert F. Kennedy 1964.jpeg|thumb|right|There are people in every time and every land who want to stop history in its tracks. They fear the future, mistrust the present, and invoke the security of a comfortable past which, in fact, never existed. ~ [[Robert F. Kennedy]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kierkegaard.jpg|thumb|right|It goes against the grain for me to do what so often happens, to speak inhumanly about the great as if a few millennia were an immense distance. I prefer to speak humanly about it, as if it happened yesterday, and let only the greatness itself be the distance. ~ [[Søren Kierkegaard]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To say that the future will be different from the present is, to scientists, hopelessly self-evident.&#039;&#039;&#039; I observe regretfully that in politics, however, it can be heresy. It can be denounced as radicalism, or branded as subversion. &#039;&#039;&#039;There are people in every time and every land who want to stop history in its tracks. They fear the future, mistrust the present, and invoke the security of a comfortable past which, in fact, never existed.&#039;&#039;&#039; It hardly seems necessary to point out in California - of all States -- that change, although it involves risks, is the law of life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert F. Kennedy]], [http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/2011/01/20/06-08-1964.pdf &#039;&#039;The Opening to the Future&#039;&#039; Adress at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, California] (June 8, 1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It goes against the grain for me to do what so often happens, to speak inhumanly about the great as if a few millennia were an immense distance. I prefer to speak humanly about it, as if it happened yesterday, and let only the greatness itself be the distance.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Søren Kierkegaard]], &#039;&#039;Fear and Trembling&#039;&#039; (1843), S. Walsh, trans. (2006), p. 28.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The study of history offers no manual of instructions that can be applied automatically; history teaches by analogy, shedding light on the likely consequences of comparable situations.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Kissinger]], &#039;&#039;Diplomacy&#039;&#039; (1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every civilization that has ever existed has ultimately collapsed ... History is a tale of efforts that failed, of aspirations that weren’t realized . . . So, as a historian, one has to live with a sense of the inevitability of tragedy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Kissinger]], Cited in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; 2004, 4/1, &#039;&#039;[http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2004241?q=durant&amp;amp;p=par Identifying the Wild Beast and Its Mark]&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Purpose]] has no place in [[biology]], but history has no meaning without it. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Kubler]], &#039;&#039;{{w|The Shape of Time}},&#039;&#039; 1982, p. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;...[[Jesus]] told us this a long time ago, and I can still hear that voice crying through the vista of time, saying, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, pray for them that despitefully use you.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot; And there is still a voice saying to every potential Peter, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Put up your sword&#039;&#039;.&amp;quot; History is replete with the bleached bones of nations, history is cluttered with the wreckage of communities that failed to follow this command.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther King Jr.]]. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; From the [http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/documentsentry/doc_speech_at_the_great_march_on_detroit/ Speech delivered at the Great March on Detroit], 23 June 1963. King was alluding to the words of Christ in the [[w:Sermon on the Mount|Sermon on the Mount]] (Matthew 5:44) and during His arrest (on Matthew 26:52)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The history books, which had almost completely ignored the contribution of the Negro in American history, only served to intensify the Negroes&#039; sense of worthlessness and to augment the anachronistic doctrine of white supremacy. All too many Negroes and whites are unaware of the fact that the first American to shed blood in the revolution which freed this country from British oppression was a black seaman named Crispus Attucks. Negroes and whites are almost totally oblivious of the fact that it was a Negro physician, Dr. Daniel Hale Williams, who performed the first successful operation on the heart in America. Another Negro physician, Dr. Charles Drew, was largely responsible for developing the method of separating blood plasma and storing it on a large scale, a process that saved thousands of lives in World War II and has made possible many of the important advances in postwar medicine. History books have virtually overlooked the many Negro scientists and inventors who have enriched American life. Although a few refer to George Washington Carver, whose research in agricultural products helped to revive the economy of the South when the throne of King Cotton began to totter, they ignore the contribution of Norbert Rillieuz, whose invention of an evaporating pan revolutionized the process of sugar refining. How many people know that multimillion-dollar United Shoe Machinery Company developed from the shoe-lasting machine invented in the last century by a Negro from Dutch Guiana, Jan Matzelinger; or that Granville T. Woods, an expert in electric motors, whose many patents speeded the growth and improvement of the railroads at the beginning of this century, was a Negro?&amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;Even the Negroes&#039; contribution to the music of America is sometimes overlooked in astonishing ways. In 1965 my oldest son and daughter entered an integrated school in Atlanta. A few months later my wife and I were invited to attend a program entitled &amp;quot;Music that has made America great.&amp;quot; As the evening unfolded, we listened to the folk songs and melodies of the various immigrant groups. We were certain that the program would end with the most original of all American music, the Negro spiritual. But we were mistaken. Instead, all the students, including our children, ended the program by singing &amp;quot;Dixie&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther King Jr.]], as quoted in Carson, Clayborne. 2001. &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr.&#039;&#039;, Grand Central Publishing. Cap: Black Power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Time in its irresistible and ceaseless flow carries along on its flood all created things, and drowns them in the depths of obscurity, no matter if they be quite unworthy of mention, or most noteworthy and important, and thus, as the tragedian says, &amp;quot;he brings from the darkness all things to the birth, and all things born envelops in the night.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;&#039;But&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;the tale of history forms a very strong bulwark against the stream of time, and to some extent checks its irresistible flow, and, of all things done in it, as many as history has taken over, it secures and binds together, and does not allow them to slip away into the abyss of oblivion.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Anna Komnene|Anna Komnene]], &#039;&#039;[[wikisource:The_Alexiad/Preface|The Alexiad]]&#039;&#039; (c. 1148)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==L==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Historybooks.JPG|thumb|I started to think why [[people]] feel [[comfortable]] [[disrespecting]] [[w:Latino people|us]] in a way that’s just not [[normal]] or [[natural]]. And I started to think that it&#039;s because our contributions aren&#039;t in history [[textbooks]]. ~ [[John Leguizamo]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Frozen_river_in_Alaska.jpg|thumb|What is the use trying to describe the flowing of a [[river]] at any one [[moment]], and then at the next moment, and then at the next, and the next, and the next? You wear out. You say: There is a great river, and it flows through this [[land]], and we have named it History. ~ [[Ursula K. Le Guin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ban_Zhao.jpg|thumb|[[w:Time travel|Time travel]] [[w:Drama|dramas]] are becoming a hot theme for [[television]] and [[films]]. But the content and exaggerated performance style are questionable. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Many [[stories]] are totally made up and are made to strain for an effect of novelty. [[w:Producer|Producers]] and [[writers]] are treating [[serious]] history in a frivolous way, which should by no means be encouraged anymore. ~  Li Jingsheng]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Historians as a rule follow the main lines of history—the wars, the politics, the rise and fall of empires—yet the true history is that of the people themselves: where they lived, their ways of making a living, their inventions, discoveries, problem-solving, business dealings, and their relations with each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Louis L&#039;Amour]], {{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CzMGUCMtFMoC&amp;amp;q=historians#v=snippet&amp;amp;q=historian&amp;amp;f=false|isbn = 9780307490384|title = The Sackett Companion: The Facts Behind the Fiction|date = 19 February 2009|publisher = Random House Publishing}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We hope, plan, execute; will it be vain?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Or will the future be the past again?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]], &#039;&#039;Romance and Reality&#039;&#039; (1831), Vol I., Chapter 15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History hath but few pages—soon is told&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Man’s ordinary life,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Labour, and care, and strife,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Make up the constant chronicle of old.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]], &#039;&#039;Fisher&#039;s Drawing Room Scrap Book, 1835&#039;&#039; (1834), &#039;Hindoo and Mahommedan Buildings&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is nothing whatever but a record of what living persons have done in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rose Wilder Lane]], &#039;&#039;Give Me Liberty&#039;&#039; (1936).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There was a little bit of improvement in my [[son]]’s [[education]], but [[w:Latin American|Latin American]] and [[African American|black]] contributions—and I don’t mean to lump us together—were nonexistent in my [[w:Public school|public school]]. Even when I went to [[college]], there was [[nothing]]. When I was [[studying]] the [[American Civil War|Civil War]], there was nothing about everything we did, not one mention of any participation or contribution, ever. And it would’ve [[changed]] my [[life]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Leguizamo]], [https://www.vogue.com/article/john-leguizamo-latin-history-morons &amp;quot;John Leguizamo Is Here to Explain Latino History for You&amp;quot;], Patricia Garcia, &#039;&#039;Vogue&#039;&#039;, (April 6, 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I started to think why [[people]] feel [[comfortable]] [[disrespecting]] [[w:Latino people|us]] in a way that’s just not [[normal]] or [[natural]]. And I started to think that it&#039;s because our contributions aren&#039;t in history [[textbooks]].&lt;br /&gt;
** John Leguizamo in [https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/nbc-latino-john-leguizamo-n795796 &amp;quot;#NBCLatino20: Broadway&#039;s Professor, John Leguizamo&amp;quot;], by Raul A. Reyes, Marshall Crook and Geraldine Cols Azócar, &#039;&#039;NBC News&#039;&#039;, (Sept. 14, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the use trying to describe the flowing of a [[river]] at any one [[moment]], and then at the next moment, and then at the next, and the next, and the next? You wear out. You say: There is a great river, and it flows through this [[land]], and we have named it History.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ursula K. Le Guin]], &amp;quot;A Man of the People&amp;quot;, in &#039;&#039;Four Ways to Forgiveness&#039;&#039; (1995), p. 108.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is the art of making an argument about the past by telling a story accountable to evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Jill Lepore|Jill Lepore]], &amp;quot;Story of America: essays on origins&amp;quot;, (2014), p. 15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:Time travel|Time travel]] [[w:Drama|dramas]] are becoming a hot theme for [[television]] and [[films]]. But the content and exaggerated performance style are questionable. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Many [[stories]] are totally made up and are made to strain for an effect of novelty. [[w:Producer|Producers]] and [[writers]] are treating [[serious]] history in a frivolous way, which should by no means be encouraged anymore. &lt;br /&gt;
** Li Jingsheng, [[w:State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television|SARFT]] conference, (April 1, 2011); as qtd. in [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/14/china-time-travel-dramas &amp;quot;China censors want to consign time travel dramas to past&amp;quot;], by Tania Branigan, &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, (4/14/2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What has once happened, will invariably happen again, when the same circumstances which combined to produce it, shall again combine in the same way.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], speech on the sub-Treasury, in the hall of the House of Representatives, Springfield, Illinois (December 26, 1839); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 1, p. 165.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe if we tell the [[truth]] about the past, we can tell the truth about the present.&lt;br /&gt;
** Ken Loach, at [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/29/movies/29cann.html Cannes Festival Awards 2006]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacob_de_Wit_-_Allegorie_op_het_schrijven_van_de_geschiedenis_1754.jpg|thumb|Lives of great men all remind us&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We can make our lives sublime,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And departing, leave behind us&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Footprints on the sands of [[time]]; ~ [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lives of great men all remind us&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We can make our lives sublime,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And departing, leave behind us&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Footprints on the sands of time;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;[[wikisource:A Psalm of Life|A Psalm of Life]]&#039;&#039; (1839), St. 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History casts its [[shadow]] far into the [[land]] of [[song]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;Outre-Mer&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Ancient Spanish Ballads&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They who live in history only seemed to walk the [[earth]] again.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;The Belfry of Bruges&#039;&#039;, Stanza 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M==&lt;br /&gt;
* I shall cheerfully bear the reproach of having descended below the dignity of history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay]], &#039;&#039;History of England&#039;&#039;, Volume I, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What then is, generally speaking, the truth of history ? A fable agreed upon.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Napoleon]], &#039;&#039;Mémorial de Sainte Hélène&#039;&#039;, v. 4, [http://books.google.com/books?id=945jAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;vq=%22fable%20agreed%20upon%22&amp;amp;pg=PA251 p. 251]. However, the phrase predates Napoleon. [[w:Claude Adrien Helvétius|Helvétius]] attributes it to [[w:Bernard le Bovier de Fontenelle|Bernard le Bovier de Fontenelle]], &#039;&#039;De l&#039;esprit&#039;&#039; (1758), [http://books.google.com/books?id=N7g8AAAAcAAJ&amp;amp;vq=%22fable%20convenue%22&amp;amp;pg=RA1-PA443 p. 443],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is experimental politics.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph de Maistre]], &#039;&#039;Against Rousseau&#039;&#039; (1795), p. 21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;{{anchor|Marx}} [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]] remarks somewhere that all facts and personages of great importance in world history occur, as it were, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], &amp;quot;The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon&amp;quot; (1852), part 1, in &#039;&#039;On Revolution&#039;&#039; (vol. 1 of The Karl Marx Library), ed. and trans. Saul K. Padover, p. 245 (1971).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;See [[#Hegel|Hegel quote]], above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[History]] admits no [[rules]], only outcomes.&#039;&#039;&#039; What precipitates outcomes?  Vicious acts &amp;amp; virtuous acts.  What precipitates acts?  [[Belief]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Mitchell (author)|David Mitchell]], in  &#039;&#039;[[w:Cloud Atlas (novel)|Cloud Atlas]]&#039;&#039; (2004), &amp;quot;The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing&amp;quot;, p. 528.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Napoleon had nuclear subs, we&#039;d all be speaking French. So, the history thing can be oversold.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mike Murphy (political consultant)|Mike Murphy]], [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/mike-murphy-ii/ interview with Bill Kristol] (7 February 2018), [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/transcript/mike-murphy-ii-transcript/ transcript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [O]ne&#039;s political ideology is inextricable from one&#039;s view of [[history]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Brian Reynolds Myers]], [http://sthelepress.com/index.php/2018/08/27/heaven-is-helping-us-more-from-the-nationalist-left-b-r-myers/ &amp;quot;&#039;Heaven is Helping Us&#039;: More from the Nationalist Left&amp;quot;] (27 August 2018), &#039;&#039;Sthele Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==O==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smithsonian-nmaahc-outside-20160720.jpg|thumb|right|History helps us recognize the [[mistakes]] that we’ve made and the [[dark]] corners of the [[human]] [[spirit]] that we need to guard against. ~ [[Barack Obama]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Close_up_of_Hand_Cut_Jigsaw_Puzzle.JPG|thumb|[I]f kids are taught an incomplete history, they&#039;ll either never get the full story, or when they do, they don&#039;t have the framework to understand how the pieces fit together. ~ [[John Oliver]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The great historian John Hope Franklin, who helped to get this museum started, once said, “Good history is a good foundation for a better present and future.” He understood &#039;&#039;&#039;the best history doesn’t just sit behind a glass case; it helps us to understand what’s outside the case. The best history helps us recognize the mistakes that we’ve made and the dark corners of the human spirit that we need to guard against. And, yes, a clear-eyed view of history can make us uncomfortable, and shake us out of familiar narratives. But it is precisely because of that discomfort that we learn and grow and harness our collective power to make this nation more perfect.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Barack Obama]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/24/remarks-president-dedication-national-museum-african-american-history &#039;&#039;Remarks by the President at the Dedication of the National Museum of African American History and Culture at the National Mall in Washington, D.C.&#039;&#039;] (24 September 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kids can understand that things can be racist and also other things. The Constitution can be revolutionary, and also racist. Movies can be romantic and also racist. Children&#039;s books can be charming, and also racist. Broadcasters can be incredibly successful and also racist. And if kids are taught an incomplete history, they&#039;ll either never get the full story, or when they do, they don&#039;t have the framework to understand how the pieces fit together. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Oliver]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsxukOPEdgg “U.S. History”], &#039;&#039;Last Week Tonight with John Oliver&#039;&#039;, (Aug 3, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, when taught well, shows us how to improve the world. But history when taught poorly falsely claims there is nothing to improve…&lt;br /&gt;
** John Oliver, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsxukOPEdgg “U.S. History”], &#039;&#039;Last Week Tonight with John Oliver&#039;&#039;, (Aug 3, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver Pitcher presented to White House (Portrait).jpg|thumb|right|If we don&#039;t care about our past we can&#039;t have very much hope for our future. ~ [[Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If we don’t care about our past we can’t have very much hope for our future.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis]], [https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/preservation-battle-grand-central-180969446/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man is no thing, but a drama... Man, in a word, has no nature; what he has is... history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[José Ortega y Gasset]], &#039;&#039;History as a System&#039;&#039; (1935)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]&#039;&#039; (1949), Chapter III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible... If the Party could thrust its hand into the past and say of this or that event, it never happened — that, surely, was more terrifying than mere torture and death? And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -if all records told the same tale — then the lie passed into history and became truth. Who controls the past,&#039; ran the Party slogan, &#039;controls the future: who controls the present controls the past. And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. &#039;Reality control&#039;, they called it: in Newspeak, &#039;doublethink&#039;... &lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]&#039;&#039; (1949), Chapter III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had been actually destroyed. For how could you establish even the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside your own memory?... To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself... That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word ‘doublethink’ involved the use of doublethink.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]&#039;&#039; (1949), Chapter III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We&#039;ve always been at war with Eastasia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]&#039;&#039; (1949), Chapter IX.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==P==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Gower world Vox Clamantis.jpg|thumb|right|History always has a few tricks up its frayed sleeve. It&#039;s been around a long time. ~ [[Terry Pratchett]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Typical-orb-web-photo.jpg|thumb|Such is the unity of all history that anyone who endeavours to tell a piece of it must feel that his first sentence tears a seamless web. ~ [[w:Sir Frederick Pollock, 3rd Baronet|Frederick Pollock]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History is a graveyard of [[Aristocracy|aristocracies]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Vilfredo Pareto]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is impossible to write ancient history because we do not have enough sources, and impossible to write modern history because we have far too many.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Péguy]], &#039;&#039;Clio&#039;&#039; (1931) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Just as geographers, O Sossius Senecio, crowd on to the outer edges of their maps the parts of the earth which elude their knowledge, with explanatory notes that &amp;quot;What lies beyond is sandy desert without water and full of wild beasts,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;blind marsh,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Scythian cold,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;frozen sea,&amp;quot; so in the writing of my Parallel Lives, now that I have traversed those periods of time which are accessible to probable reasoning and which afford basis for a history dealing with facts, &#039;&#039;&#039;I might well say of the earlier periods: &amp;quot;What lies beyond is full of marvels and unreality, a land of poets and fabulists, of doubt and obscurity.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plutarch]], &#039;&#039;The Life of Theseus&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The past is just one long, smelly error until we get to the car, computer and iPod.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Laura Penny]], &#039;&#039;More Money Than Brains&#039;&#039;, p. 23.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This moment&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I am keener on the stories of valour&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;washed away by this year&#039;s monsoon floods&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;than the abstract shapes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;glued to myths, history and stories. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Suman Pokhrel]], &#039;&#039;Before Buddha’s Statue in the Rain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Such is the unity of all history that anyone who endeavours to tell a piece of it must feel that his first sentence tears a seamless web.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Sir Frederick Pollock, 3rd Baronet|Frederick Pollock]], &#039;&#039;[https://archive.org/details/historyofenglish01poll/page/n48/mode/1up The history of English law before the time of Edward I]&#039;&#039;, p. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Had previous chroniclers neglected to speak in praise of History in general, it might perhaps have been necessary for me to recommend everyone to choose for study and welcome such treatises as the present, since men have no more ready corrective of conduct than knowledge of the past.&#039;&#039;&#039; But all historians, one may say without exception, and in no half-hearted manner, but making this the beginning and end of their labour, have impressed on us that the soundest education and training for a life of active politics is the study of History, and that surest and indeed the only method of learning how to bear bravely the vicissitudes of fortune, is to recall the calamities of others. Evidently therefore no one, and least of all myself, would think it his duty at this day to repeat what has been so well and so often said. For the very element of unexpectedness in the events I have chosen as my theme will be sufficient to challenge and incite everyone, young and old alike, to peruse my systematic history. For who is so worthless or indolent as not to wish to know by what means and under what system of polity the Romans in less than fifty-three years have succeeded in subjecting nearly the whole inhabited world to their sole government — a thing unique in history? Or who again is there so passionately devoted to other spectacles or studies as to regard anything as of greater moment than the acquisition of this knowledge?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Polybius]] [[w:The Histories (Polybius)|&#039;&#039;The Histories&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no history of mankind, there is only an indefinite number of histories of all kinds of aspects of human life. And one of these is the history of political power. This is elevated into the history of the world. But this, I hold, is an offence against every decent conception of mankind.&#039;&#039;&#039; It is hardly better than to treat the history of embezzlement or of robbery or of poisoning as the history of mankind. For &#039;&#039;the history of power politics is nothing but the history of international crime and mass murder&#039;&#039; (including it is true, some of the attempts to suppress them). This history is taught in schools, and some of the greatest criminals are extolled as heroes.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no history of mankind, there are only many histories of all kinds of aspects of human life. And one of these is the history of political power. This is elevated into the history of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Popper]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Open Society and Its Enemies|The Open Society and Its Enemies]]&#039;&#039;, Vol 2, Ch. 25 &amp;quot;Has History any Meaning?&amp;quot; (1945)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History always has a few tricks up its frayed sleeve. It&#039;s been around a long time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Mort|Mort]]&#039;&#039; (1987).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History, the proverb says, is made at night. The European civil servant normally sleeps at night. What waits in his IN basket to confront him at nine in the morning is history.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Pynchon]], &#039;&#039;[[w:V.|V.]]&#039;&#039; (1963).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==R==&lt;br /&gt;
* [History] hath triumphed over Time, which besides it, nothing but Eternity hath triumphed over.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Walter Raleigh]], &#039;&#039;The History of the World&#039;&#039;, Preface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a word, we may gather out of history a policy no less wise than eternal; by the comparison and application of other men&#039;s forepassed miseries with our own like errors and ill deservings.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Walter Raleigh]], &#039;&#039;History of the World&#039;&#039;, Preface, Par, IX.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Classical history is concerned with political life, as lived in the Greek city states and the Roman republic and empire.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book|author=Isabel Rivers|title=Classical and Christian Ideas in English Renaissance Poetry|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QhGIAgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA55|date=2 September 2003|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-134-84417-3|page=55}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is the story of mankind, of what it has done, suffered or enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Roberts (historian)|J. M. Roberts]], &#039;&#039;The Penguin History of the World&#039;&#039; (1976)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The history of all peoples is full of bloody and revolting pages. So much blood has been spilled for every new construction, every new teaching or religion! That is why humanity urgently must learn the two great concepts — [[Tolerance]] and [[Cooperation]]. On these two foundations the [[New Epoch]] will be built.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]], &#039;&#039;Letters I&#039;&#039;, 6 June 1935 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Franklin Roosevelt]], [https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/annual-message-congress-3 Annual Message to Congress], 4 January 1935&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know that all things pass away but history. History never dies. It is what defines us as a civilization, and we live out our collective histories every day, in ways both good and evil... History dies hard.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Paul Rusesabagina|Paul Rusesabagina]], &#039;&#039;An Ordinary Man&#039;&#039; (2006), Chapters 10–11&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is true that numerous instances are not always necessary to establish a law, provided the essential and [[relevant]] circumstances can easily be disentangled. But, in history, so many circumstances of a small and accidental nature are relevant, that no broad and simple uniformities are possible. Where our main endeavour is to discover general laws, we regard these as intrinsically more valuable than any of the facts which they inter-connect. In astronomy, the law of gravitation is plainly better worth knowing than the position of a particular planet on a particular night, or even on every night throughout a year. There are in the law a splendour and simplicity and sense of mastery which illuminate a mass of otherwise uninteresting details... But in history the matter is far otherwise... &#039;&#039;&#039;Historical facts, many of them, have an intrinsic value, a profound interest on their own account, which makes them worthy of study, quite apart from any possibility of linking them together by means of causal laws.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;On History&#039;&#039; (1904).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The past alone is truly real: the present is but a painful, struggling birth into the immutable being of what is no longer. Only the dead exist fully. The lives of the living are fragmentary, doubtful, and subject to change; but the lives of the dead are complete, free from the sway of Time, the all but omnipotent lord of the world. Their failures and successes, their hopes and fears, their joys and pains, have become eternal—our efforts cannot now abate one jot of them. Sorrows long buried in the grave, tragedies of which only a fading memory remains, loves immortalized by Death&#039;s hallowing touch these have a power, a magic, an untroubled calm, to which no present can attain. ...On the banks of the river of Time, the sad procession of human generations is marching slowly to the grave; in the quiet country of the Past, the march is ended, the tired wanderers rest, and the weeping is hushed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;On History&#039;&#039; (1904).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A land without ruins is a land without memories—a land without memories is a land without history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Abram Joseph Ryan|Abram Joseph Ryan]], &amp;quot;A Land Without Ruins&amp;quot;, Preface quoting an unnamed source. Edd Winfield Parks, &#039;&#039;Southern Poets&#039;&#039; (1936), p. 165.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==S==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:&amp;quot;The School of Athens&amp;quot; by Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino.jpg|thumb|History teaches us that a given view has been abandoned in favor of another by all men, or by all competent men, or perhaps by only the most vocal men; it does not teach us whether the change was sound or whether the rejected view deserved to be rejected. Only an impartial analysis of the view in question, an analysis that is not dazzled by the victory or stunned by the defeat of the adherents of the view concerned—could teach us anything regarding the worth of the view and hence regarding the meaning of the historical change. ~ [[Leo Strauss]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Classics Hall.jpg|thumb|Our understanding of the thought of the past is liable to be the more adequate, the less the historian is convinced of the superiority of his own point of view, or the more he is prepared to admit the possibility that he may have to learn something, not merely about the thinkers of the past, but from them.  ~ [[Leo Strauss]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. &#039;&#039;&#039;Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Santayana]], &#039;&#039;The Life of Reason&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1: &#039;&#039;Reason in Common Sense&#039;&#039; (1905).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Die Weltgeschichte ist das Weltgericht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The world&#039;s history is the world&#039;s judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Resignation&#039;&#039;, 17.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Es giebt keine Selbstkenntniss als die historische. Niemand weiss was er ist, wer nicht weiss was seine Genossen sind.&lt;br /&gt;
** There is no self-knowledge except historical self-knowledge. No one knows what he is if he doesn’t know what his contemporaries are.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], “Ideas,” &#039;&#039;Lucinde and the Fragments&#039;&#039;, p. Firchow, trans. (1991), § 139.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History shows that there are no invincible armies and that there never have been.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]], Radio Address &amp;quot;Comrades! Citizens! Brothers and sisters! Men of our army and navy!&amp;quot; (3 July 1941).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Serious affairs and history are carefully laid snares for the uninformed.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]] in &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun,&#039;&#039; Game III, Sequence: “A Game” (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Creators of history always play with our impotence and our ignorance.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]] in &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun,&#039;&#039; Game III, Sequence: “A Game” (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;He did not waste time in a vain search for a place in history.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**  [[Dejan Stojanovic]] in &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun,&#039;&#039; “Socrates,” Sequence: “A Stone and a Word” (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History will be erased in the universal purgatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]] in “Don Quixote”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Narrative is taken to mean the organization of material in a chronologically sequential order and the focussing of the content into a single coherent story, albeit with sub-plots. The two essential ways in which narrative history differs from structural history is that its arrangement is descriptive rather than analytical and that its central focus is on man not circumstances. It therefore deals with the peculiar and the specific, rather than the collective and statistical. Narrative is a mode of historical writing, but it is a mode which also affects and is affected by content and method.&lt;br /&gt;
** Lawrence Stone, ‘The Revival of Narrative: Reflections on a new old history’ in The Past and Present Revisited,London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987 p. 74.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History teaches us that a given view has been abandoned in favor of another by all men, or by all competent men, or perhaps by only the most vocal men; it does not teach us whether the change was sound or whether the rejected view deserved to be rejected. Only an impartial analysis of the view in question, an analysis that is not dazzled by the victory or stunned by the defeat of the adherents of the view concerned—could teach us anything regarding the worth of the view and hence regarding the meaning of the historical change.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Strauss]], &#039;&#039;Natural Right and History&#039;&#039; (1953), p. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our understanding of the thought of the past is liable to be the more adequate, the less the historian is convinced of the superiority of his own point of view, or the more he is prepared to admit the possibility that he may have to learn something, not merely about the thinkers of the past, but from them.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Strauss]], &#039;&#039;What is Political Philosophy?&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 68&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “Our ideas” are only partly our ideas. Most of our ideas are abbreviations or residues of the thought of other people, of our teachers (in the broadest sense of the term) and of our teachers’ teachers; they are abbreviations and residues of the thought of the past. These thoughts were once explicit and in the center of consideration and discussion. It may even be presumed that they were once perfectly lucid. By being transmitted to later generations they have possibly been transformed, and there is no certainty that the transformation was effected consciously and with full clarity. … This means that the clarification of our political ideas insensibly changes into and becomes indistinguishable from the history of political ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Strauss]], &#039;&#039;What is Political Philosophy?&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 73&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==T==&lt;br /&gt;
* History is a big word..........History is not the sort of animal you can domesticate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Antonio Tabucchi|Antonio Tabucchi]], &#039;&#039;Pereira Maintains&#039;&#039; (2010), p. 89.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Præcipium munus annalium reor, ne virtutes sileantur, utque pravis dictis, factisque ex posteritate et infamia metus sit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The principal office of history I take to be this: to prevent virtuous actions from being forgotten, and that evil words and deeds should fear an infamous reputation with posterity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tacitus]], &#039;&#039;Annales&#039;&#039; (AD 117), III. 65.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For me, history is of use... by being able to steal the ideas of others and leverage them, correct the mental defect that seems to block my ability to learn from others.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nassim Nicholas Taleb]], &#039;&#039;Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets&#039;&#039; (2001) Three:  A Mathematical Meditation on History — Fun in My Attic — &#039;&#039;Denigration of History&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is written by the victors, but it&#039;s victims who write the memoirs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Carol Tavris|Carol Tavris]] and Elliot Aronson, in &#039;&#039;Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me) : Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts&#039;&#039; (2008), p. 197.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History gets thicker as it approaches recent times: more people, more events, and more books written about them. More evidence is preserved, often, one is tempted to say, too much. Decay and destruction have hardly begun their beneficent work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[A. J. P. Taylor]], &#039;&#039;English History 1914 – 1945 ([1965] 1975)&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Revised Bibliography&amp;quot;, p. 729&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is hard to know, because of all the hired bullshit, but even without being sure of &amp;quot;history&amp;quot; it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time — and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hunter S. Thompson]], [[w:Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas|Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas]], Chapter 8, Genius..., p. 67.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Compared with the life-span of a human being the time-span of a civilization is so vast that a human observer cannot hope to take the measure of its curve unless he is in a position to view it in a distant perspective; and he can only obtain this perspective vis-a-vis some society that is extinct. He can never stand back sufficiently far from the history of the society in which he himself lives and moves and has his being. In other words, to assert of any living society, at any moment in its life, that it is the consummation of human history is to hazard a guess which is intrinsically unsusceptible of immediate verification. When we find that a majority of the members of all societies at all times make this assertion about their own civilizations, it becomes evident that their guesses have really nothing to do with any objective calculation of probabilities but are pure expressions of the egocentric illusion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arnold J. Toynbee]], &#039;&#039;A Study of History&#039;&#039; (1934–1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The very ink with which all history is written is merely fluid prejudice.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mark Twain]], &#039;&#039;Following the Equator&#039;&#039;, Part 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To ingenious attempts at explaining by the light of reason things which want the light of history to show their meaning, much of the learned nonsense of the world has indeed been due.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Edward Burnett Tylor|Edward Burnett Tylor]], &#039;&#039;Primitive Culture&#039;&#039; (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==V==&lt;br /&gt;
* The absence from the Dead Sea Scrolls of historical texts proper should not surprise us.  Neither in the inter-Testamental period, nor in earlier biblical times, was the recording of history as we understand it a strong point among the Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geza Vermes]] &#039;&#039;The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English&#039;&#039;Chapter 3: The History of the Community, p. 49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Everybody likes a bit of gossip to some point, as long as it&#039;s gossip with some point to it. That&#039;s why I like history.&#039;&#039;&#039; History is nothing but gossip about the past, with the hope that it might be true.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gore Vidal]], interview in: Butt, Nr. 20, Special Summer 2007, p. 63.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All our ancient history, as one of our wits remarked, is no more than accepted fiction.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Jeannot et Colin&#039;&#039; (1764)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L&#039;histoire n&#039;est que le tableau des crimes et des malheurs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Indeed, history is nothing more than a tableau of crimes and misfortunes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;[[w:L&#039;Ingénu|L&#039;Ingénu]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 10 (1767)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==W==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vasnetsov Nesmeyana.jpg|thumb|right|The history of the world has been one not of [[conquest]], as supposed; it has been one of [[wikt:ennui|ennui]]. ~ [[w:Helen Westley|Helen Westley]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Oh do not read history, for that I know must be false.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Walpole]], I, &#039;&#039;Walpoliana&#039;&#039;, No. CXLI. Also in Advertisement to Letters to Horace Mann.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are apt to suppose that the facts in any branch of meaning must be in some way open to direct inspection, and that the statements of experts in each branch can be tested by their conformity with them ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The most striking thing about history is that the facts it purports to describe are past facts; and past facts are no longer accessible to direct inspection. We cannot, in a word, test the accuracy of historical statements by simply seeing whether they correspond to a reality which is independently known. How then can we test them? … &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;... we do so by referring to historical evidence. Although the past is not accessible to direct inspection it has left ample traces of itself in the present, in the shape of documents, buildings, coins, institutions, procedures and so forth.&lt;br /&gt;
** W. H. Walsh, &#039;&#039;An Introduction to the Philosophy of History&#039;&#039; (1958) pp. 19–20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Human history becomes more and more a race between [[education]] and [[catastrophe]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. G. Wells]], &#039;&#039;The Outline of History&#039;&#039; (1921), vol. 2, chapter 41, p. 594.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The history of the world has been one not of conquest, as supposed; it has been one of [[wikt:ennui|ennui]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Helen Westley|Helen Westley]], as quoted in &amp;quot;The Confessions of Helen Westley&amp;quot; by [[Djuna Barnes]] in &#039;&#039;New York Morning Telegraph Sunday Magazine&#039;&#039; (23 September 1917).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Anybody can make history. Only a great man can write it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oscar Wilde]] &amp;quot;The True Function and Value of Criticism.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Nineteenth Century&#039;&#039; XXVII (July-December 1890): 137.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History has a way of reducing individuals to flat, two-dimensional portraits. it is the enemy of subjectivity, which is why Stephen Dedalus called it &amp;quot;a nightmare from which I am trying to awake&amp;quot;. If we think of [[Søren Kierkegaard|Kierkegaard]], of [[Friedrich Nietzsche|Nietzsche]], of [[Friedrich Hölderlin|Hölderlin]], we see them standing alone, outside of history. They are spotlighted by their intensity, and the background is all darkness. They intersect history, but are not a part of it. There is something anti-history about such men; they are not subject to time, accident and death, but their intensity is a protest against it. I have elsewhere called such men &amp;quot;Outsiders&amp;quot; because they attempt to stand outside history. which defines humanity on terms of limitation, not of possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Colin Wilson]] in &#039;&#039;Rasputin and the Fall of the Romanovs&#039;&#039;, p. 13-14 (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Memory plays tricks that history corrects.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Charles Wilson]], &#039;&#039;Utriusque Cosmi&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]]&#039;&#039; (mass market paperback edition, {{ISBN|978-0-06-156236-5}}), p. 28&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Those old credulities, to nature dear,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shall they no longer bloom upon the stock&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of History.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Wordsworth]], &#039;&#039;Memorials of a Tour in Italy&#039;&#039;, IV. At Rome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Y==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is always a part of the misfortunes of the vanquished that their portraits are painted and their history written by the victors.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A. Yankee, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spectator &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;s&#039;&#039;] Special Correspondent in New York. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ans_AQAAIAAJ&amp;amp;dq=%22It%20is%20always%20a%20part%20of%20the%20misfortunes%20of%20the%20vanquished%20that%20their%20portraits%20are%20painted%20and%20their%20history%20written%20by%20the%20victors.%22&amp;amp;pg=PA552#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22It%20is%20always%20a%20part%20of%20the%20misfortunes%20of%20the%20vanquished%20that%20their%20portraits%20are%20painted%20and%20their%20history%20written%20by%20the%20victors.%22&amp;amp;f=false May 6, 1865].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The greater part of what passes for diplomatic history is little more than the record of what one clerk said to another clerk.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. M. Young]], &#039;&#039;Victorian England: Portrait of an Age&#039;&#039; (1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Z==&lt;br /&gt;
* If you don&#039;t know history, it&#039;s as if you were born yesterday.  If you were born yesterday, then any leader can tell you anything.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Howard Zinn]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.democracynow.org/2009/1/2/placeholder_howard_zinn War and Social Justice]&#039;&#039;, speech at Binghamton University on 8 November 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 368-69.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Happy is the nation without a history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cesare Beccaria]], &#039;&#039;Trattato dei Delitti e delle Pene&#039;&#039; (Treatise of Crimes and of Punishment). Introduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is a pageant, not a philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine Birrell]], &#039;&#039;Obiter Dicta&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Muse of History&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Happy the people whose annals are tiresome.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Montesquieu]] (attributed).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Misattributed begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misattributed ==&lt;br /&gt;
* History doesn&#039;t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.&lt;br /&gt;
** This is very often attributed to [[Mark Twain]], but is not found in his works. The earliest publication yet located is a verse which might involve a deliberate invocation of poetic license in [[w:John Robert Colombo|John Robert Colombo&#039;s]] poem, &amp;quot;A Said Poem&amp;quot;, published in &#039;&#039;Neo Poems&#039;&#039; (1970), which reads: &amp;quot; &#039;History never repeats itself but it rhymes,&#039; said Mark Twain&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Actual quote is:&lt;br /&gt;
** For my part, I consider that it will be found much better by all Parties &#039;&#039;to leave the past to history, especially as I propose to write that history.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Speech in the House of Commons (January 23, 1948); Cited in &#039;&#039;The Yale Book of Quotations&#039;&#039; (2006), ed. Fred R. Shapiro, Yale University Press, p. 154 &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; {{ISBN|0300107986}} &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Misattributed end}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Noam Chomsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Memory]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progress]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Propaganda]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Time]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Truth]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Howard Zinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary|history}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History|*]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Time]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=History&amp;diff=3124140</id>
		<title>History</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=History&amp;diff=3124140"/>
		<updated>2022-06-08T20:51:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* E */ einstein&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:International Human Rights Day protest march against war and against deportations (24109135727).jpg|thumb|There have always been wars, [[tyrannies]] and [[scarcity|privations]].  [[Escapism|Escapists]] take refuge in [[Cliché|cliches]] such as “Human nature will never change” and “History always repeats itself!” Nevertheless, [[human nature]] is changing before our eyes,  and quite new history is being made... It is a new procedure  when a large and ever growing section of the public begins to take [[responsibility]] for the trend of [[evolution]] to such  purpose that the community is increasingly honeycombed with [[Progressivism|progressive movements]] of every possible kind.  This is the new element in history which constitutes a  mighty landmark in the [[development]] of [[humanity|mankind]]. ~ [[Vera Stanley Alder]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:History|History]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (from [[w:Ancient Greek|Greek]], &#039;&#039;historia&#039;&#039;, meaning &amp;quot;inquiry, knowledge acquired by investigation&amp;quot;) is the study of the past, particularly how it relates to humans. It is an [[w:umbrella term|umbrella term]] that relates to past events as well as the memory, discovery, collection, organization, presentation, and interpretation of information about these events. Scholars who write about history are called [[historian]]s. Events occurring prior to written record are considered [[prehistory]].&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha|extsource=yes|hoyt=yes|[[#Misattributed|Misattributed]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:History-Dielman-Highsmith.jpeg|thumb|Man is a history-making creature who can neither repeat his past nor leave it behind. ~ [[W. H. Auden]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A ==&lt;br /&gt;
* History is the sum total of things that could have been avoided.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Konrad Adenauer]] (attributed), &#039;&#039;Lend Me Your Ears: Oxford Dictionary of Political Quotations&#039;&#039; (2010), 4th edition, edited by Antony Jay&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Escapism|Escapists]] take refuge in [[Cliché|cliches]] such as “Human nature will never change” and “History always repeats itself!” Nevertheless, [[human nature]] is changing before our eyes,  and quite new history is being made.   This century has seen [[World War I|world war]] for the first time. It has seen a world [[civilization]] threatened with self-destruction, not only through war but through the exploitation of  all [[Mother Nature|the kingdoms in nature]]. It has also seen the beginnings  of [[Internationalism|international alignment]] and [[collaboration]]. It has seen  the [[Leadership|leaders]] of the people struggling with great [[patience]] to  work out a new political approach from the ‘world’ angle.  It has seen the people themselves taking increasing individual and collective [[activism|action]] in order to obtain a world organization or government, a universal religion, or a universal language. Let us avoid being misled by the apparent irresponsibility of the crowd with its absorption in [[horror|crime films]], dog racing and [[gambling]], and its immorality and [[apathy]]!... It is traditional for the outstanding [[Leadership|leaders]] of humanity  to work for the shaping of history. It is a new procedure  when a large and ever growing section of the public begins to take [[responsibility]] for the trend of [[evolution]] to such  purpose that the community is increasingly honeycombed with [[Progressivism|progressive movements]] of every possible kind.  This is the new element in history which constitutes a  mighty landmark in the [[development]] of [[humanity|mankind.]] &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vera Stanley Alder]] in [[Vera_Stanley_Alder#Humanity_Comes_of_Age,_A_study_of_Individual_and_World_Fulfillment_(1950)|&#039;&#039;Humanity Comes of Age, A study of Individual and World Fulfillment&#039;&#039;]] (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There are two ways of summing up world history, the inner way and the outer way. Both have been at the mercy of scribes and policies. We must use our divinely-given intuition in order to arrive near to the truth. Let us begin by realizing that the story of human evolution has progressed steadily from complete exclusiveness to an ever broadening inclusiveness. At first it was built up around the self-interest of the family unit. Later the ring-pass-not enlarged to include the tribe. The tribal communities finally produced the small state or nation. The aggressive self-interest of nations eventually produced Empires. Everything outside of the Empire was potential enemy or potential prey.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Finally came the conceptions of [[unity|Federation]] and of [[Commonwealth]]. This saw the emergence of a new concept of co-operation instead of tyranny, and of the rights of the individual instead of those of the autocrat. Nevertheless, even the most benign and powerful of these nation-groups had still to consider everything outside of itself as potential enemy, and therefore self-interest still ruled. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vera Stanley Alder]] in [[Vera_Stanley_Alder#Humanity_Comes_of_Age,_A_study_of_Individual_and_World_Fulfillment_(1950)|&#039;&#039;Humanity Comes of Age, A study of Individual and World Fulfillment&#039;&#039;]] (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past is a pointer to the future. If we can understand  the past and follow the trend of development throughout  history we shall be more sure of where we are going. History tells us of wars and conquests and empires and  revolutions, of cities and cultures, and of religions and persecutions. Yet actually it is a rather superficial survey. It leaves out almost entirely one vital part of the picture — the most important part. It has very little to say of man’s purpose in living, of his understanding of the reason of his existence and of his conception of life around him, and his interpretation of the mysteries of creation and evolution. So little does history say about this aspect of man — the mainspring and motive of his living — that we are left guessing about the most important part of the story — the extent of man’s actual knowledge throughout the ages... We are given superficial and rather materialistic details of the outward forms and the bitter strife which accompanied the development of the various religions as they  were interpreted and practised by the people, much of which leaves us with an impression of brutal and bigoted primitiveness. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vera Stanley Alder]] in [[Vera_Stanley_Alder#Humanity_Comes_of_Age,_A_study_of_Individual_and_World_Fulfillment_(1950)|&#039;&#039;Humanity Comes of Age, A study of Individual and World Fulfillment&#039;&#039;]] (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[sciences]] we are familiar with have been installed in a number of great &#039;continents&#039;. Before [[Karl Marx|Marx]], two such continents had been opened up to scientific knowledge: the continent of Mathematics and the continent of Physics. The first by the Greeks ([[Thales]]), the second by [[Galileo]]. [[Karl Marx|Marx]] opened up a third continent to scientific knowledge: the continent of History.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Louis Althusser]], &amp;quot;Philosophy as a Revolutionary Weapon&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;{{w|Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays}}&#039;&#039; (1968) as translated by Ben Brewster (Monthly Review Press: 1971), p. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I was not speaking of minor ripples in the mainstream of history—certainly those are ruled by chance. But the broad current moves quite inexorably, I assure you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Poul Anderson]], &#039;&#039;Cold Victory,&#039;&#039; in [[w:George H. Scithers|George H. Scithers]] &amp;amp; [[w:Darrell Schweitzer|Darrell Schweitzer]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;Another Round at the Spaceport Bar,&#039;&#039; p. 181. Originally appeared in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_Science_Fiction Venture Science Fiction], May 1957&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History repeats itself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anonymous]] proverb; popularized since the mid-1800s; already considered clichéd by 1865. &amp;quot;The most solemn humbug which does duty as a profound historical reflection is, that history repeats itself.&amp;quot; Harper&#039;s, volume 30, [http://books.google.com/books?id=tX8CAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA124&amp;amp;dq=%22history+repeats+itself%22 p. 124], 1865&lt;br /&gt;
** Widely attributed to various famous authors, who expressed similar sentiments – see [[#Marx|Marx]] and [[#Hegel|Hegel]] quotes below.&lt;br /&gt;
** An early attested form is &amp;quot;history repeats itself never&amp;quot; (reversing it), 1854, [[William Howitt]] &#039;&#039;The history of magic, Volume 2,&#039;&#039; by Joseph Ennemoser, translation William Howitt, 1854, [http://books.google.com/books?id=zgXuzN2ZRtoC&amp;amp;pg=PA86#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=history%20repeats%20itself p. 86]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is about the past. Yet it exists only in the present – the moment of its creation as history provides us with a narrative constructed after the events with which it is concerned. The narrative must then relate to the moment of its creation as much as its historical subject. History presents an historian with the task of producing a dialogue between the past and the present. But as these temporal co-ordinates cannot be fixed, history becomes a continuous interaction between the historian and the past. As such, history can be seen as a process of evaluation whereby the past is always coloured by the intellectual fashions and philosophical concerns of the present. This shifting perspective on the past is matched by the fluid status of the past itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dana Arnold]], &#039;&#039;Reading Architectural History&#039;&#039; (2002), Ch. 1 : Reading the past : What is architectural history?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The recognition of the role and importance of subjectivity in the construction of histories does, by implication, negate the possibility for objectivity in the writing of history. But there will always be historical narrative and, consequently, a narrative voice, be it hidden in the syntactical structure of the writing by, for instance, the absence of first person or the use of simple past tense. But this is a sleight of hand which gives the reader a sense of immediate  contact  with  the  past  without  the  presence  of  an  interlocutor.  This  apparently ‘unmediated’ contact gives history a kind of privileged status of objective knowledge&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dana Arnold]] &#039;&#039;Reading Architectural History&#039;&#039; (2002), Ch. 1 : Reading the past : What is architectural history?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Historical reality is then a &#039;referential illusion&#039;, in which we try to grasp the reality (the referent of language) that we believe lies beyond the barrier of the linguistic construction of its narratives. In this way history becomes a Myth or an ideology as it purports to be reality. Indeed, storytelling is often seen as one of the most important functions of writing histories and fundamental to the nature of the discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dana Arnold]], &#039;&#039;Reading Architectural History&#039;&#039; (2002), Ch. 1 : Reading the past : What is architectural history?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man is a history-making creature who can neither repeat his past nor leave it behind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. H. Auden]], &#039;&#039;The Dyers Hand&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;D.H. Lawrence&amp;quot; (1962)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Political history is far too criminal and pathological to be a fit subject of study for the young. Children should acquire their heroes and villains from fiction.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. H. Auden]], &#039;&#039;A Certain World&#039;&#039; (1970)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All things from eternity are of like forms and come round in a circle.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Aurelius]], &#039;&#039;Meditations&#039;&#039;, Bk. II, Ch. 14 (c. 121–180 AD)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==B==&lt;br /&gt;
*History is of two kinds—there is the official history taught in schools, a lying compilation &#039;&#039;ad usum delphini&#039;&#039;; and there is the secret history which deals with the real causes of events—a scandalous chronicle.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Honoré de Balzac]], in [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1639/1639-h/1639-h.htm &#039;&#039;Eve and David (Lost Illusions Part III)&#039;&#039;], Translated by Ellen Marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Journalism is the first rough draft of history.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Originally stated in slightly different forms “News/The press [is the] … first rough draft of history”, this form dates at least to the 1940s, and was most likely popularized by {{w|Alan Barth}}, as an editorial writer for the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; in the 1940s. The sentiment appears several times in the editorial pages of the &#039;&#039;Post&#039;&#039; in that era, with the earliest citation from Barth being 1943:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shafer2010&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:: News is only the first rough draft of history.&lt;br /&gt;
::* {{w|Alan Barth}}, review of &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of a Curmudgeon&#039;&#039; by {{w|Harold L. Ickes}} in &#039;&#039;{{w|New Republic}},&#039;&#039; 1943, collected in &#039;&#039;The New Republic,&#039;&#039; Volume 108, [http://books.google.com/books?id=cDgQAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;q=%22draft+of+history%22 p. 677]&lt;br /&gt;
:* This quote is generally incorrectly credited to {{w|Philip L. Graham}}, in an address to &#039;&#039;Newsweek&#039;&#039; correspondents in London (1963):&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;shafer2010&amp;quot;&amp;gt;“[http://www.slate.com/id/2265540/pagenum/all Who Said It First? Journalism is the &#039;first rough draft of history.’]” by {{w|Jack Shafer}}, &#039;&#039;Slate&#039;&#039; (30 August 2010)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Personal History&#039;&#039; (1997) by {{w|Katharine Graham}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The end of history is, alas, also the end of the dustbins of history. There are no longer any dustbins for disposing of old ideologies, old regimes, old values. Where are we going to throw Marxism, which actually invented the dustbins of history? (Yet there is some justice here since the very people who invented them have fallen in.) Conclusion: if there are no more dustbins of history, &#039;&#039;this is because History itself has become a dustbin.&#039;&#039; It has become its own dustbin, just as the planet itself is becoming its own dustbin.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Baudrillard]], &#039;&#039;The Illusion of the End&#039;&#039; (1992), &amp;quot;The Event Strike&amp;quot;, p. 26.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Take one of [[Voltaire]]&#039;s swift shining shafts of wit: &amp;quot;History is after all only a pack of tricks we play on the dead.&amp;quot; Ah, yes, how true it is, we say; and we are astonished that Voltaire could have been so profound. Then we realize that he did not really mean it. To him it was a witticism intended to brand dishonest historians, whereas we perceive that it formulated, in the neatest possible way, a profound truth — the truth that all historical writing, even the most honest, is unconsciously subjective, since every age is bound, in spite of itself, to make the dead perform whatever tricks it finds necessary for its own peace of mind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carl L. Becker]], &#039;&#039;The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers&#039;&#039; (1932), Ch. II. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971, pp. 43–4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mrs. Lintott&#039;&#039;&#039;: Now. How do you define history, Mr. Rudge?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Rudge&#039;&#039;&#039;: Can I speak freely, Miss? Without being hit?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Mrs. Lintott&#039;&#039;&#039;: I will protect you.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Rudge&#039;&#039;&#039;: How do I define history? It&#039;s just one fucking thing after another.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alan Bennett]], &#039;&#039;[[The History Boys]]&#039;&#039; (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History must not be written with bias, and both sides must be given, even if there is only one side.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Betjeman]], &#039;&#039;First and Last Loves&#039;&#039; (1952)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*HISTORY, &#039;&#039;n.&#039;&#039; An account mostly false, of events mostly unimportant, which are brought about by rulers, mostly knaves, and soldiers, mostly fools. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ambrose Bierce]], [https://archive.org/details/cynicswordbook00bier/page/160/mode/2up &#039;&#039;The Cynic&#039;s Word Book&#039;&#039;] (1906); republished as &#039;&#039;The Devil&#039;s Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1911).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we disown history we are at its mercy. To have a reasonable knowledge of the past is to possess an anchor which is likely to prevent us from being swept towards false ideas about the present and future.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Blainey]], &#039;&#039;The Great Seesaw: A New View of the Western World, 1750-2000&#039;&#039; (1988)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Unpredictable events, or the coincidence of vital events happening side by side, play their part in history. In the emerging of the United States of America, the South American nations, South Africa, Canada and Australia the unforeseen mixture of events was especially powerful in the final decades of the 18th century.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Blainey]], &#039;&#039;A Short History of the World&#039;&#039; (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The essence of studying history is that, as best we can, we try to wear the shoes and put on the spectacles worn by people of the past. We try to see the obstacles and dilemmas they struggled against or evaded. We also hope that the future will try to understand why we made blunders, and learn from failures and achievements of our era.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geoffrey Blainey]], [https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/no-point-in-ignoring-facts-and-history/news-story/aaf4faf43dfb6c31bcecb635fba09e2c &amp;quot;No point in ignoring facts and history&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The Australian&#039;&#039; (June 14, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With all regimes, there is what might be called an official interpretation of the past that makes it appear defective or just a step on the way to the present regime.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Allan Bloom]], &#039;&#039;[[The Closing of the American Mind]]&#039;&#039; (New York: 1988), p. 249&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have read somewhere or other, in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, I think, that &#039;&#039;&#039;history is philosophy teaching by examples.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke]], &#039;&#039;On the Study and Use of History&#039;&#039;, Letter 2. Also quoted by [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;History&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The dignity of history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke]], &#039;&#039;On the Study and Use of History&#039;&#039;. Letter V. Fielding, &#039;&#039;Tom Jones&#039;&#039;, Book XI, Chapter II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On September 20, 1792, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (who had accompanied the Duke of Weimar on a military expedition to Paris) saw the finest army of Europe inexplicably repulsed at Valmy by some French militiamen, and said to his disconcerted friends, “In this place and on this day, a new epoch in the history of the world is beginning, and we shall be able to say that we have been present at its origin.” Since that time historic days have been numerous, and one of the tasks of the governments has been to fabricate them or to simulate them with an abundance of preconditioning propaganda followed by relentless publicity. &lt;br /&gt;
** The Modesty of History by Jorge Luis Borges from Borges, a reader: a selection from the writings of Jorge Luis Borges by Borges p. 246&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Always the victor writes the history of the vanquished. He who beats distorts the faces of the beaten. The weaker depart from this world and the lies remain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertolt Brecht]], &#039;&#039;{{w|The Trial of Lucullus}}&#039;&#039; (1940), &#039;&#039;Brecht Collected Plays&#039;&#039;, vol. 4, p. 386.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Papa [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]] he say that all we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history. &#039;&#039;I&#039;&#039; know people who can&#039;t even learn from what happened this morning. Hegel must have been taking the long view.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Brunner]], &#039;&#039;Stand on Zanzibar&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
** See [[#Hegel|Hegel quote]], below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is much more the product of chaos than of conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [[w:The New York Times|The New York Times]], January 18, 1981 [http://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/18/nyregion/quotation-of-the-day-227621.html?scp=28&amp;amp;sq=Brzezinski&amp;amp;st=nyt Quotation of the Day].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History gives us a kind of chart, and we dare not surrender even a small rushlight in the darkness. The hasty reformer who does not remember the past will find himself condemned to repeat it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Buchan]], general introduction to &#039;&#039;The Nations of Today&#039;&#039;, a series of popular histories published in 1923–1924 under Buchan&#039;s editorship. Each work contained Buchan&#039;s introduction. Reported in &#039;&#039;Great Britain&#039;&#039; (1923), vol. 1, p. 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What we learn from history is that people don&#039;t learn from history — and you certainly see that in [[w:Financial market|financial market]]s all the time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Warren Buffett]], {{cite journal|title=Warren Buffett: 2004 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting Part 1|date=August 2, 2018|journal=Hioim, YouTube|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cayxcPyQoAc}} (quote at 1:24:47 of 2:33:25)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is on every occasion the record of what one age finds worthy of note in another.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Jacob Burckhardt|Jacob Burckhardt]], &#039;&#039;Judgements on History and Historians&#039;&#039; (1929), Section 84: Introduction to the History of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What want these outlaws conquerors should have&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But History&#039;s purchased page to call them great?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;[[Childe Harold&#039;s Pilgrimage]]&#039;&#039;, Canto III (1816), Stanza 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And history with all her volumes vast,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hath but one page.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;[[Childe Harold&#039;s Pilgrimage]]&#039;&#039;, Canto IV (1818), Stanza 108.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==C==&lt;br /&gt;
* History does not always repeat itself. Sometimes it just yells, &#039;Can&#039;t you remember anything I told you?&#039; and lets fly with a club.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John W. Campbell]], &#039;&#039;Analog Science Fiction/Fact magazine&#039;&#039;(1965)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, a distillation of rumor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;The French Revolution, A History&#039;&#039; (1837), Part I, Book VII, Chapter V.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Happy the people whose annals are tiresome.&lt;br /&gt;
** Thomas Carlyle, &#039;&#039;The French Revolution, A History&#039;&#039; (1837), Part I, Book II, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No great man lives in vain. The history of the world is but the biography of great men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;[[w:On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and The Heroic in History|Heroes and Hero Worship]]&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;The Hero as Divinity&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Histories are as perfect as the Historian is wise, and is gifted with an eye and a soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Cromwell&#039;s Letters and Speeches&#039;&#039;, Introduction, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is the essence of innumerable Biographies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, On History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, as it lies at the root of all science, is also the first distinct product of man&#039;s spiritual nature; his earliest expression of what can be called Thought.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, On History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All history … is an inarticulate Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], Latter Day Pamphlets. 405.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All history is a Bible—a thing stated in words by me more than once.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], &#039;&#039;Quoted in Froude&#039;s Early Life of Carlyle&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Happy the People whose Annals are blank in History-Books.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Carlyle]], Life of Frederick the Great, Book XVI, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The historian and the facts of history are necessary to one another. The historian without his facts is rootless and futile; the facts without their historian are dead and meaningless. My first answer therefore to the question, What is History?, is that it is a continuous process of interaction between the historian and his facts, an unending dialogue between the present and the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. H. Carr]], &#039;&#039;What is History?&#039;&#039; (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The historian, then, is an individual human being. Like other individuals, he is also a social phenomenon, both the product and the conscious or unconscious spokesman of the society to which he belongs; it is in this capacity that he approaches the facts of the historical past. We sometimes speak of the course of history as a ‘moving procession’. The metaphor is fair enough, provided it does not tempt the historian to think of himself as an eagle surveying the scene from a lonely crag or as a V.I.P. at the saluting base. Nothing of the kind! The historian is just another dim figure trudging along in another part of the procession. And as the procession winds along, swerving now to the right and now to the left, and sometimes doubling back on itself, the relative positions of different parts of the procession are constantly changing, so that it may make perfectly good sense to say, for example, that we are nearer today to the Middle Ages than were our great-grandfathers a century ago, or that the age of Caesar is nearer to us than the age of Dante. New vistas, new angles of vision, constantly appear as the procession – and the historian with it – moves along. The historian is part of history. The point in the procession at which he finds himself determines his angle of vision over the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. H. Carr]], &#039;&#039;What is History?&#039;&#039; (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History therefore is a process of selection in terms of historical significance. To borrow [[Talcott Parsons]]’s phrase once more, history is ‘a selective system’ not only of cognitive, but of causal, orientations to reality. Just as from the infinite ocean of facts the historian selects those which are significant for his purpose, so from the multiplicity of sequences of cause and effect he extracts those, and only those, which are historically significant; and the standard of historical significance is his ability to fit them into his pattern of rational explanation and interpretation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. H. Carr]], &#039;&#039;What is History?&#039;&#039; (1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The history of every country begins in the heart of a man or woman.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Willa Cather]], &#039;&#039;{{W|O Pioneers!}}&#039;&#039;, Pt. I, Ch. 5 (1913)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Woe to the vanquished&amp;quot; ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vae_victis Vae victis]) in history as on the battle-field.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Emanuele Celesia, &#039;&#039;The Conspiracy of Gianluigi Fieschi: or, Genoa in the Sixteenth Century.&#039;&#039; (1866), [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=dHsKAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;dq=%22Woe%20to%20the%20vanquished%20in%20history%20as%20on%20the%20battle-field.%22&amp;amp;pg=PR24#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22Woe%20to%20the%20vanquished%20in%20history%20as%20on%20the%20battle-field.%22&amp;amp;f=false p.xxiv]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The one-sided class war of the last 40 years is becoming two-sided. &#039;&#039;&#039;The population is actually beginning to participate instead of just accepting the hammer blows. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://lauraflanders.org/2021/10/aoc-noam-chomsky/ AOC &amp;amp; Noam Chomsky: The Way Forward + transcript]    (October 28, 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We should recognize that [[white supremacy|white male supremacy]] is a deep current in American history. It’s not gonna go away immediately. But there have been dents, significant ones. So for example, even in the mainstream, when the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; ran the 1619 Project, it couldn’t have happened a couple of years earlier. And it’s because of changes in general [[consciousness]] and [[awareness]]. Of course, there was an immediate backlash, strong backlash, and you’re gonna expect that, white male supremacy is a deep part of American history and culture. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://lauraflanders.org/2021/10/aoc-noam-chomsky/ AOC &amp;amp; Noam Chomsky: The Way Forward + transcript]    (October 28, 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Coronavirus]] is serious enough but it&#039;s worth recalling that there is a much greater horror approaching, we are racing to the edge of disaster, far worse than anything that&#039;s ever happened in human history.... [[Donald Trump]] &amp;amp; his minions are in the lead, in racing to the abyss.  In fact there are two immense threats that we are facing. One is the growing threat of [[Nuclear war]], which has exacerbated it by the tearing what&#039;s left of the [[W:arms control|arms control regime]] and the other of course is the growing threat of [[global warming]]. Both threats can be dealt with but there isn&#039;t a lot of time... the corona virus is a horrible... can have terrifying consequences but there will be recovery, while the others won&#039;t be recovered, it&#039;s finished. If we don&#039;t deal with them we&#039;re done.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-N3In2rLI4 Coronavirus - What is at stake?] | [[W:Democracy in Europe Movement 2025|&#039;&#039;Democracy in Europe Movement 2025&#039;&#039; (DiEM25) ]]  Mar 28, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Presidency of Donald Trump|current administration]] had ample [[w:COVID-19 pandemic in the United States#Reports predicting global pandemics|warning about a likely pandemic]]. In fact, [[w:Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security#Event 201|a high-level simulation]] was run as recently as last October. Trump has reacted during his years in office in the manner to which we have become accustomed: by defunding and dismantling every relevant part of government and assiduously implementing the instructions of his [[Corporatocracy|corporate masters]] to eliminate the regulations that impede profits while saving lives — and leading the race to the abyss of {{w|environmental catastrophe}}, by far his greatest [[crime]] — in fact, the greatest crime in history when we consider the consequences. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],  &#039;&#039;Chomsky: Ventilator Shortage Exposes the Cruelty of Neoliberal Capitalism&#039;&#039;, Interview with C.J. Polychroniou, &#039;&#039;[https://truthout.org/articles/chomsky-ventilator-shortage-exposes-the-cruelty-of-neoliberal-capitalism/ Chomsky: Ventilator Shortage Exposes the Cruelty of Neoliberal Capitalism]&#039;&#039; (April 1, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you look over the history of regulation — railroad regulation, financial regulation and so on — you find that, quite commonly, it&#039;s either initiated by the economic concentrations that are being regulated, or it&#039;s supported by them. And the reason is because they know that, sooner or later, they can take over the regulators and essentially run what they do. They can offer what amounts to bribes — offer them jobs or whatever it may be — it&#039;s an advantage to the regulators to accommodate themselves to the will of the powerful. It happens naturally in many ways, and ends up with what&#039;s called “regulatory capture.” The business being regulated is in fact running the regulators. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],  quoted by [[Bill Moyers]] in [https://billmoyers.com/story/noam-chomskys-requiem-american-dream/ &#039;&#039;In His New Book, Noam Chomsky Takes a Look at Income Inequality,&#039;&#039;] (11 May 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The threat of China is not military. The threat of China is they can&#039;t be intimidated... Europe you can intimidate. When the US tries to get people to stop investing in Iran, European companies pull out, China disregards it. You look at history and understand why — they&#039;ve been around for 4,000 years, they have contempt for the barbarians, they just don&#039;t give a damn... of all the major powers, they&#039;ve been the least aggressive militarily.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], Discussion with [[w:Robert Trivers|Robert Trivers]], September 6, 2006 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Clinton, Kennedy, they all carried out mass murder, but they didn&#039;t think that that was what they were doing - nor does Bush. You know, they were defending justice and democracy from greater evils. And in fact I think you&#039;d find it hard to discover a mass murderer in history who didn&#039;t think that.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://chomsky.info/wp-content/uploads/20040917.pdf interview by  Wallace Shawn] , October 19, 2004  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There&#039;s a good reason why nobody studies history. It just teaches you too much.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],  KGNU benefit, [[w:University of Colorado at Boulder|University of Colorado at Boulder]], April 5, 2003  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There&#039;s one white powder which is by far the most lethal known. It&#039;s called sugar. If you look at the history of [[imperialism]], a lot of it has to do with that. A lot of the imperial conquest, say in the Caribbean, set up a kind of a network... The Caribbean back in the 18th century was a soft drug producer: sugar, rum, tobacco, chocolate. And in order to do it, they had to enslave Africans, and it was done largely to pacify working people in England who were being driven into awful circumstances by the early industrial revolution. That&#039;s why so many wars took place around the Caribbean.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [http://www.kpftx.org/archive.htm Talk at the  University of Houston], Texas, October 18, 2002 &lt;br /&gt;
*Armies usually aren&#039;t interested in wars. They like preparation for war. But they have an understandable reluctance to fight a war. So I think if you look at, at least the history that I know, &#039;&#039;&#039;it&#039;s usually the civilian leadership who is pushing the military to do something. It was the case in the early days of the [[Vietnam War]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], Interview by Hugh Gusterson, November 2000 [https://web.archive.org/web/20051210055017/http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/2002----.pdf].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before there were any suicide bombers, it was also reported by the same sources that &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Saddam Hussein]] was giving $10,000 to the families of anyone who was killed by Israeli atrocities, and there were plenty of them.&#039;&#039;&#039; Well, should he&#039;ve been doing that? So let&#039;s take the first month of the [[w:Second Intifada|current intifada]]. I&#039;m just relying now on IDF sources. What they say is, that in the first few days of the intifada, the Israeli army fired a million bullets. One of the high military officers said &#039;that means one bullet for every child&#039;. Within the first month of the intifada, they killed about 70 people. Using U.S. helicopters, and in fact &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] shipped new helicopters to Israel as soon as they started using them against civilians.&#039;&#039;&#039; That&#039;s just the first month. And it goes on, no suicide bombers. &#039;&#039;&#039;At the time, it was reported that Saddam Hussein was giving $10,000 to every family. Well, is that supporting terror? It seems to me, sending helicopters to Israel when they&#039;re using them to attack apartment complexes, that&#039;s supporting terror.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]],  [https://archive.org/details/NoamChomsky-2002-11-04-WhyIraqincludesShortDebateWithTedSorensen &amp;quot;Why Iraq?&amp;quot;] talk at [[w:Harvard University|Harvard University]], November 4, 2002 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Pointing to the massive amounts of propaganda spewed by government and institutions around the world, observers have called our era the age of Orwell. But the fact is that Orwell was a latecomer on the scene. &#039;&#039;&#039;As early as World War I, American historians offered themselves to President [[Woodrow Wilson]] to carry out a task they called &amp;quot;historical engineering,&amp;quot; by which they meant designing the facts of history so that they would serve state policy.&#039;&#039;&#039; In this instance, the U.S. government wanted to silence opposition to the war. This represents &#039;&#039;&#039;a version of Orwell&#039;s &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four|1984]]&#039;&#039;, even before Orwell was writing.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], in: Wendy McElroy, ‎Carl Watner (1987) &#039;&#039;The Voluntaryist,&#039;&#039; Nr. 23-41 (1987), p. 120; Republished in: &amp;quot;[http://www.zpub.com/un/chomsky.html Propaganda Review, 1987],&amp;quot; at &#039;&#039;zpub.com,&#039;&#039; accessed May 23, 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Every year thousands of people, mostly children and poor farmers, are killed in the [[w:Plain of Jars|Plain of Jars]] in Northern Laos, the scene of the heaviest bombing of civilian targets in history it appears, and arguably the most cruel: Washington&#039;s furious assault on a poor peasant society had little to do with its wars in the region. The worst period was from 1968, when Washington was compelled to undertake negotiations (under popular and business pressure), ending the regular bombardment of North Vietnam. Kissinger-Nixon then decided to shift the planes to bombardment of Laos and Cambodia. The deaths are from &amp;quot;bombies,&amp;quot; tiny anti-personnel weapons, far worse than land-mines: they are designed specifically to kill and maim, and have no effect on trucks, buildings, etc. The Plain was saturated with hundreds of millions of these criminal devices, which have a failure-to-explode rate of 20%-30% according to the manufacturer, [[w:Honeywell|Honeywell]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://chomsky.info/199903__/ The Current Bombings: Behind the Rhetoric]  March 1999  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet to enter approved memory is the &amp;quot;finale&amp;quot; described in the official Air Force history, a 1000-plane raid on civilian targets organized by General [[w:Henry H. Arnold|&amp;quot;Hap&amp;quot; Arnold]] to celebrate the war&#039;s end, five days after Nagasaki. According to survivors, leaflets were dropped among the bombs announcing the surrender.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] Z Magazine, July 1995 [https://web.archive.org/web/20001002121936/http://zena.secureforum.com/Znet/zmag/articles/chommemories.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Want of foresight, unwillingness to act when action would be simple and effective, lack of clear thinking, confusion of counsel until the emergency comes, until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong—these are the features which constitute the endless repetition of history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], speech, House of Commons (May 2, 1935); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; (1974), vol. 6, p. 5592. Quoted by Senator John Tower in an address delivered before the American Defense Preparedness Association (April 14, 1983); &#039;&#039;Congressional Record&#039;&#039; (April 20, 1983), vol. 129, p. S4989 (daily edition).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nescire autem quid ante quam natus sis acciderit, id est semper esse puerum.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Not to know what happened before you were born is to remain forever a child.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;M. Tulli Ciceronis Orator Ad M. Brutum&#039;&#039; (46 B.C.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Isn&#039;t history ultimately the result of our fear of boredom?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emil Cioran]], &#039;&#039;Histoire et utopie&#039;&#039; (&amp;quot;History and Utopia&amp;quot;) (1960)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I turn to the past to learn its story without any preconceived opinion what that story may be. I do not assume that one period or one line of study is more instructive than another, but I am ready to recognise the real identity of man&#039;s aspiration at all times. Some episodes in history are regarded as profoundly modern; others are dismissed contemptuously as concerned with trifles. In some ages there are great heroes, in others the actors are sunk in indolence and sloth. For my own part I do not recognise this great distinction.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mandell Creighton]], &#039;&#039;The teaching of ecclesiastical history&#039;&#039;, Inaugural lecture, [[w:Dixie Professor of Ecclesiastical History|Dixie Chair of Ecclesiastical History]], [[w:University of Cambridge|University of Cambridge]] (23 January 1885).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every decade or so, the world is tested by a crisis so grave that it breaks the mould: one so horrific and inhumane that the response of politicians to it becomes emblematic of their generation —their moral leadership or cowardice, their resolution or incompetence. It is how history judges us. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jo Cox]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/opinion/jo-cox-don-t-leave-syria-to-become-a-graveyard-this-generation-s-responsibility-to-the-world-1-7512876 Don’t leave Syria to become a graveyard — this generation’s responsibility to the world]&#039;&#039; (13 October 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Those who cannot forget the past, are doomed to repeat it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**  [[CrimethInc.]], &#039;&#039;Days of War, Nights of Love&#039;&#039; (2001)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we say, “That’s history,” it’s a pejorative. Well, the rest of the world takes history pretty seriously.&lt;br /&gt;
** Ryan Crocker, [https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/the-frontline-interview-ryan-crocker/&amp;quot;The FRONTLINE Interview: Ryan Crocker&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Frontline&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;PBS&#039;&#039;, (February 20, 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While we read history we make history... Every great crisis of human history is a pass of [[w:Battle of Thermopylae|Thermopylae]], and there is always a [[w:Leonidas I|Leonidas]] and his three hundred to die in it, if they can not conquer.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George William Curtis]], &#039;&#039;The Call of Freedom&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==D==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Inundation of the Nile (4904849744).jpg|thumb|right|History has been too often a picture of the bloody stream. The history of civilization is a record of what happened on the banks. ~ [[Will Durant]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Historians usually focus their attention on the past of countries that still exist, writing hundreds and thousands of books on British history, French history, German history, Russian history, American history, Chinese history, Indian history, Brazilian history or whatever. Whether consciously or not, they are seeking the roots of the present, thereby putting themselves in danger of reading history backwards. As soon as great powers arise, whether the United States in the twentieth century or China in the twenty-first, the call goes out for offerings on American History or Chinese History, and siren voices sing that today’s important countries are also those whose past is most deserving of examination, that a more comprehensive spectrum of historical knowledge can be safely ignored.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Vanished Kingdoms: The History of Half-Forgotten Europe&#039;&#039; (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is easy to argue persuasively the truism that the lessons of history are best derived from what actually happened, rather than from what nearly happened. It should be added, however, that what happened becomes more fully comprehensible in the light of the contending forces that existed at moments of decision. Understanding of the total historical setting is bound to contribute to a clearer view of the actual course of affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:w:de:Harold C. Deutsch|Harold C. Deutsch]], introduction to &#039;&#039;What If? Strategic Alternatives of WWII&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:Assassination|Assassination]] has never changed the history of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Disraeli]], Addressing the House of Commons after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln (1 May 1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only understand the present by continually referring to and studying the past; when any one of the intricate phenomena of our daily life puzzles us; when there arises religious problems, political problems, race problems, we must always remember that while their solution lies in the present, their cause and their explanation lie in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. E. B. DuBois]], “The Beginnings of Slavery,” &#039;&#039;Voice of the Negro&#039;&#039;, vol. 2 (1905), p. 104, as cited in James B. Stewart, “The Field and Function of Black Studies,” in &#039;&#039;The African American Studies Reader&#039;&#039;, edited by Nathaniel Norment, Jr. (Carolina Academic Press: 2007), p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The difference of development, North and South, is explained as a sort of working out of cosmic social and economic law. ... In this sweeping mechanistic interpretation, there is no room for the real plot of the story, for the clear mistake and guilt of building a new slavery of the working class in the midst of a fateful experiment in democracy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. E. B. Du Bois]], &#039;&#039;Black Reconstruction in America, 1860-1880&#039;&#039; (1935), pp. 714-715&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Perhaps the cause of our contemporary pessimism is our tendency to view history as a turbulent stream of conflicts — between individuals in economic life, between groups in politics, between creeds in religion, between states in war.&#039;&#039;&#039; This is the more dramatic side of history; it captures the eye of the historian and the interest of the reader. But if we turn from that Mississippi of strife, hot with hate and dark with blood, to look upon the banks of the stream, we find quieter but more inspiring scenes: women rearing children, men building homes, peasants drawing food from the soil, artisans making the conveniences of life, statesmen sometimes organizing peace instead of war, teachers forming savages into citizens, musicians taming our hearts with harmony and rhythm, scientists patiently accumulating knowledge, philosophers groping for truth, saints suggesting the wisdom of love. &#039;&#039;&#039;History has been too often a picture of the bloody stream. The history of civilization is a record of what happened on the banks.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Will Durant]], as quoted in &amp;quot;The Gentle Philosopher&amp;quot; (2006) by John Little at Will Durant Foundation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* LOVE one another ... my final lesson of history, ... is the same as that of Jesus. . . . just try it. Love is the most practical thing in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Will Durant]], cited in &#039;&#039;Love—The “Surpassing Way”&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; magazine, 4/15, 1980.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Note: A 92-year-old historian summed up his long study of human events by giving that short piece of advice. When asked, at the age of 92, if he could summarize the lessons of history into a single sentence. As quoted in &amp;quot;Durants on History from the Ages, with Love,&amp;quot; by Pam Proctor, &#039;&#039;Parade&#039;&#039; (6 August 1978) p. 12. Durant is quoting The Gospel of John from Gospel of John 13:34, here, and might also be quoting Jiddu Krishnamurti: &amp;quot;Love is the most practical thing in the world. To love, to be kind, not to be greedy, not to be ambitious, not to be influenced by people but to think for yourself — these are all very practical things, and they will bring about a practical, happy society.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[War]] is one of the constants of history ... and has not diminished with [[civilization]] or [[democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Wrote historians Will and Ariel Durant, cited in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; 2004, 4/1, &#039;&#039;[http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2004241?q=durant&amp;amp;p=par Identifying the Wild Beast and Its Mark]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is [[philosophy]] [[teaching]] by [[examples]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Dionysius of Halicarnassus|Dionysius of Halicarnassus]], &#039;&#039;Ars rhetorica (The Art of Rhetoric)&#039;&#039;, XI:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The contact with manners then is education; and this Thucydides appears to assert when he says history is philosophy learned from examples.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dionysius of Halicarnassus, &#039;&#039;Ars Rhetorica&#039;&#039;, XI. 2, p. 212. (Tauchnitz Ed.) See Thucydides, &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039;, I. 22.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Que voulez-vous de plus? Il a inventé l&#039;histoire.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** What more would you have? He has invented history.&lt;br /&gt;
** Madame Du Deffand of Voltaire, who was accused by critics of lack of invention. See Fourier, &#039;&#039;L&#039;Esprit dans Histoire&#039;&#039;, p. 141.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is an endless repetition of the wrong way of living.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lawrence Durrell]], &#039;&#039;The Listener&#039;&#039; (1978)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==E==&lt;br /&gt;
* History teaches us that [[men]] and [[nations]] behave [[wisely]] once they have exhausted all other alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abba Eban]], Speech in London (16 December 1970); as quoted in The Times [London] (17 December 1970) and in Great Jewish Quotations (1996) by Alfred J. Kolatch, p. 115.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Psychology]] has a long [[past]], but only a short history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herman Ebbinghaus]], cited in: [[Edwin Boring]] (1929) &#039;&#039;A History of Experimental Psychology&#039;&#039; p. ix.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History does not long entrust the care of [[freedom]] to the [[weak]] or the timid. We must acquire proficiency in defense and display stamina in [[purpose]]. We must be willing, individually and as a [[Nation]], to accept whatever [[sacrifices]] may be required of us. A people that values its [[privileges]] above its [[principles]] soon loses both.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]], in his First Inaugural address (20 January 1953)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We, as we [[read]], must become [[Greeks]], [[Romans]], [[Turks]], [[priest]] and [[king]], [[martyr]] and [[w:Executioner|executioner]], must fasten these [[images]] to some [[reality]] in our [[secret]] [[experience]], or we shall [[see]] [[nothing]], [[learn]] nothing, keep nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], “History”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When a [[thought]] of [[Plato]] becomes a thought to me, when a truth that fired the soul of [[Gospel of John|St. John]], fires mine, [[time]] is no more.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], “History”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is properly no history, only biography.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, History.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Historians&#039; History of the World - Title Page.jpg|thumb|right|Good history is a good foundation for a better present and future. ~ [[w:John Hope Franklin|John Hope Franklin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Le bon historien n&#039;est d&#039;aucun temps ni d&#039;aucun pays: quoiqu&#039;il aime sa patrie, il ne la flatte jamais en rien.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, however, is not a linear narrative of progress. Rights may be won and taken away; gains are never complete or uncontested, and popular movements generate their own countervailing pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eric Foner]], [http://ericfoner.com/articles/121002nation.html &amp;quot;The Century: A Nation&#039;s-Eye View&amp;quot;] (10 December 2002), &#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t know much about history, and I wouldn&#039;t give a nickel for all the history in the [[world]]. It means [[nothing]] to me. &#039;&#039;&#039;History is more or less bunk.&#039;&#039;&#039; It&#039;s [[tradition]]. We don&#039;t want tradition. We want to live in the [[present]] and the only history that is worth a tinker&#039;s damn is the history we make [[today]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Ford]], interview in &#039;&#039;Chicago Tribune&#039;&#039; (25 May 1916).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic history is not politically correct. Many on the left therefore struggle with its findings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Niall Ferguson]], [https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/on-being-called-a-racist &amp;quot;On being called a racist&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;&#039; (17 December 2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Today]] is [[Yesterday]]&#039;s Pupil.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], &#039;&#039;[[Poor Richard&#039;s Almanack]]&#039;&#039; (1751).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[T]his historian who seeks to mine the various quarries of the past in the belief that &#039;&#039;&#039;good history is a good foundation for a better present and future.&#039;&#039;&#039;”&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John Hope Franklin}}, Preface to &#039;&#039;Race and History: Selected Essays 1938-1988,&#039;&#039; Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, c1989. As quoted by [http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/John_Hope_Franklin.aspx encyclopedia.com (2005): Franklin, John Hope 1915– by Thomson Gale].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==G==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ogrod Saski Historia.jpg|thumb|right|History does not belong to us, we belong to it. ~ [[Hans-Georg Gadamer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* History does not belong to us, we belong to it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hans-Georg Gadamer]], &#039;&#039;Truth and Method&#039;&#039;, p. 276.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “It can’t make things any worse.”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“If there’s one thing that a study of history has taught us, it is that things can always get worse,” said my friend.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Neil Gaiman]], ‘’[[w:A Study in Emerald|A Study in Emerald]]’’ in [[w:Paula Guran|Paula Guran]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;[[w:Cthulhu Mythos anthology|New Cthulhu: The Recent Weird]],&#039;&#039; p. 205 (originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Shadows Over Baker Street|Shadows Over Baker Street]],&#039;&#039; 2003)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are moments in history when brooding tragedy and its dark shadows can be lightened by recalling great moments of the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Indira Gandhi]], Letter to Richard Nixon (December 15, 1971) [http://www.thehindu.com/thehindu/mag/2005/07/03/stories/2005070300090100.htm].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History never looks like history when you are living through it. It always looks confusing and messy, and it always feels uncomfortable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John W. Gardner]], &#039;&#039;No Easy Victories&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The reign of Antoninus is marked by the rare advantage of furnishing very few materials for history, which is indeed little more than the register of the crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Gibbon]], &#039;&#039;[[The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. III (1776), [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/gibbon/decline/files/volume1/chap3.htm Vol. 1, Ch. 3 &amp;quot;Of the Constitution of the Roman Empire, in the Age of the Antonines&amp;quot;] &lt;br /&gt;
** This has often been paraphrased: &#039;&#039;&#039;History is indeed little more than the register of crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is not the past but a map of the past, drawn from a particular point of view, to be useful to the modern traveller.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Henry Glassie|Henry Glassie]], &#039;&#039;Passing the Time in Ballymenone&#039;&#039; (1982)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History teaches, but it has no pupils.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Gramsci]], Letter from Prison (21 June 1919), translated by Hamish Henderson, {{w|Edinburgh University Student Publications}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is at once [[freedom]] and [[necessity]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Gramsci]], &#039;&#039;Selections from the Prison Notebooks&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Revolutionaries]] see history as a creation of their own [[spirit]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Gramsci]], &#039;&#039;Selections from the Prison Notebooks&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And read their history in a [[nation]]&#039;s [[eyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Gray]], &#039;&#039;Elegy in a Country Churchyard&#039;&#039;, Stanza 16.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The great Russian dissident Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said that the first step a tyrant takes toward enslaving a people is to steal their history, for in that case, no one has anything from the past with which to compare the present, and any horror can be normalized. ... It was once said, as a commercial joke, that it’s not nice to fool Mother Nature. The same is true in this case, but not as a joke: It’s not nice to fool with history.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Allen C. Guelzo]], [https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/05/new-york-times-1619-project-narrative-of-despair/ &amp;quot;1619 and the Narrative of Despair&amp;quot;] (11 May 2020), &#039;&#039;National Review&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, if it should serve its purpose of stirring emotion, instigating inquiry and directing thought, must first of all be exciting. Is it impossible to be both truthful and warm-hearted, both factual and moving? Are imagination and conscience necessarily enemies to each other? In reconciling them is the art of the true historian. The flow of the story must be swift, vivid, vibrant.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[D.V. Gundappa]], ‘The Classical Age’, All India Radio, Mysore, 26 July 1954. Reprinted in Triveni Journal, October 1954. quoted from Balakrishna, S. Invaders and infidels: From Sindh to Delhi : the 500- year journey of Islamic invasions. New Delhi : Bloomsbury, 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H==&lt;br /&gt;
* {{anchor|Hegel}} What experience and history teach is this — that nations and governments have never learned anything from history, or acted upon any lessons they might have drawn from it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on the Philosophy of History&#039;&#039; (1832), Introduction, [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel#Volume 1|Volume 1]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A generation which ignores history has no past — and no future.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough For Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The expansion of Europe was the transforming force in human history of the last 500 years, and yet the modern academy looks for reasons not to study it. In the era of decolonisation the new nations want to stress their indigenous roots and sympathetic scholars explain that European influence was not overwhelming, but that it was used and subverted by locals for local purposes. To concentrate on Europe is criticised as &#039;Eurocentric&#039;. But to ignore Europe makes the history of any part of the globe unintelligible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Hirst]], &#039;&#039;Sense and Nonsense in Australian History&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not the neutrals or the lukewarm who make history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Adolf Hitler]], Speech in Berlin (23 April 1933)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the end, [[young]] people are at risk of being [[w:Inheritance|disinherited]] from their [[community]] if that community lacks the [[courage]] and [[confidence]] to teach its history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Howard]] Australia Day Address, (January 25, 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most historical facts are unpleasant.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], &#039;&#039;[[Brave New World]]&#039;&#039;, (1932), [http://www.huxley.net/bnw/one.html ch.2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I==&lt;br /&gt;
* What we know of the past is mostly not worth knowing. What is worth knowing is mostly uncertain. Events in the past may roughly be divided into those which probably never happened and those which do not matter.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dean Inge]], &#039;&#039;Assessments and Anticipations&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Prognostications&amp;quot; (1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History does not relate any true revolution which came from power.  All began with education and meant in essence a moral summons.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alija Izetbegović]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Islamic Declaration|The Islamic Declaration]]&#039;&#039; (1970), p. 53.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==J==&lt;br /&gt;
* Today&#039;s banalities apparently gain in profundity if one states that the wisdom of the past, for all its virtues, belongs to the past. The arrogance of those who come later preens itself with the notion that the past is dead and gone.  … The modern mind can no longer think thought, only can locate it in time and space. The activity of thinking decays to the passivity of classifying.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Russell Jacoby]], &#039;&#039;Social Amnesia&#039;&#039; (1975), p. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It takes a great deal of history to produce a little [[literature]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry James]], &#039;&#039;Life of Nathaniel Hawthorne&#039;&#039;, Ch. I: The Early Years (1879).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I like the [[dreams]] of the [[future]] better than the history of the [[past]], — so [[good]] [[night]]!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Letter to [[John Adams]] (1 August 1816).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;History,&amp;quot; Stephen said, &amp;quot;is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Joyce]], &#039;&#039;[[Ulysses (novel)|Ulysses]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 2: Nestor (1922)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==K==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Robert F. Kennedy 1964.jpeg|thumb|right|There are people in every time and every land who want to stop history in its tracks. They fear the future, mistrust the present, and invoke the security of a comfortable past which, in fact, never existed. ~ [[Robert F. Kennedy]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kierkegaard.jpg|thumb|right|It goes against the grain for me to do what so often happens, to speak inhumanly about the great as if a few millennia were an immense distance. I prefer to speak humanly about it, as if it happened yesterday, and let only the greatness itself be the distance. ~ [[Søren Kierkegaard]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To say that the future will be different from the present is, to scientists, hopelessly self-evident.&#039;&#039;&#039; I observe regretfully that in politics, however, it can be heresy. It can be denounced as radicalism, or branded as subversion. &#039;&#039;&#039;There are people in every time and every land who want to stop history in its tracks. They fear the future, mistrust the present, and invoke the security of a comfortable past which, in fact, never existed.&#039;&#039;&#039; It hardly seems necessary to point out in California - of all States -- that change, although it involves risks, is the law of life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert F. Kennedy]], [http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/2011/01/20/06-08-1964.pdf &#039;&#039;The Opening to the Future&#039;&#039; Adress at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, California] (June 8, 1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It goes against the grain for me to do what so often happens, to speak inhumanly about the great as if a few millennia were an immense distance. I prefer to speak humanly about it, as if it happened yesterday, and let only the greatness itself be the distance.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Søren Kierkegaard]], &#039;&#039;Fear and Trembling&#039;&#039; (1843), S. Walsh, trans. (2006), p. 28.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The study of history offers no manual of instructions that can be applied automatically; history teaches by analogy, shedding light on the likely consequences of comparable situations.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Kissinger]], &#039;&#039;Diplomacy&#039;&#039; (1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every civilization that has ever existed has ultimately collapsed ... History is a tale of efforts that failed, of aspirations that weren’t realized . . . So, as a historian, one has to live with a sense of the inevitability of tragedy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Kissinger]], Cited in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; 2004, 4/1, &#039;&#039;[http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2004241?q=durant&amp;amp;p=par Identifying the Wild Beast and Its Mark]&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Purpose]] has no place in [[biology]], but history has no meaning without it. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Kubler]], &#039;&#039;{{w|The Shape of Time}},&#039;&#039; 1982, p. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;...[[Jesus]] told us this a long time ago, and I can still hear that voice crying through the vista of time, saying, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, pray for them that despitefully use you.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot; And there is still a voice saying to every potential Peter, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Put up your sword&#039;&#039;.&amp;quot; History is replete with the bleached bones of nations, history is cluttered with the wreckage of communities that failed to follow this command.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther King Jr.]]. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; From the [http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/documentsentry/doc_speech_at_the_great_march_on_detroit/ Speech delivered at the Great March on Detroit], 23 June 1963. King was alluding to the words of Christ in the [[w:Sermon on the Mount|Sermon on the Mount]] (Matthew 5:44) and during His arrest (on Matthew 26:52)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The history books, which had almost completely ignored the contribution of the Negro in American history, only served to intensify the Negroes&#039; sense of worthlessness and to augment the anachronistic doctrine of white supremacy. All too many Negroes and whites are unaware of the fact that the first American to shed blood in the revolution which freed this country from British oppression was a black seaman named Crispus Attucks. Negroes and whites are almost totally oblivious of the fact that it was a Negro physician, Dr. Daniel Hale Williams, who performed the first successful operation on the heart in America. Another Negro physician, Dr. Charles Drew, was largely responsible for developing the method of separating blood plasma and storing it on a large scale, a process that saved thousands of lives in World War II and has made possible many of the important advances in postwar medicine. History books have virtually overlooked the many Negro scientists and inventors who have enriched American life. Although a few refer to George Washington Carver, whose research in agricultural products helped to revive the economy of the South when the throne of King Cotton began to totter, they ignore the contribution of Norbert Rillieuz, whose invention of an evaporating pan revolutionized the process of sugar refining. How many people know that multimillion-dollar United Shoe Machinery Company developed from the shoe-lasting machine invented in the last century by a Negro from Dutch Guiana, Jan Matzelinger; or that Granville T. Woods, an expert in electric motors, whose many patents speeded the growth and improvement of the railroads at the beginning of this century, was a Negro?&amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;Even the Negroes&#039; contribution to the music of America is sometimes overlooked in astonishing ways. In 1965 my oldest son and daughter entered an integrated school in Atlanta. A few months later my wife and I were invited to attend a program entitled &amp;quot;Music that has made America great.&amp;quot; As the evening unfolded, we listened to the folk songs and melodies of the various immigrant groups. We were certain that the program would end with the most original of all American music, the Negro spiritual. But we were mistaken. Instead, all the students, including our children, ended the program by singing &amp;quot;Dixie&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther King Jr.]], as quoted in Carson, Clayborne. 2001. &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr.&#039;&#039;, Grand Central Publishing. Cap: Black Power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Time in its irresistible and ceaseless flow carries along on its flood all created things, and drowns them in the depths of obscurity, no matter if they be quite unworthy of mention, or most noteworthy and important, and thus, as the tragedian says, &amp;quot;he brings from the darkness all things to the birth, and all things born envelops in the night.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;&#039;But&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;the tale of history forms a very strong bulwark against the stream of time, and to some extent checks its irresistible flow, and, of all things done in it, as many as history has taken over, it secures and binds together, and does not allow them to slip away into the abyss of oblivion.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Anna Komnene|Anna Komnene]], &#039;&#039;[[wikisource:The_Alexiad/Preface|The Alexiad]]&#039;&#039; (c. 1148)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==L==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Historybooks.JPG|thumb|I started to think why [[people]] feel [[comfortable]] [[disrespecting]] [[w:Latino people|us]] in a way that’s just not [[normal]] or [[natural]]. And I started to think that it&#039;s because our contributions aren&#039;t in history [[textbooks]]. ~ [[John Leguizamo]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Frozen_river_in_Alaska.jpg|thumb|What is the use trying to describe the flowing of a [[river]] at any one [[moment]], and then at the next moment, and then at the next, and the next, and the next? You wear out. You say: There is a great river, and it flows through this [[land]], and we have named it History. ~ [[Ursula K. Le Guin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ban_Zhao.jpg|thumb|[[w:Time travel|Time travel]] [[w:Drama|dramas]] are becoming a hot theme for [[television]] and [[films]]. But the content and exaggerated performance style are questionable. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Many [[stories]] are totally made up and are made to strain for an effect of novelty. [[w:Producer|Producers]] and [[writers]] are treating [[serious]] history in a frivolous way, which should by no means be encouraged anymore. ~  Li Jingsheng]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Historians as a rule follow the main lines of history—the wars, the politics, the rise and fall of empires—yet the true history is that of the people themselves: where they lived, their ways of making a living, their inventions, discoveries, problem-solving, business dealings, and their relations with each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Louis L&#039;Amour]], {{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CzMGUCMtFMoC&amp;amp;q=historians#v=snippet&amp;amp;q=historian&amp;amp;f=false|isbn = 9780307490384|title = The Sackett Companion: The Facts Behind the Fiction|date = 19 February 2009|publisher = Random House Publishing}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We hope, plan, execute; will it be vain?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Or will the future be the past again?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]], &#039;&#039;Romance and Reality&#039;&#039; (1831), Vol I., Chapter 15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History hath but few pages—soon is told&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Man’s ordinary life,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Labour, and care, and strife,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Make up the constant chronicle of old.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Letitia Elizabeth Landon]], &#039;&#039;Fisher&#039;s Drawing Room Scrap Book, 1835&#039;&#039; (1834), &#039;Hindoo and Mahommedan Buildings&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is nothing whatever but a record of what living persons have done in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rose Wilder Lane]], &#039;&#039;Give Me Liberty&#039;&#039; (1936).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There was a little bit of improvement in my [[son]]’s [[education]], but [[w:Latin American|Latin American]] and [[African American|black]] contributions—and I don’t mean to lump us together—were nonexistent in my [[w:Public school|public school]]. Even when I went to [[college]], there was [[nothing]]. When I was [[studying]] the [[American Civil War|Civil War]], there was nothing about everything we did, not one mention of any participation or contribution, ever. And it would’ve [[changed]] my [[life]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Leguizamo]], [https://www.vogue.com/article/john-leguizamo-latin-history-morons &amp;quot;John Leguizamo Is Here to Explain Latino History for You&amp;quot;], Patricia Garcia, &#039;&#039;Vogue&#039;&#039;, (April 6, 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I started to think why [[people]] feel [[comfortable]] [[disrespecting]] [[w:Latino people|us]] in a way that’s just not [[normal]] or [[natural]]. And I started to think that it&#039;s because our contributions aren&#039;t in history [[textbooks]].&lt;br /&gt;
** John Leguizamo in [https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/nbc-latino-john-leguizamo-n795796 &amp;quot;#NBCLatino20: Broadway&#039;s Professor, John Leguizamo&amp;quot;], by Raul A. Reyes, Marshall Crook and Geraldine Cols Azócar, &#039;&#039;NBC News&#039;&#039;, (Sept. 14, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the use trying to describe the flowing of a [[river]] at any one [[moment]], and then at the next moment, and then at the next, and the next, and the next? You wear out. You say: There is a great river, and it flows through this [[land]], and we have named it History.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ursula K. Le Guin]], &amp;quot;A Man of the People&amp;quot;, in &#039;&#039;Four Ways to Forgiveness&#039;&#039; (1995), p. 108.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is the art of making an argument about the past by telling a story accountable to evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Jill Lepore|Jill Lepore]], &amp;quot;Story of America: essays on origins&amp;quot;, (2014), p. 15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:Time travel|Time travel]] [[w:Drama|dramas]] are becoming a hot theme for [[television]] and [[films]]. But the content and exaggerated performance style are questionable. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Many [[stories]] are totally made up and are made to strain for an effect of novelty. [[w:Producer|Producers]] and [[writers]] are treating [[serious]] history in a frivolous way, which should by no means be encouraged anymore. &lt;br /&gt;
** Li Jingsheng, [[w:State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television|SARFT]] conference, (April 1, 2011); as qtd. in [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/14/china-time-travel-dramas &amp;quot;China censors want to consign time travel dramas to past&amp;quot;], by Tania Branigan, &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, (4/14/2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What has once happened, will invariably happen again, when the same circumstances which combined to produce it, shall again combine in the same way.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], speech on the sub-Treasury, in the hall of the House of Representatives, Springfield, Illinois (December 26, 1839); in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1953), vol. 1, p. 165.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe if we tell the [[truth]] about the past, we can tell the truth about the present.&lt;br /&gt;
** Ken Loach, at [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/29/movies/29cann.html Cannes Festival Awards 2006]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacob_de_Wit_-_Allegorie_op_het_schrijven_van_de_geschiedenis_1754.jpg|thumb|Lives of great men all remind us&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We can make our lives sublime,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And departing, leave behind us&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Footprints on the sands of [[time]]; ~ [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lives of great men all remind us&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;We can make our lives sublime,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And departing, leave behind us&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Footprints on the sands of time;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;[[wikisource:A Psalm of Life|A Psalm of Life]]&#039;&#039; (1839), St. 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History casts its [[shadow]] far into the [[land]] of [[song]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;Outre-Mer&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Ancient Spanish Ballads&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They who live in history only seemed to walk the [[earth]] again.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;The Belfry of Bruges&#039;&#039;, Stanza 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M==&lt;br /&gt;
* I shall cheerfully bear the reproach of having descended below the dignity of history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay]], &#039;&#039;History of England&#039;&#039;, Volume I, Chapter I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What then is, generally speaking, the truth of history ? A fable agreed upon.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Napoleon]], &#039;&#039;Mémorial de Sainte Hélène&#039;&#039;, v. 4, [http://books.google.com/books?id=945jAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;vq=%22fable%20agreed%20upon%22&amp;amp;pg=PA251 p. 251]. However, the phrase predates Napoleon. [[w:Claude Adrien Helvétius|Helvétius]] attributes it to [[w:Bernard le Bovier de Fontenelle|Bernard le Bovier de Fontenelle]], &#039;&#039;De l&#039;esprit&#039;&#039; (1758), [http://books.google.com/books?id=N7g8AAAAcAAJ&amp;amp;vq=%22fable%20convenue%22&amp;amp;pg=RA1-PA443 p. 443],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is experimental politics.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph de Maistre]], &#039;&#039;Against Rousseau&#039;&#039; (1795), p. 21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;{{anchor|Marx}} [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]] remarks somewhere that all facts and personages of great importance in world history occur, as it were, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Marx]], &amp;quot;The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon&amp;quot; (1852), part 1, in &#039;&#039;On Revolution&#039;&#039; (vol. 1 of The Karl Marx Library), ed. and trans. Saul K. Padover, p. 245 (1971).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;See [[#Hegel|Hegel quote]], above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[History]] admits no [[rules]], only outcomes.&#039;&#039;&#039; What precipitates outcomes?  Vicious acts &amp;amp; virtuous acts.  What precipitates acts?  [[Belief]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Mitchell (author)|David Mitchell]], in  &#039;&#039;[[w:Cloud Atlas (novel)|Cloud Atlas]]&#039;&#039; (2004), &amp;quot;The Pacific Journal of Adam Ewing&amp;quot;, p. 528.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Napoleon had nuclear subs, we&#039;d all be speaking French. So, the history thing can be oversold.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mike Murphy (political consultant)|Mike Murphy]], [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/video/mike-murphy-ii/ interview with Bill Kristol] (7 February 2018), [http://conversationswithbillkristol.org/transcript/mike-murphy-ii-transcript/ transcript]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [O]ne&#039;s political ideology is inextricable from one&#039;s view of [[history]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Brian Reynolds Myers]], [http://sthelepress.com/index.php/2018/08/27/heaven-is-helping-us-more-from-the-nationalist-left-b-r-myers/ &amp;quot;&#039;Heaven is Helping Us&#039;: More from the Nationalist Left&amp;quot;] (27 August 2018), &#039;&#039;Sthele Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==O==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smithsonian-nmaahc-outside-20160720.jpg|thumb|right|History helps us recognize the [[mistakes]] that we’ve made and the [[dark]] corners of the [[human]] [[spirit]] that we need to guard against. ~ [[Barack Obama]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Close_up_of_Hand_Cut_Jigsaw_Puzzle.JPG|thumb|[I]f kids are taught an incomplete history, they&#039;ll either never get the full story, or when they do, they don&#039;t have the framework to understand how the pieces fit together. ~ [[John Oliver]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The great historian John Hope Franklin, who helped to get this museum started, once said, “Good history is a good foundation for a better present and future.” He understood &#039;&#039;&#039;the best history doesn’t just sit behind a glass case; it helps us to understand what’s outside the case. The best history helps us recognize the mistakes that we’ve made and the dark corners of the human spirit that we need to guard against. And, yes, a clear-eyed view of history can make us uncomfortable, and shake us out of familiar narratives. But it is precisely because of that discomfort that we learn and grow and harness our collective power to make this nation more perfect.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Barack Obama]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/24/remarks-president-dedication-national-museum-african-american-history &#039;&#039;Remarks by the President at the Dedication of the National Museum of African American History and Culture at the National Mall in Washington, D.C.&#039;&#039;] (24 September 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kids can understand that things can be racist and also other things. The Constitution can be revolutionary, and also racist. Movies can be romantic and also racist. Children&#039;s books can be charming, and also racist. Broadcasters can be incredibly successful and also racist. And if kids are taught an incomplete history, they&#039;ll either never get the full story, or when they do, they don&#039;t have the framework to understand how the pieces fit together. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Oliver]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsxukOPEdgg “U.S. History”], &#039;&#039;Last Week Tonight with John Oliver&#039;&#039;, (Aug 3, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History, when taught well, shows us how to improve the world. But history when taught poorly falsely claims there is nothing to improve…&lt;br /&gt;
** John Oliver, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsxukOPEdgg “U.S. History”], &#039;&#039;Last Week Tonight with John Oliver&#039;&#039;, (Aug 3, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silver Pitcher presented to White House (Portrait).jpg|thumb|right|If we don&#039;t care about our past we can&#039;t have very much hope for our future. ~ [[Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If we don’t care about our past we can’t have very much hope for our future.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis]], [https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/preservation-battle-grand-central-180969446/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man is no thing, but a drama... Man, in a word, has no nature; what he has is... history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[José Ortega y Gasset]], &#039;&#039;History as a System&#039;&#039; (1935)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]&#039;&#039; (1949), Chapter III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible... If the Party could thrust its hand into the past and say of this or that event, it never happened — that, surely, was more terrifying than mere torture and death? And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -if all records told the same tale — then the lie passed into history and became truth. Who controls the past,&#039; ran the Party slogan, &#039;controls the future: who controls the present controls the past. And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. &#039;Reality control&#039;, they called it: in Newspeak, &#039;doublethink&#039;... &lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]&#039;&#039; (1949), Chapter III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had been actually destroyed. For how could you establish even the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside your own memory?... To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself... That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word ‘doublethink’ involved the use of doublethink.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]&#039;&#039; (1949), Chapter III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We&#039;ve always been at war with Eastasia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]&#039;&#039; (1949), Chapter IX.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==P==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Gower world Vox Clamantis.jpg|thumb|right|History always has a few tricks up its frayed sleeve. It&#039;s been around a long time. ~ [[Terry Pratchett]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Typical-orb-web-photo.jpg|thumb|Such is the unity of all history that anyone who endeavours to tell a piece of it must feel that his first sentence tears a seamless web. ~ [[w:Sir Frederick Pollock, 3rd Baronet|Frederick Pollock]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History is a graveyard of [[Aristocracy|aristocracies]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Vilfredo Pareto]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is impossible to write ancient history because we do not have enough sources, and impossible to write modern history because we have far too many.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Péguy]], &#039;&#039;Clio&#039;&#039; (1931) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Just as geographers, O Sossius Senecio, crowd on to the outer edges of their maps the parts of the earth which elude their knowledge, with explanatory notes that &amp;quot;What lies beyond is sandy desert without water and full of wild beasts,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;blind marsh,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Scythian cold,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;frozen sea,&amp;quot; so in the writing of my Parallel Lives, now that I have traversed those periods of time which are accessible to probable reasoning and which afford basis for a history dealing with facts, &#039;&#039;&#039;I might well say of the earlier periods: &amp;quot;What lies beyond is full of marvels and unreality, a land of poets and fabulists, of doubt and obscurity.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plutarch]], &#039;&#039;The Life of Theseus&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The past is just one long, smelly error until we get to the car, computer and iPod.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Laura Penny]], &#039;&#039;More Money Than Brains&#039;&#039;, p. 23.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This moment&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I am keener on the stories of valour&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;washed away by this year&#039;s monsoon floods&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;than the abstract shapes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;glued to myths, history and stories. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Suman Pokhrel]], &#039;&#039;Before Buddha’s Statue in the Rain&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Such is the unity of all history that anyone who endeavours to tell a piece of it must feel that his first sentence tears a seamless web.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Sir Frederick Pollock, 3rd Baronet|Frederick Pollock]], &#039;&#039;[https://archive.org/details/historyofenglish01poll/page/n48/mode/1up The history of English law before the time of Edward I]&#039;&#039;, p. 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Had previous chroniclers neglected to speak in praise of History in general, it might perhaps have been necessary for me to recommend everyone to choose for study and welcome such treatises as the present, since men have no more ready corrective of conduct than knowledge of the past.&#039;&#039;&#039; But all historians, one may say without exception, and in no half-hearted manner, but making this the beginning and end of their labour, have impressed on us that the soundest education and training for a life of active politics is the study of History, and that surest and indeed the only method of learning how to bear bravely the vicissitudes of fortune, is to recall the calamities of others. Evidently therefore no one, and least of all myself, would think it his duty at this day to repeat what has been so well and so often said. For the very element of unexpectedness in the events I have chosen as my theme will be sufficient to challenge and incite everyone, young and old alike, to peruse my systematic history. For who is so worthless or indolent as not to wish to know by what means and under what system of polity the Romans in less than fifty-three years have succeeded in subjecting nearly the whole inhabited world to their sole government — a thing unique in history? Or who again is there so passionately devoted to other spectacles or studies as to regard anything as of greater moment than the acquisition of this knowledge?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Polybius]] [[w:The Histories (Polybius)|&#039;&#039;The Histories&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no history of mankind, there is only an indefinite number of histories of all kinds of aspects of human life. And one of these is the history of political power. This is elevated into the history of the world. But this, I hold, is an offence against every decent conception of mankind.&#039;&#039;&#039; It is hardly better than to treat the history of embezzlement or of robbery or of poisoning as the history of mankind. For &#039;&#039;the history of power politics is nothing but the history of international crime and mass murder&#039;&#039; (including it is true, some of the attempts to suppress them). This history is taught in schools, and some of the greatest criminals are extolled as heroes.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no history of mankind, there are only many histories of all kinds of aspects of human life. And one of these is the history of political power. This is elevated into the history of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Karl Popper]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Open Society and Its Enemies|The Open Society and Its Enemies]]&#039;&#039;, Vol 2, Ch. 25 &amp;quot;Has History any Meaning?&amp;quot; (1945)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History always has a few tricks up its frayed sleeve. It&#039;s been around a long time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Mort|Mort]]&#039;&#039; (1987).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History, the proverb says, is made at night. The European civil servant normally sleeps at night. What waits in his IN basket to confront him at nine in the morning is history.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Pynchon]], &#039;&#039;[[w:V.|V.]]&#039;&#039; (1963).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==R==&lt;br /&gt;
* [History] hath triumphed over Time, which besides it, nothing but Eternity hath triumphed over.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Walter Raleigh]], &#039;&#039;The History of the World&#039;&#039;, Preface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a word, we may gather out of history a policy no less wise than eternal; by the comparison and application of other men&#039;s forepassed miseries with our own like errors and ill deservings.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Walter Raleigh]], &#039;&#039;History of the World&#039;&#039;, Preface, Par, IX.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Classical history is concerned with political life, as lived in the Greek city states and the Roman republic and empire.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book|author=Isabel Rivers|title=Classical and Christian Ideas in English Renaissance Poetry|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QhGIAgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA55|date=2 September 2003|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-134-84417-3|page=55}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is the story of mankind, of what it has done, suffered or enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Roberts (historian)|J. M. Roberts]], &#039;&#039;The Penguin History of the World&#039;&#039; (1976)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The history of all peoples is full of bloody and revolting pages. So much blood has been spilled for every new construction, every new teaching or religion! That is why humanity urgently must learn the two great concepts — [[Tolerance]] and [[Cooperation]]. On these two foundations the [[New Epoch]] will be built.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]], &#039;&#039;Letters I&#039;&#039;, 6 June 1935 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Franklin Roosevelt]], [https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/annual-message-congress-3 Annual Message to Congress], 4 January 1935&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know that all things pass away but history. History never dies. It is what defines us as a civilization, and we live out our collective histories every day, in ways both good and evil... History dies hard.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Paul Rusesabagina|Paul Rusesabagina]], &#039;&#039;An Ordinary Man&#039;&#039; (2006), Chapters 10–11&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is true that numerous instances are not always necessary to establish a law, provided the essential and [[relevant]] circumstances can easily be disentangled. But, in history, so many circumstances of a small and accidental nature are relevant, that no broad and simple uniformities are possible. Where our main endeavour is to discover general laws, we regard these as intrinsically more valuable than any of the facts which they inter-connect. In astronomy, the law of gravitation is plainly better worth knowing than the position of a particular planet on a particular night, or even on every night throughout a year. There are in the law a splendour and simplicity and sense of mastery which illuminate a mass of otherwise uninteresting details... But in history the matter is far otherwise... &#039;&#039;&#039;Historical facts, many of them, have an intrinsic value, a profound interest on their own account, which makes them worthy of study, quite apart from any possibility of linking them together by means of causal laws.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;On History&#039;&#039; (1904).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The past alone is truly real: the present is but a painful, struggling birth into the immutable being of what is no longer. Only the dead exist fully. The lives of the living are fragmentary, doubtful, and subject to change; but the lives of the dead are complete, free from the sway of Time, the all but omnipotent lord of the world. Their failures and successes, their hopes and fears, their joys and pains, have become eternal—our efforts cannot now abate one jot of them. Sorrows long buried in the grave, tragedies of which only a fading memory remains, loves immortalized by Death&#039;s hallowing touch these have a power, a magic, an untroubled calm, to which no present can attain. ...On the banks of the river of Time, the sad procession of human generations is marching slowly to the grave; in the quiet country of the Past, the march is ended, the tired wanderers rest, and the weeping is hushed.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;On History&#039;&#039; (1904).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A land without ruins is a land without memories—a land without memories is a land without history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Abram Joseph Ryan|Abram Joseph Ryan]], &amp;quot;A Land Without Ruins&amp;quot;, Preface quoting an unnamed source. Edd Winfield Parks, &#039;&#039;Southern Poets&#039;&#039; (1936), p. 165.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==S==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:&amp;quot;The School of Athens&amp;quot; by Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino.jpg|thumb|History teaches us that a given view has been abandoned in favor of another by all men, or by all competent men, or perhaps by only the most vocal men; it does not teach us whether the change was sound or whether the rejected view deserved to be rejected. Only an impartial analysis of the view in question, an analysis that is not dazzled by the victory or stunned by the defeat of the adherents of the view concerned—could teach us anything regarding the worth of the view and hence regarding the meaning of the historical change. ~ [[Leo Strauss]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Classics Hall.jpg|thumb|Our understanding of the thought of the past is liable to be the more adequate, the less the historian is convinced of the superiority of his own point of view, or the more he is prepared to admit the possibility that he may have to learn something, not merely about the thinkers of the past, but from them.  ~ [[Leo Strauss]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. &#039;&#039;&#039;Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Santayana]], &#039;&#039;The Life of Reason&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1: &#039;&#039;Reason in Common Sense&#039;&#039; (1905).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Die Weltgeschichte ist das Weltgericht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The world&#039;s history is the world&#039;s judgment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Resignation&#039;&#039;, 17.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Es giebt keine Selbstkenntniss als die historische. Niemand weiss was er ist, wer nicht weiss was seine Genossen sind.&lt;br /&gt;
** There is no self-knowledge except historical self-knowledge. No one knows what he is if he doesn’t know what his contemporaries are.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], “Ideas,” &#039;&#039;Lucinde and the Fragments&#039;&#039;, p. Firchow, trans. (1991), § 139.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History shows that there are no invincible armies and that there never have been.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]], Radio Address &amp;quot;Comrades! Citizens! Brothers and sisters! Men of our army and navy!&amp;quot; (3 July 1941).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Serious affairs and history are carefully laid snares for the uninformed.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]] in &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun,&#039;&#039; Game III, Sequence: “A Game” (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Creators of history always play with our impotence and our ignorance.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]] in &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun,&#039;&#039; Game III, Sequence: “A Game” (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;He did not waste time in a vain search for a place in history.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**  [[Dejan Stojanovic]] in &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun,&#039;&#039; “Socrates,” Sequence: “A Stone and a Word” (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;History will be erased in the universal purgatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]] in “Don Quixote”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Narrative is taken to mean the organization of material in a chronologically sequential order and the focussing of the content into a single coherent story, albeit with sub-plots. The two essential ways in which narrative history differs from structural history is that its arrangement is descriptive rather than analytical and that its central focus is on man not circumstances. It therefore deals with the peculiar and the specific, rather than the collective and statistical. Narrative is a mode of historical writing, but it is a mode which also affects and is affected by content and method.&lt;br /&gt;
** Lawrence Stone, ‘The Revival of Narrative: Reflections on a new old history’ in The Past and Present Revisited,London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987 p. 74.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History teaches us that a given view has been abandoned in favor of another by all men, or by all competent men, or perhaps by only the most vocal men; it does not teach us whether the change was sound or whether the rejected view deserved to be rejected. Only an impartial analysis of the view in question, an analysis that is not dazzled by the victory or stunned by the defeat of the adherents of the view concerned—could teach us anything regarding the worth of the view and hence regarding the meaning of the historical change.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Strauss]], &#039;&#039;Natural Right and History&#039;&#039; (1953), p. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our understanding of the thought of the past is liable to be the more adequate, the less the historian is convinced of the superiority of his own point of view, or the more he is prepared to admit the possibility that he may have to learn something, not merely about the thinkers of the past, but from them.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Strauss]], &#039;&#039;What is Political Philosophy?&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 68&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “Our ideas” are only partly our ideas. Most of our ideas are abbreviations or residues of the thought of other people, of our teachers (in the broadest sense of the term) and of our teachers’ teachers; they are abbreviations and residues of the thought of the past. These thoughts were once explicit and in the center of consideration and discussion. It may even be presumed that they were once perfectly lucid. By being transmitted to later generations they have possibly been transformed, and there is no certainty that the transformation was effected consciously and with full clarity. … This means that the clarification of our political ideas insensibly changes into and becomes indistinguishable from the history of political ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Strauss]], &#039;&#039;What is Political Philosophy?&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 73&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==T==&lt;br /&gt;
* History is a big word..........History is not the sort of animal you can domesticate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Antonio Tabucchi|Antonio Tabucchi]], &#039;&#039;Pereira Maintains&#039;&#039; (2010), p. 89.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Præcipium munus annalium reor, ne virtutes sileantur, utque pravis dictis, factisque ex posteritate et infamia metus sit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The principal office of history I take to be this: to prevent virtuous actions from being forgotten, and that evil words and deeds should fear an infamous reputation with posterity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tacitus]], &#039;&#039;Annales&#039;&#039; (AD 117), III. 65.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For me, history is of use... by being able to steal the ideas of others and leverage them, correct the mental defect that seems to block my ability to learn from others.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nassim Nicholas Taleb]], &#039;&#039;Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets&#039;&#039; (2001) Three:  A Mathematical Meditation on History — Fun in My Attic — &#039;&#039;Denigration of History&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is written by the victors, but it&#039;s victims who write the memoirs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Carol Tavris|Carol Tavris]] and Elliot Aronson, in &#039;&#039;Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me) : Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts&#039;&#039; (2008), p. 197.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History gets thicker as it approaches recent times: more people, more events, and more books written about them. More evidence is preserved, often, one is tempted to say, too much. Decay and destruction have hardly begun their beneficent work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[A. J. P. Taylor]], &#039;&#039;English History 1914 – 1945 ([1965] 1975)&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Revised Bibliography&amp;quot;, p. 729&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is hard to know, because of all the hired bullshit, but even without being sure of &amp;quot;history&amp;quot; it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time — and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hunter S. Thompson]], [[w:Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas|Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas]], Chapter 8, Genius..., p. 67.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Compared with the life-span of a human being the time-span of a civilization is so vast that a human observer cannot hope to take the measure of its curve unless he is in a position to view it in a distant perspective; and he can only obtain this perspective vis-a-vis some society that is extinct. He can never stand back sufficiently far from the history of the society in which he himself lives and moves and has his being. In other words, to assert of any living society, at any moment in its life, that it is the consummation of human history is to hazard a guess which is intrinsically unsusceptible of immediate verification. When we find that a majority of the members of all societies at all times make this assertion about their own civilizations, it becomes evident that their guesses have really nothing to do with any objective calculation of probabilities but are pure expressions of the egocentric illusion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arnold J. Toynbee]], &#039;&#039;A Study of History&#039;&#039; (1934–1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The very ink with which all history is written is merely fluid prejudice.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mark Twain]], &#039;&#039;Following the Equator&#039;&#039;, Part 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To ingenious attempts at explaining by the light of reason things which want the light of history to show their meaning, much of the learned nonsense of the world has indeed been due.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Edward Burnett Tylor|Edward Burnett Tylor]], &#039;&#039;Primitive Culture&#039;&#039; (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==V==&lt;br /&gt;
* The absence from the Dead Sea Scrolls of historical texts proper should not surprise us.  Neither in the inter-Testamental period, nor in earlier biblical times, was the recording of history as we understand it a strong point among the Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geza Vermes]] &#039;&#039;The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English&#039;&#039;Chapter 3: The History of the Community, p. 49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Everybody likes a bit of gossip to some point, as long as it&#039;s gossip with some point to it. That&#039;s why I like history.&#039;&#039;&#039; History is nothing but gossip about the past, with the hope that it might be true.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gore Vidal]], interview in: Butt, Nr. 20, Special Summer 2007, p. 63.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All our ancient history, as one of our wits remarked, is no more than accepted fiction.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Jeannot et Colin&#039;&#039; (1764)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L&#039;histoire n&#039;est que le tableau des crimes et des malheurs.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Indeed, history is nothing more than a tableau of crimes and misfortunes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;[[w:L&#039;Ingénu|L&#039;Ingénu]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 10 (1767)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==W==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vasnetsov Nesmeyana.jpg|thumb|right|The history of the world has been one not of [[conquest]], as supposed; it has been one of [[wikt:ennui|ennui]]. ~ [[w:Helen Westley|Helen Westley]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Oh do not read history, for that I know must be false.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Walpole]], I, &#039;&#039;Walpoliana&#039;&#039;, No. CXLI. Also in Advertisement to Letters to Horace Mann.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are apt to suppose that the facts in any branch of meaning must be in some way open to direct inspection, and that the statements of experts in each branch can be tested by their conformity with them ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The most striking thing about history is that the facts it purports to describe are past facts; and past facts are no longer accessible to direct inspection. We cannot, in a word, test the accuracy of historical statements by simply seeing whether they correspond to a reality which is independently known. How then can we test them? … &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;... we do so by referring to historical evidence. Although the past is not accessible to direct inspection it has left ample traces of itself in the present, in the shape of documents, buildings, coins, institutions, procedures and so forth.&lt;br /&gt;
** W. H. Walsh, &#039;&#039;An Introduction to the Philosophy of History&#039;&#039; (1958) pp. 19–20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Human history becomes more and more a race between [[education]] and [[catastrophe]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. G. Wells]], &#039;&#039;The Outline of History&#039;&#039; (1921), vol. 2, chapter 41, p. 594.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The history of the world has been one not of conquest, as supposed; it has been one of [[wikt:ennui|ennui]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Helen Westley|Helen Westley]], as quoted in &amp;quot;The Confessions of Helen Westley&amp;quot; by [[Djuna Barnes]] in &#039;&#039;New York Morning Telegraph Sunday Magazine&#039;&#039; (23 September 1917).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Anybody can make history. Only a great man can write it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Oscar Wilde]] &amp;quot;The True Function and Value of Criticism.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Nineteenth Century&#039;&#039; XXVII (July-December 1890): 137.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History has a way of reducing individuals to flat, two-dimensional portraits. it is the enemy of subjectivity, which is why Stephen Dedalus called it &amp;quot;a nightmare from which I am trying to awake&amp;quot;. If we think of [[Søren Kierkegaard|Kierkegaard]], of [[Friedrich Nietzsche|Nietzsche]], of [[Friedrich Hölderlin|Hölderlin]], we see them standing alone, outside of history. They are spotlighted by their intensity, and the background is all darkness. They intersect history, but are not a part of it. There is something anti-history about such men; they are not subject to time, accident and death, but their intensity is a protest against it. I have elsewhere called such men &amp;quot;Outsiders&amp;quot; because they attempt to stand outside history. which defines humanity on terms of limitation, not of possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Colin Wilson]] in &#039;&#039;Rasputin and the Fall of the Romanovs&#039;&#039;, p. 13-14 (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Memory plays tricks that history corrects.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Charles Wilson]], &#039;&#039;Utriusque Cosmi&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]]&#039;&#039; (mass market paperback edition, {{ISBN|978-0-06-156236-5}}), p. 28&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Those old credulities, to nature dear,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shall they no longer bloom upon the stock&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of History.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Wordsworth]], &#039;&#039;Memorials of a Tour in Italy&#039;&#039;, IV. At Rome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Y==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is always a part of the misfortunes of the vanquished that their portraits are painted and their history written by the victors.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A. Yankee, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spectator &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;s&#039;&#039;] Special Correspondent in New York. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ans_AQAAIAAJ&amp;amp;dq=%22It%20is%20always%20a%20part%20of%20the%20misfortunes%20of%20the%20vanquished%20that%20their%20portraits%20are%20painted%20and%20their%20history%20written%20by%20the%20victors.%22&amp;amp;pg=PA552#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22It%20is%20always%20a%20part%20of%20the%20misfortunes%20of%20the%20vanquished%20that%20their%20portraits%20are%20painted%20and%20their%20history%20written%20by%20the%20victors.%22&amp;amp;f=false May 6, 1865].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The greater part of what passes for diplomatic history is little more than the record of what one clerk said to another clerk.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. M. Young]], &#039;&#039;Victorian England: Portrait of an Age&#039;&#039; (1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Z==&lt;br /&gt;
* If you don&#039;t know history, it&#039;s as if you were born yesterday.  If you were born yesterday, then any leader can tell you anything.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Howard Zinn]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.democracynow.org/2009/1/2/placeholder_howard_zinn War and Social Justice]&#039;&#039;, speech at Binghamton University on 8 November 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 368-69.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Happy is the nation without a history.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cesare Beccaria]], &#039;&#039;Trattato dei Delitti e delle Pene&#039;&#039; (Treatise of Crimes and of Punishment). Introduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History is a pageant, not a philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine Birrell]], &#039;&#039;Obiter Dicta&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Muse of History&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Happy the people whose annals are tiresome.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Montesquieu]] (attributed).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Misattributed begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misattributed ==&lt;br /&gt;
* History doesn&#039;t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.&lt;br /&gt;
** This is very often attributed to [[Mark Twain]], but is not found in his works. The earliest publication yet located is a verse which might involve a deliberate invocation of poetic license in [[w:John Robert Colombo|John Robert Colombo&#039;s]] poem, &amp;quot;A Said Poem&amp;quot;, published in &#039;&#039;Neo Poems&#039;&#039; (1970), which reads: &amp;quot; &#039;History never repeats itself but it rhymes,&#039; said Mark Twain&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Actual quote is:&lt;br /&gt;
** For my part, I consider that it will be found much better by all Parties &#039;&#039;to leave the past to history, especially as I propose to write that history.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Speech in the House of Commons (January 23, 1948); Cited in &#039;&#039;The Yale Book of Quotations&#039;&#039; (2006), ed. Fred R. Shapiro, Yale University Press, p. 154 &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; {{ISBN|0300107986}} &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Misattributed end}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Noam Chomsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Memory]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progress]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Propaganda]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Time]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Truth]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Howard Zinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary|history}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History|*]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Time]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Ukraine&amp;diff=3123951</id>
		<title>Ukraine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Ukraine&amp;diff=3123951"/>
		<updated>2022-06-08T12:34:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* I */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag of Ukraine.svg|thumb|in Ukraine you don&#039;t build a democracy; it already exists. You just defend it. ~ [[w:Petro Poroshenko|Petro Poroshenko]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lesser Coat of Arms of Ukraine.svg|thumb|If the country controlled by Kyiv didn’t fracture in 2014, when the government and army were weak, polarization was high, and Putin could have invaded with impunity, it won&#039;t. ~ [[w:Alexander J. Motyl|Alexander J. Motyl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monastyr Karmelitiv Bosykh panorama.jpg|thumb|“What does Ukraine look like?” ...it’s green and gently rolling, and dotted with medieval fortresses, romantically neglected baroque palaces and monasteries, and quiet, pretty towns and little cities, much like those of Austria or the Czech Republic. ~ [[Anna Reid]] (Shown: Carmelite Monastery, Berdychiv, Zhytomyr Oblast)]][[File:80-391-0151 Kyiv St.Sophia&#039;s Cathedral RB 18 2 (cropped).jpg|thumb|Kyiv itself is a grand Belle Époque metropolis with up-and-down cobbled streets and chestnut trees. There are funny little back alleys and courtyards full of coffee shops and art galleries, leafy parks with views over the sprawling river Dnipro, and an array of glorious [[churches]], the grandest of them the 11th-century Saint Sophia Cathedral [shown]. ~ [[Anna Reid]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Ukraine|Ukraine]]&#039;&#039;&#039;  ([[w:Ukrainian|Ukrainian]]: &#039;&#039;Україна&#039;&#039;) is a country in [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern]] [[Europe]]. Ukraine borders the [[Russian Federation]] to the east and northeast, [[Belarus]] to the northwest, [[Poland]], [[w:Slovakia|Slovakia]] and [[w:Hungary|Hungary]] to the west, [[Romania]] and [[w:Moldova|Moldova]] to the southwest, and the [[w:Black Sea|Black Sea]] and [[w:Sea of Azov|Sea of Azov]] to the south and southeast, respectively. It has an area of 603,628 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (233,062 sq mi), making it the largest country entirely within the [[Europe]]an subcontinent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
* In carrying out the [[w:Declaration on State Sovereignty of Ukraine|Declaration on State Sovereignty of Ukraine]], the [[w:Verkhovna Rada|Verkhovna Rada]] of the [[w:Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic|Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic]] solemnly proclaims&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the independence of Ukraine and the creation of an independent Ukrainian state - Ukraine.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The territory of Ukraine is indivisible and inviolable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From now on in Ukraine only the Constitution and laws of Ukraine are in force.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This act takes effect from the moment of its approval.&lt;br /&gt;
** Original: здійснюючи Декларацію про державний суверенітет України, Верховна Рада Української Радянської Соціалістичної Республіки урочисто проголошує&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;незалежність України та створення самостійної Української держави — України.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Територія України є неподільною і недоторканною.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Віднині на території України мають чинність виключно Конституція і закони України.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Цей акт набирає чинності з моменту його схвалення.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Declaration of Independence of Ukraine|&#039;&#039;Act of Declaration of Independence of Ukraine&#039;&#039;]] (1991). [http://enciclopedia.us.es/index.php/Documento:Acta_de_Declaraci%C3%B3n_de_Independencia_de_Ucrania_(1991) Text of the act].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lemberg 1915 Mariyska.jpg|thumb|On Saturdays [[Judaism|Jews]] are strolling along all the streets, and no one pays attention. And such people who live in Lviv! Pure [[gold]]! ~ [[w:Sholem Aleichem|Sholem Aleichem]] &amp;quot;Lviv&amp;quot; (1906)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The city of [[w:Lviv|Lviv]] offers a picture of order,&lt;br /&gt;
:breadth, and beauty! A sight to feast the eye...&lt;br /&gt;
:In the [[heart]] of the city there unfolds a park&lt;br /&gt;
:where everyone is allowed to walk,&lt;br /&gt;
:even goats. The land of freedom!&lt;br /&gt;
:On Saturdays [[Judaism|Jews]] are strolling&lt;br /&gt;
:along all the streets, and no one&lt;br /&gt;
:pays attention. And such people&lt;br /&gt;
:who live in Lviv! Pure [[gold]]!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sholem Aleichem|Sholem Aleichem]], &amp;quot;Lviv&amp;quot; (1906) in [https://ukrainianjewishencounter.org/en/sholem-aleichems-creative-encounters-lviv-commemoration-100th-anniversary-departure-eternity/ &amp;quot;Sholem Aleichem’s Creative Encounters in Lviv (In Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of his Departure into Eternity)&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Ukrainian Jewish Encounter&#039;&#039; (2017)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The archival record backs up the testimony of the survivors. Neither crop failure nor bad weather caused the [[w:Holodomor|famine]] in Ukraine. Although the chaos of collectivization helped create the conditions that led to famine, the high numbers of deaths in Ukraine between 1932 and 1934, and especially the spike in the spring of 1933, were not caused directly by collectivization either. Starvation was the result, rather, of the forcible removal of [[food]] from people’s homes; the roadblocks that prevented peasants from seeking work or food; the harsh rules of the blacklists imposed on [[farm]]s and villages; the restrictions on barter and trade; and the vicious [[propaganda]] campaign designed to persuade Ukrainians to watch, unmoved, as their neighbours died of hunger.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Applebaum]] in &#039;&#039;Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2017) quoted at [https://huri.harvard.edu/news/ukraine-flames-1917-revolution &amp;quot;Ukraine in the Flames of the 1917 Revolution&amp;quot; (Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute, September 13, 2017)]&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]], the [[Russia|Russian Federation]], the [[United Kingdom|United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland]], and the [[United States|United States of America]],&lt;br /&gt;
: Welcoming the Accession of Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as a non-nuclear-weapon state,&lt;br /&gt;
: Taking into account the commitment of Ukraine to eliminate all [[nuclear weapons]] from its territory within a specified period of time,&lt;br /&gt;
: Noting the changes in the world-wide security situation, including the end of the [[Cold War]], which have brought about conditions for deep reductions in nuclear forces,&lt;br /&gt;
: Confirm the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:: 1. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the [[w:Helsinki Accords|CSCE Final Act]], to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
:: 2. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations...&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ukraine._Memorandum_on_Security_Assurances &amp;quot;Budapest Memorandum&amp;quot; signed December 5, 1994]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
* This ignorance of Ukraine has always been aggravating, but no one regarded it as a national security threat until the start of the Kremlin’s [[w:Hybrid war|hybrid war]] against Ukraine. All that changed when “[[w:Little green men (Russo-Ukrainian War)|little green men]]” began appearing in [[w:Crimea|Crimea]] and [[w:Eastern Ukraine|eastern Ukraine]]. It soon became clear that [[disinformation]] would play a key role in the Kremlin’s hybrid war, with Russia’s information offensive relying heavily on outside ignorance of Ukraine. Ukrainians watched in horror as the country’s complex relationship with its [[w:Tsarist Russia|Tsarist]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] past was reduced to the tribal binary of [[Russian language|Russian]]-speakers versus [[w:Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]]-speakers. Ukraine was depicted as a [[Fascism|fascist]] [[w:military junta|junta]], a [[Nazism|Nazi]] [[dictatorship]], and a [[w:Failed state|failed state]]. These nightmarish visions gained remarkable levels of traction in the international media, largely because Ukraine was such an unknown quantity.&lt;br /&gt;
**Vladislav Davidzon and Peter Dickinson, [https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/revealing-europe-s-best-kept-secret/ &amp;quot;Revealing Europe’s Best-Kept Secret&amp;quot; (March 13, 2016)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many people in Europe or North America know that Kyiv is the largest Russian-speaking city in the world outside of Russia? How many are aware that Ukraine has been one of Europe’s most multicultural communities for centuries?&lt;br /&gt;
**Vladislav Davidzon and Peter Dickinson, [https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/revealing-europe-s-best-kept-secret/ &amp;quot;Revealing Europe’s Best-Kept Secret&amp;quot; (March 13, 2016)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]] is recognized as the most threatened part of [[Russia]] in terms of secession and conquest. Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real grounds. It arose from the ambition of the leaders and the international intrigue of conquest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russians are a branch of a single, Slavic-Russian people.&#039;&#039;&#039; This branch has no reason to be at enmity with other branches of the same people and to separate into a separate state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Having seceded, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russia and Great Russia are bound together by faith, tribe, historical fate, geographical location, economy, culture and politics.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The foreigners who are preparing the dismemberment must remember that they are declaring by this to the whole of Russia a centuries-old struggle. There will be no peace and no economic prosperity under such a dismemberment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russia will turn into a source of civil and international wars for centuries. The dismembering power will become the most hated of the enemies of national Russia.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the struggle against it, all alliances and all means will be used. Russia will shift its center to the Urals, gather all its huge forces, develop its technology, find powerful allies for itself and fight until it completely and forever undermines the power of the dismembering power.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Russia is not looking for anyone&#039;s death, but it will be able to respond in time to any attempt at dismemberment and will fight to the end. It is more profitable for any power to have Russia as a friend, not an enemy. History hasn&#039;t said its last word yet...&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], &amp;quot;Fundamentals of the struggle for national Russia&amp;quot; (Основы борьбы за национальную Россию), 1938. Interestingly quoted in [https://rg.ru/2022/05/25/prorochestva-ilina.html this May 25, 2022 article] by [[w:ru:Звягинцев, Александр Григорьевич|Alexander Zvyagintsev]] published in [[w:Rossiiskaya gazeta|Rossiiskaya gazeta]], the [[Russian Federation]]&#039;s own government gazette.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In it, Zvyagintsev draws a parallel between the [[w:Livonian Brothers of the Sword|Livonian Brothers of the Sword]], the [[w:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], the [[w:Swedish Empire|Swedish Empire]], the [[w:Greater Germanic Reich|Nazis]] and (somewhat subtly) the present-day [[European Union]] by putting them all under a same umbrella term: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Several years passed, and the diabolical fascist &#039;&#039;&#039;machine of a united Europe&#039;&#039;&#039; fell upon our country. She, like once the hordes of swordsmen, Poles and Swedes, Frederick and Napoleon, was defeated.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
* If the country controlled by Kyiv didn’t fracture in 2014, when the government and army were weak, polarization was high, and [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]] could have invaded with impunity, it won’t in 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander J. Motyl|Alexander J. Motyl]], [http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/alexander-j-motyl/negativists-are-wrong-ukraine The Negativists are Wrong on Ukraine] (15 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Ukraine&#039;s Orange Blues&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;World Affairs Journal&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Many people seem to feel that the breakup of the [[Soviet Union]] was the end of the [[Cold War]]. That’s wrong. It had ended two years before that. And the breakup of the Soviet Union did not occur because of Western pressure; it occurred because of internal pressures within the Soviet Union. And it was something that [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] did not wish. As a matter of fact, one of his last speeches, when there was a Soviet Union, was in Kyiv, when he advised Ukrainians to join [[Gorbachev]]’s voluntary federation, that he was proposing, and actually warned against suicidal nationalism. Those words, you know, are not remembered much now. People seem to think that Ukraine is free because of the end of the Cold War and the pressure of the West as one of the fruits of victory in the Cold War. This is simply incorrect. It turns history upside down... &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ukraine is showing [[Belarus]] an example of how one should fight for freedom. I am sure that our countries have a common future in [[Europe]], where neither Ukrainians nor Belarusians will die.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vladimir Neklyaev, a Belarusian opposition leader, quoted on &#039;&#039;CBS News&#039;&#039;, [http://www.cbsnews.com/news/as-ukraine-protests-grow-slain-demonstrators-mourned/ &amp;quot;As Ukraine protests grow, slain demonstrators mourned&amp;quot;], January 26, 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Waräger-Russen, Friedrich Kruse, 1859.jpg|thumb|The term “Rus’,” brought to the region by the Vikings [Varangians shown] in the ninth and tenth centuries, was adopted by the inhabitants of Kyivan Rus’ ~ [[Serhii Plokhy]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The ancestors of modern Ukrainians lived in dozens of premodern and modern principalities, kingdoms, and empires, and in the course of time they took on various names and identities. The two key terms that they used to define their land were “Rus’” and “Ukraine.” (In the Cyrillic alphabet, Rus’ is spelled Pycь: the last character is a soft sign indicating palatalized pronunciation of the preceding consonant.) &#039;&#039;&#039;The term “Rus’,” brought to the region by the [[w:Varangians|Vikings]] in the ninth and tenth centuries, was adopted by the inhabitants of Kyivan Rus’&#039;&#039;&#039;, who took the Viking princes and warriors into their fold and Slavicized them. The ancestors of today’s Ukrainians, Russians, and Belarusians adopted the name “Rus’” in forms that varied from the Scandinavian/Slavic “Rus’” to the Hellenized “Rossiia.” In the eighteenth century, Muscovy adopted the latter form as the official name of its state and empire.&lt;br /&gt;
** Historian [[Serhii Plokhy]] &#039;&#039;The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p xxii&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2 hryvnia 1992 front-small.jpg|thumb|Both Ukrainians and Russians claim Yaroslav the Wise as one of their eminent medieval rulers, and his image appears on the banknotes of both countries. The Ukrainian bill depicts Yaroslav with a Ukrainian-style moustache. ~ Serhii Plokhy [Ukrainian banknote shown]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banknote 1000 rubles (1997) front.jpg|thumb|The Russian bill shows Yaroslav with a [[beard]] in the tradition of Ivan the Terrible and the Muscovite tsars of his era. ~ Serhii Plokhy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Both Ukrainians and Russians claim [[w:Yaroslav the Wise|Yaroslav the Wise]] as one of their eminent medieval rulers, and his image appears on the [[money|banknotes]] of both countries.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Ukrainian bill depicts Yaroslav with a Ukrainian-style moustache in the tradition of Prince Sviatoslav and the Ukrainian [[w:Cossacks|Cossacks]]. On the Russian note, we see a monument to him as the legendary founder of the Russian city of Yaroslavl, first mentioned in a chronicle seventeen years after his death. The Russian bill shows Yaroslav with a [[beard]] in the tradition of Ivan the Terrible and the Muscovite tsars of his era.&lt;br /&gt;
** Historian [[Serhii Plokhy]] &#039;&#039;The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:Levko Lukianenko|Lukianenko]]’s declaration referred to the thousand-year history of Ukrainian statehood, meaning the tradition established by [[w:Kievan Rus&#039;|Kyivan Rus’]]. His declaration was in fact the fourth attempt to proclaim Ukrainian independence in the twentieth century: the first occurred in 1918 in [[w:Kyiv|Kyiv]] and then in [[w:Lviv|Lviv]], the second in 1939 in [[w:Carpatho-Ukraine|Transcarpathia]], and the third in 1941 in Lviv. All those attempts had been made in [[war|wartime]], and all had come to grief. Would this one be different? The next three months would tell. A popular referendum scheduled for December 1, 1991, the same day as the previously scheduled election of Ukraine’s first president, would confirm or reject the parliamentary vote for independence...&#039;&#039;&#039;The vote for Ukraine’s independence spelled the end of the Soviet Union.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Historian [[Serhii Plokhy]] &#039;&#039;The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) pp 320–321&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*These days in Europe, many countries are sympathetic towards Ukraine and the situation here - of course, this touches a lot of people from different states. The fact that volunteers and government organizations work together on this and these kinds of [[Humanitarianism|humanitarian]] actions happen - is not unique, but it proves, that there are a lot of regular folks out there who care about Ukraine and its future&lt;br /&gt;
**Juris Poikans, Latvia&#039;s Ambassador to Ukraine, quoted on &#039;&#039;UAToday&#039;&#039; (February 11, 2016), [http://uatoday.tv/politics/latvia-sends-more-aid-to-ukraine-589114.html &amp;quot;Latvia sends more aid to Ukraine&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Ukraine, you don&#039;t build a [[democracy]]; it already exists. You just defend it and exactly this. What makes Ukraine unique, its struggle deeply and profoundly...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Petro Poroshenko|Petro Poroshenko]], [https://www.c-span.org/video/?321426-1/ukrainian-president-petro-poroshenko-address-congress&amp;amp;start=1496 speech to the U.S. Congress] (18 September 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
* “What does Ukraine look like?”...it’s green and gently rolling, and dotted with [[medieval]] fortresses, romantically neglected baroque [[palace|palaces]] and monasteries, and quiet, pretty towns and little cities, much like those of [[Austria]] or the Czech Republic. Kyiv itself is a grand Belle Époque metropolis with up-and-down cobbled streets and chestnut trees. There are funny little back alleys and courtyards full of coffee shops and art galleries, leafy parks with views over the sprawling river Dnipro, and an array of glorious [[churches]], the grandest of them the 11th-century Saint Sophia Cathedral.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/15/ukrainian-heritage-under-threat-truth-soviet-era-russia &amp;quot;Ukrainian heritage is under threat – and so is the truth about Soviet-era Russia&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;] (15 March 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Ukraine|Ukraina]]&#039;&#039; is literally translated as “on the edge” or “borderland”, and that is exactly what it is. Flat, fertile, and fatally tempting to invaders&#039;&#039;&#039;, Ukraine was split between Russia and Poland from the mid-17th century to the end of the 18th, between [[Russia]] and [[Austria]] through the 19th, and between Russia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Romania between the two world wars. Until the [[Soviet Union]] collapsed in 1991 it had never been an independent state.  &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] &#039;&#039;Borderland: a journey through the history of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 1&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Odessa numismatic museum photo 05.jpg|thumb|From the tenth century to the thirteenth it [Kiev] was the capital of the eastern Slavs’ first great civilisation, Kievan Rus. ~ [[Anna Reid]] (Silver coin shows [[w:Vladimir the Great|Vladimir the Great]] (958–1015))]]&lt;br /&gt;
* But the past that gives [[w:Kyiv|Kiev]] unique glamour, that made it ‘the City’ to the novelist [[Mikhail Bulgakov]] and the ‘Joy of the World’ to the medieval chroniclers, is not the brash boom town of the turn of the last century, but the Kiev of a thousand years ago. From the tenth century to the thirteenth it was the capital of the eastern Slavs’ first great civilisation, Kievan Rus. And here Ukraine’s fight for an identity commences. Generations of scholars have bandied insults about how Rus began, how it was governed, even about how it got its name. But the biggest argument of all is over who Rus belongs to. Did Kievan Rus civilisation pass eastward, to Muscovy and the Russians, or did it stay put, in Ukraine? &#039;&#039;&#039;‘If Moscow is Russia’s heart,’ runs a Russian proverb, ‘and St Petersburg its head, Kiev is its mother.’&#039;&#039;&#039; Ukrainians, of course, say Kiev has nothing whatsoever to do with Russia – if she mothered anybody, it was the Ukrainians themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] &#039;&#039;Borderland: a journey through the history of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here begins Ukraine’s great debate – still raw, still undecided: are Ukrainians Central Europeans, like the Poles, or a species of Russian? Poles used to call western Ukraine ‘Eastern Little [[Poland]]’; the Russian name for Ukraine was ‘Little [[Russia]].&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] &#039;&#039;Borderland: a journey through the history of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ukrainian society is less ambiguous today and Ukrainian identity is becoming increasingly civic rather than ethnic, and increasingly incompatible with a supra-ethnic, non-civic, quasi-religious, [[w:East Slavs|East Slavonic]] identity. While civic unity and civic identity are on the rise, Ukrainian attitudes toward Russians remain rather positive, in contrast to the highly negative Russian attitudes toward Ukrainians. First, Ukrainian media do not practice [[w:Hate speech|hate speech]] and [[Propaganda|propagandistic]] [[Mind control|brainwashing]] on the scale of the Russian media. And second, Ukrainians are much less inclined to identify the people with the state; their loathing of Putin has not translated into a similar attitude toward common Russians. Many Ukrainians still want open borders and good relations with Russia, even though that’s increasingly impossible at a time of war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Mykola Riabchuk|Mykola Riabchuk]], as quoted in [http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/alexander-j-motyl/ukrainian-identity-after-euromaiden &amp;quot;Ukrainian Identity After the Euromaidan&amp;quot;] (29 March 2016), by [[w:Alexander J. Motyl|Alexander J. Motyl]], &#039;&#039;Ukraine&#039;s Orange Blues&#039;&#039;, World Affairs Journal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] and [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] rose to power in [[Berlin]] and [[Moscow]], but their visions of transformation concerned above all the lands between. Their utopias of control overlapped in Ukraine. Hitler remembered the ephemeral [[Germany|German]] eastern colony of 1918 as German access to the Ukrainian breadbasket. Stalin, who had served [[Russian Revolution|his revolution]] in Ukraine shortly thereafter, regarded the land in much the same way. Its farmland, and its [[Peasant|peasants]], were to be exploited in the making of a modern [[Industry|industrial]] state. Hitler looked upon [[w:Collectivization|collectivization]] as a disastrous failure, and presented it as proof of the failure of [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[communism]] as such. But he had no doubt that Germans could make of Ukraine a land of [[milk]] and [[honey]]. For both Hitler and Stalin, Ukraine was more than a source of [[food]]. It was the place that would enable them to break the rules of traditional [[economics]], rescue their countries from [[poverty]] and [[isolation]], and remake the continent in their own image. Their programs and their power all depended upon their control of Ukraine’s fertile soil and its millions of agricultural laborers. In 1933, Ukrainians would died in the millions, in the [[w:Holodomir|greatest artificial famine in the history of world]]. This was the beginning of the special history of Ukraine, but not the end. In 1941 [[w:Operation Barbarossa|Hitler would seize Ukraine from Stalin]], and attempt to realize his own [[Colonialism|colonial]] vision beginning with the [[The Holocaust|shooting of Jews]] and the starvation of Soviet prisoners of war. The [[Stalinism|Stalinists]] colonized their own country, and the Nazis colonized occupied Soviet Ukraine: and the inhabitants of Ukraine suffered and suffered. During the years that both Stalin and Hitler were in power, more people were killed in Ukraine than anywhere else in the bloodlands, or in Europe, or in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin&#039;&#039;. E-book, New York: Basic Books, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1919, when he imposed his regime on Ukraine, [[Lenin]] gave her several Russian provinces to assuage her feelings. These provinces have never historically belonged to Ukraine. I am talking about the eastern and southern territories of today&#039;s Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
:Then, in 1954, [[Khrushchev]], with the arbitrary capriciousness of a satrap, made a &amp;quot;gift&amp;quot; of the Crimea to Ukraine. But even he did not manage to make Ukraine a &amp;quot;gift&amp;quot; of [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]], which remained a separate city under the jurisdiction of the U.S.S.R. central government. This was accomplished by the American State Department, first verbally through Ambassador Popadiuk in Kiev and later in a more official manner.&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does the State Department decide who should get Sevastopol? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994) [https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html Reprinted in &#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039; (2008)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===U===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kyiv, Euro Maidan 2013 (11278551503).jpg|thumb|Ukraine&#039;s [[freedom]] is still alive, and so also is [[liberty]] ~ [[w:Pavlo Chubynsky|Pavlo Chubynsky]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Ukraine is not dead&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; (Ukrainian national anthem)&lt;br /&gt;
: Ukraine&#039;s [[freedom]] is still alive, and so also is [[liberty]],&lt;br /&gt;
: And fortune will smile on us, young [[siblings|brothers]].&lt;br /&gt;
: All our [[enemies]] will die like dew in [[sun]].&lt;br /&gt;
: And at last we will be rulers of our [[home]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
: We&#039;ll devote our souls and bodies to our [[free will]],&lt;br /&gt;
: And we will prove that we are all of [[w:Cossack|Cossack]] origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pavlo Chubynsky|Pavlo Chubynsky]] (1839–1884), [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Translation:Ukraine_is_not_dead translated from Ukrainian by Wikisource]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ukraine has always aspired to be free: but being surrounded by [[w:Muscovy|Muscovy]], the [[w:Ottoman Empire|states of the Sultan]], and [[w:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth|Poland]], a protector had to be sought, and consequently a master in one of these three states. She first put herself under the protection of Poland, who treated her too much as subject. She then gave herself to the Muscovite, who governed her as a slave as much as he could. At first the Ukrainians enjoyed the privilege of electing a prince under the name of general; but soon they were stripped of this right, and their general was appointed by the court of Moscow. (L’Ukraine a toujours aspiré à être libre : mais étant entourée de la Moscovie, des états du grand-seigneur, et de la Pologne, il lui a fallu chercher un protecteur, et par conséquent un maître dans l’un de ces trois états. Elle se mit d’abord sous la protection de la Pologne qui la traita trop en sujette : elle se donna depuis au Moscovite, qui la gouverna en esclave autant qu’il le put. D’abord les Ukrainiens jouirent du privilège d’élire un prince sous le nom de général ; mais bientôt ils furent dépouillés de ce droit, et leur général fut nommé par la cour de Moscou.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]] 1731, &#039;&#039;Histoire de Charles XII&#039;&#039; (History of Charles XII), p 161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Any signature to a deal on forming a new Soviet Union means the breakup of the country&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Arseniy Yatsenyuk, a prominent opposition member, quoted on &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25290959 &amp;quot;Ukraine&#039;s capital Kiev gripped by huge pro-EU demonstration&amp;quot;], December 8, 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis]] &lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikinews}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wiktionary-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Commonscat-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikisource-inline|Portal:Ukraine}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikibooks-inline|Wikijunior:Europe/Ukraine}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikivoyage-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ukraine| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Countries in Eurasia‎]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3123000</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3123000"/>
		<updated>2022-06-07T11:36:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* O */ link fixed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. &#039;&#039;&#039;When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life&#039;&#039;&#039; that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [http://web.archive.org/web/20200928053316/https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne-znaet-rossii-ivan-ilin &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]] is recognized as the most threatened part of Russia in terms of secession and conquest. Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real grounds. It arose from the ambition of the leaders and the international intrigue of conquest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russians are a branch of a single, Slavic-Russian people.&#039;&#039;&#039; This branch has no reason to be at enmity with other branches of the same people and to separate into a separate state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Having seceded, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russia and Great Russia are bound together by faith, tribe, historical fate, geographical location, economy, culture and politics.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The foreigners who are preparing the dismemberment must remember that they are declaring by this to the whole of Russia a centuries-old struggle. There will be no peace and no economic prosperity under such a dismemberment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russia will turn into a source of civil and international wars for centuries. The dismembering power will become the most hated of the enemies of national Russia.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the struggle against it, all alliances and all means will be used. Russia will shift its center to the Urals, gather all its huge forces, develop its technology, find powerful allies for itself and fight until it completely and forever undermines the power of the dismembering power.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Russia is not looking for anyone&#039;s death, but it will be able to respond in time to any attempt at dismemberment and will fight to the end. It is more profitable for any power to have Russia as a friend, not an enemy. History hasn&#039;t said its last word yet...&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], &amp;quot;Fundamentals of the struggle for national Russia&amp;quot; (Основы борьбы за национальную Россию), 1938. Interestingly quoted in [https://rg.ru/2022/05/25/prorochestva-ilina.html this May 25, 2022 article] by [[w:ru:Звягинцев, Александр Григорьевич|Alexander Zvyagintsev]] published in [[w:Rossiiskaya gazeta|Rossiiskaya gazeta]], the Russian Federation&#039;s own government gazette.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In it, Zvyagintsev draws a parallel between the [[w:Livonian Brothers of the Sword|Livonian Brothers of the Sword]], the [[w:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], the [[w:Swedish Empire|Swedish Empire]], the [[w:Greater Germanic Reich|Nazis]] and (more subtly) the present-day [[European Union]] by putting them all under a same umbrella term: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Several years passed, and the diabolical fascist &#039;&#039;&#039;machine of a united Europe&#039;&#039;&#039; fell upon our country. She, like once the hordes of swordsmen, Poles and Swedes, Frederick and Napoleon, was defeated.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://web.archive.org/web/20190601230800/http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]], [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russian people will suffer a blow, it will leave the cities for fields, forests ... It will pick mushrooms, berries, nuts - the Russian people is ready in a moment of great sorrow to turn into a chipmunk people, a hamster people, it will store up for the winter all sorts of roots, all sorts of onions.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Русский народ перебьётся, он уйдёт из городов в поля, в леса... Будет собирать грибы, ягоды, орехи — русский народ готов в минуту больших печалей превратиться в народ-бурундук, народ-хомяк, он будет запасать на зиму всякие корешки, всякие луковки.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Prokhanov|Alexander Prokhanov]] on the sanctions Russia faces following the 2022 invasion of [[Ukraine]], from the interview [https://aif.ru/politics/world/pisatel_aleksandr_prohanov_mirovoy_perekur_konchilsya Writer Alexander Prokhanov: &amp;quot;The global smoke break is over&amp;quot;] (6 April 2022), &#039;&#039;[[w:Argumenty i fakty|Argumenty i fakty]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121470</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121470"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T16:07:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* H */ emphasize – not the difference between hilarion and kirill&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. &#039;&#039;&#039;When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life&#039;&#039;&#039; that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [http://web.archive.org/web/20200928053316/https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne-znaet-rossii-ivan-ilin &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]] is recognized as the most threatened part of Russia in terms of secession and conquest. Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real grounds. It arose from the ambition of the leaders and the international intrigue of conquest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russians are a branch of a single, Slavic-Russian people.&#039;&#039;&#039; This branch has no reason to be at enmity with other branches of the same people and to separate into a separate state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Having seceded, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russia and Great Russia are bound together by faith, tribe, historical fate, geographical location, economy, culture and politics.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The foreigners who are preparing the dismemberment must remember that they are declaring by this to the whole of Russia a centuries-old struggle. There will be no peace and no economic prosperity under such a dismemberment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russia will turn into a source of civil and international wars for centuries. The dismembering power will become the most hated of the enemies of national Russia.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the struggle against it, all alliances and all means will be used. Russia will shift its center to the Urals, gather all its huge forces, develop its technology, find powerful allies for itself and fight until it completely and forever undermines the power of the dismembering power.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Russia is not looking for anyone&#039;s death, but it will be able to respond in time to any attempt at dismemberment and will fight to the end. It is more profitable for any power to have Russia as a friend, not an enemy. History hasn&#039;t said its last word yet...&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], &amp;quot;Fundamentals of the struggle for national Russia&amp;quot; (Основы борьбы за национальную Россию), 1938. Interestingly quoted in [https://rg.ru/2022/05/25/prorochestva-ilina.html this May 25, 2022 article] by [[w:ru:Звягинцев, Александр Григорьевич|Alexander Zvyagintsev]] published in [[w:Rossiiskaya gazeta|Rossiiskaya gazeta]], the Russian Federation&#039;s own government gazette.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In it, Zvyagintsev draws a parallel between the [[w:Livonian Brothers of the Sword|Livonian Brothers of the Sword]], the [[w:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], the [[w:Swedish Empire|Swedish Empire]], the [[w:Greater Germanic Reich|Nazis]] and (more subtly) the present-day [[European Union]] by putting them all under a same umbrella term: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Several years passed, and the diabolical fascist &#039;&#039;&#039;machine of a united Europe&#039;&#039;&#039; fell upon our country. She, like once the hordes of swordsmen, Poles and Swedes, Frederick and Napoleon, was defeated.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]], [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russian people will suffer a blow, it will leave the cities for fields, forests ... It will pick mushrooms, berries, nuts - the Russian people is ready in a moment of great sorrow to turn into a chipmunk people, a hamster people, it will store up for the winter all sorts of roots, all sorts of onions.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Русский народ перебьётся, он уйдёт из городов в поля, в леса... Будет собирать грибы, ягоды, орехи — русский народ готов в минуту больших печалей превратиться в народ-бурундук, народ-хомяк, он будет запасать на зиму всякие корешки, всякие луковки.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Prokhanov|Alexander Prokhanov]] on the sanctions Russia faces following the 2022 invasion of [[Ukraine]], from the interview [https://aif.ru/politics/world/pisatel_aleksandr_prohanov_mirovoy_perekur_konchilsya Writer Alexander Prokhanov: &amp;quot;The global smoke break is over&amp;quot;] (6 April 2022), &#039;&#039;[[w:Argumenty i fakty|Argumenty i fakty]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121469</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121469"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T16:05:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* I */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [http://web.archive.org/web/20200928053316/https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne-znaet-rossii-ivan-ilin &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]] is recognized as the most threatened part of Russia in terms of secession and conquest. Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real grounds. It arose from the ambition of the leaders and the international intrigue of conquest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russians are a branch of a single, Slavic-Russian people.&#039;&#039;&#039; This branch has no reason to be at enmity with other branches of the same people and to separate into a separate state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Having seceded, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russia and Great Russia are bound together by faith, tribe, historical fate, geographical location, economy, culture and politics.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The foreigners who are preparing the dismemberment must remember that they are declaring by this to the whole of Russia a centuries-old struggle. There will be no peace and no economic prosperity under such a dismemberment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russia will turn into a source of civil and international wars for centuries. The dismembering power will become the most hated of the enemies of national Russia.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the struggle against it, all alliances and all means will be used. Russia will shift its center to the Urals, gather all its huge forces, develop its technology, find powerful allies for itself and fight until it completely and forever undermines the power of the dismembering power.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Russia is not looking for anyone&#039;s death, but it will be able to respond in time to any attempt at dismemberment and will fight to the end. It is more profitable for any power to have Russia as a friend, not an enemy. History hasn&#039;t said its last word yet...&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], &amp;quot;Fundamentals of the struggle for national Russia&amp;quot; (Основы борьбы за национальную Россию), 1938. Interestingly quoted in [https://rg.ru/2022/05/25/prorochestva-ilina.html this May 25, 2022 article] by [[w:ru:Звягинцев, Александр Григорьевич|Alexander Zvyagintsev]] published in [[w:Rossiiskaya gazeta|Rossiiskaya gazeta]], the Russian Federation&#039;s own government gazette.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In it, Zvyagintsev draws a parallel between the [[w:Livonian Brothers of the Sword|Livonian Brothers of the Sword]], the [[w:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], the [[w:Swedish Empire|Swedish Empire]], the [[w:Greater Germanic Reich|Nazis]] and (more subtly) the present-day [[European Union]] by putting them all under a same umbrella term: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Several years passed, and the diabolical fascist &#039;&#039;&#039;machine of a united Europe&#039;&#039;&#039; fell upon our country. She, like once the hordes of swordsmen, Poles and Swedes, Frederick and Napoleon, was defeated.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]], [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russian people will suffer a blow, it will leave the cities for fields, forests ... It will pick mushrooms, berries, nuts - the Russian people is ready in a moment of great sorrow to turn into a chipmunk people, a hamster people, it will store up for the winter all sorts of roots, all sorts of onions.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Русский народ перебьётся, он уйдёт из городов в поля, в леса... Будет собирать грибы, ягоды, орехи — русский народ готов в минуту больших печалей превратиться в народ-бурундук, народ-хомяк, он будет запасать на зиму всякие корешки, всякие луковки.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Prokhanov|Alexander Prokhanov]] on the sanctions Russia faces following the 2022 invasion of [[Ukraine]], from the interview [https://aif.ru/politics/world/pisatel_aleksandr_prohanov_mirovoy_perekur_konchilsya Writer Alexander Prokhanov: &amp;quot;The global smoke break is over&amp;quot;] (6 April 2022), &#039;&#039;[[w:Argumenty i fakty|Argumenty i fakty]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Ukraine&amp;diff=3121468</id>
		<title>Ukraine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Ukraine&amp;diff=3121468"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T16:01:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* I */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag of Ukraine.svg|thumb|in Ukraine you don&#039;t build a democracy; it already exists. You just defend it. ~ [[w:Petro Poroshenko|Petro Poroshenko]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lesser Coat of Arms of Ukraine.svg|thumb|If the country controlled by Kyiv didn’t fracture in 2014, when the government and army were weak, polarization was high, and Putin could have invaded with impunity, it won&#039;t. ~ [[w:Alexander J. Motyl|Alexander J. Motyl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monastyr Karmelitiv Bosykh panorama.jpg|thumb|“What does Ukraine look like?” ...it’s green and gently rolling, and dotted with medieval fortresses, romantically neglected baroque palaces and monasteries, and quiet, pretty towns and little cities, much like those of Austria or the Czech Republic. ~ [[Anna Reid]] (Shown: Carmelite Monastery, Berdychiv, Zhytomyr Oblast)]][[File:80-391-0151 Kyiv St.Sophia&#039;s Cathedral RB 18 2 (cropped).jpg|thumb|Kyiv itself is a grand Belle Époque metropolis with up-and-down cobbled streets and chestnut trees. There are funny little back alleys and courtyards full of coffee shops and art galleries, leafy parks with views over the sprawling river Dnipro, and an array of glorious [[churches]], the grandest of them the 11th-century Saint Sophia Cathedral [shown]. ~ [[Anna Reid]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Ukraine|Ukraine]]&#039;&#039;&#039;  ([[w:Ukrainian|Ukrainian]]: &#039;&#039;Україна&#039;&#039;) is a country in [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern]] [[Europe]]. Ukraine borders the [[Russian Federation]] to the east and northeast, [[Belarus]] to the northwest, [[Poland]], [[w:Slovakia|Slovakia]] and [[w:Hungary|Hungary]] to the west, [[Romania]] and [[w:Moldova|Moldova]] to the southwest, and the [[w:Black Sea|Black Sea]] and [[w:Sea of Azov|Sea of Azov]] to the south and southeast, respectively. It has an area of 603,628 km2 (233,062 sq mi), making it the largest country entirely within the [[Europe]]an subcontinent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
* In carrying out the [[w:Declaration on State Sovereignty of Ukraine|Declaration on State Sovereignty of Ukraine]], the [[w:Verkhovna Rada|Verkhovna Rada]] of the [[w:Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic|Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic]] solemnly proclaims&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the independence of Ukraine and the creation of an independent Ukrainian state - Ukraine.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The territory of Ukraine is indivisible and inviolable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From now on in Ukraine only the Constitution and laws of Ukraine are in force.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This act takes effect from the moment of its approval.&lt;br /&gt;
** Original: здійснюючи Декларацію про державний суверенітет України, Верховна Рада Української Радянської Соціалістичної Республіки урочисто проголошує&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;незалежність України та створення самостійної Української держави — України.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Територія України є неподільною і недоторканною.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Віднині на території України мають чинність виключно Конституція і закони України.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Цей акт набирає чинності з моменту його схвалення.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Declaration of Independence of Ukraine|&#039;&#039;Act of Declaration of Independence of Ukraine&#039;&#039;]] (1991). [http://enciclopedia.us.es/index.php/Documento:Acta_de_Declaraci%C3%B3n_de_Independencia_de_Ucrania_(1991) Text of the act].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lemberg 1915 Mariyska.jpg|thumb|On Saturdays [[Judaism|Jews]] are strolling along all the streets, and no one pays attention. And such people who live in Lviv! Pure [[gold]]! ~ [[w:Sholem Aleichem|Sholem Aleichem]] &amp;quot;Lviv&amp;quot; (1906)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The city of [[w:Lviv|Lviv]] offers a picture of order,&lt;br /&gt;
:breadth, and beauty! A sight to feast the eye...&lt;br /&gt;
:In the [[heart]] of the city there unfolds a park&lt;br /&gt;
:where everyone is allowed to walk,&lt;br /&gt;
:even goats. The land of freedom!&lt;br /&gt;
:On Saturdays [[Judaism|Jews]] are strolling&lt;br /&gt;
:along all the streets, and no one&lt;br /&gt;
:pays attention. And such people&lt;br /&gt;
:who live in Lviv! Pure [[gold]]!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sholem Aleichem|Sholem Aleichem]], &amp;quot;Lviv&amp;quot; (1906) in [https://ukrainianjewishencounter.org/en/sholem-aleichems-creative-encounters-lviv-commemoration-100th-anniversary-departure-eternity/ &amp;quot;Sholem Aleichem’s Creative Encounters in Lviv (In Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of his Departure into Eternity)&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Ukrainian Jewish Encounter&#039;&#039; (2017)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The archival record backs up the testimony of the survivors. Neither crop failure nor bad weather caused the [[w:Holodomor|famine]] in Ukraine. Although the chaos of collectivization helped create the conditions that led to famine, the high numbers of deaths in Ukraine between 1932 and 1934, and especially the spike in the spring of 1933, were not caused directly by collectivization either. Starvation was the result, rather, of the forcible removal of [[food]] from people’s homes; the roadblocks that prevented peasants from seeking work or food; the harsh rules of the blacklists imposed on [[farm]]s and villages; the restrictions on barter and trade; and the vicious [[propaganda]] campaign designed to persuade Ukrainians to watch, unmoved, as their neighbours died of hunger.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Applebaum]] in &#039;&#039;Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2017) quoted at [https://huri.harvard.edu/news/ukraine-flames-1917-revolution &amp;quot;Ukraine in the Flames of the 1917 Revolution&amp;quot; (Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute, September 13, 2017)]&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]], the [[Russia|Russian Federation]], the [[United Kingdom|United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland]], and the [[United States|United States of America]],&lt;br /&gt;
: Welcoming the Accession of Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as a non-nuclear-weapon state,&lt;br /&gt;
: Taking into account the commitment of Ukraine to eliminate all [[nuclear weapons]] from its territory within a specified period of time,&lt;br /&gt;
: Noting the changes in the world-wide security situation, including the end of the [[Cold War]], which have brought about conditions for deep reductions in nuclear forces,&lt;br /&gt;
: Confirm the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:: 1. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the [[w:Helsinki Accords|CSCE Final Act]], to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
:: 2. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations...&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ukraine._Memorandum_on_Security_Assurances &amp;quot;Budapest Memorandum&amp;quot; signed December 5, 1994]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
* This ignorance of Ukraine has always been aggravating, but no one regarded it as a national security threat until the start of the Kremlin’s [[w:Hybrid war|hybrid war]] against Ukraine. All that changed when “[[w:Little green men (Russo-Ukrainian War)|little green men]]” began appearing in [[w:Crimea|Crimea]] and [[w:Eastern Ukraine|eastern Ukraine]]. It soon became clear that [[disinformation]] would play a key role in the Kremlin’s hybrid war, with Russia’s information offensive relying heavily on outside ignorance of Ukraine. Ukrainians watched in horror as the country’s complex relationship with its [[w:Tsarist Russia|Tsarist]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] past was reduced to the tribal binary of [[Russian language|Russian]]-speakers versus [[w:Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]]-speakers. Ukraine was depicted as a [[Fascism|fascist]] [[w:military junta|junta]], a [[Nazism|Nazi]] [[dictatorship]], and a [[w:Failed state|failed state]]. These nightmarish visions gained remarkable levels of traction in the international media, largely because Ukraine was such an unknown quantity.&lt;br /&gt;
**Vladislav Davidzon and Peter Dickinson, [https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/revealing-europe-s-best-kept-secret/ &amp;quot;Revealing Europe’s Best-Kept Secret&amp;quot; (March 13, 2016)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many people in Europe or North America know that Kyiv is the largest Russian-speaking city in the world outside of Russia? How many are aware that Ukraine has been one of Europe’s most multicultural communities for centuries?&lt;br /&gt;
**Vladislav Davidzon and Peter Dickinson, [https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/revealing-europe-s-best-kept-secret/ &amp;quot;Revealing Europe’s Best-Kept Secret&amp;quot; (March 13, 2016)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]] is recognized as the most threatened part of ppRussia]] in terms of secession and conquest. Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real grounds. It arose from the ambition of the leaders and the international intrigue of conquest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russians are a branch of a single, Slavic-Russian people.&#039;&#039;&#039; This branch has no reason to be at enmity with other branches of the same people and to separate into a separate state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Having seceded, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russia and Great Russia are bound together by faith, tribe, historical fate, geographical location, economy, culture and politics.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The foreigners who are preparing the dismemberment must remember that they are declaring by this to the whole of Russia a centuries-old struggle. There will be no peace and no economic prosperity under such a dismemberment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russia will turn into a source of civil and international wars for centuries. The dismembering power will become the most hated of the enemies of national Russia.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the struggle against it, all alliances and all means will be used. Russia will shift its center to the Urals, gather all its huge forces, develop its technology, find powerful allies for itself and fight until it completely and forever undermines the power of the dismembering power.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Russia is not looking for anyone&#039;s death, but it will be able to respond in time to any attempt at dismemberment and will fight to the end. It is more profitable for any power to have Russia as a friend, not an enemy. History hasn&#039;t said its last word yet...&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], &amp;quot;Fundamentals of the struggle for national Russia&amp;quot; (Основы борьбы за национальную Россию), 1938. Interestingly quoted in [https://rg.ru/2022/05/25/prorochestva-ilina.html this May 25, 2022 article] by [[w:ru:Звягинцев, Александр Григорьевич|Alexander Zvyagintsev]] published in [[w:Rossiiskaya gazeta|Rossiiskaya gazeta]], the [[Russian Federation]]&#039;s own government gazette.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In it, Zvyagintsev draws a parallel between the [[w:Livonian Brothers of the Sword|Livonian Brothers of the Sword]], the [[w:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], the [[w:Swedish Empire|Swedish Empire]], the [[w:Greater Germanic Reich|Nazis]] and the present-day [[European Union]] by putting them all under a same umbrella term: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Several years passed, and the diabolical fascist &#039;&#039;&#039;machine of a united Europe&#039;&#039;&#039; fell upon our country. She, like once the hordes of swordsmen, Poles and Swedes, Frederick and Napoleon, was defeated.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
* If the country controlled by Kyiv didn’t fracture in 2014, when the government and army were weak, polarization was high, and [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]] could have invaded with impunity, it won’t in 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander J. Motyl|Alexander J. Motyl]], [http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/alexander-j-motyl/negativists-are-wrong-ukraine &amp;quot;The Negativists are Wrong on Ukraine&amp;quot;] (15 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Ukraine&#039;s Orange Blues&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;World Affairs Journal&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many people seem to feel that the breakup of the [[Soviet Union]] was the end of the [[Cold War]]. That’s wrong. It had ended two years before that. And the breakup of the Soviet Union did not occur because of Western pressure; it occurred because of internal pressures within the Soviet Union. And it was something that [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] did not wish. As a matter of fact, one of his last speeches, when there was a Soviet Union, was in Kyiv, when he advised Ukrainians to join [[Gorbachev]]’s voluntary federation, that he was proposing, and actually warned against suicidal nationalism. Those words, you know, are not remembered much now. People seem to think that Ukraine is free because of the end of the Cold War and the pressure of the West as one of the fruits of victory in the Cold War. This is simply incorrect. It turns history upside down... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ukraine is showing [[Belarus]] an example of how one should fight for freedom. I am sure that our countries have a common future in [[Europe]], where neither Ukrainians nor Belarusians will die.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vladimir Neklyaev, a Belarusian opposition leader, quoted on &#039;&#039;CBS News&#039;&#039;, [http://www.cbsnews.com/news/as-ukraine-protests-grow-slain-demonstrators-mourned/ &amp;quot;As Ukraine protests grow, slain demonstrators mourned&amp;quot;], January 26, 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Waräger-Russen, Friedrich Kruse, 1859.jpg|thumb|The term “Rus’,” brought to the region by the Vikings [Varangians shown] in the ninth and tenth centuries, was adopted by the inhabitants of Kyivan Rus’ ~ [[Serhii Plokhy]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The ancestors of modern Ukrainians lived in dozens of premodern and modern principalities, kingdoms, and empires, and in the course of time they took on various names and identities. The two key terms that they used to define their land were “Rus’” and “Ukraine.” (In the Cyrillic alphabet, Rus’ is spelled Pycь: the last character is a soft sign indicating palatalized pronunciation of the preceding consonant.) &#039;&#039;&#039;The term “Rus’,” brought to the region by the [[w:Varangians|Vikings]] in the ninth and tenth centuries, was adopted by the inhabitants of Kyivan Rus’&#039;&#039;&#039;, who took the Viking princes and warriors into their fold and Slavicized them. The ancestors of today’s Ukrainians, Russians, and Belarusians adopted the name “Rus’” in forms that varied from the Scandinavian/Slavic “Rus’” to the Hellenized “Rossiia.” In the eighteenth century, Muscovy adopted the latter form as the official name of its state and empire.&lt;br /&gt;
** Historian [[Serhii Plokhy]] &#039;&#039;The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p xxii&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2 hryvnia 1992 front-small.jpg|thumb|Both Ukrainians and Russians claim Yaroslav the Wise as one of their eminent medieval rulers, and his image appears on the banknotes of both countries. The Ukrainian bill depicts Yaroslav with a Ukrainian-style moustache. ~ Serhii Plokhy [Ukrainian banknote shown]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banknote 1000 rubles (1997) front.jpg|thumb|The Russian bill shows Yaroslav with a [[beard]] in the tradition of Ivan the Terrible and the Muscovite tsars of his era. ~ Serhii Plokhy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Both Ukrainians and Russians claim [[w:Yaroslav the Wise|Yaroslav the Wise]] as one of their eminent medieval rulers, and his image appears on the [[money|banknotes]] of both countries.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Ukrainian bill depicts Yaroslav with a Ukrainian-style moustache in the tradition of Prince Sviatoslav and the Ukrainian [[w:Cossacks|Cossacks]]. On the Russian note, we see a monument to him as the legendary founder of the Russian city of Yaroslavl, first mentioned in a chronicle seventeen years after his death. The Russian bill shows Yaroslav with a [[beard]] in the tradition of Ivan the Terrible and the Muscovite tsars of his era.&lt;br /&gt;
** Historian [[Serhii Plokhy]] &#039;&#039;The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:Levko Lukianenko|Lukianenko]]’s declaration referred to the thousand-year history of Ukrainian statehood, meaning the tradition established by [[w:Kievan Rus&#039;|Kyivan Rus’]]. His declaration was in fact the fourth attempt to proclaim Ukrainian independence in the twentieth century: the first occurred in 1918 in [[w:Kyiv|Kyiv]] and then in [[w:Lviv|Lviv]], the second in 1939 in [[w:Carpatho-Ukraine|Transcarpathia]], and the third in 1941 in Lviv. All those attempts had been made in [[war|wartime]], and all had come to grief. Would this one be different? The next three months would tell. A popular referendum scheduled for December 1, 1991, the same day as the previously scheduled election of Ukraine’s first president, would confirm or reject the parliamentary vote for independence...&#039;&#039;&#039;The vote for Ukraine’s independence spelled the end of the Soviet Union.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Historian [[Serhii Plokhy]] &#039;&#039;The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) pp 320–321&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*These days in Europe, many countries are sympathetic towards Ukraine and the situation here - of course, this touches a lot of people from different states. The fact that volunteers and government organizations work together on this and these kinds of [[Humanitarianism|humanitarian]] actions happen - is not unique, but it proves, that there are a lot of regular folks out there who care about Ukraine and its future&lt;br /&gt;
**Juris Poikans, Latvia&#039;s Ambassador to Ukraine, quoted on &#039;&#039;UAToday&#039;&#039; (February 11, 2016), [http://uatoday.tv/politics/latvia-sends-more-aid-to-ukraine-589114.html &amp;quot;Latvia sends more aid to Ukraine&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Ukraine, you don&#039;t build a [[democracy]]; it already exists. You just defend it and exactly this. What makes Ukraine unique, its struggle deeply and profoundly...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Petro Poroshenko|Petro Poroshenko]], [https://www.c-span.org/video/?321426-1/ukrainian-president-petro-poroshenko-address-congress&amp;amp;start=1496 speech to the U.S. Congress] (18 September 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
* “What does Ukraine look like?”...it’s green and gently rolling, and dotted with [[medieval]] fortresses, romantically neglected baroque [[palace|palaces]] and monasteries, and quiet, pretty towns and little cities, much like those of [[Austria]] or the Czech Republic. Kyiv itself is a grand Belle Époque metropolis with up-and-down cobbled streets and chestnut trees. There are funny little back alleys and courtyards full of coffee shops and art galleries, leafy parks with views over the sprawling river Dnipro, and an array of glorious [[churches]], the grandest of them the 11th-century Saint Sophia Cathedral.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/15/ukrainian-heritage-under-threat-truth-soviet-era-russia &amp;quot;Ukrainian heritage is under threat – and so is the truth about Soviet-era Russia&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;] (15 March 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Ukraine|Ukraina]]&#039;&#039; is literally translated as “on the edge” or “borderland”, and that is exactly what it is. Flat, fertile, and fatally tempting to invaders&#039;&#039;&#039;, Ukraine was split between Russia and Poland from the mid-17th century to the end of the 18th, between [[Russia]] and [[Austria]] through the 19th, and between Russia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Romania between the two world wars. Until the [[Soviet Union]] collapsed in 1991 it had never been an independent state.  &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] &#039;&#039;Borderland: a journey through the history of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 1&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Odessa numismatic museum photo 05.jpg|thumb|From the tenth century to the thirteenth it [Kiev] was the capital of the eastern Slavs’ first great civilisation, Kievan Rus. ~ [[Anna Reid]] (Silver coin shows [[w:Vladimir the Great|Vladimir the Great]] (958–1015))]]&lt;br /&gt;
* But the past that gives [[w:Kyiv|Kiev]] unique glamour, that made it ‘the City’ to the novelist [[Mikhail Bulgakov]] and the ‘Joy of the World’ to the medieval chroniclers, is not the brash boom town of the turn of the last century, but the Kiev of a thousand years ago. From the tenth century to the thirteenth it was the capital of the eastern Slavs’ first great civilisation, Kievan Rus. And here Ukraine’s fight for an identity commences. Generations of scholars have bandied insults about how Rus began, how it was governed, even about how it got its name. But the biggest argument of all is over who Rus belongs to. Did Kievan Rus civilisation pass eastward, to Muscovy and the Russians, or did it stay put, in Ukraine? &#039;&#039;&#039;‘If Moscow is Russia’s heart,’ runs a Russian proverb, ‘and St Petersburg its head, Kiev is its mother.’&#039;&#039;&#039; Ukrainians, of course, say Kiev has nothing whatsoever to do with Russia – if she mothered anybody, it was the Ukrainians themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] &#039;&#039;Borderland: a journey through the history of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here begins Ukraine’s great debate – still raw, still undecided: are Ukrainians Central Europeans, like the Poles, or a species of Russian? Poles used to call western Ukraine ‘Eastern Little [[Poland]]’; the Russian name for Ukraine was ‘Little [[Russia]].&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] &#039;&#039;Borderland: a journey through the history of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ukrainian society is less ambiguous today and Ukrainian identity is becoming increasingly civic rather than ethnic, and increasingly incompatible with a supra-ethnic, non-civic, quasi-religious, [[w:East Slavs|East Slavonic]] identity. While civic unity and civic identity are on the rise, Ukrainian attitudes toward Russians remain rather positive, in contrast to the highly negative Russian attitudes toward Ukrainians. First, Ukrainian media do not practice [[w:Hate speech|hate speech]] and [[Propaganda|propagandistic]] [[Mind control|brainwashing]] on the scale of the Russian media. And second, Ukrainians are much less inclined to identify the people with the state; their loathing of Putin has not translated into a similar attitude toward common Russians. Many Ukrainians still want open borders and good relations with Russia, even though that’s increasingly impossible at a time of war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Mykola Riabchuk|Mykola Riabchuk]], as quoted in [http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/alexander-j-motyl/ukrainian-identity-after-euromaiden &amp;quot;Ukrainian Identity After the Euromaidan&amp;quot;] (29 March 2016), by [[w:Alexander J. Motyl|Alexander J. Motyl]], &#039;&#039;Ukraine&#039;s Orange Blues&#039;&#039;, World Affairs Journal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] and [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] rose to power in [[Berlin]] and [[Moscow]], but their visions of transformation concerned above all the lands between. Their utopias of control overlapped in Ukraine. Hitler remembered the ephemeral [[Germany|German]] eastern colony of 1918 as German access to the Ukrainian breadbasket. Stalin, who had served [[Russian Revolution|his revolution]] in Ukraine shortly thereafter, regarded the land in much the same way. Its farmland, and its [[Peasant|peasants]], were to be exploited in the making of a modern [[Industry|industrial]] state. Hitler looked upon [[w:Collectivization|collectivization]] as a disastrous failure, and presented it as proof of the failure of [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[communism]] as such. But he had no doubt that Germans could make of Ukraine a land of [[milk]] and [[honey]]. For both Hitler and Stalin, Ukraine was more than a source of [[food]]. It was the place that would enable them to break the rules of traditional [[economics]], rescue their countries from [[poverty]] and [[isolation]], and remake the continent in their own image. Their programs and their power all depended upon their control of Ukraine’s fertile soil and its millions of agricultural laborers. In 1933, Ukrainians would died in the millions, in the [[w:Holodomir|greatest artificial famine in the history of world]]. This was the beginning of the special history of Ukraine, but not the end. In 1941 [[w:Operation Barbarossa|Hitler would seize Ukraine from Stalin]], and attempt to realize his own [[Colonialism|colonial]] vision beginning with the [[The Holocaust|shooting of Jews]] and the starvation of Soviet prisoners of war. The [[Stalinism|Stalinists]] colonized their own country, and the Nazis colonized occupied Soviet Ukraine: and the inhabitants of Ukraine suffered and suffered. During the years that both Stalin and Hitler were in power, more people were killed in Ukraine than anywhere else in the bloodlands, or in Europe, or in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin&#039;&#039;. E-book, New York: Basic Books, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1919, when he imposed his regime on Ukraine, [[Lenin]] gave her several Russian provinces to assuage her feelings. These provinces have never historically belonged to Ukraine. I am talking about the eastern and southern territories of today&#039;s Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
:Then, in 1954, [[Khrushchev]], with the arbitrary capriciousness of a satrap, made a &amp;quot;gift&amp;quot; of the Crimea to Ukraine. But even he did not manage to make Ukraine a &amp;quot;gift&amp;quot; of [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]], which remained a separate city under the jurisdiction of the U.S.S.R. central government. This was accomplished by the American State Department, first verbally through Ambassador Popadiuk in Kiev and later in a more official manner.&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does the State Department decide who should get Sevastopol? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994) [https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html Reprinted in &#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039; (2008)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===U===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kyiv, Euro Maidan 2013 (11278551503).jpg|thumb|Ukraine&#039;s [[freedom]] is still alive, and so also is [[liberty]] ~ [[w:Pavlo Chubynsky|Pavlo Chubynsky]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Ukraine is not dead&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; (Ukrainian national anthem)&lt;br /&gt;
: Ukraine&#039;s [[freedom]] is still alive, and so also is [[liberty]],&lt;br /&gt;
: And fortune will smile on us, young [[siblings|brothers]].&lt;br /&gt;
: All our [[enemies]] will die like dew in [[sun]].&lt;br /&gt;
: And at last we will be rulers of our [[home]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
: We&#039;ll devote our souls and bodies to our [[free will]],&lt;br /&gt;
: And we will prove that we are all of [[w:Cossack|Cossack]] origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pavlo Chubynsky|Pavlo Chubynsky]] (1839–1884), [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Translation:Ukraine_is_not_dead translated from Ukrainian by Wikisource]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ukraine has always aspired to be free: but being surrounded by [[w:Muscovy|Muscovy]], the [[w:Ottoman Empire|states of the Sultan]], and [[w:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth|Poland]], a protector had to be sought, and consequently a master in one of these three states. She first put herself under the protection of Poland, who treated her too much as subject. She then gave herself to the Muscovite, who governed her as a slave as much as he could. At first the Ukrainians enjoyed the privilege of electing a prince under the name of general; but soon they were stripped of this right, and their general was appointed by the court of Moscow. (L’Ukraine a toujours aspiré à être libre : mais étant entourée de la Moscovie, des états du grand-seigneur, et de la Pologne, il lui a fallu chercher un protecteur, et par conséquent un maître dans l’un de ces trois états. Elle se mit d’abord sous la protection de la Pologne qui la traita trop en sujette : elle se donna depuis au Moscovite, qui la gouverna en esclave autant qu’il le put. D’abord les Ukrainiens jouirent du privilège d’élire un prince sous le nom de général ; mais bientôt ils furent dépouillés de ce droit, et leur général fut nommé par la cour de Moscou.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]] 1731, &#039;&#039;Histoire de Charles XII&#039;&#039; (History of Charles XII), p 161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Any signature to a deal on forming a new Soviet Union means the breakup of the country&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Arseniy Yatsenyuk, a prominent opposition member, quoted on &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25290959 &amp;quot;Ukraine&#039;s capital Kiev gripped by huge pro-EU demonstration&amp;quot;], December 8, 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis]] &lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikinews}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wiktionary-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Commonscat-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikisource-inline|Portal:Ukraine}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikibooks-inline|Wikijunior:Europe/Ukraine}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikivoyage-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ukraine| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Countries in Eurasia‎]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Ukraine&amp;diff=3121467</id>
		<title>Ukraine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Ukraine&amp;diff=3121467"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T15:57:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: Ilyin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag of Ukraine.svg|thumb|in Ukraine you don&#039;t build a democracy; it already exists. You just defend it. ~ [[w:Petro Poroshenko|Petro Poroshenko]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lesser Coat of Arms of Ukraine.svg|thumb|If the country controlled by Kyiv didn’t fracture in 2014, when the government and army were weak, polarization was high, and Putin could have invaded with impunity, it won&#039;t. ~ [[w:Alexander J. Motyl|Alexander J. Motyl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Monastyr Karmelitiv Bosykh panorama.jpg|thumb|“What does Ukraine look like?” ...it’s green and gently rolling, and dotted with medieval fortresses, romantically neglected baroque palaces and monasteries, and quiet, pretty towns and little cities, much like those of Austria or the Czech Republic. ~ [[Anna Reid]] (Shown: Carmelite Monastery, Berdychiv, Zhytomyr Oblast)]][[File:80-391-0151 Kyiv St.Sophia&#039;s Cathedral RB 18 2 (cropped).jpg|thumb|Kyiv itself is a grand Belle Époque metropolis with up-and-down cobbled streets and chestnut trees. There are funny little back alleys and courtyards full of coffee shops and art galleries, leafy parks with views over the sprawling river Dnipro, and an array of glorious [[churches]], the grandest of them the 11th-century Saint Sophia Cathedral [shown]. ~ [[Anna Reid]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Ukraine|Ukraine]]&#039;&#039;&#039;  ([[w:Ukrainian|Ukrainian]]: &#039;&#039;Україна&#039;&#039;) is a country in [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern]] [[Europe]]. Ukraine borders the [[Russian Federation]] to the east and northeast, [[Belarus]] to the northwest, [[Poland]], [[w:Slovakia|Slovakia]] and [[w:Hungary|Hungary]] to the west, [[Romania]] and [[w:Moldova|Moldova]] to the southwest, and the [[w:Black Sea|Black Sea]] and [[w:Sea of Azov|Sea of Azov]] to the south and southeast, respectively. It has an area of 603,628 km2 (233,062 sq mi), making it the largest country entirely within the [[Europe]]an subcontinent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
* In carrying out the [[w:Declaration on State Sovereignty of Ukraine|Declaration on State Sovereignty of Ukraine]], the [[w:Verkhovna Rada|Verkhovna Rada]] of the [[w:Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic|Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic]] solemnly proclaims&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the independence of Ukraine and the creation of an independent Ukrainian state - Ukraine.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The territory of Ukraine is indivisible and inviolable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From now on in Ukraine only the Constitution and laws of Ukraine are in force.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This act takes effect from the moment of its approval.&lt;br /&gt;
** Original: здійснюючи Декларацію про державний суверенітет України, Верховна Рада Української Радянської Соціалістичної Республіки урочисто проголошує&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;незалежність України та створення самостійної Української держави — України.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Територія України є неподільною і недоторканною.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Віднині на території України мають чинність виключно Конституція і закони України.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Цей акт набирає чинності з моменту його схвалення.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Declaration of Independence of Ukraine|&#039;&#039;Act of Declaration of Independence of Ukraine&#039;&#039;]] (1991). [http://enciclopedia.us.es/index.php/Documento:Acta_de_Declaraci%C3%B3n_de_Independencia_de_Ucrania_(1991) Text of the act].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lemberg 1915 Mariyska.jpg|thumb|On Saturdays [[Judaism|Jews]] are strolling along all the streets, and no one pays attention. And such people who live in Lviv! Pure [[gold]]! ~ [[w:Sholem Aleichem|Sholem Aleichem]] &amp;quot;Lviv&amp;quot; (1906)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The city of [[w:Lviv|Lviv]] offers a picture of order,&lt;br /&gt;
:breadth, and beauty! A sight to feast the eye...&lt;br /&gt;
:In the [[heart]] of the city there unfolds a park&lt;br /&gt;
:where everyone is allowed to walk,&lt;br /&gt;
:even goats. The land of freedom!&lt;br /&gt;
:On Saturdays [[Judaism|Jews]] are strolling&lt;br /&gt;
:along all the streets, and no one&lt;br /&gt;
:pays attention. And such people&lt;br /&gt;
:who live in Lviv! Pure [[gold]]!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sholem Aleichem|Sholem Aleichem]], &amp;quot;Lviv&amp;quot; (1906) in [https://ukrainianjewishencounter.org/en/sholem-aleichems-creative-encounters-lviv-commemoration-100th-anniversary-departure-eternity/ &amp;quot;Sholem Aleichem’s Creative Encounters in Lviv (In Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of his Departure into Eternity)&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Ukrainian Jewish Encounter&#039;&#039; (2017)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The archival record backs up the testimony of the survivors. Neither crop failure nor bad weather caused the [[w:Holodomor|famine]] in Ukraine. Although the chaos of collectivization helped create the conditions that led to famine, the high numbers of deaths in Ukraine between 1932 and 1934, and especially the spike in the spring of 1933, were not caused directly by collectivization either. Starvation was the result, rather, of the forcible removal of [[food]] from people’s homes; the roadblocks that prevented peasants from seeking work or food; the harsh rules of the blacklists imposed on [[farm]]s and villages; the restrictions on barter and trade; and the vicious [[propaganda]] campaign designed to persuade Ukrainians to watch, unmoved, as their neighbours died of hunger.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Applebaum]] in &#039;&#039;Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2017) quoted at [https://huri.harvard.edu/news/ukraine-flames-1917-revolution &amp;quot;Ukraine in the Flames of the 1917 Revolution&amp;quot; (Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute, September 13, 2017)]&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]], the [[Russia|Russian Federation]], the [[United Kingdom|United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland]], and the [[United States|United States of America]],&lt;br /&gt;
: Welcoming the Accession of Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as a non-nuclear-weapon state,&lt;br /&gt;
: Taking into account the commitment of Ukraine to eliminate all [[nuclear weapons]] from its territory within a specified period of time,&lt;br /&gt;
: Noting the changes in the world-wide security situation, including the end of the [[Cold War]], which have brought about conditions for deep reductions in nuclear forces,&lt;br /&gt;
: Confirm the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:: 1. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the [[w:Helsinki Accords|CSCE Final Act]], to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
:: 2. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations...&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ukraine._Memorandum_on_Security_Assurances &amp;quot;Budapest Memorandum&amp;quot; signed December 5, 1994]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
* This ignorance of Ukraine has always been aggravating, but no one regarded it as a national security threat until the start of the Kremlin’s [[w:Hybrid war|hybrid war]] against Ukraine. All that changed when “[[w:Little green men (Russo-Ukrainian War)|little green men]]” began appearing in [[w:Crimea|Crimea]] and [[w:Eastern Ukraine|eastern Ukraine]]. It soon became clear that [[disinformation]] would play a key role in the Kremlin’s hybrid war, with Russia’s information offensive relying heavily on outside ignorance of Ukraine. Ukrainians watched in horror as the country’s complex relationship with its [[w:Tsarist Russia|Tsarist]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] past was reduced to the tribal binary of [[Russian language|Russian]]-speakers versus [[w:Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]]-speakers. Ukraine was depicted as a [[Fascism|fascist]] [[w:military junta|junta]], a [[Nazism|Nazi]] [[dictatorship]], and a [[w:Failed state|failed state]]. These nightmarish visions gained remarkable levels of traction in the international media, largely because Ukraine was such an unknown quantity.&lt;br /&gt;
**Vladislav Davidzon and Peter Dickinson, [https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/revealing-europe-s-best-kept-secret/ &amp;quot;Revealing Europe’s Best-Kept Secret&amp;quot; (March 13, 2016)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many people in Europe or North America know that Kyiv is the largest Russian-speaking city in the world outside of Russia? How many are aware that Ukraine has been one of Europe’s most multicultural communities for centuries?&lt;br /&gt;
**Vladislav Davidzon and Peter Dickinson, [https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/revealing-europe-s-best-kept-secret/ &amp;quot;Revealing Europe’s Best-Kept Secret&amp;quot; (March 13, 2016)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]] is recognized as the most threatened part of Russia in terms of secession and conquest. Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real grounds. It arose from the ambition of the leaders and the international intrigue of conquest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russians are a branch of a single, Slavic-Russian people.&#039;&#039;&#039; This branch has no reason to be at enmity with other branches of the same people and to separate into a separate state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Having seceded, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russia and Great Russia are bound together by faith, tribe, historical fate, geographical location, economy, culture and politics.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The foreigners who are preparing the dismemberment must remember that they are declaring by this to the whole of Russia a centuries-old struggle. There will be no peace and no economic prosperity under such a dismemberment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russia will turn into a source of civil and international wars for centuries. The dismembering power will become the most hated of the enemies of national Russia.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the struggle against it, all alliances and all means will be used. Russia will shift its center to the Urals, gather all its huge forces, develop its technology, find powerful allies for itself and fight until it completely and forever undermines the power of the dismembering power.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Russia is not looking for anyone&#039;s death, but it will be able to respond in time to any attempt at dismemberment and will fight to the end. It is more profitable for any power to have Russia as a friend, not an enemy. History hasn&#039;t said its last word yet...&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], &amp;quot;Fundamentals of the struggle for national Russia&amp;quot; (Основы борьбы за национальную Россию), 1938. Interestingly quoted in [https://rg.ru/2022/05/25/prorochestva-ilina.html this May 25, 2022 article] by [[w:ru:Звягинцев, Александр Григорьевич|Alexander Zvyagintsev]] published in [[w:Rossiiskaya gazeta|Rossiiskaya gazeta]], the Russian Federation&#039;s own government gazette.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In it, Zvyagintsev draws a parallel between the [[w:Livonian Brothers of the Sword|Livonian Brothers of the Sword]], the [[w:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], the [[w:Swedish Empire|Swedish Empire]], the [[w:Greater Germanic Reich|Nazis]] and the present-day [[European Union]] by putting them all under a same umbrella term: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Several years passed, and the diabolical fascist &#039;&#039;&#039;machine of a united Europe&#039;&#039;&#039; fell upon our country. She, like once the hordes of swordsmen, Poles and Swedes, Frederick and Napoleon, was defeated.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
* If the country controlled by Kyiv didn’t fracture in 2014, when the government and army were weak, polarization was high, and [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]] could have invaded with impunity, it won’t in 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander J. Motyl|Alexander J. Motyl]], [http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/alexander-j-motyl/negativists-are-wrong-ukraine &amp;quot;The Negativists are Wrong on Ukraine&amp;quot;] (15 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Ukraine&#039;s Orange Blues&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;World Affairs Journal&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many people seem to feel that the breakup of the [[Soviet Union]] was the end of the [[Cold War]]. That’s wrong. It had ended two years before that. And the breakup of the Soviet Union did not occur because of Western pressure; it occurred because of internal pressures within the Soviet Union. And it was something that [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] did not wish. As a matter of fact, one of his last speeches, when there was a Soviet Union, was in Kyiv, when he advised Ukrainians to join [[Gorbachev]]’s voluntary federation, that he was proposing, and actually warned against suicidal nationalism. Those words, you know, are not remembered much now. People seem to think that Ukraine is free because of the end of the Cold War and the pressure of the West as one of the fruits of victory in the Cold War. This is simply incorrect. It turns history upside down... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ukraine is showing [[Belarus]] an example of how one should fight for freedom. I am sure that our countries have a common future in [[Europe]], where neither Ukrainians nor Belarusians will die.&lt;br /&gt;
** Vladimir Neklyaev, a Belarusian opposition leader, quoted on &#039;&#039;CBS News&#039;&#039;, [http://www.cbsnews.com/news/as-ukraine-protests-grow-slain-demonstrators-mourned/ &amp;quot;As Ukraine protests grow, slain demonstrators mourned&amp;quot;], January 26, 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Waräger-Russen, Friedrich Kruse, 1859.jpg|thumb|The term “Rus’,” brought to the region by the Vikings [Varangians shown] in the ninth and tenth centuries, was adopted by the inhabitants of Kyivan Rus’ ~ [[Serhii Plokhy]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The ancestors of modern Ukrainians lived in dozens of premodern and modern principalities, kingdoms, and empires, and in the course of time they took on various names and identities. The two key terms that they used to define their land were “Rus’” and “Ukraine.” (In the Cyrillic alphabet, Rus’ is spelled Pycь: the last character is a soft sign indicating palatalized pronunciation of the preceding consonant.) &#039;&#039;&#039;The term “Rus’,” brought to the region by the [[w:Varangians|Vikings]] in the ninth and tenth centuries, was adopted by the inhabitants of Kyivan Rus’&#039;&#039;&#039;, who took the Viking princes and warriors into their fold and Slavicized them. The ancestors of today’s Ukrainians, Russians, and Belarusians adopted the name “Rus’” in forms that varied from the Scandinavian/Slavic “Rus’” to the Hellenized “Rossiia.” In the eighteenth century, Muscovy adopted the latter form as the official name of its state and empire.&lt;br /&gt;
** Historian [[Serhii Plokhy]] &#039;&#039;The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p xxii&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2 hryvnia 1992 front-small.jpg|thumb|Both Ukrainians and Russians claim Yaroslav the Wise as one of their eminent medieval rulers, and his image appears on the banknotes of both countries. The Ukrainian bill depicts Yaroslav with a Ukrainian-style moustache. ~ Serhii Plokhy [Ukrainian banknote shown]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Banknote 1000 rubles (1997) front.jpg|thumb|The Russian bill shows Yaroslav with a [[beard]] in the tradition of Ivan the Terrible and the Muscovite tsars of his era. ~ Serhii Plokhy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Both Ukrainians and Russians claim [[w:Yaroslav the Wise|Yaroslav the Wise]] as one of their eminent medieval rulers, and his image appears on the [[money|banknotes]] of both countries.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Ukrainian bill depicts Yaroslav with a Ukrainian-style moustache in the tradition of Prince Sviatoslav and the Ukrainian [[w:Cossacks|Cossacks]]. On the Russian note, we see a monument to him as the legendary founder of the Russian city of Yaroslavl, first mentioned in a chronicle seventeen years after his death. The Russian bill shows Yaroslav with a [[beard]] in the tradition of Ivan the Terrible and the Muscovite tsars of his era.&lt;br /&gt;
** Historian [[Serhii Plokhy]] &#039;&#039;The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:Levko Lukianenko|Lukianenko]]’s declaration referred to the thousand-year history of Ukrainian statehood, meaning the tradition established by [[w:Kievan Rus&#039;|Kyivan Rus’]]. His declaration was in fact the fourth attempt to proclaim Ukrainian independence in the twentieth century: the first occurred in 1918 in [[w:Kyiv|Kyiv]] and then in [[w:Lviv|Lviv]], the second in 1939 in [[w:Carpatho-Ukraine|Transcarpathia]], and the third in 1941 in Lviv. All those attempts had been made in [[war|wartime]], and all had come to grief. Would this one be different? The next three months would tell. A popular referendum scheduled for December 1, 1991, the same day as the previously scheduled election of Ukraine’s first president, would confirm or reject the parliamentary vote for independence...&#039;&#039;&#039;The vote for Ukraine’s independence spelled the end of the Soviet Union.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Historian [[Serhii Plokhy]] &#039;&#039;The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) pp 320–321&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*These days in Europe, many countries are sympathetic towards Ukraine and the situation here - of course, this touches a lot of people from different states. The fact that volunteers and government organizations work together on this and these kinds of [[Humanitarianism|humanitarian]] actions happen - is not unique, but it proves, that there are a lot of regular folks out there who care about Ukraine and its future&lt;br /&gt;
**Juris Poikans, Latvia&#039;s Ambassador to Ukraine, quoted on &#039;&#039;UAToday&#039;&#039; (February 11, 2016), [http://uatoday.tv/politics/latvia-sends-more-aid-to-ukraine-589114.html &amp;quot;Latvia sends more aid to Ukraine&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Ukraine, you don&#039;t build a [[democracy]]; it already exists. You just defend it and exactly this. What makes Ukraine unique, its struggle deeply and profoundly...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Petro Poroshenko|Petro Poroshenko]], [https://www.c-span.org/video/?321426-1/ukrainian-president-petro-poroshenko-address-congress&amp;amp;start=1496 speech to the U.S. Congress] (18 September 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
* “What does Ukraine look like?”...it’s green and gently rolling, and dotted with [[medieval]] fortresses, romantically neglected baroque [[palace|palaces]] and monasteries, and quiet, pretty towns and little cities, much like those of [[Austria]] or the Czech Republic. Kyiv itself is a grand Belle Époque metropolis with up-and-down cobbled streets and chestnut trees. There are funny little back alleys and courtyards full of coffee shops and art galleries, leafy parks with views over the sprawling river Dnipro, and an array of glorious [[churches]], the grandest of them the 11th-century Saint Sophia Cathedral.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/15/ukrainian-heritage-under-threat-truth-soviet-era-russia &amp;quot;Ukrainian heritage is under threat – and so is the truth about Soviet-era Russia&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;] (15 March 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Ukraine|Ukraina]]&#039;&#039; is literally translated as “on the edge” or “borderland”, and that is exactly what it is. Flat, fertile, and fatally tempting to invaders&#039;&#039;&#039;, Ukraine was split between Russia and Poland from the mid-17th century to the end of the 18th, between [[Russia]] and [[Austria]] through the 19th, and between Russia, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Romania between the two world wars. Until the [[Soviet Union]] collapsed in 1991 it had never been an independent state.  &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] &#039;&#039;Borderland: a journey through the history of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 1&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Odessa numismatic museum photo 05.jpg|thumb|From the tenth century to the thirteenth it [Kiev] was the capital of the eastern Slavs’ first great civilisation, Kievan Rus. ~ [[Anna Reid]] (Silver coin shows [[w:Vladimir the Great|Vladimir the Great]] (958–1015))]]&lt;br /&gt;
* But the past that gives [[w:Kyiv|Kiev]] unique glamour, that made it ‘the City’ to the novelist [[Mikhail Bulgakov]] and the ‘Joy of the World’ to the medieval chroniclers, is not the brash boom town of the turn of the last century, but the Kiev of a thousand years ago. From the tenth century to the thirteenth it was the capital of the eastern Slavs’ first great civilisation, Kievan Rus. And here Ukraine’s fight for an identity commences. Generations of scholars have bandied insults about how Rus began, how it was governed, even about how it got its name. But the biggest argument of all is over who Rus belongs to. Did Kievan Rus civilisation pass eastward, to Muscovy and the Russians, or did it stay put, in Ukraine? &#039;&#039;&#039;‘If Moscow is Russia’s heart,’ runs a Russian proverb, ‘and St Petersburg its head, Kiev is its mother.’&#039;&#039;&#039; Ukrainians, of course, say Kiev has nothing whatsoever to do with Russia – if she mothered anybody, it was the Ukrainians themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] &#039;&#039;Borderland: a journey through the history of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here begins Ukraine’s great debate – still raw, still undecided: are Ukrainians Central Europeans, like the Poles, or a species of Russian? Poles used to call western Ukraine ‘Eastern Little [[Poland]]’; the Russian name for Ukraine was ‘Little [[Russia]].&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Reid]] &#039;&#039;Borderland: a journey through the history of Ukraine&#039;&#039; (2015) p 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ukrainian society is less ambiguous today and Ukrainian identity is becoming increasingly civic rather than ethnic, and increasingly incompatible with a supra-ethnic, non-civic, quasi-religious, [[w:East Slavs|East Slavonic]] identity. While civic unity and civic identity are on the rise, Ukrainian attitudes toward Russians remain rather positive, in contrast to the highly negative Russian attitudes toward Ukrainians. First, Ukrainian media do not practice [[w:Hate speech|hate speech]] and [[Propaganda|propagandistic]] [[Mind control|brainwashing]] on the scale of the Russian media. And second, Ukrainians are much less inclined to identify the people with the state; their loathing of Putin has not translated into a similar attitude toward common Russians. Many Ukrainians still want open borders and good relations with Russia, even though that’s increasingly impossible at a time of war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Mykola Riabchuk|Mykola Riabchuk]], as quoted in [http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/alexander-j-motyl/ukrainian-identity-after-euromaiden &amp;quot;Ukrainian Identity After the Euromaidan&amp;quot;] (29 March 2016), by [[w:Alexander J. Motyl|Alexander J. Motyl]], &#039;&#039;Ukraine&#039;s Orange Blues&#039;&#039;, World Affairs Journal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] and [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] rose to power in [[Berlin]] and [[Moscow]], but their visions of transformation concerned above all the lands between. Their utopias of control overlapped in Ukraine. Hitler remembered the ephemeral [[Germany|German]] eastern colony of 1918 as German access to the Ukrainian breadbasket. Stalin, who had served [[Russian Revolution|his revolution]] in Ukraine shortly thereafter, regarded the land in much the same way. Its farmland, and its [[Peasant|peasants]], were to be exploited in the making of a modern [[Industry|industrial]] state. Hitler looked upon [[w:Collectivization|collectivization]] as a disastrous failure, and presented it as proof of the failure of [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[communism]] as such. But he had no doubt that Germans could make of Ukraine a land of [[milk]] and [[honey]]. For both Hitler and Stalin, Ukraine was more than a source of [[food]]. It was the place that would enable them to break the rules of traditional [[economics]], rescue their countries from [[poverty]] and [[isolation]], and remake the continent in their own image. Their programs and their power all depended upon their control of Ukraine’s fertile soil and its millions of agricultural laborers. In 1933, Ukrainians would died in the millions, in the [[w:Holodomir|greatest artificial famine in the history of world]]. This was the beginning of the special history of Ukraine, but not the end. In 1941 [[w:Operation Barbarossa|Hitler would seize Ukraine from Stalin]], and attempt to realize his own [[Colonialism|colonial]] vision beginning with the [[The Holocaust|shooting of Jews]] and the starvation of Soviet prisoners of war. The [[Stalinism|Stalinists]] colonized their own country, and the Nazis colonized occupied Soviet Ukraine: and the inhabitants of Ukraine suffered and suffered. During the years that both Stalin and Hitler were in power, more people were killed in Ukraine than anywhere else in the bloodlands, or in Europe, or in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin&#039;&#039;. E-book, New York: Basic Books, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1919, when he imposed his regime on Ukraine, [[Lenin]] gave her several Russian provinces to assuage her feelings. These provinces have never historically belonged to Ukraine. I am talking about the eastern and southern territories of today&#039;s Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
:Then, in 1954, [[Khrushchev]], with the arbitrary capriciousness of a satrap, made a &amp;quot;gift&amp;quot; of the Crimea to Ukraine. But even he did not manage to make Ukraine a &amp;quot;gift&amp;quot; of [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]], which remained a separate city under the jurisdiction of the U.S.S.R. central government. This was accomplished by the American State Department, first verbally through Ambassador Popadiuk in Kiev and later in a more official manner.&lt;br /&gt;
:Why does the State Department decide who should get Sevastopol? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994) [https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html Reprinted in &#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039; (2008)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===U===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kyiv, Euro Maidan 2013 (11278551503).jpg|thumb|Ukraine&#039;s [[freedom]] is still alive, and so also is [[liberty]] ~ [[w:Pavlo Chubynsky|Pavlo Chubynsky]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Ukraine is not dead&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; (Ukrainian national anthem)&lt;br /&gt;
: Ukraine&#039;s [[freedom]] is still alive, and so also is [[liberty]],&lt;br /&gt;
: And fortune will smile on us, young [[siblings|brothers]].&lt;br /&gt;
: All our [[enemies]] will die like dew in [[sun]].&lt;br /&gt;
: And at last we will be rulers of our [[home]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
: We&#039;ll devote our souls and bodies to our [[free will]],&lt;br /&gt;
: And we will prove that we are all of [[w:Cossack|Cossack]] origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pavlo Chubynsky|Pavlo Chubynsky]] (1839–1884), [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Translation:Ukraine_is_not_dead translated from Ukrainian by Wikisource]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ukraine has always aspired to be free: but being surrounded by [[w:Muscovy|Muscovy]], the [[w:Ottoman Empire|states of the Sultan]], and [[w:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth|Poland]], a protector had to be sought, and consequently a master in one of these three states. She first put herself under the protection of Poland, who treated her too much as subject. She then gave herself to the Muscovite, who governed her as a slave as much as he could. At first the Ukrainians enjoyed the privilege of electing a prince under the name of general; but soon they were stripped of this right, and their general was appointed by the court of Moscow. (L’Ukraine a toujours aspiré à être libre : mais étant entourée de la Moscovie, des états du grand-seigneur, et de la Pologne, il lui a fallu chercher un protecteur, et par conséquent un maître dans l’un de ces trois états. Elle se mit d’abord sous la protection de la Pologne qui la traita trop en sujette : elle se donna depuis au Moscovite, qui la gouverna en esclave autant qu’il le put. D’abord les Ukrainiens jouirent du privilège d’élire un prince sous le nom de général ; mais bientôt ils furent dépouillés de ce droit, et leur général fut nommé par la cour de Moscou.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]] 1731, &#039;&#039;Histoire de Charles XII&#039;&#039; (History of Charles XII), p 161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Any signature to a deal on forming a new Soviet Union means the breakup of the country&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Arseniy Yatsenyuk, a prominent opposition member, quoted on &#039;&#039;BBC News&#039;&#039;, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25290959 &amp;quot;Ukraine&#039;s capital Kiev gripped by huge pro-EU demonstration&amp;quot;], December 8, 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis]] &lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikinews}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wiktionary-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Commonscat-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikisource-inline|Portal:Ukraine}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikibooks-inline|Wikijunior:Europe/Ukraine}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikivoyage-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ukraine| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Countries in Eurasia‎]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121466</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121466"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T15:57:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* I */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [http://web.archive.org/web/20200928053316/https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne-znaet-rossii-ivan-ilin &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ukraine]] is recognized as the most threatened part of Russia in terms of secession and conquest. Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real grounds. It arose from the ambition of the leaders and the international intrigue of conquest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russians are a branch of a single, Slavic-Russian people.&#039;&#039;&#039; This branch has no reason to be at enmity with other branches of the same people and to separate into a separate state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Having seceded, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russia and Great Russia are bound together by faith, tribe, historical fate, geographical location, economy, culture and politics.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The foreigners who are preparing the dismemberment must remember that they are declaring by this to the whole of Russia a centuries-old struggle. There will be no peace and no economic prosperity under such a dismemberment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russia will turn into a source of civil and international wars for centuries. The dismembering power will become the most hated of the enemies of national Russia.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the struggle against it, all alliances and all means will be used. Russia will shift its center to the Urals, gather all its huge forces, develop its technology, find powerful allies for itself and fight until it completely and forever undermines the power of the dismembering power.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Russia is not looking for anyone&#039;s death, but it will be able to respond in time to any attempt at dismemberment and will fight to the end. It is more profitable for any power to have Russia as a friend, not an enemy. History hasn&#039;t said its last word yet...&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], &amp;quot;Fundamentals of the struggle for national Russia&amp;quot; (Основы борьбы за национальную Россию), 1938. Interestingly quoted in [https://rg.ru/2022/05/25/prorochestva-ilina.html this May 25, 2022 article] by [[w:ru:Звягинцев, Александр Григорьевич|Alexander Zvyagintsev]] published in [[w:Rossiiskaya gazeta|Rossiiskaya gazeta]], the Russian Federation&#039;s own government gazette.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In it, Zvyagintsev draws a parallel between the [[w:Livonian Brothers of the Sword|Livonian Brothers of the Sword]], the [[w:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], the [[w:Swedish Empire|Swedish Empire]], the [[w:Greater Germanic Reich|Nazis]] and the present-day [[European Union]] by putting them all under a same umbrella term: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Several years passed, and the diabolical fascist &#039;&#039;&#039;machine of a united Europe&#039;&#039;&#039; fell upon our country. She, like once the hordes of swordsmen, Poles and Swedes, Frederick and Napoleon, was defeated.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]], [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russian people will suffer a blow, it will leave the cities for fields, forests ... It will pick mushrooms, berries, nuts - the Russian people is ready in a moment of great sorrow to turn into a chipmunk people, a hamster people, it will store up for the winter all sorts of roots, all sorts of onions.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Русский народ перебьётся, он уйдёт из городов в поля, в леса... Будет собирать грибы, ягоды, орехи — русский народ готов в минуту больших печалей превратиться в народ-бурундук, народ-хомяк, он будет запасать на зиму всякие корешки, всякие луковки.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Prokhanov|Alexander Prokhanov]] on the sanctions Russia faces following the 2022 invasion of [[Ukraine]], from the interview [https://aif.ru/politics/world/pisatel_aleksandr_prohanov_mirovoy_perekur_konchilsya Writer Alexander Prokhanov: &amp;quot;The global smoke break is over&amp;quot;] (6 April 2022), &#039;&#039;[[w:Argumenty i fakty|Argumenty i fakty]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121465</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121465"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T15:54:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* I */ I allow myself this writing style as we on Wikiquote don&amp;#039;t need to be as &amp;quot;encyclopedic&amp;quot; than on Wikipedia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [http://web.archive.org/web/20200928053316/https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne-znaet-rossii-ivan-ilin &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ukraine is recognized as the most threatened part of Russia in terms of secession and conquest. Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon, devoid of real grounds. It arose from the ambition of the leaders and the international intrigue of conquest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russians are a branch of a single, Slavic-Russian people.&#039;&#039;&#039; This branch has no reason to be at enmity with other branches of the same people and to separate into a separate state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Having seceded, this state betrays itself to be conquered and plundered by foreigners.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Little Russia and Great Russia are bound together by faith, tribe, historical fate, geographical location, economy, culture and politics.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The foreigners who are preparing the dismemberment must remember that they are declaring by this to the whole of Russia a centuries-old struggle. There will be no peace and no economic prosperity under such a dismemberment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russia will turn into a source of civil and international wars for centuries. The dismembering power will become the most hated of the enemies of national Russia.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the struggle against it, all alliances and all means will be used. Russia will shift its center to the Urals, gather all its huge forces, develop its technology, find powerful allies for itself and fight until it completely and forever undermines the power of the dismembering power.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Russia is not looking for anyone&#039;s death, but it will be able to respond in time to any attempt at dismemberment and will fight to the end. It is more profitable for any power to have Russia as a friend, not an enemy. History hasn&#039;t said its last word yet...&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], &amp;quot;Fundamentals of the struggle for national Russia&amp;quot; (Основы борьбы за национальную Россию), 1938. Interestingly quoted in [https://rg.ru/2022/05/25/prorochestva-ilina.html this May 25, 2022 article] by [[w:ru:Звягинцев, Александр Григорьевич|Alexander Zvyagintsev]] published in [[w:Rossiiskaya gazeta|Rossiiskaya gazeta]], the Russian Federation&#039;s own government gazette.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In it, Zvyagintsev draws a parallel between the [[w:Livonian Brothers of the Sword|Livonian Brothers of the Sword]], the [[w:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]], the [[w:Swedish Empire|Swedish Empire]], the [[w:Greater Germanic Reich|Nazis]] and the present-day [[European Union]] by putting them all under a same umbrella term: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;Several years passed, and the diabolical fascist &#039;&#039;&#039;machine of a united Europe&#039;&#039;&#039; fell upon our country. She, like once the hordes of swordsmen, Poles and Swedes, Frederick and Napoleon, was defeated.&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]], [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russian people will suffer a blow, it will leave the cities for fields, forests ... It will pick mushrooms, berries, nuts - the Russian people is ready in a moment of great sorrow to turn into a chipmunk people, a hamster people, it will store up for the winter all sorts of roots, all sorts of onions.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Русский народ перебьётся, он уйдёт из городов в поля, в леса... Будет собирать грибы, ягоды, орехи — русский народ готов в минуту больших печалей превратиться в народ-бурундук, народ-хомяк, он будет запасать на зиму всякие корешки, всякие луковки.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Prokhanov|Alexander Prokhanov]] on the sanctions Russia faces following the 2022 invasion of [[Ukraine]], from the interview [https://aif.ru/politics/world/pisatel_aleksandr_prohanov_mirovoy_perekur_konchilsya Writer Alexander Prokhanov: &amp;quot;The global smoke break is over&amp;quot;] (6 April 2022), &#039;&#039;[[w:Argumenty i fakty|Argumenty i fakty]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=3121438</id>
		<title>God</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=3121438"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T13:35:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: Undo revision 3121436 by 78.86.38.28 (talk) well tried&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Otheruses|God (disambiguation)}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Николай Бердяев.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;God is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Nikolai Berdyaev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fostre.tif|thumb| Who hath made man&#039;s mouth? or who maketh the dumb or deaf, or the seeing or the blind? have not I the LORD? ~ [[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Motherless - Luke Fildes.jpg|thumb|The [[Deity|gods]] of all [[pagan]] faiths have been allied with the [[rich]] [[rulers]]. The priests of most religions are the employees of the landowners. But the God of Israel has always claimed to be with the poor—whether in the legislation of [[Deuteronomy]], the [[words]] of the [[prophets]], or the [[experiences]] of the [[New Testament]]. Our God is on the side of the [[poor]]. ~ [[John Howard Yoder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:QUR&#039;AN 2981a.jpg|thumb|I [[know]] what you know not. ~ [[Quran]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Wealth Inequality - v2.png|thumb|Oppressed and oppressors cannot possibly mean the same thing when they speak of God. The God of the oppressed is a God of revolution who breaks the chains of slavery. The oppressors&#039; God is a God of slavery and must be destroyed along with the oppressors. ~ [[James Cone]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ludwig feuerbach.jpg|thumb|God is for man the [[w:commonplace book|commonplace book]] where he registers his highest feelings and thoughts, the genealogical album into which he enters the names of the things most dear and sacred to him. ~ [[Ludwig&amp;amp;nbsp;Feuerbach]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Schnorr von Carolsfeld Bibel in Bildern 1860 057.png|thumb|God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. ~ [[Psalms|Psalms 46:1 - 3]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simone Weil 1921.jpg|thumb|The only mark of God in us is that we feel that we are not God. ~ [[Simone&amp;amp;nbsp;Weil]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emerson, poet and thinker (1904) (14577386099).jpg|thumb|When we consider what is our thought of God we find that it is our own soul stripped of all inferiority and carried out to perfection. ~ [[Ralph&amp;amp;nbsp;Waldo&amp;amp;nbsp;Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brockhaus and Efron Jewish Encyclopedia e9 615-0.jpg|thumb|Only the idea of God gives me the confidence that morality will become reality on earth. And because I cannot live without this confidence, I cannot live without God. ~ [[Hermann&amp;amp;nbsp;Cohen]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Laurent de La Hyre - Allegory of Arithmetic - Walters 371917.jpg|thumb|He best honors God who makes his intellect as like God as possible. ~ [[Quintus Sextius]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Calvin 17.jpg|thumb|We cannot aspire to Him in earnest until we have begun to be displeased with ourselves. ~ [[John Calvin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:God the Father with His Right Hand Raised in Blessing.jpg|thumb|If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him. ~ [[Voltaire]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gregor von Nyssa.JPG|thumb|right|The love of gain, which is a large, incalculably large, element in every soul, when once applied to the desire for God, will bless the one who has it. ~ [[Gregory of Nyssa]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Percy Bysshe Shelley by Alfred Clint crop.jpg|thumb|If we find great difficulty from its admirable arrangement in conceiving that the Universe has existed from all eternity, and to resolve this difficulty suppose a Creator, how much more clearly must we perceive the necessity of this very Creator’s creation. ~ [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Friederich Nietzsche.jpg|thumb|Even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians, still take our fire, too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year-old faith, the Christian faith which was also [[Plato|Plato&#039;s]] faith, that God is truth; that truth is divine. ~ [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nietzsche1882 smaller.jpeg|thumb|You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price. ~ [[Friedrich&amp;amp;nbsp;Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bataille crop.jpg|thumb|If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated. ~ [[Georges Bataille]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Williboni.jpg|thumb|How wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed further and further back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know. ~ [[Dietrich&amp;amp;nbsp;Bonhoeffer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - Petites Mendiantes (1880).jpg|thumb|The God who appears to me is the comforter of the poor and their avenger in world history. This avenger of the poor is the God I love. ~ [[Hermann Cohen]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In [[monotheism]], &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:God|God]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is conceived of as the Supreme Being and principal object of [[faith]].&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha|&#039;&#039;[[#Bible|Bible]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Quran|Quran]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Book of Mormon|Book of Mormon]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; · [[#Anonymous|Anonymous]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotations listed alphabetically by author or work.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I refuse to prove that I exist,&amp;quot; says God, &amp;quot;for [[proof]] denies faith, and without faith, I am nothing.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oh,&amp;quot; says man, &amp;quot;but the [[w:Babel fish (The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy)|Babel fish]] is a dead give-away, isn&#039;t it? It proves You exist, and so therefore You don&#039;t.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oh, I hadn&#039;t thought of that,&amp;quot; says God, who promptly vanishes in a puff of [[logic]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Douglas Adams]], &#039;&#039;[[The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy]]&#039;&#039; (1979), [[The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy#Chapter 6|Chapter 6]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we say God is a [[spirit]], we know what we mean, as well as we do when we say that the pyramids of Egypt are matter. Let us be content, therefore, to believe him to be a spirit, that is, an essence that we know nothing of, in which originally and necessarily reside all energy, all power, all capacity, all activity, all wisdom, all goodness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Adams]], in a letter to [[Thomas Jefferson]] (17 January 1820)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nearer, my God, to Thee—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nearer to Thee—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;E&#039;en though it be a cross&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That raiseth me;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Still all my song shall be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Nearer, my God, to Thee,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nearer to Thee!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sarah Flower Adams]], &#039;&#039;Nearer, my God, to Thee!&#039;&#039; (c. 1841); an article in Notes and Queries states that the words were written by her sister, Mrs. Byrdes Flower Adams, and the music only by Sarah Flower Adams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God tells us [[Homosexuality|men fucking men]] is a terrible thing, but a father offering his two daughters, vestal [[Virginity|virgins]] no less, to a horde of horny buggers is [[heroic]]. Now that&#039;s straight. … God destroys the faggots with fire and brimstone. He turns a disobedient wife into salt. But he asks us to [[Idolatry|idolize]] [[Drunkenness|drunks]] [[Incest|who sleep with their daughters]] or offer them to a horny, unruly mob.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabih Alameddine]] on the [[Bible|biblical narrative]] of Lot and his family confronting the inhabitants of [[Sodom and Gomorrah]], as quoted by Wail S. Hassan in &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.com/books?id=vA5pAgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA207 Immigrant Narratives: Orientalism and Cultural Translation in Arab American and Arab British Literature]&#039;&#039; (2011), Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-979206-1}}, page 207.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nec audiendi qui solent dicere, vox populi, vox Dei, quum tumultuositas vulgi semper insaniae proxima sit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** And those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voice of the people is the voice of God, since the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: We should not listen to those who like to affirm that the voice of the people is the voice of God, for the tumult of the masses is truly close to madness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alcuin]] Works, Epistle 127 (to Charlemagne, AD 800)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Never place a period where God has placed a comma.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gracie Allen]], in her last letter to [[George Burns]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Two Minutes for God : Quick Fixes for the Spirit&#039;&#039; (2007) by Peter B. Panagore, p. 73; this was later used in a slogan for the [[w:United Church of Christ|United Church of Christ]]: &#039;&#039;&#039;Never place a period where God has placed a comma. God Is Still Speaking.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not only is there no God, but try getting a plumber on weekends.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;Getting Even&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit in my name in a Swiss bank.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Without Feathers|Without Feathers]]&#039;&#039; (1975)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The important thing, I think, is not to be bitter... if it turns out that there is a God, I don&#039;t think that he is evil. I think that the worst thing you could say is that he is, basically, an under-achiever. If God exists, I hope he has a good excuse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Love and Death|Love and Death]]&#039;&#039; (1975); also quoted in &#039;&#039;What Do Jews Believe? : The Customs and Culture of Modern Judaism&#039;&#039; (2007) by Edward Kessler, p. 66&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To you I&#039;m an atheist; to God, I&#039;m the Loyal Opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Stardust Memories|Stardust Memories]]&#039;&#039; (1980)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Love, Sex, Death &amp;amp; The Meaning of Life : The Films of Woody Allen&#039;&#039; (2001) by Foster Hirsch, p. 50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God — or [[Aum|Aum (om)]] —is the Highest Being of your inner self.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  [http://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Leaves-of-Moryas-Garden-I.php &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;],  6, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Love]] even the knot-grass. God created it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  237, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shepherds have received the revelations, While emperors have searched for them. Dogmatic scholars have resisted them. Leaders have been fearful of them. The Voice of God overshadows all when there is [[spiritual]] readiness.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  367, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They who deny God have not seen Him. 	&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  [http://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Leaves-of-Moryas-Garden-II.php &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden II, Illumination&#039;&#039;]  180, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The canon, “By thy God,” is the higher, and this canon is the basis of the New World. Formerly one said: “And my spirit rejoiceth in God, my Savior.” [[Now]] you will say: “And my spirit rejoiceth in God, thy Savior.”   Solemnly do I say that therein is salvation. “Long live thy God!” So you will say to everyone; and, exchanging Gods, you will walk to the One.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There where one might otherwise sink one can tread softly, if without negation. There where one could suffocate one can pass, by pronouncing “Thy God.” There where matter is revered one can pass only by elevating the earthly matter into the Cosmos. Essentially, one should not have any attachment to Earth... Thus, find the God of each one and exalt Him. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden II, Illumination&#039;&#039;,  211, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What is meant by &amp;quot;mad in God&amp;quot;? Why were the prophets of antiquity called madmen? Precisely because of the fire of straight-knowledge, which isolated them from all else, a valuable quality that severed them from the ordinary, everyday ways of thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Agni Yoga&#039;&#039;,    281, (1929) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Even in the most ancient times people understood the significance of the heart. They regarded the heart as the Dwelling of God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]], &#039;&#039;Heart&#039;&#039;  73, (1932)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Susan B. Anthony]], in an address to the National American Woman Suffrage Association (1896)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is the most noble of beings. Now it is impossible for a body to be the most noble of beings; for a body must be either animate or inanimate; and an animate body is manifestly nobler than any inanimate body. But an animate body is not animate precisely as body; otherwise all bodies would be animate. Therefore its animation depends upon some other thing, as our body depends for its animation on the soul. Hence that by which a body becomes animated must be nobler than the body. Therefore it is impossible that God should be a body.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Aquinas]], &#039;&#039;Summa Theologica&#039;&#039;, Part 1, Question 3 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ordina l&#039;uomo, e dio dispone.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man proposes, and God disposes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludovico Ariosto]], &#039;&#039;Orlando Furioso&#039;&#039; (1516), Chapter XLVI. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If I were not an [[atheist]], I would believe in a God who would choose to save people on the basis of the totality of their [[lives]] and not the pattern of their [[words]].&#039;&#039;&#039; I think he would prefer an [[honest]] and [[righteous]] atheist to a TV preacher whose every word is God, God, God, and whose every deed is foul, foul, foul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Asimov]], &#039;&#039;I. Asimov: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, in order to speak to [[Abraham]], must come from somewhere, must enter the earthly realm from some [[unknown]] heights or depths. Whence does he come, whence does he call to Abraham? We are not told. He does not come, like Zeus or [[w:Poseidon|Poseidon]], from the [[w:Aethiopia|Aethiopians]], where he has been enjoying a sacrificial feast. Nor are we told anything of his reasons for tempting Abraham so terribly. He has not, like Zeus, discussed them in set speeches with other gods gathered in council; nor have the deliberations in his own heart been presented to us; unexpected and mysterious, he enters the scene from some unknown height or depth and calls: Abraham! It will at once be said that this is to be explained by the particular concept of God which the Jews held and which was wholly different from that of the Greeks. True enough—but this constitutes no objection. For how is the Jewish concept of God to be explained? Even their earlier God of the desert was not fixed in form and content, and was alone; his lack of form, his lack of local habitation, his singleness, was in the end not only maintained but developed even further in competition with the comparatively far more manifest gods of the surrounding Near Eastern world. The concept of God held by the Jews is less a cause than a symptom of their manner of comprehending and representing things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Erich Auerbach]], &#039;&#039;Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature&#039;&#039;, Willard R. Trask, trans. (Princeton: 1953), chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If you comprehend, it is not God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]], &#039;&#039;Sermon&#039;&#039; 52, 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Deus scitur melius nesciendo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is best known in not knowing him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]], &#039;&#039;De Ordine&#039;&#039;, II, 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TenCommandmentsAustinStateCapitol.jpg|thumb|I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. ~ [[Susan&amp;amp;nbsp;B.&amp;amp;nbsp;Anthony]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For He is called omnipotent on account of His doing what He wills, not on account of His suffering what He wills not; for if that should befall Him, He would by no means be omnipotent. Wherefore, He cannot do some things for the very reason that He is omnipotent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf102.iv.V.10.html St. Augustine&#039;s City of God and Christian Doctrine: Chapter 10.—Whether Our Wills are Ruled by Necessity]&#039;&#039;, ccel.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A God who cannot smile could not have created this humorous universe.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sri Aurobindo]], &#039;&#039;Thoughts and Aphorisms&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God, the supreme being, is neither circumscribed by [[space]], nor touched by [[time]]; he cannot be found in a particular direction, and his [[essence]] cannot [[change]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The secret conversation is thus entirely spiritual; it is a direct encounter between God and the [[soul]], abstracted from all material constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Avicenna]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;366 Readings From Islam&#039;&#039; (2000), edited by Robert Van der Weyer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== B ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Martin Buber portrait.jpg|thumb|[[All]] [[names]] of God remain hallowed because they have been used not only to speak &#039;&#039;of&#039;&#039; God but also to speak &#039;&#039;to&#039;&#039; him. ~  [[Martin Buber]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At certain great moments down the ages, God drew nearer to His people and humanity at the same time made great, though oft unconscious efforts to draw near to God. From one angle, it might be regarded as God transcendent recognizing God immanent, and God in man reaching out to God in the Whole and greater than the Whole. On the part of God, working through the Head of the spiritual Hierarchy and its Membership, this effort was intentional, conscious and deliberate; on the part of man, it has been in the past largely unconscious, forced upon humanity by the tragedy of circumstances, by desperate need and by the driving urge of the immanent Christ consciousness.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]], &#039;&#039;Problems Of Humanity&#039;&#039;, Chapter V The Problem of the Churches - Part 2, (1944)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Eastern faiths have ever emphasised God Immanent, deep within the human heart, &amp;quot;nearer than hands and feet&amp;quot;, the Self, the One, the Atma, smaller than the small, yet all-comprehensive. The Western faiths have presented God Transcendent, Outside His universe, an Onlooker. God transcendent, first of all, conditioned men&#039;s concept of [[Deity]], for the action of this transcendent God appeared in the process of nature; later, in the Jewish dispensation, God appeared as the tribal [[Jehovah]], as the soul (the rather unpleasant soul) of a nation. Next, God was seen as a perfected man, and the divine God-man walked the Earth in the Person of the Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ&#039;&#039; p. 144, (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Today we have a rapidly growing emphasis upon God immanent in every human being, and in every created form. Today, we should have the churches presenting a synthesis of these two ideas, which have been summed up for us in the statement of Shri [[Krishna]] in the Bhagavad Gita: &amp;quot;Having pervaded this whole universe with a fragment of Myself, I remain.&amp;quot; God, greater than the created whole, yet God present also in the part; God Transcendent guarantees the Plan of our world, and is the Purpose conditioning all lives from the minutest atom, up through all the kingdoms of nature, to man.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] in &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ&#039;&#039; p. 145, (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*True [[religion]] is again emerging in the hearts of men in every land; this recognition of a divine hope and background may possibly take people back into the church and into the world faiths, but it will most certainly take them back to God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ,&#039;&#039; Chapter Three (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Religion is the name, surely, which we give to the invocative appeal of humanity which leads to the evocative response of the Spirit of God. This Spirit works in every human heart and in all groups.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]]  &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ,&#039;&#039; Chapter Three (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Slowly, there is dawning upon the awakening consciousness of humanity the great paralleling truth of God Immanent – divinely &amp;quot;pervading&amp;quot; all forms, conditioning from within all kingdoms in nature, expressing innate divinity through human beings. . . . There is a growing and developing belief that Christ is in us, as He was in the Master Jesus, and this belief will alter world affairs and mankind&#039;s entire attitude to life. (13 – 592).&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] in &#039;&#039;The Externalization of the Hierarchy&#039;&#039; p. 592, (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God Transcendent, greater, vaster and more inclusive than His created world, is universally recognised and has been generally emphasised; all faiths can say with Shri Krishna (speaking as God, the Creator) that &amp;quot;having pervaded the whole universe with a fragment of Myself, I remain.&amp;quot; This God Transcendent has dominated the religious thinking of millions of simple and spiritually-minded people down the centuries which have elapsed since humanity began to press forward towards divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Externalisation Of The Hierarchy&#039;&#039; The Return of the Christ - Part 1, (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A jealous lover of human liberty, and deeming it the absolute condition of all that we admire and respect in humanity, I reverse the phrase of [[Voltaire]], and say that &#039;&#039;if God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish him.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;!--emphasis in original--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Bakunin]] in &amp;quot;On God and the State&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The glory of God is not contingent on man&#039;s good will, but all existence subserves his purposes.&#039;&#039;&#039; The system of the universe is as a celestial poem, whose beauty is from all eternity, and must not be marred by human interpolations. &#039;&#039;&#039;Things proceed as they were ordered, in their nice, and well-adjusted, and perfect harmony; so that as the hand of the skilful artist gathers music from the harp-strings, history calls it forth from the well-tuned chords of time.&#039;&#039;&#039; Not that this harmony can be heard during the tumult of action. Philosophy comes after events, and gives the reason of them, and describes the nature of their results. The great mind of collective man may, one day, so improve in self-consciousness as to interpret the present and foretell the future; but as yet, the end of what is now happening, though we ourselves partake in it, seems to fall out by chance. &#039;&#039;&#039;All is nevertheless one whole; individuals, families, peoples, the race, march in accord with the Divine will; and when any part of the destiny of humanity is fulfilled, we see the ways of Providence vindicated. The antagonisms of imperfect matter and the perfect idea, of liberty and necessary law, become reconciled. What seemed irrational confusion, appears as the web woven by light, liberty and love.&#039;&#039;&#039; But this is not perceived till a great act in the drama of life is finished. The prayer of the patriarch, when he desired to behold the Divinity face to face, was denied; but he was able to catch a glimpse of Jehovah, after He had passed by; and so it fares with our search for Him in the wrestlings of the world. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is when the hour of conflict is over, that history comes to a right understanding of the strife, and is ready to exclaim: &amp;quot;Lo! God is here, and we knew it not.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bancroft]] &#039;&#039;Literary and Historical Miscellanies&#039;&#039; (1855), p. 491&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the mind is not dissipated upon extraneous things, nor diffused over the world about us through the senses, it withdraws within itself, and of its own accord ascends to the contemplation of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Basil of Caesarea]], Letter to [[w:Gregory of Nazianzus|Gregory]], &#039;&#039;Saint Basil: The Letters&#039;&#039;, R. Deferrari, trans. (1926), vol. 1, p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We thus become temples of God whenever earthly cares cease to interrupt the continuity of our memory of Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Basil of Caesarea]], Letter to [[w:Gregory of Nazianzus|Gregory]], &#039;&#039;Saint Basil: The Letters&#039;&#039;, R. Deferrari, trans. (1926), vol. 1, p. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georges Bataille]], &#039;&#039;Inner Experience&#039;&#039; (1954), L. Boldt, trans. (1988), p. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If by Godot I had meant God I would have said God, and not Godot.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Beckett]], on the title of one of his most famous plays, &#039;&#039;[[w:Waiting for Godot|Waiting for Godot]]&#039;&#039;, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Essential Samuel Beckett : An Illustrated Biography&#039;&#039;, by Enoch Brater (revised edition, 2003), p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many questions arise in this place! Constantly the question comes up: Where was God in those days? Why was he silent? How could he permit this endless slaughter, this triumph of evil? . . . We must continue to cry out humbly yet insistently to God: Rouse yourself! Do not forget mankind, your creature!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Benedict XVI]], who visited the former concentration camp at [[Auschwitz]], Poland, on (28 May 2006), as quoted in &#039;&#039;“Why, [[Lord]], Did You Remain Silent?”&#039;&#039;, in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; magazine (15 May 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Бога отрицают или потому, что мир так плох, или потому, что мир так хорош.&#039;&#039; [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikolai Berdyaev]], &#039;&#039;[http://vehi.net/soloviev/znachenie.html Self-knowledge (Самопознание)]&#039;&#039;, 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The true Mystic, realising God, has no need of any Scriptures, for he has touched the source whence all Scriptures flow.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=eIrD4GQFCPIC&amp;amp;pg=PT437 &#039;&#039;The Theosophical Writings of Annie Besant&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mysticism]] is the realisation of God, of the Universal Self. It is attained either as a realisation of God outside the Mystic, or within himself. In the first case, it is usually reached from within a religion, by exceptionally intense love and devotion, accompanied by purity of life, for only &amp;quot;the pure in heart shall see God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in &#039;&#039;Annie Besant Quotes&#039;&#039;   ISBN-13: 978-1535078498  (2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is patent to every student of the closing forty years of the last century, that crowds of thoughtful and moral people have slipped away from the churches, because the teachings they received there outraged their intelligence and shocked their moral sense. It is idle to pretend that the widespread agnosticism of this period had its root either in lack of morality or in deliberate crookedness of mind. Everyone who carefully studies the phenomena presented will admit that men of strong intellect have been driven out of Christianity by the crudity of the religious ideas set before them, the contradictions in the authoritative teachings, the views as to God, man, and the universe that no trained intelligence could possibly admit. Nor can it be said that any kind of moral degradation lay at the root of the revolt against the dogmas of the Church. The rebels were not too bad for their religion; on the contrary, it was the religion that was too bad for them. The rebellion against popular Christianity was due to the awakening and the growth of conscience; it was the conscience that revolted, as well as the intelligence, against teachings dishonouring to God and man alike, that represented God as a tyrant, and man as essentially evil, gaining salvation by slavish submission.   &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another precept of Jesus which remains as &amp;quot;a hard saying&amp;quot; to his followers is: &amp;quot;Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect&amp;quot;. [S. Matt., v, 48. ] The ordinary Christian knows that he cannot possibly obey this command; full of ordinary human frailties and weaknesses, how can he become perfect as God is perfect? Seeing the impossibility of the achievement set before him, he quietly puts it aside, and thinks no more about it. But seen as the crowning effort of [[reincarnation|many lives]] of steady improvement, as the triumph of the God within us over the lower nature, it comes within calculable distance, and we recall the words of Porphyry, how the man who achieves &amp;quot;the paradigmatic virtues is the Father of the Gods&amp;quot;, and that in the Mysteries these virtues were acquired.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For so reverent is God to that Spirit which is Himself in man, that He will not even pour into the human soul a flood of strength and life unless that soul is willing to receive it. There must be an opening from below as well as an outpouring from above, the receptiveness of the lower nature as well as the willingness of the higher to give. That is the link between the Christ and the man; that is what the churches have called the outpouring of &amp;quot;divine grace&amp;quot;; that is what is meant by the &amp;quot;faith&amp;quot; necessary to make the grace effective. As [[Giordano Bruno]] once put it — the human soul has windows, and can shut those windows close. The [[sun]] outside is shining, the light is unchanging; let the windows be opened and the sunlight must stream in. The light of God is beating against the windows of every human soul, and when the windows are thrown open, the soul becomes illuminated. There is no change in God, but there is a change in man; and man&#039;s will may not be forced, else were the divine Life in him blocked in its due evolution.  Thus in every Christ that rises, all humanity is lifted a step higher, and by His wisdom the ignorance of the whole world is lessened. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;. The chief of Grecian gods, adored by the Romans as [[w:Jupiter|Jupiter]] and by the modern Americans as God, Gold, Mob and Dog. Some explorers who have touched upon the shores of America, and one who professes to have penetrated a considerable distance to the interior, have thought that these four names stand for as many distinct deities, but in his monumental work on Surviving Faiths, Frumpp insists that the natives are monotheists, each having no other god than himself, whom he worships under many sacred names.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ambrose Bierce]], &#039;&#039;The Cynic&#039;s Word Book&#039;&#039; (1906), later retitled &#039;&#039;[[w:The Devil&#039;s Dictionary|The Devil&#039;s Dictionary]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although neither an alchemist, magician, nor astrologer, but simply a great [[philosopher]], [[Henry More]], of Cambridge University — a man universally esteemed, may be named as a shrewd logician, scientist, and metaphysician... His faith in immortality and able arguments in demonstration of the survival of man&#039;s spirit after death are all based on the [[Pythagoras#Quotes_about_Pythagoreanism|Pythagorean system]]... and other [[mystics]].  The infinite and uncreated spirit that we usually call God, a substance of the highest virtue and excellency, produced everything else by emanative causality. God thus is the primary substance... He...stoutly defended the theory of the individuality of every soul in which &amp;quot;personality, memory, and conscience will surely continue in the future state.&amp;quot; He divided the astral spirit of man after its exit from the body into two distinct entities: the &amp;quot;aerial&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;aethereal vehicle.&amp;quot; During the time that a disembodied man moves in its aerial clothing, he is subject to Fate -- i.e., evil and temptation, attached to its earthly interests, and therefore is not utterly pure; it is only when he casts off this garb of the first spheres and becomes ethereal that he becomes sure of his immortality. &amp;quot;For what shadow can that body cast that is a pure and transparent light, such as the ethereal vehicle is? And therefore that oracle is then fulfilled, when the soul has ascended into that condition we have already described, in which alone it is out of the reach of fate and mortality.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]], &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology,&#039;&#039; Vol. I, Before the Veil, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not the One unknown ever-present God in Nature, or Nature in abscondito, that is rejected, but the “God” of human dogma, and his humanized “Word.” Man, in his [[infinite]] conceit and inherent pride and vanity, shaped it himself with his sacrilegious hand out of the material he found in his own small brain-fabric, and forced it upon his fellows as a direct revelation from the one unrevealed Space.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]], &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1  (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Esoteric Philosophy...denies Deity no more than it does the sun. Esoteric Philosophy has never rejected God in Nature, nor Deity as the absolute and abstract Ens. It only refuses to accept any of the gods of the so-called monotheistic religions, gods created by man in his own image and likeness, a [[blasphemous]] and sorry caricature of the Ever-Unknowable.&lt;br /&gt;
**H.P. Blavatsky, &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1   (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We reject the idea of a personal, or an extra-cosmic and anthropomorphic God, who is but the gigantic shadow of man, and not of man at his best, either. The God of [[theology]], we say—and prove it—is a bundle of contradictions and a logical impossibility... Our DEITY is neither in a paradise, nor in a particular tree, building, or mountain; it is everywhere, in every atom of the visible as of the invisible Cosmos, in, over, and around every invisible atom and divisible molecule; for IT is the mysterious power of evolution and involution, the omnipresent, omnipotent, and even omniscient creative potentiality.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky]],&#039;&#039;The Key to Theosophy&#039;&#039; (1889) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If we have to believe in a divine principle at all, it must be in one which is as absolute harmony, logic, and justice, as it is absolute love, wisdom, and impartiality; and a God who would create every soul for the space of one brief span of life, regardless of the fact whether it has to animate the body of a wealthy, happy man, or that of a poor suffering wretch, hapless from birth to death though he has done nothing to deserve his cruel fate—would be rather a senseless fiend than a God.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],&#039;&#039;The Key to Theosophy&#039;&#039; (1889) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed further and further back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], &#039;&#039;Letters and Papers from Prison&#039;&#039; (1967), p. 311&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To everyone God is the kind of God he believes in.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], &#039;&#039;Nachfolge&#039;&#039; (1937), &#039;&#039;The Cost of Discipleship&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 185&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Only what is fated to die is capable of living. Only what dies lives.&#039;&#039;&#039; Why do you think [[Jesus|Christ]] was killed? They killed him to prove that he wasn’t a god. But in killing him, they immortalized the perishable and transformed man into a god.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giannina Braschi]] in &amp;quot;[[Empire of Dreams]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The gods [[envy]] me because they cannot die.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giannina Braschi]] in &amp;quot;[[Empire of Dreams]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Goddes love&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;is unescapable as nature&#039;s environment,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;which if a man ignore or think to thrust it off&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;he is the ill-natured fool that runneth on to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Bridges]], &#039;&#039;The Testament of Beauty&#039;&#039; (1929), Book IV, line 1419&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That we devote ourselves to God is seen&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In living just as though no God there were.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Paracelsus&#039;&#039; (1835), Part I&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the perfect [[poet]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who in his person acts his own creations.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Paracelsus&#039;&#039; (1835), Part II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;s in His [[Heaven]] — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;All&#039;s right with the world!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Pippa Passes&#039;&#039; (1841), Part I&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All service is the same with God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With God, whose puppets, best and worst,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are we: there is no last nor first.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Pippa Passes&#039;&#039; (1841), Part IV&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All names of God remain hallowed because they have been used not only to speak &#039;&#039;of&#039;&#039; God but also to speak &#039;&#039;to&#039;&#039; him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;[[w:I and Thou|I and Thou]]&#039;&#039; (1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some would deny any legitimate use of the word God because it has been misused so much. Certainly it is the most burdened of all human words. Precisely for that reason it is the most imperishable and unavoidable. And how much weight has all erroneous talk about God&#039;s nature and works (although there never has been nor can be any such talk that is not erroneous) compared with the one truth that all men who have addressed God really meant him? For whoever pronounces the word God and really means Thou, addresses, no matter what his delusion, the true Thou of his life that cannot be restricted by any other and to whom he stands in a relationship that includes all others.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;[[w:I and Thou|I and Thou]]&#039;&#039; (1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we rise out of [the night] into the new life and there begin to receive the signs, what can we know of that which—of him who gives them to us? Only what we experience from time to time from the signs themselves. If we name the speaker of this speech God, then it is always the God of a moment, a moment God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;Between Man and Man&#039;&#039; (1965), p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* According to mythological thinking, God has his domicile in [[heaven]].  What is the meaning of this statement?  The meaning is quite clear.  In a crude manner it expresses the idea that God is beyond the world, that He is transcendent. The thinking which is not yet capable of forming the abstract idea of transcendence expresses its intention in the category of space.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudolf Bultmann]], “Jesus Christ and Mythology,” Interpreting Faith for the Modern Era, p. 294 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “Don’t you know everything?”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God smiled. “No, I outgrew that trick long ago. You can’t imagine how boring it was.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Octavia Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Book of Martha&#039;&#039; (2003). Originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Sci Fiction|Sci Fiction]]&#039;&#039; (May 21, 2003). Reprinted in [[w:David G. Hartwell|David G. Hartwell]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;Year’s Best Fantasy 4&#039;&#039; (p. 52)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s merits are so transcendent that it is not surprising his faults should be in reasonable proportion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler]] &amp;quot;Rebelliousness&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Note-Books&#039;&#039; (1912)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no god but God! — to prayer — lo! &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is great!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;[[Childe Harold&#039;s Pilgrimage]]&#039;&#039;, Canto II (1812), Stanza 59, this is a translation of standard Islamic exclamations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “It’s not my job to be God’s lawyer,...I’m his salesman. I do believe he’s the greatest thing that ever existed, and I encourage people to get to know him without trying to explain what he’s doing or why.”&lt;br /&gt;
** Rabbi Chaim Bruk in [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/04/02/coronavirus-god-christain-jewish-muslim-leaders-saying-deadly-plague/5101639002/ Is the coronavirus an act of God? Faith leaders debate tough questions amid pandemic, USA Today] April 2, 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our feeling of ignorance, vanity, want, weakness, in short, depravity and corruption, reminds us ... that in the Lord, and none but He, dwell the true light of wisdom, solid virtue, exuberant goodness. We are accordingly urged by our own evil things to consider the good things of God; and, indeed, we cannot aspire to Him in earnest until we have begun to be displeased with ourselves. For what man is not disposed to rest in himself? Who, in fact, does not thus rest, so long as he is unknown to himself; that is, so long as he is contented with his own endowments, and unconscious or unmindful of his misery? Every person, therefore, on coming to the knowledge of himself, is not only urged to seek God, but is also led as by the hand to find him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Calvin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Institutes of the Christian Religion|Institutes of the Christian Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Book 1, Chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Without knowledge of self there is no knowledge of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Calvin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Institutes of the Christian Religion|Institutes of the Christian Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Book 1 Chapter 1, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God, or is it Mr. G to me?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alessia Cara|Alessia Cara]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zXfF3uxwww &amp;quot;7 Days&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The Pains of Growing&#039;&#039; (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Except during my childhood, when I was probably influenced by [[Michelangelo]]&#039;s Sistine Chapel depiction of God with a flowing white beard, I have never tried to project the Creator in any kind of human likeness. The vociferous debates about whether God is male or female seem ridiculous to me. I think of God as an omnipotent and omniscient presence, a [[spirit]] that permeates the [[universe]], the essence of [[truth]], [[nature]], being, and [[life]]. To me, these are profound and indescribable concepts that seem to be trivialized when expressed in [[words]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jimmy Carter]], &#039;&#039;Living Faith&#039;&#039; (2001), p. 222&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Although every believing Christian understands that God guides our steps, fewer and fewer emphasize the point. A God working actively in the world makes us uneasy. We tend to like our God distant and a bit malleable, ready to bend to every new human idea. A God with a will of his own is too scary, and, besides, he might get in the way of our satisfaction of immediate desire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen L. Carter]], &#039;&#039;[[Stephen L. Carter#The Emperor of Ocean Park (2002)|The Emperor of Ocean Park]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 25, &#039;&#039;A Modest Request&#039;&#039;, I (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Promises made to others in God&#039;s name engage the divine honor, fidelity, truthfulness, and authority. They must be respected in justice. To be unfaithful to them is to misuse God&#039;s name and in some way to make God out to be a liar. (1 John 1:10)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Catechism of the Catholic Church]] 2147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* True religion consists in proposing, as our great end, a growing likeness to the Supreme Being. Its noblest influence consists in making us more and more partakers of the Divinity. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Likeness to God” (1828)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious instruction should aim chiefly to turn men’s aspirations and efforts to that perfection of the soul, which constitutes it a bright image of God. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Likeness to God” (1828)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I tell you this, that you will have found out the [[truth]] of the last [[tree]] and the top-most [[cloud]] before the truth about [[Self|me]].&#039;&#039;&#039; You will [[understand]] the [[sea]], and I shall be still a [[Mystery|riddle]]; you shall [[Knowledge|know]] what the [[stars]] are, and not know [[The All|what I am]]. Since the [[beginning]] of the [[world]] all [[men]] have hunted me like a [[wolf]] — [[Monarchy|kings]] and [[Philosophy|sages]], and [[poets]] and [[Law|lawgivers]], all the [[Church|churches]], and all the [[Philosophy|philosophies]]. But &#039;&#039;&#039;I have never been caught yet, and the [[Sky|skies]] will fall in the [[time]] I turn to bay.&#039;&#039;&#039; I have given them a [[good]] run for their [[money]], and I will now.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;[[The Man Who Was Thursday]]&#039;&#039; (1908), [[s:The Man Who Was Thursday/Chapter XIII|Ch. XIII : The Pursuit of the President]], &amp;quot;Sunday&amp;quot; representing God speaking to the ostensible [[Anarchism|anarchists]] who have just realized they were were all policemen and spies, but who still haven&#039;t realized their role or Sunday&#039;s in the comic nightmare Chesterton devised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If [people] wish to love God, they [must] be prepared to do so no matter what His intentions. God is not just, God is not kind, God is not merciful, and understanding that is essential to true devotion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ted Chiang|Ted Chiang]] &amp;quot;{{w|Hell Is the Absence of God}}&amp;quot;, Stories of Your Life and Others (e-book ed.). Picador. p. 164. ISBN 978-1-4472-8198-6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God can only set in motion:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He cannot control the things he has made.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[T&#039;ao Ch&#039;ien]], &#039;&#039;Substance, Shadow, and Spirit&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Spirit expounds&amp;quot; (transl. by Arthur Waley)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all you – you fucking fake Christians – don’t fucking question my Christianity. I grew up in the church. My grandfather was a minister, who is with God now and talks to me in my dreams from God’s corner office. I am a former Sunday school teacher. I taught the [[Bible]] to children and showed them how to love God and invite him into their hearts. I believe in God – but I don’t fear him. God is my best friend. God is my ally. God is my boyfriend. God is my best fag. I am God’s fag hag cuz didn’t you know, God is a big fag. Serious bottom too. Butch in the streets, femme in the sheets. That is my God. God is my biggest fan. God gets me, dude.&lt;br /&gt;
:God wants us all to just get along. He doesn’t give a shit about the profanity. The bitch fucking invented profanity. He thinks it is hilarious. He just wants you to talk to him, and he doesn’t care what you have to say. He just wants to keep the conversation going. Like Jay-Z, he just wants to love you. He just wants you to be able to make your own decisions. God is all about you and what you need. God is happy that you are gay. God made you fucking gay cuz he thinks it is awesome. God understands if you need to have an abortion. That is why he created abortion, on the 8th day. God accepts. God forgives. God loves all of us, even though some of us might have a problem with each other.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Margaret Cho]], [http://margaretcho.com/2008/09/17/im-a-christian-you-fuckers/ I&#039;m a Christian you Fuckers]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;[[w:De legibus|De legibus]]&#039;&#039;, book 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God: a disease we imagine we are cured of because no one dies of it nowadays.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emile Cioran]], &#039;&#039;The Trouble with Being Born&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In most cases we attach ourselves to God in order to take revenge on life, to punish it, to signify we can do without it, that we have found something better.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. M. Cioran]], &#039;&#039;History and Utopia&#039;&#039; (1960)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to create him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], [http://www.clarkefoundation.org/sample-page/sir-arthurs-quotations/ clarkefoundation.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The rash assertion that ‘God made man in His own image’ is ticking like a time bomb at the foundations of many faiths, and as the hierarchy of the universe is disclosed to us, we may have to recognize this chilling truth: if there are any gods whose chief concern is man, they cannot be very important gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], [http://www.clarkefoundation.org/sample-page/sir-arthurs-quotations/ clarkefoundation.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God but I&#039;m very interested in her.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], as quoted in Multiple Intelligences in Practice : Enhancing Self-esteem and Learning in the Classroom (2006) by Mike Fleetham, Section 2 : Using MI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Haven’t you ever watched ants struggling with a load too big for them? How much did you care? Even if, like God, you marked the fall of every sparrow, you might simply be conducting a survey or expressing colossal boredom, like the people who delight in measuring things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Mildred Clingerman|Mildred Clingerman]] &amp;quot;Birds Can&#039;t Count&amp;quot; (Originally published at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magazine_of_Fantasy_%26_Science_Fiction The Magazine of Fantasy &amp;amp; Science Fiction] (February, 1955) and reprinted in her collection &#039;&#039;A Cupful of Space&#039;&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt have one God only; who&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Would be at the expense of two?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur Hugh Clough]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.potw.org/archive/potw238.html The Latest Decalogue]&#039;&#039; (1862).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God who appears to me is the comforter of the poor and their avenger in world history. This avenger of the poor is the God I love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hermann Cohen]], &#039;&#039;The Concept of Religion in the System of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1915), p. 81&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only the idea of God gives me the confidence that morality will become reality on earth. And because I cannot live without this confidence, I cannot live without God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hermann Cohen]], &#039;&#039;Reason and Hope: Selections from the Jewish Writings of Hermann Cohen&#039;&#039; (1971), p. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reason alone cannot prove the existence of God. [[Faith]] is reason plus revelation, and the revelation part requires one to think with the spirit as well as with the mind. You have to hear the music, not just read the notes on the page.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Collins]], [http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/ cnn.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is [[Death|dead]] not because He doesn&#039;t exist, but because we live, play, procreate, govern, and die as though He doesn&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Colson]], &#039;&#039;Kingdoms in Conflict&#039;&#039; (1990), p. [http://books.google.com/books?id=tIV5YCh49qsC&amp;amp;dq=%22God+is+dead+not+because+He+doesn&#039;t+exist%22 275]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Oppressed and oppressors cannot possibly mean the same thing when they speak of God. The God of the oppressed is a God of revolution who breaks the chains of slavery. The oppressors&#039; God is a God of slavery and must be destroyed along with the oppressors.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Cone]], &#039;&#039;A Black Theology of Liberation&#039;&#039; (1970), p. 61&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God never meant that man should scale the [[Heavens]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;By strides of human [[wisdom]]. In his works,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though wondrous, he commands us in his word&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To seek him rather where his [[mercy]] shines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book III, line 217&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But who with filial confidence inspired,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Can lift to Heaven an unpresumptuous eye,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And smiling say, My Father made them all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book V. The Winter Morning Walk, line 745&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Acquaint thyself with God, if thou would&#039;st taste&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His works.&#039;&#039;&#039; Admitted once to his embrace,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thou shalt perceive that thou wast blind before:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thine [[eye]] shall be instructed; and thine [[heart]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Made pure shall relish with divine delight&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Till then unfelt, what [[hands]] divine have wrought.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book V, line 782&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are really gods in incarnation. We need to recognize our threefold constitution: We are a spark of God; every religion has postulated this and has kept the idea of our divinity before humanity for thousands of years. But it can be seen more scientifically and still correctly. Speaking as an esotericist, I would say that the divine spark is so refined in vibration that it cannot manifest directly on the physical plane. It reflects itself, therefore, as the individualized human soul. The soul, in its turn, reflects itself in the human personality, with its physical, emotional, and mental bodies. Through the physical plane personality, the soul enacts its reincarnational process, until finally the individual on the physical plane, the man or woman, reflects perfectly the quality of the soul, which is the divine quality of the spark of God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://share-international.org/books/?d=AWT &#039;&#039;The Ageless Wisdom, An introduction to humanity&#039;s spiritual legacy,&#039;Share International&#039;&#039;] (1996) p.3-4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God, in the esoteric meaning, is the sum total of all the Laws and all the  energies governed by these Laws in the manifested and unmanifested universe. So God is impersonal. Nevertheless, that transcendent God is manifest in every aspect of creation, including ourselves. We are not separate from that creation — from God. Every human being has the potential of the knowledge, the awareness, of all in creation that we can think of as meaning God. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The [[Masters of Wisdom|Masters [of Wisdom]]] are God-realized, which is a very specific state, in that They have brought Their consciousness, in terms of the divine spark, the Absolute, the Self, into complete at-one-ment with Themselves as men on the physical plane — the personality and the divine aspect are totally integrated... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;God is everything that exists, and all space between that which exists...and around everything. All of that is God... Modern science has been able to break down cellular structures and show that at the centre of every atom is a nucleus with electrons around it, vibrating at a specific rate, and that every atom in the universe is made in the same way. There is nothing but energy in all of the manifested universe. The difference between that totally scientific view and that which an esotericist would hold is that the esotericist goes further and says, indeed, all is energy, but energy follows thought, is acted upon by thought. Thought is the agency by which creation takes place.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in &#039;[http://share-international.org/books/?d=AWT &#039;&#039;The Ageless Wisdom, An introduction to humanity&#039;s spiritual legacy,  Share International&#039;&#039;] (1996) p.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== D ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Freeman Dyson.jpg|thumb|We stand, in a manner of [[speaking]], midway between the [[Chance|unpredictability]] of [[atoms]] and the [[Mystery|unpredictability]] of God. ~ [[Freeman Dyson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God because I don&#039;t believe in [[w:Mother Goose|Mother Goose]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Speech in Toronto (1930); as quoted in &amp;quot;Breaking the Last Taboo&amp;quot; (1996) by James A. Haught.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: I believe that religion is the belief in future life and in God. I don’t believe in either. I don’t believe in God as I don’t believe in Mother Goose.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As quoted in &#039;&#039;Jesus: Myth Or Reality?&#039;&#039; (2006) by Ian Curtis&lt;br /&gt;
** Religion is the belief in future life and in God. I don&#039;t believe in either.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Clarence Darrow]] as quoted in  &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (19 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I am an Agnostic because I am not afraid to think. I am not afraid of any god in the universe who would send me or any other man or woman to hell. If there were such a being, he would not be a god; he would be a devil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]] as quoted in a eulogy for Darrow by Emanuel Haldeman-Julius (1938)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I am an agnostic as to the question of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; I think that it is impossible for the human mind to believe in an object or thing unless it can form a mental picture of such object or thing. Since man ceased to worship openly an anthropomorphic God and talked vaguely and not intelligently about some force in the universe, higher than man, that is responsible for the existence of man and the universe, he cannot be said to believe in God. One cannot believe in a force excepting as a force that pervades matter and is not an individual entity. To believe in a thing, an image of the thing must be stamped on the mind. If one is asked if he believes in such an animal as a camel, there immediately arises in his mind an image of the camel. This image has come from experience or knowledge of the animal gathered in some way or other. No such image comes, or can come, with the idea of a God who is described as a force.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* To say that God made the universe gives us no explanation of the beginnings of things. If we are told that God made the universe, the question immediately arises: Who made God? Did he always exist, or was there some power back of that? Did he create matter out of nothing, or is his existence coextensive with matter? The problem is still there. What is the origin of it all? If, on the other hand, one says that the universe was not made by God, that it always existed, he has the same difficulty to confront. &#039;&#039;&#039;To say that the universe was here last year, or millions of years ago, does not explain its origin. This is still a mystery. As to the question of the origin of things, man can only wonder and doubt and guess.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many Christians base the belief of a soul and God upon the Bible. Strictly speaking, there is no such book. To make the Bible, sixty-six books are bound into one volume. These books are written by many people at different times, and no one knows the time or the identity of any author. Some of the books were written by several authors at various times. These books contain all sorts of contradictory concepts of life and morals and the origin of things. Between the first and the last nearly a thousand years intervened, a longer time than has passed since the discovery of America by Columbus.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That there is much suffering in the world no one disputes. Some have attempted to explain this in reference to man by imagining that it serves for his moral improvement. But the number of men in the world is as nothing compared with that of all other sentient beings, and these often suffer greatly without any moral improvement. A being so powerful and so full of knowledge as a God who could create the universe, is to our finite minds omnipotent and omniscient, and it revolts our understanding to suppose that his benevolence is not unbounded, for what advantage can there be in the sufferings of millions of the lower animals throughout almost endless time? This very old argument from the existence of suffering against the existence of an intelligent first cause seems to me a strong one; whereas, as just remarked, the presence of much suffering agrees well with the view that all organic beings have been developed through variation and natural selection.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Darwin]], [http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1497&amp;amp;viewtype=text&amp;amp;pageseq=1 &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the Original Omissions Restored.&#039;&#039; (1958)] Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter [[w:Nora Barlow|Nora Barlow]]. Page 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At the present day the most usual argument for the existence of an intelligent God is drawn from the deep inward conviction and feelings which are experienced by most persons. But it cannot be doubted that Hindoos, Mahomadans and others might argue in the same manner and with equal force in favour of the existence of one God, or of many Gods, or as with the Buddists of no God. There are also many barbarian tribes who cannot be said with any truth to believe in what we call God: they believe indeed in spirits or ghosts, and it can be explained, as Tyler and Herbert Spencer have shown, how such a belief would be likely to arise….This argument would be a valid one if all men of all races had the same inward conviction of the existence of one God; but we know that this is very far from being the case. Therefore I cannot see that such inward convictions and feelings are of any weight as evidence of what really exists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Darwin]], [http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1497&amp;amp;viewtype=text&amp;amp;pageseq=1 &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the Original Omissions Restored.&#039;&#039; (1958)] Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter [[w:Nora Barlow|Nora Barlow]]. Pages 90-91. This is Darwin&#039;s reply to the [[w:Argumentum ad populum|Argument from Common Consent]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you see yourself as God and then you come back from this state and somebody says, “Hey, Sam, empty the garbage!” it catches you back into the model of “I&#039;m Sam who empties the garbage.”  You can&#039;t maintain these new kinds of structures.  It takes a while to realize that God can empty garbage.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ram Dass]], &#039;&#039;Be Here Now&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man who recognizes no God is probably placing an inordinate value on himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robertson Davies]] in &#039;&#039;Conversations&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], &#039;&#039;The God Delusion&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 31&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The trouble is that God in this sophisticated, physicist&#039;s sense bears no resemblance to the God of the Bible or any other religion. If a physicist says God is another name for Planck&#039;s constant, or God is a superstring, we should take it as a picturesque metaphorical way of saying that the nature of superstrings or the value of Planck&#039;s constant is a profound mystery. It has obviously not the smallest connection with a being capable of forgiving sins, a being who might listen to prayers, who cares about whether or not the Sabbath begins at 5pm or 6pm, whether you wear a veil or have a bit of arm showing; and no connection whatever with a being capable of imposing a death penalty on His son to expiate the sins of the world before and after he was born.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], from a lecture, extracted from &#039;&#039;The Nullifidian&#039;&#039; (December 1994)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eaglefairy hst big.jpg|thumb|It is solemn to remember that Vastness — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Is but the Shadow of the Brain which casts it — ~ [[Emily Dickinson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*If man is created by an external source, then he must belong to that source and not to himself. According to Buddhism, man is responsible for everything he does. Thus Buddhists have no reason to believe that man came into existence in the human form through any external sources. They believe that man is here today because of his own action. He is neither punished nor rewarded by anyone but himself according to his own good and bad action. In the process of evolution, the human being came into existence. However, there are no Buddha-words to support the belief that the world was created by anybody. The scientific discovery of gradual development of the world-system conforms with the Buddha&#039;s Teachings. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[K. Sri Dhammananda Maha Thera]], &#039;&#039;What Buddhists Believe&#039;&#039; (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They say that God is everywhere, and yet we always think of Him as somewhat of a recluse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emily Dickinson]], Letter to Mrs. J. G. Holland [L551] (Spring 1878)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is solemn to remember that Vastness — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Is but the [[Shadow]] of the [[Brain]] which casts it — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; All things swept sole away &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; This — is immensity —&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emily Dickinson]], in a letter to Thomas Wentworth Higginson [L551] (1881)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is a supreme being, he&#039;s crazy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marlene Dietrich]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Rave&#039;&#039; magazine (November 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God used [[beautiful]] [[mathematics]] in creating the [[world]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Dirac]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Cosmic Code : Quantum Physics As The Language Of Nature&#039;&#039; (1982) by Heinz R. Pagels, p. 295; also in &#039;&#039;Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac : Reminiscences about a Great Physicist&#039;&#039; (1990) edited by Behram N. Kursunoglu and Eugene Paul Wigner, p. xv&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Dirac]], [http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102000602?q=dirac&amp;amp;p=par WOL]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Clearly, the [[w:Bible|Scripture]] tells us that we lack the capacity to grasp God&#039;s infinite mind or the way He intervenes in our lives. How arrogant of us to think otherwise! Trying to analyze His omnipotence is like an amoeba attempting to comprehend the behavior of man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Dobson]] in: Bill Bradfield &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=vKG3cPCQmvMC&amp;amp;pg=PA33 On Reading the Bible: Thoughts and Reflections of Over 500 Men and Women, from St. Augustine to Oprah Winfrey ]&#039;&#039;, Courier Dover Publications, Jul 12, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be simple we must desire to remain in the image of God. We must not be so complex that we make God into our image!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Catherine Doherty]], &#039;&#039;Unfinished Pilgrimage&#039;&#039; (Combermere, Ontario: Madonna House Publications, 1995), p. 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charles Hartshorne]]... informed me that my theological standpoint is [[w:Socinianism|Socinian]]. ...The main tenet of the Socinian heresy is that God is neither omniscient nor omnipotent. He learns and grows as the universe unfolds. ...I ...find it congenial, and consistent with scientific common sense. I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. ...We are the chief inlets of God on this planet at the present stage... We may later grow with him as he grows, or we may be left behind. ...If we are left behind, it is an end. If we keep on growing, it is a beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], &#039;&#039;Infinite in All Directions&#039;&#039; (1988)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not make any clear distinction between [[mind]] and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension.&#039;&#039;&#039; God may be either a world-soul or a collection of world-souls. So I am thinking that atoms and humans and God may have minds that differ in degree but not in kind. &#039;&#039;&#039;We stand, in a manner of [[speaking]], midway between the [[Chance|unpredictability]] of [[atoms]] and the [[Mystery|unpredictability]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; Atoms are small pieces of our mental apparatus, and we are small pieces of God&#039;s mental apparatus. Our minds may receive inputs equally from atoms and from God. This view of our place in the cosmos may not be true, but it is compatible with the active nature of atoms as revealed in the experiments of modern physics. &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t say that this personal theology is supported or proved by scientific evidence. I only say that it is consistent with scientific evidence.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], in &amp;quot;[http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge68.html Progress In Religion : A Talk By Freeman Dyson]&amp;quot;, his acceptance speech for the [[w:Templeton Prize|Templeton Prize]], Washington National Cathedral (9 May 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not claim any ability to read God&#039;s mind. I am sure of only one thing. &#039;&#039;&#039;When we look at the [[glory]] of [[stars]] and [[galaxies]] in the [[sky]] and the glory of forests and flowers in the living world around us, it is evident that God loves [[diversity]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Perhaps the universe is constructed according to a principle of maximum diversity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], in &amp;quot;Progress In Religion : A Talk By Freeman Dyson&amp;quot; (9 May 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Albert_Einstein_photo_1921.jpg|thumb|Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not. ~ [[Albert Einstein]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Einstein gyro gravity probe b.jpg|thumb|The God [[Spinoza]] revered is my God, too: I meet Him everyday in the [[harmonious]] [[laws]] which govern the [[universe]]. ~ [[Albert Einstein]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg|thumb|God created men to enjoy, not destroy, the fruits of the earth and of their own toil. ~ [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RWEmerson.jpg|thumb|The purpose of life seems to be to acquaint a man with himself. He is not to live the future as described to him but to live the real future to the real present. The highest revelation is that God is in every man. ~ [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are all meant to be mothers of God, for God is always needing to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Meister Eckhart]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Christianity&#039;&#039; (1995) by Joe Jenkins, p. 27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Where the human being in obedience goes out from his “I” and dismisses what is his own, God must necessarily enter in precisely there; for when someone does not will anything for himself, God must will for that person in the same way as He wills for himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Meister Eckhart]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, in J. Hackett, &#039;&#039;A Companion to Meister Eckhart&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*When man humbles himself, God cannot restrain His mercy; He must come down and pour His grace into the humble man, and He gives Himself most of all, and all at once, to the least of all. It is essential to God to give, for His essence is His goodness and His goodness is His love. Love is the root of all joy and sorrow. Slavish fear of God is to be put away. The right fear is the fear of losing God. If the earth flee downward from heaven, it finds heaven beneath it; if it flee upward, it comes again to heaven. The earth cannot flee from heaven: whether it flee up or down, the heaven rains its influence upon it, and stamps its impress upon it, and makes it fruitful, whether it be willing or not. Thus doth God with men: whoever thinketh to escape Him, flies into His bosom, for every corner is open to Him. God brings forth His Son in thee, whether thou likest it or not, whether thou sleepest or wakest; God worketh His own will. That man is unaware of it, is man&#039;s fault, for his taste is so spoilt by feeding on earthly things that he cannot relish God&#039;s love. If we had love to God, we should relish God, and all His works; we should receive all things from God, and work the same works as He worketh.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Meister Eckhart]],  [[Meister_Eckhart#Meister_Eckhart’s_Sermons_(1909)|Sermon III, &amp;quot;The Angel&#039;s Greeting&amp;quot;]] (1909)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If God is as real as the shadow of the Great War on Armistice Day, need we seek further reason for making a place for God&#039;&#039;&#039; in our thoughts and lives? &#039;&#039;&#039;We shall not be concerned if the scientific explorer&#039;&#039;&#039; reports that he &#039;&#039;&#039;is perfectly satisfied&#039;&#039;&#039; that he has got to the bottom of things &#039;&#039;&#039;without having come across either.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur Eddington]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Unseen World&#039;&#039; (1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we pray to God as a corporeal person, this will prevent us from relinquishing the human doubts and fears which attend such a belief, and so we cannot grasp the wonders wrought by infinite, incorporeal Love, to whom all things are possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Mary Baker Eddy|Mary Baker Eddy]], in &#039;&#039;Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nature is what we know. We do not know the gods of religions. And nature is not kind, or merciful, or loving. If God made me — the fabled God of the three qualities of which I spoke: mercy, kindness, love — He also made the fish I catch and eat. And where do His mercy, kindness, and love for that fish come in? No; nature made us — nature did it all — not the gods of the religions&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], &amp;quot;&amp;quot;No Immortality of the Soul&amp;quot; says Thomas A. Edison. In Fact, He Doesn&#039;t Believe There Is a Soul — Human Beings Only an Aggregate of Cells and the Brain Only a Wonderful Machine, Says Wizard of Electricity&amp;quot;. New York Times. October 2, 1910&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not believe in the God of the theologians; but that there is a Supreme Intelligence I do not doubt.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], The Freethinker (1970), G.W. Foote &amp;amp; Company, Volume 90, p. 147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for their numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible; in my opinion, only His nonexistence could excuse Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to Edgar Meyer (2 January 1915)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Remark made during Einstein&#039;s first visit to Princeton University (April 1921) as quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein&#039;&#039; (1973) by R. W. Clark, Ch. 14. &amp;quot;God is slick, but he ain&#039;t mean&amp;quot; is a variant translation of this (1946) Unsourced variant: &amp;quot;God is subtle but he is not malicious.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** When asked what he meant by this he replied. &amp;quot;Nature hides her secret because of her essential loftiness, but not by means of ruse.&amp;quot; (&#039;&#039;Die Natur verbirgt ihr Geheimnis durch die Erhabenheit ihres Wesens, aber nicht durch List.&#039;&#039;) As quoted in &#039;&#039;Subtle is the Lord — The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein&#039;&#039; (1982) by Abraham Pais &amp;lt;!-- Clarendon Press, Oxford, and Oxford University Press, New York --&amp;gt; [http://www.einsteinandreligion.com/faith.html einsteinandreligion.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*** Originally said to Princeton University mathematics professor Oscar Veblen, May 1921, while Einstein was in Princeton for a series of lectures, upon hearing that an experimental result by Dayton C. Miller of Cleveland, if true, would contradict his theory of gravitation. But the claimed discrepancy was quite small and required special circumstances (hence Einsteins&#039;s remark). The result turned out to be false. Some say by this remark Einstein meant that Nature hides her secrets by being subtle, while others say he meant that nature is mischievous but not bent on trickery. [The Yale Book of Quotations, ed. Fred R. Shapiro, 2006]&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: God may be sophisticated, but he&#039;s not malicious.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As quoted in &#039;&#039;Cherished Illusions&#039;&#039; (2005) by Sarah Stern, p. 109&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I have second thoughts. Maybe God &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039; malicious&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Said to [[wikipedia: Valentine Bargmann|Valentine Bargmann]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein in America&#039;&#039; (1985) by Jamie Sayen, p. 51, indicating that God leads people to believe they understand things that they actually are far from understanding; also in &#039;&#039;The Yale Book of Quotations&#039;&#039; (2006), ed. Fred R. Shapiro&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The God [[Spinoza]] revered is my God, too: I meet Him everyday in the harmonious laws which govern the universe.&#039;&#039;&#039; My religion is cosmic, and my God is too universal to concern himself with the intentions of every human being. &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not accept a religion of fear; My God will not hold me responsible for the actions that [[necessity]] imposes.&#039;&#039;&#039; My God speaks to me through laws.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in an interview (1948), quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein and the Poet : In Search of the Cosmic Man&#039;&#039; (1983) by William Hermanns, p. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* About God, I cannot accept any concept based on the authority of the Church. As long as I can remember, I have resented mass indoctrination. I do not believe in the fear of life, in the fear of death, in blind faith. I cannot prove to you that there is no [[personal God]], but if I were to speak of him, I would be a liar. &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil. My God created laws that take care of that. His universe is not ruled by wishful thinking, but by immutable laws.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in an interview (1948), quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein and the Poet : In Search of the Cosmic Man&#039;&#039; (1983) by William Hermanns, p. 132&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;My position concerning God is that of an [[agnostic]].&#039;&#039;&#039; I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to M. Berkowitz (25 October 1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What I see in nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of ‘[[humility]].’ &#039;&#039;&#039;This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism. . . . My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality. . . . I want to know how God created this world. I want to know his thoughts, the rest are details.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], as quoted by [[Timothy Ferris]], in his article “The Other Einstein”, &#039;&#039;[[w:Awake!|Awake!]]&#039;&#039; magazine, (22 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These proposals spring, without ulterior purpose or political passion, from our calm conviction that the hunger for peace is in the hearts of all peoples--those of Russia and of China no less than of our own country. They conform to our firm faith that &#039;&#039;&#039;God created men to enjoy, not destroy, the fruits of the earth and of their own toil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] in his [[s:The Chance for Peace|The Chance for Peace]] speech shortly after taking office and following the death of [[Joseph Stalin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Posing the question: does the god of love use underarm deodorant, vaginal spray and fluoride toothpaste?&lt;br /&gt;
**Deathbird Stories, by [[Harlan Ellison]] [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=149760477X]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not by accident that the enormous popularity of the “death of God” was born in our world of images: the impossibility of representing God visually leads inevitably in our day to the impossibility of his existence. God is dead—but beyond all the explicit reasons generally offered, he is dead because he is not visible. We can have confidence only in a visible God who is clearly manifested, exclusively in the visual dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;The Humiliation of the Word&#039;&#039; (1981), J. Hanks, trans. (1985), p. 198&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Throughout the Old Testament we see God choosing what is weak and humble to represent him (the stammering Moses, the infant Samuel, Saul from an insignificant family, David confronting Goliath, etc.). Paul tells us that God chooses the weak things of the world to confound the mighty. Here, however, we have a striking contradiction. In [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]] God is supposedly choosing an Augustus, a triumphant military leader. This vision and this miracle are totally impossible. But they are not impossible in the context of Christianity that is already off the rails, that thinks of God as the one who directs history and is the motive power in politics.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;The Subversion of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1982), G. Bromiley, trans. (1986), p. 123&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we consider what is our thought of God we find that it is our own soul stripped of all inferiority and carried out to perfection.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], Sermon 86 (1830), &#039;&#039;The Complete Sermons of Ralph Waldo Emerson&#039;&#039;, Volume 2 (1990), p. 243&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By going much alone a man will get more of a noble courage in thought and word than from all the wisdom that is in books. He will come to hear God speak as audibly through his own lips as ever He did by the mouth of Moses or Isaiah or Milton.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], Journal Entry, October 21, 1833&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The purpose of life seems to be to acquaint a man with himself. He is not to live the future as described to him but to live the real future to the real present. The highest revelation is that God is in every man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Journals&#039;&#039; (1822–1863), 8 September 1833. As quoted in: Maurice York and Rick Spaulding (2008): &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.de/books?id=_pRMlDQavQwC&amp;amp;pg=PA240&amp;amp;dq=A+man+contains+all+that+is+needful+to+his+government+within+himself&amp;amp;hl=de&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiahO73qqfeAhUwpIsKHRqzDswQ6AEIQDAD#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=A%20man%20contains%20all%20that%20is%20needful%20to%20his%20government%20within%20himself&amp;amp;f=false Ralph Waldo Emerson – The Infinitude of the Private Man: A Biography.]&#039;&#039; Chicago and Raleigh: Wrighwood Press, pages 240 – 241. Derived from: Edward Waldo Emerson and Waldo Emerson Forbes (1909): &#039;&#039;Journals of Ralph Waldo Emerson, with annotations&#039;&#039;, III, pages 200-201. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man thinking must not be subdued by his instruments. Books are for the scholar’s idle times. When he can read God directly, the hour is too precious to be wasted in other men’s transcripts of their readings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], “The American Scholar,” Addresses and Lectures, Complete Works (1883), vol. 1, p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In calling his two sons by the names of Gershom and Eliezer, Moses, like Joseph and other righteous men, intended to have the fact of God&#039;s help constantly before him. Since his sons would be with him, and he would often address them or call them by name, he would remember his gratitude to God.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 1&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no place without God&#039;s presence. Even in the bush He was present, and this was the lesson of God&#039;s omnipresence that Moses learnt when he was called out of the bush.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 2&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Moses wanted to know God&#039;s name, and God tells him, &#039;I am that I am&#039;; that is to say, &#039;I am called--or to be called-in accordance with my work in this world.&#039; When I judge mankind I am אלהים Elohim, that being the title or designation for judgment. When I war with the wicked I am known as צבאות Zevooth. When I execute judgment for the sins of man I am known as אלשדי El Shadai, and when I am visiting the world with mercy I am אבני or יהוה Adonoi, the Eternal.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 3&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The matron whom we find so often arguing with Rabbi José observed one day to that sage, &#039;My god is surely greater than yours. When your God appeared to Moses in the bush, Moses merely covered his face, whilst when my god (the serpent) made its appearance he could not stand his ground at all, but had to run away out of fear.&#039; &#039;Not so, &#039;returned the Rabbi, &#039;for in order to be out of the power of your god it sufficed for Moses to step a few paces back, but whither could he have fled from the presence of Him who filleth the earth?&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 3&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am the first and I am the last, and beside Me there is no God&#039; (Isa. 43. 6) I am the first, I have no father; I am the last, I have no brother. Beside Me there is no God; I have no son.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 29&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When God first called Moses, not being then an expert prophet, he was addressed in a voice similar to that of his own father, and he thought that his father had come to him from Egypt. God then told him that it was not his earthly father who called him, but the God of his father. Then, we find, Moses hid his face, which he did not do when first called by his name; not in fact until he heard the words, &#039;I am the God of thy fathers.&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 45&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 108&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Church in the colonies is the white people’s Church. ... She does not call the native to God’s ways but to the ways of the white man, of the master, of the oppressor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frantz Fanon]], &#039;&#039;The Wretched of The Earth&#039;&#039; (1963), p. 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is for man the [[commonplace book]] where he registers his highest feelings and thoughts, the genealogical album into which he enters the names of the things most dear and sacred to him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], in &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), p. xvi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By positing God as unknowable, man excuses himself to what is still left of his religious conscience for his oblivion of God, his surrender to the world. He negates God in practice – his mind and his senses have been absorbed by the world – but he does not negate him in theory. He does not attack his existence; he leaves it intact. But this existence neither affects nor incommodes him, for it is only a negative existence, an existence without existence; it is an existence that contradicts itself – a being that, in view of its effects, is indistinguishable from non-being.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the claims of God are revealed to the mind, it must necessarily yield to them, or strengthen itself in sin. It must, as it were, gird itself up, and struggle to resist the claims of duty. This strengthening self in sin under light is the particular form of sin which we call impenitence. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Grandison Finney]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Systematic Theology&#039;&#039; (1878), p. 369&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is only one good definition of God: the freedom that allows other freedoms to exist.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Fowles]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The French Lieutenant&#039;s Woman|The French Lieutenant&#039;s Woman]]&#039;&#039; (London: Jonathan Cape, 1969), p. 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I [[believe]] in God, not in a Catholic God, there is no Catholic God, there is God and I believe in [[Jesus]] [[Christ]], his incarnation.&#039;&#039;&#039; Jesus is my [[teacher]] and my pastor, but God, the Father, [[w:Ab (Semitic)|Abba]], is the [[light]] and the Creator. &#039;&#039;&#039;This is my Being.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Francis]], interviewed in &amp;quot;How the Church will change&amp;quot; by Eugenio Scalfari in &#039;&#039;La Repubblica&#039;&#039; (1 October 2013), as translated from Italian to English by Kathryn Wallace&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth—that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], debates in the Constitutional Convention, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (June 28, 1787); reported in James Madison, &#039;&#039;Journal of the Federal Convention&#039;&#039;, ed. E. H. Scott (1893), p. 259–60. Franklin suggests that the Convention begin its sessions with prayers &amp;quot;imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessings on our deliberations&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== G ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gandhi smiling 1942.jpg |thumb|It is beyond my power to induce in you a belief in God. There are certain things which are self proved and certain which are not proved at all. ~ [[Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi|Mahatma Gandhi]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Goyathlay-x.jpeg|thumb|I cannot think we are useless or Usen would not have created us. He created all tribes of men and certainly had a righteous purpose in creating each. ~ [[Geronimo]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I looked and looked but I didn&#039;t see God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Yuri Gagarin]] after becoming the first person to orbit the Earth, as quoted in &#039;&#039;To Rise from Earth&#039;&#039; (1996) by Wayne Lee; the authenticity of this remark is disputed; [http://www.interfax-religion.ru/orthodoxy/?act=interview&amp;amp;div=73&amp;amp;domain=1 Colonel Valentin Petrov stated in 2006] that the cosmonaut never said such words, and that the quote originated from [[Nikita Khrushchev]]&#039;s speech at the plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU about the state&#039;s anti-religion campaign, saying &amp;quot;Gagarin flew into space, but didn&#039;t see any god there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sometimes misquoted as &amp;quot;I see no God up here&amp;quot; as if he said this in space, but there are no transcripts or recordings indicating that he ever did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Galileo Galilei]]. in his [[w:Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina|Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina]] (1615), an [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/galileo-tuscany.html essay published in 1615], in response to enquiries of [[w:Christina of Lorraine|Christina of Tuscany]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Aspects of Western Civilization : Problems and Sources in History&#039;&#039; (1988) by Perry McAdow Rogers, p. 53&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not think it is necessary to believe that the same God who has given us our senses, reason, and intelligence wished us to abandon their use, giving us by some other means the information that we could gain through them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mathematics is the language in which God wrote the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Galileo Galilei]] in &#039;&#039;Statistics: Concepts and Applications&#039;&#039; (1994) by Harry Frank and Steven C. Althoen, p. xxi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is beyond my power to induce in you a belief in God. There are certain things which are self proved and certain which are not proved at all.&#039;&#039;&#039; The existence of God is like a geometrical axiom. It may be beyond our heart grasp. I shall not talk of an intellectual grasp. Intellectual attempts are more or less failures, as a rational explanation cannot give you the faith in a living God. For it is a thing beyond the grasp of reason. It transcends reason. There are numerous phenomena from which you can reason out the existence of God, but I shall not insult your intelligence by offering you a rational explanation of that type. &#039;&#039;&#039;I would have you brush aside all rational explanations and begin with a simple childlike faith in God. If I exist, God exists. With me it is a necessity of my being as it is with millions. They may not be able to talk about it, but from their life you can see that it is a part of their life. I am only asking you to restore the belief that has been undermined.&#039;&#039;&#039; In order to do so, you have to unlearn a lot of literature that dazzles your intelligence and throws you off your feet. Start with the faith which is also a token of humility and an admission that we know nothing, that we are less than atoms in this universe. &#039;&#039;&#039;We are less than atoms, I say, because the atom obeys the law of its being, whereas we in the insolence of our ignorance deny the law of nature. But I have no argument to address to those who have no faith.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi]] in &#039;&#039;Young India&#039;&#039; (24 September 1931); also in [http://www.archive.org/details/teachingsofmahat029222mbp &#039;&#039;Teachings Of Mahatma Gandhi&#039;&#039; (1945), edited by Jag Parvesh Chander, p. 458]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People are even more reluctant to admit that man explains nothing, than they were to admit that God explains nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ernest Gellner]], &#039;&#039;Legitimation of Belief&#039;&#039; (1974), p. 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I cannot think we are useless or Usen would not have created us. He created all tribes of men and certainly had a righteous purpose in creating each.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geronimo]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Geronimo&#039;s Story of His Life&#039;&#039; (1907) as told to S.M. Barrett in 1905 and 1906, &amp;quot;Usen&amp;quot; is the Apache word for God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we desire to hold on to solidarity with everyone else in the communicative fellowship, even the dead ... then we must claim a reality that can reach beyond the here and now, or that can connect our selves beyond our own death with those who innocently went to their destruction before us. And it is this reality that the Christian tradition calls God. &lt;br /&gt;
** Jens Glebe-Möller, &#039;&#039;A Political Dogmatic&#039;&#039; (1987), p. 102&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We all of us try to make God in our image. It is one of the worst of our temptations.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Goudge]], &#039;&#039;The Bird in the Tree&#039;&#039; (1940), Chapter 6.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Either half my colleagues are enormously stupid, or else the science of Darwinism is fully compatible with conventional religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen Jay Gould]], in &amp;quot;Impeaching a Self-Appointed Judge&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Scientific American&#039;&#039; (July 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is within you&#039;&#039;&#039;, and you can do and have anything you want. &#039;&#039;&#039;You must [[love]] yourself more. … and then … you can love your fellow man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cary Grant]], as quoted in [http://www.carygrant.net/articles/thinks%20about.htm &amp;quot;Love – That’s All Cary Grant Ever Thinks About&amp;quot;] by [[w:Sheilah Graham Westbrook|Sheilah Graham Westbrook]] in &#039;&#039;Motion Picture&#039;&#039; (June 1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The love of gain, which is a large, incalculably large, element in every soul, when once applied to the desire for God, will [[bless]] the man who has it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gregory of Nyssa]], &#039;&#039;On Virginity&#039;&#039;, Chapter 18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In vain do they think themselves innocent who appropriate to their own use alone those goods which God gave in common; by not giving to others that which they themselves receive, they become homicides and murderers, inasmuch as in keeping for themselves those things which would alleviate the sufferings of the poor, we may say that every day they cause the death of as many persons as they might have fed and did not. When, therefore, we offer the means of living to the indigent, we do not give them anything of ours, but that which of right belongs to them. It is less a work of mercy which we perform than the payment of a debt.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gregory I]], quoted in [[George D. Herron]], &#039;&#039;Between Caesar and Jesus&#039;&#039; (1899), pp. 111-112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As one reads the scriptures of Christianity and Islam with a morally alert mind, one starts getting sick of the very sound of word ‘god’ which word is littered all over this literature like dead leaves in autumn. The deeds which are ascribed to or approved of by this God are quite often so cruel and obnoxious as to leave one wondering that if these are the doings of the Divine, what else is there which is left for the Devil to do.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sita Ram Goel|Sita Ram Goel]], &#039;&#039;Defence of Hindu Society&#039;&#039; (1983)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1539.jpg|thumb|right|The objects of [[philosophy]], it is true, are upon the whole the same as those of religion. In both the object is Truth, in that supreme [[sense]] in which God and God only is the [[Truth]]. ~ [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Legendre - La Prophétie d&#039;Isaïe.JPG|thumb|The prophet disdains those for whom God&#039;s presence is a comfort and security; to him it is a challenge, an incessant demand. ~ [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AdornoHorkheimerHabermasbyJeremyJShapiro2.png|thumb|right|The concept of God was for a long time the place where the idea was kept alive that there are other norms besides those to which nature and society give expression in their operation. ~ [[Max Horkheimer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Give according to your means, or God will make your means according to your giving.&lt;br /&gt;
** Reverend [[John Hall (Presbyterian pastor)|John Hall]], reported in [[Tryon Edwards]], &#039;&#039;A Dictionary of Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1908), p. 194&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe God isn&#039;t the sex police, Richard. Sometimes I think Christians get all hung up on the sex thing because it&#039;s easier to worry about sex than to ask yourself, &#039;&#039;am I a good person?&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;[…]&#039;&#039; It makes it easy to be cruel, because as long as you&#039;re not fucking around, nothing you do can be that bad. Is that really all you think of God?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Anita Blake|Anita Blake]], to [[w:Richard_Zeeman|Richard Zeeman]]&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | author = [[Laurell K. Hamilton]]&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = The Harlequin&lt;br /&gt;
  | edition = 1st edition&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = June 2007&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Berkley Books&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = {{ISBN|978-0-425-21724-5}}&lt;br /&gt;
  | chapter = chapter 44&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pp. 391-392&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No matter how much I probe and prod,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;I cannot quite believe in God;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;But oh, I hope to God that He&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;Unswervingly believes in me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Yip Harburg]], &#039;&#039;Rhymes for the Irreverent&#039;&#039;, (1965)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To the extent that we are free we are like God, who has no need of an idea of a God over [[w:Godself|Godself]] or of an incentive other than the moral law itself. But to the extent that we are also natural beings, we desire our own happiness in everything else that we desire, and we need the practical postulate of God to bring that happiness together with morality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John E. Hare]], “Ethics and Religion: Two Kantian Arguments,” &#039;&#039;Philosophical Investigations&#039;&#039;, vol. 34, no. 2 (April 2011), p. 165&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You either have a God who sends child rapists to rape children or you have a God who simply watches it and says, ‘When you’re done, I’m going to punish you.’ If I could stop a person from raping a child, I would. That’s the difference between me and your God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Tracie Harris|Tracie Harris]], [[w:The Atheist Experience|The Atheist Experience]] &#039;&#039;YouTube&#039;&#039; Jan 6 2013 as quoted in [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/atheist-experience-child-rape_n_2434198.html &#039;&#039;Atheist Experience Child Rape&#039;&#039; Huffington Post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Futurist [[w:Aldo Palazzeschi|Aldo Palazzeschi]]... exhorts us in &#039;&#039;L&#039;antidolore&#039;&#039; (1913) to laugh heartily at the mortality built into the plan of creation not out of spite, as has traditionally been the case, but because suffering and death are nothing but pranks of the prime trickster, God. If anything it is the devil who is the spirit of gravity, and it is in taking him seriously that we plummet from grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3806/is_200605/ai_n17220907/print Thomas Harrison, in &amp;quot;Laughter and the Tree Of Knowledge&amp;quot; in the &#039;&#039;Romanic Review&#039;&#039; (May-November 2006)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The objects of philosophy, it is true, are upon the whole the same as those of religion. In both the object is Truth, in that supreme sense in which God and God only is the Truth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], &#039;&#039;Logic&#039;&#039;, Chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;ve never understood how God could expect his creatures to pick the one true religion by faith — it strikes me as a sloppy way to run a universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[Stranger in a Strange Land]]&#039;&#039; (1961) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent — it says so right here on the label. If you have a mind capable of believing all three of these divine attributes simultaneously, I have a wonderful bargain for you. No checks, please. Cash and in small bills.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough for Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973), p. 264&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The most preposterous notion that H. sapiens has ever dreamed up is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of all the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of His creatures, can be swayed by their prayers, and becomes petulant if He does not receive this flattery. Yet this absurd fantasy, without a shred of evidence to bolster it, pays all the expenses of the oldest, largest, and least productive industry in all history.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The second most preposterous notion is that copulation is inherently sinful.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough for Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973), p. 266&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How much reverence can you have for a Supreme Being who finds it necessary to include such phenomena as phlegm and tooth decay in his divine system of creation?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Heller]], &#039;&#039;Catch 22&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Restore to God His due in tithe and time;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A tithe purloin&#039;d cankers the whole estate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Herbert]], &#039;&#039;The Temple&#039;&#039; (1633), &#039;&#039;The Church Porch&#039;&#039;, Stanza 65&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The prophet disdains those for whom God&#039;s presence is a comfort and security; to him it is a challenge, an incessant demand.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]], &#039;&#039;The Prophets&#039;&#039; (1962), p. 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious ideas, supposedly private matters between man and god, are in practice always political ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;The Monarchy: A Critique of Britain&#039;s Favourite Fetish&#039;&#039; (1990), &#039;&#039;Chatto Counterblasts&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only a humorless tyrant could want a perpetual chanting of praises that, one has no choice but to assume, would be the innate virtues and splendors furnished him by &#039;&#039;his&#039;&#039; creator, infinite regression, drowned in praise!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Consciousness is Gods&#039; gift to mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dr. [[w:Albert Hofmann|Albert Hofmann]] discoverer of [[LSD]] (15 January 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God only speaks to those who understand the language&lt;br /&gt;
** Dr. [[w:Albert Hofmann|Albert Hofmann]], (15 January 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The concept of God was for a long time the place where the idea was kept alive that there are other norms besides those to which nature and society give expression in their operation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Horkheimer]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on Religion,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Critical Theory: Selected Essays&#039;&#039; (1995), p. 129&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The significance of God, cause, number, substance or soul consists, as [[William James|James]] asserts, in nothing but the tendency of the given concept to make us act or think. If the world should reach a point at which it ceases to care not only about such metaphysical entities but also about murders perpetrated behind closed frontiers or simply in the dark, one would have to conclude that the concepts of such murders have no meaning, that they represent no ‘distinct ideas’ or truths, since they do not make any ‘sensible difference to anybody.’&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Horkheimer]], &#039;&#039;Eclipse of Reason&#039;&#039; (1947), pp. 46-47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing could be more untrue than the often-repeated statement that we all worship the same God; or that other, that whatever we worship the result is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Caryll Houselander|Caryll Houselander]], &#039;&#039;The Reed of God&#039;&#039; (London: Sheed &amp;amp; Ward, 1944), p. 85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Savage interrupted him. &amp;quot;But isn&#039;t it natural to feel there&#039;s a God?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;You might as well ask if it&#039;s natural to do up one&#039;s trousers with zippers,&amp;quot; said the Controller sarcastically. &amp;quot;You remind me of another of those old fellows called Bradley. He defined philosophy as the finding of bad reason for what one believes by instinct. As if one believed anything by instinct! One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them. Finding bad reasons for what one believes for other bad reasons–that&#039;s philosophy. People believe in God because they&#039;ve been conditioned to. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;But all the same,&amp;quot; insisted the Savage, &amp;quot;it is natural to believe in God when you&#039;re alone–quite alone, in the night, thinking about death …&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;But people never are alone now,&amp;quot; said Mustapha Mond. &amp;quot;We make them hate solitude; and we arrange their lives so that it&#039;s almost impossible for them ever to have it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], [[Brave New World]] ch. 17 [http://www.huxley.net/bnw/seventeen.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why did it occur to anyone to believe in only one God? And conversely why did it ever occur to anyone to believe in many gods? To both these questions we must return the same answer: Because that is how the human mind happens to work. For the human mind is both diverse and simple, simultaneously many and one. We have an immediate perception of our own diversity and of that of the outside world. And at the same time we have immediate perceptions of our own oneness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], “One and Many,” &#039;&#039;Do What You Will&#039;&#039; (1928), p. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Would God give a bird wings and make it a crime to fly? Would he give me brains and make it a crime to think? Any God that would damn one of his children for the expression of his honest thought wouldn&#039;t make a decent thief. When I read a book and don&#039;t believe it, I ought to say so. I will do so and take the consequences like a man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Ingersoll]] (14 October 1879)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead. [[Karl Marx|Marx]] is dead. And I don’t feel so well myself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eugène Ionesco]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Jewish American Literature : A Norton Anthology&#039;&#039; (2000) by Jules Chametzky, &amp;quot;Jewish Humor&amp;quot;, p. 318&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== J ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Polyptyque de la Vanité terrestre et de la Rédemption céleste-Hans Memling mg 9959.jpg|thumb|I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.&lt;br /&gt;
  ~ [[Jesus]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brueghel Jan II God creating.jpg|thumb|The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dieu Tout-Puissant Chapelle Royale Versailles ceiling.jpg|thumb|It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sabaoth icon (Russia, 19 c.) 2.jpeg|thumb|Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The theory of an existing and benevolent god simply doesn&#039;t make sense to anyone who is rational. A benevolent and omnipotent god would never allow such imbalances as I see to exist for one second. If by chance I am wrong, however I must then assume that being born black called for some automatic punishment for sins I know nothing about, and being innocent it behooves me to defy god. &lt;br /&gt;
**George Jackson, Soledad Brother: The Prison Letters of George Jackson&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s on your side? Shit, I&#039;m alright with that. Because we&#039;re going to reload the clips and come right back.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[50 Cent|Curtis J. Jackson]], [http://genius.com/50-cent-heat-lyrics/ &amp;quot;Heat&amp;quot;] (2003), &#039;&#039;Get Rich or Die Tryin&#039;&#039;&#039; (2003), by C.J. Jackson III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The God who gave us [[life]], gave us [[liberty]] at the same time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[s:A Summary View of the Rights of British America|Summary View of the Rights of British America]] (1774)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Query 17 in &#039;&#039;Notes on the State of Virginia&#039;&#039; (1781-1785)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Query 18 in &#039;&#039;Notes on the State of Virginia&#039;&#039; (1781-1785)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve the homage of [[reason]], than that of blindfolded [[fear]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr from Paris, France, (10 August 1787)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No historical fact is better established, than that the doctrine of one God, pure and uncompounded, was that of the early ages of Christianity … Nor was the unity of the Supreme Being ousted from the Christian creed by the force of reason, but by the sword of civil government, wielded at the will of the fanatic [[w:Athanasius|Athanasius]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to James Smith (1822)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The doctrines of [[Jesus]] are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man.&lt;br /&gt;
: 1. That there is one only God, and he all perfect.&lt;br /&gt;
: 2. That there is a future state of rewards and punishments.&lt;br /&gt;
: 3. That to [[love]] God with all thy heart and thy neighbor as thyself, is the sum of [[religion]].&lt;br /&gt;
::* [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to Benjamin Waterhouse, (26 June 1822)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;*I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jesus]] quoted in [[Psalms]] 82:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some foolish men declare that creator made the world. The doctrine that the world was created is ill advised and should be rejected. If God created the world, where was he before the creation? If you say he was transcendent then and needed no support, where is he now? How could God have made this world without any raw material? If you say that he made this first, and then the world, you are faced with an endless regression. If you declare that this raw material arose naturally you fall into another fallacy, For the whole universe might thus have been its own creator, and have arisen quite naturally. If God created the world by an act of his own will, without any raw material, then it is just his will and nothing else — and who will believe this silly nonsense? If he is ever perfect and complete, how could the will to create have arisen in him? If, on the other hand, he is not perfect, he could no more create the universe than a potter could. If he is form-less, action-less and all-embracing, how could he have created the world? Such a soul, devoid of all morality, would have no desire to create anything. If he is perfect, he does not strive for the three aims of man, so what advantage would he gain by creating the universe? If you say that he created to no purpose because it was his nature to do so, then God is pointless. If he created in some kind of sport, it was the sport of a foolish child, leading to trouble. If he created because of the [[karma]] of embodied beings [acquired in a previous creation] He is not the Almighty [[Lord]], but subordinate to something else. If out of love for living beings and need of them he made the world, why did he not take creation wholly blissful free from misfortune? If he were transcendent he would not create, for he would be free: Nor if involved in transmigration, for then he would not be almighty. Thus the doctrine that the world was created by God makes no sense at all, And God commits great sin in slaying the children whom he himself created. If you say that he slays only to destroy evil beings, why did he create such beings in the first place? Good men should combat the believer in divine creation, maddened by an evil doctrine. Know that the world is uncreated, as time itself is, without beginning or end, and is based on the principles, life and rest. Uncreated and indestructible, it endures under the compulsion of its own nature.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Jinasena}} (9th Century) in the &#039;&#039;[[w:Mahapurana (Jainism)|Mahāpurāna]]&#039;&#039;, as translated in &#039;&#039;Primal Myths&#039;&#039; (1979) by Barbara Sproul&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The very pure spirit does not bother about the regard of others or human respect, but communes inwardly with God, alone and in solitude as to all forms, and with delightful tranquility, for the knowledge of God is received in divine silence.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** St. [[John of the Cross]] in &#039;&#039;The Sayings of Light and Love&#039;&#039; as translated by Kieran Kavanaugh and Otilio Rodriguez (1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a dark night to man in this life.&lt;br /&gt;
** St. [[John of the Cross]], &#039;&#039;The Ascent of Mt. Carmel&#039;&#039;, I, 2, 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[All]]-thing hath the Being by the [[love]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is all that is [[Goodness|good]], as to my sight, and the goodness that each thing hath, it is He.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God willeth that we endlessly hate the sin and endlessly love the soul, as God loveth it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Truth]] seeth God, and [[Wisdom]] beholdeth God, and of these two cometh the third: that is, a holy marvellous [[delight]] in God; which is [[Love]]. Where Truth and Wisdom are verily, there is Love verily, coming of them both.&#039;&#039;&#039; And all of God’s making: for He is endless sovereign Truth, endless sovereign Wisdom, endless sovereign Love, unmade; and man’s Soul is a creature in God which hath the same properties &#039;&#039;made&#039;&#039;, and evermore it doeth that it was made for: it seeth God, it beholdeth God, and it loveth God. Whereof God enjoyeth in the creature; and the creature in God, endlessly marvelling. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;In which marvelling he seeth his God, his Lord, his Maker so high, so great, and so good, in comparison with him that is made, that scarcely the creature seemeth ought to the self. But the clarity and the clearness of Truth and Wisdom maketh him to see and to bear witness that he is made for Love, in which God endlessly keepeth him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Highly ought we to rejoice that God dwelleth in our soul, and much more highly ought we to rejoice that our soul dwelleth in God.&#039;&#039;&#039; Our soul is &#039;&#039;made&#039;&#039; to be God’s dwelling-place; and the dwelling-place of the soul is God, Which is &#039;&#039;unmade&#039;&#039;. And high understanding it is, inwardly to see and know that God, which is our Maker, dwelleth in our soul; and an higher understanding it is, inwardly to see and to know that our soul, that is made, dwelleth in God’s Substance: of which Substance, God, we are that we are. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And I saw no difference between God and our Substance: but as it were all God; and yet mine understanding took that our Substance is in God: that is to say, that &#039;&#039;&#039;God is God, and our Substance is a creature in God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;.1393), Ch. 54&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;As truly as God is our [[Father]], so truly is God our [[Mother]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c.1393), Ch. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I beheld with reverent dread, and highly marvelling in the sight and in the feeling of the sweet accord, that &#039;&#039;&#039;our Reason is in God&#039;&#039;&#039;; understanding that it is the highest gift that we have received; and it is grounded in [[nature]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;.1393), Ch. 83&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I saw full surely that ere God made us He loved us; which love was never slacked, nor ever shall be. And in this love He hath done all His works; and in this love He hath made all things profitable to us; and in this love our life is everlasting. &#039;&#039;&#039;In our making we had beginning; but the love wherein He made us was in Him from without beginning: in which love we have our beginning. And all this shall we see in God, without end.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 86&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A god is usually characteristic of a certain system of thought or morality. For instance, take the Christian God, the &#039;&#039;summum bonum&#039;&#039;: God is love, love being the highest moral principle; and God is spirit, the spirit being the supreme idea of meaning. All our Christian moral concepts derive from such assumptions, and the supreme essence of all of them is what we call God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. G. Jung]], &#039;&#039;Nietzsche&#039;s Zarathustra&#039;&#039; (1988), p. 40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* May His great Name be blessed forever and ever.&lt;br /&gt;
** The Kaddish Prayer: A new translation with a commentary anthologized from Talmudic, Midrashic and Rabbinic sources. New York: Mesorah Publications, Ltd., 2001, ISBN 0-89906-160-5, p.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We actually have a candidate for the [[mind]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; The mind of God we [[believe]] is cosmic [[music]], the music of [[String theory|strings resonating through 11 dimensional]] [[w:Hyperspace|hyperspace]]. That is the mind of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michio Kaku]], [http://bigthink.com/dr-kakus-universe/math-is-the-mind-of-god Math is the Mind of God] (29 December 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are to love God, not for the gifts bestowed upon us but for the sake of love itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Eyran Katsenelenbogen|Eyran Katsenelenbogen]], &#039;&#039;One Time&#039;&#039; (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are no gods! Just voices in your head. They tell you to do what you already want to do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]]&#039;&#039; (mass market paperback edition, {{ISBN|978-0-06-156236-5}}), p. 86&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If they are gods, they are responsible for the horror that occurs in the world. So they are evil. Why otherwise would they allow things to be as they are?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]],&#039;&#039; p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Indeed, if we are ever to be free human beings, and not puppets jerked about by unseen forces—which may or may not exist—the gods must go.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]],&#039;&#039; p. 102&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Christian God is spirit and Christianity is spirit, and there is discord between the flesh and the spirit but the flesh is not the sensuous-it is the selfish. In this sense, even the spiritual can become sensuous-for example, if a person took his spiritual gifts in vain, he would then be carnal. And of course I know that it is not necessary for the Christian that Christ must have been physically beautiful; and it would be grievous-for a reason different from the one you give-because if beauty were some essential, how the believer would long to see him; but from all this it by no means follows that the sensuous is annihilated in Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Soren Kierkegaard]] &#039;&#039;Either/Or Part II&#039;&#039; (1843) as translated by Hong, p. 50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If everything is assumed to be in order with regard to the Holy Scriptures-what then? Has the person who did not believe come a single step closer to faith? No, not a single step. Faith does not result from straightforward scholarly deliberation, nor does it come directly; on the contrary, in this objectivity one loses that infinite, personal, impassioned interestedness, which is the condition of faith, the everywhere and nowhere in which faith can come into existence. Has the person who did believe gained anything with regard to the power and strength of faith? No, not in the least; in this prolix knowledge, in this certainty that lurks at faith’s door and craves for it, he is rather in such a precarious position that much effort, much fear and trembling will be needed lest he fall into temptation and confuse knowledge with faith. Whereas up to now faith has been a beneficial taskmaster in uncertainty, but it would be its worst enemy in this certainty. If passion is taken away, faith no longer exists, and certainty and passion do not hitch up as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Soren Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments&#039;&#039; (1846) as translated by Hong, p. 29&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To live only in the unconditional, to breathe only the unconditional – the human being cannot do this; he perishes like a fish that must live in the air. But on the other hand a human being cannot in the deeper sense live without relating himself to the unconditional; he expires, that is, perhaps goes on living, but spiritlessly. &#039;&#039;&#039;Thus the single&#039;&#039;&#039; individual must personally relate himself to the unconditional. I believed, and do believe, that this is Christianity and love for “the neighbor.” &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;The Point of View On My Work As An Author by Soren Kierkegaard&#039;&#039;&#039; (finished 1848) published by Peter Christian Kierkegaard 1859 translated by Howard and Edna Hong 1998 Princeton University Press P. 19-20 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is cruel, sometimes he makes you live.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen King]], &#039;&#039;Desperation&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God said take what you want ... and pay for it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen King]], &#039;&#039;Desperation&#039;&#039;, said by the character &amp;quot;Johnny Marinville&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*According to logic &#039;nothing&amp;quot; is that of which everything can truly be denied and nothing can truly be affirmed. The idea therefore either of a finite or infinite nothing is a contradiction in terms. And yet according to theologians  &amp;quot;God the self existent being is a most simple, unchangeable, incorruptible being; without parts, figure, motion, divisibility, or any other such properties as we find in matter. For all such things so plainly and necessarily imply finiteness in their very notion and are utterly inconsistent with complete infinity.&amp;quot; Therefore the God here offered to the adoration of the XlXth century lacks every quality upon which man&#039;s mind is capable of fixing any judgment. What is this in fact but a being of whom they can affirm nothing that is not instantly contradicted. Their own Bible their Revelation destroys all the moral perceptions they heap upon him unless indeed they call those qualities perfections that every other man&#039;s reason and common sense call imperfections, odious vices and brutal wickedness. Nay more he who reads our Buddhist scriptures written for the superstitious masses will fail to find in them a demon so vindictive, unjust, so cruel and so stupid as the celestial tyrant upon whom the Christians prodigally lavish their servile worship and on whom their theologians heap those perfections that are contradicted on every page of their Bible. Truly and veritably your theology has created her God but to destroy him piecemeal. Your church is the fabulous Saturn, who begets children but to devour them.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Koot Hoomi|Koot Hoomi]], in   [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett|&#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett&#039;&#039;]],  (1923),  Letter No. X, p. 54, 1881&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Alex&#039;&#039;&#039;: You needn&#039;t take it any further, sir. You&#039;ve proved to me that all this ultraviolence and killing is wrong, wrong, and terribly wrong. I&#039;ve learned me lesson, sir. I&#039;ve seen now what I&#039;ve never seen before. I&#039;m cured! Praise god! &lt;br /&gt;
** [[A Clockwork Orange]] screenplay by Stanley Kubrick.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The important point is that all the standard attributes assigned to God in our history could equally well be the characteristics of biological entities who billions of years ago were at a stage of development similar to man&#039;s own and evolved into something as remote from man as man is remote from the primordial ooze from which he first emerged.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Stanley Kubrick]] Playboy Interview (1968) [http://paulnahm.blogspot.com/2010/06/playboy-interview-wstanley-kubrick-in.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ludovico Mazzolino - God the Father.jpg|thumb|One boy would not get it through his head that for all adults God is not an old man in a white beard sitting on a cloud. ~ [[Madeleine L&#039;Engle]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:God the Father with His Right Hand Raised in Blessing.jpg|thumb|The purposes of the Almighty are perfect, and must prevail, though we erring mortals may fail to accurately perceive them in advance. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It isn&#039;t always the middle-aged who refuse to listen, who will not even try to understand another point of view. One boy would not get it through his head that for all adults God is not an old man in a white beard sitting on a cloud. As far as this boy was concerned, this old gentleman was the adult&#039;s god, and therefore he did not believe in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Madeleine L&#039;Engle]] in &#039;&#039;The Crosswicks Journal, Book One : A Circle of Quiet&#039;&#039; (1972)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Life is too short and hard and strange not to blame God for what He done made of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Jay Lake|Jay Lake]], &#039;&#039;The Temptation of Eustace Prudence McAllen&#039;&#039; in [[w:Martin H. Greenberg|Martin H. Greenberg]] (ed.) &#039;&#039;Westward Weird&#039;&#039; {{ISBN|978-0-7564-0718-6}} p. 199&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Homo proponit et Deus disponit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** And governeth alle goode virtues.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Langland]], &#039;&#039;Vision of Piers Ploughman&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1824), Volume II, p. 427, line 13,984. [[w:John Gerson|John Gerson]] is credited with same. Saying quoted in &#039;&#039;Chronicles of Battel Abbey&#039;&#039; (1066 to 1177). Translation by Lower, 1851, p. 27. [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;Iliad&#039;&#039;, XVII. 515. [[Pindar]], &#039;&#039;Olymp&#039;&#039;, XIII. 149. [[Demosthenes]], &#039;&#039;De Corona.&#039;&#039;, 209. [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Bacchid.&#039;&#039; I, 2, 36. [[w:Ammianus Marcellinus|Ammianus Marcellinus]], &#039;&#039;Hist&#039;&#039;, XXV. 3. [[Francois Fenelon]], &#039;&#039;Sermon on the Epiphany&#039;&#039;, 1685. [[Montaigne]], &#039;&#039;Essay&#039;&#039;, Book II, Chapter XXXVII. [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;Epistles&#039;&#039;, 107. [[w:Cleanthus|Cleanthus]], &#039;&#039;Fragment&#039;&#039;. [[Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039;, I. 22. [[Dante]], &#039;&#039;Paradise&#039;&#039;, VIII, line 134. [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Wallenstein&#039;s Death&#039;&#039;, I, 7. 32. [[w:Ordericus Vitalis|Ordericus Vitalis]], &#039;&#039;Ecclesiastica Historia&#039;&#039;, Book III (1075)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God, but I have this idea that if there were a God, or destiny of some kind looking down on us, that if he saw you taking anything for granted he’d take it away. So he&#039;ll be like: &#039;You think this is going pretty well?&#039; Then he&#039;ll go and send down some big disaster. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hugh Laurie]] Stargazing: Heather&#039;s Angry, Jane is Ill, Hugh is Anxious Kansas City Star, Wed, Oct. 31, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*These findings provide the first experimental evidence that exposure to [[God]]  influences [[Goals|goal pursuit]] and suggest that the ever-present cultural reminders of God can be both burden and benefit for [[W:Self-control|self-regulation]]... From popular and classic works of fiction, to the news media, to everyday conversation, the social world is replete with mentions of God. The current findings suggest that this exposure may have broad societal consequences for fundamental [[psychological]] processes of  [[W:Self-control|self-regulation]], which in turn underlie much of [[health]], [[happiness]], and [[productivity|human productivity]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/psp-102-1-4.pdf Divergent Effects of Activating Thoughts of God on Self-Regulation], Kristin Laurin, Aaron C. Kay and Grainne M. Fitzsimons,  [[W:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|&#039;&#039;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology&#039;&#039;]], (January 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is only a great imaginative experience.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[D.H. Lawrence]], &#039;&#039;Phoenix: The Posthumous Papers of D. H. Lawrence&#039;&#039; (1936) pt. 4, edited by E. McDonald&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a latecomer in the [[w:history of religion|history of religion]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gerard van der Leeuw|Gerard van der Leeuw]], &#039;&#039;Phänomenologie der Religion&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a concept by which we measure our pain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lennon]], &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039; (1970)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The more we get to know about our [[universe]] ... the more the hypothesis that there is a Creator God, who designed the universe for a purpose, gains in credibility as the best explanation of why we are here.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Lennox|John Lennox]], cited in &#039;&#039;[[w:Awake!|Awake!]]&#039;&#039; magazine, 2010, 11/10, article: &#039;&#039;Has Science Done Away With God?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Secondly, getting rid of God does not get rid of the suffering. In fact, it can make the pain worse since it gets rid of all ultimate hope and justice. Horgan denies this in his last sentence, but I still maintain he has no ultimate personal hope to offer for anyone, including himself. The vast majority of people who have ever lived have suffered and not received justice in this life. Since, according to atheism, death is the end, then these people will never receive justice since there is no life to come. I applaud Horgan’s positive reaction to what we have achieved in overcoming disease, poverty, oppression and war, but that does not affect my point in the slightest. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Whether God could have made a world in which fire warmed but didn’t burn and there were no destructive earthquakes is difficult. After all, earthquakes are paradoxically essential for the maintenance of life. Certainly, God could have made a world in which there was no moral evil. But there would have been no humans in it--it would be a robotic world. The greatest God-given capacity we humans have is the capacity to love. It inevitably carries with it the capacity to hate. Hence the world presents us all with a mixed picture – beauty and barbed wire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Lennox|John Lennox]], [https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/can-faith-and-science-coexist-mathematician-and-christian-john-lennox-responds/ &amp;quot;Can Faith and Science Coexist? Mathematician and Christian John Lennox Responds&amp;quot; by John Horgan, at &#039;&#039;Scientific American : Cross-Check&#039;&#039; (1 March 2015)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is it not better to place a question mark upon a problem while seeking an answer than to put the label &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; there and consider the matter solved? Does not the word &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; only confuse and make more difficult the solution by assuming a conclusion that is utterly groundless and palpably absurd?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Lewis]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Atheism&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* His Omnipotence means power to do all that is intrinsically possible, not to do the intrinsically impossible. You may attribute miracles to him, but not nonsense. This is no limit to his power. If you choose to say &#039;God can give a creature free will and at the same time withhold free will from it,&#039; you have not succeeded in saying anything about God: meaningless combinations of words do not suddenly acquire meaning simply because we prefix to them the two other words &#039;God can.&#039;... It is no more possible for God than for the weakest of his creatures to carry out both of two mutually exclusive alternatives; not because his power meets an obstacle, but because nonsense remains nonsense even when we talk it about God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. S. Lewis]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=NSjlftWk78kC&amp;amp;pg=PA18 The Problem of Pain ]&#039;&#039;. Zondervan, 1944, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am much indebted to the good christian people of the country for their constant prayers and consolations; and to no one of them, more than to yourself. &#039;&#039;&#039;The purposes of the Almighty are perfect, and must prevail, though we erring mortals may fail to accurately perceive them in advance.&#039;&#039;&#039; We hoped for a happy termination of this terrible [[w:American Civil War|war]] long before this; but God knows best, and has ruled otherwise. We shall yet acknowledge His wisdom and our own error therein. Meanwhile we must work earnestly in the best light He gives us, trusting that so working still conduces to the great ends He ordains. Surely He intends some great good to follow this mighty convulsion, which no mortal could make, and no mortal could stay.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]]&#039;s Letter to Eliza Gurney (4 September 1864); quoted in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, vol. 7&#039;&#039; (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1953), p. 535&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I can see how it might be possible for a man to look down upon the earth and be an atheist, but I cannot conceive how he could look up into the heavens and say there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Recollection by Gilbert J. Greene, quoted in &#039;&#039;The Speaking Oak&#039;&#039; (1902) by Ferdinand C. Iglehart and &#039;&#039;Latest Light on Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1917) by Ervin S. Chapman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I know there is a God, and that He hates injustice and slavery. I see the storm coming, and I know that His hand is in it. If He has a place and work for me–and I think He has–I believe I am ready. I am nothing, but truth is everything. I know I am right because I know that liberty is right, for Christ teaches it, and Christ is God.&#039;&#039;&#039; I have told them that a house divided against itself cannot stand, and Christ and reason say the same; and they will find it so. [[Stephen A. Douglas|Douglas]] doesn&#039;t care whether slavery is voted up or voted down, but &#039;&#039;&#039;God cares, and humanity cares, and I care; and with God’s help I shall not fail. I may not see the end; but it will come and I shall be vindicated&#039;&#039;&#039;; and these men will find that they have not read their Bibles aright.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]] anecdote registered by novelist [[w:Josiah Gilbert Holland|Josiah Gilbert Holland]], in his &#039;&#039;Life of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1866), Chapter XVI, p. 287. [[w:University of Nebraska Press|University of Nebraska Press]], as something that Lincoln said in a conversation with educator Newman Bateman, in the Autumn of 1860.&lt;br /&gt;
* Faith in a distant, ephemeral God, solver of problems by house call, has also been left behind. Increasingly I come to understand my religion and priesthood as a committment to the society in which I live. A committment to men and women who struggle for a new social order where [[slavery]] has no place, that prepares people to fully realize themselves, in which injustice and exploitation cease to be our daily bread. I understand Jesus Christ as very related to this matter. I understand Jesus Christ as each one of my brothers and sisters. I understand that in uniting with them in this struggle, perhaps I will be capable of overcoming the small and large personal needs that are only [[relevant]] because they impede me from fully giving myself to this task.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Llidó]] letter to a friend on March 9, 1971 (from the book  &#039;&#039;Antonio Llidó: Epistolario de un compromiso&#039;&#039;,Tàndem Edicons,España (1999) {{ISBN|84-8131-227-4}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God, to confess their sins and transgressions, in humble sorrow, yet with assured hope that genuine repentance will lead to mercy and pardon, and to recognize the sublime truths announced in the Holy Scriptures, and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], Proclamation for a Day of Fasting, Humiliation and Prayer (30 March 1863)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An&#039; you&#039;ve gut to git up airly&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ef you want to take in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Russell Lowell]], &#039;&#039;The Biglow Papers&#039;&#039; (1848), First Series. No. 1, Stanza 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thanksgiving chapel interior.jpg|thumb|To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that [[Love]] is the reason for my existence, for God is love. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name. ~ [[Thomas Merton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But the thing that&#039;s really disturbing about Noah isn&#039;t the silly, it&#039;s that it&#039;s &#039;&#039;immoral&#039;&#039;. It&#039;s about a psychotic mass murderer who gets away with it, and his name is God. Genesis says God was so angry with himself for screwing up when he made mankind so flawed (grr!), that he sent the flood to kill everyone. Everyone. Men, women, children, babies.  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; What kind of tyrant punishes everyone just to get back at the few he&#039;s mad at? I mean, &#039;&#039;besides&#039;&#039; {{w|Chris Christie}}. Hey God, you know you&#039;re kind of a dick when you are in a movie with [[Russell Crowe]], and you&#039;re the one with anger issues. You know, conservatives are always going on about how Americans are losing their values and their morality. Well, maybe it&#039;s because you worship a guy who drowns &#039;&#039;babies&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time with Bill Maher&#039;&#039; {{#formatdate:2014-03-14}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Eternal turned his attention to the three shades who stood humbly and yet hopefully before him. The quick, with so short a time to live, when they talk of themselves, talk too much; but the dead, with eternity before them, are so [[verbosity|verbose]] that only angels could listen to them with civility.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. Somerset Maugham]], &#039;&#039;Collected Short Stories 1&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;The Judgement Seat&amp;quot;, p. 314&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is impossible to imagine the universe run by a wise, just and omnipotent God, but it is quite easy to imagine it run by a board of gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]] in: Donald M Simanek, John. Holden &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=ldX0FkgurzoC&amp;amp;pg=PA253 Science Askew: A Light-hearted Look at the Scientific World]&#039;&#039;, CRC Press, Oct 1, 2001,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What in me is dark,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Illumine; what is low, raise and support;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That to the height of this great argument&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I may assert eternal Providence,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And justify the ways of God to men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book I, line 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These are thy glorious works, Parent of good.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book V, line 153&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bright and clear mind — that we call God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Namboku Mizuno]], &#039;&#039;Food Governs Your Destiny&#039;&#039;, p. 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is living in people&#039;s hearts, and in God there is no distinction or rank. Therefore God lives in everyone. That&#039;s why traditionally it is said that all deities are the same. They say God comes to a person who is very humble and honest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Namboku Mizuno]], &#039;&#039;Food Governs Your Destiny&#039;&#039;, p. 105&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If, it was natural to reason, God punishes men with eternal torment, it is surely lawful for men to use doses of it in a good cause.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph McCabe]] in &#039;&#039;A History of Torture&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Creator — A [[Comedy|comedian]] whose audience is afraid to [[laugh]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]], &#039;&#039;A Mencken Chrestomathy,&#039;&#039; ch. 30 (1949)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is the immemorial refuge of the incompetent, the helpless, the miserable. They find not only sanctuary in his arms, but also a kind of superiority, soothing to their macerated egos; He will set them above their betters.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]], &#039;&#039;Minority Report&#039;&#039; (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that [[Love]] is the reason for my existence, for God is love.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], &#039;&#039;Seeds of Contemplation&#039;&#039; (1949)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Persons are not known by intellect alone, not by principles alone, but only by love. It is when we love the other, the enemy, that we obtain from God the key to an understanding of who he is, and who we are. It is only this realization that can open to us the real nature of our duty, and of right action.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], in a letter to [[Dorothy Day]] (20 December 1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O God, we are one with You. You have made us one with You. You have taught us that if we are open to one another, You dwell in us. Help us to preserve this openness and to fight for it with all our hearts. Help us to realize that there can be no understanding where there is mutual rejection. O God, in accepting one another wholeheartedly, fully, completely, we accept You, and we thank You, and we adore You, and we love You with our whole being, because our being is Your being, our spirit is rooted in Your spirit. Fill us then with love, and let us be bound together with love as we go our diverse ways, united in this one spirit which makes You present in the world, and which makes You witness to the ultimate reality that is love. Love has overcome. Love is victorious. Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], in his closing prayer to an informal address delivered in Calcutta, India (October 1968), from &#039;&#039;The Asian Journal of Thomas Merton&#039;&#039; (1975); quoted in &#039;&#039;Thomas Merton, Spiritual Master : The Essential Writings&#039;&#039; (1992), p. 237&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a very good saying that if triangles invented a god, they would make him three-sided.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles de Montesquieu]], &#039;&#039;Lettres persannes&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is anything so precious that without it history and the world will be destroyed, where will you keep it? You will naturally want to keep it in the deepest part of your mind. If you desire to place it in the depths of your mind, it needs to be invisible. It is for this very reason that God exists as an invisible being. It is fortunate that He is invisible, for if He were visible how could a great contest to gain Him be avoided? It would be difficult for God to endure the pain of seeing it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sun Myung Moon]], [http://www.unification.net/wogw/wogw1-01.html &#039;&#039;The Way of God&#039;s Will&#039;&#039; Chapter 1-1. The Will of God] (1980 translation)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is not stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sun Myung Moon]], [http://www.unification.org/ucbooks/WofGW/wogw1-05.htm &#039;&#039;The Way of God&#039;s Will&#039;&#039; Chapter 1-5. Tradition, Official Business, and Responsibility] (1980 translation)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God is merciful, He provides us with little evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Moorcock]], &#039;&#039;The War Hound and the World’s Pain&#039;&#039; (1981), Chapter 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...indeed, if there were any modesty left in mankind, the histories of the Bible might abundantly assure men of the existence of [[angels]] and spirits... I look upon it as a special piece of Providence that . . . fresh examples of apparitions may awaken our benumbed and lethargic minds into an assurance that there are other intelligent beings besides those that are clothed in heavy earth or clay . . . for this evidence, showing that there are bad spirits, will necessarily open a door to the belief that there are good ones, and lastly, that there is a [[God]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry More]], quoted by [[H.P. Blavatsky]], in &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology,&#039;&#039; (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God for all anyone knows could be [[Cary Grant]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carole Morin]], &#039;&#039;Dead Glamorous&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God isn’t in the details, He’s in the structure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carole Morin]], &#039;&#039;Spying on Strange Men&#039;&#039; (2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== N ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nyanaponika Maha Thera.jpg|thumb|A Buddhist meditator, while benefiting from the refinement of consciousness he has achieved, will be able to see these meditative experiences for what they are; and he will further know that they are without any abiding substance that could be attributed to a deity manifesting itself to his mind. ~ [[Nyanaponika Thera]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- [[File:Light dispersion conceptual.gif|thumb|From blind physical necessity, which is always and everywhere the same, no variety adhering to time and place could evolve, and all variety of created objects which represent order and life in the universe could happen only by the willful reasoning of its original Creator, Whom I call the Lord God. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Isaac Newton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Darwinek-bnw.jpg|thumb|God is dead: but considering the state Man is in, there will perhaps be caves, for ages yet, in which his shadow will be shown. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Orvieto Pozzo San Patrizio 5.JPG|thumb| I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche]] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The appeal to a religious meaning to life is a bit different. If you believe that the meaning of your life comes from fulfilling the purpose of God, who loves you, and seeing Him in eternity, then it doesn&#039;t seem appropriate to ask, &amp;quot;And what is the point of that?&amp;quot;It&#039;s supposed to be something which is its own point, and can&#039;t have a purpose outside itself. But for this very reason it has its own problems.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The idea of God seems to be the idea of something that can explain everything else, without having to be explained itself. But it&#039;s very hard to understand how there could be such a thing. If we ask the question, &amp;quot;Why is the world like this?&amp;quot; and are offered a religious answer, how can we be prevented from asking again, &amp;quot;And why is that true?&amp;quot; What kind of answer would bring all of our &amp;quot;Why?&amp;quot; questions to a stop, once and for all? And if they can stop there, why couldn&#039;t they have stopped earlier?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The same problem seems to arise if God and His purposes are offered as the ultimate explanation of the value and meaning of our lives. The idea that our lives fulfil God&#039;s purpose is supposed to give them their point, in a way that doesn&#039;t require or admit of any further point. One isn&#039;t supposed to ask &amp;quot;What is the point of God?&amp;quot; any more than one is supposed to ask, &amp;quot;What is the explanation of God?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But my problem here, as with the role of God as ultimate explanation, is that I&#039;m not sure I understand the idea. Can there really be something which gives point to everything else by encompassing it, but which couldn&#039;t have, or need, any point itself? Something whose point can&#039;t be questioned from outside because there is no outside?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If God is supposed to give our lives a meaning that we can&#039;t understand, it&#039;s not much of a consolation. God as ultimate justification, like God as ultimate explanation, may be an incomprehensible answer to a question that we can&#039;t get rid of. On the other hand, maybe that&#039;s the whole point, and I am just failing to understand religious ideas. Perhaps the belief in God is the belief that the universe is intelligible, but not to US.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Nagel]], &#039;&#039;What Does It All Mean?: A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1987), Ch. 10. The Meaning of Life&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It behooves man to take to heart who it is that hath created him, and who hath developed him from a foul-smelling drop in the womb of woman, who hath brought him to the light of the world, who hath given sight to his eyes, and who hath bestowed the power of motion upon his feet, who maketh him to stand upright, who hath infused the breath of life into him, and who hath imparted of His own pure spirit unto him.&#039;&#039;&#039; Happy the man, therefore, that polluteth not the holy spirit of God within him by doing evil deeds, and well for him if he returns it to his Creator as he received it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Naphtali son of Jacob, as cited in &#039;&#039;Legends of the Jews&#039;&#039; (1909)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The Ultimate [[Truth]] is called God.&#039;&#039;&#039; This one can realize in the state of Nirvikalpa Samadhi. &#039;&#039;&#039;A circle can have only one centre but it can have numerous radii. The centre can be compared to God and the radii to religions.&#039;&#039;&#039; So, no one sect, no one [[religion]] or [[book]] can make an absolute claim of It. &#039;&#039;&#039;He who works for It gets It.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Swami Narayanananda]], &#039;&#039;Selected Articles 1933-86&#039;&#039; (2002), p. 301&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The poor is almost always seen to have a prophetic capacity: not only is the poor in the world, but the poor is the very possibility of the world. Only the poor lives radically the actual and present being, in destitution and suffering, and thus only the poor has the ability to renew being. The divinity of the multitude of the poor does not point to any transcendence. On the contrary, here and only here in this world, in the existence of the poor, is the field of immanence presented, confirmed, consolidated, and opened. The poor is god on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri]], &#039;&#039;Empire&#039;&#039; (2000), p. 157&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.&#039;&#039;&#039; This Being governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all, and on account of His dominion He is wont to be called Lord God, Universal Ruler.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica]]&#039;&#039; (1687)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the beginning formed matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable particles, of such sizes and figures, and with such other properties, and in such proportion to space, as most conduced to the end for which he formed them; and that these primitive particles, being solids, are incomparably harder than any porous bodies compounded of them; even so very hard, as never to wear or break in pieces; no ordinary power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first creation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Opticks|Opticks, or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light]]&#039;&#039;, 4th edition (1730)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Heavenly Master governs all the world as Sovereign of the universe. We are astonished at Him by reason of His perfection, we honor Him and fall down before Him because of His unlimited power. From blind physical necessity, which is always and everywhere the same, no variety adhering to time and place could evolve, and all variety of created objects which represent order and life in the universe could happen only by the willful reasoning of its original Creator, Whom I call the Lord God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Our Humanist Heritage&#039;&#039; (2010) by George Frater, p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039;, § 357, Kauffman trans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott ist eine Mutmaßung; aber ich will, daß euer Mutmaßen nicht weiter reiche, als euer schaffender Wille.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is an assumption; but I want your assuming to reach no further than your creative will.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &amp;quot;Upon the Blessed Isles&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Thus Spoke Zarathustra&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott ist ein Gedanke, der macht alles Gerade krumm.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;God is a thought which makes crooked all that is straight.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &amp;quot;Upon the Blessed Isles&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Thus Spoke Zarathustra&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead: but considering the state Man is in, there will perhaps be caves, for ages yet, in which his shadow will be shown.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], in &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), section 125&lt;br /&gt;
** The reduction of Nietzsche&#039;s thought to … the first-liner of a graffito sometimes found in certain modern tiled cells and catacombs:&lt;br /&gt;
:: &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead&#039;&#039;&#039; — Nietzsche &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nietzsche is dead — &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: This reduction could appear to be the creative interpretation of masterful will to power — if Nietzsche&#039;s thought and style are as uncontrolled as the critics suggest. … Nietzsche himself anticipates the strife of revengeful graffiti at the conclusion of his text: &amp;quot;Wherever there are walls I shall inscribe this eternal accusation against Christianity upon them — I can write in letters which make even the blind see.&amp;quot; …Nietzsche says in his preface that his readers must have a &amp;quot;predestination for the labyrinth&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;new ears for new music&amp;quot; if they are to understand this difficult writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Gary Shapiro in &#039;&#039;Nietzschean Narratives&#039;&#039; (1989), p. 126&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;20,000 Quips &amp;amp; Quotes&#039;&#039; (1995) edited by Evan Esar, p. 347&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Will to truth&amp;quot; does not mean &amp;quot;I do not want to let myself be deceived&amp;quot; but—there is no alternative—&amp;quot;I will not deceive, not even myself&amp;quot;; and with that we stand on moral ground.  ... You will have gathered what I am getting at, namely, that it is still a metaphysical faith upon which our faith in science rests—that even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians, still take our fire, too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year-old faith, the Christian faith which was also [[Plato|Plato&#039;s]] faith, that God is truth; that truth is divine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), B. Williams, ed. (2001), § 344&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What differentiates us is not that we find no God—neither in history, nor in nature, nor behind nature—but that we do not feel that what has been revered as God is ‘god-like.’&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Antichrist&#039;&#039;, § 47, in W. Kaufmann, &#039;&#039;Nietzsche&#039;&#039;, p. 101&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is a mean kid sitting on an anthill with a magnifying glass, and I&#039;m the ant.&#039;&#039;&#039; He could fix my life in five minutes if He wanted to, but he&#039;d rather tear off my feelers and watch me squirm.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Bruce [[Giordano Bruno|Nolan]]&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;[[Bruce Almighty]]&#039;&#039; (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There probably is a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn&#039;t.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John von Neumann]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;John Von Neumann : The Scientific Genius Who Pioneered the Modern Computer , Game Theory, Nuclear Deterrence and Much More&#039;&#039; (1992) by Norman Macrae, p. 379&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After rising from deep [[w:Dhyāna in Buddhism|meditative absorption]] ([[w:jhāna|jhāna]]), the Buddhist meditator is advised to view the physical and mental factors constituting his experience in the light of the three characteristics of all conditioned existence: [[w:Impermanence|impermanence]], [[w:Dukkha|liability to suffering]], and [[w:Anatta|absence of an abiding ego or eternal substance]]. This is done primarily in order to utilize the meditative purity and strength of consciousness for the highest purpose: liberating insight. But this procedure also has a very important side effect which concerns us here: the meditator will not be overwhelmed by any uncontrolled emotions and thoughts evoked by his singular experience, and will thus be able to avoid interpretations of that experience not warranted by the facts.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hence a Buddhist meditator, while benefiting from the refinement of consciousness he has achieved, will be able to see these meditative experiences for what they are; and he will further know that they are without any abiding substance that could be attributed to a deity manifesting itself to his mind. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nyanaponika Thera]], &amp;quot;Buddhism and the God-Idea&amp;quot; (1962)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== O ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Man is born broken. He lives by mending. The grace of God is glue.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eugene O&#039;Neill]], [http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks04/0400091h.html The Great God Brown] (1926)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Near&#039;&#039;&#039;: Nobody can say what is right and what is wrong, what is righteous and what is evil. Even if there is a God, and I had his teachings before me, I would think it through and decide if that was right or wrong myself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Death Note]] chapter 105, written by Tsugumi Ohba &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can omniscient God, who&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Knows the future, find&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The Omnipotence to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Change His future mind?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Karen Owens|Karen Owens]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=yq1xDpicghkC&amp;amp;pg=PA101 The God Delusion]&#039;&#039;, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Jan 16, 2008, p. 101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Having refuted, then, as well as we could, every notion which might suggest that we were to think of God as in any degree corporeal, we go on to say that, according to strict truth, &#039;&#039;&#039;God is incomprehensible, and incapable of being measured.&#039;&#039;&#039; For whatever be the knowledge which we are able to obtain of God, either by perception or reflection, we must of necessity believe that He is by many degrees far better than what we perceive Him to be.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Origen]] &#039;&#039;On First Principles&#039;&#039;, Bk. 1, ch. 1; par. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Cura pii Dis sunt, &amp;amp; qui coluere coluntur.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Heaven rewards the pious; those who cherish God&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Themselves are cherished.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Metamorphoses&#039;&#039;, VIIL, 725&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== P ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:General George S. Patton gravesite, Luxembourg.jpg|thumb|It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who [[Death|died]]. Rather we should thank God that such men [[Life|lived]]. ~ [[George S. Patton, Jr.]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Terry Pratchett Arms.svg|thumb|I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve found God, but I may have seen where gods come from. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Terry Pratchett]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, to the fourth question in the Westminster Shorter Catechism, &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;What is God?&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;, the answer read as follows: God is a [[Holy Spirit|Spirit]], [[infinite]], eternal and uncheangeable, in his being, [[wisdom]], power, [[Sacred#Distinguished from &amp;quot;Holy&amp;quot;|holiness]], justice and [[truth]].&lt;br /&gt;
: This statement the great [[Charles Hodge]] described as &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;probably the best definition of God ever penned by a man.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; (p. 21).&lt;br /&gt;
: The [[Book of Daniel]] tells us about the wisdom, might and truth oft he great God who rules history and shows his [[sovereignty]] in acts of judgement and mercy towards individuals and nations according to his own pleasure (p. 29).&lt;br /&gt;
:* {{cite book|url= https://books.google.it/books?id=06yoMWEmwPYC&amp;amp;pg=PA7&amp;amp;dq=knowing+god&amp;amp;hl=it&amp;amp;source=gbs_selected_pages&amp;amp;cad=2|first1= James I.|last1= Packer|title= Knowing God|publisher= InterVarsity Press|edition= first|year= 1973|chapter= 1 - The study of God|location= Downers Grove, Illinois|language= en|pages= 21, 29|isbn= 978-0-8308-1651-4|lccn= 73-81573|archive-url= |archive-date=|deadurl= }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Those of us who are [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]] believe that [[all]] [[people]] are ultimately saved and that God always [[Love|loves]] us, no matter what we do. These beliefs are [[Truth|true]], but they can very easily be simplified and misunderstood.&#039;&#039;&#039; God is never [[Anger|angry]] with us in the way in which a vengeful [[human]] would reject us, but God’s love for us has a dark side and one which we should rightfully [[fear]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;God loves us not in a sentimental way which aims at our ease and [[pleasure]] but, rather in a way which aims at our highest [[good]] and with an intensity which no one, even the highest [[angels]], can understand.&#039;&#039;&#039; God is absolutely determined, with an [[infinite]] determination, to rid us of all that does not reflect His Goodness. As one of our hymns puts it,&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;“But unto wrong what is His Name? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Our God is a consuming [[flame]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To every [[wrong]] beneath the [[sun]]!”&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: And, because of that, &#039;&#039;&#039;God’s [[punishments]] are terrible, and it is wise to fear them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:* Edward J. Parkinson, in [http://www.catholicgnostics.com/node/17 &amp;quot;Divine Justice: Gnostic Reflections on Some Often Terrifying Realities&amp;quot; at &#039;&#039;CatholicGnostics.com&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;FEU. Dieu d&#039;Abraham, Dieu d&#039;Isaac, Dieu de Jacob, non des philosophes et savants. Certitude. Certitude. Sentiment. Joie. Paix.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;FIRE. God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, not of the philosophers and scholars. Certainty. Certainty. Feeling. Joy. Peace.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], Note on a parchment stitched to the lining of Pascal&#039;s coat, found by a servant shortly after his death, as quoted in [[w:Francis Crawford Burkitt|Burkitt]] &#039;&#039;Speculum religionis&#039;&#039; (1929), p. 150&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Compare not thyself with others, but with Me. If thou dost not find Me in those with whom thou comparest thyself, thou comparest thyself to one who is abominable. If thou findest Me in them, compare thyself to Me. But whom wilt thou compare? Thyself, or Me in thee? If it is thyself, it is one who is abominable. If it is I, thou comparest Me to Myself. Now I am God in all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1669), § 554&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Posterity will one day [[laugh]] at the [[Fools|foolishness]] of modern materialistic philosophers. The more I study [[nature]], the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator. I pray while I am engaged at my work in the laboratory.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Literary Digest&#039;&#039; (18 October 1902)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The more I study nature, the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Literary Digest&#039;&#039; (18 October 1902)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Science, which brings man nearer to God&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], quoted in René Vallery-Radot, &#039;&#039;The Life of Pasteur&#039;&#039; (1902), vol. 1, p. 194&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who [[Death|died]]. Rather we should thank God that such men [[Life|lived]]..&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** General [[George S. Patton, Jr.]], in a speech at the Copley Plaza Hotel, Boston Massachusetts (7 June 1945), quoted in &#039;&#039;Patton : Ordeal and Triumph&#039;&#039; (1970) by Ladislas Farago&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plato and Aristotle in The School of Athens, by italian Rafael.jpg|thumb|You are young, my son, and, as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as a judge of the highest matters... Not one of them who took up in his youth with this opinion that there are no gods ever continued until old age faithful to his conviction. ~ [[Plato]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The word &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; so &amp;quot;capitalised&amp;quot; (as we Americans say), is &#039;&#039;the&#039;&#039; definable proper name, signifying &#039;&#039;Ens [[Necessity|necessarium]]&#039;&#039;; in my belief Really creator of all three Universes of Experience.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], in &amp;quot;[[s:A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God|A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God]]&amp;quot; (1908), § I. &#039;&#039;Ens necessarium&#039;&#039; is a latin expression which signifies &amp;quot;Necessary being, necessary entity&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alan Perlis]] (1982) &#039;&#039;Epigrams on Programming&#039;&#039;. nr.79&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The hypothesis of God is a peculiar one, in that it supposes an infinitely incomprehensible object, although every hypothesis, as such, supposes its object to be truly conceived in the hypothesis.&#039;&#039;&#039; This leaves the hypothesis but one way of understanding itself; namely, as vague yet as true so far as it is definite, and as continually tending to define itself more and more, and without limit. The hypothesis, being thus itself inevitably subject to the law of growth, appears in its vagueness to represent God as so, albeit this is directly contradicted in the hypothesis from its very first phase. But this apparent attribution of growth to God, since it is ineradicable from the hypothesis, cannot, according to the hypothesis, be flatly false. Its implications concerning the Universes will be maintained in the hypothesis, while its implications concerning God will be partly disavowed, and yet held to be less false than their denial would be. Thus the hypothesis will lead to our thinking of features of each Universe as purposed; and this will stand or fall with the hypothesis. Yet a purpose essentially involves growth, and so cannot be attributed to God. Still it will, according to the hypothesis, be less false to speak so than to represent God as purposeless.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], in &amp;quot;A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God&amp;quot; (1908), § II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. &#039;&#039;&#039;This [[mind]] is the matrix of all matter.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Planck]], as he accepted the Nobel Prize (1919)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You are young, my son, and, as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as a judge of the highest matters... Not one of them who took up in his youth with this opinion that there are no gods ever continued until old age faithful to his conviction.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plato]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;[[w:Laws (dialogue)|The Laws]]&#039;&#039; (his last and longest dialogue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is truth and light his shadow.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plato]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a geometrician.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Plato]], but not found in his works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Laugh where we must, be candid where we can,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But vindicate the ways of God to man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutored mind&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To Him no high, no low, no great, no small;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He fills, He bounds, connects and equals all!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 277&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He mounts the [[storm]], and walks upon the [[wind]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle II, line 110&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An honest man&#039;s the noblest work of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle IV, line 248&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Slave to no sect, who takes no private road,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But looks through Nature up to Nature&#039;s God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle IV, line 331&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t have much truck with the &amp;quot;[[religion]] is the cause of most of our wars&amp;quot; school of thought because that is manifestly done by mad, manipulative and power-hungry men who cloak their ambition in God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I number believers of all sorts among my friends. Some of them are praying for me. I&#039;m happy they wish to do this, I really am, but I think science may be a better bet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], in [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1028222/I-create-gods-time--I-think-exist.html &amp;quot;I create gods all the time - now I think one might exist, says fantasy author Terry Pratchett&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Daily Mail&#039;&#039; (21 June 2008)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve found God, but I may have seen where gods come from.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], in &amp;quot;I create gods all the time - now I think one might exist, says fantasy author Terry Pratchett&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Daily Mail&#039;&#039; (21 June 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first act of man, filled and carried away with enthusiasm (of the divine breath), is to adore the invisible Providence on which he feels that he depends, and which he calls GOD.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Misery&#039;&#039;. § 1.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Indeed the inscrutable [[One]] is out of the reach of every rational process. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Nor can any words come up to the inexpressible Good, this One, this Source of all unity, this super-existent Being. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Mind beyond mind, word beyond speech, it is gathered up by no discourse, by no intuition, by no name. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; It is and it is as no other being is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Pseudo-Dionysius, &#039;&#039;The Divine Names&#039;&#039;, 1, 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One thing I can&#039;t stand, it&#039;s people groveling.&lt;br /&gt;
** God, in &#039;&#039;[[Monty Python and the Holy Grail]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== R ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ngc1999.jpg|thumb|The [[Wisdom]] of God Manifested in the [[Works]] of the [[Creation]]. ~ [[John Ray]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Electric iron stand.jpg|thumb|If a person who indulges in gluttony is a glutton, and a person who commits a felony is a felon, then God is an iron. ~ [[Spider Robinson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AnttlersNewM45.jpg|thumb|In the [[presence]] of [[infinite]] might and infinite [[wisdom]], the [[strength]] of the strongest man is but weakness, and the keenest of [[mortal]] [[eyes]] see but dimly. ~ [[Theodore Roosevelt]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pasternak-rilke.jpeg|thumb|There are proofs of Your existence. I had forgotten them all, and never demanded any either, for what an overwhelming obligation would come with this certainty. ~ [[Rainer Maria Rilke]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rilke in Moscow by L.Pasternak (1928).jpg|thumb|Is it possible that there are people who say &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; and suppose they mean something shared by all? — Only consider two schoolboys: one of them buys a knife, and the other buys an identical one on the same day. And a week later, they show each other the two knives, and they turn out to be only remotely similar, so differently have they been shaped by different hands. ... Is it possible to believe we could have a god without making use of him? ~ [[Rainer Maria Rilke]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* All true knowledge of God begins with the knowledge of his hiddenness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gerhard von Rad|Gerhard von Rad]], &#039;&#039;Old Testament Theology. Volume II: The Theology of Israel&#039;s Prophetic Traditions&#039;&#039; (1960). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001, p. 377&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;He who is called [[Brahman]] by the [[w:Jnana|jnanis]] is known as [[w:Atman|Atman]] by the [[w:yogi|yogis]] and as [[w:Bhagavan|Bhagavan]] by the [[w:Bhakti|bhaktas]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The same brahmin is called priest, when worshipping in the temple, and cook, when preparing a meal in the kitchen. &#039;&#039;&#039;The &#039;&#039;jnani&#039;&#039;, following the path of knowledge, always reason about the Reality saying, &amp;quot;not this, not this.&amp;quot; Brahman is neither &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; nor &amp;quot;that&amp;quot;; It is neither the universe nor its living beings. Reasoning in this way, the mind becomes steady.&#039;&#039;&#039; Finally it disappears and the aspirant goes into [[w:samadhi|samadhi]]. This is the Knowledge of Brahman. It is the unwavering conviction of the jnani that Brahman alone is real and the world is illusory. &#039;&#039;&#039;All these [[names]] and forms are illusory, like a [[dream]]. What Brahman is cannot be described.&#039;&#039;&#039; One cannot even say that Brahman is a Person. This is the opinion of the jnanis, the followers of Vedanta. But &#039;&#039;&#039;the bhaktas accept all the states of consciousness. They take the waking state to be real also. They don&#039;t think the world to be illusory, like a dream. They say that the universe is a manifestation of the God&#039;s [[power]] and [[glory]]. God has created all these — [[sky]], [[stars]], [[moon]], [[sun]], [[mountains]], [[ocean]], [[men]], [[animals]]. They constitute His glory.&#039;&#039;&#039; He is within us, in our hearts. Again, He is outside. The most advanced devotees say that He Himself has become all this — the 24 cosmic principles, the universe, and all living beings. &#039;&#039;&#039;The devotee of God wants to eat sugar, and not become sugar.&#039;&#039;&#039; (All laugh.) Do you know how a lover of God feels? His attitude is: &amp;quot;O God, Thou art the Master, and I am Thy servant. Thou art the Mother, and I Thy child.&amp;quot; Or again: &amp;quot;Thou art my Father and Mother. &#039;&#039;&#039;Thou art the Whole, and I am a part.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot; He does not like to say, &amp;quot;I am Brahman.&amp;quot; They yogi seeks to realize the [[w:Paramatman|Paramatman]], the Supreme Soul. &#039;&#039;&#039;His ideal is the union of the embodied soul and the Supreme Soul.&#039;&#039;&#039; He withdraws his mind from sense objects and tries to concentrate on the Paramatman. Therefore, during the first stage of his spiritual discipline, he retires into solitude and with undivided attention practices [[meditation]] in a fixed posture. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; But the reality is one and the same; the difference is only in name. He who is Brahman is verily Atman, and again, He is the Bhagavan. He is Brahman to the followers of the path of knowledge, Paramatman to the yogis, and Bhagavan to the lovers of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ramakrishna]], &#039;&#039;The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna&#039;&#039; (1942), p. 132&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The [[Wisdom]] of God Manifested in the [[Works]] of the [[Creation]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Ray]], title of a book (1691)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most intellectual people do not [[believe]] in God, but they [[fear]] him just the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], in James Lee Christian &#039;&#039;Philosophy : An Introduction to the Art of Wondering&#039;&#039;,  (2005), p. 556.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The god of many cannot remain the true god.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Richardson]], &#039;&#039;Vectors: Aphorisms and Ten Second Essays&#039;&#039; (2001), #138&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is it possible that there are people who say &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; and suppose they mean something shared by all? &amp;amp;mdash; Only consider two schoolboys: one of them buys a knife, and the other buys an identical one on the same day. And a week later, they show each other the two knives, and they turn out to be only remotely similar, so differently have they been shaped by different hands. ... Is it possible to believe we could have a god without making use of him?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge|The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge]]&#039;&#039; (1910), as translated by Michael Hulse (2009), p. 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A thought struck me abruptly: My God, you do &#039;&#039;exist&#039;&#039;, then. There are proofs of Your existence. I had forgotten them all, and never demanded any either, for what an overwhelming obligation would come with this certainty. And yet that is what is now being shown to me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge|The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge]]&#039;&#039; (1910), as translated by Michael Hulse (2009), p. 135&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When I speak of All That Is, you must understand my position within it. All That Is knows no other. This does not mean that there &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;may&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; not be more to know. It does not mean, and here words quite fail us, it does not mean that All That Is, in any terms we can conceive of, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;may&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; not be limited. It &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;knows&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of no other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jane Roberts]], (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If a person who indulges in gluttony is a glutton, and a person who commits a felony is a felon, then God is an iron.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Spider Robinson]], in &amp;quot;God is an Iron&amp;quot; (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gene Roddenberry]], Free Inquiry (autumn, 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think God is as much a basic ingredient in the universe as neutrons and positrons . . . God is, for lack of a better term, clout. This is the prime force, when we look around the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gene Roddenberry]] [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=113558088X]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you do not know your heart, you do not know your God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Radoslav Rochallyi]], &amp;quot;Mythra Invictus&amp;quot;, published in VSS:Bratislava, (2019), p. 62&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, if you read attentively and objectively the &amp;quot;Letter about God&amp;quot;: in [[w:The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett|The Mahatma Letters]], you will see that the Mahatma repudiates the sacrilegious and anthropomorphic conception of a Personal god—cruel and unjust, chastising with eternal damnation all so-called heretics, and justifying all the crimes committed in his Holy Name! Verily, such a God cannot have a Mahatma&#039;s approval and respect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters I,&#039;&#039; (8 September 1934)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Its Humanity develops fully only in the Fourth—our Fourth—our present Round. Up to this fourth Life-Cycle, it is referred to as &#039;humanity&#039; only for lack of a more appropriate term. Like the grub which becomes chrysalis and butterfly, Man, or rather that which becomes man, passes through all the forms and kingdoms during the first Round and through all the human shapes during the two following Rounds... During the three Rounds to come, Humanity, like the globe [planet] on which it lives, will be ever tending to reassume its primeval form, that of a Dhyan-Chohanic Host. Man tends to become a God and then—GOD, like every other atom in the Universe...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (16 November 1935)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Ruling Principle of the Universe is one of Harmony and Love—God is Love. Therefore, if we wish to embody the most ancient axiom, &amp;quot;as above, so below,&amp;quot; we should become unified precisely upon this principle of love and should be subordinate to it, regarding it as our only boundless Ruler. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (15 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*By propagating the dogma of Jesus Christ as the only begotten Son of God, the Church contradicts the very sense of the prayer given to us by Jesus Christ himself, &amp;quot;Our Father which art in heaven.&amp;quot; And also the words of the Scriptures, &amp;quot;So God created man in his own image.&amp;quot; (Genesis 1:27)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (2 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Verily, there is nothing more sacrilegious for human consciousness than to limit the Ineffable Grandeur of the Divine Principle that is poured out over the entire Universe. Assuredly, from this monstrous, ignorant belittling issue all the unworthy concepts of God. Man, in his conceit, tries to bring everything down to his own level and likeness... Indeed, the books of the Teaching are full of concepts of the Divine Principle, or God, and of Spirit and spirituality.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (24 May 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The God in us is the sole reality; all else, as beautifully and poetically expressed by the East, is but the &amp;quot;Play of the Great Mother of the World.&amp;quot;...There is no God, or Gods, who was not at some time a man.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (24 May 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In the presence of infinite might and infinite wisdom, the strength of the strongest man is but weakness, and the keenest of mortal eyes see but dimly.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Theodore Roosevelt]]&#039;s Christian Citizenship Address before the Young Men&#039;s Christian Association, Carnegie Hall, New York (30 December 1900)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nothing remains, under God, but those passions which have often proved&#039;&#039;&#039; the best ministers of His vengeance, and &#039;&#039;&#039;the surest protectors of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.archive.org/stream/elementarysketc03smitgoog#page/n440/mode/2up Lecture XXVIL: On Habit - Part II, in “Elementary Sketches of Moral Philosophy”, delivered at The Royal Institution in the years 1804, 1805, and 1806 by the late Rev. Sydney Smith, M.A. (Spottiswoodes and Shaw (London: 1849))], p. 424&lt;br /&gt;
*** Another Variant: &#039;&#039;&#039;When the usual hopes and the common aids of man are all gone, nothing remains under God but those passions which have often proved the best ministers of His purpose and the surest protectors of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** Quoted by [[w:Theodore Roosevelt|Theodore Roosevelt]] in his &amp;quot;[http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/images/research/txtspeeches/668.pdf Brotherhood and the Heroic Virtues]&amp;quot; Address at the Veterans&#039; Reunion, Burlington, Vermont, September 5, 1901 and published in Theodore Roosevelt&#039;s &amp;quot;The Strenuous Life: Essays and Addresses&amp;quot; by Dover Publications (April 23, 2009) in its Dover Thrift Editions (ISBN: 978-0486472294), p. 127&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kill one man and you are a murderer. Kill millions and you are a conqueror. Kill everyone and you are a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Rostand]], &#039;&#039;Thoughts of a Biologist&#039;&#039; (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If I were granted omnipotence, and millions of years to experiment in, I should not think Man much to boast of as the final result of all my efforts.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;Religion and Science&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there were a God, I think it very unlikely that he would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt his existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], quoted in &#039;&#039;Bertrand Russell&#039;s Best&#039;&#039; (1958), &amp;quot;On Religion&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pragmatists]] explained that Truth is what it pays to believe. Historians of morals reduced the Good to a matter of tribal custom. Beauty was abolished by artists in a revolt against the sugary insipidities of a philistine epoch and in a mood of fury in which satisfaction is to be derived only from what hurts. And so the world was swept clear not only of God as a person but of God&#039;s essence as an ideal to which man owed an ideal allegiance. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &amp;quot;On Being Modern-Minded,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Unpopular Essays&#039;&#039; (1950), p. 69&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== S ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tree of Life 2009 large.png |thumb|Individual things are nothing but modifications of the attributes of God, or modes by which the attributes of God are expressed in a fixed and definite manner. ~ [[Baruch Spinoza]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think that if there were a God, there would be less evil on this earth. I believe that if evil exists here below, then either it was willed by God or it was beyond His powers to prevent it. Now I cannot bring myself to fear a God who is either spiteful or weak. I defy Him without fear and care not a fig for his thunderbolts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marquis de Sade]], &#039;&#039;Justine or The Misfortunes of Virtue&#039;&#039; (1787) [This quote is strikingly similar to Epicurus&#039; above.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The existence of the world without God seems to me less absurd than the presence of a God, existing in all his perfection, creating an imperfect man in order to make him run the risk of Hell.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Armand Salacrou|Armand Salacrou]] in &#039;&#039;Ceritudes et incertitudes&#039;&#039; (1943)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Respectable society believed in God in order to avoid having to speak about him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], &#039;&#039;The Words&#039;&#039; (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott werden, Mensch sein, sich bilden, sind Ausdrücke, die einerlei bedeuten.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**To become God, to be human, to cultivate oneself are all expressions that mean the same thing.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], &#039;&#039;Lucinde and the Fragments&#039;&#039;, P. Firchow, trans. (1991), “Athenaeum Fragments” § 262&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are as many gods as there are ideals. And further, the relation of the true artist and the true human being to his ideals is absolutely religious. The man for whom this inner divine service is the end and occupation of all his life is a priest, and this is how everyone can and should become a priest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Fragments&#039;&#039;, P. Firchow, trans. (1991) § 406&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In saying we are in immediate relation with God, the latter term is used only to designate the &#039;&#039;Whence&#039;&#039; of our spontaneous and receptive life, of which we become aware in our feeling of absolute dependence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schleiermacher]], in &#039;&#039;Theology of Schleiermacher&#039;&#039; (1911), pp. 121-122 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I can see him. I know that God is real. I know it in my heart. You can only believe in what you know to be [[Truth|true]]. You know your own truth. I know mine. Everyone should be able to find that within themselves... I want to live my life for God, and let other people take from that whatever they want.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Rachel Scott]], as quoted in [https://books.google.com/books?id=kI4YwhBD7FgC&amp;amp;pg=PA149 &#039;&#039;No Easy Answers: The Truth Behind Death at Columbine&#039;&#039;] (2002), by Brooks Brown and Rob Merritt, New York: Lantern Books, pp. 149&amp;amp;ndash;150&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I think the [[destiny]] of all men is not to sit in the rubble of their own making but to reach out for an ultimate [[perfection]] which is to be had. At the moment, it is a [[dream]]. But as of the [[moment]] we clasp hands with our neighbor, we build the first span to bridge the gap between the young and the old. At this hour, it’s a [[wish]]. But we have it within our [[power]] to make it a [[reality]]. If you want to prove that God is not [[dead]], first prove that [[man]] is [[alive]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rod Serling]] seech at Moorpark College, Moorpark, California (3 December 1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You have in yourself some thing similar to God, and therefore use yourself as the temple of God, on account of that which in you resembles God.&lt;br /&gt;
* The greatest honor which can be paid to God is to know and imitate him.&lt;br /&gt;
* Consider lost all the time in which you do not think of divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
* A good intellect is the choir of divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
* You should not dare to speak of God to the multitude.&lt;br /&gt;
* He who is worthy of God is also a god among men.&lt;br /&gt;
* He best honors God who makes his intellect as like God as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Quintus Sextius]] &#039;&#039;[[w:Sentences of Sextus|Sentences of Sextus]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We are all writing God&#039;s poem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Sexton]], as quoted by [[Erica Jong]], in [http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2000/oct/26/features11.g2 &amp;quot;Into the lion&#039;s den&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039; (26 October 2000)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is our fortress, in whose conquering name&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Let us resolve to scale their flinty bulwarks.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry VI, Part 2|&#039;&#039;Henry VI&#039;&#039;, Part II]] (c. 1590-91), Act II, scene 1, line 26&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God shall be my hope,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My stay, my guide and lantern to my feet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry VI, Part 2|&#039;&#039;Henry VI&#039;&#039;, Part II]] (c. 1590-91), Act II, scene 3, line 24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And to add greater honours to his age&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Than man could give him, he died fearing God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Henry VIII (play)|Henry VIII]]&#039;&#039; ([[w:Henry VIII (play)#Date|c. 1613]]), Act IV, scene 2, line 67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Had I but serv&#039;d my God with half the zeal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I serv&#039;d my king, He would not in mine age&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Have left me naked to mine enemies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Henry VIII (play)|Henry VIII]]&#039;&#039; ([[w:Henry VIII (play)#Date|c. 1613]]), Act III, scene 2, lines 455–57. Cardinal Wolsey is speaking to his servant, Cromwell. During the Watergate hearings on June 12, 1973, Senator Sam Ervin quoted these words to Herbert Porter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Don&#039;t worry if you see God first, tell him shit got worse.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[2Pac|Tupac Shakur]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-rHzG3moso &amp;quot;God Bless the Dead&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Beware of the man whose god is in the skies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Maxims for Revolutionists&#039;&#039;, #83&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If he is infinitely good, what reason should we have to fear him?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is infinitely wise, why should we have doubts concerning our future?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he knows all, why warn him of our needs and fatigue him with our prayers?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is everywhere, why erect temples to him?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is just, why fear that he will punish the creatures that he has filled with weaknesses?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;The Necessity of Atheism&#039;&#039; (1811)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tacitus]] says, that the [[Jews]] held God to be something eternal and supreme, neither subject to change nor to decay; therefore, they permit no statues in their cities or their temples. The universal Being can only be described or defined by negatives which deny his subjection to the laws of all inferior existences. &#039;&#039;&#039;Where indefiniteness ends, idolatry and anthropomorphism begin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], in &#039;&#039;Essay on Christianity&#039;&#039; (1859)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we find great difficulty from its admirable arrangement in conceiving that the Universe has existed from all eternity, and to resolve this difficulty suppose a Creator, how much more clearly must we perceive the necessity of this very Creator’s creation whose perfections comprehend an arrangement far more accurate and just.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;Eusebes and Theosophus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here was a beast for whom there could be no predator. What better definition of God is there than that?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Lucius Shepard|Lucius Shepard]], &#039;&#039;Señor Volto&#039;&#039; (2003). Originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Sci Fiction|Sci Fiction]]&#039;&#039; (February 12, 2003). Reprinted in [[w:David G. Hartwell|David G. Hartwell]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;Year’s Best Fantasy 4&#039;&#039; (p. 349)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Doesn’t that sound like God to you? This big stupid, invulnerable thing that resembles us and whose creations are more intelligent than it is? The Bible left out that part, but it would explain a great deal.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lucius Shepard]], &#039;&#039;The Skinny Girl&#039;&#039; (2011), in [[w:Ellen Datlow|Ellen Datlow]] (ed.) &#039;&#039;Naked City&#039;&#039; (p. 453)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Joseph Smith first vision stained glass.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;For behold, this is my work and my glory — to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.&#039;&#039; ~ God as portrayed in the &#039;&#039;{{w|Book of Moses}}&#039;&#039; (1830), as dictated by [[Joseph Smith]], 1:39]]&lt;br /&gt;
* For behold, this is my work and my glory — to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.&lt;br /&gt;
** God as portrayed in the &#039;&#039;{{w|Book of Moses}}&#039;&#039; (1830), as dictated by [[Joseph Smith]], 1:39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The value of a mind is measured by the nature of the objects it habitually contemplates. They whose thoughts are of trifles are trifling: they who dwell with what is eternally true, good and fair, are like unto God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lancaster Spalding]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 268&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;By &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;, I mean a being absolutely infinite — that is, a substance consisting in infinite attributes, of which each expresses eternal and infinite essentiality.&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Explanation — I say absolutely infinite, not infinite after its kind: for, of a thing infinite only after its kind, infinite attributes may be denied; but &#039;&#039;&#039;that which is absolutely infinite, contains in its essence whatever expresses reality, and involves no negation.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in [[s:Ethics (Spinoza)|&#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; [&#039;&#039;Ethics Geometrically Demonstrtated&#039;&#039;] (1677)]], Definition 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Whatsoever is, is in God, and without God nothing can be, or be conceived.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God and all attributes of God are eternal.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Individual things are nothing but modifications of the attributes of God, or modes by which the attributes of God are expressed in a fixed and definite manner.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 25&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the indwelling and not the transient cause of all things.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Things could not have been brought into being by God in any manner or in any order different from that which has in fact obtained.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We are willing to worship a God only if God makes us safe. Thus you get the silly question, How does a good God let bad things happen to good people? Of course, it was a rabbi who raised that question, but Christians took it up as their own. Have you read the Psalms lately? We&#039;re seeing a much more complex God than that question gives credit for.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stanley Hauerwas]] from the Chronicle for Higher Education, The Chronicle Review, &amp;quot;A Complex God&amp;quot;  September 28, 2001  &#039;&#039;The Chronicle Review&#039;&#039; Page: B6 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[universe]] is God’s son.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]], &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun&#039;&#039; (1999) “God’s Son” (Sequence: “Is It Possible to Write a Poem”)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== T ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brocken-tanzawa2.JPG|thumb|God is that infinite All of which man knows himself to be a finite part. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God alone exists truly. Man manifests Him in time, space and matter. ~ [[Leo Tolstoy]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDC-emb.jpg|thumb|God, from a beautiful [[necessity]], is [[Love]] in all he doeth, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love, a brilliant fire, to gladden or consume... ~ [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mosaik-Ikone Christus der Barmherzige.jpg|thumb|Here below, God is the feeblest and most destitute of beings; his love, unlike that of idols, does not fill the carnal part of the soul. ~ [[Gustave Thibon]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Stray Birds&#039;&#039; (1916); paraphrased variant: Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God seeks comrades and claims [[love]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The devil seeks [[slaves]] and claims [[obedience]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Fireflies&#039;&#039; (1928)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a mistake to suppose that God is only, or even chiefly, concerned with religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Temple (bishop)|William Temple]], quoted in [[w:R. V. C. Bodley|R. V. C. Bodley]], &#039;&#039;In Search of Serenity&#039;&#039; (1955), ch. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God is truly powerful, He would not let this plague go on.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sheri S. Tepper]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Grass (novel)|Grass]]&#039;&#039; (1989), Chapter 11&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here below, God is the feeblest and most destitute of beings; his love, unlike that of idols, does not fill the carnal part of the soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gustave Thibon]], Introduction to &#039;&#039;[[Gravity and Grace]]&#039;&#039; (1947), p. 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man’s basic anxiety … drives the anxious subject to establish objects of fear. Anxiety strives to become fear, because fear can be met by courage. … Horror is ordinarily avoided by the transformation of anxiety into fear of something, no matter what. The human mind is not only, as [[John Calvin|Calvin]] has said, a permanent factory of idols, it is also a permanent factory of fears—the first in order to escape God, the second in order to escape anxiety. … But ultimately the attempts to transform anxiety into fear are vain. The basic anxiety, the anxiety of a finite being about the threat of nonbeing, cannot be eliminated. It belongs to existence itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Tillich]], &#039;&#039;The Courage To Be&#039;&#039; (1952), p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What, but God?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Inspiring God! who boundless Spirit all,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And unremitting Energy, pervades,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Adjusts, sustains, and agitates the whole.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], &#039;&#039;The Seasons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Spring&#039;&#039; (1728), line 849&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;The word God has become empty of meaning through thousands of years of misuse... I mean that people who have never even glimpsed the realm of the sacred, the infinite vastness behind that word, use it with great conviction, as if they knew what they are talking about.&#039;&#039;&#039; Or they argue against it, as if they knew what it is that they are denying. This misuse gives rise to absurd beliefs, assertions, and egoic delusions, such as &amp;quot;My or our God is the only true God, and your God is false,&amp;quot; or Nietzsche&#039;s famous statement &amp;quot;God is dead.&amp;quot;   The word God has become a closed concept. The moment the word is uttered, a mental image is created, no longer, perhaps, of an old man with a white beard, but still a mental representation of someone or something outside you, and, yes, almost inevitably a male someone or something.  Neither God nor Being nor any other word can define or explain the ineffable reality behind the word, so the only important question is whether the word is a help or a hindrance in enabling you to experience That toward which it points. Does it point beyond itself to that transcendental reality, or does it lend itself too easily to becoming no more than an idea in your head that you believe in, a mental idol?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p. 14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A [[word]] is no more than a means to an end. Its an abstraction. Not unlike a signpost, it points beyond itself. The word honey isn&#039;t honey. You can study and talk about honey for as long as you like, but you won&#039; t really know it until you taste it. After you have tasted it, the word becomes less important to you. You won&#039;t be attached to it anymore. Similarly, you can talk or think about [[God]] continuously for the rest of your life, but does that mean you know or have even glimpsed the reality to which the word points? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p.71&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If, for whatever reason, you disliked the word honey, that might prevent you from ever tasting it. If you had a strong aversion to the word God which is a negative form of attachment, you may be denying not just the word but also the reality to which it points. You would be cutting yourself off from the possibility of experiencing that reality. All this is, of course, intrinsically connected with being identified with your mind. So, if a word doesn&#039;t work for you anymore, then drop it and replace it with one that does work. If you don&#039;t like the word [[sin]], then call it [[unconsciousness]] or [[insanity]]. That may get you closer to the truth, the reality behind the word, than a long-misused word like sin, and leaves little room for [[guilt]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p.71&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has been said:”Stillness is the language God speaks, and everything else is a bad translation.” Stillness is really another word for space. Becoming conscious of stillness whenever we encounter it in our lives will connect us with the formless and timeless dimension within ourselves, that which is beyond thought, beyond [[ego]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life&#039;s Purpose,&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“I want to know the mind of God,” Einstein said. “The rest are details.” What is the mind of God? Consciousness. What does it mean to know the mind of God? To be aware. What are the details? Your outer purpose, and whatever happens outwardly.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The word [[enthusiasm]] comes from ancient Greek – en and theos meaning God. And the related word enthousiazein means &amp;quot;to be possessed by a god.” With enthusiasm you will find that you don&#039;t have to do it all by yourself. In fact, there is nothing of significance that you can do by yourself. Sustained enthusiasm brings into existence a wave of creative energy, and all you have to do then is “ride the wave.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What is [[God]]? The eternal One Life underneath all the forms of life.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in [&#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life&#039;s Purpose,&#039;&#039; p. 98, (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Love is life. All, everything that I understand, I understand only because I love.&#039;&#039;&#039; Everything is, everything exists, only because I love. Everything is united by it alone. Love is God, and to die means that I, a particle of love, shall return to the general and eternal source.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:War and Peace|War and Peace]]&#039;&#039; Bk XIII, Chapter 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is that infinite All of which man knows himself to be a finite part. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God alone exists truly. Man manifests Him in time, space and matter.&#039;&#039;&#039; The more God&#039;s manifestation in man (life) unites with the manifestations (lives) of other beings, the more man exists. This union with the lives of other beings is accomplished through love. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is not love, but the more there is of love, the more man manifests God, and the more he truly exists... &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;We acknowledge God only when we are conscious of His manifestation in us.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]] in his diary (1 November 1910)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why is it when we talk to God we&#039;re said to be praying — but when God talks to us, we&#039;re said to be schizophrenic?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lily Tomlin]], Contributions of Jane Wagner&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be right with God has often meant to be in trouble with men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[A. W. Tozer]], &#039;&#039;Of God and Men&#039;&#039;, p. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am what you call &amp;quot;The World&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;The Universe&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;Everything&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;One&amp;quot;. And, &#039;&#039;&#039;I am &amp;quot;You&amp;quot;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Truth]] Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So what if a kid dies? God will take care of him.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]], in April 2013, as quoted in [http://abcnews.go.com/US/boston-bombing-day-stunning-stop-killers-made-attack/story?id=38335067 &amp;quot;Boston Bombing Day 1: The Stunning Stop the Killers Made After the Attack&amp;quot;] (18 April 2016), by Brian Ross, &#039;&#039;ABC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God, from a beautiful [[necessity]], is [[Love]] in all he doeth, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love, a brilliant fire, to gladden or consume&#039;&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The wicked work their woe by looking upon love, and hating it: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The righteous find their joys in yearning on its loveliness for ever.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]], in &amp;quot;Of Immortality&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Proverbial Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1849)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Satan]]: There is no God, no universe, no human race, no earthly life, no heaven, no hell. It is all a Dream, a grotesque and foolish dream. Nothing exists but you. And You are but a Thought — a vagrant Thought, a useless Thought, a homeless Thought, wandering forlorn among the empty eternities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mark Twain]] &#039;&#039;[[w:The Mysterious Stranger|The Mysterious Stranger]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Some one happened to mention to me that a certain [[Helena Blavatsky|Madame Blavatsky]] had just arrived in London, bringing with her a [[Theosophy|new religion]]... I asked her to explain her new religion... I explained to her my difficulties, which she proceeded to solve by expounding the doctrines of [[reincarnation]] and [[Karma]]. They jumped instantly to my reason. &#039;&#039;&#039;I there and then found the Just [[God]], of whom I had been in search.&#039;&#039;&#039; From that day to this I have never had reason to swerve from those beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Violet Tweedale|Violet Tweedale]], [[Ghosts I Have Seen, and Other Psychic Experiences|&#039;&#039;Ghosts I Have Seen, and Other Psychic Experiences&#039;&#039;]],    1919&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1in god we trust.jpg|thumb|In God We Trust. ~ United States of America national motto]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US-original-Declaration-1776.jpg|thumb|[[w:All men are created equal|All men are created equal]], that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are [[w:Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness|Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness]]. ~ United States Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In God We Trust.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[United States of America]] national motto, as well as &#039;&#039;E PLURIBUS UNUM&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We hold these truths to be self-evident, that &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:All men are created equal|all men are created equal]], that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are [[w:Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness|Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness]].&#039;&#039;&#039;--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:United States Declaration of Independence|United States Declaration of Independence]] (July 4, 1776)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== V ==&lt;br /&gt;
* I looked to find a man who walked with God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Like the translated patriarch of old;— &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though gladdened millions on His footstool trod,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet none with him did such sweet converse hold;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I heard the wind in low complaint go by&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That none his melodies like him could hear;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Day unto day spoke wisdom from on high,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet none like David turned a willing ear;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God walked alone unhonored through the earth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For Him no heart-built temple open stood,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The soul forgetful of her nobler birth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Had hewn him lofty shrines of stone and wood,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And left unfinished and in ruins still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The only temple he delights to fill.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jones Very]], “Enoch”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The one [[idea]] the [[Hindu]] [[religions]] differ in from every other in the [[world]], the one idea to express which the [[sages]] almost exhaust the [[w:Vocabulary|vocabulary]] of the Sanskrit language, is that man must realise God even in this [[life]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Swami Vivekananda]] in: &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=kQCNAwAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA405 The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda [ Volume 4 ] ],&#039;&#039;  Kartindo.com, p. 405.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: &amp;quot;O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.&amp;quot; And God granted it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], in a letter to Étienne Noël Damilaville (16 May 1767)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If God did not exist, He would have to be invented.&amp;quot; But all nature cries aloud that he does exist: that there is a supreme intelligence, an immense power, an admirable order, and everything teaches us our own dependence on it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Voltaire quoting himself in a letter to Prince Frederick William of Prussia (28 November 1770), as quoted in &#039;&#039;Voltaire in His Letters&#039;&#039; (1919) by [[Evelyn Beatrice Hall|S. G. Tallentyre (Evelyn Beatrice Hall)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;More Random Walks in Science : An Anthology&#039;&#039; (1982) by Robert L. Weber, p. 65&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Take Care of the People, and God Almighty Will Take Care of Himself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Sirens of Titan|The Sirens of Titan]]&#039;&#039; (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; WAS MUSIC.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], [http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0205-29.htm &amp;quot;Vonnegut&#039;s Blues for America&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Sunday Herald|Sunday Herald]]&#039;&#039; (5 February 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the final proof of God&#039;s omnipotence that he need not exist in order to save us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Peter De Vries|Peter De Vries]], &#039;&#039;The Mackerel Plaza&#039;&#039; (1958), p. 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== W ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rosace.jpg|thumb|To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist. ~ [[Simone Weil]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Дервиш руми.jpg|thumb|Dear God … Everyone I [[know]] admits they’ve never seen your [[face]], they’re not sure where you [[live]] and have no map to [[Kingdom of God|the place]]. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Dawud Wharnsby]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Storm Spirits.jpg|thumb|&amp;quot;[[w:Elohim|Elohim]],&amp;quot; the name for the creative power in &#039;&#039;[[w:Book of Genesis|Genesis]]&#039;&#039;, is a female plural, a fact that generations of learned rabbis and Christian theologians have all explained as merely grammatical convention. The King James and most other Bibles translate it as &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; but if you take the grammar literally, it seems to mean &amp;quot;goddesses.&amp;quot; [[w:El Shaddai|Al Shaddai]], god of battles, appears later, and [[w:Tetragrammaton|YHWH]], mispronounced Jehovah, later still. ~ [[Robert Anton Wilson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Navy 060608-N-6501M-005 The U.S. Military Sealift Command (MSC) Hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19), anchored off of the coast of Jolo City.jpg|thumb|I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we&#039;ll find it in the nature of that thing. &lt;br /&gt;
~ [[Frank Lloyd Wright]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Don&#039;t you know there ain&#039;t no devil? There&#039;s only God when He&#039;s drunk.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Waits]], in &amp;quot;[[w:Heartattack and Vine (song)|Heartattack and Vine]]&amp;quot; on &#039;&#039;[[w:Heartattack and Vine|Heartattack and Vine]]&#039;&#039; (1980)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;s greatness and goodness are measured by the fact that he gives us choices.&#039;&#039;&#039; He doesn&#039;t require us to thank him for our food. (In case you hadn&#039;t noticed.) God is not a Modernist. He doesn&#039;t view us as nails. God expects us to behave like carpenters. Indeed, he gave us a carpenter as an example. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; So I think God is postmodern. &#039;&#039;&#039;He has his own ideas of what rules, and what sucks, and he doesn&#039;t expect everyone else to agree with him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Larry Wall]] in [http://www.perl.com/pub/a/1999/03/pm.html &amp;quot;Perl, the first postmodern computer language&amp;quot; (9 March 1999)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For modern man, … pride reveals itself in impatience, which is an unwillingness to bear the pain of discipline. … In effect his becomes a deification of his own will; man is not making himself like a god but is taking himself as he is and putting himself in the place of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Weaver]], &#039;&#039;Ideas Have Consequences&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1948), p. 183&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first thing that we know about ourselves is our imperfection. &lt;br /&gt;
: This is what [[Descartes]] meant when he said: &#039;I know God before I know myself.&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
: The only mark of God in us is that we feel that we are not God.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to obey God, one must receive his commands. How did it happen that I received them in adolescence, while I was professing atheism? &#039;&#039;&#039;To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No human being escapes the necessity of conceiving some good outside himself towards which his thought turns in a movement of desire, supplication, and hope. consequently, the only choice is between worshipping the true God or an idol.&#039;&#039;&#039; Every atheist is an idolater — unless he is worshipping the true God in his impersonal aspect. &#039;&#039;&#039;The majority of the pious are idolaters.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Christianity&#039;&#039; (1967) edited by William Robert Miller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No man — prince, peasant, pope, — has all the light, who says else is a mountebank. I claim no private lien on truth, only a liberty to seek it, prove it in debate, and to be wrong a thousand times to reach a single rightness.&#039;&#039;&#039; It is that liberty they fear. They want us to be driven to God like sheep, not running to him like lovers, shouting joy!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], in his play about [[Giordano Bruno]], &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ever since the Greeks, we have been drunk with language! &#039;&#039;&#039;We have made a cage with words and shoved our God inside!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If God be God and man a creature made in image of the divine intelligence, his noblest function is the search for truth.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Once you accept the existence of God — however you define him, however you explain your relationship to him — then you are caught forever with his presence in the center of all things.&#039;&#039;&#039; You are also caught with the fact that man is a creature who walks in two worlds and traces upon the walls of his cave the wonders and the nightmare experiences of his spiritual pilgrimage.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Clowns of God&#039;&#039; (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To assume that one’s existential task is completed when the individual is brought into right relation with society, that is, when the individual has been socialized, is to absolutize society and confuse society with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Merold Westphal]], &#039;&#039;Kierkegaard’s Critique of Reason and Society&#039;&#039;, p. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dear God I&#039;ve heard your [[name]] from [[teachers]], [[family]] and friends, you made the [[universe]] and so will live on when it [[ends]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Everyone I know admits they’ve never seen your [[face]], they’re not sure where you [[live]] and have no map [[Kingdom of God|to the place]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dawud Wharnsby]], in &amp;quot;Dear God&amp;quot;, in &#039;&#039;A Picnic of Poems in Allah&#039;s Green Garden&#039;&#039; (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No reason can be given for the nature of God, because that nature is the ground of rationality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred North Whitehead]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Modern World&#039;&#039; (1925), Chapter XI. New York: Mentor Books, 1948, p. 179&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The worship of God is not a rule of safety—it is an adventure of the spirit, a flight after the unattainable. The death of religion comes with the repression of the high hope of adventure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred North Whitehead]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Modern World&#039;&#039; (1925), Chapter XII. New York: Mentor Books, 1948, p. 192&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;&#039;: God? God is love. I don&#039;t love you.&lt;br /&gt;
** Gregory Widen, [[The Prophecy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;I sit and talk to God&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And he just laughs at my plans&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robbie Williams]] and {{w|Guy Chambers}}, &#039;&#039;[[W:Feel (Robbie Williams song)|Feel]]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[[W:Escapology (album)|Escapology]]&#039;&#039; (18 November 2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;All your Western theologies, the whole mythology of them, are based on the concept of God as a senile delinquent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tennessee Williams]], &#039;&#039;The Night of the Iguana&#039;&#039; (1963)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;{{w|Elohim}},&amp;quot; the name for the creative power in &#039;&#039;[[Book of Genesis|Genesis]]&#039;&#039;, is a female plural, a fact that generations of learned rabbis and Christian theologians have all explained as merely grammatical convention.&#039;&#039;&#039; The King James and most other Bibles translate it as &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; but if you take the grammar literally, it seems to mean &amp;quot;[[goddesses]].&amp;quot; [[w:El Shaddai|Al Shaddai]], god of battles, appears later, and [[w:Tetragrammaton|YHWH]], mispronounced Jehovah, later still.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Anton Wilson]], &#039;&#039;Everything Is Under Control : Conspiracies, Cults, and Cover-Ups&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 197&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To believe in a God means to understand the question about the meaning of life. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To believe in a God means to see that the facts of the world are not the end of the matter. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To believe in God means to see that life has a meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] Journal entry (8 July 1916), p. 74e&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe in God, only I spell it &amp;quot;[[Nature]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frank Lloyd Wright]], &#039;&#039;Quote&#039;&#039; magazine (14 August 1966)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the great mysterious motivator of what we call nature and it has been said often by philosophers, that nature is the will of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; And, I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. &#039;&#039;&#039;If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we&#039;ll find it in the nature of that thing.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Frank Lloyd Wright, quoted in &#039;&#039;Truth Against the World : Frank Lloyd Wright speaks for an organic architecture&#039;&#039; (1987) edited by Patrick J. Meehan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe the growth of &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; signifies the existence of God. That is: if history naturally pushes people toward moral improvement, toward moral growth, and their God, as they conceive their God, grows accordingly, becoming morally richer, then maybe this growth is evidence of some higher purpose, and maybe — conceivably — the source of that purpose is worthy of the name divinity.[… I]f it is a natural outgrowth of history — then it is more likely that this &amp;quot;growth of God&amp;quot; signifies the existence of God, or at least the existence of something you might call divine, however unlike ancient conceptions of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Wright]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Evolution of God|The Evolution of God]]&#039;&#039; (2009). New York: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 286–7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is God love? Like all characterizations of God, this one presumes more insight than I feel in possession of. But there&#039;s certainly something to the idea that love is connected to, indeed emanates from, the kind of God whose existence is being surmised here.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The connection comes via love&#039;s connection to the moral order of which that God is the source. The moral order has revealed itself through ever-widening circles of [[w:Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny|non-zero-sumness]] that draw people toward the moral truth that mutual respect is warranted. As we saw […], it is the moral imagination whose growth often paves the way for that truth, and it does so through the extension of a kind of sympathy, a subjective identification with the situation of the other. And as sympathy intensifies it approaches love. Love, you might say, is the apotheosis of the moral imagination; it can foster the most intimate identification with the other, the most intense appreciation of the moral worth of the other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Wright]], &#039;&#039;The Evolution of God&#039;&#039; (2009), p. 456&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== X ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Y ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They who deny God have not seen Him. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039; Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  12, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The gods of all pagan faiths have been allied with the rich rulers. The priests of most religions are the employees of the landowners. But the God of Israel has always claimed to be with the poor—whether in the legislation of [[Deuteronomy]], the words of the [[prophets]], or the experiences of the [[New Testament]]. Our God is on the side of the poor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Howard Yoder]], &#039;&#039;Radical Christian Discipleship&#039;&#039;, p. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A God all mercy is a God unjust.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night IV, line 234&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By night an atheist half believes in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night V, line 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Deity believed, is joy begun;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A Deity adored, is joy advanced;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A Deity beloved, is joy matured.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Each branch of piety delight inspires.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night VIII, line 720&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A God alone can comprehend a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night LX, line 835&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou, my all!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My theme! my inspiration! and my crown!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My strength in age—my rise in low estate!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My souls ambition, pleasure, wealth!—my world!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My light in darkness! and my life in death!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My boast through time! bliss through eternity!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Eternity, too short to speak thy praise!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Or fathom thy profound of love to man!&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night IV, line 586&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Arthur Frayn:&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;And you, poor creatures, who conjured you out of the clay? Is God in show business, too?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zardoz]] (1974)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;[[Bible]]&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Bible|&#039;&#039;The Bible&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Domenico Fetti 004.jpg|thumb|Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God. ~ [[Moses]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nicolò barabino, profeta isaia, studio per affresco nella chiesa di s.m. dell&#039;assunta a genova sestri.jpg|thumb|As the [[heavens]] are higher than the [[earth]], so are my ways higher than your ways, and my [[thoughts]] than your thoughts. ~ [[Isaiah]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Guercino Padreterno.jpg|thumb|God is [[love]]. Whoever [[lives]] in love lives in God, and God in him. ~ [[John the Evangelist]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Albert_Edelfelt_-_Christ_and_Mary_Magdalene.jpg|thumb|God is not a [[man]]. ~ [[w:Balaam|Balaam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Genesis]] [[W:Genesis 1|1:1]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We ought to obey God rather than men. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Acts of the Apostles]] [[W:Acts 5|5:29]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is not a man&#039;&#039;&#039;, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Balaam|Balaam, son of Beor]] in  &#039;&#039;[[Book of Numbers|Numbers]]&#039;&#039; 23:19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious. For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in [[Acts of the Apostles]] [[W:Acts 17|17:22-23]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thine, O Lord is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in the earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, O Lord, and thou art exalted as head above all. Both riches and honour come of thee, and thou reignest over all; and in thine hand is power and might; and in thine hand it is to make great, and to give strength unto all. Now therefore, our God, we thank thee, and praise thy glorious name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Book of Chronicles|1 Chronicles]] 29:11-13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things that are mighty.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Corinthians 1}}:27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Corinthians 3}}:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The hair of his head was like clean wool. His throne was flames of fire; its wheels were a burning fire. There was a stream of fire flowing and going out from before him. There were a thousand thousands that kept ministering to him, and ten thousand times ten thousand that kept standing right before him. The Court took its seat, and there were books that were opened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel]], [[Book of Daniel]] [[W:Daniel 7|7:9-10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* None can hope in God but those who know his name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David]], [[Psalms|Psalm]] [[w:Psalm 9|9:10]], as cited in {{w|Institutes of the Christian Religion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many things you have done, &lt;br /&gt;
:O Jehovah my God, &lt;br /&gt;
:Your wonderful works and your thoughts toward us.&lt;br /&gt;
:None can compare to you;&lt;br /&gt;
:If I were to try to tell and speak of them, &lt;br /&gt;
:They would be too numerous to recount!&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[David]], [[Psalms|Psalm]] [[W:Psalm 40|40:5]], [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, God is greater than we can know; &lt;br /&gt;
:The number of his years is beyond comprehension.&lt;br /&gt;
:He draws up the drops of [[water]]; &lt;br /&gt;
:They condense into rain from his mist;&lt;br /&gt;
:Then the [[cloud]]s pour it down; &lt;br /&gt;
:They shower down upon mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[w:Elihu (Job)|E·li′hu]], [[Book of Job]], 36:26-28, [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And the LORD said unto him, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Who hath made man&#039;s mouth? or who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the seeing, or the blind? have not I the LORD?&#039;&#039;&#039; Now therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]&#039;&#039; 4:11-12 ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God said unto [[Moses]], I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]&#039;&#039; 3:14 ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: God said to Moses, &#039;I will be what I will be&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Exodus|Exodus]] 20:7, ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Similar phrase: &amp;quot;Keep yourselves from evil to take the name of the Lord in vain, for I am the Lord your God, even the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham and of Isaac and of Jacob.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Doctrine and Covenants}} 136:21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See now that &#039;&#039;&#039;I, even I, am He, and there is no god besides Me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of My hand&#039;&#039;&#039;. For I lift up My hand to heaven, and say, I live for ever. If I whet My glittering sword, and Mine hand take hold on judgment; I will render vengeance to Mine enemies, and will reward them that hate Me. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]]&#039;&#039; 32:39-41 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create calamity: I the LORD do all these things.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Isaiah]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Isaiah 45|45:5-7]] ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: I am the Lord and there is no other. Who forms light and creates darkness, Who makes peace and creates calamity; I am the Lord, who makes all these.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaiah]] [[W:Isaiah 55#Verse 9|55:9]] [[KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;You cannot serve both God and [[w:Mammon|Mammon]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jesus]], &#039;&#039;[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Matthew 6:24|6:24]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is greater than we can know; The number of his years is beyond comprehension.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Job|Job]] 36:26, [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is [[light]]; in him there is no [[darkness]] at [[all]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}} in {{w|1 John}} 1:5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}}, in {{w|John}} 3:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is [[love]]. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}} in {{w|1 John}} 4:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. Keep these words that I am commanding you today in your heart. Recite them to your children and talk about them when you are at home and when you are away, when you lie down and when you rise. Bind them as a sign on your hand, fix them as an emblem on your forehead, and write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moses]], [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5-9 [[w:New Revised Standard Version|NRSV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moses]], [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 18:13 [[King James Version|KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the invisible things of him since the creation of the [[world]] are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting [[power]] and divinity; that they may be without excuse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:Epistle to the Romans|Romans]]&#039;&#039; 1:20 (ASV)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the [[faith]] of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar&#039;&#039;&#039;; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man) God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world? For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 3|3:3-8]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the [[law]].&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Is he&#039;&#039; the God of the Jews only? &#039;&#039;is he&#039;&#039; not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also: Seeing &#039;&#039;it is&#039;&#039; one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]], &#039;&#039;Romans&#039;&#039; [[W:Romans 3|3:19-31]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O the depth of God’s riches and [[wisdom]] and [[knowledge]]! How unsearchable his judgments are and beyond tracing out his ways are! For “who has come to know Jehovah&#039;s mind, or who has become his [[adviser]]?” Or, “who has first given to him, so that it must be repaid to him?” Because from him and by him and for him are all things. To him be the glory forever. Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]], [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 11|11:33-36]], [[New World Translation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fear]] God. [[Honour]] the [[King]].&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Peter 2}}:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalms 19}}:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalms 23}}:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is our refuge and [[strength]], a very present help in trouble. &#039;&#039;&#039;Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the [[mountains]] shake with the swelling thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 46|46:1 - 3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High. God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved: God shall help her, and that right early. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The heathen raged, the kingdoms were moved: he uttered his voice, the earth melted. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 46|46:4 - 7]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[fool]] says in his [[heart]] &amp;quot;There is no God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 53|53:1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I had rather be a doorkeeper in the house of my God, than to dwell in the tents of wickedness.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalm 84}}:10&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: &amp;quot;For I would rather be a servant in the House of the Lord than to sit in the seats of the mighty.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** By {{w|Alben W. Barkley}}, addressed to a mock Democratic convention, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia (April 30, 1956), reported in &#039;&#039;Memorial Services Held in the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States, Together with Remarks Presented in Eulogy of Alben William Barkley, Late a Senator from Kentucky&#039;&#039; (1956), p. 106.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God be for us, who can be against us?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 8|8:31]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no respect of persons with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Romans, 2:11; Acts 10:34&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But will God really dwell with mankind on the [[earth]]? Look! The heavens, yes, the heaven of the [[heaven]]s, cannot contain you; how much less, then, this house that I have built!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Solomon]], 2 [[W:Books of Chronicles|Chronicles]] 6:18, [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;[[Quran]]&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EMİRSULTAN CAMİİ BURSA - panoramio.jpg|thumb|O [[mankind]], It is you that have need of God, and God is the [[Self-sufficiency|Self-Sufficient]], the [[Praised]] [[Kenosis|One]]. If He please, He will remove you and bring a new [[creation]]. And this is not hard for God. ~ [[Quran]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Quran|&#039;&#039;The Quran&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|Allah}}&lt;br /&gt;
* And (mention, O [[Muhammad]]), when your Lord said to the [[angels]], &amp;quot;Indeed, I will make upon the earth a successive [[authority]].&amp;quot; They said, &amp;quot;Will You place upon it one who causes [[corruption]] therein and sheds [[blood]], while we declare Your [[praise]] and [[sanctification|sanctify]] You?&amp;quot; He said: Surely, &#039;&#039;&#039;I know what you know not.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Al-Baqara}} 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He said: Do you then [[understand]] what you [[worship]] -- You and your forefathers? -- Surely they are abhorrence to me, except the [[Lord]] of the [[worlds]],&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Who created me, then He [[guides]] me the way,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who provides me sustenance to [[eat]] and to [[drink]],&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And when I am [[sick]], it is He who [[heals]] me,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who will cause me to [[die]], and will [[resurrect]] me,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who, I [[hope]], will [[forgive]] me and my [[mistakes]] on the Day of Judgment. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham]],  [[w:Ash-Shu&#039;ara|Ash-Shu&#039;ara]] 75-82&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:God in Islam|God]]! [[W:Tawhid|There is no god but He]], — the [[Living]], the Self-subsisting, [[Eternal]]. No slumber can seize Him nor [[sleep]]. His are [[all]] [[things]] in the heavens and on earth. Who is there that can intercede in His [[presence]] except as He permitteth? he knoweth what before or after or behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His [[Throne]] doth extend over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in [[guard|guarding]] and [[perversity|preserving]] them for He is the Most High, the Supreme.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Al-Baqara 255}}, translated by {{w|Arthur John Arberry}} in &#039;&#039;{{w|The Koran Interpreted}}&#039;&#039; (1955).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God helps you, there is none that can overcome you; and if He forsakes you, who is there that can [[help]] you?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Ali-Imran|Sūrat Ali-Imran]] 3:159&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Inventor]] of the heavens and the earth. How could He have a son when He has no consort? And He created everything, and all things He knows. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Al-Anam|Sūrat Al-An&#039;am]] 6:101&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Say: &amp;quot;Who is it that sustains you (in life) from the sky and from the earth? or who is it that has power over hearing and sight? And who is it that brings out the living from the [[Death|dead]] and (brings out) the dead from the living? and who is it that rules and regulates all affairs?&amp;quot; They will soon say, &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;. Say, &amp;quot;will ye not then show piety (to Him)?&amp;quot; such is God, your true Lord; nothing apart from the truth, but error. How then are ye turned away?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Yunus (sura)|Sūrat Yunus]] 10:31-32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  Seest thou him who takes his own [[desire]] as his [[deity|god]], and God leaves him in [[error]] knowingly, and seals his [[hearing]] and his [[heart]] and puts a covering on his [[sight]]? Who can then guide him after God? Will you not reflect? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Al-Jathiyah|Sūrat Al-Jathiyah]] 45:23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  O mankind, It is you that have need of God, and God is the [[Self-sufficiency|Self-Sufficient]], the [[Praised]] [[Kenosis|One]]. If He please, He will remove you and bring a new [[creation]]. And this is not hard for God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Fatir|Sūrat Fatir]] 35:15-17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no god but The God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Muhammad (surah)|Sūrat Muḥammad]] 47:19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;[[Book of Mormon]]&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Book of Mormon|&#039;&#039;The Book of Mormon&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Book of Mosiah|Mosiah]] 13:15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And again, the Lord God hath commanded that men should not murder; that they should not lie; that they should not steal; that they should not take the name of the Lord their God in vain; that they should not envy; that they should not have malice; that they should not contend one with another; that they should not commit whoredoms; and that they should do none of these things; for whoso doeth them shall perish.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|2 Nephi}} 26:32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 315-21.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Homo cogitat, Deus indicat.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man thinks, God directs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alcuin]], &#039;&#039;Epistles&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At Athens, wise men propose, and fools dispose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anacharsis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man says—&amp;quot;So, so.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Heaven says—&amp;quot;No, no.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Chinese Aphorism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s Wisdom and God&#039;s Goodness!—Ah, but fools&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Mis-define thee, till God knows them no more.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wisdom and goodness they are God!—what schools&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Have yet so much as heard this simpler lore.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This no Saint preaches, and this no Church rules:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;Tis in the desert, now and heretofore.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Matthew Arnold]], &#039;&#039;The Divinity&#039;&#039;, Stanza 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They that deny a God destroy man&#039;s nobility; for certainly man is of kin to the beasts by his body; and, if he be not of kin to God by his spirit, he is a base and ignoble creature.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Of Atheism&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From thee all human actions take their springs,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rise of empires, and the fall of kings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Samuel Boyse|Samuel Boyse]], &#039;&#039;The Deity&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O Rock of Israel, Rock of Salvation, Rock struck and cleft for me, let those two streams of blood and water which once gushed out of thy side … bring down with them salvation and holiness into my soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Daniel Brevint|Brevint]], &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1679), p. 17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He made little, too little of sacraments and priests, because God was so intensely real to him. What should he do with lenses who stood thus full in the torrent of the sunshine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Phillips Brooks]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Seriousness of Life&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It never frightened a Puritan when you bade him stand still and listen to the speech of God. His closet and his church were full of the reverberations of the awful, gracious, beautiful voice for which he listened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Phillips Brooks]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Seriousness of Life&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Of what I call God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And fools call Nature.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;The Ring and the Book&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Pope&#039;&#039;, line 1,073&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A picket frozen on duty—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A mother starved for her brood—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Socrates drinking the hemlock,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And Jesus on the rood;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And millions who, humble and nameless,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The straight, hard pathway trod—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Some call it Consecration,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And others call it God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Herbert Carruth|W. H. Carruth]], &#039;&#039;Evolution&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil est quod deus efficere non possit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is nothing which God cannot do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;De Divinatione&#039;&#039;, II. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God! sing, ye meadow-streams, with gladsome voice!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ye pine-groves, with your soft and soul-like sounds!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And they too have a voice, yon piles of snow,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And in their perilous fall shall thunder, God!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]], &#039;&#039;Hymn before Sunrise in the Vale of Chamouni&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God moves in a mysterious way&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; His wonders to perform;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He plants his footsteps in the sea&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And rides upon the storm.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Hymn&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Light Shining out of Darkness&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a God! the sky his presence shares,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; His hand upheaves the billows in their mirth,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Destroys the mighty, yet the humble spares&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And with contentment crowns the thought of worth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Charlotte Cushman|Charlotte Cushman]], &#039;&#039;There is a God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My God, my Father, and my Friend,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Do not forsake me in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wentworth Dillon]], translation of &#039;&#039;Dies Iræ&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;Twas much, that man was made like God before:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But, that God should be made like man, much more.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Donne]], &#039;&#039;Holy Sonnets&#039;&#039;, Sonnet XXII&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By tracing Heaven his footsteps may be found:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Behold! how awfully he walks the round!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God is abroad, and wondrous in his ways&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rise of empires, and their fall surveys.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Dryden]], &#039;&#039;Britannia Rediviva&#039;&#039;, line 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too wise to err, too good to be unkind,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are all the movements of the Eternal Mind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rev. [[John East]], &#039;&#039;Songs of My Pilgrimage&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is divine Principle, supreme incorporeal Being, Mind, Spirit, Soul, Life, Truth, Love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mary Baker Eddy]], &#039;&#039;Science and Health&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV. Ed. 1906, p. 465&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no life, truth, intelligence, nor substance in matter. All is infinite Mind, and its infinite manifestation, for God is All in All. Spirit is immortal Truth; Matter is mortal error.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mary Baker Eddy]], &#039;&#039;Science and Health&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV. Ed. 1906, p. 468&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the Master of the universe has points to carry in his government he impresses his will in the structure of minds.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Letters and Social Aims&#039;&#039; (1876), &#039;&#039;Immortality&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He was a wise man who originated the idea of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Euripides]], &#039;&#039;Sisyphus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Henceforth the Majesty of God revere;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fear him and you have nothing else to fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fordyce]], &#039;&#039;Answer to a Gentleman who Apologized to the Author for Swearing&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Wie einer ist, so ist sein Gott,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Darum ward Gott so oft zu Spott.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** As a man is, so is his God; therefore God was so often an object of mockery.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], &#039;&#039;Gedichte&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My God commands, whose power no power resists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Greene (dramatist)|Robert Greene]], &#039;&#039;Looking-Glass for London and England&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some men treat the God of their fathers as they treat their father&#039;s friend. They do not deny him; by no means: they only deny themselves to him, when he is good enough to call upon them.&lt;br /&gt;
** J. C. and A. W. Hare, &#039;&#039;Guesses at Truth&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I askt the seas and all the deeps below&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; My God to know,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I askt the reptiles, and whatever is &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; In the abyss;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Even from the shrimps to the leviathan&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Enquiry ran;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But in those deserts that no line can sound&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The God I sought for was not to be found.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Heywood]], &#039;&#039;Searching after God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Forgetful youth! but know, the Power above&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With ease can save each object of his love;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wide as his will, extends his boundless grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book III, line 285. Pope&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O thou, whose certain eye foresees&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The fix&#039;d event of fate&#039;s remote decrees.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book IV, line 627. Pope&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dangerous it were for the feeble brain of man to wade far into the doings of the Most High; whom although to know be life, and joy to make mention of his name, yet our soundest knowledge is to know that we know him not as indeed he is, neither can know him; and our safest eloquence concerning him is our silence, when we confess without confession that his glory is inexplicable, his greatness above our capacity and reach.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hooker]], &#039;&#039;Ecclesiastical Polity&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter II. 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But if the sky were paper and a scribe each star above,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And every scribe had seven hands, they could not write all my love.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Dürsli und Bäbeli&#039;&#039;; old public house ditty of the Canton de Soleure or Solothurn. Original in Swiss dialect. Given in &#039;&#039;Notes and Queries&#039;&#039; (Feb. 10, 1872), p. 114&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From thee, great God, we spring, to thee we tend,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Path, motive, guide, original, and end.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], &#039;&#039;Motto to The Rambler&#039;&#039;, No. 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The sun and every vassal star,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; All space, beyond the soar of angel&#039;s wings,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wait on His word: and yet He stays His car&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; For every sigh a contrite suppliant brings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Keble]], &#039;&#039;The Christian Year&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Ascension Day&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nam homo proponit, sed Deus disponit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man proposes, but God disposes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas à Kempis]], &#039;&#039;Imitation of Christ&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter XIX. Thomas Dibdin&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O God, I am thinking Thy thoughts after Thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johannes Kepler]], when studying astronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All but God is changing day by day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Kingsley]], &#039;&#039;The Saints&#039; Tragedy&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Prometheus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L&#039;impossibilité où je suis de prouver que Dieu n&#039;est pas, me decouvre son existence.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The very impossibility in which I find myself to prove that God is not, discloses to me His existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean de La Bruyère]], &#039;&#039;Les Caractères&#039;&#039;, XVI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Sire, je n&#039;avais besoin de cet hypothèse.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sire, I had no need for that hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[La Place]] to [[Napoleon]], who asked why God was not mentioned in &#039;&#039;Traite de la Méchanique Céleste&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Denn Gott lohnt Gutes, hier gethan, auch hier noch.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** For God rewards good deeds done here below—rewards them here.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gotthold Ephraim Lessing]], &#039;&#039;Nathan der Weise&#039;&#039;, I, 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We trust, Sir, that God is on our side.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;It is more important to know that we are on God&#039;s side.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], reply to deputation of Southerners during Civil War&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God had sifted three kingdoms to find the wheat for this planting.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;The Courtship of Miles Standish&#039;&#039;, IV&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Estne dei sedes nisi terra et pontus et aër&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Et cœlum et virtus? Superos quid quærimus ultra?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jupiter est quodcumque vides, quodcumque moveris.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Is there any other seat of the Divinity than the earth, sea, air, the heavens, and virtuous minds? why do we seek God elsewhere? He is whatever you see; he is wherever you move.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Annaeus Lucanus]], &#039;&#039;Pharsalia&#039;&#039;, IX. 578&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ein gute Wehr und Waffen,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Er hilft uns frei aus aller Not,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Die uns jetzt hat betroffen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A mighty fortress is our God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A bulwark never failing,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Our helper he amid the flood&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of mortal ills prevailing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;Ein feste Burg&#039;&#039;. Translation by F. H. Hedge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I fear no foe with Thee at hand to bless;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ills have no weight, and tears no bitterness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Francis Lyte]], &#039;&#039;Eventide&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A voice in the wind I do not know;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A meaning on the face of the high hills&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Whose utterance I cannot comprehend.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A something is behind them: that is God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George MacDonald]], &#039;&#039;Within and Without&#039;&#039;, Part I, scene 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Exemplumque dei quisque est in imagine parva.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Every one is in a small way the image of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, IV. 895&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Quis cœlum possit nisi cœli munera nosse?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Et reperire deum nisi qui pars ipse deorum est?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Who can know heaven except by its gifts? and who can find out God, unless the man who is himself an emanation from God?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, II. 115&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One sole God;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One sole ruler,—his Law;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One sole interpreter of that law—Humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giuseppe Mazzini]], &#039;&#039;Life and Writings&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Young Europe&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;General Principles&#039;&#039;, No. 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too wise to be mistaken still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Too good to be unkind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Medley]], &#039;&#039;Hymn of God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Who best&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Bear his mild yoke, they serve him best: his state&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is kingly; thousands at his bidding speed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And post o&#039;er land and ocean without rest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;Sonnet&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;On His Blindness&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott-trunkener Mensch.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A God-intoxicated man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Novalis]], in reference to [[Spinoza]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Trumpeter, sound for the splendour of God!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;. . . . . .&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Trumpeter, rally us, up to the heights of it!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Sound for the City of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred Noyes]], &#039;&#039;Trumpet Call&#039;&#039;, last lines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est deus in nobis; et sunt commercia cœli.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God within us and intercourse with heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Ars Amatoria&#039;&#039;, Book III. 549. (Milton&#039;s &amp;quot;Looks commercing with the skies&amp;quot; said to be inspired by this phrase)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est deus in nobis: agitante calescimus illo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God within us, and we glow when he stirs us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Fasti&#039;&#039;, Book VI. 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Sed tamen ut fuso taurorum sanguine centum,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sic capitur minimo thuris honore deux.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** As God is propitiated by the blood of a hundred bulls, so also is he by the smallest offering of incense.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Tristium&#039;&#039;, II. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil ita sublime est, supraque pericula tendit&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Non sit ut inferius suppositumque deo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nothing is so high and above all danger that is not below and in the power of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Tristium&#039;&#039;, IV. 8. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One on God&#039;s side is a majority.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wendell Phillips]], speech at Harper&#039;s Ferry (1 November 1859)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est profecto deus, qui, quæ nos gerimus, auditque et videt.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is indeed a God that hears and sees whate&#039;er we do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Captivi&#039;&#039;, II. 2. 63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He from thick films shall purge the visual ray,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on the sightless eyeball pour the day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;Messiah&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou Great First Cause, least understood.&lt;br /&gt;
** Alexander Pope, &#039;&#039;Universal Prayer&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je crains Dieu, cher Abner, et n&#039;ai point d&#039;autre crainte.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I fear God, dear Abner, and I have no other fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Racine]], &#039;&#039;Athalie&#039;&#039;, Act I, scene 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Give us a God—a living God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; One to wake the sleeping soul, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; One to cleanse the tainted blood &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Whose pulses in our bosoms roll.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. G. Rosenberg]], &#039;&#039;The Winged Horn&#039;&#039;, Stanza 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We may scavenge the dross of the nation, we may shudder past bloody sod,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But we thrill to the new revelation that we are parts of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Haven Schauffler]], &#039;&#039;New Gods for Old&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Es lebt ein Gott zu strafen und zu rächen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God to punish and avenge.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Wilhelm Tell&#039;&#039;, IV. 3. 37&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil ab illo [i.e. a Deo] vacat; opus suum ipse implet.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nothing is void of God; He Himself fills His work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;De Beneficiis&#039;&#039;, IV. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Deum non immolationibus et sanguine multo colendum: quæ enim ex trucidatione immerentium voluptas est? sed mente pura, bono honestoque proposito. Non templa illi, congestis in altitudinem saxis, struenda sunt; in suo cuique consecrandus est pectore.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is not to be worshipped with sacrifices and blood; for what pleasure can He have in the slaughter of the innocent? but with a pure mind, a good and honest purpose. Temples are not to be built for Him with stones piled on high; God is to be consecrated in the breast of each.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;Fragment&#039;&#039;, V. 204&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God helps those who help themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Algernon Sidney]], &#039;&#039;Discourse Concerning Government&#039;&#039;, Chapter II. Ovid—Metamorphoses. X. 586. [[Pliny the Elder]], viewing the Eruption of Vesuvius, Aug., 79. [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;William Tell&#039;&#039;, I. 2. [[Simonides]] is quoted as author by Claudian. [[Sophocles]], &#039;&#039;Fragments&#039;&#039;. [[Terence]], &#039;&#039;Phormio&#039;&#039;. I. 4. [[Vergil]], &#039;&#039;Æneid&#039;&#039; (29-19 BC), X, 284. Quoted as a proverb by old and modern writers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From Piety, whose soul sincere&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fears God, and knows no other fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. Smyth]], &#039;&#039;Ode for the Installation of the Duke of Gloucester as Chancellor of Cambridge&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ad majorem Dei gloriam.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** For the greater glory of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Motto of the Society of Jesus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The divine essence itself is love and wisdom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emanuel Swedenborg]], &#039;&#039;Divine Love and Wisdom&#039;&#039;, Par. 28&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, the Great Giver, can open the whole universe to our gaze in the narrow space of a single lane.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Jivan-smitri&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ha sotto i piedi il Fato e la Natura.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ministri umili; e&#039;l moto e chi&#039;l misura.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Under whose feet (subjected to His grace),&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Sit nature, fortune, motion, time, and place.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Torquato Tasso]], &#039;&#039;Gerusalemme&#039;&#039;, IX, 66&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At last I heard a voice upon the slope&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Cry to the summit, &amp;quot;Is there any hope?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To which an answer pealed from that high land,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But in a tongue no man could understand;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on the glimmering limit far withdrawn,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God made himself an awful rose of dawn.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred Tennyson]], &#039;&#039;Vision of Sin&#039;&#039;, V&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I fled Him, down the nights and down the days;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I fled Him, down the arches of the years;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I fled Him, down the labyrinthine ways&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of my own mind; and in the midst of tears&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I hid from Him, and under running laughter.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Thompson]], &#039;&#039;The Hound of Heaven&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But I lose&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Myself in Him, in Light ineffable!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Come then, expressive Silence, muse His praise.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;These, as they change, Almighty Father, these&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are but the varied God. The rolling Year&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is full of Thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], &#039;&#039;Hymn&#039;&#039;, line 116&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The being of God is so comfortable, so convenient, so necessary to the felicity of Mankind, that, (as [[Cicero|Tully]] admirably says) &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;, if God were not a necessary being of himself, he might almost seem to be made on purpose for the use and benefit of men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Tillotson|Archbishop Tillotson]], &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039;, Sermon 93, Volume I, (1712 edition), p. 696; this is the probable origin of [[Voltaire]]&#039;s phrase.&lt;br /&gt;
** Cicero&#039;s phrase from &#039;&#039;[[w:De Legibus|De legibus]]&#039;&#039; in fact references &amp;quot;gods&amp;quot; in the plural&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rock of Ages, cleft for me,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Let me hide myself in thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustus Toplady]], &#039;&#039;Living and Dying Prayer&#039;&#039;. &amp;quot;Rock of Ages&amp;quot; is translation. from the Hebrew of &amp;quot;everlasting strength.&amp;quot; Isaiah, XXVI. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* None but God can satisfy the longings of an immortal soul; that as the heart was made for Him, so He only can fill it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Chenevix Trench]], &#039;&#039;Notes on the Parables&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Prodigal Son&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, from a beautiful necessity, is Love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]], &#039;&#039;Of Immortality&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that there is no God, but that matter is God and God is matter; and that it is no matter whether there is any God or no.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;The Unbeliever&#039;s Creed&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Connoisseur No. IX&#039;&#039; (March 28, 1754)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Si genus humanum et mortalia temnitis arma&#039;&#039;,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;At sperate deos memores fandi atque nefandi&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** If ye despise the human race, and mortal arms, yet remember that there is a God who is mindful of right and wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Virgil]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Aeneid|Æneid]]&#039;&#039; (29-19 BC), I. 542&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Si Dieu n&#039;existait pas, il faudrait l&#039;inventer.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** If there were no God, it would be necessary to invent him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Epitre à l&#039;Auteur du Livre des Trois Imposteurs&#039;&#039;, CXI. See Œuvres Complètes de Voltaire, Volume I, p. 1076. Ed. Didot, 1827. Also in letter to Frederick, Prince Royal of Prussia&lt;br /&gt;
*** cf. [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je voudrais que vous écrasassiez l&#039;infâme.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I wish that you would crush this infamy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]] to D&#039;Alembert June 23, 1760. Attributed to Voltaire by Abbé Barruch—Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism. Generally quoted &amp;quot;Écrasez l&#039;infâme.&amp;quot; A. De Morgan contends that the popular idea that it refers to God is incorrect. It refers probably to the Roman Catholic Church, or the traditions in the church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God on His throne is eldest of poets:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Unto His measures moveth the Whole.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;England my Mother&#039;&#039;, Part II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God I know of, I shall ne&#039;er&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Know, though he dwells exceeding nigh.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Raise thou the stone and find me there,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Cleave thou the wood and there am I.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yea, in my flesh his spirit doth flow,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Too near, too far, for me to know.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;The Unknown God&#039;&#039;. Third and fourth lines are from &amp;quot;newly discovered sayings of Jesus.&amp;quot; Probably an ancient Oriental proverb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Somewhat which we name but cannot know.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ev&#039;n as we name a star and only see&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Its quenchless flashings forth, which ever show&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And ever hide him, and which are not he.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;Wordsworth&#039;s Grave&#039;&#039;, I, Stanza 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is and all is well.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;My Birthday&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know not where His islands lift&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Their fronded palms in air;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I only know I cannot drift&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Beyond His love and care.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;The Eternal Goodness&#039;&#039;, Stanza 20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Though man sits still, and takes his ease,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is at work on man;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No means, no moment unemploy&#039;d,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To bless him, if he can.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Resignation&#039;&#039;, Part I, Stanza 119&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anonymous ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Proverbs or widely known statements by unknown authors.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;GOD IS COMING, AND IS &#039;&#039;SHE&#039;&#039; PISSED!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Anonymous bumper sticker as quoted in &#039;&#039;My First Saturnalia&#039;&#039; (1981) by Michael Rumaker, p. 3&lt;br /&gt;
** GOD IS COMING, AND BOY IS SHE PISSED!&lt;br /&gt;
*** Variant bumper sticker as quoted in &#039;&#039;River Angel : A Novel&#039;&#039; (1999) A. Manette Ansay, p. 107&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Ageless Wisdom Teachings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fear of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kingdom of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Love of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Om]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pandeism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pantheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Personal God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Polytheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Commons category}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|God and Religious Toleration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:God| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121435</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121435"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T12:41:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* P */ prokhanov&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne- &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]], [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russian people will suffer a blow, it will leave the cities for fields, forests ... It will pick mushrooms, berries, nuts - the Russian people is ready in a moment of great sorrow to turn into a chipmunk people, a hamster people, it will store up for the winter all sorts of roots, all sorts of onions.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Русский народ перебьётся, он уйдёт из городов в поля, в леса... Будет собирать грибы, ягоды, орехи — русский народ готов в минуту больших печалей превратиться в народ-бурундук, народ-хомяк, он будет запасать на зиму всякие корешки, всякие луковки.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Prokhanov|Alexander Prokhanov]] on the sanctions Russia faces following the 2022 invasion of [[Ukraine]], from the interview [https://aif.ru/politics/world/pisatel_aleksandr_prohanov_mirovoy_perekur_konchilsya Writer Alexander Prokhanov: &amp;quot;The global smoke break is over&amp;quot;] (6 April 2022), &#039;&#039;[[w:Argumenty i fakty|Argumenty i fakty]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121432</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121432"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T12:13:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: Undo revision 3121431 by Spafky (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne- &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** Andrei Pionkovsky, [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121431</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121431"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T12:12:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* S */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne- &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** Andrei Pionkovsky, [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121429</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121429"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T12:08:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne- &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers, 3:20], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** Andrei Pionkovsky, [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121428</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3121428"/>
		<updated>2022-06-04T12:07:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* N */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne- &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is clear that if [[Putin]] converts to Buddhism tomorrow, they will fill wastebaskets in their luxurious offices with all these icons, draw a scarlet spot between their eyebrows and sing “Om mani padme hum”.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Понятно, что если завтра Путин примет буддизм, то они всеми этими иконками набьют мусорные корзины в своих роскошных кабинетах, нарисуют себе алое пятно между бровями и будут петь «Ом мани падме хум».&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of Russian officials. From the interview titled [http://www.newlookmedia.ru/?p=23172 Александр Невзоров: кощунник] (11 October 2012), &#039;&#039;[[w:Novy Vzglyad|Novy Vzglyad]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*If a person wants to be the king of the Papuans, then he is doomed to stick large feathers into his head, wear necklaces from the largest shells and dance certain dances the fastest of all.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Если человек хочет быть королём папуасов, то он обречён втыкать себе в голову большие перья, одевать ожерелья из самых больших ракушек и резвее всех танцевать определённые танцы.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]] on the religiosity of the Russian President. [https://youtube.com/watch?v=pYx-7H-LmNE?t=200 Replying to questions from his YouTube channel&#039;s viewers], 3 February 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** Andrei Pionkovsky, [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=3120547</id>
		<title>Atheism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=3120547"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T16:33:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Nikolay Berdyaev.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Nikolai Berdyaev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Epikouros BM 1843.jpg|thumb|Not the person who denies the gods worshipped by the multitude, but he who affirms of the gods what the multitude believes about them is truly impious. For the utterances of the multitude about the gods are not true. ~ [[Epicurus]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Friederich Nietzsche.jpg|thumb|You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price. ~ [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hoard of ancient gold coins.jpg|thumb|Most atheists, if they worship anything, worship something which really exists but is not worthy of worship. ... In order for capitalism to have a clear path, it needs to profane all that is sacred; there must be no limits to what is saleable. The totalitarian commercialism which is now the established Church throughout the West has come close to achieving this. ~ [[Andrew Collier (philosopher)|Andrew Collier]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Alciphron (1732) title page.jpg|thumb|Is it intellectually responsible to define one&#039;s identity against something that one does not understand? ~ [[Jacques Berlinerblau]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simone Weil 1931.jpg|thumb|There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God. ~ [[Simone Weil]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ilya Efimovich Repin (1844-1930) - Portrait of Leo Tolstoy (1887).jpg|thumb|In former days the free-thinker was a man who had been brought up in ideas of religion, law, and morality, and only through conflict and struggle came to free-thought; but now there has sprung up a new type of born free-thinkers who grow up without even having heard of principles of morality or of religion, of the existence of authorities, who grow up directly in ideas of negation in everything, that is to say, savages. ~ [[Leo Tolstoy]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Atheism|Atheism]]&#039;&#039;&#039; in a broad sense is a rejection of [[belief]] in the existence of [[deities]], in a narrower sense, the specific belief that there are no deities, and most inclusively, it is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist. Atheism is contrasted with [[theism]], which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists. The word originates with the Greek ἄθεος (&#039;&#039;atheos&#039;&#039;), meaning &amp;quot;without god(s)&amp;quot;, used as a pejorative term applied to those thought to reject the gods worshipped by the larger society.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
==A==&lt;br /&gt;
* If you describe yourself as &amp;quot;Atheist,&amp;quot; some people will say, &amp;quot;Don&#039;t you mean &#039;[[Agnostic]]&#039;?&amp;quot; I have to reply that I really &#039;&#039;do&#039;&#039; mean Atheist. I really do not believe that there is a god — in fact I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one. It&#039;s easier to say that I am a radical Atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it&#039;s an opinion I hold seriously. It&#039;s funny how many people are genuinely surprised to hear a view expressed so strongly. In England we seem to have drifted from vague, wishy-washy [[Anglicanism]] to vague, wishy-washy [[Agnosticism]] — both of which I think betoken a desire not to have to [[think]] about things too much. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; People will then often say, &amp;quot;But surely it&#039;s better to remain an [[Agnosticism|Agnostic]] just in case?&amp;quot; This, to me, suggests such a level of silliness and muddle that I usually edge out of the conversation rather than get sucked into it. (If it turns out that I&#039;ve been wrong all along, and there is in fact a god, and if it further turned out that this kind of legalistic, cross-your-fingers-behind-your-back, Clintonian hair-splitting impressed him, then I would choose not to worship him anyway.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Douglas Adams]], in {{citation | title = Life, the Universe, and Everything: An Interview with Douglas Adams | author = [[David Silverman]] | periodical = The American Atheist | volume = 37 | issue = 1 | year = 1998 | month = Winter | url = http://www.americanatheist.org/win98-99/T2/silverman.html | archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20071228115639/http://www.americanatheist.org/win98-99/T2/silverman.html | archivedate = 2007-12-28 }}&amp;lt;!--alt source: http://www.nichirenbuddhist.org/Religion/Atheists/DouglasAdams/Interview-American-Atheists.html ; article has not completed a move to http://atheists.org/content/interview-douglas-adams at this writing--&amp;gt;, later [http://books.google.com/books?id=DpIwyu_ZW9AC&amp;amp;pg=PT108#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false published] in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Salmon of Doubt|The Salmon of Doubt]]&#039;&#039; (2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Government has no right to hurt a hair on the head of an Atheist for his Opinions. Let him have a care of his Practices.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Adams]] to [[John Quincy Adams]], June 16, 1816. Adams Papers (microfilm), reel 432, Library of Congress. James H. Hutson (ed.), &#039;&#039;The Founders on Religion: A Book of Quotations&#039;&#039;. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007, p. 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After having treated of these false [[Zealots]] in Religion, I cannot forbear mentioning … the Zealots in Atheism. One would fancy that these Men, tho&#039; they fall short, in every other Respect, of those who make a Profession of Religion, would at least outshine them in this Particular, and be exempt from that single Fault which seems to grow out of the impudent Fervours of Religion: But so it is, that [[Infidelity]] is propagated with as much Fierceness and Contention, Wrath and Indignation, as if the Safety of Mankind depended upon it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Addison]], [http://archive.twoaspirinsandacomedy.com/spectator/spectator.php?line=185 &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;&#039;, No 185] (2 October 1711).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I would fain ask one of these bigotted Infidels, supposing all the great Points of Atheism … were laid together and formed into a kind of Creed, according to the Opinions of the most celebrated Atheists; I say, supposing such a Creed as this were formed, and imposed upon any one People in the World, whether it would not require an infinitely greater Measure of [[Faith]], than any Set of Articles which they so violently oppose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Addison]], &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;&#039;, No 185 (2 October 1711)&lt;br /&gt;
** Often misquoted as &amp;quot;To be an atheist requires an infinitely greater measure of faith than to receive all the great truths which atheism would deny.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The inhabitants of the earth are of two sorts:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Those with brains, but no religion,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And those with religion, but no brains.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Al-Ma&#039;arri|Abu&#039;l-`Ala&#039; al-Ma`arri]] (973–1058) (Arabic: {{lang|ar|أبو العلاء المعري|rtl}}), poet of Ma`arra, quoted in &#039;&#039;Crusades Through Arab Eyes&#039;&#039; (1989) by [[w:Amin Maalouf|Amin Maalouf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To you I&#039;m an atheist; to God I&#039;m the [[w:loyal opposition|loyal opposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Stardust Memories|Stardust Memories]]&#039;&#039; (1980).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some highly religious people are outraged that atheists would publicly declare their lack of faith. Accordingly many of the people who belong to atheist associations hide their beliefs from most others, knowing from experience it could affect their employment, membership in other clubs, and social connections. It reminds me of the reaction of many high RWAs when homosexuals began to come out: “Don’t these people know they’re supposed to be ashamed of what they are?” That in turn reminded me of the reaction of many White supremists to the civil rights movement: “Don’t these n------ know they’re inferior and should never be treated as our equals?” Fortunately, eventually, minorities can overcome these reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bob Altemeyer]], &#039;&#039;The Authoritarians&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 160&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A great man is the unbelieving man; he is without spiritual sight or spiritual hearing; his glory is in understanding his own understanding. It is he who subdues the forest, tames the beasts of the field to service. He goes alone in the dark, unafraid. He follows no man’s course, but, searches for himself; the priests cannot make him believe, nor the angels of heaven; none can subdue his judgment. He says: why permit others even priests, to think for you? Stand on your own feet – be a man. Through his arm are tyrants and evil kings overthrown. Through him are doctrines and religions sifted to the bottom and the falsehood and evil in them cast aside. Who but the Creator could have created so great a man as the unbeliever?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:w:Kenneth Arnold|Kenneth Arnold]]&#039;s paraphrasing of a section from &#039;&#039;[[:w:Oahspe: A New Bible|Oahspe: A New Bible]]&#039;&#039; by John Ballou Newbrough (1828–1891), p. 361, which he handed out as his &amp;quot;[http://www.blueblurrylines.com/2017/03/ufos-kenneth-arnold-and-american-bible.html philosophy card]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am an atheist, out and out. It took me a long time to say it. I&#039;ve been an atheist for years and years, but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable to say one was an atheist, because it assumed knowledge that one didn&#039;t have. Somehow, it was better to say one was a humanist or an agnostic. I finally decided that I&#039;m a creature of emotion as well as of reason. Emotionally, I am an atheist. I don&#039;t have the evidence to prove that God doesn&#039;t exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn&#039;t that I don&#039;t want to waste my time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Asimov]], &#039;&#039;Free Inquiry&#039;&#039;, Vol. 2, Spring 1982, p. 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==B==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God never wrought miracle, to convince atheism, because his ordinary works convince it. It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man&#039;s mind to atheism; but depth in philosophy bringeth men&#039;s minds about to religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, [http://www.worldwideschool.org/library/books/phil/modernwesternphilosophy/FrancisBacon/chap16.html &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Scripture saith, The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God; it is not said, The fool hath thought in his heart; so as he rather saith it by rote to himself, as that he would have, than that he can thoroughly believe it, or be persuaded of it; for none deny there is a God, but those for whom it maketh that there were no God. It appeareth in nothing more that atheism is rather in the lip than in the heart of man by this, that atheists will ever be talking of that their opinion, as if they fainted in it within themselves, and would be glad to be strengthened by the consent of others; nay more, you shall have atheists strive to get disciples, as it fareth with other sects; and, which is most of all, you shall have of them that will suffer for atheism, and not recant; whereas, if they did truly think that there were no such thing as God, why should they trouble themselves?&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The causes of atheism are: divisions in religion, if they be many; for any one main division addeth zeal to both sides; but many divisions introduce atheism. Another is, scandal of priests; when it is come to what St [[Bernard of Clairvaux|Bernard]] saith, &#039;&#039;non est jam dicere, ut populus sic sacerdos; quia nec sic populus ut sacerdos&#039;&#039; [One cannot now say, the priest is as the people, for the truth is that the people are not so bad as the priest]. A third is, custom of profane scoffing in holy matters; which doth, by little and little, deface the reverence of religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They that deny a God, destroy man&#039;s nobility; for certainly man is of kin to the beasts, by his body; and if he be not kin to God, by his spirit, he is a base and ignoble creature.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Therefore, as atheism is in all respects hateful, so in this, that it depriveth human nature of the means to exalt itself, above human frailty.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism leaves a man to sense, to philosophy, to natural piety, to laws, to reputation; all which may be guides to an outward moral virtue, though religion were not; but superstition dismounts all these, and erecteth an absolute monarchy, in the minds of men.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 17, &amp;quot;Of Superstition&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth had fallen victim to the greatest cosmic prank of all time, the flu that had swept across the world in the spring and summer of 1918, as if the bloody abattoir in the trenches hadn&#039;t been evidence enough of humanity’s divine disfavor. That&#039;s what Elizabeth had called it in the last letter he&#039;d ever had from her: God&#039;s judgment on a world gone mad. Garner had given up on God by then: he&#039;d packed away the Bible Elizabeth had pressed upon him after a week in the field hospital, knowing that its paltry lies could bring him no comfort in the face of such horror, and it hadn&#039;t. Not then, and not later, when he’d come home to face Elizabeth&#039;s mute and barren grave.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Dale Bailey|Dale Bailey]] &amp;amp; [[w:Nathan Ballingrud|Nathan Ballingrud]], &#039;&#039;The Crevasse&#039;&#039; in [[w:Paula Guran|Paula Guran]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;[[w:Cthulhu Mythos anthology|New Cthulhu: The Recent Weird]],&#039;&#039; p. 105 (originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Lovecraft Unbound|Lovecraft Unbound]],&#039;&#039; 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Une societé d&#039;athées inventerait aussitôt une religion.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: A society of atheists would immediately invent a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Honoré de Balzac]], &#039;&#039;Le catéchisme social&#039;&#039; (c. 1840–1842). Paris: La Renaissance du Livre, 1933, p. 137.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Experience is, in fever and anguish, the putting into question (to the test) of that which a man knows of being. Should he in this fever have any apprehension whatsoever, he cannot say: “I have seen God, the absolute, or the depths of the universe”; he can only say “that which I have seen eludes understanding”—and God, the absolute, the depths of the universe are nothing if they are not categories of the understanding.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georges Bataille]], &#039;&#039;Inner Experience&#039;&#039; (1954), L. Boldt, trans. (1988), p. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A religion may be discerned in capitalism—that is to say, capitalism serves essentially to allay the same anxieties, torments, and disturbances to which the so-called religions offered answers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walter Benjamin]], &amp;quot;Capitalism as Religion&amp;quot; (1921), translated by Rodney Livingstone in &#039;&#039;Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 1&#039;&#039; (Harvard: 1996)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Empty-brained triflers who have never tried to think, who take their creed as they take their fashions, speak of atheism as the outcome of foul life and vicious desires.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]]. In [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=ey9hPV9brxoC&amp;amp;pg=PA89 Annie Besant: An Autobiography], p. 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Бога отрицают или потому, что мир так плох, или потому, что мир так хорош.&#039;&#039; [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikolai Berdyaev]], &#039;&#039;[http://vehi.net/soloviev/znachenie.html Self-knowledge (Самопознание)]&#039;&#039;, 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Today&#039;s secularists too often have very little accurate knowledge about religion, and even less desire to learn. This is problematic insofar as their sense of self is constructed in opposition to religion. Above all, the secularist is not a Jew, is not a Christian, not a Muslim, and so on. But is it intellectually responsible to define one&#039;s identity against something that one does not understand?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Berlinerblau]], &#039;&#039;The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously&#039;&#039; (2005), p. 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Knowledge of [[Karma]] gives the conviction that if ... &#039;&#039;Virtue in distress, and vice in triumph  Make atheists of mankind,&#039;&#039;(Dryden) it is only because mankind has ever shut its eyes to the great truth that man is himself his own saviour and his own destroyer. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],  &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1, p. 707  (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The light of Christianity has only served to show how much more hypocrisy and vice its teachings have begotten in the world since its advent, and how immensely superior were the ancients over us in every point of honor.. .The clergy, by teaching the helplessness of man, his utter dependence on Providence, and the doctrine of atonement, have crushed in their faithful followers every atom of self-reliance and self-respect. So true is this, that it is becoming an axiom that the most honorable men are to be found among [[atheists]] and the so-called “infidels”...  Their system breeds atheism, nihilism, despair, and crime...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],  [[Isis Unveiled|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]  Vol. 2, p. 1104, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There were no Atheists in those days of old; no disbelievers or materialists, in the modern sense of the word, as there were no bigoted detractors. He who judges the ancient philosophies by their external phraseology, and quotes from ancient writings sentences seemingly atheistical, is unfit to be trusted as a critic, for he is unable to penetrate into the inner sense of their metaphysics.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],  [[Isis Unveiled|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]  Vol. 2, p. 1278, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* There is no [[w:proselytism|proselyter]] half so energetic as the hard-shelled atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heywood Broun]], &amp;quot;A New Preface to an Old Story&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Broun&#039;s Nutmeg&#039;&#039;, August 19, 1939.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nobody talks so constantly about God as those who insist that there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heywood Broun]], &#039;&#039;Collected Edition of Heywood Broun&#039;&#039;, compiled by [[w:Heywood Hale Broun|Heywood Hale Broun]]. New York: Harcourt, Brace &amp;amp; Co., 1941, p. 26.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have heard an atheist defined as a man who had no invisible means of support.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir]], speaking to the [[w:Law Society of Upper Canada|Law Society of Upper Canada]], (21 February 1936); published in &#039;&#039;Canadian Occasions&#039;&#039; (1940), p. 201.&lt;br /&gt;
** Buchan&#039;s source remains unknown. The witticism was repeated by [[Harry Emerson Fosdick]] in his &#039;&#039;On Being a Real Person&#039;&#039; (1943), ch. 1, with acknowledgement to Buchan, and was again used by Archbishop [[Fulton J. Sheen]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:Look (American magazine)|Look]]&#039;&#039; magazine (December 14, 1955). Credit for this line is therefore often wrongly given to Fosdick or to Sheen. Credit has also been given to the conductor [[w:Walter Damrosch|Walter Damrosch]] (1862-1950).&lt;br /&gt;
** This is a play on words commonly used in vagrancy statutes to define a vagrant or bum as having &amp;quot;no visible means of support&amp;quot; financially.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je suis toujours athée, gràce á Dieu.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: I&#039;m still an atheist, thank God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Luis Buñuel]], in Michèle Manceaux, &amp;quot;Luis Buñuel: athée gràce á Dieu&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;L&#039;Express&#039;&#039;, May 12, 1960, p. 41. See [http://aphelis.net/luis-bunuels-aphorism-god-im-atheist/ &amp;quot;On Luis Buñuel&#039;s Aphorism &#039;Thank God I&#039;m an Atheist&#039;&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Aphelis&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Seventeen years later, Buñuel expressed a different attitude in another interview: &amp;quot;I&#039;m not a Christian, but I&#039;m not an atheist either,&amp;quot; he says. &amp;quot;I&#039;m weary of hearing that accidental old aphorism of mine &amp;quot;I&#039;m not an atheist, thank God.&amp;quot; It&#039;s outworn. Dead leaves. In 1951, I made a small film called &#039;Mexican Bus Ride,&#039; about a village too poor to support a church and a priest. The place was serene, because no one suffered from guilt. It&#039;s guilt we must escape, not God.&amp;quot; (Penelope Gilliat, &amp;quot;Long Live the Living!&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;, December 5, 1977, p. 54) As &#039;&#039;Aphelis&#039;&#039; notes, &amp;quot;There&#039;s most likely a small confusion when Buñuel quotes his own aphorism: instead of &#039;I&#039;m not an atheist, thank God&#039; — which doesn&#039;t correspond [to] what he said in 1960 — one should read &#039;I&#039;m an atheist, thank God.&#039; That&#039;s the aphorism Buñuel didn&#039;t agree with anymore in 1977.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Although the aphorism is associated with Buñuel, it did not originate with him. [[Samuel Butler (novelist)|Samuel Butler]] (1835–1902) mentions in his &#039;&#039;Note-Books&#039;&#039; having heard of a man exclaiming &amp;quot;I am an atheist, thank God!&amp;quot; Even earlier, there is a rather similar aphorism by [[Georg Christoph Lichtenberg]] (1742–1799).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We know, and it is our pride to know, that man is by his constitution a religious animal; that atheism is against, not only our reason but our instincts; and that it cannot prevail long. But if, in the moment of riot, and in a drunken delirium from the hot spirit drawn out of the [[w:alembic|alembic]] of hell, which in France is now so furiously boiling, we should uncover our nakedness by throwing off that Christian religion which has hitherto been our boast and comfort, and one great source of civilization amongst us, and among many other nations, we are apprehensive (being well aware that the mind will not endure a void) that some uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition, might take place of it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edmund Burke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Reflections on the Revolution in France|Reflections on the Revolution in France]]&#039;&#039; (1790), [http://www.bartleby.com/24/3/7.html Paras. 150–174], Para. 152.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Boldness formerly was not the character of Atheists as such. ... But of late they are grown active, designing, turbulent, and seditious.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edmund Burke]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on French Affairs&amp;quot; (December, 1791), in &#039;&#039;Three Memorials on French Affairs&#039;&#039; (1797), p. 53&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think people attack me because they are fearful that I will then say that you&#039;re not equally as patriotic if you&#039;re not a religious person... I&#039;ve never said that. I&#039;ve never acted like that. I think that&#039;s just the way it is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George W. Bush]], quoted in [http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20050111-101004-3771r &amp;quot;President outlines role of his faith&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Washington Times&#039;&#039;, 12 January 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have heard of a man exclaiming &amp;quot;I am an atheist, thank God!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (novelist)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Note-Books of Samuel Butler&#039;&#039;: Selections arranged and edited by [[w:Henry Festing Jones|Henry Festing Jones]] (1912). New York: E. P. Dutton &amp;amp; Co., 1917, p. 315.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Theist and Atheist: The fight between them is as to whether God shall be called God or shall have some other name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (novelist)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Note-Books of Samuel Butler&#039;&#039;, p. 337.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==C==&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion has actually convinced people that there&#039;s an invisible man living in the sky who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever &#039;til the end of time!. . . But He loves you!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Carlin]], &amp;quot;[http://www.rense.com/general69/obj.htm George Carlin On Religion]&amp;quot; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Mon chien est athée: il ne crois plus en moi.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: My dog is an atheist: he no longer believes in me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:François Cavanna|François Cavanna]], &#039;&#039;L&#039;almanach-agenda de Cavanna 1985&#039;&#039; (1985). Paris: Belfond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion assures us that our afflictions shall have an end; she comforts us, she dries our tears, she promises us another life. On the contrary, in the abominable worship of atheism, human woes are the incense, death is the priest, a coffin the altar, and annihilation the Deity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[François-René de Chateaubriand]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Génie du christianisme|The Genius of Christianity]]&#039;&#039; (1802), Part I, Book VI, Chapter V. Translated by Charles I. White, D.D. Baltimore: John Murphy, 1871, p. 202.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism can benefit no class of people; neither the unfortunate, whom it bereaves of hope, nor the prosperous, whose joys it renders insipid, nor the soldier, of whom it makes a coward, nor the woman whose beauty and sensibility it mars, nor the mother, who has a son to lose, nor the rulers of men, who have no surer pledge of the fidelity of their subjects than religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[François-René de Chateaubriand]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Génie du christianisme|The Genius of Christianity]]&#039;&#039; (1802), Part IV, Book VI, Chapter XII. Translated by Charles I. White, D.D. Baltimore: John Murphy, 1871, p. 665.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is, I suppose, the supreme example of a simple [[faith]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;Where All Roads Lead&#039;&#039; (1922).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there were not God, there would be no atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;Where All Roads Lead&#039;&#039; (1922).&lt;br /&gt;
** Frequently misquoted, with &amp;quot;not&amp;quot;, which grammatically implies monotheism, being replaced by the vaguer &amp;quot;no&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheists aren&#039;t angry because we&#039;re selfish, or bitter, or joyless. Atheists are angry because we have [[compassion]]. Atheists are angry because we have a sense of [[justice]]. Atheists are angry because we see millions of people being terribly harmed by [[religion]], and our hearts go out to them, and we feel motivated to do something about it. Atheists aren&#039;t angry because there&#039;s something wrong with us. Atheists are angry because there&#039;s something right with us.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Greta Christina}}, speaking at {{w|Reason Rally}}, National Mall, Washington, DC, {{#formatdate:2012-03-24}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The habit of arguing in support of atheism, whether it be done from conviction or in pretense, is a wicked and impious practice.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;De Natura Deorum&#039;&#039; [On the Nature of the Gods] (45 BCE), vol. II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;amp;emsp; bold with joy,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Forth from his dark and lonely hiding-place&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(Portentous sight!) the owlet Atheism,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sailing on obscene wings athwart the noon,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Drops her blue-fringed lids, and holds them close,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And hooting at the glorious sun in Heaven,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Cries out, &amp;quot;Where is it?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]], [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Fears_in_Solitude &amp;quot;Fears in Solitude&amp;quot;] (April 1798), ll. 80–86.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most atheists, if they worship anything, worship something which really exists but is not worthy of worship. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Collier (philosopher)|Andrew Collier]], in &#039;&#039;Transcendence: Critical Realism and God&#039;&#039; (2013), p. 84&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order for capitalism to have a clear path, it needs to profane all that is sacred; there must be no limits to what is saleable. The totalitarian commercialism which is now the established Church throughout the West has come close to achieving this. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Collier (philosopher)|Andrew Collier]], in &#039;&#039;Transcendence: Critical Realism and God&#039;&#039; (2013), p. 85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I was an atheist, finding no reason to postulate the existence of any truths outside of mathematics, physics and chemistry. But then I went to medical school, and encountered life and death issues at the bedsides of my patients. Challenged by one of those patients, who asked &amp;quot;What do you believe, doctor?&amp;quot;, I began searching for answers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Collins]], a geneticist who led the U.S. government’s effort to decipher the human genome (DNA). [http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/ cnn.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism can never be an institution; ... it can never be more than a destitution.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Robert Collyer|Robert Collyer]], sermon reported in [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50F1EFB3D5910738DDDAF0894DB405B8284F0D3 &amp;quot;Yesterday in the Pulpit&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, March 6, 1882.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is hard to see how a great man can be an atheist. Without the sustaining influence of [[faith]] in a [[divine|divine power]] we could have little faith in ourselves. We need to feel that behind us is [[intelligence]] and [[love]]. [[Doubt|Doubters]] do not achieve; [[Skepticism|skeptics]] do not contribute; [[Cynicism|cynics]] do not create. Faith is the great motive power, and no man realizes his full possibilities unless he has the deep conviction that life is eternally important, and that his work, well done, is part of an unending plan.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Calvin Coolidge]], [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=24184#axzz20J65JJtC &amp;quot;Telephone Remarks to a Group of Boy Scouts: &#039;What it Means to Be a Boy Scout&#039;&amp;quot;], July 25, 1924.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Very often atheists themselves admit that they have no evidence of God&#039;s absence, but they try to put a different spin on it. They&#039;ll tell you, “No one can prove a universal negative” (like “There is no God”). They think this somehow excuses them from needing evidence against God&#039;s existence. But not only is it false that you can&#039;t prove a universal negative (all you have to do is show something is self-contradictory), but more importantly, this claim is really an admission that it&#039;s impossible to prove atheism! Atheism involves a universal negative, you can&#039;t prove a universal negative, therefore, atheism is unprovable. It turns out that it is the atheist who is believing a view for which there is and can be no evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Lane Craig]], &#039;&#039;On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision&#039;&#039; (2010), p. 149&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Even the Atheists … readily acknowledge it for an indubitable truth, that there must be something … which was never made or produced — and which therefore is the cause of those other things that are made, something … whose existence must needs be necessary.... Wherefore all the question now is, what is this … self-existent thing, which is the cause of all other things that are made. Now there are two grand opinions opposite to one another concerning it; for, first, some contend, that the only self-existent, unmade and incorruptible thing is senseless matter.... But because this is really the lowest and most imperfect of all beings, others on the contrary judge it reasonable, that the first principle and original of all things should be that, which is the most perfect … not senseless matter, but a perfect conscious understanding nature, or mind. And these are they, who are strictly and properly called Theists, who affirm, that a [[God|perfectly conscious understanding being, or mind, existing of itself from eternity]], was the cause of all other things; and they, on the contrary, who derive all things from senseless matter, as the first original, and deny that there is any conscious understanding being self-existent and unmade, are those that are properly called Atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Cudworth]], &#039;&#039;The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Vol. I&#039;&#039;, London, 1678. New York: Gould &amp;amp; Newman, 1837, pp. 266–267.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If this be not atheism, to acknowledge no other deity besides dead and senseless matter, then the word hath no signification.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Cudworth]], &#039;&#039;The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Vol. I&#039;&#039;, London, 1678. New York: Gould &amp;amp; Newman, 1837, p. 425.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:There are no atheists in foxholes|There are no atheists in foxholes]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Father [[w:William Thomas Cummings|William Thomas Cummings]], &#039;&#039;Field Sermon on Bataan&#039;&#039; (1942), quoted in &#039;&#039;I Saw the Fall of the Philippines&#039;&#039; by [[w:Carlos P. Romulo|Carlos P. Romulo]]; also attributed to Lieut. Col. [[w:Warren J. Clear|Warren J. Clear]], &amp;quot;Bataan Defenders&#039; Suffering Related,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;[[w:The Los Angeles Times|The Los Angeles Times]]&#039;&#039;, 13 April 1942, Pg. 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==D==&lt;br /&gt;
* Although atheism might have been logically tenable before [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]], Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book| id={{ISBN|0393315703}}| title=The Blind Watchmaker| author=Richard Dawkins| authorlink=Richard Dawkins| year=1986}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is often said, mainly by the &#039;no-contests&#039;, that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal&#039;s wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can&#039;t prove that there aren&#039;t any, so shouldn&#039;t we be agnostic with respect to fairies?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], speech at the Edinburgh International Science Festival, {{#formatdate:1992-04-15}}, quoted in {{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = A scientist&#039;s case against God&lt;br /&gt;
    | newspaper = [[w:The Independent|The Independent (London)]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | date = April 20, 1992&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 17&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]] (2006) &#039;&#039;The Root of All Evil&#039;&#039; television programme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Diderot]] paid a visit to the Russian Court at the invitation of the Empress. He conversed very freely, and gave the younger members of the Court circle a great deal of lively atheism. The Empress was much amused, but some of her councillors suggested that it might be desirable to check these expressions of doctrine. The Empress did not like to put a direct muzzle on her guest&#039;s tongue, so the following plot was contrived. Diderot was informed that a learned mathematician was in possession of an algebraic demonstration of the existence of God, and would give it him before all the Court, if he desired to hear it. Diderot gladly consented.... [T]he mathematician … was [[Euler]]. He advanced towards Diderot, and said gravely, and in a tone of perfect conviction: &#039;&#039;Monsieur, (a+b&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)/n=x, donc Dieu existe; répondez!&#039;&#039; Diderot, to whom algebra was Hebrew, was embarrassed and disconcerted; while peals of laughter arose on all sides. He asked permission to return to France at once, which was granted.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustus De Morgan]] (1872). &#039;&#039;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Budget_of_Paradoxes/J A Budget of Paradoxes]&#039;&#039;, Volume II, edited by [[David Eugene Smith]]. 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; edition, 1915, p. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At the end of &#039;&#039;[[w:Being and Nothingness|Being and Nothingness]]&#039;&#039;, ... [[w:Being in itself|Being in-itself]] and Being for-itself were &#039;&#039;of Being&#039;&#039;; and this totality of beings, in which they were effected, itself was linked up to itself, relating and appearing to itself, by means of the essential project of human-reality. What was named in this way, in an allegedly neutral and undetermined way, was nothing other than the [[Metaphysics|metaphysical]] unity of man and God, the relation of man to God, the project of becoming God as the project constituting human-reality. [[Atheism]] changes nothing in this fundamental structure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Derrida]], &amp;quot;The Ends of Man,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Margins of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, tr. w/ notes by Alan Bass. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, 1982. (original French published in Paris, 1972, as &#039;&#039;Marges de la philosophie&#039;&#039;). p. 116.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Laissez-nous donc tout confondre, amour, religion, génie, et le soleil et les parfums, et la musique et la poésie: il n&#039;y a d&#039;athéisme que dans la froideur, l&#039;égoïsme, la bassesse.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Let us then mingle everything, love, religion, genius, with sunshine, perfume, music, and poetry. Atheism exists only in coldness, [[selfishness]], and baseness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Louise Germaine de Staël]], &#039;&#039;Corinne, or Italy&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Corinne, ou l&#039;Italie&#039;&#039;, 1807), Book X, Chapter V. Translated by Sylvia Raphael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 273.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “[[Skepticism]] is my nature. Freethought is my [[methodology]]. [[Agnosticism]] is my conclusion. Atheism is my opinion. [[Humanitarianism]] is my motivation.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:w:Jerry DeWitt|Jerry DeWitt]] of &#039;&#039;[http://recoveringfromreligion.org/pages/home Recovering from Religion]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[https://twitter.com/jerry_dewitt/statuses/193964823569121280 on Twitter]&#039;&#039;, April 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is easier for a Russian to become an Atheist, than for any other nationality in the world. And not only does a Russian &#039;become an Atheist,&#039; but he actually BELIEVES IN Atheism, just as though he had found a new [[faith]], not perceiving that he has pinned his faith in a negation. Such is our anguish of thirst!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], &#039;&#039;The Idiot&#039;&#039; (1869), translated by Eva Martin. Part IV, Chapter 7, [http://www.literaturepage.com/read/theidiot-626.html p. 626]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==E==&lt;br /&gt;
* The overwhelming majority of countries fail to respect [[w:Discrimination against atheists#Human rights|the rights]] of atheists and [[freethinkers]] although they have signed [[w:International human rights law|U.N agreements]] to [[w:Equality before the law|treat all citizens equally]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sonja Eggerickx]] on the The Freethought Report 2013 report issued by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU). As quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-religion-atheists/atheists-face-death-in-13-countries-global-discrimination-study-idUSBRE9B900G20131210 Atheists face death in 13 countries, global discrimination: study]&#039;&#039; (December 10, 2013) by Robert Evans, &#039;&#039;{{w|Reuters}}&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The word [[god]] is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], Gutkind Letter (3 January 1954), {{cite news | title=Childish superstition: Einstein&#039;s letter makes view of religion relatively clear | publisher=The Guardian | date=13 May 2008 | url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Science]] can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with the [[aspiration]] toward [[truth]] and [[understanding]]. This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion. To this there also belongs the faith in the possibility that the regulations valid for the world of existence are [[rational]], that is, [[comprehensible]] to reason. I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound [[faith]]. The situation may be expressed by an image: &#039;&#039;&#039;science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in &amp;quot;Religion and Science&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (9 November 1930).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. … Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man&#039;s [[Ethics|ethical]] behavior should be based effectually on [[sympathy]], [[education]], and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in &amp;quot;Religion and Science&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (9 November 1930).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In view of such [[harmony]] in the [[cosmos]] which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], quoted in &#039;&#039;Towards the Further Shore&#039;&#039; (1968) by Prince Hubertus Zu, p. 156.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], quoted in {{cite book| title=Albert Einstein: The Human Side| author=Dukas, Helen (ed.) and Banesh Hoffman (ed.)| publisher=Princeton University Press| year=1981}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism should always be encouraged (i.e. rationalistic not emotional atheism) for the sake of the Faith. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[T.S. Eliot]], in a letter to [[Richard Aldington]] (24 February, 1927). &#039;&#039;The Letters of T.S. Eliot: 1926-1927&#039;&#039; p. 424.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not the person who denies the gods worshipped by the multitude, but he who affirms of the gods what the multitude believes about them is truly impious. For the utterances of the multitude about the gods are not true preconceptions but false assumptions.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Epicurus]], Letter to Menoeceus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Gods exist but they are not what the hoi polloi [the multitude] suppose them to be. He is not an infidel or atheist who denies the existence of Gods whom the multitude worship, but he is such who fastens on the Gods the opinions of the multitude. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Epicurus]],  quoted by  [[H.P. Blavatsky]],  &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol 3. (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there are none [no gods], what need to toil?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Euripides]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Iphigenia in Aulis|Iphigenia in Aulis]]&#039;&#039; (c. 405 BCE), [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0108%3Acard%3D992 l. 1035]. Translated by Edward P. Coleridge, 1891.&lt;br /&gt;
** Translated by Charles R. Walker, 1958, as &amp;quot;If there are none, all our toil is without meaning.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translated by W. S. Merwin and George E. Dimock, Jr., 1978, as &amp;quot;If there are none, what does anything matter?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F==&lt;br /&gt;
* God was always invented to explain [[mystery]]. God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand. Now when you finally discover how something works, you get some laws which you&#039;re taking away from God; you don&#039;t need him anymore. But you need him for the other mysteries. So therefore you leave him to create the universe because we haven&#039;t figured that out yet; you need him for understanding those things which you don&#039;t believe the laws will explain, such as consciousness, or why you only live to a certain length of time — life and death — stuff like that. God is always associated with those things that you do not understand. Therefore I don&#039;t think that the laws can be considered to be like God because they have been figured out.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Feynman]], quoted in {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Davies&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = P. C. W.&lt;br /&gt;
 | coauthor = J. Brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Superstrings: A Theory of Everything?&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1988&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = {{ISBN|0-521-35741-1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages = pp. 208-209&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God did not, as the Bible says, make man in His image; on the contrary man, as I have shown in &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039;, made God in his image.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], {{cite book | title=Lectures on the essence of religion | publisher=Harper &amp;amp; Row | location=New York | year=1967 | page=187 |others=Transl. [[w:Ralph Manheim|Ralph Manheim]]}} German: {{cite book | title=Vorlesungen über das Wesen der Religion | publisher=Wigand | location=Leipzig | year=1851 | page=241}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By positing God as unknowable, man excuses himself to what is still left of his religious conscience for his oblivion of God, his surrender to the world. He negates God in practice – his mind and his senses have been absorbed by the world – but he does not negate him in theory. He does not attack [God&#039;s] existence; he leaves it intact. But this existence neither affects nor incommodes him, for it is only a negative existence, an existence without existence; it is an existence that contradicts itself – a being that, in view of its effects, is indistinguishable from non-being. The negation of determinate, positive predicates of the Divine Being is nothing else than the negation of religion, but one which still has an appearance of religion, so that it is not recognized as a negation – it is nothing but a subtle, sly atheism. The alleged religious horror of limiting God by determinate predicates is only the irreligious wish to forget all about God, to banish him from the mind. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;Introduction to The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A true atheist, that is, an atheist in the ordinary sense, is therefore he alone to whom the predicates of the Divine Being – for example, love, wisdom, and justice – are nothing, not he to whom only the subject of these predicates is nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;Introduction to The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 119&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==G==&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[w:Atheist Bus Campaign|atheist buses]] touring London are quite revealing. &amp;quot;There&#039;s probably no God,&amp;quot; reads the hoarding. &amp;quot;Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.&amp;quot; There you have it: what is stopping people enjoying life is apparently not war, famine, unemployment, murderous social inequality, or the uncertainty and unfairness that arises from a system of global exploitation, but a misplaced belief in God. Some materialism, that!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Galloway]], [http://www.newstatesman.com/religion/2009/04/god-world-reason-universe &amp;quot;What God means to me&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;New Statesman&#039;&#039;, 9 April 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Saying atheism is a belief system is like saying not going skiing is a hobby. I&#039;ve never been skiing. It&#039;s my biggest hobby. I literally do it all the time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ricky Gervais]], quoted in [http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010/12/22/does-god-exist-ricky-gervais-takes-your-questions/ &amp;quot;Does God Exist? Ricky Gervais Takes Your Questions&amp;quot;] ({{#formatdate:2010-10-22}}), &#039;&#039;Speakeasy&#039;&#039;, Wall Street Journal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism. There is not a single exalting and emancipating influence that does not in turn become inhibitory.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[André Gide]], &#039;&#039;Journals&#039;&#039;, January 13, 1929. Translated by Justin O&#039;Brien.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Whatever an atheist who denies God and the prophet is, one who murders a human is equivalent to that.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Fethullah Gülen|Fethullah Gülen]], [http://www.nuriyeakman.net/node/1499 Interview with Nuriye Akman], &#039;&#039;[[w:Zaman (newspaper)|Zaman]]&#039;&#039;, 23 March 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The question of the origin of the matter in the universe is no longer thought to be beyond the range of science — &#039;&#039;everything&#039;&#039; can be created from nothing…it is fair to say that the universe is the ultimate free lunch.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Alan Guth|Alan Guth]], &#039;&#039;The Inflationary Universe : The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins&#039;&#039; (1998) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; {{ISBN|0201328402}} &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H==&lt;br /&gt;
* Settle it therefore in your minds, as a maxim never to be effaced or forgotten, that atheism is an inhuman, bloody, ferocious system, equally hostile to every useful restraint and to every virtuous affection; that, leaving nothing above us to excite awe, nor round us to awaken tenderness, it wages war with heaven and with earth: its first object is to dethrone God, its next to destroy man.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rev. [[Robert Hall]], sermon to Baptist meeting, Cambridge, quoted in {{cite book | year = 1843 | title  = The Baptist Library: a republication of standard Baptist works | volume = 2 | editors = Charles George Sommers, William R. Williams, Levi L. Hill | page = 108 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=CgxMAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA108 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is striking that the idea of a moral being without ordinary human limitations as the source of the moral demand survived in 20th century moral philosophy even in theories that do not posit the existence of such a being. ... In [[w:Richard Brandt|R. B. Brandt’s]] &#039;&#039;Ethical Theory&#039;&#039;, there is a position for an ideal observer. In [[w:R. M. Hare|R. M. Hare]], there is an archangel, with full command of the facts and of logic. In [[John Rawls]], there is the person behind the [[w:veil of ignorance|veil of ignorance]], who does not know what position she occupies in the situation for which she is prescribing. In all these last three cases, there is the postulation, as the source of the moral demand, of a being who is without ordinary human limitations, and it is plausible to suggest that these are all survivals of a worldview in which it was God who played this role.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John E. Hare]], “Ethics and Religion: Two [[Immanuel Kant|Kantian]] Arguments,” &#039;&#039;Philosophical Investigations&#039;&#039;, vol. 34, no. 2 (April 2011), pp. 158-159&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is not a philosophy; it is not even a view of the world; it is simply an admission of the obvious. In fact, &amp;quot;atheism&amp;quot; is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a &amp;quot;non-astrologer&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;non-alchemist.&amp;quot; We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattle. Atheism is nothing more than the noises reasonable people make in the presence of unjustified religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sam Harris]], &#039;&#039;Letter to a Christian Nation&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 51.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Agnosticism is a perfectly respectable and tenable philosophical position; it is not dogmatic and makes no pronouncements about the ultimate truths of the universe. It remains open to evidence and persuasion; lacking faith, it nevertheless does not deride faith. Atheism, on the other hand, is as unyielding and dogmatic about religious belief as true believers are about heathens. It tries to use reason to demolish a structure that is not built upon reason; because, though rational argument may take us to the edge of belief, we require a &amp;quot;leap of faith&amp;quot; to jump the chasm.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sydney J. Harris]], in &amp;quot;Atheists, Like Fundamentalists, are Dogmatic&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Pieces of Eight&#039;&#039; (1982).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All thinking men are atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ernest Hemingway]], &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=2_XH0Z81_ZEC&amp;amp;pg=PA13&amp;amp;dq=All+thinking+men+are+atheists+A+FAREWELL+TO+ARMS&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=BTQpTaOnG5CSnAfwk43pAQ&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=2&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false A Farewell to Arms]&#039;&#039; (1929). Simon &amp;amp; Schuster, 1997, p. 13.&lt;br /&gt;
** The speaker is an Italian major who is baiting a priest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;m an atheist, and that&#039;s it. I believe there&#039;s nothing we can know except that we should be kind to each other and do what we can for other people.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Katharine Hepburn]], in Myrna Blyth, &amp;quot;Kate Talks Straight&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Ladies&#039; Home Journal&#039;&#039;, {{#formatdate:1991-10-01}}, p. 215.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Along with [[w:Islam|Islam]] and [[w:Christianity|Christianity]], [[w:Judaism|Judaism]] does insist that some turgid and contradictory and sometimes evil and mad texts, obviously written by fairly unexceptional humans, are in fact the word of god. I think that the indispensable condition of any intellectual liberty is the realisation that there is no such thing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief is positively harmful. Reviewing the false claims of religion, I do not wish, as some sentimental materialists affect to wish, that they were true. I do not envy believers their faith. I am relieved to think that the whole story is a sinister fairy tale; life would be miserable if what the faithful affirmed was actually the case.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, though I dislike to differ with such a great man, [[Voltaire]] was simply ludicrous when he said that if god did not exist it would be necessary to invent him. The human invention of god is the problem to begin with.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;[[God is Not Great|God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything]]&#039;&#039; (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The universe, that is, the whole mass of things that are, is corporeal, that is to say, body; and hath the dimensions of magnitude, namely length, breadth and depth:[...] consequently every part of the universe is body, and that which is not body is no part of the universe: and because the universe is all, that which is no part of it is nothing, and consequently, nowhere. Nor does it follow from hence that spirits are nothing: for they have dimensions and are therefore really bodies; though that name in common speech be given to such bodies only as are visible or palpable; that is, that have some degree of opacity: but for spirits, they call them incorporeal, which is a name of more honour, and may therefore with more piety be attributed to God Himself; in whom we consider not what attribute expresseth best His nature, which is incomprehensible, but what best expresseth our desire to honour Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Hobbes]], &#039;&#039;Leviathan&#039;&#039; Part IV, chapter iii (1651)&lt;br /&gt;
** Misquoted in [[Jonathan Miller]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief|Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief]]&#039;&#039; (2004), as &amp;quot;The universe, the whole mass of all things that are, is corporeal, that is to say body, and hath dimensions of magnitude, length, breadth and depth. Every part of the universe is body and that which is not body is not part of the universe. And because the universe is all, that which is no part of it is nothing. Consequently, nowhere.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not whether there is a god or not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eric Hoffer]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The True Believer|The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements]]&#039;&#039; (1951) Section 62.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Tous les enfans ſont des athées; ils n&#039;ont aucune idée de Dieu: ſont-ils donc criminels à cauſe de cette ignorance?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1772&lt;br /&gt;
    | first = Paul-Henri Thiry (baron d&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
    | last = Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | authorlink = Baron d&#039;Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Le Bon-Sens, ou, Idées Naturelles Opposées aux Idées Surnaturelles&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Marc-Michel Rey&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 22&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZiUPAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA22&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: All children are Atheists; they have no idea of God. Are they then criminal on account of their ignorance?&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1826&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense: or Natural Ideas Opposed to Ideas that are Supernatural&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Richard Carlile&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 12&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=VS0-AAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=RA2-PA12&amp;amp;dq=%22All+children+are+Atheists%22&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: All children are born Atheists; they have no idea of God. Are they then criminal on account of their ignorance?&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = c. 1900&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense without God: or Freethoughts Opposed to Supernatural Ideas&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = W. Stewart&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7319&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ce n&#039;eſt qu&#039;en écartant ſes nuages &amp;amp; ſes phantômes que nous découvrirons les ſources du vrai, de la raiſon, de la morale, &amp;amp; les motifs réels qui doivent nous porter à la vertu.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1772&lt;br /&gt;
    | first = Paul-Henri Thiry (baron d&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
    | last = Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | authorlink = Baron d&#039;Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Le Bon-Sens, ou, Idées Naturelles Opposées aux Idées Surnaturelles&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Marc-Michel Rey&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §206&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 315&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZiUPAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA315&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: It is only by dispelling the clouds and phantoms of Religion, that we shall discover the sources of Truth, Reason and Morality, and the real motives that should incline us to Virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1826&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense: or Natural Ideas Opposed to Ideas that are Supernatural&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Richard Carlile&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 169&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=VS0-AAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=RA2-PA169&amp;amp;dq=%22It+is+only+by+dispelling%22&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: It is only by dispelling the clouds and phantoms of Religion, that we shall discover Truth, Reason and Morality.&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = c. 1900&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense without God: or Freethoughts Opposed to Supernatural Ideas&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = W. Stewart&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §206&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7319&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The only religion of Albania is Albanianism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Enver Hoxha]], promoting atheism, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New York Times Book Review&#039;&#039;, Vol. 2 (1977); this is actually derived from a secularly nationalistic slogan &amp;quot;The true religion of Albania is Albanianism&amp;quot;, originally intended to ease the strife of sectarian divisions while being respectful of them, which was created by the Roman Catholic [[w:Pashko Vasa|Pashko Vasa]], in the form: &amp;quot;The religion of Albania is Albanianism&amp;quot; — as quoted in &#039;&#039;Catholicism and Politics in Communist Societies&#039;&#039; (1990) by Sabrina P. Ramet, p. 236.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Atheist&#039;&#039;: Any man who does not believe in himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &#039;&#039;The Note Book of Elbert Hubbard&#039;&#039; (1927). New York: Wm. H. Wise &amp;amp; Co., p. 187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are, as we know, powerful and illustrious atheists. At bottom, led back to the truth by their very force, they are not absolutely sure that they are atheists; it is with them only a question of definition, and in any case, if they do not believe in God, being great minds, they prove God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Victor Hugo]], &#039;&#039;Les Misérables&#039;&#039; Volume II, Book 7 &amp;quot;Parenthesis&amp;quot;, Chapter vi (1862).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* His [God&#039;s] power we allow is infinite: whatever he wills is executed: but neither man nor any other animal is happy: therefore he does not will their happiness.... [[Epicurus]]&#039;s old questions are yet unanswered. Is he willing to prevent evil but not able? then is he impotent. Is he able but not willing? then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Hume]], &#039;&#039;[[s:Dialogues concerning Natural Religion|Dialogues concerning Natural Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Part X (1789).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have never had the least sympathy with the &#039;&#039;[[w:a priori and a posteriori|a priori]]&#039;&#039; reasons against [[w:orthodoxy|orthodoxy]], and I have by nature and disposition the greatest possible antipathy to all the atheistic and infidel school. Nevertheless I know that I am, in spite of myself, exactly what the Christian would call, and, so far as I can see, is justified in calling, atheist and infidel.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Henry Huxley]], letter to [[Charles Kingsley]], May 6, 1863.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I==&lt;br /&gt;
* The watch argument was [[William Paley|Paley&#039;s]] greatest effort. A man finds a watch and it is so wonderful that he concludes that it must have had a maker. He finds the maker and he is so much more wonderful than the watch that he says he must have had a maker. Then he finds God, the maker of the man, and he is so much more wonderful than the man that he could not have had a maker. This is what the lawyers call a departure in pleading.&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Paley there can be no design without a designer&amp;amp;mdash;but there can be a designer without a design. The wonder of the watch suggested the watchmaker, and the wonder of the watchmaker, suggested the creator, and the wonder of the creator demonstrated that he was not created&amp;amp;mdash;but was uncaused and eternal.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Robert G. Ingersoll]], [http://infidels.org/library/historical/robert_ingersoll/why_i_am_agnostic.html &amp;quot;Why I Am Agnostic&amp;quot;] (1896), 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==J==&lt;br /&gt;
* For my own part, I do not know what the sweat and blood of this life mean, if they mean anything short of this. If this life be not a real fight, in which something is eternally gained for the universe by success, it is no better than a game of private theatricals from which we may withdraw at will. But it &#039;&#039;feels&#039;&#039; like a real fight — as if there were something really wild in the universe which we, with all our idealities and faithfullnesses, are needed to redeem: and first of all to redeem our own hearts from atheism and fears. For such a half-wild, half-saved universe our nature is adapted.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William James]], &#039;&#039;The Will to Believe&#039;&#039; (1897), p. 61.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The legitimate powers of government extend to only such acts as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say that there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], &#039;&#039;[[Notes on the State of Virginia]]&#039;&#039; (1784), Query XVII.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t have to be brave or a saint, a martyr, or even very smart to be an atheist. All you have to be able to say is &amp;quot;I don&#039;t know&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
    | date = 2011-08-16&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = God, No! : Signs you may already be an atheist and other magical tales&lt;br /&gt;
    | first = Penn&lt;br /&gt;
    | last = Jillette&lt;br /&gt;
    | authorlink = Penn Jillette&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Simon &amp;amp; Schuster&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = New York&lt;br /&gt;
    | isbn = 978-1451610369&lt;br /&gt;
    | lccn = 2010043439&lt;br /&gt;
    | ol = 25074653M&lt;br /&gt;
    | id = {{LCC|PN6231.R4 J55 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = xiii&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is the only real hope against terrorism.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Penn Jillette]] [http://americanhumanist.org/HNN/details/2012-12-morality-religion-and-bullsht-an-interview-with-penn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here falling Houses thunder on your Head,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And here a female Atheist talks you dead.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], [http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Texts/london2.html &amp;quot;London: A Poem in Imitation of the Third Satire of Juvenal&amp;quot;] (1738), ll. 17–18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It has long been observed, that an atheist has no just reason for endeavouring conversions; and yet none harass those minds which they can influence, with more importunity of solicitation to adopt their opinions. In proportion as they doubt the truth of their own doctrines, they are desirous to gain the attestation of another understanding: and industriously labour to win a proselyte, and eagerly catch at the slightest pretence to dignify their sect with a distinguished name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], [http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Texts/browne.html &amp;quot;The Life of Sir Thomas Browne, Kt., M.D.&amp;quot;] (1756), written as a preface for an edition of [[Thomas Browne|Browne]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;Christian Morals&#039;&#039; (1716).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==K==&lt;br /&gt;
* Godlessness is a kind of shameless wickedness which bids defiance to the punishments that the idea of God inspires in us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Immanuel Kant]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Ethics&#039;&#039; as transcribed by Georg Ludwig Collins ([[w:Cambridge University Press|Cambridge University Press]]: 1997), p. 111.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The Koran! well, come put me to the test—&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Lovely old book in hideous error drest—&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp;Believe me, I can quote the Koran too,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The unbeliever knows his Koran best.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;And do you think that unto such as you,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp;God gave the secret, and denied it me?—&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well, well, what matters it! believe that too.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Omar Khayyám]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam|Rubaiyat]]&#039;&#039;, [[s:Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám (Le Gallienne)|translation]] by [[w:Richard Le Gallienne|Richard Le Gallienne]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you have a sloppy religion you get a sloppy atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ronald Knox]], quoted in [[Penelope Fitzgerald]], &#039;&#039;The Knox Brothers&#039;&#039; (1977), Ch. IV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is one indisputable fact about the human condition it is that no community can survive if it is persuaded — or even if it suspects — that its members are leading meaningless lives in a meaningless universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Irving Kristol]], [http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/the-future-of-american-jewry &amp;quot;The Future of American Jewry&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Commentary (magazine)|Commentary]]&#039;&#039; (August 1991).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious leaders must face the reality that here in Nigeria and elsewhere around the world, millions of people are leaving [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]]. While we are busy building walls of division with the blocks of prejudice, our members are becoming atheists but we prefer to pretend that we do not see this. We cannot pretend not to hear the footsteps of our faithful who are marching away into [[atheism]] and [[secularism]]. No threats can stop this, but dialogue can open our hearts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** ~ [[:w:Matthew Hassan Kukah|Matthew Hassan Kukah]], [http://Https://www.premiumtimesng.com/features-and-interviews/524346-full-text-bishop-mathew-kukahs-2022-easter-message-a-must-read.html T0 mend a broken nation: the Easter metaphor, premiumtimesng.com] (@ Diocese of Sokoto, April 17th, 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==L==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Un dévot est celui qui, sous un roi athée, serait athée.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: A man who parades his piety is one who, under an atheist king, would be an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean de La Bruyère]], &#039;&#039;Les Caractères ou les Mœurs de ce siècle&#039;&#039; (1688), Ch. XIII &amp;quot;De la mode&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* I had no need of that hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Simon Laplace]], in response to [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]]&#039;s objection that Laplace had omitted [[w:God|God]] from &#039;&#039;Celestial Mechanics&#039;&#039; (Boyer 1968, p. 538)&lt;br /&gt;
** There is no contemporary source for this version of Laplace&#039;s interaction with Napoleon. It is not mentioned in the only eye-witness account of the event (see [http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2007/06/18/the-hypothetical-atheist/ Daniel Johnson, 2007]), and [[w:Hervé Faye|Hervé Faye]] was told by [[François Arago]] that Laplace had sought his help in a failed attempt to get the story removed from an unauthorized biography (Faye, &#039;&#039;Sur l&#039;origine du monde&#039;&#039;, Paris, 1884, pp. 109–111). Scholars believe the hypothesis Laplace was referring to was [[Isaac Newton|Newton]]&#039;s notion that God had to intervene periodically to prevent [[w:secular phenomena|secular]] perturbations from destroying the solar system. By demonstrating mathematically that the solar system was stable, Laplace eliminated any need for that hypothesis. (See, besides Faye and Johnson, [[w:Florian Cajori|Cajori]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;History of Mathematics&#039;&#039;, 1991 edn, p. 262, and [http://www.hawking.org.uk/does-god-play-dice.html Hawking, 1999]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hesiod]], the oldest author to have written on [[w:theogony|theogony]], asserted that the gods and men are created by unknown natural forces. We can therefore consider paganism as a superstitious form of atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Simon Laplace]], &amp;quot;On Causality&amp;quot; (manuscript), in Roger Hahn, &#039;&#039;Pierre-Simon Laplace,1749–1827: A Determined Scientist&#039;&#039;. Harvard University Press, 2005, p. 232.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Atheist ist nur der, der sich auch aus dem Atheismus keinen Gott macht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: The only atheist is someone who does not make a God even out of atheism itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gabriel Lauber|Gabriel Lauber]], &#039;&#039;Denken verdirbt den Charakter: Alle Aphorismen&#039;&#039; (1984). Munich: Carl Hauser Verlag, p. 37.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Für diejenigen, die schon in den Atheismus hineingeboren wurden, ist es ein Glaube wie jeder andere. Ein wirklicher Atheist ist nur ein ehemaliger Gläubiger.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: For those who are born into atheism, it&#039;s a faith like any other. The only real atheist is an ex-believer.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gabriel Lauber|Gabriel Lauber]], &#039;&#039;Denken verdirbt den Charakter&#039;&#039; (1984), p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As long as the prerequisite for that shining [[paradise]] is [[ignorance]], [[bigotry]] and [[hate]], I say to hell with it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Henry Drummond character in [[w:Inherit the Wind (1960 film)|Inherit the Wind (1960 film)]], written by Jerome Lawrence (play), Robert E. Lee (play), Nedrick Young, and Harold Jacob Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Were it possible to induce the masses to adopt atheism, this belief would exhibit all the intolerant ardor of a religious sentiment, and in its exterior forms would soon become a cult.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gustave Le Bon|Gustave Le Bon]], &#039;&#039;The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind&#039;&#039; (1895), [http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=BonCrow.sgm&amp;amp;images=images/modeng&amp;amp;data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&amp;amp;tag=public&amp;amp;part=4&amp;amp;division=div2 Book I, Chapter IV], p. 67.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Even atheists rebel and express, like [[Thomas Hardy|Hardy]] and [[A. E. Housman|Housman]], their rage against God although (or because) He does not, on their view, exist...&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: &amp;quot;Atheists express their rage against God although in their view He does not exist.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. S. Lewis]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Problem of Pain|The Problem of Pain]]&#039;&#039; (1940), [http://www.gutenberg.ca/ebooks/lewiscs-problemofpain/lewiscs-problemofpain-00-h.html#tocchapter06 Chapter VI].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;... und ich dank&amp;lt;!--[sic]--&amp;gt; es dem lieben Gott tausendmal, daß&amp;lt;!--[sic]--&amp;gt; er mich zum Atheisten hat werden lassen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: And I thank the Lord a thousand times that he let me become an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Christoph Lichtenberg]] as quoted in &#039;&#039;Lichtenberg: A Doctrine of Scattered Occasions. Reconstructed from his Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; by [[w:J. P. Stern|J. P. Stern]]. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1959, p. 249. Original source: Entsprechend SB (= Sudelbücher) 3. 403.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Lastly,&#039;&#039; Those are not at all to be tolerated who &#039;&#039;deny the Being of a God&#039;&#039;. Promises, Covenants, and Oaths, which are the Bonds of Humane Society, can have no hold upon an Atheist. The taking away of God, though but even in thought, dissolves all. Besides also, those that by their Atheism undermine and destroy all Religion, can have no pretence of Religion whereupon to challenge the Privilege of a Toleration.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Locke]], &#039;&#039;[http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/locke-a-letter-concerning-toleration-and-other-writings A Letter Concerning Toleration]&#039;&#039; ({{#formatdate:1689-10-03}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All I say is that I think it is damned unlikely that anything like a central cosmic will, a spirit world, or an eternal survival of personality exist. They are the most preposterous and unjustified of all the guesses which can be made about the universe, and I am not enough of a hair-splitter to pretend that I don&#039;t regard them as arrant and negligible moonshine. In theory I am an [[agnosticism|agnostic]], but pending the appearance of radical evidence I must be classed, practically and provisionally, as an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. P. Lovecraft]] letter to Robert E. Howard (August 16, 1932), in &#039;&#039;Selected Letters 1932-1934&#039;&#039; (Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House, 1976), p. 57.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M==&lt;br /&gt;
* Having insured the moderation of a fanatical rabble, by giving out among them the savage &#039;&#039;war-whoop&#039;&#039; of atheism, he ([[Edmund Burke]]) already fancies himself in full march to Paris.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Mackintosh]], &#039;&#039;Vindiciæ Gallicæ: Defence of the French Revolution and its English Admirers against the Accusations of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke&#039;&#039; (London, 1791), [http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&amp;amp;staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1665&amp;amp;chapter=62364&amp;amp;layout=html&amp;amp;Itemid=27 &amp;quot;Introduction&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Until someone claims to see [[Christopher Hitchens]]&#039; face in a tree stump, idiots must stop claiming that atheism is a religion. There&#039;s one little difference: Religion is defined as the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, and atheism is — precisely not that. Got it? Atheism is a religion like abstinence is a sex position.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time With Bill Maher&#039;&#039; (HBO) ({{#formatdate:2012-02-03}}), quoted in {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 2012-02-03&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Maher’s New Rule: Atheism And Religion Are ‘Not Two Sides Of The Same Coin’&lt;br /&gt;
  | periodical = Mediaite&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-mahers-new-rule-atheism-and-religion-are-not-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/&lt;br /&gt;
  | accessdate = 2012-09-07&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
* But when it comes to religion, we&#039;re not two sides of the same coin, and you don&#039;t get to put your unreason up on the same shelf with my reason. &#039;&#039;Your&#039;&#039; stuff has to go over &#039;&#039;there&#039;&#039;, on the shelf with Zeus and Thor and the Kraken, with the stuff that is not evidence-based, stuff that religious people never change their mind about, no matter what happens.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time With Bill Maher&#039;&#039; (HBO) ({{#formatdate:2012-02-03}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Największą wiarę mają ateiści: wierzą, że Boga nie ma.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: The atheists have the greatest faith: they believe that God does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrzej Majewski]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms: Magnum in Parvo&#039;&#039; (2000). Warsaw: KiW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The greatest single cause of atheism in the world today is Christians who acknowledge Jesus with their lips and walk out the door and deny Him by their lifestyle. That is what an unbelieving world simply finds unbelievable.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Brennan Manning]], as quoted in [https://relevantmagazine.com/god/practical-faith/ragamuffin-legacy &amp;quot;The Ragamuffin Legacy&amp;quot;] (16 April 2013), by Ben Simpson, &#039;&#039;Relevant Magazine&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People like [[Richard Dawkins|Dawkins]] are the public face of atheism. And that public face is one that is defensively and irrationally sexist. It&#039;s not only turning women away from atheism, it&#039;s discrediting the idea that atheists are actually people who argue from a position of rationality. How can they be, when they cling to the ancient, irrational tradition of treating women like they aren&#039;t quite as human as men?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Amanda Marcotte|Amanda Marcotte]] quoted by journalist Kimberly Winston, &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (November 18, 2014) [http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/richard-dawkins-stands-by-remarks-on-sexism-pedophilia-down-syndrome/2014/11/18/a2915cd8-6f64-11e4-a2c2-478179fd0489_story.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Absolute atheism starts in an act of faith in reverse gear and is a full-blown religious commitment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Maritain]], &#039;&#039;The Range of Reason&#039;&#039; (1952), [http://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/etext/range08.htm Chapter 8]. New York: Charles Scribner&#039;s Sons, p. 106.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some people say God died during the Partition in 1947. He may have died in 1971 during the war. Or he may have died yesterday here in Pondicherry in an orphanage. That&#039;s what some people say, Pi. When I was your age, I lived in bed, racked with polio. I asked myself every day, &#039;Where is God? Where is God? Where is God?&#039; God never came. It wasn&#039;t God who saved me—it was medicine. Reason is my prophet and it tells me that as a watch stops, so we die. It&#039;s the end. If the watch doesn&#039;t work properly, it must be fixed here and now by us. One day we will take hold of the [[means of production]] and there will be justice on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book | author = [[Yann Martel]] | title = {{w|Life of Pi}} | year = 2001 | isbn = 9780151008117 | section = Chapter 22 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=wgHPjx2UPGEC&amp;amp;pg=PA34&amp;amp;q=%22Some+people+say%22#v=snippet&amp;amp;q=%22Some+people+say+God+died%22 | page = 34}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I can well imagine an atheist&#039;s last words: &amp;quot;White, white! L-L-Love! My God!&amp;quot; — and the deathbed leap of faith. Whereas the agnostic, if he stays true to his reasonable self, if he stays beholden to dry, yeastless factuality, might try to explain the warm light bathing him by saying, &amp;quot;Possibly a f-f-failing oxygenation of the b-b-brain,&amp;quot; and, to the very end, lack imagination and miss the better story.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book | author = [[Yann Martel]] | title = [[w:Life of Pi|Life of Pi]] | year = 2001 | isbn = 9780151008117 | section = Chapter 22 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=wgHPjx2UPGEC&amp;amp;pg=PA80&amp;amp;q=%22I+can+well+imagine%22 | pages = 80-81}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An atheist doesn&#039;t have to be someone who thinks he has a proof that there can&#039;t be a god.  He only has to be someone who believes that the evidence on the God question is at a similar level to the evidence on the werewolf question.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John McCarthy (computer scientist)|John McCarthy]], &amp;quot;[http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books/msg/f8ce8532210e7f2a Agnostics and Atheists]&amp;quot; ({{#formatdate:1992-07-23}}), &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;rec.arts.books&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Internet has given atheists, agnostics, skeptics, the people who like to destroy everything that you and I believe, the almost equal access to your kids as your youth pastor and you have... whether you like it or not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Josh McDowell]] {{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Apologist Josh McDowell: Internet the Greatest Threat to Christians&lt;br /&gt;
|journal=Christian Post&lt;br /&gt;
|date=2011-07-16&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Anugrah&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Kumar&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://www.christianpost.com/news/apologist-josh-mcdowell-internet-the-greatest-threat-to-christians-52382/&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate=2011-10-21}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Theology recognizes the contingency of human existence only to derive it from a necessary being, that is, to remove it. Theology makes use of philosophical wonder only for the purpose of motivating an affirmation which ends it. Philosophy, on the other hand, arouses us to what is problematic in our own existence and in that of the world, to such a point that we shall never be cured of searching for a solution.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]], &#039;&#039;In Praise of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1963), p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The philosopher ... is well able to understand religion as one of the expressions of the central phenomenon of consciousness. But the example of [[Socrates]] reminds us that it is not the same thing, but almost the opposite, to understand religion and to accept it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]], &#039;&#039;In Praise of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1963), p. 45&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;No hay arte ateo. Aunque no ames el Creador, lo afirmarás creando a su semejanza.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: There is no atheist art. Even if you do not love the Creator, you will affirm him, creating in his likeness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gabriela Mistral|Gabriela Mistral]], &amp;quot;Decálogo del artista&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;Decalogue of the Artist&amp;quot;), &#039;&#039;Desolación&#039;&#039; (1922).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the unlikely event of losing Pascal&#039;s Wager, I intend to saunter in to Judgement Day with a bookshelf full of grievances, a flaming sword of my own devising, and a serious attitude problem.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rick Moen, &amp;quot;[http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.sf.written.robert-jordan/msg/934608fa971abdc7 TAN: Mormons]&amp;quot; {{#formatdate:1997-10-11}}, &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;rec.arts.sf.written.robert-jordan&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I remember how, at Cambridge, I walked with her ([[George Eliot]]) once in the Fellows&#039; Garden of Trinity, on an evening of rainy May, and she, stirred somewhat beyond her wont, and taking as her text the three words which have been used so often as the inspiring trumpet-calls of men — the words &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Immortality&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Duty&#039;&#039; — pronounced with terrible earnestness how inconceivable was the &#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;, how unbelievable the &#039;&#039;second&#039;&#039;, and yet how peremptory and absolute the &#039;&#039;third&#039;&#039;. Never, perhaps, have sterner accents affirmed the sovereignty of impersonal and unrecompensing Law. I listened, and night fell; her grave, majestic countenance turned towards me like a [[w:sibyl|sibyl]]&#039;s in the gloom; it was as though she withdrew from my grasp, one by one, the two scrolls of promise, and left me the third scroll only, awful with inevitable fate. And when we stood at length and parted amid that columnar circuit of the forest trees, beneath the last twilight of starless skies, I seemed to be gazing, like [[w:Titus|Titus]] at Jerusalem, on vacant seats and empty halls — on a [[w:Holy of Holies|Sanctuary]] with no Presence to hallow it, and heaven left lonely of a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frederic William Henry Myers]], [http://www.bartelby.com/309/1001.html &amp;quot;George Eliot&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Century Magazine&#039;&#039;, November 1881.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==N==&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is so senseless &amp;amp; odious to mankind that it never had many professors. Can it be by accident that all birds beasts &amp;amp; men have their right side &amp;amp; left side alike shaped (except in their bowells) &amp;amp; just two eyes &amp;amp; no more on either side the face &amp;amp; just two ears on either side the head &amp;amp; a nose with two holes &amp;amp; no more between the eyes &amp;amp; one mouth under the nose &amp;amp; either two fore leggs or two wings or two arms on the sholders &amp;amp; two leggs on the hipps one on either side &amp;amp; no more? Whence arises this uniformity in all their outward shapes but from the counsel &amp;amp; contrivance of an Author? Whence is it that the eyes of all sorts of living creatures are transparent to the very bottom &amp;amp; the only transparent members in the body, having on the outside an hard transparent skin, &amp;amp; within transparent juyces with a crystalline Lens in the middle &amp;amp; a pupil before the Lens all of them so truly shaped &amp;amp; fitted for vision, that no Artist can mend them? Did blind chance know that there was light &amp;amp; what was its refraction &amp;amp; fit the eys of all creatures after the most curious manner to make use of it? These &amp;amp; such like considerations always have &amp;amp; ever will prevail with man kind to believe that there is a being who made all things &amp;amp; has all things in his power &amp;amp; who is therfore to be feared.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Isaac Newton]] in [http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/texts/viewtext.php?id=THEM00007&amp;amp;mode=normalized &amp;quot;A short Schem of the true Religion&amp;quot;] (post-1710).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), as translated by Walter Kaufmann, § 357&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==O==&lt;br /&gt;
* Your petitioners are Atheists and they define their beliefs as follows. An Atheist loves his fellow man instead of god. An Atheist believes that heaven is something for which we should work now—here on earth for all men together to enjoy. An Atheist believes that he can get no help through prayer but that he must find in himself the inner conviction, and strength to meet life, to grapple with it, to subdue it, and enjoy it. An Atheist believes that only in a knowledge of himself and a knowledge of his fellow man can he find the understanding that will help to a life of fulfillment. He seeks to know himself and his fellow man rather than to know a god. An Atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An Atheist believes that deed must be done instead of a prayer said. An Atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death. He wants disease conquered, poverty vanished, war eliminated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Madalyn Murray O&#039;Hair]], Petition for Relief (1959), &#039;&#039;Murray v. Curlett&#039;&#039;, quoted in &amp;quot;Why I am an Atheist&amp;quot; (1966).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He was an embittered atheist (the sort of atheist who does not so much disbelieve in God as personally dislike him).&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Down and Out in Paris and London|Down and Out in Paris and London]]&#039;&#039; (1933), [http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/o/orwell/george/o79d/chapter30.html Chapter XXX]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==P==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Athéisme, force de l&#039;esprit, mais jusq&#039;à un certain degré seulement.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Atheism shows strength of mind, but only to a certain degree.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1669), [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h.htm#p_225 225]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Objection des athées: &amp;quot;Mais nous n&#039;avons nulle lumière.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Objection of atheists: &amp;quot;But we have no light.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1699; transaltion 1869), [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h.htm#p_228 228]&lt;br /&gt;
** In another &#039;&#039;pensée&#039;&#039; Pascal writes: &amp;quot;There is enough light for those who only desire to believe, and enough obscurity for those of a contrary disposition.&amp;quot; ([http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h.htm#p_430 430]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No one is so much alone in the universe as a denier of God. With an orphaned heart, which has lost the greatest of fathers, he stands mourning by the immeasurable corpse of nature, no longer moved and sustained by the Spirit of the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Paul]], &#039;&#039;Blumen- Frucht- und Dornenstücke, oder Ehestand, Tod und Hochzeit des Armenadvokaten Siebenkäs&#039;&#039; (1796), translated as E. H. Noel (tr.), &#039;&#039;Flower, fruit and thorn pieces: or, The married life, death, and wedding of the advocate of the poor Firmian Stanislaus Siebenkäs&#039;&#039; (1845), [http://books.google.com/books?id=2w4EAAAAQAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA276&amp;amp;dq=%22No+one+is+so+much+alone+in+the+universe+as+a+denier+of+God%22 p. 276].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On second thought, maybe the atheist cannot find God, for the same reason a thief cannot find a policeman.&lt;br /&gt;
**{{cite book | author = [[Laurence J. Peter]] | title = Peter&#039;s Quotations: Ideas for Our Times | year = 1977 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=W6bPGIL-_-8C&amp;amp;pg=PA44&amp;amp;dq=%22On+second+thought,+maybe+the+atheist%22 | page = 44}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Sometimes misattributed to [[Francis Thompson]], whose quote &amp;quot;An atheist is a man who believes himself an accident&amp;quot; Peter was commenting on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He who tries to flee from God takes refuge in himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Philo]], &#039;&#039;Legum allegoriarum&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Allegorical Interpretation&#039;&#039;), Book III, 29 (1st century).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By definition, that is, by its very stance, atheism denies or ignores the creatureliness and thus also the provisionality [&#039;&#039;Entwurfscharakter&#039;&#039;] of the world and man — with the consequence that atheists must explain man&#039;s moral failure as, at most, inappropriate behavior, or perhaps as an error of judgment, or, even more tepidly, as an inability to adapt to society.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Josef Pieper]], &#039;&#039;The Concept of Sin&#039;&#039; (1977), translated by Edward T. Oakes, S.J. South Bend, Indiana: St Augustine&#039;s Press, 2001, p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine [[reward]] then, brother, that person is a piece of shit. And I’d like to get as many of them out in the open as possible. You gotta get together and tell yourself [[stories]] that violate every [[law]] of the [[universe]] just to get through the goddamn day? What’s that say about your [[reality]]?&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Rust&amp;quot; Cohle, as interpreted by [[w:Matthew McConaughey|Matthew McConaughey]] in &#039;&#039;[[True Detective (TV series)|True Detective]]&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;The Locked Room&amp;quot;, written by [[w:Nic Pizzolatto|Nic Pizzolatto]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If [[religion]] has no intrinsic content and value, and is only a fraud, then its interest to [[scholarship]] should be marginal. Yet [[w:Research institute|research institutes]] [[w:Publishing house|publishing houses]], [[w:Academic journal|journals]] and thousands of [[w:PhD|PhD]]s and other [[scholars]] are engagd in nothing other than a systematic lifetime [[study]] of religion and its refutation. But if millions of roubles and man-hours of [[Soviet]] scholars are spent on the study of religion, then the subject is worthy of scholarly pursuit, and must be in itself a scholarly discipline, not simply a fraud or opiate. In other words, its study required an objective, open-ended approach. Yet Soviet scholars are oblidged to approach the suject with a predetermined conclusion: whatever they discover about religion and the believers, their conclusion must be negative, it must lead to only one single definition of religion, namely that it is a [[fraud]] and a [[delusion]]. In these circumstances all Soviet atheistic scholarship becomes nothing but support for the main thesis. This obligatory thesis, the condemnation of religion as fraud and believers as vicctims of fraud perpetuated by a [[clergy]] who are either clever swindlers or fools, has to be made in such a way as to appear as fresh and new as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dimitry V. Pospielovsky, [https://www.google.com/books/edition/History_Of_Soviet_Atheism_In_Theory_And/awiwCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&amp;amp;gbpv=1&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover &amp;quot;A History of Soviet Atheism in Theory, and Practice, and the Believer&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Vol 3: A History of Marxist-Leninist Atheism and Soviet Anti-Religious Policies&#039;&#039;, St Martin&#039;s Press, New York (1987), pp. xvi-xvii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A textbook, &#039;&#039;Foundation of Scientific Atheism&#039;&#039;, defined atheism as: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;a system of [[materialistic]] [[scientifically]] based views, rejecting any faith in go (or gods), in supernatural powers and any religion whatsoever...Atheism...is one of the essential and most important aspects of materialistic philosophy.&#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Religion]] in the same book is described as &#039;a form of social consciousness... a perverse, fantastic reflection of reality in the consciousness of men&#039;. This, of course, is straight out of [[Engels]]. All religious [[philosophy]] is described as a [[class]] philosophy. Hence [[Plato]], for instance, is said to &#039;represent the interest of the [[slave]]-owning [[aristocracy]]&#039;. But then it has to be shown that atheism, has always been a major school of thought wherefore moralists, such as [[Lao-Tse]], and pantheists, such as [[Spinoza]] are presented, or rather misrepresented, as atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dimitry V. Pospielovsky, [https://www.google.com/books/edition/History_Of_Soviet_Atheism_In_Theory_And/awiwCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&amp;amp;gbpv=1&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover &amp;quot;A History of Soviet Atheism in Theory, and Practice, and the Believer&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Vol 3: A History of Marxist-Leninist Atheism and Soviet Anti-Religious Policies&#039;&#039;, St Martin&#039;s Press, New York (1987), pp. xvii-xviii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheists put on a false courage and alacrity in the midst of their darkness and apprehensions, like children who, when they fear to go in the dark, will sing for fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on Various Subjects&amp;quot; (1727), &#039;&#039;Miscellanies in Verse and Prose&#039;&#039;, Vol. II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The believer in God has to account for one thing, the existence of unjust suffering; the atheist, however, has to account for the existence of everything else.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Dennis Prager|Dennis Prager]] paraphrasing [[w:Milton Steinberg|Milton Steinberg]] in a [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzIHuyqqBaI debate] (2008) with [[Christopher Hitchens]] and [[Dinesh D&#039;Souza]]. A slightly different version (&#039;must&#039; twice instead of &#039;has to&#039; and &#039;evil&#039; instead of &#039;unjust suffering&#039;) is found in Dennis Prager and [[w:Joseph Telushkin|Joseph Telushkin]], &#039;&#039;The Nine Questions People ask about Judaism&#039;&#039; (1981), Question 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God can stand being told by [[A. J. Ayer|Professor Ayer]] and [[w:Marghanita Laski|Marghanita Laski]] that He does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. B. Priestley]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Listener (magazine)|The Listener]]&#039;&#039; (1 July 1965).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Il n&#039;est pas de sauveurs suprêmes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ni Dieu, ni César, ni tribun.&lt;br /&gt;
** There are no supreme saviors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Neither God, nor [[Caesar]], nor [[tribune]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eugène Edine Pottier]], &#039;&#039;[[The Internationale]]&#039;&#039; (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==R==&lt;br /&gt;
* I am an intransigent atheist, though not a militant one. This means that I am not fighting &#039;&#039;against&#039;&#039; religion — I am fighting &#039;&#039;for&#039;&#039; reason.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ayn Rand]] (1963), in Michael S. Berliner, ed., &#039;&#039;Letters of Ayn Rand&#039;&#039; (New York: Dutton, 1995), p. 606.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no &#039;law&#039; in heaven or earth that man must needs obey! Take what you can, and all you can; and take it while you – may.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Let not the Jew-born Christ ideal unnerve you from the fight. You have no &#039;rights&#039; except the rights you win by – might.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There is no justice, right, nor wrong; no truth, no good, no evil. There is no &#039;man&#039;s immortal soul,&#039; no fiery, fearsome devil.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There is no &#039;heaven of glory:&#039; No! – no &#039;hell where sinners roast.&#039; There is no &#039;God the Father,&#039; No! – no Son, no &#039;Holy Ghost.&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The world is no Nirvāna where joy forever flows. It is a grewsome butcher shop where dead &#039;lambs&#039; hang in rows.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Man is the most ferocious of all the beasts of prey. He rageth round the mountains, to love, and feast, and – slay.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;He sails the stormy oceans, he gallops o&#039;er the plains, and sucks the very marrow-bones of captives held in – chains.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Death endeth all for every man, – for every &#039;son of thunder;&#039; Then be a lion (not a &#039;lamb&#039;) and – don&#039;t be trampled under.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ragnar Redbeard|Ragnar Redbeard]] (probably [[Arthur Desmond]]), &#039;&#039;[[w:Might is Right|Might is Right]]: The Survival of the Fittest&#039;&#039; (1890).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most intellectual people do not [[believe]] in [[God]], but they [[fear]] him just the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], in James Lee Christian &#039;&#039;Philosophy : An Introduction to the Art of Wondering&#039;&#039;,  (2005), p. 556.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.&lt;br /&gt;
** Stephen F. Roberts. See his [http://freelink.wildlink.com/quote_history.php &amp;quot;Brief History of the Quote&amp;quot;] or Alex Colias, [http://www.sfatheists.com/Essays/Documents/No%20Theist%20is%20Atheist%20Towards%20Anything.pdf &amp;quot;No Theist is Atheist Towards Anything&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
** Misattributed to [[w:Stephen Henry Roberts|Stephen Henry Roberts]] (1901–71) by [[Sam Harris]] in his article [http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/10-myths-and-10-truths-about-atheism1/ &amp;quot;10 Myths — and 10 Truths — about Atheism&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Los Angeles Times&#039;&#039;, December 24, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is aristocratic; the idea of a Great Being that watches over oppressed innocence and punishes triumphant crime is altogether popular. The people, the unfortunate, will always applaud me; I shall find detractors only among the rich and the guilty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Maximilien Robespierre]], [http://www.thegreatbooks.com/sources/ifgoddidnot.html &amp;quot;Address to the Jacobin Club&amp;quot;] (November 21, 1793), in &#039;&#039;Œuvres Complètes&#039;&#039; (Paris: Ernest Leroux, 1910–1967), vol. 10, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Slavoj Žižek]] writes that for Robespierre atheism was &amp;quot;the ideology of the cynical-hedonistic aristocrats who had lost all sense of historical mission&amp;quot; (&#039;&#039;In Defense of Lost Causes&#039;&#039;. London: Verso, 2008, p. 499).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In this actual world a churchless community, a community where men have abandoned and scoff at or ignore their religious needs, is a community on the rapid down grade. It is true that occasional individuals or families may have nothing to do with church or with religious practices and observances and yet maintain the highest standard of refined ethical obligation. But this does not affect the case in the world as it now is, any more than the fact that exceptional men and women under exceptional conditions have disregarded the marriage tie without moral harm to themselves interferes with the larger fact that such disregard if at all common means the complete moral disintegration of the body politic&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Theodore Roosevelt]], &#039;&#039;The Foes of Our Own Household&#039;&#039; (1917).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;m not an atheist because I just can&#039;t be that certain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mike Rosen]] in &#039;&#039;The Mike Rosen Show&#039;&#039; on [[w:talk radio|news/talk radio]] station [[w:KOA (AM)|850 KOA]] (December 19, 2007, 10:56 am).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==S==&lt;br /&gt;
*Stripped of the opportunities for satire which organised religion cannot help but supply, the case for atheism has very little substance.&lt;br /&gt;
** Bill Saunders, [https://archive.is/20130629110854/www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-5165945.html &amp;quot;Sunlight on dungheaps&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Independent on Sunday|Independent on Sunday]]&#039;&#039;, 10 June 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Atheism is an old idea, probably as old as humanity, and it has always justified its case by its superior understanding of nature. Unfortunately, as scientific knowledge has become more sophisticated over the past three centuries, all the scientific ideas which support atheism have evaporated into murky puddles of water, when they have not actually dried up entirely. It is now clear that the Universe has not always been here, it has a beginning. Everything is not made of indestructible atoms. Life is not caused by sunlight on dungheaps, and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
** Bill Saunders, &amp;quot;Sunlight on dungheaps&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Independent On Sunday&#039;&#039;, 10 June 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have concluded, through careful empirical analysis and much thought, that somebody is looking out for me, keeping track of what I think about things, forgiving me when I do less than I ought, giving me strength to shoot for more than I think I&#039;m capable of. I believe they know everything that I do and think and they still love me, and I have concluded after careful consideration, that this person keeping score is &#039;&#039;me&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Adam Savage}}, speaking at {{w|Reason Rally}}, National Mall, Washington, DC, {{#formatdate:2012-03-24}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t have to believe in atheism, because atheism is based on REASON.&lt;br /&gt;
** Manfred F. Schieder, in [http://rebirthofreason.com/Spirit/Quotes/Author_537.shtml &amp;quot;Rebirth of Reason&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nee, ich trinke keinen Tee, ich bin Atheist.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Nah, I don&#039;t drink tea, I&#039;m an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Helge Schneider|Helge Schneider]], &#039;&#039;Jazzclub — Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm&#039;&#039; (2004), a film he wrote, directed, acted in and composed the music for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality of happiness, and by no means a necessity of life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Androcles and the Lion (play)|Androcles and the Lion]]&#039;&#039; (1913), [[s:Androcles and the Lion (Shaw)/Preface to Androcles and the Lion/The Importance of Hell  in the Salvation Scheme|Preface: The Importance of Hell in the Salvation Scheme]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The &#039;&#039;reality&#039;&#039; of God is dead.&amp;quot; Here we come to an important point. These are real atheists who say that. This kind of atheism is not born of the intellect. It is born of the &#039;&#039;will&#039;&#039;. They &#039;&#039;will&#039;&#039; that God does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fulton J. Sheen]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPa-EtQS0ls &amp;quot;The Death of God&amp;quot;] (1966). The quote begins at around 12 min 10 sec.&lt;br /&gt;
** In support of his assertion, Sheen goes on to quote [[Martin Heidegger]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], [[André Gide]], [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], the fictional atheist Kirillov from [[Fyodor Dostoevsky]]&#039;s novel &#039;&#039;[[Demons (novel)|The Devils]]&#039;&#039;, and an unnamed American writer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ariane Sherine|Ariane Sherine]], in her [[w:Atheist Bus Campaign|Atheist Bus Campaign]] (2008).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheists in foxholes, some say they are myths,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Creations of the mind who just don&#039;t exist.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yet, they answered the call to defend, with great pride.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;With reason their watchword, they bled and they died.&lt;br /&gt;
** Alice Shiver, &amp;quot;Atheists-in-Foxholes&amp;quot; monument, dedicated on 4 July 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nationwide, the nonreligious population is both the fastest growing, and the most despised. I ask you all, why is that? Why are we hated, when we endorse no violence, incite no racism or hatred, and demand nothing more than equal treatment? I&#039;ll tell you why: It&#039;s easy to hate what you don&#039;t know, and the theists don&#039;t know us. Well, actually, they &#039;&#039;do&#039;&#039; know us, but they don&#039;t &#039;&#039;know&#039;&#039; they know us, because most atheists in this country are closeted. Bigotry is born of ignorance, but ignorance can be cured. If the atheists weren&#039;t closeted, it would be harder to hate us, because in the end, you can&#039;t hate what you already love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Silverman]], speaking at {{w|Reason Rally}}, National Mall, Washington, DC, {{#formatdate:2012-03-24}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What Jupiter? Do not trifle. There is no Jupiter.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Socrates]] (character) in [[Aristophanes]]&#039; &#039;&#039;[[w:The Clouds|The Clouds]]&#039;&#039; (5th c. BCE, tr. Hickie 1853, vol. 1, [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Aristoph.+Cl.+356 Perseus]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the first place, it is clear that by self-existence we especially mean, an existence independent of any other — not produced by any other: the assertion of self-existence is simply an indirect denial of creation.... Self-existence, therefore, necessarily means existence without a beginning; and to form a conception of self-existence is to form a conception of existence without a beginning. Now by no mental effort can we do this.... To this let us add, that even were self-existence conceivable, it would not in any sense be an explanation of the Universe.... Thus the Atheistic theory is not only absolutely unthinkable, but, even if it were thinkable, would not be a solution. The assertion that the Universe is self-existent does not really carry us a step beyond the cognition of its present existence; and so leaves us with a mere restatement of the mystery.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862). London: Williams and Norgate, pp. 32–33.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As was proved at the outset of the argument, self-existence is rigorously inconceivable; and this holds true whatever be the nature of the object of which it is predicated.... Thus these three different suppositions [atheism, pantheism, theism] respecting the origin of things, verbally intelligible though they are, and severally seeming to their respective adherents quite rational, turn out, when critically examined to be literally unthinkable. It is not a question of probability, or credibility, but of conceivability. Experiment proves that the elements of these hypotheses cannot even be put together in consciousness; and we can entertain them only as we entertain such pseud-ideas as a square fluid and a moral substance — only by abstaining from the endeavour to render them into actual thoughts. Or, reverting to our original mode of statement, we may say that they severally involve symbolic conceptions of the illegitimate and illusive kind. Differing so widely as they seem to do, the atheistic, the pantheistic, and the theistic hypotheses contain the same ultimate element. It is impossible to avoid making the assumption of self-existence somewhere; and whether that assumption be made nakedly, or under complicated disguises, it is equally vicious, equally unthinkable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862), pp. 36–37.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Passing over the consideration of credibility, and confining ourselves to that of conceivability, we see that Atheism, Pantheism, and Theism, when rigorously analyzed, severally prove to be absolutely unthinkable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862), pp. 44–45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Leaving out the accompanying moral code, which is in all cases a supplementary growth, a religious creed is definable as a theory of original causation.... [E]ven that which is commonly regarded as the negation of all Religion — even positive Atheism, comes within the definition; for it, too, in asserting the self-existence of Space, Matter, and Motion, which it regards as adequate causes of every appearance, propounds an &#039;&#039;[[w:a priori and a posteriori|à priori]]&#039;&#039; theory from which it holds the facts to be deducible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862), p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You know, they are fooling us, there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]], to a fellow student while studying to become a priest in the Russian Orthodox Church; quoted in &#039;&#039;Landmarks in the Life of Stalin&#039;&#039; (1942) by [[w:Yemelyan Yaroslavsky|Yemelyan Yaroslavsky]], p. 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We had many interesting conversations and he introduced me to his young wife. He confided to me that he had married her because she was a fanatical atheist. Atheism was the main topic of their conversations. Such fervid atheism is usually a screen for repressed religion. The truly convinced atheist does not emphasize his atheism. He does not talk about it and is careful to avoid blasphemies.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The man was interested in dreams and each morning he related several of his dreams. They were full of religious symbols. I was cautious not to reveal to him the meaning of his dreams; such off-hand analyses are always dangerous.... The banker did not want to be disturbed in his supposed atheism.... His atheism was a [[w:reaction formation|reaction formation]] established upon an ineradicable religious belief.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Stekel]], &amp;quot;Autobiography&amp;quot; [serialized], &#039;&#039;[[w:American Journal of Psychotherapy|American Journal of Psychotherapy]]&#039;&#039;, Vol. II (1948); &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Wilhelm Stekel: The Life Story of a Pioneer Psychoanalyst&#039;&#039; (1950), translated and edited by [[w:Emil Gutheil|E. A. Gutheil]], New York: Liveright. See full extract in [http://benatlas.com/2010/06/wilhelm-stekel-on-atheism-and-telepathy/ &amp;quot;Wilhelm Stekel on Atheism and Telepathy&amp;quot;]. The man. Stekel&#039;s fellow-passenger on a transatlantic liner, was a prominent New York banker on his way to Europe to attend an international banking conference.&lt;br /&gt;
** Often quoted as &amp;quot;Fervid atheism is usually a screen for repressed religion.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing enlarges more the gulf of atheism, than that wide passage, which lies between the faith and lives of men pretending to be Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Edward Stillingfleet|Edward Stillingfleet]], &#039;&#039;Origines Sacræ&#039;&#039; (1663). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1797, p. x.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Including, I suppose, death. ... It&#039;s an interesting view of atheism, as a sort of crutch for those who can&#039;t bear the reality of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Stoppard]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Jumpers|Jumpers]]&#039;&#039; (1972).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As an atheist, I believe that all life is unspeakably precious, because it’s only here for a brief moment, a flare against the dark, and then it’s gone forever. No afterlives, no second chances, no backsies. So there can be nothing crueler than the abuse, destruction or wanton taking of a life. It is a crime no less than burning the Mona Lisa, for there is always just one of each. So I cannot forgive.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. Michael Straczynski]], [http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/countries/us/guide/048.html &#039;&#039;Lurker&#039;s Guide to Babylon 5&#039;&#039; : &amp;quot;Passing Through Gethsemane : jms speaks&amp;quot; (13 July (2004)].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==T==&lt;br /&gt;
* The thing framed says that nothing framed it; the tongue never made itself to speak, and yet talks against him that did; saying that which is made, &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039;, and that which made it, &#039;&#039;is not&#039;&#039;. But this folly is infinite as hell, as much without light or bound as the &#039;&#039;chaos&#039;&#039; or the &#039;&#039;primitive nothing&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jeremy Taylor]] (1613-1667), &#039;&#039;Discourses on Various Subjects&#039;&#039;, Sermon XX, p. [http://books.google.com/books?id=teVLAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA376&amp;amp;dq=%22The+thing+framed+says%22 376].&lt;br /&gt;
** Misquoted in &#039;&#039;Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers&#039;&#039;, p. 18, as &amp;quot;The thing formed says that nothing formed it; and that which is made &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039;, while that which made it &#039;&#039;is not!&#039;&#039; The folly is infinite.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “Is there a God?” I said. “I mean, are you in touch, telepathically, with any kind of God?”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“No. I’m not in touch with anything like that. As far as I know, there is no God.”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“Oh,” I said.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“It doesn’t bother you,” the voice said. “You may think it does; but it doesn’t. You’re really on your own. You’ve been learning that.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walter Tevis]], &#039;&#039;Mockingbird&#039;&#039; (1980), {{ISBN|978-1-4072-3376-5}}, p. 251&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An Atheist is a man who believes himself an accident.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Thompson]], &amp;quot;Paganism: Old and New&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;A Renegade Poet and Other Essays&#039;&#039; (1910), p. 47.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When men live as if there were no God, it becomes expedient for them that there should be none; and then they endeavour to persuade themselves so, and will be glad to find arguments to fortify themselves in this persuasion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Tillotson]], &amp;quot;The Folly of Scoffing at Religion&amp;quot; (1671), in &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039;, Volume I, Edinburgh, 1748, p. 58.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In former days the free-thinker was a man who had been brought up in ideas of religion, law, and morality, and only through conflict and struggle came to free-thought; but now there has sprung up a new type of born free-thinkers who grow up without even having heard of principles of morality or of religion, of the existence of authorities, who grow up directly in ideas of negation in everything, that is to say, savages.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]], Golenishtchev in &#039;&#039;[[Anna Karenina]]&#039;&#039; (1877), C. Garnett, trans. (New York: 2003), Part 5, Chapter 9, p. 434&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What men deny is not God, but some preposterous idol of the imagination.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:George Tyrrell|George Tyrrell]], &#039;&#039;Autobiography&#039;&#039; (1912), p. 71.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U==&lt;br /&gt;
* The parasites which live in the intestines of higher animals, feeding upon the nutritive juices which these animals supply, do not need either to see or hear, and therefore for them the visible and audible world does not exist. And if they possessed a certain degree of consciousness and took account of the fact that the animal at whose expense they live believed in a world of sight and hearing, they would perhaps deem such belief to be due merely to the extravagance of its imagination. And similarly there are social parasites, as Mr. A. J. Balfour admirably observes, who, receiving from the society in which they live the motives of their moral conduct, deny that belief in God and the other life is a necessary foundation for good conduct and for a tolerable life, society having prepared for them the spiritual nutriment by which they live. An isolated individual can endure life and live it well and even heroically without in any sort believing either in the immortality of the soul or in God, but he lives the life of a spiritual parasite.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Unamuno]], &#039;&#039;Tragic Sense of Life&#039;&#039; (1913)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Among the repulsions of atheism for me has been its drastic uninterestingness as an intellectual position. Where was the ingenuity, the ambiguity, the humanity (in the Harvard sense) of saying that the universe just happened to happen and that when we&#039;re dead we&#039;re dead?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Updike]], &#039;&#039;Self-Consciousness: Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1989), ch. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==V==&lt;br /&gt;
* For entirely savage races,... one cannot count them among either the atheists or the theists. Asking them their belief would be like asking them if they are for [[Aristotle]] or [[Democritus]]: they know nothing; they are not atheists any more than they are [[w:Peripatetics|Peripatetics]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), [http://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volathe1.html &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section I]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is the vice of a few intelligent persons, and superstition is the vice of fools.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The atheists are for the most part impudent and misguided scholars who reason badly, and who, not being able to understand the creation, the origin of evil and other difficulties, have recourse to the hypotheses of the eternity of things and of inevitability.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), [http://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volathe2.html.htnl &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I would not wish to have to deal with an atheist prince, who would find it in his interest to have me ground to powder in a mortar: I should be quite certain of being ground to powder. If I were a sovereign, I would not wish to have to deal with atheist courtiers, whose interest it would be to poison me: I should have to be taking antidotes every day. It is therefore absolutely necessary for princes and for peoples, that the idea of a Supreme Being, creator, ruler, rewarder, revenger, shall be deeply engraved in people&#039;s minds.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[w:Kaffir (racial term)|Caffres]], the [[w:Khoikhoi|Hottentots]], the [[w:Tupí people|Topinambous]], and many other small nations, have no God: they neither deny nor affirm; they have never heard speak of Him; tell them that there is a God: they will believe it easily; tell them that everything happens through the nature of things: they will believe you equally. To claim that they are atheists is to make the same imputation as if one said they are anti-Cartesian; they are neither for nor against [[Descartes]]. They are real children; a child is neither atheist nor deist, he is nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What conclusion shall we draw from all this? That atheism is a very pernicious monster in those who govern; that it is also pernicious in the persons around statesmen ...; that, if it is not so deadly as fanaticism, it is nearly always fatal to virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there are atheists, whom must one blame if not the mercenary tyrants of souls, who, making us revolt against their knaveries, force a few weak minds to deny the God whom these monsters dishonour?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Men fattened on our substance cry to us: &amp;quot;Be persuaded that a she-ass has spoken ([[w:Balaam&#039;s ass|Balaam&#039;s ass]]); believe that a fish has swallowed a man and has given him up at the end of three days safe and sound on the shore ([[w:Jonah|Jonah]]); have no doubt that the God of the universe ordered one Jewish prophet to eat excrement ([[w:Ezekiel|Ezekiel]]), and another prophet to buy two whores and to make with them sons of whoredom ([[w:Hosea|Hosea]]).&amp;quot; These are the very words that the God of truth and purity has been made to utter.... These inconceivable absurdities revolt weak and rash minds, as well as wise and resolute minds. They say: &amp;quot;Our masters paint God to us as the most insensate and the most barbarous of all beings; therefore there is no God;&amp;quot; but they should say: &amp;quot;Our masters attribute to God their absurdities and their furies; therefore God is the contrary of what they proclaim, therefore God is as wise and good as they make him out mad and wicked.&amp;quot; It is thus that wise men account for things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is an absurd one. What is most repellent in [Holbach&#039;s] &#039;&#039;[[w:The System of Nature|The System of Nature]]&#039;&#039; — after the recipe for making eels from flour — is the audacity with which it decides that there is no God, without even having tried to prove the impossibility. There is some eloquence in the book: but much more rant, and no sort of proof.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], letter to Frederick William, Prince of Prussia (28 November 1770), in S. G. Tallentyre (ed.), &#039;&#039;Voltaire in His Letters&#039;&#039;. New York: G. P. Putnam&#039;s Sons, 1919, p. 232. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The study of anthropology … confirmed my atheism, which was the faith of my fathers anyway. Religions were exhibited and studied as the [[w:Rube Goldberg|Rube Goldberg]] inventions I&#039;d always thought they were.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], [http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/3605/the-art-of-fiction-no-64-kurt-vonnegut &amp;quot;Interviews: Kurt Vonnegut, The Art of Fiction No. 64&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Paris Review|The Paris Review]]&#039;&#039; (Spring 1977) No. 69.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The sermon was based on what he claimed was a well-known fact, that there were no Atheists in foxholes. I asked Jack what he thought of the sermon afterwards, and he said, &amp;quot;There&#039;s a Chaplain who never visited the front.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Hocus Pocus (novel)|Hocus Pocus]]&#039;&#039; (1990); 1997 reprint, [http://books.google.com/books?id=iK7tOOKaAeQC&amp;amp;pg=PA180 page 180].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==W==&lt;br /&gt;
* If we don&#039;t play God, who will?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James D. Watson]] (1996), in &#039;&#039;The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities&#039;&#039;, [http://www.jstor.org/view/00987921/di980536/98p00105/0] New&amp;amp;nbsp;York; Simon and Schuster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One of the most exquisite pleasures of human love — to serve the loved one without his knowing it — is only possible, as regards the love of God, through atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to obey God, one must receive his commands. How did it happen that I received them in adolescence, while I was professing atheism? To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No human being escapes the necessity of conceiving some good outside himself towards which his thought turns in a movement of desire, supplication, and hope. Consequently, the only choice is between worshipping the true God or an idol. Every atheist is an idolater — unless he is worshipping the true God in his impersonal aspect. The majority of the pious are idolaters.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Gravity and Grace&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;La Pesanteur et la grâce&#039;&#039;, 1947). Routledge Classics, 2002, p. 114.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion in so far as it is a source of consolation is a hindrance to true faith: in this sense atheism is a purification. I have to be atheistic with the part of me which is not made for God. Among those in whom the supernatural part of themselves has not been awakened, the atheists are right and the believers wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Gravity and Grace&#039;&#039; (1947), Routledge Classics, 2002, p. 115; also in George A. Panichas (ed.), &#039;&#039;The Simone Weil Reader&#039;&#039; (1977). New York: David McKay, p. 417.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As in the West, the word God, taken in its usual meaning, signifies a Person, men whose attention, faith and love are almost exclusively concentrated on the impersonal aspect of God can actually believe themselves and declare themselves to be atheists, even though supernatural love inhabits their souls.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Letter to a Priest|Letter to a Priest]]&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Lettre a un religieux&#039;&#039;, 1951), translated by A. F. Wills, Section 12. London: Routledge &amp;amp; Kegan Paul, 1953, pp. 35–36&lt;br /&gt;
** Often misquoted as &amp;quot;An atheist may be simply one whose faith and love are concentrated on the impersonal aspects of God.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Premature as the question may be, it is hardly possible not to wonder whether we will find any answer to our deepest questions, any signs of the workings of an interested God, in a final theory. I think that we will not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Steven Weinberg]], &#039;&#039;Dreams of a Final Theory&#039;&#039; (1993), pp. 257-258. See also [http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/weinberg.htm positiveatheism.org&#039;s Weinberg quotations].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The aim of this conference is to have a constructive dialogue between science and religion. I am all in favor of a dialogue between science and religion, but not a constructive dialogue. One of the great achievements of science has been, if not to make it impossible for intelligent people to be religious, then at least to make it possible for them not to be religious. We should not retreat from this accomplishment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Steven Weinberg]], &#039;&#039;Facing Up: Science and Its Cultural Adversaries&#039;&#039; (2001), p.&amp;amp;nbsp;242.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As a born-again atheist, I now knew exactly what satisfactions were on offer. For the first time in my 38 years I was at one with my own generation.... If I bumped into [[Richard Dawkins]] (an old colleague from Oxford days) or had dinner in Washington with [[Christopher Hitchens]] ..., I did not have to feel out on a limb. Hitchens was excited to meet a new convert to his non-creed and put me through a catechism before uncorking some stupendous claret. &amp;quot;So - absolutely no God?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Nope,&amp;quot; I was able to say with [[w:Moonie|Moonie]]-zeal. &amp;quot;No future life, nothing &#039;out there&#039;?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;No,&amp;quot; I obediently replied. At last! I could join in the creed shared by so many (most?) of my intelligent contemporaries in the Western world - that men and women are purely material beings (whatever that is supposed to mean), that &amp;quot;this is all there is&amp;quot; (ditto), that God, Jesus and religion are a load of baloney: and worse than that, the cause of much (no, come on, let yourself go), most (why stint yourself - go for it, man), all the trouble in the world, from Jerusalem to Belfast, from Washington to Islamabad.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[A. N. Wilson]], [http://www.newstatesman.com/religion/2009/04/conversion-experience-atheism &amp;quot;Why I believe again&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;New Statesman&#039;&#039;, 2 April 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Given your premises, you will have to come up with a different reason for rejecting Christ as you do. But for you to make this move would reveal the two fundamental tenets of &#039;&#039;true&#039;&#039; atheism. One: There is no God. Two: I hate Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Douglas Wilson (theologian)|Douglas Wilson]] to [[Christopher Hitchens]], [http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/mayweb-only/121-52.0.html?start=4 &amp;quot;Is Christianity Good for the World?&amp;quot; (part 5)], &#039;&#039;Christianity Today&#039;&#039; ({{#formatdate:2007-05-25}})&lt;br /&gt;
** Often paraphrased as &amp;quot;There are two tenets of atheism: One, there is no God. Two, I hate him.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is speculatively as unfounded as theism, and practically can only spring from bad motives.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Chauncey Wright|Chauncey Wright]], letter to Francis Allingwood Abbot (October 28, 1867). &#039;&#039;Letters of Chauncey Wright&#039;&#039;, ed. James Bradley Thayer. Cambridge, Mass.: John Wilson, 1878, p. 133&lt;br /&gt;
** Wright had earlier written to Abbot that &amp;quot;about what we really know nothing we ought not to affirm or deny anything&amp;quot; (August 13, 1867). &#039;&#039;Letters of Chauncey Wright&#039;&#039;, p. 109.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Y==&lt;br /&gt;
* By night an atheist half believes in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1743), &amp;quot;Night Two&amp;quot;, p. 292.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Z==&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is not the denial of the existence of God, but having doubts as to whether God is conscious.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Slavoj Žižek]] in Slavoj Žižek and Boris Gunjević, &#039;&#039;God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse&#039;&#039; (2012), translated by Ellen Elias Bursac. New York: Seven Stories Press.&lt;br /&gt;
{{disputed begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Disputed==&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to Seneca, as quoted in &#039;&#039;What Great Men Think About Religion&#039;&#039; (1945) by Ira D. Cardiff, p. 342. No original source for this has been found in the works of Seneca, or published translations (see: [[Talk:Seneca the Younger]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then he is not omnipotent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is he able, but not willing?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then he is malevolent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is God both able and willing?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then whence cometh evil?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is he neither able nor willing?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then why call him God?&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Epicurus]], as quoted in [[w:BBC Four|BBC Four]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief|Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief]]&#039;&#039;. No original source has been found for this quote (see: [[Epicurus#Disputed|Epicurus: Disputed]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{disputed end}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Agnosticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christian atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Death of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Death of God theology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Faith]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Irreligiousness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Religiousness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Skepticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Unbelief]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:Category:Atheists|List of Atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary|atheism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=3120546</id>
		<title>Atheism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=3120546"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T16:32:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: Sure, I may have posted a pic of Berdyaev on the page God as well, but I just find it a really good quote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Nikolay Berdyaev.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;God is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Nikolai Berdyaev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Epikouros BM 1843.jpg|thumb|Not the person who denies the gods worshipped by the multitude, but he who affirms of the gods what the multitude believes about them is truly impious. For the utterances of the multitude about the gods are not true. ~ [[Epicurus]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Friederich Nietzsche.jpg|thumb|You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price. ~ [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hoard of ancient gold coins.jpg|thumb|Most atheists, if they worship anything, worship something which really exists but is not worthy of worship. ... In order for capitalism to have a clear path, it needs to profane all that is sacred; there must be no limits to what is saleable. The totalitarian commercialism which is now the established Church throughout the West has come close to achieving this. ~ [[Andrew Collier (philosopher)|Andrew Collier]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Alciphron (1732) title page.jpg|thumb|Is it intellectually responsible to define one&#039;s identity against something that one does not understand? ~ [[Jacques Berlinerblau]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simone Weil 1931.jpg|thumb|There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God. ~ [[Simone Weil]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ilya Efimovich Repin (1844-1930) - Portrait of Leo Tolstoy (1887).jpg|thumb|In former days the free-thinker was a man who had been brought up in ideas of religion, law, and morality, and only through conflict and struggle came to free-thought; but now there has sprung up a new type of born free-thinkers who grow up without even having heard of principles of morality or of religion, of the existence of authorities, who grow up directly in ideas of negation in everything, that is to say, savages. ~ [[Leo Tolstoy]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Atheism|Atheism]]&#039;&#039;&#039; in a broad sense is a rejection of [[belief]] in the existence of [[deities]], in a narrower sense, the specific belief that there are no deities, and most inclusively, it is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist. Atheism is contrasted with [[theism]], which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists. The word originates with the Greek ἄθεος (&#039;&#039;atheos&#039;&#039;), meaning &amp;quot;without god(s)&amp;quot;, used as a pejorative term applied to those thought to reject the gods worshipped by the larger society.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
==A==&lt;br /&gt;
* If you describe yourself as &amp;quot;Atheist,&amp;quot; some people will say, &amp;quot;Don&#039;t you mean &#039;[[Agnostic]]&#039;?&amp;quot; I have to reply that I really &#039;&#039;do&#039;&#039; mean Atheist. I really do not believe that there is a god — in fact I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one. It&#039;s easier to say that I am a radical Atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it&#039;s an opinion I hold seriously. It&#039;s funny how many people are genuinely surprised to hear a view expressed so strongly. In England we seem to have drifted from vague, wishy-washy [[Anglicanism]] to vague, wishy-washy [[Agnosticism]] — both of which I think betoken a desire not to have to [[think]] about things too much. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; People will then often say, &amp;quot;But surely it&#039;s better to remain an [[Agnosticism|Agnostic]] just in case?&amp;quot; This, to me, suggests such a level of silliness and muddle that I usually edge out of the conversation rather than get sucked into it. (If it turns out that I&#039;ve been wrong all along, and there is in fact a god, and if it further turned out that this kind of legalistic, cross-your-fingers-behind-your-back, Clintonian hair-splitting impressed him, then I would choose not to worship him anyway.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Douglas Adams]], in {{citation | title = Life, the Universe, and Everything: An Interview with Douglas Adams | author = [[David Silverman]] | periodical = The American Atheist | volume = 37 | issue = 1 | year = 1998 | month = Winter | url = http://www.americanatheist.org/win98-99/T2/silverman.html | archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20071228115639/http://www.americanatheist.org/win98-99/T2/silverman.html | archivedate = 2007-12-28 }}&amp;lt;!--alt source: http://www.nichirenbuddhist.org/Religion/Atheists/DouglasAdams/Interview-American-Atheists.html ; article has not completed a move to http://atheists.org/content/interview-douglas-adams at this writing--&amp;gt;, later [http://books.google.com/books?id=DpIwyu_ZW9AC&amp;amp;pg=PT108#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false published] in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Salmon of Doubt|The Salmon of Doubt]]&#039;&#039; (2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Government has no right to hurt a hair on the head of an Atheist for his Opinions. Let him have a care of his Practices.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Adams]] to [[John Quincy Adams]], June 16, 1816. Adams Papers (microfilm), reel 432, Library of Congress. James H. Hutson (ed.), &#039;&#039;The Founders on Religion: A Book of Quotations&#039;&#039;. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007, p. 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After having treated of these false [[Zealots]] in Religion, I cannot forbear mentioning … the Zealots in Atheism. One would fancy that these Men, tho&#039; they fall short, in every other Respect, of those who make a Profession of Religion, would at least outshine them in this Particular, and be exempt from that single Fault which seems to grow out of the impudent Fervours of Religion: But so it is, that [[Infidelity]] is propagated with as much Fierceness and Contention, Wrath and Indignation, as if the Safety of Mankind depended upon it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Addison]], [http://archive.twoaspirinsandacomedy.com/spectator/spectator.php?line=185 &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;&#039;, No 185] (2 October 1711).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I would fain ask one of these bigotted Infidels, supposing all the great Points of Atheism … were laid together and formed into a kind of Creed, according to the Opinions of the most celebrated Atheists; I say, supposing such a Creed as this were formed, and imposed upon any one People in the World, whether it would not require an infinitely greater Measure of [[Faith]], than any Set of Articles which they so violently oppose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Addison]], &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;&#039;, No 185 (2 October 1711)&lt;br /&gt;
** Often misquoted as &amp;quot;To be an atheist requires an infinitely greater measure of faith than to receive all the great truths which atheism would deny.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The inhabitants of the earth are of two sorts:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Those with brains, but no religion,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And those with religion, but no brains.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Al-Ma&#039;arri|Abu&#039;l-`Ala&#039; al-Ma`arri]] (973–1058) (Arabic: {{lang|ar|أبو العلاء المعري|rtl}}), poet of Ma`arra, quoted in &#039;&#039;Crusades Through Arab Eyes&#039;&#039; (1989) by [[w:Amin Maalouf|Amin Maalouf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To you I&#039;m an atheist; to God I&#039;m the [[w:loyal opposition|loyal opposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Stardust Memories|Stardust Memories]]&#039;&#039; (1980).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some highly religious people are outraged that atheists would publicly declare their lack of faith. Accordingly many of the people who belong to atheist associations hide their beliefs from most others, knowing from experience it could affect their employment, membership in other clubs, and social connections. It reminds me of the reaction of many high RWAs when homosexuals began to come out: “Don’t these people know they’re supposed to be ashamed of what they are?” That in turn reminded me of the reaction of many White supremists to the civil rights movement: “Don’t these n------ know they’re inferior and should never be treated as our equals?” Fortunately, eventually, minorities can overcome these reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bob Altemeyer]], &#039;&#039;The Authoritarians&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 160&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A great man is the unbelieving man; he is without spiritual sight or spiritual hearing; his glory is in understanding his own understanding. It is he who subdues the forest, tames the beasts of the field to service. He goes alone in the dark, unafraid. He follows no man’s course, but, searches for himself; the priests cannot make him believe, nor the angels of heaven; none can subdue his judgment. He says: why permit others even priests, to think for you? Stand on your own feet – be a man. Through his arm are tyrants and evil kings overthrown. Through him are doctrines and religions sifted to the bottom and the falsehood and evil in them cast aside. Who but the Creator could have created so great a man as the unbeliever?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:w:Kenneth Arnold|Kenneth Arnold]]&#039;s paraphrasing of a section from &#039;&#039;[[:w:Oahspe: A New Bible|Oahspe: A New Bible]]&#039;&#039; by John Ballou Newbrough (1828–1891), p. 361, which he handed out as his &amp;quot;[http://www.blueblurrylines.com/2017/03/ufos-kenneth-arnold-and-american-bible.html philosophy card]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am an atheist, out and out. It took me a long time to say it. I&#039;ve been an atheist for years and years, but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable to say one was an atheist, because it assumed knowledge that one didn&#039;t have. Somehow, it was better to say one was a humanist or an agnostic. I finally decided that I&#039;m a creature of emotion as well as of reason. Emotionally, I am an atheist. I don&#039;t have the evidence to prove that God doesn&#039;t exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn&#039;t that I don&#039;t want to waste my time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Asimov]], &#039;&#039;Free Inquiry&#039;&#039;, Vol. 2, Spring 1982, p. 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==B==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God never wrought miracle, to convince atheism, because his ordinary works convince it. It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man&#039;s mind to atheism; but depth in philosophy bringeth men&#039;s minds about to religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, [http://www.worldwideschool.org/library/books/phil/modernwesternphilosophy/FrancisBacon/chap16.html &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Scripture saith, The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God; it is not said, The fool hath thought in his heart; so as he rather saith it by rote to himself, as that he would have, than that he can thoroughly believe it, or be persuaded of it; for none deny there is a God, but those for whom it maketh that there were no God. It appeareth in nothing more that atheism is rather in the lip than in the heart of man by this, that atheists will ever be talking of that their opinion, as if they fainted in it within themselves, and would be glad to be strengthened by the consent of others; nay more, you shall have atheists strive to get disciples, as it fareth with other sects; and, which is most of all, you shall have of them that will suffer for atheism, and not recant; whereas, if they did truly think that there were no such thing as God, why should they trouble themselves?&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The causes of atheism are: divisions in religion, if they be many; for any one main division addeth zeal to both sides; but many divisions introduce atheism. Another is, scandal of priests; when it is come to what St [[Bernard of Clairvaux|Bernard]] saith, &#039;&#039;non est jam dicere, ut populus sic sacerdos; quia nec sic populus ut sacerdos&#039;&#039; [One cannot now say, the priest is as the people, for the truth is that the people are not so bad as the priest]. A third is, custom of profane scoffing in holy matters; which doth, by little and little, deface the reverence of religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They that deny a God, destroy man&#039;s nobility; for certainly man is of kin to the beasts, by his body; and if he be not kin to God, by his spirit, he is a base and ignoble creature.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Therefore, as atheism is in all respects hateful, so in this, that it depriveth human nature of the means to exalt itself, above human frailty.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism leaves a man to sense, to philosophy, to natural piety, to laws, to reputation; all which may be guides to an outward moral virtue, though religion were not; but superstition dismounts all these, and erecteth an absolute monarchy, in the minds of men.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 17, &amp;quot;Of Superstition&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth had fallen victim to the greatest cosmic prank of all time, the flu that had swept across the world in the spring and summer of 1918, as if the bloody abattoir in the trenches hadn&#039;t been evidence enough of humanity’s divine disfavor. That&#039;s what Elizabeth had called it in the last letter he&#039;d ever had from her: God&#039;s judgment on a world gone mad. Garner had given up on God by then: he&#039;d packed away the Bible Elizabeth had pressed upon him after a week in the field hospital, knowing that its paltry lies could bring him no comfort in the face of such horror, and it hadn&#039;t. Not then, and not later, when he’d come home to face Elizabeth&#039;s mute and barren grave.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Dale Bailey|Dale Bailey]] &amp;amp; [[w:Nathan Ballingrud|Nathan Ballingrud]], &#039;&#039;The Crevasse&#039;&#039; in [[w:Paula Guran|Paula Guran]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;[[w:Cthulhu Mythos anthology|New Cthulhu: The Recent Weird]],&#039;&#039; p. 105 (originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Lovecraft Unbound|Lovecraft Unbound]],&#039;&#039; 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Une societé d&#039;athées inventerait aussitôt une religion.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: A society of atheists would immediately invent a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Honoré de Balzac]], &#039;&#039;Le catéchisme social&#039;&#039; (c. 1840–1842). Paris: La Renaissance du Livre, 1933, p. 137.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Experience is, in fever and anguish, the putting into question (to the test) of that which a man knows of being. Should he in this fever have any apprehension whatsoever, he cannot say: “I have seen God, the absolute, or the depths of the universe”; he can only say “that which I have seen eludes understanding”—and God, the absolute, the depths of the universe are nothing if they are not categories of the understanding.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georges Bataille]], &#039;&#039;Inner Experience&#039;&#039; (1954), L. Boldt, trans. (1988), p. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A religion may be discerned in capitalism—that is to say, capitalism serves essentially to allay the same anxieties, torments, and disturbances to which the so-called religions offered answers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walter Benjamin]], &amp;quot;Capitalism as Religion&amp;quot; (1921), translated by Rodney Livingstone in &#039;&#039;Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 1&#039;&#039; (Harvard: 1996)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Empty-brained triflers who have never tried to think, who take their creed as they take their fashions, speak of atheism as the outcome of foul life and vicious desires.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]]. In [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=ey9hPV9brxoC&amp;amp;pg=PA89 Annie Besant: An Autobiography], p. 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Бога отрицают или потому, что мир так плох, или потому, что мир так хорош.&#039;&#039; [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikolai Berdyaev]], &#039;&#039;[http://vehi.net/soloviev/znachenie.html Self-knowledge (Самопознание)]&#039;&#039;, 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Today&#039;s secularists too often have very little accurate knowledge about religion, and even less desire to learn. This is problematic insofar as their sense of self is constructed in opposition to religion. Above all, the secularist is not a Jew, is not a Christian, not a Muslim, and so on. But is it intellectually responsible to define one&#039;s identity against something that one does not understand?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Berlinerblau]], &#039;&#039;The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously&#039;&#039; (2005), p. 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Knowledge of [[Karma]] gives the conviction that if ... &#039;&#039;Virtue in distress, and vice in triumph  Make atheists of mankind,&#039;&#039;(Dryden) it is only because mankind has ever shut its eyes to the great truth that man is himself his own saviour and his own destroyer. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],  &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1, p. 707  (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The light of Christianity has only served to show how much more hypocrisy and vice its teachings have begotten in the world since its advent, and how immensely superior were the ancients over us in every point of honor.. .The clergy, by teaching the helplessness of man, his utter dependence on Providence, and the doctrine of atonement, have crushed in their faithful followers every atom of self-reliance and self-respect. So true is this, that it is becoming an axiom that the most honorable men are to be found among [[atheists]] and the so-called “infidels”...  Their system breeds atheism, nihilism, despair, and crime...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],  [[Isis Unveiled|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]  Vol. 2, p. 1104, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There were no Atheists in those days of old; no disbelievers or materialists, in the modern sense of the word, as there were no bigoted detractors. He who judges the ancient philosophies by their external phraseology, and quotes from ancient writings sentences seemingly atheistical, is unfit to be trusted as a critic, for he is unable to penetrate into the inner sense of their metaphysics.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],  [[Isis Unveiled|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]  Vol. 2, p. 1278, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* There is no [[w:proselytism|proselyter]] half so energetic as the hard-shelled atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heywood Broun]], &amp;quot;A New Preface to an Old Story&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Broun&#039;s Nutmeg&#039;&#039;, August 19, 1939.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nobody talks so constantly about God as those who insist that there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heywood Broun]], &#039;&#039;Collected Edition of Heywood Broun&#039;&#039;, compiled by [[w:Heywood Hale Broun|Heywood Hale Broun]]. New York: Harcourt, Brace &amp;amp; Co., 1941, p. 26.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have heard an atheist defined as a man who had no invisible means of support.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir]], speaking to the [[w:Law Society of Upper Canada|Law Society of Upper Canada]], (21 February 1936); published in &#039;&#039;Canadian Occasions&#039;&#039; (1940), p. 201.&lt;br /&gt;
** Buchan&#039;s source remains unknown. The witticism was repeated by [[Harry Emerson Fosdick]] in his &#039;&#039;On Being a Real Person&#039;&#039; (1943), ch. 1, with acknowledgement to Buchan, and was again used by Archbishop [[Fulton J. Sheen]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:Look (American magazine)|Look]]&#039;&#039; magazine (December 14, 1955). Credit for this line is therefore often wrongly given to Fosdick or to Sheen. Credit has also been given to the conductor [[w:Walter Damrosch|Walter Damrosch]] (1862-1950).&lt;br /&gt;
** This is a play on words commonly used in vagrancy statutes to define a vagrant or bum as having &amp;quot;no visible means of support&amp;quot; financially.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je suis toujours athée, gràce á Dieu.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: I&#039;m still an atheist, thank God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Luis Buñuel]], in Michèle Manceaux, &amp;quot;Luis Buñuel: athée gràce á Dieu&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;L&#039;Express&#039;&#039;, May 12, 1960, p. 41. See [http://aphelis.net/luis-bunuels-aphorism-god-im-atheist/ &amp;quot;On Luis Buñuel&#039;s Aphorism &#039;Thank God I&#039;m an Atheist&#039;&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Aphelis&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Seventeen years later, Buñuel expressed a different attitude in another interview: &amp;quot;I&#039;m not a Christian, but I&#039;m not an atheist either,&amp;quot; he says. &amp;quot;I&#039;m weary of hearing that accidental old aphorism of mine &amp;quot;I&#039;m not an atheist, thank God.&amp;quot; It&#039;s outworn. Dead leaves. In 1951, I made a small film called &#039;Mexican Bus Ride,&#039; about a village too poor to support a church and a priest. The place was serene, because no one suffered from guilt. It&#039;s guilt we must escape, not God.&amp;quot; (Penelope Gilliat, &amp;quot;Long Live the Living!&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;, December 5, 1977, p. 54) As &#039;&#039;Aphelis&#039;&#039; notes, &amp;quot;There&#039;s most likely a small confusion when Buñuel quotes his own aphorism: instead of &#039;I&#039;m not an atheist, thank God&#039; — which doesn&#039;t correspond [to] what he said in 1960 — one should read &#039;I&#039;m an atheist, thank God.&#039; That&#039;s the aphorism Buñuel didn&#039;t agree with anymore in 1977.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Although the aphorism is associated with Buñuel, it did not originate with him. [[Samuel Butler (novelist)|Samuel Butler]] (1835–1902) mentions in his &#039;&#039;Note-Books&#039;&#039; having heard of a man exclaiming &amp;quot;I am an atheist, thank God!&amp;quot; Even earlier, there is a rather similar aphorism by [[Georg Christoph Lichtenberg]] (1742–1799).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We know, and it is our pride to know, that man is by his constitution a religious animal; that atheism is against, not only our reason but our instincts; and that it cannot prevail long. But if, in the moment of riot, and in a drunken delirium from the hot spirit drawn out of the [[w:alembic|alembic]] of hell, which in France is now so furiously boiling, we should uncover our nakedness by throwing off that Christian religion which has hitherto been our boast and comfort, and one great source of civilization amongst us, and among many other nations, we are apprehensive (being well aware that the mind will not endure a void) that some uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition, might take place of it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edmund Burke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Reflections on the Revolution in France|Reflections on the Revolution in France]]&#039;&#039; (1790), [http://www.bartleby.com/24/3/7.html Paras. 150–174], Para. 152.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Boldness formerly was not the character of Atheists as such. ... But of late they are grown active, designing, turbulent, and seditious.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edmund Burke]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on French Affairs&amp;quot; (December, 1791), in &#039;&#039;Three Memorials on French Affairs&#039;&#039; (1797), p. 53&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think people attack me because they are fearful that I will then say that you&#039;re not equally as patriotic if you&#039;re not a religious person... I&#039;ve never said that. I&#039;ve never acted like that. I think that&#039;s just the way it is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George W. Bush]], quoted in [http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20050111-101004-3771r &amp;quot;President outlines role of his faith&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Washington Times&#039;&#039;, 12 January 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have heard of a man exclaiming &amp;quot;I am an atheist, thank God!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (novelist)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Note-Books of Samuel Butler&#039;&#039;: Selections arranged and edited by [[w:Henry Festing Jones|Henry Festing Jones]] (1912). New York: E. P. Dutton &amp;amp; Co., 1917, p. 315.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Theist and Atheist: The fight between them is as to whether God shall be called God or shall have some other name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (novelist)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Note-Books of Samuel Butler&#039;&#039;, p. 337.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==C==&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion has actually convinced people that there&#039;s an invisible man living in the sky who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever &#039;til the end of time!. . . But He loves you!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Carlin]], &amp;quot;[http://www.rense.com/general69/obj.htm George Carlin On Religion]&amp;quot; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Mon chien est athée: il ne crois plus en moi.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: My dog is an atheist: he no longer believes in me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:François Cavanna|François Cavanna]], &#039;&#039;L&#039;almanach-agenda de Cavanna 1985&#039;&#039; (1985). Paris: Belfond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion assures us that our afflictions shall have an end; she comforts us, she dries our tears, she promises us another life. On the contrary, in the abominable worship of atheism, human woes are the incense, death is the priest, a coffin the altar, and annihilation the Deity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[François-René de Chateaubriand]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Génie du christianisme|The Genius of Christianity]]&#039;&#039; (1802), Part I, Book VI, Chapter V. Translated by Charles I. White, D.D. Baltimore: John Murphy, 1871, p. 202.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism can benefit no class of people; neither the unfortunate, whom it bereaves of hope, nor the prosperous, whose joys it renders insipid, nor the soldier, of whom it makes a coward, nor the woman whose beauty and sensibility it mars, nor the mother, who has a son to lose, nor the rulers of men, who have no surer pledge of the fidelity of their subjects than religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[François-René de Chateaubriand]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Génie du christianisme|The Genius of Christianity]]&#039;&#039; (1802), Part IV, Book VI, Chapter XII. Translated by Charles I. White, D.D. Baltimore: John Murphy, 1871, p. 665.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is, I suppose, the supreme example of a simple [[faith]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;Where All Roads Lead&#039;&#039; (1922).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there were not God, there would be no atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;Where All Roads Lead&#039;&#039; (1922).&lt;br /&gt;
** Frequently misquoted, with &amp;quot;not&amp;quot;, which grammatically implies monotheism, being replaced by the vaguer &amp;quot;no&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheists aren&#039;t angry because we&#039;re selfish, or bitter, or joyless. Atheists are angry because we have [[compassion]]. Atheists are angry because we have a sense of [[justice]]. Atheists are angry because we see millions of people being terribly harmed by [[religion]], and our hearts go out to them, and we feel motivated to do something about it. Atheists aren&#039;t angry because there&#039;s something wrong with us. Atheists are angry because there&#039;s something right with us.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Greta Christina}}, speaking at {{w|Reason Rally}}, National Mall, Washington, DC, {{#formatdate:2012-03-24}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The habit of arguing in support of atheism, whether it be done from conviction or in pretense, is a wicked and impious practice.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;De Natura Deorum&#039;&#039; [On the Nature of the Gods] (45 BCE), vol. II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;amp;emsp; bold with joy,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Forth from his dark and lonely hiding-place&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(Portentous sight!) the owlet Atheism,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sailing on obscene wings athwart the noon,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Drops her blue-fringed lids, and holds them close,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And hooting at the glorious sun in Heaven,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Cries out, &amp;quot;Where is it?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]], [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Fears_in_Solitude &amp;quot;Fears in Solitude&amp;quot;] (April 1798), ll. 80–86.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most atheists, if they worship anything, worship something which really exists but is not worthy of worship. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Collier (philosopher)|Andrew Collier]], in &#039;&#039;Transcendence: Critical Realism and God&#039;&#039; (2013), p. 84&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order for capitalism to have a clear path, it needs to profane all that is sacred; there must be no limits to what is saleable. The totalitarian commercialism which is now the established Church throughout the West has come close to achieving this. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Collier (philosopher)|Andrew Collier]], in &#039;&#039;Transcendence: Critical Realism and God&#039;&#039; (2013), p. 85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I was an atheist, finding no reason to postulate the existence of any truths outside of mathematics, physics and chemistry. But then I went to medical school, and encountered life and death issues at the bedsides of my patients. Challenged by one of those patients, who asked &amp;quot;What do you believe, doctor?&amp;quot;, I began searching for answers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Collins]], a geneticist who led the U.S. government’s effort to decipher the human genome (DNA). [http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/ cnn.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism can never be an institution; ... it can never be more than a destitution.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Robert Collyer|Robert Collyer]], sermon reported in [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50F1EFB3D5910738DDDAF0894DB405B8284F0D3 &amp;quot;Yesterday in the Pulpit&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, March 6, 1882.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is hard to see how a great man can be an atheist. Without the sustaining influence of [[faith]] in a [[divine|divine power]] we could have little faith in ourselves. We need to feel that behind us is [[intelligence]] and [[love]]. [[Doubt|Doubters]] do not achieve; [[Skepticism|skeptics]] do not contribute; [[Cynicism|cynics]] do not create. Faith is the great motive power, and no man realizes his full possibilities unless he has the deep conviction that life is eternally important, and that his work, well done, is part of an unending plan.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Calvin Coolidge]], [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=24184#axzz20J65JJtC &amp;quot;Telephone Remarks to a Group of Boy Scouts: &#039;What it Means to Be a Boy Scout&#039;&amp;quot;], July 25, 1924.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Very often atheists themselves admit that they have no evidence of God&#039;s absence, but they try to put a different spin on it. They&#039;ll tell you, “No one can prove a universal negative” (like “There is no God”). They think this somehow excuses them from needing evidence against God&#039;s existence. But not only is it false that you can&#039;t prove a universal negative (all you have to do is show something is self-contradictory), but more importantly, this claim is really an admission that it&#039;s impossible to prove atheism! Atheism involves a universal negative, you can&#039;t prove a universal negative, therefore, atheism is unprovable. It turns out that it is the atheist who is believing a view for which there is and can be no evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Lane Craig]], &#039;&#039;On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision&#039;&#039; (2010), p. 149&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Even the Atheists … readily acknowledge it for an indubitable truth, that there must be something … which was never made or produced — and which therefore is the cause of those other things that are made, something … whose existence must needs be necessary.... Wherefore all the question now is, what is this … self-existent thing, which is the cause of all other things that are made. Now there are two grand opinions opposite to one another concerning it; for, first, some contend, that the only self-existent, unmade and incorruptible thing is senseless matter.... But because this is really the lowest and most imperfect of all beings, others on the contrary judge it reasonable, that the first principle and original of all things should be that, which is the most perfect … not senseless matter, but a perfect conscious understanding nature, or mind. And these are they, who are strictly and properly called Theists, who affirm, that a [[God|perfectly conscious understanding being, or mind, existing of itself from eternity]], was the cause of all other things; and they, on the contrary, who derive all things from senseless matter, as the first original, and deny that there is any conscious understanding being self-existent and unmade, are those that are properly called Atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Cudworth]], &#039;&#039;The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Vol. I&#039;&#039;, London, 1678. New York: Gould &amp;amp; Newman, 1837, pp. 266–267.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If this be not atheism, to acknowledge no other deity besides dead and senseless matter, then the word hath no signification.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Cudworth]], &#039;&#039;The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Vol. I&#039;&#039;, London, 1678. New York: Gould &amp;amp; Newman, 1837, p. 425.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:There are no atheists in foxholes|There are no atheists in foxholes]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Father [[w:William Thomas Cummings|William Thomas Cummings]], &#039;&#039;Field Sermon on Bataan&#039;&#039; (1942), quoted in &#039;&#039;I Saw the Fall of the Philippines&#039;&#039; by [[w:Carlos P. Romulo|Carlos P. Romulo]]; also attributed to Lieut. Col. [[w:Warren J. Clear|Warren J. Clear]], &amp;quot;Bataan Defenders&#039; Suffering Related,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;[[w:The Los Angeles Times|The Los Angeles Times]]&#039;&#039;, 13 April 1942, Pg. 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==D==&lt;br /&gt;
* Although atheism might have been logically tenable before [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]], Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book| id={{ISBN|0393315703}}| title=The Blind Watchmaker| author=Richard Dawkins| authorlink=Richard Dawkins| year=1986}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is often said, mainly by the &#039;no-contests&#039;, that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal&#039;s wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can&#039;t prove that there aren&#039;t any, so shouldn&#039;t we be agnostic with respect to fairies?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], speech at the Edinburgh International Science Festival, {{#formatdate:1992-04-15}}, quoted in {{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = A scientist&#039;s case against God&lt;br /&gt;
    | newspaper = [[w:The Independent|The Independent (London)]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | date = April 20, 1992&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 17&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]] (2006) &#039;&#039;The Root of All Evil&#039;&#039; television programme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Diderot]] paid a visit to the Russian Court at the invitation of the Empress. He conversed very freely, and gave the younger members of the Court circle a great deal of lively atheism. The Empress was much amused, but some of her councillors suggested that it might be desirable to check these expressions of doctrine. The Empress did not like to put a direct muzzle on her guest&#039;s tongue, so the following plot was contrived. Diderot was informed that a learned mathematician was in possession of an algebraic demonstration of the existence of God, and would give it him before all the Court, if he desired to hear it. Diderot gladly consented.... [T]he mathematician … was [[Euler]]. He advanced towards Diderot, and said gravely, and in a tone of perfect conviction: &#039;&#039;Monsieur, (a+b&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)/n=x, donc Dieu existe; répondez!&#039;&#039; Diderot, to whom algebra was Hebrew, was embarrassed and disconcerted; while peals of laughter arose on all sides. He asked permission to return to France at once, which was granted.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustus De Morgan]] (1872). &#039;&#039;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Budget_of_Paradoxes/J A Budget of Paradoxes]&#039;&#039;, Volume II, edited by [[David Eugene Smith]]. 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; edition, 1915, p. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At the end of &#039;&#039;[[w:Being and Nothingness|Being and Nothingness]]&#039;&#039;, ... [[w:Being in itself|Being in-itself]] and Being for-itself were &#039;&#039;of Being&#039;&#039;; and this totality of beings, in which they were effected, itself was linked up to itself, relating and appearing to itself, by means of the essential project of human-reality. What was named in this way, in an allegedly neutral and undetermined way, was nothing other than the [[Metaphysics|metaphysical]] unity of man and God, the relation of man to God, the project of becoming God as the project constituting human-reality. [[Atheism]] changes nothing in this fundamental structure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Derrida]], &amp;quot;The Ends of Man,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Margins of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, tr. w/ notes by Alan Bass. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, 1982. (original French published in Paris, 1972, as &#039;&#039;Marges de la philosophie&#039;&#039;). p. 116.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Laissez-nous donc tout confondre, amour, religion, génie, et le soleil et les parfums, et la musique et la poésie: il n&#039;y a d&#039;athéisme que dans la froideur, l&#039;égoïsme, la bassesse.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Let us then mingle everything, love, religion, genius, with sunshine, perfume, music, and poetry. Atheism exists only in coldness, [[selfishness]], and baseness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Louise Germaine de Staël]], &#039;&#039;Corinne, or Italy&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Corinne, ou l&#039;Italie&#039;&#039;, 1807), Book X, Chapter V. Translated by Sylvia Raphael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 273.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “[[Skepticism]] is my nature. Freethought is my [[methodology]]. [[Agnosticism]] is my conclusion. Atheism is my opinion. [[Humanitarianism]] is my motivation.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:w:Jerry DeWitt|Jerry DeWitt]] of &#039;&#039;[http://recoveringfromreligion.org/pages/home Recovering from Religion]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[https://twitter.com/jerry_dewitt/statuses/193964823569121280 on Twitter]&#039;&#039;, April 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is easier for a Russian to become an Atheist, than for any other nationality in the world. And not only does a Russian &#039;become an Atheist,&#039; but he actually BELIEVES IN Atheism, just as though he had found a new [[faith]], not perceiving that he has pinned his faith in a negation. Such is our anguish of thirst!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], &#039;&#039;The Idiot&#039;&#039; (1869), translated by Eva Martin. Part IV, Chapter 7, [http://www.literaturepage.com/read/theidiot-626.html p. 626]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==E==&lt;br /&gt;
* The overwhelming majority of countries fail to respect [[w:Discrimination against atheists#Human rights|the rights]] of atheists and [[freethinkers]] although they have signed [[w:International human rights law|U.N agreements]] to [[w:Equality before the law|treat all citizens equally]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sonja Eggerickx]] on the The Freethought Report 2013 report issued by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU). As quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-religion-atheists/atheists-face-death-in-13-countries-global-discrimination-study-idUSBRE9B900G20131210 Atheists face death in 13 countries, global discrimination: study]&#039;&#039; (December 10, 2013) by Robert Evans, &#039;&#039;{{w|Reuters}}&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The word [[god]] is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], Gutkind Letter (3 January 1954), {{cite news | title=Childish superstition: Einstein&#039;s letter makes view of religion relatively clear | publisher=The Guardian | date=13 May 2008 | url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Science]] can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with the [[aspiration]] toward [[truth]] and [[understanding]]. This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion. To this there also belongs the faith in the possibility that the regulations valid for the world of existence are [[rational]], that is, [[comprehensible]] to reason. I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound [[faith]]. The situation may be expressed by an image: &#039;&#039;&#039;science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in &amp;quot;Religion and Science&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (9 November 1930).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. … Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man&#039;s [[Ethics|ethical]] behavior should be based effectually on [[sympathy]], [[education]], and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in &amp;quot;Religion and Science&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (9 November 1930).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In view of such [[harmony]] in the [[cosmos]] which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], quoted in &#039;&#039;Towards the Further Shore&#039;&#039; (1968) by Prince Hubertus Zu, p. 156.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], quoted in {{cite book| title=Albert Einstein: The Human Side| author=Dukas, Helen (ed.) and Banesh Hoffman (ed.)| publisher=Princeton University Press| year=1981}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism should always be encouraged (i.e. rationalistic not emotional atheism) for the sake of the Faith. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[T.S. Eliot]], in a letter to [[Richard Aldington]] (24 February, 1927). &#039;&#039;The Letters of T.S. Eliot: 1926-1927&#039;&#039; p. 424.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not the person who denies the gods worshipped by the multitude, but he who affirms of the gods what the multitude believes about them is truly impious. For the utterances of the multitude about the gods are not true preconceptions but false assumptions.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Epicurus]], Letter to Menoeceus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Gods exist but they are not what the hoi polloi [the multitude] suppose them to be. He is not an infidel or atheist who denies the existence of Gods whom the multitude worship, but he is such who fastens on the Gods the opinions of the multitude. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Epicurus]],  quoted by  [[H.P. Blavatsky]],  &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol 3. (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there are none [no gods], what need to toil?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Euripides]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Iphigenia in Aulis|Iphigenia in Aulis]]&#039;&#039; (c. 405 BCE), [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0108%3Acard%3D992 l. 1035]. Translated by Edward P. Coleridge, 1891.&lt;br /&gt;
** Translated by Charles R. Walker, 1958, as &amp;quot;If there are none, all our toil is without meaning.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translated by W. S. Merwin and George E. Dimock, Jr., 1978, as &amp;quot;If there are none, what does anything matter?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F==&lt;br /&gt;
* God was always invented to explain [[mystery]]. God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand. Now when you finally discover how something works, you get some laws which you&#039;re taking away from God; you don&#039;t need him anymore. But you need him for the other mysteries. So therefore you leave him to create the universe because we haven&#039;t figured that out yet; you need him for understanding those things which you don&#039;t believe the laws will explain, such as consciousness, or why you only live to a certain length of time — life and death — stuff like that. God is always associated with those things that you do not understand. Therefore I don&#039;t think that the laws can be considered to be like God because they have been figured out.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Feynman]], quoted in {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Davies&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = P. C. W.&lt;br /&gt;
 | coauthor = J. Brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Superstrings: A Theory of Everything?&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1988&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = {{ISBN|0-521-35741-1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages = pp. 208-209&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God did not, as the Bible says, make man in His image; on the contrary man, as I have shown in &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039;, made God in his image.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], {{cite book | title=Lectures on the essence of religion | publisher=Harper &amp;amp; Row | location=New York | year=1967 | page=187 |others=Transl. [[w:Ralph Manheim|Ralph Manheim]]}} German: {{cite book | title=Vorlesungen über das Wesen der Religion | publisher=Wigand | location=Leipzig | year=1851 | page=241}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By positing God as unknowable, man excuses himself to what is still left of his religious conscience for his oblivion of God, his surrender to the world. He negates God in practice – his mind and his senses have been absorbed by the world – but he does not negate him in theory. He does not attack [God&#039;s] existence; he leaves it intact. But this existence neither affects nor incommodes him, for it is only a negative existence, an existence without existence; it is an existence that contradicts itself – a being that, in view of its effects, is indistinguishable from non-being. The negation of determinate, positive predicates of the Divine Being is nothing else than the negation of religion, but one which still has an appearance of religion, so that it is not recognized as a negation – it is nothing but a subtle, sly atheism. The alleged religious horror of limiting God by determinate predicates is only the irreligious wish to forget all about God, to banish him from the mind. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;Introduction to The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A true atheist, that is, an atheist in the ordinary sense, is therefore he alone to whom the predicates of the Divine Being – for example, love, wisdom, and justice – are nothing, not he to whom only the subject of these predicates is nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;Introduction to The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 119&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==G==&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[w:Atheist Bus Campaign|atheist buses]] touring London are quite revealing. &amp;quot;There&#039;s probably no God,&amp;quot; reads the hoarding. &amp;quot;Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.&amp;quot; There you have it: what is stopping people enjoying life is apparently not war, famine, unemployment, murderous social inequality, or the uncertainty and unfairness that arises from a system of global exploitation, but a misplaced belief in God. Some materialism, that!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Galloway]], [http://www.newstatesman.com/religion/2009/04/god-world-reason-universe &amp;quot;What God means to me&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;New Statesman&#039;&#039;, 9 April 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Saying atheism is a belief system is like saying not going skiing is a hobby. I&#039;ve never been skiing. It&#039;s my biggest hobby. I literally do it all the time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ricky Gervais]], quoted in [http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010/12/22/does-god-exist-ricky-gervais-takes-your-questions/ &amp;quot;Does God Exist? Ricky Gervais Takes Your Questions&amp;quot;] ({{#formatdate:2010-10-22}}), &#039;&#039;Speakeasy&#039;&#039;, Wall Street Journal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism. There is not a single exalting and emancipating influence that does not in turn become inhibitory.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[André Gide]], &#039;&#039;Journals&#039;&#039;, January 13, 1929. Translated by Justin O&#039;Brien.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Whatever an atheist who denies God and the prophet is, one who murders a human is equivalent to that.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Fethullah Gülen|Fethullah Gülen]], [http://www.nuriyeakman.net/node/1499 Interview with Nuriye Akman], &#039;&#039;[[w:Zaman (newspaper)|Zaman]]&#039;&#039;, 23 March 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The question of the origin of the matter in the universe is no longer thought to be beyond the range of science — &#039;&#039;everything&#039;&#039; can be created from nothing…it is fair to say that the universe is the ultimate free lunch.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Alan Guth|Alan Guth]], &#039;&#039;The Inflationary Universe : The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins&#039;&#039; (1998) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; {{ISBN|0201328402}} &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H==&lt;br /&gt;
* Settle it therefore in your minds, as a maxim never to be effaced or forgotten, that atheism is an inhuman, bloody, ferocious system, equally hostile to every useful restraint and to every virtuous affection; that, leaving nothing above us to excite awe, nor round us to awaken tenderness, it wages war with heaven and with earth: its first object is to dethrone God, its next to destroy man.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rev. [[Robert Hall]], sermon to Baptist meeting, Cambridge, quoted in {{cite book | year = 1843 | title  = The Baptist Library: a republication of standard Baptist works | volume = 2 | editors = Charles George Sommers, William R. Williams, Levi L. Hill | page = 108 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=CgxMAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA108 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is striking that the idea of a moral being without ordinary human limitations as the source of the moral demand survived in 20th century moral philosophy even in theories that do not posit the existence of such a being. ... In [[w:Richard Brandt|R. B. Brandt’s]] &#039;&#039;Ethical Theory&#039;&#039;, there is a position for an ideal observer. In [[w:R. M. Hare|R. M. Hare]], there is an archangel, with full command of the facts and of logic. In [[John Rawls]], there is the person behind the [[w:veil of ignorance|veil of ignorance]], who does not know what position she occupies in the situation for which she is prescribing. In all these last three cases, there is the postulation, as the source of the moral demand, of a being who is without ordinary human limitations, and it is plausible to suggest that these are all survivals of a worldview in which it was God who played this role.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John E. Hare]], “Ethics and Religion: Two [[Immanuel Kant|Kantian]] Arguments,” &#039;&#039;Philosophical Investigations&#039;&#039;, vol. 34, no. 2 (April 2011), pp. 158-159&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is not a philosophy; it is not even a view of the world; it is simply an admission of the obvious. In fact, &amp;quot;atheism&amp;quot; is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a &amp;quot;non-astrologer&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;non-alchemist.&amp;quot; We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattle. Atheism is nothing more than the noises reasonable people make in the presence of unjustified religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sam Harris]], &#039;&#039;Letter to a Christian Nation&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 51.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Agnosticism is a perfectly respectable and tenable philosophical position; it is not dogmatic and makes no pronouncements about the ultimate truths of the universe. It remains open to evidence and persuasion; lacking faith, it nevertheless does not deride faith. Atheism, on the other hand, is as unyielding and dogmatic about religious belief as true believers are about heathens. It tries to use reason to demolish a structure that is not built upon reason; because, though rational argument may take us to the edge of belief, we require a &amp;quot;leap of faith&amp;quot; to jump the chasm.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sydney J. Harris]], in &amp;quot;Atheists, Like Fundamentalists, are Dogmatic&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Pieces of Eight&#039;&#039; (1982).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All thinking men are atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ernest Hemingway]], &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=2_XH0Z81_ZEC&amp;amp;pg=PA13&amp;amp;dq=All+thinking+men+are+atheists+A+FAREWELL+TO+ARMS&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=BTQpTaOnG5CSnAfwk43pAQ&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=2&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false A Farewell to Arms]&#039;&#039; (1929). Simon &amp;amp; Schuster, 1997, p. 13.&lt;br /&gt;
** The speaker is an Italian major who is baiting a priest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;m an atheist, and that&#039;s it. I believe there&#039;s nothing we can know except that we should be kind to each other and do what we can for other people.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Katharine Hepburn]], in Myrna Blyth, &amp;quot;Kate Talks Straight&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Ladies&#039; Home Journal&#039;&#039;, {{#formatdate:1991-10-01}}, p. 215.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Along with [[w:Islam|Islam]] and [[w:Christianity|Christianity]], [[w:Judaism|Judaism]] does insist that some turgid and contradictory and sometimes evil and mad texts, obviously written by fairly unexceptional humans, are in fact the word of god. I think that the indispensable condition of any intellectual liberty is the realisation that there is no such thing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief is positively harmful. Reviewing the false claims of religion, I do not wish, as some sentimental materialists affect to wish, that they were true. I do not envy believers their faith. I am relieved to think that the whole story is a sinister fairy tale; life would be miserable if what the faithful affirmed was actually the case.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, though I dislike to differ with such a great man, [[Voltaire]] was simply ludicrous when he said that if god did not exist it would be necessary to invent him. The human invention of god is the problem to begin with.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;[[God is Not Great|God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything]]&#039;&#039; (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The universe, that is, the whole mass of things that are, is corporeal, that is to say, body; and hath the dimensions of magnitude, namely length, breadth and depth:[...] consequently every part of the universe is body, and that which is not body is no part of the universe: and because the universe is all, that which is no part of it is nothing, and consequently, nowhere. Nor does it follow from hence that spirits are nothing: for they have dimensions and are therefore really bodies; though that name in common speech be given to such bodies only as are visible or palpable; that is, that have some degree of opacity: but for spirits, they call them incorporeal, which is a name of more honour, and may therefore with more piety be attributed to God Himself; in whom we consider not what attribute expresseth best His nature, which is incomprehensible, but what best expresseth our desire to honour Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Hobbes]], &#039;&#039;Leviathan&#039;&#039; Part IV, chapter iii (1651)&lt;br /&gt;
** Misquoted in [[Jonathan Miller]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief|Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief]]&#039;&#039; (2004), as &amp;quot;The universe, the whole mass of all things that are, is corporeal, that is to say body, and hath dimensions of magnitude, length, breadth and depth. Every part of the universe is body and that which is not body is not part of the universe. And because the universe is all, that which is no part of it is nothing. Consequently, nowhere.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not whether there is a god or not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eric Hoffer]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The True Believer|The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements]]&#039;&#039; (1951) Section 62.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Tous les enfans ſont des athées; ils n&#039;ont aucune idée de Dieu: ſont-ils donc criminels à cauſe de cette ignorance?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1772&lt;br /&gt;
    | first = Paul-Henri Thiry (baron d&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
    | last = Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | authorlink = Baron d&#039;Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Le Bon-Sens, ou, Idées Naturelles Opposées aux Idées Surnaturelles&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Marc-Michel Rey&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 22&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZiUPAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA22&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: All children are Atheists; they have no idea of God. Are they then criminal on account of their ignorance?&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1826&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense: or Natural Ideas Opposed to Ideas that are Supernatural&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Richard Carlile&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 12&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=VS0-AAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=RA2-PA12&amp;amp;dq=%22All+children+are+Atheists%22&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: All children are born Atheists; they have no idea of God. Are they then criminal on account of their ignorance?&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = c. 1900&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense without God: or Freethoughts Opposed to Supernatural Ideas&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = W. Stewart&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7319&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ce n&#039;eſt qu&#039;en écartant ſes nuages &amp;amp; ſes phantômes que nous découvrirons les ſources du vrai, de la raiſon, de la morale, &amp;amp; les motifs réels qui doivent nous porter à la vertu.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1772&lt;br /&gt;
    | first = Paul-Henri Thiry (baron d&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
    | last = Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | authorlink = Baron d&#039;Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Le Bon-Sens, ou, Idées Naturelles Opposées aux Idées Surnaturelles&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Marc-Michel Rey&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §206&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 315&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZiUPAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA315&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: It is only by dispelling the clouds and phantoms of Religion, that we shall discover the sources of Truth, Reason and Morality, and the real motives that should incline us to Virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1826&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense: or Natural Ideas Opposed to Ideas that are Supernatural&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Richard Carlile&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 169&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=VS0-AAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=RA2-PA169&amp;amp;dq=%22It+is+only+by+dispelling%22&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: It is only by dispelling the clouds and phantoms of Religion, that we shall discover Truth, Reason and Morality.&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = c. 1900&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense without God: or Freethoughts Opposed to Supernatural Ideas&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = W. Stewart&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §206&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7319&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The only religion of Albania is Albanianism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Enver Hoxha]], promoting atheism, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New York Times Book Review&#039;&#039;, Vol. 2 (1977); this is actually derived from a secularly nationalistic slogan &amp;quot;The true religion of Albania is Albanianism&amp;quot;, originally intended to ease the strife of sectarian divisions while being respectful of them, which was created by the Roman Catholic [[w:Pashko Vasa|Pashko Vasa]], in the form: &amp;quot;The religion of Albania is Albanianism&amp;quot; — as quoted in &#039;&#039;Catholicism and Politics in Communist Societies&#039;&#039; (1990) by Sabrina P. Ramet, p. 236.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Atheist&#039;&#039;: Any man who does not believe in himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &#039;&#039;The Note Book of Elbert Hubbard&#039;&#039; (1927). New York: Wm. H. Wise &amp;amp; Co., p. 187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are, as we know, powerful and illustrious atheists. At bottom, led back to the truth by their very force, they are not absolutely sure that they are atheists; it is with them only a question of definition, and in any case, if they do not believe in God, being great minds, they prove God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Victor Hugo]], &#039;&#039;Les Misérables&#039;&#039; Volume II, Book 7 &amp;quot;Parenthesis&amp;quot;, Chapter vi (1862).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* His [God&#039;s] power we allow is infinite: whatever he wills is executed: but neither man nor any other animal is happy: therefore he does not will their happiness.... [[Epicurus]]&#039;s old questions are yet unanswered. Is he willing to prevent evil but not able? then is he impotent. Is he able but not willing? then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Hume]], &#039;&#039;[[s:Dialogues concerning Natural Religion|Dialogues concerning Natural Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Part X (1789).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have never had the least sympathy with the &#039;&#039;[[w:a priori and a posteriori|a priori]]&#039;&#039; reasons against [[w:orthodoxy|orthodoxy]], and I have by nature and disposition the greatest possible antipathy to all the atheistic and infidel school. Nevertheless I know that I am, in spite of myself, exactly what the Christian would call, and, so far as I can see, is justified in calling, atheist and infidel.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Henry Huxley]], letter to [[Charles Kingsley]], May 6, 1863.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I==&lt;br /&gt;
* The watch argument was [[William Paley|Paley&#039;s]] greatest effort. A man finds a watch and it is so wonderful that he concludes that it must have had a maker. He finds the maker and he is so much more wonderful than the watch that he says he must have had a maker. Then he finds God, the maker of the man, and he is so much more wonderful than the man that he could not have had a maker. This is what the lawyers call a departure in pleading.&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Paley there can be no design without a designer&amp;amp;mdash;but there can be a designer without a design. The wonder of the watch suggested the watchmaker, and the wonder of the watchmaker, suggested the creator, and the wonder of the creator demonstrated that he was not created&amp;amp;mdash;but was uncaused and eternal.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Robert G. Ingersoll]], [http://infidels.org/library/historical/robert_ingersoll/why_i_am_agnostic.html &amp;quot;Why I Am Agnostic&amp;quot;] (1896), 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==J==&lt;br /&gt;
* For my own part, I do not know what the sweat and blood of this life mean, if they mean anything short of this. If this life be not a real fight, in which something is eternally gained for the universe by success, it is no better than a game of private theatricals from which we may withdraw at will. But it &#039;&#039;feels&#039;&#039; like a real fight — as if there were something really wild in the universe which we, with all our idealities and faithfullnesses, are needed to redeem: and first of all to redeem our own hearts from atheism and fears. For such a half-wild, half-saved universe our nature is adapted.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William James]], &#039;&#039;The Will to Believe&#039;&#039; (1897), p. 61.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The legitimate powers of government extend to only such acts as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say that there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], &#039;&#039;[[Notes on the State of Virginia]]&#039;&#039; (1784), Query XVII.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t have to be brave or a saint, a martyr, or even very smart to be an atheist. All you have to be able to say is &amp;quot;I don&#039;t know&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
    | date = 2011-08-16&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = God, No! : Signs you may already be an atheist and other magical tales&lt;br /&gt;
    | first = Penn&lt;br /&gt;
    | last = Jillette&lt;br /&gt;
    | authorlink = Penn Jillette&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Simon &amp;amp; Schuster&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = New York&lt;br /&gt;
    | isbn = 978-1451610369&lt;br /&gt;
    | lccn = 2010043439&lt;br /&gt;
    | ol = 25074653M&lt;br /&gt;
    | id = {{LCC|PN6231.R4 J55 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = xiii&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is the only real hope against terrorism.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Penn Jillette]] [http://americanhumanist.org/HNN/details/2012-12-morality-religion-and-bullsht-an-interview-with-penn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here falling Houses thunder on your Head,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And here a female Atheist talks you dead.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], [http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Texts/london2.html &amp;quot;London: A Poem in Imitation of the Third Satire of Juvenal&amp;quot;] (1738), ll. 17–18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It has long been observed, that an atheist has no just reason for endeavouring conversions; and yet none harass those minds which they can influence, with more importunity of solicitation to adopt their opinions. In proportion as they doubt the truth of their own doctrines, they are desirous to gain the attestation of another understanding: and industriously labour to win a proselyte, and eagerly catch at the slightest pretence to dignify their sect with a distinguished name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], [http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Texts/browne.html &amp;quot;The Life of Sir Thomas Browne, Kt., M.D.&amp;quot;] (1756), written as a preface for an edition of [[Thomas Browne|Browne]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;Christian Morals&#039;&#039; (1716).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==K==&lt;br /&gt;
* Godlessness is a kind of shameless wickedness which bids defiance to the punishments that the idea of God inspires in us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Immanuel Kant]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Ethics&#039;&#039; as transcribed by Georg Ludwig Collins ([[w:Cambridge University Press|Cambridge University Press]]: 1997), p. 111.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The Koran! well, come put me to the test—&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Lovely old book in hideous error drest—&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp;Believe me, I can quote the Koran too,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The unbeliever knows his Koran best.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;And do you think that unto such as you,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp;God gave the secret, and denied it me?—&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well, well, what matters it! believe that too.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Omar Khayyám]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam|Rubaiyat]]&#039;&#039;, [[s:Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám (Le Gallienne)|translation]] by [[w:Richard Le Gallienne|Richard Le Gallienne]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you have a sloppy religion you get a sloppy atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ronald Knox]], quoted in [[Penelope Fitzgerald]], &#039;&#039;The Knox Brothers&#039;&#039; (1977), Ch. IV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is one indisputable fact about the human condition it is that no community can survive if it is persuaded — or even if it suspects — that its members are leading meaningless lives in a meaningless universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Irving Kristol]], [http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/the-future-of-american-jewry &amp;quot;The Future of American Jewry&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Commentary (magazine)|Commentary]]&#039;&#039; (August 1991).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious leaders must face the reality that here in Nigeria and elsewhere around the world, millions of people are leaving [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]]. While we are busy building walls of division with the blocks of prejudice, our members are becoming atheists but we prefer to pretend that we do not see this. We cannot pretend not to hear the footsteps of our faithful who are marching away into [[atheism]] and [[secularism]]. No threats can stop this, but dialogue can open our hearts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** ~ [[:w:Matthew Hassan Kukah|Matthew Hassan Kukah]], [http://Https://www.premiumtimesng.com/features-and-interviews/524346-full-text-bishop-mathew-kukahs-2022-easter-message-a-must-read.html T0 mend a broken nation: the Easter metaphor, premiumtimesng.com] (@ Diocese of Sokoto, April 17th, 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==L==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Un dévot est celui qui, sous un roi athée, serait athée.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: A man who parades his piety is one who, under an atheist king, would be an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean de La Bruyère]], &#039;&#039;Les Caractères ou les Mœurs de ce siècle&#039;&#039; (1688), Ch. XIII &amp;quot;De la mode&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* I had no need of that hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Simon Laplace]], in response to [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]]&#039;s objection that Laplace had omitted [[w:God|God]] from &#039;&#039;Celestial Mechanics&#039;&#039; (Boyer 1968, p. 538)&lt;br /&gt;
** There is no contemporary source for this version of Laplace&#039;s interaction with Napoleon. It is not mentioned in the only eye-witness account of the event (see [http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2007/06/18/the-hypothetical-atheist/ Daniel Johnson, 2007]), and [[w:Hervé Faye|Hervé Faye]] was told by [[François Arago]] that Laplace had sought his help in a failed attempt to get the story removed from an unauthorized biography (Faye, &#039;&#039;Sur l&#039;origine du monde&#039;&#039;, Paris, 1884, pp. 109–111). Scholars believe the hypothesis Laplace was referring to was [[Isaac Newton|Newton]]&#039;s notion that God had to intervene periodically to prevent [[w:secular phenomena|secular]] perturbations from destroying the solar system. By demonstrating mathematically that the solar system was stable, Laplace eliminated any need for that hypothesis. (See, besides Faye and Johnson, [[w:Florian Cajori|Cajori]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;History of Mathematics&#039;&#039;, 1991 edn, p. 262, and [http://www.hawking.org.uk/does-god-play-dice.html Hawking, 1999]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hesiod]], the oldest author to have written on [[w:theogony|theogony]], asserted that the gods and men are created by unknown natural forces. We can therefore consider paganism as a superstitious form of atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Simon Laplace]], &amp;quot;On Causality&amp;quot; (manuscript), in Roger Hahn, &#039;&#039;Pierre-Simon Laplace,1749–1827: A Determined Scientist&#039;&#039;. Harvard University Press, 2005, p. 232.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Atheist ist nur der, der sich auch aus dem Atheismus keinen Gott macht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: The only atheist is someone who does not make a God even out of atheism itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gabriel Lauber|Gabriel Lauber]], &#039;&#039;Denken verdirbt den Charakter: Alle Aphorismen&#039;&#039; (1984). Munich: Carl Hauser Verlag, p. 37.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Für diejenigen, die schon in den Atheismus hineingeboren wurden, ist es ein Glaube wie jeder andere. Ein wirklicher Atheist ist nur ein ehemaliger Gläubiger.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: For those who are born into atheism, it&#039;s a faith like any other. The only real atheist is an ex-believer.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gabriel Lauber|Gabriel Lauber]], &#039;&#039;Denken verdirbt den Charakter&#039;&#039; (1984), p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As long as the prerequisite for that shining [[paradise]] is [[ignorance]], [[bigotry]] and [[hate]], I say to hell with it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Henry Drummond character in [[w:Inherit the Wind (1960 film)|Inherit the Wind (1960 film)]], written by Jerome Lawrence (play), Robert E. Lee (play), Nedrick Young, and Harold Jacob Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Were it possible to induce the masses to adopt atheism, this belief would exhibit all the intolerant ardor of a religious sentiment, and in its exterior forms would soon become a cult.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gustave Le Bon|Gustave Le Bon]], &#039;&#039;The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind&#039;&#039; (1895), [http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=BonCrow.sgm&amp;amp;images=images/modeng&amp;amp;data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&amp;amp;tag=public&amp;amp;part=4&amp;amp;division=div2 Book I, Chapter IV], p. 67.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Even atheists rebel and express, like [[Thomas Hardy|Hardy]] and [[A. E. Housman|Housman]], their rage against God although (or because) He does not, on their view, exist...&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: &amp;quot;Atheists express their rage against God although in their view He does not exist.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. S. Lewis]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Problem of Pain|The Problem of Pain]]&#039;&#039; (1940), [http://www.gutenberg.ca/ebooks/lewiscs-problemofpain/lewiscs-problemofpain-00-h.html#tocchapter06 Chapter VI].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;... und ich dank&amp;lt;!--[sic]--&amp;gt; es dem lieben Gott tausendmal, daß&amp;lt;!--[sic]--&amp;gt; er mich zum Atheisten hat werden lassen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: And I thank the Lord a thousand times that he let me become an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Christoph Lichtenberg]] as quoted in &#039;&#039;Lichtenberg: A Doctrine of Scattered Occasions. Reconstructed from his Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; by [[w:J. P. Stern|J. P. Stern]]. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1959, p. 249. Original source: Entsprechend SB (= Sudelbücher) 3. 403.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Lastly,&#039;&#039; Those are not at all to be tolerated who &#039;&#039;deny the Being of a God&#039;&#039;. Promises, Covenants, and Oaths, which are the Bonds of Humane Society, can have no hold upon an Atheist. The taking away of God, though but even in thought, dissolves all. Besides also, those that by their Atheism undermine and destroy all Religion, can have no pretence of Religion whereupon to challenge the Privilege of a Toleration.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Locke]], &#039;&#039;[http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/locke-a-letter-concerning-toleration-and-other-writings A Letter Concerning Toleration]&#039;&#039; ({{#formatdate:1689-10-03}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All I say is that I think it is damned unlikely that anything like a central cosmic will, a spirit world, or an eternal survival of personality exist. They are the most preposterous and unjustified of all the guesses which can be made about the universe, and I am not enough of a hair-splitter to pretend that I don&#039;t regard them as arrant and negligible moonshine. In theory I am an [[agnosticism|agnostic]], but pending the appearance of radical evidence I must be classed, practically and provisionally, as an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. P. Lovecraft]] letter to Robert E. Howard (August 16, 1932), in &#039;&#039;Selected Letters 1932-1934&#039;&#039; (Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House, 1976), p. 57.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M==&lt;br /&gt;
* Having insured the moderation of a fanatical rabble, by giving out among them the savage &#039;&#039;war-whoop&#039;&#039; of atheism, he ([[Edmund Burke]]) already fancies himself in full march to Paris.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Mackintosh]], &#039;&#039;Vindiciæ Gallicæ: Defence of the French Revolution and its English Admirers against the Accusations of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke&#039;&#039; (London, 1791), [http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&amp;amp;staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1665&amp;amp;chapter=62364&amp;amp;layout=html&amp;amp;Itemid=27 &amp;quot;Introduction&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Until someone claims to see [[Christopher Hitchens]]&#039; face in a tree stump, idiots must stop claiming that atheism is a religion. There&#039;s one little difference: Religion is defined as the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, and atheism is — precisely not that. Got it? Atheism is a religion like abstinence is a sex position.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time With Bill Maher&#039;&#039; (HBO) ({{#formatdate:2012-02-03}}), quoted in {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 2012-02-03&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Maher’s New Rule: Atheism And Religion Are ‘Not Two Sides Of The Same Coin’&lt;br /&gt;
  | periodical = Mediaite&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-mahers-new-rule-atheism-and-religion-are-not-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/&lt;br /&gt;
  | accessdate = 2012-09-07&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
* But when it comes to religion, we&#039;re not two sides of the same coin, and you don&#039;t get to put your unreason up on the same shelf with my reason. &#039;&#039;Your&#039;&#039; stuff has to go over &#039;&#039;there&#039;&#039;, on the shelf with Zeus and Thor and the Kraken, with the stuff that is not evidence-based, stuff that religious people never change their mind about, no matter what happens.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time With Bill Maher&#039;&#039; (HBO) ({{#formatdate:2012-02-03}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Największą wiarę mają ateiści: wierzą, że Boga nie ma.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: The atheists have the greatest faith: they believe that God does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrzej Majewski]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms: Magnum in Parvo&#039;&#039; (2000). Warsaw: KiW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The greatest single cause of atheism in the world today is Christians who acknowledge Jesus with their lips and walk out the door and deny Him by their lifestyle. That is what an unbelieving world simply finds unbelievable.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Brennan Manning]], as quoted in [https://relevantmagazine.com/god/practical-faith/ragamuffin-legacy &amp;quot;The Ragamuffin Legacy&amp;quot;] (16 April 2013), by Ben Simpson, &#039;&#039;Relevant Magazine&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People like [[Richard Dawkins|Dawkins]] are the public face of atheism. And that public face is one that is defensively and irrationally sexist. It&#039;s not only turning women away from atheism, it&#039;s discrediting the idea that atheists are actually people who argue from a position of rationality. How can they be, when they cling to the ancient, irrational tradition of treating women like they aren&#039;t quite as human as men?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Amanda Marcotte|Amanda Marcotte]] quoted by journalist Kimberly Winston, &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (November 18, 2014) [http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/richard-dawkins-stands-by-remarks-on-sexism-pedophilia-down-syndrome/2014/11/18/a2915cd8-6f64-11e4-a2c2-478179fd0489_story.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Absolute atheism starts in an act of faith in reverse gear and is a full-blown religious commitment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Maritain]], &#039;&#039;The Range of Reason&#039;&#039; (1952), [http://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/etext/range08.htm Chapter 8]. New York: Charles Scribner&#039;s Sons, p. 106.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some people say God died during the Partition in 1947. He may have died in 1971 during the war. Or he may have died yesterday here in Pondicherry in an orphanage. That&#039;s what some people say, Pi. When I was your age, I lived in bed, racked with polio. I asked myself every day, &#039;Where is God? Where is God? Where is God?&#039; God never came. It wasn&#039;t God who saved me—it was medicine. Reason is my prophet and it tells me that as a watch stops, so we die. It&#039;s the end. If the watch doesn&#039;t work properly, it must be fixed here and now by us. One day we will take hold of the [[means of production]] and there will be justice on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book | author = [[Yann Martel]] | title = {{w|Life of Pi}} | year = 2001 | isbn = 9780151008117 | section = Chapter 22 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=wgHPjx2UPGEC&amp;amp;pg=PA34&amp;amp;q=%22Some+people+say%22#v=snippet&amp;amp;q=%22Some+people+say+God+died%22 | page = 34}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I can well imagine an atheist&#039;s last words: &amp;quot;White, white! L-L-Love! My God!&amp;quot; — and the deathbed leap of faith. Whereas the agnostic, if he stays true to his reasonable self, if he stays beholden to dry, yeastless factuality, might try to explain the warm light bathing him by saying, &amp;quot;Possibly a f-f-failing oxygenation of the b-b-brain,&amp;quot; and, to the very end, lack imagination and miss the better story.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book | author = [[Yann Martel]] | title = [[w:Life of Pi|Life of Pi]] | year = 2001 | isbn = 9780151008117 | section = Chapter 22 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=wgHPjx2UPGEC&amp;amp;pg=PA80&amp;amp;q=%22I+can+well+imagine%22 | pages = 80-81}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An atheist doesn&#039;t have to be someone who thinks he has a proof that there can&#039;t be a god.  He only has to be someone who believes that the evidence on the God question is at a similar level to the evidence on the werewolf question.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John McCarthy (computer scientist)|John McCarthy]], &amp;quot;[http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books/msg/f8ce8532210e7f2a Agnostics and Atheists]&amp;quot; ({{#formatdate:1992-07-23}}), &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;rec.arts.books&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Internet has given atheists, agnostics, skeptics, the people who like to destroy everything that you and I believe, the almost equal access to your kids as your youth pastor and you have... whether you like it or not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Josh McDowell]] {{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Apologist Josh McDowell: Internet the Greatest Threat to Christians&lt;br /&gt;
|journal=Christian Post&lt;br /&gt;
|date=2011-07-16&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Anugrah&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Kumar&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://www.christianpost.com/news/apologist-josh-mcdowell-internet-the-greatest-threat-to-christians-52382/&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate=2011-10-21}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Theology recognizes the contingency of human existence only to derive it from a necessary being, that is, to remove it. Theology makes use of philosophical wonder only for the purpose of motivating an affirmation which ends it. Philosophy, on the other hand, arouses us to what is problematic in our own existence and in that of the world, to such a point that we shall never be cured of searching for a solution.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]], &#039;&#039;In Praise of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1963), p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The philosopher ... is well able to understand religion as one of the expressions of the central phenomenon of consciousness. But the example of [[Socrates]] reminds us that it is not the same thing, but almost the opposite, to understand religion and to accept it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]], &#039;&#039;In Praise of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1963), p. 45&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;No hay arte ateo. Aunque no ames el Creador, lo afirmarás creando a su semejanza.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: There is no atheist art. Even if you do not love the Creator, you will affirm him, creating in his likeness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gabriela Mistral|Gabriela Mistral]], &amp;quot;Decálogo del artista&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;Decalogue of the Artist&amp;quot;), &#039;&#039;Desolación&#039;&#039; (1922).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the unlikely event of losing Pascal&#039;s Wager, I intend to saunter in to Judgement Day with a bookshelf full of grievances, a flaming sword of my own devising, and a serious attitude problem.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rick Moen, &amp;quot;[http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.sf.written.robert-jordan/msg/934608fa971abdc7 TAN: Mormons]&amp;quot; {{#formatdate:1997-10-11}}, &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;rec.arts.sf.written.robert-jordan&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I remember how, at Cambridge, I walked with her ([[George Eliot]]) once in the Fellows&#039; Garden of Trinity, on an evening of rainy May, and she, stirred somewhat beyond her wont, and taking as her text the three words which have been used so often as the inspiring trumpet-calls of men — the words &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Immortality&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Duty&#039;&#039; — pronounced with terrible earnestness how inconceivable was the &#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;, how unbelievable the &#039;&#039;second&#039;&#039;, and yet how peremptory and absolute the &#039;&#039;third&#039;&#039;. Never, perhaps, have sterner accents affirmed the sovereignty of impersonal and unrecompensing Law. I listened, and night fell; her grave, majestic countenance turned towards me like a [[w:sibyl|sibyl]]&#039;s in the gloom; it was as though she withdrew from my grasp, one by one, the two scrolls of promise, and left me the third scroll only, awful with inevitable fate. And when we stood at length and parted amid that columnar circuit of the forest trees, beneath the last twilight of starless skies, I seemed to be gazing, like [[w:Titus|Titus]] at Jerusalem, on vacant seats and empty halls — on a [[w:Holy of Holies|Sanctuary]] with no Presence to hallow it, and heaven left lonely of a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frederic William Henry Myers]], [http://www.bartelby.com/309/1001.html &amp;quot;George Eliot&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Century Magazine&#039;&#039;, November 1881.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==N==&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is so senseless &amp;amp; odious to mankind that it never had many professors. Can it be by accident that all birds beasts &amp;amp; men have their right side &amp;amp; left side alike shaped (except in their bowells) &amp;amp; just two eyes &amp;amp; no more on either side the face &amp;amp; just two ears on either side the head &amp;amp; a nose with two holes &amp;amp; no more between the eyes &amp;amp; one mouth under the nose &amp;amp; either two fore leggs or two wings or two arms on the sholders &amp;amp; two leggs on the hipps one on either side &amp;amp; no more? Whence arises this uniformity in all their outward shapes but from the counsel &amp;amp; contrivance of an Author? Whence is it that the eyes of all sorts of living creatures are transparent to the very bottom &amp;amp; the only transparent members in the body, having on the outside an hard transparent skin, &amp;amp; within transparent juyces with a crystalline Lens in the middle &amp;amp; a pupil before the Lens all of them so truly shaped &amp;amp; fitted for vision, that no Artist can mend them? Did blind chance know that there was light &amp;amp; what was its refraction &amp;amp; fit the eys of all creatures after the most curious manner to make use of it? These &amp;amp; such like considerations always have &amp;amp; ever will prevail with man kind to believe that there is a being who made all things &amp;amp; has all things in his power &amp;amp; who is therfore to be feared.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Isaac Newton]] in [http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/texts/viewtext.php?id=THEM00007&amp;amp;mode=normalized &amp;quot;A short Schem of the true Religion&amp;quot;] (post-1710).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), as translated by Walter Kaufmann, § 357&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==O==&lt;br /&gt;
* Your petitioners are Atheists and they define their beliefs as follows. An Atheist loves his fellow man instead of god. An Atheist believes that heaven is something for which we should work now—here on earth for all men together to enjoy. An Atheist believes that he can get no help through prayer but that he must find in himself the inner conviction, and strength to meet life, to grapple with it, to subdue it, and enjoy it. An Atheist believes that only in a knowledge of himself and a knowledge of his fellow man can he find the understanding that will help to a life of fulfillment. He seeks to know himself and his fellow man rather than to know a god. An Atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An Atheist believes that deed must be done instead of a prayer said. An Atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death. He wants disease conquered, poverty vanished, war eliminated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Madalyn Murray O&#039;Hair]], Petition for Relief (1959), &#039;&#039;Murray v. Curlett&#039;&#039;, quoted in &amp;quot;Why I am an Atheist&amp;quot; (1966).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He was an embittered atheist (the sort of atheist who does not so much disbelieve in God as personally dislike him).&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Down and Out in Paris and London|Down and Out in Paris and London]]&#039;&#039; (1933), [http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/o/orwell/george/o79d/chapter30.html Chapter XXX]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==P==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Athéisme, force de l&#039;esprit, mais jusq&#039;à un certain degré seulement.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Atheism shows strength of mind, but only to a certain degree.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1669), [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h.htm#p_225 225]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Objection des athées: &amp;quot;Mais nous n&#039;avons nulle lumière.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Objection of atheists: &amp;quot;But we have no light.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1699; transaltion 1869), [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h.htm#p_228 228]&lt;br /&gt;
** In another &#039;&#039;pensée&#039;&#039; Pascal writes: &amp;quot;There is enough light for those who only desire to believe, and enough obscurity for those of a contrary disposition.&amp;quot; ([http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h.htm#p_430 430]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No one is so much alone in the universe as a denier of God. With an orphaned heart, which has lost the greatest of fathers, he stands mourning by the immeasurable corpse of nature, no longer moved and sustained by the Spirit of the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Paul]], &#039;&#039;Blumen- Frucht- und Dornenstücke, oder Ehestand, Tod und Hochzeit des Armenadvokaten Siebenkäs&#039;&#039; (1796), translated as E. H. Noel (tr.), &#039;&#039;Flower, fruit and thorn pieces: or, The married life, death, and wedding of the advocate of the poor Firmian Stanislaus Siebenkäs&#039;&#039; (1845), [http://books.google.com/books?id=2w4EAAAAQAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA276&amp;amp;dq=%22No+one+is+so+much+alone+in+the+universe+as+a+denier+of+God%22 p. 276].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On second thought, maybe the atheist cannot find God, for the same reason a thief cannot find a policeman.&lt;br /&gt;
**{{cite book | author = [[Laurence J. Peter]] | title = Peter&#039;s Quotations: Ideas for Our Times | year = 1977 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=W6bPGIL-_-8C&amp;amp;pg=PA44&amp;amp;dq=%22On+second+thought,+maybe+the+atheist%22 | page = 44}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Sometimes misattributed to [[Francis Thompson]], whose quote &amp;quot;An atheist is a man who believes himself an accident&amp;quot; Peter was commenting on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He who tries to flee from God takes refuge in himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Philo]], &#039;&#039;Legum allegoriarum&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Allegorical Interpretation&#039;&#039;), Book III, 29 (1st century).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By definition, that is, by its very stance, atheism denies or ignores the creatureliness and thus also the provisionality [&#039;&#039;Entwurfscharakter&#039;&#039;] of the world and man — with the consequence that atheists must explain man&#039;s moral failure as, at most, inappropriate behavior, or perhaps as an error of judgment, or, even more tepidly, as an inability to adapt to society.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Josef Pieper]], &#039;&#039;The Concept of Sin&#039;&#039; (1977), translated by Edward T. Oakes, S.J. South Bend, Indiana: St Augustine&#039;s Press, 2001, p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine [[reward]] then, brother, that person is a piece of shit. And I’d like to get as many of them out in the open as possible. You gotta get together and tell yourself [[stories]] that violate every [[law]] of the [[universe]] just to get through the goddamn day? What’s that say about your [[reality]]?&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Rust&amp;quot; Cohle, as interpreted by [[w:Matthew McConaughey|Matthew McConaughey]] in &#039;&#039;[[True Detective (TV series)|True Detective]]&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;The Locked Room&amp;quot;, written by [[w:Nic Pizzolatto|Nic Pizzolatto]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If [[religion]] has no intrinsic content and value, and is only a fraud, then its interest to [[scholarship]] should be marginal. Yet [[w:Research institute|research institutes]] [[w:Publishing house|publishing houses]], [[w:Academic journal|journals]] and thousands of [[w:PhD|PhD]]s and other [[scholars]] are engagd in nothing other than a systematic lifetime [[study]] of religion and its refutation. But if millions of roubles and man-hours of [[Soviet]] scholars are spent on the study of religion, then the subject is worthy of scholarly pursuit, and must be in itself a scholarly discipline, not simply a fraud or opiate. In other words, its study required an objective, open-ended approach. Yet Soviet scholars are oblidged to approach the suject with a predetermined conclusion: whatever they discover about religion and the believers, their conclusion must be negative, it must lead to only one single definition of religion, namely that it is a [[fraud]] and a [[delusion]]. In these circumstances all Soviet atheistic scholarship becomes nothing but support for the main thesis. This obligatory thesis, the condemnation of religion as fraud and believers as vicctims of fraud perpetuated by a [[clergy]] who are either clever swindlers or fools, has to be made in such a way as to appear as fresh and new as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dimitry V. Pospielovsky, [https://www.google.com/books/edition/History_Of_Soviet_Atheism_In_Theory_And/awiwCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&amp;amp;gbpv=1&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover &amp;quot;A History of Soviet Atheism in Theory, and Practice, and the Believer&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Vol 3: A History of Marxist-Leninist Atheism and Soviet Anti-Religious Policies&#039;&#039;, St Martin&#039;s Press, New York (1987), pp. xvi-xvii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A textbook, &#039;&#039;Foundation of Scientific Atheism&#039;&#039;, defined atheism as: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;a system of [[materialistic]] [[scientifically]] based views, rejecting any faith in go (or gods), in supernatural powers and any religion whatsoever...Atheism...is one of the essential and most important aspects of materialistic philosophy.&#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Religion]] in the same book is described as &#039;a form of social consciousness... a perverse, fantastic reflection of reality in the consciousness of men&#039;. This, of course, is straight out of [[Engels]]. All religious [[philosophy]] is described as a [[class]] philosophy. Hence [[Plato]], for instance, is said to &#039;represent the interest of the [[slave]]-owning [[aristocracy]]&#039;. But then it has to be shown that atheism, has always been a major school of thought wherefore moralists, such as [[Lao-Tse]], and pantheists, such as [[Spinoza]] are presented, or rather misrepresented, as atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dimitry V. Pospielovsky, [https://www.google.com/books/edition/History_Of_Soviet_Atheism_In_Theory_And/awiwCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&amp;amp;gbpv=1&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover &amp;quot;A History of Soviet Atheism in Theory, and Practice, and the Believer&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Vol 3: A History of Marxist-Leninist Atheism and Soviet Anti-Religious Policies&#039;&#039;, St Martin&#039;s Press, New York (1987), pp. xvii-xviii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheists put on a false courage and alacrity in the midst of their darkness and apprehensions, like children who, when they fear to go in the dark, will sing for fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on Various Subjects&amp;quot; (1727), &#039;&#039;Miscellanies in Verse and Prose&#039;&#039;, Vol. II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The believer in God has to account for one thing, the existence of unjust suffering; the atheist, however, has to account for the existence of everything else.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Dennis Prager|Dennis Prager]] paraphrasing [[w:Milton Steinberg|Milton Steinberg]] in a [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzIHuyqqBaI debate] (2008) with [[Christopher Hitchens]] and [[Dinesh D&#039;Souza]]. A slightly different version (&#039;must&#039; twice instead of &#039;has to&#039; and &#039;evil&#039; instead of &#039;unjust suffering&#039;) is found in Dennis Prager and [[w:Joseph Telushkin|Joseph Telushkin]], &#039;&#039;The Nine Questions People ask about Judaism&#039;&#039; (1981), Question 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God can stand being told by [[A. J. Ayer|Professor Ayer]] and [[w:Marghanita Laski|Marghanita Laski]] that He does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. B. Priestley]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Listener (magazine)|The Listener]]&#039;&#039; (1 July 1965).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Il n&#039;est pas de sauveurs suprêmes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ni Dieu, ni César, ni tribun.&lt;br /&gt;
** There are no supreme saviors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Neither God, nor [[Caesar]], nor [[tribune]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eugène Edine Pottier]], &#039;&#039;[[The Internationale]]&#039;&#039; (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==R==&lt;br /&gt;
* I am an intransigent atheist, though not a militant one. This means that I am not fighting &#039;&#039;against&#039;&#039; religion — I am fighting &#039;&#039;for&#039;&#039; reason.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ayn Rand]] (1963), in Michael S. Berliner, ed., &#039;&#039;Letters of Ayn Rand&#039;&#039; (New York: Dutton, 1995), p. 606.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no &#039;law&#039; in heaven or earth that man must needs obey! Take what you can, and all you can; and take it while you – may.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Let not the Jew-born Christ ideal unnerve you from the fight. You have no &#039;rights&#039; except the rights you win by – might.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There is no justice, right, nor wrong; no truth, no good, no evil. There is no &#039;man&#039;s immortal soul,&#039; no fiery, fearsome devil.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There is no &#039;heaven of glory:&#039; No! – no &#039;hell where sinners roast.&#039; There is no &#039;God the Father,&#039; No! – no Son, no &#039;Holy Ghost.&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The world is no Nirvāna where joy forever flows. It is a grewsome butcher shop where dead &#039;lambs&#039; hang in rows.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Man is the most ferocious of all the beasts of prey. He rageth round the mountains, to love, and feast, and – slay.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;He sails the stormy oceans, he gallops o&#039;er the plains, and sucks the very marrow-bones of captives held in – chains.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Death endeth all for every man, – for every &#039;son of thunder;&#039; Then be a lion (not a &#039;lamb&#039;) and – don&#039;t be trampled under.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ragnar Redbeard|Ragnar Redbeard]] (probably [[Arthur Desmond]]), &#039;&#039;[[w:Might is Right|Might is Right]]: The Survival of the Fittest&#039;&#039; (1890).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most intellectual people do not [[believe]] in [[God]], but they [[fear]] him just the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], in James Lee Christian &#039;&#039;Philosophy : An Introduction to the Art of Wondering&#039;&#039;,  (2005), p. 556.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.&lt;br /&gt;
** Stephen F. Roberts. See his [http://freelink.wildlink.com/quote_history.php &amp;quot;Brief History of the Quote&amp;quot;] or Alex Colias, [http://www.sfatheists.com/Essays/Documents/No%20Theist%20is%20Atheist%20Towards%20Anything.pdf &amp;quot;No Theist is Atheist Towards Anything&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
** Misattributed to [[w:Stephen Henry Roberts|Stephen Henry Roberts]] (1901–71) by [[Sam Harris]] in his article [http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/10-myths-and-10-truths-about-atheism1/ &amp;quot;10 Myths — and 10 Truths — about Atheism&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Los Angeles Times&#039;&#039;, December 24, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is aristocratic; the idea of a Great Being that watches over oppressed innocence and punishes triumphant crime is altogether popular. The people, the unfortunate, will always applaud me; I shall find detractors only among the rich and the guilty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Maximilien Robespierre]], [http://www.thegreatbooks.com/sources/ifgoddidnot.html &amp;quot;Address to the Jacobin Club&amp;quot;] (November 21, 1793), in &#039;&#039;Œuvres Complètes&#039;&#039; (Paris: Ernest Leroux, 1910–1967), vol. 10, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Slavoj Žižek]] writes that for Robespierre atheism was &amp;quot;the ideology of the cynical-hedonistic aristocrats who had lost all sense of historical mission&amp;quot; (&#039;&#039;In Defense of Lost Causes&#039;&#039;. London: Verso, 2008, p. 499).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In this actual world a churchless community, a community where men have abandoned and scoff at or ignore their religious needs, is a community on the rapid down grade. It is true that occasional individuals or families may have nothing to do with church or with religious practices and observances and yet maintain the highest standard of refined ethical obligation. But this does not affect the case in the world as it now is, any more than the fact that exceptional men and women under exceptional conditions have disregarded the marriage tie without moral harm to themselves interferes with the larger fact that such disregard if at all common means the complete moral disintegration of the body politic&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Theodore Roosevelt]], &#039;&#039;The Foes of Our Own Household&#039;&#039; (1917).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;m not an atheist because I just can&#039;t be that certain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mike Rosen]] in &#039;&#039;The Mike Rosen Show&#039;&#039; on [[w:talk radio|news/talk radio]] station [[w:KOA (AM)|850 KOA]] (December 19, 2007, 10:56 am).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==S==&lt;br /&gt;
*Stripped of the opportunities for satire which organised religion cannot help but supply, the case for atheism has very little substance.&lt;br /&gt;
** Bill Saunders, [https://archive.is/20130629110854/www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-5165945.html &amp;quot;Sunlight on dungheaps&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Independent on Sunday|Independent on Sunday]]&#039;&#039;, 10 June 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Atheism is an old idea, probably as old as humanity, and it has always justified its case by its superior understanding of nature. Unfortunately, as scientific knowledge has become more sophisticated over the past three centuries, all the scientific ideas which support atheism have evaporated into murky puddles of water, when they have not actually dried up entirely. It is now clear that the Universe has not always been here, it has a beginning. Everything is not made of indestructible atoms. Life is not caused by sunlight on dungheaps, and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
** Bill Saunders, &amp;quot;Sunlight on dungheaps&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Independent On Sunday&#039;&#039;, 10 June 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have concluded, through careful empirical analysis and much thought, that somebody is looking out for me, keeping track of what I think about things, forgiving me when I do less than I ought, giving me strength to shoot for more than I think I&#039;m capable of. I believe they know everything that I do and think and they still love me, and I have concluded after careful consideration, that this person keeping score is &#039;&#039;me&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Adam Savage}}, speaking at {{w|Reason Rally}}, National Mall, Washington, DC, {{#formatdate:2012-03-24}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t have to believe in atheism, because atheism is based on REASON.&lt;br /&gt;
** Manfred F. Schieder, in [http://rebirthofreason.com/Spirit/Quotes/Author_537.shtml &amp;quot;Rebirth of Reason&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nee, ich trinke keinen Tee, ich bin Atheist.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Nah, I don&#039;t drink tea, I&#039;m an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Helge Schneider|Helge Schneider]], &#039;&#039;Jazzclub — Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm&#039;&#039; (2004), a film he wrote, directed, acted in and composed the music for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality of happiness, and by no means a necessity of life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Androcles and the Lion (play)|Androcles and the Lion]]&#039;&#039; (1913), [[s:Androcles and the Lion (Shaw)/Preface to Androcles and the Lion/The Importance of Hell  in the Salvation Scheme|Preface: The Importance of Hell in the Salvation Scheme]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The &#039;&#039;reality&#039;&#039; of God is dead.&amp;quot; Here we come to an important point. These are real atheists who say that. This kind of atheism is not born of the intellect. It is born of the &#039;&#039;will&#039;&#039;. They &#039;&#039;will&#039;&#039; that God does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fulton J. Sheen]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPa-EtQS0ls &amp;quot;The Death of God&amp;quot;] (1966). The quote begins at around 12 min 10 sec.&lt;br /&gt;
** In support of his assertion, Sheen goes on to quote [[Martin Heidegger]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], [[André Gide]], [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], the fictional atheist Kirillov from [[Fyodor Dostoevsky]]&#039;s novel &#039;&#039;[[Demons (novel)|The Devils]]&#039;&#039;, and an unnamed American writer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ariane Sherine|Ariane Sherine]], in her [[w:Atheist Bus Campaign|Atheist Bus Campaign]] (2008).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheists in foxholes, some say they are myths,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Creations of the mind who just don&#039;t exist.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yet, they answered the call to defend, with great pride.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;With reason their watchword, they bled and they died.&lt;br /&gt;
** Alice Shiver, &amp;quot;Atheists-in-Foxholes&amp;quot; monument, dedicated on 4 July 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nationwide, the nonreligious population is both the fastest growing, and the most despised. I ask you all, why is that? Why are we hated, when we endorse no violence, incite no racism or hatred, and demand nothing more than equal treatment? I&#039;ll tell you why: It&#039;s easy to hate what you don&#039;t know, and the theists don&#039;t know us. Well, actually, they &#039;&#039;do&#039;&#039; know us, but they don&#039;t &#039;&#039;know&#039;&#039; they know us, because most atheists in this country are closeted. Bigotry is born of ignorance, but ignorance can be cured. If the atheists weren&#039;t closeted, it would be harder to hate us, because in the end, you can&#039;t hate what you already love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Silverman]], speaking at {{w|Reason Rally}}, National Mall, Washington, DC, {{#formatdate:2012-03-24}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What Jupiter? Do not trifle. There is no Jupiter.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Socrates]] (character) in [[Aristophanes]]&#039; &#039;&#039;[[w:The Clouds|The Clouds]]&#039;&#039; (5th c. BCE, tr. Hickie 1853, vol. 1, [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Aristoph.+Cl.+356 Perseus]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the first place, it is clear that by self-existence we especially mean, an existence independent of any other — not produced by any other: the assertion of self-existence is simply an indirect denial of creation.... Self-existence, therefore, necessarily means existence without a beginning; and to form a conception of self-existence is to form a conception of existence without a beginning. Now by no mental effort can we do this.... To this let us add, that even were self-existence conceivable, it would not in any sense be an explanation of the Universe.... Thus the Atheistic theory is not only absolutely unthinkable, but, even if it were thinkable, would not be a solution. The assertion that the Universe is self-existent does not really carry us a step beyond the cognition of its present existence; and so leaves us with a mere restatement of the mystery.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862). London: Williams and Norgate, pp. 32–33.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As was proved at the outset of the argument, self-existence is rigorously inconceivable; and this holds true whatever be the nature of the object of which it is predicated.... Thus these three different suppositions [atheism, pantheism, theism] respecting the origin of things, verbally intelligible though they are, and severally seeming to their respective adherents quite rational, turn out, when critically examined to be literally unthinkable. It is not a question of probability, or credibility, but of conceivability. Experiment proves that the elements of these hypotheses cannot even be put together in consciousness; and we can entertain them only as we entertain such pseud-ideas as a square fluid and a moral substance — only by abstaining from the endeavour to render them into actual thoughts. Or, reverting to our original mode of statement, we may say that they severally involve symbolic conceptions of the illegitimate and illusive kind. Differing so widely as they seem to do, the atheistic, the pantheistic, and the theistic hypotheses contain the same ultimate element. It is impossible to avoid making the assumption of self-existence somewhere; and whether that assumption be made nakedly, or under complicated disguises, it is equally vicious, equally unthinkable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862), pp. 36–37.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Passing over the consideration of credibility, and confining ourselves to that of conceivability, we see that Atheism, Pantheism, and Theism, when rigorously analyzed, severally prove to be absolutely unthinkable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862), pp. 44–45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Leaving out the accompanying moral code, which is in all cases a supplementary growth, a religious creed is definable as a theory of original causation.... [E]ven that which is commonly regarded as the negation of all Religion — even positive Atheism, comes within the definition; for it, too, in asserting the self-existence of Space, Matter, and Motion, which it regards as adequate causes of every appearance, propounds an &#039;&#039;[[w:a priori and a posteriori|à priori]]&#039;&#039; theory from which it holds the facts to be deducible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862), p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You know, they are fooling us, there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]], to a fellow student while studying to become a priest in the Russian Orthodox Church; quoted in &#039;&#039;Landmarks in the Life of Stalin&#039;&#039; (1942) by [[w:Yemelyan Yaroslavsky|Yemelyan Yaroslavsky]], p. 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We had many interesting conversations and he introduced me to his young wife. He confided to me that he had married her because she was a fanatical atheist. Atheism was the main topic of their conversations. Such fervid atheism is usually a screen for repressed religion. The truly convinced atheist does not emphasize his atheism. He does not talk about it and is careful to avoid blasphemies.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The man was interested in dreams and each morning he related several of his dreams. They were full of religious symbols. I was cautious not to reveal to him the meaning of his dreams; such off-hand analyses are always dangerous.... The banker did not want to be disturbed in his supposed atheism.... His atheism was a [[w:reaction formation|reaction formation]] established upon an ineradicable religious belief.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Stekel]], &amp;quot;Autobiography&amp;quot; [serialized], &#039;&#039;[[w:American Journal of Psychotherapy|American Journal of Psychotherapy]]&#039;&#039;, Vol. II (1948); &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Wilhelm Stekel: The Life Story of a Pioneer Psychoanalyst&#039;&#039; (1950), translated and edited by [[w:Emil Gutheil|E. A. Gutheil]], New York: Liveright. See full extract in [http://benatlas.com/2010/06/wilhelm-stekel-on-atheism-and-telepathy/ &amp;quot;Wilhelm Stekel on Atheism and Telepathy&amp;quot;]. The man. Stekel&#039;s fellow-passenger on a transatlantic liner, was a prominent New York banker on his way to Europe to attend an international banking conference.&lt;br /&gt;
** Often quoted as &amp;quot;Fervid atheism is usually a screen for repressed religion.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing enlarges more the gulf of atheism, than that wide passage, which lies between the faith and lives of men pretending to be Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Edward Stillingfleet|Edward Stillingfleet]], &#039;&#039;Origines Sacræ&#039;&#039; (1663). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1797, p. x.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Including, I suppose, death. ... It&#039;s an interesting view of atheism, as a sort of crutch for those who can&#039;t bear the reality of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Stoppard]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Jumpers|Jumpers]]&#039;&#039; (1972).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As an atheist, I believe that all life is unspeakably precious, because it’s only here for a brief moment, a flare against the dark, and then it’s gone forever. No afterlives, no second chances, no backsies. So there can be nothing crueler than the abuse, destruction or wanton taking of a life. It is a crime no less than burning the Mona Lisa, for there is always just one of each. So I cannot forgive.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. Michael Straczynski]], [http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/countries/us/guide/048.html &#039;&#039;Lurker&#039;s Guide to Babylon 5&#039;&#039; : &amp;quot;Passing Through Gethsemane : jms speaks&amp;quot; (13 July (2004)].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==T==&lt;br /&gt;
* The thing framed says that nothing framed it; the tongue never made itself to speak, and yet talks against him that did; saying that which is made, &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039;, and that which made it, &#039;&#039;is not&#039;&#039;. But this folly is infinite as hell, as much without light or bound as the &#039;&#039;chaos&#039;&#039; or the &#039;&#039;primitive nothing&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jeremy Taylor]] (1613-1667), &#039;&#039;Discourses on Various Subjects&#039;&#039;, Sermon XX, p. [http://books.google.com/books?id=teVLAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA376&amp;amp;dq=%22The+thing+framed+says%22 376].&lt;br /&gt;
** Misquoted in &#039;&#039;Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers&#039;&#039;, p. 18, as &amp;quot;The thing formed says that nothing formed it; and that which is made &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039;, while that which made it &#039;&#039;is not!&#039;&#039; The folly is infinite.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “Is there a God?” I said. “I mean, are you in touch, telepathically, with any kind of God?”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“No. I’m not in touch with anything like that. As far as I know, there is no God.”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“Oh,” I said.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“It doesn’t bother you,” the voice said. “You may think it does; but it doesn’t. You’re really on your own. You’ve been learning that.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walter Tevis]], &#039;&#039;Mockingbird&#039;&#039; (1980), {{ISBN|978-1-4072-3376-5}}, p. 251&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An Atheist is a man who believes himself an accident.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Thompson]], &amp;quot;Paganism: Old and New&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;A Renegade Poet and Other Essays&#039;&#039; (1910), p. 47.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When men live as if there were no God, it becomes expedient for them that there should be none; and then they endeavour to persuade themselves so, and will be glad to find arguments to fortify themselves in this persuasion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Tillotson]], &amp;quot;The Folly of Scoffing at Religion&amp;quot; (1671), in &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039;, Volume I, Edinburgh, 1748, p. 58.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In former days the free-thinker was a man who had been brought up in ideas of religion, law, and morality, and only through conflict and struggle came to free-thought; but now there has sprung up a new type of born free-thinkers who grow up without even having heard of principles of morality or of religion, of the existence of authorities, who grow up directly in ideas of negation in everything, that is to say, savages.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]], Golenishtchev in &#039;&#039;[[Anna Karenina]]&#039;&#039; (1877), C. Garnett, trans. (New York: 2003), Part 5, Chapter 9, p. 434&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What men deny is not God, but some preposterous idol of the imagination.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:George Tyrrell|George Tyrrell]], &#039;&#039;Autobiography&#039;&#039; (1912), p. 71.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U==&lt;br /&gt;
* The parasites which live in the intestines of higher animals, feeding upon the nutritive juices which these animals supply, do not need either to see or hear, and therefore for them the visible and audible world does not exist. And if they possessed a certain degree of consciousness and took account of the fact that the animal at whose expense they live believed in a world of sight and hearing, they would perhaps deem such belief to be due merely to the extravagance of its imagination. And similarly there are social parasites, as Mr. A. J. Balfour admirably observes, who, receiving from the society in which they live the motives of their moral conduct, deny that belief in God and the other life is a necessary foundation for good conduct and for a tolerable life, society having prepared for them the spiritual nutriment by which they live. An isolated individual can endure life and live it well and even heroically without in any sort believing either in the immortality of the soul or in God, but he lives the life of a spiritual parasite.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Unamuno]], &#039;&#039;Tragic Sense of Life&#039;&#039; (1913)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Among the repulsions of atheism for me has been its drastic uninterestingness as an intellectual position. Where was the ingenuity, the ambiguity, the humanity (in the Harvard sense) of saying that the universe just happened to happen and that when we&#039;re dead we&#039;re dead?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Updike]], &#039;&#039;Self-Consciousness: Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1989), ch. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==V==&lt;br /&gt;
* For entirely savage races,... one cannot count them among either the atheists or the theists. Asking them their belief would be like asking them if they are for [[Aristotle]] or [[Democritus]]: they know nothing; they are not atheists any more than they are [[w:Peripatetics|Peripatetics]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), [http://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volathe1.html &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section I]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is the vice of a few intelligent persons, and superstition is the vice of fools.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The atheists are for the most part impudent and misguided scholars who reason badly, and who, not being able to understand the creation, the origin of evil and other difficulties, have recourse to the hypotheses of the eternity of things and of inevitability.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), [http://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volathe2.html.htnl &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I would not wish to have to deal with an atheist prince, who would find it in his interest to have me ground to powder in a mortar: I should be quite certain of being ground to powder. If I were a sovereign, I would not wish to have to deal with atheist courtiers, whose interest it would be to poison me: I should have to be taking antidotes every day. It is therefore absolutely necessary for princes and for peoples, that the idea of a Supreme Being, creator, ruler, rewarder, revenger, shall be deeply engraved in people&#039;s minds.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[w:Kaffir (racial term)|Caffres]], the [[w:Khoikhoi|Hottentots]], the [[w:Tupí people|Topinambous]], and many other small nations, have no God: they neither deny nor affirm; they have never heard speak of Him; tell them that there is a God: they will believe it easily; tell them that everything happens through the nature of things: they will believe you equally. To claim that they are atheists is to make the same imputation as if one said they are anti-Cartesian; they are neither for nor against [[Descartes]]. They are real children; a child is neither atheist nor deist, he is nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What conclusion shall we draw from all this? That atheism is a very pernicious monster in those who govern; that it is also pernicious in the persons around statesmen ...; that, if it is not so deadly as fanaticism, it is nearly always fatal to virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there are atheists, whom must one blame if not the mercenary tyrants of souls, who, making us revolt against their knaveries, force a few weak minds to deny the God whom these monsters dishonour?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Men fattened on our substance cry to us: &amp;quot;Be persuaded that a she-ass has spoken ([[w:Balaam&#039;s ass|Balaam&#039;s ass]]); believe that a fish has swallowed a man and has given him up at the end of three days safe and sound on the shore ([[w:Jonah|Jonah]]); have no doubt that the God of the universe ordered one Jewish prophet to eat excrement ([[w:Ezekiel|Ezekiel]]), and another prophet to buy two whores and to make with them sons of whoredom ([[w:Hosea|Hosea]]).&amp;quot; These are the very words that the God of truth and purity has been made to utter.... These inconceivable absurdities revolt weak and rash minds, as well as wise and resolute minds. They say: &amp;quot;Our masters paint God to us as the most insensate and the most barbarous of all beings; therefore there is no God;&amp;quot; but they should say: &amp;quot;Our masters attribute to God their absurdities and their furies; therefore God is the contrary of what they proclaim, therefore God is as wise and good as they make him out mad and wicked.&amp;quot; It is thus that wise men account for things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is an absurd one. What is most repellent in [Holbach&#039;s] &#039;&#039;[[w:The System of Nature|The System of Nature]]&#039;&#039; — after the recipe for making eels from flour — is the audacity with which it decides that there is no God, without even having tried to prove the impossibility. There is some eloquence in the book: but much more rant, and no sort of proof.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], letter to Frederick William, Prince of Prussia (28 November 1770), in S. G. Tallentyre (ed.), &#039;&#039;Voltaire in His Letters&#039;&#039;. New York: G. P. Putnam&#039;s Sons, 1919, p. 232. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The study of anthropology … confirmed my atheism, which was the faith of my fathers anyway. Religions were exhibited and studied as the [[w:Rube Goldberg|Rube Goldberg]] inventions I&#039;d always thought they were.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], [http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/3605/the-art-of-fiction-no-64-kurt-vonnegut &amp;quot;Interviews: Kurt Vonnegut, The Art of Fiction No. 64&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Paris Review|The Paris Review]]&#039;&#039; (Spring 1977) No. 69.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The sermon was based on what he claimed was a well-known fact, that there were no Atheists in foxholes. I asked Jack what he thought of the sermon afterwards, and he said, &amp;quot;There&#039;s a Chaplain who never visited the front.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Hocus Pocus (novel)|Hocus Pocus]]&#039;&#039; (1990); 1997 reprint, [http://books.google.com/books?id=iK7tOOKaAeQC&amp;amp;pg=PA180 page 180].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==W==&lt;br /&gt;
* If we don&#039;t play God, who will?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James D. Watson]] (1996), in &#039;&#039;The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities&#039;&#039;, [http://www.jstor.org/view/00987921/di980536/98p00105/0] New&amp;amp;nbsp;York; Simon and Schuster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One of the most exquisite pleasures of human love — to serve the loved one without his knowing it — is only possible, as regards the love of God, through atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to obey God, one must receive his commands. How did it happen that I received them in adolescence, while I was professing atheism? To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No human being escapes the necessity of conceiving some good outside himself towards which his thought turns in a movement of desire, supplication, and hope. Consequently, the only choice is between worshipping the true God or an idol. Every atheist is an idolater — unless he is worshipping the true God in his impersonal aspect. The majority of the pious are idolaters.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Gravity and Grace&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;La Pesanteur et la grâce&#039;&#039;, 1947). Routledge Classics, 2002, p. 114.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion in so far as it is a source of consolation is a hindrance to true faith: in this sense atheism is a purification. I have to be atheistic with the part of me which is not made for God. Among those in whom the supernatural part of themselves has not been awakened, the atheists are right and the believers wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Gravity and Grace&#039;&#039; (1947), Routledge Classics, 2002, p. 115; also in George A. Panichas (ed.), &#039;&#039;The Simone Weil Reader&#039;&#039; (1977). New York: David McKay, p. 417.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As in the West, the word God, taken in its usual meaning, signifies a Person, men whose attention, faith and love are almost exclusively concentrated on the impersonal aspect of God can actually believe themselves and declare themselves to be atheists, even though supernatural love inhabits their souls.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Letter to a Priest|Letter to a Priest]]&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Lettre a un religieux&#039;&#039;, 1951), translated by A. F. Wills, Section 12. London: Routledge &amp;amp; Kegan Paul, 1953, pp. 35–36&lt;br /&gt;
** Often misquoted as &amp;quot;An atheist may be simply one whose faith and love are concentrated on the impersonal aspects of God.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Premature as the question may be, it is hardly possible not to wonder whether we will find any answer to our deepest questions, any signs of the workings of an interested God, in a final theory. I think that we will not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Steven Weinberg]], &#039;&#039;Dreams of a Final Theory&#039;&#039; (1993), pp. 257-258. See also [http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/weinberg.htm positiveatheism.org&#039;s Weinberg quotations].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The aim of this conference is to have a constructive dialogue between science and religion. I am all in favor of a dialogue between science and religion, but not a constructive dialogue. One of the great achievements of science has been, if not to make it impossible for intelligent people to be religious, then at least to make it possible for them not to be religious. We should not retreat from this accomplishment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Steven Weinberg]], &#039;&#039;Facing Up: Science and Its Cultural Adversaries&#039;&#039; (2001), p.&amp;amp;nbsp;242.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As a born-again atheist, I now knew exactly what satisfactions were on offer. For the first time in my 38 years I was at one with my own generation.... If I bumped into [[Richard Dawkins]] (an old colleague from Oxford days) or had dinner in Washington with [[Christopher Hitchens]] ..., I did not have to feel out on a limb. Hitchens was excited to meet a new convert to his non-creed and put me through a catechism before uncorking some stupendous claret. &amp;quot;So - absolutely no God?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Nope,&amp;quot; I was able to say with [[w:Moonie|Moonie]]-zeal. &amp;quot;No future life, nothing &#039;out there&#039;?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;No,&amp;quot; I obediently replied. At last! I could join in the creed shared by so many (most?) of my intelligent contemporaries in the Western world - that men and women are purely material beings (whatever that is supposed to mean), that &amp;quot;this is all there is&amp;quot; (ditto), that God, Jesus and religion are a load of baloney: and worse than that, the cause of much (no, come on, let yourself go), most (why stint yourself - go for it, man), all the trouble in the world, from Jerusalem to Belfast, from Washington to Islamabad.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[A. N. Wilson]], [http://www.newstatesman.com/religion/2009/04/conversion-experience-atheism &amp;quot;Why I believe again&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;New Statesman&#039;&#039;, 2 April 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Given your premises, you will have to come up with a different reason for rejecting Christ as you do. But for you to make this move would reveal the two fundamental tenets of &#039;&#039;true&#039;&#039; atheism. One: There is no God. Two: I hate Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Douglas Wilson (theologian)|Douglas Wilson]] to [[Christopher Hitchens]], [http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/mayweb-only/121-52.0.html?start=4 &amp;quot;Is Christianity Good for the World?&amp;quot; (part 5)], &#039;&#039;Christianity Today&#039;&#039; ({{#formatdate:2007-05-25}})&lt;br /&gt;
** Often paraphrased as &amp;quot;There are two tenets of atheism: One, there is no God. Two, I hate him.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is speculatively as unfounded as theism, and practically can only spring from bad motives.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Chauncey Wright|Chauncey Wright]], letter to Francis Allingwood Abbot (October 28, 1867). &#039;&#039;Letters of Chauncey Wright&#039;&#039;, ed. James Bradley Thayer. Cambridge, Mass.: John Wilson, 1878, p. 133&lt;br /&gt;
** Wright had earlier written to Abbot that &amp;quot;about what we really know nothing we ought not to affirm or deny anything&amp;quot; (August 13, 1867). &#039;&#039;Letters of Chauncey Wright&#039;&#039;, p. 109.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Y==&lt;br /&gt;
* By night an atheist half believes in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1743), &amp;quot;Night Two&amp;quot;, p. 292.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Z==&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is not the denial of the existence of God, but having doubts as to whether God is conscious.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Slavoj Žižek]] in Slavoj Žižek and Boris Gunjević, &#039;&#039;God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse&#039;&#039; (2012), translated by Ellen Elias Bursac. New York: Seven Stories Press.&lt;br /&gt;
{{disputed begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Disputed==&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to Seneca, as quoted in &#039;&#039;What Great Men Think About Religion&#039;&#039; (1945) by Ira D. Cardiff, p. 342. No original source for this has been found in the works of Seneca, or published translations (see: [[Talk:Seneca the Younger]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then he is not omnipotent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is he able, but not willing?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then he is malevolent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is God both able and willing?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then whence cometh evil?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is he neither able nor willing?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then why call him God?&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Epicurus]], as quoted in [[w:BBC Four|BBC Four]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief|Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief]]&#039;&#039;. No original source has been found for this quote (see: [[Epicurus#Disputed|Epicurus: Disputed]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{disputed end}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Agnosticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christian atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Death of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Death of God theology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Faith]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Irreligiousness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Religiousness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Skepticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Unbelief]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:Category:Atheists|List of Atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary|atheism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=3120543</id>
		<title>God</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=3120543"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T16:24:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: berdyaev&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Otheruses|God (disambiguation)}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Николай Бердяев.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;God is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Nikolai Berdyaev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fostre.tif|thumb| Who hath made man&#039;s mouth? or who maketh the dumb or deaf, or the seeing or the blind? have not I the LORD? ~ [[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Motherless - Luke Fildes.jpg|thumb|The [[Deity|gods]] of all [[pagan]] faiths have been allied with the [[rich]] [[rulers]]. The priests of most religions are the employees of the landowners. But the God of Israel has always claimed to be with the poor—whether in the legislation of [[Deuteronomy]], the [[words]] of the [[prophets]], or the [[experiences]] of the [[New Testament]]. Our God is on the side of the [[poor]]. ~ [[John Howard Yoder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:QUR&#039;AN 2981a.jpg|thumb|I [[know]] what you know not. ~ [[Quran]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Wealth Inequality - v2.png|thumb|Oppressed and oppressors cannot possibly mean the same thing when they speak of God. The God of the oppressed is a God of revolution who breaks the chains of slavery. The oppressors&#039; God is a God of slavery and must be destroyed along with the oppressors. ~ [[James Cone]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ludwig feuerbach.jpg|thumb|God is for man the [[w:commonplace book|commonplace book]] where he registers his highest feelings and thoughts, the genealogical album into which he enters the names of the things most dear and sacred to him. ~ [[Ludwig&amp;amp;nbsp;Feuerbach]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Schnorr von Carolsfeld Bibel in Bildern 1860 057.png|thumb|God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. ~ [[Psalms|Psalms 46:1 - 3]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simone Weil 1921.jpg|thumb|The only mark of God in us is that we feel that we are not God. ~ [[Simone&amp;amp;nbsp;Weil]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emerson, poet and thinker (1904) (14577386099).jpg|thumb|When we consider what is our thought of God we find that it is our own soul stripped of all inferiority and carried out to perfection. ~ [[Ralph&amp;amp;nbsp;Waldo&amp;amp;nbsp;Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brockhaus and Efron Jewish Encyclopedia e9 615-0.jpg|thumb|Only the idea of God gives me the confidence that morality will become reality on earth. And because I cannot live without this confidence, I cannot live without God. ~ [[Hermann&amp;amp;nbsp;Cohen]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Laurent de La Hyre - Allegory of Arithmetic - Walters 371917.jpg|thumb|He best honors God who makes his intellect as like God as possible. ~ [[Quintus Sextius]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Calvin 17.jpg|thumb|We cannot aspire to Him in earnest until we have begun to be displeased with ourselves. ~ [[John Calvin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:God the Father with His Right Hand Raised in Blessing.jpg|thumb|If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him. ~ [[Voltaire]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gregor von Nyssa.JPG|thumb|right|The love of gain, which is a large, incalculably large, element in every soul, when once applied to the desire for God, will bless the one who has it. ~ [[Gregory of Nyssa]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Percy Bysshe Shelley by Alfred Clint crop.jpg|thumb|If we find great difficulty from its admirable arrangement in conceiving that the Universe has existed from all eternity, and to resolve this difficulty suppose a Creator, how much more clearly must we perceive the necessity of this very Creator’s creation. ~ [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Friederich Nietzsche.jpg|thumb|Even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians, still take our fire, too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year-old faith, the Christian faith which was also [[Plato|Plato&#039;s]] faith, that God is truth; that truth is divine. ~ [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nietzsche1882 smaller.jpeg|thumb|You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price. ~ [[Friedrich&amp;amp;nbsp;Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bataille crop.jpg|thumb|If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated. ~ [[Georges Bataille]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Williboni.jpg|thumb|How wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed further and further back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know. ~ [[Dietrich&amp;amp;nbsp;Bonhoeffer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - Petites Mendiantes (1880).jpg|thumb|The God who appears to me is the comforter of the poor and their avenger in world history. This avenger of the poor is the God I love. ~ [[Hermann Cohen]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In [[monotheism]], &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:God|God]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is conceived of as the Supreme Being and principal object of [[faith]].&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha|&#039;&#039;[[#Bible|Bible]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Quran|Quran]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Book of Mormon|Book of Mormon]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; · [[#Anonymous|Anonymous]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotations listed alphabetically by author or work.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I refuse to prove that I exist,&amp;quot; says God, &amp;quot;for [[proof]] denies faith, and without faith, I am nothing.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oh,&amp;quot; says man, &amp;quot;but the [[w:Babel fish (The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy)|Babel fish]] is a dead give-away, isn&#039;t it? It proves You exist, and so therefore You don&#039;t.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oh, I hadn&#039;t thought of that,&amp;quot; says God, who promptly vanishes in a puff of [[logic]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Douglas Adams]], &#039;&#039;[[The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy]]&#039;&#039; (1979), [[The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy#Chapter 6|Chapter 6]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we say God is a [[spirit]], we know what we mean, as well as we do when we say that the pyramids of Egypt are matter. Let us be content, therefore, to believe him to be a spirit, that is, an essence that we know nothing of, in which originally and necessarily reside all energy, all power, all capacity, all activity, all wisdom, all goodness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Adams]], in a letter to [[Thomas Jefferson]] (17 January 1820)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nearer, my God, to Thee—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nearer to Thee—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;E&#039;en though it be a cross&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That raiseth me;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Still all my song shall be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Nearer, my God, to Thee,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nearer to Thee!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sarah Flower Adams]], &#039;&#039;Nearer, my God, to Thee!&#039;&#039; (c. 1841); an article in Notes and Queries states that the words were written by her sister, Mrs. Byrdes Flower Adams, and the music only by Sarah Flower Adams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God tells us [[Homosexuality|men fucking men]] is a terrible thing, but a father offering his two daughters, vestal [[Virginity|virgins]] no less, to a horde of horny buggers is [[heroic]]. Now that&#039;s straight. … God destroys the faggots with fire and brimstone. He turns a disobedient wife into salt. But he asks us to [[Idolatry|idolize]] [[Drunkenness|drunks]] [[Incest|who sleep with their daughters]] or offer them to a horny, unruly mob.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabih Alameddine]] on the [[Bible|biblical narrative]] of Lot and his family confronting the inhabitants of [[Sodom and Gomorrah]], as quoted by Wail S. Hassan in &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.com/books?id=vA5pAgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA207 Immigrant Narratives: Orientalism and Cultural Translation in Arab American and Arab British Literature]&#039;&#039; (2011), Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-979206-1}}, page 207.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nec audiendi qui solent dicere, vox populi, vox Dei, quum tumultuositas vulgi semper insaniae proxima sit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** And those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voice of the people is the voice of God, since the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: We should not listen to those who like to affirm that the voice of the people is the voice of God, for the tumult of the masses is truly close to madness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alcuin]] Works, Epistle 127 (to Charlemagne, AD 800)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Never place a period where God has placed a comma.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gracie Allen]], in her last letter to [[George Burns]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Two Minutes for God : Quick Fixes for the Spirit&#039;&#039; (2007) by Peter B. Panagore, p. 73; this was later used in a slogan for the [[w:United Church of Christ|United Church of Christ]]: &#039;&#039;&#039;Never place a period where God has placed a comma. God Is Still Speaking.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not only is there no God, but try getting a plumber on weekends.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;Getting Even&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit in my name in a Swiss bank.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Without Feathers|Without Feathers]]&#039;&#039; (1975)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The important thing, I think, is not to be bitter... if it turns out that there is a God, I don&#039;t think that he is evil. I think that the worst thing you could say is that he is, basically, an under-achiever. If God exists, I hope he has a good excuse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Love and Death|Love and Death]]&#039;&#039; (1975); also quoted in &#039;&#039;What Do Jews Believe? : The Customs and Culture of Modern Judaism&#039;&#039; (2007) by Edward Kessler, p. 66&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To you I&#039;m an atheist; to God, I&#039;m the Loyal Opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Stardust Memories|Stardust Memories]]&#039;&#039; (1980)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Love, Sex, Death &amp;amp; The Meaning of Life : The Films of Woody Allen&#039;&#039; (2001) by Foster Hirsch, p. 50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God — or [[Aum|Aum (om)]] —is the Highest Being of your inner self.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  [http://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Leaves-of-Moryas-Garden-I.php &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;],  6, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Love]] even the knot-grass. God created it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  237, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shepherds have received the revelations, While emperors have searched for them. Dogmatic scholars have resisted them. Leaders have been fearful of them. The Voice of God overshadows all when there is [[spiritual]] readiness.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  367, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They who deny God have not seen Him. 	&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  [http://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Leaves-of-Moryas-Garden-II.php &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden II, Illumination&#039;&#039;]  180, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The canon, “By thy God,” is the higher, and this canon is the basis of the New World. Formerly one said: “And my spirit rejoiceth in God, my Savior.” [[Now]] you will say: “And my spirit rejoiceth in God, thy Savior.”   Solemnly do I say that therein is salvation. “Long live thy God!” So you will say to everyone; and, exchanging Gods, you will walk to the One.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There where one might otherwise sink one can tread softly, if without negation. There where one could suffocate one can pass, by pronouncing “Thy God.” There where matter is revered one can pass only by elevating the earthly matter into the Cosmos. Essentially, one should not have any attachment to Earth... Thus, find the God of each one and exalt Him. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden II, Illumination&#039;&#039;,  211, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What is meant by &amp;quot;mad in God&amp;quot;? Why were the prophets of antiquity called madmen? Precisely because of the fire of straight-knowledge, which isolated them from all else, a valuable quality that severed them from the ordinary, everyday ways of thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Agni Yoga&#039;&#039;,    281, (1929) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Even in the most ancient times people understood the significance of the heart. They regarded the heart as the Dwelling of God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]], &#039;&#039;Heart&#039;&#039;  73, (1932)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Susan B. Anthony]], in an address to the National American Woman Suffrage Association (1896)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is the most noble of beings. Now it is impossible for a body to be the most noble of beings; for a body must be either animate or inanimate; and an animate body is manifestly nobler than any inanimate body. But an animate body is not animate precisely as body; otherwise all bodies would be animate. Therefore its animation depends upon some other thing, as our body depends for its animation on the soul. Hence that by which a body becomes animated must be nobler than the body. Therefore it is impossible that God should be a body.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Aquinas]], &#039;&#039;Summa Theologica&#039;&#039;, Part 1, Question 3 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ordina l&#039;uomo, e dio dispone.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man proposes, and God disposes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludovico Ariosto]], &#039;&#039;Orlando Furioso&#039;&#039; (1516), Chapter XLVI. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If I were not an [[atheist]], I would believe in a God who would choose to save people on the basis of the totality of their [[lives]] and not the pattern of their [[words]].&#039;&#039;&#039; I think he would prefer an [[honest]] and [[righteous]] atheist to a TV preacher whose every word is God, God, God, and whose every deed is foul, foul, foul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Asimov]], &#039;&#039;I. Asimov: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, in order to speak to [[Abraham]], must come from somewhere, must enter the earthly realm from some [[unknown]] heights or depths. Whence does he come, whence does he call to Abraham? We are not told. He does not come, like Zeus or [[w:Poseidon|Poseidon]], from the [[w:Aethiopia|Aethiopians]], where he has been enjoying a sacrificial feast. Nor are we told anything of his reasons for tempting Abraham so terribly. He has not, like Zeus, discussed them in set speeches with other gods gathered in council; nor have the deliberations in his own heart been presented to us; unexpected and mysterious, he enters the scene from some unknown height or depth and calls: Abraham! It will at once be said that this is to be explained by the particular concept of God which the Jews held and which was wholly different from that of the Greeks. True enough—but this constitutes no objection. For how is the Jewish concept of God to be explained? Even their earlier God of the desert was not fixed in form and content, and was alone; his lack of form, his lack of local habitation, his singleness, was in the end not only maintained but developed even further in competition with the comparatively far more manifest gods of the surrounding Near Eastern world. The concept of God held by the Jews is less a cause than a symptom of their manner of comprehending and representing things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Erich Auerbach]], &#039;&#039;Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature&#039;&#039;, Willard R. Trask, trans. (Princeton: 1953), chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If you comprehend, it is not God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]], &#039;&#039;Sermon&#039;&#039; 52, 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Deus scitur melius nesciendo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is best known in not knowing him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]], &#039;&#039;De Ordine&#039;&#039;, II, 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TenCommandmentsAustinStateCapitol.jpg|thumb|I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. ~ [[Susan&amp;amp;nbsp;B.&amp;amp;nbsp;Anthony]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For He is called omnipotent on account of His doing what He wills, not on account of His suffering what He wills not; for if that should befall Him, He would by no means be omnipotent. Wherefore, He cannot do some things for the very reason that He is omnipotent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf102.iv.V.10.html St. Augustine&#039;s City of God and Christian Doctrine: Chapter 10.—Whether Our Wills are Ruled by Necessity]&#039;&#039;, ccel.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A God who cannot smile could not have created this humorous universe.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sri Aurobindo]], &#039;&#039;Thoughts and Aphorisms&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God, the supreme being, is neither circumscribed by [[space]], nor touched by [[time]]; he cannot be found in a particular direction, and his [[essence]] cannot [[change]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The secret conversation is thus entirely spiritual; it is a direct encounter between God and the [[soul]], abstracted from all material constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Avicenna]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;366 Readings From Islam&#039;&#039; (2000), edited by Robert Van der Weyer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== B ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Martin Buber portrait.jpg|thumb|[[All]] [[names]] of God remain hallowed because they have been used not only to speak &#039;&#039;of&#039;&#039; God but also to speak &#039;&#039;to&#039;&#039; him. ~  [[Martin Buber]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At certain great moments down the ages, God drew nearer to His people and humanity at the same time made great, though oft unconscious efforts to draw near to God. From one angle, it might be regarded as God transcendent recognizing God immanent, and God in man reaching out to God in the Whole and greater than the Whole. On the part of God, working through the Head of the spiritual Hierarchy and its Membership, this effort was intentional, conscious and deliberate; on the part of man, it has been in the past largely unconscious, forced upon humanity by the tragedy of circumstances, by desperate need and by the driving urge of the immanent Christ consciousness.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]], &#039;&#039;Problems Of Humanity&#039;&#039;, Chapter V The Problem of the Churches - Part 2, (1944)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Eastern faiths have ever emphasised God Immanent, deep within the human heart, &amp;quot;nearer than hands and feet&amp;quot;, the Self, the One, the Atma, smaller than the small, yet all-comprehensive. The Western faiths have presented God Transcendent, Outside His universe, an Onlooker. God transcendent, first of all, conditioned men&#039;s concept of [[Deity]], for the action of this transcendent God appeared in the process of nature; later, in the Jewish dispensation, God appeared as the tribal [[Jehovah]], as the soul (the rather unpleasant soul) of a nation. Next, God was seen as a perfected man, and the divine God-man walked the Earth in the Person of the Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ&#039;&#039; p. 144, (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Today we have a rapidly growing emphasis upon God immanent in every human being, and in every created form. Today, we should have the churches presenting a synthesis of these two ideas, which have been summed up for us in the statement of Shri [[Krishna]] in the Bhagavad Gita: &amp;quot;Having pervaded this whole universe with a fragment of Myself, I remain.&amp;quot; God, greater than the created whole, yet God present also in the part; God Transcendent guarantees the Plan of our world, and is the Purpose conditioning all lives from the minutest atom, up through all the kingdoms of nature, to man.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] in &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ&#039;&#039; p. 145, (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*True [[religion]] is again emerging in the hearts of men in every land; this recognition of a divine hope and background may possibly take people back into the church and into the world faiths, but it will most certainly take them back to God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ,&#039;&#039; Chapter Three (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Religion is the name, surely, which we give to the invocative appeal of humanity which leads to the evocative response of the Spirit of God. This Spirit works in every human heart and in all groups.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]]  &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ,&#039;&#039; Chapter Three (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Slowly, there is dawning upon the awakening consciousness of humanity the great paralleling truth of God Immanent – divinely &amp;quot;pervading&amp;quot; all forms, conditioning from within all kingdoms in nature, expressing innate divinity through human beings. . . . There is a growing and developing belief that Christ is in us, as He was in the Master Jesus, and this belief will alter world affairs and mankind&#039;s entire attitude to life. (13 – 592).&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] in &#039;&#039;The Externalization of the Hierarchy&#039;&#039; p. 592, (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God Transcendent, greater, vaster and more inclusive than His created world, is universally recognised and has been generally emphasised; all faiths can say with Shri Krishna (speaking as God, the Creator) that &amp;quot;having pervaded the whole universe with a fragment of Myself, I remain.&amp;quot; This God Transcendent has dominated the religious thinking of millions of simple and spiritually-minded people down the centuries which have elapsed since humanity began to press forward towards divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Externalisation Of The Hierarchy&#039;&#039; The Return of the Christ - Part 1, (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A jealous lover of human liberty, and deeming it the absolute condition of all that we admire and respect in humanity, I reverse the phrase of [[Voltaire]], and say that &#039;&#039;if God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish him.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;!--emphasis in original--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Bakunin]] in &amp;quot;On God and the State&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The glory of God is not contingent on man&#039;s good will, but all existence subserves his purposes.&#039;&#039;&#039; The system of the universe is as a celestial poem, whose beauty is from all eternity, and must not be marred by human interpolations. &#039;&#039;&#039;Things proceed as they were ordered, in their nice, and well-adjusted, and perfect harmony; so that as the hand of the skilful artist gathers music from the harp-strings, history calls it forth from the well-tuned chords of time.&#039;&#039;&#039; Not that this harmony can be heard during the tumult of action. Philosophy comes after events, and gives the reason of them, and describes the nature of their results. The great mind of collective man may, one day, so improve in self-consciousness as to interpret the present and foretell the future; but as yet, the end of what is now happening, though we ourselves partake in it, seems to fall out by chance. &#039;&#039;&#039;All is nevertheless one whole; individuals, families, peoples, the race, march in accord with the Divine will; and when any part of the destiny of humanity is fulfilled, we see the ways of Providence vindicated. The antagonisms of imperfect matter and the perfect idea, of liberty and necessary law, become reconciled. What seemed irrational confusion, appears as the web woven by light, liberty and love.&#039;&#039;&#039; But this is not perceived till a great act in the drama of life is finished. The prayer of the patriarch, when he desired to behold the Divinity face to face, was denied; but he was able to catch a glimpse of Jehovah, after He had passed by; and so it fares with our search for Him in the wrestlings of the world. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is when the hour of conflict is over, that history comes to a right understanding of the strife, and is ready to exclaim: &amp;quot;Lo! God is here, and we knew it not.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bancroft]] &#039;&#039;Literary and Historical Miscellanies&#039;&#039; (1855), p. 491&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the mind is not dissipated upon extraneous things, nor diffused over the world about us through the senses, it withdraws within itself, and of its own accord ascends to the contemplation of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Basil of Caesarea]], Letter to [[w:Gregory of Nazianzus|Gregory]], &#039;&#039;Saint Basil: The Letters&#039;&#039;, R. Deferrari, trans. (1926), vol. 1, p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We thus become temples of God whenever earthly cares cease to interrupt the continuity of our memory of Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Basil of Caesarea]], Letter to [[w:Gregory of Nazianzus|Gregory]], &#039;&#039;Saint Basil: The Letters&#039;&#039;, R. Deferrari, trans. (1926), vol. 1, p. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georges Bataille]], &#039;&#039;Inner Experience&#039;&#039; (1954), L. Boldt, trans. (1988), p. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If by Godot I had meant God I would have said God, and not Godot.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Beckett]], on the title of one of his most famous plays, &#039;&#039;[[w:Waiting for Godot|Waiting for Godot]]&#039;&#039;, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Essential Samuel Beckett : An Illustrated Biography&#039;&#039;, by Enoch Brater (revised edition, 2003), p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many questions arise in this place! Constantly the question comes up: Where was God in those days? Why was he silent? How could he permit this endless slaughter, this triumph of evil? . . . We must continue to cry out humbly yet insistently to God: Rouse yourself! Do not forget mankind, your creature!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Benedict XVI]], who visited the former concentration camp at [[Auschwitz]], Poland, on (28 May 2006), as quoted in &#039;&#039;“Why, [[Lord]], Did You Remain Silent?”&#039;&#039;, in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; magazine (15 May 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Бога отрицают или потому, что мир так плох, или потому, что мир так хорош.&#039;&#039; [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikolai Berdyaev]], &#039;&#039;[http://vehi.net/soloviev/znachenie.html Self-knowledge (Самопознание)]&#039;&#039;, 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The true Mystic, realising God, has no need of any Scriptures, for he has touched the source whence all Scriptures flow.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=eIrD4GQFCPIC&amp;amp;pg=PT437 &#039;&#039;The Theosophical Writings of Annie Besant&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mysticism]] is the realisation of God, of the Universal Self. It is attained either as a realisation of God outside the Mystic, or within himself. In the first case, it is usually reached from within a religion, by exceptionally intense love and devotion, accompanied by purity of life, for only &amp;quot;the pure in heart shall see God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in &#039;&#039;Annie Besant Quotes&#039;&#039;   ISBN-13: 978-1535078498  (2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is patent to every student of the closing forty years of the last century, that crowds of thoughtful and moral people have slipped away from the churches, because the teachings they received there outraged their intelligence and shocked their moral sense. It is idle to pretend that the widespread agnosticism of this period had its root either in lack of morality or in deliberate crookedness of mind. Everyone who carefully studies the phenomena presented will admit that men of strong intellect have been driven out of Christianity by the crudity of the religious ideas set before them, the contradictions in the authoritative teachings, the views as to God, man, and the universe that no trained intelligence could possibly admit. Nor can it be said that any kind of moral degradation lay at the root of the revolt against the dogmas of the Church. The rebels were not too bad for their religion; on the contrary, it was the religion that was too bad for them. The rebellion against popular Christianity was due to the awakening and the growth of conscience; it was the conscience that revolted, as well as the intelligence, against teachings dishonouring to God and man alike, that represented God as a tyrant, and man as essentially evil, gaining salvation by slavish submission.   &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another precept of Jesus which remains as &amp;quot;a hard saying&amp;quot; to his followers is: &amp;quot;Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect&amp;quot;. [S. Matt., v, 48. ] The ordinary Christian knows that he cannot possibly obey this command; full of ordinary human frailties and weaknesses, how can he become perfect as God is perfect? Seeing the impossibility of the achievement set before him, he quietly puts it aside, and thinks no more about it. But seen as the crowning effort of [[reincarnation|many lives]] of steady improvement, as the triumph of the God within us over the lower nature, it comes within calculable distance, and we recall the words of Porphyry, how the man who achieves &amp;quot;the paradigmatic virtues is the Father of the Gods&amp;quot;, and that in the Mysteries these virtues were acquired.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For so reverent is God to that Spirit which is Himself in man, that He will not even pour into the human soul a flood of strength and life unless that soul is willing to receive it. There must be an opening from below as well as an outpouring from above, the receptiveness of the lower nature as well as the willingness of the higher to give. That is the link between the Christ and the man; that is what the churches have called the outpouring of &amp;quot;divine grace&amp;quot;; that is what is meant by the &amp;quot;faith&amp;quot; necessary to make the grace effective. As [[Giordano Bruno]] once put it — the human soul has windows, and can shut those windows close. The [[sun]] outside is shining, the light is unchanging; let the windows be opened and the sunlight must stream in. The light of God is beating against the windows of every human soul, and when the windows are thrown open, the soul becomes illuminated. There is no change in God, but there is a change in man; and man&#039;s will may not be forced, else were the divine Life in him blocked in its due evolution.  Thus in every Christ that rises, all humanity is lifted a step higher, and by His wisdom the ignorance of the whole world is lessened. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;. The chief of Grecian gods, adored by the Romans as [[w:Jupiter|Jupiter]] and by the modern Americans as God, Gold, Mob and Dog. Some explorers who have touched upon the shores of America, and one who professes to have penetrated a considerable distance to the interior, have thought that these four names stand for as many distinct deities, but in his monumental work on Surviving Faiths, Frumpp insists that the natives are monotheists, each having no other god than himself, whom he worships under many sacred names.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ambrose Bierce]], &#039;&#039;The Cynic&#039;s Word Book&#039;&#039; (1906), later retitled &#039;&#039;[[w:The Devil&#039;s Dictionary|The Devil&#039;s Dictionary]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although neither an alchemist, magician, nor astrologer, but simply a great [[philosopher]], [[Henry More]], of Cambridge University — a man universally esteemed, may be named as a shrewd logician, scientist, and metaphysician... His faith in immortality and able arguments in demonstration of the survival of man&#039;s spirit after death are all based on the [[Pythagoras#Quotes_about_Pythagoreanism|Pythagorean system]]... and other [[mystics]].  The infinite and uncreated spirit that we usually call God, a substance of the highest virtue and excellency, produced everything else by emanative causality. God thus is the primary substance... He...stoutly defended the theory of the individuality of every soul in which &amp;quot;personality, memory, and conscience will surely continue in the future state.&amp;quot; He divided the astral spirit of man after its exit from the body into two distinct entities: the &amp;quot;aerial&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;aethereal vehicle.&amp;quot; During the time that a disembodied man moves in its aerial clothing, he is subject to Fate -- i.e., evil and temptation, attached to its earthly interests, and therefore is not utterly pure; it is only when he casts off this garb of the first spheres and becomes ethereal that he becomes sure of his immortality. &amp;quot;For what shadow can that body cast that is a pure and transparent light, such as the ethereal vehicle is? And therefore that oracle is then fulfilled, when the soul has ascended into that condition we have already described, in which alone it is out of the reach of fate and mortality.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]], &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology,&#039;&#039; Vol. I, Before the Veil, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not the One unknown ever-present God in Nature, or Nature in abscondito, that is rejected, but the “God” of human dogma, and his humanized “Word.” Man, in his [[infinite]] conceit and inherent pride and vanity, shaped it himself with his sacrilegious hand out of the material he found in his own small brain-fabric, and forced it upon his fellows as a direct revelation from the one unrevealed Space.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]], &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1  (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Esoteric Philosophy...denies Deity no more than it does the sun. Esoteric Philosophy has never rejected God in Nature, nor Deity as the absolute and abstract Ens. It only refuses to accept any of the gods of the so-called monotheistic religions, gods created by man in his own image and likeness, a [[blasphemous]] and sorry caricature of the Ever-Unknowable.&lt;br /&gt;
**H.P. Blavatsky, &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1   (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We reject the idea of a personal, or an extra-cosmic and anthropomorphic God, who is but the gigantic shadow of man, and not of man at his best, either. The God of [[theology]], we say—and prove it—is a bundle of contradictions and a logical impossibility... Our DEITY is neither in a paradise, nor in a particular tree, building, or mountain; it is everywhere, in every atom of the visible as of the invisible Cosmos, in, over, and around every invisible atom and divisible molecule; for IT is the mysterious power of evolution and involution, the omnipresent, omnipotent, and even omniscient creative potentiality.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky]],&#039;&#039;The Key to Theosophy&#039;&#039; (1889) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If we have to believe in a divine principle at all, it must be in one which is as absolute harmony, logic, and justice, as it is absolute love, wisdom, and impartiality; and a God who would create every soul for the space of one brief span of life, regardless of the fact whether it has to animate the body of a wealthy, happy man, or that of a poor suffering wretch, hapless from birth to death though he has done nothing to deserve his cruel fate—would be rather a senseless fiend than a God.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],&#039;&#039;The Key to Theosophy&#039;&#039; (1889) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed further and further back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], &#039;&#039;Letters and Papers from Prison&#039;&#039; (1967), p. 311&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To everyone God is the kind of God he believes in.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], &#039;&#039;Nachfolge&#039;&#039; (1937), &#039;&#039;The Cost of Discipleship&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 185&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Only what is fated to die is capable of living. Only what dies lives.&#039;&#039;&#039; Why do you think [[Jesus|Christ]] was killed? They killed him to prove that he wasn’t a god. But in killing him, they immortalized the perishable and transformed man into a god.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giannina Braschi]] in &amp;quot;[[Empire of Dreams]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The gods [[envy]] me because they cannot die.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giannina Braschi]] in &amp;quot;[[Empire of Dreams]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Goddes love&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;is unescapable as nature&#039;s environment,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;which if a man ignore or think to thrust it off&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;he is the ill-natured fool that runneth on to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Bridges]], &#039;&#039;The Testament of Beauty&#039;&#039; (1929), Book IV, line 1419&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That we devote ourselves to God is seen&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In living just as though no God there were.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Paracelsus&#039;&#039; (1835), Part I&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the perfect [[poet]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who in his person acts his own creations.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Paracelsus&#039;&#039; (1835), Part II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;s in His [[Heaven]] — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;All&#039;s right with the world!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Pippa Passes&#039;&#039; (1841), Part I&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All service is the same with God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With God, whose puppets, best and worst,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are we: there is no last nor first.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Pippa Passes&#039;&#039; (1841), Part IV&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All names of God remain hallowed because they have been used not only to speak &#039;&#039;of&#039;&#039; God but also to speak &#039;&#039;to&#039;&#039; him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;[[w:I and Thou|I and Thou]]&#039;&#039; (1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some would deny any legitimate use of the word God because it has been misused so much. Certainly it is the most burdened of all human words. Precisely for that reason it is the most imperishable and unavoidable. And how much weight has all erroneous talk about God&#039;s nature and works (although there never has been nor can be any such talk that is not erroneous) compared with the one truth that all men who have addressed God really meant him? For whoever pronounces the word God and really means Thou, addresses, no matter what his delusion, the true Thou of his life that cannot be restricted by any other and to whom he stands in a relationship that includes all others.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;[[w:I and Thou|I and Thou]]&#039;&#039; (1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we rise out of [the night] into the new life and there begin to receive the signs, what can we know of that which—of him who gives them to us? Only what we experience from time to time from the signs themselves. If we name the speaker of this speech God, then it is always the God of a moment, a moment God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;Between Man and Man&#039;&#039; (1965), p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* According to mythological thinking, God has his domicile in [[heaven]].  What is the meaning of this statement?  The meaning is quite clear.  In a crude manner it expresses the idea that God is beyond the world, that He is transcendent. The thinking which is not yet capable of forming the abstract idea of transcendence expresses its intention in the category of space.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudolf Bultmann]], “Jesus Christ and Mythology,” Interpreting Faith for the Modern Era, p. 294 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “Don’t you know everything?”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God smiled. “No, I outgrew that trick long ago. You can’t imagine how boring it was.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Octavia Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Book of Martha&#039;&#039; (2003). Originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Sci Fiction|Sci Fiction]]&#039;&#039; (May 21, 2003). Reprinted in [[w:David G. Hartwell|David G. Hartwell]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;Year’s Best Fantasy 4&#039;&#039; (p. 52)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s merits are so transcendent that it is not surprising his faults should be in reasonable proportion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler]] &amp;quot;Rebelliousness&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Note-Books&#039;&#039; (1912)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no god but God! — to prayer — lo! &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is great!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;[[Childe Harold&#039;s Pilgrimage]]&#039;&#039;, Canto II (1812), Stanza 59, this is a translation of standard Islamic exclamations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “It’s not my job to be God’s lawyer,...I’m his salesman. I do believe he’s the greatest thing that ever existed, and I encourage people to get to know him without trying to explain what he’s doing or why.”&lt;br /&gt;
** Rabbi Chaim Bruk in [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/04/02/coronavirus-god-christain-jewish-muslim-leaders-saying-deadly-plague/5101639002/ Is the coronavirus an act of God? Faith leaders debate tough questions amid pandemic, USA Today] April 2, 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our feeling of ignorance, vanity, want, weakness, in short, depravity and corruption, reminds us ... that in the Lord, and none but He, dwell the true light of wisdom, solid virtue, exuberant goodness. We are accordingly urged by our own evil things to consider the good things of God; and, indeed, we cannot aspire to Him in earnest until we have begun to be displeased with ourselves. For what man is not disposed to rest in himself? Who, in fact, does not thus rest, so long as he is unknown to himself; that is, so long as he is contented with his own endowments, and unconscious or unmindful of his misery? Every person, therefore, on coming to the knowledge of himself, is not only urged to seek God, but is also led as by the hand to find him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Calvin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Institutes of the Christian Religion|Institutes of the Christian Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Book 1, Chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Without knowledge of self there is no knowledge of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Calvin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Institutes of the Christian Religion|Institutes of the Christian Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Book 1 Chapter 1, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God, or is it Mr. G to me?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alessia Cara|Alessia Cara]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zXfF3uxwww &amp;quot;7 Days&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The Pains of Growing&#039;&#039; (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Except during my childhood, when I was probably influenced by [[Michelangelo]]&#039;s Sistine Chapel depiction of God with a flowing white beard, I have never tried to project the Creator in any kind of human likeness. The vociferous debates about whether God is male or female seem ridiculous to me. I think of God as an omnipotent and omniscient presence, a [[spirit]] that permeates the [[universe]], the essence of [[truth]], [[nature]], being, and [[life]]. To me, these are profound and indescribable concepts that seem to be trivialized when expressed in [[words]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jimmy Carter]], &#039;&#039;Living Faith&#039;&#039; (2001), p. 222&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Although every believing Christian understands that God guides our steps, fewer and fewer emphasize the point. A God working actively in the world makes us uneasy. We tend to like our God distant and a bit malleable, ready to bend to every new human idea. A God with a will of his own is too scary, and, besides, he might get in the way of our satisfaction of immediate desire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen L. Carter]], &#039;&#039;[[Stephen L. Carter#The Emperor of Ocean Park (2002)|The Emperor of Ocean Park]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 25, &#039;&#039;A Modest Request&#039;&#039;, I (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Promises made to others in God&#039;s name engage the divine honor, fidelity, truthfulness, and authority. They must be respected in justice. To be unfaithful to them is to misuse God&#039;s name and in some way to make God out to be a liar. (1 John 1:10)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Catechism of the Catholic Church]] 2147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* True religion consists in proposing, as our great end, a growing likeness to the Supreme Being. Its noblest influence consists in making us more and more partakers of the Divinity. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Likeness to God” (1828)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious instruction should aim chiefly to turn men’s aspirations and efforts to that perfection of the soul, which constitutes it a bright image of God. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Likeness to God” (1828)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I tell you this, that you will have found out the [[truth]] of the last [[tree]] and the top-most [[cloud]] before the truth about [[Self|me]].&#039;&#039;&#039; You will [[understand]] the [[sea]], and I shall be still a [[Mystery|riddle]]; you shall [[Knowledge|know]] what the [[stars]] are, and not know [[The All|what I am]]. Since the [[beginning]] of the [[world]] all [[men]] have hunted me like a [[wolf]] — [[Monarchy|kings]] and [[Philosophy|sages]], and [[poets]] and [[Law|lawgivers]], all the [[Church|churches]], and all the [[Philosophy|philosophies]]. But &#039;&#039;&#039;I have never been caught yet, and the [[Sky|skies]] will fall in the [[time]] I turn to bay.&#039;&#039;&#039; I have given them a [[good]] run for their [[money]], and I will now.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;[[The Man Who Was Thursday]]&#039;&#039; (1908), [[s:The Man Who Was Thursday/Chapter XIII|Ch. XIII : The Pursuit of the President]], &amp;quot;Sunday&amp;quot; representing God speaking to the ostensible [[Anarchism|anarchists]] who have just realized they were were all policemen and spies, but who still haven&#039;t realized their role or Sunday&#039;s in the comic nightmare Chesterton devised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If [people] wish to love God, they [must] be prepared to do so no matter what His intentions. God is not just, God is not kind, God is not merciful, and understanding that is essential to true devotion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ted Chiang|Ted Chiang]] &amp;quot;{{w|Hell Is the Absence of God}}&amp;quot;, Stories of Your Life and Others (e-book ed.). Picador. p. 164. ISBN 978-1-4472-8198-6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God can only set in motion:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He cannot control the things he has made.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[T&#039;ao Ch&#039;ien]], &#039;&#039;Substance, Shadow, and Spirit&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Spirit expounds&amp;quot; (transl. by Arthur Waley)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all you – you fucking fake Christians – don’t fucking question my Christianity. I grew up in the church. My grandfather was a minister, who is with God now and talks to me in my dreams from God’s corner office. I am a former Sunday school teacher. I taught the [[Bible]] to children and showed them how to love God and invite him into their hearts. I believe in God – but I don’t fear him. God is my best friend. God is my ally. God is my boyfriend. God is my best fag. I am God’s fag hag cuz didn’t you know, God is a big fag. Serious bottom too. Butch in the streets, femme in the sheets. That is my God. God is my biggest fan. God gets me, dude.&lt;br /&gt;
:God wants us all to just get along. He doesn’t give a shit about the profanity. The bitch fucking invented profanity. He thinks it is hilarious. He just wants you to talk to him, and he doesn’t care what you have to say. He just wants to keep the conversation going. Like Jay-Z, he just wants to love you. He just wants you to be able to make your own decisions. God is all about you and what you need. God is happy that you are gay. God made you fucking gay cuz he thinks it is awesome. God understands if you need to have an abortion. That is why he created abortion, on the 8th day. God accepts. God forgives. God loves all of us, even though some of us might have a problem with each other.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Margaret Cho]], [http://margaretcho.com/2008/09/17/im-a-christian-you-fuckers/ I&#039;m a Christian you Fuckers]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;[[w:De legibus|De legibus]]&#039;&#039;, book 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God: a disease we imagine we are cured of because no one dies of it nowadays.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emile Cioran]], &#039;&#039;The Trouble with Being Born&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In most cases we attach ourselves to God in order to take revenge on life, to punish it, to signify we can do without it, that we have found something better.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. M. Cioran]], &#039;&#039;History and Utopia&#039;&#039; (1960)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to create him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], [http://www.clarkefoundation.org/sample-page/sir-arthurs-quotations/ clarkefoundation.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The rash assertion that ‘God made man in His own image’ is ticking like a time bomb at the foundations of many faiths, and as the hierarchy of the universe is disclosed to us, we may have to recognize this chilling truth: if there are any gods whose chief concern is man, they cannot be very important gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], [http://www.clarkefoundation.org/sample-page/sir-arthurs-quotations/ clarkefoundation.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God but I&#039;m very interested in her.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], as quoted in Multiple Intelligences in Practice : Enhancing Self-esteem and Learning in the Classroom (2006) by Mike Fleetham, Section 2 : Using MI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Haven’t you ever watched ants struggling with a load too big for them? How much did you care? Even if, like God, you marked the fall of every sparrow, you might simply be conducting a survey or expressing colossal boredom, like the people who delight in measuring things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Mildred Clingerman|Mildred Clingerman]] &amp;quot;Birds Can&#039;t Count&amp;quot; (Originally published at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magazine_of_Fantasy_%26_Science_Fiction The Magazine of Fantasy &amp;amp; Science Fiction] (February, 1955) and reprinted in her collection &#039;&#039;A Cupful of Space&#039;&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt have one God only; who&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Would be at the expense of two?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur Hugh Clough]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.potw.org/archive/potw238.html The Latest Decalogue]&#039;&#039; (1862).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God who appears to me is the comforter of the poor and their avenger in world history. This avenger of the poor is the God I love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hermann Cohen]], &#039;&#039;The Concept of Religion in the System of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1915), p. 81&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only the idea of God gives me the confidence that morality will become reality on earth. And because I cannot live without this confidence, I cannot live without God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hermann Cohen]], &#039;&#039;Reason and Hope: Selections from the Jewish Writings of Hermann Cohen&#039;&#039; (1971), p. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reason alone cannot prove the existence of God. [[Faith]] is reason plus revelation, and the revelation part requires one to think with the spirit as well as with the mind. You have to hear the music, not just read the notes on the page.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Collins]], [http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/ cnn.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is [[Death|dead]] not because He doesn&#039;t exist, but because we live, play, procreate, govern, and die as though He doesn&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Colson]], &#039;&#039;Kingdoms in Conflict&#039;&#039; (1990), p. [http://books.google.com/books?id=tIV5YCh49qsC&amp;amp;dq=%22God+is+dead+not+because+He+doesn&#039;t+exist%22 275]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Oppressed and oppressors cannot possibly mean the same thing when they speak of God. The God of the oppressed is a God of revolution who breaks the chains of slavery. The oppressors&#039; God is a God of slavery and must be destroyed along with the oppressors.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Cone]], &#039;&#039;A Black Theology of Liberation&#039;&#039; (1970), p. 61&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God never meant that man should scale the [[Heavens]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;By strides of human [[wisdom]]. In his works,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though wondrous, he commands us in his word&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To seek him rather where his [[mercy]] shines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book III, line 217&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But who with filial confidence inspired,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Can lift to Heaven an unpresumptuous eye,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And smiling say, My Father made them all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book V. The Winter Morning Walk, line 745&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Acquaint thyself with God, if thou would&#039;st taste&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His works.&#039;&#039;&#039; Admitted once to his embrace,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thou shalt perceive that thou wast blind before:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thine [[eye]] shall be instructed; and thine [[heart]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Made pure shall relish with divine delight&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Till then unfelt, what [[hands]] divine have wrought.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book V, line 782&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are really gods in incarnation. We need to recognize our threefold constitution: We are a spark of God; every religion has postulated this and has kept the idea of our divinity before humanity for thousands of years. But it can be seen more scientifically and still correctly. Speaking as an esotericist, I would say that the divine spark is so refined in vibration that it cannot manifest directly on the physical plane. It reflects itself, therefore, as the individualized human soul. The soul, in its turn, reflects itself in the human personality, with its physical, emotional, and mental bodies. Through the physical plane personality, the soul enacts its reincarnational process, until finally the individual on the physical plane, the man or woman, reflects perfectly the quality of the soul, which is the divine quality of the spark of God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://share-international.org/books/?d=AWT &#039;&#039;The Ageless Wisdom, An introduction to humanity&#039;s spiritual legacy,&#039;Share International&#039;&#039;] (1996) p.3-4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God, in the esoteric meaning, is the sum total of all the Laws and all the  energies governed by these Laws in the manifested and unmanifested universe. So God is impersonal. Nevertheless, that transcendent God is manifest in every aspect of creation, including ourselves. We are not separate from that creation — from God. Every human being has the potential of the knowledge, the awareness, of all in creation that we can think of as meaning God. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The [[Masters of Wisdom|Masters [of Wisdom]]] are God-realized, which is a very specific state, in that They have brought Their consciousness, in terms of the divine spark, the Absolute, the Self, into complete at-one-ment with Themselves as men on the physical plane — the personality and the divine aspect are totally integrated... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;God is everything that exists, and all space between that which exists...and around everything. All of that is God... Modern science has been able to break down cellular structures and show that at the centre of every atom is a nucleus with electrons around it, vibrating at a specific rate, and that every atom in the universe is made in the same way. There is nothing but energy in all of the manifested universe. The difference between that totally scientific view and that which an esotericist would hold is that the esotericist goes further and says, indeed, all is energy, but energy follows thought, is acted upon by thought. Thought is the agency by which creation takes place.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in &#039;[http://share-international.org/books/?d=AWT &#039;&#039;The Ageless Wisdom, An introduction to humanity&#039;s spiritual legacy,  Share International&#039;&#039;] (1996) p.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== D ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Freeman Dyson.jpg|thumb|We stand, in a manner of [[speaking]], midway between the [[Chance|unpredictability]] of [[atoms]] and the [[Mystery|unpredictability]] of God. ~ [[Freeman Dyson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God because I don&#039;t believe in [[w:Mother Goose|Mother Goose]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Speech in Toronto (1930); as quoted in &amp;quot;Breaking the Last Taboo&amp;quot; (1996) by James A. Haught.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: I believe that religion is the belief in future life and in God. I don’t believe in either. I don’t believe in God as I don’t believe in Mother Goose.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As quoted in &#039;&#039;Jesus: Myth Or Reality?&#039;&#039; (2006) by Ian Curtis&lt;br /&gt;
** Religion is the belief in future life and in God. I don&#039;t believe in either.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Clarence Darrow]] as quoted in  &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (19 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I am an Agnostic because I am not afraid to think. I am not afraid of any god in the universe who would send me or any other man or woman to hell. If there were such a being, he would not be a god; he would be a devil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]] as quoted in a eulogy for Darrow by Emanuel Haldeman-Julius (1938)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I am an agnostic as to the question of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; I think that it is impossible for the human mind to believe in an object or thing unless it can form a mental picture of such object or thing. Since man ceased to worship openly an anthropomorphic God and talked vaguely and not intelligently about some force in the universe, higher than man, that is responsible for the existence of man and the universe, he cannot be said to believe in God. One cannot believe in a force excepting as a force that pervades matter and is not an individual entity. To believe in a thing, an image of the thing must be stamped on the mind. If one is asked if he believes in such an animal as a camel, there immediately arises in his mind an image of the camel. This image has come from experience or knowledge of the animal gathered in some way or other. No such image comes, or can come, with the idea of a God who is described as a force.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* To say that God made the universe gives us no explanation of the beginnings of things. If we are told that God made the universe, the question immediately arises: Who made God? Did he always exist, or was there some power back of that? Did he create matter out of nothing, or is his existence coextensive with matter? The problem is still there. What is the origin of it all? If, on the other hand, one says that the universe was not made by God, that it always existed, he has the same difficulty to confront. &#039;&#039;&#039;To say that the universe was here last year, or millions of years ago, does not explain its origin. This is still a mystery. As to the question of the origin of things, man can only wonder and doubt and guess.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many Christians base the belief of a soul and God upon the Bible. Strictly speaking, there is no such book. To make the Bible, sixty-six books are bound into one volume. These books are written by many people at different times, and no one knows the time or the identity of any author. Some of the books were written by several authors at various times. These books contain all sorts of contradictory concepts of life and morals and the origin of things. Between the first and the last nearly a thousand years intervened, a longer time than has passed since the discovery of America by Columbus.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That there is much suffering in the world no one disputes. Some have attempted to explain this in reference to man by imagining that it serves for his moral improvement. But the number of men in the world is as nothing compared with that of all other sentient beings, and these often suffer greatly without any moral improvement. A being so powerful and so full of knowledge as a God who could create the universe, is to our finite minds omnipotent and omniscient, and it revolts our understanding to suppose that his benevolence is not unbounded, for what advantage can there be in the sufferings of millions of the lower animals throughout almost endless time? This very old argument from the existence of suffering against the existence of an intelligent first cause seems to me a strong one; whereas, as just remarked, the presence of much suffering agrees well with the view that all organic beings have been developed through variation and natural selection.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Darwin]], [http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1497&amp;amp;viewtype=text&amp;amp;pageseq=1 &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the Original Omissions Restored.&#039;&#039; (1958)] Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter [[w:Nora Barlow|Nora Barlow]]. Page 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At the present day the most usual argument for the existence of an intelligent God is drawn from the deep inward conviction and feelings which are experienced by most persons. But it cannot be doubted that Hindoos, Mahomadans and others might argue in the same manner and with equal force in favour of the existence of one God, or of many Gods, or as with the Buddists of no God. There are also many barbarian tribes who cannot be said with any truth to believe in what we call God: they believe indeed in spirits or ghosts, and it can be explained, as Tyler and Herbert Spencer have shown, how such a belief would be likely to arise….This argument would be a valid one if all men of all races had the same inward conviction of the existence of one God; but we know that this is very far from being the case. Therefore I cannot see that such inward convictions and feelings are of any weight as evidence of what really exists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Darwin]], [http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1497&amp;amp;viewtype=text&amp;amp;pageseq=1 &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the Original Omissions Restored.&#039;&#039; (1958)] Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter [[w:Nora Barlow|Nora Barlow]]. Pages 90-91. This is Darwin&#039;s reply to the [[w:Argumentum ad populum|Argument from Common Consent]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you see yourself as God and then you come back from this state and somebody says, “Hey, Sam, empty the garbage!” it catches you back into the model of “I&#039;m Sam who empties the garbage.”  You can&#039;t maintain these new kinds of structures.  It takes a while to realize that God can empty garbage.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ram Dass]], &#039;&#039;Be Here Now&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man who recognizes no God is probably placing an inordinate value on himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robertson Davies]] in &#039;&#039;Conversations&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], &#039;&#039;The God Delusion&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 31&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The trouble is that God in this sophisticated, physicist&#039;s sense bears no resemblance to the God of the Bible or any other religion. If a physicist says God is another name for Planck&#039;s constant, or God is a superstring, we should take it as a picturesque metaphorical way of saying that the nature of superstrings or the value of Planck&#039;s constant is a profound mystery. It has obviously not the smallest connection with a being capable of forgiving sins, a being who might listen to prayers, who cares about whether or not the Sabbath begins at 5pm or 6pm, whether you wear a veil or have a bit of arm showing; and no connection whatever with a being capable of imposing a death penalty on His son to expiate the sins of the world before and after he was born.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], from a lecture, extracted from &#039;&#039;The Nullifidian&#039;&#039; (December 1994)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eaglefairy hst big.jpg|thumb|It is solemn to remember that Vastness — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Is but the Shadow of the Brain which casts it — ~ [[Emily Dickinson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*If man is created by an external source, then he must belong to that source and not to himself. According to Buddhism, man is responsible for everything he does. Thus Buddhists have no reason to believe that man came into existence in the human form through any external sources. They believe that man is here today because of his own action. He is neither punished nor rewarded by anyone but himself according to his own good and bad action. In the process of evolution, the human being came into existence. However, there are no Buddha-words to support the belief that the world was created by anybody. The scientific discovery of gradual development of the world-system conforms with the Buddha&#039;s Teachings. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[K. Sri Dhammananda Maha Thera]], &#039;&#039;What Buddhists Believe&#039;&#039; (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They say that God is everywhere, and yet we always think of Him as somewhat of a recluse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emily Dickinson]], Letter to Mrs. J. G. Holland [L551] (Spring 1878)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is solemn to remember that Vastness — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Is but the [[Shadow]] of the [[Brain]] which casts it — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; All things swept sole away &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; This — is immensity —&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emily Dickinson]], in a letter to Thomas Wentworth Higginson [L551] (1881)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is a supreme being, he&#039;s crazy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marlene Dietrich]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Rave&#039;&#039; magazine (November 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God used [[beautiful]] [[mathematics]] in creating the [[world]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Dirac]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Cosmic Code : Quantum Physics As The Language Of Nature&#039;&#039; (1982) by Heinz R. Pagels, p. 295; also in &#039;&#039;Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac : Reminiscences about a Great Physicist&#039;&#039; (1990) edited by Behram N. Kursunoglu and Eugene Paul Wigner, p. xv&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Dirac]], [http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102000602?q=dirac&amp;amp;p=par WOL]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Clearly, the [[w:Bible|Scripture]] tells us that we lack the capacity to grasp God&#039;s infinite mind or the way He intervenes in our lives. How arrogant of us to think otherwise! Trying to analyze His omnipotence is like an amoeba attempting to comprehend the behavior of man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Dobson]] in: Bill Bradfield &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=vKG3cPCQmvMC&amp;amp;pg=PA33 On Reading the Bible: Thoughts and Reflections of Over 500 Men and Women, from St. Augustine to Oprah Winfrey ]&#039;&#039;, Courier Dover Publications, Jul 12, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be simple we must desire to remain in the image of God. We must not be so complex that we make God into our image!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Catherine Doherty]], &#039;&#039;Unfinished Pilgrimage&#039;&#039; (Combermere, Ontario: Madonna House Publications, 1995), p. 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charles Hartshorne]]... informed me that my theological standpoint is [[w:Socinianism|Socinian]]. ...The main tenet of the Socinian heresy is that God is neither omniscient nor omnipotent. He learns and grows as the universe unfolds. ...I ...find it congenial, and consistent with scientific common sense. I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. ...We are the chief inlets of God on this planet at the present stage... We may later grow with him as he grows, or we may be left behind. ...If we are left behind, it is an end. If we keep on growing, it is a beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], &#039;&#039;Infinite in All Directions&#039;&#039; (1988)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not make any clear distinction between [[mind]] and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension.&#039;&#039;&#039; God may be either a world-soul or a collection of world-souls. So I am thinking that atoms and humans and God may have minds that differ in degree but not in kind. &#039;&#039;&#039;We stand, in a manner of [[speaking]], midway between the [[Chance|unpredictability]] of [[atoms]] and the [[Mystery|unpredictability]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; Atoms are small pieces of our mental apparatus, and we are small pieces of God&#039;s mental apparatus. Our minds may receive inputs equally from atoms and from God. This view of our place in the cosmos may not be true, but it is compatible with the active nature of atoms as revealed in the experiments of modern physics. &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t say that this personal theology is supported or proved by scientific evidence. I only say that it is consistent with scientific evidence.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], in &amp;quot;[http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge68.html Progress In Religion : A Talk By Freeman Dyson]&amp;quot;, his acceptance speech for the [[w:Templeton Prize|Templeton Prize]], Washington National Cathedral (9 May 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not claim any ability to read God&#039;s mind. I am sure of only one thing. &#039;&#039;&#039;When we look at the [[glory]] of [[stars]] and [[galaxies]] in the [[sky]] and the glory of forests and flowers in the living world around us, it is evident that God loves [[diversity]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Perhaps the universe is constructed according to a principle of maximum diversity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], in &amp;quot;Progress In Religion : A Talk By Freeman Dyson&amp;quot; (9 May 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Albert_Einstein_photo_1921.jpg|thumb|Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not. ~ [[Albert Einstein]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Einstein gyro gravity probe b.jpg|thumb|The God [[Spinoza]] revered is my God, too: I meet Him everyday in the [[harmonious]] [[laws]] which govern the [[universe]]. ~ [[Albert Einstein]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg|thumb|God created men to enjoy, not destroy, the fruits of the earth and of their own toil. ~ [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RWEmerson.jpg|thumb|The purpose of life seems to be to acquaint a man with himself. He is not to live the future as described to him but to live the real future to the real present. The highest revelation is that God is in every man. ~ [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are all meant to be mothers of God, for God is always needing to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Meister Eckhart]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Christianity&#039;&#039; (1995) by Joe Jenkins, p. 27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Where the human being in obedience goes out from his “I” and dismisses what is his own, God must necessarily enter in precisely there; for when someone does not will anything for himself, God must will for that person in the same way as He wills for himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Meister Eckhart]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, in J. Hackett, &#039;&#039;A Companion to Meister Eckhart&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*When man humbles himself, God cannot restrain His mercy; He must come down and pour His grace into the humble man, and He gives Himself most of all, and all at once, to the least of all. It is essential to God to give, for His essence is His goodness and His goodness is His love. Love is the root of all joy and sorrow. Slavish fear of God is to be put away. The right fear is the fear of losing God. If the earth flee downward from heaven, it finds heaven beneath it; if it flee upward, it comes again to heaven. The earth cannot flee from heaven: whether it flee up or down, the heaven rains its influence upon it, and stamps its impress upon it, and makes it fruitful, whether it be willing or not. Thus doth God with men: whoever thinketh to escape Him, flies into His bosom, for every corner is open to Him. God brings forth His Son in thee, whether thou likest it or not, whether thou sleepest or wakest; God worketh His own will. That man is unaware of it, is man&#039;s fault, for his taste is so spoilt by feeding on earthly things that he cannot relish God&#039;s love. If we had love to God, we should relish God, and all His works; we should receive all things from God, and work the same works as He worketh.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Meister Eckhart]],  [[Meister_Eckhart#Meister_Eckhart’s_Sermons_(1909)|Sermon III, &amp;quot;The Angel&#039;s Greeting&amp;quot;]] (1909)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If God is as real as the shadow of the Great War on Armistice Day, need we seek further reason for making a place for God&#039;&#039;&#039; in our thoughts and lives? &#039;&#039;&#039;We shall not be concerned if the scientific explorer&#039;&#039;&#039; reports that he &#039;&#039;&#039;is perfectly satisfied&#039;&#039;&#039; that he has got to the bottom of things &#039;&#039;&#039;without having come across either.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur Eddington]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Unseen World&#039;&#039; (1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we pray to God as a corporeal person, this will prevent us from relinquishing the human doubts and fears which attend such a belief, and so we cannot grasp the wonders wrought by infinite, incorporeal Love, to whom all things are possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Mary Baker Eddy|Mary Baker Eddy]], in &#039;&#039;Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nature is what we know. We do not know the gods of religions. And nature is not kind, or merciful, or loving. If God made me — the fabled God of the three qualities of which I spoke: mercy, kindness, love — He also made the fish I catch and eat. And where do His mercy, kindness, and love for that fish come in? No; nature made us — nature did it all — not the gods of the religions&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], &amp;quot;&amp;quot;No Immortality of the Soul&amp;quot; says Thomas A. Edison. In Fact, He Doesn&#039;t Believe There Is a Soul — Human Beings Only an Aggregate of Cells and the Brain Only a Wonderful Machine, Says Wizard of Electricity&amp;quot;. New York Times. October 2, 1910&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not believe in the God of the theologians; but that there is a Supreme Intelligence I do not doubt.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], The Freethinker (1970), G.W. Foote &amp;amp; Company, Volume 90, p. 147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for their numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible; in my opinion, only His nonexistence could excuse Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to Edgar Meyer (2 January 1915)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Remark made during Einstein&#039;s first visit to Princeton University (April 1921) as quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein&#039;&#039; (1973) by R. W. Clark, Ch. 14. &amp;quot;God is slick, but he ain&#039;t mean&amp;quot; is a variant translation of this (1946) Unsourced variant: &amp;quot;God is subtle but he is not malicious.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** When asked what he meant by this he replied. &amp;quot;Nature hides her secret because of her essential loftiness, but not by means of ruse.&amp;quot; (&#039;&#039;Die Natur verbirgt ihr Geheimnis durch die Erhabenheit ihres Wesens, aber nicht durch List.&#039;&#039;) As quoted in &#039;&#039;Subtle is the Lord — The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein&#039;&#039; (1982) by Abraham Pais &amp;lt;!-- Clarendon Press, Oxford, and Oxford University Press, New York --&amp;gt; [http://www.einsteinandreligion.com/faith.html einsteinandreligion.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*** Originally said to Princeton University mathematics professor Oscar Veblen, May 1921, while Einstein was in Princeton for a series of lectures, upon hearing that an experimental result by Dayton C. Miller of Cleveland, if true, would contradict his theory of gravitation. But the claimed discrepancy was quite small and required special circumstances (hence Einsteins&#039;s remark). The result turned out to be false. Some say by this remark Einstein meant that Nature hides her secrets by being subtle, while others say he meant that nature is mischievous but not bent on trickery. [The Yale Book of Quotations, ed. Fred R. Shapiro, 2006]&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: God may be sophisticated, but he&#039;s not malicious.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As quoted in &#039;&#039;Cherished Illusions&#039;&#039; (2005) by Sarah Stern, p. 109&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I have second thoughts. Maybe God &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039; malicious&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Said to [[wikipedia: Valentine Bargmann|Valentine Bargmann]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein in America&#039;&#039; (1985) by Jamie Sayen, p. 51, indicating that God leads people to believe they understand things that they actually are far from understanding; also in &#039;&#039;The Yale Book of Quotations&#039;&#039; (2006), ed. Fred R. Shapiro&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The God [[Spinoza]] revered is my God, too: I meet Him everyday in the harmonious laws which govern the universe.&#039;&#039;&#039; My religion is cosmic, and my God is too universal to concern himself with the intentions of every human being. &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not accept a religion of fear; My God will not hold me responsible for the actions that [[necessity]] imposes.&#039;&#039;&#039; My God speaks to me through laws.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in an interview (1948), quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein and the Poet : In Search of the Cosmic Man&#039;&#039; (1983) by William Hermanns, p. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* About God, I cannot accept any concept based on the authority of the Church. As long as I can remember, I have resented mass indoctrination. I do not believe in the fear of life, in the fear of death, in blind faith. I cannot prove to you that there is no [[personal God]], but if I were to speak of him, I would be a liar. &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil. My God created laws that take care of that. His universe is not ruled by wishful thinking, but by immutable laws.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in an interview (1948), quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein and the Poet : In Search of the Cosmic Man&#039;&#039; (1983) by William Hermanns, p. 132&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;My position concerning God is that of an [[agnostic]].&#039;&#039;&#039; I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to M. Berkowitz (25 October 1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What I see in nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of ‘[[humility]].’ &#039;&#039;&#039;This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism. . . . My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality. . . . I want to know how God created this world. I want to know his thoughts, the rest are details.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], as quoted by [[Timothy Ferris]], in his article “The Other Einstein”, &#039;&#039;[[w:Awake!|Awake!]]&#039;&#039; magazine, (22 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These proposals spring, without ulterior purpose or political passion, from our calm conviction that the hunger for peace is in the hearts of all peoples--those of Russia and of China no less than of our own country. They conform to our firm faith that &#039;&#039;&#039;God created men to enjoy, not destroy, the fruits of the earth and of their own toil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] in his [[s:The Chance for Peace|The Chance for Peace]] speech shortly after taking office and following the death of [[Joseph Stalin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Posing the question: does the god of love use underarm deodorant, vaginal spray and fluoride toothpaste?&lt;br /&gt;
**Deathbird Stories, by [[Harlan Ellison]] [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=149760477X]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not by accident that the enormous popularity of the “death of God” was born in our world of images: the impossibility of representing God visually leads inevitably in our day to the impossibility of his existence. God is dead—but beyond all the explicit reasons generally offered, he is dead because he is not visible. We can have confidence only in a visible God who is clearly manifested, exclusively in the visual dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;The Humiliation of the Word&#039;&#039; (1981), J. Hanks, trans. (1985), p. 198&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Throughout the Old Testament we see God choosing what is weak and humble to represent him (the stammering Moses, the infant Samuel, Saul from an insignificant family, David confronting Goliath, etc.). Paul tells us that God chooses the weak things of the world to confound the mighty. Here, however, we have a striking contradiction. In [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]] God is supposedly choosing an Augustus, a triumphant military leader. This vision and this miracle are totally impossible. But they are not impossible in the context of Christianity that is already off the rails, that thinks of God as the one who directs history and is the motive power in politics.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;The Subversion of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1982), G. Bromiley, trans. (1986), p. 123&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we consider what is our thought of God we find that it is our own soul stripped of all inferiority and carried out to perfection.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], Sermon 86 (1830), &#039;&#039;The Complete Sermons of Ralph Waldo Emerson&#039;&#039;, Volume 2 (1990), p. 243&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By going much alone a man will get more of a noble courage in thought and word than from all the wisdom that is in books. He will come to hear God speak as audibly through his own lips as ever He did by the mouth of Moses or Isaiah or Milton.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], Journal Entry, October 21, 1833&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The purpose of life seems to be to acquaint a man with himself. He is not to live the future as described to him but to live the real future to the real present. The highest revelation is that God is in every man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Journals&#039;&#039; (1822–1863), 8 September 1833. As quoted in: Maurice York and Rick Spaulding (2008): &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.de/books?id=_pRMlDQavQwC&amp;amp;pg=PA240&amp;amp;dq=A+man+contains+all+that+is+needful+to+his+government+within+himself&amp;amp;hl=de&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiahO73qqfeAhUwpIsKHRqzDswQ6AEIQDAD#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=A%20man%20contains%20all%20that%20is%20needful%20to%20his%20government%20within%20himself&amp;amp;f=false Ralph Waldo Emerson – The Infinitude of the Private Man: A Biography.]&#039;&#039; Chicago and Raleigh: Wrighwood Press, pages 240 – 241. Derived from: Edward Waldo Emerson and Waldo Emerson Forbes (1909): &#039;&#039;Journals of Ralph Waldo Emerson, with annotations&#039;&#039;, III, pages 200-201. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man thinking must not be subdued by his instruments. Books are for the scholar’s idle times. When he can read God directly, the hour is too precious to be wasted in other men’s transcripts of their readings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], “The American Scholar,” Addresses and Lectures, Complete Works (1883), vol. 1, p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In calling his two sons by the names of Gershom and Eliezer, Moses, like Joseph and other righteous men, intended to have the fact of God&#039;s help constantly before him. Since his sons would be with him, and he would often address them or call them by name, he would remember his gratitude to God.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 1&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no place without God&#039;s presence. Even in the bush He was present, and this was the lesson of God&#039;s omnipresence that Moses learnt when he was called out of the bush.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 2&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Moses wanted to know God&#039;s name, and God tells him, &#039;I am that I am&#039;; that is to say, &#039;I am called--or to be called-in accordance with my work in this world.&#039; When I judge mankind I am אלהים Elohim, that being the title or designation for judgment. When I war with the wicked I am known as צבאות Zevooth. When I execute judgment for the sins of man I am known as אלשדי El Shadai, and when I am visiting the world with mercy I am אבני or יהוה Adonoi, the Eternal.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 3&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The matron whom we find so often arguing with Rabbi José observed one day to that sage, &#039;My god is surely greater than yours. When your God appeared to Moses in the bush, Moses merely covered his face, whilst when my god (the serpent) made its appearance he could not stand his ground at all, but had to run away out of fear.&#039; &#039;Not so, &#039;returned the Rabbi, &#039;for in order to be out of the power of your god it sufficed for Moses to step a few paces back, but whither could he have fled from the presence of Him who filleth the earth?&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 3&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am the first and I am the last, and beside Me there is no God&#039; (Isa. 43. 6) I am the first, I have no father; I am the last, I have no brother. Beside Me there is no God; I have no son.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 29&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When God first called Moses, not being then an expert prophet, he was addressed in a voice similar to that of his own father, and he thought that his father had come to him from Egypt. God then told him that it was not his earthly father who called him, but the God of his father. Then, we find, Moses hid his face, which he did not do when first called by his name; not in fact until he heard the words, &#039;I am the God of thy fathers.&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 45&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 108&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Church in the colonies is the white people’s Church. ... She does not call the native to God’s ways but to the ways of the white man, of the master, of the oppressor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frantz Fanon]], &#039;&#039;The Wretched of The Earth&#039;&#039; (1963), p. 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is for man the [[commonplace book]] where he registers his highest feelings and thoughts, the genealogical album into which he enters the names of the things most dear and sacred to him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], in &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), p. xvi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By positing God as unknowable, man excuses himself to what is still left of his religious conscience for his oblivion of God, his surrender to the world. He negates God in practice – his mind and his senses have been absorbed by the world – but he does not negate him in theory. He does not attack his existence; he leaves it intact. But this existence neither affects nor incommodes him, for it is only a negative existence, an existence without existence; it is an existence that contradicts itself – a being that, in view of its effects, is indistinguishable from non-being.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the claims of God are revealed to the mind, it must necessarily yield to them, or strengthen itself in sin. It must, as it were, gird itself up, and struggle to resist the claims of duty. This strengthening self in sin under light is the particular form of sin which we call impenitence. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Grandison Finney]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Systematic Theology&#039;&#039; (1878), p. 369&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is only one good definition of God: the freedom that allows other freedoms to exist.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Fowles]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The French Lieutenant&#039;s Woman|The French Lieutenant&#039;s Woman]]&#039;&#039; (London: Jonathan Cape, 1969), p. 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I [[believe]] in God, not in a Catholic God, there is no Catholic God, there is God and I believe in [[Jesus]] [[Christ]], his incarnation.&#039;&#039;&#039; Jesus is my [[teacher]] and my pastor, but God, the Father, [[w:Ab (Semitic)|Abba]], is the [[light]] and the Creator. &#039;&#039;&#039;This is my Being.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Francis]], interviewed in &amp;quot;How the Church will change&amp;quot; by Eugenio Scalfari in &#039;&#039;La Repubblica&#039;&#039; (1 October 2013), as translated from Italian to English by Kathryn Wallace&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth—that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], debates in the Constitutional Convention, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (June 28, 1787); reported in James Madison, &#039;&#039;Journal of the Federal Convention&#039;&#039;, ed. E. H. Scott (1893), p. 259–60. Franklin suggests that the Convention begin its sessions with prayers &amp;quot;imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessings on our deliberations&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== G ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gandhi smiling 1942.jpg |thumb|It is beyond my power to induce in you a belief in God. There are certain things which are self proved and certain which are not proved at all. ~ [[Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi|Mahatma Gandhi]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Goyathlay-x.jpeg|thumb|I cannot think we are useless or Usen would not have created us. He created all tribes of men and certainly had a righteous purpose in creating each. ~ [[Geronimo]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I looked and looked but I didn&#039;t see God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Yuri Gagarin]] after becoming the first person to orbit the Earth, as quoted in &#039;&#039;To Rise from Earth&#039;&#039; (1996) by Wayne Lee; the authenticity of this remark is disputed; [http://www.interfax-religion.ru/orthodoxy/?act=interview&amp;amp;div=73&amp;amp;domain=1 Colonel Valentin Petrov stated in 2006] that the cosmonaut never said such words, and that the quote originated from [[Nikita Khrushchev]]&#039;s speech at the plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU about the state&#039;s anti-religion campaign, saying &amp;quot;Gagarin flew into space, but didn&#039;t see any god there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sometimes misquoted as &amp;quot;I see no God up here&amp;quot; as if he said this in space, but there are no transcripts or recordings indicating that he ever did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Galileo Galilei]]. in his [[w:Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina|Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina]] (1615), an [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/galileo-tuscany.html essay published in 1615], in response to enquiries of [[w:Christina of Lorraine|Christina of Tuscany]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Aspects of Western Civilization : Problems and Sources in History&#039;&#039; (1988) by Perry McAdow Rogers, p. 53&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not think it is necessary to believe that the same God who has given us our senses, reason, and intelligence wished us to abandon their use, giving us by some other means the information that we could gain through them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mathematics is the language in which God wrote the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Galileo Galilei]] in &#039;&#039;Statistics: Concepts and Applications&#039;&#039; (1994) by Harry Frank and Steven C. Althoen, p. xxi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is beyond my power to induce in you a belief in God. There are certain things which are self proved and certain which are not proved at all.&#039;&#039;&#039; The existence of God is like a geometrical axiom. It may be beyond our heart grasp. I shall not talk of an intellectual grasp. Intellectual attempts are more or less failures, as a rational explanation cannot give you the faith in a living God. For it is a thing beyond the grasp of reason. It transcends reason. There are numerous phenomena from which you can reason out the existence of God, but I shall not insult your intelligence by offering you a rational explanation of that type. &#039;&#039;&#039;I would have you brush aside all rational explanations and begin with a simple childlike faith in God. If I exist, God exists. With me it is a necessity of my being as it is with millions. They may not be able to talk about it, but from their life you can see that it is a part of their life. I am only asking you to restore the belief that has been undermined.&#039;&#039;&#039; In order to do so, you have to unlearn a lot of literature that dazzles your intelligence and throws you off your feet. Start with the faith which is also a token of humility and an admission that we know nothing, that we are less than atoms in this universe. &#039;&#039;&#039;We are less than atoms, I say, because the atom obeys the law of its being, whereas we in the insolence of our ignorance deny the law of nature. But I have no argument to address to those who have no faith.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi]] in &#039;&#039;Young India&#039;&#039; (24 September 1931); also in [http://www.archive.org/details/teachingsofmahat029222mbp &#039;&#039;Teachings Of Mahatma Gandhi&#039;&#039; (1945), edited by Jag Parvesh Chander, p. 458]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People are even more reluctant to admit that man explains nothing, than they were to admit that God explains nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ernest Gellner]], &#039;&#039;Legitimation of Belief&#039;&#039; (1974), p. 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I cannot think we are useless or Usen would not have created us. He created all tribes of men and certainly had a righteous purpose in creating each.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geronimo]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Geronimo&#039;s Story of His Life&#039;&#039; (1907) as told to S.M. Barrett in 1905 and 1906, &amp;quot;Usen&amp;quot; is the Apache word for God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we desire to hold on to solidarity with everyone else in the communicative fellowship, even the dead ... then we must claim a reality that can reach beyond the here and now, or that can connect our selves beyond our own death with those who innocently went to their destruction before us. And it is this reality that the Christian tradition calls God. &lt;br /&gt;
** Jens Glebe-Möller, &#039;&#039;A Political Dogmatic&#039;&#039; (1987), p. 102&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We all of us try to make God in our image. It is one of the worst of our temptations.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Goudge]], &#039;&#039;The Bird in the Tree&#039;&#039; (1940), Chapter 6.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Either half my colleagues are enormously stupid, or else the science of Darwinism is fully compatible with conventional religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen Jay Gould]], in &amp;quot;Impeaching a Self-Appointed Judge&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Scientific American&#039;&#039; (July 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is within you&#039;&#039;&#039;, and you can do and have anything you want. &#039;&#039;&#039;You must [[love]] yourself more. … and then … you can love your fellow man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cary Grant]], as quoted in [http://www.carygrant.net/articles/thinks%20about.htm &amp;quot;Love – That’s All Cary Grant Ever Thinks About&amp;quot;] by [[w:Sheilah Graham Westbrook|Sheilah Graham Westbrook]] in &#039;&#039;Motion Picture&#039;&#039; (June 1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The love of gain, which is a large, incalculably large, element in every soul, when once applied to the desire for God, will [[bless]] the man who has it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gregory of Nyssa]], &#039;&#039;On Virginity&#039;&#039;, Chapter 18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In vain do they think themselves innocent who appropriate to their own use alone those goods which God gave in common; by not giving to others that which they themselves receive, they become homicides and murderers, inasmuch as in keeping for themselves those things which would alleviate the sufferings of the poor, we may say that every day they cause the death of as many persons as they might have fed and did not. When, therefore, we offer the means of living to the indigent, we do not give them anything of ours, but that which of right belongs to them. It is less a work of mercy which we perform than the payment of a debt.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gregory I]], quoted in [[George D. Herron]], &#039;&#039;Between Caesar and Jesus&#039;&#039; (1899), pp. 111-112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As one reads the scriptures of Christianity and Islam with a morally alert mind, one starts getting sick of the very sound of word ‘god’ which word is littered all over this literature like dead leaves in autumn. The deeds which are ascribed to or approved of by this God are quite often so cruel and obnoxious as to leave one wondering that if these are the doings of the Divine, what else is there which is left for the Devil to do.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sita Ram Goel|Sita Ram Goel]], &#039;&#039;Defence of Hindu Society&#039;&#039; (1983)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1539.jpg|thumb|right|The objects of [[philosophy]], it is true, are upon the whole the same as those of religion. In both the object is Truth, in that supreme [[sense]] in which God and God only is the [[Truth]]. ~ [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Legendre - La Prophétie d&#039;Isaïe.JPG|thumb|The prophet disdains those for whom God&#039;s presence is a comfort and security; to him it is a challenge, an incessant demand. ~ [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AdornoHorkheimerHabermasbyJeremyJShapiro2.png|thumb|right|The concept of God was for a long time the place where the idea was kept alive that there are other norms besides those to which nature and society give expression in their operation. ~ [[Max Horkheimer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Give according to your means, or God will make your means according to your giving.&lt;br /&gt;
** Reverend [[John Hall (Presbyterian pastor)|John Hall]], reported in [[Tryon Edwards]], &#039;&#039;A Dictionary of Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1908), p. 194&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe God isn&#039;t the sex police, Richard. Sometimes I think Christians get all hung up on the sex thing because it&#039;s easier to worry about sex than to ask yourself, &#039;&#039;am I a good person?&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;[…]&#039;&#039; It makes it easy to be cruel, because as long as you&#039;re not fucking around, nothing you do can be that bad. Is that really all you think of God?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Anita Blake|Anita Blake]], to [[w:Richard_Zeeman|Richard Zeeman]]&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | author = [[Laurell K. Hamilton]]&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = The Harlequin&lt;br /&gt;
  | edition = 1st edition&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = June 2007&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Berkley Books&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = {{ISBN|978-0-425-21724-5}}&lt;br /&gt;
  | chapter = chapter 44&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pp. 391-392&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No matter how much I probe and prod,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;I cannot quite believe in God;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;But oh, I hope to God that He&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;Unswervingly believes in me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Yip Harburg]], &#039;&#039;Rhymes for the Irreverent&#039;&#039;, (1965)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To the extent that we are free we are like God, who has no need of an idea of a God over [[w:Godself|Godself]] or of an incentive other than the moral law itself. But to the extent that we are also natural beings, we desire our own happiness in everything else that we desire, and we need the practical postulate of God to bring that happiness together with morality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John E. Hare]], “Ethics and Religion: Two Kantian Arguments,” &#039;&#039;Philosophical Investigations&#039;&#039;, vol. 34, no. 2 (April 2011), p. 165&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You either have a God who sends child rapists to rape children or you have a God who simply watches it and says, ‘When you’re done, I’m going to punish you.’ If I could stop a person from raping a child, I would. That’s the difference between me and your God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Tracie Harris|Tracie Harris]], [[w:The Atheist Experience|The Atheist Experience]] &#039;&#039;YouTube&#039;&#039; Jan 6 2013 as quoted in [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/atheist-experience-child-rape_n_2434198.html &#039;&#039;Atheist Experience Child Rape&#039;&#039; Huffington Post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Futurist [[w:Aldo Palazzeschi|Aldo Palazzeschi]]... exhorts us in &#039;&#039;L&#039;antidolore&#039;&#039; (1913) to laugh heartily at the mortality built into the plan of creation not out of spite, as has traditionally been the case, but because suffering and death are nothing but pranks of the prime trickster, God. If anything it is the devil who is the spirit of gravity, and it is in taking him seriously that we plummet from grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3806/is_200605/ai_n17220907/print Thomas Harrison, in &amp;quot;Laughter and the Tree Of Knowledge&amp;quot; in the &#039;&#039;Romanic Review&#039;&#039; (May-November 2006)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The objects of philosophy, it is true, are upon the whole the same as those of religion. In both the object is Truth, in that supreme sense in which God and God only is the Truth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], &#039;&#039;Logic&#039;&#039;, Chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;ve never understood how God could expect his creatures to pick the one true religion by faith — it strikes me as a sloppy way to run a universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[Stranger in a Strange Land]]&#039;&#039; (1961) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent — it says so right here on the label. If you have a mind capable of believing all three of these divine attributes simultaneously, I have a wonderful bargain for you. No checks, please. Cash and in small bills.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough for Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973), p. 264&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The most preposterous notion that H. sapiens has ever dreamed up is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of all the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of His creatures, can be swayed by their prayers, and becomes petulant if He does not receive this flattery. Yet this absurd fantasy, without a shred of evidence to bolster it, pays all the expenses of the oldest, largest, and least productive industry in all history.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The second most preposterous notion is that copulation is inherently sinful.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough for Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973), p. 266&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How much reverence can you have for a Supreme Being who finds it necessary to include such phenomena as phlegm and tooth decay in his divine system of creation?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Heller]], &#039;&#039;Catch 22&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Restore to God His due in tithe and time;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A tithe purloin&#039;d cankers the whole estate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Herbert]], &#039;&#039;The Temple&#039;&#039; (1633), &#039;&#039;The Church Porch&#039;&#039;, Stanza 65&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The prophet disdains those for whom God&#039;s presence is a comfort and security; to him it is a challenge, an incessant demand.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]], &#039;&#039;The Prophets&#039;&#039; (1962), p. 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious ideas, supposedly private matters between man and god, are in practice always political ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;The Monarchy: A Critique of Britain&#039;s Favourite Fetish&#039;&#039; (1990), &#039;&#039;Chatto Counterblasts&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only a humorless tyrant could want a perpetual chanting of praises that, one has no choice but to assume, would be the innate virtues and splendors furnished him by &#039;&#039;his&#039;&#039; creator, infinite regression, drowned in praise!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Consciousness is Gods&#039; gift to mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dr. [[w:Albert Hofmann|Albert Hofmann]] discoverer of [[LSD]] (15 January 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God only speaks to those who understand the language&lt;br /&gt;
** Dr. [[w:Albert Hofmann|Albert Hofmann]], (15 January 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The concept of God was for a long time the place where the idea was kept alive that there are other norms besides those to which nature and society give expression in their operation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Horkheimer]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on Religion,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Critical Theory: Selected Essays&#039;&#039; (1995), p. 129&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The significance of God, cause, number, substance or soul consists, as [[William James|James]] asserts, in nothing but the tendency of the given concept to make us act or think. If the world should reach a point at which it ceases to care not only about such metaphysical entities but also about murders perpetrated behind closed frontiers or simply in the dark, one would have to conclude that the concepts of such murders have no meaning, that they represent no ‘distinct ideas’ or truths, since they do not make any ‘sensible difference to anybody.’&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Horkheimer]], &#039;&#039;Eclipse of Reason&#039;&#039; (1947), pp. 46-47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing could be more untrue than the often-repeated statement that we all worship the same God; or that other, that whatever we worship the result is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Caryll Houselander|Caryll Houselander]], &#039;&#039;The Reed of God&#039;&#039; (London: Sheed &amp;amp; Ward, 1944), p. 85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Savage interrupted him. &amp;quot;But isn&#039;t it natural to feel there&#039;s a God?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;You might as well ask if it&#039;s natural to do up one&#039;s trousers with zippers,&amp;quot; said the Controller sarcastically. &amp;quot;You remind me of another of those old fellows called Bradley. He defined philosophy as the finding of bad reason for what one believes by instinct. As if one believed anything by instinct! One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them. Finding bad reasons for what one believes for other bad reasons–that&#039;s philosophy. People believe in God because they&#039;ve been conditioned to. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;But all the same,&amp;quot; insisted the Savage, &amp;quot;it is natural to believe in God when you&#039;re alone–quite alone, in the night, thinking about death …&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;But people never are alone now,&amp;quot; said Mustapha Mond. &amp;quot;We make them hate solitude; and we arrange their lives so that it&#039;s almost impossible for them ever to have it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], [[Brave New World]] ch. 17 [http://www.huxley.net/bnw/seventeen.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why did it occur to anyone to believe in only one God? And conversely why did it ever occur to anyone to believe in many gods? To both these questions we must return the same answer: Because that is how the human mind happens to work. For the human mind is both diverse and simple, simultaneously many and one. We have an immediate perception of our own diversity and of that of the outside world. And at the same time we have immediate perceptions of our own oneness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], “One and Many,” &#039;&#039;Do What You Will&#039;&#039; (1928), p. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Would God give a bird wings and make it a crime to fly? Would he give me brains and make it a crime to think? Any God that would damn one of his children for the expression of his honest thought wouldn&#039;t make a decent thief. When I read a book and don&#039;t believe it, I ought to say so. I will do so and take the consequences like a man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Ingersoll]] (14 October 1879)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead. [[Karl Marx|Marx]] is dead. And I don’t feel so well myself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eugène Ionesco]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Jewish American Literature : A Norton Anthology&#039;&#039; (2000) by Jules Chametzky, &amp;quot;Jewish Humor&amp;quot;, p. 318&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== J ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Polyptyque de la Vanité terrestre et de la Rédemption céleste-Hans Memling mg 9959.jpg|thumb|I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.&lt;br /&gt;
  ~ [[Jesus]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brueghel Jan II God creating.jpg|thumb|The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dieu Tout-Puissant Chapelle Royale Versailles ceiling.jpg|thumb|It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sabaoth icon (Russia, 19 c.) 2.jpeg|thumb|Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The theory of an existing and benevolent god simply doesn&#039;t make sense to anyone who is rational. A benevolent and omnipotent god would never allow such imbalances as I see to exist for one second. If by chance I am wrong, however I must then assume that being born black called for some automatic punishment for sins I know nothing about, and being innocent it behooves me to defy god. &lt;br /&gt;
**George Jackson, Soledad Brother: The Prison Letters of George Jackson&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s on your side? Shit, I&#039;m alright with that. Because we&#039;re going to reload the clips and come right back.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[50 Cent|Curtis J. Jackson]], [http://genius.com/50-cent-heat-lyrics/ &amp;quot;Heat&amp;quot;] (2003), &#039;&#039;Get Rich or Die Tryin&#039;&#039;&#039; (2003), by C.J. Jackson III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The God who gave us [[life]], gave us [[liberty]] at the same time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[s:A Summary View of the Rights of British America|Summary View of the Rights of British America]] (1774)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Query 17 in &#039;&#039;Notes on the State of Virginia&#039;&#039; (1781-1785)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Query 18 in &#039;&#039;Notes on the State of Virginia&#039;&#039; (1781-1785)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve the homage of [[reason]], than that of blindfolded [[fear]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr from Paris, France, (10 August 1787)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No historical fact is better established, than that the doctrine of one God, pure and uncompounded, was that of the early ages of Christianity … Nor was the unity of the Supreme Being ousted from the Christian creed by the force of reason, but by the sword of civil government, wielded at the will of the fanatic [[w:Athanasius|Athanasius]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to James Smith (1822)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The doctrines of [[Jesus]] are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man.&lt;br /&gt;
: 1. That there is one only God, and he all perfect.&lt;br /&gt;
: 2. That there is a future state of rewards and punishments.&lt;br /&gt;
: 3. That to [[love]] God with all thy heart and thy neighbor as thyself, is the sum of [[religion]].&lt;br /&gt;
::* [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to Benjamin Waterhouse, (26 June 1822)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;*I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jesus]] quoted in [[Psalms]] 82:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some foolish men declare that creator made the world. The doctrine that the world was created is ill advised and should be rejected. If God created the world, where was he before the creation? If you say he was transcendent then and needed no support, where is he now? How could God have made this world without any raw material? If you say that he made this first, and then the world, you are faced with an endless regression. If you declare that this raw material arose naturally you fall into another fallacy, For the whole universe might thus have been its own creator, and have arisen quite naturally. If God created the world by an act of his own will, without any raw material, then it is just his will and nothing else — and who will believe this silly nonsense? If he is ever perfect and complete, how could the will to create have arisen in him? If, on the other hand, he is not perfect, he could no more create the universe than a potter could. If he is form-less, action-less and all-embracing, how could he have created the world? Such a soul, devoid of all morality, would have no desire to create anything. If he is perfect, he does not strive for the three aims of man, so what advantage would he gain by creating the universe? If you say that he created to no purpose because it was his nature to do so, then God is pointless. If he created in some kind of sport, it was the sport of a foolish child, leading to trouble. If he created because of the [[karma]] of embodied beings [acquired in a previous creation] He is not the Almighty [[Lord]], but subordinate to something else. If out of love for living beings and need of them he made the world, why did he not take creation wholly blissful free from misfortune? If he were transcendent he would not create, for he would be free: Nor if involved in transmigration, for then he would not be almighty. Thus the doctrine that the world was created by God makes no sense at all, And God commits great sin in slaying the children whom he himself created. If you say that he slays only to destroy evil beings, why did he create such beings in the first place? Good men should combat the believer in divine creation, maddened by an evil doctrine. Know that the world is uncreated, as time itself is, without beginning or end, and is based on the principles, life and rest. Uncreated and indestructible, it endures under the compulsion of its own nature.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Jinasena}} (9th Century) in the &#039;&#039;[[w:Mahapurana (Jainism)|Mahāpurāna]]&#039;&#039;, as translated in &#039;&#039;Primal Myths&#039;&#039; (1979) by Barbara Sproul&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The very pure spirit does not bother about the regard of others or human respect, but communes inwardly with God, alone and in solitude as to all forms, and with delightful tranquility, for the knowledge of God is received in divine silence.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** St. [[John of the Cross]] in &#039;&#039;The Sayings of Light and Love&#039;&#039; as translated by Kieran Kavanaugh and Otilio Rodriguez (1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a dark night to man in this life.&lt;br /&gt;
** St. [[John of the Cross]], &#039;&#039;The Ascent of Mt. Carmel&#039;&#039;, I, 2, 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[All]]-thing hath the Being by the [[love]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is all that is [[Goodness|good]], as to my sight, and the goodness that each thing hath, it is He.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God willeth that we endlessly hate the sin and endlessly love the soul, as God loveth it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Truth]] seeth God, and [[Wisdom]] beholdeth God, and of these two cometh the third: that is, a holy marvellous [[delight]] in God; which is [[Love]]. Where Truth and Wisdom are verily, there is Love verily, coming of them both.&#039;&#039;&#039; And all of God’s making: for He is endless sovereign Truth, endless sovereign Wisdom, endless sovereign Love, unmade; and man’s Soul is a creature in God which hath the same properties &#039;&#039;made&#039;&#039;, and evermore it doeth that it was made for: it seeth God, it beholdeth God, and it loveth God. Whereof God enjoyeth in the creature; and the creature in God, endlessly marvelling. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;In which marvelling he seeth his God, his Lord, his Maker so high, so great, and so good, in comparison with him that is made, that scarcely the creature seemeth ought to the self. But the clarity and the clearness of Truth and Wisdom maketh him to see and to bear witness that he is made for Love, in which God endlessly keepeth him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Highly ought we to rejoice that God dwelleth in our soul, and much more highly ought we to rejoice that our soul dwelleth in God.&#039;&#039;&#039; Our soul is &#039;&#039;made&#039;&#039; to be God’s dwelling-place; and the dwelling-place of the soul is God, Which is &#039;&#039;unmade&#039;&#039;. And high understanding it is, inwardly to see and know that God, which is our Maker, dwelleth in our soul; and an higher understanding it is, inwardly to see and to know that our soul, that is made, dwelleth in God’s Substance: of which Substance, God, we are that we are. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And I saw no difference between God and our Substance: but as it were all God; and yet mine understanding took that our Substance is in God: that is to say, that &#039;&#039;&#039;God is God, and our Substance is a creature in God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;.1393), Ch. 54&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;As truly as God is our [[Father]], so truly is God our [[Mother]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c.1393), Ch. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I beheld with reverent dread, and highly marvelling in the sight and in the feeling of the sweet accord, that &#039;&#039;&#039;our Reason is in God&#039;&#039;&#039;; understanding that it is the highest gift that we have received; and it is grounded in [[nature]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;.1393), Ch. 83&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I saw full surely that ere God made us He loved us; which love was never slacked, nor ever shall be. And in this love He hath done all His works; and in this love He hath made all things profitable to us; and in this love our life is everlasting. &#039;&#039;&#039;In our making we had beginning; but the love wherein He made us was in Him from without beginning: in which love we have our beginning. And all this shall we see in God, without end.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 86&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A god is usually characteristic of a certain system of thought or morality. For instance, take the Christian God, the &#039;&#039;summum bonum&#039;&#039;: God is love, love being the highest moral principle; and God is spirit, the spirit being the supreme idea of meaning. All our Christian moral concepts derive from such assumptions, and the supreme essence of all of them is what we call God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. G. Jung]], &#039;&#039;Nietzsche&#039;s Zarathustra&#039;&#039; (1988), p. 40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* May His great Name be blessed forever and ever.&lt;br /&gt;
** The Kaddish Prayer: A new translation with a commentary anthologized from Talmudic, Midrashic and Rabbinic sources. New York: Mesorah Publications, Ltd., 2001, ISBN 0-89906-160-5, p.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We actually have a candidate for the [[mind]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; The mind of God we [[believe]] is cosmic [[music]], the music of [[String theory|strings resonating through 11 dimensional]] [[w:Hyperspace|hyperspace]]. That is the mind of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michio Kaku]], [http://bigthink.com/dr-kakus-universe/math-is-the-mind-of-god Math is the Mind of God] (29 December 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are to love God, not for the gifts bestowed upon us but for the sake of love itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Eyran Katsenelenbogen|Eyran Katsenelenbogen]], &#039;&#039;One Time&#039;&#039; (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are no gods! Just voices in your head. They tell you to do what you already want to do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]]&#039;&#039; (mass market paperback edition, {{ISBN|978-0-06-156236-5}}), p. 86&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If they are gods, they are responsible for the horror that occurs in the world. So they are evil. Why otherwise would they allow things to be as they are?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]],&#039;&#039; p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Indeed, if we are ever to be free human beings, and not puppets jerked about by unseen forces—which may or may not exist—the gods must go.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]],&#039;&#039; p. 102&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Christian God is spirit and Christianity is spirit, and there is discord between the flesh and the spirit but the flesh is not the sensuous-it is the selfish. In this sense, even the spiritual can become sensuous-for example, if a person took his spiritual gifts in vain, he would then be carnal. And of course I know that it is not necessary for the Christian that Christ must have been physically beautiful; and it would be grievous-for a reason different from the one you give-because if beauty were some essential, how the believer would long to see him; but from all this it by no means follows that the sensuous is annihilated in Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Soren Kierkegaard]] &#039;&#039;Either/Or Part II&#039;&#039; (1843) as translated by Hong, p. 50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If everything is assumed to be in order with regard to the Holy Scriptures-what then? Has the person who did not believe come a single step closer to faith? No, not a single step. Faith does not result from straightforward scholarly deliberation, nor does it come directly; on the contrary, in this objectivity one loses that infinite, personal, impassioned interestedness, which is the condition of faith, the everywhere and nowhere in which faith can come into existence. Has the person who did believe gained anything with regard to the power and strength of faith? No, not in the least; in this prolix knowledge, in this certainty that lurks at faith’s door and craves for it, he is rather in such a precarious position that much effort, much fear and trembling will be needed lest he fall into temptation and confuse knowledge with faith. Whereas up to now faith has been a beneficial taskmaster in uncertainty, but it would be its worst enemy in this certainty. If passion is taken away, faith no longer exists, and certainty and passion do not hitch up as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Soren Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments&#039;&#039; (1846) as translated by Hong, p. 29&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To live only in the unconditional, to breathe only the unconditional – the human being cannot do this; he perishes like a fish that must live in the air. But on the other hand a human being cannot in the deeper sense live without relating himself to the unconditional; he expires, that is, perhaps goes on living, but spiritlessly. &#039;&#039;&#039;Thus the single&#039;&#039;&#039; individual must personally relate himself to the unconditional. I believed, and do believe, that this is Christianity and love for “the neighbor.” &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;The Point of View On My Work As An Author by Soren Kierkegaard&#039;&#039;&#039; (finished 1848) published by Peter Christian Kierkegaard 1859 translated by Howard and Edna Hong 1998 Princeton University Press P. 19-20 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is cruel, sometimes he makes you live.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen King]], &#039;&#039;Desperation&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God said take what you want ... and pay for it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen King]], &#039;&#039;Desperation&#039;&#039;, said by the character &amp;quot;Johnny Marinville&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*According to logic &#039;nothing&amp;quot; is that of which everything can truly be denied and nothing can truly be affirmed. The idea therefore either of a finite or infinite nothing is a contradiction in terms. And yet according to theologians  &amp;quot;God the self existent being is a most simple, unchangeable, incorruptible being; without parts, figure, motion, divisibility, or any other such properties as we find in matter. For all such things so plainly and necessarily imply finiteness in their very notion and are utterly inconsistent with complete infinity.&amp;quot; Therefore the God here offered to the adoration of the XlXth century lacks every quality upon which man&#039;s mind is capable of fixing any judgment. What is this in fact but a being of whom they can affirm nothing that is not instantly contradicted. Their own Bible their Revelation destroys all the moral perceptions they heap upon him unless indeed they call those qualities perfections that every other man&#039;s reason and common sense call imperfections, odious vices and brutal wickedness. Nay more he who reads our Buddhist scriptures written for the superstitious masses will fail to find in them a demon so vindictive, unjust, so cruel and so stupid as the celestial tyrant upon whom the Christians prodigally lavish their servile worship and on whom their theologians heap those perfections that are contradicted on every page of their Bible. Truly and veritably your theology has created her God but to destroy him piecemeal. Your church is the fabulous Saturn, who begets children but to devour them.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Koot Hoomi|Koot Hoomi]], in   [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett|&#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett&#039;&#039;]],  (1923),  Letter No. X, p. 54, 1881&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Alex&#039;&#039;&#039;: You needn&#039;t take it any further, sir. You&#039;ve proved to me that all this ultraviolence and killing is wrong, wrong, and terribly wrong. I&#039;ve learned me lesson, sir. I&#039;ve seen now what I&#039;ve never seen before. I&#039;m cured! Praise god! &lt;br /&gt;
** [[A Clockwork Orange]] screenplay by Stanley Kubrick.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The important point is that all the standard attributes assigned to God in our history could equally well be the characteristics of biological entities who billions of years ago were at a stage of development similar to man&#039;s own and evolved into something as remote from man as man is remote from the primordial ooze from which he first emerged.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Stanley Kubrick]] Playboy Interview (1968) [http://paulnahm.blogspot.com/2010/06/playboy-interview-wstanley-kubrick-in.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ludovico Mazzolino - God the Father.jpg|thumb|One boy would not get it through his head that for all adults God is not an old man in a white beard sitting on a cloud. ~ [[Madeleine L&#039;Engle]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:God the Father with His Right Hand Raised in Blessing.jpg|thumb|The purposes of the Almighty are perfect, and must prevail, though we erring mortals may fail to accurately perceive them in advance. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It isn&#039;t always the middle-aged who refuse to listen, who will not even try to understand another point of view. One boy would not get it through his head that for all adults God is not an old man in a white beard sitting on a cloud. As far as this boy was concerned, this old gentleman was the adult&#039;s god, and therefore he did not believe in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Madeleine L&#039;Engle]] in &#039;&#039;The Crosswicks Journal, Book One : A Circle of Quiet&#039;&#039; (1972)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Life is too short and hard and strange not to blame God for what He done made of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Jay Lake|Jay Lake]], &#039;&#039;The Temptation of Eustace Prudence McAllen&#039;&#039; in [[w:Martin H. Greenberg|Martin H. Greenberg]] (ed.) &#039;&#039;Westward Weird&#039;&#039; {{ISBN|978-0-7564-0718-6}} p. 199&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Homo proponit et Deus disponit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** And governeth alle goode virtues.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Langland]], &#039;&#039;Vision of Piers Ploughman&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1824), Volume II, p. 427, line 13,984. [[w:John Gerson|John Gerson]] is credited with same. Saying quoted in &#039;&#039;Chronicles of Battel Abbey&#039;&#039; (1066 to 1177). Translation by Lower, 1851, p. 27. [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;Iliad&#039;&#039;, XVII. 515. [[Pindar]], &#039;&#039;Olymp&#039;&#039;, XIII. 149. [[Demosthenes]], &#039;&#039;De Corona.&#039;&#039;, 209. [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Bacchid.&#039;&#039; I, 2, 36. [[w:Ammianus Marcellinus|Ammianus Marcellinus]], &#039;&#039;Hist&#039;&#039;, XXV. 3. [[Francois Fenelon]], &#039;&#039;Sermon on the Epiphany&#039;&#039;, 1685. [[Montaigne]], &#039;&#039;Essay&#039;&#039;, Book II, Chapter XXXVII. [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;Epistles&#039;&#039;, 107. [[w:Cleanthus|Cleanthus]], &#039;&#039;Fragment&#039;&#039;. [[Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039;, I. 22. [[Dante]], &#039;&#039;Paradise&#039;&#039;, VIII, line 134. [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Wallenstein&#039;s Death&#039;&#039;, I, 7. 32. [[w:Ordericus Vitalis|Ordericus Vitalis]], &#039;&#039;Ecclesiastica Historia&#039;&#039;, Book III (1075)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God, but I have this idea that if there were a God, or destiny of some kind looking down on us, that if he saw you taking anything for granted he’d take it away. So he&#039;ll be like: &#039;You think this is going pretty well?&#039; Then he&#039;ll go and send down some big disaster. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hugh Laurie]] Stargazing: Heather&#039;s Angry, Jane is Ill, Hugh is Anxious Kansas City Star, Wed, Oct. 31, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*These findings provide the first experimental evidence that exposure to [[God]]  influences [[Goals|goal pursuit]] and suggest that the ever-present cultural reminders of God can be both burden and benefit for [[W:Self-control|self-regulation]]... From popular and classic works of fiction, to the news media, to everyday conversation, the social world is replete with mentions of God. The current findings suggest that this exposure may have broad societal consequences for fundamental [[psychological]] processes of  [[W:Self-control|self-regulation]], which in turn underlie much of [[health]], [[happiness]], and [[productivity|human productivity]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/psp-102-1-4.pdf Divergent Effects of Activating Thoughts of God on Self-Regulation], Kristin Laurin, Aaron C. Kay and Grainne M. Fitzsimons,  [[W:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|&#039;&#039;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology&#039;&#039;]], (January 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is only a great imaginative experience.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[D.H. Lawrence]], &#039;&#039;Phoenix: The Posthumous Papers of D. H. Lawrence&#039;&#039; (1936) pt. 4, edited by E. McDonald&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a latecomer in the [[w:history of religion|history of religion]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gerard van der Leeuw|Gerard van der Leeuw]], &#039;&#039;Phänomenologie der Religion&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a concept by which we measure our pain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lennon]], &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039; (1970)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The more we get to know about our [[universe]] ... the more the hypothesis that there is a Creator God, who designed the universe for a purpose, gains in credibility as the best explanation of why we are here.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Lennox|John Lennox]], cited in &#039;&#039;[[w:Awake!|Awake!]]&#039;&#039; magazine, 2010, 11/10, article: &#039;&#039;Has Science Done Away With God?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Secondly, getting rid of God does not get rid of the suffering. In fact, it can make the pain worse since it gets rid of all ultimate hope and justice. Horgan denies this in his last sentence, but I still maintain he has no ultimate personal hope to offer for anyone, including himself. The vast majority of people who have ever lived have suffered and not received justice in this life. Since, according to atheism, death is the end, then these people will never receive justice since there is no life to come. I applaud Horgan’s positive reaction to what we have achieved in overcoming disease, poverty, oppression and war, but that does not affect my point in the slightest. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Whether God could have made a world in which fire warmed but didn’t burn and there were no destructive earthquakes is difficult. After all, earthquakes are paradoxically essential for the maintenance of life. Certainly, God could have made a world in which there was no moral evil. But there would have been no humans in it--it would be a robotic world. The greatest God-given capacity we humans have is the capacity to love. It inevitably carries with it the capacity to hate. Hence the world presents us all with a mixed picture – beauty and barbed wire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Lennox|John Lennox]], [https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/can-faith-and-science-coexist-mathematician-and-christian-john-lennox-responds/ &amp;quot;Can Faith and Science Coexist? Mathematician and Christian John Lennox Responds&amp;quot; by John Horgan, at &#039;&#039;Scientific American : Cross-Check&#039;&#039; (1 March 2015)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is it not better to place a question mark upon a problem while seeking an answer than to put the label &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; there and consider the matter solved? Does not the word &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; only confuse and make more difficult the solution by assuming a conclusion that is utterly groundless and palpably absurd?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Lewis]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Atheism&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* His Omnipotence means power to do all that is intrinsically possible, not to do the intrinsically impossible. You may attribute miracles to him, but not nonsense. This is no limit to his power. If you choose to say &#039;God can give a creature free will and at the same time withhold free will from it,&#039; you have not succeeded in saying anything about God: meaningless combinations of words do not suddenly acquire meaning simply because we prefix to them the two other words &#039;God can.&#039;... It is no more possible for God than for the weakest of his creatures to carry out both of two mutually exclusive alternatives; not because his power meets an obstacle, but because nonsense remains nonsense even when we talk it about God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. S. Lewis]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=NSjlftWk78kC&amp;amp;pg=PA18 The Problem of Pain ]&#039;&#039;. Zondervan, 1944, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am much indebted to the good christian people of the country for their constant prayers and consolations; and to no one of them, more than to yourself. &#039;&#039;&#039;The purposes of the Almighty are perfect, and must prevail, though we erring mortals may fail to accurately perceive them in advance.&#039;&#039;&#039; We hoped for a happy termination of this terrible [[w:American Civil War|war]] long before this; but God knows best, and has ruled otherwise. We shall yet acknowledge His wisdom and our own error therein. Meanwhile we must work earnestly in the best light He gives us, trusting that so working still conduces to the great ends He ordains. Surely He intends some great good to follow this mighty convulsion, which no mortal could make, and no mortal could stay.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]]&#039;s Letter to Eliza Gurney (4 September 1864); quoted in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, vol. 7&#039;&#039; (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1953), p. 535&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I can see how it might be possible for a man to look down upon the earth and be an atheist, but I cannot conceive how he could look up into the heavens and say there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Recollection by Gilbert J. Greene, quoted in &#039;&#039;The Speaking Oak&#039;&#039; (1902) by Ferdinand C. Iglehart and &#039;&#039;Latest Light on Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1917) by Ervin S. Chapman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I know there is a God, and that He hates injustice and slavery. I see the storm coming, and I know that His hand is in it. If He has a place and work for me–and I think He has–I believe I am ready. I am nothing, but truth is everything. I know I am right because I know that liberty is right, for Christ teaches it, and Christ is God.&#039;&#039;&#039; I have told them that a house divided against itself cannot stand, and Christ and reason say the same; and they will find it so. [[Stephen A. Douglas|Douglas]] doesn&#039;t care whether slavery is voted up or voted down, but &#039;&#039;&#039;God cares, and humanity cares, and I care; and with God’s help I shall not fail. I may not see the end; but it will come and I shall be vindicated&#039;&#039;&#039;; and these men will find that they have not read their Bibles aright.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]] anecdote registered by novelist [[w:Josiah Gilbert Holland|Josiah Gilbert Holland]], in his &#039;&#039;Life of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1866), Chapter XVI, p. 287. [[w:University of Nebraska Press|University of Nebraska Press]], as something that Lincoln said in a conversation with educator Newman Bateman, in the Autumn of 1860.&lt;br /&gt;
* Faith in a distant, ephemeral God, solver of problems by house call, has also been left behind. Increasingly I come to understand my religion and priesthood as a committment to the society in which I live. A committment to men and women who struggle for a new social order where [[slavery]] has no place, that prepares people to fully realize themselves, in which injustice and exploitation cease to be our daily bread. I understand Jesus Christ as very related to this matter. I understand Jesus Christ as each one of my brothers and sisters. I understand that in uniting with them in this struggle, perhaps I will be capable of overcoming the small and large personal needs that are only [[relevant]] because they impede me from fully giving myself to this task.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Llidó]] letter to a friend on March 9, 1971 (from the book  &#039;&#039;Antonio Llidó: Epistolario de un compromiso&#039;&#039;,Tàndem Edicons,España (1999) {{ISBN|84-8131-227-4}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God, to confess their sins and transgressions, in humble sorrow, yet with assured hope that genuine repentance will lead to mercy and pardon, and to recognize the sublime truths announced in the Holy Scriptures, and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], Proclamation for a Day of Fasting, Humiliation and Prayer (30 March 1863)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An&#039; you&#039;ve gut to git up airly&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ef you want to take in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Russell Lowell]], &#039;&#039;The Biglow Papers&#039;&#039; (1848), First Series. No. 1, Stanza 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thanksgiving chapel interior.jpg|thumb|To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that [[Love]] is the reason for my existence, for God is love. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name. ~ [[Thomas Merton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But the thing that&#039;s really disturbing about Noah isn&#039;t the silly, it&#039;s that it&#039;s &#039;&#039;immoral&#039;&#039;. It&#039;s about a psychotic mass murderer who gets away with it, and his name is God. Genesis says God was so angry with himself for screwing up when he made mankind so flawed (grr!), that he sent the flood to kill everyone. Everyone. Men, women, children, babies.  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; What kind of tyrant punishes everyone just to get back at the few he&#039;s mad at? I mean, &#039;&#039;besides&#039;&#039; {{w|Chris Christie}}. Hey God, you know you&#039;re kind of a dick when you are in a movie with [[Russell Crowe]], and you&#039;re the one with anger issues. You know, conservatives are always going on about how Americans are losing their values and their morality. Well, maybe it&#039;s because you worship a guy who drowns &#039;&#039;babies&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time with Bill Maher&#039;&#039; {{#formatdate:2014-03-14}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Eternal turned his attention to the three shades who stood humbly and yet hopefully before him. The quick, with so short a time to live, when they talk of themselves, talk too much; but the dead, with eternity before them, are so [[verbosity|verbose]] that only angels could listen to them with civility.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. Somerset Maugham]], &#039;&#039;Collected Short Stories 1&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;The Judgement Seat&amp;quot;, p. 314&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is impossible to imagine the universe run by a wise, just and omnipotent God, but it is quite easy to imagine it run by a board of gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]] in: Donald M Simanek, John. Holden &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=ldX0FkgurzoC&amp;amp;pg=PA253 Science Askew: A Light-hearted Look at the Scientific World]&#039;&#039;, CRC Press, Oct 1, 2001,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What in me is dark,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Illumine; what is low, raise and support;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That to the height of this great argument&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I may assert eternal Providence,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And justify the ways of God to men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book I, line 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These are thy glorious works, Parent of good.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book V, line 153&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bright and clear mind — that we call God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Namboku Mizuno]], &#039;&#039;Food Governs Your Destiny&#039;&#039;, p. 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is living in people&#039;s hearts, and in God there is no distinction or rank. Therefore God lives in everyone. That&#039;s why traditionally it is said that all deities are the same. They say God comes to a person who is very humble and honest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Namboku Mizuno]], &#039;&#039;Food Governs Your Destiny&#039;&#039;, p. 105&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If, it was natural to reason, God punishes men with eternal torment, it is surely lawful for men to use doses of it in a good cause.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph McCabe]] in &#039;&#039;A History of Torture&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Creator — A [[Comedy|comedian]] whose audience is afraid to [[laugh]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]], &#039;&#039;A Mencken Chrestomathy,&#039;&#039; ch. 30 (1949)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is the immemorial refuge of the incompetent, the helpless, the miserable. They find not only sanctuary in his arms, but also a kind of superiority, soothing to their macerated egos; He will set them above their betters.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]], &#039;&#039;Minority Report&#039;&#039; (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that [[Love]] is the reason for my existence, for God is love.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], &#039;&#039;Seeds of Contemplation&#039;&#039; (1949)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Persons are not known by intellect alone, not by principles alone, but only by love. It is when we love the other, the enemy, that we obtain from God the key to an understanding of who he is, and who we are. It is only this realization that can open to us the real nature of our duty, and of right action.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], in a letter to [[Dorothy Day]] (20 December 1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O God, we are one with You. You have made us one with You. You have taught us that if we are open to one another, You dwell in us. Help us to preserve this openness and to fight for it with all our hearts. Help us to realize that there can be no understanding where there is mutual rejection. O God, in accepting one another wholeheartedly, fully, completely, we accept You, and we thank You, and we adore You, and we love You with our whole being, because our being is Your being, our spirit is rooted in Your spirit. Fill us then with love, and let us be bound together with love as we go our diverse ways, united in this one spirit which makes You present in the world, and which makes You witness to the ultimate reality that is love. Love has overcome. Love is victorious. Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], in his closing prayer to an informal address delivered in Calcutta, India (October 1968), from &#039;&#039;The Asian Journal of Thomas Merton&#039;&#039; (1975); quoted in &#039;&#039;Thomas Merton, Spiritual Master : The Essential Writings&#039;&#039; (1992), p. 237&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a very good saying that if triangles invented a god, they would make him three-sided.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles de Montesquieu]], &#039;&#039;Lettres persannes&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is anything so precious that without it history and the world will be destroyed, where will you keep it? You will naturally want to keep it in the deepest part of your mind. If you desire to place it in the depths of your mind, it needs to be invisible. It is for this very reason that God exists as an invisible being. It is fortunate that He is invisible, for if He were visible how could a great contest to gain Him be avoided? It would be difficult for God to endure the pain of seeing it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sun Myung Moon]], [http://www.unification.net/wogw/wogw1-01.html &#039;&#039;The Way of God&#039;s Will&#039;&#039; Chapter 1-1. The Will of God] (1980 translation)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is not stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sun Myung Moon]], [http://www.unification.org/ucbooks/WofGW/wogw1-05.htm &#039;&#039;The Way of God&#039;s Will&#039;&#039; Chapter 1-5. Tradition, Official Business, and Responsibility] (1980 translation)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God is merciful, He provides us with little evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Moorcock]], &#039;&#039;The War Hound and the World’s Pain&#039;&#039; (1981), Chapter 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...indeed, if there were any modesty left in mankind, the histories of the Bible might abundantly assure men of the existence of [[angels]] and spirits... I look upon it as a special piece of Providence that . . . fresh examples of apparitions may awaken our benumbed and lethargic minds into an assurance that there are other intelligent beings besides those that are clothed in heavy earth or clay . . . for this evidence, showing that there are bad spirits, will necessarily open a door to the belief that there are good ones, and lastly, that there is a [[God]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry More]], quoted by [[H.P. Blavatsky]], in &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology,&#039;&#039; (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God for all anyone knows could be [[Cary Grant]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carole Morin]], &#039;&#039;Dead Glamorous&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God isn’t in the details, He’s in the structure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carole Morin]], &#039;&#039;Spying on Strange Men&#039;&#039; (2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== N ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nyanaponika Maha Thera.jpg|thumb|A Buddhist meditator, while benefiting from the refinement of consciousness he has achieved, will be able to see these meditative experiences for what they are; and he will further know that they are without any abiding substance that could be attributed to a deity manifesting itself to his mind. ~ [[Nyanaponika Thera]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- [[File:Light dispersion conceptual.gif|thumb|From blind physical necessity, which is always and everywhere the same, no variety adhering to time and place could evolve, and all variety of created objects which represent order and life in the universe could happen only by the willful reasoning of its original Creator, Whom I call the Lord God. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Isaac Newton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Darwinek-bnw.jpg|thumb|God is dead: but considering the state Man is in, there will perhaps be caves, for ages yet, in which his shadow will be shown. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Orvieto Pozzo San Patrizio 5.JPG|thumb| I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche]] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The appeal to a religious meaning to life is a bit different. If you believe that the meaning of your life comes from fulfilling the purpose of God, who loves you, and seeing Him in eternity, then it doesn&#039;t seem appropriate to ask, &amp;quot;And what is the point of that?&amp;quot;It&#039;s supposed to be something which is its own point, and can&#039;t have a purpose outside itself. But for this very reason it has its own problems.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The idea of God seems to be the idea of something that can explain everything else, without having to be explained itself. But it&#039;s very hard to understand how there could be such a thing. If we ask the question, &amp;quot;Why is the world like this?&amp;quot; and are offered a religious answer, how can we be prevented from asking again, &amp;quot;And why is that true?&amp;quot; What kind of answer would bring all of our &amp;quot;Why?&amp;quot; questions to a stop, once and for all? And if they can stop there, why couldn&#039;t they have stopped earlier?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The same problem seems to arise if God and His purposes are offered as the ultimate explanation of the value and meaning of our lives. The idea that our lives fulfil God&#039;s purpose is supposed to give them their point, in a way that doesn&#039;t require or admit of any further point. One isn&#039;t supposed to ask &amp;quot;What is the point of God?&amp;quot; any more than one is supposed to ask, &amp;quot;What is the explanation of God?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But my problem here, as with the role of God as ultimate explanation, is that I&#039;m not sure I understand the idea. Can there really be something which gives point to everything else by encompassing it, but which couldn&#039;t have, or need, any point itself? Something whose point can&#039;t be questioned from outside because there is no outside?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If God is supposed to give our lives a meaning that we can&#039;t understand, it&#039;s not much of a consolation. God as ultimate justification, like God as ultimate explanation, may be an incomprehensible answer to a question that we can&#039;t get rid of. On the other hand, maybe that&#039;s the whole point, and I am just failing to understand religious ideas. Perhaps the belief in God is the belief that the universe is intelligible, but not to US.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Nagel]], &#039;&#039;What Does It All Mean?: A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1987), Ch. 10. The Meaning of Life&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It behooves man to take to heart who it is that hath created him, and who hath developed him from a foul-smelling drop in the womb of woman, who hath brought him to the light of the world, who hath given sight to his eyes, and who hath bestowed the power of motion upon his feet, who maketh him to stand upright, who hath infused the breath of life into him, and who hath imparted of His own pure spirit unto him.&#039;&#039;&#039; Happy the man, therefore, that polluteth not the holy spirit of God within him by doing evil deeds, and well for him if he returns it to his Creator as he received it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Naphtali son of Jacob, as cited in &#039;&#039;Legends of the Jews&#039;&#039; (1909)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The Ultimate [[Truth]] is called God.&#039;&#039;&#039; This one can realize in the state of Nirvikalpa Samadhi. &#039;&#039;&#039;A circle can have only one centre but it can have numerous radii. The centre can be compared to God and the radii to religions.&#039;&#039;&#039; So, no one sect, no one [[religion]] or [[book]] can make an absolute claim of It. &#039;&#039;&#039;He who works for It gets It.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Swami Narayanananda]], &#039;&#039;Selected Articles 1933-86&#039;&#039; (2002), p. 301&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The poor is almost always seen to have a prophetic capacity: not only is the poor in the world, but the poor is the very possibility of the world. Only the poor lives radically the actual and present being, in destitution and suffering, and thus only the poor has the ability to renew being. The divinity of the multitude of the poor does not point to any transcendence. On the contrary, here and only here in this world, in the existence of the poor, is the field of immanence presented, confirmed, consolidated, and opened. The poor is god on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri]], &#039;&#039;Empire&#039;&#039; (2000), p. 157&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.&#039;&#039;&#039; This Being governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all, and on account of His dominion He is wont to be called Lord God, Universal Ruler.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica]]&#039;&#039; (1687)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the beginning formed matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable particles, of such sizes and figures, and with such other properties, and in such proportion to space, as most conduced to the end for which he formed them; and that these primitive particles, being solids, are incomparably harder than any porous bodies compounded of them; even so very hard, as never to wear or break in pieces; no ordinary power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first creation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Opticks|Opticks, or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light]]&#039;&#039;, 4th edition (1730)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Heavenly Master governs all the world as Sovereign of the universe. We are astonished at Him by reason of His perfection, we honor Him and fall down before Him because of His unlimited power. From blind physical necessity, which is always and everywhere the same, no variety adhering to time and place could evolve, and all variety of created objects which represent order and life in the universe could happen only by the willful reasoning of its original Creator, Whom I call the Lord God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Our Humanist Heritage&#039;&#039; (2010) by George Frater, p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039;, § 357, Kauffman trans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott ist eine Mutmaßung; aber ich will, daß euer Mutmaßen nicht weiter reiche, als euer schaffender Wille.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is an assumption; but I want your assuming to reach no further than your creative will.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &amp;quot;Upon the Blessed Isles&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Thus Spoke Zarathustra&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott ist ein Gedanke, der macht alles Gerade krumm.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;God is a thought which makes crooked all that is straight.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &amp;quot;Upon the Blessed Isles&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Thus Spoke Zarathustra&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead: but considering the state Man is in, there will perhaps be caves, for ages yet, in which his shadow will be shown.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], in &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), section 125&lt;br /&gt;
** The reduction of Nietzsche&#039;s thought to … the first-liner of a graffito sometimes found in certain modern tiled cells and catacombs:&lt;br /&gt;
:: &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead&#039;&#039;&#039; — Nietzsche &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nietzsche is dead — &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: This reduction could appear to be the creative interpretation of masterful will to power — if Nietzsche&#039;s thought and style are as uncontrolled as the critics suggest. … Nietzsche himself anticipates the strife of revengeful graffiti at the conclusion of his text: &amp;quot;Wherever there are walls I shall inscribe this eternal accusation against Christianity upon them — I can write in letters which make even the blind see.&amp;quot; …Nietzsche says in his preface that his readers must have a &amp;quot;predestination for the labyrinth&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;new ears for new music&amp;quot; if they are to understand this difficult writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Gary Shapiro in &#039;&#039;Nietzschean Narratives&#039;&#039; (1989), p. 126&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;20,000 Quips &amp;amp; Quotes&#039;&#039; (1995) edited by Evan Esar, p. 347&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Will to truth&amp;quot; does not mean &amp;quot;I do not want to let myself be deceived&amp;quot; but—there is no alternative—&amp;quot;I will not deceive, not even myself&amp;quot;; and with that we stand on moral ground.  ... You will have gathered what I am getting at, namely, that it is still a metaphysical faith upon which our faith in science rests—that even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians, still take our fire, too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year-old faith, the Christian faith which was also [[Plato|Plato&#039;s]] faith, that God is truth; that truth is divine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), B. Williams, ed. (2001), § 344&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What differentiates us is not that we find no God—neither in history, nor in nature, nor behind nature—but that we do not feel that what has been revered as God is ‘god-like.’&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Antichrist&#039;&#039;, § 47, in W. Kaufmann, &#039;&#039;Nietzsche&#039;&#039;, p. 101&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is a mean kid sitting on an anthill with a magnifying glass, and I&#039;m the ant.&#039;&#039;&#039; He could fix my life in five minutes if He wanted to, but he&#039;d rather tear off my feelers and watch me squirm.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Bruce [[Giordano Bruno|Nolan]]&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;[[Bruce Almighty]]&#039;&#039; (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There probably is a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn&#039;t.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John von Neumann]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;John Von Neumann : The Scientific Genius Who Pioneered the Modern Computer , Game Theory, Nuclear Deterrence and Much More&#039;&#039; (1992) by Norman Macrae, p. 379&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After rising from deep [[w:Dhyāna in Buddhism|meditative absorption]] ([[w:jhāna|jhāna]]), the Buddhist meditator is advised to view the physical and mental factors constituting his experience in the light of the three characteristics of all conditioned existence: [[w:Impermanence|impermanence]], [[w:Dukkha|liability to suffering]], and [[w:Anatta|absence of an abiding ego or eternal substance]]. This is done primarily in order to utilize the meditative purity and strength of consciousness for the highest purpose: liberating insight. But this procedure also has a very important side effect which concerns us here: the meditator will not be overwhelmed by any uncontrolled emotions and thoughts evoked by his singular experience, and will thus be able to avoid interpretations of that experience not warranted by the facts.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hence a Buddhist meditator, while benefiting from the refinement of consciousness he has achieved, will be able to see these meditative experiences for what they are; and he will further know that they are without any abiding substance that could be attributed to a deity manifesting itself to his mind. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nyanaponika Thera]], &amp;quot;Buddhism and the God-Idea&amp;quot; (1962)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== O ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Man is born broken. He lives by mending. The grace of God is glue.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eugene O&#039;Neill]], [http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks04/0400091h.html The Great God Brown] (1926)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Near&#039;&#039;&#039;: Nobody can say what is right and what is wrong, what is righteous and what is evil. Even if there is a God, and I had his teachings before me, I would think it through and decide if that was right or wrong myself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Death Note]] chapter 105, written by Tsugumi Ohba &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can omniscient God, who&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Knows the future, find&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The Omnipotence to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Change His future mind?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Karen Owens|Karen Owens]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=yq1xDpicghkC&amp;amp;pg=PA101 The God Delusion]&#039;&#039;, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Jan 16, 2008, p. 101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Having refuted, then, as well as we could, every notion which might suggest that we were to think of God as in any degree corporeal, we go on to say that, according to strict truth, &#039;&#039;&#039;God is incomprehensible, and incapable of being measured.&#039;&#039;&#039; For whatever be the knowledge which we are able to obtain of God, either by perception or reflection, we must of necessity believe that He is by many degrees far better than what we perceive Him to be.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Origen]] &#039;&#039;On First Principles&#039;&#039;, Bk. 1, ch. 1; par. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Cura pii Dis sunt, &amp;amp; qui coluere coluntur.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Heaven rewards the pious; those who cherish God&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Themselves are cherished.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Metamorphoses&#039;&#039;, VIIL, 725&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== P ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:General George S. Patton gravesite, Luxembourg.jpg|thumb|It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who [[Death|died]]. Rather we should thank God that such men [[Life|lived]]. ~ [[George S. Patton, Jr.]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Terry Pratchett Arms.svg|thumb|I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve found God, but I may have seen where gods come from. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Terry Pratchett]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, to the fourth question in the Westminster Shorter Catechism, &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;What is God?&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;, the answer read as follows: God is a [[Holy Spirit|Spirit]], [[infinite]], eternal and uncheangeable, in his being, [[wisdom]], power, [[Sacred#Distinguished from &amp;quot;Holy&amp;quot;|holiness]], justice and [[truth]].&lt;br /&gt;
: This statement the great [[Charles Hodge]] described as &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;probably the best definition of God ever penned by a man.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; (p. 21).&lt;br /&gt;
: The [[Book of Daniel]] tells us about the wisdom, might and truth oft he great God who rules history and shows his [[sovereignty]] in acts of judgement and mercy towards individuals and nations according to his own pleasure (p. 29).&lt;br /&gt;
:* {{cite book|url= https://books.google.it/books?id=06yoMWEmwPYC&amp;amp;pg=PA7&amp;amp;dq=knowing+god&amp;amp;hl=it&amp;amp;source=gbs_selected_pages&amp;amp;cad=2|first1= James I.|last1= Packer|title= Knowing God|publisher= InterVarsity Press|edition= first|year= 1973|chapter= 1 - The study of God|location= Downers Grove, Illinois|language= en|pages= 21, 29|isbn= 978-0-8308-1651-4|lccn= 73-81573|archive-url= |archive-date=|deadurl= }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Those of us who are [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]] believe that [[all]] [[people]] are ultimately saved and that God always [[Love|loves]] us, no matter what we do. These beliefs are [[Truth|true]], but they can very easily be simplified and misunderstood.&#039;&#039;&#039; God is never [[Anger|angry]] with us in the way in which a vengeful [[human]] would reject us, but God’s love for us has a dark side and one which we should rightfully [[fear]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;God loves us not in a sentimental way which aims at our ease and [[pleasure]] but, rather in a way which aims at our highest [[good]] and with an intensity which no one, even the highest [[angels]], can understand.&#039;&#039;&#039; God is absolutely determined, with an [[infinite]] determination, to rid us of all that does not reflect His Goodness. As one of our hymns puts it,&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;“But unto wrong what is His Name? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Our God is a consuming [[flame]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To every [[wrong]] beneath the [[sun]]!”&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: And, because of that, &#039;&#039;&#039;God’s [[punishments]] are terrible, and it is wise to fear them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:* Edward J. Parkinson, in [http://www.catholicgnostics.com/node/17 &amp;quot;Divine Justice: Gnostic Reflections on Some Often Terrifying Realities&amp;quot; at &#039;&#039;CatholicGnostics.com&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;FEU. Dieu d&#039;Abraham, Dieu d&#039;Isaac, Dieu de Jacob, non des philosophes et savants. Certitude. Certitude. Sentiment. Joie. Paix.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;FIRE. God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, not of the philosophers and scholars. Certainty. Certainty. Feeling. Joy. Peace.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], Note on a parchment stitched to the lining of Pascal&#039;s coat, found by a servant shortly after his death, as quoted in [[w:Francis Crawford Burkitt|Burkitt]] &#039;&#039;Speculum religionis&#039;&#039; (1929), p. 150&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Compare not thyself with others, but with Me. If thou dost not find Me in those with whom thou comparest thyself, thou comparest thyself to one who is abominable. If thou findest Me in them, compare thyself to Me. But whom wilt thou compare? Thyself, or Me in thee? If it is thyself, it is one who is abominable. If it is I, thou comparest Me to Myself. Now I am God in all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1669), § 554&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Posterity will one day [[laugh]] at the [[Fools|foolishness]] of modern materialistic philosophers. The more I study [[nature]], the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator. I pray while I am engaged at my work in the laboratory.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Literary Digest&#039;&#039; (18 October 1902)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The more I study nature, the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Literary Digest&#039;&#039; (18 October 1902)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Science, which brings man nearer to God&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], quoted in René Vallery-Radot, &#039;&#039;The Life of Pasteur&#039;&#039; (1902), vol. 1, p. 194&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who [[Death|died]]. Rather we should thank God that such men [[Life|lived]]..&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** General [[George S. Patton, Jr.]], in a speech at the Copley Plaza Hotel, Boston Massachusetts (7 June 1945), quoted in &#039;&#039;Patton : Ordeal and Triumph&#039;&#039; (1970) by Ladislas Farago&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plato and Aristotle in The School of Athens, by italian Rafael.jpg|thumb|You are young, my son, and, as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as a judge of the highest matters... Not one of them who took up in his youth with this opinion that there are no gods ever continued until old age faithful to his conviction. ~ [[Plato]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The word &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; so &amp;quot;capitalised&amp;quot; (as we Americans say), is &#039;&#039;the&#039;&#039; definable proper name, signifying &#039;&#039;Ens [[Necessity|necessarium]]&#039;&#039;; in my belief Really creator of all three Universes of Experience.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], in &amp;quot;[[s:A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God|A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God]]&amp;quot; (1908), § I. &#039;&#039;Ens necessarium&#039;&#039; is a latin expression which signifies &amp;quot;Necessary being, necessary entity&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alan Perlis]] (1982) &#039;&#039;Epigrams on Programming&#039;&#039;. nr.79&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The hypothesis of God is a peculiar one, in that it supposes an infinitely incomprehensible object, although every hypothesis, as such, supposes its object to be truly conceived in the hypothesis.&#039;&#039;&#039; This leaves the hypothesis but one way of understanding itself; namely, as vague yet as true so far as it is definite, and as continually tending to define itself more and more, and without limit. The hypothesis, being thus itself inevitably subject to the law of growth, appears in its vagueness to represent God as so, albeit this is directly contradicted in the hypothesis from its very first phase. But this apparent attribution of growth to God, since it is ineradicable from the hypothesis, cannot, according to the hypothesis, be flatly false. Its implications concerning the Universes will be maintained in the hypothesis, while its implications concerning God will be partly disavowed, and yet held to be less false than their denial would be. Thus the hypothesis will lead to our thinking of features of each Universe as purposed; and this will stand or fall with the hypothesis. Yet a purpose essentially involves growth, and so cannot be attributed to God. Still it will, according to the hypothesis, be less false to speak so than to represent God as purposeless.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], in &amp;quot;A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God&amp;quot; (1908), § II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. &#039;&#039;&#039;This [[mind]] is the matrix of all matter.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Planck]], as he accepted the Nobel Prize (1919)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You are young, my son, and, as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as a judge of the highest matters... Not one of them who took up in his youth with this opinion that there are no gods ever continued until old age faithful to his conviction.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plato]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;[[w:Laws (dialogue)|The Laws]]&#039;&#039; (his last and longest dialogue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is truth and light his shadow.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plato]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a geometrician.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Plato]], but not found in his works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Laugh where we must, be candid where we can,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But vindicate the ways of God to man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutored mind&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To Him no high, no low, no great, no small;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He fills, He bounds, connects and equals all!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 277&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He mounts the [[storm]], and walks upon the [[wind]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle II, line 110&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An honest man&#039;s the noblest work of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle IV, line 248&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Slave to no sect, who takes no private road,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But looks through Nature up to Nature&#039;s God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle IV, line 331&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t have much truck with the &amp;quot;[[religion]] is the cause of most of our wars&amp;quot; school of thought because that is manifestly done by mad, manipulative and power-hungry men who cloak their ambition in God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I number believers of all sorts among my friends. Some of them are praying for me. I&#039;m happy they wish to do this, I really am, but I think science may be a better bet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], in [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1028222/I-create-gods-time--I-think-exist.html &amp;quot;I create gods all the time - now I think one might exist, says fantasy author Terry Pratchett&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Daily Mail&#039;&#039; (21 June 2008)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve found God, but I may have seen where gods come from.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], in &amp;quot;I create gods all the time - now I think one might exist, says fantasy author Terry Pratchett&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Daily Mail&#039;&#039; (21 June 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first act of man, filled and carried away with enthusiasm (of the divine breath), is to adore the invisible Providence on which he feels that he depends, and which he calls GOD.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Misery&#039;&#039;. § 1.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Indeed the inscrutable [[One]] is out of the reach of every rational process. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Nor can any words come up to the inexpressible Good, this One, this Source of all unity, this super-existent Being. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Mind beyond mind, word beyond speech, it is gathered up by no discourse, by no intuition, by no name. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; It is and it is as no other being is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Pseudo-Dionysius, &#039;&#039;The Divine Names&#039;&#039;, 1, 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One thing I can&#039;t stand, it&#039;s people groveling.&lt;br /&gt;
** God, in &#039;&#039;[[Monty Python and the Holy Grail]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== R ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ngc1999.jpg|thumb|The [[Wisdom]] of God Manifested in the [[Works]] of the [[Creation]]. ~ [[John Ray]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Electric iron stand.jpg|thumb|If a person who indulges in gluttony is a glutton, and a person who commits a felony is a felon, then God is an iron. ~ [[Spider Robinson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AnttlersNewM45.jpg|thumb|In the [[presence]] of [[infinite]] might and infinite [[wisdom]], the [[strength]] of the strongest man is but weakness, and the keenest of [[mortal]] [[eyes]] see but dimly. ~ [[Theodore Roosevelt]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pasternak-rilke.jpeg|thumb|There are proofs of Your existence. I had forgotten them all, and never demanded any either, for what an overwhelming obligation would come with this certainty. ~ [[Rainer Maria Rilke]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rilke in Moscow by L.Pasternak (1928).jpg|thumb|Is it possible that there are people who say &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; and suppose they mean something shared by all? — Only consider two schoolboys: one of them buys a knife, and the other buys an identical one on the same day. And a week later, they show each other the two knives, and they turn out to be only remotely similar, so differently have they been shaped by different hands. ... Is it possible to believe we could have a god without making use of him? ~ [[Rainer Maria Rilke]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* All true knowledge of God begins with the knowledge of his hiddenness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gerhard von Rad|Gerhard von Rad]], &#039;&#039;Old Testament Theology. Volume II: The Theology of Israel&#039;s Prophetic Traditions&#039;&#039; (1960). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001, p. 377&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;He who is called [[Brahman]] by the [[w:Jnana|jnanis]] is known as [[w:Atman|Atman]] by the [[w:yogi|yogis]] and as [[w:Bhagavan|Bhagavan]] by the [[w:Bhakti|bhaktas]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The same brahmin is called priest, when worshipping in the temple, and cook, when preparing a meal in the kitchen. &#039;&#039;&#039;The &#039;&#039;jnani&#039;&#039;, following the path of knowledge, always reason about the Reality saying, &amp;quot;not this, not this.&amp;quot; Brahman is neither &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; nor &amp;quot;that&amp;quot;; It is neither the universe nor its living beings. Reasoning in this way, the mind becomes steady.&#039;&#039;&#039; Finally it disappears and the aspirant goes into [[w:samadhi|samadhi]]. This is the Knowledge of Brahman. It is the unwavering conviction of the jnani that Brahman alone is real and the world is illusory. &#039;&#039;&#039;All these [[names]] and forms are illusory, like a [[dream]]. What Brahman is cannot be described.&#039;&#039;&#039; One cannot even say that Brahman is a Person. This is the opinion of the jnanis, the followers of Vedanta. But &#039;&#039;&#039;the bhaktas accept all the states of consciousness. They take the waking state to be real also. They don&#039;t think the world to be illusory, like a dream. They say that the universe is a manifestation of the God&#039;s [[power]] and [[glory]]. God has created all these — [[sky]], [[stars]], [[moon]], [[sun]], [[mountains]], [[ocean]], [[men]], [[animals]]. They constitute His glory.&#039;&#039;&#039; He is within us, in our hearts. Again, He is outside. The most advanced devotees say that He Himself has become all this — the 24 cosmic principles, the universe, and all living beings. &#039;&#039;&#039;The devotee of God wants to eat sugar, and not become sugar.&#039;&#039;&#039; (All laugh.) Do you know how a lover of God feels? His attitude is: &amp;quot;O God, Thou art the Master, and I am Thy servant. Thou art the Mother, and I Thy child.&amp;quot; Or again: &amp;quot;Thou art my Father and Mother. &#039;&#039;&#039;Thou art the Whole, and I am a part.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot; He does not like to say, &amp;quot;I am Brahman.&amp;quot; They yogi seeks to realize the [[w:Paramatman|Paramatman]], the Supreme Soul. &#039;&#039;&#039;His ideal is the union of the embodied soul and the Supreme Soul.&#039;&#039;&#039; He withdraws his mind from sense objects and tries to concentrate on the Paramatman. Therefore, during the first stage of his spiritual discipline, he retires into solitude and with undivided attention practices [[meditation]] in a fixed posture. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; But the reality is one and the same; the difference is only in name. He who is Brahman is verily Atman, and again, He is the Bhagavan. He is Brahman to the followers of the path of knowledge, Paramatman to the yogis, and Bhagavan to the lovers of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ramakrishna]], &#039;&#039;The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna&#039;&#039; (1942), p. 132&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The [[Wisdom]] of God Manifested in the [[Works]] of the [[Creation]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Ray]], title of a book (1691)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most intellectual people do not [[believe]] in God, but they [[fear]] him just the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], in James Lee Christian &#039;&#039;Philosophy : An Introduction to the Art of Wondering&#039;&#039;,  (2005), p. 556.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The god of many cannot remain the true god.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Richardson]], &#039;&#039;Vectors: Aphorisms and Ten Second Essays&#039;&#039; (2001), #138&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is it possible that there are people who say &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; and suppose they mean something shared by all? &amp;amp;mdash; Only consider two schoolboys: one of them buys a knife, and the other buys an identical one on the same day. And a week later, they show each other the two knives, and they turn out to be only remotely similar, so differently have they been shaped by different hands. ... Is it possible to believe we could have a god without making use of him?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge|The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge]]&#039;&#039; (1910), as translated by Michael Hulse (2009), p. 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A thought struck me abruptly: My God, you do &#039;&#039;exist&#039;&#039;, then. There are proofs of Your existence. I had forgotten them all, and never demanded any either, for what an overwhelming obligation would come with this certainty. And yet that is what is now being shown to me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge|The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge]]&#039;&#039; (1910), as translated by Michael Hulse (2009), p. 135&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When I speak of All That Is, you must understand my position within it. All That Is knows no other. This does not mean that there &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;may&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; not be more to know. It does not mean, and here words quite fail us, it does not mean that All That Is, in any terms we can conceive of, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;may&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; not be limited. It &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;knows&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of no other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jane Roberts]], (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If a person who indulges in gluttony is a glutton, and a person who commits a felony is a felon, then God is an iron.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Spider Robinson]], in &amp;quot;God is an Iron&amp;quot; (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gene Roddenberry]], Free Inquiry (autumn, 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think God is as much a basic ingredient in the universe as neutrons and positrons . . . God is, for lack of a better term, clout. This is the prime force, when we look around the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gene Roddenberry]] [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=113558088X]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you do not know your heart, you do not know your God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Radoslav Rochallyi]], &amp;quot;Mythra Invictus&amp;quot;, published in VSS:Bratislava, (2019), p. 62&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, if you read attentively and objectively the &amp;quot;Letter about God&amp;quot;: in [[w:The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett|The Mahatma Letters]], you will see that the Mahatma repudiates the sacrilegious and anthropomorphic conception of a Personal god—cruel and unjust, chastising with eternal damnation all so-called heretics, and justifying all the crimes committed in his Holy Name! Verily, such a God cannot have a Mahatma&#039;s approval and respect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters I,&#039;&#039; (8 September 1934)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Its Humanity develops fully only in the Fourth—our Fourth—our present Round. Up to this fourth Life-Cycle, it is referred to as &#039;humanity&#039; only for lack of a more appropriate term. Like the grub which becomes chrysalis and butterfly, Man, or rather that which becomes man, passes through all the forms and kingdoms during the first Round and through all the human shapes during the two following Rounds... During the three Rounds to come, Humanity, like the globe [planet] on which it lives, will be ever tending to reassume its primeval form, that of a Dhyan-Chohanic Host. Man tends to become a God and then—GOD, like every other atom in the Universe...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (16 November 1935)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Ruling Principle of the Universe is one of Harmony and Love—God is Love. Therefore, if we wish to embody the most ancient axiom, &amp;quot;as above, so below,&amp;quot; we should become unified precisely upon this principle of love and should be subordinate to it, regarding it as our only boundless Ruler. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (15 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*By propagating the dogma of Jesus Christ as the only begotten Son of God, the Church contradicts the very sense of the prayer given to us by Jesus Christ himself, &amp;quot;Our Father which art in heaven.&amp;quot; And also the words of the Scriptures, &amp;quot;So God created man in his own image.&amp;quot; (Genesis 1:27)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (2 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Verily, there is nothing more sacrilegious for human consciousness than to limit the Ineffable Grandeur of the Divine Principle that is poured out over the entire Universe. Assuredly, from this monstrous, ignorant belittling issue all the unworthy concepts of God. Man, in his conceit, tries to bring everything down to his own level and likeness... Indeed, the books of the Teaching are full of concepts of the Divine Principle, or God, and of Spirit and spirituality.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (24 May 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The God in us is the sole reality; all else, as beautifully and poetically expressed by the East, is but the &amp;quot;Play of the Great Mother of the World.&amp;quot;...There is no God, or Gods, who was not at some time a man.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (24 May 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In the presence of infinite might and infinite wisdom, the strength of the strongest man is but weakness, and the keenest of mortal eyes see but dimly.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Theodore Roosevelt]]&#039;s Christian Citizenship Address before the Young Men&#039;s Christian Association, Carnegie Hall, New York (30 December 1900)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nothing remains, under God, but those passions which have often proved&#039;&#039;&#039; the best ministers of His vengeance, and &#039;&#039;&#039;the surest protectors of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.archive.org/stream/elementarysketc03smitgoog#page/n440/mode/2up Lecture XXVIL: On Habit - Part II, in “Elementary Sketches of Moral Philosophy”, delivered at The Royal Institution in the years 1804, 1805, and 1806 by the late Rev. Sydney Smith, M.A. (Spottiswoodes and Shaw (London: 1849))], p. 424&lt;br /&gt;
*** Another Variant: &#039;&#039;&#039;When the usual hopes and the common aids of man are all gone, nothing remains under God but those passions which have often proved the best ministers of His purpose and the surest protectors of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** Quoted by [[w:Theodore Roosevelt|Theodore Roosevelt]] in his &amp;quot;[http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/images/research/txtspeeches/668.pdf Brotherhood and the Heroic Virtues]&amp;quot; Address at the Veterans&#039; Reunion, Burlington, Vermont, September 5, 1901 and published in Theodore Roosevelt&#039;s &amp;quot;The Strenuous Life: Essays and Addresses&amp;quot; by Dover Publications (April 23, 2009) in its Dover Thrift Editions (ISBN: 978-0486472294), p. 127&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kill one man and you are a murderer. Kill millions and you are a conqueror. Kill everyone and you are a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Rostand]], &#039;&#039;Thoughts of a Biologist&#039;&#039; (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If I were granted omnipotence, and millions of years to experiment in, I should not think Man much to boast of as the final result of all my efforts.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;Religion and Science&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there were a God, I think it very unlikely that he would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt his existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], quoted in &#039;&#039;Bertrand Russell&#039;s Best&#039;&#039; (1958), &amp;quot;On Religion&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pragmatists]] explained that Truth is what it pays to believe. Historians of morals reduced the Good to a matter of tribal custom. Beauty was abolished by artists in a revolt against the sugary insipidities of a philistine epoch and in a mood of fury in which satisfaction is to be derived only from what hurts. And so the world was swept clear not only of God as a person but of God&#039;s essence as an ideal to which man owed an ideal allegiance. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &amp;quot;On Being Modern-Minded,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Unpopular Essays&#039;&#039; (1950), p. 69&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== S ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tree of Life 2009 large.png |thumb|Individual things are nothing but modifications of the attributes of God, or modes by which the attributes of God are expressed in a fixed and definite manner. ~ [[Baruch Spinoza]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think that if there were a God, there would be less evil on this earth. I believe that if evil exists here below, then either it was willed by God or it was beyond His powers to prevent it. Now I cannot bring myself to fear a God who is either spiteful or weak. I defy Him without fear and care not a fig for his thunderbolts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marquis de Sade]], &#039;&#039;Justine or The Misfortunes of Virtue&#039;&#039; (1787) [This quote is strikingly similar to Epicurus&#039; above.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The existence of the world without God seems to me less absurd than the presence of a God, existing in all his perfection, creating an imperfect man in order to make him run the risk of Hell.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Armand Salacrou|Armand Salacrou]] in &#039;&#039;Ceritudes et incertitudes&#039;&#039; (1943)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Respectable society believed in God in order to avoid having to speak about him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], &#039;&#039;The Words&#039;&#039; (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott werden, Mensch sein, sich bilden, sind Ausdrücke, die einerlei bedeuten.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**To become God, to be human, to cultivate oneself are all expressions that mean the same thing.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], &#039;&#039;Lucinde and the Fragments&#039;&#039;, P. Firchow, trans. (1991), “Athenaeum Fragments” § 262&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are as many gods as there are ideals. And further, the relation of the true artist and the true human being to his ideals is absolutely religious. The man for whom this inner divine service is the end and occupation of all his life is a priest, and this is how everyone can and should become a priest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Fragments&#039;&#039;, P. Firchow, trans. (1991) § 406&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In saying we are in immediate relation with God, the latter term is used only to designate the &#039;&#039;Whence&#039;&#039; of our spontaneous and receptive life, of which we become aware in our feeling of absolute dependence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schleiermacher]], in &#039;&#039;Theology of Schleiermacher&#039;&#039; (1911), pp. 121-122 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I can see him. I know that God is real. I know it in my heart. You can only believe in what you know to be [[Truth|true]]. You know your own truth. I know mine. Everyone should be able to find that within themselves... I want to live my life for God, and let other people take from that whatever they want.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Rachel Scott]], as quoted in [https://books.google.com/books?id=kI4YwhBD7FgC&amp;amp;pg=PA149 &#039;&#039;No Easy Answers: The Truth Behind Death at Columbine&#039;&#039;] (2002), by Brooks Brown and Rob Merritt, New York: Lantern Books, pp. 149&amp;amp;ndash;150&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I think the [[destiny]] of all men is not to sit in the rubble of their own making but to reach out for an ultimate [[perfection]] which is to be had. At the moment, it is a [[dream]]. But as of the [[moment]] we clasp hands with our neighbor, we build the first span to bridge the gap between the young and the old. At this hour, it’s a [[wish]]. But we have it within our [[power]] to make it a [[reality]]. If you want to prove that God is not [[dead]], first prove that [[man]] is [[alive]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rod Serling]] seech at Moorpark College, Moorpark, California (3 December 1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You have in yourself some thing similar to God, and therefore use yourself as the temple of God, on account of that which in you resembles God.&lt;br /&gt;
* The greatest honor which can be paid to God is to know and imitate him.&lt;br /&gt;
* Consider lost all the time in which you do not think of divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
* A good intellect is the choir of divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
* You should not dare to speak of God to the multitude.&lt;br /&gt;
* He who is worthy of God is also a god among men.&lt;br /&gt;
* He best honors God who makes his intellect as like God as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Quintus Sextius]] &#039;&#039;[[w:Sentences of Sextus|Sentences of Sextus]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We are all writing God&#039;s poem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Sexton]], as quoted by [[Erica Jong]], in [http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2000/oct/26/features11.g2 &amp;quot;Into the lion&#039;s den&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039; (26 October 2000)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is our fortress, in whose conquering name&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Let us resolve to scale their flinty bulwarks.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry VI, Part 2|&#039;&#039;Henry VI&#039;&#039;, Part II]] (c. 1590-91), Act II, scene 1, line 26&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God shall be my hope,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My stay, my guide and lantern to my feet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry VI, Part 2|&#039;&#039;Henry VI&#039;&#039;, Part II]] (c. 1590-91), Act II, scene 3, line 24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And to add greater honours to his age&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Than man could give him, he died fearing God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Henry VIII (play)|Henry VIII]]&#039;&#039; ([[w:Henry VIII (play)#Date|c. 1613]]), Act IV, scene 2, line 67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Had I but serv&#039;d my God with half the zeal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I serv&#039;d my king, He would not in mine age&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Have left me naked to mine enemies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Henry VIII (play)|Henry VIII]]&#039;&#039; ([[w:Henry VIII (play)#Date|c. 1613]]), Act III, scene 2, lines 455–57. Cardinal Wolsey is speaking to his servant, Cromwell. During the Watergate hearings on June 12, 1973, Senator Sam Ervin quoted these words to Herbert Porter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Don&#039;t worry if you see God first, tell him shit got worse.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[2Pac|Tupac Shakur]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-rHzG3moso &amp;quot;God Bless the Dead&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Beware of the man whose god is in the skies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Maxims for Revolutionists&#039;&#039;, #83&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If he is infinitely good, what reason should we have to fear him?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is infinitely wise, why should we have doubts concerning our future?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he knows all, why warn him of our needs and fatigue him with our prayers?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is everywhere, why erect temples to him?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is just, why fear that he will punish the creatures that he has filled with weaknesses?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;The Necessity of Atheism&#039;&#039; (1811)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tacitus]] says, that the [[Jews]] held God to be something eternal and supreme, neither subject to change nor to decay; therefore, they permit no statues in their cities or their temples. The universal Being can only be described or defined by negatives which deny his subjection to the laws of all inferior existences. &#039;&#039;&#039;Where indefiniteness ends, idolatry and anthropomorphism begin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], in &#039;&#039;Essay on Christianity&#039;&#039; (1859)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we find great difficulty from its admirable arrangement in conceiving that the Universe has existed from all eternity, and to resolve this difficulty suppose a Creator, how much more clearly must we perceive the necessity of this very Creator’s creation whose perfections comprehend an arrangement far more accurate and just.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;Eusebes and Theosophus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here was a beast for whom there could be no predator. What better definition of God is there than that?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Lucius Shepard|Lucius Shepard]], &#039;&#039;Señor Volto&#039;&#039; (2003). Originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Sci Fiction|Sci Fiction]]&#039;&#039; (February 12, 2003). Reprinted in [[w:David G. Hartwell|David G. Hartwell]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;Year’s Best Fantasy 4&#039;&#039; (p. 349)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Doesn’t that sound like God to you? This big stupid, invulnerable thing that resembles us and whose creations are more intelligent than it is? The Bible left out that part, but it would explain a great deal.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lucius Shepard]], &#039;&#039;The Skinny Girl&#039;&#039; (2011), in [[w:Ellen Datlow|Ellen Datlow]] (ed.) &#039;&#039;Naked City&#039;&#039; (p. 453)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Joseph Smith first vision stained glass.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;For behold, this is my work and my glory — to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.&#039;&#039; ~ God as portrayed in the &#039;&#039;{{w|Book of Moses}}&#039;&#039; (1830), as dictated by [[Joseph Smith]], 1:39]]&lt;br /&gt;
* For behold, this is my work and my glory — to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.&lt;br /&gt;
** God as portrayed in the &#039;&#039;{{w|Book of Moses}}&#039;&#039; (1830), as dictated by [[Joseph Smith]], 1:39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The value of a mind is measured by the nature of the objects it habitually contemplates. They whose thoughts are of trifles are trifling: they who dwell with what is eternally true, good and fair, are like unto God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lancaster Spalding]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 268&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;By &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;, I mean a being absolutely infinite — that is, a substance consisting in infinite attributes, of which each expresses eternal and infinite essentiality.&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Explanation — I say absolutely infinite, not infinite after its kind: for, of a thing infinite only after its kind, infinite attributes may be denied; but &#039;&#039;&#039;that which is absolutely infinite, contains in its essence whatever expresses reality, and involves no negation.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in [[s:Ethics (Spinoza)|&#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; [&#039;&#039;Ethics Geometrically Demonstrtated&#039;&#039;] (1677)]], Definition 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Whatsoever is, is in God, and without God nothing can be, or be conceived.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God and all attributes of God are eternal.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Individual things are nothing but modifications of the attributes of God, or modes by which the attributes of God are expressed in a fixed and definite manner.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 25&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the indwelling and not the transient cause of all things.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Things could not have been brought into being by God in any manner or in any order different from that which has in fact obtained.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We are willing to worship a God only if God makes us safe. Thus you get the silly question, How does a good God let bad things happen to good people? Of course, it was a rabbi who raised that question, but Christians took it up as their own. Have you read the Psalms lately? We&#039;re seeing a much more complex God than that question gives credit for.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stanley Hauerwas]] from the Chronicle for Higher Education, The Chronicle Review, &amp;quot;A Complex God&amp;quot;  September 28, 2001  &#039;&#039;The Chronicle Review&#039;&#039; Page: B6 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[universe]] is God’s son.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]], &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun&#039;&#039; (1999) “God’s Son” (Sequence: “Is It Possible to Write a Poem”)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== T ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brocken-tanzawa2.JPG|thumb|God is that infinite All of which man knows himself to be a finite part. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God alone exists truly. Man manifests Him in time, space and matter. ~ [[Leo Tolstoy]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDC-emb.jpg|thumb|God, from a beautiful [[necessity]], is [[Love]] in all he doeth, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love, a brilliant fire, to gladden or consume... ~ [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mosaik-Ikone Christus der Barmherzige.jpg|thumb|Here below, God is the feeblest and most destitute of beings; his love, unlike that of idols, does not fill the carnal part of the soul. ~ [[Gustave Thibon]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Stray Birds&#039;&#039; (1916); paraphrased variant: Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God seeks comrades and claims [[love]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The devil seeks [[slaves]] and claims [[obedience]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Fireflies&#039;&#039; (1928)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a mistake to suppose that God is only, or even chiefly, concerned with religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Temple (bishop)|William Temple]], quoted in [[w:R. V. C. Bodley|R. V. C. Bodley]], &#039;&#039;In Search of Serenity&#039;&#039; (1955), ch. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God is truly powerful, He would not let this plague go on.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sheri S. Tepper]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Grass (novel)|Grass]]&#039;&#039; (1989), Chapter 11&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here below, God is the feeblest and most destitute of beings; his love, unlike that of idols, does not fill the carnal part of the soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gustave Thibon]], Introduction to &#039;&#039;[[Gravity and Grace]]&#039;&#039; (1947), p. 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man’s basic anxiety … drives the anxious subject to establish objects of fear. Anxiety strives to become fear, because fear can be met by courage. … Horror is ordinarily avoided by the transformation of anxiety into fear of something, no matter what. The human mind is not only, as [[John Calvin|Calvin]] has said, a permanent factory of idols, it is also a permanent factory of fears—the first in order to escape God, the second in order to escape anxiety. … But ultimately the attempts to transform anxiety into fear are vain. The basic anxiety, the anxiety of a finite being about the threat of nonbeing, cannot be eliminated. It belongs to existence itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Tillich]], &#039;&#039;The Courage To Be&#039;&#039; (1952), p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What, but God?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Inspiring God! who boundless Spirit all,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And unremitting Energy, pervades,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Adjusts, sustains, and agitates the whole.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], &#039;&#039;The Seasons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Spring&#039;&#039; (1728), line 849&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;The word God has become empty of meaning through thousands of years of misuse... I mean that people who have never even glimpsed the realm of the sacred, the infinite vastness behind that word, use it with great conviction, as if they knew what they are talking about.&#039;&#039;&#039; Or they argue against it, as if they knew what it is that they are denying. This misuse gives rise to absurd beliefs, assertions, and egoic delusions, such as &amp;quot;My or our God is the only true God, and your God is false,&amp;quot; or Nietzsche&#039;s famous statement &amp;quot;God is dead.&amp;quot;   The word God has become a closed concept. The moment the word is uttered, a mental image is created, no longer, perhaps, of an old man with a white beard, but still a mental representation of someone or something outside you, and, yes, almost inevitably a male someone or something.  Neither God nor Being nor any other word can define or explain the ineffable reality behind the word, so the only important question is whether the word is a help or a hindrance in enabling you to experience That toward which it points. Does it point beyond itself to that transcendental reality, or does it lend itself too easily to becoming no more than an idea in your head that you believe in, a mental idol?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p. 14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A [[word]] is no more than a means to an end. Its an abstraction. Not unlike a signpost, it points beyond itself. The word honey isn&#039;t honey. You can study and talk about honey for as long as you like, but you won&#039; t really know it until you taste it. After you have tasted it, the word becomes less important to you. You won&#039;t be attached to it anymore. Similarly, you can talk or think about [[God]] continuously for the rest of your life, but does that mean you know or have even glimpsed the reality to which the word points? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p.71&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If, for whatever reason, you disliked the word honey, that might prevent you from ever tasting it. If you had a strong aversion to the word God which is a negative form of attachment, you may be denying not just the word but also the reality to which it points. You would be cutting yourself off from the possibility of experiencing that reality. All this is, of course, intrinsically connected with being identified with your mind. So, if a word doesn&#039;t work for you anymore, then drop it and replace it with one that does work. If you don&#039;t like the word [[sin]], then call it [[unconsciousness]] or [[insanity]]. That may get you closer to the truth, the reality behind the word, than a long-misused word like sin, and leaves little room for [[guilt]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p.71&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has been said:”Stillness is the language God speaks, and everything else is a bad translation.” Stillness is really another word for space. Becoming conscious of stillness whenever we encounter it in our lives will connect us with the formless and timeless dimension within ourselves, that which is beyond thought, beyond [[ego]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life&#039;s Purpose,&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“I want to know the mind of God,” Einstein said. “The rest are details.” What is the mind of God? Consciousness. What does it mean to know the mind of God? To be aware. What are the details? Your outer purpose, and whatever happens outwardly.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The word [[enthusiasm]] comes from ancient Greek – en and theos meaning God. And the related word enthousiazein means &amp;quot;to be possessed by a god.” With enthusiasm you will find that you don&#039;t have to do it all by yourself. In fact, there is nothing of significance that you can do by yourself. Sustained enthusiasm brings into existence a wave of creative energy, and all you have to do then is “ride the wave.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What is [[God]]? The eternal One Life underneath all the forms of life.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in [&#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life&#039;s Purpose,&#039;&#039; p. 98, (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Love is life. All, everything that I understand, I understand only because I love.&#039;&#039;&#039; Everything is, everything exists, only because I love. Everything is united by it alone. Love is God, and to die means that I, a particle of love, shall return to the general and eternal source.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:War and Peace|War and Peace]]&#039;&#039; Bk XIII, Chapter 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is that infinite All of which man knows himself to be a finite part. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God alone exists truly. Man manifests Him in time, space and matter.&#039;&#039;&#039; The more God&#039;s manifestation in man (life) unites with the manifestations (lives) of other beings, the more man exists. This union with the lives of other beings is accomplished through love. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is not love, but the more there is of love, the more man manifests God, and the more he truly exists... &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;We acknowledge God only when we are conscious of His manifestation in us.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]] in his diary (1 November 1910)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why is it when we talk to God we&#039;re said to be praying — but when God talks to us, we&#039;re said to be schizophrenic?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lily Tomlin]], Contributions of Jane Wagner&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be right with God has often meant to be in trouble with men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[A. W. Tozer]], &#039;&#039;Of God and Men&#039;&#039;, p. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am what you call &amp;quot;The World&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;The Universe&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;Everything&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;One&amp;quot;. And, &#039;&#039;&#039;I am &amp;quot;You&amp;quot;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Truth]] Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So what if a kid dies? God will take care of him.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]], in April 2013, as quoted in [http://abcnews.go.com/US/boston-bombing-day-stunning-stop-killers-made-attack/story?id=38335067 &amp;quot;Boston Bombing Day 1: The Stunning Stop the Killers Made After the Attack&amp;quot;] (18 April 2016), by Brian Ross, &#039;&#039;ABC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God, from a beautiful [[necessity]], is [[Love]] in all he doeth, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love, a brilliant fire, to gladden or consume&#039;&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The wicked work their woe by looking upon love, and hating it: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The righteous find their joys in yearning on its loveliness for ever.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]], in &amp;quot;Of Immortality&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Proverbial Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1849)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Satan]]: There is no God, no universe, no human race, no earthly life, no heaven, no hell. It is all a Dream, a grotesque and foolish dream. Nothing exists but you. And You are but a Thought — a vagrant Thought, a useless Thought, a homeless Thought, wandering forlorn among the empty eternities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mark Twain]] &#039;&#039;[[w:The Mysterious Stranger|The Mysterious Stranger]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Some one happened to mention to me that a certain [[Helena Blavatsky|Madame Blavatsky]] had just arrived in London, bringing with her a [[Theosophy|new religion]]... I asked her to explain her new religion... I explained to her my difficulties, which she proceeded to solve by expounding the doctrines of [[reincarnation]] and [[Karma]]. They jumped instantly to my reason. &#039;&#039;&#039;I there and then found the Just [[God]], of whom I had been in search.&#039;&#039;&#039; From that day to this I have never had reason to swerve from those beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Violet Tweedale|Violet Tweedale]], [[Ghosts I Have Seen, and Other Psychic Experiences|&#039;&#039;Ghosts I Have Seen, and Other Psychic Experiences&#039;&#039;]],    1919&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1in god we trust.jpg|thumb|In God We Trust. ~ United States of America national motto]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US-original-Declaration-1776.jpg|thumb|[[w:All men are created equal|All men are created equal]], that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are [[w:Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness|Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness]]. ~ United States Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In God We Trust.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[United States of America]] national motto, as well as &#039;&#039;E PLURIBUS UNUM&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We hold these truths to be self-evident, that &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:All men are created equal|all men are created equal]], that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are [[w:Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness|Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness]].&#039;&#039;&#039;--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:United States Declaration of Independence|United States Declaration of Independence]] (July 4, 1776)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== V ==&lt;br /&gt;
* I looked to find a man who walked with God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Like the translated patriarch of old;— &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though gladdened millions on His footstool trod,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet none with him did such sweet converse hold;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I heard the wind in low complaint go by&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That none his melodies like him could hear;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Day unto day spoke wisdom from on high,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet none like David turned a willing ear;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God walked alone unhonored through the earth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For Him no heart-built temple open stood,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The soul forgetful of her nobler birth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Had hewn him lofty shrines of stone and wood,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And left unfinished and in ruins still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The only temple he delights to fill.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jones Very]], “Enoch”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The one [[idea]] the [[Hindu]] [[religions]] differ in from every other in the [[world]], the one idea to express which the [[sages]] almost exhaust the [[w:Vocabulary|vocabulary]] of the Sanskrit language, is that man must realise God even in this [[life]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Swami Vivekananda]] in: &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=kQCNAwAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA405 The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda [ Volume 4 ] ],&#039;&#039;  Kartindo.com, p. 405.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: &amp;quot;O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.&amp;quot; And God granted it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], in a letter to Étienne Noël Damilaville (16 May 1767)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If God did not exist, He would have to be invented.&amp;quot; But all nature cries aloud that he does exist: that there is a supreme intelligence, an immense power, an admirable order, and everything teaches us our own dependence on it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Voltaire quoting himself in a letter to Prince Frederick William of Prussia (28 November 1770), as quoted in &#039;&#039;Voltaire in His Letters&#039;&#039; (1919) by [[Evelyn Beatrice Hall|S. G. Tallentyre (Evelyn Beatrice Hall)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;More Random Walks in Science : An Anthology&#039;&#039; (1982) by Robert L. Weber, p. 65&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Take Care of the People, and God Almighty Will Take Care of Himself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Sirens of Titan|The Sirens of Titan]]&#039;&#039; (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; WAS MUSIC.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], [http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0205-29.htm &amp;quot;Vonnegut&#039;s Blues for America&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Sunday Herald|Sunday Herald]]&#039;&#039; (5 February 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the final proof of God&#039;s omnipotence that he need not exist in order to save us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Peter De Vries|Peter De Vries]], &#039;&#039;The Mackerel Plaza&#039;&#039; (1958), p. 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== W ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rosace.jpg|thumb|To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist. ~ [[Simone Weil]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Дервиш руми.jpg|thumb|Dear God … Everyone I [[know]] admits they’ve never seen your [[face]], they’re not sure where you [[live]] and have no map to [[Kingdom of God|the place]]. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Dawud Wharnsby]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Storm Spirits.jpg|thumb|&amp;quot;[[w:Elohim|Elohim]],&amp;quot; the name for the creative power in &#039;&#039;[[w:Book of Genesis|Genesis]]&#039;&#039;, is a female plural, a fact that generations of learned rabbis and Christian theologians have all explained as merely grammatical convention. The King James and most other Bibles translate it as &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; but if you take the grammar literally, it seems to mean &amp;quot;goddesses.&amp;quot; [[w:El Shaddai|Al Shaddai]], god of battles, appears later, and [[w:Tetragrammaton|YHWH]], mispronounced Jehovah, later still. ~ [[Robert Anton Wilson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Navy 060608-N-6501M-005 The U.S. Military Sealift Command (MSC) Hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19), anchored off of the coast of Jolo City.jpg|thumb|I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we&#039;ll find it in the nature of that thing. &lt;br /&gt;
~ [[Frank Lloyd Wright]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Don&#039;t you know there ain&#039;t no devil? There&#039;s only God when He&#039;s drunk.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Waits]], in &amp;quot;[[w:Heartattack and Vine (song)|Heartattack and Vine]]&amp;quot; on &#039;&#039;[[w:Heartattack and Vine|Heartattack and Vine]]&#039;&#039; (1980)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;s greatness and goodness are measured by the fact that he gives us choices.&#039;&#039;&#039; He doesn&#039;t require us to thank him for our food. (In case you hadn&#039;t noticed.) God is not a Modernist. He doesn&#039;t view us as nails. God expects us to behave like carpenters. Indeed, he gave us a carpenter as an example. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; So I think God is postmodern. &#039;&#039;&#039;He has his own ideas of what rules, and what sucks, and he doesn&#039;t expect everyone else to agree with him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Larry Wall]] in [http://www.perl.com/pub/a/1999/03/pm.html &amp;quot;Perl, the first postmodern computer language&amp;quot; (9 March 1999)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For modern man, … pride reveals itself in impatience, which is an unwillingness to bear the pain of discipline. … In effect his becomes a deification of his own will; man is not making himself like a god but is taking himself as he is and putting himself in the place of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Weaver]], &#039;&#039;Ideas Have Consequences&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1948), p. 183&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first thing that we know about ourselves is our imperfection. &lt;br /&gt;
: This is what [[Descartes]] meant when he said: &#039;I know God before I know myself.&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
: The only mark of God in us is that we feel that we are not God.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to obey God, one must receive his commands. How did it happen that I received them in adolescence, while I was professing atheism? &#039;&#039;&#039;To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No human being escapes the necessity of conceiving some good outside himself towards which his thought turns in a movement of desire, supplication, and hope. consequently, the only choice is between worshipping the true God or an idol.&#039;&#039;&#039; Every atheist is an idolater — unless he is worshipping the true God in his impersonal aspect. &#039;&#039;&#039;The majority of the pious are idolaters.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Christianity&#039;&#039; (1967) edited by William Robert Miller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No man — prince, peasant, pope, — has all the light, who says else is a mountebank. I claim no private lien on truth, only a liberty to seek it, prove it in debate, and to be wrong a thousand times to reach a single rightness.&#039;&#039;&#039; It is that liberty they fear. They want us to be driven to God like sheep, not running to him like lovers, shouting joy!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], in his play about [[Giordano Bruno]], &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ever since the Greeks, we have been drunk with language! &#039;&#039;&#039;We have made a cage with words and shoved our God inside!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If God be God and man a creature made in image of the divine intelligence, his noblest function is the search for truth.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Once you accept the existence of God — however you define him, however you explain your relationship to him — then you are caught forever with his presence in the center of all things.&#039;&#039;&#039; You are also caught with the fact that man is a creature who walks in two worlds and traces upon the walls of his cave the wonders and the nightmare experiences of his spiritual pilgrimage.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Clowns of God&#039;&#039; (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To assume that one’s existential task is completed when the individual is brought into right relation with society, that is, when the individual has been socialized, is to absolutize society and confuse society with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Merold Westphal]], &#039;&#039;Kierkegaard’s Critique of Reason and Society&#039;&#039;, p. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dear God I&#039;ve heard your [[name]] from [[teachers]], [[family]] and friends, you made the [[universe]] and so will live on when it [[ends]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Everyone I know admits they’ve never seen your [[face]], they’re not sure where you [[live]] and have no map [[Kingdom of God|to the place]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dawud Wharnsby]], in &amp;quot;Dear God&amp;quot;, in &#039;&#039;A Picnic of Poems in Allah&#039;s Green Garden&#039;&#039; (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No reason can be given for the nature of God, because that nature is the ground of rationality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred North Whitehead]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Modern World&#039;&#039; (1925), Chapter XI. New York: Mentor Books, 1948, p. 179&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The worship of God is not a rule of safety—it is an adventure of the spirit, a flight after the unattainable. The death of religion comes with the repression of the high hope of adventure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred North Whitehead]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Modern World&#039;&#039; (1925), Chapter XII. New York: Mentor Books, 1948, p. 192&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;&#039;: God? God is love. I don&#039;t love you.&lt;br /&gt;
** Gregory Widen, [[The Prophecy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;I sit and talk to God&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And he just laughs at my plans&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robbie Williams]] and {{w|Guy Chambers}}, &#039;&#039;[[W:Feel (Robbie Williams song)|Feel]]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[[W:Escapology (album)|Escapology]]&#039;&#039; (18 November 2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;All your Western theologies, the whole mythology of them, are based on the concept of God as a senile delinquent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tennessee Williams]], &#039;&#039;The Night of the Iguana&#039;&#039; (1963)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;{{w|Elohim}},&amp;quot; the name for the creative power in &#039;&#039;[[Book of Genesis|Genesis]]&#039;&#039;, is a female plural, a fact that generations of learned rabbis and Christian theologians have all explained as merely grammatical convention.&#039;&#039;&#039; The King James and most other Bibles translate it as &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; but if you take the grammar literally, it seems to mean &amp;quot;[[goddesses]].&amp;quot; [[w:El Shaddai|Al Shaddai]], god of battles, appears later, and [[w:Tetragrammaton|YHWH]], mispronounced Jehovah, later still.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Anton Wilson]], &#039;&#039;Everything Is Under Control : Conspiracies, Cults, and Cover-Ups&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 197&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To believe in a God means to understand the question about the meaning of life. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To believe in a God means to see that the facts of the world are not the end of the matter. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To believe in God means to see that life has a meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] Journal entry (8 July 1916), p. 74e&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe in God, only I spell it &amp;quot;[[Nature]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frank Lloyd Wright]], &#039;&#039;Quote&#039;&#039; magazine (14 August 1966)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the great mysterious motivator of what we call nature and it has been said often by philosophers, that nature is the will of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; And, I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. &#039;&#039;&#039;If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we&#039;ll find it in the nature of that thing.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Frank Lloyd Wright, quoted in &#039;&#039;Truth Against the World : Frank Lloyd Wright speaks for an organic architecture&#039;&#039; (1987) edited by Patrick J. Meehan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe the growth of &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; signifies the existence of God. That is: if history naturally pushes people toward moral improvement, toward moral growth, and their God, as they conceive their God, grows accordingly, becoming morally richer, then maybe this growth is evidence of some higher purpose, and maybe — conceivably — the source of that purpose is worthy of the name divinity.[… I]f it is a natural outgrowth of history — then it is more likely that this &amp;quot;growth of God&amp;quot; signifies the existence of God, or at least the existence of something you might call divine, however unlike ancient conceptions of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Wright]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Evolution of God|The Evolution of God]]&#039;&#039; (2009). New York: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 286–7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is God love? Like all characterizations of God, this one presumes more insight than I feel in possession of. But there&#039;s certainly something to the idea that love is connected to, indeed emanates from, the kind of God whose existence is being surmised here.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The connection comes via love&#039;s connection to the moral order of which that God is the source. The moral order has revealed itself through ever-widening circles of [[w:Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny|non-zero-sumness]] that draw people toward the moral truth that mutual respect is warranted. As we saw […], it is the moral imagination whose growth often paves the way for that truth, and it does so through the extension of a kind of sympathy, a subjective identification with the situation of the other. And as sympathy intensifies it approaches love. Love, you might say, is the apotheosis of the moral imagination; it can foster the most intimate identification with the other, the most intense appreciation of the moral worth of the other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Wright]], &#039;&#039;The Evolution of God&#039;&#039; (2009), p. 456&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== X ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Y ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They who deny God have not seen Him. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039; Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  12, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The gods of all pagan faiths have been allied with the rich rulers. The priests of most religions are the employees of the landowners. But the God of Israel has always claimed to be with the poor—whether in the legislation of [[Deuteronomy]], the words of the [[prophets]], or the experiences of the [[New Testament]]. Our God is on the side of the poor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Howard Yoder]], &#039;&#039;Radical Christian Discipleship&#039;&#039;, p. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A God all mercy is a God unjust.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night IV, line 234&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By night an atheist half believes in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night V, line 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Deity believed, is joy begun;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A Deity adored, is joy advanced;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A Deity beloved, is joy matured.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Each branch of piety delight inspires.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night VIII, line 720&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A God alone can comprehend a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night LX, line 835&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou, my all!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My theme! my inspiration! and my crown!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My strength in age—my rise in low estate!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My souls ambition, pleasure, wealth!—my world!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My light in darkness! and my life in death!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My boast through time! bliss through eternity!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Eternity, too short to speak thy praise!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Or fathom thy profound of love to man!&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night IV, line 586&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Arthur Frayn:&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;And you, poor creatures, who conjured you out of the clay? Is God in show business, too?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zardoz]] (1974)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;[[Bible]]&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Bible|&#039;&#039;The Bible&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Domenico Fetti 004.jpg|thumb|Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God. ~ [[Moses]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nicolò barabino, profeta isaia, studio per affresco nella chiesa di s.m. dell&#039;assunta a genova sestri.jpg|thumb|As the [[heavens]] are higher than the [[earth]], so are my ways higher than your ways, and my [[thoughts]] than your thoughts. ~ [[Isaiah]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Guercino Padreterno.jpg|thumb|God is [[love]]. Whoever [[lives]] in love lives in God, and God in him. ~ [[John the Evangelist]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Albert_Edelfelt_-_Christ_and_Mary_Magdalene.jpg|thumb|God is not a [[man]]. ~ [[w:Balaam|Balaam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Genesis]] [[W:Genesis 1|1:1]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We ought to obey God rather than men. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Acts of the Apostles]] [[W:Acts 5|5:29]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is not a man&#039;&#039;&#039;, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Balaam|Balaam, son of Beor]] in  &#039;&#039;[[Book of Numbers|Numbers]]&#039;&#039; 23:19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious. For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in [[Acts of the Apostles]] [[W:Acts 17|17:22-23]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thine, O Lord is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in the earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, O Lord, and thou art exalted as head above all. Both riches and honour come of thee, and thou reignest over all; and in thine hand is power and might; and in thine hand it is to make great, and to give strength unto all. Now therefore, our God, we thank thee, and praise thy glorious name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Book of Chronicles|1 Chronicles]] 29:11-13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things that are mighty.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Corinthians 1}}:27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Corinthians 3}}:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The hair of his head was like clean wool. His throne was flames of fire; its wheels were a burning fire. There was a stream of fire flowing and going out from before him. There were a thousand thousands that kept ministering to him, and ten thousand times ten thousand that kept standing right before him. The Court took its seat, and there were books that were opened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel]], [[Book of Daniel]] [[W:Daniel 7|7:9-10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* None can hope in God but those who know his name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David]], [[Psalms|Psalm]] [[w:Psalm 9|9:10]], as cited in {{w|Institutes of the Christian Religion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many things you have done, &lt;br /&gt;
:O Jehovah my God, &lt;br /&gt;
:Your wonderful works and your thoughts toward us.&lt;br /&gt;
:None can compare to you;&lt;br /&gt;
:If I were to try to tell and speak of them, &lt;br /&gt;
:They would be too numerous to recount!&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[David]], [[Psalms|Psalm]] [[W:Psalm 40|40:5]], [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, God is greater than we can know; &lt;br /&gt;
:The number of his years is beyond comprehension.&lt;br /&gt;
:He draws up the drops of [[water]]; &lt;br /&gt;
:They condense into rain from his mist;&lt;br /&gt;
:Then the [[cloud]]s pour it down; &lt;br /&gt;
:They shower down upon mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[w:Elihu (Job)|E·li′hu]], [[Book of Job]], 36:26-28, [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And the LORD said unto him, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Who hath made man&#039;s mouth? or who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the seeing, or the blind? have not I the LORD?&#039;&#039;&#039; Now therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]&#039;&#039; 4:11-12 ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God said unto [[Moses]], I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]&#039;&#039; 3:14 ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: God said to Moses, &#039;I will be what I will be&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Exodus|Exodus]] 20:7, ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Similar phrase: &amp;quot;Keep yourselves from evil to take the name of the Lord in vain, for I am the Lord your God, even the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham and of Isaac and of Jacob.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Doctrine and Covenants}} 136:21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See now that &#039;&#039;&#039;I, even I, am He, and there is no god besides Me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of My hand&#039;&#039;&#039;. For I lift up My hand to heaven, and say, I live for ever. If I whet My glittering sword, and Mine hand take hold on judgment; I will render vengeance to Mine enemies, and will reward them that hate Me. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]]&#039;&#039; 32:39-41 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create calamity: I the LORD do all these things.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Isaiah]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Isaiah 45|45:5-7]] ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: I am the Lord and there is no other. Who forms light and creates darkness, Who makes peace and creates calamity; I am the Lord, who makes all these.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaiah]] [[W:Isaiah 55#Verse 9|55:9]] [[KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;You cannot serve both God and [[w:Mammon|Mammon]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jesus]], &#039;&#039;[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Matthew 6:24|6:24]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is greater than we can know; The number of his years is beyond comprehension.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Job|Job]] 36:26, [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is [[light]]; in him there is no [[darkness]] at [[all]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}} in {{w|1 John}} 1:5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}}, in {{w|John}} 3:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is [[love]]. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}} in {{w|1 John}} 4:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. Keep these words that I am commanding you today in your heart. Recite them to your children and talk about them when you are at home and when you are away, when you lie down and when you rise. Bind them as a sign on your hand, fix them as an emblem on your forehead, and write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moses]], [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5-9 [[w:New Revised Standard Version|NRSV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moses]], [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 18:13 [[King James Version|KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the invisible things of him since the creation of the [[world]] are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting [[power]] and divinity; that they may be without excuse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:Epistle to the Romans|Romans]]&#039;&#039; 1:20 (ASV)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the [[faith]] of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar&#039;&#039;&#039;; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man) God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world? For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 3|3:3-8]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the [[law]].&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Is he&#039;&#039; the God of the Jews only? &#039;&#039;is he&#039;&#039; not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also: Seeing &#039;&#039;it is&#039;&#039; one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]], &#039;&#039;Romans&#039;&#039; [[W:Romans 3|3:19-31]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O the depth of God’s riches and [[wisdom]] and [[knowledge]]! How unsearchable his judgments are and beyond tracing out his ways are! For “who has come to know Jehovah&#039;s mind, or who has become his [[adviser]]?” Or, “who has first given to him, so that it must be repaid to him?” Because from him and by him and for him are all things. To him be the glory forever. Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]], [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 11|11:33-36]], [[New World Translation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fear]] God. [[Honour]] the [[King]].&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Peter 2}}:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalms 19}}:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalms 23}}:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is our refuge and [[strength]], a very present help in trouble. &#039;&#039;&#039;Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the [[mountains]] shake with the swelling thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 46|46:1 - 3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High. God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved: God shall help her, and that right early. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The heathen raged, the kingdoms were moved: he uttered his voice, the earth melted. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 46|46:4 - 7]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[fool]] says in his [[heart]] &amp;quot;There is no God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 53|53:1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I had rather be a doorkeeper in the house of my God, than to dwell in the tents of wickedness.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalm 84}}:10&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: &amp;quot;For I would rather be a servant in the House of the Lord than to sit in the seats of the mighty.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** By {{w|Alben W. Barkley}}, addressed to a mock Democratic convention, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia (April 30, 1956), reported in &#039;&#039;Memorial Services Held in the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States, Together with Remarks Presented in Eulogy of Alben William Barkley, Late a Senator from Kentucky&#039;&#039; (1956), p. 106.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God be for us, who can be against us?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 8|8:31]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no respect of persons with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Romans, 2:11; Acts 10:34&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But will God really dwell with mankind on the [[earth]]? Look! The heavens, yes, the heaven of the [[heaven]]s, cannot contain you; how much less, then, this house that I have built!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Solomon]], 2 [[W:Books of Chronicles|Chronicles]] 6:18, [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;[[Quran]]&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EMİRSULTAN CAMİİ BURSA - panoramio.jpg|thumb|O [[mankind]], It is you that have need of God, and God is the [[Self-sufficiency|Self-Sufficient]], the [[Praised]] [[Kenosis|One]]. If He please, He will remove you and bring a new [[creation]]. And this is not hard for God. ~ [[Quran]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Quran|&#039;&#039;The Quran&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|Allah}}&lt;br /&gt;
* And (mention, O [[Muhammad]]), when your Lord said to the [[angels]], &amp;quot;Indeed, I will make upon the earth a successive [[authority]].&amp;quot; They said, &amp;quot;Will You place upon it one who causes [[corruption]] therein and sheds [[blood]], while we declare Your [[praise]] and [[sanctification|sanctify]] You?&amp;quot; He said: Surely, &#039;&#039;&#039;I know what you know not.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Al-Baqara}} 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He said: Do you then [[understand]] what you [[worship]] -- You and your forefathers? -- Surely they are abhorrence to me, except the [[Lord]] of the [[worlds]],&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Who created me, then He [[guides]] me the way,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who provides me sustenance to [[eat]] and to [[drink]],&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And when I am [[sick]], it is He who [[heals]] me,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who will cause me to [[die]], and will [[resurrect]] me,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who, I [[hope]], will [[forgive]] me and my [[mistakes]] on the Day of Judgment. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham]],  [[w:Ash-Shu&#039;ara|Ash-Shu&#039;ara]] 75-82&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:God in Islam|God]]! [[W:Tawhid|There is no god but He]], — the [[Living]], the Self-subsisting, [[Eternal]]. No slumber can seize Him nor [[sleep]]. His are [[all]] [[things]] in the heavens and on earth. Who is there that can intercede in His [[presence]] except as He permitteth? he knoweth what before or after or behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His [[Throne]] doth extend over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in [[guard|guarding]] and [[perversity|preserving]] them for He is the Most High, the Supreme.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Al-Baqara 255}}, translated by {{w|Arthur John Arberry}} in &#039;&#039;{{w|The Koran Interpreted}}&#039;&#039; (1955).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God helps you, there is none that can overcome you; and if He forsakes you, who is there that can [[help]] you?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Ali-Imran|Sūrat Ali-Imran]] 3:159&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Inventor]] of the heavens and the earth. How could He have a son when He has no consort? And He created everything, and all things He knows. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Al-Anam|Sūrat Al-An&#039;am]] 6:101&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Say: &amp;quot;Who is it that sustains you (in life) from the sky and from the earth? or who is it that has power over hearing and sight? And who is it that brings out the living from the [[Death|dead]] and (brings out) the dead from the living? and who is it that rules and regulates all affairs?&amp;quot; They will soon say, &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;. Say, &amp;quot;will ye not then show piety (to Him)?&amp;quot; such is God, your true Lord; nothing apart from the truth, but error. How then are ye turned away?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Yunus (sura)|Sūrat Yunus]] 10:31-32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  Seest thou him who takes his own [[desire]] as his [[deity|god]], and God leaves him in [[error]] knowingly, and seals his [[hearing]] and his [[heart]] and puts a covering on his [[sight]]? Who can then guide him after God? Will you not reflect? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Al-Jathiyah|Sūrat Al-Jathiyah]] 45:23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  O mankind, It is you that have need of God, and God is the [[Self-sufficiency|Self-Sufficient]], the [[Praised]] [[Kenosis|One]]. If He please, He will remove you and bring a new [[creation]]. And this is not hard for God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Fatir|Sūrat Fatir]] 35:15-17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no god but The God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Muhammad (surah)|Sūrat Muḥammad]] 47:19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;[[Book of Mormon]]&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Book of Mormon|&#039;&#039;The Book of Mormon&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Book of Mosiah|Mosiah]] 13:15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And again, the Lord God hath commanded that men should not murder; that they should not lie; that they should not steal; that they should not take the name of the Lord their God in vain; that they should not envy; that they should not have malice; that they should not contend one with another; that they should not commit whoredoms; and that they should do none of these things; for whoso doeth them shall perish.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|2 Nephi}} 26:32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 315-21.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Homo cogitat, Deus indicat.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man thinks, God directs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alcuin]], &#039;&#039;Epistles&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At Athens, wise men propose, and fools dispose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anacharsis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man says—&amp;quot;So, so.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Heaven says—&amp;quot;No, no.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Chinese Aphorism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s Wisdom and God&#039;s Goodness!—Ah, but fools&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Mis-define thee, till God knows them no more.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wisdom and goodness they are God!—what schools&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Have yet so much as heard this simpler lore.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This no Saint preaches, and this no Church rules:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;Tis in the desert, now and heretofore.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Matthew Arnold]], &#039;&#039;The Divinity&#039;&#039;, Stanza 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They that deny a God destroy man&#039;s nobility; for certainly man is of kin to the beasts by his body; and, if he be not of kin to God by his spirit, he is a base and ignoble creature.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Of Atheism&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From thee all human actions take their springs,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rise of empires, and the fall of kings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Samuel Boyse|Samuel Boyse]], &#039;&#039;The Deity&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O Rock of Israel, Rock of Salvation, Rock struck and cleft for me, let those two streams of blood and water which once gushed out of thy side … bring down with them salvation and holiness into my soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Daniel Brevint|Brevint]], &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1679), p. 17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He made little, too little of sacraments and priests, because God was so intensely real to him. What should he do with lenses who stood thus full in the torrent of the sunshine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Phillips Brooks]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Seriousness of Life&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It never frightened a Puritan when you bade him stand still and listen to the speech of God. His closet and his church were full of the reverberations of the awful, gracious, beautiful voice for which he listened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Phillips Brooks]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Seriousness of Life&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Of what I call God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And fools call Nature.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;The Ring and the Book&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Pope&#039;&#039;, line 1,073&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A picket frozen on duty—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A mother starved for her brood—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Socrates drinking the hemlock,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And Jesus on the rood;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And millions who, humble and nameless,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The straight, hard pathway trod—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Some call it Consecration,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And others call it God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Herbert Carruth|W. H. Carruth]], &#039;&#039;Evolution&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil est quod deus efficere non possit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is nothing which God cannot do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;De Divinatione&#039;&#039;, II. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God! sing, ye meadow-streams, with gladsome voice!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ye pine-groves, with your soft and soul-like sounds!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And they too have a voice, yon piles of snow,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And in their perilous fall shall thunder, God!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]], &#039;&#039;Hymn before Sunrise in the Vale of Chamouni&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God moves in a mysterious way&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; His wonders to perform;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He plants his footsteps in the sea&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And rides upon the storm.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Hymn&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Light Shining out of Darkness&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a God! the sky his presence shares,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; His hand upheaves the billows in their mirth,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Destroys the mighty, yet the humble spares&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And with contentment crowns the thought of worth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Charlotte Cushman|Charlotte Cushman]], &#039;&#039;There is a God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My God, my Father, and my Friend,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Do not forsake me in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wentworth Dillon]], translation of &#039;&#039;Dies Iræ&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;Twas much, that man was made like God before:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But, that God should be made like man, much more.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Donne]], &#039;&#039;Holy Sonnets&#039;&#039;, Sonnet XXII&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By tracing Heaven his footsteps may be found:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Behold! how awfully he walks the round!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God is abroad, and wondrous in his ways&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rise of empires, and their fall surveys.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Dryden]], &#039;&#039;Britannia Rediviva&#039;&#039;, line 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too wise to err, too good to be unkind,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are all the movements of the Eternal Mind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rev. [[John East]], &#039;&#039;Songs of My Pilgrimage&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is divine Principle, supreme incorporeal Being, Mind, Spirit, Soul, Life, Truth, Love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mary Baker Eddy]], &#039;&#039;Science and Health&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV. Ed. 1906, p. 465&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no life, truth, intelligence, nor substance in matter. All is infinite Mind, and its infinite manifestation, for God is All in All. Spirit is immortal Truth; Matter is mortal error.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mary Baker Eddy]], &#039;&#039;Science and Health&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV. Ed. 1906, p. 468&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the Master of the universe has points to carry in his government he impresses his will in the structure of minds.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Letters and Social Aims&#039;&#039; (1876), &#039;&#039;Immortality&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He was a wise man who originated the idea of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Euripides]], &#039;&#039;Sisyphus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Henceforth the Majesty of God revere;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fear him and you have nothing else to fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fordyce]], &#039;&#039;Answer to a Gentleman who Apologized to the Author for Swearing&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Wie einer ist, so ist sein Gott,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Darum ward Gott so oft zu Spott.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** As a man is, so is his God; therefore God was so often an object of mockery.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], &#039;&#039;Gedichte&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My God commands, whose power no power resists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Greene (dramatist)|Robert Greene]], &#039;&#039;Looking-Glass for London and England&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some men treat the God of their fathers as they treat their father&#039;s friend. They do not deny him; by no means: they only deny themselves to him, when he is good enough to call upon them.&lt;br /&gt;
** J. C. and A. W. Hare, &#039;&#039;Guesses at Truth&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I askt the seas and all the deeps below&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; My God to know,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I askt the reptiles, and whatever is &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; In the abyss;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Even from the shrimps to the leviathan&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Enquiry ran;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But in those deserts that no line can sound&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The God I sought for was not to be found.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Heywood]], &#039;&#039;Searching after God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Forgetful youth! but know, the Power above&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With ease can save each object of his love;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wide as his will, extends his boundless grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book III, line 285. Pope&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O thou, whose certain eye foresees&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The fix&#039;d event of fate&#039;s remote decrees.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book IV, line 627. Pope&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dangerous it were for the feeble brain of man to wade far into the doings of the Most High; whom although to know be life, and joy to make mention of his name, yet our soundest knowledge is to know that we know him not as indeed he is, neither can know him; and our safest eloquence concerning him is our silence, when we confess without confession that his glory is inexplicable, his greatness above our capacity and reach.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hooker]], &#039;&#039;Ecclesiastical Polity&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter II. 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But if the sky were paper and a scribe each star above,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And every scribe had seven hands, they could not write all my love.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Dürsli und Bäbeli&#039;&#039;; old public house ditty of the Canton de Soleure or Solothurn. Original in Swiss dialect. Given in &#039;&#039;Notes and Queries&#039;&#039; (Feb. 10, 1872), p. 114&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From thee, great God, we spring, to thee we tend,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Path, motive, guide, original, and end.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], &#039;&#039;Motto to The Rambler&#039;&#039;, No. 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The sun and every vassal star,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; All space, beyond the soar of angel&#039;s wings,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wait on His word: and yet He stays His car&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; For every sigh a contrite suppliant brings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Keble]], &#039;&#039;The Christian Year&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Ascension Day&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nam homo proponit, sed Deus disponit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man proposes, but God disposes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas à Kempis]], &#039;&#039;Imitation of Christ&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter XIX. Thomas Dibdin&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O God, I am thinking Thy thoughts after Thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johannes Kepler]], when studying astronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All but God is changing day by day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Kingsley]], &#039;&#039;The Saints&#039; Tragedy&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Prometheus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L&#039;impossibilité où je suis de prouver que Dieu n&#039;est pas, me decouvre son existence.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The very impossibility in which I find myself to prove that God is not, discloses to me His existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean de La Bruyère]], &#039;&#039;Les Caractères&#039;&#039;, XVI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Sire, je n&#039;avais besoin de cet hypothèse.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sire, I had no need for that hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[La Place]] to [[Napoleon]], who asked why God was not mentioned in &#039;&#039;Traite de la Méchanique Céleste&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Denn Gott lohnt Gutes, hier gethan, auch hier noch.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** For God rewards good deeds done here below—rewards them here.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gotthold Ephraim Lessing]], &#039;&#039;Nathan der Weise&#039;&#039;, I, 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We trust, Sir, that God is on our side.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;It is more important to know that we are on God&#039;s side.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], reply to deputation of Southerners during Civil War&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God had sifted three kingdoms to find the wheat for this planting.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;The Courtship of Miles Standish&#039;&#039;, IV&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Estne dei sedes nisi terra et pontus et aër&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Et cœlum et virtus? Superos quid quærimus ultra?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jupiter est quodcumque vides, quodcumque moveris.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Is there any other seat of the Divinity than the earth, sea, air, the heavens, and virtuous minds? why do we seek God elsewhere? He is whatever you see; he is wherever you move.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Annaeus Lucanus]], &#039;&#039;Pharsalia&#039;&#039;, IX. 578&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ein gute Wehr und Waffen,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Er hilft uns frei aus aller Not,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Die uns jetzt hat betroffen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A mighty fortress is our God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A bulwark never failing,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Our helper he amid the flood&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of mortal ills prevailing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;Ein feste Burg&#039;&#039;. Translation by F. H. Hedge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I fear no foe with Thee at hand to bless;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ills have no weight, and tears no bitterness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Francis Lyte]], &#039;&#039;Eventide&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A voice in the wind I do not know;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A meaning on the face of the high hills&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Whose utterance I cannot comprehend.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A something is behind them: that is God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George MacDonald]], &#039;&#039;Within and Without&#039;&#039;, Part I, scene 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Exemplumque dei quisque est in imagine parva.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Every one is in a small way the image of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, IV. 895&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Quis cœlum possit nisi cœli munera nosse?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Et reperire deum nisi qui pars ipse deorum est?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Who can know heaven except by its gifts? and who can find out God, unless the man who is himself an emanation from God?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, II. 115&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One sole God;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One sole ruler,—his Law;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One sole interpreter of that law—Humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giuseppe Mazzini]], &#039;&#039;Life and Writings&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Young Europe&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;General Principles&#039;&#039;, No. 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too wise to be mistaken still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Too good to be unkind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Medley]], &#039;&#039;Hymn of God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Who best&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Bear his mild yoke, they serve him best: his state&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is kingly; thousands at his bidding speed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And post o&#039;er land and ocean without rest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;Sonnet&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;On His Blindness&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott-trunkener Mensch.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A God-intoxicated man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Novalis]], in reference to [[Spinoza]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Trumpeter, sound for the splendour of God!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;. . . . . .&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Trumpeter, rally us, up to the heights of it!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Sound for the City of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred Noyes]], &#039;&#039;Trumpet Call&#039;&#039;, last lines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est deus in nobis; et sunt commercia cœli.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God within us and intercourse with heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Ars Amatoria&#039;&#039;, Book III. 549. (Milton&#039;s &amp;quot;Looks commercing with the skies&amp;quot; said to be inspired by this phrase)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est deus in nobis: agitante calescimus illo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God within us, and we glow when he stirs us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Fasti&#039;&#039;, Book VI. 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Sed tamen ut fuso taurorum sanguine centum,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sic capitur minimo thuris honore deux.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** As God is propitiated by the blood of a hundred bulls, so also is he by the smallest offering of incense.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Tristium&#039;&#039;, II. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil ita sublime est, supraque pericula tendit&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Non sit ut inferius suppositumque deo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nothing is so high and above all danger that is not below and in the power of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Tristium&#039;&#039;, IV. 8. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One on God&#039;s side is a majority.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wendell Phillips]], speech at Harper&#039;s Ferry (1 November 1859)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est profecto deus, qui, quæ nos gerimus, auditque et videt.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is indeed a God that hears and sees whate&#039;er we do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Captivi&#039;&#039;, II. 2. 63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He from thick films shall purge the visual ray,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on the sightless eyeball pour the day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;Messiah&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou Great First Cause, least understood.&lt;br /&gt;
** Alexander Pope, &#039;&#039;Universal Prayer&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je crains Dieu, cher Abner, et n&#039;ai point d&#039;autre crainte.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I fear God, dear Abner, and I have no other fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Racine]], &#039;&#039;Athalie&#039;&#039;, Act I, scene 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Give us a God—a living God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; One to wake the sleeping soul, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; One to cleanse the tainted blood &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Whose pulses in our bosoms roll.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. G. Rosenberg]], &#039;&#039;The Winged Horn&#039;&#039;, Stanza 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We may scavenge the dross of the nation, we may shudder past bloody sod,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But we thrill to the new revelation that we are parts of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Haven Schauffler]], &#039;&#039;New Gods for Old&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Es lebt ein Gott zu strafen und zu rächen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God to punish and avenge.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Wilhelm Tell&#039;&#039;, IV. 3. 37&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil ab illo [i.e. a Deo] vacat; opus suum ipse implet.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nothing is void of God; He Himself fills His work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;De Beneficiis&#039;&#039;, IV. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Deum non immolationibus et sanguine multo colendum: quæ enim ex trucidatione immerentium voluptas est? sed mente pura, bono honestoque proposito. Non templa illi, congestis in altitudinem saxis, struenda sunt; in suo cuique consecrandus est pectore.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is not to be worshipped with sacrifices and blood; for what pleasure can He have in the slaughter of the innocent? but with a pure mind, a good and honest purpose. Temples are not to be built for Him with stones piled on high; God is to be consecrated in the breast of each.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;Fragment&#039;&#039;, V. 204&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God helps those who help themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Algernon Sidney]], &#039;&#039;Discourse Concerning Government&#039;&#039;, Chapter II. Ovid—Metamorphoses. X. 586. [[Pliny the Elder]], viewing the Eruption of Vesuvius, Aug., 79. [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;William Tell&#039;&#039;, I. 2. [[Simonides]] is quoted as author by Claudian. [[Sophocles]], &#039;&#039;Fragments&#039;&#039;. [[Terence]], &#039;&#039;Phormio&#039;&#039;. I. 4. [[Vergil]], &#039;&#039;Æneid&#039;&#039; (29-19 BC), X, 284. Quoted as a proverb by old and modern writers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From Piety, whose soul sincere&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fears God, and knows no other fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. Smyth]], &#039;&#039;Ode for the Installation of the Duke of Gloucester as Chancellor of Cambridge&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ad majorem Dei gloriam.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** For the greater glory of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Motto of the Society of Jesus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The divine essence itself is love and wisdom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emanuel Swedenborg]], &#039;&#039;Divine Love and Wisdom&#039;&#039;, Par. 28&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, the Great Giver, can open the whole universe to our gaze in the narrow space of a single lane.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Jivan-smitri&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ha sotto i piedi il Fato e la Natura.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ministri umili; e&#039;l moto e chi&#039;l misura.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Under whose feet (subjected to His grace),&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Sit nature, fortune, motion, time, and place.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Torquato Tasso]], &#039;&#039;Gerusalemme&#039;&#039;, IX, 66&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At last I heard a voice upon the slope&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Cry to the summit, &amp;quot;Is there any hope?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To which an answer pealed from that high land,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But in a tongue no man could understand;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on the glimmering limit far withdrawn,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God made himself an awful rose of dawn.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred Tennyson]], &#039;&#039;Vision of Sin&#039;&#039;, V&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I fled Him, down the nights and down the days;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I fled Him, down the arches of the years;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I fled Him, down the labyrinthine ways&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of my own mind; and in the midst of tears&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I hid from Him, and under running laughter.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Thompson]], &#039;&#039;The Hound of Heaven&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But I lose&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Myself in Him, in Light ineffable!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Come then, expressive Silence, muse His praise.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;These, as they change, Almighty Father, these&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are but the varied God. The rolling Year&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is full of Thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], &#039;&#039;Hymn&#039;&#039;, line 116&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The being of God is so comfortable, so convenient, so necessary to the felicity of Mankind, that, (as [[Cicero|Tully]] admirably says) &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;, if God were not a necessary being of himself, he might almost seem to be made on purpose for the use and benefit of men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Tillotson|Archbishop Tillotson]], &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039;, Sermon 93, Volume I, (1712 edition), p. 696; this is the probable origin of [[Voltaire]]&#039;s phrase.&lt;br /&gt;
** Cicero&#039;s phrase from &#039;&#039;[[w:De Legibus|De legibus]]&#039;&#039; in fact references &amp;quot;gods&amp;quot; in the plural&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rock of Ages, cleft for me,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Let me hide myself in thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustus Toplady]], &#039;&#039;Living and Dying Prayer&#039;&#039;. &amp;quot;Rock of Ages&amp;quot; is translation. from the Hebrew of &amp;quot;everlasting strength.&amp;quot; Isaiah, XXVI. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* None but God can satisfy the longings of an immortal soul; that as the heart was made for Him, so He only can fill it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Chenevix Trench]], &#039;&#039;Notes on the Parables&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Prodigal Son&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, from a beautiful necessity, is Love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]], &#039;&#039;Of Immortality&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that there is no God, but that matter is God and God is matter; and that it is no matter whether there is any God or no.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;The Unbeliever&#039;s Creed&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Connoisseur No. IX&#039;&#039; (March 28, 1754)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Si genus humanum et mortalia temnitis arma&#039;&#039;,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;At sperate deos memores fandi atque nefandi&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** If ye despise the human race, and mortal arms, yet remember that there is a God who is mindful of right and wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Virgil]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Aeneid|Æneid]]&#039;&#039; (29-19 BC), I. 542&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Si Dieu n&#039;existait pas, il faudrait l&#039;inventer.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** If there were no God, it would be necessary to invent him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Epitre à l&#039;Auteur du Livre des Trois Imposteurs&#039;&#039;, CXI. See Œuvres Complètes de Voltaire, Volume I, p. 1076. Ed. Didot, 1827. Also in letter to Frederick, Prince Royal of Prussia&lt;br /&gt;
*** cf. [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je voudrais que vous écrasassiez l&#039;infâme.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I wish that you would crush this infamy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]] to D&#039;Alembert June 23, 1760. Attributed to Voltaire by Abbé Barruch—Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism. Generally quoted &amp;quot;Écrasez l&#039;infâme.&amp;quot; A. De Morgan contends that the popular idea that it refers to God is incorrect. It refers probably to the Roman Catholic Church, or the traditions in the church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God on His throne is eldest of poets:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Unto His measures moveth the Whole.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;England my Mother&#039;&#039;, Part II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God I know of, I shall ne&#039;er&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Know, though he dwells exceeding nigh.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Raise thou the stone and find me there,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Cleave thou the wood and there am I.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yea, in my flesh his spirit doth flow,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Too near, too far, for me to know.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;The Unknown God&#039;&#039;. Third and fourth lines are from &amp;quot;newly discovered sayings of Jesus.&amp;quot; Probably an ancient Oriental proverb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Somewhat which we name but cannot know.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ev&#039;n as we name a star and only see&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Its quenchless flashings forth, which ever show&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And ever hide him, and which are not he.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;Wordsworth&#039;s Grave&#039;&#039;, I, Stanza 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is and all is well.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;My Birthday&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know not where His islands lift&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Their fronded palms in air;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I only know I cannot drift&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Beyond His love and care.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;The Eternal Goodness&#039;&#039;, Stanza 20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Though man sits still, and takes his ease,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is at work on man;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No means, no moment unemploy&#039;d,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To bless him, if he can.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Resignation&#039;&#039;, Part I, Stanza 119&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anonymous ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Proverbs or widely known statements by unknown authors.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;GOD IS COMING, AND IS &#039;&#039;SHE&#039;&#039; PISSED!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Anonymous bumper sticker as quoted in &#039;&#039;My First Saturnalia&#039;&#039; (1981) by Michael Rumaker, p. 3&lt;br /&gt;
** GOD IS COMING, AND BOY IS SHE PISSED!&lt;br /&gt;
*** Variant bumper sticker as quoted in &#039;&#039;River Angel : A Novel&#039;&#039; (1999) A. Manette Ansay, p. 107&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Ageless Wisdom Teachings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fear of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kingdom of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Love of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Om]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pandeism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pantheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Personal God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Polytheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Commons category}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|God and Religious Toleration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:God| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=3120542</id>
		<title>God</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=3120542"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T16:19:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Otheruses|God (disambiguation)}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fostre.tif|thumb| Who hath made man&#039;s mouth? or who maketh the dumb or deaf, or the seeing or the blind? have not I the LORD? ~ [[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Motherless - Luke Fildes.jpg|thumb|The [[Deity|gods]] of all [[pagan]] faiths have been allied with the [[rich]] [[rulers]]. The priests of most religions are the employees of the landowners. But the God of Israel has always claimed to be with the poor—whether in the legislation of [[Deuteronomy]], the [[words]] of the [[prophets]], or the [[experiences]] of the [[New Testament]]. Our God is on the side of the [[poor]]. ~ [[John Howard Yoder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:QUR&#039;AN 2981a.jpg|thumb|I [[know]] what you know not. ~ [[Quran]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Wealth Inequality - v2.png|thumb|Oppressed and oppressors cannot possibly mean the same thing when they speak of God. The God of the oppressed is a God of revolution who breaks the chains of slavery. The oppressors&#039; God is a God of slavery and must be destroyed along with the oppressors. ~ [[James Cone]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ludwig feuerbach.jpg|thumb|God is for man the [[w:commonplace book|commonplace book]] where he registers his highest feelings and thoughts, the genealogical album into which he enters the names of the things most dear and sacred to him. ~ [[Ludwig&amp;amp;nbsp;Feuerbach]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Schnorr von Carolsfeld Bibel in Bildern 1860 057.png|thumb|God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. ~ [[Psalms|Psalms 46:1 - 3]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simone Weil 1921.jpg|thumb|The only mark of God in us is that we feel that we are not God. ~ [[Simone&amp;amp;nbsp;Weil]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emerson, poet and thinker (1904) (14577386099).jpg|thumb|When we consider what is our thought of God we find that it is our own soul stripped of all inferiority and carried out to perfection. ~ [[Ralph&amp;amp;nbsp;Waldo&amp;amp;nbsp;Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brockhaus and Efron Jewish Encyclopedia e9 615-0.jpg|thumb|Only the idea of God gives me the confidence that morality will become reality on earth. And because I cannot live without this confidence, I cannot live without God. ~ [[Hermann&amp;amp;nbsp;Cohen]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Laurent de La Hyre - Allegory of Arithmetic - Walters 371917.jpg|thumb|He best honors God who makes his intellect as like God as possible. ~ [[Quintus Sextius]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Calvin 17.jpg|thumb|We cannot aspire to Him in earnest until we have begun to be displeased with ourselves. ~ [[John Calvin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:God the Father with His Right Hand Raised in Blessing.jpg|thumb|If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him. ~ [[Voltaire]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gregor von Nyssa.JPG|thumb|right|The love of gain, which is a large, incalculably large, element in every soul, when once applied to the desire for God, will bless the one who has it. ~ [[Gregory of Nyssa]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Percy Bysshe Shelley by Alfred Clint crop.jpg|thumb|If we find great difficulty from its admirable arrangement in conceiving that the Universe has existed from all eternity, and to resolve this difficulty suppose a Creator, how much more clearly must we perceive the necessity of this very Creator’s creation. ~ [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Friederich Nietzsche.jpg|thumb|Even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians, still take our fire, too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year-old faith, the Christian faith which was also [[Plato|Plato&#039;s]] faith, that God is truth; that truth is divine. ~ [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nietzsche1882 smaller.jpeg|thumb|You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price. ~ [[Friedrich&amp;amp;nbsp;Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bataille crop.jpg|thumb|If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated. ~ [[Georges Bataille]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Williboni.jpg|thumb|How wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed further and further back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know. ~ [[Dietrich&amp;amp;nbsp;Bonhoeffer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - Petites Mendiantes (1880).jpg|thumb|The God who appears to me is the comforter of the poor and their avenger in world history. This avenger of the poor is the God I love. ~ [[Hermann Cohen]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In [[monotheism]], &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:God|God]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is conceived of as the Supreme Being and principal object of [[faith]].&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha|&#039;&#039;[[#Bible|Bible]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Quran|Quran]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Book of Mormon|Book of Mormon]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; · [[#Anonymous|Anonymous]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotations listed alphabetically by author or work.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I refuse to prove that I exist,&amp;quot; says God, &amp;quot;for [[proof]] denies faith, and without faith, I am nothing.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oh,&amp;quot; says man, &amp;quot;but the [[w:Babel fish (The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy)|Babel fish]] is a dead give-away, isn&#039;t it? It proves You exist, and so therefore You don&#039;t.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oh, I hadn&#039;t thought of that,&amp;quot; says God, who promptly vanishes in a puff of [[logic]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Douglas Adams]], &#039;&#039;[[The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy]]&#039;&#039; (1979), [[The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy#Chapter 6|Chapter 6]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we say God is a [[spirit]], we know what we mean, as well as we do when we say that the pyramids of Egypt are matter. Let us be content, therefore, to believe him to be a spirit, that is, an essence that we know nothing of, in which originally and necessarily reside all energy, all power, all capacity, all activity, all wisdom, all goodness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Adams]], in a letter to [[Thomas Jefferson]] (17 January 1820)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nearer, my God, to Thee—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nearer to Thee—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;E&#039;en though it be a cross&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That raiseth me;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Still all my song shall be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Nearer, my God, to Thee,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nearer to Thee!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sarah Flower Adams]], &#039;&#039;Nearer, my God, to Thee!&#039;&#039; (c. 1841); an article in Notes and Queries states that the words were written by her sister, Mrs. Byrdes Flower Adams, and the music only by Sarah Flower Adams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God tells us [[Homosexuality|men fucking men]] is a terrible thing, but a father offering his two daughters, vestal [[Virginity|virgins]] no less, to a horde of horny buggers is [[heroic]]. Now that&#039;s straight. … God destroys the faggots with fire and brimstone. He turns a disobedient wife into salt. But he asks us to [[Idolatry|idolize]] [[Drunkenness|drunks]] [[Incest|who sleep with their daughters]] or offer them to a horny, unruly mob.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabih Alameddine]] on the [[Bible|biblical narrative]] of Lot and his family confronting the inhabitants of [[Sodom and Gomorrah]], as quoted by Wail S. Hassan in &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.com/books?id=vA5pAgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA207 Immigrant Narratives: Orientalism and Cultural Translation in Arab American and Arab British Literature]&#039;&#039; (2011), Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-979206-1}}, page 207.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nec audiendi qui solent dicere, vox populi, vox Dei, quum tumultuositas vulgi semper insaniae proxima sit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** And those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voice of the people is the voice of God, since the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: We should not listen to those who like to affirm that the voice of the people is the voice of God, for the tumult of the masses is truly close to madness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alcuin]] Works, Epistle 127 (to Charlemagne, AD 800)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Never place a period where God has placed a comma.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gracie Allen]], in her last letter to [[George Burns]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Two Minutes for God : Quick Fixes for the Spirit&#039;&#039; (2007) by Peter B. Panagore, p. 73; this was later used in a slogan for the [[w:United Church of Christ|United Church of Christ]]: &#039;&#039;&#039;Never place a period where God has placed a comma. God Is Still Speaking.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not only is there no God, but try getting a plumber on weekends.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;Getting Even&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit in my name in a Swiss bank.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Without Feathers|Without Feathers]]&#039;&#039; (1975)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The important thing, I think, is not to be bitter... if it turns out that there is a God, I don&#039;t think that he is evil. I think that the worst thing you could say is that he is, basically, an under-achiever. If God exists, I hope he has a good excuse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Love and Death|Love and Death]]&#039;&#039; (1975); also quoted in &#039;&#039;What Do Jews Believe? : The Customs and Culture of Modern Judaism&#039;&#039; (2007) by Edward Kessler, p. 66&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To you I&#039;m an atheist; to God, I&#039;m the Loyal Opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Stardust Memories|Stardust Memories]]&#039;&#039; (1980)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Love, Sex, Death &amp;amp; The Meaning of Life : The Films of Woody Allen&#039;&#039; (2001) by Foster Hirsch, p. 50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God — or [[Aum|Aum (om)]] —is the Highest Being of your inner self.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  [http://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Leaves-of-Moryas-Garden-I.php &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;],  6, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Love]] even the knot-grass. God created it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  237, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shepherds have received the revelations, While emperors have searched for them. Dogmatic scholars have resisted them. Leaders have been fearful of them. The Voice of God overshadows all when there is [[spiritual]] readiness.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  367, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They who deny God have not seen Him. 	&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  [http://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Leaves-of-Moryas-Garden-II.php &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden II, Illumination&#039;&#039;]  180, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The canon, “By thy God,” is the higher, and this canon is the basis of the New World. Formerly one said: “And my spirit rejoiceth in God, my Savior.” [[Now]] you will say: “And my spirit rejoiceth in God, thy Savior.”   Solemnly do I say that therein is salvation. “Long live thy God!” So you will say to everyone; and, exchanging Gods, you will walk to the One.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There where one might otherwise sink one can tread softly, if without negation. There where one could suffocate one can pass, by pronouncing “Thy God.” There where matter is revered one can pass only by elevating the earthly matter into the Cosmos. Essentially, one should not have any attachment to Earth... Thus, find the God of each one and exalt Him. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden II, Illumination&#039;&#039;,  211, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What is meant by &amp;quot;mad in God&amp;quot;? Why were the prophets of antiquity called madmen? Precisely because of the fire of straight-knowledge, which isolated them from all else, a valuable quality that severed them from the ordinary, everyday ways of thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Agni Yoga&#039;&#039;,    281, (1929) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Even in the most ancient times people understood the significance of the heart. They regarded the heart as the Dwelling of God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]], &#039;&#039;Heart&#039;&#039;  73, (1932)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Susan B. Anthony]], in an address to the National American Woman Suffrage Association (1896)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is the most noble of beings. Now it is impossible for a body to be the most noble of beings; for a body must be either animate or inanimate; and an animate body is manifestly nobler than any inanimate body. But an animate body is not animate precisely as body; otherwise all bodies would be animate. Therefore its animation depends upon some other thing, as our body depends for its animation on the soul. Hence that by which a body becomes animated must be nobler than the body. Therefore it is impossible that God should be a body.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Aquinas]], &#039;&#039;Summa Theologica&#039;&#039;, Part 1, Question 3 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ordina l&#039;uomo, e dio dispone.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man proposes, and God disposes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludovico Ariosto]], &#039;&#039;Orlando Furioso&#039;&#039; (1516), Chapter XLVI. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If I were not an [[atheist]], I would believe in a God who would choose to save people on the basis of the totality of their [[lives]] and not the pattern of their [[words]].&#039;&#039;&#039; I think he would prefer an [[honest]] and [[righteous]] atheist to a TV preacher whose every word is God, God, God, and whose every deed is foul, foul, foul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Asimov]], &#039;&#039;I. Asimov: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, in order to speak to [[Abraham]], must come from somewhere, must enter the earthly realm from some [[unknown]] heights or depths. Whence does he come, whence does he call to Abraham? We are not told. He does not come, like Zeus or [[w:Poseidon|Poseidon]], from the [[w:Aethiopia|Aethiopians]], where he has been enjoying a sacrificial feast. Nor are we told anything of his reasons for tempting Abraham so terribly. He has not, like Zeus, discussed them in set speeches with other gods gathered in council; nor have the deliberations in his own heart been presented to us; unexpected and mysterious, he enters the scene from some unknown height or depth and calls: Abraham! It will at once be said that this is to be explained by the particular concept of God which the Jews held and which was wholly different from that of the Greeks. True enough—but this constitutes no objection. For how is the Jewish concept of God to be explained? Even their earlier God of the desert was not fixed in form and content, and was alone; his lack of form, his lack of local habitation, his singleness, was in the end not only maintained but developed even further in competition with the comparatively far more manifest gods of the surrounding Near Eastern world. The concept of God held by the Jews is less a cause than a symptom of their manner of comprehending and representing things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Erich Auerbach]], &#039;&#039;Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature&#039;&#039;, Willard R. Trask, trans. (Princeton: 1953), chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If you comprehend, it is not God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]], &#039;&#039;Sermon&#039;&#039; 52, 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Deus scitur melius nesciendo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is best known in not knowing him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]], &#039;&#039;De Ordine&#039;&#039;, II, 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TenCommandmentsAustinStateCapitol.jpg|thumb|I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. ~ [[Susan&amp;amp;nbsp;B.&amp;amp;nbsp;Anthony]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For He is called omnipotent on account of His doing what He wills, not on account of His suffering what He wills not; for if that should befall Him, He would by no means be omnipotent. Wherefore, He cannot do some things for the very reason that He is omnipotent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf102.iv.V.10.html St. Augustine&#039;s City of God and Christian Doctrine: Chapter 10.—Whether Our Wills are Ruled by Necessity]&#039;&#039;, ccel.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A God who cannot smile could not have created this humorous universe.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sri Aurobindo]], &#039;&#039;Thoughts and Aphorisms&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God, the supreme being, is neither circumscribed by [[space]], nor touched by [[time]]; he cannot be found in a particular direction, and his [[essence]] cannot [[change]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The secret conversation is thus entirely spiritual; it is a direct encounter between God and the [[soul]], abstracted from all material constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Avicenna]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;366 Readings From Islam&#039;&#039; (2000), edited by Robert Van der Weyer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== B ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Martin Buber portrait.jpg|thumb|[[All]] [[names]] of God remain hallowed because they have been used not only to speak &#039;&#039;of&#039;&#039; God but also to speak &#039;&#039;to&#039;&#039; him. ~  [[Martin Buber]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At certain great moments down the ages, God drew nearer to His people and humanity at the same time made great, though oft unconscious efforts to draw near to God. From one angle, it might be regarded as God transcendent recognizing God immanent, and God in man reaching out to God in the Whole and greater than the Whole. On the part of God, working through the Head of the spiritual Hierarchy and its Membership, this effort was intentional, conscious and deliberate; on the part of man, it has been in the past largely unconscious, forced upon humanity by the tragedy of circumstances, by desperate need and by the driving urge of the immanent Christ consciousness.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]], &#039;&#039;Problems Of Humanity&#039;&#039;, Chapter V The Problem of the Churches - Part 2, (1944)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Eastern faiths have ever emphasised God Immanent, deep within the human heart, &amp;quot;nearer than hands and feet&amp;quot;, the Self, the One, the Atma, smaller than the small, yet all-comprehensive. The Western faiths have presented God Transcendent, Outside His universe, an Onlooker. God transcendent, first of all, conditioned men&#039;s concept of [[Deity]], for the action of this transcendent God appeared in the process of nature; later, in the Jewish dispensation, God appeared as the tribal [[Jehovah]], as the soul (the rather unpleasant soul) of a nation. Next, God was seen as a perfected man, and the divine God-man walked the Earth in the Person of the Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ&#039;&#039; p. 144, (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Today we have a rapidly growing emphasis upon God immanent in every human being, and in every created form. Today, we should have the churches presenting a synthesis of these two ideas, which have been summed up for us in the statement of Shri [[Krishna]] in the Bhagavad Gita: &amp;quot;Having pervaded this whole universe with a fragment of Myself, I remain.&amp;quot; God, greater than the created whole, yet God present also in the part; God Transcendent guarantees the Plan of our world, and is the Purpose conditioning all lives from the minutest atom, up through all the kingdoms of nature, to man.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] in &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ&#039;&#039; p. 145, (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*True [[religion]] is again emerging in the hearts of men in every land; this recognition of a divine hope and background may possibly take people back into the church and into the world faiths, but it will most certainly take them back to God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ,&#039;&#039; Chapter Three (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Religion is the name, surely, which we give to the invocative appeal of humanity which leads to the evocative response of the Spirit of God. This Spirit works in every human heart and in all groups.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]]  &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ,&#039;&#039; Chapter Three (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Slowly, there is dawning upon the awakening consciousness of humanity the great paralleling truth of God Immanent – divinely &amp;quot;pervading&amp;quot; all forms, conditioning from within all kingdoms in nature, expressing innate divinity through human beings. . . . There is a growing and developing belief that Christ is in us, as He was in the Master Jesus, and this belief will alter world affairs and mankind&#039;s entire attitude to life. (13 – 592).&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] in &#039;&#039;The Externalization of the Hierarchy&#039;&#039; p. 592, (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God Transcendent, greater, vaster and more inclusive than His created world, is universally recognised and has been generally emphasised; all faiths can say with Shri Krishna (speaking as God, the Creator) that &amp;quot;having pervaded the whole universe with a fragment of Myself, I remain.&amp;quot; This God Transcendent has dominated the religious thinking of millions of simple and spiritually-minded people down the centuries which have elapsed since humanity began to press forward towards divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Externalisation Of The Hierarchy&#039;&#039; The Return of the Christ - Part 1, (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A jealous lover of human liberty, and deeming it the absolute condition of all that we admire and respect in humanity, I reverse the phrase of [[Voltaire]], and say that &#039;&#039;if God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish him.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;!--emphasis in original--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Bakunin]] in &amp;quot;On God and the State&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The glory of God is not contingent on man&#039;s good will, but all existence subserves his purposes.&#039;&#039;&#039; The system of the universe is as a celestial poem, whose beauty is from all eternity, and must not be marred by human interpolations. &#039;&#039;&#039;Things proceed as they were ordered, in their nice, and well-adjusted, and perfect harmony; so that as the hand of the skilful artist gathers music from the harp-strings, history calls it forth from the well-tuned chords of time.&#039;&#039;&#039; Not that this harmony can be heard during the tumult of action. Philosophy comes after events, and gives the reason of them, and describes the nature of their results. The great mind of collective man may, one day, so improve in self-consciousness as to interpret the present and foretell the future; but as yet, the end of what is now happening, though we ourselves partake in it, seems to fall out by chance. &#039;&#039;&#039;All is nevertheless one whole; individuals, families, peoples, the race, march in accord with the Divine will; and when any part of the destiny of humanity is fulfilled, we see the ways of Providence vindicated. The antagonisms of imperfect matter and the perfect idea, of liberty and necessary law, become reconciled. What seemed irrational confusion, appears as the web woven by light, liberty and love.&#039;&#039;&#039; But this is not perceived till a great act in the drama of life is finished. The prayer of the patriarch, when he desired to behold the Divinity face to face, was denied; but he was able to catch a glimpse of Jehovah, after He had passed by; and so it fares with our search for Him in the wrestlings of the world. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is when the hour of conflict is over, that history comes to a right understanding of the strife, and is ready to exclaim: &amp;quot;Lo! God is here, and we knew it not.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bancroft]] &#039;&#039;Literary and Historical Miscellanies&#039;&#039; (1855), p. 491&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the mind is not dissipated upon extraneous things, nor diffused over the world about us through the senses, it withdraws within itself, and of its own accord ascends to the contemplation of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Basil of Caesarea]], Letter to [[w:Gregory of Nazianzus|Gregory]], &#039;&#039;Saint Basil: The Letters&#039;&#039;, R. Deferrari, trans. (1926), vol. 1, p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We thus become temples of God whenever earthly cares cease to interrupt the continuity of our memory of Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Basil of Caesarea]], Letter to [[w:Gregory of Nazianzus|Gregory]], &#039;&#039;Saint Basil: The Letters&#039;&#039;, R. Deferrari, trans. (1926), vol. 1, p. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georges Bataille]], &#039;&#039;Inner Experience&#039;&#039; (1954), L. Boldt, trans. (1988), p. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If by Godot I had meant God I would have said God, and not Godot.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Beckett]], on the title of one of his most famous plays, &#039;&#039;[[w:Waiting for Godot|Waiting for Godot]]&#039;&#039;, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Essential Samuel Beckett : An Illustrated Biography&#039;&#039;, by Enoch Brater (revised edition, 2003), p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many questions arise in this place! Constantly the question comes up: Where was God in those days? Why was he silent? How could he permit this endless slaughter, this triumph of evil? . . . We must continue to cry out humbly yet insistently to God: Rouse yourself! Do not forget mankind, your creature!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Benedict XVI]], who visited the former concentration camp at [[Auschwitz]], Poland, on (28 May 2006), as quoted in &#039;&#039;“Why, [[Lord]], Did You Remain Silent?”&#039;&#039;, in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; magazine (15 May 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Бога отрицают или потому, что мир так плох, или потому, что мир так хорош.&#039;&#039; [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikolai Berdyaev]], &#039;&#039;[http://vehi.net/soloviev/znachenie.html Self-knowledge (Самопознание)]&#039;&#039;, 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The true Mystic, realising God, has no need of any Scriptures, for he has touched the source whence all Scriptures flow.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=eIrD4GQFCPIC&amp;amp;pg=PT437 &#039;&#039;The Theosophical Writings of Annie Besant&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mysticism]] is the realisation of God, of the Universal Self. It is attained either as a realisation of God outside the Mystic, or within himself. In the first case, it is usually reached from within a religion, by exceptionally intense love and devotion, accompanied by purity of life, for only &amp;quot;the pure in heart shall see God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in &#039;&#039;Annie Besant Quotes&#039;&#039;   ISBN-13: 978-1535078498  (2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is patent to every student of the closing forty years of the last century, that crowds of thoughtful and moral people have slipped away from the churches, because the teachings they received there outraged their intelligence and shocked their moral sense. It is idle to pretend that the widespread agnosticism of this period had its root either in lack of morality or in deliberate crookedness of mind. Everyone who carefully studies the phenomena presented will admit that men of strong intellect have been driven out of Christianity by the crudity of the religious ideas set before them, the contradictions in the authoritative teachings, the views as to God, man, and the universe that no trained intelligence could possibly admit. Nor can it be said that any kind of moral degradation lay at the root of the revolt against the dogmas of the Church. The rebels were not too bad for their religion; on the contrary, it was the religion that was too bad for them. The rebellion against popular Christianity was due to the awakening and the growth of conscience; it was the conscience that revolted, as well as the intelligence, against teachings dishonouring to God and man alike, that represented God as a tyrant, and man as essentially evil, gaining salvation by slavish submission.   &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another precept of Jesus which remains as &amp;quot;a hard saying&amp;quot; to his followers is: &amp;quot;Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect&amp;quot;. [S. Matt., v, 48. ] The ordinary Christian knows that he cannot possibly obey this command; full of ordinary human frailties and weaknesses, how can he become perfect as God is perfect? Seeing the impossibility of the achievement set before him, he quietly puts it aside, and thinks no more about it. But seen as the crowning effort of [[reincarnation|many lives]] of steady improvement, as the triumph of the God within us over the lower nature, it comes within calculable distance, and we recall the words of Porphyry, how the man who achieves &amp;quot;the paradigmatic virtues is the Father of the Gods&amp;quot;, and that in the Mysteries these virtues were acquired.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For so reverent is God to that Spirit which is Himself in man, that He will not even pour into the human soul a flood of strength and life unless that soul is willing to receive it. There must be an opening from below as well as an outpouring from above, the receptiveness of the lower nature as well as the willingness of the higher to give. That is the link between the Christ and the man; that is what the churches have called the outpouring of &amp;quot;divine grace&amp;quot;; that is what is meant by the &amp;quot;faith&amp;quot; necessary to make the grace effective. As [[Giordano Bruno]] once put it — the human soul has windows, and can shut those windows close. The [[sun]] outside is shining, the light is unchanging; let the windows be opened and the sunlight must stream in. The light of God is beating against the windows of every human soul, and when the windows are thrown open, the soul becomes illuminated. There is no change in God, but there is a change in man; and man&#039;s will may not be forced, else were the divine Life in him blocked in its due evolution.  Thus in every Christ that rises, all humanity is lifted a step higher, and by His wisdom the ignorance of the whole world is lessened. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;. The chief of Grecian gods, adored by the Romans as [[w:Jupiter|Jupiter]] and by the modern Americans as God, Gold, Mob and Dog. Some explorers who have touched upon the shores of America, and one who professes to have penetrated a considerable distance to the interior, have thought that these four names stand for as many distinct deities, but in his monumental work on Surviving Faiths, Frumpp insists that the natives are monotheists, each having no other god than himself, whom he worships under many sacred names.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ambrose Bierce]], &#039;&#039;The Cynic&#039;s Word Book&#039;&#039; (1906), later retitled &#039;&#039;[[w:The Devil&#039;s Dictionary|The Devil&#039;s Dictionary]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although neither an alchemist, magician, nor astrologer, but simply a great [[philosopher]], [[Henry More]], of Cambridge University — a man universally esteemed, may be named as a shrewd logician, scientist, and metaphysician... His faith in immortality and able arguments in demonstration of the survival of man&#039;s spirit after death are all based on the [[Pythagoras#Quotes_about_Pythagoreanism|Pythagorean system]]... and other [[mystics]].  The infinite and uncreated spirit that we usually call God, a substance of the highest virtue and excellency, produced everything else by emanative causality. God thus is the primary substance... He...stoutly defended the theory of the individuality of every soul in which &amp;quot;personality, memory, and conscience will surely continue in the future state.&amp;quot; He divided the astral spirit of man after its exit from the body into two distinct entities: the &amp;quot;aerial&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;aethereal vehicle.&amp;quot; During the time that a disembodied man moves in its aerial clothing, he is subject to Fate -- i.e., evil and temptation, attached to its earthly interests, and therefore is not utterly pure; it is only when he casts off this garb of the first spheres and becomes ethereal that he becomes sure of his immortality. &amp;quot;For what shadow can that body cast that is a pure and transparent light, such as the ethereal vehicle is? And therefore that oracle is then fulfilled, when the soul has ascended into that condition we have already described, in which alone it is out of the reach of fate and mortality.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]], &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology,&#039;&#039; Vol. I, Before the Veil, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not the One unknown ever-present God in Nature, or Nature in abscondito, that is rejected, but the “God” of human dogma, and his humanized “Word.” Man, in his [[infinite]] conceit and inherent pride and vanity, shaped it himself with his sacrilegious hand out of the material he found in his own small brain-fabric, and forced it upon his fellows as a direct revelation from the one unrevealed Space.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]], &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1  (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Esoteric Philosophy...denies Deity no more than it does the sun. Esoteric Philosophy has never rejected God in Nature, nor Deity as the absolute and abstract Ens. It only refuses to accept any of the gods of the so-called monotheistic religions, gods created by man in his own image and likeness, a [[blasphemous]] and sorry caricature of the Ever-Unknowable.&lt;br /&gt;
**H.P. Blavatsky, &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1   (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We reject the idea of a personal, or an extra-cosmic and anthropomorphic God, who is but the gigantic shadow of man, and not of man at his best, either. The God of [[theology]], we say—and prove it—is a bundle of contradictions and a logical impossibility... Our DEITY is neither in a paradise, nor in a particular tree, building, or mountain; it is everywhere, in every atom of the visible as of the invisible Cosmos, in, over, and around every invisible atom and divisible molecule; for IT is the mysterious power of evolution and involution, the omnipresent, omnipotent, and even omniscient creative potentiality.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky]],&#039;&#039;The Key to Theosophy&#039;&#039; (1889) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If we have to believe in a divine principle at all, it must be in one which is as absolute harmony, logic, and justice, as it is absolute love, wisdom, and impartiality; and a God who would create every soul for the space of one brief span of life, regardless of the fact whether it has to animate the body of a wealthy, happy man, or that of a poor suffering wretch, hapless from birth to death though he has done nothing to deserve his cruel fate—would be rather a senseless fiend than a God.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],&#039;&#039;The Key to Theosophy&#039;&#039; (1889) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed further and further back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], &#039;&#039;Letters and Papers from Prison&#039;&#039; (1967), p. 311&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To everyone God is the kind of God he believes in.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], &#039;&#039;Nachfolge&#039;&#039; (1937), &#039;&#039;The Cost of Discipleship&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 185&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Only what is fated to die is capable of living. Only what dies lives.&#039;&#039;&#039; Why do you think [[Jesus|Christ]] was killed? They killed him to prove that he wasn’t a god. But in killing him, they immortalized the perishable and transformed man into a god.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giannina Braschi]] in &amp;quot;[[Empire of Dreams]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The gods [[envy]] me because they cannot die.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giannina Braschi]] in &amp;quot;[[Empire of Dreams]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Goddes love&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;is unescapable as nature&#039;s environment,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;which if a man ignore or think to thrust it off&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;he is the ill-natured fool that runneth on to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Bridges]], &#039;&#039;The Testament of Beauty&#039;&#039; (1929), Book IV, line 1419&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That we devote ourselves to God is seen&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In living just as though no God there were.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Paracelsus&#039;&#039; (1835), Part I&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the perfect [[poet]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who in his person acts his own creations.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Paracelsus&#039;&#039; (1835), Part II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;s in His [[Heaven]] — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;All&#039;s right with the world!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Pippa Passes&#039;&#039; (1841), Part I&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All service is the same with God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With God, whose puppets, best and worst,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are we: there is no last nor first.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Pippa Passes&#039;&#039; (1841), Part IV&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All names of God remain hallowed because they have been used not only to speak &#039;&#039;of&#039;&#039; God but also to speak &#039;&#039;to&#039;&#039; him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;[[w:I and Thou|I and Thou]]&#039;&#039; (1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some would deny any legitimate use of the word God because it has been misused so much. Certainly it is the most burdened of all human words. Precisely for that reason it is the most imperishable and unavoidable. And how much weight has all erroneous talk about God&#039;s nature and works (although there never has been nor can be any such talk that is not erroneous) compared with the one truth that all men who have addressed God really meant him? For whoever pronounces the word God and really means Thou, addresses, no matter what his delusion, the true Thou of his life that cannot be restricted by any other and to whom he stands in a relationship that includes all others.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;[[w:I and Thou|I and Thou]]&#039;&#039; (1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we rise out of [the night] into the new life and there begin to receive the signs, what can we know of that which—of him who gives them to us? Only what we experience from time to time from the signs themselves. If we name the speaker of this speech God, then it is always the God of a moment, a moment God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;Between Man and Man&#039;&#039; (1965), p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* According to mythological thinking, God has his domicile in [[heaven]].  What is the meaning of this statement?  The meaning is quite clear.  In a crude manner it expresses the idea that God is beyond the world, that He is transcendent. The thinking which is not yet capable of forming the abstract idea of transcendence expresses its intention in the category of space.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudolf Bultmann]], “Jesus Christ and Mythology,” Interpreting Faith for the Modern Era, p. 294 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “Don’t you know everything?”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God smiled. “No, I outgrew that trick long ago. You can’t imagine how boring it was.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Octavia Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Book of Martha&#039;&#039; (2003). Originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Sci Fiction|Sci Fiction]]&#039;&#039; (May 21, 2003). Reprinted in [[w:David G. Hartwell|David G. Hartwell]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;Year’s Best Fantasy 4&#039;&#039; (p. 52)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s merits are so transcendent that it is not surprising his faults should be in reasonable proportion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler]] &amp;quot;Rebelliousness&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Note-Books&#039;&#039; (1912)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no god but God! — to prayer — lo! &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is great!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;[[Childe Harold&#039;s Pilgrimage]]&#039;&#039;, Canto II (1812), Stanza 59, this is a translation of standard Islamic exclamations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “It’s not my job to be God’s lawyer,...I’m his salesman. I do believe he’s the greatest thing that ever existed, and I encourage people to get to know him without trying to explain what he’s doing or why.”&lt;br /&gt;
** Rabbi Chaim Bruk in [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/04/02/coronavirus-god-christain-jewish-muslim-leaders-saying-deadly-plague/5101639002/ Is the coronavirus an act of God? Faith leaders debate tough questions amid pandemic, USA Today] April 2, 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our feeling of ignorance, vanity, want, weakness, in short, depravity and corruption, reminds us ... that in the Lord, and none but He, dwell the true light of wisdom, solid virtue, exuberant goodness. We are accordingly urged by our own evil things to consider the good things of God; and, indeed, we cannot aspire to Him in earnest until we have begun to be displeased with ourselves. For what man is not disposed to rest in himself? Who, in fact, does not thus rest, so long as he is unknown to himself; that is, so long as he is contented with his own endowments, and unconscious or unmindful of his misery? Every person, therefore, on coming to the knowledge of himself, is not only urged to seek God, but is also led as by the hand to find him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Calvin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Institutes of the Christian Religion|Institutes of the Christian Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Book 1, Chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Without knowledge of self there is no knowledge of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Calvin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Institutes of the Christian Religion|Institutes of the Christian Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Book 1 Chapter 1, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God, or is it Mr. G to me?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alessia Cara|Alessia Cara]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zXfF3uxwww &amp;quot;7 Days&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The Pains of Growing&#039;&#039; (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Except during my childhood, when I was probably influenced by [[Michelangelo]]&#039;s Sistine Chapel depiction of God with a flowing white beard, I have never tried to project the Creator in any kind of human likeness. The vociferous debates about whether God is male or female seem ridiculous to me. I think of God as an omnipotent and omniscient presence, a [[spirit]] that permeates the [[universe]], the essence of [[truth]], [[nature]], being, and [[life]]. To me, these are profound and indescribable concepts that seem to be trivialized when expressed in [[words]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jimmy Carter]], &#039;&#039;Living Faith&#039;&#039; (2001), p. 222&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Although every believing Christian understands that God guides our steps, fewer and fewer emphasize the point. A God working actively in the world makes us uneasy. We tend to like our God distant and a bit malleable, ready to bend to every new human idea. A God with a will of his own is too scary, and, besides, he might get in the way of our satisfaction of immediate desire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen L. Carter]], &#039;&#039;[[Stephen L. Carter#The Emperor of Ocean Park (2002)|The Emperor of Ocean Park]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 25, &#039;&#039;A Modest Request&#039;&#039;, I (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Promises made to others in God&#039;s name engage the divine honor, fidelity, truthfulness, and authority. They must be respected in justice. To be unfaithful to them is to misuse God&#039;s name and in some way to make God out to be a liar. (1 John 1:10)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Catechism of the Catholic Church]] 2147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* True religion consists in proposing, as our great end, a growing likeness to the Supreme Being. Its noblest influence consists in making us more and more partakers of the Divinity. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Likeness to God” (1828)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious instruction should aim chiefly to turn men’s aspirations and efforts to that perfection of the soul, which constitutes it a bright image of God. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Likeness to God” (1828)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I tell you this, that you will have found out the [[truth]] of the last [[tree]] and the top-most [[cloud]] before the truth about [[Self|me]].&#039;&#039;&#039; You will [[understand]] the [[sea]], and I shall be still a [[Mystery|riddle]]; you shall [[Knowledge|know]] what the [[stars]] are, and not know [[The All|what I am]]. Since the [[beginning]] of the [[world]] all [[men]] have hunted me like a [[wolf]] — [[Monarchy|kings]] and [[Philosophy|sages]], and [[poets]] and [[Law|lawgivers]], all the [[Church|churches]], and all the [[Philosophy|philosophies]]. But &#039;&#039;&#039;I have never been caught yet, and the [[Sky|skies]] will fall in the [[time]] I turn to bay.&#039;&#039;&#039; I have given them a [[good]] run for their [[money]], and I will now.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;[[The Man Who Was Thursday]]&#039;&#039; (1908), [[s:The Man Who Was Thursday/Chapter XIII|Ch. XIII : The Pursuit of the President]], &amp;quot;Sunday&amp;quot; representing God speaking to the ostensible [[Anarchism|anarchists]] who have just realized they were were all policemen and spies, but who still haven&#039;t realized their role or Sunday&#039;s in the comic nightmare Chesterton devised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If [people] wish to love God, they [must] be prepared to do so no matter what His intentions. God is not just, God is not kind, God is not merciful, and understanding that is essential to true devotion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ted Chiang|Ted Chiang]] &amp;quot;{{w|Hell Is the Absence of God}}&amp;quot;, Stories of Your Life and Others (e-book ed.). Picador. p. 164. ISBN 978-1-4472-8198-6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God can only set in motion:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He cannot control the things he has made.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[T&#039;ao Ch&#039;ien]], &#039;&#039;Substance, Shadow, and Spirit&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Spirit expounds&amp;quot; (transl. by Arthur Waley)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all you – you fucking fake Christians – don’t fucking question my Christianity. I grew up in the church. My grandfather was a minister, who is with God now and talks to me in my dreams from God’s corner office. I am a former Sunday school teacher. I taught the [[Bible]] to children and showed them how to love God and invite him into their hearts. I believe in God – but I don’t fear him. God is my best friend. God is my ally. God is my boyfriend. God is my best fag. I am God’s fag hag cuz didn’t you know, God is a big fag. Serious bottom too. Butch in the streets, femme in the sheets. That is my God. God is my biggest fan. God gets me, dude.&lt;br /&gt;
:God wants us all to just get along. He doesn’t give a shit about the profanity. The bitch fucking invented profanity. He thinks it is hilarious. He just wants you to talk to him, and he doesn’t care what you have to say. He just wants to keep the conversation going. Like Jay-Z, he just wants to love you. He just wants you to be able to make your own decisions. God is all about you and what you need. God is happy that you are gay. God made you fucking gay cuz he thinks it is awesome. God understands if you need to have an abortion. That is why he created abortion, on the 8th day. God accepts. God forgives. God loves all of us, even though some of us might have a problem with each other.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Margaret Cho]], [http://margaretcho.com/2008/09/17/im-a-christian-you-fuckers/ I&#039;m a Christian you Fuckers]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;[[w:De legibus|De legibus]]&#039;&#039;, book 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God: a disease we imagine we are cured of because no one dies of it nowadays.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emile Cioran]], &#039;&#039;The Trouble with Being Born&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In most cases we attach ourselves to God in order to take revenge on life, to punish it, to signify we can do without it, that we have found something better.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. M. Cioran]], &#039;&#039;History and Utopia&#039;&#039; (1960)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to create him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], [http://www.clarkefoundation.org/sample-page/sir-arthurs-quotations/ clarkefoundation.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The rash assertion that ‘God made man in His own image’ is ticking like a time bomb at the foundations of many faiths, and as the hierarchy of the universe is disclosed to us, we may have to recognize this chilling truth: if there are any gods whose chief concern is man, they cannot be very important gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], [http://www.clarkefoundation.org/sample-page/sir-arthurs-quotations/ clarkefoundation.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God but I&#039;m very interested in her.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], as quoted in Multiple Intelligences in Practice : Enhancing Self-esteem and Learning in the Classroom (2006) by Mike Fleetham, Section 2 : Using MI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Haven’t you ever watched ants struggling with a load too big for them? How much did you care? Even if, like God, you marked the fall of every sparrow, you might simply be conducting a survey or expressing colossal boredom, like the people who delight in measuring things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Mildred Clingerman|Mildred Clingerman]] &amp;quot;Birds Can&#039;t Count&amp;quot; (Originally published at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magazine_of_Fantasy_%26_Science_Fiction The Magazine of Fantasy &amp;amp; Science Fiction] (February, 1955) and reprinted in her collection &#039;&#039;A Cupful of Space&#039;&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt have one God only; who&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Would be at the expense of two?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur Hugh Clough]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.potw.org/archive/potw238.html The Latest Decalogue]&#039;&#039; (1862).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God who appears to me is the comforter of the poor and their avenger in world history. This avenger of the poor is the God I love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hermann Cohen]], &#039;&#039;The Concept of Religion in the System of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1915), p. 81&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only the idea of God gives me the confidence that morality will become reality on earth. And because I cannot live without this confidence, I cannot live without God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hermann Cohen]], &#039;&#039;Reason and Hope: Selections from the Jewish Writings of Hermann Cohen&#039;&#039; (1971), p. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reason alone cannot prove the existence of God. [[Faith]] is reason plus revelation, and the revelation part requires one to think with the spirit as well as with the mind. You have to hear the music, not just read the notes on the page.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Collins]], [http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/ cnn.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is [[Death|dead]] not because He doesn&#039;t exist, but because we live, play, procreate, govern, and die as though He doesn&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Colson]], &#039;&#039;Kingdoms in Conflict&#039;&#039; (1990), p. [http://books.google.com/books?id=tIV5YCh49qsC&amp;amp;dq=%22God+is+dead+not+because+He+doesn&#039;t+exist%22 275]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Oppressed and oppressors cannot possibly mean the same thing when they speak of God. The God of the oppressed is a God of revolution who breaks the chains of slavery. The oppressors&#039; God is a God of slavery and must be destroyed along with the oppressors.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Cone]], &#039;&#039;A Black Theology of Liberation&#039;&#039; (1970), p. 61&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God never meant that man should scale the [[Heavens]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;By strides of human [[wisdom]]. In his works,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though wondrous, he commands us in his word&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To seek him rather where his [[mercy]] shines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book III, line 217&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But who with filial confidence inspired,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Can lift to Heaven an unpresumptuous eye,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And smiling say, My Father made them all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book V. The Winter Morning Walk, line 745&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Acquaint thyself with God, if thou would&#039;st taste&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His works.&#039;&#039;&#039; Admitted once to his embrace,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thou shalt perceive that thou wast blind before:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thine [[eye]] shall be instructed; and thine [[heart]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Made pure shall relish with divine delight&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Till then unfelt, what [[hands]] divine have wrought.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book V, line 782&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are really gods in incarnation. We need to recognize our threefold constitution: We are a spark of God; every religion has postulated this and has kept the idea of our divinity before humanity for thousands of years. But it can be seen more scientifically and still correctly. Speaking as an esotericist, I would say that the divine spark is so refined in vibration that it cannot manifest directly on the physical plane. It reflects itself, therefore, as the individualized human soul. The soul, in its turn, reflects itself in the human personality, with its physical, emotional, and mental bodies. Through the physical plane personality, the soul enacts its reincarnational process, until finally the individual on the physical plane, the man or woman, reflects perfectly the quality of the soul, which is the divine quality of the spark of God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://share-international.org/books/?d=AWT &#039;&#039;The Ageless Wisdom, An introduction to humanity&#039;s spiritual legacy,&#039;Share International&#039;&#039;] (1996) p.3-4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God, in the esoteric meaning, is the sum total of all the Laws and all the  energies governed by these Laws in the manifested and unmanifested universe. So God is impersonal. Nevertheless, that transcendent God is manifest in every aspect of creation, including ourselves. We are not separate from that creation — from God. Every human being has the potential of the knowledge, the awareness, of all in creation that we can think of as meaning God. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The [[Masters of Wisdom|Masters [of Wisdom]]] are God-realized, which is a very specific state, in that They have brought Their consciousness, in terms of the divine spark, the Absolute, the Self, into complete at-one-ment with Themselves as men on the physical plane — the personality and the divine aspect are totally integrated... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;God is everything that exists, and all space between that which exists...and around everything. All of that is God... Modern science has been able to break down cellular structures and show that at the centre of every atom is a nucleus with electrons around it, vibrating at a specific rate, and that every atom in the universe is made in the same way. There is nothing but energy in all of the manifested universe. The difference between that totally scientific view and that which an esotericist would hold is that the esotericist goes further and says, indeed, all is energy, but energy follows thought, is acted upon by thought. Thought is the agency by which creation takes place.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in &#039;[http://share-international.org/books/?d=AWT &#039;&#039;The Ageless Wisdom, An introduction to humanity&#039;s spiritual legacy,  Share International&#039;&#039;] (1996) p.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== D ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Freeman Dyson.jpg|thumb|We stand, in a manner of [[speaking]], midway between the [[Chance|unpredictability]] of [[atoms]] and the [[Mystery|unpredictability]] of God. ~ [[Freeman Dyson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God because I don&#039;t believe in [[w:Mother Goose|Mother Goose]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Speech in Toronto (1930); as quoted in &amp;quot;Breaking the Last Taboo&amp;quot; (1996) by James A. Haught.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: I believe that religion is the belief in future life and in God. I don’t believe in either. I don’t believe in God as I don’t believe in Mother Goose.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As quoted in &#039;&#039;Jesus: Myth Or Reality?&#039;&#039; (2006) by Ian Curtis&lt;br /&gt;
** Religion is the belief in future life and in God. I don&#039;t believe in either.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Clarence Darrow]] as quoted in  &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (19 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I am an Agnostic because I am not afraid to think. I am not afraid of any god in the universe who would send me or any other man or woman to hell. If there were such a being, he would not be a god; he would be a devil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]] as quoted in a eulogy for Darrow by Emanuel Haldeman-Julius (1938)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I am an agnostic as to the question of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; I think that it is impossible for the human mind to believe in an object or thing unless it can form a mental picture of such object or thing. Since man ceased to worship openly an anthropomorphic God and talked vaguely and not intelligently about some force in the universe, higher than man, that is responsible for the existence of man and the universe, he cannot be said to believe in God. One cannot believe in a force excepting as a force that pervades matter and is not an individual entity. To believe in a thing, an image of the thing must be stamped on the mind. If one is asked if he believes in such an animal as a camel, there immediately arises in his mind an image of the camel. This image has come from experience or knowledge of the animal gathered in some way or other. No such image comes, or can come, with the idea of a God who is described as a force.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* To say that God made the universe gives us no explanation of the beginnings of things. If we are told that God made the universe, the question immediately arises: Who made God? Did he always exist, or was there some power back of that? Did he create matter out of nothing, or is his existence coextensive with matter? The problem is still there. What is the origin of it all? If, on the other hand, one says that the universe was not made by God, that it always existed, he has the same difficulty to confront. &#039;&#039;&#039;To say that the universe was here last year, or millions of years ago, does not explain its origin. This is still a mystery. As to the question of the origin of things, man can only wonder and doubt and guess.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many Christians base the belief of a soul and God upon the Bible. Strictly speaking, there is no such book. To make the Bible, sixty-six books are bound into one volume. These books are written by many people at different times, and no one knows the time or the identity of any author. Some of the books were written by several authors at various times. These books contain all sorts of contradictory concepts of life and morals and the origin of things. Between the first and the last nearly a thousand years intervened, a longer time than has passed since the discovery of America by Columbus.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That there is much suffering in the world no one disputes. Some have attempted to explain this in reference to man by imagining that it serves for his moral improvement. But the number of men in the world is as nothing compared with that of all other sentient beings, and these often suffer greatly without any moral improvement. A being so powerful and so full of knowledge as a God who could create the universe, is to our finite minds omnipotent and omniscient, and it revolts our understanding to suppose that his benevolence is not unbounded, for what advantage can there be in the sufferings of millions of the lower animals throughout almost endless time? This very old argument from the existence of suffering against the existence of an intelligent first cause seems to me a strong one; whereas, as just remarked, the presence of much suffering agrees well with the view that all organic beings have been developed through variation and natural selection.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Darwin]], [http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1497&amp;amp;viewtype=text&amp;amp;pageseq=1 &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the Original Omissions Restored.&#039;&#039; (1958)] Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter [[w:Nora Barlow|Nora Barlow]]. Page 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At the present day the most usual argument for the existence of an intelligent God is drawn from the deep inward conviction and feelings which are experienced by most persons. But it cannot be doubted that Hindoos, Mahomadans and others might argue in the same manner and with equal force in favour of the existence of one God, or of many Gods, or as with the Buddists of no God. There are also many barbarian tribes who cannot be said with any truth to believe in what we call God: they believe indeed in spirits or ghosts, and it can be explained, as Tyler and Herbert Spencer have shown, how such a belief would be likely to arise….This argument would be a valid one if all men of all races had the same inward conviction of the existence of one God; but we know that this is very far from being the case. Therefore I cannot see that such inward convictions and feelings are of any weight as evidence of what really exists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Darwin]], [http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1497&amp;amp;viewtype=text&amp;amp;pageseq=1 &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the Original Omissions Restored.&#039;&#039; (1958)] Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter [[w:Nora Barlow|Nora Barlow]]. Pages 90-91. This is Darwin&#039;s reply to the [[w:Argumentum ad populum|Argument from Common Consent]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you see yourself as God and then you come back from this state and somebody says, “Hey, Sam, empty the garbage!” it catches you back into the model of “I&#039;m Sam who empties the garbage.”  You can&#039;t maintain these new kinds of structures.  It takes a while to realize that God can empty garbage.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ram Dass]], &#039;&#039;Be Here Now&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man who recognizes no God is probably placing an inordinate value on himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robertson Davies]] in &#039;&#039;Conversations&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], &#039;&#039;The God Delusion&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 31&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The trouble is that God in this sophisticated, physicist&#039;s sense bears no resemblance to the God of the Bible or any other religion. If a physicist says God is another name for Planck&#039;s constant, or God is a superstring, we should take it as a picturesque metaphorical way of saying that the nature of superstrings or the value of Planck&#039;s constant is a profound mystery. It has obviously not the smallest connection with a being capable of forgiving sins, a being who might listen to prayers, who cares about whether or not the Sabbath begins at 5pm or 6pm, whether you wear a veil or have a bit of arm showing; and no connection whatever with a being capable of imposing a death penalty on His son to expiate the sins of the world before and after he was born.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], from a lecture, extracted from &#039;&#039;The Nullifidian&#039;&#039; (December 1994)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eaglefairy hst big.jpg|thumb|It is solemn to remember that Vastness — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Is but the Shadow of the Brain which casts it — ~ [[Emily Dickinson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*If man is created by an external source, then he must belong to that source and not to himself. According to Buddhism, man is responsible for everything he does. Thus Buddhists have no reason to believe that man came into existence in the human form through any external sources. They believe that man is here today because of his own action. He is neither punished nor rewarded by anyone but himself according to his own good and bad action. In the process of evolution, the human being came into existence. However, there are no Buddha-words to support the belief that the world was created by anybody. The scientific discovery of gradual development of the world-system conforms with the Buddha&#039;s Teachings. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[K. Sri Dhammananda Maha Thera]], &#039;&#039;What Buddhists Believe&#039;&#039; (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They say that God is everywhere, and yet we always think of Him as somewhat of a recluse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emily Dickinson]], Letter to Mrs. J. G. Holland [L551] (Spring 1878)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is solemn to remember that Vastness — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Is but the [[Shadow]] of the [[Brain]] which casts it — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; All things swept sole away &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; This — is immensity —&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emily Dickinson]], in a letter to Thomas Wentworth Higginson [L551] (1881)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is a supreme being, he&#039;s crazy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marlene Dietrich]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Rave&#039;&#039; magazine (November 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God used [[beautiful]] [[mathematics]] in creating the [[world]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Dirac]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Cosmic Code : Quantum Physics As The Language Of Nature&#039;&#039; (1982) by Heinz R. Pagels, p. 295; also in &#039;&#039;Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac : Reminiscences about a Great Physicist&#039;&#039; (1990) edited by Behram N. Kursunoglu and Eugene Paul Wigner, p. xv&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Dirac]], [http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102000602?q=dirac&amp;amp;p=par WOL]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Clearly, the [[w:Bible|Scripture]] tells us that we lack the capacity to grasp God&#039;s infinite mind or the way He intervenes in our lives. How arrogant of us to think otherwise! Trying to analyze His omnipotence is like an amoeba attempting to comprehend the behavior of man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Dobson]] in: Bill Bradfield &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=vKG3cPCQmvMC&amp;amp;pg=PA33 On Reading the Bible: Thoughts and Reflections of Over 500 Men and Women, from St. Augustine to Oprah Winfrey ]&#039;&#039;, Courier Dover Publications, Jul 12, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be simple we must desire to remain in the image of God. We must not be so complex that we make God into our image!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Catherine Doherty]], &#039;&#039;Unfinished Pilgrimage&#039;&#039; (Combermere, Ontario: Madonna House Publications, 1995), p. 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charles Hartshorne]]... informed me that my theological standpoint is [[w:Socinianism|Socinian]]. ...The main tenet of the Socinian heresy is that God is neither omniscient nor omnipotent. He learns and grows as the universe unfolds. ...I ...find it congenial, and consistent with scientific common sense. I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. ...We are the chief inlets of God on this planet at the present stage... We may later grow with him as he grows, or we may be left behind. ...If we are left behind, it is an end. If we keep on growing, it is a beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], &#039;&#039;Infinite in All Directions&#039;&#039; (1988)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not make any clear distinction between [[mind]] and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension.&#039;&#039;&#039; God may be either a world-soul or a collection of world-souls. So I am thinking that atoms and humans and God may have minds that differ in degree but not in kind. &#039;&#039;&#039;We stand, in a manner of [[speaking]], midway between the [[Chance|unpredictability]] of [[atoms]] and the [[Mystery|unpredictability]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; Atoms are small pieces of our mental apparatus, and we are small pieces of God&#039;s mental apparatus. Our minds may receive inputs equally from atoms and from God. This view of our place in the cosmos may not be true, but it is compatible with the active nature of atoms as revealed in the experiments of modern physics. &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t say that this personal theology is supported or proved by scientific evidence. I only say that it is consistent with scientific evidence.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], in &amp;quot;[http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge68.html Progress In Religion : A Talk By Freeman Dyson]&amp;quot;, his acceptance speech for the [[w:Templeton Prize|Templeton Prize]], Washington National Cathedral (9 May 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not claim any ability to read God&#039;s mind. I am sure of only one thing. &#039;&#039;&#039;When we look at the [[glory]] of [[stars]] and [[galaxies]] in the [[sky]] and the glory of forests and flowers in the living world around us, it is evident that God loves [[diversity]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Perhaps the universe is constructed according to a principle of maximum diversity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], in &amp;quot;Progress In Religion : A Talk By Freeman Dyson&amp;quot; (9 May 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Albert_Einstein_photo_1921.jpg|thumb|Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not. ~ [[Albert Einstein]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Einstein gyro gravity probe b.jpg|thumb|The God [[Spinoza]] revered is my God, too: I meet Him everyday in the [[harmonious]] [[laws]] which govern the [[universe]]. ~ [[Albert Einstein]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg|thumb|God created men to enjoy, not destroy, the fruits of the earth and of their own toil. ~ [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RWEmerson.jpg|thumb|The purpose of life seems to be to acquaint a man with himself. He is not to live the future as described to him but to live the real future to the real present. The highest revelation is that God is in every man. ~ [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are all meant to be mothers of God, for God is always needing to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Meister Eckhart]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Christianity&#039;&#039; (1995) by Joe Jenkins, p. 27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Where the human being in obedience goes out from his “I” and dismisses what is his own, God must necessarily enter in precisely there; for when someone does not will anything for himself, God must will for that person in the same way as He wills for himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Meister Eckhart]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, in J. Hackett, &#039;&#039;A Companion to Meister Eckhart&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*When man humbles himself, God cannot restrain His mercy; He must come down and pour His grace into the humble man, and He gives Himself most of all, and all at once, to the least of all. It is essential to God to give, for His essence is His goodness and His goodness is His love. Love is the root of all joy and sorrow. Slavish fear of God is to be put away. The right fear is the fear of losing God. If the earth flee downward from heaven, it finds heaven beneath it; if it flee upward, it comes again to heaven. The earth cannot flee from heaven: whether it flee up or down, the heaven rains its influence upon it, and stamps its impress upon it, and makes it fruitful, whether it be willing or not. Thus doth God with men: whoever thinketh to escape Him, flies into His bosom, for every corner is open to Him. God brings forth His Son in thee, whether thou likest it or not, whether thou sleepest or wakest; God worketh His own will. That man is unaware of it, is man&#039;s fault, for his taste is so spoilt by feeding on earthly things that he cannot relish God&#039;s love. If we had love to God, we should relish God, and all His works; we should receive all things from God, and work the same works as He worketh.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Meister Eckhart]],  [[Meister_Eckhart#Meister_Eckhart’s_Sermons_(1909)|Sermon III, &amp;quot;The Angel&#039;s Greeting&amp;quot;]] (1909)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If God is as real as the shadow of the Great War on Armistice Day, need we seek further reason for making a place for God&#039;&#039;&#039; in our thoughts and lives? &#039;&#039;&#039;We shall not be concerned if the scientific explorer&#039;&#039;&#039; reports that he &#039;&#039;&#039;is perfectly satisfied&#039;&#039;&#039; that he has got to the bottom of things &#039;&#039;&#039;without having come across either.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur Eddington]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Unseen World&#039;&#039; (1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we pray to God as a corporeal person, this will prevent us from relinquishing the human doubts and fears which attend such a belief, and so we cannot grasp the wonders wrought by infinite, incorporeal Love, to whom all things are possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Mary Baker Eddy|Mary Baker Eddy]], in &#039;&#039;Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nature is what we know. We do not know the gods of religions. And nature is not kind, or merciful, or loving. If God made me — the fabled God of the three qualities of which I spoke: mercy, kindness, love — He also made the fish I catch and eat. And where do His mercy, kindness, and love for that fish come in? No; nature made us — nature did it all — not the gods of the religions&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], &amp;quot;&amp;quot;No Immortality of the Soul&amp;quot; says Thomas A. Edison. In Fact, He Doesn&#039;t Believe There Is a Soul — Human Beings Only an Aggregate of Cells and the Brain Only a Wonderful Machine, Says Wizard of Electricity&amp;quot;. New York Times. October 2, 1910&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not believe in the God of the theologians; but that there is a Supreme Intelligence I do not doubt.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], The Freethinker (1970), G.W. Foote &amp;amp; Company, Volume 90, p. 147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for their numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible; in my opinion, only His nonexistence could excuse Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to Edgar Meyer (2 January 1915)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Remark made during Einstein&#039;s first visit to Princeton University (April 1921) as quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein&#039;&#039; (1973) by R. W. Clark, Ch. 14. &amp;quot;God is slick, but he ain&#039;t mean&amp;quot; is a variant translation of this (1946) Unsourced variant: &amp;quot;God is subtle but he is not malicious.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** When asked what he meant by this he replied. &amp;quot;Nature hides her secret because of her essential loftiness, but not by means of ruse.&amp;quot; (&#039;&#039;Die Natur verbirgt ihr Geheimnis durch die Erhabenheit ihres Wesens, aber nicht durch List.&#039;&#039;) As quoted in &#039;&#039;Subtle is the Lord — The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein&#039;&#039; (1982) by Abraham Pais &amp;lt;!-- Clarendon Press, Oxford, and Oxford University Press, New York --&amp;gt; [http://www.einsteinandreligion.com/faith.html einsteinandreligion.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*** Originally said to Princeton University mathematics professor Oscar Veblen, May 1921, while Einstein was in Princeton for a series of lectures, upon hearing that an experimental result by Dayton C. Miller of Cleveland, if true, would contradict his theory of gravitation. But the claimed discrepancy was quite small and required special circumstances (hence Einsteins&#039;s remark). The result turned out to be false. Some say by this remark Einstein meant that Nature hides her secrets by being subtle, while others say he meant that nature is mischievous but not bent on trickery. [The Yale Book of Quotations, ed. Fred R. Shapiro, 2006]&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: God may be sophisticated, but he&#039;s not malicious.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As quoted in &#039;&#039;Cherished Illusions&#039;&#039; (2005) by Sarah Stern, p. 109&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I have second thoughts. Maybe God &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039; malicious&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Said to [[wikipedia: Valentine Bargmann|Valentine Bargmann]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein in America&#039;&#039; (1985) by Jamie Sayen, p. 51, indicating that God leads people to believe they understand things that they actually are far from understanding; also in &#039;&#039;The Yale Book of Quotations&#039;&#039; (2006), ed. Fred R. Shapiro&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The God [[Spinoza]] revered is my God, too: I meet Him everyday in the harmonious laws which govern the universe.&#039;&#039;&#039; My religion is cosmic, and my God is too universal to concern himself with the intentions of every human being. &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not accept a religion of fear; My God will not hold me responsible for the actions that [[necessity]] imposes.&#039;&#039;&#039; My God speaks to me through laws.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in an interview (1948), quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein and the Poet : In Search of the Cosmic Man&#039;&#039; (1983) by William Hermanns, p. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* About God, I cannot accept any concept based on the authority of the Church. As long as I can remember, I have resented mass indoctrination. I do not believe in the fear of life, in the fear of death, in blind faith. I cannot prove to you that there is no [[personal God]], but if I were to speak of him, I would be a liar. &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil. My God created laws that take care of that. His universe is not ruled by wishful thinking, but by immutable laws.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in an interview (1948), quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein and the Poet : In Search of the Cosmic Man&#039;&#039; (1983) by William Hermanns, p. 132&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;My position concerning God is that of an [[agnostic]].&#039;&#039;&#039; I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to M. Berkowitz (25 October 1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What I see in nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of ‘[[humility]].’ &#039;&#039;&#039;This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism. . . . My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality. . . . I want to know how God created this world. I want to know his thoughts, the rest are details.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], as quoted by [[Timothy Ferris]], in his article “The Other Einstein”, &#039;&#039;[[w:Awake!|Awake!]]&#039;&#039; magazine, (22 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These proposals spring, without ulterior purpose or political passion, from our calm conviction that the hunger for peace is in the hearts of all peoples--those of Russia and of China no less than of our own country. They conform to our firm faith that &#039;&#039;&#039;God created men to enjoy, not destroy, the fruits of the earth and of their own toil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] in his [[s:The Chance for Peace|The Chance for Peace]] speech shortly after taking office and following the death of [[Joseph Stalin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Posing the question: does the god of love use underarm deodorant, vaginal spray and fluoride toothpaste?&lt;br /&gt;
**Deathbird Stories, by [[Harlan Ellison]] [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=149760477X]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not by accident that the enormous popularity of the “death of God” was born in our world of images: the impossibility of representing God visually leads inevitably in our day to the impossibility of his existence. God is dead—but beyond all the explicit reasons generally offered, he is dead because he is not visible. We can have confidence only in a visible God who is clearly manifested, exclusively in the visual dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;The Humiliation of the Word&#039;&#039; (1981), J. Hanks, trans. (1985), p. 198&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Throughout the Old Testament we see God choosing what is weak and humble to represent him (the stammering Moses, the infant Samuel, Saul from an insignificant family, David confronting Goliath, etc.). Paul tells us that God chooses the weak things of the world to confound the mighty. Here, however, we have a striking contradiction. In [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]] God is supposedly choosing an Augustus, a triumphant military leader. This vision and this miracle are totally impossible. But they are not impossible in the context of Christianity that is already off the rails, that thinks of God as the one who directs history and is the motive power in politics.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;The Subversion of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1982), G. Bromiley, trans. (1986), p. 123&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we consider what is our thought of God we find that it is our own soul stripped of all inferiority and carried out to perfection.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], Sermon 86 (1830), &#039;&#039;The Complete Sermons of Ralph Waldo Emerson&#039;&#039;, Volume 2 (1990), p. 243&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By going much alone a man will get more of a noble courage in thought and word than from all the wisdom that is in books. He will come to hear God speak as audibly through his own lips as ever He did by the mouth of Moses or Isaiah or Milton.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], Journal Entry, October 21, 1833&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The purpose of life seems to be to acquaint a man with himself. He is not to live the future as described to him but to live the real future to the real present. The highest revelation is that God is in every man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Journals&#039;&#039; (1822–1863), 8 September 1833. As quoted in: Maurice York and Rick Spaulding (2008): &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.de/books?id=_pRMlDQavQwC&amp;amp;pg=PA240&amp;amp;dq=A+man+contains+all+that+is+needful+to+his+government+within+himself&amp;amp;hl=de&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiahO73qqfeAhUwpIsKHRqzDswQ6AEIQDAD#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=A%20man%20contains%20all%20that%20is%20needful%20to%20his%20government%20within%20himself&amp;amp;f=false Ralph Waldo Emerson – The Infinitude of the Private Man: A Biography.]&#039;&#039; Chicago and Raleigh: Wrighwood Press, pages 240 – 241. Derived from: Edward Waldo Emerson and Waldo Emerson Forbes (1909): &#039;&#039;Journals of Ralph Waldo Emerson, with annotations&#039;&#039;, III, pages 200-201. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man thinking must not be subdued by his instruments. Books are for the scholar’s idle times. When he can read God directly, the hour is too precious to be wasted in other men’s transcripts of their readings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], “The American Scholar,” Addresses and Lectures, Complete Works (1883), vol. 1, p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In calling his two sons by the names of Gershom and Eliezer, Moses, like Joseph and other righteous men, intended to have the fact of God&#039;s help constantly before him. Since his sons would be with him, and he would often address them or call them by name, he would remember his gratitude to God.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 1&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no place without God&#039;s presence. Even in the bush He was present, and this was the lesson of God&#039;s omnipresence that Moses learnt when he was called out of the bush.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 2&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Moses wanted to know God&#039;s name, and God tells him, &#039;I am that I am&#039;; that is to say, &#039;I am called--or to be called-in accordance with my work in this world.&#039; When I judge mankind I am אלהים Elohim, that being the title or designation for judgment. When I war with the wicked I am known as צבאות Zevooth. When I execute judgment for the sins of man I am known as אלשדי El Shadai, and when I am visiting the world with mercy I am אבני or יהוה Adonoi, the Eternal.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 3&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The matron whom we find so often arguing with Rabbi José observed one day to that sage, &#039;My god is surely greater than yours. When your God appeared to Moses in the bush, Moses merely covered his face, whilst when my god (the serpent) made its appearance he could not stand his ground at all, but had to run away out of fear.&#039; &#039;Not so, &#039;returned the Rabbi, &#039;for in order to be out of the power of your god it sufficed for Moses to step a few paces back, but whither could he have fled from the presence of Him who filleth the earth?&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 3&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am the first and I am the last, and beside Me there is no God&#039; (Isa. 43. 6) I am the first, I have no father; I am the last, I have no brother. Beside Me there is no God; I have no son.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 29&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When God first called Moses, not being then an expert prophet, he was addressed in a voice similar to that of his own father, and he thought that his father had come to him from Egypt. God then told him that it was not his earthly father who called him, but the God of his father. Then, we find, Moses hid his face, which he did not do when first called by his name; not in fact until he heard the words, &#039;I am the God of thy fathers.&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 45&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 108&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Church in the colonies is the white people’s Church. ... She does not call the native to God’s ways but to the ways of the white man, of the master, of the oppressor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frantz Fanon]], &#039;&#039;The Wretched of The Earth&#039;&#039; (1963), p. 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is for man the [[commonplace book]] where he registers his highest feelings and thoughts, the genealogical album into which he enters the names of the things most dear and sacred to him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], in &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), p. xvi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By positing God as unknowable, man excuses himself to what is still left of his religious conscience for his oblivion of God, his surrender to the world. He negates God in practice – his mind and his senses have been absorbed by the world – but he does not negate him in theory. He does not attack his existence; he leaves it intact. But this existence neither affects nor incommodes him, for it is only a negative existence, an existence without existence; it is an existence that contradicts itself – a being that, in view of its effects, is indistinguishable from non-being.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the claims of God are revealed to the mind, it must necessarily yield to them, or strengthen itself in sin. It must, as it were, gird itself up, and struggle to resist the claims of duty. This strengthening self in sin under light is the particular form of sin which we call impenitence. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Grandison Finney]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Systematic Theology&#039;&#039; (1878), p. 369&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is only one good definition of God: the freedom that allows other freedoms to exist.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Fowles]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The French Lieutenant&#039;s Woman|The French Lieutenant&#039;s Woman]]&#039;&#039; (London: Jonathan Cape, 1969), p. 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I [[believe]] in God, not in a Catholic God, there is no Catholic God, there is God and I believe in [[Jesus]] [[Christ]], his incarnation.&#039;&#039;&#039; Jesus is my [[teacher]] and my pastor, but God, the Father, [[w:Ab (Semitic)|Abba]], is the [[light]] and the Creator. &#039;&#039;&#039;This is my Being.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Francis]], interviewed in &amp;quot;How the Church will change&amp;quot; by Eugenio Scalfari in &#039;&#039;La Repubblica&#039;&#039; (1 October 2013), as translated from Italian to English by Kathryn Wallace&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth—that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], debates in the Constitutional Convention, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (June 28, 1787); reported in James Madison, &#039;&#039;Journal of the Federal Convention&#039;&#039;, ed. E. H. Scott (1893), p. 259–60. Franklin suggests that the Convention begin its sessions with prayers &amp;quot;imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessings on our deliberations&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== G ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gandhi smiling 1942.jpg |thumb|It is beyond my power to induce in you a belief in God. There are certain things which are self proved and certain which are not proved at all. ~ [[Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi|Mahatma Gandhi]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Goyathlay-x.jpeg|thumb|I cannot think we are useless or Usen would not have created us. He created all tribes of men and certainly had a righteous purpose in creating each. ~ [[Geronimo]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I looked and looked but I didn&#039;t see God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Yuri Gagarin]] after becoming the first person to orbit the Earth, as quoted in &#039;&#039;To Rise from Earth&#039;&#039; (1996) by Wayne Lee; the authenticity of this remark is disputed; [http://www.interfax-religion.ru/orthodoxy/?act=interview&amp;amp;div=73&amp;amp;domain=1 Colonel Valentin Petrov stated in 2006] that the cosmonaut never said such words, and that the quote originated from [[Nikita Khrushchev]]&#039;s speech at the plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU about the state&#039;s anti-religion campaign, saying &amp;quot;Gagarin flew into space, but didn&#039;t see any god there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sometimes misquoted as &amp;quot;I see no God up here&amp;quot; as if he said this in space, but there are no transcripts or recordings indicating that he ever did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Galileo Galilei]]. in his [[w:Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina|Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina]] (1615), an [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/galileo-tuscany.html essay published in 1615], in response to enquiries of [[w:Christina of Lorraine|Christina of Tuscany]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Aspects of Western Civilization : Problems and Sources in History&#039;&#039; (1988) by Perry McAdow Rogers, p. 53&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not think it is necessary to believe that the same God who has given us our senses, reason, and intelligence wished us to abandon their use, giving us by some other means the information that we could gain through them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mathematics is the language in which God wrote the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Galileo Galilei]] in &#039;&#039;Statistics: Concepts and Applications&#039;&#039; (1994) by Harry Frank and Steven C. Althoen, p. xxi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is beyond my power to induce in you a belief in God. There are certain things which are self proved and certain which are not proved at all.&#039;&#039;&#039; The existence of God is like a geometrical axiom. It may be beyond our heart grasp. I shall not talk of an intellectual grasp. Intellectual attempts are more or less failures, as a rational explanation cannot give you the faith in a living God. For it is a thing beyond the grasp of reason. It transcends reason. There are numerous phenomena from which you can reason out the existence of God, but I shall not insult your intelligence by offering you a rational explanation of that type. &#039;&#039;&#039;I would have you brush aside all rational explanations and begin with a simple childlike faith in God. If I exist, God exists. With me it is a necessity of my being as it is with millions. They may not be able to talk about it, but from their life you can see that it is a part of their life. I am only asking you to restore the belief that has been undermined.&#039;&#039;&#039; In order to do so, you have to unlearn a lot of literature that dazzles your intelligence and throws you off your feet. Start with the faith which is also a token of humility and an admission that we know nothing, that we are less than atoms in this universe. &#039;&#039;&#039;We are less than atoms, I say, because the atom obeys the law of its being, whereas we in the insolence of our ignorance deny the law of nature. But I have no argument to address to those who have no faith.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi]] in &#039;&#039;Young India&#039;&#039; (24 September 1931); also in [http://www.archive.org/details/teachingsofmahat029222mbp &#039;&#039;Teachings Of Mahatma Gandhi&#039;&#039; (1945), edited by Jag Parvesh Chander, p. 458]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People are even more reluctant to admit that man explains nothing, than they were to admit that God explains nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ernest Gellner]], &#039;&#039;Legitimation of Belief&#039;&#039; (1974), p. 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I cannot think we are useless or Usen would not have created us. He created all tribes of men and certainly had a righteous purpose in creating each.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geronimo]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Geronimo&#039;s Story of His Life&#039;&#039; (1907) as told to S.M. Barrett in 1905 and 1906, &amp;quot;Usen&amp;quot; is the Apache word for God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we desire to hold on to solidarity with everyone else in the communicative fellowship, even the dead ... then we must claim a reality that can reach beyond the here and now, or that can connect our selves beyond our own death with those who innocently went to their destruction before us. And it is this reality that the Christian tradition calls God. &lt;br /&gt;
** Jens Glebe-Möller, &#039;&#039;A Political Dogmatic&#039;&#039; (1987), p. 102&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We all of us try to make God in our image. It is one of the worst of our temptations.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Goudge]], &#039;&#039;The Bird in the Tree&#039;&#039; (1940), Chapter 6.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Either half my colleagues are enormously stupid, or else the science of Darwinism is fully compatible with conventional religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen Jay Gould]], in &amp;quot;Impeaching a Self-Appointed Judge&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Scientific American&#039;&#039; (July 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is within you&#039;&#039;&#039;, and you can do and have anything you want. &#039;&#039;&#039;You must [[love]] yourself more. … and then … you can love your fellow man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cary Grant]], as quoted in [http://www.carygrant.net/articles/thinks%20about.htm &amp;quot;Love – That’s All Cary Grant Ever Thinks About&amp;quot;] by [[w:Sheilah Graham Westbrook|Sheilah Graham Westbrook]] in &#039;&#039;Motion Picture&#039;&#039; (June 1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The love of gain, which is a large, incalculably large, element in every soul, when once applied to the desire for God, will [[bless]] the man who has it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gregory of Nyssa]], &#039;&#039;On Virginity&#039;&#039;, Chapter 18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In vain do they think themselves innocent who appropriate to their own use alone those goods which God gave in common; by not giving to others that which they themselves receive, they become homicides and murderers, inasmuch as in keeping for themselves those things which would alleviate the sufferings of the poor, we may say that every day they cause the death of as many persons as they might have fed and did not. When, therefore, we offer the means of living to the indigent, we do not give them anything of ours, but that which of right belongs to them. It is less a work of mercy which we perform than the payment of a debt.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gregory I]], quoted in [[George D. Herron]], &#039;&#039;Between Caesar and Jesus&#039;&#039; (1899), pp. 111-112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As one reads the scriptures of Christianity and Islam with a morally alert mind, one starts getting sick of the very sound of word ‘god’ which word is littered all over this literature like dead leaves in autumn. The deeds which are ascribed to or approved of by this God are quite often so cruel and obnoxious as to leave one wondering that if these are the doings of the Divine, what else is there which is left for the Devil to do.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sita Ram Goel|Sita Ram Goel]], &#039;&#039;Defence of Hindu Society&#039;&#039; (1983)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1539.jpg|thumb|right|The objects of [[philosophy]], it is true, are upon the whole the same as those of religion. In both the object is Truth, in that supreme [[sense]] in which God and God only is the [[Truth]]. ~ [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Legendre - La Prophétie d&#039;Isaïe.JPG|thumb|The prophet disdains those for whom God&#039;s presence is a comfort and security; to him it is a challenge, an incessant demand. ~ [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AdornoHorkheimerHabermasbyJeremyJShapiro2.png|thumb|right|The concept of God was for a long time the place where the idea was kept alive that there are other norms besides those to which nature and society give expression in their operation. ~ [[Max Horkheimer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Give according to your means, or God will make your means according to your giving.&lt;br /&gt;
** Reverend [[John Hall (Presbyterian pastor)|John Hall]], reported in [[Tryon Edwards]], &#039;&#039;A Dictionary of Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1908), p. 194&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe God isn&#039;t the sex police, Richard. Sometimes I think Christians get all hung up on the sex thing because it&#039;s easier to worry about sex than to ask yourself, &#039;&#039;am I a good person?&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;[…]&#039;&#039; It makes it easy to be cruel, because as long as you&#039;re not fucking around, nothing you do can be that bad. Is that really all you think of God?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Anita Blake|Anita Blake]], to [[w:Richard_Zeeman|Richard Zeeman]]&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | author = [[Laurell K. Hamilton]]&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = The Harlequin&lt;br /&gt;
  | edition = 1st edition&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = June 2007&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Berkley Books&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = {{ISBN|978-0-425-21724-5}}&lt;br /&gt;
  | chapter = chapter 44&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pp. 391-392&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No matter how much I probe and prod,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;I cannot quite believe in God;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;But oh, I hope to God that He&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;Unswervingly believes in me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Yip Harburg]], &#039;&#039;Rhymes for the Irreverent&#039;&#039;, (1965)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To the extent that we are free we are like God, who has no need of an idea of a God over [[w:Godself|Godself]] or of an incentive other than the moral law itself. But to the extent that we are also natural beings, we desire our own happiness in everything else that we desire, and we need the practical postulate of God to bring that happiness together with morality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John E. Hare]], “Ethics and Religion: Two Kantian Arguments,” &#039;&#039;Philosophical Investigations&#039;&#039;, vol. 34, no. 2 (April 2011), p. 165&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You either have a God who sends child rapists to rape children or you have a God who simply watches it and says, ‘When you’re done, I’m going to punish you.’ If I could stop a person from raping a child, I would. That’s the difference between me and your God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Tracie Harris|Tracie Harris]], [[w:The Atheist Experience|The Atheist Experience]] &#039;&#039;YouTube&#039;&#039; Jan 6 2013 as quoted in [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/atheist-experience-child-rape_n_2434198.html &#039;&#039;Atheist Experience Child Rape&#039;&#039; Huffington Post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Futurist [[w:Aldo Palazzeschi|Aldo Palazzeschi]]... exhorts us in &#039;&#039;L&#039;antidolore&#039;&#039; (1913) to laugh heartily at the mortality built into the plan of creation not out of spite, as has traditionally been the case, but because suffering and death are nothing but pranks of the prime trickster, God. If anything it is the devil who is the spirit of gravity, and it is in taking him seriously that we plummet from grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3806/is_200605/ai_n17220907/print Thomas Harrison, in &amp;quot;Laughter and the Tree Of Knowledge&amp;quot; in the &#039;&#039;Romanic Review&#039;&#039; (May-November 2006)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The objects of philosophy, it is true, are upon the whole the same as those of religion. In both the object is Truth, in that supreme sense in which God and God only is the Truth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], &#039;&#039;Logic&#039;&#039;, Chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;ve never understood how God could expect his creatures to pick the one true religion by faith — it strikes me as a sloppy way to run a universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[Stranger in a Strange Land]]&#039;&#039; (1961) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent — it says so right here on the label. If you have a mind capable of believing all three of these divine attributes simultaneously, I have a wonderful bargain for you. No checks, please. Cash and in small bills.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough for Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973), p. 264&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The most preposterous notion that H. sapiens has ever dreamed up is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of all the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of His creatures, can be swayed by their prayers, and becomes petulant if He does not receive this flattery. Yet this absurd fantasy, without a shred of evidence to bolster it, pays all the expenses of the oldest, largest, and least productive industry in all history.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The second most preposterous notion is that copulation is inherently sinful.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough for Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973), p. 266&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How much reverence can you have for a Supreme Being who finds it necessary to include such phenomena as phlegm and tooth decay in his divine system of creation?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Heller]], &#039;&#039;Catch 22&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Restore to God His due in tithe and time;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A tithe purloin&#039;d cankers the whole estate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Herbert]], &#039;&#039;The Temple&#039;&#039; (1633), &#039;&#039;The Church Porch&#039;&#039;, Stanza 65&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The prophet disdains those for whom God&#039;s presence is a comfort and security; to him it is a challenge, an incessant demand.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]], &#039;&#039;The Prophets&#039;&#039; (1962), p. 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious ideas, supposedly private matters between man and god, are in practice always political ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;The Monarchy: A Critique of Britain&#039;s Favourite Fetish&#039;&#039; (1990), &#039;&#039;Chatto Counterblasts&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only a humorless tyrant could want a perpetual chanting of praises that, one has no choice but to assume, would be the innate virtues and splendors furnished him by &#039;&#039;his&#039;&#039; creator, infinite regression, drowned in praise!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Consciousness is Gods&#039; gift to mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dr. [[w:Albert Hofmann|Albert Hofmann]] discoverer of [[LSD]] (15 January 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God only speaks to those who understand the language&lt;br /&gt;
** Dr. [[w:Albert Hofmann|Albert Hofmann]], (15 January 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The concept of God was for a long time the place where the idea was kept alive that there are other norms besides those to which nature and society give expression in their operation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Horkheimer]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on Religion,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Critical Theory: Selected Essays&#039;&#039; (1995), p. 129&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The significance of God, cause, number, substance or soul consists, as [[William James|James]] asserts, in nothing but the tendency of the given concept to make us act or think. If the world should reach a point at which it ceases to care not only about such metaphysical entities but also about murders perpetrated behind closed frontiers or simply in the dark, one would have to conclude that the concepts of such murders have no meaning, that they represent no ‘distinct ideas’ or truths, since they do not make any ‘sensible difference to anybody.’&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Horkheimer]], &#039;&#039;Eclipse of Reason&#039;&#039; (1947), pp. 46-47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing could be more untrue than the often-repeated statement that we all worship the same God; or that other, that whatever we worship the result is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Caryll Houselander|Caryll Houselander]], &#039;&#039;The Reed of God&#039;&#039; (London: Sheed &amp;amp; Ward, 1944), p. 85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Savage interrupted him. &amp;quot;But isn&#039;t it natural to feel there&#039;s a God?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;You might as well ask if it&#039;s natural to do up one&#039;s trousers with zippers,&amp;quot; said the Controller sarcastically. &amp;quot;You remind me of another of those old fellows called Bradley. He defined philosophy as the finding of bad reason for what one believes by instinct. As if one believed anything by instinct! One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them. Finding bad reasons for what one believes for other bad reasons–that&#039;s philosophy. People believe in God because they&#039;ve been conditioned to. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;But all the same,&amp;quot; insisted the Savage, &amp;quot;it is natural to believe in God when you&#039;re alone–quite alone, in the night, thinking about death …&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;But people never are alone now,&amp;quot; said Mustapha Mond. &amp;quot;We make them hate solitude; and we arrange their lives so that it&#039;s almost impossible for them ever to have it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], [[Brave New World]] ch. 17 [http://www.huxley.net/bnw/seventeen.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why did it occur to anyone to believe in only one God? And conversely why did it ever occur to anyone to believe in many gods? To both these questions we must return the same answer: Because that is how the human mind happens to work. For the human mind is both diverse and simple, simultaneously many and one. We have an immediate perception of our own diversity and of that of the outside world. And at the same time we have immediate perceptions of our own oneness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], “One and Many,” &#039;&#039;Do What You Will&#039;&#039; (1928), p. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Would God give a bird wings and make it a crime to fly? Would he give me brains and make it a crime to think? Any God that would damn one of his children for the expression of his honest thought wouldn&#039;t make a decent thief. When I read a book and don&#039;t believe it, I ought to say so. I will do so and take the consequences like a man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Ingersoll]] (14 October 1879)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead. [[Karl Marx|Marx]] is dead. And I don’t feel so well myself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eugène Ionesco]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Jewish American Literature : A Norton Anthology&#039;&#039; (2000) by Jules Chametzky, &amp;quot;Jewish Humor&amp;quot;, p. 318&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== J ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Polyptyque de la Vanité terrestre et de la Rédemption céleste-Hans Memling mg 9959.jpg|thumb|I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.&lt;br /&gt;
  ~ [[Jesus]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brueghel Jan II God creating.jpg|thumb|The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dieu Tout-Puissant Chapelle Royale Versailles ceiling.jpg|thumb|It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sabaoth icon (Russia, 19 c.) 2.jpeg|thumb|Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The theory of an existing and benevolent god simply doesn&#039;t make sense to anyone who is rational. A benevolent and omnipotent god would never allow such imbalances as I see to exist for one second. If by chance I am wrong, however I must then assume that being born black called for some automatic punishment for sins I know nothing about, and being innocent it behooves me to defy god. &lt;br /&gt;
**George Jackson, Soledad Brother: The Prison Letters of George Jackson&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s on your side? Shit, I&#039;m alright with that. Because we&#039;re going to reload the clips and come right back.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[50 Cent|Curtis J. Jackson]], [http://genius.com/50-cent-heat-lyrics/ &amp;quot;Heat&amp;quot;] (2003), &#039;&#039;Get Rich or Die Tryin&#039;&#039;&#039; (2003), by C.J. Jackson III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The God who gave us [[life]], gave us [[liberty]] at the same time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[s:A Summary View of the Rights of British America|Summary View of the Rights of British America]] (1774)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Query 17 in &#039;&#039;Notes on the State of Virginia&#039;&#039; (1781-1785)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Query 18 in &#039;&#039;Notes on the State of Virginia&#039;&#039; (1781-1785)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve the homage of [[reason]], than that of blindfolded [[fear]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr from Paris, France, (10 August 1787)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No historical fact is better established, than that the doctrine of one God, pure and uncompounded, was that of the early ages of Christianity … Nor was the unity of the Supreme Being ousted from the Christian creed by the force of reason, but by the sword of civil government, wielded at the will of the fanatic [[w:Athanasius|Athanasius]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to James Smith (1822)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The doctrines of [[Jesus]] are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man.&lt;br /&gt;
: 1. That there is one only God, and he all perfect.&lt;br /&gt;
: 2. That there is a future state of rewards and punishments.&lt;br /&gt;
: 3. That to [[love]] God with all thy heart and thy neighbor as thyself, is the sum of [[religion]].&lt;br /&gt;
::* [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to Benjamin Waterhouse, (26 June 1822)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;*I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jesus]] quoted in [[Psalms]] 82:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some foolish men declare that creator made the world. The doctrine that the world was created is ill advised and should be rejected. If God created the world, where was he before the creation? If you say he was transcendent then and needed no support, where is he now? How could God have made this world without any raw material? If you say that he made this first, and then the world, you are faced with an endless regression. If you declare that this raw material arose naturally you fall into another fallacy, For the whole universe might thus have been its own creator, and have arisen quite naturally. If God created the world by an act of his own will, without any raw material, then it is just his will and nothing else — and who will believe this silly nonsense? If he is ever perfect and complete, how could the will to create have arisen in him? If, on the other hand, he is not perfect, he could no more create the universe than a potter could. If he is form-less, action-less and all-embracing, how could he have created the world? Such a soul, devoid of all morality, would have no desire to create anything. If he is perfect, he does not strive for the three aims of man, so what advantage would he gain by creating the universe? If you say that he created to no purpose because it was his nature to do so, then God is pointless. If he created in some kind of sport, it was the sport of a foolish child, leading to trouble. If he created because of the [[karma]] of embodied beings [acquired in a previous creation] He is not the Almighty [[Lord]], but subordinate to something else. If out of love for living beings and need of them he made the world, why did he not take creation wholly blissful free from misfortune? If he were transcendent he would not create, for he would be free: Nor if involved in transmigration, for then he would not be almighty. Thus the doctrine that the world was created by God makes no sense at all, And God commits great sin in slaying the children whom he himself created. If you say that he slays only to destroy evil beings, why did he create such beings in the first place? Good men should combat the believer in divine creation, maddened by an evil doctrine. Know that the world is uncreated, as time itself is, without beginning or end, and is based on the principles, life and rest. Uncreated and indestructible, it endures under the compulsion of its own nature.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Jinasena}} (9th Century) in the &#039;&#039;[[w:Mahapurana (Jainism)|Mahāpurāna]]&#039;&#039;, as translated in &#039;&#039;Primal Myths&#039;&#039; (1979) by Barbara Sproul&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The very pure spirit does not bother about the regard of others or human respect, but communes inwardly with God, alone and in solitude as to all forms, and with delightful tranquility, for the knowledge of God is received in divine silence.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** St. [[John of the Cross]] in &#039;&#039;The Sayings of Light and Love&#039;&#039; as translated by Kieran Kavanaugh and Otilio Rodriguez (1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a dark night to man in this life.&lt;br /&gt;
** St. [[John of the Cross]], &#039;&#039;The Ascent of Mt. Carmel&#039;&#039;, I, 2, 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[All]]-thing hath the Being by the [[love]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is all that is [[Goodness|good]], as to my sight, and the goodness that each thing hath, it is He.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God willeth that we endlessly hate the sin and endlessly love the soul, as God loveth it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Truth]] seeth God, and [[Wisdom]] beholdeth God, and of these two cometh the third: that is, a holy marvellous [[delight]] in God; which is [[Love]]. Where Truth and Wisdom are verily, there is Love verily, coming of them both.&#039;&#039;&#039; And all of God’s making: for He is endless sovereign Truth, endless sovereign Wisdom, endless sovereign Love, unmade; and man’s Soul is a creature in God which hath the same properties &#039;&#039;made&#039;&#039;, and evermore it doeth that it was made for: it seeth God, it beholdeth God, and it loveth God. Whereof God enjoyeth in the creature; and the creature in God, endlessly marvelling. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;In which marvelling he seeth his God, his Lord, his Maker so high, so great, and so good, in comparison with him that is made, that scarcely the creature seemeth ought to the self. But the clarity and the clearness of Truth and Wisdom maketh him to see and to bear witness that he is made for Love, in which God endlessly keepeth him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Highly ought we to rejoice that God dwelleth in our soul, and much more highly ought we to rejoice that our soul dwelleth in God.&#039;&#039;&#039; Our soul is &#039;&#039;made&#039;&#039; to be God’s dwelling-place; and the dwelling-place of the soul is God, Which is &#039;&#039;unmade&#039;&#039;. And high understanding it is, inwardly to see and know that God, which is our Maker, dwelleth in our soul; and an higher understanding it is, inwardly to see and to know that our soul, that is made, dwelleth in God’s Substance: of which Substance, God, we are that we are. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And I saw no difference between God and our Substance: but as it were all God; and yet mine understanding took that our Substance is in God: that is to say, that &#039;&#039;&#039;God is God, and our Substance is a creature in God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;.1393), Ch. 54&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;As truly as God is our [[Father]], so truly is God our [[Mother]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c.1393), Ch. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I beheld with reverent dread, and highly marvelling in the sight and in the feeling of the sweet accord, that &#039;&#039;&#039;our Reason is in God&#039;&#039;&#039;; understanding that it is the highest gift that we have received; and it is grounded in [[nature]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;.1393), Ch. 83&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I saw full surely that ere God made us He loved us; which love was never slacked, nor ever shall be. And in this love He hath done all His works; and in this love He hath made all things profitable to us; and in this love our life is everlasting. &#039;&#039;&#039;In our making we had beginning; but the love wherein He made us was in Him from without beginning: in which love we have our beginning. And all this shall we see in God, without end.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 86&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A god is usually characteristic of a certain system of thought or morality. For instance, take the Christian God, the &#039;&#039;summum bonum&#039;&#039;: God is love, love being the highest moral principle; and God is spirit, the spirit being the supreme idea of meaning. All our Christian moral concepts derive from such assumptions, and the supreme essence of all of them is what we call God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. G. Jung]], &#039;&#039;Nietzsche&#039;s Zarathustra&#039;&#039; (1988), p. 40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* May His great Name be blessed forever and ever.&lt;br /&gt;
** The Kaddish Prayer: A new translation with a commentary anthologized from Talmudic, Midrashic and Rabbinic sources. New York: Mesorah Publications, Ltd., 2001, ISBN 0-89906-160-5, p.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We actually have a candidate for the [[mind]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; The mind of God we [[believe]] is cosmic [[music]], the music of [[String theory|strings resonating through 11 dimensional]] [[w:Hyperspace|hyperspace]]. That is the mind of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michio Kaku]], [http://bigthink.com/dr-kakus-universe/math-is-the-mind-of-god Math is the Mind of God] (29 December 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are to love God, not for the gifts bestowed upon us but for the sake of love itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Eyran Katsenelenbogen|Eyran Katsenelenbogen]], &#039;&#039;One Time&#039;&#039; (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are no gods! Just voices in your head. They tell you to do what you already want to do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]]&#039;&#039; (mass market paperback edition, {{ISBN|978-0-06-156236-5}}), p. 86&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If they are gods, they are responsible for the horror that occurs in the world. So they are evil. Why otherwise would they allow things to be as they are?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]],&#039;&#039; p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Indeed, if we are ever to be free human beings, and not puppets jerked about by unseen forces—which may or may not exist—the gods must go.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]],&#039;&#039; p. 102&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Christian God is spirit and Christianity is spirit, and there is discord between the flesh and the spirit but the flesh is not the sensuous-it is the selfish. In this sense, even the spiritual can become sensuous-for example, if a person took his spiritual gifts in vain, he would then be carnal. And of course I know that it is not necessary for the Christian that Christ must have been physically beautiful; and it would be grievous-for a reason different from the one you give-because if beauty were some essential, how the believer would long to see him; but from all this it by no means follows that the sensuous is annihilated in Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Soren Kierkegaard]] &#039;&#039;Either/Or Part II&#039;&#039; (1843) as translated by Hong, p. 50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If everything is assumed to be in order with regard to the Holy Scriptures-what then? Has the person who did not believe come a single step closer to faith? No, not a single step. Faith does not result from straightforward scholarly deliberation, nor does it come directly; on the contrary, in this objectivity one loses that infinite, personal, impassioned interestedness, which is the condition of faith, the everywhere and nowhere in which faith can come into existence. Has the person who did believe gained anything with regard to the power and strength of faith? No, not in the least; in this prolix knowledge, in this certainty that lurks at faith’s door and craves for it, he is rather in such a precarious position that much effort, much fear and trembling will be needed lest he fall into temptation and confuse knowledge with faith. Whereas up to now faith has been a beneficial taskmaster in uncertainty, but it would be its worst enemy in this certainty. If passion is taken away, faith no longer exists, and certainty and passion do not hitch up as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Soren Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments&#039;&#039; (1846) as translated by Hong, p. 29&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To live only in the unconditional, to breathe only the unconditional – the human being cannot do this; he perishes like a fish that must live in the air. But on the other hand a human being cannot in the deeper sense live without relating himself to the unconditional; he expires, that is, perhaps goes on living, but spiritlessly. &#039;&#039;&#039;Thus the single&#039;&#039;&#039; individual must personally relate himself to the unconditional. I believed, and do believe, that this is Christianity and love for “the neighbor.” &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;The Point of View On My Work As An Author by Soren Kierkegaard&#039;&#039;&#039; (finished 1848) published by Peter Christian Kierkegaard 1859 translated by Howard and Edna Hong 1998 Princeton University Press P. 19-20 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is cruel, sometimes he makes you live.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen King]], &#039;&#039;Desperation&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God said take what you want ... and pay for it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen King]], &#039;&#039;Desperation&#039;&#039;, said by the character &amp;quot;Johnny Marinville&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*According to logic &#039;nothing&amp;quot; is that of which everything can truly be denied and nothing can truly be affirmed. The idea therefore either of a finite or infinite nothing is a contradiction in terms. And yet according to theologians  &amp;quot;God the self existent being is a most simple, unchangeable, incorruptible being; without parts, figure, motion, divisibility, or any other such properties as we find in matter. For all such things so plainly and necessarily imply finiteness in their very notion and are utterly inconsistent with complete infinity.&amp;quot; Therefore the God here offered to the adoration of the XlXth century lacks every quality upon which man&#039;s mind is capable of fixing any judgment. What is this in fact but a being of whom they can affirm nothing that is not instantly contradicted. Their own Bible their Revelation destroys all the moral perceptions they heap upon him unless indeed they call those qualities perfections that every other man&#039;s reason and common sense call imperfections, odious vices and brutal wickedness. Nay more he who reads our Buddhist scriptures written for the superstitious masses will fail to find in them a demon so vindictive, unjust, so cruel and so stupid as the celestial tyrant upon whom the Christians prodigally lavish their servile worship and on whom their theologians heap those perfections that are contradicted on every page of their Bible. Truly and veritably your theology has created her God but to destroy him piecemeal. Your church is the fabulous Saturn, who begets children but to devour them.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Koot Hoomi|Koot Hoomi]], in   [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett|&#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett&#039;&#039;]],  (1923),  Letter No. X, p. 54, 1881&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Alex&#039;&#039;&#039;: You needn&#039;t take it any further, sir. You&#039;ve proved to me that all this ultraviolence and killing is wrong, wrong, and terribly wrong. I&#039;ve learned me lesson, sir. I&#039;ve seen now what I&#039;ve never seen before. I&#039;m cured! Praise god! &lt;br /&gt;
** [[A Clockwork Orange]] screenplay by Stanley Kubrick.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The important point is that all the standard attributes assigned to God in our history could equally well be the characteristics of biological entities who billions of years ago were at a stage of development similar to man&#039;s own and evolved into something as remote from man as man is remote from the primordial ooze from which he first emerged.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Stanley Kubrick]] Playboy Interview (1968) [http://paulnahm.blogspot.com/2010/06/playboy-interview-wstanley-kubrick-in.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ludovico Mazzolino - God the Father.jpg|thumb|One boy would not get it through his head that for all adults God is not an old man in a white beard sitting on a cloud. ~ [[Madeleine L&#039;Engle]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:God the Father with His Right Hand Raised in Blessing.jpg|thumb|The purposes of the Almighty are perfect, and must prevail, though we erring mortals may fail to accurately perceive them in advance. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It isn&#039;t always the middle-aged who refuse to listen, who will not even try to understand another point of view. One boy would not get it through his head that for all adults God is not an old man in a white beard sitting on a cloud. As far as this boy was concerned, this old gentleman was the adult&#039;s god, and therefore he did not believe in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Madeleine L&#039;Engle]] in &#039;&#039;The Crosswicks Journal, Book One : A Circle of Quiet&#039;&#039; (1972)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Life is too short and hard and strange not to blame God for what He done made of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Jay Lake|Jay Lake]], &#039;&#039;The Temptation of Eustace Prudence McAllen&#039;&#039; in [[w:Martin H. Greenberg|Martin H. Greenberg]] (ed.) &#039;&#039;Westward Weird&#039;&#039; {{ISBN|978-0-7564-0718-6}} p. 199&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Homo proponit et Deus disponit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** And governeth alle goode virtues.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Langland]], &#039;&#039;Vision of Piers Ploughman&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1824), Volume II, p. 427, line 13,984. [[w:John Gerson|John Gerson]] is credited with same. Saying quoted in &#039;&#039;Chronicles of Battel Abbey&#039;&#039; (1066 to 1177). Translation by Lower, 1851, p. 27. [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;Iliad&#039;&#039;, XVII. 515. [[Pindar]], &#039;&#039;Olymp&#039;&#039;, XIII. 149. [[Demosthenes]], &#039;&#039;De Corona.&#039;&#039;, 209. [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Bacchid.&#039;&#039; I, 2, 36. [[w:Ammianus Marcellinus|Ammianus Marcellinus]], &#039;&#039;Hist&#039;&#039;, XXV. 3. [[Francois Fenelon]], &#039;&#039;Sermon on the Epiphany&#039;&#039;, 1685. [[Montaigne]], &#039;&#039;Essay&#039;&#039;, Book II, Chapter XXXVII. [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;Epistles&#039;&#039;, 107. [[w:Cleanthus|Cleanthus]], &#039;&#039;Fragment&#039;&#039;. [[Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039;, I. 22. [[Dante]], &#039;&#039;Paradise&#039;&#039;, VIII, line 134. [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Wallenstein&#039;s Death&#039;&#039;, I, 7. 32. [[w:Ordericus Vitalis|Ordericus Vitalis]], &#039;&#039;Ecclesiastica Historia&#039;&#039;, Book III (1075)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God, but I have this idea that if there were a God, or destiny of some kind looking down on us, that if he saw you taking anything for granted he’d take it away. So he&#039;ll be like: &#039;You think this is going pretty well?&#039; Then he&#039;ll go and send down some big disaster. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hugh Laurie]] Stargazing: Heather&#039;s Angry, Jane is Ill, Hugh is Anxious Kansas City Star, Wed, Oct. 31, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*These findings provide the first experimental evidence that exposure to [[God]]  influences [[Goals|goal pursuit]] and suggest that the ever-present cultural reminders of God can be both burden and benefit for [[W:Self-control|self-regulation]]... From popular and classic works of fiction, to the news media, to everyday conversation, the social world is replete with mentions of God. The current findings suggest that this exposure may have broad societal consequences for fundamental [[psychological]] processes of  [[W:Self-control|self-regulation]], which in turn underlie much of [[health]], [[happiness]], and [[productivity|human productivity]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/psp-102-1-4.pdf Divergent Effects of Activating Thoughts of God on Self-Regulation], Kristin Laurin, Aaron C. Kay and Grainne M. Fitzsimons,  [[W:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|&#039;&#039;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology&#039;&#039;]], (January 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is only a great imaginative experience.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[D.H. Lawrence]], &#039;&#039;Phoenix: The Posthumous Papers of D. H. Lawrence&#039;&#039; (1936) pt. 4, edited by E. McDonald&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a latecomer in the [[w:history of religion|history of religion]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gerard van der Leeuw|Gerard van der Leeuw]], &#039;&#039;Phänomenologie der Religion&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a concept by which we measure our pain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lennon]], &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039; (1970)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The more we get to know about our [[universe]] ... the more the hypothesis that there is a Creator God, who designed the universe for a purpose, gains in credibility as the best explanation of why we are here.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Lennox|John Lennox]], cited in &#039;&#039;[[w:Awake!|Awake!]]&#039;&#039; magazine, 2010, 11/10, article: &#039;&#039;Has Science Done Away With God?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Secondly, getting rid of God does not get rid of the suffering. In fact, it can make the pain worse since it gets rid of all ultimate hope and justice. Horgan denies this in his last sentence, but I still maintain he has no ultimate personal hope to offer for anyone, including himself. The vast majority of people who have ever lived have suffered and not received justice in this life. Since, according to atheism, death is the end, then these people will never receive justice since there is no life to come. I applaud Horgan’s positive reaction to what we have achieved in overcoming disease, poverty, oppression and war, but that does not affect my point in the slightest. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Whether God could have made a world in which fire warmed but didn’t burn and there were no destructive earthquakes is difficult. After all, earthquakes are paradoxically essential for the maintenance of life. Certainly, God could have made a world in which there was no moral evil. But there would have been no humans in it--it would be a robotic world. The greatest God-given capacity we humans have is the capacity to love. It inevitably carries with it the capacity to hate. Hence the world presents us all with a mixed picture – beauty and barbed wire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Lennox|John Lennox]], [https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/can-faith-and-science-coexist-mathematician-and-christian-john-lennox-responds/ &amp;quot;Can Faith and Science Coexist? Mathematician and Christian John Lennox Responds&amp;quot; by John Horgan, at &#039;&#039;Scientific American : Cross-Check&#039;&#039; (1 March 2015)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is it not better to place a question mark upon a problem while seeking an answer than to put the label &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; there and consider the matter solved? Does not the word &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; only confuse and make more difficult the solution by assuming a conclusion that is utterly groundless and palpably absurd?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Lewis]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Atheism&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* His Omnipotence means power to do all that is intrinsically possible, not to do the intrinsically impossible. You may attribute miracles to him, but not nonsense. This is no limit to his power. If you choose to say &#039;God can give a creature free will and at the same time withhold free will from it,&#039; you have not succeeded in saying anything about God: meaningless combinations of words do not suddenly acquire meaning simply because we prefix to them the two other words &#039;God can.&#039;... It is no more possible for God than for the weakest of his creatures to carry out both of two mutually exclusive alternatives; not because his power meets an obstacle, but because nonsense remains nonsense even when we talk it about God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. S. Lewis]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=NSjlftWk78kC&amp;amp;pg=PA18 The Problem of Pain ]&#039;&#039;. Zondervan, 1944, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am much indebted to the good christian people of the country for their constant prayers and consolations; and to no one of them, more than to yourself. &#039;&#039;&#039;The purposes of the Almighty are perfect, and must prevail, though we erring mortals may fail to accurately perceive them in advance.&#039;&#039;&#039; We hoped for a happy termination of this terrible [[w:American Civil War|war]] long before this; but God knows best, and has ruled otherwise. We shall yet acknowledge His wisdom and our own error therein. Meanwhile we must work earnestly in the best light He gives us, trusting that so working still conduces to the great ends He ordains. Surely He intends some great good to follow this mighty convulsion, which no mortal could make, and no mortal could stay.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]]&#039;s Letter to Eliza Gurney (4 September 1864); quoted in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, vol. 7&#039;&#039; (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1953), p. 535&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I can see how it might be possible for a man to look down upon the earth and be an atheist, but I cannot conceive how he could look up into the heavens and say there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Recollection by Gilbert J. Greene, quoted in &#039;&#039;The Speaking Oak&#039;&#039; (1902) by Ferdinand C. Iglehart and &#039;&#039;Latest Light on Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1917) by Ervin S. Chapman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I know there is a God, and that He hates injustice and slavery. I see the storm coming, and I know that His hand is in it. If He has a place and work for me–and I think He has–I believe I am ready. I am nothing, but truth is everything. I know I am right because I know that liberty is right, for Christ teaches it, and Christ is God.&#039;&#039;&#039; I have told them that a house divided against itself cannot stand, and Christ and reason say the same; and they will find it so. [[Stephen A. Douglas|Douglas]] doesn&#039;t care whether slavery is voted up or voted down, but &#039;&#039;&#039;God cares, and humanity cares, and I care; and with God’s help I shall not fail. I may not see the end; but it will come and I shall be vindicated&#039;&#039;&#039;; and these men will find that they have not read their Bibles aright.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]] anecdote registered by novelist [[w:Josiah Gilbert Holland|Josiah Gilbert Holland]], in his &#039;&#039;Life of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1866), Chapter XVI, p. 287. [[w:University of Nebraska Press|University of Nebraska Press]], as something that Lincoln said in a conversation with educator Newman Bateman, in the Autumn of 1860.&lt;br /&gt;
* Faith in a distant, ephemeral God, solver of problems by house call, has also been left behind. Increasingly I come to understand my religion and priesthood as a committment to the society in which I live. A committment to men and women who struggle for a new social order where [[slavery]] has no place, that prepares people to fully realize themselves, in which injustice and exploitation cease to be our daily bread. I understand Jesus Christ as very related to this matter. I understand Jesus Christ as each one of my brothers and sisters. I understand that in uniting with them in this struggle, perhaps I will be capable of overcoming the small and large personal needs that are only [[relevant]] because they impede me from fully giving myself to this task.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Llidó]] letter to a friend on March 9, 1971 (from the book  &#039;&#039;Antonio Llidó: Epistolario de un compromiso&#039;&#039;,Tàndem Edicons,España (1999) {{ISBN|84-8131-227-4}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God, to confess their sins and transgressions, in humble sorrow, yet with assured hope that genuine repentance will lead to mercy and pardon, and to recognize the sublime truths announced in the Holy Scriptures, and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], Proclamation for a Day of Fasting, Humiliation and Prayer (30 March 1863)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An&#039; you&#039;ve gut to git up airly&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ef you want to take in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Russell Lowell]], &#039;&#039;The Biglow Papers&#039;&#039; (1848), First Series. No. 1, Stanza 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thanksgiving chapel interior.jpg|thumb|To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that [[Love]] is the reason for my existence, for God is love. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name. ~ [[Thomas Merton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But the thing that&#039;s really disturbing about Noah isn&#039;t the silly, it&#039;s that it&#039;s &#039;&#039;immoral&#039;&#039;. It&#039;s about a psychotic mass murderer who gets away with it, and his name is God. Genesis says God was so angry with himself for screwing up when he made mankind so flawed (grr!), that he sent the flood to kill everyone. Everyone. Men, women, children, babies.  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; What kind of tyrant punishes everyone just to get back at the few he&#039;s mad at? I mean, &#039;&#039;besides&#039;&#039; {{w|Chris Christie}}. Hey God, you know you&#039;re kind of a dick when you are in a movie with [[Russell Crowe]], and you&#039;re the one with anger issues. You know, conservatives are always going on about how Americans are losing their values and their morality. Well, maybe it&#039;s because you worship a guy who drowns &#039;&#039;babies&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time with Bill Maher&#039;&#039; {{#formatdate:2014-03-14}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Eternal turned his attention to the three shades who stood humbly and yet hopefully before him. The quick, with so short a time to live, when they talk of themselves, talk too much; but the dead, with eternity before them, are so [[verbosity|verbose]] that only angels could listen to them with civility.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. Somerset Maugham]], &#039;&#039;Collected Short Stories 1&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;The Judgement Seat&amp;quot;, p. 314&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is impossible to imagine the universe run by a wise, just and omnipotent God, but it is quite easy to imagine it run by a board of gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]] in: Donald M Simanek, John. Holden &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=ldX0FkgurzoC&amp;amp;pg=PA253 Science Askew: A Light-hearted Look at the Scientific World]&#039;&#039;, CRC Press, Oct 1, 2001,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What in me is dark,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Illumine; what is low, raise and support;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That to the height of this great argument&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I may assert eternal Providence,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And justify the ways of God to men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book I, line 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These are thy glorious works, Parent of good.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book V, line 153&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bright and clear mind — that we call God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Namboku Mizuno]], &#039;&#039;Food Governs Your Destiny&#039;&#039;, p. 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is living in people&#039;s hearts, and in God there is no distinction or rank. Therefore God lives in everyone. That&#039;s why traditionally it is said that all deities are the same. They say God comes to a person who is very humble and honest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Namboku Mizuno]], &#039;&#039;Food Governs Your Destiny&#039;&#039;, p. 105&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If, it was natural to reason, God punishes men with eternal torment, it is surely lawful for men to use doses of it in a good cause.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph McCabe]] in &#039;&#039;A History of Torture&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Creator — A [[Comedy|comedian]] whose audience is afraid to [[laugh]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]], &#039;&#039;A Mencken Chrestomathy,&#039;&#039; ch. 30 (1949)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is the immemorial refuge of the incompetent, the helpless, the miserable. They find not only sanctuary in his arms, but also a kind of superiority, soothing to their macerated egos; He will set them above their betters.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]], &#039;&#039;Minority Report&#039;&#039; (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that [[Love]] is the reason for my existence, for God is love.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], &#039;&#039;Seeds of Contemplation&#039;&#039; (1949)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Persons are not known by intellect alone, not by principles alone, but only by love. It is when we love the other, the enemy, that we obtain from God the key to an understanding of who he is, and who we are. It is only this realization that can open to us the real nature of our duty, and of right action.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], in a letter to [[Dorothy Day]] (20 December 1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O God, we are one with You. You have made us one with You. You have taught us that if we are open to one another, You dwell in us. Help us to preserve this openness and to fight for it with all our hearts. Help us to realize that there can be no understanding where there is mutual rejection. O God, in accepting one another wholeheartedly, fully, completely, we accept You, and we thank You, and we adore You, and we love You with our whole being, because our being is Your being, our spirit is rooted in Your spirit. Fill us then with love, and let us be bound together with love as we go our diverse ways, united in this one spirit which makes You present in the world, and which makes You witness to the ultimate reality that is love. Love has overcome. Love is victorious. Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], in his closing prayer to an informal address delivered in Calcutta, India (October 1968), from &#039;&#039;The Asian Journal of Thomas Merton&#039;&#039; (1975); quoted in &#039;&#039;Thomas Merton, Spiritual Master : The Essential Writings&#039;&#039; (1992), p. 237&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a very good saying that if triangles invented a god, they would make him three-sided.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles de Montesquieu]], &#039;&#039;Lettres persannes&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is anything so precious that without it history and the world will be destroyed, where will you keep it? You will naturally want to keep it in the deepest part of your mind. If you desire to place it in the depths of your mind, it needs to be invisible. It is for this very reason that God exists as an invisible being. It is fortunate that He is invisible, for if He were visible how could a great contest to gain Him be avoided? It would be difficult for God to endure the pain of seeing it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sun Myung Moon]], [http://www.unification.net/wogw/wogw1-01.html &#039;&#039;The Way of God&#039;s Will&#039;&#039; Chapter 1-1. The Will of God] (1980 translation)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is not stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sun Myung Moon]], [http://www.unification.org/ucbooks/WofGW/wogw1-05.htm &#039;&#039;The Way of God&#039;s Will&#039;&#039; Chapter 1-5. Tradition, Official Business, and Responsibility] (1980 translation)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God is merciful, He provides us with little evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Moorcock]], &#039;&#039;The War Hound and the World’s Pain&#039;&#039; (1981), Chapter 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...indeed, if there were any modesty left in mankind, the histories of the Bible might abundantly assure men of the existence of [[angels]] and spirits... I look upon it as a special piece of Providence that . . . fresh examples of apparitions may awaken our benumbed and lethargic minds into an assurance that there are other intelligent beings besides those that are clothed in heavy earth or clay . . . for this evidence, showing that there are bad spirits, will necessarily open a door to the belief that there are good ones, and lastly, that there is a [[God]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry More]], quoted by [[H.P. Blavatsky]], in &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology,&#039;&#039; (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God for all anyone knows could be [[Cary Grant]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carole Morin]], &#039;&#039;Dead Glamorous&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God isn’t in the details, He’s in the structure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carole Morin]], &#039;&#039;Spying on Strange Men&#039;&#039; (2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== N ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nyanaponika Maha Thera.jpg|thumb|A Buddhist meditator, while benefiting from the refinement of consciousness he has achieved, will be able to see these meditative experiences for what they are; and he will further know that they are without any abiding substance that could be attributed to a deity manifesting itself to his mind. ~ [[Nyanaponika Thera]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- [[File:Light dispersion conceptual.gif|thumb|From blind physical necessity, which is always and everywhere the same, no variety adhering to time and place could evolve, and all variety of created objects which represent order and life in the universe could happen only by the willful reasoning of its original Creator, Whom I call the Lord God. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Isaac Newton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Darwinek-bnw.jpg|thumb|God is dead: but considering the state Man is in, there will perhaps be caves, for ages yet, in which his shadow will be shown. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Orvieto Pozzo San Patrizio 5.JPG|thumb| I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche]] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The appeal to a religious meaning to life is a bit different. If you believe that the meaning of your life comes from fulfilling the purpose of God, who loves you, and seeing Him in eternity, then it doesn&#039;t seem appropriate to ask, &amp;quot;And what is the point of that?&amp;quot;It&#039;s supposed to be something which is its own point, and can&#039;t have a purpose outside itself. But for this very reason it has its own problems.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The idea of God seems to be the idea of something that can explain everything else, without having to be explained itself. But it&#039;s very hard to understand how there could be such a thing. If we ask the question, &amp;quot;Why is the world like this?&amp;quot; and are offered a religious answer, how can we be prevented from asking again, &amp;quot;And why is that true?&amp;quot; What kind of answer would bring all of our &amp;quot;Why?&amp;quot; questions to a stop, once and for all? And if they can stop there, why couldn&#039;t they have stopped earlier?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The same problem seems to arise if God and His purposes are offered as the ultimate explanation of the value and meaning of our lives. The idea that our lives fulfil God&#039;s purpose is supposed to give them their point, in a way that doesn&#039;t require or admit of any further point. One isn&#039;t supposed to ask &amp;quot;What is the point of God?&amp;quot; any more than one is supposed to ask, &amp;quot;What is the explanation of God?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But my problem here, as with the role of God as ultimate explanation, is that I&#039;m not sure I understand the idea. Can there really be something which gives point to everything else by encompassing it, but which couldn&#039;t have, or need, any point itself? Something whose point can&#039;t be questioned from outside because there is no outside?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If God is supposed to give our lives a meaning that we can&#039;t understand, it&#039;s not much of a consolation. God as ultimate justification, like God as ultimate explanation, may be an incomprehensible answer to a question that we can&#039;t get rid of. On the other hand, maybe that&#039;s the whole point, and I am just failing to understand religious ideas. Perhaps the belief in God is the belief that the universe is intelligible, but not to US.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Nagel]], &#039;&#039;What Does It All Mean?: A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1987), Ch. 10. The Meaning of Life&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It behooves man to take to heart who it is that hath created him, and who hath developed him from a foul-smelling drop in the womb of woman, who hath brought him to the light of the world, who hath given sight to his eyes, and who hath bestowed the power of motion upon his feet, who maketh him to stand upright, who hath infused the breath of life into him, and who hath imparted of His own pure spirit unto him.&#039;&#039;&#039; Happy the man, therefore, that polluteth not the holy spirit of God within him by doing evil deeds, and well for him if he returns it to his Creator as he received it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Naphtali son of Jacob, as cited in &#039;&#039;Legends of the Jews&#039;&#039; (1909)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The Ultimate [[Truth]] is called God.&#039;&#039;&#039; This one can realize in the state of Nirvikalpa Samadhi. &#039;&#039;&#039;A circle can have only one centre but it can have numerous radii. The centre can be compared to God and the radii to religions.&#039;&#039;&#039; So, no one sect, no one [[religion]] or [[book]] can make an absolute claim of It. &#039;&#039;&#039;He who works for It gets It.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Swami Narayanananda]], &#039;&#039;Selected Articles 1933-86&#039;&#039; (2002), p. 301&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The poor is almost always seen to have a prophetic capacity: not only is the poor in the world, but the poor is the very possibility of the world. Only the poor lives radically the actual and present being, in destitution and suffering, and thus only the poor has the ability to renew being. The divinity of the multitude of the poor does not point to any transcendence. On the contrary, here and only here in this world, in the existence of the poor, is the field of immanence presented, confirmed, consolidated, and opened. The poor is god on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri]], &#039;&#039;Empire&#039;&#039; (2000), p. 157&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.&#039;&#039;&#039; This Being governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all, and on account of His dominion He is wont to be called Lord God, Universal Ruler.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica]]&#039;&#039; (1687)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the beginning formed matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable particles, of such sizes and figures, and with such other properties, and in such proportion to space, as most conduced to the end for which he formed them; and that these primitive particles, being solids, are incomparably harder than any porous bodies compounded of them; even so very hard, as never to wear or break in pieces; no ordinary power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first creation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Opticks|Opticks, or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light]]&#039;&#039;, 4th edition (1730)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Heavenly Master governs all the world as Sovereign of the universe. We are astonished at Him by reason of His perfection, we honor Him and fall down before Him because of His unlimited power. From blind physical necessity, which is always and everywhere the same, no variety adhering to time and place could evolve, and all variety of created objects which represent order and life in the universe could happen only by the willful reasoning of its original Creator, Whom I call the Lord God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Our Humanist Heritage&#039;&#039; (2010) by George Frater, p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039;, § 357, Kauffman trans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott ist eine Mutmaßung; aber ich will, daß euer Mutmaßen nicht weiter reiche, als euer schaffender Wille.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is an assumption; but I want your assuming to reach no further than your creative will.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &amp;quot;Upon the Blessed Isles&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Thus Spoke Zarathustra&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott ist ein Gedanke, der macht alles Gerade krumm.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;God is a thought which makes crooked all that is straight.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &amp;quot;Upon the Blessed Isles&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Thus Spoke Zarathustra&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead: but considering the state Man is in, there will perhaps be caves, for ages yet, in which his shadow will be shown.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], in &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), section 125&lt;br /&gt;
** The reduction of Nietzsche&#039;s thought to … the first-liner of a graffito sometimes found in certain modern tiled cells and catacombs:&lt;br /&gt;
:: &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead&#039;&#039;&#039; — Nietzsche &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nietzsche is dead — &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: This reduction could appear to be the creative interpretation of masterful will to power — if Nietzsche&#039;s thought and style are as uncontrolled as the critics suggest. … Nietzsche himself anticipates the strife of revengeful graffiti at the conclusion of his text: &amp;quot;Wherever there are walls I shall inscribe this eternal accusation against Christianity upon them — I can write in letters which make even the blind see.&amp;quot; …Nietzsche says in his preface that his readers must have a &amp;quot;predestination for the labyrinth&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;new ears for new music&amp;quot; if they are to understand this difficult writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Gary Shapiro in &#039;&#039;Nietzschean Narratives&#039;&#039; (1989), p. 126&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;20,000 Quips &amp;amp; Quotes&#039;&#039; (1995) edited by Evan Esar, p. 347&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Will to truth&amp;quot; does not mean &amp;quot;I do not want to let myself be deceived&amp;quot; but—there is no alternative—&amp;quot;I will not deceive, not even myself&amp;quot;; and with that we stand on moral ground.  ... You will have gathered what I am getting at, namely, that it is still a metaphysical faith upon which our faith in science rests—that even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians, still take our fire, too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year-old faith, the Christian faith which was also [[Plato|Plato&#039;s]] faith, that God is truth; that truth is divine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), B. Williams, ed. (2001), § 344&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What differentiates us is not that we find no God—neither in history, nor in nature, nor behind nature—but that we do not feel that what has been revered as God is ‘god-like.’&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Antichrist&#039;&#039;, § 47, in W. Kaufmann, &#039;&#039;Nietzsche&#039;&#039;, p. 101&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is a mean kid sitting on an anthill with a magnifying glass, and I&#039;m the ant.&#039;&#039;&#039; He could fix my life in five minutes if He wanted to, but he&#039;d rather tear off my feelers and watch me squirm.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Bruce [[Giordano Bruno|Nolan]]&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;[[Bruce Almighty]]&#039;&#039; (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There probably is a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn&#039;t.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John von Neumann]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;John Von Neumann : The Scientific Genius Who Pioneered the Modern Computer , Game Theory, Nuclear Deterrence and Much More&#039;&#039; (1992) by Norman Macrae, p. 379&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After rising from deep [[w:Dhyāna in Buddhism|meditative absorption]] ([[w:jhāna|jhāna]]), the Buddhist meditator is advised to view the physical and mental factors constituting his experience in the light of the three characteristics of all conditioned existence: [[w:Impermanence|impermanence]], [[w:Dukkha|liability to suffering]], and [[w:Anatta|absence of an abiding ego or eternal substance]]. This is done primarily in order to utilize the meditative purity and strength of consciousness for the highest purpose: liberating insight. But this procedure also has a very important side effect which concerns us here: the meditator will not be overwhelmed by any uncontrolled emotions and thoughts evoked by his singular experience, and will thus be able to avoid interpretations of that experience not warranted by the facts.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hence a Buddhist meditator, while benefiting from the refinement of consciousness he has achieved, will be able to see these meditative experiences for what they are; and he will further know that they are without any abiding substance that could be attributed to a deity manifesting itself to his mind. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nyanaponika Thera]], &amp;quot;Buddhism and the God-Idea&amp;quot; (1962)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== O ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Man is born broken. He lives by mending. The grace of God is glue.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eugene O&#039;Neill]], [http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks04/0400091h.html The Great God Brown] (1926)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Near&#039;&#039;&#039;: Nobody can say what is right and what is wrong, what is righteous and what is evil. Even if there is a God, and I had his teachings before me, I would think it through and decide if that was right or wrong myself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Death Note]] chapter 105, written by Tsugumi Ohba &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can omniscient God, who&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Knows the future, find&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The Omnipotence to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Change His future mind?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Karen Owens|Karen Owens]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=yq1xDpicghkC&amp;amp;pg=PA101 The God Delusion]&#039;&#039;, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Jan 16, 2008, p. 101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Having refuted, then, as well as we could, every notion which might suggest that we were to think of God as in any degree corporeal, we go on to say that, according to strict truth, &#039;&#039;&#039;God is incomprehensible, and incapable of being measured.&#039;&#039;&#039; For whatever be the knowledge which we are able to obtain of God, either by perception or reflection, we must of necessity believe that He is by many degrees far better than what we perceive Him to be.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Origen]] &#039;&#039;On First Principles&#039;&#039;, Bk. 1, ch. 1; par. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Cura pii Dis sunt, &amp;amp; qui coluere coluntur.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Heaven rewards the pious; those who cherish God&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Themselves are cherished.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Metamorphoses&#039;&#039;, VIIL, 725&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== P ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:General George S. Patton gravesite, Luxembourg.jpg|thumb|It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who [[Death|died]]. Rather we should thank God that such men [[Life|lived]]. ~ [[George S. Patton, Jr.]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Terry Pratchett Arms.svg|thumb|I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve found God, but I may have seen where gods come from. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Terry Pratchett]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, to the fourth question in the Westminster Shorter Catechism, &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;What is God?&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;, the answer read as follows: God is a [[Holy Spirit|Spirit]], [[infinite]], eternal and uncheangeable, in his being, [[wisdom]], power, [[Sacred#Distinguished from &amp;quot;Holy&amp;quot;|holiness]], justice and [[truth]].&lt;br /&gt;
: This statement the great [[Charles Hodge]] described as &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;probably the best definition of God ever penned by a man.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; (p. 21).&lt;br /&gt;
: The [[Book of Daniel]] tells us about the wisdom, might and truth oft he great God who rules history and shows his [[sovereignty]] in acts of judgement and mercy towards individuals and nations according to his own pleasure (p. 29).&lt;br /&gt;
:* {{cite book|url= https://books.google.it/books?id=06yoMWEmwPYC&amp;amp;pg=PA7&amp;amp;dq=knowing+god&amp;amp;hl=it&amp;amp;source=gbs_selected_pages&amp;amp;cad=2|first1= James I.|last1= Packer|title= Knowing God|publisher= InterVarsity Press|edition= first|year= 1973|chapter= 1 - The study of God|location= Downers Grove, Illinois|language= en|pages= 21, 29|isbn= 978-0-8308-1651-4|lccn= 73-81573|archive-url= |archive-date=|deadurl= }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Those of us who are [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]] believe that [[all]] [[people]] are ultimately saved and that God always [[Love|loves]] us, no matter what we do. These beliefs are [[Truth|true]], but they can very easily be simplified and misunderstood.&#039;&#039;&#039; God is never [[Anger|angry]] with us in the way in which a vengeful [[human]] would reject us, but God’s love for us has a dark side and one which we should rightfully [[fear]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;God loves us not in a sentimental way which aims at our ease and [[pleasure]] but, rather in a way which aims at our highest [[good]] and with an intensity which no one, even the highest [[angels]], can understand.&#039;&#039;&#039; God is absolutely determined, with an [[infinite]] determination, to rid us of all that does not reflect His Goodness. As one of our hymns puts it,&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;“But unto wrong what is His Name? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Our God is a consuming [[flame]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To every [[wrong]] beneath the [[sun]]!”&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: And, because of that, &#039;&#039;&#039;God’s [[punishments]] are terrible, and it is wise to fear them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:* Edward J. Parkinson, in [http://www.catholicgnostics.com/node/17 &amp;quot;Divine Justice: Gnostic Reflections on Some Often Terrifying Realities&amp;quot; at &#039;&#039;CatholicGnostics.com&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;FEU. Dieu d&#039;Abraham, Dieu d&#039;Isaac, Dieu de Jacob, non des philosophes et savants. Certitude. Certitude. Sentiment. Joie. Paix.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;FIRE. God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, not of the philosophers and scholars. Certainty. Certainty. Feeling. Joy. Peace.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], Note on a parchment stitched to the lining of Pascal&#039;s coat, found by a servant shortly after his death, as quoted in [[w:Francis Crawford Burkitt|Burkitt]] &#039;&#039;Speculum religionis&#039;&#039; (1929), p. 150&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Compare not thyself with others, but with Me. If thou dost not find Me in those with whom thou comparest thyself, thou comparest thyself to one who is abominable. If thou findest Me in them, compare thyself to Me. But whom wilt thou compare? Thyself, or Me in thee? If it is thyself, it is one who is abominable. If it is I, thou comparest Me to Myself. Now I am God in all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1669), § 554&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Posterity will one day [[laugh]] at the [[Fools|foolishness]] of modern materialistic philosophers. The more I study [[nature]], the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator. I pray while I am engaged at my work in the laboratory.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Literary Digest&#039;&#039; (18 October 1902)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The more I study nature, the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Literary Digest&#039;&#039; (18 October 1902)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Science, which brings man nearer to God&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], quoted in René Vallery-Radot, &#039;&#039;The Life of Pasteur&#039;&#039; (1902), vol. 1, p. 194&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who [[Death|died]]. Rather we should thank God that such men [[Life|lived]]..&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** General [[George S. Patton, Jr.]], in a speech at the Copley Plaza Hotel, Boston Massachusetts (7 June 1945), quoted in &#039;&#039;Patton : Ordeal and Triumph&#039;&#039; (1970) by Ladislas Farago&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plato and Aristotle in The School of Athens, by italian Rafael.jpg|thumb|You are young, my son, and, as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as a judge of the highest matters... Not one of them who took up in his youth with this opinion that there are no gods ever continued until old age faithful to his conviction. ~ [[Plato]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The word &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; so &amp;quot;capitalised&amp;quot; (as we Americans say), is &#039;&#039;the&#039;&#039; definable proper name, signifying &#039;&#039;Ens [[Necessity|necessarium]]&#039;&#039;; in my belief Really creator of all three Universes of Experience.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], in &amp;quot;[[s:A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God|A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God]]&amp;quot; (1908), § I. &#039;&#039;Ens necessarium&#039;&#039; is a latin expression which signifies &amp;quot;Necessary being, necessary entity&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alan Perlis]] (1982) &#039;&#039;Epigrams on Programming&#039;&#039;. nr.79&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The hypothesis of God is a peculiar one, in that it supposes an infinitely incomprehensible object, although every hypothesis, as such, supposes its object to be truly conceived in the hypothesis.&#039;&#039;&#039; This leaves the hypothesis but one way of understanding itself; namely, as vague yet as true so far as it is definite, and as continually tending to define itself more and more, and without limit. The hypothesis, being thus itself inevitably subject to the law of growth, appears in its vagueness to represent God as so, albeit this is directly contradicted in the hypothesis from its very first phase. But this apparent attribution of growth to God, since it is ineradicable from the hypothesis, cannot, according to the hypothesis, be flatly false. Its implications concerning the Universes will be maintained in the hypothesis, while its implications concerning God will be partly disavowed, and yet held to be less false than their denial would be. Thus the hypothesis will lead to our thinking of features of each Universe as purposed; and this will stand or fall with the hypothesis. Yet a purpose essentially involves growth, and so cannot be attributed to God. Still it will, according to the hypothesis, be less false to speak so than to represent God as purposeless.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], in &amp;quot;A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God&amp;quot; (1908), § II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. &#039;&#039;&#039;This [[mind]] is the matrix of all matter.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Planck]], as he accepted the Nobel Prize (1919)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You are young, my son, and, as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as a judge of the highest matters... Not one of them who took up in his youth with this opinion that there are no gods ever continued until old age faithful to his conviction.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plato]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;[[w:Laws (dialogue)|The Laws]]&#039;&#039; (his last and longest dialogue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is truth and light his shadow.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plato]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a geometrician.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Plato]], but not found in his works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Laugh where we must, be candid where we can,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But vindicate the ways of God to man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutored mind&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To Him no high, no low, no great, no small;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He fills, He bounds, connects and equals all!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 277&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He mounts the [[storm]], and walks upon the [[wind]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle II, line 110&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An honest man&#039;s the noblest work of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle IV, line 248&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Slave to no sect, who takes no private road,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But looks through Nature up to Nature&#039;s God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle IV, line 331&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t have much truck with the &amp;quot;[[religion]] is the cause of most of our wars&amp;quot; school of thought because that is manifestly done by mad, manipulative and power-hungry men who cloak their ambition in God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I number believers of all sorts among my friends. Some of them are praying for me. I&#039;m happy they wish to do this, I really am, but I think science may be a better bet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], in [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1028222/I-create-gods-time--I-think-exist.html &amp;quot;I create gods all the time - now I think one might exist, says fantasy author Terry Pratchett&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Daily Mail&#039;&#039; (21 June 2008)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve found God, but I may have seen where gods come from.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], in &amp;quot;I create gods all the time - now I think one might exist, says fantasy author Terry Pratchett&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Daily Mail&#039;&#039; (21 June 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first act of man, filled and carried away with enthusiasm (of the divine breath), is to adore the invisible Providence on which he feels that he depends, and which he calls GOD.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Misery&#039;&#039;. § 1.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Indeed the inscrutable [[One]] is out of the reach of every rational process. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Nor can any words come up to the inexpressible Good, this One, this Source of all unity, this super-existent Being. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Mind beyond mind, word beyond speech, it is gathered up by no discourse, by no intuition, by no name. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; It is and it is as no other being is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Pseudo-Dionysius, &#039;&#039;The Divine Names&#039;&#039;, 1, 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One thing I can&#039;t stand, it&#039;s people groveling.&lt;br /&gt;
** God, in &#039;&#039;[[Monty Python and the Holy Grail]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== R ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ngc1999.jpg|thumb|The [[Wisdom]] of God Manifested in the [[Works]] of the [[Creation]]. ~ [[John Ray]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Electric iron stand.jpg|thumb|If a person who indulges in gluttony is a glutton, and a person who commits a felony is a felon, then God is an iron. ~ [[Spider Robinson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AnttlersNewM45.jpg|thumb|In the [[presence]] of [[infinite]] might and infinite [[wisdom]], the [[strength]] of the strongest man is but weakness, and the keenest of [[mortal]] [[eyes]] see but dimly. ~ [[Theodore Roosevelt]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pasternak-rilke.jpeg|thumb|There are proofs of Your existence. I had forgotten them all, and never demanded any either, for what an overwhelming obligation would come with this certainty. ~ [[Rainer Maria Rilke]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rilke in Moscow by L.Pasternak (1928).jpg|thumb|Is it possible that there are people who say &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; and suppose they mean something shared by all? — Only consider two schoolboys: one of them buys a knife, and the other buys an identical one on the same day. And a week later, they show each other the two knives, and they turn out to be only remotely similar, so differently have they been shaped by different hands. ... Is it possible to believe we could have a god without making use of him? ~ [[Rainer Maria Rilke]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* All true knowledge of God begins with the knowledge of his hiddenness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gerhard von Rad|Gerhard von Rad]], &#039;&#039;Old Testament Theology. Volume II: The Theology of Israel&#039;s Prophetic Traditions&#039;&#039; (1960). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001, p. 377&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;He who is called [[Brahman]] by the [[w:Jnana|jnanis]] is known as [[w:Atman|Atman]] by the [[w:yogi|yogis]] and as [[w:Bhagavan|Bhagavan]] by the [[w:Bhakti|bhaktas]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The same brahmin is called priest, when worshipping in the temple, and cook, when preparing a meal in the kitchen. &#039;&#039;&#039;The &#039;&#039;jnani&#039;&#039;, following the path of knowledge, always reason about the Reality saying, &amp;quot;not this, not this.&amp;quot; Brahman is neither &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; nor &amp;quot;that&amp;quot;; It is neither the universe nor its living beings. Reasoning in this way, the mind becomes steady.&#039;&#039;&#039; Finally it disappears and the aspirant goes into [[w:samadhi|samadhi]]. This is the Knowledge of Brahman. It is the unwavering conviction of the jnani that Brahman alone is real and the world is illusory. &#039;&#039;&#039;All these [[names]] and forms are illusory, like a [[dream]]. What Brahman is cannot be described.&#039;&#039;&#039; One cannot even say that Brahman is a Person. This is the opinion of the jnanis, the followers of Vedanta. But &#039;&#039;&#039;the bhaktas accept all the states of consciousness. They take the waking state to be real also. They don&#039;t think the world to be illusory, like a dream. They say that the universe is a manifestation of the God&#039;s [[power]] and [[glory]]. God has created all these — [[sky]], [[stars]], [[moon]], [[sun]], [[mountains]], [[ocean]], [[men]], [[animals]]. They constitute His glory.&#039;&#039;&#039; He is within us, in our hearts. Again, He is outside. The most advanced devotees say that He Himself has become all this — the 24 cosmic principles, the universe, and all living beings. &#039;&#039;&#039;The devotee of God wants to eat sugar, and not become sugar.&#039;&#039;&#039; (All laugh.) Do you know how a lover of God feels? His attitude is: &amp;quot;O God, Thou art the Master, and I am Thy servant. Thou art the Mother, and I Thy child.&amp;quot; Or again: &amp;quot;Thou art my Father and Mother. &#039;&#039;&#039;Thou art the Whole, and I am a part.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot; He does not like to say, &amp;quot;I am Brahman.&amp;quot; They yogi seeks to realize the [[w:Paramatman|Paramatman]], the Supreme Soul. &#039;&#039;&#039;His ideal is the union of the embodied soul and the Supreme Soul.&#039;&#039;&#039; He withdraws his mind from sense objects and tries to concentrate on the Paramatman. Therefore, during the first stage of his spiritual discipline, he retires into solitude and with undivided attention practices [[meditation]] in a fixed posture. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; But the reality is one and the same; the difference is only in name. He who is Brahman is verily Atman, and again, He is the Bhagavan. He is Brahman to the followers of the path of knowledge, Paramatman to the yogis, and Bhagavan to the lovers of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ramakrishna]], &#039;&#039;The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna&#039;&#039; (1942), p. 132&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The [[Wisdom]] of God Manifested in the [[Works]] of the [[Creation]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Ray]], title of a book (1691)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most intellectual people do not [[believe]] in God, but they [[fear]] him just the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], in James Lee Christian &#039;&#039;Philosophy : An Introduction to the Art of Wondering&#039;&#039;,  (2005), p. 556.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The god of many cannot remain the true god.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Richardson]], &#039;&#039;Vectors: Aphorisms and Ten Second Essays&#039;&#039; (2001), #138&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is it possible that there are people who say &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; and suppose they mean something shared by all? &amp;amp;mdash; Only consider two schoolboys: one of them buys a knife, and the other buys an identical one on the same day. And a week later, they show each other the two knives, and they turn out to be only remotely similar, so differently have they been shaped by different hands. ... Is it possible to believe we could have a god without making use of him?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge|The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge]]&#039;&#039; (1910), as translated by Michael Hulse (2009), p. 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A thought struck me abruptly: My God, you do &#039;&#039;exist&#039;&#039;, then. There are proofs of Your existence. I had forgotten them all, and never demanded any either, for what an overwhelming obligation would come with this certainty. And yet that is what is now being shown to me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge|The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge]]&#039;&#039; (1910), as translated by Michael Hulse (2009), p. 135&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When I speak of All That Is, you must understand my position within it. All That Is knows no other. This does not mean that there &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;may&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; not be more to know. It does not mean, and here words quite fail us, it does not mean that All That Is, in any terms we can conceive of, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;may&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; not be limited. It &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;knows&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of no other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jane Roberts]], (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If a person who indulges in gluttony is a glutton, and a person who commits a felony is a felon, then God is an iron.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Spider Robinson]], in &amp;quot;God is an Iron&amp;quot; (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gene Roddenberry]], Free Inquiry (autumn, 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think God is as much a basic ingredient in the universe as neutrons and positrons . . . God is, for lack of a better term, clout. This is the prime force, when we look around the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gene Roddenberry]] [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=113558088X]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you do not know your heart, you do not know your God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Radoslav Rochallyi]], &amp;quot;Mythra Invictus&amp;quot;, published in VSS:Bratislava, (2019), p. 62&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, if you read attentively and objectively the &amp;quot;Letter about God&amp;quot;: in [[w:The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett|The Mahatma Letters]], you will see that the Mahatma repudiates the sacrilegious and anthropomorphic conception of a Personal god—cruel and unjust, chastising with eternal damnation all so-called heretics, and justifying all the crimes committed in his Holy Name! Verily, such a God cannot have a Mahatma&#039;s approval and respect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters I,&#039;&#039; (8 September 1934)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Its Humanity develops fully only in the Fourth—our Fourth—our present Round. Up to this fourth Life-Cycle, it is referred to as &#039;humanity&#039; only for lack of a more appropriate term. Like the grub which becomes chrysalis and butterfly, Man, or rather that which becomes man, passes through all the forms and kingdoms during the first Round and through all the human shapes during the two following Rounds... During the three Rounds to come, Humanity, like the globe [planet] on which it lives, will be ever tending to reassume its primeval form, that of a Dhyan-Chohanic Host. Man tends to become a God and then—GOD, like every other atom in the Universe...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (16 November 1935)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Ruling Principle of the Universe is one of Harmony and Love—God is Love. Therefore, if we wish to embody the most ancient axiom, &amp;quot;as above, so below,&amp;quot; we should become unified precisely upon this principle of love and should be subordinate to it, regarding it as our only boundless Ruler. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (15 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*By propagating the dogma of Jesus Christ as the only begotten Son of God, the Church contradicts the very sense of the prayer given to us by Jesus Christ himself, &amp;quot;Our Father which art in heaven.&amp;quot; And also the words of the Scriptures, &amp;quot;So God created man in his own image.&amp;quot; (Genesis 1:27)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (2 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Verily, there is nothing more sacrilegious for human consciousness than to limit the Ineffable Grandeur of the Divine Principle that is poured out over the entire Universe. Assuredly, from this monstrous, ignorant belittling issue all the unworthy concepts of God. Man, in his conceit, tries to bring everything down to his own level and likeness... Indeed, the books of the Teaching are full of concepts of the Divine Principle, or God, and of Spirit and spirituality.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (24 May 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The God in us is the sole reality; all else, as beautifully and poetically expressed by the East, is but the &amp;quot;Play of the Great Mother of the World.&amp;quot;...There is no God, or Gods, who was not at some time a man.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (24 May 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In the presence of infinite might and infinite wisdom, the strength of the strongest man is but weakness, and the keenest of mortal eyes see but dimly.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Theodore Roosevelt]]&#039;s Christian Citizenship Address before the Young Men&#039;s Christian Association, Carnegie Hall, New York (30 December 1900)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nothing remains, under God, but those passions which have often proved&#039;&#039;&#039; the best ministers of His vengeance, and &#039;&#039;&#039;the surest protectors of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.archive.org/stream/elementarysketc03smitgoog#page/n440/mode/2up Lecture XXVIL: On Habit - Part II, in “Elementary Sketches of Moral Philosophy”, delivered at The Royal Institution in the years 1804, 1805, and 1806 by the late Rev. Sydney Smith, M.A. (Spottiswoodes and Shaw (London: 1849))], p. 424&lt;br /&gt;
*** Another Variant: &#039;&#039;&#039;When the usual hopes and the common aids of man are all gone, nothing remains under God but those passions which have often proved the best ministers of His purpose and the surest protectors of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** Quoted by [[w:Theodore Roosevelt|Theodore Roosevelt]] in his &amp;quot;[http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/images/research/txtspeeches/668.pdf Brotherhood and the Heroic Virtues]&amp;quot; Address at the Veterans&#039; Reunion, Burlington, Vermont, September 5, 1901 and published in Theodore Roosevelt&#039;s &amp;quot;The Strenuous Life: Essays and Addresses&amp;quot; by Dover Publications (April 23, 2009) in its Dover Thrift Editions (ISBN: 978-0486472294), p. 127&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kill one man and you are a murderer. Kill millions and you are a conqueror. Kill everyone and you are a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Rostand]], &#039;&#039;Thoughts of a Biologist&#039;&#039; (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If I were granted omnipotence, and millions of years to experiment in, I should not think Man much to boast of as the final result of all my efforts.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;Religion and Science&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there were a God, I think it very unlikely that he would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt his existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], quoted in &#039;&#039;Bertrand Russell&#039;s Best&#039;&#039; (1958), &amp;quot;On Religion&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pragmatists]] explained that Truth is what it pays to believe. Historians of morals reduced the Good to a matter of tribal custom. Beauty was abolished by artists in a revolt against the sugary insipidities of a philistine epoch and in a mood of fury in which satisfaction is to be derived only from what hurts. And so the world was swept clear not only of God as a person but of God&#039;s essence as an ideal to which man owed an ideal allegiance. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &amp;quot;On Being Modern-Minded,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Unpopular Essays&#039;&#039; (1950), p. 69&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== S ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tree of Life 2009 large.png |thumb|Individual things are nothing but modifications of the attributes of God, or modes by which the attributes of God are expressed in a fixed and definite manner. ~ [[Baruch Spinoza]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think that if there were a God, there would be less evil on this earth. I believe that if evil exists here below, then either it was willed by God or it was beyond His powers to prevent it. Now I cannot bring myself to fear a God who is either spiteful or weak. I defy Him without fear and care not a fig for his thunderbolts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marquis de Sade]], &#039;&#039;Justine or The Misfortunes of Virtue&#039;&#039; (1787) [This quote is strikingly similar to Epicurus&#039; above.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The existence of the world without God seems to me less absurd than the presence of a God, existing in all his perfection, creating an imperfect man in order to make him run the risk of Hell.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Armand Salacrou|Armand Salacrou]] in &#039;&#039;Ceritudes et incertitudes&#039;&#039; (1943)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Respectable society believed in God in order to avoid having to speak about him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], &#039;&#039;The Words&#039;&#039; (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott werden, Mensch sein, sich bilden, sind Ausdrücke, die einerlei bedeuten.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**To become God, to be human, to cultivate oneself are all expressions that mean the same thing.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], &#039;&#039;Lucinde and the Fragments&#039;&#039;, P. Firchow, trans. (1991), “Athenaeum Fragments” § 262&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are as many gods as there are ideals. And further, the relation of the true artist and the true human being to his ideals is absolutely religious. The man for whom this inner divine service is the end and occupation of all his life is a priest, and this is how everyone can and should become a priest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Fragments&#039;&#039;, P. Firchow, trans. (1991) § 406&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In saying we are in immediate relation with God, the latter term is used only to designate the &#039;&#039;Whence&#039;&#039; of our spontaneous and receptive life, of which we become aware in our feeling of absolute dependence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schleiermacher]], in &#039;&#039;Theology of Schleiermacher&#039;&#039; (1911), pp. 121-122 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I can see him. I know that God is real. I know it in my heart. You can only believe in what you know to be [[Truth|true]]. You know your own truth. I know mine. Everyone should be able to find that within themselves... I want to live my life for God, and let other people take from that whatever they want.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Rachel Scott]], as quoted in [https://books.google.com/books?id=kI4YwhBD7FgC&amp;amp;pg=PA149 &#039;&#039;No Easy Answers: The Truth Behind Death at Columbine&#039;&#039;] (2002), by Brooks Brown and Rob Merritt, New York: Lantern Books, pp. 149&amp;amp;ndash;150&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I think the [[destiny]] of all men is not to sit in the rubble of their own making but to reach out for an ultimate [[perfection]] which is to be had. At the moment, it is a [[dream]]. But as of the [[moment]] we clasp hands with our neighbor, we build the first span to bridge the gap between the young and the old. At this hour, it’s a [[wish]]. But we have it within our [[power]] to make it a [[reality]]. If you want to prove that God is not [[dead]], first prove that [[man]] is [[alive]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rod Serling]] seech at Moorpark College, Moorpark, California (3 December 1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You have in yourself some thing similar to God, and therefore use yourself as the temple of God, on account of that which in you resembles God.&lt;br /&gt;
* The greatest honor which can be paid to God is to know and imitate him.&lt;br /&gt;
* Consider lost all the time in which you do not think of divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
* A good intellect is the choir of divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
* You should not dare to speak of God to the multitude.&lt;br /&gt;
* He who is worthy of God is also a god among men.&lt;br /&gt;
* He best honors God who makes his intellect as like God as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Quintus Sextius]] &#039;&#039;[[w:Sentences of Sextus|Sentences of Sextus]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We are all writing God&#039;s poem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Sexton]], as quoted by [[Erica Jong]], in [http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2000/oct/26/features11.g2 &amp;quot;Into the lion&#039;s den&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039; (26 October 2000)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is our fortress, in whose conquering name&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Let us resolve to scale their flinty bulwarks.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry VI, Part 2|&#039;&#039;Henry VI&#039;&#039;, Part II]] (c. 1590-91), Act II, scene 1, line 26&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God shall be my hope,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My stay, my guide and lantern to my feet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry VI, Part 2|&#039;&#039;Henry VI&#039;&#039;, Part II]] (c. 1590-91), Act II, scene 3, line 24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And to add greater honours to his age&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Than man could give him, he died fearing God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Henry VIII (play)|Henry VIII]]&#039;&#039; ([[w:Henry VIII (play)#Date|c. 1613]]), Act IV, scene 2, line 67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Had I but serv&#039;d my God with half the zeal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I serv&#039;d my king, He would not in mine age&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Have left me naked to mine enemies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Henry VIII (play)|Henry VIII]]&#039;&#039; ([[w:Henry VIII (play)#Date|c. 1613]]), Act III, scene 2, lines 455–57. Cardinal Wolsey is speaking to his servant, Cromwell. During the Watergate hearings on June 12, 1973, Senator Sam Ervin quoted these words to Herbert Porter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Don&#039;t worry if you see God first, tell him shit got worse.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[2Pac|Tupac Shakur]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-rHzG3moso &amp;quot;God Bless the Dead&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Beware of the man whose god is in the skies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Maxims for Revolutionists&#039;&#039;, #83&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If he is infinitely good, what reason should we have to fear him?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is infinitely wise, why should we have doubts concerning our future?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he knows all, why warn him of our needs and fatigue him with our prayers?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is everywhere, why erect temples to him?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is just, why fear that he will punish the creatures that he has filled with weaknesses?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;The Necessity of Atheism&#039;&#039; (1811)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tacitus]] says, that the [[Jews]] held God to be something eternal and supreme, neither subject to change nor to decay; therefore, they permit no statues in their cities or their temples. The universal Being can only be described or defined by negatives which deny his subjection to the laws of all inferior existences. &#039;&#039;&#039;Where indefiniteness ends, idolatry and anthropomorphism begin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], in &#039;&#039;Essay on Christianity&#039;&#039; (1859)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we find great difficulty from its admirable arrangement in conceiving that the Universe has existed from all eternity, and to resolve this difficulty suppose a Creator, how much more clearly must we perceive the necessity of this very Creator’s creation whose perfections comprehend an arrangement far more accurate and just.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;Eusebes and Theosophus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here was a beast for whom there could be no predator. What better definition of God is there than that?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Lucius Shepard|Lucius Shepard]], &#039;&#039;Señor Volto&#039;&#039; (2003). Originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Sci Fiction|Sci Fiction]]&#039;&#039; (February 12, 2003). Reprinted in [[w:David G. Hartwell|David G. Hartwell]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;Year’s Best Fantasy 4&#039;&#039; (p. 349)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Doesn’t that sound like God to you? This big stupid, invulnerable thing that resembles us and whose creations are more intelligent than it is? The Bible left out that part, but it would explain a great deal.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lucius Shepard]], &#039;&#039;The Skinny Girl&#039;&#039; (2011), in [[w:Ellen Datlow|Ellen Datlow]] (ed.) &#039;&#039;Naked City&#039;&#039; (p. 453)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Joseph Smith first vision stained glass.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;For behold, this is my work and my glory — to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.&#039;&#039; ~ God as portrayed in the &#039;&#039;{{w|Book of Moses}}&#039;&#039; (1830), as dictated by [[Joseph Smith]], 1:39]]&lt;br /&gt;
* For behold, this is my work and my glory — to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.&lt;br /&gt;
** God as portrayed in the &#039;&#039;{{w|Book of Moses}}&#039;&#039; (1830), as dictated by [[Joseph Smith]], 1:39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The value of a mind is measured by the nature of the objects it habitually contemplates. They whose thoughts are of trifles are trifling: they who dwell with what is eternally true, good and fair, are like unto God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lancaster Spalding]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 268&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;By &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;, I mean a being absolutely infinite — that is, a substance consisting in infinite attributes, of which each expresses eternal and infinite essentiality.&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Explanation — I say absolutely infinite, not infinite after its kind: for, of a thing infinite only after its kind, infinite attributes may be denied; but &#039;&#039;&#039;that which is absolutely infinite, contains in its essence whatever expresses reality, and involves no negation.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in [[s:Ethics (Spinoza)|&#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; [&#039;&#039;Ethics Geometrically Demonstrtated&#039;&#039;] (1677)]], Definition 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Whatsoever is, is in God, and without God nothing can be, or be conceived.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God and all attributes of God are eternal.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Individual things are nothing but modifications of the attributes of God, or modes by which the attributes of God are expressed in a fixed and definite manner.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 25&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the indwelling and not the transient cause of all things.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Things could not have been brought into being by God in any manner or in any order different from that which has in fact obtained.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We are willing to worship a God only if God makes us safe. Thus you get the silly question, How does a good God let bad things happen to good people? Of course, it was a rabbi who raised that question, but Christians took it up as their own. Have you read the Psalms lately? We&#039;re seeing a much more complex God than that question gives credit for.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stanley Hauerwas]] from the Chronicle for Higher Education, The Chronicle Review, &amp;quot;A Complex God&amp;quot;  September 28, 2001  &#039;&#039;The Chronicle Review&#039;&#039; Page: B6 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[universe]] is God’s son.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]], &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun&#039;&#039; (1999) “God’s Son” (Sequence: “Is It Possible to Write a Poem”)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== T ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brocken-tanzawa2.JPG|thumb|God is that infinite All of which man knows himself to be a finite part. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God alone exists truly. Man manifests Him in time, space and matter. ~ [[Leo Tolstoy]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDC-emb.jpg|thumb|God, from a beautiful [[necessity]], is [[Love]] in all he doeth, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love, a brilliant fire, to gladden or consume... ~ [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mosaik-Ikone Christus der Barmherzige.jpg|thumb|Here below, God is the feeblest and most destitute of beings; his love, unlike that of idols, does not fill the carnal part of the soul. ~ [[Gustave Thibon]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Stray Birds&#039;&#039; (1916); paraphrased variant: Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God seeks comrades and claims [[love]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The devil seeks [[slaves]] and claims [[obedience]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Fireflies&#039;&#039; (1928)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a mistake to suppose that God is only, or even chiefly, concerned with religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Temple (bishop)|William Temple]], quoted in [[w:R. V. C. Bodley|R. V. C. Bodley]], &#039;&#039;In Search of Serenity&#039;&#039; (1955), ch. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God is truly powerful, He would not let this plague go on.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sheri S. Tepper]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Grass (novel)|Grass]]&#039;&#039; (1989), Chapter 11&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here below, God is the feeblest and most destitute of beings; his love, unlike that of idols, does not fill the carnal part of the soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gustave Thibon]], Introduction to &#039;&#039;[[Gravity and Grace]]&#039;&#039; (1947), p. 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man’s basic anxiety … drives the anxious subject to establish objects of fear. Anxiety strives to become fear, because fear can be met by courage. … Horror is ordinarily avoided by the transformation of anxiety into fear of something, no matter what. The human mind is not only, as [[John Calvin|Calvin]] has said, a permanent factory of idols, it is also a permanent factory of fears—the first in order to escape God, the second in order to escape anxiety. … But ultimately the attempts to transform anxiety into fear are vain. The basic anxiety, the anxiety of a finite being about the threat of nonbeing, cannot be eliminated. It belongs to existence itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Tillich]], &#039;&#039;The Courage To Be&#039;&#039; (1952), p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What, but God?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Inspiring God! who boundless Spirit all,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And unremitting Energy, pervades,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Adjusts, sustains, and agitates the whole.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], &#039;&#039;The Seasons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Spring&#039;&#039; (1728), line 849&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;The word God has become empty of meaning through thousands of years of misuse... I mean that people who have never even glimpsed the realm of the sacred, the infinite vastness behind that word, use it with great conviction, as if they knew what they are talking about.&#039;&#039;&#039; Or they argue against it, as if they knew what it is that they are denying. This misuse gives rise to absurd beliefs, assertions, and egoic delusions, such as &amp;quot;My or our God is the only true God, and your God is false,&amp;quot; or Nietzsche&#039;s famous statement &amp;quot;God is dead.&amp;quot;   The word God has become a closed concept. The moment the word is uttered, a mental image is created, no longer, perhaps, of an old man with a white beard, but still a mental representation of someone or something outside you, and, yes, almost inevitably a male someone or something.  Neither God nor Being nor any other word can define or explain the ineffable reality behind the word, so the only important question is whether the word is a help or a hindrance in enabling you to experience That toward which it points. Does it point beyond itself to that transcendental reality, or does it lend itself too easily to becoming no more than an idea in your head that you believe in, a mental idol?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p. 14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A [[word]] is no more than a means to an end. Its an abstraction. Not unlike a signpost, it points beyond itself. The word honey isn&#039;t honey. You can study and talk about honey for as long as you like, but you won&#039; t really know it until you taste it. After you have tasted it, the word becomes less important to you. You won&#039;t be attached to it anymore. Similarly, you can talk or think about [[God]] continuously for the rest of your life, but does that mean you know or have even glimpsed the reality to which the word points? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p.71&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If, for whatever reason, you disliked the word honey, that might prevent you from ever tasting it. If you had a strong aversion to the word God which is a negative form of attachment, you may be denying not just the word but also the reality to which it points. You would be cutting yourself off from the possibility of experiencing that reality. All this is, of course, intrinsically connected with being identified with your mind. So, if a word doesn&#039;t work for you anymore, then drop it and replace it with one that does work. If you don&#039;t like the word [[sin]], then call it [[unconsciousness]] or [[insanity]]. That may get you closer to the truth, the reality behind the word, than a long-misused word like sin, and leaves little room for [[guilt]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p.71&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has been said:”Stillness is the language God speaks, and everything else is a bad translation.” Stillness is really another word for space. Becoming conscious of stillness whenever we encounter it in our lives will connect us with the formless and timeless dimension within ourselves, that which is beyond thought, beyond [[ego]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life&#039;s Purpose,&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“I want to know the mind of God,” Einstein said. “The rest are details.” What is the mind of God? Consciousness. What does it mean to know the mind of God? To be aware. What are the details? Your outer purpose, and whatever happens outwardly.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The word [[enthusiasm]] comes from ancient Greek – en and theos meaning God. And the related word enthousiazein means &amp;quot;to be possessed by a god.” With enthusiasm you will find that you don&#039;t have to do it all by yourself. In fact, there is nothing of significance that you can do by yourself. Sustained enthusiasm brings into existence a wave of creative energy, and all you have to do then is “ride the wave.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What is [[God]]? The eternal One Life underneath all the forms of life.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in [&#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life&#039;s Purpose,&#039;&#039; p. 98, (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Love is life. All, everything that I understand, I understand only because I love.&#039;&#039;&#039; Everything is, everything exists, only because I love. Everything is united by it alone. Love is God, and to die means that I, a particle of love, shall return to the general and eternal source.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:War and Peace|War and Peace]]&#039;&#039; Bk XIII, Chapter 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is that infinite All of which man knows himself to be a finite part. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God alone exists truly. Man manifests Him in time, space and matter.&#039;&#039;&#039; The more God&#039;s manifestation in man (life) unites with the manifestations (lives) of other beings, the more man exists. This union with the lives of other beings is accomplished through love. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is not love, but the more there is of love, the more man manifests God, and the more he truly exists... &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;We acknowledge God only when we are conscious of His manifestation in us.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]] in his diary (1 November 1910)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why is it when we talk to God we&#039;re said to be praying — but when God talks to us, we&#039;re said to be schizophrenic?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lily Tomlin]], Contributions of Jane Wagner&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be right with God has often meant to be in trouble with men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[A. W. Tozer]], &#039;&#039;Of God and Men&#039;&#039;, p. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am what you call &amp;quot;The World&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;The Universe&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;Everything&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;One&amp;quot;. And, &#039;&#039;&#039;I am &amp;quot;You&amp;quot;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Truth]] Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So what if a kid dies? God will take care of him.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]], in April 2013, as quoted in [http://abcnews.go.com/US/boston-bombing-day-stunning-stop-killers-made-attack/story?id=38335067 &amp;quot;Boston Bombing Day 1: The Stunning Stop the Killers Made After the Attack&amp;quot;] (18 April 2016), by Brian Ross, &#039;&#039;ABC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God, from a beautiful [[necessity]], is [[Love]] in all he doeth, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love, a brilliant fire, to gladden or consume&#039;&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The wicked work their woe by looking upon love, and hating it: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The righteous find their joys in yearning on its loveliness for ever.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]], in &amp;quot;Of Immortality&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Proverbial Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1849)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Satan]]: There is no God, no universe, no human race, no earthly life, no heaven, no hell. It is all a Dream, a grotesque and foolish dream. Nothing exists but you. And You are but a Thought — a vagrant Thought, a useless Thought, a homeless Thought, wandering forlorn among the empty eternities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mark Twain]] &#039;&#039;[[w:The Mysterious Stranger|The Mysterious Stranger]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Some one happened to mention to me that a certain [[Helena Blavatsky|Madame Blavatsky]] had just arrived in London, bringing with her a [[Theosophy|new religion]]... I asked her to explain her new religion... I explained to her my difficulties, which she proceeded to solve by expounding the doctrines of [[reincarnation]] and [[Karma]]. They jumped instantly to my reason. &#039;&#039;&#039;I there and then found the Just [[God]], of whom I had been in search.&#039;&#039;&#039; From that day to this I have never had reason to swerve from those beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Violet Tweedale|Violet Tweedale]], [[Ghosts I Have Seen, and Other Psychic Experiences|&#039;&#039;Ghosts I Have Seen, and Other Psychic Experiences&#039;&#039;]],    1919&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1in god we trust.jpg|thumb|In God We Trust. ~ United States of America national motto]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US-original-Declaration-1776.jpg|thumb|[[w:All men are created equal|All men are created equal]], that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are [[w:Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness|Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness]]. ~ United States Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In God We Trust.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[United States of America]] national motto, as well as &#039;&#039;E PLURIBUS UNUM&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We hold these truths to be self-evident, that &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:All men are created equal|all men are created equal]], that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are [[w:Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness|Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness]].&#039;&#039;&#039;--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:United States Declaration of Independence|United States Declaration of Independence]] (July 4, 1776)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== V ==&lt;br /&gt;
* I looked to find a man who walked with God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Like the translated patriarch of old;— &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though gladdened millions on His footstool trod,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet none with him did such sweet converse hold;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I heard the wind in low complaint go by&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That none his melodies like him could hear;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Day unto day spoke wisdom from on high,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet none like David turned a willing ear;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God walked alone unhonored through the earth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For Him no heart-built temple open stood,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The soul forgetful of her nobler birth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Had hewn him lofty shrines of stone and wood,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And left unfinished and in ruins still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The only temple he delights to fill.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jones Very]], “Enoch”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The one [[idea]] the [[Hindu]] [[religions]] differ in from every other in the [[world]], the one idea to express which the [[sages]] almost exhaust the [[w:Vocabulary|vocabulary]] of the Sanskrit language, is that man must realise God even in this [[life]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Swami Vivekananda]] in: &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=kQCNAwAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA405 The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda [ Volume 4 ] ],&#039;&#039;  Kartindo.com, p. 405.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: &amp;quot;O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.&amp;quot; And God granted it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], in a letter to Étienne Noël Damilaville (16 May 1767)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If God did not exist, He would have to be invented.&amp;quot; But all nature cries aloud that he does exist: that there is a supreme intelligence, an immense power, an admirable order, and everything teaches us our own dependence on it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Voltaire quoting himself in a letter to Prince Frederick William of Prussia (28 November 1770), as quoted in &#039;&#039;Voltaire in His Letters&#039;&#039; (1919) by [[Evelyn Beatrice Hall|S. G. Tallentyre (Evelyn Beatrice Hall)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;More Random Walks in Science : An Anthology&#039;&#039; (1982) by Robert L. Weber, p. 65&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Take Care of the People, and God Almighty Will Take Care of Himself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Sirens of Titan|The Sirens of Titan]]&#039;&#039; (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; WAS MUSIC.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], [http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0205-29.htm &amp;quot;Vonnegut&#039;s Blues for America&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Sunday Herald|Sunday Herald]]&#039;&#039; (5 February 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the final proof of God&#039;s omnipotence that he need not exist in order to save us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Peter De Vries|Peter De Vries]], &#039;&#039;The Mackerel Plaza&#039;&#039; (1958), p. 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== W ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rosace.jpg|thumb|To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist. ~ [[Simone Weil]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Дервиш руми.jpg|thumb|Dear God … Everyone I [[know]] admits they’ve never seen your [[face]], they’re not sure where you [[live]] and have no map to [[Kingdom of God|the place]]. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Dawud Wharnsby]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Storm Spirits.jpg|thumb|&amp;quot;[[w:Elohim|Elohim]],&amp;quot; the name for the creative power in &#039;&#039;[[w:Book of Genesis|Genesis]]&#039;&#039;, is a female plural, a fact that generations of learned rabbis and Christian theologians have all explained as merely grammatical convention. The King James and most other Bibles translate it as &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; but if you take the grammar literally, it seems to mean &amp;quot;goddesses.&amp;quot; [[w:El Shaddai|Al Shaddai]], god of battles, appears later, and [[w:Tetragrammaton|YHWH]], mispronounced Jehovah, later still. ~ [[Robert Anton Wilson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Navy 060608-N-6501M-005 The U.S. Military Sealift Command (MSC) Hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19), anchored off of the coast of Jolo City.jpg|thumb|I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we&#039;ll find it in the nature of that thing. &lt;br /&gt;
~ [[Frank Lloyd Wright]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Don&#039;t you know there ain&#039;t no devil? There&#039;s only God when He&#039;s drunk.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Waits]], in &amp;quot;[[w:Heartattack and Vine (song)|Heartattack and Vine]]&amp;quot; on &#039;&#039;[[w:Heartattack and Vine|Heartattack and Vine]]&#039;&#039; (1980)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;s greatness and goodness are measured by the fact that he gives us choices.&#039;&#039;&#039; He doesn&#039;t require us to thank him for our food. (In case you hadn&#039;t noticed.) God is not a Modernist. He doesn&#039;t view us as nails. God expects us to behave like carpenters. Indeed, he gave us a carpenter as an example. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; So I think God is postmodern. &#039;&#039;&#039;He has his own ideas of what rules, and what sucks, and he doesn&#039;t expect everyone else to agree with him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Larry Wall]] in [http://www.perl.com/pub/a/1999/03/pm.html &amp;quot;Perl, the first postmodern computer language&amp;quot; (9 March 1999)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For modern man, … pride reveals itself in impatience, which is an unwillingness to bear the pain of discipline. … In effect his becomes a deification of his own will; man is not making himself like a god but is taking himself as he is and putting himself in the place of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Weaver]], &#039;&#039;Ideas Have Consequences&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1948), p. 183&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first thing that we know about ourselves is our imperfection. &lt;br /&gt;
: This is what [[Descartes]] meant when he said: &#039;I know God before I know myself.&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
: The only mark of God in us is that we feel that we are not God.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to obey God, one must receive his commands. How did it happen that I received them in adolescence, while I was professing atheism? &#039;&#039;&#039;To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No human being escapes the necessity of conceiving some good outside himself towards which his thought turns in a movement of desire, supplication, and hope. consequently, the only choice is between worshipping the true God or an idol.&#039;&#039;&#039; Every atheist is an idolater — unless he is worshipping the true God in his impersonal aspect. &#039;&#039;&#039;The majority of the pious are idolaters.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Christianity&#039;&#039; (1967) edited by William Robert Miller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No man — prince, peasant, pope, — has all the light, who says else is a mountebank. I claim no private lien on truth, only a liberty to seek it, prove it in debate, and to be wrong a thousand times to reach a single rightness.&#039;&#039;&#039; It is that liberty they fear. They want us to be driven to God like sheep, not running to him like lovers, shouting joy!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], in his play about [[Giordano Bruno]], &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ever since the Greeks, we have been drunk with language! &#039;&#039;&#039;We have made a cage with words and shoved our God inside!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If God be God and man a creature made in image of the divine intelligence, his noblest function is the search for truth.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Once you accept the existence of God — however you define him, however you explain your relationship to him — then you are caught forever with his presence in the center of all things.&#039;&#039;&#039; You are also caught with the fact that man is a creature who walks in two worlds and traces upon the walls of his cave the wonders and the nightmare experiences of his spiritual pilgrimage.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Clowns of God&#039;&#039; (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To assume that one’s existential task is completed when the individual is brought into right relation with society, that is, when the individual has been socialized, is to absolutize society and confuse society with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Merold Westphal]], &#039;&#039;Kierkegaard’s Critique of Reason and Society&#039;&#039;, p. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dear God I&#039;ve heard your [[name]] from [[teachers]], [[family]] and friends, you made the [[universe]] and so will live on when it [[ends]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Everyone I know admits they’ve never seen your [[face]], they’re not sure where you [[live]] and have no map [[Kingdom of God|to the place]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dawud Wharnsby]], in &amp;quot;Dear God&amp;quot;, in &#039;&#039;A Picnic of Poems in Allah&#039;s Green Garden&#039;&#039; (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No reason can be given for the nature of God, because that nature is the ground of rationality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred North Whitehead]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Modern World&#039;&#039; (1925), Chapter XI. New York: Mentor Books, 1948, p. 179&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The worship of God is not a rule of safety—it is an adventure of the spirit, a flight after the unattainable. The death of religion comes with the repression of the high hope of adventure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred North Whitehead]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Modern World&#039;&#039; (1925), Chapter XII. New York: Mentor Books, 1948, p. 192&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;&#039;: God? God is love. I don&#039;t love you.&lt;br /&gt;
** Gregory Widen, [[The Prophecy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;I sit and talk to God&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And he just laughs at my plans&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robbie Williams]] and {{w|Guy Chambers}}, &#039;&#039;[[W:Feel (Robbie Williams song)|Feel]]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[[W:Escapology (album)|Escapology]]&#039;&#039; (18 November 2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;All your Western theologies, the whole mythology of them, are based on the concept of God as a senile delinquent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tennessee Williams]], &#039;&#039;The Night of the Iguana&#039;&#039; (1963)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;{{w|Elohim}},&amp;quot; the name for the creative power in &#039;&#039;[[Book of Genesis|Genesis]]&#039;&#039;, is a female plural, a fact that generations of learned rabbis and Christian theologians have all explained as merely grammatical convention.&#039;&#039;&#039; The King James and most other Bibles translate it as &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; but if you take the grammar literally, it seems to mean &amp;quot;[[goddesses]].&amp;quot; [[w:El Shaddai|Al Shaddai]], god of battles, appears later, and [[w:Tetragrammaton|YHWH]], mispronounced Jehovah, later still.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Anton Wilson]], &#039;&#039;Everything Is Under Control : Conspiracies, Cults, and Cover-Ups&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 197&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To believe in a God means to understand the question about the meaning of life. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To believe in a God means to see that the facts of the world are not the end of the matter. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To believe in God means to see that life has a meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] Journal entry (8 July 1916), p. 74e&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe in God, only I spell it &amp;quot;[[Nature]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frank Lloyd Wright]], &#039;&#039;Quote&#039;&#039; magazine (14 August 1966)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the great mysterious motivator of what we call nature and it has been said often by philosophers, that nature is the will of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; And, I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. &#039;&#039;&#039;If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we&#039;ll find it in the nature of that thing.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Frank Lloyd Wright, quoted in &#039;&#039;Truth Against the World : Frank Lloyd Wright speaks for an organic architecture&#039;&#039; (1987) edited by Patrick J. Meehan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe the growth of &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; signifies the existence of God. That is: if history naturally pushes people toward moral improvement, toward moral growth, and their God, as they conceive their God, grows accordingly, becoming morally richer, then maybe this growth is evidence of some higher purpose, and maybe — conceivably — the source of that purpose is worthy of the name divinity.[… I]f it is a natural outgrowth of history — then it is more likely that this &amp;quot;growth of God&amp;quot; signifies the existence of God, or at least the existence of something you might call divine, however unlike ancient conceptions of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Wright]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Evolution of God|The Evolution of God]]&#039;&#039; (2009). New York: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 286–7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is God love? Like all characterizations of God, this one presumes more insight than I feel in possession of. But there&#039;s certainly something to the idea that love is connected to, indeed emanates from, the kind of God whose existence is being surmised here.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The connection comes via love&#039;s connection to the moral order of which that God is the source. The moral order has revealed itself through ever-widening circles of [[w:Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny|non-zero-sumness]] that draw people toward the moral truth that mutual respect is warranted. As we saw […], it is the moral imagination whose growth often paves the way for that truth, and it does so through the extension of a kind of sympathy, a subjective identification with the situation of the other. And as sympathy intensifies it approaches love. Love, you might say, is the apotheosis of the moral imagination; it can foster the most intimate identification with the other, the most intense appreciation of the moral worth of the other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Wright]], &#039;&#039;The Evolution of God&#039;&#039; (2009), p. 456&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== X ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Y ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They who deny God have not seen Him. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039; Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  12, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The gods of all pagan faiths have been allied with the rich rulers. The priests of most religions are the employees of the landowners. But the God of Israel has always claimed to be with the poor—whether in the legislation of [[Deuteronomy]], the words of the [[prophets]], or the experiences of the [[New Testament]]. Our God is on the side of the poor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Howard Yoder]], &#039;&#039;Radical Christian Discipleship&#039;&#039;, p. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A God all mercy is a God unjust.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night IV, line 234&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By night an atheist half believes in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night V, line 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Deity believed, is joy begun;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A Deity adored, is joy advanced;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A Deity beloved, is joy matured.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Each branch of piety delight inspires.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night VIII, line 720&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A God alone can comprehend a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night LX, line 835&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou, my all!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My theme! my inspiration! and my crown!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My strength in age—my rise in low estate!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My souls ambition, pleasure, wealth!—my world!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My light in darkness! and my life in death!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My boast through time! bliss through eternity!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Eternity, too short to speak thy praise!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Or fathom thy profound of love to man!&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night IV, line 586&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Arthur Frayn:&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;And you, poor creatures, who conjured you out of the clay? Is God in show business, too?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zardoz]] (1974)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;[[Bible]]&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Bible|&#039;&#039;The Bible&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Domenico Fetti 004.jpg|thumb|Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God. ~ [[Moses]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nicolò barabino, profeta isaia, studio per affresco nella chiesa di s.m. dell&#039;assunta a genova sestri.jpg|thumb|As the [[heavens]] are higher than the [[earth]], so are my ways higher than your ways, and my [[thoughts]] than your thoughts. ~ [[Isaiah]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Guercino Padreterno.jpg|thumb|God is [[love]]. Whoever [[lives]] in love lives in God, and God in him. ~ [[John the Evangelist]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Albert_Edelfelt_-_Christ_and_Mary_Magdalene.jpg|thumb|God is not a [[man]]. ~ [[w:Balaam|Balaam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Genesis]] [[W:Genesis 1|1:1]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We ought to obey God rather than men. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Acts of the Apostles]] [[W:Acts 5|5:29]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is not a man&#039;&#039;&#039;, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Balaam|Balaam, son of Beor]] in  &#039;&#039;[[Book of Numbers|Numbers]]&#039;&#039; 23:19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious. For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in [[Acts of the Apostles]] [[W:Acts 17|17:22-23]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thine, O Lord is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in the earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, O Lord, and thou art exalted as head above all. Both riches and honour come of thee, and thou reignest over all; and in thine hand is power and might; and in thine hand it is to make great, and to give strength unto all. Now therefore, our God, we thank thee, and praise thy glorious name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Book of Chronicles|1 Chronicles]] 29:11-13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things that are mighty.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Corinthians 1}}:27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Corinthians 3}}:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The hair of his head was like clean wool. His throne was flames of fire; its wheels were a burning fire. There was a stream of fire flowing and going out from before him. There were a thousand thousands that kept ministering to him, and ten thousand times ten thousand that kept standing right before him. The Court took its seat, and there were books that were opened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel]], [[Book of Daniel]] [[W:Daniel 7|7:9-10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* None can hope in God but those who know his name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David]], [[Psalms|Psalm]] [[w:Psalm 9|9:10]], as cited in {{w|Institutes of the Christian Religion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many things you have done, &lt;br /&gt;
:O Jehovah my God, &lt;br /&gt;
:Your wonderful works and your thoughts toward us.&lt;br /&gt;
:None can compare to you;&lt;br /&gt;
:If I were to try to tell and speak of them, &lt;br /&gt;
:They would be too numerous to recount!&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[David]], [[Psalms|Psalm]] [[W:Psalm 40|40:5]], [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, God is greater than we can know; &lt;br /&gt;
:The number of his years is beyond comprehension.&lt;br /&gt;
:He draws up the drops of [[water]]; &lt;br /&gt;
:They condense into rain from his mist;&lt;br /&gt;
:Then the [[cloud]]s pour it down; &lt;br /&gt;
:They shower down upon mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[w:Elihu (Job)|E·li′hu]], [[Book of Job]], 36:26-28, [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And the LORD said unto him, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Who hath made man&#039;s mouth? or who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the seeing, or the blind? have not I the LORD?&#039;&#039;&#039; Now therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]&#039;&#039; 4:11-12 ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God said unto [[Moses]], I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]&#039;&#039; 3:14 ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: God said to Moses, &#039;I will be what I will be&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Exodus|Exodus]] 20:7, ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Similar phrase: &amp;quot;Keep yourselves from evil to take the name of the Lord in vain, for I am the Lord your God, even the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham and of Isaac and of Jacob.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Doctrine and Covenants}} 136:21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See now that &#039;&#039;&#039;I, even I, am He, and there is no god besides Me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of My hand&#039;&#039;&#039;. For I lift up My hand to heaven, and say, I live for ever. If I whet My glittering sword, and Mine hand take hold on judgment; I will render vengeance to Mine enemies, and will reward them that hate Me. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]]&#039;&#039; 32:39-41 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create calamity: I the LORD do all these things.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Isaiah]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Isaiah 45|45:5-7]] ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: I am the Lord and there is no other. Who forms light and creates darkness, Who makes peace and creates calamity; I am the Lord, who makes all these.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaiah]] [[W:Isaiah 55#Verse 9|55:9]] [[KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;You cannot serve both God and [[w:Mammon|Mammon]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jesus]], &#039;&#039;[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Matthew 6:24|6:24]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is greater than we can know; The number of his years is beyond comprehension.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Job|Job]] 36:26, [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is [[light]]; in him there is no [[darkness]] at [[all]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}} in {{w|1 John}} 1:5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}}, in {{w|John}} 3:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is [[love]]. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}} in {{w|1 John}} 4:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. Keep these words that I am commanding you today in your heart. Recite them to your children and talk about them when you are at home and when you are away, when you lie down and when you rise. Bind them as a sign on your hand, fix them as an emblem on your forehead, and write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moses]], [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5-9 [[w:New Revised Standard Version|NRSV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moses]], [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 18:13 [[King James Version|KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the invisible things of him since the creation of the [[world]] are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting [[power]] and divinity; that they may be without excuse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:Epistle to the Romans|Romans]]&#039;&#039; 1:20 (ASV)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the [[faith]] of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar&#039;&#039;&#039;; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man) God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world? For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 3|3:3-8]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the [[law]].&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Is he&#039;&#039; the God of the Jews only? &#039;&#039;is he&#039;&#039; not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also: Seeing &#039;&#039;it is&#039;&#039; one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]], &#039;&#039;Romans&#039;&#039; [[W:Romans 3|3:19-31]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O the depth of God’s riches and [[wisdom]] and [[knowledge]]! How unsearchable his judgments are and beyond tracing out his ways are! For “who has come to know Jehovah&#039;s mind, or who has become his [[adviser]]?” Or, “who has first given to him, so that it must be repaid to him?” Because from him and by him and for him are all things. To him be the glory forever. Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]], [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 11|11:33-36]], [[New World Translation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fear]] God. [[Honour]] the [[King]].&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Peter 2}}:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalms 19}}:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalms 23}}:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is our refuge and [[strength]], a very present help in trouble. &#039;&#039;&#039;Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the [[mountains]] shake with the swelling thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 46|46:1 - 3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High. God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved: God shall help her, and that right early. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The heathen raged, the kingdoms were moved: he uttered his voice, the earth melted. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 46|46:4 - 7]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[fool]] says in his [[heart]] &amp;quot;There is no God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 53|53:1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I had rather be a doorkeeper in the house of my God, than to dwell in the tents of wickedness.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalm 84}}:10&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: &amp;quot;For I would rather be a servant in the House of the Lord than to sit in the seats of the mighty.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** By {{w|Alben W. Barkley}}, addressed to a mock Democratic convention, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia (April 30, 1956), reported in &#039;&#039;Memorial Services Held in the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States, Together with Remarks Presented in Eulogy of Alben William Barkley, Late a Senator from Kentucky&#039;&#039; (1956), p. 106.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God be for us, who can be against us?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 8|8:31]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no respect of persons with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Romans, 2:11; Acts 10:34&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But will God really dwell with mankind on the [[earth]]? Look! The heavens, yes, the heaven of the [[heaven]]s, cannot contain you; how much less, then, this house that I have built!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Solomon]], 2 [[W:Books of Chronicles|Chronicles]] 6:18, [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;[[Quran]]&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EMİRSULTAN CAMİİ BURSA - panoramio.jpg|thumb|O [[mankind]], It is you that have need of God, and God is the [[Self-sufficiency|Self-Sufficient]], the [[Praised]] [[Kenosis|One]]. If He please, He will remove you and bring a new [[creation]]. And this is not hard for God. ~ [[Quran]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Quran|&#039;&#039;The Quran&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|Allah}}&lt;br /&gt;
* And (mention, O [[Muhammad]]), when your Lord said to the [[angels]], &amp;quot;Indeed, I will make upon the earth a successive [[authority]].&amp;quot; They said, &amp;quot;Will You place upon it one who causes [[corruption]] therein and sheds [[blood]], while we declare Your [[praise]] and [[sanctification|sanctify]] You?&amp;quot; He said: Surely, &#039;&#039;&#039;I know what you know not.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Al-Baqara}} 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He said: Do you then [[understand]] what you [[worship]] -- You and your forefathers? -- Surely they are abhorrence to me, except the [[Lord]] of the [[worlds]],&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Who created me, then He [[guides]] me the way,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who provides me sustenance to [[eat]] and to [[drink]],&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And when I am [[sick]], it is He who [[heals]] me,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who will cause me to [[die]], and will [[resurrect]] me,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who, I [[hope]], will [[forgive]] me and my [[mistakes]] on the Day of Judgment. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham]],  [[w:Ash-Shu&#039;ara|Ash-Shu&#039;ara]] 75-82&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:God in Islam|God]]! [[W:Tawhid|There is no god but He]], — the [[Living]], the Self-subsisting, [[Eternal]]. No slumber can seize Him nor [[sleep]]. His are [[all]] [[things]] in the heavens and on earth. Who is there that can intercede in His [[presence]] except as He permitteth? he knoweth what before or after or behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His [[Throne]] doth extend over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in [[guard|guarding]] and [[perversity|preserving]] them for He is the Most High, the Supreme.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Al-Baqara 255}}, translated by {{w|Arthur John Arberry}} in &#039;&#039;{{w|The Koran Interpreted}}&#039;&#039; (1955).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God helps you, there is none that can overcome you; and if He forsakes you, who is there that can [[help]] you?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Ali-Imran|Sūrat Ali-Imran]] 3:159&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Inventor]] of the heavens and the earth. How could He have a son when He has no consort? And He created everything, and all things He knows. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Al-Anam|Sūrat Al-An&#039;am]] 6:101&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Say: &amp;quot;Who is it that sustains you (in life) from the sky and from the earth? or who is it that has power over hearing and sight? And who is it that brings out the living from the [[Death|dead]] and (brings out) the dead from the living? and who is it that rules and regulates all affairs?&amp;quot; They will soon say, &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;. Say, &amp;quot;will ye not then show piety (to Him)?&amp;quot; such is God, your true Lord; nothing apart from the truth, but error. How then are ye turned away?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Yunus (sura)|Sūrat Yunus]] 10:31-32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  Seest thou him who takes his own [[desire]] as his [[deity|god]], and God leaves him in [[error]] knowingly, and seals his [[hearing]] and his [[heart]] and puts a covering on his [[sight]]? Who can then guide him after God? Will you not reflect? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Al-Jathiyah|Sūrat Al-Jathiyah]] 45:23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  O mankind, It is you that have need of God, and God is the [[Self-sufficiency|Self-Sufficient]], the [[Praised]] [[Kenosis|One]]. If He please, He will remove you and bring a new [[creation]]. And this is not hard for God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Fatir|Sūrat Fatir]] 35:15-17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no god but The God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Muhammad (surah)|Sūrat Muḥammad]] 47:19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;[[Book of Mormon]]&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Book of Mormon|&#039;&#039;The Book of Mormon&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Book of Mosiah|Mosiah]] 13:15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And again, the Lord God hath commanded that men should not murder; that they should not lie; that they should not steal; that they should not take the name of the Lord their God in vain; that they should not envy; that they should not have malice; that they should not contend one with another; that they should not commit whoredoms; and that they should do none of these things; for whoso doeth them shall perish.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|2 Nephi}} 26:32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 315-21.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Homo cogitat, Deus indicat.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man thinks, God directs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alcuin]], &#039;&#039;Epistles&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At Athens, wise men propose, and fools dispose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anacharsis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man says—&amp;quot;So, so.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Heaven says—&amp;quot;No, no.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Chinese Aphorism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s Wisdom and God&#039;s Goodness!—Ah, but fools&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Mis-define thee, till God knows them no more.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wisdom and goodness they are God!—what schools&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Have yet so much as heard this simpler lore.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This no Saint preaches, and this no Church rules:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;Tis in the desert, now and heretofore.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Matthew Arnold]], &#039;&#039;The Divinity&#039;&#039;, Stanza 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They that deny a God destroy man&#039;s nobility; for certainly man is of kin to the beasts by his body; and, if he be not of kin to God by his spirit, he is a base and ignoble creature.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Of Atheism&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From thee all human actions take their springs,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rise of empires, and the fall of kings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Samuel Boyse|Samuel Boyse]], &#039;&#039;The Deity&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O Rock of Israel, Rock of Salvation, Rock struck and cleft for me, let those two streams of blood and water which once gushed out of thy side … bring down with them salvation and holiness into my soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Daniel Brevint|Brevint]], &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1679), p. 17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He made little, too little of sacraments and priests, because God was so intensely real to him. What should he do with lenses who stood thus full in the torrent of the sunshine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Phillips Brooks]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Seriousness of Life&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It never frightened a Puritan when you bade him stand still and listen to the speech of God. His closet and his church were full of the reverberations of the awful, gracious, beautiful voice for which he listened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Phillips Brooks]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Seriousness of Life&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Of what I call God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And fools call Nature.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;The Ring and the Book&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Pope&#039;&#039;, line 1,073&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A picket frozen on duty—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A mother starved for her brood—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Socrates drinking the hemlock,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And Jesus on the rood;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And millions who, humble and nameless,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The straight, hard pathway trod—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Some call it Consecration,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And others call it God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Herbert Carruth|W. H. Carruth]], &#039;&#039;Evolution&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil est quod deus efficere non possit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is nothing which God cannot do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;De Divinatione&#039;&#039;, II. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God! sing, ye meadow-streams, with gladsome voice!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ye pine-groves, with your soft and soul-like sounds!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And they too have a voice, yon piles of snow,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And in their perilous fall shall thunder, God!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]], &#039;&#039;Hymn before Sunrise in the Vale of Chamouni&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God moves in a mysterious way&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; His wonders to perform;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He plants his footsteps in the sea&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And rides upon the storm.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Hymn&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Light Shining out of Darkness&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a God! the sky his presence shares,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; His hand upheaves the billows in their mirth,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Destroys the mighty, yet the humble spares&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And with contentment crowns the thought of worth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Charlotte Cushman|Charlotte Cushman]], &#039;&#039;There is a God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My God, my Father, and my Friend,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Do not forsake me in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wentworth Dillon]], translation of &#039;&#039;Dies Iræ&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;Twas much, that man was made like God before:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But, that God should be made like man, much more.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Donne]], &#039;&#039;Holy Sonnets&#039;&#039;, Sonnet XXII&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By tracing Heaven his footsteps may be found:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Behold! how awfully he walks the round!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God is abroad, and wondrous in his ways&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rise of empires, and their fall surveys.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Dryden]], &#039;&#039;Britannia Rediviva&#039;&#039;, line 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too wise to err, too good to be unkind,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are all the movements of the Eternal Mind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rev. [[John East]], &#039;&#039;Songs of My Pilgrimage&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is divine Principle, supreme incorporeal Being, Mind, Spirit, Soul, Life, Truth, Love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mary Baker Eddy]], &#039;&#039;Science and Health&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV. Ed. 1906, p. 465&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no life, truth, intelligence, nor substance in matter. All is infinite Mind, and its infinite manifestation, for God is All in All. Spirit is immortal Truth; Matter is mortal error.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mary Baker Eddy]], &#039;&#039;Science and Health&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV. Ed. 1906, p. 468&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the Master of the universe has points to carry in his government he impresses his will in the structure of minds.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Letters and Social Aims&#039;&#039; (1876), &#039;&#039;Immortality&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He was a wise man who originated the idea of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Euripides]], &#039;&#039;Sisyphus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Henceforth the Majesty of God revere;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fear him and you have nothing else to fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fordyce]], &#039;&#039;Answer to a Gentleman who Apologized to the Author for Swearing&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Wie einer ist, so ist sein Gott,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Darum ward Gott so oft zu Spott.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** As a man is, so is his God; therefore God was so often an object of mockery.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], &#039;&#039;Gedichte&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My God commands, whose power no power resists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Greene (dramatist)|Robert Greene]], &#039;&#039;Looking-Glass for London and England&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some men treat the God of their fathers as they treat their father&#039;s friend. They do not deny him; by no means: they only deny themselves to him, when he is good enough to call upon them.&lt;br /&gt;
** J. C. and A. W. Hare, &#039;&#039;Guesses at Truth&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I askt the seas and all the deeps below&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; My God to know,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I askt the reptiles, and whatever is &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; In the abyss;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Even from the shrimps to the leviathan&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Enquiry ran;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But in those deserts that no line can sound&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The God I sought for was not to be found.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Heywood]], &#039;&#039;Searching after God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Forgetful youth! but know, the Power above&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With ease can save each object of his love;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wide as his will, extends his boundless grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book III, line 285. Pope&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O thou, whose certain eye foresees&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The fix&#039;d event of fate&#039;s remote decrees.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book IV, line 627. Pope&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dangerous it were for the feeble brain of man to wade far into the doings of the Most High; whom although to know be life, and joy to make mention of his name, yet our soundest knowledge is to know that we know him not as indeed he is, neither can know him; and our safest eloquence concerning him is our silence, when we confess without confession that his glory is inexplicable, his greatness above our capacity and reach.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hooker]], &#039;&#039;Ecclesiastical Polity&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter II. 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But if the sky were paper and a scribe each star above,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And every scribe had seven hands, they could not write all my love.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Dürsli und Bäbeli&#039;&#039;; old public house ditty of the Canton de Soleure or Solothurn. Original in Swiss dialect. Given in &#039;&#039;Notes and Queries&#039;&#039; (Feb. 10, 1872), p. 114&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From thee, great God, we spring, to thee we tend,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Path, motive, guide, original, and end.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], &#039;&#039;Motto to The Rambler&#039;&#039;, No. 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The sun and every vassal star,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; All space, beyond the soar of angel&#039;s wings,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wait on His word: and yet He stays His car&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; For every sigh a contrite suppliant brings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Keble]], &#039;&#039;The Christian Year&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Ascension Day&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nam homo proponit, sed Deus disponit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man proposes, but God disposes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas à Kempis]], &#039;&#039;Imitation of Christ&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter XIX. Thomas Dibdin&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O God, I am thinking Thy thoughts after Thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johannes Kepler]], when studying astronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All but God is changing day by day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Kingsley]], &#039;&#039;The Saints&#039; Tragedy&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Prometheus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L&#039;impossibilité où je suis de prouver que Dieu n&#039;est pas, me decouvre son existence.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The very impossibility in which I find myself to prove that God is not, discloses to me His existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean de La Bruyère]], &#039;&#039;Les Caractères&#039;&#039;, XVI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Sire, je n&#039;avais besoin de cet hypothèse.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sire, I had no need for that hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[La Place]] to [[Napoleon]], who asked why God was not mentioned in &#039;&#039;Traite de la Méchanique Céleste&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Denn Gott lohnt Gutes, hier gethan, auch hier noch.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** For God rewards good deeds done here below—rewards them here.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gotthold Ephraim Lessing]], &#039;&#039;Nathan der Weise&#039;&#039;, I, 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We trust, Sir, that God is on our side.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;It is more important to know that we are on God&#039;s side.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], reply to deputation of Southerners during Civil War&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God had sifted three kingdoms to find the wheat for this planting.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;The Courtship of Miles Standish&#039;&#039;, IV&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Estne dei sedes nisi terra et pontus et aër&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Et cœlum et virtus? Superos quid quærimus ultra?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jupiter est quodcumque vides, quodcumque moveris.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Is there any other seat of the Divinity than the earth, sea, air, the heavens, and virtuous minds? why do we seek God elsewhere? He is whatever you see; he is wherever you move.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Annaeus Lucanus]], &#039;&#039;Pharsalia&#039;&#039;, IX. 578&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ein gute Wehr und Waffen,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Er hilft uns frei aus aller Not,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Die uns jetzt hat betroffen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A mighty fortress is our God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A bulwark never failing,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Our helper he amid the flood&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of mortal ills prevailing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;Ein feste Burg&#039;&#039;. Translation by F. H. Hedge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I fear no foe with Thee at hand to bless;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ills have no weight, and tears no bitterness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Francis Lyte]], &#039;&#039;Eventide&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A voice in the wind I do not know;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A meaning on the face of the high hills&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Whose utterance I cannot comprehend.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A something is behind them: that is God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George MacDonald]], &#039;&#039;Within and Without&#039;&#039;, Part I, scene 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Exemplumque dei quisque est in imagine parva.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Every one is in a small way the image of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, IV. 895&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Quis cœlum possit nisi cœli munera nosse?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Et reperire deum nisi qui pars ipse deorum est?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Who can know heaven except by its gifts? and who can find out God, unless the man who is himself an emanation from God?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, II. 115&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One sole God;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One sole ruler,—his Law;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One sole interpreter of that law—Humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giuseppe Mazzini]], &#039;&#039;Life and Writings&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Young Europe&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;General Principles&#039;&#039;, No. 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too wise to be mistaken still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Too good to be unkind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Medley]], &#039;&#039;Hymn of God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Who best&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Bear his mild yoke, they serve him best: his state&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is kingly; thousands at his bidding speed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And post o&#039;er land and ocean without rest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;Sonnet&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;On His Blindness&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott-trunkener Mensch.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A God-intoxicated man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Novalis]], in reference to [[Spinoza]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Trumpeter, sound for the splendour of God!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;. . . . . .&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Trumpeter, rally us, up to the heights of it!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Sound for the City of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred Noyes]], &#039;&#039;Trumpet Call&#039;&#039;, last lines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est deus in nobis; et sunt commercia cœli.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God within us and intercourse with heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Ars Amatoria&#039;&#039;, Book III. 549. (Milton&#039;s &amp;quot;Looks commercing with the skies&amp;quot; said to be inspired by this phrase)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est deus in nobis: agitante calescimus illo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God within us, and we glow when he stirs us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Fasti&#039;&#039;, Book VI. 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Sed tamen ut fuso taurorum sanguine centum,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sic capitur minimo thuris honore deux.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** As God is propitiated by the blood of a hundred bulls, so also is he by the smallest offering of incense.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Tristium&#039;&#039;, II. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil ita sublime est, supraque pericula tendit&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Non sit ut inferius suppositumque deo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nothing is so high and above all danger that is not below and in the power of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Tristium&#039;&#039;, IV. 8. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One on God&#039;s side is a majority.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wendell Phillips]], speech at Harper&#039;s Ferry (1 November 1859)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est profecto deus, qui, quæ nos gerimus, auditque et videt.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is indeed a God that hears and sees whate&#039;er we do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Captivi&#039;&#039;, II. 2. 63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He from thick films shall purge the visual ray,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on the sightless eyeball pour the day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;Messiah&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou Great First Cause, least understood.&lt;br /&gt;
** Alexander Pope, &#039;&#039;Universal Prayer&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je crains Dieu, cher Abner, et n&#039;ai point d&#039;autre crainte.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I fear God, dear Abner, and I have no other fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Racine]], &#039;&#039;Athalie&#039;&#039;, Act I, scene 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Give us a God—a living God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; One to wake the sleeping soul, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; One to cleanse the tainted blood &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Whose pulses in our bosoms roll.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. G. Rosenberg]], &#039;&#039;The Winged Horn&#039;&#039;, Stanza 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We may scavenge the dross of the nation, we may shudder past bloody sod,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But we thrill to the new revelation that we are parts of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Haven Schauffler]], &#039;&#039;New Gods for Old&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Es lebt ein Gott zu strafen und zu rächen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God to punish and avenge.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Wilhelm Tell&#039;&#039;, IV. 3. 37&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil ab illo [i.e. a Deo] vacat; opus suum ipse implet.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nothing is void of God; He Himself fills His work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;De Beneficiis&#039;&#039;, IV. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Deum non immolationibus et sanguine multo colendum: quæ enim ex trucidatione immerentium voluptas est? sed mente pura, bono honestoque proposito. Non templa illi, congestis in altitudinem saxis, struenda sunt; in suo cuique consecrandus est pectore.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is not to be worshipped with sacrifices and blood; for what pleasure can He have in the slaughter of the innocent? but with a pure mind, a good and honest purpose. Temples are not to be built for Him with stones piled on high; God is to be consecrated in the breast of each.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;Fragment&#039;&#039;, V. 204&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God helps those who help themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Algernon Sidney]], &#039;&#039;Discourse Concerning Government&#039;&#039;, Chapter II. Ovid—Metamorphoses. X. 586. [[Pliny the Elder]], viewing the Eruption of Vesuvius, Aug., 79. [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;William Tell&#039;&#039;, I. 2. [[Simonides]] is quoted as author by Claudian. [[Sophocles]], &#039;&#039;Fragments&#039;&#039;. [[Terence]], &#039;&#039;Phormio&#039;&#039;. I. 4. [[Vergil]], &#039;&#039;Æneid&#039;&#039; (29-19 BC), X, 284. Quoted as a proverb by old and modern writers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From Piety, whose soul sincere&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fears God, and knows no other fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. Smyth]], &#039;&#039;Ode for the Installation of the Duke of Gloucester as Chancellor of Cambridge&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ad majorem Dei gloriam.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** For the greater glory of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Motto of the Society of Jesus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The divine essence itself is love and wisdom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emanuel Swedenborg]], &#039;&#039;Divine Love and Wisdom&#039;&#039;, Par. 28&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, the Great Giver, can open the whole universe to our gaze in the narrow space of a single lane.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Jivan-smitri&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ha sotto i piedi il Fato e la Natura.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ministri umili; e&#039;l moto e chi&#039;l misura.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Under whose feet (subjected to His grace),&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Sit nature, fortune, motion, time, and place.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Torquato Tasso]], &#039;&#039;Gerusalemme&#039;&#039;, IX, 66&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At last I heard a voice upon the slope&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Cry to the summit, &amp;quot;Is there any hope?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To which an answer pealed from that high land,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But in a tongue no man could understand;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on the glimmering limit far withdrawn,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God made himself an awful rose of dawn.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred Tennyson]], &#039;&#039;Vision of Sin&#039;&#039;, V&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I fled Him, down the nights and down the days;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I fled Him, down the arches of the years;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I fled Him, down the labyrinthine ways&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of my own mind; and in the midst of tears&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I hid from Him, and under running laughter.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Thompson]], &#039;&#039;The Hound of Heaven&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But I lose&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Myself in Him, in Light ineffable!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Come then, expressive Silence, muse His praise.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;These, as they change, Almighty Father, these&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are but the varied God. The rolling Year&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is full of Thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], &#039;&#039;Hymn&#039;&#039;, line 116&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The being of God is so comfortable, so convenient, so necessary to the felicity of Mankind, that, (as [[Cicero|Tully]] admirably says) &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;, if God were not a necessary being of himself, he might almost seem to be made on purpose for the use and benefit of men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Tillotson|Archbishop Tillotson]], &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039;, Sermon 93, Volume I, (1712 edition), p. 696; this is the probable origin of [[Voltaire]]&#039;s phrase.&lt;br /&gt;
** Cicero&#039;s phrase from &#039;&#039;[[w:De Legibus|De legibus]]&#039;&#039; in fact references &amp;quot;gods&amp;quot; in the plural&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rock of Ages, cleft for me,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Let me hide myself in thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustus Toplady]], &#039;&#039;Living and Dying Prayer&#039;&#039;. &amp;quot;Rock of Ages&amp;quot; is translation. from the Hebrew of &amp;quot;everlasting strength.&amp;quot; Isaiah, XXVI. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* None but God can satisfy the longings of an immortal soul; that as the heart was made for Him, so He only can fill it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Chenevix Trench]], &#039;&#039;Notes on the Parables&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Prodigal Son&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, from a beautiful necessity, is Love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]], &#039;&#039;Of Immortality&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that there is no God, but that matter is God and God is matter; and that it is no matter whether there is any God or no.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;The Unbeliever&#039;s Creed&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Connoisseur No. IX&#039;&#039; (March 28, 1754)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Si genus humanum et mortalia temnitis arma&#039;&#039;,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;At sperate deos memores fandi atque nefandi&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** If ye despise the human race, and mortal arms, yet remember that there is a God who is mindful of right and wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Virgil]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Aeneid|Æneid]]&#039;&#039; (29-19 BC), I. 542&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Si Dieu n&#039;existait pas, il faudrait l&#039;inventer.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** If there were no God, it would be necessary to invent him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Epitre à l&#039;Auteur du Livre des Trois Imposteurs&#039;&#039;, CXI. See Œuvres Complètes de Voltaire, Volume I, p. 1076. Ed. Didot, 1827. Also in letter to Frederick, Prince Royal of Prussia&lt;br /&gt;
*** cf. [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je voudrais que vous écrasassiez l&#039;infâme.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I wish that you would crush this infamy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]] to D&#039;Alembert June 23, 1760. Attributed to Voltaire by Abbé Barruch—Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism. Generally quoted &amp;quot;Écrasez l&#039;infâme.&amp;quot; A. De Morgan contends that the popular idea that it refers to God is incorrect. It refers probably to the Roman Catholic Church, or the traditions in the church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God on His throne is eldest of poets:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Unto His measures moveth the Whole.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;England my Mother&#039;&#039;, Part II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God I know of, I shall ne&#039;er&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Know, though he dwells exceeding nigh.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Raise thou the stone and find me there,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Cleave thou the wood and there am I.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yea, in my flesh his spirit doth flow,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Too near, too far, for me to know.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;The Unknown God&#039;&#039;. Third and fourth lines are from &amp;quot;newly discovered sayings of Jesus.&amp;quot; Probably an ancient Oriental proverb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Somewhat which we name but cannot know.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ev&#039;n as we name a star and only see&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Its quenchless flashings forth, which ever show&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And ever hide him, and which are not he.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;Wordsworth&#039;s Grave&#039;&#039;, I, Stanza 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is and all is well.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;My Birthday&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know not where His islands lift&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Their fronded palms in air;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I only know I cannot drift&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Beyond His love and care.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;The Eternal Goodness&#039;&#039;, Stanza 20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Though man sits still, and takes his ease,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is at work on man;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No means, no moment unemploy&#039;d,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To bless him, if he can.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Resignation&#039;&#039;, Part I, Stanza 119&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anonymous ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Proverbs or widely known statements by unknown authors.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;GOD IS COMING, AND IS &#039;&#039;SHE&#039;&#039; PISSED!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Anonymous bumper sticker as quoted in &#039;&#039;My First Saturnalia&#039;&#039; (1981) by Michael Rumaker, p. 3&lt;br /&gt;
** GOD IS COMING, AND BOY IS SHE PISSED!&lt;br /&gt;
*** Variant bumper sticker as quoted in &#039;&#039;River Angel : A Novel&#039;&#039; (1999) A. Manette Ansay, p. 107&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Ageless Wisdom Teachings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fear of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kingdom of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Love of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Om]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pandeism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pantheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Personal God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Polytheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Commons category}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|God and Religious Toleration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:God| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=3120541</id>
		<title>God</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=God&amp;diff=3120541"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T16:17:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* B */ berdyaev&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Otheruses|God (disambiguation)}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fostre.tif|thumb| Who hath made man&#039;s mouth? or who maketh the dumb or deaf, or the seeing or the blind? have not I the LORD? ~ [[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Motherless - Luke Fildes.jpg|thumb|The [[Deity|gods]] of all [[pagan]] faiths have been allied with the [[rich]] [[rulers]]. The priests of most religions are the employees of the landowners. But the God of Israel has always claimed to be with the poor—whether in the legislation of [[Deuteronomy]], the [[words]] of the [[prophets]], or the [[experiences]] of the [[New Testament]]. Our God is on the side of the [[poor]]. ~ [[John Howard Yoder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:QUR&#039;AN 2981a.jpg|thumb|I [[know]] what you know not. ~ [[Quran]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Wealth Inequality - v2.png|thumb|Oppressed and oppressors cannot possibly mean the same thing when they speak of God. The God of the oppressed is a God of revolution who breaks the chains of slavery. The oppressors&#039; God is a God of slavery and must be destroyed along with the oppressors. ~ [[James Cone]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ludwig feuerbach.jpg|thumb|God is for man the [[w:commonplace book|commonplace book]] where he registers his highest feelings and thoughts, the genealogical album into which he enters the names of the things most dear and sacred to him. ~ [[Ludwig&amp;amp;nbsp;Feuerbach]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Schnorr von Carolsfeld Bibel in Bildern 1860 057.png|thumb|God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. ~ [[Psalms|Psalms 46:1 - 3]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simone Weil 1921.jpg|thumb|The only mark of God in us is that we feel that we are not God. ~ [[Simone&amp;amp;nbsp;Weil]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Emerson, poet and thinker (1904) (14577386099).jpg|thumb|When we consider what is our thought of God we find that it is our own soul stripped of all inferiority and carried out to perfection. ~ [[Ralph&amp;amp;nbsp;Waldo&amp;amp;nbsp;Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brockhaus and Efron Jewish Encyclopedia e9 615-0.jpg|thumb|Only the idea of God gives me the confidence that morality will become reality on earth. And because I cannot live without this confidence, I cannot live without God. ~ [[Hermann&amp;amp;nbsp;Cohen]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Laurent de La Hyre - Allegory of Arithmetic - Walters 371917.jpg|thumb|He best honors God who makes his intellect as like God as possible. ~ [[Quintus Sextius]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Calvin 17.jpg|thumb|We cannot aspire to Him in earnest until we have begun to be displeased with ourselves. ~ [[John Calvin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:God the Father with His Right Hand Raised in Blessing.jpg|thumb|If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him. ~ [[Voltaire]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gregor von Nyssa.JPG|thumb|right|The love of gain, which is a large, incalculably large, element in every soul, when once applied to the desire for God, will bless the one who has it. ~ [[Gregory of Nyssa]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Percy Bysshe Shelley by Alfred Clint crop.jpg|thumb|If we find great difficulty from its admirable arrangement in conceiving that the Universe has existed from all eternity, and to resolve this difficulty suppose a Creator, how much more clearly must we perceive the necessity of this very Creator’s creation. ~ [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Friederich Nietzsche.jpg|thumb|Even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians, still take our fire, too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year-old faith, the Christian faith which was also [[Plato|Plato&#039;s]] faith, that God is truth; that truth is divine. ~ [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nietzsche1882 smaller.jpeg|thumb|You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price. ~ [[Friedrich&amp;amp;nbsp;Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bataille crop.jpg|thumb|If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated. ~ [[Georges Bataille]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Williboni.jpg|thumb|How wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed further and further back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know. ~ [[Dietrich&amp;amp;nbsp;Bonhoeffer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - Petites Mendiantes (1880).jpg|thumb|The God who appears to me is the comforter of the poor and their avenger in world history. This avenger of the poor is the God I love. ~ [[Hermann Cohen]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In [[monotheism]], &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:God|God]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is conceived of as the Supreme Being and principal object of [[faith]].&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha|&#039;&#039;[[#Bible|Bible]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Quran|Quran]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Book of Mormon|Book of Mormon]]&#039;&#039; · &#039;&#039;[[#Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; · [[#Anonymous|Anonymous]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotations listed alphabetically by author or work.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I refuse to prove that I exist,&amp;quot; says God, &amp;quot;for [[proof]] denies faith, and without faith, I am nothing.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oh,&amp;quot; says man, &amp;quot;but the [[w:Babel fish (The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy)|Babel fish]] is a dead give-away, isn&#039;t it? It proves You exist, and so therefore You don&#039;t.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Oh, I hadn&#039;t thought of that,&amp;quot; says God, who promptly vanishes in a puff of [[logic]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Douglas Adams]], &#039;&#039;[[The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy]]&#039;&#039; (1979), [[The Hitchhiker&#039;s Guide to the Galaxy#Chapter 6|Chapter 6]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we say God is a [[spirit]], we know what we mean, as well as we do when we say that the pyramids of Egypt are matter. Let us be content, therefore, to believe him to be a spirit, that is, an essence that we know nothing of, in which originally and necessarily reside all energy, all power, all capacity, all activity, all wisdom, all goodness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Adams]], in a letter to [[Thomas Jefferson]] (17 January 1820)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nearer, my God, to Thee—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nearer to Thee—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;E&#039;en though it be a cross&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That raiseth me;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Still all my song shall be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Nearer, my God, to Thee,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nearer to Thee!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sarah Flower Adams]], &#039;&#039;Nearer, my God, to Thee!&#039;&#039; (c. 1841); an article in Notes and Queries states that the words were written by her sister, Mrs. Byrdes Flower Adams, and the music only by Sarah Flower Adams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God tells us [[Homosexuality|men fucking men]] is a terrible thing, but a father offering his two daughters, vestal [[Virginity|virgins]] no less, to a horde of horny buggers is [[heroic]]. Now that&#039;s straight. … God destroys the faggots with fire and brimstone. He turns a disobedient wife into salt. But he asks us to [[Idolatry|idolize]] [[Drunkenness|drunks]] [[Incest|who sleep with their daughters]] or offer them to a horny, unruly mob.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabih Alameddine]] on the [[Bible|biblical narrative]] of Lot and his family confronting the inhabitants of [[Sodom and Gomorrah]], as quoted by Wail S. Hassan in &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.com/books?id=vA5pAgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA207 Immigrant Narratives: Orientalism and Cultural Translation in Arab American and Arab British Literature]&#039;&#039; (2011), Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-19-979206-1}}, page 207.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nec audiendi qui solent dicere, vox populi, vox Dei, quum tumultuositas vulgi semper insaniae proxima sit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** And those people should not be listened to who keep saying the voice of the people is the voice of God, since the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: We should not listen to those who like to affirm that the voice of the people is the voice of God, for the tumult of the masses is truly close to madness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alcuin]] Works, Epistle 127 (to Charlemagne, AD 800)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Never place a period where God has placed a comma.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gracie Allen]], in her last letter to [[George Burns]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Two Minutes for God : Quick Fixes for the Spirit&#039;&#039; (2007) by Peter B. Panagore, p. 73; this was later used in a slogan for the [[w:United Church of Christ|United Church of Christ]]: &#039;&#039;&#039;Never place a period where God has placed a comma. God Is Still Speaking.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not only is there no God, but try getting a plumber on weekends.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;Getting Even&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit in my name in a Swiss bank.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Without Feathers|Without Feathers]]&#039;&#039; (1975)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The important thing, I think, is not to be bitter... if it turns out that there is a God, I don&#039;t think that he is evil. I think that the worst thing you could say is that he is, basically, an under-achiever. If God exists, I hope he has a good excuse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Love and Death|Love and Death]]&#039;&#039; (1975); also quoted in &#039;&#039;What Do Jews Believe? : The Customs and Culture of Modern Judaism&#039;&#039; (2007) by Edward Kessler, p. 66&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To you I&#039;m an atheist; to God, I&#039;m the Loyal Opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Stardust Memories|Stardust Memories]]&#039;&#039; (1980)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Love, Sex, Death &amp;amp; The Meaning of Life : The Films of Woody Allen&#039;&#039; (2001) by Foster Hirsch, p. 50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God — or [[Aum|Aum (om)]] —is the Highest Being of your inner self.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  [http://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Leaves-of-Moryas-Garden-I.php &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;],  6, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Love]] even the knot-grass. God created it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  237, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Shepherds have received the revelations, While emperors have searched for them. Dogmatic scholars have resisted them. Leaders have been fearful of them. The Voice of God overshadows all when there is [[spiritual]] readiness.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  367, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They who deny God have not seen Him. 	&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  [http://agniyoga.org/ay_en/Leaves-of-Moryas-Garden-II.php &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden II, Illumination&#039;&#039;]  180, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The canon, “By thy God,” is the higher, and this canon is the basis of the New World. Formerly one said: “And my spirit rejoiceth in God, my Savior.” [[Now]] you will say: “And my spirit rejoiceth in God, thy Savior.”   Solemnly do I say that therein is salvation. “Long live thy God!” So you will say to everyone; and, exchanging Gods, you will walk to the One.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There where one might otherwise sink one can tread softly, if without negation. There where one could suffocate one can pass, by pronouncing “Thy God.” There where matter is revered one can pass only by elevating the earthly matter into the Cosmos. Essentially, one should not have any attachment to Earth... Thus, find the God of each one and exalt Him. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Leaves of Morya’s Garden II, Illumination&#039;&#039;,  211, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What is meant by &amp;quot;mad in God&amp;quot;? Why were the prophets of antiquity called madmen? Precisely because of the fire of straight-knowledge, which isolated them from all else, a valuable quality that severed them from the ordinary, everyday ways of thinking.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039;Agni Yoga&#039;&#039;,    281, (1929) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Even in the most ancient times people understood the significance of the heart. They regarded the heart as the Dwelling of God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]], &#039;&#039;Heart&#039;&#039;  73, (1932)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Susan B. Anthony]], in an address to the National American Woman Suffrage Association (1896)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is the most noble of beings. Now it is impossible for a body to be the most noble of beings; for a body must be either animate or inanimate; and an animate body is manifestly nobler than any inanimate body. But an animate body is not animate precisely as body; otherwise all bodies would be animate. Therefore its animation depends upon some other thing, as our body depends for its animation on the soul. Hence that by which a body becomes animated must be nobler than the body. Therefore it is impossible that God should be a body.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Aquinas]], &#039;&#039;Summa Theologica&#039;&#039;, Part 1, Question 3 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ordina l&#039;uomo, e dio dispone.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man proposes, and God disposes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludovico Ariosto]], &#039;&#039;Orlando Furioso&#039;&#039; (1516), Chapter XLVI. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If I were not an [[atheist]], I would believe in a God who would choose to save people on the basis of the totality of their [[lives]] and not the pattern of their [[words]].&#039;&#039;&#039; I think he would prefer an [[honest]] and [[righteous]] atheist to a TV preacher whose every word is God, God, God, and whose every deed is foul, foul, foul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Asimov]], &#039;&#039;I. Asimov: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, in order to speak to [[Abraham]], must come from somewhere, must enter the earthly realm from some [[unknown]] heights or depths. Whence does he come, whence does he call to Abraham? We are not told. He does not come, like Zeus or [[w:Poseidon|Poseidon]], from the [[w:Aethiopia|Aethiopians]], where he has been enjoying a sacrificial feast. Nor are we told anything of his reasons for tempting Abraham so terribly. He has not, like Zeus, discussed them in set speeches with other gods gathered in council; nor have the deliberations in his own heart been presented to us; unexpected and mysterious, he enters the scene from some unknown height or depth and calls: Abraham! It will at once be said that this is to be explained by the particular concept of God which the Jews held and which was wholly different from that of the Greeks. True enough—but this constitutes no objection. For how is the Jewish concept of God to be explained? Even their earlier God of the desert was not fixed in form and content, and was alone; his lack of form, his lack of local habitation, his singleness, was in the end not only maintained but developed even further in competition with the comparatively far more manifest gods of the surrounding Near Eastern world. The concept of God held by the Jews is less a cause than a symptom of their manner of comprehending and representing things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Erich Auerbach]], &#039;&#039;Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature&#039;&#039;, Willard R. Trask, trans. (Princeton: 1953), chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If you comprehend, it is not God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]], &#039;&#039;Sermon&#039;&#039; 52, 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Deus scitur melius nesciendo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is best known in not knowing him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]], &#039;&#039;De Ordine&#039;&#039;, II, 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TenCommandmentsAustinStateCapitol.jpg|thumb|I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. ~ [[Susan&amp;amp;nbsp;B.&amp;amp;nbsp;Anthony]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For He is called omnipotent on account of His doing what He wills, not on account of His suffering what He wills not; for if that should befall Him, He would by no means be omnipotent. Wherefore, He cannot do some things for the very reason that He is omnipotent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustine of Hippo]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf102.iv.V.10.html St. Augustine&#039;s City of God and Christian Doctrine: Chapter 10.—Whether Our Wills are Ruled by Necessity]&#039;&#039;, ccel.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A God who cannot smile could not have created this humorous universe.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sri Aurobindo]], &#039;&#039;Thoughts and Aphorisms&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God, the supreme being, is neither circumscribed by [[space]], nor touched by [[time]]; he cannot be found in a particular direction, and his [[essence]] cannot [[change]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The secret conversation is thus entirely spiritual; it is a direct encounter between God and the [[soul]], abstracted from all material constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Avicenna]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;366 Readings From Islam&#039;&#039; (2000), edited by Robert Van der Weyer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== B ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Martin Buber portrait.jpg|thumb|[[All]] [[names]] of God remain hallowed because they have been used not only to speak &#039;&#039;of&#039;&#039; God but also to speak &#039;&#039;to&#039;&#039; him. ~  [[Martin Buber]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At certain great moments down the ages, God drew nearer to His people and humanity at the same time made great, though oft unconscious efforts to draw near to God. From one angle, it might be regarded as God transcendent recognizing God immanent, and God in man reaching out to God in the Whole and greater than the Whole. On the part of God, working through the Head of the spiritual Hierarchy and its Membership, this effort was intentional, conscious and deliberate; on the part of man, it has been in the past largely unconscious, forced upon humanity by the tragedy of circumstances, by desperate need and by the driving urge of the immanent Christ consciousness.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]], &#039;&#039;Problems Of Humanity&#039;&#039;, Chapter V The Problem of the Churches - Part 2, (1944)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Eastern faiths have ever emphasised God Immanent, deep within the human heart, &amp;quot;nearer than hands and feet&amp;quot;, the Self, the One, the Atma, smaller than the small, yet all-comprehensive. The Western faiths have presented God Transcendent, Outside His universe, an Onlooker. God transcendent, first of all, conditioned men&#039;s concept of [[Deity]], for the action of this transcendent God appeared in the process of nature; later, in the Jewish dispensation, God appeared as the tribal [[Jehovah]], as the soul (the rather unpleasant soul) of a nation. Next, God was seen as a perfected man, and the divine God-man walked the Earth in the Person of the Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ&#039;&#039; p. 144, (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Today we have a rapidly growing emphasis upon God immanent in every human being, and in every created form. Today, we should have the churches presenting a synthesis of these two ideas, which have been summed up for us in the statement of Shri [[Krishna]] in the Bhagavad Gita: &amp;quot;Having pervaded this whole universe with a fragment of Myself, I remain.&amp;quot; God, greater than the created whole, yet God present also in the part; God Transcendent guarantees the Plan of our world, and is the Purpose conditioning all lives from the minutest atom, up through all the kingdoms of nature, to man.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] in &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ&#039;&#039; p. 145, (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*True [[religion]] is again emerging in the hearts of men in every land; this recognition of a divine hope and background may possibly take people back into the church and into the world faiths, but it will most certainly take them back to God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ,&#039;&#039; Chapter Three (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Religion is the name, surely, which we give to the invocative appeal of humanity which leads to the evocative response of the Spirit of God. This Spirit works in every human heart and in all groups.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]]  &#039;&#039;The Reappearance of the Christ,&#039;&#039; Chapter Three (1947) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Slowly, there is dawning upon the awakening consciousness of humanity the great paralleling truth of God Immanent – divinely &amp;quot;pervading&amp;quot; all forms, conditioning from within all kingdoms in nature, expressing innate divinity through human beings. . . . There is a growing and developing belief that Christ is in us, as He was in the Master Jesus, and this belief will alter world affairs and mankind&#039;s entire attitude to life. (13 – 592).&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] in &#039;&#039;The Externalization of the Hierarchy&#039;&#039; p. 592, (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God Transcendent, greater, vaster and more inclusive than His created world, is universally recognised and has been generally emphasised; all faiths can say with Shri Krishna (speaking as God, the Creator) that &amp;quot;having pervaded the whole universe with a fragment of Myself, I remain.&amp;quot; This God Transcendent has dominated the religious thinking of millions of simple and spiritually-minded people down the centuries which have elapsed since humanity began to press forward towards divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alice Bailey]] &#039;&#039;The Externalisation Of The Hierarchy&#039;&#039; The Return of the Christ - Part 1, (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A jealous lover of human liberty, and deeming it the absolute condition of all that we admire and respect in humanity, I reverse the phrase of [[Voltaire]], and say that &#039;&#039;if God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish him.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;!--emphasis in original--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Bakunin]] in &amp;quot;On God and the State&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The glory of God is not contingent on man&#039;s good will, but all existence subserves his purposes.&#039;&#039;&#039; The system of the universe is as a celestial poem, whose beauty is from all eternity, and must not be marred by human interpolations. &#039;&#039;&#039;Things proceed as they were ordered, in their nice, and well-adjusted, and perfect harmony; so that as the hand of the skilful artist gathers music from the harp-strings, history calls it forth from the well-tuned chords of time.&#039;&#039;&#039; Not that this harmony can be heard during the tumult of action. Philosophy comes after events, and gives the reason of them, and describes the nature of their results. The great mind of collective man may, one day, so improve in self-consciousness as to interpret the present and foretell the future; but as yet, the end of what is now happening, though we ourselves partake in it, seems to fall out by chance. &#039;&#039;&#039;All is nevertheless one whole; individuals, families, peoples, the race, march in accord with the Divine will; and when any part of the destiny of humanity is fulfilled, we see the ways of Providence vindicated. The antagonisms of imperfect matter and the perfect idea, of liberty and necessary law, become reconciled. What seemed irrational confusion, appears as the web woven by light, liberty and love.&#039;&#039;&#039; But this is not perceived till a great act in the drama of life is finished. The prayer of the patriarch, when he desired to behold the Divinity face to face, was denied; but he was able to catch a glimpse of Jehovah, after He had passed by; and so it fares with our search for Him in the wrestlings of the world. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is when the hour of conflict is over, that history comes to a right understanding of the strife, and is ready to exclaim: &amp;quot;Lo! God is here, and we knew it not.&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bancroft]] &#039;&#039;Literary and Historical Miscellanies&#039;&#039; (1855), p. 491&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the mind is not dissipated upon extraneous things, nor diffused over the world about us through the senses, it withdraws within itself, and of its own accord ascends to the contemplation of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Basil of Caesarea]], Letter to [[w:Gregory of Nazianzus|Gregory]], &#039;&#039;Saint Basil: The Letters&#039;&#039;, R. Deferrari, trans. (1926), vol. 1, p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We thus become temples of God whenever earthly cares cease to interrupt the continuity of our memory of Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Basil of Caesarea]], Letter to [[w:Gregory of Nazianzus|Gregory]], &#039;&#039;Saint Basil: The Letters&#039;&#039;, R. Deferrari, trans. (1926), vol. 1, p. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georges Bataille]], &#039;&#039;Inner Experience&#039;&#039; (1954), L. Boldt, trans. (1988), p. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If by Godot I had meant God I would have said God, and not Godot.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Beckett]], on the title of one of his most famous plays, &#039;&#039;[[w:Waiting for Godot|Waiting for Godot]]&#039;&#039;, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Essential Samuel Beckett : An Illustrated Biography&#039;&#039;, by Enoch Brater (revised edition, 2003), p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many questions arise in this place! Constantly the question comes up: Where was God in those days? Why was he silent? How could he permit this endless slaughter, this triumph of evil? . . . We must continue to cry out humbly yet insistently to God: Rouse yourself! Do not forget mankind, your creature!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Benedict XVI]], who visited the former concentration camp at [[Auschwitz]], Poland, on (28 May 2006), as quoted in &#039;&#039;“Why, [[Lord]], Did You Remain Silent?”&#039;&#039;, in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Watchtower|The Watchtower]]&#039;&#039; magazine (15 May 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Бога отрицают или потому, что мир так плох, или потому, что мир так хорош.&#039;&#039; [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikolai Berdyaev]], &#039;&#039;[http://vehi.net/soloviev/znachenie.html Self-knowledge (Самопознание)]&#039;&#039;, 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The true Mystic, realising God, has no need of any Scriptures, for he has touched the source whence all Scriptures flow.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=eIrD4GQFCPIC&amp;amp;pg=PT437 &#039;&#039;The Theosophical Writings of Annie Besant&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mysticism]] is the realisation of God, of the Universal Self. It is attained either as a realisation of God outside the Mystic, or within himself. In the first case, it is usually reached from within a religion, by exceptionally intense love and devotion, accompanied by purity of life, for only &amp;quot;the pure in heart shall see God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in &#039;&#039;Annie Besant Quotes&#039;&#039;   ISBN-13: 978-1535078498  (2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is patent to every student of the closing forty years of the last century, that crowds of thoughtful and moral people have slipped away from the churches, because the teachings they received there outraged their intelligence and shocked their moral sense. It is idle to pretend that the widespread agnosticism of this period had its root either in lack of morality or in deliberate crookedness of mind. Everyone who carefully studies the phenomena presented will admit that men of strong intellect have been driven out of Christianity by the crudity of the religious ideas set before them, the contradictions in the authoritative teachings, the views as to God, man, and the universe that no trained intelligence could possibly admit. Nor can it be said that any kind of moral degradation lay at the root of the revolt against the dogmas of the Church. The rebels were not too bad for their religion; on the contrary, it was the religion that was too bad for them. The rebellion against popular Christianity was due to the awakening and the growth of conscience; it was the conscience that revolted, as well as the intelligence, against teachings dishonouring to God and man alike, that represented God as a tyrant, and man as essentially evil, gaining salvation by slavish submission.   &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another precept of Jesus which remains as &amp;quot;a hard saying&amp;quot; to his followers is: &amp;quot;Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect&amp;quot;. [S. Matt., v, 48. ] The ordinary Christian knows that he cannot possibly obey this command; full of ordinary human frailties and weaknesses, how can he become perfect as God is perfect? Seeing the impossibility of the achievement set before him, he quietly puts it aside, and thinks no more about it. But seen as the crowning effort of [[reincarnation|many lives]] of steady improvement, as the triumph of the God within us over the lower nature, it comes within calculable distance, and we recall the words of Porphyry, how the man who achieves &amp;quot;the paradigmatic virtues is the Father of the Gods&amp;quot;, and that in the Mysteries these virtues were acquired.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For so reverent is God to that Spirit which is Himself in man, that He will not even pour into the human soul a flood of strength and life unless that soul is willing to receive it. There must be an opening from below as well as an outpouring from above, the receptiveness of the lower nature as well as the willingness of the higher to give. That is the link between the Christ and the man; that is what the churches have called the outpouring of &amp;quot;divine grace&amp;quot;; that is what is meant by the &amp;quot;faith&amp;quot; necessary to make the grace effective. As [[Giordano Bruno]] once put it — the human soul has windows, and can shut those windows close. The [[sun]] outside is shining, the light is unchanging; let the windows be opened and the sunlight must stream in. The light of God is beating against the windows of every human soul, and when the windows are thrown open, the soul becomes illuminated. There is no change in God, but there is a change in man; and man&#039;s will may not be forced, else were the divine Life in him blocked in its due evolution.  Thus in every Christ that rises, all humanity is lifted a step higher, and by His wisdom the ignorance of the whole world is lessened. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]] in  &#039;&#039;[https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=26938 Esoteric Christianity (The Lesser Mysteries), Theosophical publishing,]&#039;&#039; (1914)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Zeus]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;. The chief of Grecian gods, adored by the Romans as [[w:Jupiter|Jupiter]] and by the modern Americans as God, Gold, Mob and Dog. Some explorers who have touched upon the shores of America, and one who professes to have penetrated a considerable distance to the interior, have thought that these four names stand for as many distinct deities, but in his monumental work on Surviving Faiths, Frumpp insists that the natives are monotheists, each having no other god than himself, whom he worships under many sacred names.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ambrose Bierce]], &#039;&#039;The Cynic&#039;s Word Book&#039;&#039; (1906), later retitled &#039;&#039;[[w:The Devil&#039;s Dictionary|The Devil&#039;s Dictionary]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although neither an alchemist, magician, nor astrologer, but simply a great [[philosopher]], [[Henry More]], of Cambridge University — a man universally esteemed, may be named as a shrewd logician, scientist, and metaphysician... His faith in immortality and able arguments in demonstration of the survival of man&#039;s spirit after death are all based on the [[Pythagoras#Quotes_about_Pythagoreanism|Pythagorean system]]... and other [[mystics]].  The infinite and uncreated spirit that we usually call God, a substance of the highest virtue and excellency, produced everything else by emanative causality. God thus is the primary substance... He...stoutly defended the theory of the individuality of every soul in which &amp;quot;personality, memory, and conscience will surely continue in the future state.&amp;quot; He divided the astral spirit of man after its exit from the body into two distinct entities: the &amp;quot;aerial&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;aethereal vehicle.&amp;quot; During the time that a disembodied man moves in its aerial clothing, he is subject to Fate -- i.e., evil and temptation, attached to its earthly interests, and therefore is not utterly pure; it is only when he casts off this garb of the first spheres and becomes ethereal that he becomes sure of his immortality. &amp;quot;For what shadow can that body cast that is a pure and transparent light, such as the ethereal vehicle is? And therefore that oracle is then fulfilled, when the soul has ascended into that condition we have already described, in which alone it is out of the reach of fate and mortality.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]], &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology,&#039;&#039; Vol. I, Before the Veil, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not the One unknown ever-present God in Nature, or Nature in abscondito, that is rejected, but the “God” of human dogma, and his humanized “Word.” Man, in his [[infinite]] conceit and inherent pride and vanity, shaped it himself with his sacrilegious hand out of the material he found in his own small brain-fabric, and forced it upon his fellows as a direct revelation from the one unrevealed Space.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]], &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1  (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Esoteric Philosophy...denies Deity no more than it does the sun. Esoteric Philosophy has never rejected God in Nature, nor Deity as the absolute and abstract Ens. It only refuses to accept any of the gods of the so-called monotheistic religions, gods created by man in his own image and likeness, a [[blasphemous]] and sorry caricature of the Ever-Unknowable.&lt;br /&gt;
**H.P. Blavatsky, &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1   (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We reject the idea of a personal, or an extra-cosmic and anthropomorphic God, who is but the gigantic shadow of man, and not of man at his best, either. The God of [[theology]], we say—and prove it—is a bundle of contradictions and a logical impossibility... Our DEITY is neither in a paradise, nor in a particular tree, building, or mountain; it is everywhere, in every atom of the visible as of the invisible Cosmos, in, over, and around every invisible atom and divisible molecule; for IT is the mysterious power of evolution and involution, the omnipresent, omnipotent, and even omniscient creative potentiality.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Petrovna Blavatsky]],&#039;&#039;The Key to Theosophy&#039;&#039; (1889) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If we have to believe in a divine principle at all, it must be in one which is as absolute harmony, logic, and justice, as it is absolute love, wisdom, and impartiality; and a God who would create every soul for the space of one brief span of life, regardless of the fact whether it has to animate the body of a wealthy, happy man, or that of a poor suffering wretch, hapless from birth to death though he has done nothing to deserve his cruel fate—would be rather a senseless fiend than a God.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],&#039;&#039;The Key to Theosophy&#039;&#039; (1889) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed further and further back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], &#039;&#039;Letters and Papers from Prison&#039;&#039; (1967), p. 311&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;To everyone God is the kind of God he believes in.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]], &#039;&#039;Nachfolge&#039;&#039; (1937), &#039;&#039;The Cost of Discipleship&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 185&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Only what is fated to die is capable of living. Only what dies lives.&#039;&#039;&#039; Why do you think [[Jesus|Christ]] was killed? They killed him to prove that he wasn’t a god. But in killing him, they immortalized the perishable and transformed man into a god.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giannina Braschi]] in &amp;quot;[[Empire of Dreams]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*The gods [[envy]] me because they cannot die.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giannina Braschi]] in &amp;quot;[[Empire of Dreams]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Goddes love&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;is unescapable as nature&#039;s environment,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;which if a man ignore or think to thrust it off&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;he is the ill-natured fool that runneth on to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Bridges]], &#039;&#039;The Testament of Beauty&#039;&#039; (1929), Book IV, line 1419&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That we devote ourselves to God is seen&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In living just as though no God there were.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Paracelsus&#039;&#039; (1835), Part I&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the perfect [[poet]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Who in his person acts his own creations.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Paracelsus&#039;&#039; (1835), Part II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;s in His [[Heaven]] — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;All&#039;s right with the world!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Pippa Passes&#039;&#039; (1841), Part I&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All service is the same with God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With God, whose puppets, best and worst,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are we: there is no last nor first.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;Pippa Passes&#039;&#039; (1841), Part IV&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All names of God remain hallowed because they have been used not only to speak &#039;&#039;of&#039;&#039; God but also to speak &#039;&#039;to&#039;&#039; him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;[[w:I and Thou|I and Thou]]&#039;&#039; (1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some would deny any legitimate use of the word God because it has been misused so much. Certainly it is the most burdened of all human words. Precisely for that reason it is the most imperishable and unavoidable. And how much weight has all erroneous talk about God&#039;s nature and works (although there never has been nor can be any such talk that is not erroneous) compared with the one truth that all men who have addressed God really meant him? For whoever pronounces the word God and really means Thou, addresses, no matter what his delusion, the true Thou of his life that cannot be restricted by any other and to whom he stands in a relationship that includes all others.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;[[w:I and Thou|I and Thou]]&#039;&#039; (1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we rise out of [the night] into the new life and there begin to receive the signs, what can we know of that which—of him who gives them to us? Only what we experience from time to time from the signs themselves. If we name the speaker of this speech God, then it is always the God of a moment, a moment God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Buber]], &#039;&#039;Between Man and Man&#039;&#039; (1965), p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* According to mythological thinking, God has his domicile in [[heaven]].  What is the meaning of this statement?  The meaning is quite clear.  In a crude manner it expresses the idea that God is beyond the world, that He is transcendent. The thinking which is not yet capable of forming the abstract idea of transcendence expresses its intention in the category of space.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rudolf Bultmann]], “Jesus Christ and Mythology,” Interpreting Faith for the Modern Era, p. 294 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “Don’t you know everything?”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God smiled. “No, I outgrew that trick long ago. You can’t imagine how boring it was.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Octavia Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Book of Martha&#039;&#039; (2003). Originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Sci Fiction|Sci Fiction]]&#039;&#039; (May 21, 2003). Reprinted in [[w:David G. Hartwell|David G. Hartwell]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;Year’s Best Fantasy 4&#039;&#039; (p. 52)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s merits are so transcendent that it is not surprising his faults should be in reasonable proportion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler]] &amp;quot;Rebelliousness&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Note-Books&#039;&#039; (1912)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no god but God! — to prayer — lo! &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is great!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lord Byron]], &#039;&#039;[[Childe Harold&#039;s Pilgrimage]]&#039;&#039;, Canto II (1812), Stanza 59, this is a translation of standard Islamic exclamations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “It’s not my job to be God’s lawyer,...I’m his salesman. I do believe he’s the greatest thing that ever existed, and I encourage people to get to know him without trying to explain what he’s doing or why.”&lt;br /&gt;
** Rabbi Chaim Bruk in [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/04/02/coronavirus-god-christain-jewish-muslim-leaders-saying-deadly-plague/5101639002/ Is the coronavirus an act of God? Faith leaders debate tough questions amid pandemic, USA Today] April 2, 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== C ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Our feeling of ignorance, vanity, want, weakness, in short, depravity and corruption, reminds us ... that in the Lord, and none but He, dwell the true light of wisdom, solid virtue, exuberant goodness. We are accordingly urged by our own evil things to consider the good things of God; and, indeed, we cannot aspire to Him in earnest until we have begun to be displeased with ourselves. For what man is not disposed to rest in himself? Who, in fact, does not thus rest, so long as he is unknown to himself; that is, so long as he is contented with his own endowments, and unconscious or unmindful of his misery? Every person, therefore, on coming to the knowledge of himself, is not only urged to seek God, but is also led as by the hand to find him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Calvin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Institutes of the Christian Religion|Institutes of the Christian Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Book 1, Chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Without knowledge of self there is no knowledge of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Calvin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Institutes of the Christian Religion|Institutes of the Christian Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Book 1 Chapter 1, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God, or is it Mr. G to me?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alessia Cara|Alessia Cara]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zXfF3uxwww &amp;quot;7 Days&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The Pains of Growing&#039;&#039; (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Except during my childhood, when I was probably influenced by [[Michelangelo]]&#039;s Sistine Chapel depiction of God with a flowing white beard, I have never tried to project the Creator in any kind of human likeness. The vociferous debates about whether God is male or female seem ridiculous to me. I think of God as an omnipotent and omniscient presence, a [[spirit]] that permeates the [[universe]], the essence of [[truth]], [[nature]], being, and [[life]]. To me, these are profound and indescribable concepts that seem to be trivialized when expressed in [[words]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jimmy Carter]], &#039;&#039;Living Faith&#039;&#039; (2001), p. 222&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Although every believing Christian understands that God guides our steps, fewer and fewer emphasize the point. A God working actively in the world makes us uneasy. We tend to like our God distant and a bit malleable, ready to bend to every new human idea. A God with a will of his own is too scary, and, besides, he might get in the way of our satisfaction of immediate desire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen L. Carter]], &#039;&#039;[[Stephen L. Carter#The Emperor of Ocean Park (2002)|The Emperor of Ocean Park]]&#039;&#039;, Ch. 25, &#039;&#039;A Modest Request&#039;&#039;, I (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Promises made to others in God&#039;s name engage the divine honor, fidelity, truthfulness, and authority. They must be respected in justice. To be unfaithful to them is to misuse God&#039;s name and in some way to make God out to be a liar. (1 John 1:10)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Catechism of the Catholic Church]] 2147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* True religion consists in proposing, as our great end, a growing likeness to the Supreme Being. Its noblest influence consists in making us more and more partakers of the Divinity. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Likeness to God” (1828)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious instruction should aim chiefly to turn men’s aspirations and efforts to that perfection of the soul, which constitutes it a bright image of God. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Ellery Channing]], “Likeness to God” (1828)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I tell you this, that you will have found out the [[truth]] of the last [[tree]] and the top-most [[cloud]] before the truth about [[Self|me]].&#039;&#039;&#039; You will [[understand]] the [[sea]], and I shall be still a [[Mystery|riddle]]; you shall [[Knowledge|know]] what the [[stars]] are, and not know [[The All|what I am]]. Since the [[beginning]] of the [[world]] all [[men]] have hunted me like a [[wolf]] — [[Monarchy|kings]] and [[Philosophy|sages]], and [[poets]] and [[Law|lawgivers]], all the [[Church|churches]], and all the [[Philosophy|philosophies]]. But &#039;&#039;&#039;I have never been caught yet, and the [[Sky|skies]] will fall in the [[time]] I turn to bay.&#039;&#039;&#039; I have given them a [[good]] run for their [[money]], and I will now.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;[[The Man Who Was Thursday]]&#039;&#039; (1908), [[s:The Man Who Was Thursday/Chapter XIII|Ch. XIII : The Pursuit of the President]], &amp;quot;Sunday&amp;quot; representing God speaking to the ostensible [[Anarchism|anarchists]] who have just realized they were were all policemen and spies, but who still haven&#039;t realized their role or Sunday&#039;s in the comic nightmare Chesterton devised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If [people] wish to love God, they [must] be prepared to do so no matter what His intentions. God is not just, God is not kind, God is not merciful, and understanding that is essential to true devotion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ted Chiang|Ted Chiang]] &amp;quot;{{w|Hell Is the Absence of God}}&amp;quot;, Stories of Your Life and Others (e-book ed.). Picador. p. 164. ISBN 978-1-4472-8198-6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God can only set in motion:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He cannot control the things he has made.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[T&#039;ao Ch&#039;ien]], &#039;&#039;Substance, Shadow, and Spirit&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;Spirit expounds&amp;quot; (transl. by Arthur Waley)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* First of all you – you fucking fake Christians – don’t fucking question my Christianity. I grew up in the church. My grandfather was a minister, who is with God now and talks to me in my dreams from God’s corner office. I am a former Sunday school teacher. I taught the [[Bible]] to children and showed them how to love God and invite him into their hearts. I believe in God – but I don’t fear him. God is my best friend. God is my ally. God is my boyfriend. God is my best fag. I am God’s fag hag cuz didn’t you know, God is a big fag. Serious bottom too. Butch in the streets, femme in the sheets. That is my God. God is my biggest fan. God gets me, dude.&lt;br /&gt;
:God wants us all to just get along. He doesn’t give a shit about the profanity. The bitch fucking invented profanity. He thinks it is hilarious. He just wants you to talk to him, and he doesn’t care what you have to say. He just wants to keep the conversation going. Like Jay-Z, he just wants to love you. He just wants you to be able to make your own decisions. God is all about you and what you need. God is happy that you are gay. God made you fucking gay cuz he thinks it is awesome. God understands if you need to have an abortion. That is why he created abortion, on the 8th day. God accepts. God forgives. God loves all of us, even though some of us might have a problem with each other.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Margaret Cho]], [http://margaretcho.com/2008/09/17/im-a-christian-you-fuckers/ I&#039;m a Christian you Fuckers]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;[[w:De legibus|De legibus]]&#039;&#039;, book 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God: a disease we imagine we are cured of because no one dies of it nowadays.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emile Cioran]], &#039;&#039;The Trouble with Being Born&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In most cases we attach ourselves to God in order to take revenge on life, to punish it, to signify we can do without it, that we have found something better.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[E. M. Cioran]], &#039;&#039;History and Utopia&#039;&#039; (1960)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to create him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], [http://www.clarkefoundation.org/sample-page/sir-arthurs-quotations/ clarkefoundation.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The rash assertion that ‘God made man in His own image’ is ticking like a time bomb at the foundations of many faiths, and as the hierarchy of the universe is disclosed to us, we may have to recognize this chilling truth: if there are any gods whose chief concern is man, they cannot be very important gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], [http://www.clarkefoundation.org/sample-page/sir-arthurs-quotations/ clarkefoundation.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God but I&#039;m very interested in her.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur C. Clarke]], as quoted in Multiple Intelligences in Practice : Enhancing Self-esteem and Learning in the Classroom (2006) by Mike Fleetham, Section 2 : Using MI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Haven’t you ever watched ants struggling with a load too big for them? How much did you care? Even if, like God, you marked the fall of every sparrow, you might simply be conducting a survey or expressing colossal boredom, like the people who delight in measuring things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Mildred Clingerman|Mildred Clingerman]] &amp;quot;Birds Can&#039;t Count&amp;quot; (Originally published at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magazine_of_Fantasy_%26_Science_Fiction The Magazine of Fantasy &amp;amp; Science Fiction] (February, 1955) and reprinted in her collection &#039;&#039;A Cupful of Space&#039;&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt have one God only; who&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Would be at the expense of two?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur Hugh Clough]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.potw.org/archive/potw238.html The Latest Decalogue]&#039;&#039; (1862).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God who appears to me is the comforter of the poor and their avenger in world history. This avenger of the poor is the God I love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hermann Cohen]], &#039;&#039;The Concept of Religion in the System of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1915), p. 81&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only the idea of God gives me the confidence that morality will become reality on earth. And because I cannot live without this confidence, I cannot live without God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hermann Cohen]], &#039;&#039;Reason and Hope: Selections from the Jewish Writings of Hermann Cohen&#039;&#039; (1971), p. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reason alone cannot prove the existence of God. [[Faith]] is reason plus revelation, and the revelation part requires one to think with the spirit as well as with the mind. You have to hear the music, not just read the notes on the page.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Collins]], [http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/ cnn.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is [[Death|dead]] not because He doesn&#039;t exist, but because we live, play, procreate, govern, and die as though He doesn&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Colson]], &#039;&#039;Kingdoms in Conflict&#039;&#039; (1990), p. [http://books.google.com/books?id=tIV5YCh49qsC&amp;amp;dq=%22God+is+dead+not+because+He+doesn&#039;t+exist%22 275]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Oppressed and oppressors cannot possibly mean the same thing when they speak of God. The God of the oppressed is a God of revolution who breaks the chains of slavery. The oppressors&#039; God is a God of slavery and must be destroyed along with the oppressors.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Cone]], &#039;&#039;A Black Theology of Liberation&#039;&#039; (1970), p. 61&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God never meant that man should scale the [[Heavens]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;By strides of human [[wisdom]]. In his works,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though wondrous, he commands us in his word&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To seek him rather where his [[mercy]] shines.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book III, line 217&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But who with filial confidence inspired,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Can lift to Heaven an unpresumptuous eye,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And smiling say, My Father made them all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book V. The Winter Morning Walk, line 745&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Acquaint thyself with God, if thou would&#039;st taste&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;His works.&#039;&#039;&#039; Admitted once to his embrace,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thou shalt perceive that thou wast blind before:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Thine [[eye]] shall be instructed; and thine [[heart]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Made pure shall relish with divine delight&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Till then unfelt, what [[hands]] divine have wrought.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;The Task&#039;&#039; (1785), Book V, line 782&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are really gods in incarnation. We need to recognize our threefold constitution: We are a spark of God; every religion has postulated this and has kept the idea of our divinity before humanity for thousands of years. But it can be seen more scientifically and still correctly. Speaking as an esotericist, I would say that the divine spark is so refined in vibration that it cannot manifest directly on the physical plane. It reflects itself, therefore, as the individualized human soul. The soul, in its turn, reflects itself in the human personality, with its physical, emotional, and mental bodies. Through the physical plane personality, the soul enacts its reincarnational process, until finally the individual on the physical plane, the man or woman, reflects perfectly the quality of the soul, which is the divine quality of the spark of God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://share-international.org/books/?d=AWT &#039;&#039;The Ageless Wisdom, An introduction to humanity&#039;s spiritual legacy,&#039;Share International&#039;&#039;] (1996) p.3-4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*God, in the esoteric meaning, is the sum total of all the Laws and all the  energies governed by these Laws in the manifested and unmanifested universe. So God is impersonal. Nevertheless, that transcendent God is manifest in every aspect of creation, including ourselves. We are not separate from that creation — from God. Every human being has the potential of the knowledge, the awareness, of all in creation that we can think of as meaning God. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The [[Masters of Wisdom|Masters [of Wisdom]]] are God-realized, which is a very specific state, in that They have brought Their consciousness, in terms of the divine spark, the Absolute, the Self, into complete at-one-ment with Themselves as men on the physical plane — the personality and the divine aspect are totally integrated... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;God is everything that exists, and all space between that which exists...and around everything. All of that is God... Modern science has been able to break down cellular structures and show that at the centre of every atom is a nucleus with electrons around it, vibrating at a specific rate, and that every atom in the universe is made in the same way. There is nothing but energy in all of the manifested universe. The difference between that totally scientific view and that which an esotericist would hold is that the esotericist goes further and says, indeed, all is energy, but energy follows thought, is acted upon by thought. Thought is the agency by which creation takes place.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in &#039;[http://share-international.org/books/?d=AWT &#039;&#039;The Ageless Wisdom, An introduction to humanity&#039;s spiritual legacy,  Share International&#039;&#039;] (1996) p.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== D ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Freeman Dyson.jpg|thumb|We stand, in a manner of [[speaking]], midway between the [[Chance|unpredictability]] of [[atoms]] and the [[Mystery|unpredictability]] of God. ~ [[Freeman Dyson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God because I don&#039;t believe in [[w:Mother Goose|Mother Goose]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Speech in Toronto (1930); as quoted in &amp;quot;Breaking the Last Taboo&amp;quot; (1996) by James A. Haught.&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: I believe that religion is the belief in future life and in God. I don’t believe in either. I don’t believe in God as I don’t believe in Mother Goose.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As quoted in &#039;&#039;Jesus: Myth Or Reality?&#039;&#039; (2006) by Ian Curtis&lt;br /&gt;
** Religion is the belief in future life and in God. I don&#039;t believe in either.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Clarence Darrow]] as quoted in  &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039; (19 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I am an Agnostic because I am not afraid to think. I am not afraid of any god in the universe who would send me or any other man or woman to hell. If there were such a being, he would not be a god; he would be a devil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]] as quoted in a eulogy for Darrow by Emanuel Haldeman-Julius (1938)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I am an agnostic as to the question of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; I think that it is impossible for the human mind to believe in an object or thing unless it can form a mental picture of such object or thing. Since man ceased to worship openly an anthropomorphic God and talked vaguely and not intelligently about some force in the universe, higher than man, that is responsible for the existence of man and the universe, he cannot be said to believe in God. One cannot believe in a force excepting as a force that pervades matter and is not an individual entity. To believe in a thing, an image of the thing must be stamped on the mind. If one is asked if he believes in such an animal as a camel, there immediately arises in his mind an image of the camel. This image has come from experience or knowledge of the animal gathered in some way or other. No such image comes, or can come, with the idea of a God who is described as a force.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* To say that God made the universe gives us no explanation of the beginnings of things. If we are told that God made the universe, the question immediately arises: Who made God? Did he always exist, or was there some power back of that? Did he create matter out of nothing, or is his existence coextensive with matter? The problem is still there. What is the origin of it all? If, on the other hand, one says that the universe was not made by God, that it always existed, he has the same difficulty to confront. &#039;&#039;&#039;To say that the universe was here last year, or millions of years ago, does not explain its origin. This is still a mystery. As to the question of the origin of things, man can only wonder and doubt and guess.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Many Christians base the belief of a soul and God upon the Bible. Strictly speaking, there is no such book. To make the Bible, sixty-six books are bound into one volume. These books are written by many people at different times, and no one knows the time or the identity of any author. Some of the books were written by several authors at various times. These books contain all sorts of contradictory concepts of life and morals and the origin of things. Between the first and the last nearly a thousand years intervened, a longer time than has passed since the discovery of America by Columbus.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clarence Darrow]], &#039;&#039;Why I Am An Agnostic&#039;&#039; (1929) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/darrow2.htm Full text online]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* That there is much suffering in the world no one disputes. Some have attempted to explain this in reference to man by imagining that it serves for his moral improvement. But the number of men in the world is as nothing compared with that of all other sentient beings, and these often suffer greatly without any moral improvement. A being so powerful and so full of knowledge as a God who could create the universe, is to our finite minds omnipotent and omniscient, and it revolts our understanding to suppose that his benevolence is not unbounded, for what advantage can there be in the sufferings of millions of the lower animals throughout almost endless time? This very old argument from the existence of suffering against the existence of an intelligent first cause seems to me a strong one; whereas, as just remarked, the presence of much suffering agrees well with the view that all organic beings have been developed through variation and natural selection.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Darwin]], [http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1497&amp;amp;viewtype=text&amp;amp;pageseq=1 &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the Original Omissions Restored.&#039;&#039; (1958)] Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter [[w:Nora Barlow|Nora Barlow]]. Page 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At the present day the most usual argument for the existence of an intelligent God is drawn from the deep inward conviction and feelings which are experienced by most persons. But it cannot be doubted that Hindoos, Mahomadans and others might argue in the same manner and with equal force in favour of the existence of one God, or of many Gods, or as with the Buddists of no God. There are also many barbarian tribes who cannot be said with any truth to believe in what we call God: they believe indeed in spirits or ghosts, and it can be explained, as Tyler and Herbert Spencer have shown, how such a belief would be likely to arise….This argument would be a valid one if all men of all races had the same inward conviction of the existence of one God; but we know that this is very far from being the case. Therefore I cannot see that such inward convictions and feelings are of any weight as evidence of what really exists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Darwin]], [http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1497&amp;amp;viewtype=text&amp;amp;pageseq=1 &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the Original Omissions Restored.&#039;&#039; (1958)] Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter [[w:Nora Barlow|Nora Barlow]]. Pages 90-91. This is Darwin&#039;s reply to the [[w:Argumentum ad populum|Argument from Common Consent]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you see yourself as God and then you come back from this state and somebody says, “Hey, Sam, empty the garbage!” it catches you back into the model of “I&#039;m Sam who empties the garbage.”  You can&#039;t maintain these new kinds of structures.  It takes a while to realize that God can empty garbage.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ram Dass]], &#039;&#039;Be Here Now&#039;&#039; (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A man who recognizes no God is probably placing an inordinate value on himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robertson Davies]] in &#039;&#039;Conversations&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], &#039;&#039;The God Delusion&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 31&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The trouble is that God in this sophisticated, physicist&#039;s sense bears no resemblance to the God of the Bible or any other religion. If a physicist says God is another name for Planck&#039;s constant, or God is a superstring, we should take it as a picturesque metaphorical way of saying that the nature of superstrings or the value of Planck&#039;s constant is a profound mystery. It has obviously not the smallest connection with a being capable of forgiving sins, a being who might listen to prayers, who cares about whether or not the Sabbath begins at 5pm or 6pm, whether you wear a veil or have a bit of arm showing; and no connection whatever with a being capable of imposing a death penalty on His son to expiate the sins of the world before and after he was born.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], from a lecture, extracted from &#039;&#039;The Nullifidian&#039;&#039; (December 1994)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eaglefairy hst big.jpg|thumb|It is solemn to remember that Vastness — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Is but the Shadow of the Brain which casts it — ~ [[Emily Dickinson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*If man is created by an external source, then he must belong to that source and not to himself. According to Buddhism, man is responsible for everything he does. Thus Buddhists have no reason to believe that man came into existence in the human form through any external sources. They believe that man is here today because of his own action. He is neither punished nor rewarded by anyone but himself according to his own good and bad action. In the process of evolution, the human being came into existence. However, there are no Buddha-words to support the belief that the world was created by anybody. The scientific discovery of gradual development of the world-system conforms with the Buddha&#039;s Teachings. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[K. Sri Dhammananda Maha Thera]], &#039;&#039;What Buddhists Believe&#039;&#039; (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They say that God is everywhere, and yet we always think of Him as somewhat of a recluse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emily Dickinson]], Letter to Mrs. J. G. Holland [L551] (Spring 1878)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is solemn to remember that Vastness — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Is but the [[Shadow]] of the [[Brain]] which casts it — &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; All things swept sole away &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; This — is immensity —&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emily Dickinson]], in a letter to Thomas Wentworth Higginson [L551] (1881)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is a supreme being, he&#039;s crazy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marlene Dietrich]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Rave&#039;&#039; magazine (November 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God used [[beautiful]] [[mathematics]] in creating the [[world]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Dirac]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Cosmic Code : Quantum Physics As The Language Of Nature&#039;&#039; (1982) by Heinz R. Pagels, p. 295; also in &#039;&#039;Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac : Reminiscences about a Great Physicist&#039;&#039; (1990) edited by Behram N. Kursunoglu and Eugene Paul Wigner, p. xv&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One could perhaps describe the situation by saying that God is a mathematician of a very high order, and He used very advanced mathematics in constructing the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Dirac]], [http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102000602?q=dirac&amp;amp;p=par WOL]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Clearly, the [[w:Bible|Scripture]] tells us that we lack the capacity to grasp God&#039;s infinite mind or the way He intervenes in our lives. How arrogant of us to think otherwise! Trying to analyze His omnipotence is like an amoeba attempting to comprehend the behavior of man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Dobson]] in: Bill Bradfield &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=vKG3cPCQmvMC&amp;amp;pg=PA33 On Reading the Bible: Thoughts and Reflections of Over 500 Men and Women, from St. Augustine to Oprah Winfrey ]&#039;&#039;, Courier Dover Publications, Jul 12, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be simple we must desire to remain in the image of God. We must not be so complex that we make God into our image!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Catherine Doherty]], &#039;&#039;Unfinished Pilgrimage&#039;&#039; (Combermere, Ontario: Madonna House Publications, 1995), p. 12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charles Hartshorne]]... informed me that my theological standpoint is [[w:Socinianism|Socinian]]. ...The main tenet of the Socinian heresy is that God is neither omniscient nor omnipotent. He learns and grows as the universe unfolds. ...I ...find it congenial, and consistent with scientific common sense. I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. ...We are the chief inlets of God on this planet at the present stage... We may later grow with him as he grows, or we may be left behind. ...If we are left behind, it is an end. If we keep on growing, it is a beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], &#039;&#039;Infinite in All Directions&#039;&#039; (1988)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not make any clear distinction between [[mind]] and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension.&#039;&#039;&#039; God may be either a world-soul or a collection of world-souls. So I am thinking that atoms and humans and God may have minds that differ in degree but not in kind. &#039;&#039;&#039;We stand, in a manner of [[speaking]], midway between the [[Chance|unpredictability]] of [[atoms]] and the [[Mystery|unpredictability]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; Atoms are small pieces of our mental apparatus, and we are small pieces of God&#039;s mental apparatus. Our minds may receive inputs equally from atoms and from God. This view of our place in the cosmos may not be true, but it is compatible with the active nature of atoms as revealed in the experiments of modern physics. &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t say that this personal theology is supported or proved by scientific evidence. I only say that it is consistent with scientific evidence.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], in &amp;quot;[http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge68.html Progress In Religion : A Talk By Freeman Dyson]&amp;quot;, his acceptance speech for the [[w:Templeton Prize|Templeton Prize]], Washington National Cathedral (9 May 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not claim any ability to read God&#039;s mind. I am sure of only one thing. &#039;&#039;&#039;When we look at the [[glory]] of [[stars]] and [[galaxies]] in the [[sky]] and the glory of forests and flowers in the living world around us, it is evident that God loves [[diversity]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Perhaps the universe is constructed according to a principle of maximum diversity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Freeman Dyson]], in &amp;quot;Progress In Religion : A Talk By Freeman Dyson&amp;quot; (9 May 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Albert_Einstein_photo_1921.jpg|thumb|Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not. ~ [[Albert Einstein]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Einstein gyro gravity probe b.jpg|thumb|The God [[Spinoza]] revered is my God, too: I meet Him everyday in the [[harmonious]] [[laws]] which govern the [[universe]]. ~ [[Albert Einstein]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg|thumb|God created men to enjoy, not destroy, the fruits of the earth and of their own toil. ~ [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RWEmerson.jpg|thumb|The purpose of life seems to be to acquaint a man with himself. He is not to live the future as described to him but to live the real future to the real present. The highest revelation is that God is in every man. ~ [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are all meant to be mothers of God, for God is always needing to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Meister Eckhart]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Christianity&#039;&#039; (1995) by Joe Jenkins, p. 27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Where the human being in obedience goes out from his “I” and dismisses what is his own, God must necessarily enter in precisely there; for when someone does not will anything for himself, God must will for that person in the same way as He wills for himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Meister Eckhart]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, in J. Hackett, &#039;&#039;A Companion to Meister Eckhart&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*When man humbles himself, God cannot restrain His mercy; He must come down and pour His grace into the humble man, and He gives Himself most of all, and all at once, to the least of all. It is essential to God to give, for His essence is His goodness and His goodness is His love. Love is the root of all joy and sorrow. Slavish fear of God is to be put away. The right fear is the fear of losing God. If the earth flee downward from heaven, it finds heaven beneath it; if it flee upward, it comes again to heaven. The earth cannot flee from heaven: whether it flee up or down, the heaven rains its influence upon it, and stamps its impress upon it, and makes it fruitful, whether it be willing or not. Thus doth God with men: whoever thinketh to escape Him, flies into His bosom, for every corner is open to Him. God brings forth His Son in thee, whether thou likest it or not, whether thou sleepest or wakest; God worketh His own will. That man is unaware of it, is man&#039;s fault, for his taste is so spoilt by feeding on earthly things that he cannot relish God&#039;s love. If we had love to God, we should relish God, and all His works; we should receive all things from God, and work the same works as He worketh.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Meister Eckhart]],  [[Meister_Eckhart#Meister_Eckhart’s_Sermons_(1909)|Sermon III, &amp;quot;The Angel&#039;s Greeting&amp;quot;]] (1909)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If God is as real as the shadow of the Great War on Armistice Day, need we seek further reason for making a place for God&#039;&#039;&#039; in our thoughts and lives? &#039;&#039;&#039;We shall not be concerned if the scientific explorer&#039;&#039;&#039; reports that he &#039;&#039;&#039;is perfectly satisfied&#039;&#039;&#039; that he has got to the bottom of things &#039;&#039;&#039;without having come across either.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Arthur Eddington]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Unseen World&#039;&#039; (1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we pray to God as a corporeal person, this will prevent us from relinquishing the human doubts and fears which attend such a belief, and so we cannot grasp the wonders wrought by infinite, incorporeal Love, to whom all things are possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Mary Baker Eddy|Mary Baker Eddy]], in &#039;&#039;Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nature is what we know. We do not know the gods of religions. And nature is not kind, or merciful, or loving. If God made me — the fabled God of the three qualities of which I spoke: mercy, kindness, love — He also made the fish I catch and eat. And where do His mercy, kindness, and love for that fish come in? No; nature made us — nature did it all — not the gods of the religions&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], &amp;quot;&amp;quot;No Immortality of the Soul&amp;quot; says Thomas A. Edison. In Fact, He Doesn&#039;t Believe There Is a Soul — Human Beings Only an Aggregate of Cells and the Brain Only a Wonderful Machine, Says Wizard of Electricity&amp;quot;. New York Times. October 2, 1910&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I do not believe in the God of the theologians; but that there is a Supreme Intelligence I do not doubt.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Edison]], The Freethinker (1970), G.W. Foote &amp;amp; Company, Volume 90, p. 147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for their numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible; in my opinion, only His nonexistence could excuse Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to Edgar Meyer (2 January 1915)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Remark made during Einstein&#039;s first visit to Princeton University (April 1921) as quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein&#039;&#039; (1973) by R. W. Clark, Ch. 14. &amp;quot;God is slick, but he ain&#039;t mean&amp;quot; is a variant translation of this (1946) Unsourced variant: &amp;quot;God is subtle but he is not malicious.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** When asked what he meant by this he replied. &amp;quot;Nature hides her secret because of her essential loftiness, but not by means of ruse.&amp;quot; (&#039;&#039;Die Natur verbirgt ihr Geheimnis durch die Erhabenheit ihres Wesens, aber nicht durch List.&#039;&#039;) As quoted in &#039;&#039;Subtle is the Lord — The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein&#039;&#039; (1982) by Abraham Pais &amp;lt;!-- Clarendon Press, Oxford, and Oxford University Press, New York --&amp;gt; [http://www.einsteinandreligion.com/faith.html einsteinandreligion.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*** Originally said to Princeton University mathematics professor Oscar Veblen, May 1921, while Einstein was in Princeton for a series of lectures, upon hearing that an experimental result by Dayton C. Miller of Cleveland, if true, would contradict his theory of gravitation. But the claimed discrepancy was quite small and required special circumstances (hence Einsteins&#039;s remark). The result turned out to be false. Some say by this remark Einstein meant that Nature hides her secrets by being subtle, while others say he meant that nature is mischievous but not bent on trickery. [The Yale Book of Quotations, ed. Fred R. Shapiro, 2006]&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: God may be sophisticated, but he&#039;s not malicious.&lt;br /&gt;
*** As quoted in &#039;&#039;Cherished Illusions&#039;&#039; (2005) by Sarah Stern, p. 109&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;I have second thoughts. Maybe God &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039; malicious&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Said to [[wikipedia: Valentine Bargmann|Valentine Bargmann]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein in America&#039;&#039; (1985) by Jamie Sayen, p. 51, indicating that God leads people to believe they understand things that they actually are far from understanding; also in &#039;&#039;The Yale Book of Quotations&#039;&#039; (2006), ed. Fred R. Shapiro&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The God [[Spinoza]] revered is my God, too: I meet Him everyday in the harmonious laws which govern the universe.&#039;&#039;&#039; My religion is cosmic, and my God is too universal to concern himself with the intentions of every human being. &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not accept a religion of fear; My God will not hold me responsible for the actions that [[necessity]] imposes.&#039;&#039;&#039; My God speaks to me through laws.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in an interview (1948), quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein and the Poet : In Search of the Cosmic Man&#039;&#039; (1983) by William Hermanns, p. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* About God, I cannot accept any concept based on the authority of the Church. As long as I can remember, I have resented mass indoctrination. I do not believe in the fear of life, in the fear of death, in blind faith. I cannot prove to you that there is no [[personal God]], but if I were to speak of him, I would be a liar. &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil. My God created laws that take care of that. His universe is not ruled by wishful thinking, but by immutable laws.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in an interview (1948), quoted in &#039;&#039;Einstein and the Poet : In Search of the Cosmic Man&#039;&#039; (1983) by William Hermanns, p. 132&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;My position concerning God is that of an [[agnostic]].&#039;&#039;&#039; I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the basis of reward and punishment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], letter to M. Berkowitz (25 October 1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What I see in nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of ‘[[humility]].’ &#039;&#039;&#039;This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism. . . . My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality. . . . I want to know how God created this world. I want to know his thoughts, the rest are details.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], as quoted by [[Timothy Ferris]], in his article “The Other Einstein”, &#039;&#039;[[w:Awake!|Awake!]]&#039;&#039; magazine, (22 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These proposals spring, without ulterior purpose or political passion, from our calm conviction that the hunger for peace is in the hearts of all peoples--those of Russia and of China no less than of our own country. They conform to our firm faith that &#039;&#039;&#039;God created men to enjoy, not destroy, the fruits of the earth and of their own toil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] in his [[s:The Chance for Peace|The Chance for Peace]] speech shortly after taking office and following the death of [[Joseph Stalin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Posing the question: does the god of love use underarm deodorant, vaginal spray and fluoride toothpaste?&lt;br /&gt;
**Deathbird Stories, by [[Harlan Ellison]] [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=149760477X]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is not by accident that the enormous popularity of the “death of God” was born in our world of images: the impossibility of representing God visually leads inevitably in our day to the impossibility of his existence. God is dead—but beyond all the explicit reasons generally offered, he is dead because he is not visible. We can have confidence only in a visible God who is clearly manifested, exclusively in the visual dimension.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;The Humiliation of the Word&#039;&#039; (1981), J. Hanks, trans. (1985), p. 198&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Throughout the Old Testament we see God choosing what is weak and humble to represent him (the stammering Moses, the infant Samuel, Saul from an insignificant family, David confronting Goliath, etc.). Paul tells us that God chooses the weak things of the world to confound the mighty. Here, however, we have a striking contradiction. In [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]] God is supposedly choosing an Augustus, a triumphant military leader. This vision and this miracle are totally impossible. But they are not impossible in the context of Christianity that is already off the rails, that thinks of God as the one who directs history and is the motive power in politics.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Ellul]], &#039;&#039;The Subversion of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1982), G. Bromiley, trans. (1986), p. 123&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When we consider what is our thought of God we find that it is our own soul stripped of all inferiority and carried out to perfection.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], Sermon 86 (1830), &#039;&#039;The Complete Sermons of Ralph Waldo Emerson&#039;&#039;, Volume 2 (1990), p. 243&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By going much alone a man will get more of a noble courage in thought and word than from all the wisdom that is in books. He will come to hear God speak as audibly through his own lips as ever He did by the mouth of Moses or Isaiah or Milton.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], Journal Entry, October 21, 1833&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The purpose of life seems to be to acquaint a man with himself. He is not to live the future as described to him but to live the real future to the real present. The highest revelation is that God is in every man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Journals&#039;&#039; (1822–1863), 8 September 1833. As quoted in: Maurice York and Rick Spaulding (2008): &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.de/books?id=_pRMlDQavQwC&amp;amp;pg=PA240&amp;amp;dq=A+man+contains+all+that+is+needful+to+his+government+within+himself&amp;amp;hl=de&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiahO73qqfeAhUwpIsKHRqzDswQ6AEIQDAD#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=A%20man%20contains%20all%20that%20is%20needful%20to%20his%20government%20within%20himself&amp;amp;f=false Ralph Waldo Emerson – The Infinitude of the Private Man: A Biography.]&#039;&#039; Chicago and Raleigh: Wrighwood Press, pages 240 – 241. Derived from: Edward Waldo Emerson and Waldo Emerson Forbes (1909): &#039;&#039;Journals of Ralph Waldo Emerson, with annotations&#039;&#039;, III, pages 200-201. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man thinking must not be subdued by his instruments. Books are for the scholar’s idle times. When he can read God directly, the hour is too precious to be wasted in other men’s transcripts of their readings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], “The American Scholar,” Addresses and Lectures, Complete Works (1883), vol. 1, p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In calling his two sons by the names of Gershom and Eliezer, Moses, like Joseph and other righteous men, intended to have the fact of God&#039;s help constantly before him. Since his sons would be with him, and he would often address them or call them by name, he would remember his gratitude to God.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 1&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no place without God&#039;s presence. Even in the bush He was present, and this was the lesson of God&#039;s omnipresence that Moses learnt when he was called out of the bush.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 2&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Moses wanted to know God&#039;s name, and God tells him, &#039;I am that I am&#039;; that is to say, &#039;I am called--or to be called-in accordance with my work in this world.&#039; When I judge mankind I am אלהים Elohim, that being the title or designation for judgment. When I war with the wicked I am known as צבאות Zevooth. When I execute judgment for the sins of man I am known as אלשדי El Shadai, and when I am visiting the world with mercy I am אבני or יהוה Adonoi, the Eternal.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 3&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The matron whom we find so often arguing with Rabbi José observed one day to that sage, &#039;My god is surely greater than yours. When your God appeared to Moses in the bush, Moses merely covered his face, whilst when my god (the serpent) made its appearance he could not stand his ground at all, but had to run away out of fear.&#039; &#039;Not so, &#039;returned the Rabbi, &#039;for in order to be out of the power of your god it sufficed for Moses to step a few paces back, but whither could he have fled from the presence of Him who filleth the earth?&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 3&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am the first and I am the last, and beside Me there is no God&#039; (Isa. 43. 6) I am the first, I have no father; I am the last, I have no brother. Beside Me there is no God; I have no son.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 29&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When God first called Moses, not being then an expert prophet, he was addressed in a voice similar to that of his own father, and he thought that his father had come to him from Egypt. God then told him that it was not his earthly father who called him, but the God of his father. Then, we find, Moses hid his face, which he did not do when first called by his name; not in fact until he heard the words, &#039;I am the God of thy fathers.&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;{{w|Exodus Rabbah}} 45&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/tmm/tmm07.htm Tales and Maxims from the Midrash]&#039;&#039; by Rev. Samuel Rapaport, (1907), p. 108&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== F ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Church in the colonies is the white people’s Church. ... She does not call the native to God’s ways but to the ways of the white man, of the master, of the oppressor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frantz Fanon]], &#039;&#039;The Wretched of The Earth&#039;&#039; (1963), p. 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is for man the [[commonplace book]] where he registers his highest feelings and thoughts, the genealogical album into which he enters the names of the things most dear and sacred to him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], in &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), p. xvi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By positing God as unknowable, man excuses himself to what is still left of his religious conscience for his oblivion of God, his surrender to the world. He negates God in practice – his mind and his senses have been absorbed by the world – but he does not negate him in theory. He does not attack his existence; he leaves it intact. But this existence neither affects nor incommodes him, for it is only a negative existence, an existence without existence; it is an existence that contradicts itself – a being that, in view of its effects, is indistinguishable from non-being.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the claims of God are revealed to the mind, it must necessarily yield to them, or strengthen itself in sin. It must, as it were, gird itself up, and struggle to resist the claims of duty. This strengthening self in sin under light is the particular form of sin which we call impenitence. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Grandison Finney]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Systematic Theology&#039;&#039; (1878), p. 369&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is only one good definition of God: the freedom that allows other freedoms to exist.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Fowles]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The French Lieutenant&#039;s Woman|The French Lieutenant&#039;s Woman]]&#039;&#039; (London: Jonathan Cape, 1969), p. 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I [[believe]] in God, not in a Catholic God, there is no Catholic God, there is God and I believe in [[Jesus]] [[Christ]], his incarnation.&#039;&#039;&#039; Jesus is my [[teacher]] and my pastor, but God, the Father, [[w:Ab (Semitic)|Abba]], is the [[light]] and the Creator. &#039;&#039;&#039;This is my Being.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pope Francis]], interviewed in &amp;quot;How the Church will change&amp;quot; by Eugenio Scalfari in &#039;&#039;La Repubblica&#039;&#039; (1 October 2013), as translated from Italian to English by Kathryn Wallace&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth—that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Benjamin Franklin]], debates in the Constitutional Convention, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (June 28, 1787); reported in James Madison, &#039;&#039;Journal of the Federal Convention&#039;&#039;, ed. E. H. Scott (1893), p. 259–60. Franklin suggests that the Convention begin its sessions with prayers &amp;quot;imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessings on our deliberations&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== G ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gandhi smiling 1942.jpg |thumb|It is beyond my power to induce in you a belief in God. There are certain things which are self proved and certain which are not proved at all. ~ [[Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi|Mahatma Gandhi]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Goyathlay-x.jpeg|thumb|I cannot think we are useless or Usen would not have created us. He created all tribes of men and certainly had a righteous purpose in creating each. ~ [[Geronimo]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I looked and looked but I didn&#039;t see God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Yuri Gagarin]] after becoming the first person to orbit the Earth, as quoted in &#039;&#039;To Rise from Earth&#039;&#039; (1996) by Wayne Lee; the authenticity of this remark is disputed; [http://www.interfax-religion.ru/orthodoxy/?act=interview&amp;amp;div=73&amp;amp;domain=1 Colonel Valentin Petrov stated in 2006] that the cosmonaut never said such words, and that the quote originated from [[Nikita Khrushchev]]&#039;s speech at the plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU about the state&#039;s anti-religion campaign, saying &amp;quot;Gagarin flew into space, but didn&#039;t see any god there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sometimes misquoted as &amp;quot;I see no God up here&amp;quot; as if he said this in space, but there are no transcripts or recordings indicating that he ever did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Galileo Galilei]]. in his [[w:Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina|Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina]] (1615), an [http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/galileo-tuscany.html essay published in 1615], in response to enquiries of [[w:Christina of Lorraine|Christina of Tuscany]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Aspects of Western Civilization : Problems and Sources in History&#039;&#039; (1988) by Perry McAdow Rogers, p. 53&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant translation: &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not think it is necessary to believe that the same God who has given us our senses, reason, and intelligence wished us to abandon their use, giving us by some other means the information that we could gain through them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mathematics is the language in which God wrote the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Galileo Galilei]] in &#039;&#039;Statistics: Concepts and Applications&#039;&#039; (1994) by Harry Frank and Steven C. Althoen, p. xxi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is beyond my power to induce in you a belief in God. There are certain things which are self proved and certain which are not proved at all.&#039;&#039;&#039; The existence of God is like a geometrical axiom. It may be beyond our heart grasp. I shall not talk of an intellectual grasp. Intellectual attempts are more or less failures, as a rational explanation cannot give you the faith in a living God. For it is a thing beyond the grasp of reason. It transcends reason. There are numerous phenomena from which you can reason out the existence of God, but I shall not insult your intelligence by offering you a rational explanation of that type. &#039;&#039;&#039;I would have you brush aside all rational explanations and begin with a simple childlike faith in God. If I exist, God exists. With me it is a necessity of my being as it is with millions. They may not be able to talk about it, but from their life you can see that it is a part of their life. I am only asking you to restore the belief that has been undermined.&#039;&#039;&#039; In order to do so, you have to unlearn a lot of literature that dazzles your intelligence and throws you off your feet. Start with the faith which is also a token of humility and an admission that we know nothing, that we are less than atoms in this universe. &#039;&#039;&#039;We are less than atoms, I say, because the atom obeys the law of its being, whereas we in the insolence of our ignorance deny the law of nature. But I have no argument to address to those who have no faith.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi]] in &#039;&#039;Young India&#039;&#039; (24 September 1931); also in [http://www.archive.org/details/teachingsofmahat029222mbp &#039;&#039;Teachings Of Mahatma Gandhi&#039;&#039; (1945), edited by Jag Parvesh Chander, p. 458]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People are even more reluctant to admit that man explains nothing, than they were to admit that God explains nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ernest Gellner]], &#039;&#039;Legitimation of Belief&#039;&#039; (1974), p. 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I cannot think we are useless or Usen would not have created us. He created all tribes of men and certainly had a righteous purpose in creating each.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Geronimo]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Geronimo&#039;s Story of His Life&#039;&#039; (1907) as told to S.M. Barrett in 1905 and 1906, &amp;quot;Usen&amp;quot; is the Apache word for God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we desire to hold on to solidarity with everyone else in the communicative fellowship, even the dead ... then we must claim a reality that can reach beyond the here and now, or that can connect our selves beyond our own death with those who innocently went to their destruction before us. And it is this reality that the Christian tradition calls God. &lt;br /&gt;
** Jens Glebe-Möller, &#039;&#039;A Political Dogmatic&#039;&#039; (1987), p. 102&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We all of us try to make God in our image. It is one of the worst of our temptations.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elizabeth Goudge]], &#039;&#039;The Bird in the Tree&#039;&#039; (1940), Chapter 6.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Either half my colleagues are enormously stupid, or else the science of Darwinism is fully compatible with conventional religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen Jay Gould]], in &amp;quot;Impeaching a Self-Appointed Judge&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Scientific American&#039;&#039; (July 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is within you&#039;&#039;&#039;, and you can do and have anything you want. &#039;&#039;&#039;You must [[love]] yourself more. … and then … you can love your fellow man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cary Grant]], as quoted in [http://www.carygrant.net/articles/thinks%20about.htm &amp;quot;Love – That’s All Cary Grant Ever Thinks About&amp;quot;] by [[w:Sheilah Graham Westbrook|Sheilah Graham Westbrook]] in &#039;&#039;Motion Picture&#039;&#039; (June 1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The love of gain, which is a large, incalculably large, element in every soul, when once applied to the desire for God, will [[bless]] the man who has it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gregory of Nyssa]], &#039;&#039;On Virginity&#039;&#039;, Chapter 18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In vain do they think themselves innocent who appropriate to their own use alone those goods which God gave in common; by not giving to others that which they themselves receive, they become homicides and murderers, inasmuch as in keeping for themselves those things which would alleviate the sufferings of the poor, we may say that every day they cause the death of as many persons as they might have fed and did not. When, therefore, we offer the means of living to the indigent, we do not give them anything of ours, but that which of right belongs to them. It is less a work of mercy which we perform than the payment of a debt.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gregory I]], quoted in [[George D. Herron]], &#039;&#039;Between Caesar and Jesus&#039;&#039; (1899), pp. 111-112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As one reads the scriptures of Christianity and Islam with a morally alert mind, one starts getting sick of the very sound of word ‘god’ which word is littered all over this literature like dead leaves in autumn. The deeds which are ascribed to or approved of by this God are quite often so cruel and obnoxious as to leave one wondering that if these are the doings of the Divine, what else is there which is left for the Devil to do.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sita Ram Goel|Sita Ram Goel]], &#039;&#039;Defence of Hindu Society&#039;&#039; (1983)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1539.jpg|thumb|right|The objects of [[philosophy]], it is true, are upon the whole the same as those of religion. In both the object is Truth, in that supreme [[sense]] in which God and God only is the [[Truth]]. ~ [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Legendre - La Prophétie d&#039;Isaïe.JPG|thumb|The prophet disdains those for whom God&#039;s presence is a comfort and security; to him it is a challenge, an incessant demand. ~ [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AdornoHorkheimerHabermasbyJeremyJShapiro2.png|thumb|right|The concept of God was for a long time the place where the idea was kept alive that there are other norms besides those to which nature and society give expression in their operation. ~ [[Max Horkheimer]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Give according to your means, or God will make your means according to your giving.&lt;br /&gt;
** Reverend [[John Hall (Presbyterian pastor)|John Hall]], reported in [[Tryon Edwards]], &#039;&#039;A Dictionary of Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1908), p. 194&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe God isn&#039;t the sex police, Richard. Sometimes I think Christians get all hung up on the sex thing because it&#039;s easier to worry about sex than to ask yourself, &#039;&#039;am I a good person?&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;[…]&#039;&#039; It makes it easy to be cruel, because as long as you&#039;re not fucking around, nothing you do can be that bad. Is that really all you think of God?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Anita Blake|Anita Blake]], to [[w:Richard_Zeeman|Richard Zeeman]]&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | author = [[Laurell K. Hamilton]]&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = The Harlequin&lt;br /&gt;
  | edition = 1st edition&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = June 2007&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Berkley Books&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = {{ISBN|978-0-425-21724-5}}&lt;br /&gt;
  | chapter = chapter 44&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pp. 391-392&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No matter how much I probe and prod,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;I cannot quite believe in God;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;But oh, I hope to God that He&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;Unswervingly believes in me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Yip Harburg]], &#039;&#039;Rhymes for the Irreverent&#039;&#039;, (1965)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To the extent that we are free we are like God, who has no need of an idea of a God over [[w:Godself|Godself]] or of an incentive other than the moral law itself. But to the extent that we are also natural beings, we desire our own happiness in everything else that we desire, and we need the practical postulate of God to bring that happiness together with morality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John E. Hare]], “Ethics and Religion: Two Kantian Arguments,” &#039;&#039;Philosophical Investigations&#039;&#039;, vol. 34, no. 2 (April 2011), p. 165&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You either have a God who sends child rapists to rape children or you have a God who simply watches it and says, ‘When you’re done, I’m going to punish you.’ If I could stop a person from raping a child, I would. That’s the difference between me and your God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Tracie Harris|Tracie Harris]], [[w:The Atheist Experience|The Atheist Experience]] &#039;&#039;YouTube&#039;&#039; Jan 6 2013 as quoted in [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/atheist-experience-child-rape_n_2434198.html &#039;&#039;Atheist Experience Child Rape&#039;&#039; Huffington Post]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Futurist [[w:Aldo Palazzeschi|Aldo Palazzeschi]]... exhorts us in &#039;&#039;L&#039;antidolore&#039;&#039; (1913) to laugh heartily at the mortality built into the plan of creation not out of spite, as has traditionally been the case, but because suffering and death are nothing but pranks of the prime trickster, God. If anything it is the devil who is the spirit of gravity, and it is in taking him seriously that we plummet from grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3806/is_200605/ai_n17220907/print Thomas Harrison, in &amp;quot;Laughter and the Tree Of Knowledge&amp;quot; in the &#039;&#039;Romanic Review&#039;&#039; (May-November 2006)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The objects of philosophy, it is true, are upon the whole the same as those of religion. In both the object is Truth, in that supreme sense in which God and God only is the Truth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], &#039;&#039;Logic&#039;&#039;, Chapter 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;ve never understood how God could expect his creatures to pick the one true religion by faith — it strikes me as a sloppy way to run a universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[Stranger in a Strange Land]]&#039;&#039; (1961) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent — it says so right here on the label. If you have a mind capable of believing all three of these divine attributes simultaneously, I have a wonderful bargain for you. No checks, please. Cash and in small bills.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough for Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973), p. 264&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The most preposterous notion that H. sapiens has ever dreamed up is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of all the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of His creatures, can be swayed by their prayers, and becomes petulant if He does not receive this flattery. Yet this absurd fantasy, without a shred of evidence to bolster it, pays all the expenses of the oldest, largest, and least productive industry in all history.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The second most preposterous notion is that copulation is inherently sinful.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert A. Heinlein]], in &#039;&#039;[[w:Time Enough for Love|Time Enough for Love]]&#039;&#039; (1973), p. 266&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How much reverence can you have for a Supreme Being who finds it necessary to include such phenomena as phlegm and tooth decay in his divine system of creation?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Heller]], &#039;&#039;Catch 22&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Restore to God His due in tithe and time;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A tithe purloin&#039;d cankers the whole estate.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Herbert]], &#039;&#039;The Temple&#039;&#039; (1633), &#039;&#039;The Church Porch&#039;&#039;, Stanza 65&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The prophet disdains those for whom God&#039;s presence is a comfort and security; to him it is a challenge, an incessant demand.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Joshua Heschel]], &#039;&#039;The Prophets&#039;&#039; (1962), p. 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious ideas, supposedly private matters between man and god, are in practice always political ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;The Monarchy: A Critique of Britain&#039;s Favourite Fetish&#039;&#039; (1990), &#039;&#039;Chatto Counterblasts&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only a humorless tyrant could want a perpetual chanting of praises that, one has no choice but to assume, would be the innate virtues and splendors furnished him by &#039;&#039;his&#039;&#039; creator, infinite regression, drowned in praise!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Consciousness is Gods&#039; gift to mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dr. [[w:Albert Hofmann|Albert Hofmann]] discoverer of [[LSD]] (15 January 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God only speaks to those who understand the language&lt;br /&gt;
** Dr. [[w:Albert Hofmann|Albert Hofmann]], (15 January 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The concept of God was for a long time the place where the idea was kept alive that there are other norms besides those to which nature and society give expression in their operation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Horkheimer]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on Religion,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Critical Theory: Selected Essays&#039;&#039; (1995), p. 129&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The significance of God, cause, number, substance or soul consists, as [[William James|James]] asserts, in nothing but the tendency of the given concept to make us act or think. If the world should reach a point at which it ceases to care not only about such metaphysical entities but also about murders perpetrated behind closed frontiers or simply in the dark, one would have to conclude that the concepts of such murders have no meaning, that they represent no ‘distinct ideas’ or truths, since they do not make any ‘sensible difference to anybody.’&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Horkheimer]], &#039;&#039;Eclipse of Reason&#039;&#039; (1947), pp. 46-47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing could be more untrue than the often-repeated statement that we all worship the same God; or that other, that whatever we worship the result is the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Caryll Houselander|Caryll Houselander]], &#039;&#039;The Reed of God&#039;&#039; (London: Sheed &amp;amp; Ward, 1944), p. 85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Savage interrupted him. &amp;quot;But isn&#039;t it natural to feel there&#039;s a God?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;You might as well ask if it&#039;s natural to do up one&#039;s trousers with zippers,&amp;quot; said the Controller sarcastically. &amp;quot;You remind me of another of those old fellows called Bradley. He defined philosophy as the finding of bad reason for what one believes by instinct. As if one believed anything by instinct! One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them. Finding bad reasons for what one believes for other bad reasons–that&#039;s philosophy. People believe in God because they&#039;ve been conditioned to. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;But all the same,&amp;quot; insisted the Savage, &amp;quot;it is natural to believe in God when you&#039;re alone–quite alone, in the night, thinking about death …&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;quot;But people never are alone now,&amp;quot; said Mustapha Mond. &amp;quot;We make them hate solitude; and we arrange their lives so that it&#039;s almost impossible for them ever to have it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], [[Brave New World]] ch. 17 [http://www.huxley.net/bnw/seventeen.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Why did it occur to anyone to believe in only one God? And conversely why did it ever occur to anyone to believe in many gods? To both these questions we must return the same answer: Because that is how the human mind happens to work. For the human mind is both diverse and simple, simultaneously many and one. We have an immediate perception of our own diversity and of that of the outside world. And at the same time we have immediate perceptions of our own oneness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aldous Huxley]], “One and Many,” &#039;&#039;Do What You Will&#039;&#039; (1928), p. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Would God give a bird wings and make it a crime to fly? Would he give me brains and make it a crime to think? Any God that would damn one of his children for the expression of his honest thought wouldn&#039;t make a decent thief. When I read a book and don&#039;t believe it, I ought to say so. I will do so and take the consequences like a man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Ingersoll]] (14 October 1879)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead. [[Karl Marx|Marx]] is dead. And I don’t feel so well myself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eugène Ionesco]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Jewish American Literature : A Norton Anthology&#039;&#039; (2000) by Jules Chametzky, &amp;quot;Jewish Humor&amp;quot;, p. 318&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== J ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Polyptyque de la Vanité terrestre et de la Rédemption céleste-Hans Memling mg 9959.jpg|thumb|I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.&lt;br /&gt;
  ~ [[Jesus]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brueghel Jan II God creating.jpg|thumb|The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dieu Tout-Puissant Chapelle Royale Versailles ceiling.jpg|thumb|It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sabaoth icon (Russia, 19 c.) 2.jpeg|thumb|Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear. ~ [[Thomas Jefferson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The theory of an existing and benevolent god simply doesn&#039;t make sense to anyone who is rational. A benevolent and omnipotent god would never allow such imbalances as I see to exist for one second. If by chance I am wrong, however I must then assume that being born black called for some automatic punishment for sins I know nothing about, and being innocent it behooves me to defy god. &lt;br /&gt;
**George Jackson, Soledad Brother: The Prison Letters of George Jackson&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s on your side? Shit, I&#039;m alright with that. Because we&#039;re going to reload the clips and come right back.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[50 Cent|Curtis J. Jackson]], [http://genius.com/50-cent-heat-lyrics/ &amp;quot;Heat&amp;quot;] (2003), &#039;&#039;Get Rich or Die Tryin&#039;&#039;&#039; (2003), by C.J. Jackson III.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The God who gave us [[life]], gave us [[liberty]] at the same time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[s:A Summary View of the Rights of British America|Summary View of the Rights of British America]] (1774)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Query 17 in &#039;&#039;Notes on the State of Virginia&#039;&#039; (1781-1785)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], Query 18 in &#039;&#039;Notes on the State of Virginia&#039;&#039; (1781-1785)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because, if there be one, he must more approve the homage of [[reason]], than that of blindfolded [[fear]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr from Paris, France, (10 August 1787)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No historical fact is better established, than that the doctrine of one God, pure and uncompounded, was that of the early ages of Christianity … Nor was the unity of the Supreme Being ousted from the Christian creed by the force of reason, but by the sword of civil government, wielded at the will of the fanatic [[w:Athanasius|Athanasius]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to James Smith (1822)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The doctrines of [[Jesus]] are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man.&lt;br /&gt;
: 1. That there is one only God, and he all perfect.&lt;br /&gt;
: 2. That there is a future state of rewards and punishments.&lt;br /&gt;
: 3. That to [[love]] God with all thy heart and thy neighbor as thyself, is the sum of [[religion]].&lt;br /&gt;
::* [[Thomas Jefferson]], in a letter to Benjamin Waterhouse, (26 June 1822)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;*I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jesus]] quoted in [[Psalms]] 82:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some foolish men declare that creator made the world. The doctrine that the world was created is ill advised and should be rejected. If God created the world, where was he before the creation? If you say he was transcendent then and needed no support, where is he now? How could God have made this world without any raw material? If you say that he made this first, and then the world, you are faced with an endless regression. If you declare that this raw material arose naturally you fall into another fallacy, For the whole universe might thus have been its own creator, and have arisen quite naturally. If God created the world by an act of his own will, without any raw material, then it is just his will and nothing else — and who will believe this silly nonsense? If he is ever perfect and complete, how could the will to create have arisen in him? If, on the other hand, he is not perfect, he could no more create the universe than a potter could. If he is form-less, action-less and all-embracing, how could he have created the world? Such a soul, devoid of all morality, would have no desire to create anything. If he is perfect, he does not strive for the three aims of man, so what advantage would he gain by creating the universe? If you say that he created to no purpose because it was his nature to do so, then God is pointless. If he created in some kind of sport, it was the sport of a foolish child, leading to trouble. If he created because of the [[karma]] of embodied beings [acquired in a previous creation] He is not the Almighty [[Lord]], but subordinate to something else. If out of love for living beings and need of them he made the world, why did he not take creation wholly blissful free from misfortune? If he were transcendent he would not create, for he would be free: Nor if involved in transmigration, for then he would not be almighty. Thus the doctrine that the world was created by God makes no sense at all, And God commits great sin in slaying the children whom he himself created. If you say that he slays only to destroy evil beings, why did he create such beings in the first place? Good men should combat the believer in divine creation, maddened by an evil doctrine. Know that the world is uncreated, as time itself is, without beginning or end, and is based on the principles, life and rest. Uncreated and indestructible, it endures under the compulsion of its own nature.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Jinasena}} (9th Century) in the &#039;&#039;[[w:Mahapurana (Jainism)|Mahāpurāna]]&#039;&#039;, as translated in &#039;&#039;Primal Myths&#039;&#039; (1979) by Barbara Sproul&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The very pure spirit does not bother about the regard of others or human respect, but communes inwardly with God, alone and in solitude as to all forms, and with delightful tranquility, for the knowledge of God is received in divine silence.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** St. [[John of the Cross]] in &#039;&#039;The Sayings of Light and Love&#039;&#039; as translated by Kieran Kavanaugh and Otilio Rodriguez (1991)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a dark night to man in this life.&lt;br /&gt;
** St. [[John of the Cross]], &#039;&#039;The Ascent of Mt. Carmel&#039;&#039;, I, 2, 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[All]]-thing hath the Being by the [[love]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is all that is [[Goodness|good]], as to my sight, and the goodness that each thing hath, it is He.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God willeth that we endlessly hate the sin and endlessly love the soul, as God loveth it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Truth]] seeth God, and [[Wisdom]] beholdeth God, and of these two cometh the third: that is, a holy marvellous [[delight]] in God; which is [[Love]]. Where Truth and Wisdom are verily, there is Love verily, coming of them both.&#039;&#039;&#039; And all of God’s making: for He is endless sovereign Truth, endless sovereign Wisdom, endless sovereign Love, unmade; and man’s Soul is a creature in God which hath the same properties &#039;&#039;made&#039;&#039;, and evermore it doeth that it was made for: it seeth God, it beholdeth God, and it loveth God. Whereof God enjoyeth in the creature; and the creature in God, endlessly marvelling. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;In which marvelling he seeth his God, his Lord, his Maker so high, so great, and so good, in comparison with him that is made, that scarcely the creature seemeth ought to the self. But the clarity and the clearness of Truth and Wisdom maketh him to see and to bear witness that he is made for Love, in which God endlessly keepeth him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Highly ought we to rejoice that God dwelleth in our soul, and much more highly ought we to rejoice that our soul dwelleth in God.&#039;&#039;&#039; Our soul is &#039;&#039;made&#039;&#039; to be God’s dwelling-place; and the dwelling-place of the soul is God, Which is &#039;&#039;unmade&#039;&#039;. And high understanding it is, inwardly to see and know that God, which is our Maker, dwelleth in our soul; and an higher understanding it is, inwardly to see and to know that our soul, that is made, dwelleth in God’s Substance: of which Substance, God, we are that we are. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And I saw no difference between God and our Substance: but as it were all God; and yet mine understanding took that our Substance is in God: that is to say, that &#039;&#039;&#039;God is God, and our Substance is a creature in God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;.1393), Ch. 54&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;As truly as God is our [[Father]], so truly is God our [[Mother]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c.1393), Ch. 59&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I beheld with reverent dread, and highly marvelling in the sight and in the feeling of the sweet accord, that &#039;&#039;&#039;our Reason is in God&#039;&#039;&#039;; understanding that it is the highest gift that we have received; and it is grounded in [[nature]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;.1393), Ch. 83&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I saw full surely that ere God made us He loved us; which love was never slacked, nor ever shall be. And in this love He hath done all His works; and in this love He hath made all things profitable to us; and in this love our life is everlasting. &#039;&#039;&#039;In our making we had beginning; but the love wherein He made us was in Him from without beginning: in which love we have our beginning. And all this shall we see in God, without end.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Julian of Norwich]], &#039;&#039;Revelations of Divine Love&#039;&#039; (c. 1393), Ch. 86&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A god is usually characteristic of a certain system of thought or morality. For instance, take the Christian God, the &#039;&#039;summum bonum&#039;&#039;: God is love, love being the highest moral principle; and God is spirit, the spirit being the supreme idea of meaning. All our Christian moral concepts derive from such assumptions, and the supreme essence of all of them is what we call God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. G. Jung]], &#039;&#039;Nietzsche&#039;s Zarathustra&#039;&#039; (1988), p. 40&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== K ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* May His great Name be blessed forever and ever.&lt;br /&gt;
** The Kaddish Prayer: A new translation with a commentary anthologized from Talmudic, Midrashic and Rabbinic sources. New York: Mesorah Publications, Ltd., 2001, ISBN 0-89906-160-5, p.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We actually have a candidate for the [[mind]] of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; The mind of God we [[believe]] is cosmic [[music]], the music of [[String theory|strings resonating through 11 dimensional]] [[w:Hyperspace|hyperspace]]. That is the mind of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michio Kaku]], [http://bigthink.com/dr-kakus-universe/math-is-the-mind-of-god Math is the Mind of God] (29 December 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are to love God, not for the gifts bestowed upon us but for the sake of love itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Eyran Katsenelenbogen|Eyran Katsenelenbogen]], &#039;&#039;One Time&#039;&#039; (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are no gods! Just voices in your head. They tell you to do what you already want to do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]]&#039;&#039; (mass market paperback edition, {{ISBN|978-0-06-156236-5}}), p. 86&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If they are gods, they are responsible for the horror that occurs in the world. So they are evil. Why otherwise would they allow things to be as they are?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]],&#039;&#039; p. 91&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Indeed, if we are ever to be free human beings, and not puppets jerked about by unseen forces—which may or may not exist—the gods must go.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Kessel|John Kessel]], &#039;&#039;Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance&#039;&#039; (2009) in [[w:Gardner Dozois|Gardner Dozois]] &amp;amp; [[w:Jonathan Strahan|Jonathan Strahan]] (eds.) &#039;&#039;[[w:The New Space Opera 2|The New Space Opera 2]],&#039;&#039; p. 102&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Christian God is spirit and Christianity is spirit, and there is discord between the flesh and the spirit but the flesh is not the sensuous-it is the selfish. In this sense, even the spiritual can become sensuous-for example, if a person took his spiritual gifts in vain, he would then be carnal. And of course I know that it is not necessary for the Christian that Christ must have been physically beautiful; and it would be grievous-for a reason different from the one you give-because if beauty were some essential, how the believer would long to see him; but from all this it by no means follows that the sensuous is annihilated in Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Soren Kierkegaard]] &#039;&#039;Either/Or Part II&#039;&#039; (1843) as translated by Hong, p. 50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If everything is assumed to be in order with regard to the Holy Scriptures-what then? Has the person who did not believe come a single step closer to faith? No, not a single step. Faith does not result from straightforward scholarly deliberation, nor does it come directly; on the contrary, in this objectivity one loses that infinite, personal, impassioned interestedness, which is the condition of faith, the everywhere and nowhere in which faith can come into existence. Has the person who did believe gained anything with regard to the power and strength of faith? No, not in the least; in this prolix knowledge, in this certainty that lurks at faith’s door and craves for it, he is rather in such a precarious position that much effort, much fear and trembling will be needed lest he fall into temptation and confuse knowledge with faith. Whereas up to now faith has been a beneficial taskmaster in uncertainty, but it would be its worst enemy in this certainty. If passion is taken away, faith no longer exists, and certainty and passion do not hitch up as a team.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Soren Kierkegaard, Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments&#039;&#039; (1846) as translated by Hong, p. 29&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To live only in the unconditional, to breathe only the unconditional – the human being cannot do this; he perishes like a fish that must live in the air. But on the other hand a human being cannot in the deeper sense live without relating himself to the unconditional; he expires, that is, perhaps goes on living, but spiritlessly. &#039;&#039;&#039;Thus the single&#039;&#039;&#039; individual must personally relate himself to the unconditional. I believed, and do believe, that this is Christianity and love for “the neighbor.” &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;The Point of View On My Work As An Author by Soren Kierkegaard&#039;&#039;&#039; (finished 1848) published by Peter Christian Kierkegaard 1859 translated by Howard and Edna Hong 1998 Princeton University Press P. 19-20 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is cruel, sometimes he makes you live.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen King]], &#039;&#039;Desperation&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God said take what you want ... and pay for it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stephen King]], &#039;&#039;Desperation&#039;&#039;, said by the character &amp;quot;Johnny Marinville&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*According to logic &#039;nothing&amp;quot; is that of which everything can truly be denied and nothing can truly be affirmed. The idea therefore either of a finite or infinite nothing is a contradiction in terms. And yet according to theologians  &amp;quot;God the self existent being is a most simple, unchangeable, incorruptible being; without parts, figure, motion, divisibility, or any other such properties as we find in matter. For all such things so plainly and necessarily imply finiteness in their very notion and are utterly inconsistent with complete infinity.&amp;quot; Therefore the God here offered to the adoration of the XlXth century lacks every quality upon which man&#039;s mind is capable of fixing any judgment. What is this in fact but a being of whom they can affirm nothing that is not instantly contradicted. Their own Bible their Revelation destroys all the moral perceptions they heap upon him unless indeed they call those qualities perfections that every other man&#039;s reason and common sense call imperfections, odious vices and brutal wickedness. Nay more he who reads our Buddhist scriptures written for the superstitious masses will fail to find in them a demon so vindictive, unjust, so cruel and so stupid as the celestial tyrant upon whom the Christians prodigally lavish their servile worship and on whom their theologians heap those perfections that are contradicted on every page of their Bible. Truly and veritably your theology has created her God but to destroy him piecemeal. Your church is the fabulous Saturn, who begets children but to devour them.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Koot Hoomi|Koot Hoomi]], in   [[The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett|&#039;&#039;The Mahatma Letters to A. P. Sinnett&#039;&#039;]],  (1923),  Letter No. X, p. 54, 1881&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Alex&#039;&#039;&#039;: You needn&#039;t take it any further, sir. You&#039;ve proved to me that all this ultraviolence and killing is wrong, wrong, and terribly wrong. I&#039;ve learned me lesson, sir. I&#039;ve seen now what I&#039;ve never seen before. I&#039;m cured! Praise god! &lt;br /&gt;
** [[A Clockwork Orange]] screenplay by Stanley Kubrick.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The important point is that all the standard attributes assigned to God in our history could equally well be the characteristics of biological entities who billions of years ago were at a stage of development similar to man&#039;s own and evolved into something as remote from man as man is remote from the primordial ooze from which he first emerged.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Stanley Kubrick]] Playboy Interview (1968) [http://paulnahm.blogspot.com/2010/06/playboy-interview-wstanley-kubrick-in.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== L ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ludovico Mazzolino - God the Father.jpg|thumb|One boy would not get it through his head that for all adults God is not an old man in a white beard sitting on a cloud. ~ [[Madeleine L&#039;Engle]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:God the Father with His Right Hand Raised in Blessing.jpg|thumb|The purposes of the Almighty are perfect, and must prevail, though we erring mortals may fail to accurately perceive them in advance. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It isn&#039;t always the middle-aged who refuse to listen, who will not even try to understand another point of view. One boy would not get it through his head that for all adults God is not an old man in a white beard sitting on a cloud. As far as this boy was concerned, this old gentleman was the adult&#039;s god, and therefore he did not believe in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Madeleine L&#039;Engle]] in &#039;&#039;The Crosswicks Journal, Book One : A Circle of Quiet&#039;&#039; (1972)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Life is too short and hard and strange not to blame God for what He done made of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Jay Lake|Jay Lake]], &#039;&#039;The Temptation of Eustace Prudence McAllen&#039;&#039; in [[w:Martin H. Greenberg|Martin H. Greenberg]] (ed.) &#039;&#039;Westward Weird&#039;&#039; {{ISBN|978-0-7564-0718-6}} p. 199&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Homo proponit et Deus disponit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** And governeth alle goode virtues.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Langland]], &#039;&#039;Vision of Piers Ploughman&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1824), Volume II, p. 427, line 13,984. [[w:John Gerson|John Gerson]] is credited with same. Saying quoted in &#039;&#039;Chronicles of Battel Abbey&#039;&#039; (1066 to 1177). Translation by Lower, 1851, p. 27. [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;Iliad&#039;&#039;, XVII. 515. [[Pindar]], &#039;&#039;Olymp&#039;&#039;, XIII. 149. [[Demosthenes]], &#039;&#039;De Corona.&#039;&#039;, 209. [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Bacchid.&#039;&#039; I, 2, 36. [[w:Ammianus Marcellinus|Ammianus Marcellinus]], &#039;&#039;Hist&#039;&#039;, XXV. 3. [[Francois Fenelon]], &#039;&#039;Sermon on the Epiphany&#039;&#039;, 1685. [[Montaigne]], &#039;&#039;Essay&#039;&#039;, Book II, Chapter XXXVII. [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;Epistles&#039;&#039;, 107. [[w:Cleanthus|Cleanthus]], &#039;&#039;Fragment&#039;&#039;. [[Cervantes]], &#039;&#039;Don Quixote&#039;&#039;, I. 22. [[Dante]], &#039;&#039;Paradise&#039;&#039;, VIII, line 134. [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Wallenstein&#039;s Death&#039;&#039;, I, 7. 32. [[w:Ordericus Vitalis|Ordericus Vitalis]], &#039;&#039;Ecclesiastica Historia&#039;&#039;, Book III (1075)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don&#039;t believe in God, but I have this idea that if there were a God, or destiny of some kind looking down on us, that if he saw you taking anything for granted he’d take it away. So he&#039;ll be like: &#039;You think this is going pretty well?&#039; Then he&#039;ll go and send down some big disaster. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hugh Laurie]] Stargazing: Heather&#039;s Angry, Jane is Ill, Hugh is Anxious Kansas City Star, Wed, Oct. 31, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*These findings provide the first experimental evidence that exposure to [[God]]  influences [[Goals|goal pursuit]] and suggest that the ever-present cultural reminders of God can be both burden and benefit for [[W:Self-control|self-regulation]]... From popular and classic works of fiction, to the news media, to everyday conversation, the social world is replete with mentions of God. The current findings suggest that this exposure may have broad societal consequences for fundamental [[psychological]] processes of  [[W:Self-control|self-regulation]], which in turn underlie much of [[health]], [[happiness]], and [[productivity|human productivity]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/psp-102-1-4.pdf Divergent Effects of Activating Thoughts of God on Self-Regulation], Kristin Laurin, Aaron C. Kay and Grainne M. Fitzsimons,  [[W:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology|&#039;&#039;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology&#039;&#039;]], (January 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is only a great imaginative experience.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[D.H. Lawrence]], &#039;&#039;Phoenix: The Posthumous Papers of D. H. Lawrence&#039;&#039; (1936) pt. 4, edited by E. McDonald&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a latecomer in the [[w:history of religion|history of religion]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gerard van der Leeuw|Gerard van der Leeuw]], &#039;&#039;Phänomenologie der Religion&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a concept by which we measure our pain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lennon]], &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039; (1970)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The more we get to know about our [[universe]] ... the more the hypothesis that there is a Creator God, who designed the universe for a purpose, gains in credibility as the best explanation of why we are here.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Lennox|John Lennox]], cited in &#039;&#039;[[w:Awake!|Awake!]]&#039;&#039; magazine, 2010, 11/10, article: &#039;&#039;Has Science Done Away With God?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Secondly, getting rid of God does not get rid of the suffering. In fact, it can make the pain worse since it gets rid of all ultimate hope and justice. Horgan denies this in his last sentence, but I still maintain he has no ultimate personal hope to offer for anyone, including himself. The vast majority of people who have ever lived have suffered and not received justice in this life. Since, according to atheism, death is the end, then these people will never receive justice since there is no life to come. I applaud Horgan’s positive reaction to what we have achieved in overcoming disease, poverty, oppression and war, but that does not affect my point in the slightest. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Whether God could have made a world in which fire warmed but didn’t burn and there were no destructive earthquakes is difficult. After all, earthquakes are paradoxically essential for the maintenance of life. Certainly, God could have made a world in which there was no moral evil. But there would have been no humans in it--it would be a robotic world. The greatest God-given capacity we humans have is the capacity to love. It inevitably carries with it the capacity to hate. Hence the world presents us all with a mixed picture – beauty and barbed wire.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Lennox|John Lennox]], [https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/can-faith-and-science-coexist-mathematician-and-christian-john-lennox-responds/ &amp;quot;Can Faith and Science Coexist? Mathematician and Christian John Lennox Responds&amp;quot; by John Horgan, at &#039;&#039;Scientific American : Cross-Check&#039;&#039; (1 March 2015)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is it not better to place a question mark upon a problem while seeking an answer than to put the label &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; there and consider the matter solved? Does not the word &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; only confuse and make more difficult the solution by assuming a conclusion that is utterly groundless and palpably absurd?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Lewis]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Atheism&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* His Omnipotence means power to do all that is intrinsically possible, not to do the intrinsically impossible. You may attribute miracles to him, but not nonsense. This is no limit to his power. If you choose to say &#039;God can give a creature free will and at the same time withhold free will from it,&#039; you have not succeeded in saying anything about God: meaningless combinations of words do not suddenly acquire meaning simply because we prefix to them the two other words &#039;God can.&#039;... It is no more possible for God than for the weakest of his creatures to carry out both of two mutually exclusive alternatives; not because his power meets an obstacle, but because nonsense remains nonsense even when we talk it about God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. S. Lewis]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=NSjlftWk78kC&amp;amp;pg=PA18 The Problem of Pain ]&#039;&#039;. Zondervan, 1944, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am much indebted to the good christian people of the country for their constant prayers and consolations; and to no one of them, more than to yourself. &#039;&#039;&#039;The purposes of the Almighty are perfect, and must prevail, though we erring mortals may fail to accurately perceive them in advance.&#039;&#039;&#039; We hoped for a happy termination of this terrible [[w:American Civil War|war]] long before this; but God knows best, and has ruled otherwise. We shall yet acknowledge His wisdom and our own error therein. Meanwhile we must work earnestly in the best light He gives us, trusting that so working still conduces to the great ends He ordains. Surely He intends some great good to follow this mighty convulsion, which no mortal could make, and no mortal could stay.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]]&#039;s Letter to Eliza Gurney (4 September 1864); quoted in Roy P. Basler, ed., &#039;&#039;The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, vol. 7&#039;&#039; (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1953), p. 535&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I can see how it might be possible for a man to look down upon the earth and be an atheist, but I cannot conceive how he could look up into the heavens and say there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Recollection by Gilbert J. Greene, quoted in &#039;&#039;The Speaking Oak&#039;&#039; (1902) by Ferdinand C. Iglehart and &#039;&#039;Latest Light on Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1917) by Ervin S. Chapman&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I know there is a God, and that He hates injustice and slavery. I see the storm coming, and I know that His hand is in it. If He has a place and work for me–and I think He has–I believe I am ready. I am nothing, but truth is everything. I know I am right because I know that liberty is right, for Christ teaches it, and Christ is God.&#039;&#039;&#039; I have told them that a house divided against itself cannot stand, and Christ and reason say the same; and they will find it so. [[Stephen A. Douglas|Douglas]] doesn&#039;t care whether slavery is voted up or voted down, but &#039;&#039;&#039;God cares, and humanity cares, and I care; and with God’s help I shall not fail. I may not see the end; but it will come and I shall be vindicated&#039;&#039;&#039;; and these men will find that they have not read their Bibles aright.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]] anecdote registered by novelist [[w:Josiah Gilbert Holland|Josiah Gilbert Holland]], in his &#039;&#039;Life of Abraham Lincoln&#039;&#039; (1866), Chapter XVI, p. 287. [[w:University of Nebraska Press|University of Nebraska Press]], as something that Lincoln said in a conversation with educator Newman Bateman, in the Autumn of 1860.&lt;br /&gt;
* Faith in a distant, ephemeral God, solver of problems by house call, has also been left behind. Increasingly I come to understand my religion and priesthood as a committment to the society in which I live. A committment to men and women who struggle for a new social order where [[slavery]] has no place, that prepares people to fully realize themselves, in which injustice and exploitation cease to be our daily bread. I understand Jesus Christ as very related to this matter. I understand Jesus Christ as each one of my brothers and sisters. I understand that in uniting with them in this struggle, perhaps I will be capable of overcoming the small and large personal needs that are only [[relevant]] because they impede me from fully giving myself to this task.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Antonio Llidó]] letter to a friend on March 9, 1971 (from the book  &#039;&#039;Antonio Llidó: Epistolario de un compromiso&#039;&#039;,Tàndem Edicons,España (1999) {{ISBN|84-8131-227-4}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God, to confess their sins and transgressions, in humble sorrow, yet with assured hope that genuine repentance will lead to mercy and pardon, and to recognize the sublime truths announced in the Holy Scriptures, and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], Proclamation for a Day of Fasting, Humiliation and Prayer (30 March 1863)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An&#039; you&#039;ve gut to git up airly&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ef you want to take in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Russell Lowell]], &#039;&#039;The Biglow Papers&#039;&#039; (1848), First Series. No. 1, Stanza 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== M ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thanksgiving chapel interior.jpg|thumb|To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that [[Love]] is the reason for my existence, for God is love. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name. ~ [[Thomas Merton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But the thing that&#039;s really disturbing about Noah isn&#039;t the silly, it&#039;s that it&#039;s &#039;&#039;immoral&#039;&#039;. It&#039;s about a psychotic mass murderer who gets away with it, and his name is God. Genesis says God was so angry with himself for screwing up when he made mankind so flawed (grr!), that he sent the flood to kill everyone. Everyone. Men, women, children, babies.  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; What kind of tyrant punishes everyone just to get back at the few he&#039;s mad at? I mean, &#039;&#039;besides&#039;&#039; {{w|Chris Christie}}. Hey God, you know you&#039;re kind of a dick when you are in a movie with [[Russell Crowe]], and you&#039;re the one with anger issues. You know, conservatives are always going on about how Americans are losing their values and their morality. Well, maybe it&#039;s because you worship a guy who drowns &#039;&#039;babies&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time with Bill Maher&#039;&#039; {{#formatdate:2014-03-14}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Eternal turned his attention to the three shades who stood humbly and yet hopefully before him. The quick, with so short a time to live, when they talk of themselves, talk too much; but the dead, with eternity before them, are so [[verbosity|verbose]] that only angels could listen to them with civility.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. Somerset Maugham]], &#039;&#039;Collected Short Stories 1&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;The Judgement Seat&amp;quot;, p. 314&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is impossible to imagine the universe run by a wise, just and omnipotent God, but it is quite easy to imagine it run by a board of gods.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]] in: Donald M Simanek, John. Holden &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=ldX0FkgurzoC&amp;amp;pg=PA253 Science Askew: A Light-hearted Look at the Scientific World]&#039;&#039;, CRC Press, Oct 1, 2001,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What in me is dark,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Illumine; what is low, raise and support;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That to the height of this great argument&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I may assert eternal Providence,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And justify the ways of God to men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book I, line 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These are thy glorious works, Parent of good.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;[[Paradise Lost]]&#039;&#039; (1667; 1674), Book V, line 153&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bright and clear mind — that we call God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Namboku Mizuno]], &#039;&#039;Food Governs Your Destiny&#039;&#039;, p. 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is living in people&#039;s hearts, and in God there is no distinction or rank. Therefore God lives in everyone. That&#039;s why traditionally it is said that all deities are the same. They say God comes to a person who is very humble and honest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Namboku Mizuno]], &#039;&#039;Food Governs Your Destiny&#039;&#039;, p. 105&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If, it was natural to reason, God punishes men with eternal torment, it is surely lawful for men to use doses of it in a good cause.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph McCabe]] in &#039;&#039;A History of Torture&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Creator — A [[Comedy|comedian]] whose audience is afraid to [[laugh]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]], &#039;&#039;A Mencken Chrestomathy,&#039;&#039; ch. 30 (1949)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is the immemorial refuge of the incompetent, the helpless, the miserable. They find not only sanctuary in his arms, but also a kind of superiority, soothing to their macerated egos; He will set them above their betters.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. L. Mencken]], &#039;&#039;Minority Report&#039;&#039; (1956)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To say that I am made in the image of God is to say that [[Love]] is the reason for my existence, for God is love.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Love is my true identity. Selflessness is my true self. Love is my true character. Love is my name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], &#039;&#039;Seeds of Contemplation&#039;&#039; (1949)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Persons are not known by intellect alone, not by principles alone, but only by love. It is when we love the other, the enemy, that we obtain from God the key to an understanding of who he is, and who we are. It is only this realization that can open to us the real nature of our duty, and of right action.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], in a letter to [[Dorothy Day]] (20 December 1961)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O God, we are one with You. You have made us one with You. You have taught us that if we are open to one another, You dwell in us. Help us to preserve this openness and to fight for it with all our hearts. Help us to realize that there can be no understanding where there is mutual rejection. O God, in accepting one another wholeheartedly, fully, completely, we accept You, and we thank You, and we adore You, and we love You with our whole being, because our being is Your being, our spirit is rooted in Your spirit. Fill us then with love, and let us be bound together with love as we go our diverse ways, united in this one spirit which makes You present in the world, and which makes You witness to the ultimate reality that is love. Love has overcome. Love is victorious. Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Merton]], in his closing prayer to an informal address delivered in Calcutta, India (October 1968), from &#039;&#039;The Asian Journal of Thomas Merton&#039;&#039; (1975); quoted in &#039;&#039;Thomas Merton, Spiritual Master : The Essential Writings&#039;&#039; (1992), p. 237&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a very good saying that if triangles invented a god, they would make him three-sided.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles de Montesquieu]], &#039;&#039;Lettres persannes&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is anything so precious that without it history and the world will be destroyed, where will you keep it? You will naturally want to keep it in the deepest part of your mind. If you desire to place it in the depths of your mind, it needs to be invisible. It is for this very reason that God exists as an invisible being. It is fortunate that He is invisible, for if He were visible how could a great contest to gain Him be avoided? It would be difficult for God to endure the pain of seeing it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sun Myung Moon]], [http://www.unification.net/wogw/wogw1-01.html &#039;&#039;The Way of God&#039;s Will&#039;&#039; Chapter 1-1. The Will of God] (1980 translation)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is not stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sun Myung Moon]], [http://www.unification.org/ucbooks/WofGW/wogw1-05.htm &#039;&#039;The Way of God&#039;s Will&#039;&#039; Chapter 1-5. Tradition, Official Business, and Responsibility] (1980 translation)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God is merciful, He provides us with little evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Moorcock]], &#039;&#039;The War Hound and the World’s Pain&#039;&#039; (1981), Chapter 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...indeed, if there were any modesty left in mankind, the histories of the Bible might abundantly assure men of the existence of [[angels]] and spirits... I look upon it as a special piece of Providence that . . . fresh examples of apparitions may awaken our benumbed and lethargic minds into an assurance that there are other intelligent beings besides those that are clothed in heavy earth or clay . . . for this evidence, showing that there are bad spirits, will necessarily open a door to the belief that there are good ones, and lastly, that there is a [[God]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry More]], quoted by [[H.P. Blavatsky]], in &#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology,&#039;&#039; (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God for all anyone knows could be [[Cary Grant]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carole Morin]], &#039;&#039;Dead Glamorous&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God isn’t in the details, He’s in the structure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Carole Morin]], &#039;&#039;Spying on Strange Men&#039;&#039; (2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== N ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nyanaponika Maha Thera.jpg|thumb|A Buddhist meditator, while benefiting from the refinement of consciousness he has achieved, will be able to see these meditative experiences for what they are; and he will further know that they are without any abiding substance that could be attributed to a deity manifesting itself to his mind. ~ [[Nyanaponika Thera]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- [[File:Light dispersion conceptual.gif|thumb|From blind physical necessity, which is always and everywhere the same, no variety adhering to time and place could evolve, and all variety of created objects which represent order and life in the universe could happen only by the willful reasoning of its original Creator, Whom I call the Lord God. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Isaac Newton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Darwinek-bnw.jpg|thumb|God is dead: but considering the state Man is in, there will perhaps be caves, for ages yet, in which his shadow will be shown. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Orvieto Pozzo San Patrizio 5.JPG|thumb| I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche]] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The appeal to a religious meaning to life is a bit different. If you believe that the meaning of your life comes from fulfilling the purpose of God, who loves you, and seeing Him in eternity, then it doesn&#039;t seem appropriate to ask, &amp;quot;And what is the point of that?&amp;quot;It&#039;s supposed to be something which is its own point, and can&#039;t have a purpose outside itself. But for this very reason it has its own problems.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The idea of God seems to be the idea of something that can explain everything else, without having to be explained itself. But it&#039;s very hard to understand how there could be such a thing. If we ask the question, &amp;quot;Why is the world like this?&amp;quot; and are offered a religious answer, how can we be prevented from asking again, &amp;quot;And why is that true?&amp;quot; What kind of answer would bring all of our &amp;quot;Why?&amp;quot; questions to a stop, once and for all? And if they can stop there, why couldn&#039;t they have stopped earlier?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The same problem seems to arise if God and His purposes are offered as the ultimate explanation of the value and meaning of our lives. The idea that our lives fulfil God&#039;s purpose is supposed to give them their point, in a way that doesn&#039;t require or admit of any further point. One isn&#039;t supposed to ask &amp;quot;What is the point of God?&amp;quot; any more than one is supposed to ask, &amp;quot;What is the explanation of God?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But my problem here, as with the role of God as ultimate explanation, is that I&#039;m not sure I understand the idea. Can there really be something which gives point to everything else by encompassing it, but which couldn&#039;t have, or need, any point itself? Something whose point can&#039;t be questioned from outside because there is no outside?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If God is supposed to give our lives a meaning that we can&#039;t understand, it&#039;s not much of a consolation. God as ultimate justification, like God as ultimate explanation, may be an incomprehensible answer to a question that we can&#039;t get rid of. On the other hand, maybe that&#039;s the whole point, and I am just failing to understand religious ideas. Perhaps the belief in God is the belief that the universe is intelligible, but not to US.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Nagel]], &#039;&#039;What Does It All Mean?: A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1987), Ch. 10. The Meaning of Life&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It behooves man to take to heart who it is that hath created him, and who hath developed him from a foul-smelling drop in the womb of woman, who hath brought him to the light of the world, who hath given sight to his eyes, and who hath bestowed the power of motion upon his feet, who maketh him to stand upright, who hath infused the breath of life into him, and who hath imparted of His own pure spirit unto him.&#039;&#039;&#039; Happy the man, therefore, that polluteth not the holy spirit of God within him by doing evil deeds, and well for him if he returns it to his Creator as he received it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Naphtali son of Jacob, as cited in &#039;&#039;Legends of the Jews&#039;&#039; (1909)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The Ultimate [[Truth]] is called God.&#039;&#039;&#039; This one can realize in the state of Nirvikalpa Samadhi. &#039;&#039;&#039;A circle can have only one centre but it can have numerous radii. The centre can be compared to God and the radii to religions.&#039;&#039;&#039; So, no one sect, no one [[religion]] or [[book]] can make an absolute claim of It. &#039;&#039;&#039;He who works for It gets It.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Swami Narayanananda]], &#039;&#039;Selected Articles 1933-86&#039;&#039; (2002), p. 301&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The poor is almost always seen to have a prophetic capacity: not only is the poor in the world, but the poor is the very possibility of the world. Only the poor lives radically the actual and present being, in destitution and suffering, and thus only the poor has the ability to renew being. The divinity of the multitude of the poor does not point to any transcendence. On the contrary, here and only here in this world, in the existence of the poor, is the field of immanence presented, confirmed, consolidated, and opened. The poor is god on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri]], &#039;&#039;Empire&#039;&#039; (2000), p. 157&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.&#039;&#039;&#039; This Being governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all, and on account of His dominion He is wont to be called Lord God, Universal Ruler.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica]]&#039;&#039; (1687)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the beginning formed matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable particles, of such sizes and figures, and with such other properties, and in such proportion to space, as most conduced to the end for which he formed them; and that these primitive particles, being solids, are incomparably harder than any porous bodies compounded of them; even so very hard, as never to wear or break in pieces; no ordinary power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first creation.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Opticks|Opticks, or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light]]&#039;&#039;, 4th edition (1730)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Heavenly Master governs all the world as Sovereign of the universe. We are astonished at Him by reason of His perfection, we honor Him and fall down before Him because of His unlimited power. From blind physical necessity, which is always and everywhere the same, no variety adhering to time and place could evolve, and all variety of created objects which represent order and life in the universe could happen only by the willful reasoning of its original Creator, Whom I call the Lord God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Newton]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Our Humanist Heritage&#039;&#039; (2010) by George Frater, p. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039;, § 357, Kauffman trans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott ist eine Mutmaßung; aber ich will, daß euer Mutmaßen nicht weiter reiche, als euer schaffender Wille.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is an assumption; but I want your assuming to reach no further than your creative will.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &amp;quot;Upon the Blessed Isles&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Thus Spoke Zarathustra&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott ist ein Gedanke, der macht alles Gerade krumm.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;God is a thought which makes crooked all that is straight.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &amp;quot;Upon the Blessed Isles&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Thus Spoke Zarathustra&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead: but considering the state Man is in, there will perhaps be caves, for ages yet, in which his shadow will be shown.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], in &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), section 125&lt;br /&gt;
** The reduction of Nietzsche&#039;s thought to … the first-liner of a graffito sometimes found in certain modern tiled cells and catacombs:&lt;br /&gt;
:: &#039;&#039;&#039;God is dead&#039;&#039;&#039; — Nietzsche &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Nietzsche is dead — &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: This reduction could appear to be the creative interpretation of masterful will to power — if Nietzsche&#039;s thought and style are as uncontrolled as the critics suggest. … Nietzsche himself anticipates the strife of revengeful graffiti at the conclusion of his text: &amp;quot;Wherever there are walls I shall inscribe this eternal accusation against Christianity upon them — I can write in letters which make even the blind see.&amp;quot; …Nietzsche says in his preface that his readers must have a &amp;quot;predestination for the labyrinth&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;new ears for new music&amp;quot; if they are to understand this difficult writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Gary Shapiro in &#039;&#039;Nietzschean Narratives&#039;&#039; (1989), p. 126&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;20,000 Quips &amp;amp; Quotes&#039;&#039; (1995) edited by Evan Esar, p. 347&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Will to truth&amp;quot; does not mean &amp;quot;I do not want to let myself be deceived&amp;quot; but—there is no alternative—&amp;quot;I will not deceive, not even myself&amp;quot;; and with that we stand on moral ground.  ... You will have gathered what I am getting at, namely, that it is still a metaphysical faith upon which our faith in science rests—that even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians, still take our fire, too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year-old faith, the Christian faith which was also [[Plato|Plato&#039;s]] faith, that God is truth; that truth is divine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), B. Williams, ed. (2001), § 344&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What differentiates us is not that we find no God—neither in history, nor in nature, nor behind nature—but that we do not feel that what has been revered as God is ‘god-like.’&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Antichrist&#039;&#039;, § 47, in W. Kaufmann, &#039;&#039;Nietzsche&#039;&#039;, p. 101&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is a mean kid sitting on an anthill with a magnifying glass, and I&#039;m the ant.&#039;&#039;&#039; He could fix my life in five minutes if He wanted to, but he&#039;d rather tear off my feelers and watch me squirm.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Bruce [[Giordano Bruno|Nolan]]&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;[[Bruce Almighty]]&#039;&#039; (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There probably is a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn&#039;t.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John von Neumann]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;John Von Neumann : The Scientific Genius Who Pioneered the Modern Computer , Game Theory, Nuclear Deterrence and Much More&#039;&#039; (1992) by Norman Macrae, p. 379&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After rising from deep [[w:Dhyāna in Buddhism|meditative absorption]] ([[w:jhāna|jhāna]]), the Buddhist meditator is advised to view the physical and mental factors constituting his experience in the light of the three characteristics of all conditioned existence: [[w:Impermanence|impermanence]], [[w:Dukkha|liability to suffering]], and [[w:Anatta|absence of an abiding ego or eternal substance]]. This is done primarily in order to utilize the meditative purity and strength of consciousness for the highest purpose: liberating insight. But this procedure also has a very important side effect which concerns us here: the meditator will not be overwhelmed by any uncontrolled emotions and thoughts evoked by his singular experience, and will thus be able to avoid interpretations of that experience not warranted by the facts.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hence a Buddhist meditator, while benefiting from the refinement of consciousness he has achieved, will be able to see these meditative experiences for what they are; and he will further know that they are without any abiding substance that could be attributed to a deity manifesting itself to his mind. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nyanaponika Thera]], &amp;quot;Buddhism and the God-Idea&amp;quot; (1962)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== O ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Man is born broken. He lives by mending. The grace of God is glue.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eugene O&#039;Neill]], [http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks04/0400091h.html The Great God Brown] (1926)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Near&#039;&#039;&#039;: Nobody can say what is right and what is wrong, what is righteous and what is evil. Even if there is a God, and I had his teachings before me, I would think it through and decide if that was right or wrong myself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Death Note]] chapter 105, written by Tsugumi Ohba &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Can omniscient God, who&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Knows the future, find&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The Omnipotence to&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Change His future mind?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Karen Owens|Karen Owens]] in: &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=yq1xDpicghkC&amp;amp;pg=PA101 The God Delusion]&#039;&#039;, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Jan 16, 2008, p. 101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Having refuted, then, as well as we could, every notion which might suggest that we were to think of God as in any degree corporeal, we go on to say that, according to strict truth, &#039;&#039;&#039;God is incomprehensible, and incapable of being measured.&#039;&#039;&#039; For whatever be the knowledge which we are able to obtain of God, either by perception or reflection, we must of necessity believe that He is by many degrees far better than what we perceive Him to be.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Origen]] &#039;&#039;On First Principles&#039;&#039;, Bk. 1, ch. 1; par. 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Cura pii Dis sunt, &amp;amp; qui coluere coluntur.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Heaven rewards the pious; those who cherish God&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Themselves are cherished.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Metamorphoses&#039;&#039;, VIIL, 725&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== P ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:General George S. Patton gravesite, Luxembourg.jpg|thumb|It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who [[Death|died]]. Rather we should thank God that such men [[Life|lived]]. ~ [[George S. Patton, Jr.]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Terry Pratchett Arms.svg|thumb|I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve found God, but I may have seen where gods come from. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Terry Pratchett]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, to the fourth question in the Westminster Shorter Catechism, &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;What is God?&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;, the answer read as follows: God is a [[Holy Spirit|Spirit]], [[infinite]], eternal and uncheangeable, in his being, [[wisdom]], power, [[Sacred#Distinguished from &amp;quot;Holy&amp;quot;|holiness]], justice and [[truth]].&lt;br /&gt;
: This statement the great [[Charles Hodge]] described as &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;probably the best definition of God ever penned by a man.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039; (p. 21).&lt;br /&gt;
: The [[Book of Daniel]] tells us about the wisdom, might and truth oft he great God who rules history and shows his [[sovereignty]] in acts of judgement and mercy towards individuals and nations according to his own pleasure (p. 29).&lt;br /&gt;
:* {{cite book|url= https://books.google.it/books?id=06yoMWEmwPYC&amp;amp;pg=PA7&amp;amp;dq=knowing+god&amp;amp;hl=it&amp;amp;source=gbs_selected_pages&amp;amp;cad=2|first1= James I.|last1= Packer|title= Knowing God|publisher= InterVarsity Press|edition= first|year= 1973|chapter= 1 - The study of God|location= Downers Grove, Illinois|language= en|pages= 21, 29|isbn= 978-0-8308-1651-4|lccn= 73-81573|archive-url= |archive-date=|deadurl= }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Those of us who are [[Gnosticism|Gnostics]] believe that [[all]] [[people]] are ultimately saved and that God always [[Love|loves]] us, no matter what we do. These beliefs are [[Truth|true]], but they can very easily be simplified and misunderstood.&#039;&#039;&#039; God is never [[Anger|angry]] with us in the way in which a vengeful [[human]] would reject us, but God’s love for us has a dark side and one which we should rightfully [[fear]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;God loves us not in a sentimental way which aims at our ease and [[pleasure]] but, rather in a way which aims at our highest [[good]] and with an intensity which no one, even the highest [[angels]], can understand.&#039;&#039;&#039; God is absolutely determined, with an [[infinite]] determination, to rid us of all that does not reflect His Goodness. As one of our hymns puts it,&lt;br /&gt;
::&#039;&#039;“But unto wrong what is His Name? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Our God is a consuming [[flame]] &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To every [[wrong]] beneath the [[sun]]!”&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
: And, because of that, &#039;&#039;&#039;God’s [[punishments]] are terrible, and it is wise to fear them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
:* Edward J. Parkinson, in [http://www.catholicgnostics.com/node/17 &amp;quot;Divine Justice: Gnostic Reflections on Some Often Terrifying Realities&amp;quot; at &#039;&#039;CatholicGnostics.com&#039;&#039;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;FEU. Dieu d&#039;Abraham, Dieu d&#039;Isaac, Dieu de Jacob, non des philosophes et savants. Certitude. Certitude. Sentiment. Joie. Paix.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;FIRE. God of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, not of the philosophers and scholars. Certainty. Certainty. Feeling. Joy. Peace.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], Note on a parchment stitched to the lining of Pascal&#039;s coat, found by a servant shortly after his death, as quoted in [[w:Francis Crawford Burkitt|Burkitt]] &#039;&#039;Speculum religionis&#039;&#039; (1929), p. 150&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Compare not thyself with others, but with Me. If thou dost not find Me in those with whom thou comparest thyself, thou comparest thyself to one who is abominable. If thou findest Me in them, compare thyself to Me. But whom wilt thou compare? Thyself, or Me in thee? If it is thyself, it is one who is abominable. If it is I, thou comparest Me to Myself. Now I am God in all.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1669), § 554&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Posterity will one day [[laugh]] at the [[Fools|foolishness]] of modern materialistic philosophers. The more I study [[nature]], the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator. I pray while I am engaged at my work in the laboratory.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Literary Digest&#039;&#039; (18 October 1902)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The more I study nature, the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Literary Digest&#039;&#039; (18 October 1902)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Science, which brings man nearer to God&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Louis Pasteur]], quoted in René Vallery-Radot, &#039;&#039;The Life of Pasteur&#039;&#039; (1902), vol. 1, p. 194&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who [[Death|died]]. Rather we should thank God that such men [[Life|lived]]..&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** General [[George S. Patton, Jr.]], in a speech at the Copley Plaza Hotel, Boston Massachusetts (7 June 1945), quoted in &#039;&#039;Patton : Ordeal and Triumph&#039;&#039; (1970) by Ladislas Farago&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plato and Aristotle in The School of Athens, by italian Rafael.jpg|thumb|You are young, my son, and, as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as a judge of the highest matters... Not one of them who took up in his youth with this opinion that there are no gods ever continued until old age faithful to his conviction. ~ [[Plato]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The word &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; so &amp;quot;capitalised&amp;quot; (as we Americans say), is &#039;&#039;the&#039;&#039; definable proper name, signifying &#039;&#039;Ens [[Necessity|necessarium]]&#039;&#039;; in my belief Really creator of all three Universes of Experience.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], in &amp;quot;[[s:A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God|A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God]]&amp;quot; (1908), § I. &#039;&#039;Ens necessarium&#039;&#039; is a latin expression which signifies &amp;quot;Necessary being, necessary entity&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alan Perlis]] (1982) &#039;&#039;Epigrams on Programming&#039;&#039;. nr.79&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The hypothesis of God is a peculiar one, in that it supposes an infinitely incomprehensible object, although every hypothesis, as such, supposes its object to be truly conceived in the hypothesis.&#039;&#039;&#039; This leaves the hypothesis but one way of understanding itself; namely, as vague yet as true so far as it is definite, and as continually tending to define itself more and more, and without limit. The hypothesis, being thus itself inevitably subject to the law of growth, appears in its vagueness to represent God as so, albeit this is directly contradicted in the hypothesis from its very first phase. But this apparent attribution of growth to God, since it is ineradicable from the hypothesis, cannot, according to the hypothesis, be flatly false. Its implications concerning the Universes will be maintained in the hypothesis, while its implications concerning God will be partly disavowed, and yet held to be less false than their denial would be. Thus the hypothesis will lead to our thinking of features of each Universe as purposed; and this will stand or fall with the hypothesis. Yet a purpose essentially involves growth, and so cannot be attributed to God. Still it will, according to the hypothesis, be less false to speak so than to represent God as purposeless.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Sanders Peirce]], in &amp;quot;A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God&amp;quot; (1908), § II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. &#039;&#039;&#039;This [[mind]] is the matrix of all matter.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Planck]], as he accepted the Nobel Prize (1919)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You are young, my son, and, as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as a judge of the highest matters... Not one of them who took up in his youth with this opinion that there are no gods ever continued until old age faithful to his conviction.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plato]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;[[w:Laws (dialogue)|The Laws]]&#039;&#039; (his last and longest dialogue).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is truth and light his shadow.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plato]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is a geometrician.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Plato]], but not found in his works&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Laugh where we must, be candid where we can,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But vindicate the ways of God to man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lo, the poor Indian! whose untutored mind&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 99&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To Him no high, no low, no great, no small;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He fills, He bounds, connects and equals all!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle I, line 277&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He mounts the [[storm]], and walks upon the [[wind]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle II, line 110&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An honest man&#039;s the noblest work of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle IV, line 248&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Slave to no sect, who takes no private road,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But looks through Nature up to Nature&#039;s God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;An Essay on Man&#039;&#039; (1733-34), Epistle IV, line 331&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t have much truck with the &amp;quot;[[religion]] is the cause of most of our wars&amp;quot; school of thought because that is manifestly done by mad, manipulative and power-hungry men who cloak their ambition in God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I number believers of all sorts among my friends. Some of them are praying for me. I&#039;m happy they wish to do this, I really am, but I think science may be a better bet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], in [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1028222/I-create-gods-time--I-think-exist.html &amp;quot;I create gods all the time - now I think one might exist, says fantasy author Terry Pratchett&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Daily Mail&#039;&#039; (21 June 2008)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve found God, but I may have seen where gods come from.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Terry Pratchett]], in &amp;quot;I create gods all the time - now I think one might exist, says fantasy author Terry Pratchett&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Daily Mail&#039;&#039; (21 June 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first act of man, filled and carried away with enthusiasm (of the divine breath), is to adore the invisible Providence on which he feels that he depends, and which he calls GOD.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]], &#039;&#039;The Philosophy of Misery&#039;&#039;. § 1.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Indeed the inscrutable [[One]] is out of the reach of every rational process. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Nor can any words come up to the inexpressible Good, this One, this Source of all unity, this super-existent Being. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Mind beyond mind, word beyond speech, it is gathered up by no discourse, by no intuition, by no name. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; It is and it is as no other being is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Pseudo-Dionysius, &#039;&#039;The Divine Names&#039;&#039;, 1, 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One thing I can&#039;t stand, it&#039;s people groveling.&lt;br /&gt;
** God, in &#039;&#039;[[Monty Python and the Holy Grail]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Q ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== R ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ngc1999.jpg|thumb|The [[Wisdom]] of God Manifested in the [[Works]] of the [[Creation]]. ~ [[John Ray]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Electric iron stand.jpg|thumb|If a person who indulges in gluttony is a glutton, and a person who commits a felony is a felon, then God is an iron. ~ [[Spider Robinson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AnttlersNewM45.jpg|thumb|In the [[presence]] of [[infinite]] might and infinite [[wisdom]], the [[strength]] of the strongest man is but weakness, and the keenest of [[mortal]] [[eyes]] see but dimly. ~ [[Theodore Roosevelt]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pasternak-rilke.jpeg|thumb|There are proofs of Your existence. I had forgotten them all, and never demanded any either, for what an overwhelming obligation would come with this certainty. ~ [[Rainer Maria Rilke]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rilke in Moscow by L.Pasternak (1928).jpg|thumb|Is it possible that there are people who say &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; and suppose they mean something shared by all? — Only consider two schoolboys: one of them buys a knife, and the other buys an identical one on the same day. And a week later, they show each other the two knives, and they turn out to be only remotely similar, so differently have they been shaped by different hands. ... Is it possible to believe we could have a god without making use of him? ~ [[Rainer Maria Rilke]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* All true knowledge of God begins with the knowledge of his hiddenness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gerhard von Rad|Gerhard von Rad]], &#039;&#039;Old Testament Theology. Volume II: The Theology of Israel&#039;s Prophetic Traditions&#039;&#039; (1960). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001, p. 377&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;He who is called [[Brahman]] by the [[w:Jnana|jnanis]] is known as [[w:Atman|Atman]] by the [[w:yogi|yogis]] and as [[w:Bhagavan|Bhagavan]] by the [[w:Bhakti|bhaktas]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The same brahmin is called priest, when worshipping in the temple, and cook, when preparing a meal in the kitchen. &#039;&#039;&#039;The &#039;&#039;jnani&#039;&#039;, following the path of knowledge, always reason about the Reality saying, &amp;quot;not this, not this.&amp;quot; Brahman is neither &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; nor &amp;quot;that&amp;quot;; It is neither the universe nor its living beings. Reasoning in this way, the mind becomes steady.&#039;&#039;&#039; Finally it disappears and the aspirant goes into [[w:samadhi|samadhi]]. This is the Knowledge of Brahman. It is the unwavering conviction of the jnani that Brahman alone is real and the world is illusory. &#039;&#039;&#039;All these [[names]] and forms are illusory, like a [[dream]]. What Brahman is cannot be described.&#039;&#039;&#039; One cannot even say that Brahman is a Person. This is the opinion of the jnanis, the followers of Vedanta. But &#039;&#039;&#039;the bhaktas accept all the states of consciousness. They take the waking state to be real also. They don&#039;t think the world to be illusory, like a dream. They say that the universe is a manifestation of the God&#039;s [[power]] and [[glory]]. God has created all these — [[sky]], [[stars]], [[moon]], [[sun]], [[mountains]], [[ocean]], [[men]], [[animals]]. They constitute His glory.&#039;&#039;&#039; He is within us, in our hearts. Again, He is outside. The most advanced devotees say that He Himself has become all this — the 24 cosmic principles, the universe, and all living beings. &#039;&#039;&#039;The devotee of God wants to eat sugar, and not become sugar.&#039;&#039;&#039; (All laugh.) Do you know how a lover of God feels? His attitude is: &amp;quot;O God, Thou art the Master, and I am Thy servant. Thou art the Mother, and I Thy child.&amp;quot; Or again: &amp;quot;Thou art my Father and Mother. &#039;&#039;&#039;Thou art the Whole, and I am a part.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot; He does not like to say, &amp;quot;I am Brahman.&amp;quot; They yogi seeks to realize the [[w:Paramatman|Paramatman]], the Supreme Soul. &#039;&#039;&#039;His ideal is the union of the embodied soul and the Supreme Soul.&#039;&#039;&#039; He withdraws his mind from sense objects and tries to concentrate on the Paramatman. Therefore, during the first stage of his spiritual discipline, he retires into solitude and with undivided attention practices [[meditation]] in a fixed posture. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; But the reality is one and the same; the difference is only in name. He who is Brahman is verily Atman, and again, He is the Bhagavan. He is Brahman to the followers of the path of knowledge, Paramatman to the yogis, and Bhagavan to the lovers of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ramakrishna]], &#039;&#039;The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna&#039;&#039; (1942), p. 132&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The [[Wisdom]] of God Manifested in the [[Works]] of the [[Creation]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Ray]], title of a book (1691)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most intellectual people do not [[believe]] in God, but they [[fear]] him just the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], in James Lee Christian &#039;&#039;Philosophy : An Introduction to the Art of Wondering&#039;&#039;,  (2005), p. 556.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The god of many cannot remain the true god.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Richardson]], &#039;&#039;Vectors: Aphorisms and Ten Second Essays&#039;&#039; (2001), #138&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is it possible that there are people who say &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; and suppose they mean something shared by all? &amp;amp;mdash; Only consider two schoolboys: one of them buys a knife, and the other buys an identical one on the same day. And a week later, they show each other the two knives, and they turn out to be only remotely similar, so differently have they been shaped by different hands. ... Is it possible to believe we could have a god without making use of him?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge|The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge]]&#039;&#039; (1910), as translated by Michael Hulse (2009), p. 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A thought struck me abruptly: My God, you do &#039;&#039;exist&#039;&#039;, then. There are proofs of Your existence. I had forgotten them all, and never demanded any either, for what an overwhelming obligation would come with this certainty. And yet that is what is now being shown to me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rainer Maria Rilke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge|The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge]]&#039;&#039; (1910), as translated by Michael Hulse (2009), p. 135&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When I speak of All That Is, you must understand my position within it. All That Is knows no other. This does not mean that there &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;may&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; not be more to know. It does not mean, and here words quite fail us, it does not mean that All That Is, in any terms we can conceive of, &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;may&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; not be limited. It &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;knows&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of no other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jane Roberts]], (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If a person who indulges in gluttony is a glutton, and a person who commits a felony is a felon, then God is an iron.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Spider Robinson]], in &amp;quot;God is an Iron&amp;quot; (1977)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gene Roddenberry]], Free Inquiry (autumn, 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think God is as much a basic ingredient in the universe as neutrons and positrons . . . God is, for lack of a better term, clout. This is the prime force, when we look around the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gene Roddenberry]] [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=113558088X]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you do not know your heart, you do not know your God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Radoslav Rochallyi]], &amp;quot;Mythra Invictus&amp;quot;, published in VSS:Bratislava, (2019), p. 62&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, if you read attentively and objectively the &amp;quot;Letter about God&amp;quot;: in [[w:The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett|The Mahatma Letters]], you will see that the Mahatma repudiates the sacrilegious and anthropomorphic conception of a Personal god—cruel and unjust, chastising with eternal damnation all so-called heretics, and justifying all the crimes committed in his Holy Name! Verily, such a God cannot have a Mahatma&#039;s approval and respect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters I,&#039;&#039; (8 September 1934)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Its Humanity develops fully only in the Fourth—our Fourth—our present Round. Up to this fourth Life-Cycle, it is referred to as &#039;humanity&#039; only for lack of a more appropriate term. Like the grub which becomes chrysalis and butterfly, Man, or rather that which becomes man, passes through all the forms and kingdoms during the first Round and through all the human shapes during the two following Rounds... During the three Rounds to come, Humanity, like the globe [planet] on which it lives, will be ever tending to reassume its primeval form, that of a Dhyan-Chohanic Host. Man tends to become a God and then—GOD, like every other atom in the Universe...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (16 November 1935)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Ruling Principle of the Universe is one of Harmony and Love—God is Love. Therefore, if we wish to embody the most ancient axiom, &amp;quot;as above, so below,&amp;quot; we should become unified precisely upon this principle of love and should be subordinate to it, regarding it as our only boundless Ruler. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (15 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*By propagating the dogma of Jesus Christ as the only begotten Son of God, the Church contradicts the very sense of the prayer given to us by Jesus Christ himself, &amp;quot;Our Father which art in heaven.&amp;quot; And also the words of the Scriptures, &amp;quot;So God created man in his own image.&amp;quot; (Genesis 1:27)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (2 April 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Verily, there is nothing more sacrilegious for human consciousness than to limit the Ineffable Grandeur of the Divine Principle that is poured out over the entire Universe. Assuredly, from this monstrous, ignorant belittling issue all the unworthy concepts of God. Man, in his conceit, tries to bring everything down to his own level and likeness... Indeed, the books of the Teaching are full of concepts of the Divine Principle, or God, and of Spirit and spirituality.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (24 May 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The God in us is the sole reality; all else, as beautifully and poetically expressed by the East, is but the &amp;quot;Play of the Great Mother of the World.&amp;quot;...There is no God, or Gods, who was not at some time a man.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Helena Roerich]]  &#039;&#039;Letters II,&#039;&#039; (24 May 1936)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In the presence of infinite might and infinite wisdom, the strength of the strongest man is but weakness, and the keenest of mortal eyes see but dimly.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Theodore Roosevelt]]&#039;s Christian Citizenship Address before the Young Men&#039;s Christian Association, Carnegie Hall, New York (30 December 1900)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Nothing remains, under God, but those passions which have often proved&#039;&#039;&#039; the best ministers of His vengeance, and &#039;&#039;&#039;the surest protectors of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.archive.org/stream/elementarysketc03smitgoog#page/n440/mode/2up Lecture XXVIL: On Habit - Part II, in “Elementary Sketches of Moral Philosophy”, delivered at The Royal Institution in the years 1804, 1805, and 1806 by the late Rev. Sydney Smith, M.A. (Spottiswoodes and Shaw (London: 1849))], p. 424&lt;br /&gt;
*** Another Variant: &#039;&#039;&#039;When the usual hopes and the common aids of man are all gone, nothing remains under God but those passions which have often proved the best ministers of His purpose and the surest protectors of the world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*** Quoted by [[w:Theodore Roosevelt|Theodore Roosevelt]] in his &amp;quot;[http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/images/research/txtspeeches/668.pdf Brotherhood and the Heroic Virtues]&amp;quot; Address at the Veterans&#039; Reunion, Burlington, Vermont, September 5, 1901 and published in Theodore Roosevelt&#039;s &amp;quot;The Strenuous Life: Essays and Addresses&amp;quot; by Dover Publications (April 23, 2009) in its Dover Thrift Editions (ISBN: 978-0486472294), p. 127&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kill one man and you are a murderer. Kill millions and you are a conqueror. Kill everyone and you are a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Rostand]], &#039;&#039;Thoughts of a Biologist&#039;&#039; (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If I were granted omnipotence, and millions of years to experiment in, I should not think Man much to boast of as the final result of all my efforts.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &#039;&#039;Religion and Science&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there were a God, I think it very unlikely that he would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt his existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], quoted in &#039;&#039;Bertrand Russell&#039;s Best&#039;&#039; (1958), &amp;quot;On Religion&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pragmatists]] explained that Truth is what it pays to believe. Historians of morals reduced the Good to a matter of tribal custom. Beauty was abolished by artists in a revolt against the sugary insipidities of a philistine epoch and in a mood of fury in which satisfaction is to be derived only from what hurts. And so the world was swept clear not only of God as a person but of God&#039;s essence as an ideal to which man owed an ideal allegiance. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bertrand Russell]], &amp;quot;On Being Modern-Minded,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Unpopular Essays&#039;&#039; (1950), p. 69&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== S ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tree of Life 2009 large.png |thumb|Individual things are nothing but modifications of the attributes of God, or modes by which the attributes of God are expressed in a fixed and definite manner. ~ [[Baruch Spinoza]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think that if there were a God, there would be less evil on this earth. I believe that if evil exists here below, then either it was willed by God or it was beyond His powers to prevent it. Now I cannot bring myself to fear a God who is either spiteful or weak. I defy Him without fear and care not a fig for his thunderbolts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marquis de Sade]], &#039;&#039;Justine or The Misfortunes of Virtue&#039;&#039; (1787) [This quote is strikingly similar to Epicurus&#039; above.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The existence of the world without God seems to me less absurd than the presence of a God, existing in all his perfection, creating an imperfect man in order to make him run the risk of Hell.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Armand Salacrou|Armand Salacrou]] in &#039;&#039;Ceritudes et incertitudes&#039;&#039; (1943)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Respectable society believed in God in order to avoid having to speak about him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], &#039;&#039;The Words&#039;&#039; (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott werden, Mensch sein, sich bilden, sind Ausdrücke, die einerlei bedeuten.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**To become God, to be human, to cultivate oneself are all expressions that mean the same thing.&lt;br /&gt;
*** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], &#039;&#039;Lucinde and the Fragments&#039;&#039;, P. Firchow, trans. (1991), “Athenaeum Fragments” § 262&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are as many gods as there are ideals. And further, the relation of the true artist and the true human being to his ideals is absolutely religious. The man for whom this inner divine service is the end and occupation of all his life is a priest, and this is how everyone can and should become a priest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schlegel]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Fragments&#039;&#039;, P. Firchow, trans. (1991) § 406&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In saying we are in immediate relation with God, the latter term is used only to designate the &#039;&#039;Whence&#039;&#039; of our spontaneous and receptive life, of which we become aware in our feeling of absolute dependence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schleiermacher]], in &#039;&#039;Theology of Schleiermacher&#039;&#039; (1911), pp. 121-122 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I can see him. I know that God is real. I know it in my heart. You can only believe in what you know to be [[Truth|true]]. You know your own truth. I know mine. Everyone should be able to find that within themselves... I want to live my life for God, and let other people take from that whatever they want.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Rachel Scott]], as quoted in [https://books.google.com/books?id=kI4YwhBD7FgC&amp;amp;pg=PA149 &#039;&#039;No Easy Answers: The Truth Behind Death at Columbine&#039;&#039;] (2002), by Brooks Brown and Rob Merritt, New York: Lantern Books, pp. 149&amp;amp;ndash;150&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I think the [[destiny]] of all men is not to sit in the rubble of their own making but to reach out for an ultimate [[perfection]] which is to be had. At the moment, it is a [[dream]]. But as of the [[moment]] we clasp hands with our neighbor, we build the first span to bridge the gap between the young and the old. At this hour, it’s a [[wish]]. But we have it within our [[power]] to make it a [[reality]]. If you want to prove that God is not [[dead]], first prove that [[man]] is [[alive]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rod Serling]] seech at Moorpark College, Moorpark, California (3 December 1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You have in yourself some thing similar to God, and therefore use yourself as the temple of God, on account of that which in you resembles God.&lt;br /&gt;
* The greatest honor which can be paid to God is to know and imitate him.&lt;br /&gt;
* Consider lost all the time in which you do not think of divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
* A good intellect is the choir of divinity.&lt;br /&gt;
* You should not dare to speak of God to the multitude.&lt;br /&gt;
* He who is worthy of God is also a god among men.&lt;br /&gt;
* He best honors God who makes his intellect as like God as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Quintus Sextius]] &#039;&#039;[[w:Sentences of Sextus|Sentences of Sextus]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We are all writing God&#039;s poem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Sexton]], as quoted by [[Erica Jong]], in [http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2000/oct/26/features11.g2 &amp;quot;Into the lion&#039;s den&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039; (26 October 2000)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is our fortress, in whose conquering name&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Let us resolve to scale their flinty bulwarks.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry VI, Part 2|&#039;&#039;Henry VI&#039;&#039;, Part II]] (c. 1590-91), Act II, scene 1, line 26&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God shall be my hope,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My stay, my guide and lantern to my feet.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], [[Henry VI, Part 2|&#039;&#039;Henry VI&#039;&#039;, Part II]] (c. 1590-91), Act II, scene 3, line 24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And to add greater honours to his age&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Than man could give him, he died fearing God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Henry VIII (play)|Henry VIII]]&#039;&#039; ([[w:Henry VIII (play)#Date|c. 1613]]), Act IV, scene 2, line 67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Had I but serv&#039;d my God with half the zeal&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I serv&#039;d my king, He would not in mine age&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Have left me naked to mine enemies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Shakespeare]], &#039;&#039;[[Henry VIII (play)|Henry VIII]]&#039;&#039; ([[w:Henry VIII (play)#Date|c. 1613]]), Act III, scene 2, lines 455–57. Cardinal Wolsey is speaking to his servant, Cromwell. During the Watergate hearings on June 12, 1973, Senator Sam Ervin quoted these words to Herbert Porter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Don&#039;t worry if you see God first, tell him shit got worse.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[2Pac|Tupac Shakur]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-rHzG3moso &amp;quot;God Bless the Dead&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Beware of the man whose god is in the skies.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;Maxims for Revolutionists&#039;&#039;, #83&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If he is infinitely good, what reason should we have to fear him?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is infinitely wise, why should we have doubts concerning our future?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he knows all, why warn him of our needs and fatigue him with our prayers?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is everywhere, why erect temples to him?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If he is just, why fear that he will punish the creatures that he has filled with weaknesses?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;The Necessity of Atheism&#039;&#039; (1811)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tacitus]] says, that the [[Jews]] held God to be something eternal and supreme, neither subject to change nor to decay; therefore, they permit no statues in their cities or their temples. The universal Being can only be described or defined by negatives which deny his subjection to the laws of all inferior existences. &#039;&#039;&#039;Where indefiniteness ends, idolatry and anthropomorphism begin.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], in &#039;&#039;Essay on Christianity&#039;&#039; (1859)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If we find great difficulty from its admirable arrangement in conceiving that the Universe has existed from all eternity, and to resolve this difficulty suppose a Creator, how much more clearly must we perceive the necessity of this very Creator’s creation whose perfections comprehend an arrangement far more accurate and just.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Percy Bysshe Shelley]], &#039;&#039;Eusebes and Theosophus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here was a beast for whom there could be no predator. What better definition of God is there than that?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Lucius Shepard|Lucius Shepard]], &#039;&#039;Señor Volto&#039;&#039; (2003). Originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Sci Fiction|Sci Fiction]]&#039;&#039; (February 12, 2003). Reprinted in [[w:David G. Hartwell|David G. Hartwell]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;Year’s Best Fantasy 4&#039;&#039; (p. 349)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Doesn’t that sound like God to you? This big stupid, invulnerable thing that resembles us and whose creations are more intelligent than it is? The Bible left out that part, but it would explain a great deal.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Lucius Shepard]], &#039;&#039;The Skinny Girl&#039;&#039; (2011), in [[w:Ellen Datlow|Ellen Datlow]] (ed.) &#039;&#039;Naked City&#039;&#039; (p. 453)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Joseph Smith first vision stained glass.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;For behold, this is my work and my glory — to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.&#039;&#039; ~ God as portrayed in the &#039;&#039;{{w|Book of Moses}}&#039;&#039; (1830), as dictated by [[Joseph Smith]], 1:39]]&lt;br /&gt;
* For behold, this is my work and my glory — to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man.&lt;br /&gt;
** God as portrayed in the &#039;&#039;{{w|Book of Moses}}&#039;&#039; (1830), as dictated by [[Joseph Smith]], 1:39&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The value of a mind is measured by the nature of the objects it habitually contemplates. They whose thoughts are of trifles are trifling: they who dwell with what is eternally true, good and fair, are like unto God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Lancaster Spalding]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; (1901), p. 268&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;By &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;, I mean a being absolutely infinite — that is, a substance consisting in infinite attributes, of which each expresses eternal and infinite essentiality.&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Explanation — I say absolutely infinite, not infinite after its kind: for, of a thing infinite only after its kind, infinite attributes may be denied; but &#039;&#039;&#039;that which is absolutely infinite, contains in its essence whatever expresses reality, and involves no negation.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in [[s:Ethics (Spinoza)|&#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; [&#039;&#039;Ethics Geometrically Demonstrtated&#039;&#039;] (1677)]], Definition 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Whatsoever is, is in God, and without God nothing can be, or be conceived.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God and all attributes of God are eternal.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Baruch Spinoza]], in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Individual things are nothing but modifications of the attributes of God, or modes by which the attributes of God are expressed in a fixed and definite manner.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677), Prop. 25&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the indwelling and not the transient cause of all things.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Things could not have been brought into being by God in any manner or in any order different from that which has in fact obtained.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Baruch Spinoza, in &#039;&#039;Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata&#039;&#039; (1677)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We are willing to worship a God only if God makes us safe. Thus you get the silly question, How does a good God let bad things happen to good people? Of course, it was a rabbi who raised that question, but Christians took it up as their own. Have you read the Psalms lately? We&#039;re seeing a much more complex God than that question gives credit for.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Stanley Hauerwas]] from the Chronicle for Higher Education, The Chronicle Review, &amp;quot;A Complex God&amp;quot;  September 28, 2001  &#039;&#039;The Chronicle Review&#039;&#039; Page: B6 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[universe]] is God’s son.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dejan Stojanovic]], &#039;&#039;The Sun Watches the Sun&#039;&#039; (1999) “God’s Son” (Sequence: “Is It Possible to Write a Poem”)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== T ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brocken-tanzawa2.JPG|thumb|God is that infinite All of which man knows himself to be a finite part. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God alone exists truly. Man manifests Him in time, space and matter. ~ [[Leo Tolstoy]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDC-emb.jpg|thumb|God, from a beautiful [[necessity]], is [[Love]] in all he doeth, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love, a brilliant fire, to gladden or consume... ~ [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mosaik-Ikone Christus der Barmherzige.jpg|thumb|Here below, God is the feeblest and most destitute of beings; his love, unlike that of idols, does not fill the carnal part of the soul. ~ [[Gustave Thibon]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of man.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Stray Birds&#039;&#039; (1916); paraphrased variant: Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God seeks comrades and claims [[love]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The devil seeks [[slaves]] and claims [[obedience]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Fireflies&#039;&#039; (1928)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is a mistake to suppose that God is only, or even chiefly, concerned with religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Temple (bishop)|William Temple]], quoted in [[w:R. V. C. Bodley|R. V. C. Bodley]], &#039;&#039;In Search of Serenity&#039;&#039; (1955), ch. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God is truly powerful, He would not let this plague go on.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sheri S. Tepper]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Grass (novel)|Grass]]&#039;&#039; (1989), Chapter 11&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here below, God is the feeblest and most destitute of beings; his love, unlike that of idols, does not fill the carnal part of the soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gustave Thibon]], Introduction to &#039;&#039;[[Gravity and Grace]]&#039;&#039; (1947), p. 22&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man’s basic anxiety … drives the anxious subject to establish objects of fear. Anxiety strives to become fear, because fear can be met by courage. … Horror is ordinarily avoided by the transformation of anxiety into fear of something, no matter what. The human mind is not only, as [[John Calvin|Calvin]] has said, a permanent factory of idols, it is also a permanent factory of fears—the first in order to escape God, the second in order to escape anxiety. … But ultimately the attempts to transform anxiety into fear are vain. The basic anxiety, the anxiety of a finite being about the threat of nonbeing, cannot be eliminated. It belongs to existence itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul Tillich]], &#039;&#039;The Courage To Be&#039;&#039; (1952), p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What, but God?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Inspiring God! who boundless Spirit all,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And unremitting Energy, pervades,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Adjusts, sustains, and agitates the whole.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], &#039;&#039;The Seasons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Spring&#039;&#039; (1728), line 849&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;The word God has become empty of meaning through thousands of years of misuse... I mean that people who have never even glimpsed the realm of the sacred, the infinite vastness behind that word, use it with great conviction, as if they knew what they are talking about.&#039;&#039;&#039; Or they argue against it, as if they knew what it is that they are denying. This misuse gives rise to absurd beliefs, assertions, and egoic delusions, such as &amp;quot;My or our God is the only true God, and your God is false,&amp;quot; or Nietzsche&#039;s famous statement &amp;quot;God is dead.&amp;quot;   The word God has become a closed concept. The moment the word is uttered, a mental image is created, no longer, perhaps, of an old man with a white beard, but still a mental representation of someone or something outside you, and, yes, almost inevitably a male someone or something.  Neither God nor Being nor any other word can define or explain the ineffable reality behind the word, so the only important question is whether the word is a help or a hindrance in enabling you to experience That toward which it points. Does it point beyond itself to that transcendental reality, or does it lend itself too easily to becoming no more than an idea in your head that you believe in, a mental idol?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p. 14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A [[word]] is no more than a means to an end. Its an abstraction. Not unlike a signpost, it points beyond itself. The word honey isn&#039;t honey. You can study and talk about honey for as long as you like, but you won&#039; t really know it until you taste it. After you have tasted it, the word becomes less important to you. You won&#039;t be attached to it anymore. Similarly, you can talk or think about [[God]] continuously for the rest of your life, but does that mean you know or have even glimpsed the reality to which the word points? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p.71&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If, for whatever reason, you disliked the word honey, that might prevent you from ever tasting it. If you had a strong aversion to the word God which is a negative form of attachment, you may be denying not just the word but also the reality to which it points. You would be cutting yourself off from the possibility of experiencing that reality. All this is, of course, intrinsically connected with being identified with your mind. So, if a word doesn&#039;t work for you anymore, then drop it and replace it with one that does work. If you don&#039;t like the word [[sin]], then call it [[unconsciousness]] or [[insanity]]. That may get you closer to the truth, the reality behind the word, than a long-misused word like sin, and leaves little room for [[guilt]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in  &#039;&#039;[[The Power of Now: A Guide to Spiritual Enlightenment]]&#039;&#039; (1997) p.71&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has been said:”Stillness is the language God speaks, and everything else is a bad translation.” Stillness is really another word for space. Becoming conscious of stillness whenever we encounter it in our lives will connect us with the formless and timeless dimension within ourselves, that which is beyond thought, beyond [[ego]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life&#039;s Purpose,&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“I want to know the mind of God,” Einstein said. “The rest are details.” What is the mind of God? Consciousness. What does it mean to know the mind of God? To be aware. What are the details? Your outer purpose, and whatever happens outwardly.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The word [[enthusiasm]] comes from ancient Greek – en and theos meaning God. And the related word enthousiazein means &amp;quot;to be possessed by a god.” With enthusiasm you will find that you don&#039;t have to do it all by yourself. In fact, there is nothing of significance that you can do by yourself. Sustained enthusiasm brings into existence a wave of creative energy, and all you have to do then is “ride the wave.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]], in &#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose&#039;&#039; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What is [[God]]? The eternal One Life underneath all the forms of life.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Eckhart Tolle]] in [&#039;&#039;A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life&#039;s Purpose,&#039;&#039; p. 98, (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Love is life. All, everything that I understand, I understand only because I love.&#039;&#039;&#039; Everything is, everything exists, only because I love. Everything is united by it alone. Love is God, and to die means that I, a particle of love, shall return to the general and eternal source.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:War and Peace|War and Peace]]&#039;&#039; Bk XIII, Chapter 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is that infinite All of which man knows himself to be a finite part. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God alone exists truly. Man manifests Him in time, space and matter.&#039;&#039;&#039; The more God&#039;s manifestation in man (life) unites with the manifestations (lives) of other beings, the more man exists. This union with the lives of other beings is accomplished through love. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is not love, but the more there is of love, the more man manifests God, and the more he truly exists... &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;We acknowledge God only when we are conscious of His manifestation in us.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]] in his diary (1 November 1910)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Why is it when we talk to God we&#039;re said to be praying — but when God talks to us, we&#039;re said to be schizophrenic?&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lily Tomlin]], Contributions of Jane Wagner&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To be right with God has often meant to be in trouble with men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[A. W. Tozer]], &#039;&#039;Of God and Men&#039;&#039;, p. 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am what you call &amp;quot;The World&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;The Universe&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;Everything&amp;quot;. Or perhaps &amp;quot;One&amp;quot;. And, &#039;&#039;&#039;I am &amp;quot;You&amp;quot;.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Truth]] Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So what if a kid dies? God will take care of him.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]], in April 2013, as quoted in [http://abcnews.go.com/US/boston-bombing-day-stunning-stop-killers-made-attack/story?id=38335067 &amp;quot;Boston Bombing Day 1: The Stunning Stop the Killers Made After the Attack&amp;quot;] (18 April 2016), by Brian Ross, &#039;&#039;ABC News&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God, from a beautiful [[necessity]], is [[Love]] in all he doeth, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Love, a brilliant fire, to gladden or consume&#039;&#039;&#039;: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The wicked work their woe by looking upon love, and hating it: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The righteous find their joys in yearning on its loveliness for ever.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]], in &amp;quot;Of Immortality&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Proverbial Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1849)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Satan]]: There is no God, no universe, no human race, no earthly life, no heaven, no hell. It is all a Dream, a grotesque and foolish dream. Nothing exists but you. And You are but a Thought — a vagrant Thought, a useless Thought, a homeless Thought, wandering forlorn among the empty eternities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mark Twain]] &#039;&#039;[[w:The Mysterious Stranger|The Mysterious Stranger]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Some one happened to mention to me that a certain [[Helena Blavatsky|Madame Blavatsky]] had just arrived in London, bringing with her a [[Theosophy|new religion]]... I asked her to explain her new religion... I explained to her my difficulties, which she proceeded to solve by expounding the doctrines of [[reincarnation]] and [[Karma]]. They jumped instantly to my reason. &#039;&#039;&#039;I there and then found the Just [[God]], of whom I had been in search.&#039;&#039;&#039; From that day to this I have never had reason to swerve from those beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Violet Tweedale|Violet Tweedale]], [[Ghosts I Have Seen, and Other Psychic Experiences|&#039;&#039;Ghosts I Have Seen, and Other Psychic Experiences&#039;&#039;]],    1919&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1in god we trust.jpg|thumb|In God We Trust. ~ United States of America national motto]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US-original-Declaration-1776.jpg|thumb|[[w:All men are created equal|All men are created equal]], that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are [[w:Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness|Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness]]. ~ United States Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In God We Trust.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[United States of America]] national motto, as well as &#039;&#039;E PLURIBUS UNUM&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We hold these truths to be self-evident, that &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:All men are created equal|all men are created equal]], that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are [[w:Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness|Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness]].&#039;&#039;&#039;--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:United States Declaration of Independence|United States Declaration of Independence]] (July 4, 1776)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== V ==&lt;br /&gt;
* I looked to find a man who walked with God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Like the translated patriarch of old;— &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Though gladdened millions on His footstool trod,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet none with him did such sweet converse hold;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I heard the wind in low complaint go by&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That none his melodies like him could hear;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Day unto day spoke wisdom from on high,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yet none like David turned a willing ear;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God walked alone unhonored through the earth;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For Him no heart-built temple open stood,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The soul forgetful of her nobler birth&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Had hewn him lofty shrines of stone and wood,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And left unfinished and in ruins still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The only temple he delights to fill.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jones Very]], “Enoch”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The one [[idea]] the [[Hindu]] [[religions]] differ in from every other in the [[world]], the one idea to express which the [[sages]] almost exhaust the [[w:Vocabulary|vocabulary]] of the Sanskrit language, is that man must realise God even in this [[life]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Swami Vivekananda]] in: &#039;&#039;[https://books.google.co.in/books?id=kQCNAwAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA405 The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda [ Volume 4 ] ],&#039;&#039;  Kartindo.com, p. 405.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: &amp;quot;O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.&amp;quot; And God granted it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], in a letter to Étienne Noël Damilaville (16 May 1767)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If God did not exist, He would have to be invented.&amp;quot; But all nature cries aloud that he does exist: that there is a supreme intelligence, an immense power, an admirable order, and everything teaches us our own dependence on it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Voltaire quoting himself in a letter to Prince Frederick William of Prussia (28 November 1770), as quoted in &#039;&#039;Voltaire in His Letters&#039;&#039; (1919) by [[Evelyn Beatrice Hall|S. G. Tallentyre (Evelyn Beatrice Hall)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;More Random Walks in Science : An Anthology&#039;&#039; (1982) by Robert L. Weber, p. 65&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Take Care of the People, and God Almighty Will Take Care of Himself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Sirens of Titan|The Sirens of Titan]]&#039;&#039; (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp; WAS MUSIC.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], [http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0205-29.htm &amp;quot;Vonnegut&#039;s Blues for America&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Sunday Herald|Sunday Herald]]&#039;&#039; (5 February 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is the final proof of God&#039;s omnipotence that he need not exist in order to save us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Peter De Vries|Peter De Vries]], &#039;&#039;The Mackerel Plaza&#039;&#039; (1958), p. 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== W ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rosace.jpg|thumb|To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist. ~ [[Simone Weil]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Дервиш руми.jpg|thumb|Dear God … Everyone I [[know]] admits they’ve never seen your [[face]], they’re not sure where you [[live]] and have no map to [[Kingdom of God|the place]]. ~ &lt;br /&gt;
[[Dawud Wharnsby]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Storm Spirits.jpg|thumb|&amp;quot;[[w:Elohim|Elohim]],&amp;quot; the name for the creative power in &#039;&#039;[[w:Book of Genesis|Genesis]]&#039;&#039;, is a female plural, a fact that generations of learned rabbis and Christian theologians have all explained as merely grammatical convention. The King James and most other Bibles translate it as &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; but if you take the grammar literally, it seems to mean &amp;quot;goddesses.&amp;quot; [[w:El Shaddai|Al Shaddai]], god of battles, appears later, and [[w:Tetragrammaton|YHWH]], mispronounced Jehovah, later still. ~ [[Robert Anton Wilson]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:US Navy 060608-N-6501M-005 The U.S. Military Sealift Command (MSC) Hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19), anchored off of the coast of Jolo City.jpg|thumb|I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we&#039;ll find it in the nature of that thing. &lt;br /&gt;
~ [[Frank Lloyd Wright]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Don&#039;t you know there ain&#039;t no devil? There&#039;s only God when He&#039;s drunk.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Waits]], in &amp;quot;[[w:Heartattack and Vine (song)|Heartattack and Vine]]&amp;quot; on &#039;&#039;[[w:Heartattack and Vine|Heartattack and Vine]]&#039;&#039; (1980)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God&#039;s greatness and goodness are measured by the fact that he gives us choices.&#039;&#039;&#039; He doesn&#039;t require us to thank him for our food. (In case you hadn&#039;t noticed.) God is not a Modernist. He doesn&#039;t view us as nails. God expects us to behave like carpenters. Indeed, he gave us a carpenter as an example. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; So I think God is postmodern. &#039;&#039;&#039;He has his own ideas of what rules, and what sucks, and he doesn&#039;t expect everyone else to agree with him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Larry Wall]] in [http://www.perl.com/pub/a/1999/03/pm.html &amp;quot;Perl, the first postmodern computer language&amp;quot; (9 March 1999)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For modern man, … pride reveals itself in impatience, which is an unwillingness to bear the pain of discipline. … In effect his becomes a deification of his own will; man is not making himself like a god but is taking himself as he is and putting himself in the place of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Weaver]], &#039;&#039;Ideas Have Consequences&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1948), p. 183&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first thing that we know about ourselves is our imperfection. &lt;br /&gt;
: This is what [[Descartes]] meant when he said: &#039;I know God before I know myself.&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
: The only mark of God in us is that we feel that we are not God.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Philosophy&#039;&#039; (1959), p. 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to obey God, one must receive his commands. How did it happen that I received them in adolescence, while I was professing atheism? &#039;&#039;&#039;To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No human being escapes the necessity of conceiving some good outside himself towards which his thought turns in a movement of desire, supplication, and hope. consequently, the only choice is between worshipping the true God or an idol.&#039;&#039;&#039; Every atheist is an idolater — unless he is worshipping the true God in his impersonal aspect. &#039;&#039;&#039;The majority of the pious are idolaters.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Christianity&#039;&#039; (1967) edited by William Robert Miller&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No man — prince, peasant, pope, — has all the light, who says else is a mountebank. I claim no private lien on truth, only a liberty to seek it, prove it in debate, and to be wrong a thousand times to reach a single rightness.&#039;&#039;&#039; It is that liberty they fear. They want us to be driven to God like sheep, not running to him like lovers, shouting joy!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], in his play about [[Giordano Bruno]], &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ever since the Greeks, we have been drunk with language! &#039;&#039;&#039;We have made a cage with words and shoved our God inside!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If God be God and man a creature made in image of the divine intelligence, his noblest function is the search for truth.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Heretic&#039;&#039; (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Once you accept the existence of God — however you define him, however you explain your relationship to him — then you are caught forever with his presence in the center of all things.&#039;&#039;&#039; You are also caught with the fact that man is a creature who walks in two worlds and traces upon the walls of his cave the wonders and the nightmare experiences of his spiritual pilgrimage.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Morris West]], &#039;&#039;The Clowns of God&#039;&#039; (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To assume that one’s existential task is completed when the individual is brought into right relation with society, that is, when the individual has been socialized, is to absolutize society and confuse society with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Merold Westphal]], &#039;&#039;Kierkegaard’s Critique of Reason and Society&#039;&#039;, p. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dear God I&#039;ve heard your [[name]] from [[teachers]], [[family]] and friends, you made the [[universe]] and so will live on when it [[ends]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Everyone I know admits they’ve never seen your [[face]], they’re not sure where you [[live]] and have no map [[Kingdom of God|to the place]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dawud Wharnsby]], in &amp;quot;Dear God&amp;quot;, in &#039;&#039;A Picnic of Poems in Allah&#039;s Green Garden&#039;&#039; (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No reason can be given for the nature of God, because that nature is the ground of rationality.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred North Whitehead]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Modern World&#039;&#039; (1925), Chapter XI. New York: Mentor Books, 1948, p. 179&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The worship of God is not a rule of safety—it is an adventure of the spirit, a flight after the unattainable. The death of religion comes with the repression of the high hope of adventure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred North Whitehead]], &#039;&#039;Science and the Modern World&#039;&#039; (1925), Chapter XII. New York: Mentor Books, 1948, p. 192&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lucifer&#039;&#039;&#039;: God? God is love. I don&#039;t love you.&lt;br /&gt;
** Gregory Widen, [[The Prophecy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;I sit and talk to God&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And he just laughs at my plans&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robbie Williams]] and {{w|Guy Chambers}}, &#039;&#039;[[W:Feel (Robbie Williams song)|Feel]]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[[W:Escapology (album)|Escapology]]&#039;&#039; (18 November 2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;All your Western theologies, the whole mythology of them, are based on the concept of God as a senile delinquent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tennessee Williams]], &#039;&#039;The Night of the Iguana&#039;&#039; (1963)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;{{w|Elohim}},&amp;quot; the name for the creative power in &#039;&#039;[[Book of Genesis|Genesis]]&#039;&#039;, is a female plural, a fact that generations of learned rabbis and Christian theologians have all explained as merely grammatical convention.&#039;&#039;&#039; The King James and most other Bibles translate it as &amp;quot;God,&amp;quot; but if you take the grammar literally, it seems to mean &amp;quot;[[goddesses]].&amp;quot; [[w:El Shaddai|Al Shaddai]], god of battles, appears later, and [[w:Tetragrammaton|YHWH]], mispronounced Jehovah, later still.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Anton Wilson]], &#039;&#039;Everything Is Under Control : Conspiracies, Cults, and Cover-Ups&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 197&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To believe in a God means to understand the question about the meaning of life. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To believe in a God means to see that the facts of the world are not the end of the matter. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To believe in God means to see that life has a meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] Journal entry (8 July 1916), p. 74e&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe in God, only I spell it &amp;quot;[[Nature]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frank Lloyd Wright]], &#039;&#039;Quote&#039;&#039; magazine (14 August 1966)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is the great mysterious motivator of what we call nature and it has been said often by philosophers, that nature is the will of God.&#039;&#039;&#039; And, I prefer to say that nature is the only body of God that we shall ever see. &#039;&#039;&#039;If we wish to know the truth concerning anything, we&#039;ll find it in the nature of that thing.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Frank Lloyd Wright, quoted in &#039;&#039;Truth Against the World : Frank Lloyd Wright speaks for an organic architecture&#039;&#039; (1987) edited by Patrick J. Meehan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe the growth of &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; signifies the existence of God. That is: if history naturally pushes people toward moral improvement, toward moral growth, and their God, as they conceive their God, grows accordingly, becoming morally richer, then maybe this growth is evidence of some higher purpose, and maybe — conceivably — the source of that purpose is worthy of the name divinity.[… I]f it is a natural outgrowth of history — then it is more likely that this &amp;quot;growth of God&amp;quot; signifies the existence of God, or at least the existence of something you might call divine, however unlike ancient conceptions of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Wright]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Evolution of God|The Evolution of God]]&#039;&#039; (2009). New York: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 286–7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is God love? Like all characterizations of God, this one presumes more insight than I feel in possession of. But there&#039;s certainly something to the idea that love is connected to, indeed emanates from, the kind of God whose existence is being surmised here.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The connection comes via love&#039;s connection to the moral order of which that God is the source. The moral order has revealed itself through ever-widening circles of [[w:Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny|non-zero-sumness]] that draw people toward the moral truth that mutual respect is warranted. As we saw […], it is the moral imagination whose growth often paves the way for that truth, and it does so through the extension of a kind of sympathy, a subjective identification with the situation of the other. And as sympathy intensifies it approaches love. Love, you might say, is the apotheosis of the moral imagination; it can foster the most intimate identification with the other, the most intense appreciation of the moral worth of the other.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Wright]], &#039;&#039;The Evolution of God&#039;&#039; (2009), p. 456&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== X ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Y ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They who deny God have not seen Him. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Agni Yoga]],  &#039;&#039; Leaves of Morya’s Garden: Book One: The Call&#039;&#039;,  12, (1924)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The gods of all pagan faiths have been allied with the rich rulers. The priests of most religions are the employees of the landowners. But the God of Israel has always claimed to be with the poor—whether in the legislation of [[Deuteronomy]], the words of the [[prophets]], or the experiences of the [[New Testament]]. Our God is on the side of the poor.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Howard Yoder]], &#039;&#039;Radical Christian Discipleship&#039;&#039;, p. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A God all mercy is a God unjust.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night IV, line 234&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By night an atheist half believes in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night V, line 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A Deity believed, is joy begun;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A Deity adored, is joy advanced;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A Deity beloved, is joy matured.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Each branch of piety delight inspires.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night VIII, line 720&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A God alone can comprehend a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night LX, line 835&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou, my all!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My theme! my inspiration! and my crown!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My strength in age—my rise in low estate!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My souls ambition, pleasure, wealth!—my world!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My light in darkness! and my life in death!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My boast through time! bliss through eternity!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Eternity, too short to speak thy praise!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Or fathom thy profound of love to man!&lt;br /&gt;
** Edward Young, &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1742-1745), Night IV, line 586&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Z ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Arthur Frayn:&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;And you, poor creatures, who conjured you out of the clay? Is God in show business, too?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zardoz]] (1974)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;[[Bible]]&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Bible|&#039;&#039;The Bible&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Domenico Fetti 004.jpg|thumb|Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God. ~ [[Moses]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nicolò barabino, profeta isaia, studio per affresco nella chiesa di s.m. dell&#039;assunta a genova sestri.jpg|thumb|As the [[heavens]] are higher than the [[earth]], so are my ways higher than your ways, and my [[thoughts]] than your thoughts. ~ [[Isaiah]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Guercino Padreterno.jpg|thumb|God is [[love]]. Whoever [[lives]] in love lives in God, and God in him. ~ [[John the Evangelist]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Albert_Edelfelt_-_Christ_and_Mary_Magdalene.jpg|thumb|God is not a [[man]]. ~ [[w:Balaam|Balaam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Genesis]] [[W:Genesis 1|1:1]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We ought to obey God rather than men. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Acts of the Apostles]] [[W:Acts 5|5:29]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is not a man&#039;&#039;&#039;, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Balaam|Balaam, son of Beor]] in  &#039;&#039;[[Book of Numbers|Numbers]]&#039;&#039; 23:19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious. For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in [[Acts of the Apostles]] [[W:Acts 17|17:22-23]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thine, O Lord is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in the earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, O Lord, and thou art exalted as head above all. Both riches and honour come of thee, and thou reignest over all; and in thine hand is power and might; and in thine hand it is to make great, and to give strength unto all. Now therefore, our God, we thank thee, and praise thy glorious name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Book of Chronicles|1 Chronicles]] 29:11-13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things that are mighty.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Corinthians 1}}:27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Corinthians 3}}:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The hair of his head was like clean wool. His throne was flames of fire; its wheels were a burning fire. There was a stream of fire flowing and going out from before him. There were a thousand thousands that kept ministering to him, and ten thousand times ten thousand that kept standing right before him. The Court took its seat, and there were books that were opened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Daniel]], [[Book of Daniel]] [[W:Daniel 7|7:9-10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* None can hope in God but those who know his name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David]], [[Psalms|Psalm]] [[w:Psalm 9|9:10]], as cited in {{w|Institutes of the Christian Religion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How many things you have done, &lt;br /&gt;
:O Jehovah my God, &lt;br /&gt;
:Your wonderful works and your thoughts toward us.&lt;br /&gt;
:None can compare to you;&lt;br /&gt;
:If I were to try to tell and speak of them, &lt;br /&gt;
:They would be too numerous to recount!&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[David]], [[Psalms|Psalm]] [[W:Psalm 40|40:5]], [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, God is greater than we can know; &lt;br /&gt;
:The number of his years is beyond comprehension.&lt;br /&gt;
:He draws up the drops of [[water]]; &lt;br /&gt;
:They condense into rain from his mist;&lt;br /&gt;
:Then the [[cloud]]s pour it down; &lt;br /&gt;
:They shower down upon mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[w:Elihu (Job)|E·li′hu]], [[Book of Job]], 36:26-28, [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And the LORD said unto him, &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Who hath made man&#039;s mouth? or who maketh the dumb, or deaf, or the seeing, or the blind? have not I the LORD?&#039;&#039;&#039; Now therefore go, and I will be with thy mouth, and teach thee what thou shalt say.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]&#039;&#039; 4:11-12 ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God said unto [[Moses]], I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Exodus|Exodus]]&#039;&#039; 3:14 ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: God said to Moses, &#039;I will be what I will be&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Exodus|Exodus]] 20:7, ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Similar phrase: &amp;quot;Keep yourselves from evil to take the name of the Lord in vain, for I am the Lord your God, even the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham and of Isaac and of Jacob.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Doctrine and Covenants}} 136:21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* See now that &#039;&#039;&#039;I, even I, am He, and there is no god besides Me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of My hand&#039;&#039;&#039;. For I lift up My hand to heaven, and say, I live for ever. If I whet My glittering sword, and Mine hand take hold on judgment; I will render vengeance to Mine enemies, and will reward them that hate Me. &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]]&#039;&#039; 32:39-41 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create calamity: I the LORD do all these things.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Isaiah]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Isaiah 45|45:5-7]] ([[King James Version]])&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: I am the Lord and there is no other. Who forms light and creates darkness, Who makes peace and creates calamity; I am the Lord, who makes all these.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaiah]] [[W:Isaiah 55#Verse 9|55:9]] [[KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;You cannot serve both God and [[w:Mammon|Mammon]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jesus]], &#039;&#039;[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Matthew 6:24|6:24]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is greater than we can know; The number of his years is beyond comprehension.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Book of Job|Job]] 36:26, [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is [[light]]; in him there is no [[darkness]] at [[all]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}} in {{w|1 John}} 1:5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}}, in {{w|John}} 3:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is [[love]]. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|John the Apostle}} in {{w|1 John}} 4:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. Keep these words that I am commanding you today in your heart. Recite them to your children and talk about them when you are at home and when you are away, when you lie down and when you rise. Bind them as a sign on your hand, fix them as an emblem on your forehead, and write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moses]], [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5-9 [[w:New Revised Standard Version|NRSV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Moses]], [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 18:13 [[King James Version|KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the invisible things of him since the creation of the [[world]] are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting [[power]] and divinity; that they may be without excuse.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:Epistle to the Romans|Romans]]&#039;&#039; 1:20 (ASV)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the [[faith]] of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar&#039;&#039;&#039;; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man) God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world? For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner? And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]] in [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 3|3:3-8]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the [[law]].&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Is he&#039;&#039; the God of the Jews only? &#039;&#039;is he&#039;&#039; not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also: Seeing &#039;&#039;it is&#039;&#039; one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]], &#039;&#039;Romans&#039;&#039; [[W:Romans 3|3:19-31]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O the depth of God’s riches and [[wisdom]] and [[knowledge]]! How unsearchable his judgments are and beyond tracing out his ways are! For “who has come to know Jehovah&#039;s mind, or who has become his [[adviser]]?” Or, “who has first given to him, so that it must be repaid to him?” Because from him and by him and for him are all things. To him be the glory forever. Amen.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Paul of Tarsus]], [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 11|11:33-36]], [[New World Translation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fear]] God. [[Honour]] the [[King]].&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|1 Peter 2}}:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalms 19}}:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalms 23}}:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;God is our refuge and [[strength]], a very present help in trouble. &#039;&#039;&#039;Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the [[mountains]] shake with the swelling thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 46|46:1 - 3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High. God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved: God shall help her, and that right early. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The heathen raged, the kingdoms were moved: he uttered his voice, the earth melted. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 46|46:4 - 7]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[fool]] says in his [[heart]] &amp;quot;There is no God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;[[Psalms]]&#039;&#039; [[W:Psalm 53|53:1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I had rather be a doorkeeper in the house of my God, than to dwell in the tents of wickedness.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Psalm 84}}:10&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: &amp;quot;For I would rather be a servant in the House of the Lord than to sit in the seats of the mighty.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** By {{w|Alben W. Barkley}}, addressed to a mock Democratic convention, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia (April 30, 1956), reported in &#039;&#039;Memorial Services Held in the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States, Together with Remarks Presented in Eulogy of Alben William Barkley, Late a Senator from Kentucky&#039;&#039; (1956), p. 106.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God be for us, who can be against us?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Romans]] [[W:Romans 8|8:31]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no respect of persons with God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Romans, 2:11; Acts 10:34&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But will God really dwell with mankind on the [[earth]]? Look! The heavens, yes, the heaven of the [[heaven]]s, cannot contain you; how much less, then, this house that I have built!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Solomon]], 2 [[W:Books of Chronicles|Chronicles]] 6:18, [[NWT]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;[[Quran]]&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EMİRSULTAN CAMİİ BURSA - panoramio.jpg|thumb|O [[mankind]], It is you that have need of God, and God is the [[Self-sufficiency|Self-Sufficient]], the [[Praised]] [[Kenosis|One]]. If He please, He will remove you and bring a new [[creation]]. And this is not hard for God. ~ [[Quran]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Quran|&#039;&#039;The Quran&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|Allah}}&lt;br /&gt;
* And (mention, O [[Muhammad]]), when your Lord said to the [[angels]], &amp;quot;Indeed, I will make upon the earth a successive [[authority]].&amp;quot; They said, &amp;quot;Will You place upon it one who causes [[corruption]] therein and sheds [[blood]], while we declare Your [[praise]] and [[sanctification|sanctify]] You?&amp;quot; He said: Surely, &#039;&#039;&#039;I know what you know not.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Al-Baqara}} 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He said: Do you then [[understand]] what you [[worship]] -- You and your forefathers? -- Surely they are abhorrence to me, except the [[Lord]] of the [[worlds]],&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Who created me, then He [[guides]] me the way,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who provides me sustenance to [[eat]] and to [[drink]],&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And when I am [[sick]], it is He who [[heals]] me,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who will cause me to [[die]], and will [[resurrect]] me,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And Who, I [[hope]], will [[forgive]] me and my [[mistakes]] on the Day of Judgment. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham]],  [[w:Ash-Shu&#039;ara|Ash-Shu&#039;ara]] 75-82&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:God in Islam|God]]! [[W:Tawhid|There is no god but He]], — the [[Living]], the Self-subsisting, [[Eternal]]. No slumber can seize Him nor [[sleep]]. His are [[all]] [[things]] in the heavens and on earth. Who is there that can intercede in His [[presence]] except as He permitteth? he knoweth what before or after or behind them. Nor shall they compass aught of His knowledge except as He willeth. His [[Throne]] doth extend over the heavens and the earth, and He feeleth no fatigue in [[guard|guarding]] and [[perversity|preserving]] them for He is the Most High, the Supreme.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Al-Baqara 255}}, translated by {{w|Arthur John Arberry}} in &#039;&#039;{{w|The Koran Interpreted}}&#039;&#039; (1955).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If God helps you, there is none that can overcome you; and if He forsakes you, who is there that can [[help]] you?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Ali-Imran|Sūrat Ali-Imran]] 3:159&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Inventor]] of the heavens and the earth. How could He have a son when He has no consort? And He created everything, and all things He knows. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Al-Anam|Sūrat Al-An&#039;am]] 6:101&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Say: &amp;quot;Who is it that sustains you (in life) from the sky and from the earth? or who is it that has power over hearing and sight? And who is it that brings out the living from the [[Death|dead]] and (brings out) the dead from the living? and who is it that rules and regulates all affairs?&amp;quot; They will soon say, &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;. Say, &amp;quot;will ye not then show piety (to Him)?&amp;quot; such is God, your true Lord; nothing apart from the truth, but error. How then are ye turned away?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Yunus (sura)|Sūrat Yunus]] 10:31-32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  Seest thou him who takes his own [[desire]] as his [[deity|god]], and God leaves him in [[error]] knowingly, and seals his [[hearing]] and his [[heart]] and puts a covering on his [[sight]]? Who can then guide him after God? Will you not reflect? &lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Al-Jathiyah|Sūrat Al-Jathiyah]] 45:23&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  O mankind, It is you that have need of God, and God is the [[Self-sufficiency|Self-Sufficient]], the [[Praised]] [[Kenosis|One]]. If He please, He will remove you and bring a new [[creation]]. And this is not hard for God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Fatir|Sūrat Fatir]] 35:15-17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no god but The God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W:Muhammad (surah)|Sūrat Muḥammad]] 47:19&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;[[Book of Mormon]]&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Wikisource:Book of Mormon|&#039;&#039;The Book of Mormon&#039;&#039; on Wikisource]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Book of Mosiah|Mosiah]] 13:15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And again, the Lord God hath commanded that men should not murder; that they should not lie; that they should not steal; that they should not take the name of the Lord their God in vain; that they should not envy; that they should not have malice; that they should not contend one with another; that they should not commit whoredoms; and that they should do none of these things; for whoso doeth them shall perish.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|2 Nephi}} 26:32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&#039;&#039;Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Quotes reported in &#039;&#039;[[Wikisource:Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations (1922)|Hoyt&#039;s New Cyclopedia Of Practical Quotations]]&#039;&#039; (1922), p. 315-21.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Homo cogitat, Deus indicat.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man thinks, God directs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alcuin]], &#039;&#039;Epistles&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At Athens, wise men propose, and fools dispose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anacharsis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Man says—&amp;quot;So, so.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Heaven says—&amp;quot;No, no.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Chinese Aphorism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God&#039;s Wisdom and God&#039;s Goodness!—Ah, but fools&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Mis-define thee, till God knows them no more.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wisdom and goodness they are God!—what schools&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Have yet so much as heard this simpler lore.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This no Saint preaches, and this no Church rules:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;Tis in the desert, now and heretofore.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Matthew Arnold]], &#039;&#039;The Divinity&#039;&#039;, Stanza 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They that deny a God destroy man&#039;s nobility; for certainly man is of kin to the beasts by his body; and, if he be not of kin to God by his spirit, he is a base and ignoble creature.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Of Atheism&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From thee all human actions take their springs,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rise of empires, and the fall of kings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Samuel Boyse|Samuel Boyse]], &#039;&#039;The Deity&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O Rock of Israel, Rock of Salvation, Rock struck and cleft for me, let those two streams of blood and water which once gushed out of thy side … bring down with them salvation and holiness into my soul.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Daniel Brevint|Brevint]], &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039; (Ed. 1679), p. 17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He made little, too little of sacraments and priests, because God was so intensely real to him. What should he do with lenses who stood thus full in the torrent of the sunshine.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Phillips Brooks]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Seriousness of Life&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It never frightened a Puritan when you bade him stand still and listen to the speech of God. His closet and his church were full of the reverberations of the awful, gracious, beautiful voice for which he listened.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Phillips Brooks]], &#039;&#039;Sermons&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Seriousness of Life&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Of what I call God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And fools call Nature.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Browning]], &#039;&#039;The Ring and the Book&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;The Pope&#039;&#039;, line 1,073&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A picket frozen on duty—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A mother starved for her brood—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Socrates drinking the hemlock,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And Jesus on the rood;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And millions who, humble and nameless,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; The straight, hard pathway trod—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Some call it Consecration,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And others call it God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:William Herbert Carruth|W. H. Carruth]], &#039;&#039;Evolution&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil est quod deus efficere non possit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is nothing which God cannot do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;De Divinatione&#039;&#039;, II. 41&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God! sing, ye meadow-streams, with gladsome voice!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ye pine-groves, with your soft and soul-like sounds!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And they too have a voice, yon piles of snow,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And in their perilous fall shall thunder, God!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]], &#039;&#039;Hymn before Sunrise in the Vale of Chamouni&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God moves in a mysterious way&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; His wonders to perform;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He plants his footsteps in the sea&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And rides upon the storm.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Cowper]], &#039;&#039;Hymn&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Light Shining out of Darkness&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is a God! the sky his presence shares,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; His hand upheaves the billows in their mirth,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Destroys the mighty, yet the humble spares&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And with contentment crowns the thought of worth.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Charlotte Cushman|Charlotte Cushman]], &#039;&#039;There is a God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My God, my Father, and my Friend,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Do not forsake me in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wentworth Dillon]], translation of &#039;&#039;Dies Iræ&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;Twas much, that man was made like God before:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But, that God should be made like man, much more.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Donne]], &#039;&#039;Holy Sonnets&#039;&#039;, Sonnet XXII&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By tracing Heaven his footsteps may be found:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Behold! how awfully he walks the round!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God is abroad, and wondrous in his ways&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The rise of empires, and their fall surveys.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Dryden]], &#039;&#039;Britannia Rediviva&#039;&#039;, line 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too wise to err, too good to be unkind,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are all the movements of the Eternal Mind.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rev. [[John East]], &#039;&#039;Songs of My Pilgrimage&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is divine Principle, supreme incorporeal Being, Mind, Spirit, Soul, Life, Truth, Love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mary Baker Eddy]], &#039;&#039;Science and Health&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV. Ed. 1906, p. 465&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no life, truth, intelligence, nor substance in matter. All is infinite Mind, and its infinite manifestation, for God is All in All. Spirit is immortal Truth; Matter is mortal error.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mary Baker Eddy]], &#039;&#039;Science and Health&#039;&#039;, Chapter XIV. Ed. 1906, p. 468&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the Master of the universe has points to carry in his government he impresses his will in the structure of minds.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]], &#039;&#039;Letters and Social Aims&#039;&#039; (1876), &#039;&#039;Immortality&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He was a wise man who originated the idea of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Euripides]], &#039;&#039;Sisyphus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Henceforth the Majesty of God revere;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fear him and you have nothing else to fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fordyce]], &#039;&#039;Answer to a Gentleman who Apologized to the Author for Swearing&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Wie einer ist, so ist sein Gott,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Darum ward Gott so oft zu Spott.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** As a man is, so is his God; therefore God was so often an object of mockery.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]], &#039;&#039;Gedichte&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My God commands, whose power no power resists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Greene (dramatist)|Robert Greene]], &#039;&#039;Looking-Glass for London and England&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some men treat the God of their fathers as they treat their father&#039;s friend. They do not deny him; by no means: they only deny themselves to him, when he is good enough to call upon them.&lt;br /&gt;
** J. C. and A. W. Hare, &#039;&#039;Guesses at Truth&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I askt the seas and all the deeps below&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; My God to know,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I askt the reptiles, and whatever is &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; In the abyss;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Even from the shrimps to the leviathan&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Enquiry ran;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But in those deserts that no line can sound&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The God I sought for was not to be found.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Heywood]], &#039;&#039;Searching after God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Forgetful youth! but know, the Power above&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With ease can save each object of his love;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wide as his will, extends his boundless grace.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book III, line 285. Pope&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O thou, whose certain eye foresees&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The fix&#039;d event of fate&#039;s remote decrees.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Homer]], &#039;&#039;The Odyssey&#039;&#039;, Book IV, line 627. Pope&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dangerous it were for the feeble brain of man to wade far into the doings of the Most High; whom although to know be life, and joy to make mention of his name, yet our soundest knowledge is to know that we know him not as indeed he is, neither can know him; and our safest eloquence concerning him is our silence, when we confess without confession that his glory is inexplicable, his greatness above our capacity and reach.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Hooker]], &#039;&#039;Ecclesiastical Polity&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter II. 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But if the sky were paper and a scribe each star above,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And every scribe had seven hands, they could not write all my love.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Dürsli und Bäbeli&#039;&#039;; old public house ditty of the Canton de Soleure or Solothurn. Original in Swiss dialect. Given in &#039;&#039;Notes and Queries&#039;&#039; (Feb. 10, 1872), p. 114&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From thee, great God, we spring, to thee we tend,—&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Path, motive, guide, original, and end.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], &#039;&#039;Motto to The Rambler&#039;&#039;, No. 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The sun and every vassal star,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; All space, beyond the soar of angel&#039;s wings,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wait on His word: and yet He stays His car&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; For every sigh a contrite suppliant brings.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Keble]], &#039;&#039;The Christian Year&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Ascension Day&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nam homo proponit, sed Deus disponit.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Man proposes, but God disposes.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas à Kempis]], &#039;&#039;Imitation of Christ&#039;&#039;, Book I, Chapter XIX. Thomas Dibdin&#039;s translation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* O God, I am thinking Thy thoughts after Thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Johannes Kepler]], when studying astronomy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All but God is changing day by day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Charles Kingsley]], &#039;&#039;The Saints&#039; Tragedy&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Prometheus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L&#039;impossibilité où je suis de prouver que Dieu n&#039;est pas, me decouvre son existence.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** The very impossibility in which I find myself to prove that God is not, discloses to me His existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean de La Bruyère]], &#039;&#039;Les Caractères&#039;&#039;, XVI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Sire, je n&#039;avais besoin de cet hypothèse.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Sire, I had no need for that hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[La Place]] to [[Napoleon]], who asked why God was not mentioned in &#039;&#039;Traite de la Méchanique Céleste&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Denn Gott lohnt Gutes, hier gethan, auch hier noch.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** For God rewards good deeds done here below—rewards them here.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Gotthold Ephraim Lessing]], &#039;&#039;Nathan der Weise&#039;&#039;, I, 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We trust, Sir, that God is on our side.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;It is more important to know that we are on God&#039;s side.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Abraham Lincoln]], reply to deputation of Southerners during Civil War&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God had sifted three kingdoms to find the wheat for this planting.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Wadsworth Longfellow]], &#039;&#039;The Courtship of Miles Standish&#039;&#039;, IV&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Estne dei sedes nisi terra et pontus et aër&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Et cœlum et virtus? Superos quid quærimus ultra?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jupiter est quodcumque vides, quodcumque moveris.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Is there any other seat of the Divinity than the earth, sea, air, the heavens, and virtuous minds? why do we seek God elsewhere? He is whatever you see; he is wherever you move.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Annaeus Lucanus]], &#039;&#039;Pharsalia&#039;&#039;, IX. 578&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ein gute Wehr und Waffen,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Er hilft uns frei aus aller Not,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Die uns jetzt hat betroffen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A mighty fortress is our God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; A bulwark never failing,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Our helper he amid the flood&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of mortal ills prevailing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Luther]], &#039;&#039;Ein feste Burg&#039;&#039;. Translation by F. H. Hedge&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I fear no foe with Thee at hand to bless;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ills have no weight, and tears no bitterness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Henry Francis Lyte]], &#039;&#039;Eventide&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A voice in the wind I do not know;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A meaning on the face of the high hills&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Whose utterance I cannot comprehend.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A something is behind them: that is God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George MacDonald]], &#039;&#039;Within and Without&#039;&#039;, Part I, scene 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Exemplumque dei quisque est in imagine parva.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Every one is in a small way the image of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, IV. 895&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Quis cœlum possit nisi cœli munera nosse?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Et reperire deum nisi qui pars ipse deorum est?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Who can know heaven except by its gifts? and who can find out God, unless the man who is himself an emanation from God?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Marcus Manilius]], &#039;&#039;Astronomica&#039;&#039;, II. 115&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One sole God;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One sole ruler,—his Law;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One sole interpreter of that law—Humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Giuseppe Mazzini]], &#039;&#039;Life and Writings&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Young Europe&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;General Principles&#039;&#039;, No. 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Too wise to be mistaken still&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Too good to be unkind.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Medley]], &#039;&#039;Hymn of God&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Who best&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Bear his mild yoke, they serve him best: his state&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is kingly; thousands at his bidding speed,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And post o&#039;er land and ocean without rest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Milton]], &#039;&#039;Sonnet&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;On His Blindness&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Gott-trunkener Mensch.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** A God-intoxicated man.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Novalis]], in reference to [[Spinoza]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Trumpeter, sound for the splendour of God!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;. . . . . .&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Trumpeter, rally us, up to the heights of it!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Sound for the City of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred Noyes]], &#039;&#039;Trumpet Call&#039;&#039;, last lines&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est deus in nobis; et sunt commercia cœli.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God within us and intercourse with heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Ars Amatoria&#039;&#039;, Book III. 549. (Milton&#039;s &amp;quot;Looks commercing with the skies&amp;quot; said to be inspired by this phrase)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est deus in nobis: agitante calescimus illo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God within us, and we glow when he stirs us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Fasti&#039;&#039;, Book VI. 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Sed tamen ut fuso taurorum sanguine centum,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sic capitur minimo thuris honore deux.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** As God is propitiated by the blood of a hundred bulls, so also is he by the smallest offering of incense.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Tristium&#039;&#039;, II. 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil ita sublime est, supraque pericula tendit&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Non sit ut inferius suppositumque deo.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nothing is so high and above all danger that is not below and in the power of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ovid]], &#039;&#039;Tristium&#039;&#039;, IV. 8. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One on God&#039;s side is a majority.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wendell Phillips]], speech at Harper&#039;s Ferry (1 November 1859)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Est profecto deus, qui, quæ nos gerimus, auditque et videt.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is indeed a God that hears and sees whate&#039;er we do.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Plautus]], &#039;&#039;Captivi&#039;&#039;, II. 2. 63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He from thick films shall purge the visual ray,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on the sightless eyeball pour the day.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &#039;&#039;Messiah&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thou Great First Cause, least understood.&lt;br /&gt;
** Alexander Pope, &#039;&#039;Universal Prayer&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je crains Dieu, cher Abner, et n&#039;ai point d&#039;autre crainte.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I fear God, dear Abner, and I have no other fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Racine]], &#039;&#039;Athalie&#039;&#039;, Act I, scene 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Give us a God—a living God,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; One to wake the sleeping soul, &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; One to cleanse the tainted blood &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Whose pulses in our bosoms roll.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. G. Rosenberg]], &#039;&#039;The Winged Horn&#039;&#039;, Stanza 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We may scavenge the dross of the nation, we may shudder past bloody sod,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But we thrill to the new revelation that we are parts of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Robert Haven Schauffler]], &#039;&#039;New Gods for Old&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Es lebt ein Gott zu strafen und zu rächen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** There is a God to punish and avenge.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;Wilhelm Tell&#039;&#039;, IV. 3. 37&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nihil ab illo [i.e. a Deo] vacat; opus suum ipse implet.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Nothing is void of God; He Himself fills His work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;De Beneficiis&#039;&#039;, IV. 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Deum non immolationibus et sanguine multo colendum: quæ enim ex trucidatione immerentium voluptas est? sed mente pura, bono honestoque proposito. Non templa illi, congestis in altitudinem saxis, struenda sunt; in suo cuique consecrandus est pectore.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** God is not to be worshipped with sacrifices and blood; for what pleasure can He have in the slaughter of the innocent? but with a pure mind, a good and honest purpose. Temples are not to be built for Him with stones piled on high; God is to be consecrated in the breast of each.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Seneca the Younger]], &#039;&#039;Fragment&#039;&#039;, V. 204&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God helps those who help themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Algernon Sidney]], &#039;&#039;Discourse Concerning Government&#039;&#039;, Chapter II. Ovid—Metamorphoses. X. 586. [[Pliny the Elder]], viewing the Eruption of Vesuvius, Aug., 79. [[Friedrich Schiller]], &#039;&#039;William Tell&#039;&#039;, I. 2. [[Simonides]] is quoted as author by Claudian. [[Sophocles]], &#039;&#039;Fragments&#039;&#039;. [[Terence]], &#039;&#039;Phormio&#039;&#039;. I. 4. [[Vergil]], &#039;&#039;Æneid&#039;&#039; (29-19 BC), X, 284. Quoted as a proverb by old and modern writers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From Piety, whose soul sincere&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Fears God, and knows no other fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[W. Smyth]], &#039;&#039;Ode for the Installation of the Duke of Gloucester as Chancellor of Cambridge&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ad majorem Dei gloriam.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** For the greater glory of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** Motto of the Society of Jesus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The divine essence itself is love and wisdom.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Emanuel Swedenborg]], &#039;&#039;Divine Love and Wisdom&#039;&#039;, Par. 28&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, the Great Giver, can open the whole universe to our gaze in the narrow space of a single lane.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Rabindranath Tagore]], &#039;&#039;Jivan-smitri&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ha sotto i piedi il Fato e la Natura.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ministri umili; e&#039;l moto e chi&#039;l misura.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Under whose feet (subjected to His grace),&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Sit nature, fortune, motion, time, and place.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Torquato Tasso]], &#039;&#039;Gerusalemme&#039;&#039;, IX, 66&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At last I heard a voice upon the slope&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Cry to the summit, &amp;quot;Is there any hope?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To which an answer pealed from that high land,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But in a tongue no man could understand;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And on the glimmering limit far withdrawn,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;God made himself an awful rose of dawn.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alfred Tennyson]], &#039;&#039;Vision of Sin&#039;&#039;, V&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I fled Him, down the nights and down the days;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I fled Him, down the arches of the years;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I fled Him, down the labyrinthine ways&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Of my own mind; and in the midst of tears&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I hid from Him, and under running laughter.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Thompson]], &#039;&#039;The Hound of Heaven&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* But I lose&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Myself in Him, in Light ineffable!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Come then, expressive Silence, muse His praise.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;These, as they change, Almighty Father, these&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Are but the varied God. The rolling Year&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Is full of Thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]], &#039;&#039;Hymn&#039;&#039;, line 116&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The being of God is so comfortable, so convenient, so necessary to the felicity of Mankind, that, (as [[Cicero|Tully]] admirably says) &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;, if God were not a necessary being of himself, he might almost seem to be made on purpose for the use and benefit of men.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John Tillotson|Archbishop Tillotson]], &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039;, Sermon 93, Volume I, (1712 edition), p. 696; this is the probable origin of [[Voltaire]]&#039;s phrase.&lt;br /&gt;
** Cicero&#039;s phrase from &#039;&#039;[[w:De Legibus|De legibus]]&#039;&#039; in fact references &amp;quot;gods&amp;quot; in the plural&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rock of Ages, cleft for me,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Let me hide myself in thee.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustus Toplady]], &#039;&#039;Living and Dying Prayer&#039;&#039;. &amp;quot;Rock of Ages&amp;quot; is translation. from the Hebrew of &amp;quot;everlasting strength.&amp;quot; Isaiah, XXVI. 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* None but God can satisfy the longings of an immortal soul; that as the heart was made for Him, so He only can fill it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Chenevix Trench]], &#039;&#039;Notes on the Parables&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Prodigal Son&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God, from a beautiful necessity, is Love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Martin Farquhar Tupper]], &#039;&#039;Of Immortality&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I believe that there is no God, but that matter is God and God is matter; and that it is no matter whether there is any God or no.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;The Unbeliever&#039;s Creed&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Connoisseur No. IX&#039;&#039; (March 28, 1754)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Si genus humanum et mortalia temnitis arma&#039;&#039;,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;At sperate deos memores fandi atque nefandi&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** If ye despise the human race, and mortal arms, yet remember that there is a God who is mindful of right and wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Virgil]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Aeneid|Æneid]]&#039;&#039; (29-19 BC), I. 542&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Si Dieu n&#039;existait pas, il faudrait l&#039;inventer.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** If there were no God, it would be necessary to invent him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Epitre à l&#039;Auteur du Livre des Trois Imposteurs&#039;&#039;, CXI. See Œuvres Complètes de Voltaire, Volume I, p. 1076. Ed. Didot, 1827. Also in letter to Frederick, Prince Royal of Prussia&lt;br /&gt;
*** cf. [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;Dii immortales ad usum hominum fabricati pene videantur&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je voudrais que vous écrasassiez l&#039;infâme.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** I wish that you would crush this infamy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]] to D&#039;Alembert June 23, 1760. Attributed to Voltaire by Abbé Barruch—Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism. Generally quoted &amp;quot;Écrasez l&#039;infâme.&amp;quot; A. De Morgan contends that the popular idea that it refers to God is incorrect. It refers probably to the Roman Catholic Church, or the traditions in the church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God on His throne is eldest of poets:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Unto His measures moveth the Whole.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;England my Mother&#039;&#039;, Part II&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The God I know of, I shall ne&#039;er&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Know, though he dwells exceeding nigh.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Raise thou the stone and find me there,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Cleave thou the wood and there am I.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yea, in my flesh his spirit doth flow,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Too near, too far, for me to know.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;The Unknown God&#039;&#039;. Third and fourth lines are from &amp;quot;newly discovered sayings of Jesus.&amp;quot; Probably an ancient Oriental proverb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Somewhat which we name but cannot know.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Ev&#039;n as we name a star and only see&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Its quenchless flashings forth, which ever show&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; And ever hide him, and which are not he.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Watson]], &#039;&#039;Wordsworth&#039;s Grave&#039;&#039;, I, Stanza 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God is and all is well.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;My Birthday&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I know not where His islands lift&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Their fronded palms in air;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I only know I cannot drift&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Beyond His love and care.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Greenleaf Whittier]], &#039;&#039;The Eternal Goodness&#039;&#039;, Stanza 20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Though man sits still, and takes his ease,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; God is at work on man;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No means, no moment unemploy&#039;d,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; To bless him, if he can.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Resignation&#039;&#039;, Part I, Stanza 119&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anonymous ==&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Proverbs or widely known statements by unknown authors.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;GOD IS COMING, AND IS &#039;&#039;SHE&#039;&#039; PISSED!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Anonymous bumper sticker as quoted in &#039;&#039;My First Saturnalia&#039;&#039; (1981) by Michael Rumaker, p. 3&lt;br /&gt;
** GOD IS COMING, AND BOY IS SHE PISSED!&lt;br /&gt;
*** Variant bumper sticker as quoted in &#039;&#039;River Angel : A Novel&#039;&#039; (1999) A. Manette Ansay, p. 107&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Ageless Wisdom Teachings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fear of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kingdom of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Love of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Om]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pandeism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pantheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Personal God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Polytheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Commons category}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|God and Religious Toleration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:God| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=3120540</id>
		<title>Atheism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;diff=3120540"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T16:15:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* B */ berdyaev&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Epikouros BM 1843.jpg|thumb|Not the person who denies the gods worshipped by the multitude, but he who affirms of the gods what the multitude believes about them is truly impious. For the utterances of the multitude about the gods are not true. ~ [[Epicurus]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Friederich Nietzsche.jpg|thumb|You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price. ~ [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hoard of ancient gold coins.jpg|thumb|Most atheists, if they worship anything, worship something which really exists but is not worthy of worship. ... In order for capitalism to have a clear path, it needs to profane all that is sacred; there must be no limits to what is saleable. The totalitarian commercialism which is now the established Church throughout the West has come close to achieving this. ~ [[Andrew Collier (philosopher)|Andrew Collier]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Alciphron (1732) title page.jpg|thumb|Is it intellectually responsible to define one&#039;s identity against something that one does not understand? ~ [[Jacques Berlinerblau]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Simone Weil 1931.jpg|thumb|There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God. ~ [[Simone Weil]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ilya Efimovich Repin (1844-1930) - Portrait of Leo Tolstoy (1887).jpg|thumb|In former days the free-thinker was a man who had been brought up in ideas of religion, law, and morality, and only through conflict and struggle came to free-thought; but now there has sprung up a new type of born free-thinkers who grow up without even having heard of principles of morality or of religion, of the existence of authorities, who grow up directly in ideas of negation in everything, that is to say, savages. ~ [[Leo Tolstoy]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Atheism|Atheism]]&#039;&#039;&#039; in a broad sense is a rejection of [[belief]] in the existence of [[deities]], in a narrower sense, the specific belief that there are no deities, and most inclusively, it is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist. Atheism is contrasted with [[theism]], which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists. The word originates with the Greek ἄθεος (&#039;&#039;atheos&#039;&#039;), meaning &amp;quot;without god(s)&amp;quot;, used as a pejorative term applied to those thought to reject the gods worshipped by the larger society.&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
==A==&lt;br /&gt;
* If you describe yourself as &amp;quot;Atheist,&amp;quot; some people will say, &amp;quot;Don&#039;t you mean &#039;[[Agnostic]]&#039;?&amp;quot; I have to reply that I really &#039;&#039;do&#039;&#039; mean Atheist. I really do not believe that there is a god — in fact I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one. It&#039;s easier to say that I am a radical Atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it&#039;s an opinion I hold seriously. It&#039;s funny how many people are genuinely surprised to hear a view expressed so strongly. In England we seem to have drifted from vague, wishy-washy [[Anglicanism]] to vague, wishy-washy [[Agnosticism]] — both of which I think betoken a desire not to have to [[think]] about things too much. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; People will then often say, &amp;quot;But surely it&#039;s better to remain an [[Agnosticism|Agnostic]] just in case?&amp;quot; This, to me, suggests such a level of silliness and muddle that I usually edge out of the conversation rather than get sucked into it. (If it turns out that I&#039;ve been wrong all along, and there is in fact a god, and if it further turned out that this kind of legalistic, cross-your-fingers-behind-your-back, Clintonian hair-splitting impressed him, then I would choose not to worship him anyway.)&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Douglas Adams]], in {{citation | title = Life, the Universe, and Everything: An Interview with Douglas Adams | author = [[David Silverman]] | periodical = The American Atheist | volume = 37 | issue = 1 | year = 1998 | month = Winter | url = http://www.americanatheist.org/win98-99/T2/silverman.html | archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20071228115639/http://www.americanatheist.org/win98-99/T2/silverman.html | archivedate = 2007-12-28 }}&amp;lt;!--alt source: http://www.nichirenbuddhist.org/Religion/Atheists/DouglasAdams/Interview-American-Atheists.html ; article has not completed a move to http://atheists.org/content/interview-douglas-adams at this writing--&amp;gt;, later [http://books.google.com/books?id=DpIwyu_ZW9AC&amp;amp;pg=PT108#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false published] in &#039;&#039;[[w:The Salmon of Doubt|The Salmon of Doubt]]&#039;&#039; (2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Government has no right to hurt a hair on the head of an Atheist for his Opinions. Let him have a care of his Practices.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Adams]] to [[John Quincy Adams]], June 16, 1816. Adams Papers (microfilm), reel 432, Library of Congress. James H. Hutson (ed.), &#039;&#039;The Founders on Religion: A Book of Quotations&#039;&#039;. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007, p. 20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After having treated of these false [[Zealots]] in Religion, I cannot forbear mentioning … the Zealots in Atheism. One would fancy that these Men, tho&#039; they fall short, in every other Respect, of those who make a Profession of Religion, would at least outshine them in this Particular, and be exempt from that single Fault which seems to grow out of the impudent Fervours of Religion: But so it is, that [[Infidelity]] is propagated with as much Fierceness and Contention, Wrath and Indignation, as if the Safety of Mankind depended upon it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Addison]], [http://archive.twoaspirinsandacomedy.com/spectator/spectator.php?line=185 &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;&#039;, No 185] (2 October 1711).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I would fain ask one of these bigotted Infidels, supposing all the great Points of Atheism … were laid together and formed into a kind of Creed, according to the Opinions of the most celebrated Atheists; I say, supposing such a Creed as this were formed, and imposed upon any one People in the World, whether it would not require an infinitely greater Measure of [[Faith]], than any Set of Articles which they so violently oppose.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Addison]], &#039;&#039;The Spectator&#039;&#039;, No 185 (2 October 1711)&lt;br /&gt;
** Often misquoted as &amp;quot;To be an atheist requires an infinitely greater measure of faith than to receive all the great truths which atheism would deny.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The inhabitants of the earth are of two sorts:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Those with brains, but no religion,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And those with religion, but no brains.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Al-Ma&#039;arri|Abu&#039;l-`Ala&#039; al-Ma`arri]] (973–1058) (Arabic: {{lang|ar|أبو العلاء المعري|rtl}}), poet of Ma`arra, quoted in &#039;&#039;Crusades Through Arab Eyes&#039;&#039; (1989) by [[w:Amin Maalouf|Amin Maalouf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To you I&#039;m an atheist; to God I&#039;m the [[w:loyal opposition|loyal opposition]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Woody Allen]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Stardust Memories|Stardust Memories]]&#039;&#039; (1980).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some highly religious people are outraged that atheists would publicly declare their lack of faith. Accordingly many of the people who belong to atheist associations hide their beliefs from most others, knowing from experience it could affect their employment, membership in other clubs, and social connections. It reminds me of the reaction of many high RWAs when homosexuals began to come out: “Don’t these people know they’re supposed to be ashamed of what they are?” That in turn reminded me of the reaction of many White supremists to the civil rights movement: “Don’t these n------ know they’re inferior and should never be treated as our equals?” Fortunately, eventually, minorities can overcome these reactions.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bob Altemeyer]], &#039;&#039;The Authoritarians&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 160&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A great man is the unbelieving man; he is without spiritual sight or spiritual hearing; his glory is in understanding his own understanding. It is he who subdues the forest, tames the beasts of the field to service. He goes alone in the dark, unafraid. He follows no man’s course, but, searches for himself; the priests cannot make him believe, nor the angels of heaven; none can subdue his judgment. He says: why permit others even priests, to think for you? Stand on your own feet – be a man. Through his arm are tyrants and evil kings overthrown. Through him are doctrines and religions sifted to the bottom and the falsehood and evil in them cast aside. Who but the Creator could have created so great a man as the unbeliever?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:w:Kenneth Arnold|Kenneth Arnold]]&#039;s paraphrasing of a section from &#039;&#039;[[:w:Oahspe: A New Bible|Oahspe: A New Bible]]&#039;&#039; by John Ballou Newbrough (1828–1891), p. 361, which he handed out as his &amp;quot;[http://www.blueblurrylines.com/2017/03/ufos-kenneth-arnold-and-american-bible.html philosophy card]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am an atheist, out and out. It took me a long time to say it. I&#039;ve been an atheist for years and years, but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable to say one was an atheist, because it assumed knowledge that one didn&#039;t have. Somehow, it was better to say one was a humanist or an agnostic. I finally decided that I&#039;m a creature of emotion as well as of reason. Emotionally, I am an atheist. I don&#039;t have the evidence to prove that God doesn&#039;t exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn&#039;t that I don&#039;t want to waste my time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Isaac Asimov]], &#039;&#039;Free Inquiry&#039;&#039;, Vol. 2, Spring 1982, p. 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==B==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God never wrought miracle, to convince atheism, because his ordinary works convince it. It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man&#039;s mind to atheism; but depth in philosophy bringeth men&#039;s minds about to religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, [http://www.worldwideschool.org/library/books/phil/modernwesternphilosophy/FrancisBacon/chap16.html &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Scripture saith, The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God; it is not said, The fool hath thought in his heart; so as he rather saith it by rote to himself, as that he would have, than that he can thoroughly believe it, or be persuaded of it; for none deny there is a God, but those for whom it maketh that there were no God. It appeareth in nothing more that atheism is rather in the lip than in the heart of man by this, that atheists will ever be talking of that their opinion, as if they fainted in it within themselves, and would be glad to be strengthened by the consent of others; nay more, you shall have atheists strive to get disciples, as it fareth with other sects; and, which is most of all, you shall have of them that will suffer for atheism, and not recant; whereas, if they did truly think that there were no such thing as God, why should they trouble themselves?&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The causes of atheism are: divisions in religion, if they be many; for any one main division addeth zeal to both sides; but many divisions introduce atheism. Another is, scandal of priests; when it is come to what St [[Bernard of Clairvaux|Bernard]] saith, &#039;&#039;non est jam dicere, ut populus sic sacerdos; quia nec sic populus ut sacerdos&#039;&#039; [One cannot now say, the priest is as the people, for the truth is that the people are not so bad as the priest]. A third is, custom of profane scoffing in holy matters; which doth, by little and little, deface the reverence of religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They that deny a God, destroy man&#039;s nobility; for certainly man is of kin to the beasts, by his body; and if he be not kin to God, by his spirit, he is a base and ignoble creature.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Therefore, as atheism is in all respects hateful, so in this, that it depriveth human nature of the means to exalt itself, above human frailty.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 16, &amp;quot;Of Atheism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism leaves a man to sense, to philosophy, to natural piety, to laws, to reputation; all which may be guides to an outward moral virtue, though religion were not; but superstition dismounts all these, and erecteth an absolute monarchy, in the minds of men.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Francis Bacon]], &#039;&#039;Essays&#039;&#039; (1625), 17, &amp;quot;Of Superstition&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth had fallen victim to the greatest cosmic prank of all time, the flu that had swept across the world in the spring and summer of 1918, as if the bloody abattoir in the trenches hadn&#039;t been evidence enough of humanity’s divine disfavor. That&#039;s what Elizabeth had called it in the last letter he&#039;d ever had from her: God&#039;s judgment on a world gone mad. Garner had given up on God by then: he&#039;d packed away the Bible Elizabeth had pressed upon him after a week in the field hospital, knowing that its paltry lies could bring him no comfort in the face of such horror, and it hadn&#039;t. Not then, and not later, when he’d come home to face Elizabeth&#039;s mute and barren grave.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Dale Bailey|Dale Bailey]] &amp;amp; [[w:Nathan Ballingrud|Nathan Ballingrud]], &#039;&#039;The Crevasse&#039;&#039; in [[w:Paula Guran|Paula Guran]] (ed.), &#039;&#039;[[w:Cthulhu Mythos anthology|New Cthulhu: The Recent Weird]],&#039;&#039; p. 105 (originally published in &#039;&#039;[[w:Lovecraft Unbound|Lovecraft Unbound]],&#039;&#039; 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Une societé d&#039;athées inventerait aussitôt une religion.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: A society of atheists would immediately invent a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Honoré de Balzac]], &#039;&#039;Le catéchisme social&#039;&#039; (c. 1840–1842). Paris: La Renaissance du Livre, 1933, p. 137.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Experience is, in fever and anguish, the putting into question (to the test) of that which a man knows of being. Should he in this fever have any apprehension whatsoever, he cannot say: “I have seen God, the absolute, or the depths of the universe”; he can only say “that which I have seen eludes understanding”—and God, the absolute, the depths of the universe are nothing if they are not categories of the understanding.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If I said decisively, “I have seen God,” that which I see would change. Instead of the inconceivable unknown—wildly free before me, leaving me wild and free before it—there would be a dead object and the thing of the theologian, to which the unknown would be subjugated.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georges Bataille]], &#039;&#039;Inner Experience&#039;&#039; (1954), L. Boldt, trans. (1988), p. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A religion may be discerned in capitalism—that is to say, capitalism serves essentially to allay the same anxieties, torments, and disturbances to which the so-called religions offered answers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walter Benjamin]], &amp;quot;Capitalism as Religion&amp;quot; (1921), translated by Rodney Livingstone in &#039;&#039;Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 1&#039;&#039; (Harvard: 1996)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Empty-brained triflers who have never tried to think, who take their creed as they take their fashions, speak of atheism as the outcome of foul life and vicious desires.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Annie Besant]]. In [http://books.google.co.in/books?id=ey9hPV9brxoC&amp;amp;pg=PA89 Annie Besant: An Autobiography], p. 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Бога отрицают или потому, что мир так плох, или потому, что мир так хорош.&#039;&#039; [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikolai Berdyaev]], &#039;&#039;[http://vehi.net/soloviev/znachenie.html Self-knowledge (Самопознание)]&#039;&#039;, 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Today&#039;s secularists too often have very little accurate knowledge about religion, and even less desire to learn. This is problematic insofar as their sense of self is constructed in opposition to religion. Above all, the secularist is not a Jew, is not a Christian, not a Muslim, and so on. But is it intellectually responsible to define one&#039;s identity against something that one does not understand?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Berlinerblau]], &#039;&#039;The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously&#039;&#039; (2005), p. 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Knowledge of [[Karma]] gives the conviction that if ... &#039;&#039;Virtue in distress, and vice in triumph  Make atheists of mankind,&#039;&#039;(Dryden) it is only because mankind has ever shut its eyes to the great truth that man is himself his own saviour and his own destroyer. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],  &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol. 1, p. 707  (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The light of Christianity has only served to show how much more hypocrisy and vice its teachings have begotten in the world since its advent, and how immensely superior were the ancients over us in every point of honor.. .The clergy, by teaching the helplessness of man, his utter dependence on Providence, and the doctrine of atonement, have crushed in their faithful followers every atom of self-reliance and self-respect. So true is this, that it is becoming an axiom that the most honorable men are to be found among [[atheists]] and the so-called “infidels”...  Their system breeds atheism, nihilism, despair, and crime...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],  [[Isis Unveiled|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]  Vol. 2, p. 1104, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There were no Atheists in those days of old; no disbelievers or materialists, in the modern sense of the word, as there were no bigoted detractors. He who judges the ancient philosophies by their external phraseology, and quotes from ancient writings sentences seemingly atheistical, is unfit to be trusted as a critic, for he is unable to penetrate into the inner sense of their metaphysics.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[H.P. Blavatsky]],  [[Isis Unveiled|&#039;&#039;Isis Unveiled&#039;&#039;]]  Vol. 2, p. 1278, (1877)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* There is no [[w:proselytism|proselyter]] half so energetic as the hard-shelled atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heywood Broun]], &amp;quot;A New Preface to an Old Story&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Broun&#039;s Nutmeg&#039;&#039;, August 19, 1939.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nobody talks so constantly about God as those who insist that there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Heywood Broun]], &#039;&#039;Collected Edition of Heywood Broun&#039;&#039;, compiled by [[w:Heywood Hale Broun|Heywood Hale Broun]]. New York: Harcourt, Brace &amp;amp; Co., 1941, p. 26.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have heard an atheist defined as a man who had no invisible means of support.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir]], speaking to the [[w:Law Society of Upper Canada|Law Society of Upper Canada]], (21 February 1936); published in &#039;&#039;Canadian Occasions&#039;&#039; (1940), p. 201.&lt;br /&gt;
** Buchan&#039;s source remains unknown. The witticism was repeated by [[Harry Emerson Fosdick]] in his &#039;&#039;On Being a Real Person&#039;&#039; (1943), ch. 1, with acknowledgement to Buchan, and was again used by Archbishop [[Fulton J. Sheen]] in &#039;&#039;[[w:Look (American magazine)|Look]]&#039;&#039; magazine (December 14, 1955). Credit for this line is therefore often wrongly given to Fosdick or to Sheen. Credit has also been given to the conductor [[w:Walter Damrosch|Walter Damrosch]] (1862-1950).&lt;br /&gt;
** This is a play on words commonly used in vagrancy statutes to define a vagrant or bum as having &amp;quot;no visible means of support&amp;quot; financially.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Je suis toujours athée, gràce á Dieu.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: I&#039;m still an atheist, thank God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Luis Buñuel]], in Michèle Manceaux, &amp;quot;Luis Buñuel: athée gràce á Dieu&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;L&#039;Express&#039;&#039;, May 12, 1960, p. 41. See [http://aphelis.net/luis-bunuels-aphorism-god-im-atheist/ &amp;quot;On Luis Buñuel&#039;s Aphorism &#039;Thank God I&#039;m an Atheist&#039;&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Aphelis&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Seventeen years later, Buñuel expressed a different attitude in another interview: &amp;quot;I&#039;m not a Christian, but I&#039;m not an atheist either,&amp;quot; he says. &amp;quot;I&#039;m weary of hearing that accidental old aphorism of mine &amp;quot;I&#039;m not an atheist, thank God.&amp;quot; It&#039;s outworn. Dead leaves. In 1951, I made a small film called &#039;Mexican Bus Ride,&#039; about a village too poor to support a church and a priest. The place was serene, because no one suffered from guilt. It&#039;s guilt we must escape, not God.&amp;quot; (Penelope Gilliat, &amp;quot;Long Live the Living!&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;, December 5, 1977, p. 54) As &#039;&#039;Aphelis&#039;&#039; notes, &amp;quot;There&#039;s most likely a small confusion when Buñuel quotes his own aphorism: instead of &#039;I&#039;m not an atheist, thank God&#039; — which doesn&#039;t correspond [to] what he said in 1960 — one should read &#039;I&#039;m an atheist, thank God.&#039; That&#039;s the aphorism Buñuel didn&#039;t agree with anymore in 1977.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Although the aphorism is associated with Buñuel, it did not originate with him. [[Samuel Butler (novelist)|Samuel Butler]] (1835–1902) mentions in his &#039;&#039;Note-Books&#039;&#039; having heard of a man exclaiming &amp;quot;I am an atheist, thank God!&amp;quot; Even earlier, there is a rather similar aphorism by [[Georg Christoph Lichtenberg]] (1742–1799).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We know, and it is our pride to know, that man is by his constitution a religious animal; that atheism is against, not only our reason but our instincts; and that it cannot prevail long. But if, in the moment of riot, and in a drunken delirium from the hot spirit drawn out of the [[w:alembic|alembic]] of hell, which in France is now so furiously boiling, we should uncover our nakedness by throwing off that Christian religion which has hitherto been our boast and comfort, and one great source of civilization amongst us, and among many other nations, we are apprehensive (being well aware that the mind will not endure a void) that some uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition, might take place of it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edmund Burke]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Reflections on the Revolution in France|Reflections on the Revolution in France]]&#039;&#039; (1790), [http://www.bartleby.com/24/3/7.html Paras. 150–174], Para. 152.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Boldness formerly was not the character of Atheists as such. ... But of late they are grown active, designing, turbulent, and seditious.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edmund Burke]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on French Affairs&amp;quot; (December, 1791), in &#039;&#039;Three Memorials on French Affairs&#039;&#039; (1797), p. 53&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think people attack me because they are fearful that I will then say that you&#039;re not equally as patriotic if you&#039;re not a religious person... I&#039;ve never said that. I&#039;ve never acted like that. I think that&#039;s just the way it is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George W. Bush]], quoted in [http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20050111-101004-3771r &amp;quot;President outlines role of his faith&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Washington Times&#039;&#039;, 12 January 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have heard of a man exclaiming &amp;quot;I am an atheist, thank God!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (novelist)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Note-Books of Samuel Butler&#039;&#039;: Selections arranged and edited by [[w:Henry Festing Jones|Henry Festing Jones]] (1912). New York: E. P. Dutton &amp;amp; Co., 1917, p. 315.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Theist and Atheist: The fight between them is as to whether God shall be called God or shall have some other name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Butler (novelist)|Samuel Butler]], &#039;&#039;The Note-Books of Samuel Butler&#039;&#039;, p. 337.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==C==&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion has actually convinced people that there&#039;s an invisible man living in the sky who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever &#039;til the end of time!. . . But He loves you!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Carlin]], &amp;quot;[http://www.rense.com/general69/obj.htm George Carlin On Religion]&amp;quot; (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Mon chien est athée: il ne crois plus en moi.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: My dog is an atheist: he no longer believes in me.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:François Cavanna|François Cavanna]], &#039;&#039;L&#039;almanach-agenda de Cavanna 1985&#039;&#039; (1985). Paris: Belfond.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion assures us that our afflictions shall have an end; she comforts us, she dries our tears, she promises us another life. On the contrary, in the abominable worship of atheism, human woes are the incense, death is the priest, a coffin the altar, and annihilation the Deity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[François-René de Chateaubriand]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Génie du christianisme|The Genius of Christianity]]&#039;&#039; (1802), Part I, Book VI, Chapter V. Translated by Charles I. White, D.D. Baltimore: John Murphy, 1871, p. 202.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism can benefit no class of people; neither the unfortunate, whom it bereaves of hope, nor the prosperous, whose joys it renders insipid, nor the soldier, of whom it makes a coward, nor the woman whose beauty and sensibility it mars, nor the mother, who has a son to lose, nor the rulers of men, who have no surer pledge of the fidelity of their subjects than religion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[François-René de Chateaubriand]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Génie du christianisme|The Genius of Christianity]]&#039;&#039; (1802), Part IV, Book VI, Chapter XII. Translated by Charles I. White, D.D. Baltimore: John Murphy, 1871, p. 665.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is, I suppose, the supreme example of a simple [[faith]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;Where All Roads Lead&#039;&#039; (1922).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there were not God, there would be no atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[G. K. Chesterton]], &#039;&#039;Where All Roads Lead&#039;&#039; (1922).&lt;br /&gt;
** Frequently misquoted, with &amp;quot;not&amp;quot;, which grammatically implies monotheism, being replaced by the vaguer &amp;quot;no&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheists aren&#039;t angry because we&#039;re selfish, or bitter, or joyless. Atheists are angry because we have [[compassion]]. Atheists are angry because we have a sense of [[justice]]. Atheists are angry because we see millions of people being terribly harmed by [[religion]], and our hearts go out to them, and we feel motivated to do something about it. Atheists aren&#039;t angry because there&#039;s something wrong with us. Atheists are angry because there&#039;s something right with us.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Greta Christina}}, speaking at {{w|Reason Rally}}, National Mall, Washington, DC, {{#formatdate:2012-03-24}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The habit of arguing in support of atheism, whether it be done from conviction or in pretense, is a wicked and impious practice.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cicero]], &#039;&#039;De Natura Deorum&#039;&#039; [On the Nature of the Gods] (45 BCE), vol. II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;amp;emsp; bold with joy,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Forth from his dark and lonely hiding-place&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(Portentous sight!) the owlet Atheism,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Sailing on obscene wings athwart the noon,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Drops her blue-fringed lids, and holds them close,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And hooting at the glorious sun in Heaven,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Cries out, &amp;quot;Where is it?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Taylor Coleridge]], [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Fears_in_Solitude &amp;quot;Fears in Solitude&amp;quot;] (April 1798), ll. 80–86.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most atheists, if they worship anything, worship something which really exists but is not worthy of worship. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Collier (philosopher)|Andrew Collier]], in &#039;&#039;Transcendence: Critical Realism and God&#039;&#039; (2013), p. 84&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order for capitalism to have a clear path, it needs to profane all that is sacred; there must be no limits to what is saleable. The totalitarian commercialism which is now the established Church throughout the West has come close to achieving this. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrew Collier (philosopher)|Andrew Collier]], in &#039;&#039;Transcendence: Critical Realism and God&#039;&#039; (2013), p. 85&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I was an atheist, finding no reason to postulate the existence of any truths outside of mathematics, physics and chemistry. But then I went to medical school, and encountered life and death issues at the bedsides of my patients. Challenged by one of those patients, who asked &amp;quot;What do you believe, doctor?&amp;quot;, I began searching for answers.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Collins]], a geneticist who led the U.S. government’s effort to decipher the human genome (DNA). [http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/ cnn.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism can never be an institution; ... it can never be more than a destitution.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Robert Collyer|Robert Collyer]], sermon reported in [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50F1EFB3D5910738DDDAF0894DB405B8284F0D3 &amp;quot;Yesterday in the Pulpit&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, March 6, 1882.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is hard to see how a great man can be an atheist. Without the sustaining influence of [[faith]] in a [[divine|divine power]] we could have little faith in ourselves. We need to feel that behind us is [[intelligence]] and [[love]]. [[Doubt|Doubters]] do not achieve; [[Skepticism|skeptics]] do not contribute; [[Cynicism|cynics]] do not create. Faith is the great motive power, and no man realizes his full possibilities unless he has the deep conviction that life is eternally important, and that his work, well done, is part of an unending plan.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Calvin Coolidge]], [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=24184#axzz20J65JJtC &amp;quot;Telephone Remarks to a Group of Boy Scouts: &#039;What it Means to Be a Boy Scout&#039;&amp;quot;], July 25, 1924.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Very often atheists themselves admit that they have no evidence of God&#039;s absence, but they try to put a different spin on it. They&#039;ll tell you, “No one can prove a universal negative” (like “There is no God”). They think this somehow excuses them from needing evidence against God&#039;s existence. But not only is it false that you can&#039;t prove a universal negative (all you have to do is show something is self-contradictory), but more importantly, this claim is really an admission that it&#039;s impossible to prove atheism! Atheism involves a universal negative, you can&#039;t prove a universal negative, therefore, atheism is unprovable. It turns out that it is the atheist who is believing a view for which there is and can be no evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William Lane Craig]], &#039;&#039;On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision&#039;&#039; (2010), p. 149&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Even the Atheists … readily acknowledge it for an indubitable truth, that there must be something … which was never made or produced — and which therefore is the cause of those other things that are made, something … whose existence must needs be necessary.... Wherefore all the question now is, what is this … self-existent thing, which is the cause of all other things that are made. Now there are two grand opinions opposite to one another concerning it; for, first, some contend, that the only self-existent, unmade and incorruptible thing is senseless matter.... But because this is really the lowest and most imperfect of all beings, others on the contrary judge it reasonable, that the first principle and original of all things should be that, which is the most perfect … not senseless matter, but a perfect conscious understanding nature, or mind. And these are they, who are strictly and properly called Theists, who affirm, that a [[God|perfectly conscious understanding being, or mind, existing of itself from eternity]], was the cause of all other things; and they, on the contrary, who derive all things from senseless matter, as the first original, and deny that there is any conscious understanding being self-existent and unmade, are those that are properly called Atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Cudworth]], &#039;&#039;The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Vol. I&#039;&#039;, London, 1678. New York: Gould &amp;amp; Newman, 1837, pp. 266–267.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If this be not atheism, to acknowledge no other deity besides dead and senseless matter, then the word hath no signification.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ralph Cudworth]], &#039;&#039;The True Intellectual System of the Universe, Vol. I&#039;&#039;, London, 1678. New York: Gould &amp;amp; Newman, 1837, p. 425.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[w:There are no atheists in foxholes|There are no atheists in foxholes]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Father [[w:William Thomas Cummings|William Thomas Cummings]], &#039;&#039;Field Sermon on Bataan&#039;&#039; (1942), quoted in &#039;&#039;I Saw the Fall of the Philippines&#039;&#039; by [[w:Carlos P. Romulo|Carlos P. Romulo]]; also attributed to Lieut. Col. [[w:Warren J. Clear|Warren J. Clear]], &amp;quot;Bataan Defenders&#039; Suffering Related,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;[[w:The Los Angeles Times|The Los Angeles Times]]&#039;&#039;, 13 April 1942, Pg. 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==D==&lt;br /&gt;
* Although atheism might have been logically tenable before [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]], Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book| id={{ISBN|0393315703}}| title=The Blind Watchmaker| author=Richard Dawkins| authorlink=Richard Dawkins| year=1986}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is often said, mainly by the &#039;no-contests&#039;, that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal&#039;s wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can&#039;t prove that there aren&#039;t any, so shouldn&#039;t we be agnostic with respect to fairies?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]], speech at the Edinburgh International Science Festival, {{#formatdate:1992-04-15}}, quoted in {{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = A scientist&#039;s case against God&lt;br /&gt;
    | newspaper = [[w:The Independent|The Independent (London)]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | date = April 20, 1992&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 17&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Dawkins]] (2006) &#039;&#039;The Root of All Evil&#039;&#039; television programme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Diderot]] paid a visit to the Russian Court at the invitation of the Empress. He conversed very freely, and gave the younger members of the Court circle a great deal of lively atheism. The Empress was much amused, but some of her councillors suggested that it might be desirable to check these expressions of doctrine. The Empress did not like to put a direct muzzle on her guest&#039;s tongue, so the following plot was contrived. Diderot was informed that a learned mathematician was in possession of an algebraic demonstration of the existence of God, and would give it him before all the Court, if he desired to hear it. Diderot gladly consented.... [T]he mathematician … was [[Euler]]. He advanced towards Diderot, and said gravely, and in a tone of perfect conviction: &#039;&#039;Monsieur, (a+b&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)/n=x, donc Dieu existe; répondez!&#039;&#039; Diderot, to whom algebra was Hebrew, was embarrassed and disconcerted; while peals of laughter arose on all sides. He asked permission to return to France at once, which was granted.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Augustus De Morgan]] (1872). &#039;&#039;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Budget_of_Paradoxes/J A Budget of Paradoxes]&#039;&#039;, Volume II, edited by [[David Eugene Smith]]. 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;nd&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; edition, 1915, p. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At the end of &#039;&#039;[[w:Being and Nothingness|Being and Nothingness]]&#039;&#039;, ... [[w:Being in itself|Being in-itself]] and Being for-itself were &#039;&#039;of Being&#039;&#039;; and this totality of beings, in which they were effected, itself was linked up to itself, relating and appearing to itself, by means of the essential project of human-reality. What was named in this way, in an allegedly neutral and undetermined way, was nothing other than the [[Metaphysics|metaphysical]] unity of man and God, the relation of man to God, the project of becoming God as the project constituting human-reality. [[Atheism]] changes nothing in this fundamental structure.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Derrida]], &amp;quot;The Ends of Man,&amp;quot; &#039;&#039;Margins of Philosophy&#039;&#039;, tr. w/ notes by Alan Bass. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, 1982. (original French published in Paris, 1972, as &#039;&#039;Marges de la philosophie&#039;&#039;). p. 116.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Laissez-nous donc tout confondre, amour, religion, génie, et le soleil et les parfums, et la musique et la poésie: il n&#039;y a d&#039;athéisme que dans la froideur, l&#039;égoïsme, la bassesse.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Let us then mingle everything, love, religion, genius, with sunshine, perfume, music, and poetry. Atheism exists only in coldness, [[selfishness]], and baseness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anne Louise Germaine de Staël]], &#039;&#039;Corinne, or Italy&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Corinne, ou l&#039;Italie&#039;&#039;, 1807), Book X, Chapter V. Translated by Sylvia Raphael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 273.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “[[Skepticism]] is my nature. Freethought is my [[methodology]]. [[Agnosticism]] is my conclusion. Atheism is my opinion. [[Humanitarianism]] is my motivation.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[:w:Jerry DeWitt|Jerry DeWitt]] of &#039;&#039;[http://recoveringfromreligion.org/pages/home Recovering from Religion]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;[https://twitter.com/jerry_dewitt/statuses/193964823569121280 on Twitter]&#039;&#039;, April 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is easier for a Russian to become an Atheist, than for any other nationality in the world. And not only does a Russian &#039;become an Atheist,&#039; but he actually BELIEVES IN Atheism, just as though he had found a new [[faith]], not perceiving that he has pinned his faith in a negation. Such is our anguish of thirst!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], &#039;&#039;The Idiot&#039;&#039; (1869), translated by Eva Martin. Part IV, Chapter 7, [http://www.literaturepage.com/read/theidiot-626.html p. 626]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==E==&lt;br /&gt;
* The overwhelming majority of countries fail to respect [[w:Discrimination against atheists#Human rights|the rights]] of atheists and [[freethinkers]] although they have signed [[w:International human rights law|U.N agreements]] to [[w:Equality before the law|treat all citizens equally]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sonja Eggerickx]] on the The Freethought Report 2013 report issued by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU). As quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.reuters.com/article/us-religion-atheists/atheists-face-death-in-13-countries-global-discrimination-study-idUSBRE9B900G20131210 Atheists face death in 13 countries, global discrimination: study]&#039;&#039; (December 10, 2013) by Robert Evans, &#039;&#039;{{w|Reuters}}&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The word [[god]] is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], Gutkind Letter (3 January 1954), {{cite news | title=Childish superstition: Einstein&#039;s letter makes view of religion relatively clear | publisher=The Guardian | date=13 May 2008 | url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Science]] can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with the [[aspiration]] toward [[truth]] and [[understanding]]. This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion. To this there also belongs the faith in the possibility that the regulations valid for the world of existence are [[rational]], that is, [[comprehensible]] to reason. I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound [[faith]]. The situation may be expressed by an image: &#039;&#039;&#039;science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in &amp;quot;Religion and Science&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (9 November 1930).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere. … Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man&#039;s [[Ethics|ethical]] behavior should be based effectually on [[sympathy]], [[education]], and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], in &amp;quot;Religion and Science&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;New York Times Magazine&#039;&#039; (9 November 1930).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In view of such [[harmony]] in the [[cosmos]] which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], quoted in &#039;&#039;Towards the Further Shore&#039;&#039; (1968) by Prince Hubertus Zu, p. 156.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Albert Einstein]], quoted in {{cite book| title=Albert Einstein: The Human Side| author=Dukas, Helen (ed.) and Banesh Hoffman (ed.)| publisher=Princeton University Press| year=1981}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism should always be encouraged (i.e. rationalistic not emotional atheism) for the sake of the Faith. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[T.S. Eliot]], in a letter to [[Richard Aldington]] (24 February, 1927). &#039;&#039;The Letters of T.S. Eliot: 1926-1927&#039;&#039; p. 424.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Not the person who denies the gods worshipped by the multitude, but he who affirms of the gods what the multitude believes about them is truly impious. For the utterances of the multitude about the gods are not true preconceptions but false assumptions.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Epicurus]], Letter to Menoeceus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Gods exist but they are not what the hoi polloi [the multitude] suppose them to be. He is not an infidel or atheist who denies the existence of Gods whom the multitude worship, but he is such who fastens on the Gods the opinions of the multitude. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Epicurus]],  quoted by  [[H.P. Blavatsky]],  &#039;&#039;The Secret Doctrine&#039;&#039;, Vol 3. (1888)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there are none [no gods], what need to toil?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Euripides]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Iphigenia in Aulis|Iphigenia in Aulis]]&#039;&#039; (c. 405 BCE), [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0108%3Acard%3D992 l. 1035]. Translated by Edward P. Coleridge, 1891.&lt;br /&gt;
** Translated by Charles R. Walker, 1958, as &amp;quot;If there are none, all our toil is without meaning.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translated by W. S. Merwin and George E. Dimock, Jr., 1978, as &amp;quot;If there are none, what does anything matter?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==F==&lt;br /&gt;
* God was always invented to explain [[mystery]]. God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand. Now when you finally discover how something works, you get some laws which you&#039;re taking away from God; you don&#039;t need him anymore. But you need him for the other mysteries. So therefore you leave him to create the universe because we haven&#039;t figured that out yet; you need him for understanding those things which you don&#039;t believe the laws will explain, such as consciousness, or why you only live to a certain length of time — life and death — stuff like that. God is always associated with those things that you do not understand. Therefore I don&#039;t think that the laws can be considered to be like God because they have been figured out.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Richard Feynman]], quoted in {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Davies&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = P. C. W.&lt;br /&gt;
 | coauthor = J. Brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Superstrings: A Theory of Everything?&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1988&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = {{ISBN|0-521-35741-1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages = pp. 208-209&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God did not, as the Bible says, make man in His image; on the contrary man, as I have shown in &#039;&#039;The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039;, made God in his image.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], {{cite book | title=Lectures on the essence of religion | publisher=Harper &amp;amp; Row | location=New York | year=1967 | page=187 |others=Transl. [[w:Ralph Manheim|Ralph Manheim]]}} German: {{cite book | title=Vorlesungen über das Wesen der Religion | publisher=Wigand | location=Leipzig | year=1851 | page=241}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By positing God as unknowable, man excuses himself to what is still left of his religious conscience for his oblivion of God, his surrender to the world. He negates God in practice – his mind and his senses have been absorbed by the world – but he does not negate him in theory. He does not attack [God&#039;s] existence; he leaves it intact. But this existence neither affects nor incommodes him, for it is only a negative existence, an existence without existence; it is an existence that contradicts itself – a being that, in view of its effects, is indistinguishable from non-being. The negation of determinate, positive predicates of the Divine Being is nothing else than the negation of religion, but one which still has an appearance of religion, so that it is not recognized as a negation – it is nothing but a subtle, sly atheism. The alleged religious horror of limiting God by determinate predicates is only the irreligious wish to forget all about God, to banish him from the mind. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;Introduction to The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A true atheist, that is, an atheist in the ordinary sense, is therefore he alone to whom the predicates of the Divine Being – for example, love, wisdom, and justice – are nothing, not he to whom only the subject of these predicates is nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], &#039;&#039;Introduction to The Essence of Christianity&#039;&#039; (1843), Z. Hanfi, trans., in &#039;&#039;The Fiery Brook&#039;&#039; (1972), p. 119&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==G==&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[w:Atheist Bus Campaign|atheist buses]] touring London are quite revealing. &amp;quot;There&#039;s probably no God,&amp;quot; reads the hoarding. &amp;quot;Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.&amp;quot; There you have it: what is stopping people enjoying life is apparently not war, famine, unemployment, murderous social inequality, or the uncertainty and unfairness that arises from a system of global exploitation, but a misplaced belief in God. Some materialism, that!&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Galloway]], [http://www.newstatesman.com/religion/2009/04/god-world-reason-universe &amp;quot;What God means to me&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;New Statesman&#039;&#039;, 9 April 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Saying atheism is a belief system is like saying not going skiing is a hobby. I&#039;ve never been skiing. It&#039;s my biggest hobby. I literally do it all the time.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ricky Gervais]], quoted in [http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010/12/22/does-god-exist-ricky-gervais-takes-your-questions/ &amp;quot;Does God Exist? Ricky Gervais Takes Your Questions&amp;quot;] ({{#formatdate:2010-10-22}}), &#039;&#039;Speakeasy&#039;&#039;, Wall Street Journal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism. There is not a single exalting and emancipating influence that does not in turn become inhibitory.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[André Gide]], &#039;&#039;Journals&#039;&#039;, January 13, 1929. Translated by Justin O&#039;Brien.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Whatever an atheist who denies God and the prophet is, one who murders a human is equivalent to that.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Fethullah Gülen|Fethullah Gülen]], [http://www.nuriyeakman.net/node/1499 Interview with Nuriye Akman], &#039;&#039;[[w:Zaman (newspaper)|Zaman]]&#039;&#039;, 23 March 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The question of the origin of the matter in the universe is no longer thought to be beyond the range of science — &#039;&#039;everything&#039;&#039; can be created from nothing…it is fair to say that the universe is the ultimate free lunch.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Alan Guth|Alan Guth]], &#039;&#039;The Inflationary Universe : The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins&#039;&#039; (1998) &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; {{ISBN|0201328402}} &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==H==&lt;br /&gt;
* Settle it therefore in your minds, as a maxim never to be effaced or forgotten, that atheism is an inhuman, bloody, ferocious system, equally hostile to every useful restraint and to every virtuous affection; that, leaving nothing above us to excite awe, nor round us to awaken tenderness, it wages war with heaven and with earth: its first object is to dethrone God, its next to destroy man.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rev. [[Robert Hall]], sermon to Baptist meeting, Cambridge, quoted in {{cite book | year = 1843 | title  = The Baptist Library: a republication of standard Baptist works | volume = 2 | editors = Charles George Sommers, William R. Williams, Levi L. Hill | page = 108 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=CgxMAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA108 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is striking that the idea of a moral being without ordinary human limitations as the source of the moral demand survived in 20th century moral philosophy even in theories that do not posit the existence of such a being. ... In [[w:Richard Brandt|R. B. Brandt’s]] &#039;&#039;Ethical Theory&#039;&#039;, there is a position for an ideal observer. In [[w:R. M. Hare|R. M. Hare]], there is an archangel, with full command of the facts and of logic. In [[John Rawls]], there is the person behind the [[w:veil of ignorance|veil of ignorance]], who does not know what position she occupies in the situation for which she is prescribing. In all these last three cases, there is the postulation, as the source of the moral demand, of a being who is without ordinary human limitations, and it is plausible to suggest that these are all survivals of a worldview in which it was God who played this role.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John E. Hare]], “Ethics and Religion: Two [[Immanuel Kant|Kantian]] Arguments,” &#039;&#039;Philosophical Investigations&#039;&#039;, vol. 34, no. 2 (April 2011), pp. 158-159&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is not a philosophy; it is not even a view of the world; it is simply an admission of the obvious. In fact, &amp;quot;atheism&amp;quot; is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a &amp;quot;non-astrologer&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;non-alchemist.&amp;quot; We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattle. Atheism is nothing more than the noises reasonable people make in the presence of unjustified religious beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sam Harris]], &#039;&#039;Letter to a Christian Nation&#039;&#039; (2006), p. 51.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Agnosticism is a perfectly respectable and tenable philosophical position; it is not dogmatic and makes no pronouncements about the ultimate truths of the universe. It remains open to evidence and persuasion; lacking faith, it nevertheless does not deride faith. Atheism, on the other hand, is as unyielding and dogmatic about religious belief as true believers are about heathens. It tries to use reason to demolish a structure that is not built upon reason; because, though rational argument may take us to the edge of belief, we require a &amp;quot;leap of faith&amp;quot; to jump the chasm.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Sydney J. Harris]], in &amp;quot;Atheists, Like Fundamentalists, are Dogmatic&amp;quot; in &#039;&#039;Pieces of Eight&#039;&#039; (1982).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All thinking men are atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ernest Hemingway]], &#039;&#039;[http://books.google.com/books?id=2_XH0Z81_ZEC&amp;amp;pg=PA13&amp;amp;dq=All+thinking+men+are+atheists+A+FAREWELL+TO+ARMS&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=BTQpTaOnG5CSnAfwk43pAQ&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=2&amp;amp;ved=0CCsQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false A Farewell to Arms]&#039;&#039; (1929). Simon &amp;amp; Schuster, 1997, p. 13.&lt;br /&gt;
** The speaker is an Italian major who is baiting a priest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;m an atheist, and that&#039;s it. I believe there&#039;s nothing we can know except that we should be kind to each other and do what we can for other people.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Katharine Hepburn]], in Myrna Blyth, &amp;quot;Kate Talks Straight&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Ladies&#039; Home Journal&#039;&#039;, {{#formatdate:1991-10-01}}, p. 215.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Along with [[w:Islam|Islam]] and [[w:Christianity|Christianity]], [[w:Judaism|Judaism]] does insist that some turgid and contradictory and sometimes evil and mad texts, obviously written by fairly unexceptional humans, are in fact the word of god. I think that the indispensable condition of any intellectual liberty is the realisation that there is no such thing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I am not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief is positively harmful. Reviewing the false claims of religion, I do not wish, as some sentimental materialists affect to wish, that they were true. I do not envy believers their faith. I am relieved to think that the whole story is a sinister fairy tale; life would be miserable if what the faithful affirmed was actually the case.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;Letters to a Young Contrarian&#039;&#039; (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thus, though I dislike to differ with such a great man, [[Voltaire]] was simply ludicrous when he said that if god did not exist it would be necessary to invent him. The human invention of god is the problem to begin with.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Christopher Hitchens]], &#039;&#039;[[God is Not Great|God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything]]&#039;&#039; (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The universe, that is, the whole mass of things that are, is corporeal, that is to say, body; and hath the dimensions of magnitude, namely length, breadth and depth:[...] consequently every part of the universe is body, and that which is not body is no part of the universe: and because the universe is all, that which is no part of it is nothing, and consequently, nowhere. Nor does it follow from hence that spirits are nothing: for they have dimensions and are therefore really bodies; though that name in common speech be given to such bodies only as are visible or palpable; that is, that have some degree of opacity: but for spirits, they call them incorporeal, which is a name of more honour, and may therefore with more piety be attributed to God Himself; in whom we consider not what attribute expresseth best His nature, which is incomprehensible, but what best expresseth our desire to honour Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Hobbes]], &#039;&#039;Leviathan&#039;&#039; Part IV, chapter iii (1651)&lt;br /&gt;
** Misquoted in [[Jonathan Miller]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief|Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief]]&#039;&#039; (2004), as &amp;quot;The universe, the whole mass of all things that are, is corporeal, that is to say body, and hath dimensions of magnitude, length, breadth and depth. Every part of the universe is body and that which is not body is not part of the universe. And because the universe is all, that which is no part of it is nothing. Consequently, nowhere.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not whether there is a god or not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eric Hoffer]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The True Believer|The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements]]&#039;&#039; (1951) Section 62.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Tous les enfans ſont des athées; ils n&#039;ont aucune idée de Dieu: ſont-ils donc criminels à cauſe de cette ignorance?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1772&lt;br /&gt;
    | first = Paul-Henri Thiry (baron d&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
    | last = Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | authorlink = Baron d&#039;Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Le Bon-Sens, ou, Idées Naturelles Opposées aux Idées Surnaturelles&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Marc-Michel Rey&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 22&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZiUPAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA22&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: All children are Atheists; they have no idea of God. Are they then criminal on account of their ignorance?&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1826&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense: or Natural Ideas Opposed to Ideas that are Supernatural&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Richard Carlile&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 12&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=VS0-AAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=RA2-PA12&amp;amp;dq=%22All+children+are+Atheists%22&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: All children are born Atheists; they have no idea of God. Are they then criminal on account of their ignorance?&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = c. 1900&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense without God: or Freethoughts Opposed to Supernatural Ideas&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = W. Stewart&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7319&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Ce n&#039;eſt qu&#039;en écartant ſes nuages &amp;amp; ſes phantômes que nous découvrirons les ſources du vrai, de la raiſon, de la morale, &amp;amp; les motifs réels qui doivent nous porter à la vertu.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1772&lt;br /&gt;
    | first = Paul-Henri Thiry (baron d&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
    | last = Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | authorlink = Baron d&#039;Holbach&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Le Bon-Sens, ou, Idées Naturelles Opposées aux Idées Surnaturelles&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Marc-Michel Rey&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §206&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 315&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZiUPAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA315&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: It is only by dispelling the clouds and phantoms of Religion, that we shall discover the sources of Truth, Reason and Morality, and the real motives that should incline us to Virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = 1826&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense: or Natural Ideas Opposed to Ideas that are Supernatural&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Richard Carlile&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §30&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = 169&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=VS0-AAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=RA2-PA169&amp;amp;dq=%22It+is+only+by+dispelling%22&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: It is only by dispelling the clouds and phantoms of Religion, that we shall discover Truth, Reason and Morality.&lt;br /&gt;
*** {{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
    | year = c. 1900&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = Good Sense without God: or Freethoughts Opposed to Supernatural Ideas&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = London&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = W. Stewart&lt;br /&gt;
    | section = §206&lt;br /&gt;
    | url = http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7319&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The only religion of Albania is Albanianism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Enver Hoxha]], promoting atheism, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New York Times Book Review&#039;&#039;, Vol. 2 (1977); this is actually derived from a secularly nationalistic slogan &amp;quot;The true religion of Albania is Albanianism&amp;quot;, originally intended to ease the strife of sectarian divisions while being respectful of them, which was created by the Roman Catholic [[w:Pashko Vasa|Pashko Vasa]], in the form: &amp;quot;The religion of Albania is Albanianism&amp;quot; — as quoted in &#039;&#039;Catholicism and Politics in Communist Societies&#039;&#039; (1990) by Sabrina P. Ramet, p. 236.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Atheist&#039;&#039;: Any man who does not believe in himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Elbert Hubbard]], &#039;&#039;The Note Book of Elbert Hubbard&#039;&#039; (1927). New York: Wm. H. Wise &amp;amp; Co., p. 187.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are, as we know, powerful and illustrious atheists. At bottom, led back to the truth by their very force, they are not absolutely sure that they are atheists; it is with them only a question of definition, and in any case, if they do not believe in God, being great minds, they prove God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Victor Hugo]], &#039;&#039;Les Misérables&#039;&#039; Volume II, Book 7 &amp;quot;Parenthesis&amp;quot;, Chapter vi (1862).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* His [God&#039;s] power we allow is infinite: whatever he wills is executed: but neither man nor any other animal is happy: therefore he does not will their happiness.... [[Epicurus]]&#039;s old questions are yet unanswered. Is he willing to prevent evil but not able? then is he impotent. Is he able but not willing? then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Hume]], &#039;&#039;[[s:Dialogues concerning Natural Religion|Dialogues concerning Natural Religion]]&#039;&#039;, Part X (1789).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have never had the least sympathy with the &#039;&#039;[[w:a priori and a posteriori|a priori]]&#039;&#039; reasons against [[w:orthodoxy|orthodoxy]], and I have by nature and disposition the greatest possible antipathy to all the atheistic and infidel school. Nevertheless I know that I am, in spite of myself, exactly what the Christian would call, and, so far as I can see, is justified in calling, atheist and infidel.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Henry Huxley]], letter to [[Charles Kingsley]], May 6, 1863.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I==&lt;br /&gt;
* The watch argument was [[William Paley|Paley&#039;s]] greatest effort. A man finds a watch and it is so wonderful that he concludes that it must have had a maker. He finds the maker and he is so much more wonderful than the watch that he says he must have had a maker. Then he finds God, the maker of the man, and he is so much more wonderful than the man that he could not have had a maker. This is what the lawyers call a departure in pleading.&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Paley there can be no design without a designer&amp;amp;mdash;but there can be a designer without a design. The wonder of the watch suggested the watchmaker, and the wonder of the watchmaker, suggested the creator, and the wonder of the creator demonstrated that he was not created&amp;amp;mdash;but was uncaused and eternal.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Robert G. Ingersoll]], [http://infidels.org/library/historical/robert_ingersoll/why_i_am_agnostic.html &amp;quot;Why I Am Agnostic&amp;quot;] (1896), 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==J==&lt;br /&gt;
* For my own part, I do not know what the sweat and blood of this life mean, if they mean anything short of this. If this life be not a real fight, in which something is eternally gained for the universe by success, it is no better than a game of private theatricals from which we may withdraw at will. But it &#039;&#039;feels&#039;&#039; like a real fight — as if there were something really wild in the universe which we, with all our idealities and faithfullnesses, are needed to redeem: and first of all to redeem our own hearts from atheism and fears. For such a half-wild, half-saved universe our nature is adapted.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[William James]], &#039;&#039;The Will to Believe&#039;&#039; (1897), p. 61.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The legitimate powers of government extend to only such acts as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say that there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Thomas Jefferson]], &#039;&#039;[[Notes on the State of Virginia]]&#039;&#039; (1784), Query XVII.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t have to be brave or a saint, a martyr, or even very smart to be an atheist. All you have to be able to say is &amp;quot;I don&#039;t know&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
    | date = 2011-08-16&lt;br /&gt;
    | title = God, No! : Signs you may already be an atheist and other magical tales&lt;br /&gt;
    | first = Penn&lt;br /&gt;
    | last = Jillette&lt;br /&gt;
    | authorlink = Penn Jillette&lt;br /&gt;
    | publisher = Simon &amp;amp; Schuster&lt;br /&gt;
    | location = New York&lt;br /&gt;
    | isbn = 978-1451610369&lt;br /&gt;
    | lccn = 2010043439&lt;br /&gt;
    | ol = 25074653M&lt;br /&gt;
    | id = {{LCC|PN6231.R4 J55 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
    | page = xiii&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is the only real hope against terrorism.&lt;br /&gt;
:* [[Penn Jillette]] [http://americanhumanist.org/HNN/details/2012-12-morality-religion-and-bullsht-an-interview-with-penn]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Here falling Houses thunder on your Head,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And here a female Atheist talks you dead.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], [http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Texts/london2.html &amp;quot;London: A Poem in Imitation of the Third Satire of Juvenal&amp;quot;] (1738), ll. 17–18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It has long been observed, that an atheist has no just reason for endeavouring conversions; and yet none harass those minds which they can influence, with more importunity of solicitation to adopt their opinions. In proportion as they doubt the truth of their own doctrines, they are desirous to gain the attestation of another understanding: and industriously labour to win a proselyte, and eagerly catch at the slightest pretence to dignify their sect with a distinguished name.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Samuel Johnson]], [http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Texts/browne.html &amp;quot;The Life of Sir Thomas Browne, Kt., M.D.&amp;quot;] (1756), written as a preface for an edition of [[Thomas Browne|Browne]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;Christian Morals&#039;&#039; (1716).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==K==&lt;br /&gt;
* Godlessness is a kind of shameless wickedness which bids defiance to the punishments that the idea of God inspires in us.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Immanuel Kant]], &#039;&#039;Lectures on Ethics&#039;&#039; as transcribed by Georg Ludwig Collins ([[w:Cambridge University Press|Cambridge University Press]]: 1997), p. 111.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;The Koran! well, come put me to the test—&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Lovely old book in hideous error drest—&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp;Believe me, I can quote the Koran too,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The unbeliever knows his Koran best.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;And do you think that unto such as you,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;amp;emsp;God gave the secret, and denied it me?—&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well, well, what matters it! believe that too.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Omar Khayyám]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam|Rubaiyat]]&#039;&#039;, [[s:Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám (Le Gallienne)|translation]] by [[w:Richard Le Gallienne|Richard Le Gallienne]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If you have a sloppy religion you get a sloppy atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ronald Knox]], quoted in [[Penelope Fitzgerald]], &#039;&#039;The Knox Brothers&#039;&#039; (1977), Ch. IV.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there is one indisputable fact about the human condition it is that no community can survive if it is persuaded — or even if it suspects — that its members are leading meaningless lives in a meaningless universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Irving Kristol]], [http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/the-future-of-american-jewry &amp;quot;The Future of American Jewry&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Commentary (magazine)|Commentary]]&#039;&#039; (August 1991).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religious leaders must face the reality that here in Nigeria and elsewhere around the world, millions of people are leaving [[Christianity]] and [[Islam]]. While we are busy building walls of division with the blocks of prejudice, our members are becoming atheists but we prefer to pretend that we do not see this. We cannot pretend not to hear the footsteps of our faithful who are marching away into [[atheism]] and [[secularism]]. No threats can stop this, but dialogue can open our hearts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
** ~ [[:w:Matthew Hassan Kukah|Matthew Hassan Kukah]], [http://Https://www.premiumtimesng.com/features-and-interviews/524346-full-text-bishop-mathew-kukahs-2022-easter-message-a-must-read.html T0 mend a broken nation: the Easter metaphor, premiumtimesng.com] (@ Diocese of Sokoto, April 17th, 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==L==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Un dévot est celui qui, sous un roi athée, serait athée.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: A man who parades his piety is one who, under an atheist king, would be an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean de La Bruyère]], &#039;&#039;Les Caractères ou les Mœurs de ce siècle&#039;&#039; (1688), Ch. XIII &amp;quot;De la mode&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* I had no need of that hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Simon Laplace]], in response to [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]]&#039;s objection that Laplace had omitted [[w:God|God]] from &#039;&#039;Celestial Mechanics&#039;&#039; (Boyer 1968, p. 538)&lt;br /&gt;
** There is no contemporary source for this version of Laplace&#039;s interaction with Napoleon. It is not mentioned in the only eye-witness account of the event (see [http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2007/06/18/the-hypothetical-atheist/ Daniel Johnson, 2007]), and [[w:Hervé Faye|Hervé Faye]] was told by [[François Arago]] that Laplace had sought his help in a failed attempt to get the story removed from an unauthorized biography (Faye, &#039;&#039;Sur l&#039;origine du monde&#039;&#039;, Paris, 1884, pp. 109–111). Scholars believe the hypothesis Laplace was referring to was [[Isaac Newton|Newton]]&#039;s notion that God had to intervene periodically to prevent [[w:secular phenomena|secular]] perturbations from destroying the solar system. By demonstrating mathematically that the solar system was stable, Laplace eliminated any need for that hypothesis. (See, besides Faye and Johnson, [[w:Florian Cajori|Cajori]]&#039;s &#039;&#039;History of Mathematics&#039;&#039;, 1991 edn, p. 262, and [http://www.hawking.org.uk/does-god-play-dice.html Hawking, 1999]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hesiod]], the oldest author to have written on [[w:theogony|theogony]], asserted that the gods and men are created by unknown natural forces. We can therefore consider paganism as a superstitious form of atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Pierre-Simon Laplace]], &amp;quot;On Causality&amp;quot; (manuscript), in Roger Hahn, &#039;&#039;Pierre-Simon Laplace,1749–1827: A Determined Scientist&#039;&#039;. Harvard University Press, 2005, p. 232.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Atheist ist nur der, der sich auch aus dem Atheismus keinen Gott macht.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: The only atheist is someone who does not make a God even out of atheism itself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gabriel Lauber|Gabriel Lauber]], &#039;&#039;Denken verdirbt den Charakter: Alle Aphorismen&#039;&#039; (1984). Munich: Carl Hauser Verlag, p. 37.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Für diejenigen, die schon in den Atheismus hineingeboren wurden, ist es ein Glaube wie jeder andere. Ein wirklicher Atheist ist nur ein ehemaliger Gläubiger.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: For those who are born into atheism, it&#039;s a faith like any other. The only real atheist is an ex-believer.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gabriel Lauber|Gabriel Lauber]], &#039;&#039;Denken verdirbt den Charakter&#039;&#039; (1984), p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As long as the prerequisite for that shining [[paradise]] is [[ignorance]], [[bigotry]] and [[hate]], I say to hell with it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Henry Drummond character in [[w:Inherit the Wind (1960 film)|Inherit the Wind (1960 film)]], written by Jerome Lawrence (play), Robert E. Lee (play), Nedrick Young, and Harold Jacob Smith&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Were it possible to induce the masses to adopt atheism, this belief would exhibit all the intolerant ardor of a religious sentiment, and in its exterior forms would soon become a cult.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gustave Le Bon|Gustave Le Bon]], &#039;&#039;The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind&#039;&#039; (1895), [http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=BonCrow.sgm&amp;amp;images=images/modeng&amp;amp;data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&amp;amp;tag=public&amp;amp;part=4&amp;amp;division=div2 Book I, Chapter IV], p. 67.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Even atheists rebel and express, like [[Thomas Hardy|Hardy]] and [[A. E. Housman|Housman]], their rage against God although (or because) He does not, on their view, exist...&lt;br /&gt;
** Variant: &amp;quot;Atheists express their rage against God although in their view He does not exist.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[C. S. Lewis]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Problem of Pain|The Problem of Pain]]&#039;&#039; (1940), [http://www.gutenberg.ca/ebooks/lewiscs-problemofpain/lewiscs-problemofpain-00-h.html#tocchapter06 Chapter VI].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;... und ich dank&amp;lt;!--[sic]--&amp;gt; es dem lieben Gott tausendmal, daß&amp;lt;!--[sic]--&amp;gt; er mich zum Atheisten hat werden lassen.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: And I thank the Lord a thousand times that he let me become an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georg Christoph Lichtenberg]] as quoted in &#039;&#039;Lichtenberg: A Doctrine of Scattered Occasions. Reconstructed from his Aphorisms and Reflections&#039;&#039; by [[w:J. P. Stern|J. P. Stern]]. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1959, p. 249. Original source: Entsprechend SB (= Sudelbücher) 3. 403.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Lastly,&#039;&#039; Those are not at all to be tolerated who &#039;&#039;deny the Being of a God&#039;&#039;. Promises, Covenants, and Oaths, which are the Bonds of Humane Society, can have no hold upon an Atheist. The taking away of God, though but even in thought, dissolves all. Besides also, those that by their Atheism undermine and destroy all Religion, can have no pretence of Religion whereupon to challenge the Privilege of a Toleration.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Locke]], &#039;&#039;[http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/locke-a-letter-concerning-toleration-and-other-writings A Letter Concerning Toleration]&#039;&#039; ({{#formatdate:1689-10-03}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All I say is that I think it is damned unlikely that anything like a central cosmic will, a spirit world, or an eternal survival of personality exist. They are the most preposterous and unjustified of all the guesses which can be made about the universe, and I am not enough of a hair-splitter to pretend that I don&#039;t regard them as arrant and negligible moonshine. In theory I am an [[agnosticism|agnostic]], but pending the appearance of radical evidence I must be classed, practically and provisionally, as an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[H. P. Lovecraft]] letter to Robert E. Howard (August 16, 1932), in &#039;&#039;Selected Letters 1932-1934&#039;&#039; (Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House, 1976), p. 57.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==M==&lt;br /&gt;
* Having insured the moderation of a fanatical rabble, by giving out among them the savage &#039;&#039;war-whoop&#039;&#039; of atheism, he ([[Edmund Burke]]) already fancies himself in full march to Paris.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James Mackintosh]], &#039;&#039;Vindiciæ Gallicæ: Defence of the French Revolution and its English Admirers against the Accusations of the Right Hon. Edmund Burke&#039;&#039; (London, 1791), [http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&amp;amp;staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1665&amp;amp;chapter=62364&amp;amp;layout=html&amp;amp;Itemid=27 &amp;quot;Introduction&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Until someone claims to see [[Christopher Hitchens]]&#039; face in a tree stump, idiots must stop claiming that atheism is a religion. There&#039;s one little difference: Religion is defined as the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, and atheism is — precisely not that. Got it? Atheism is a religion like abstinence is a sex position.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time With Bill Maher&#039;&#039; (HBO) ({{#formatdate:2012-02-03}}), quoted in {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 2012-02-03&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Maher’s New Rule: Atheism And Religion Are ‘Not Two Sides Of The Same Coin’&lt;br /&gt;
  | periodical = Mediaite&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-mahers-new-rule-atheism-and-religion-are-not-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/&lt;br /&gt;
  | accessdate = 2012-09-07&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
* But when it comes to religion, we&#039;re not two sides of the same coin, and you don&#039;t get to put your unreason up on the same shelf with my reason. &#039;&#039;Your&#039;&#039; stuff has to go over &#039;&#039;there&#039;&#039;, on the shelf with Zeus and Thor and the Kraken, with the stuff that is not evidence-based, stuff that religious people never change their mind about, no matter what happens.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bill Maher]], &#039;&#039;Real Time With Bill Maher&#039;&#039; (HBO) ({{#formatdate:2012-02-03}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Największą wiarę mają ateiści: wierzą, że Boga nie ma.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: The atheists have the greatest faith: they believe that God does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Andrzej Majewski]], &#039;&#039;Aphorisms: Magnum in Parvo&#039;&#039; (2000). Warsaw: KiW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The greatest single cause of atheism in the world today is Christians who acknowledge Jesus with their lips and walk out the door and deny Him by their lifestyle. That is what an unbelieving world simply finds unbelievable.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Brennan Manning]], as quoted in [https://relevantmagazine.com/god/practical-faith/ragamuffin-legacy &amp;quot;The Ragamuffin Legacy&amp;quot;] (16 April 2013), by Ben Simpson, &#039;&#039;Relevant Magazine&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People like [[Richard Dawkins|Dawkins]] are the public face of atheism. And that public face is one that is defensively and irrationally sexist. It&#039;s not only turning women away from atheism, it&#039;s discrediting the idea that atheists are actually people who argue from a position of rationality. How can they be, when they cling to the ancient, irrational tradition of treating women like they aren&#039;t quite as human as men?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Amanda Marcotte|Amanda Marcotte]] quoted by journalist Kimberly Winston, &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (November 18, 2014) [http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/richard-dawkins-stands-by-remarks-on-sexism-pedophilia-down-syndrome/2014/11/18/a2915cd8-6f64-11e4-a2c2-478179fd0489_story.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Absolute atheism starts in an act of faith in reverse gear and is a full-blown religious commitment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jacques Maritain]], &#039;&#039;The Range of Reason&#039;&#039; (1952), [http://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/etext/range08.htm Chapter 8]. New York: Charles Scribner&#039;s Sons, p. 106.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Some people say God died during the Partition in 1947. He may have died in 1971 during the war. Or he may have died yesterday here in Pondicherry in an orphanage. That&#039;s what some people say, Pi. When I was your age, I lived in bed, racked with polio. I asked myself every day, &#039;Where is God? Where is God? Where is God?&#039; God never came. It wasn&#039;t God who saved me—it was medicine. Reason is my prophet and it tells me that as a watch stops, so we die. It&#039;s the end. If the watch doesn&#039;t work properly, it must be fixed here and now by us. One day we will take hold of the [[means of production]] and there will be justice on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book | author = [[Yann Martel]] | title = {{w|Life of Pi}} | year = 2001 | isbn = 9780151008117 | section = Chapter 22 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=wgHPjx2UPGEC&amp;amp;pg=PA34&amp;amp;q=%22Some+people+say%22#v=snippet&amp;amp;q=%22Some+people+say+God+died%22 | page = 34}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I can well imagine an atheist&#039;s last words: &amp;quot;White, white! L-L-Love! My God!&amp;quot; — and the deathbed leap of faith. Whereas the agnostic, if he stays true to his reasonable self, if he stays beholden to dry, yeastless factuality, might try to explain the warm light bathing him by saying, &amp;quot;Possibly a f-f-failing oxygenation of the b-b-brain,&amp;quot; and, to the very end, lack imagination and miss the better story.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{cite book | author = [[Yann Martel]] | title = [[w:Life of Pi|Life of Pi]] | year = 2001 | isbn = 9780151008117 | section = Chapter 22 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=wgHPjx2UPGEC&amp;amp;pg=PA80&amp;amp;q=%22I+can+well+imagine%22 | pages = 80-81}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An atheist doesn&#039;t have to be someone who thinks he has a proof that there can&#039;t be a god.  He only has to be someone who believes that the evidence on the God question is at a similar level to the evidence on the werewolf question.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:John McCarthy (computer scientist)|John McCarthy]], &amp;quot;[http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.books/msg/f8ce8532210e7f2a Agnostics and Atheists]&amp;quot; ({{#formatdate:1992-07-23}}), &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;rec.arts.books&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Internet has given atheists, agnostics, skeptics, the people who like to destroy everything that you and I believe, the almost equal access to your kids as your youth pastor and you have... whether you like it or not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Josh McDowell]] {{cite journal&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Apologist Josh McDowell: Internet the Greatest Threat to Christians&lt;br /&gt;
|journal=Christian Post&lt;br /&gt;
|date=2011-07-16&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Anugrah&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Kumar&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://www.christianpost.com/news/apologist-josh-mcdowell-internet-the-greatest-threat-to-christians-52382/&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate=2011-10-21}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Theology recognizes the contingency of human existence only to derive it from a necessary being, that is, to remove it. Theology makes use of philosophical wonder only for the purpose of motivating an affirmation which ends it. Philosophy, on the other hand, arouses us to what is problematic in our own existence and in that of the world, to such a point that we shall never be cured of searching for a solution.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]], &#039;&#039;In Praise of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1963), p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The philosopher ... is well able to understand religion as one of the expressions of the central phenomenon of consciousness. But the example of [[Socrates]] reminds us that it is not the same thing, but almost the opposite, to understand religion and to accept it.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]], &#039;&#039;In Praise of Philosophy&#039;&#039; (Chicago: 1963), p. 45&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;No hay arte ateo. Aunque no ames el Creador, lo afirmarás creando a su semejanza.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: There is no atheist art. Even if you do not love the Creator, you will affirm him, creating in his likeness.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Gabriela Mistral|Gabriela Mistral]], &amp;quot;Decálogo del artista&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;Decalogue of the Artist&amp;quot;), &#039;&#039;Desolación&#039;&#039; (1922).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the unlikely event of losing Pascal&#039;s Wager, I intend to saunter in to Judgement Day with a bookshelf full of grievances, a flaming sword of my own devising, and a serious attitude problem.&lt;br /&gt;
** Rick Moen, &amp;quot;[http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.sf.written.robert-jordan/msg/934608fa971abdc7 TAN: Mormons]&amp;quot; {{#formatdate:1997-10-11}}, &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;rec.arts.sf.written.robert-jordan&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I remember how, at Cambridge, I walked with her ([[George Eliot]]) once in the Fellows&#039; Garden of Trinity, on an evening of rainy May, and she, stirred somewhat beyond her wont, and taking as her text the three words which have been used so often as the inspiring trumpet-calls of men — the words &#039;&#039;God&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Immortality&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Duty&#039;&#039; — pronounced with terrible earnestness how inconceivable was the &#039;&#039;first&#039;&#039;, how unbelievable the &#039;&#039;second&#039;&#039;, and yet how peremptory and absolute the &#039;&#039;third&#039;&#039;. Never, perhaps, have sterner accents affirmed the sovereignty of impersonal and unrecompensing Law. I listened, and night fell; her grave, majestic countenance turned towards me like a [[w:sibyl|sibyl]]&#039;s in the gloom; it was as though she withdrew from my grasp, one by one, the two scrolls of promise, and left me the third scroll only, awful with inevitable fate. And when we stood at length and parted amid that columnar circuit of the forest trees, beneath the last twilight of starless skies, I seemed to be gazing, like [[w:Titus|Titus]] at Jerusalem, on vacant seats and empty halls — on a [[w:Holy of Holies|Sanctuary]] with no Presence to hallow it, and heaven left lonely of a God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Frederic William Henry Myers]], [http://www.bartelby.com/309/1001.html &amp;quot;George Eliot&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Century Magazine&#039;&#039;, November 1881.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==N==&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is so senseless &amp;amp; odious to mankind that it never had many professors. Can it be by accident that all birds beasts &amp;amp; men have their right side &amp;amp; left side alike shaped (except in their bowells) &amp;amp; just two eyes &amp;amp; no more on either side the face &amp;amp; just two ears on either side the head &amp;amp; a nose with two holes &amp;amp; no more between the eyes &amp;amp; one mouth under the nose &amp;amp; either two fore leggs or two wings or two arms on the sholders &amp;amp; two leggs on the hipps one on either side &amp;amp; no more? Whence arises this uniformity in all their outward shapes but from the counsel &amp;amp; contrivance of an Author? Whence is it that the eyes of all sorts of living creatures are transparent to the very bottom &amp;amp; the only transparent members in the body, having on the outside an hard transparent skin, &amp;amp; within transparent juyces with a crystalline Lens in the middle &amp;amp; a pupil before the Lens all of them so truly shaped &amp;amp; fitted for vision, that no Artist can mend them? Did blind chance know that there was light &amp;amp; what was its refraction &amp;amp; fit the eys of all creatures after the most curious manner to make use of it? These &amp;amp; such like considerations always have &amp;amp; ever will prevail with man kind to believe that there is a being who made all things &amp;amp; has all things in his power &amp;amp; who is therfore to be feared.&lt;br /&gt;
** Sir [[Isaac Newton]] in [http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/texts/viewtext.php?id=THEM00007&amp;amp;mode=normalized &amp;quot;A short Schem of the true Religion&amp;quot;] (post-1710).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You see what it was that really triumphed over the Christian God: Christian morality itself, the concept of truthfulness that was understood more rigorously, the father confessor’s refinement of the Christian conscience, translated and sublimated into a scientific conscience, into intellectual cleanliness at any price.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], &#039;&#039;The Gay Science&#039;&#039; (1882), as translated by Walter Kaufmann, § 357&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==O==&lt;br /&gt;
* Your petitioners are Atheists and they define their beliefs as follows. An Atheist loves his fellow man instead of god. An Atheist believes that heaven is something for which we should work now—here on earth for all men together to enjoy. An Atheist believes that he can get no help through prayer but that he must find in himself the inner conviction, and strength to meet life, to grapple with it, to subdue it, and enjoy it. An Atheist believes that only in a knowledge of himself and a knowledge of his fellow man can he find the understanding that will help to a life of fulfillment. He seeks to know himself and his fellow man rather than to know a god. An Atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An Atheist believes that deed must be done instead of a prayer said. An Atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death. He wants disease conquered, poverty vanished, war eliminated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Madalyn Murray O&#039;Hair]], Petition for Relief (1959), &#039;&#039;Murray v. Curlett&#039;&#039;, quoted in &amp;quot;Why I am an Atheist&amp;quot; (1966).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He was an embittered atheist (the sort of atheist who does not so much disbelieve in God as personally dislike him).&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Down and Out in Paris and London|Down and Out in Paris and London]]&#039;&#039; (1933), [http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/o/orwell/george/o79d/chapter30.html Chapter XXX]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==P==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Athéisme, force de l&#039;esprit, mais jusq&#039;à un certain degré seulement.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Atheism shows strength of mind, but only to a certain degree.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1669), [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h.htm#p_225 225]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Objection des athées: &amp;quot;Mais nous n&#039;avons nulle lumière.&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Objection of atheists: &amp;quot;But we have no light.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Blaise Pascal]], &#039;&#039;[[Pensées]]&#039;&#039; (1699; transaltion 1869), [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h.htm#p_228 228]&lt;br /&gt;
** In another &#039;&#039;pensée&#039;&#039; Pascal writes: &amp;quot;There is enough light for those who only desire to believe, and enough obscurity for those of a contrary disposition.&amp;quot; ([http://www.gutenberg.org/files/18269/18269-h.htm#p_430 430]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No one is so much alone in the universe as a denier of God. With an orphaned heart, which has lost the greatest of fathers, he stands mourning by the immeasurable corpse of nature, no longer moved and sustained by the Spirit of the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jean Paul]], &#039;&#039;Blumen- Frucht- und Dornenstücke, oder Ehestand, Tod und Hochzeit des Armenadvokaten Siebenkäs&#039;&#039; (1796), translated as E. H. Noel (tr.), &#039;&#039;Flower, fruit and thorn pieces: or, The married life, death, and wedding of the advocate of the poor Firmian Stanislaus Siebenkäs&#039;&#039; (1845), [http://books.google.com/books?id=2w4EAAAAQAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA276&amp;amp;dq=%22No+one+is+so+much+alone+in+the+universe+as+a+denier+of+God%22 p. 276].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On second thought, maybe the atheist cannot find God, for the same reason a thief cannot find a policeman.&lt;br /&gt;
**{{cite book | author = [[Laurence J. Peter]] | title = Peter&#039;s Quotations: Ideas for Our Times | year = 1977 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=W6bPGIL-_-8C&amp;amp;pg=PA44&amp;amp;dq=%22On+second+thought,+maybe+the+atheist%22 | page = 44}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Sometimes misattributed to [[Francis Thompson]], whose quote &amp;quot;An atheist is a man who believes himself an accident&amp;quot; Peter was commenting on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* He who tries to flee from God takes refuge in himself.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Philo]], &#039;&#039;Legum allegoriarum&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Allegorical Interpretation&#039;&#039;), Book III, 29 (1st century).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* By definition, that is, by its very stance, atheism denies or ignores the creatureliness and thus also the provisionality [&#039;&#039;Entwurfscharakter&#039;&#039;] of the world and man — with the consequence that atheists must explain man&#039;s moral failure as, at most, inappropriate behavior, or perhaps as an error of judgment, or, even more tepidly, as an inability to adapt to society.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Josef Pieper]], &#039;&#039;The Concept of Sin&#039;&#039; (1977), translated by Edward T. Oakes, S.J. South Bend, Indiana: St Augustine&#039;s Press, 2001, p. 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine [[reward]] then, brother, that person is a piece of shit. And I’d like to get as many of them out in the open as possible. You gotta get together and tell yourself [[stories]] that violate every [[law]] of the [[universe]] just to get through the goddamn day? What’s that say about your [[reality]]?&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Rust&amp;quot; Cohle, as interpreted by [[w:Matthew McConaughey|Matthew McConaughey]] in &#039;&#039;[[True Detective (TV series)|True Detective]]&#039;&#039;, &amp;quot;The Locked Room&amp;quot;, written by [[w:Nic Pizzolatto|Nic Pizzolatto]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If [[religion]] has no intrinsic content and value, and is only a fraud, then its interest to [[scholarship]] should be marginal. Yet [[w:Research institute|research institutes]] [[w:Publishing house|publishing houses]], [[w:Academic journal|journals]] and thousands of [[w:PhD|PhD]]s and other [[scholars]] are engagd in nothing other than a systematic lifetime [[study]] of religion and its refutation. But if millions of roubles and man-hours of [[Soviet]] scholars are spent on the study of religion, then the subject is worthy of scholarly pursuit, and must be in itself a scholarly discipline, not simply a fraud or opiate. In other words, its study required an objective, open-ended approach. Yet Soviet scholars are oblidged to approach the suject with a predetermined conclusion: whatever they discover about religion and the believers, their conclusion must be negative, it must lead to only one single definition of religion, namely that it is a [[fraud]] and a [[delusion]]. In these circumstances all Soviet atheistic scholarship becomes nothing but support for the main thesis. This obligatory thesis, the condemnation of religion as fraud and believers as vicctims of fraud perpetuated by a [[clergy]] who are either clever swindlers or fools, has to be made in such a way as to appear as fresh and new as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dimitry V. Pospielovsky, [https://www.google.com/books/edition/History_Of_Soviet_Atheism_In_Theory_And/awiwCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&amp;amp;gbpv=1&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover &amp;quot;A History of Soviet Atheism in Theory, and Practice, and the Believer&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Vol 3: A History of Marxist-Leninist Atheism and Soviet Anti-Religious Policies&#039;&#039;, St Martin&#039;s Press, New York (1987), pp. xvi-xvii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A textbook, &#039;&#039;Foundation of Scientific Atheism&#039;&#039;, defined atheism as: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &#039;a system of [[materialistic]] [[scientifically]] based views, rejecting any faith in go (or gods), in supernatural powers and any religion whatsoever...Atheism...is one of the essential and most important aspects of materialistic philosophy.&#039; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Religion]] in the same book is described as &#039;a form of social consciousness... a perverse, fantastic reflection of reality in the consciousness of men&#039;. This, of course, is straight out of [[Engels]]. All religious [[philosophy]] is described as a [[class]] philosophy. Hence [[Plato]], for instance, is said to &#039;represent the interest of the [[slave]]-owning [[aristocracy]]&#039;. But then it has to be shown that atheism, has always been a major school of thought wherefore moralists, such as [[Lao-Tse]], and pantheists, such as [[Spinoza]] are presented, or rather misrepresented, as atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
** Dimitry V. Pospielovsky, [https://www.google.com/books/edition/History_Of_Soviet_Atheism_In_Theory_And/awiwCwAAQBAJ?hl=en&amp;amp;gbpv=1&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover &amp;quot;A History of Soviet Atheism in Theory, and Practice, and the Believer&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Vol 3: A History of Marxist-Leninist Atheism and Soviet Anti-Religious Policies&#039;&#039;, St Martin&#039;s Press, New York (1987), pp. xvii-xviii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheists put on a false courage and alacrity in the midst of their darkness and apprehensions, like children who, when they fear to go in the dark, will sing for fear.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pope]], &amp;quot;Thoughts on Various Subjects&amp;quot; (1727), &#039;&#039;Miscellanies in Verse and Prose&#039;&#039;, Vol. II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The believer in God has to account for one thing, the existence of unjust suffering; the atheist, however, has to account for the existence of everything else.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Dennis Prager|Dennis Prager]] paraphrasing [[w:Milton Steinberg|Milton Steinberg]] in a [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzIHuyqqBaI debate] (2008) with [[Christopher Hitchens]] and [[Dinesh D&#039;Souza]]. A slightly different version (&#039;must&#039; twice instead of &#039;has to&#039; and &#039;evil&#039; instead of &#039;unjust suffering&#039;) is found in Dennis Prager and [[w:Joseph Telushkin|Joseph Telushkin]], &#039;&#039;The Nine Questions People ask about Judaism&#039;&#039; (1981), Question 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* God can stand being told by [[A. J. Ayer|Professor Ayer]] and [[w:Marghanita Laski|Marghanita Laski]] that He does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. B. Priestley]], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Listener (magazine)|The Listener]]&#039;&#039; (1 July 1965).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Il n&#039;est pas de sauveurs suprêmes&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Ni Dieu, ni César, ni tribun.&lt;br /&gt;
** There are no supreme saviors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Neither God, nor [[Caesar]], nor [[tribune]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Eugène Edine Pottier]], &#039;&#039;[[The Internationale]]&#039;&#039; (1871)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==R==&lt;br /&gt;
* I am an intransigent atheist, though not a militant one. This means that I am not fighting &#039;&#039;against&#039;&#039; religion — I am fighting &#039;&#039;for&#039;&#039; reason.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Ayn Rand]] (1963), in Michael S. Berliner, ed., &#039;&#039;Letters of Ayn Rand&#039;&#039; (New York: Dutton, 1995), p. 606.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no &#039;law&#039; in heaven or earth that man must needs obey! Take what you can, and all you can; and take it while you – may.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Let not the Jew-born Christ ideal unnerve you from the fight. You have no &#039;rights&#039; except the rights you win by – might.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There is no justice, right, nor wrong; no truth, no good, no evil. There is no &#039;man&#039;s immortal soul,&#039; no fiery, fearsome devil.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There is no &#039;heaven of glory:&#039; No! – no &#039;hell where sinners roast.&#039; There is no &#039;God the Father,&#039; No! – no Son, no &#039;Holy Ghost.&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The world is no Nirvāna where joy forever flows. It is a grewsome butcher shop where dead &#039;lambs&#039; hang in rows.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Man is the most ferocious of all the beasts of prey. He rageth round the mountains, to love, and feast, and – slay.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;He sails the stormy oceans, he gallops o&#039;er the plains, and sucks the very marrow-bones of captives held in – chains.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Death endeth all for every man, – for every &#039;son of thunder;&#039; Then be a lion (not a &#039;lamb&#039;) and – don&#039;t be trampled under.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ragnar Redbeard|Ragnar Redbeard]] (probably [[Arthur Desmond]]), &#039;&#039;[[w:Might is Right|Might is Right]]: The Survival of the Fittest&#039;&#039; (1890).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Most intellectual people do not [[believe]] in [[God]], but they [[fear]] him just the same.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Reich]], in James Lee Christian &#039;&#039;Philosophy : An Introduction to the Art of Wondering&#039;&#039;,  (2005), p. 556.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.&lt;br /&gt;
** Stephen F. Roberts. See his [http://freelink.wildlink.com/quote_history.php &amp;quot;Brief History of the Quote&amp;quot;] or Alex Colias, [http://www.sfatheists.com/Essays/Documents/No%20Theist%20is%20Atheist%20Towards%20Anything.pdf &amp;quot;No Theist is Atheist Towards Anything&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
** Misattributed to [[w:Stephen Henry Roberts|Stephen Henry Roberts]] (1901–71) by [[Sam Harris]] in his article [http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/10-myths-and-10-truths-about-atheism1/ &amp;quot;10 Myths — and 10 Truths — about Atheism&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Los Angeles Times&#039;&#039;, December 24, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is aristocratic; the idea of a Great Being that watches over oppressed innocence and punishes triumphant crime is altogether popular. The people, the unfortunate, will always applaud me; I shall find detractors only among the rich and the guilty.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Maximilien Robespierre]], [http://www.thegreatbooks.com/sources/ifgoddidnot.html &amp;quot;Address to the Jacobin Club&amp;quot;] (November 21, 1793), in &#039;&#039;Œuvres Complètes&#039;&#039; (Paris: Ernest Leroux, 1910–1967), vol. 10, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Slavoj Žižek]] writes that for Robespierre atheism was &amp;quot;the ideology of the cynical-hedonistic aristocrats who had lost all sense of historical mission&amp;quot; (&#039;&#039;In Defense of Lost Causes&#039;&#039;. London: Verso, 2008, p. 499).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In this actual world a churchless community, a community where men have abandoned and scoff at or ignore their religious needs, is a community on the rapid down grade. It is true that occasional individuals or families may have nothing to do with church or with religious practices and observances and yet maintain the highest standard of refined ethical obligation. But this does not affect the case in the world as it now is, any more than the fact that exceptional men and women under exceptional conditions have disregarded the marriage tie without moral harm to themselves interferes with the larger fact that such disregard if at all common means the complete moral disintegration of the body politic&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Theodore Roosevelt]], &#039;&#039;The Foes of Our Own Household&#039;&#039; (1917).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I&#039;m not an atheist because I just can&#039;t be that certain.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mike Rosen]] in &#039;&#039;The Mike Rosen Show&#039;&#039; on [[w:talk radio|news/talk radio]] station [[w:KOA (AM)|850 KOA]] (December 19, 2007, 10:56 am).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==S==&lt;br /&gt;
*Stripped of the opportunities for satire which organised religion cannot help but supply, the case for atheism has very little substance.&lt;br /&gt;
** Bill Saunders, [https://archive.is/20130629110854/www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-5165945.html &amp;quot;Sunlight on dungheaps&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:Independent on Sunday|Independent on Sunday]]&#039;&#039;, 10 June 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Atheism is an old idea, probably as old as humanity, and it has always justified its case by its superior understanding of nature. Unfortunately, as scientific knowledge has become more sophisticated over the past three centuries, all the scientific ideas which support atheism have evaporated into murky puddles of water, when they have not actually dried up entirely. It is now clear that the Universe has not always been here, it has a beginning. Everything is not made of indestructible atoms. Life is not caused by sunlight on dungheaps, and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
** Bill Saunders, &amp;quot;Sunlight on dungheaps&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Independent On Sunday&#039;&#039;, 10 June 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I have concluded, through careful empirical analysis and much thought, that somebody is looking out for me, keeping track of what I think about things, forgiving me when I do less than I ought, giving me strength to shoot for more than I think I&#039;m capable of. I believe they know everything that I do and think and they still love me, and I have concluded after careful consideration, that this person keeping score is &#039;&#039;me&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{w|Adam Savage}}, speaking at {{w|Reason Rally}}, National Mall, Washington, DC, {{#formatdate:2012-03-24}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t have to believe in atheism, because atheism is based on REASON.&lt;br /&gt;
** Manfred F. Schieder, in [http://rebirthofreason.com/Spirit/Quotes/Author_537.shtml &amp;quot;Rebirth of Reason&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;Nee, ich trinke keinen Tee, ich bin Atheist.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Translation: Nah, I don&#039;t drink tea, I&#039;m an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Helge Schneider|Helge Schneider]], &#039;&#039;Jazzclub — Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm&#039;&#039; (2004), a film he wrote, directed, acted in and composed the music for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality of happiness, and by no means a necessity of life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[George Bernard Shaw]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Androcles and the Lion (play)|Androcles and the Lion]]&#039;&#039; (1913), [[s:Androcles and the Lion (Shaw)/Preface to Androcles and the Lion/The Importance of Hell  in the Salvation Scheme|Preface: The Importance of Hell in the Salvation Scheme]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The &#039;&#039;reality&#039;&#039; of God is dead.&amp;quot; Here we come to an important point. These are real atheists who say that. This kind of atheism is not born of the intellect. It is born of the &#039;&#039;will&#039;&#039;. They &#039;&#039;will&#039;&#039; that God does not exist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Fulton J. Sheen]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPa-EtQS0ls &amp;quot;The Death of God&amp;quot;] (1966). The quote begins at around 12 min 10 sec.&lt;br /&gt;
** In support of his assertion, Sheen goes on to quote [[Martin Heidegger]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], [[André Gide]], [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], the fictional atheist Kirillov from [[Fyodor Dostoevsky]]&#039;s novel &#039;&#039;[[Demons (novel)|The Devils]]&#039;&#039;, and an unnamed American writer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There is probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Ariane Sherine|Ariane Sherine]], in her [[w:Atheist Bus Campaign|Atheist Bus Campaign]] (2008).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheists in foxholes, some say they are myths,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Creations of the mind who just don&#039;t exist.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yet, they answered the call to defend, with great pride.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;With reason their watchword, they bled and they died.&lt;br /&gt;
** Alice Shiver, &amp;quot;Atheists-in-Foxholes&amp;quot; monument, dedicated on 4 July 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nationwide, the nonreligious population is both the fastest growing, and the most despised. I ask you all, why is that? Why are we hated, when we endorse no violence, incite no racism or hatred, and demand nothing more than equal treatment? I&#039;ll tell you why: It&#039;s easy to hate what you don&#039;t know, and the theists don&#039;t know us. Well, actually, they &#039;&#039;do&#039;&#039; know us, but they don&#039;t &#039;&#039;know&#039;&#039; they know us, because most atheists in this country are closeted. Bigotry is born of ignorance, but ignorance can be cured. If the atheists weren&#039;t closeted, it would be harder to hate us, because in the end, you can&#039;t hate what you already love.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[David Silverman]], speaking at {{w|Reason Rally}}, National Mall, Washington, DC, {{#formatdate:2012-03-24}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What Jupiter? Do not trifle. There is no Jupiter.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Socrates]] (character) in [[Aristophanes]]&#039; &#039;&#039;[[w:The Clouds|The Clouds]]&#039;&#039; (5th c. BCE, tr. Hickie 1853, vol. 1, [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Aristoph.+Cl.+356 Perseus]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the first place, it is clear that by self-existence we especially mean, an existence independent of any other — not produced by any other: the assertion of self-existence is simply an indirect denial of creation.... Self-existence, therefore, necessarily means existence without a beginning; and to form a conception of self-existence is to form a conception of existence without a beginning. Now by no mental effort can we do this.... To this let us add, that even were self-existence conceivable, it would not in any sense be an explanation of the Universe.... Thus the Atheistic theory is not only absolutely unthinkable, but, even if it were thinkable, would not be a solution. The assertion that the Universe is self-existent does not really carry us a step beyond the cognition of its present existence; and so leaves us with a mere restatement of the mystery.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862). London: Williams and Norgate, pp. 32–33.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As was proved at the outset of the argument, self-existence is rigorously inconceivable; and this holds true whatever be the nature of the object of which it is predicated.... Thus these three different suppositions [atheism, pantheism, theism] respecting the origin of things, verbally intelligible though they are, and severally seeming to their respective adherents quite rational, turn out, when critically examined to be literally unthinkable. It is not a question of probability, or credibility, but of conceivability. Experiment proves that the elements of these hypotheses cannot even be put together in consciousness; and we can entertain them only as we entertain such pseud-ideas as a square fluid and a moral substance — only by abstaining from the endeavour to render them into actual thoughts. Or, reverting to our original mode of statement, we may say that they severally involve symbolic conceptions of the illegitimate and illusive kind. Differing so widely as they seem to do, the atheistic, the pantheistic, and the theistic hypotheses contain the same ultimate element. It is impossible to avoid making the assumption of self-existence somewhere; and whether that assumption be made nakedly, or under complicated disguises, it is equally vicious, equally unthinkable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862), pp. 36–37.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Passing over the consideration of credibility, and confining ourselves to that of conceivability, we see that Atheism, Pantheism, and Theism, when rigorously analyzed, severally prove to be absolutely unthinkable.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862), pp. 44–45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Leaving out the accompanying moral code, which is in all cases a supplementary growth, a religious creed is definable as a theory of original causation.... [E]ven that which is commonly regarded as the negation of all Religion — even positive Atheism, comes within the definition; for it, too, in asserting the self-existence of Space, Matter, and Motion, which it regards as adequate causes of every appearance, propounds an &#039;&#039;[[w:a priori and a posteriori|à priori]]&#039;&#039; theory from which it holds the facts to be deducible.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Herbert Spencer]], &#039;&#039;First Principles&#039;&#039; (1862), p. 45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You know, they are fooling us, there is no God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]], to a fellow student while studying to become a priest in the Russian Orthodox Church; quoted in &#039;&#039;Landmarks in the Life of Stalin&#039;&#039; (1942) by [[w:Yemelyan Yaroslavsky|Yemelyan Yaroslavsky]], p. 9.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We had many interesting conversations and he introduced me to his young wife. He confided to me that he had married her because she was a fanatical atheist. Atheism was the main topic of their conversations. Such fervid atheism is usually a screen for repressed religion. The truly convinced atheist does not emphasize his atheism. He does not talk about it and is careful to avoid blasphemies.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The man was interested in dreams and each morning he related several of his dreams. They were full of religious symbols. I was cautious not to reveal to him the meaning of his dreams; such off-hand analyses are always dangerous.... The banker did not want to be disturbed in his supposed atheism.... His atheism was a [[w:reaction formation|reaction formation]] established upon an ineradicable religious belief.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wilhelm Stekel]], &amp;quot;Autobiography&amp;quot; [serialized], &#039;&#039;[[w:American Journal of Psychotherapy|American Journal of Psychotherapy]]&#039;&#039;, Vol. II (1948); &#039;&#039;The Autobiography of Wilhelm Stekel: The Life Story of a Pioneer Psychoanalyst&#039;&#039; (1950), translated and edited by [[w:Emil Gutheil|E. A. Gutheil]], New York: Liveright. See full extract in [http://benatlas.com/2010/06/wilhelm-stekel-on-atheism-and-telepathy/ &amp;quot;Wilhelm Stekel on Atheism and Telepathy&amp;quot;]. The man. Stekel&#039;s fellow-passenger on a transatlantic liner, was a prominent New York banker on his way to Europe to attend an international banking conference.&lt;br /&gt;
** Often quoted as &amp;quot;Fervid atheism is usually a screen for repressed religion.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nothing enlarges more the gulf of atheism, than that wide passage, which lies between the faith and lives of men pretending to be Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Edward Stillingfleet|Edward Stillingfleet]], &#039;&#039;Origines Sacræ&#039;&#039; (1663). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1797, p. x.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Including, I suppose, death. ... It&#039;s an interesting view of atheism, as a sort of crutch for those who can&#039;t bear the reality of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Stoppard]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Jumpers|Jumpers]]&#039;&#039; (1972).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As an atheist, I believe that all life is unspeakably precious, because it’s only here for a brief moment, a flare against the dark, and then it’s gone forever. No afterlives, no second chances, no backsies. So there can be nothing crueler than the abuse, destruction or wanton taking of a life. It is a crime no less than burning the Mona Lisa, for there is always just one of each. So I cannot forgive.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[J. Michael Straczynski]], [http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/countries/us/guide/048.html &#039;&#039;Lurker&#039;s Guide to Babylon 5&#039;&#039; : &amp;quot;Passing Through Gethsemane : jms speaks&amp;quot; (13 July (2004)].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==T==&lt;br /&gt;
* The thing framed says that nothing framed it; the tongue never made itself to speak, and yet talks against him that did; saying that which is made, &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039;, and that which made it, &#039;&#039;is not&#039;&#039;. But this folly is infinite as hell, as much without light or bound as the &#039;&#039;chaos&#039;&#039; or the &#039;&#039;primitive nothing&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jeremy Taylor]] (1613-1667), &#039;&#039;Discourses on Various Subjects&#039;&#039;, Sermon XX, p. [http://books.google.com/books?id=teVLAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA376&amp;amp;dq=%22The+thing+framed+says%22 376].&lt;br /&gt;
** Misquoted in &#039;&#039;Dictionary of Burning Words of Brilliant Writers&#039;&#039;, p. 18, as &amp;quot;The thing formed says that nothing formed it; and that which is made &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039;, while that which made it &#039;&#039;is not!&#039;&#039; The folly is infinite.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “Is there a God?” I said. “I mean, are you in touch, telepathically, with any kind of God?”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“No. I’m not in touch with anything like that. As far as I know, there is no God.”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“Oh,” I said.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“It doesn’t bother you,” the voice said. “You may think it does; but it doesn’t. You’re really on your own. You’ve been learning that.”&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Walter Tevis]], &#039;&#039;Mockingbird&#039;&#039; (1980), {{ISBN|978-1-4072-3376-5}}, p. 251&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* An Atheist is a man who believes himself an accident.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Francis Thompson]], &amp;quot;Paganism: Old and New&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;A Renegade Poet and Other Essays&#039;&#039; (1910), p. 47.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When men live as if there were no God, it becomes expedient for them that there should be none; and then they endeavour to persuade themselves so, and will be glad to find arguments to fortify themselves in this persuasion.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Tillotson]], &amp;quot;The Folly of Scoffing at Religion&amp;quot; (1671), in &#039;&#039;Works&#039;&#039;, Volume I, Edinburgh, 1748, p. 58.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In former days the free-thinker was a man who had been brought up in ideas of religion, law, and morality, and only through conflict and struggle came to free-thought; but now there has sprung up a new type of born free-thinkers who grow up without even having heard of principles of morality or of religion, of the existence of authorities, who grow up directly in ideas of negation in everything, that is to say, savages.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leo Tolstoy]], Golenishtchev in &#039;&#039;[[Anna Karenina]]&#039;&#039; (1877), C. Garnett, trans. (New York: 2003), Part 5, Chapter 9, p. 434&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What men deny is not God, but some preposterous idol of the imagination.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:George Tyrrell|George Tyrrell]], &#039;&#039;Autobiography&#039;&#039; (1912), p. 71.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U==&lt;br /&gt;
* The parasites which live in the intestines of higher animals, feeding upon the nutritive juices which these animals supply, do not need either to see or hear, and therefore for them the visible and audible world does not exist. And if they possessed a certain degree of consciousness and took account of the fact that the animal at whose expense they live believed in a world of sight and hearing, they would perhaps deem such belief to be due merely to the extravagance of its imagination. And similarly there are social parasites, as Mr. A. J. Balfour admirably observes, who, receiving from the society in which they live the motives of their moral conduct, deny that belief in God and the other life is a necessary foundation for good conduct and for a tolerable life, society having prepared for them the spiritual nutriment by which they live. An isolated individual can endure life and live it well and even heroically without in any sort believing either in the immortality of the soul or in God, but he lives the life of a spiritual parasite.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Miguel de Unamuno]], &#039;&#039;Tragic Sense of Life&#039;&#039; (1913)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Among the repulsions of atheism for me has been its drastic uninterestingness as an intellectual position. Where was the ingenuity, the ambiguity, the humanity (in the Harvard sense) of saying that the universe just happened to happen and that when we&#039;re dead we&#039;re dead?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[John Updike]], &#039;&#039;Self-Consciousness: Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1989), ch. 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==V==&lt;br /&gt;
* For entirely savage races,... one cannot count them among either the atheists or the theists. Asking them their belief would be like asking them if they are for [[Aristotle]] or [[Democritus]]: they know nothing; they are not atheists any more than they are [[w:Peripatetics|Peripatetics]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), [http://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volathe1.html &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section I]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is the vice of a few intelligent persons, and superstition is the vice of fools.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section I.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The atheists are for the most part impudent and misguided scholars who reason badly, and who, not being able to understand the creation, the origin of evil and other difficulties, have recourse to the hypotheses of the eternity of things and of inevitability.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), [http://history.hanover.edu/texts/voltaire/volathe2.html.htnl &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I would not wish to have to deal with an atheist prince, who would find it in his interest to have me ground to powder in a mortar: I should be quite certain of being ground to powder. If I were a sovereign, I would not wish to have to deal with atheist courtiers, whose interest it would be to poison me: I should have to be taking antidotes every day. It is therefore absolutely necessary for princes and for peoples, that the idea of a Supreme Being, creator, ruler, rewarder, revenger, shall be deeply engraved in people&#039;s minds.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[w:Kaffir (racial term)|Caffres]], the [[w:Khoikhoi|Hottentots]], the [[w:Tupí people|Topinambous]], and many other small nations, have no God: they neither deny nor affirm; they have never heard speak of Him; tell them that there is a God: they will believe it easily; tell them that everything happens through the nature of things: they will believe you equally. To claim that they are atheists is to make the same imputation as if one said they are anti-Cartesian; they are neither for nor against [[Descartes]]. They are real children; a child is neither atheist nor deist, he is nothing.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What conclusion shall we draw from all this? That atheism is a very pernicious monster in those who govern; that it is also pernicious in the persons around statesmen ...; that, if it is not so deadly as fanaticism, it is nearly always fatal to virtue.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If there are atheists, whom must one blame if not the mercenary tyrants of souls, who, making us revolt against their knaveries, force a few weak minds to deny the God whom these monsters dishonour?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Men fattened on our substance cry to us: &amp;quot;Be persuaded that a she-ass has spoken ([[w:Balaam&#039;s ass|Balaam&#039;s ass]]); believe that a fish has swallowed a man and has given him up at the end of three days safe and sound on the shore ([[w:Jonah|Jonah]]); have no doubt that the God of the universe ordered one Jewish prophet to eat excrement ([[w:Ezekiel|Ezekiel]]), and another prophet to buy two whores and to make with them sons of whoredom ([[w:Hosea|Hosea]]).&amp;quot; These are the very words that the God of truth and purity has been made to utter.... These inconceivable absurdities revolt weak and rash minds, as well as wise and resolute minds. They say: &amp;quot;Our masters paint God to us as the most insensate and the most barbarous of all beings; therefore there is no God;&amp;quot; but they should say: &amp;quot;Our masters attribute to God their absurdities and their furies; therefore God is the contrary of what they proclaim, therefore God is as wise and good as they make him out mad and wicked.&amp;quot; It is thus that wise men account for things.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], &#039;&#039;Philosophical Dictionary&#039;&#039; (1764), &amp;quot;Atheism&amp;quot;, Section II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is an absurd one. What is most repellent in [Holbach&#039;s] &#039;&#039;[[w:The System of Nature|The System of Nature]]&#039;&#039; — after the recipe for making eels from flour — is the audacity with which it decides that there is no God, without even having tried to prove the impossibility. There is some eloquence in the book: but much more rant, and no sort of proof.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Voltaire]], letter to Frederick William, Prince of Prussia (28 November 1770), in S. G. Tallentyre (ed.), &#039;&#039;Voltaire in His Letters&#039;&#039;. New York: G. P. Putnam&#039;s Sons, 1919, p. 232. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The study of anthropology … confirmed my atheism, which was the faith of my fathers anyway. Religions were exhibited and studied as the [[w:Rube Goldberg|Rube Goldberg]] inventions I&#039;d always thought they were.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], [http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/3605/the-art-of-fiction-no-64-kurt-vonnegut &amp;quot;Interviews: Kurt Vonnegut, The Art of Fiction No. 64&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Paris Review|The Paris Review]]&#039;&#039; (Spring 1977) No. 69.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The sermon was based on what he claimed was a well-known fact, that there were no Atheists in foxholes. I asked Jack what he thought of the sermon afterwards, and he said, &amp;quot;There&#039;s a Chaplain who never visited the front.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Hocus Pocus (novel)|Hocus Pocus]]&#039;&#039; (1990); 1997 reprint, [http://books.google.com/books?id=iK7tOOKaAeQC&amp;amp;pg=PA180 page 180].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==W==&lt;br /&gt;
* If we don&#039;t play God, who will?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[James D. Watson]] (1996), in &#039;&#039;The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities&#039;&#039;, [http://www.jstor.org/view/00987921/di980536/98p00105/0] New&amp;amp;nbsp;York; Simon and Schuster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* One of the most exquisite pleasures of human love — to serve the loved one without his knowing it — is only possible, as regards the love of God, through atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to obey God, one must receive his commands. How did it happen that I received them in adolescence, while I was professing atheism? To believe that the desire for good is always fulfilled — that is faith, and whoever has it is not an atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* No human being escapes the necessity of conceiving some good outside himself towards which his thought turns in a movement of desire, supplication, and hope. Consequently, the only choice is between worshipping the true God or an idol. Every atheist is an idolater — unless he is worshipping the true God in his impersonal aspect. The majority of the pious are idolaters.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Last Notebook&#039;&#039; (1942).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are two atheisms of which one is a purification of the notion of God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Gravity and Grace&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;La Pesanteur et la grâce&#039;&#039;, 1947). Routledge Classics, 2002, p. 114.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion in so far as it is a source of consolation is a hindrance to true faith: in this sense atheism is a purification. I have to be atheistic with the part of me which is not made for God. Among those in whom the supernatural part of themselves has not been awakened, the atheists are right and the believers wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;Gravity and Grace&#039;&#039; (1947), Routledge Classics, 2002, p. 115; also in George A. Panichas (ed.), &#039;&#039;The Simone Weil Reader&#039;&#039; (1977). New York: David McKay, p. 417.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As in the West, the word God, taken in its usual meaning, signifies a Person, men whose attention, faith and love are almost exclusively concentrated on the impersonal aspect of God can actually believe themselves and declare themselves to be atheists, even though supernatural love inhabits their souls.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Simone Weil]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Letter to a Priest|Letter to a Priest]]&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Lettre a un religieux&#039;&#039;, 1951), translated by A. F. Wills, Section 12. London: Routledge &amp;amp; Kegan Paul, 1953, pp. 35–36&lt;br /&gt;
** Often misquoted as &amp;quot;An atheist may be simply one whose faith and love are concentrated on the impersonal aspects of God.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Premature as the question may be, it is hardly possible not to wonder whether we will find any answer to our deepest questions, any signs of the workings of an interested God, in a final theory. I think that we will not.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Steven Weinberg]], &#039;&#039;Dreams of a Final Theory&#039;&#039; (1993), pp. 257-258. See also [http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/weinberg.htm positiveatheism.org&#039;s Weinberg quotations].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The aim of this conference is to have a constructive dialogue between science and religion. I am all in favor of a dialogue between science and religion, but not a constructive dialogue. One of the great achievements of science has been, if not to make it impossible for intelligent people to be religious, then at least to make it possible for them not to be religious. We should not retreat from this accomplishment.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Steven Weinberg]], &#039;&#039;Facing Up: Science and Its Cultural Adversaries&#039;&#039; (2001), p.&amp;amp;nbsp;242.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As a born-again atheist, I now knew exactly what satisfactions were on offer. For the first time in my 38 years I was at one with my own generation.... If I bumped into [[Richard Dawkins]] (an old colleague from Oxford days) or had dinner in Washington with [[Christopher Hitchens]] ..., I did not have to feel out on a limb. Hitchens was excited to meet a new convert to his non-creed and put me through a catechism before uncorking some stupendous claret. &amp;quot;So - absolutely no God?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Nope,&amp;quot; I was able to say with [[w:Moonie|Moonie]]-zeal. &amp;quot;No future life, nothing &#039;out there&#039;?&amp;quot; &amp;quot;No,&amp;quot; I obediently replied. At last! I could join in the creed shared by so many (most?) of my intelligent contemporaries in the Western world - that men and women are purely material beings (whatever that is supposed to mean), that &amp;quot;this is all there is&amp;quot; (ditto), that God, Jesus and religion are a load of baloney: and worse than that, the cause of much (no, come on, let yourself go), most (why stint yourself - go for it, man), all the trouble in the world, from Jerusalem to Belfast, from Washington to Islamabad.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[A. N. Wilson]], [http://www.newstatesman.com/religion/2009/04/conversion-experience-atheism &amp;quot;Why I believe again&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;New Statesman&#039;&#039;, 2 April 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Given your premises, you will have to come up with a different reason for rejecting Christ as you do. But for you to make this move would reveal the two fundamental tenets of &#039;&#039;true&#039;&#039; atheism. One: There is no God. Two: I hate Him.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Douglas Wilson (theologian)|Douglas Wilson]] to [[Christopher Hitchens]], [http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/mayweb-only/121-52.0.html?start=4 &amp;quot;Is Christianity Good for the World?&amp;quot; (part 5)], &#039;&#039;Christianity Today&#039;&#039; ({{#formatdate:2007-05-25}})&lt;br /&gt;
** Often paraphrased as &amp;quot;There are two tenets of atheism: One, there is no God. Two, I hate him.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is speculatively as unfounded as theism, and practically can only spring from bad motives.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Chauncey Wright|Chauncey Wright]], letter to Francis Allingwood Abbot (October 28, 1867). &#039;&#039;Letters of Chauncey Wright&#039;&#039;, ed. James Bradley Thayer. Cambridge, Mass.: John Wilson, 1878, p. 133&lt;br /&gt;
** Wright had earlier written to Abbot that &amp;quot;about what we really know nothing we ought not to affirm or deny anything&amp;quot; (August 13, 1867). &#039;&#039;Letters of Chauncey Wright&#039;&#039;, p. 109.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Y==&lt;br /&gt;
* By night an atheist half believes in God.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Edward Young]], &#039;&#039;Night Thoughts&#039;&#039; (1743), &amp;quot;Night Two&amp;quot;, p. 292.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Z==&lt;br /&gt;
* Atheism is not the denial of the existence of God, but having doubts as to whether God is conscious.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Slavoj Žižek]] in Slavoj Žižek and Boris Gunjević, &#039;&#039;God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse&#039;&#039; (2012), translated by Ellen Elias Bursac. New York: Seven Stories Press.&lt;br /&gt;
{{disputed begin}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Disputed==&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to Seneca, as quoted in &#039;&#039;What Great Men Think About Religion&#039;&#039; (1945) by Ira D. Cardiff, p. 342. No original source for this has been found in the works of Seneca, or published translations (see: [[Talk:Seneca the Younger]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then he is not omnipotent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is he able, but not willing?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then he is malevolent.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is God both able and willing?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then whence cometh evil?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is he neither able nor willing?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Then why call him God?&lt;br /&gt;
** Attributed to [[Epicurus]], as quoted in [[w:BBC Four|BBC Four]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief|Atheism: A Rough History of Disbelief]]&#039;&#039;. No original source has been found for this quote (see: [[Epicurus#Disputed|Epicurus: Disputed]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{disputed end}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Agnosticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christian atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Death of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Death of God theology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Faith]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Irreligiousness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Religiousness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Skepticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Unbelief]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:Category:Atheists|List of Atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wiktionary|atheism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Berdyaev&amp;diff=3120539</id>
		<title>Nikolai Berdyaev</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Berdyaev&amp;diff=3120539"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T16:12:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Self-knowlesge (Самопознание) (1940). */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:NBerdyaev.jpg|thumb|The [[religious]] [[truth]] of [[anarchism]] consists in this, that [[power]] over man is bound up with [[sin]] and [[evil]], that a state of [[perfection]] is a state where there is no power of man over man, that is to say, anarchy. The [[Kingdom of God]] is [[freedom]] and the absence of such power... the Kingdom of God is anarchy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Nikolai Berdyaev|Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev]]&#039;&#039;&#039;  [Никола́й Алекса́ндрович Бердя́ев] ([[18 March]] [[1874]] {[[w:Old Style and New Style dates|O.S.]] 6  March} &amp;amp;nbsp;– [[24 March]] [[1948]]) was a [[Russian]] [[Christian]] [[universalist]] [[mystic]] and [[Christian anarchist]] [[political]] [[philosopher]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nikolay Berdyaev.jpg|thumb|Orthodoxy gave away the [[earth]] into the hands of the [[state]] because of its own non-belief in [[Humanity|man]] and [[mankind]], because of its [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Christian Anarchist Blot.svg|thumb|The new [[religious]] [[consciousness]] rises up against the [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]] and [[mankind]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Alphaomega.png|thumb| For the new [[religious]] [[consciousness]] the declaration of the [[will]] of [[God]] is together with this a declaration of the [[rights]] of [[man]], a revealing of the [[Divine]] within [[mankind]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Николай Бердяев.jpg|thumb| The greater part of Eastern teachers of the Church, from [[Clement of Alexandria]] to [[w:Maximus the Confessor|Maximus the Confessor]], were supporters of [[w:Apocatastasis|Apokatastasis]], of [[Universalism|universal salvation]] and [[resurrection]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The uniting of Orthodoxy with state [[absolutism]] came about on the soil of a non-belief in the Divineness of the [[earth]], in the earthly [[future]] of [[mankind]]; Orthodoxy gave away the earth into the hands of the state because of its own non-belief in man and mankind, because of its [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]].&#039;&#039;&#039; Orthodoxy does not [[believe]] in the [[religious]] [[ordering]] of [[human]] [[life]] upon the earth, and it compensates for its own hopeless [[pessimism]] by a call for the forceful ordering of it by state [[authority]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.berdyaev.com/berdiaev/berd_lib/1907_135_4.html &amp;quot;Nihilism  On  A  Religious Soil&amp;quot; (6 May 1907)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  &#039;&#039;&#039;The new [[religious]] [[consciousness]] rises up against the [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]] and [[mankind]].&#039;&#039;&#039; If a religious rebirth be possible, only then on this soil will there be the revealing of the religious meaning of secular [[culture]] and earthly liberation, the revealing of the [[truth]] about mankind. &#039;&#039;&#039;For the new religious consciousness the declaration of the will of God is together with this a declaration of the rights of man, a revealing of the [[Divine]] within mankind.&#039;&#039;&#039; We believe in the objective, the cosmic might of the truth of [[God]], in the possibility according to God to guide the earthly destiny of mankind. This will be the [[victory]] of the [[Christian anarchism|true theocracy]], whether over a false democratism, — the apotheosis of the quantitative collectivity of [[human]] wills, or so also over the false theocraticism, — all that [[Deification|apotheosis]] of the human will within [[w:Caesaropapism|Caesaropapism]] or Papocaesarism. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Christ]] cannot have human vicarage in the person of the tsar or high-priest.&#039;&#039;&#039; He — is Himself the Tsar and High-Priest, and He will reign in the world. “[[Kingdom of God|Thy Kingdom]] come, Thy Will be done on earth, as it is in [[Heaven]].”&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Nihilism  On  A  Religious  Soil&amp;quot; (6 May 1907); it should be noted here that Berdyaev is here defining &amp;quot;[[theocracy]]&amp;quot; not in the sense as it is often used, of &#039;&#039;people&#039;&#039; ruling over other people, in &#039;&#039;claims&#039;&#039; of doing so by the commands of God, but rather defining it in terms of [[Christian anarchism]] — as a vigorous assertion of the right of &#039;&#039;no-one&#039;&#039; to rule over humans, &#039;&#039;save God&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Ethics]] occupies a central place in philosophy because it is concerned with sin, with the origin of good and evil and with moral valuations.&#039;&#039;&#039; And since these problems have a universal significance, the sphere of ethics is wider than is generally supposed. It deals with meaning and value and its province is the world in which the distinction between good and evil is drawn, evaluations are made and meaning is sought.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;The Destiny of Man&#039;&#039; (1931), p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is beyond dispute that the state exercises very great [[power]] over [[human]] [[life]] and it always shows a tendency to go beyond the limits laid down for it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Slavery and Freedom&#039;&#039; (1939), p. 145&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is absolute [[truth]] in [[anarchism]] and it is to be seen in its attitude to the sovereignty of the state and to every form of state [[absolutism]].&#039;&#039;&#039; … The religious [[truth]] of anarchism consists in this, that [[power]] over man is bound up with [[sin]] and [[evil]], that a state of perfection is a state where there is no power of man over man, that is to say, anarchy. &#039;&#039;&#039;The [[Kingdom of God]] is [[freedom]] and the absence of such power... the Kingdom of God is anarchy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Slavery and Freedom&#039;&#039; (1939), p. 147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The Christian world doesn&#039;t know Orthodoxy too well. It only knows the external and for the most part, the negative features of the Orthodox Church and not the inner spiritual treasure.&#039;&#039;&#039; Orthodoxy was locked inside itself, it did not have the spirit of proselytism and did not reveal itself to the world. For the longest time, Orthodoxy did not have such world-wide significance as did [[Catholicism]] and [[Protestantism]]. It remained apart form passionate religious battles for hundreds of years, for centuries it lived under the protection of large empires (Byzantium and Russia), and preserved its eternal truth from the destructive processes of world history. It is characteristic of Orthodoxy&#039;s religious nature that it was not sufficiently actualized nor exposed externally, it was not militant, and precisely because of this the heavenly truth of Christian revelation was not distorted so much. &#039;&#039;&#039;Orthodoxy is that form of Christianity which suffered the least distortion in its substance as a result of human history.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Orthodox Church had its moments of historical sin, for the most part in connection with its external dependence on the State, but the Church&#039;s teaching, her inner spiritual path was not subject to distortion. The Orthodox Church is primarily the Church of tradition, in contrast to the Catholic Church, which is the Church of authority, and to the Protestant Churches which are essentially churches of individual faith. The Orthodox Church was never subject to a single externally authoritarian organization and it unshakenly was held together by the strength of internal tradition and not by any external authority. Out of all forms of Christianity it is the Orthodox Church which remained more closely tied to early Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.kosovo.net/ortruth.html &amp;quot;The Truth of Orthodoxy&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Vestnik&#039;&#039; of the Russian West European Patriarchal Exarchate (1952)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The greater part of Eastern teachers of the Church, from [[Clement of Alexandria]] to [[w:Maximus the Confessor|Maximus the Confessor]], were supporters of [[w:Apocatastasis|Apokatastasis]], of [[Universalism|universal salvation]] and [[resurrection]].&#039;&#039;&#039; And this is characteristic of (contemporary) Russian religious thought. &#039;&#039;&#039;Orthodox thought has never been suppressed by the idea of Divine [[justice]] and it never forgot the idea of Divine [[love]]. Chiefly — it did not define man from the point of view of Divine justice but from the idea of transfiguration and Deification of [[man]] and [[cosmos]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;The Truth of Orthodoxy&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Vestnik&#039;&#039; of the [[w:Russian Orthodox Exarchate in Western Europe|Russian West European Patriarchal Exarchate]] (1952)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;The End of Our Time&#039;&#039; (1919) ===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;as translated by Donald Atwater (Sheed and Ward: 1933)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It must be recognized that man in his limited and relative earthly life is capable of bringing about the beautiful and the valuable only when he believes in another life, unlimited, absolute, eternal. That is a law of his being. A contact with this mortal life exclusive of any other ends in the wearing-away of effective energy and a self-satisfaction that makes one useless and superficial. Only the spiritual man, striking his roots deep in infinite and eternal life, can be a true creator. But [[Secular humanism|Humanism]] denied the spiritual man, handed over the eternal to the temporal, and took its stand by the natural man within the limited confines of the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 34&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole economic system of [[Capitalism]] is an offshoot of a devouring and overwhelming lust, of a kind that can hold sway only in a society that has deliberately renounced the Christian [[asceticism]] and turned away from Heaven to give itself over exclusively to earthly gratifications. ... It is the result of a secularization of economic life, and by it the hierarchical subordination of the material to the spiritual is inverted. The autonomy of economics has ended in their dominating the whole life of human societies: the worship of [[Mammon]] has become the determining force of the age. And the worst of it is that this undisguised “mammonism” is regarded as a very good thing, an attainment to the knowledge of truth and a release from illusions. [[w:Dialectical materialism|Economic materialism]] formulates this to perfection when it brands the whole spiritual life of man as a deception and a dream.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to be able to go on living it is possible that the bankrupt peoples will have to enter on a new path of self-denial, by curbing their covetousness and putting a check on the indefinite expansion of their wants, and by having smaller families.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 94&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Morally, it is wrong to suppose the source of evil is outside oneself, that one is a vessel of holiness running over with virtue. Such a disposition is the best soil for a hateful and cruel fanaticism. It is as wrong to impute every wickedness to [[Jews]], [[w:Freemasons|Freemasons]], &amp;quot;[[intellectuals]],&amp;quot; as it is to blame all crimes on the &#039;&#039;[[bourgeoisie]]&#039;&#039;, the nobility, and the powers that were. No; the root of evil is in me as well, and I must take my share of the responsibility and the blame. That was true before the [[w:Russian revolution|revolution]] and it is true still.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 128&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nobody is bound to have an optimistic outlook on the future: that is not a precept of the Christian religion. ... It is a matter of immense importance that illusions should be dispelled and man come face to face with positive realities.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 131&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We used to pay too little attention to utopias, or even disregard them altogether, saying with regret they were impossible of realisation. Now indeed they seem to be able to be brought about far more easily than we supposed, and we are actually faced by an agonising problem of quite another kind: how can we prevent their final realisation? ...  Utopias are more realisable than those &#039;realist politics&#039; that are only the carefully calculated policies of office-holders, and towards utopias we are moving. But it is possible that a new age is already beginning, in which cultured and intelligent people will dream of ways to avoid ideal states and to get back to a society that is less &#039;perfect&#039; and more free.&lt;br /&gt;
** pp. 187-188. [[Aldous Huxley]] used this passage (in French translation) as the epigraph to [[Brave New World]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It appears that liberty is bound up with imperfection, with a right to imperfection. [[Socialism]] leads to the same type of authoritarian state as [[w:Theocracy|Theocracy]]. ... One must choose: either Socialism or liberty of spirit, the liberty of man&#039;s conscience. ... Socialism uses a &amp;quot;sacred&amp;quot; authority and establishes a &amp;quot;sacred&amp;quot; society in which there is no place for the &amp;quot;lay,&amp;quot; for the free, for choice, for the unrestrained activity of human forces.&lt;br /&gt;
** pp. 188-189&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Self-knowledge (Самопознание)&#039;&#039; (1940). ===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Бога отрицают или потому, что мир так плох, или потому, что мир так хорош.&#039;&#039; [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Spirit and Reality&#039;&#039; (1946) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dove of the Holy Spirit.png|thumb|[[Spirit]] is never an object; nor a spiritual [[reality]] an objective one.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Spirit]] is never an object; nor a spiritual reality an objective one.&#039;&#039;&#039; In the so-called objective [[world]] there&#039;s no such [[nature]], thing, or objective [[reality]] as spirit. Hence it is easy to deny the reality of spirit. [[God]] is spirit because he is not object, because he is subject.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Spirit, like [[flame]], like [[freedom]], like [[creativeness]], is opposed to any [[social]] stagnation or any lifeless tradition.&#039;&#039;&#039; In terms of [[Immanuel Kant|Kantian]] philosophy — terms which I consider erroneous and confusing — spirit appears as a &#039;&#039;thing in itself&#039;&#039; and objectification as a &#039;&#039;phenomenon&#039;&#039;. Another and truer definition would be, spirit is &#039;&#039;freedom&#039;&#039; and objectification is &#039;&#039;nature&#039;&#039; (not in the romantic sense). Objectification has two aspects: on the one hand it denotes the fallen, divided and servile world, in which the existential subjects, the personalities, are materialized. On the other it comprehends the agency of the personal subject, of spirit tending to reinforce ties and communications in this fallen world. Hence objectification is related to the problem of culture, and in this consists the whole complexity of the problem.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;In objectification there are no primal realities, but only [[symbols]]. The objective spirit is merely a symbolism of spirit. Spirit is realistic while [[cultural]] and social life are symbolical.&#039;&#039;&#039; In the object there is never any reality, but only the symbol of reality. &#039;&#039;&#039;The subject alone always has reality.&#039;&#039;&#039; Therefore in objectification and in its product, the objective spirit, there can be no sacred reality, but only its symbolism. In the objective history of the world nothing transpires but a conventional symbolism; the idea of sacredness is peculiar to the existential world, to existential subjects. The real depths of spirit are apprehensible only existentially in the personal experience of destiny, in its suffering, nostalgia, love, creation, freedom and death.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===  &#039;&#039;The Beginning and the End&#039;&#039; (1947) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Empyrean Light.jpg|thumb|I do not think discursively. It is not so much that I arrive at [[truth]] as that I take my start from it.]] &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;The Beginning and The End&#039;&#039; (written 1941; published 1947)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not think discursively. It is not so much that I arrive at truth as that I take my start from it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**  Introduction &amp;lt;!-- as quoted in a review in &#039;&#039;Journal of Bible and Religion&#039;&#039;, Vol. 21, p. 37 (1953) --&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Objectification is above all exteriorization, the alienation of spirit from itself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What one needs to do at every [[moment]] of one&#039;s life is to put an end to the old world and to begin a new world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Dream and Reality&#039;&#039; (1949) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NikolayBerdyaev with Maria Skobtzeva.jpg|thumb|I see myself immersed in the depths of [[human]] existence and standing in the face of the ineffable [[mystery]] of the [[world]] and of [[all]] that is.]] &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Dream and Reality : An Essay in Autobiography&#039;&#039; (1949) &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I see myself immersed in the depths of [[human]] existence and standing in the face of the ineffable [[mystery]] of the [[world]] and of [[all]] that is. And in that situation, I am made poignantly and burningly [[aware]] that the world cannot be self-sufficient, that there is hidden in some still greater depth a mysterious, transcendent [[meaning]]. This meaning is called [[God]]. Men have not been able to find a loftier [[name]], although they have abused it to the extent of making it almost unutterable.&#039;&#039;&#039; God can be denied only on the surface; but he cannot be denied where human experience reaches down beneath the surface of flat, vapid, commonplace existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** As translated in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005) by Richard Schain, p. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no objective [[reality]]. But there is only an illusion of [[consciousness]], there is only an objectivication of reality, which was created by the [[spirit]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The origin of life is creativity, freedom; and the personality, subject, and spirit are the representatives of that origin, but not the nature, not the object.&lt;br /&gt;
** As translated at [http://www.isfp.co.uk/russian_thinkers/nikolay_berdyaev.html &#039;&#039;Gallery of Russian Thinkers … selected by Dmitry Olshansky&#039;&#039; (2005)&amp;lt;!-- by Richard Schain --&amp;gt; ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Divine and the Human (1949) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;This was once revealed to me in a dream.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Testament (1949) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bierdiajew phixr.jpg|thumb| We [[live]] in a nightmare of [[falsehoods]], and there are few who are sufficiently [[awake]] and [[aware]] to see things as they are. Our first [[duty]] is to clear away [[illusions]] and recover a sense of [[reality]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; [http://www.berdyaev.com/berdiaev/berd_lib/1949_478b.pdf &amp;quot;Political Testament&amp;quot;, as translated by E. Lampert, in &#039;&#039;World Review&#039;&#039; (March 1949)]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Fate]] and [[freedom]] alike play a part in [[history]]; and there are times, as in [[wars]] and [[revolutions]], when fate is the stronger of the two.&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Freedom&#039;&#039; — the freedom of man and of nations — could never have been the origin of two world wars. These latter were brought about by fate, which exercises its power owing to the weakness and decline of freedom and of the creative spirit of man. Almost all contemporary political ideologies, with their characteristic tendency to state-idolatry, are likewise largely a product of two world wars, begotten as they are of the inexorability&#039;s of fate.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A real reconciliation of East and West is impossible and inconceivable on the basis of a [[materialistic]] [[Communism]], or of a materialistic [[Capitalism]], or indeed of a materialistic [[Socialism]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The third way will neither be &amp;quot;anti-Communist&amp;quot; nor &amp;quot;anti-Capitalist&amp;quot;. It will recognize the [[truth]] in &#039;&#039;[[liberal]] [[democracy]]&#039;&#039;, and it will equally recognize the truth in Communism. A critique of Communism and [[Marxism]] does not entail an enmity towards [[Soviet]] [[Russia]], just as a critique of liberal democracy is not entail enmity towards the west. … But the final and most important justification of a &amp;quot;third way&amp;quot; is that there must be a place from which we may boldly testify to, and proclaim, truth, [[love]] and [[justice]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;No one today likes truth: utility and self interest have long ago been substituted for truth.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We live in a nightmare of falsehoods, and there are few who are sufficiently awake and aware to see things as they are. Our first [[duty]] is to clear away illusions and recover a sense of reality.&#039;&#039;&#039; If war should come, it will do so on account of our delusions, for which our hag-ridden conscience attempts to find moral excuses. To recover a sense of reality is to recover the truth about ourselves and the world in which we live, and thereby to gain the power of keeping this world from flying asunder.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes about Berdyaev ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Мыслители XX века Бердяев Николай.JPG|thumb| Berdyaev attempts to development of [[Christian]] [[symbols]] that is parallel to [[Carl Jung|Jung]]&#039;s in order to give a place to [[human]] [[freedom]] and [[creativity]] in this sphere of Christian [[spirituality]]. ~ Georg Nicolaus]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1020033-1.JPG|thumb| It is difficult to fit the [[work]] of Nikolai Berdyaev into any neat category …an &amp;quot;[[existential]] [[Christian]] [[philosopher]]&amp;quot; … his [[voice]] is equally relevant to [[psychology]] and [[psychoanalysis]] and it also constitutes a uniquely original commentary on the very [[nature]] of the person in our postmodern world especially in relation to [[spirituality]]. ~ Renos K. Papadopoulos]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pasternak VyachIvanov Berdyaev Bely.jpg|thumb|He was no ivory tower [[philosopher]] but was intimately affected by these events throughout his [[life]] and drew his [[inspirations]] from them regarding the nature of the [[human]] condition. ~ Richard Schain]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tombe Berdiaev2.JPG|thumb|He never avoided the label of &amp;quot;[[mystic]]&amp;quot; since he felt it was the mystics of the [[world]] who came closest to [[understanding]] the role of [[spirit]]. ~ Richard Schain ]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion for [Berdyaev] is a social phenomenon and is adapted to the needs of the masses; as such, it is embodied in visible institutions and in authoritative formulas. The mystic, on the other hand, is aristocratic in temperament and never quite at home where the masses are catered for. He cannot remain in the world of form and convention and second-hand truths which is all about us and with which official religion has to come to terms; he aspires to a contact with spiritual reality as it is, a return to the ultimate sources of his being.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edgar Leonard Allen (1893-1961), &#039;&#039;Freedom in God: A Guide to the Thought of Nicholas Berdyaev&#039;&#039; (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Berdyaev attempts to development of [[Christian]] [[symbols]] that is parallel to [[Carl Jung|Jung]]&#039;s in order to give a place to [[human]] [[freedom]] and [[creativity]] in this sphere of Christian spirituality.&#039;&#039;&#039; Much of the creative self-expression, which ought to have been given a spiritual-religious meaning, had to emigrate out of the domain of ecclesiastic Christianity into the secular sphere, even though it had its origin within it. Both of these elements which Jung and Berdyaev address, that of &#039;&#039;[[soul]]&#039;&#039; and that of &#039;&#039;human freedom and creative self-expression&#039;&#039;, could not be fully accommodated within traditional Christianity and as a consequence found a home in the &amp;quot;[[pagan]]&amp;quot; rebellion since the Renaissance and its progressive push towards secularization. The spirituality that had initially been shaped by ecclesiastic Christianity has burst its container and has in turn given shape to the underlying meaning-structures of modern secular society.&#039;&#039;&#039; Jung and Berdyaev share an awareness of these underlying historical dynamics. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; We have learned and are still [[learning]] very bitter lessons about the link between claims of [[absolute]] [[truth]] and [[violence]]. For [[good]] [[reasons]] contemporary thinkers are more or less unanimous in their [[suspicion]] towards all &amp;quot;meta-narratives&amp;quot; which end up justifying the violation of individual freedoms.&#039;&#039;&#039; Any return to a serious consideration of spirituality will have to remain mindful of this persistent [[danger]]. Jung&#039;s psychology offers an abundant wealth of insights about the [[need]] for remaining consistently mindful of the ways in which the [[shadow]] operates most forcefully where the [[light]] shines most strongly. But a convincing argument could be made for claiming that at present we are paying the price for the repression of religion and spirituality that occurred as a reaction to their destructive sides. &#039;&#039;&#039;In the absence of a spiritual culture the return of repressed spirituality takes destructive forms.&#039;&#039;&#039; Spirituality, by being repressed, does not disappear but mutates into more atavistic forms. This shadow side of spirituality should not make us shy away from it but on the contrary motivate us to find a way to give it a new place in our contemporary culture, a way which does not jettison the liberating games of secular modernity.&lt;br /&gt;
** Georg Nicolaus, in &#039;&#039;C.G. Jung and Nikolai Berdyaev: Individuation and the Person&#039;&#039; (2011), Introduction, p. 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is difficult to fit the work of Nikolai Berdyaev into any neat category.&#039;&#039;&#039; The label that was used most frequently to characterize him was that of an &amp;quot;existential Christian philosopher&amp;quot; but … his voice is equally relevant to [[psychology]] and [[psychoanalysis]] and it also constitutes a uniquely original commentary on the very nature of the person in our postmodern world especially in relation to spirituality.&lt;br /&gt;
** Renos K. Papadopoulos, in &#039;&#039;C.G. Jung and Nikolai Berdyaev: Individuation and the Person&#039;&#039; (2011) by Georg Nicolaus, Foreword, p. xiii&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The life of Berdyaev spans the momentous events of the first half of the twentieth century in Europe. He was no ivory tower philosopher but was intimately affected by these events throughout his life and drew his inspirations from them regarding the nature of the human condition.&#039;&#039;&#039; His writings bear the imprint of the catastrophic situations within which he was destined to live.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Schain, in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005), Ch. 7 : Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev — A Champion of the Spirit, p. 43&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Surprisingly, Berdyaev was able to write, lecture and publish for five years after the [[w:October Revolution|October Revolution]] of 1917. He was once detained and interviewed by the fearsome head of the [[w:Cheka|Cheka]], [[w:Felix Dzerzhinsky|Felix Dzerzhinsky]]. Although he was released, the [[w:Bolsheviks|Bolsheviks]] gradually realized that Berdyaev was unassimilable to their cause and gave him a choice, along with a group of other intellectuals, of exile or execution. Reluctantly, Berdyaev chose exile to [[Berlin]]. He was never again to return to [[Russia]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Schain, in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005), Ch. 7 : Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev — A Champion of the Spirit, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Berdyaev has been categorized as a Christian existentialist and a mystical philosopher. He never avoided the label of &amp;quot;mystic&amp;quot; since he felt it was the mystics of the world who came closest to understanding the role of spirit.&#039;&#039;&#039; Many of the philosophers he quoted were mystics — [[Meister Eckhart]], [[Angelus Silesius]] and especially [[w:Jakob Böhme|Jacob Boehme]]. The influence of [[Dostoevsky]] was central to his thought. Nevertheless, &#039;&#039;&#039;Berdyaev is not a naively irrational thinker; he brings an enormous fund of philosophical knowledge combined with the profundity of his own thought to support his view of existence. There are no dogmas in his writings to offend one&#039;s intellectual conscience.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Schain, in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005), Ch. 7 : Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev — A Champion of the Spirit, p. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;He was arrested twice&#039;&#039;&#039;; he was taken in 1922 for a midnight interrogation with [[w:Felix Dzerzhinsky|Dzerjinsky]]; [[w:Lev Kamenev|Kamenev]] was also there. … But Berdyaev did not humiliate himself, he did not beg, he firmly professed the moral and religious principles by virtue of which he did not adhere to the party in power; and &#039;&#039;&#039;not only did they judge that there was no point in putting him on trial, but he was freed. Now there is a man who had a &amp;quot;point of view&amp;quot;!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], in &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;; cited in &#039;&#039;La Philosophie de l&#039;inégalité et les idées politiques de Nicolas Berdiaev&#039;&#039; (1978) by Marko Marković&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{commonscat-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.berdyaev.com/ Berdyaev Online Library and Index]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~dima/mytexts/suff.html Philosopher of Freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.isfp.co.uk/russian_thinkers/nikolay_berdyaev.html ISFP Gallery of Russian Thinkers: Nikolay Berdyaev]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Berdyaev, Nikolai}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anarchists]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Eastern Orthodox Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian theologians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mystics]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Universalists]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophers from Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1874 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1948 deaths]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Existentialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian memoirists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Kyiv]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Berdyaev&amp;diff=3120538</id>
		<title>Nikolai Berdyaev</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Berdyaev&amp;diff=3120538"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T16:11:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* Self-knowlesge (Самопознание) (1940). */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:NBerdyaev.jpg|thumb|The [[religious]] [[truth]] of [[anarchism]] consists in this, that [[power]] over man is bound up with [[sin]] and [[evil]], that a state of [[perfection]] is a state where there is no power of man over man, that is to say, anarchy. The [[Kingdom of God]] is [[freedom]] and the absence of such power... the Kingdom of God is anarchy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Nikolai Berdyaev|Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev]]&#039;&#039;&#039;  [Никола́й Алекса́ндрович Бердя́ев] ([[18 March]] [[1874]] {[[w:Old Style and New Style dates|O.S.]] 6  March} &amp;amp;nbsp;– [[24 March]] [[1948]]) was a [[Russian]] [[Christian]] [[universalist]] [[mystic]] and [[Christian anarchist]] [[political]] [[philosopher]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nikolay Berdyaev.jpg|thumb|Orthodoxy gave away the [[earth]] into the hands of the [[state]] because of its own non-belief in [[Humanity|man]] and [[mankind]], because of its [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Christian Anarchist Blot.svg|thumb|The new [[religious]] [[consciousness]] rises up against the [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]] and [[mankind]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Alphaomega.png|thumb| For the new [[religious]] [[consciousness]] the declaration of the [[will]] of [[God]] is together with this a declaration of the [[rights]] of [[man]], a revealing of the [[Divine]] within [[mankind]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Николай Бердяев.jpg|thumb| The greater part of Eastern teachers of the Church, from [[Clement of Alexandria]] to [[w:Maximus the Confessor|Maximus the Confessor]], were supporters of [[w:Apocatastasis|Apokatastasis]], of [[Universalism|universal salvation]] and [[resurrection]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The uniting of Orthodoxy with state [[absolutism]] came about on the soil of a non-belief in the Divineness of the [[earth]], in the earthly [[future]] of [[mankind]]; Orthodoxy gave away the earth into the hands of the state because of its own non-belief in man and mankind, because of its [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]].&#039;&#039;&#039; Orthodoxy does not [[believe]] in the [[religious]] [[ordering]] of [[human]] [[life]] upon the earth, and it compensates for its own hopeless [[pessimism]] by a call for the forceful ordering of it by state [[authority]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.berdyaev.com/berdiaev/berd_lib/1907_135_4.html &amp;quot;Nihilism  On  A  Religious Soil&amp;quot; (6 May 1907)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  &#039;&#039;&#039;The new [[religious]] [[consciousness]] rises up against the [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]] and [[mankind]].&#039;&#039;&#039; If a religious rebirth be possible, only then on this soil will there be the revealing of the religious meaning of secular [[culture]] and earthly liberation, the revealing of the [[truth]] about mankind. &#039;&#039;&#039;For the new religious consciousness the declaration of the will of God is together with this a declaration of the rights of man, a revealing of the [[Divine]] within mankind.&#039;&#039;&#039; We believe in the objective, the cosmic might of the truth of [[God]], in the possibility according to God to guide the earthly destiny of mankind. This will be the [[victory]] of the [[Christian anarchism|true theocracy]], whether over a false democratism, — the apotheosis of the quantitative collectivity of [[human]] wills, or so also over the false theocraticism, — all that [[Deification|apotheosis]] of the human will within [[w:Caesaropapism|Caesaropapism]] or Papocaesarism. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Christ]] cannot have human vicarage in the person of the tsar or high-priest.&#039;&#039;&#039; He — is Himself the Tsar and High-Priest, and He will reign in the world. “[[Kingdom of God|Thy Kingdom]] come, Thy Will be done on earth, as it is in [[Heaven]].”&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Nihilism  On  A  Religious  Soil&amp;quot; (6 May 1907); it should be noted here that Berdyaev is here defining &amp;quot;[[theocracy]]&amp;quot; not in the sense as it is often used, of &#039;&#039;people&#039;&#039; ruling over other people, in &#039;&#039;claims&#039;&#039; of doing so by the commands of God, but rather defining it in terms of [[Christian anarchism]] — as a vigorous assertion of the right of &#039;&#039;no-one&#039;&#039; to rule over humans, &#039;&#039;save God&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Ethics]] occupies a central place in philosophy because it is concerned with sin, with the origin of good and evil and with moral valuations.&#039;&#039;&#039; And since these problems have a universal significance, the sphere of ethics is wider than is generally supposed. It deals with meaning and value and its province is the world in which the distinction between good and evil is drawn, evaluations are made and meaning is sought.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;The Destiny of Man&#039;&#039; (1931), p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is beyond dispute that the state exercises very great [[power]] over [[human]] [[life]] and it always shows a tendency to go beyond the limits laid down for it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Slavery and Freedom&#039;&#039; (1939), p. 145&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is absolute [[truth]] in [[anarchism]] and it is to be seen in its attitude to the sovereignty of the state and to every form of state [[absolutism]].&#039;&#039;&#039; … The religious [[truth]] of anarchism consists in this, that [[power]] over man is bound up with [[sin]] and [[evil]], that a state of perfection is a state where there is no power of man over man, that is to say, anarchy. &#039;&#039;&#039;The [[Kingdom of God]] is [[freedom]] and the absence of such power... the Kingdom of God is anarchy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Slavery and Freedom&#039;&#039; (1939), p. 147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The Christian world doesn&#039;t know Orthodoxy too well. It only knows the external and for the most part, the negative features of the Orthodox Church and not the inner spiritual treasure.&#039;&#039;&#039; Orthodoxy was locked inside itself, it did not have the spirit of proselytism and did not reveal itself to the world. For the longest time, Orthodoxy did not have such world-wide significance as did [[Catholicism]] and [[Protestantism]]. It remained apart form passionate religious battles for hundreds of years, for centuries it lived under the protection of large empires (Byzantium and Russia), and preserved its eternal truth from the destructive processes of world history. It is characteristic of Orthodoxy&#039;s religious nature that it was not sufficiently actualized nor exposed externally, it was not militant, and precisely because of this the heavenly truth of Christian revelation was not distorted so much. &#039;&#039;&#039;Orthodoxy is that form of Christianity which suffered the least distortion in its substance as a result of human history.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Orthodox Church had its moments of historical sin, for the most part in connection with its external dependence on the State, but the Church&#039;s teaching, her inner spiritual path was not subject to distortion. The Orthodox Church is primarily the Church of tradition, in contrast to the Catholic Church, which is the Church of authority, and to the Protestant Churches which are essentially churches of individual faith. The Orthodox Church was never subject to a single externally authoritarian organization and it unshakenly was held together by the strength of internal tradition and not by any external authority. Out of all forms of Christianity it is the Orthodox Church which remained more closely tied to early Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.kosovo.net/ortruth.html &amp;quot;The Truth of Orthodoxy&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Vestnik&#039;&#039; of the Russian West European Patriarchal Exarchate (1952)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The greater part of Eastern teachers of the Church, from [[Clement of Alexandria]] to [[w:Maximus the Confessor|Maximus the Confessor]], were supporters of [[w:Apocatastasis|Apokatastasis]], of [[Universalism|universal salvation]] and [[resurrection]].&#039;&#039;&#039; And this is characteristic of (contemporary) Russian religious thought. &#039;&#039;&#039;Orthodox thought has never been suppressed by the idea of Divine [[justice]] and it never forgot the idea of Divine [[love]]. Chiefly — it did not define man from the point of view of Divine justice but from the idea of transfiguration and Deification of [[man]] and [[cosmos]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;The Truth of Orthodoxy&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Vestnik&#039;&#039; of the [[w:Russian Orthodox Exarchate in Western Europe|Russian West European Patriarchal Exarchate]] (1952)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;The End of Our Time&#039;&#039; (1919) ===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;as translated by Donald Atwater (Sheed and Ward: 1933)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It must be recognized that man in his limited and relative earthly life is capable of bringing about the beautiful and the valuable only when he believes in another life, unlimited, absolute, eternal. That is a law of his being. A contact with this mortal life exclusive of any other ends in the wearing-away of effective energy and a self-satisfaction that makes one useless and superficial. Only the spiritual man, striking his roots deep in infinite and eternal life, can be a true creator. But [[Secular humanism|Humanism]] denied the spiritual man, handed over the eternal to the temporal, and took its stand by the natural man within the limited confines of the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 34&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole economic system of [[Capitalism]] is an offshoot of a devouring and overwhelming lust, of a kind that can hold sway only in a society that has deliberately renounced the Christian [[asceticism]] and turned away from Heaven to give itself over exclusively to earthly gratifications. ... It is the result of a secularization of economic life, and by it the hierarchical subordination of the material to the spiritual is inverted. The autonomy of economics has ended in their dominating the whole life of human societies: the worship of [[Mammon]] has become the determining force of the age. And the worst of it is that this undisguised “mammonism” is regarded as a very good thing, an attainment to the knowledge of truth and a release from illusions. [[w:Dialectical materialism|Economic materialism]] formulates this to perfection when it brands the whole spiritual life of man as a deception and a dream.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to be able to go on living it is possible that the bankrupt peoples will have to enter on a new path of self-denial, by curbing their covetousness and putting a check on the indefinite expansion of their wants, and by having smaller families.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 94&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Morally, it is wrong to suppose the source of evil is outside oneself, that one is a vessel of holiness running over with virtue. Such a disposition is the best soil for a hateful and cruel fanaticism. It is as wrong to impute every wickedness to [[Jews]], [[w:Freemasons|Freemasons]], &amp;quot;[[intellectuals]],&amp;quot; as it is to blame all crimes on the &#039;&#039;[[bourgeoisie]]&#039;&#039;, the nobility, and the powers that were. No; the root of evil is in me as well, and I must take my share of the responsibility and the blame. That was true before the [[w:Russian revolution|revolution]] and it is true still.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 128&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nobody is bound to have an optimistic outlook on the future: that is not a precept of the Christian religion. ... It is a matter of immense importance that illusions should be dispelled and man come face to face with positive realities.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 131&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We used to pay too little attention to utopias, or even disregard them altogether, saying with regret they were impossible of realisation. Now indeed they seem to be able to be brought about far more easily than we supposed, and we are actually faced by an agonising problem of quite another kind: how can we prevent their final realisation? ...  Utopias are more realisable than those &#039;realist politics&#039; that are only the carefully calculated policies of office-holders, and towards utopias we are moving. But it is possible that a new age is already beginning, in which cultured and intelligent people will dream of ways to avoid ideal states and to get back to a society that is less &#039;perfect&#039; and more free.&lt;br /&gt;
** pp. 187-188. [[Aldous Huxley]] used this passage (in French translation) as the epigraph to [[Brave New World]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It appears that liberty is bound up with imperfection, with a right to imperfection. [[Socialism]] leads to the same type of authoritarian state as [[w:Theocracy|Theocracy]]. ... One must choose: either Socialism or liberty of spirit, the liberty of man&#039;s conscience. ... Socialism uses a &amp;quot;sacred&amp;quot; authority and establishes a &amp;quot;sacred&amp;quot; society in which there is no place for the &amp;quot;lay,&amp;quot; for the free, for choice, for the unrestrained activity of human forces.&lt;br /&gt;
** pp. 188-189&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Self-knowlesge (Самопознание)&#039;&#039; (1940). ===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[God]] is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good.&#039;&#039;&#039; [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Spirit and Reality&#039;&#039; (1946) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dove of the Holy Spirit.png|thumb|[[Spirit]] is never an object; nor a spiritual [[reality]] an objective one.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Spirit]] is never an object; nor a spiritual reality an objective one.&#039;&#039;&#039; In the so-called objective [[world]] there&#039;s no such [[nature]], thing, or objective [[reality]] as spirit. Hence it is easy to deny the reality of spirit. [[God]] is spirit because he is not object, because he is subject.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Spirit, like [[flame]], like [[freedom]], like [[creativeness]], is opposed to any [[social]] stagnation or any lifeless tradition.&#039;&#039;&#039; In terms of [[Immanuel Kant|Kantian]] philosophy — terms which I consider erroneous and confusing — spirit appears as a &#039;&#039;thing in itself&#039;&#039; and objectification as a &#039;&#039;phenomenon&#039;&#039;. Another and truer definition would be, spirit is &#039;&#039;freedom&#039;&#039; and objectification is &#039;&#039;nature&#039;&#039; (not in the romantic sense). Objectification has two aspects: on the one hand it denotes the fallen, divided and servile world, in which the existential subjects, the personalities, are materialized. On the other it comprehends the agency of the personal subject, of spirit tending to reinforce ties and communications in this fallen world. Hence objectification is related to the problem of culture, and in this consists the whole complexity of the problem.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;In objectification there are no primal realities, but only [[symbols]]. The objective spirit is merely a symbolism of spirit. Spirit is realistic while [[cultural]] and social life are symbolical.&#039;&#039;&#039; In the object there is never any reality, but only the symbol of reality. &#039;&#039;&#039;The subject alone always has reality.&#039;&#039;&#039; Therefore in objectification and in its product, the objective spirit, there can be no sacred reality, but only its symbolism. In the objective history of the world nothing transpires but a conventional symbolism; the idea of sacredness is peculiar to the existential world, to existential subjects. The real depths of spirit are apprehensible only existentially in the personal experience of destiny, in its suffering, nostalgia, love, creation, freedom and death.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===  &#039;&#039;The Beginning and the End&#039;&#039; (1947) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Empyrean Light.jpg|thumb|I do not think discursively. It is not so much that I arrive at [[truth]] as that I take my start from it.]] &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;The Beginning and The End&#039;&#039; (written 1941; published 1947)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not think discursively. It is not so much that I arrive at truth as that I take my start from it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**  Introduction &amp;lt;!-- as quoted in a review in &#039;&#039;Journal of Bible and Religion&#039;&#039;, Vol. 21, p. 37 (1953) --&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Objectification is above all exteriorization, the alienation of spirit from itself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What one needs to do at every [[moment]] of one&#039;s life is to put an end to the old world and to begin a new world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Dream and Reality&#039;&#039; (1949) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NikolayBerdyaev with Maria Skobtzeva.jpg|thumb|I see myself immersed in the depths of [[human]] existence and standing in the face of the ineffable [[mystery]] of the [[world]] and of [[all]] that is.]] &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Dream and Reality : An Essay in Autobiography&#039;&#039; (1949) &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I see myself immersed in the depths of [[human]] existence and standing in the face of the ineffable [[mystery]] of the [[world]] and of [[all]] that is. And in that situation, I am made poignantly and burningly [[aware]] that the world cannot be self-sufficient, that there is hidden in some still greater depth a mysterious, transcendent [[meaning]]. This meaning is called [[God]]. Men have not been able to find a loftier [[name]], although they have abused it to the extent of making it almost unutterable.&#039;&#039;&#039; God can be denied only on the surface; but he cannot be denied where human experience reaches down beneath the surface of flat, vapid, commonplace existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** As translated in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005) by Richard Schain, p. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no objective [[reality]]. But there is only an illusion of [[consciousness]], there is only an objectivication of reality, which was created by the [[spirit]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The origin of life is creativity, freedom; and the personality, subject, and spirit are the representatives of that origin, but not the nature, not the object.&lt;br /&gt;
** As translated at [http://www.isfp.co.uk/russian_thinkers/nikolay_berdyaev.html &#039;&#039;Gallery of Russian Thinkers … selected by Dmitry Olshansky&#039;&#039; (2005)&amp;lt;!-- by Richard Schain --&amp;gt; ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Divine and the Human (1949) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;This was once revealed to me in a dream.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Testament (1949) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bierdiajew phixr.jpg|thumb| We [[live]] in a nightmare of [[falsehoods]], and there are few who are sufficiently [[awake]] and [[aware]] to see things as they are. Our first [[duty]] is to clear away [[illusions]] and recover a sense of [[reality]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; [http://www.berdyaev.com/berdiaev/berd_lib/1949_478b.pdf &amp;quot;Political Testament&amp;quot;, as translated by E. Lampert, in &#039;&#039;World Review&#039;&#039; (March 1949)]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Fate]] and [[freedom]] alike play a part in [[history]]; and there are times, as in [[wars]] and [[revolutions]], when fate is the stronger of the two.&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Freedom&#039;&#039; — the freedom of man and of nations — could never have been the origin of two world wars. These latter were brought about by fate, which exercises its power owing to the weakness and decline of freedom and of the creative spirit of man. Almost all contemporary political ideologies, with their characteristic tendency to state-idolatry, are likewise largely a product of two world wars, begotten as they are of the inexorability&#039;s of fate.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A real reconciliation of East and West is impossible and inconceivable on the basis of a [[materialistic]] [[Communism]], or of a materialistic [[Capitalism]], or indeed of a materialistic [[Socialism]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The third way will neither be &amp;quot;anti-Communist&amp;quot; nor &amp;quot;anti-Capitalist&amp;quot;. It will recognize the [[truth]] in &#039;&#039;[[liberal]] [[democracy]]&#039;&#039;, and it will equally recognize the truth in Communism. A critique of Communism and [[Marxism]] does not entail an enmity towards [[Soviet]] [[Russia]], just as a critique of liberal democracy is not entail enmity towards the west. … But the final and most important justification of a &amp;quot;third way&amp;quot; is that there must be a place from which we may boldly testify to, and proclaim, truth, [[love]] and [[justice]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;No one today likes truth: utility and self interest have long ago been substituted for truth.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We live in a nightmare of falsehoods, and there are few who are sufficiently awake and aware to see things as they are. Our first [[duty]] is to clear away illusions and recover a sense of reality.&#039;&#039;&#039; If war should come, it will do so on account of our delusions, for which our hag-ridden conscience attempts to find moral excuses. To recover a sense of reality is to recover the truth about ourselves and the world in which we live, and thereby to gain the power of keeping this world from flying asunder.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes about Berdyaev ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Мыслители XX века Бердяев Николай.JPG|thumb| Berdyaev attempts to development of [[Christian]] [[symbols]] that is parallel to [[Carl Jung|Jung]]&#039;s in order to give a place to [[human]] [[freedom]] and [[creativity]] in this sphere of Christian [[spirituality]]. ~ Georg Nicolaus]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1020033-1.JPG|thumb| It is difficult to fit the [[work]] of Nikolai Berdyaev into any neat category …an &amp;quot;[[existential]] [[Christian]] [[philosopher]]&amp;quot; … his [[voice]] is equally relevant to [[psychology]] and [[psychoanalysis]] and it also constitutes a uniquely original commentary on the very [[nature]] of the person in our postmodern world especially in relation to [[spirituality]]. ~ Renos K. Papadopoulos]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pasternak VyachIvanov Berdyaev Bely.jpg|thumb|He was no ivory tower [[philosopher]] but was intimately affected by these events throughout his [[life]] and drew his [[inspirations]] from them regarding the nature of the [[human]] condition. ~ Richard Schain]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tombe Berdiaev2.JPG|thumb|He never avoided the label of &amp;quot;[[mystic]]&amp;quot; since he felt it was the mystics of the [[world]] who came closest to [[understanding]] the role of [[spirit]]. ~ Richard Schain ]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion for [Berdyaev] is a social phenomenon and is adapted to the needs of the masses; as such, it is embodied in visible institutions and in authoritative formulas. The mystic, on the other hand, is aristocratic in temperament and never quite at home where the masses are catered for. He cannot remain in the world of form and convention and second-hand truths which is all about us and with which official religion has to come to terms; he aspires to a contact with spiritual reality as it is, a return to the ultimate sources of his being.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edgar Leonard Allen (1893-1961), &#039;&#039;Freedom in God: A Guide to the Thought of Nicholas Berdyaev&#039;&#039; (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Berdyaev attempts to development of [[Christian]] [[symbols]] that is parallel to [[Carl Jung|Jung]]&#039;s in order to give a place to [[human]] [[freedom]] and [[creativity]] in this sphere of Christian spirituality.&#039;&#039;&#039; Much of the creative self-expression, which ought to have been given a spiritual-religious meaning, had to emigrate out of the domain of ecclesiastic Christianity into the secular sphere, even though it had its origin within it. Both of these elements which Jung and Berdyaev address, that of &#039;&#039;[[soul]]&#039;&#039; and that of &#039;&#039;human freedom and creative self-expression&#039;&#039;, could not be fully accommodated within traditional Christianity and as a consequence found a home in the &amp;quot;[[pagan]]&amp;quot; rebellion since the Renaissance and its progressive push towards secularization. The spirituality that had initially been shaped by ecclesiastic Christianity has burst its container and has in turn given shape to the underlying meaning-structures of modern secular society.&#039;&#039;&#039; Jung and Berdyaev share an awareness of these underlying historical dynamics. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; We have learned and are still [[learning]] very bitter lessons about the link between claims of [[absolute]] [[truth]] and [[violence]]. For [[good]] [[reasons]] contemporary thinkers are more or less unanimous in their [[suspicion]] towards all &amp;quot;meta-narratives&amp;quot; which end up justifying the violation of individual freedoms.&#039;&#039;&#039; Any return to a serious consideration of spirituality will have to remain mindful of this persistent [[danger]]. Jung&#039;s psychology offers an abundant wealth of insights about the [[need]] for remaining consistently mindful of the ways in which the [[shadow]] operates most forcefully where the [[light]] shines most strongly. But a convincing argument could be made for claiming that at present we are paying the price for the repression of religion and spirituality that occurred as a reaction to their destructive sides. &#039;&#039;&#039;In the absence of a spiritual culture the return of repressed spirituality takes destructive forms.&#039;&#039;&#039; Spirituality, by being repressed, does not disappear but mutates into more atavistic forms. This shadow side of spirituality should not make us shy away from it but on the contrary motivate us to find a way to give it a new place in our contemporary culture, a way which does not jettison the liberating games of secular modernity.&lt;br /&gt;
** Georg Nicolaus, in &#039;&#039;C.G. Jung and Nikolai Berdyaev: Individuation and the Person&#039;&#039; (2011), Introduction, p. 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is difficult to fit the work of Nikolai Berdyaev into any neat category.&#039;&#039;&#039; The label that was used most frequently to characterize him was that of an &amp;quot;existential Christian philosopher&amp;quot; but … his voice is equally relevant to [[psychology]] and [[psychoanalysis]] and it also constitutes a uniquely original commentary on the very nature of the person in our postmodern world especially in relation to spirituality.&lt;br /&gt;
** Renos K. Papadopoulos, in &#039;&#039;C.G. Jung and Nikolai Berdyaev: Individuation and the Person&#039;&#039; (2011) by Georg Nicolaus, Foreword, p. xiii&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The life of Berdyaev spans the momentous events of the first half of the twentieth century in Europe. He was no ivory tower philosopher but was intimately affected by these events throughout his life and drew his inspirations from them regarding the nature of the human condition.&#039;&#039;&#039; His writings bear the imprint of the catastrophic situations within which he was destined to live.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Schain, in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005), Ch. 7 : Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev — A Champion of the Spirit, p. 43&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Surprisingly, Berdyaev was able to write, lecture and publish for five years after the [[w:October Revolution|October Revolution]] of 1917. He was once detained and interviewed by the fearsome head of the [[w:Cheka|Cheka]], [[w:Felix Dzerzhinsky|Felix Dzerzhinsky]]. Although he was released, the [[w:Bolsheviks|Bolsheviks]] gradually realized that Berdyaev was unassimilable to their cause and gave him a choice, along with a group of other intellectuals, of exile or execution. Reluctantly, Berdyaev chose exile to [[Berlin]]. He was never again to return to [[Russia]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Schain, in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005), Ch. 7 : Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev — A Champion of the Spirit, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Berdyaev has been categorized as a Christian existentialist and a mystical philosopher. He never avoided the label of &amp;quot;mystic&amp;quot; since he felt it was the mystics of the world who came closest to understanding the role of spirit.&#039;&#039;&#039; Many of the philosophers he quoted were mystics — [[Meister Eckhart]], [[Angelus Silesius]] and especially [[w:Jakob Böhme|Jacob Boehme]]. The influence of [[Dostoevsky]] was central to his thought. Nevertheless, &#039;&#039;&#039;Berdyaev is not a naively irrational thinker; he brings an enormous fund of philosophical knowledge combined with the profundity of his own thought to support his view of existence. There are no dogmas in his writings to offend one&#039;s intellectual conscience.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Schain, in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005), Ch. 7 : Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev — A Champion of the Spirit, p. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;He was arrested twice&#039;&#039;&#039;; he was taken in 1922 for a midnight interrogation with [[w:Felix Dzerzhinsky|Dzerjinsky]]; [[w:Lev Kamenev|Kamenev]] was also there. … But Berdyaev did not humiliate himself, he did not beg, he firmly professed the moral and religious principles by virtue of which he did not adhere to the party in power; and &#039;&#039;&#039;not only did they judge that there was no point in putting him on trial, but he was freed. Now there is a man who had a &amp;quot;point of view&amp;quot;!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], in &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;; cited in &#039;&#039;La Philosophie de l&#039;inégalité et les idées politiques de Nicolas Berdiaev&#039;&#039; (1978) by Marko Marković&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{commonscat-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.berdyaev.com/ Berdyaev Online Library and Index]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~dima/mytexts/suff.html Philosopher of Freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.isfp.co.uk/russian_thinkers/nikolay_berdyaev.html ISFP Gallery of Russian Thinkers: Nikolay Berdyaev]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Berdyaev, Nikolai}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anarchists]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Eastern Orthodox Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian theologians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mystics]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Universalists]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophers from Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1874 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1948 deaths]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Existentialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian memoirists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Kyiv]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Berdyaev&amp;diff=3120537</id>
		<title>Nikolai Berdyaev</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Berdyaev&amp;diff=3120537"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T16:11:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: samopoznanie&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:NBerdyaev.jpg|thumb|The [[religious]] [[truth]] of [[anarchism]] consists in this, that [[power]] over man is bound up with [[sin]] and [[evil]], that a state of [[perfection]] is a state where there is no power of man over man, that is to say, anarchy. The [[Kingdom of God]] is [[freedom]] and the absence of such power... the Kingdom of God is anarchy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Nikolai Berdyaev|Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev]]&#039;&#039;&#039;  [Никола́й Алекса́ндрович Бердя́ев] ([[18 March]] [[1874]] {[[w:Old Style and New Style dates|O.S.]] 6  March} &amp;amp;nbsp;– [[24 March]] [[1948]]) was a [[Russian]] [[Christian]] [[universalist]] [[mystic]] and [[Christian anarchist]] [[political]] [[philosopher]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nikolay Berdyaev.jpg|thumb|Orthodoxy gave away the [[earth]] into the hands of the [[state]] because of its own non-belief in [[Humanity|man]] and [[mankind]], because of its [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Christian Anarchist Blot.svg|thumb|The new [[religious]] [[consciousness]] rises up against the [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]] and [[mankind]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Alphaomega.png|thumb| For the new [[religious]] [[consciousness]] the declaration of the [[will]] of [[God]] is together with this a declaration of the [[rights]] of [[man]], a revealing of the [[Divine]] within [[mankind]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Николай Бердяев.jpg|thumb| The greater part of Eastern teachers of the Church, from [[Clement of Alexandria]] to [[w:Maximus the Confessor|Maximus the Confessor]], were supporters of [[w:Apocatastasis|Apokatastasis]], of [[Universalism|universal salvation]] and [[resurrection]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The uniting of Orthodoxy with state [[absolutism]] came about on the soil of a non-belief in the Divineness of the [[earth]], in the earthly [[future]] of [[mankind]]; Orthodoxy gave away the earth into the hands of the state because of its own non-belief in man and mankind, because of its [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]].&#039;&#039;&#039; Orthodoxy does not [[believe]] in the [[religious]] [[ordering]] of [[human]] [[life]] upon the earth, and it compensates for its own hopeless [[pessimism]] by a call for the forceful ordering of it by state [[authority]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.berdyaev.com/berdiaev/berd_lib/1907_135_4.html &amp;quot;Nihilism  On  A  Religious Soil&amp;quot; (6 May 1907)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*  &#039;&#039;&#039;The new [[religious]] [[consciousness]] rises up against the [[nihilistic]] [[attitude]] towards the [[world]] and [[mankind]].&#039;&#039;&#039; If a religious rebirth be possible, only then on this soil will there be the revealing of the religious meaning of secular [[culture]] and earthly liberation, the revealing of the [[truth]] about mankind. &#039;&#039;&#039;For the new religious consciousness the declaration of the will of God is together with this a declaration of the rights of man, a revealing of the [[Divine]] within mankind.&#039;&#039;&#039; We believe in the objective, the cosmic might of the truth of [[God]], in the possibility according to God to guide the earthly destiny of mankind. This will be the [[victory]] of the [[Christian anarchism|true theocracy]], whether over a false democratism, — the apotheosis of the quantitative collectivity of [[human]] wills, or so also over the false theocraticism, — all that [[Deification|apotheosis]] of the human will within [[w:Caesaropapism|Caesaropapism]] or Papocaesarism. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Christ]] cannot have human vicarage in the person of the tsar or high-priest.&#039;&#039;&#039; He — is Himself the Tsar and High-Priest, and He will reign in the world. “[[Kingdom of God|Thy Kingdom]] come, Thy Will be done on earth, as it is in [[Heaven]].”&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;Nihilism  On  A  Religious  Soil&amp;quot; (6 May 1907); it should be noted here that Berdyaev is here defining &amp;quot;[[theocracy]]&amp;quot; not in the sense as it is often used, of &#039;&#039;people&#039;&#039; ruling over other people, in &#039;&#039;claims&#039;&#039; of doing so by the commands of God, but rather defining it in terms of [[Christian anarchism]] — as a vigorous assertion of the right of &#039;&#039;no-one&#039;&#039; to rule over humans, &#039;&#039;save God&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Ethics]] occupies a central place in philosophy because it is concerned with sin, with the origin of good and evil and with moral valuations.&#039;&#039;&#039; And since these problems have a universal significance, the sphere of ethics is wider than is generally supposed. It deals with meaning and value and its province is the world in which the distinction between good and evil is drawn, evaluations are made and meaning is sought.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;The Destiny of Man&#039;&#039; (1931), p. 15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is beyond dispute that the state exercises very great [[power]] over [[human]] [[life]] and it always shows a tendency to go beyond the limits laid down for it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Slavery and Freedom&#039;&#039; (1939), p. 145&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is absolute [[truth]] in [[anarchism]] and it is to be seen in its attitude to the sovereignty of the state and to every form of state [[absolutism]].&#039;&#039;&#039; … The religious [[truth]] of anarchism consists in this, that [[power]] over man is bound up with [[sin]] and [[evil]], that a state of perfection is a state where there is no power of man over man, that is to say, anarchy. &#039;&#039;&#039;The [[Kingdom of God]] is [[freedom]] and the absence of such power... the Kingdom of God is anarchy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;Slavery and Freedom&#039;&#039; (1939), p. 147&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The Christian world doesn&#039;t know Orthodoxy too well. It only knows the external and for the most part, the negative features of the Orthodox Church and not the inner spiritual treasure.&#039;&#039;&#039; Orthodoxy was locked inside itself, it did not have the spirit of proselytism and did not reveal itself to the world. For the longest time, Orthodoxy did not have such world-wide significance as did [[Catholicism]] and [[Protestantism]]. It remained apart form passionate religious battles for hundreds of years, for centuries it lived under the protection of large empires (Byzantium and Russia), and preserved its eternal truth from the destructive processes of world history. It is characteristic of Orthodoxy&#039;s religious nature that it was not sufficiently actualized nor exposed externally, it was not militant, and precisely because of this the heavenly truth of Christian revelation was not distorted so much. &#039;&#039;&#039;Orthodoxy is that form of Christianity which suffered the least distortion in its substance as a result of human history.&#039;&#039;&#039; The Orthodox Church had its moments of historical sin, for the most part in connection with its external dependence on the State, but the Church&#039;s teaching, her inner spiritual path was not subject to distortion. The Orthodox Church is primarily the Church of tradition, in contrast to the Catholic Church, which is the Church of authority, and to the Protestant Churches which are essentially churches of individual faith. The Orthodox Church was never subject to a single externally authoritarian organization and it unshakenly was held together by the strength of internal tradition and not by any external authority. Out of all forms of Christianity it is the Orthodox Church which remained more closely tied to early Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.kosovo.net/ortruth.html &amp;quot;The Truth of Orthodoxy&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Vestnik&#039;&#039; of the Russian West European Patriarchal Exarchate (1952)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The greater part of Eastern teachers of the Church, from [[Clement of Alexandria]] to [[w:Maximus the Confessor|Maximus the Confessor]], were supporters of [[w:Apocatastasis|Apokatastasis]], of [[Universalism|universal salvation]] and [[resurrection]].&#039;&#039;&#039; And this is characteristic of (contemporary) Russian religious thought. &#039;&#039;&#039;Orthodox thought has never been suppressed by the idea of Divine [[justice]] and it never forgot the idea of Divine [[love]]. Chiefly — it did not define man from the point of view of Divine justice but from the idea of transfiguration and Deification of [[man]] and [[cosmos]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;quot;The Truth of Orthodoxy&amp;quot; as translated in &#039;&#039;Vestnik&#039;&#039; of the [[w:Russian Orthodox Exarchate in Western Europe|Russian West European Patriarchal Exarchate]] (1952)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;The End of Our Time&#039;&#039; (1919) ===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;as translated by Donald Atwater (Sheed and Ward: 1933)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It must be recognized that man in his limited and relative earthly life is capable of bringing about the beautiful and the valuable only when he believes in another life, unlimited, absolute, eternal. That is a law of his being. A contact with this mortal life exclusive of any other ends in the wearing-away of effective energy and a self-satisfaction that makes one useless and superficial. Only the spiritual man, striking his roots deep in infinite and eternal life, can be a true creator. But [[Secular humanism|Humanism]] denied the spiritual man, handed over the eternal to the temporal, and took its stand by the natural man within the limited confines of the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 34&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The whole economic system of [[Capitalism]] is an offshoot of a devouring and overwhelming lust, of a kind that can hold sway only in a society that has deliberately renounced the Christian [[asceticism]] and turned away from Heaven to give itself over exclusively to earthly gratifications. ... It is the result of a secularization of economic life, and by it the hierarchical subordination of the material to the spiritual is inverted. The autonomy of economics has ended in their dominating the whole life of human societies: the worship of [[Mammon]] has become the determining force of the age. And the worst of it is that this undisguised “mammonism” is regarded as a very good thing, an attainment to the knowledge of truth and a release from illusions. [[w:Dialectical materialism|Economic materialism]] formulates this to perfection when it brands the whole spiritual life of man as a deception and a dream.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 92&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In order to be able to go on living it is possible that the bankrupt peoples will have to enter on a new path of self-denial, by curbing their covetousness and putting a check on the indefinite expansion of their wants, and by having smaller families.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 94&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Morally, it is wrong to suppose the source of evil is outside oneself, that one is a vessel of holiness running over with virtue. Such a disposition is the best soil for a hateful and cruel fanaticism. It is as wrong to impute every wickedness to [[Jews]], [[w:Freemasons|Freemasons]], &amp;quot;[[intellectuals]],&amp;quot; as it is to blame all crimes on the &#039;&#039;[[bourgeoisie]]&#039;&#039;, the nobility, and the powers that were. No; the root of evil is in me as well, and I must take my share of the responsibility and the blame. That was true before the [[w:Russian revolution|revolution]] and it is true still.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 128&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Nobody is bound to have an optimistic outlook on the future: that is not a precept of the Christian religion. ... It is a matter of immense importance that illusions should be dispelled and man come face to face with positive realities.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 131&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We used to pay too little attention to utopias, or even disregard them altogether, saying with regret they were impossible of realisation. Now indeed they seem to be able to be brought about far more easily than we supposed, and we are actually faced by an agonising problem of quite another kind: how can we prevent their final realisation? ...  Utopias are more realisable than those &#039;realist politics&#039; that are only the carefully calculated policies of office-holders, and towards utopias we are moving. But it is possible that a new age is already beginning, in which cultured and intelligent people will dream of ways to avoid ideal states and to get back to a society that is less &#039;perfect&#039; and more free.&lt;br /&gt;
** pp. 187-188. [[Aldous Huxley]] used this passage (in French translation) as the epigraph to [[Brave New World]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It appears that liberty is bound up with imperfection, with a right to imperfection. [[Socialism]] leads to the same type of authoritarian state as [[w:Theocracy|Theocracy]]. ... One must choose: either Socialism or liberty of spirit, the liberty of man&#039;s conscience. ... Socialism uses a &amp;quot;sacred&amp;quot; authority and establishes a &amp;quot;sacred&amp;quot; society in which there is no place for the &amp;quot;lay,&amp;quot; for the free, for choice, for the unrestrained activity of human forces.&lt;br /&gt;
** pp. 188-189&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Self-knowlesge (Самопознание)&#039;&#039; (1940). ===&lt;br /&gt;
*God is denied either because the world is so bad or because the world is so good. [https://www.vehi.net/berdyaev/samopoznanie/002.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Spirit and Reality&#039;&#039; (1946) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dove of the Holy Spirit.png|thumb|[[Spirit]] is never an object; nor a spiritual [[reality]] an objective one.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Spirit]] is never an object; nor a spiritual reality an objective one.&#039;&#039;&#039; In the so-called objective [[world]] there&#039;s no such [[nature]], thing, or objective [[reality]] as spirit. Hence it is easy to deny the reality of spirit. [[God]] is spirit because he is not object, because he is subject.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Spirit, like [[flame]], like [[freedom]], like [[creativeness]], is opposed to any [[social]] stagnation or any lifeless tradition.&#039;&#039;&#039; In terms of [[Immanuel Kant|Kantian]] philosophy — terms which I consider erroneous and confusing — spirit appears as a &#039;&#039;thing in itself&#039;&#039; and objectification as a &#039;&#039;phenomenon&#039;&#039;. Another and truer definition would be, spirit is &#039;&#039;freedom&#039;&#039; and objectification is &#039;&#039;nature&#039;&#039; (not in the romantic sense). Objectification has two aspects: on the one hand it denotes the fallen, divided and servile world, in which the existential subjects, the personalities, are materialized. On the other it comprehends the agency of the personal subject, of spirit tending to reinforce ties and communications in this fallen world. Hence objectification is related to the problem of culture, and in this consists the whole complexity of the problem.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;In objectification there are no primal realities, but only [[symbols]]. The objective spirit is merely a symbolism of spirit. Spirit is realistic while [[cultural]] and social life are symbolical.&#039;&#039;&#039; In the object there is never any reality, but only the symbol of reality. &#039;&#039;&#039;The subject alone always has reality.&#039;&#039;&#039; Therefore in objectification and in its product, the objective spirit, there can be no sacred reality, but only its symbolism. In the objective history of the world nothing transpires but a conventional symbolism; the idea of sacredness is peculiar to the existential world, to existential subjects. The real depths of spirit are apprehensible only existentially in the personal experience of destiny, in its suffering, nostalgia, love, creation, freedom and death.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===  &#039;&#039;The Beginning and the End&#039;&#039; (1947) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Empyrean Light.jpg|thumb|I do not think discursively. It is not so much that I arrive at [[truth]] as that I take my start from it.]] &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;The Beginning and The End&#039;&#039; (written 1941; published 1947)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I do not think discursively. It is not so much that I arrive at truth as that I take my start from it.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**  Introduction &amp;lt;!-- as quoted in a review in &#039;&#039;Journal of Bible and Religion&#039;&#039;, Vol. 21, p. 37 (1953) --&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Objectification is above all exteriorization, the alienation of spirit from itself.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 63&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;What one needs to do at every [[moment]] of one&#039;s life is to put an end to the old world and to begin a new world.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Dream and Reality&#039;&#039; (1949) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NikolayBerdyaev with Maria Skobtzeva.jpg|thumb|I see myself immersed in the depths of [[human]] existence and standing in the face of the ineffable [[mystery]] of the [[world]] and of [[all]] that is.]] &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Dream and Reality : An Essay in Autobiography&#039;&#039; (1949) &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I see myself immersed in the depths of [[human]] existence and standing in the face of the ineffable [[mystery]] of the [[world]] and of [[all]] that is. And in that situation, I am made poignantly and burningly [[aware]] that the world cannot be self-sufficient, that there is hidden in some still greater depth a mysterious, transcendent [[meaning]]. This meaning is called [[God]]. Men have not been able to find a loftier [[name]], although they have abused it to the extent of making it almost unutterable.&#039;&#039;&#039; God can be denied only on the surface; but he cannot be denied where human experience reaches down beneath the surface of flat, vapid, commonplace existence.&lt;br /&gt;
** As translated in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005) by Richard Schain, p. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There is no objective [[reality]]. But there is only an illusion of [[consciousness]], there is only an objectivication of reality, which was created by the [[spirit]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The origin of life is creativity, freedom; and the personality, subject, and spirit are the representatives of that origin, but not the nature, not the object.&lt;br /&gt;
** As translated at [http://www.isfp.co.uk/russian_thinkers/nikolay_berdyaev.html &#039;&#039;Gallery of Russian Thinkers … selected by Dmitry Olshansky&#039;&#039; (2005)&amp;lt;!-- by Richard Schain --&amp;gt; ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Divine and the Human (1949) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;This was once revealed to me in a dream.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Testament (1949) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bierdiajew phixr.jpg|thumb| We [[live]] in a nightmare of [[falsehoods]], and there are few who are sufficiently [[awake]] and [[aware]] to see things as they are. Our first [[duty]] is to clear away [[illusions]] and recover a sense of [[reality]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; [http://www.berdyaev.com/berdiaev/berd_lib/1949_478b.pdf &amp;quot;Political Testament&amp;quot;, as translated by E. Lampert, in &#039;&#039;World Review&#039;&#039; (March 1949)]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Fate]] and [[freedom]] alike play a part in [[history]]; and there are times, as in [[wars]] and [[revolutions]], when fate is the stronger of the two.&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Freedom&#039;&#039; — the freedom of man and of nations — could never have been the origin of two world wars. These latter were brought about by fate, which exercises its power owing to the weakness and decline of freedom and of the creative spirit of man. Almost all contemporary political ideologies, with their characteristic tendency to state-idolatry, are likewise largely a product of two world wars, begotten as they are of the inexorability&#039;s of fate.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 32&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A real reconciliation of East and West is impossible and inconceivable on the basis of a [[materialistic]] [[Communism]], or of a materialistic [[Capitalism]], or indeed of a materialistic [[Socialism]].&#039;&#039;&#039; The third way will neither be &amp;quot;anti-Communist&amp;quot; nor &amp;quot;anti-Capitalist&amp;quot;. It will recognize the [[truth]] in &#039;&#039;[[liberal]] [[democracy]]&#039;&#039;, and it will equally recognize the truth in Communism. A critique of Communism and [[Marxism]] does not entail an enmity towards [[Soviet]] [[Russia]], just as a critique of liberal democracy is not entail enmity towards the west. … But the final and most important justification of a &amp;quot;third way&amp;quot; is that there must be a place from which we may boldly testify to, and proclaim, truth, [[love]] and [[justice]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;No one today likes truth: utility and self interest have long ago been substituted for truth.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We live in a nightmare of falsehoods, and there are few who are sufficiently awake and aware to see things as they are. Our first [[duty]] is to clear away illusions and recover a sense of reality.&#039;&#039;&#039; If war should come, it will do so on account of our delusions, for which our hag-ridden conscience attempts to find moral excuses. To recover a sense of reality is to recover the truth about ourselves and the world in which we live, and thereby to gain the power of keeping this world from flying asunder.&lt;br /&gt;
** p. 80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes about Berdyaev ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Мыслители XX века Бердяев Николай.JPG|thumb| Berdyaev attempts to development of [[Christian]] [[symbols]] that is parallel to [[Carl Jung|Jung]]&#039;s in order to give a place to [[human]] [[freedom]] and [[creativity]] in this sphere of Christian [[spirituality]]. ~ Georg Nicolaus]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1020033-1.JPG|thumb| It is difficult to fit the [[work]] of Nikolai Berdyaev into any neat category …an &amp;quot;[[existential]] [[Christian]] [[philosopher]]&amp;quot; … his [[voice]] is equally relevant to [[psychology]] and [[psychoanalysis]] and it also constitutes a uniquely original commentary on the very [[nature]] of the person in our postmodern world especially in relation to [[spirituality]]. ~ Renos K. Papadopoulos]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pasternak VyachIvanov Berdyaev Bely.jpg|thumb|He was no ivory tower [[philosopher]] but was intimately affected by these events throughout his [[life]] and drew his [[inspirations]] from them regarding the nature of the [[human]] condition. ~ Richard Schain]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tombe Berdiaev2.JPG|thumb|He never avoided the label of &amp;quot;[[mystic]]&amp;quot; since he felt it was the mystics of the [[world]] who came closest to [[understanding]] the role of [[spirit]]. ~ Richard Schain ]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Religion for [Berdyaev] is a social phenomenon and is adapted to the needs of the masses; as such, it is embodied in visible institutions and in authoritative formulas. The mystic, on the other hand, is aristocratic in temperament and never quite at home where the masses are catered for. He cannot remain in the world of form and convention and second-hand truths which is all about us and with which official religion has to come to terms; he aspires to a contact with spiritual reality as it is, a return to the ultimate sources of his being.&lt;br /&gt;
** Edgar Leonard Allen (1893-1961), &#039;&#039;Freedom in God: A Guide to the Thought of Nicholas Berdyaev&#039;&#039; (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Berdyaev attempts to development of [[Christian]] [[symbols]] that is parallel to [[Carl Jung|Jung]]&#039;s in order to give a place to [[human]] [[freedom]] and [[creativity]] in this sphere of Christian spirituality.&#039;&#039;&#039; Much of the creative self-expression, which ought to have been given a spiritual-religious meaning, had to emigrate out of the domain of ecclesiastic Christianity into the secular sphere, even though it had its origin within it. Both of these elements which Jung and Berdyaev address, that of &#039;&#039;[[soul]]&#039;&#039; and that of &#039;&#039;human freedom and creative self-expression&#039;&#039;, could not be fully accommodated within traditional Christianity and as a consequence found a home in the &amp;quot;[[pagan]]&amp;quot; rebellion since the Renaissance and its progressive push towards secularization. The spirituality that had initially been shaped by ecclesiastic Christianity has burst its container and has in turn given shape to the underlying meaning-structures of modern secular society.&#039;&#039;&#039; Jung and Berdyaev share an awareness of these underlying historical dynamics. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; We have learned and are still [[learning]] very bitter lessons about the link between claims of [[absolute]] [[truth]] and [[violence]]. For [[good]] [[reasons]] contemporary thinkers are more or less unanimous in their [[suspicion]] towards all &amp;quot;meta-narratives&amp;quot; which end up justifying the violation of individual freedoms.&#039;&#039;&#039; Any return to a serious consideration of spirituality will have to remain mindful of this persistent [[danger]]. Jung&#039;s psychology offers an abundant wealth of insights about the [[need]] for remaining consistently mindful of the ways in which the [[shadow]] operates most forcefully where the [[light]] shines most strongly. But a convincing argument could be made for claiming that at present we are paying the price for the repression of religion and spirituality that occurred as a reaction to their destructive sides. &#039;&#039;&#039;In the absence of a spiritual culture the return of repressed spirituality takes destructive forms.&#039;&#039;&#039; Spirituality, by being repressed, does not disappear but mutates into more atavistic forms. This shadow side of spirituality should not make us shy away from it but on the contrary motivate us to find a way to give it a new place in our contemporary culture, a way which does not jettison the liberating games of secular modernity.&lt;br /&gt;
** Georg Nicolaus, in &#039;&#039;C.G. Jung and Nikolai Berdyaev: Individuation and the Person&#039;&#039; (2011), Introduction, p. 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;It is difficult to fit the work of Nikolai Berdyaev into any neat category.&#039;&#039;&#039; The label that was used most frequently to characterize him was that of an &amp;quot;existential Christian philosopher&amp;quot; but … his voice is equally relevant to [[psychology]] and [[psychoanalysis]] and it also constitutes a uniquely original commentary on the very nature of the person in our postmodern world especially in relation to spirituality.&lt;br /&gt;
** Renos K. Papadopoulos, in &#039;&#039;C.G. Jung and Nikolai Berdyaev: Individuation and the Person&#039;&#039; (2011) by Georg Nicolaus, Foreword, p. xiii&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The life of Berdyaev spans the momentous events of the first half of the twentieth century in Europe. He was no ivory tower philosopher but was intimately affected by these events throughout his life and drew his inspirations from them regarding the nature of the human condition.&#039;&#039;&#039; His writings bear the imprint of the catastrophic situations within which he was destined to live.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Schain, in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005), Ch. 7 : Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev — A Champion of the Spirit, p. 43&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Surprisingly, Berdyaev was able to write, lecture and publish for five years after the [[w:October Revolution|October Revolution]] of 1917. He was once detained and interviewed by the fearsome head of the [[w:Cheka|Cheka]], [[w:Felix Dzerzhinsky|Felix Dzerzhinsky]]. Although he was released, the [[w:Bolsheviks|Bolsheviks]] gradually realized that Berdyaev was unassimilable to their cause and gave him a choice, along with a group of other intellectuals, of exile or execution. Reluctantly, Berdyaev chose exile to [[Berlin]]. He was never again to return to [[Russia]].&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Schain, in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005), Ch. 7 : Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev — A Champion of the Spirit, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Berdyaev has been categorized as a Christian existentialist and a mystical philosopher. He never avoided the label of &amp;quot;mystic&amp;quot; since he felt it was the mystics of the world who came closest to understanding the role of spirit.&#039;&#039;&#039; Many of the philosophers he quoted were mystics — [[Meister Eckhart]], [[Angelus Silesius]] and especially [[w:Jakob Böhme|Jacob Boehme]]. The influence of [[Dostoevsky]] was central to his thought. Nevertheless, &#039;&#039;&#039;Berdyaev is not a naively irrational thinker; he brings an enormous fund of philosophical knowledge combined with the profundity of his own thought to support his view of existence. There are no dogmas in his writings to offend one&#039;s intellectual conscience.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Schain, in &#039;&#039;In Love with Eternity : Philosophical Essays and Fragments&#039;&#039; (2005), Ch. 7 : Nikolai Alexandrovich Berdyaev — A Champion of the Spirit, p. 47&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;He was arrested twice&#039;&#039;&#039;; he was taken in 1922 for a midnight interrogation with [[w:Felix Dzerzhinsky|Dzerjinsky]]; [[w:Lev Kamenev|Kamenev]] was also there. … But Berdyaev did not humiliate himself, he did not beg, he firmly professed the moral and religious principles by virtue of which he did not adhere to the party in power; and &#039;&#039;&#039;not only did they judge that there was no point in putting him on trial, but he was freed. Now there is a man who had a &amp;quot;point of view&amp;quot;!&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], in &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;; cited in &#039;&#039;La Philosophie de l&#039;inégalité et les idées politiques de Nicolas Berdiaev&#039;&#039; (1978) by Marko Marković&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{wikipedia-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{commonscat-inline}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.berdyaev.com/ Berdyaev Online Library and Index]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~dima/mytexts/suff.html Philosopher of Freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.isfp.co.uk/russian_thinkers/nikolay_berdyaev.html ISFP Gallery of Russian Thinkers: Nikolay Berdyaev]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Berdyaev, Nikolai}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anarchists]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Eastern Orthodox Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian theologians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mystics]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Universalists]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophers from Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1874 births]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1948 deaths]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Existentialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian memoirists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People from Kyiv]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3120483</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3120483"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T13:24:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* N */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne- &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time [https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/12/02/the-tv-vs-the-fridge-russia-putin-media/ replace many essential nutrients for Russians]. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** Andrei Pionkovsky, [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3120469</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=3120469"/>
		<updated>2022-06-02T12:55:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* N */ nevzorov&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Flag_of_Russia_(2-1).svg|thumb|Russia has only two allies; its army and navy. ~ [[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Russia|Russia]]&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[w:Russian|Russian]]: &#039;&#039;Росси́йская Федера́ция&#039;&#039;), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Russian Federation&#039;&#039;&#039;, is a country spanning [[w:Eastern Europe|Eastern Europe]] and [[w:Northern Asia|Northern Asia]]. It is the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by area|largest country in the world by area]], and encompasses more than one-eighth of Earth&#039;s inhabited land area. Russia extends across [[w:Time in Russia|eleven time zones]], and has the [[w:List of countries and territories by land borders|most borders of any country]] in the world, adjoining [[w:borders of Russia|sixteen sovereign nations]]. It has a population of 146.2 million; and is the [[w:List of European countries by population|most populous country]] in Europe, and the [[w:List of countries and dependencies by population|ninth-most populous country]] in the world. [[Moscow]], the capital, is the [[w:List of European cities by population|largest city in Europe]], while [[w:Saint Petersburg|Saint Petersburg]] is the nation&#039;s [[w:List of cities and towns in Russia by population|second-largest city]] and cultural centre. [[Russians]] are the largest [[w:Slavs|Slavic]] and [[w:Ethnic groups in Europe|European nation]]; they speak [[Russian language|Russian]], the most spoken [[w:Slavic languages|Slavic language]], and the most spoken [[w:native language|native language]] in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IBC Moscow, Mar2015.jpg|thumb|There are things in Russia which are not as they seem. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Georgy Zhukov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia has only two allies; its army and navy.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander III of Russia|Alexander III of Russia]], as cited in: Jan Zielonka (2015). &#039;&#039;Media and Politics in New Democracies,&#039;&#039; p. 257&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Democracy is the wholesome and pure air without which a socialist public organization cannot live a full-blooded life.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], Speech to the 27th Party Congress, Moscow (25 February 1986)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russian word &amp;quot;[[w:Perestroika|perestroika]]&amp;quot; has easily entered the international lexicon, this is due to more than just interest in what is going on in the Soviet Union. Now the whole world needs restructuring, &#039;&#039;i.e.&#039;&#039; progressive development, a fundamental change.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Perestroika: New Thinking For Our Country and the World&#039;&#039; (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan and Gorbachev (1985).jpg|thumb| Never before has the idea that peace is indivisible been so true as it is now. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Reagan Gorbachev Island.jpg|thumb|In our times, good relations benefit all. Any worsening of relations anywhere is a common loss.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:President Ronald Reagan shaking hands with Mikhail Gorbachev.jpg|thumb|All members of the world community should resolutely discard old [[stereotypes]] and motivations nurtured by the Cold War, and give up the habit of seeking each other&#039;s weak spots and exploiting them in their own interests.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Gorbachev 1987.jpg|thumb| Progress towards the civilization of the 21st century will certainly not be simple or easy.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Preparing for my address I found in an old Russian encyclopedia a definition of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;commune&amp;quot; — the traditional cell of Russian peasant life.  I saw in that definition the people&#039;s profound understanding of peace as harmony, concord, mutual help, and cooperation.  This understanding is embodied in the canons of world religions and in the works of philosophers from antiquity to our time.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I began my book about &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; and the new thinking with the following words: &amp;quot;We want to be understood&amp;quot;. After a while I felt that it was already happening. But now I would like once again to repeat those words here, from this world rostrum. Because to understand us really — to understand so as to believe us — proved to be not at all easy, owing to the immensity of the changes under way in our country. Their magnitude and character are such as to require in-depth analysis. Applying conventional wisdom to &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; is unproductive. It is also futile and dangerous to set conditions, to say: We&#039;ll understand and believe you, as soon as you, the Soviet Union, come completely to resemble &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;, the West.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;No one is in a position to describe in detail what &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will finally produce. But it would certainly be a self-delusion to expect that &#039;&#039;perestroika&#039;&#039; will produce &amp;quot;a copy&amp;quot; of anything... Our democracy is being born in pain. A political culture is emerging — one that presupposes debate and pluralism, but also legal order and, if democracy is to work, strong government authority based on one law for all. This process is gaining strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1990/gorbachev-lecture.html Nobel lecture (5 June 1991)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A German-Russian partnership is a key element in any serious [[w:European integration|pan-European integration]] process. It is my ardent wish that Russia and [[Germany]] may manage to preserve all the positive achievements of the late 1980s and early 1990s in today&#039;s difficult times.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], &#039;&#039;Memoirs&#039;&#039; (1995).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russians may be unique, just like all peoples are, but this does not mean that they are uniquely bad. Or, to put it differently, being good is hard if you live under an authoritarian regime. As the war rages on and anti-Russian sentiment grows, the temptation to see the Russian people as perpetrators rather than victims also grows. But to view them this way obscures something more fundamental: They too are victims, because they have been gradually stripped of their status as free moral agents. This is by design. Authoritarian leaders aim to implicate their own people in their crimes, which in turn allows them to both spread and dilute political responsibility. If responsibility is spread across the population, then so is guilt. To repudiate Putin would mean repudiating themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
** Shadi Hamid, &#039;&#039;The Atlantic&#039;&#039;, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/04/russians-support-putin-invasion-popularity/629653/ Why the Russian People Go Along With Putin’s War] / April 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag-Map of Russia without Autonomous Okrugs and Republics.svg|thumb|300px|I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [[Alexei Navalny|Navalny]], in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces [[Putin]] is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; [...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you need to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus. To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[International law]].  We see that our colleagues from the [[NATO]] countries are pursuing a policy of containing Russia, increasing their military activity on our borders, creating a military infrastructure on the “eastern front”, as they say, and resorting to unsubstantiated accusations instead of diplomatic methods...  It is also alarming that our Western colleagues use the term “international law” less and less often. Instead, they talk more about a rules-based order... something they can invent themselves... We urge our colleagues to comply with the agreements reached within the framework of international law.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfounded [[Accusation|accusations]]. Several years ago, the United States started accusing Russia of violating the [[w:INF Treaty|INF Treaty]], without providing any evidence. We basically had to pry the information from the US, information that would help us understand... what they meant. The US eventually mentioned the [[w:9M729 missile|9M729 missile]], claiming that it had been tested on certain days at a certain testing site, and that the range violated the treaty’s provisions. Our data concerning these tests showed the opposite. The missile’s range is allowed under the treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NATO]] foreign ministers met several days ago to support the US position. According to media reports, they did this after Washington presented certain irrefutable documents confirming that the treaty was violated. If this is so, we have not received any such documents from the US side. This is what we have been asking the US to do for a long time. We are still ready for a serious and professional discussion. Instead, the Americans resort to unfounded accusations, and again and again, from high rostrums, make allegations for the entire international community to hear about things that should first be clarified with the other party to the treaty. This would be a more appropriate, polite and correct approach.&lt;br /&gt;
*When we are accused...Every time a problem occurs, we ask very specific questions. For example, the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in Ukrainian airspace in July 2014. Where is the data from the Ukrainian radars? We provided our data. Where are the records of what the Ukrainian dispatchers said? No answer. Where is the data from American satellites that surely exists? No answer again. The questions are very specific. So in the case of Salisbury, where are the Skripals? There is no room for “highly likely” here. There can only be two answers here: yes or no, alive or not. Therefore, it is very difficult...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sergey Lavrov]] [http://www.mid.ru/en/press_service/minister_speeches/-/asset_publisher/7OvQR5KJWVmR/content/id/3437709  News conference following the 25th OSCE Ministerial Council, Milan, Italy ] (7 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sergey_Lavrov_2016.jpg|thumb|We are concerned about what the US and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... ~[[Sergey Lavrov]](Foreign Minister of Russia)  (29 January 2019)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We are concerned about what the [[United States|US]] and its closest allies are doing with respect to [[Venezuela]], brazenly violating all imaginable norms of [[international law]] and actually openly pursuing the policy aimed at overthrowing the legitimate government in that [[Latin America|Latin American]] country... According to our sources, the leaders of the opposition movement who have declared ‘dual power’ are in fact receiving instructions from [[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] not to make any concessions until the authorities agree to abdicate in some way. Together with other responsible members of the international community, we will do everything to support [[Nicolás Maduro|President Maduro]]’s legitimate government in upholding the Venezuelan constitution and employing methods to resolve the crisis that are within the constitutional framework...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Given signals coming from the [[European Union|EU]] and... Caribbean countries, as well as...[[China]] and [[India]]... we would like to figure out what the international community could do to prevent another blatant violation of [[international law]] and violent regime change... This is what I discussed yesterday with the [[Iran|Iranian]] foreign minister, who - just like us - wants to find an opportunity for external players to prove themselves useful to the Venezuelan people.&lt;br /&gt;
**Russian Foreign Minister [[Sergey Lavrov]] in [http://tass.com/politics/1042235 &#039;&#039;&#039;US policy aimed at toppling Venezuela’s government, TASS&#039;&#039;&#039;] (29 January 2019)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Complete equality of rights for all nations; the right of nations to self-determination; the unity of the workers of all nations—such is the national program that [[Marxism]], the experience of the whole world, and the experience of Russia, teach the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Lenin]], &amp;quot;The Right of Nations to Self-Determination&amp;quot;, reported in Vladimir Lenin; Doug Lorimer (2002). &#039;&#039;Marxism &amp;amp; Nationalism&#039;&#039;. Resistance Books, p. 125. {{ISBN|1876646136}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia has made its choice in favor of [[democracy]]. Fourteen years ago, independently, without any pressure from outside, it made that decision in the interests of itself and interests of its people — of its citizens. This is our final choice, and we have no way back. There can be no return to what we used to have before. And the guarantee for this is the choice of the Russian people, themselves. No, guarantees from outside cannot be provided. This is impossible. It would be impossible for Russia today. Any kind of turn towards totalitarianism for Russia would be impossible, due to the condition of the Russian society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]],  [http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050224-9.html Joint press conference with President George Bush in 2005, Slovakia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* People in Russia say that those who do not regret the collapse of the Soviet Union have no heart, and those that do regret it have no brain. We do not regret this, we simply state the fact and know that we need to look ahead, not backwards. We will not allow the past to drag us down and stop us from moving ahead. We understand where we should move. But we must act based on a clear understanding of what happened..&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir Putin|Vladimir Putin]], Interview with German television channel [[w:ARD|ARD]] and [[w:ZDF|ZDF]], May 2005. [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/speeches/2005/05/05/2355_type82912type82916_87597.shtml Kremlin, RU,] (May 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times|New York Times]]&#039;&#039; publication that Russia allegedly offered secretly bounties to Afghan militants for killing coalition forces was fabricated by the US intelligence agencies, Russia’s Foreign Ministry told &#039;&#039;[[w:TASS|TASS]]&#039;&#039; on Saturday...  Should we speak about facts - moreover, well-known [facts], it has not long been a secret in [[Afghanistan]] that members of the US intelligence community are involved in drug trafficking, cash payments to militants for letting transport convoys pass through, kickbacks from contracts implementing various projects paid by American taxpayers. The list of their actions can be continued if you want...  We can understand their feelings as they do not want to be deprived of the above mentioned sources of the off-the-books income...&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://tass.com/russia/1172369 Russia Foreign Ministry: NYT article on Russia in Afghanistan fake from US intelligence, &#039;&#039;TASS Russian News Agency&#039;&#039;]  (27 June 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*I would like to raise a toast to the health of our Soviet people and, before all, the Russian people. I drink, before all, to the health of the Russian people, because in this war they earned general recognition as the leading force of the Soviet Union among all the nationalities of our country.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Stalin]], [http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow/eight-hundred-years-of-moscow-texts/toast-to-the-great-russian-people/ Speech at the Reception in the Kremlin in Honour of the Commanders of the Red Army Troops to Celebrate Victory over Germany]. May 24, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is a historical irony that the Russian Federation, a State with centuries-long experience in [[foreign policy]] and [[diplomacy]], has only just appeared on the political map of the world. I am confident that the world community will find in Russia, as an equal participant in [[international relations]] and as a permanent member&#039; of the Security Council, a firm and steadfast champion of [[freedom]], [[democracy]] and [[humanism]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], [https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196999?ln=en Comments at the 3046th Meeting off the United Nations Security Council], (31 January 1992)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;There are things in Russia which are not as they seem.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Georgy Zhukov]], as quoted in &amp;quot;Mandate for Change, 1953-1956: The White House Years&amp;quot; - Page 518 - by Dwight David Eisenhower - 1963&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Vladimir Putin (2021-02-27).jpg|thumb|[To the] ...Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people.... I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repin-Ivan and Son detail.jpg|thumb|220px|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan|I&#039;ve killed my son! I&#039;ve killed my son!]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Ivan the Terrible|Ivan the Terrible]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This painting, by [[w:Ilya Repin|Ilya Repin]], is one of the most famous Russian paintings. After killing his son in a fit of rage, Tsar Ivan had no competent heir left, which ended up culminating in the [[w:Time of Troubles|Time of Troubles]] and the end of [[w:Rurikid dynasty|his dynasty.]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the President of Russia.svg|thumb|With NATO’s eastward expansion... We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us. ~ [[Vladimir Putin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Владислав Сурков на V съезде НАШИх.JPG|thumb|210px|[[w:Vladislav Surkov|[Vladislav] Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:New Horizons International Conference 21.jpg|thumb|260px|&#039;&#039;&#039;It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, [[w:Internet_Research_Agency#Rallies_and_protests_organized_by_IRA_in_the_United_States|encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts]], actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:World information war Collage.png|thumb|260px|As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (warfare)|demoralization]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===President Vladimir Putin&#039;s Speech on Ukraine and US Foreign Policy and NATO - 24 February 2022===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843  (Full text)]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the [[W:Enlargement of NATO|eastward expansion of NATO]], which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border.  It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine... is approaching our very border. Why is this happening? Where did this insolent manner of talking down from the height of their exceptionalism, infallibility and all-permissiveness come from? What is the explanation for this contemptuous and disdainful attitude to our interests and absolutely legitimate demands.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Entreaties and requests do not help. Anything that does not suit the dominant state, the powers that be, is denounced as archaic, obsolete and useless. At the same time, everything it regards as useful is presented as the ultimate truth and forced on others regardless of the cost, abusively and by any means available. Those who refuse to comply are subjected to strong-arm tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not the only country that is worried about this. This has to do with the entire system of international relations, and sometimes even US allies. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to a redivision of the world, and the norms of [[international law]] that developed by that time – and the most important of them, the fundamental norms that were adopted following WWII and largely formalised its outcome – came in the way of those who declared themselves the winners of the Cold War. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;...we saw a state of euphoria created by the feeling of absolute superiority, a kind of modern absolutism, coupled with the low cultural standards and arrogance of those who formulated and pushed through decisions that suited only themselves. The situation took a different turn. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There are many examples of this. First a bloody military operation was waged against Belgrade, without the UN Security Council’s sanction but with combat aircraft and missiles used in the heart of Europe. The bombing of peaceful cities and vital infrastructure went on for several weeks. I have to recall these facts, because some Western colleagues prefer to forget them, and when we mentioned the event, they prefer to avoid speaking about international law... &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then came the turn of Iraq, Libya and Syria. The illegal use of military power against Libya and the distortion of all the UN Security Council decisions on Libya ruined the state, created a huge seat of international terrorism, and pushed the country towards a humanitarian catastrophe, into the vortex of a civil war, which has continued there for years.... A similar fate was also prepared for Syria. The combat operations conducted by the Western coalition in that country without the Syrian government’s approval or UN Security Council’s sanction can only be defined as aggression and intervention... But the example that stands apart from the above events is, of course, the invasion of [[Iraq War|Iraq]] without any legal grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Overall, it appears that nearly everywhere, in many regions of the world where the United States brought its law and order, this created bloody, non-healing wounds and the curse of international terrorism and extremism. I have only mentioned the most glaring but far from only examples of disregard for [[International law|international law.]]&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; This array includes promises not to expand NATO eastwards even by an inch. To reiterate: they have deceived us, or, to put it simply, they have played us... This type of con-artist behaviour is contrary not only to the principles of international relations but also and above all to the generally accepted norms of morality and ethics. Where is justice and truth here? Just lies and hypocrisy all around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Incidentally, US politicians, political scientists and journalists write and say that a veritable &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot; has been created inside the United States in recent years. It is hard to disagree with this – it is really so. But one should not be modest about it: the United States is still a great country and a system-forming power. All its satellites not only humbly and obediently say yes to and parrot it at the slightest pretext but also imitate its behaviour and enthusiastically accept the rules it is offering them. Therefore, one can say with good reason and confidence that the whole so-called Western bloc formed by the United States in its own image and likeness is, in its entirety, the very same &amp;quot;empire of lies&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Properly speaking, the attempts to use us in their own interests never ceased until quite recently: they sought to destroy our traditional values and force on us their false values that would erode us, our people from within, the attitudes they have been aggressively imposing on their countries, attitudes that are directly leading to degradation and degeneration, because they are contrary to [[human nature]]. This is not going to happen. No one has ever succeeded in doing this, nor will they succeed now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With NATO’s eastward expansion the situation for Russia has been becoming worse and more dangerous by the year. Moreover, these past days NATO leadership has been blunt in its statements that they need to accelerate and step up efforts to bring the alliance’s infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders. In other words, they have been toughening their position. We cannot stay idle and passively observe these developments. This would be an absolutely irresponsible thing to do for us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For the United States and its allies, it is a policy of containing Russia, with obvious geopolitical dividends. For our country, it is a matter of life and death, a matter of our historical future as a nation. This is not an exaggeration; this is a fact. It is not only a very real threat to our interests but to the very existence of our state and to its sovereignty. It is the red line which we have spoken about on numerous occasions. They have crossed it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We can see that the forces that staged the coup in Ukraine in 2014 have seized power, are keeping it with the help of ornamental election procedures and have abandoned the path of a peaceful conflict settlement.  For eight years, for eight endless years we have been doing everything possible to settle the situation by peaceful political means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I would also like to address the military personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Comrade officers, Your fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers did not fight the Nazi occupiers and did not defend our common Motherland to allow today’s neo-Nazis to seize power in Ukraine. You swore the oath of allegiance to the Ukrainian people and not to the junta, the people’s adversary which is plundering Ukraine and humiliating the Ukrainian people. I urge you to refuse to carry out their criminal orders. I urge you to immediately lay down arms and go home. The military personnel of the Ukrainian army who do this will be able to freely leave the zone of hostilities and return to their families...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I want to emphasize again that all responsibility for the possible bloodshed will lie fully and wholly with the ruling Ukrainian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the end of the day, the future of Russia is in the hands of its multi-ethnic people, as has always been the case in our history. This means that the decisions that I made will be executed, that we will achieve the goals we have set, and reliably guarantee the security of our Motherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I believe in your support and the invincible force rooted in the love for our Fatherland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UN General Assembly.jpg|thumb|I am an optimist and I believe that together we shall be able now to make the right historical choice so as not to miss the great chance at the turn of centuries and millenia and make the current extremely difficult transition to a peaceful world order. ~[[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Operation_Upshot-Knothole_-_Badger_001.jpg|thumb|Has not the political thinking in the world changed substantially? Does not most of the world community already regard weapons of mass destruction as unacceptable for achieving political objectives? ~ [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cropped Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Vladmir Putin shake hands at G8 summit, 2013]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jacek Malczewski - Na etapie (Aresztanci).jpg|thumb|400px|The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Медведев и Нургалиев на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|300px|Russia... Where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Abraham Lincoln]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NOTOC__&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOCalpha}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes about==&lt;br /&gt;
===A===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If Russia is to be a great power, it will be, not because of its nuclear potential, faith in God or the president, or Western investment, but thanks to the labor of the nation, faith in knowledge and science and the maintenance and development of scientific potential and education. &lt;br /&gt;
** {{W|Zhores Ivanovich Alferov}}, quoted in Darryl J. Leiter, Sharon Leiter, A to Z of physicists (2003), 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You don&#039;t fight Russia and America. You get Russia and America to fight each other, and destroy each other.&lt;br /&gt;
** Richard Dressler in &#039;&#039;[[The Sum of All Fears (film)|The Sum of All Fears]]&#039;&#039; (2002), written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, [[w:Paramount Pictures|Paramount Pictures]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russian politics is not based on making deals, it&#039;s based on values and that&#039;s why you don&#039;t see any achievements between them and Americans because of their principles, the American politics is based on making deals regardless all the values which is not the case for the Russian.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Bashar al-Assad]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45odEv_1DAY Interview with Bill Neely] (July 2016) on &amp;quot;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-s-president-bashar-al-assad-speaks-nbc-news-n608746 NBC: Exclusive Interview with Bashar al-Assad]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian [[Communism]] is the illegitimate child of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Catherine II of Russia|Catherine the Great]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Clement Attlee]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Observer&#039;&#039; (1956).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are a queer mixture of [[strength]] and weakness. They have got a [[passion]] in their [[intellect]], say, a passionate intellect. They have a distracted and restless emotional being, but there is something behind it which is very fine and psychic, though their [[soul]] is not very healthy. And therefore I am not right in saying that [[Gandhi]] is a Russian Christian, because he is so very dry. He has got the intellectual passion and a great moral will-force, but he is more dry than the Russians. The gospel of [[suffering]] that he is preaching has its root in Russia as nowhere else in [[Europe]]... other Christian nations don&#039;t believe in it. At the most they have it in the mind, but the Russians have got it in their very blood. They commit a mistake in preaching the gospel of suffering, but we also commit in [[India]] a mistake in preaching the idea of vairagya [disgust with the world].&lt;br /&gt;
**Sri Aurobindo, June 22, 1926 quoted from [[Sri Aurobindo]], ., Nahar, S., Aurobindo, ., &amp;amp; Institut de recherches évolutives (Paris). &#039;&#039;India&#039;s rebirth: A selection from Sri Aurobindo&#039;s writing, talks and speeches.&#039;&#039; Paris: Institut de Recherches Evolutives. 3rd Edition (2000). [https://web.archive.org/web/20170826004028/http://bharatvani.org/books/ir/IR_frontpage.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a geriatric maritime giant surrounded by much more energetic rivals.&lt;br /&gt;
**David Axe, [http://theweek.com/articles/572496/russias-navy-falling-apart &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Navy is Falling Apart&amp;quot;] (25 August 2015), &#039;&#039;War is Boring&#039;&#039;, The Week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===B===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:(Leningrád) Palota tér. Fortepan 731.jpg|thumb|300px|You know, I never planned to leave. I was not extremely patriotic about Mother Russia. You know, I played their game, pretending, of course.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mikhail Baryshnikov 1984.jpg|thumb|200px|He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there — the stronger you are the worse it is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Mikhail Baryshnikov]], had he stayed in Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Borodinskii bread.jpg|thumb|200px|I hate to say it [...] but, after the [[novelty]] wore off, I had this cliché moment of a [[w:émigré|Russian émigré]] abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but [[w:Homesickness|I &#039;&#039;really&#039;&#039; missed it]]. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Alexei Navalny]], about when he lived in the US.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Iljin02.jpg|thumb|155px|[[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Гебенс - Песенники Семёновского полка.jpg|thumb|​Little [[soldier]]s, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your [[esteem]]ed?&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our esteemed, the invincible [[Wikipedia:Tsar|Tsar]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Holy Rus|Our Holy Rus&#039;]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your [[glory]]?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories,&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki], marching song popular in the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://youtube.com/watch?v=J3Qzsk0bfpg?t=30 Here] is the pace. (Starts at 0:30)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RU050 10.jpg|thumb|We can only pity the [[Poland|Poles]]. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Alexander Pushkin]] on the [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], 1830]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lermontov TiflisGLM.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – [[Mikhail Lermontov]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shamil Basaev2.jpg|thumb|170px|Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is. ~ [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Moscow StBasilCathedral d18.jpg|thumb|280px|You know what impresses me more about Russia than its T-80 tanks and MiG-31 fighters? The writing of [[Tolstoy]], [[Pushkin]], and [[Dostoyevsky]]. The music of [[Wikipedia:Rimsky-Korsakov|Rimsky-Korsakov]], [[Tchaikovsky]], [[Wikipedia:Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]. The scientific achievements of [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Lomonosov|Lomonosov]] and the engineering genius of [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky|Tsiolkovsky]]. What these brilliant Russians achieved will still be spoken of long after... &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Jeffrey Evan Brooks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Yevgeny Onegin by Repin.jpg|thumb|280px|Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;...]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eugene Onegin (Samokish-Sudkovskaya) 13.jpg|thumb|280px|...a Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Your [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|Great Russian dream]] is to sit up to the neck in shit, and drag everyone else down there. That&#039;s what [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Shamil Basayev|Shamil Basayev]], [https://www.kavkazcenter.com/russ/content/2016/07/11/112688/dokument--otkrytoe-pismo-vyzov-shamilya-basaeva-v-adres-putina.shtml Open letter of defiance to Putin (&#039;&#039;Открытое письмо-вызов Шамиля Басаева в адрес Путина&#039;&#039;)], 2001, published by [[Wikipedia:Kavkazcenter|Kavkazcenter.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*** Original: &#039;&#039;Ваша великорусская мечта — сидя по горло в дерьме, затащить туда всех остальных. Это и есть русизм.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*He’d be a ruin by now, both physically and mentally. Physically because of the bottle. . . . Mentally because of &#039;&#039;&#039;that mixture of impotence and cynicism that corrodes everyone there&#039;&#039;&#039; — the stronger you are the worse it is.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joseph Brodsky]] on what would have become of his friend [[Mikhail Baryshnikov]] if he had stayed in Russia, 1988 interview with [[Wikipedia:Arlene Croce|Arlene Croce]], as quoted in [https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/01/19/the-soloist The Soloist – How Ballet Saved Baryshnikov], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The New Yorker|The New Yorker]]&#039;&#039;, 11 January 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The February meeting of [[NATO]]... defense ministers... revealed an antiquated, 75-year-old alliance that, despite its military failures in Afghanistan and Libya, is now turning its military madness toward two more formidable, nuclear-armed enemies: Russia and China... [[NATO]] seems oblivious to the changing dynamics of today&#039;s world, as if it were living on a different planet. Its one-sided Reflection Group report cites Russia&#039;s violation of international law in Crimea as a principal cause of deteriorating relations with the West, and insists that Russia must &amp;quot;return to full compliance with [[international law]].&amp;quot; But it ignores the U.S. and NATO&#039;s far more numerous violations of international law and leading role in the tensions fueling the renewed Cold War:   Illegal invasions of [[Kosovo]], [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]]... broken agreement over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe... U.S. withdrawals from important arms control treaties... More than 300,000 bombs and missiles dropped on other countries by the U.S. and its allies since 2001... U.S. proxy wars in Libya and Syria, which plunged both countries into chaos, revived Al Qaeda and spawned the Islamic State.. U.S. management of the 2014 coup in Ukraine, which led to economic collapse, Russian annexation of Crimea and civil war in Eastern Ukraine... The stark reality of the U.S. record as a serial aggressor whose [[Military-industrial complex|offensive war machine]] dwarfs Russia&#039;s defense spending by 11 to 1 and China&#039;s by 2.8 to 1, even without counting other NATO countries&#039; military spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*NATO&#039;s failure to seriously examine its own role in what it euphemistically calls &amp;quot;uncertain times&amp;quot; should be more alarming to Americans and Europeans than its one-sided criticisms of Russia and China, whose contributions to the uncertainty of our times pale by comparison. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Medea Benjamin]] and [[W:Nick Davies|Nicolas J. S. Davies]], [https://www.salon.com/2021/02/25/what-planet-is-nato-living-on-because-its-no-longer-useful-on-this-one/ What Planet Is NATO Living On? It&#039;s No Longer Useful to This One &#039;&#039;Salon&#039;&#039;], (24 February 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elections]] are not a viable means of ensuring democratic change in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Berezovsky]], 2007 interview in &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, reported in Henry Meyer (13 April 2007). &amp;quot;[http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&amp;amp;sid=aTJX3NiO.sR0&amp;amp;refer=europe Russia Demands Berezovsky Extradition After Call for Revolution]&amp;quot;, Bloomberg News, Bloomberg L.P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it... That&#039;s the tragedy of the situation of [[w:Demoralization (Warfare)|demoralization]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yuri Bezmenov|Yuri Bezmenov]], 1983 interview, as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/ 38 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America]&#039;&#039; (18 July 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:Big Think|Big Think]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the 21st century, nations cannot; and we cannot allow them to redraw borders by force. These are the ground rules. And if we fail to uphold them, we will rue the day. Russia has violated these ground rules and continues to violate them.  Today Russia is occupying sovereign Ukrainian territory.  Let me be crystal clear:  The United States does not, will not, never will recognize Russia’s attempt to annex the [[w:Crimea|Crimea]]. It’s that saying -- that simple.  There is no justification.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Joe Biden]], [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/12/09/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-ukrainian-rada remarks by Vice President Joe Biden to The Ukrainian Rada] (9 December 2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In this interview, former [[w:United States National Security Agency|National Security Agency]] Technical Director Bill Binney demonstrates that the most important premise for Russiagate, that Russian military intelligence conducted an internet hack of the DNC and then provided the purloined files to WikiLeaks for publication, is a fraud. &lt;br /&gt;
*If the Russians hacked the DNC, the NSA would be able to provide specific and detailed information tracing that attack as to times, dates, places, but no such proof has been provided. Binney created or supervised the NSA programs that provide this capability. Binney has now conducted two independent forensic studies of the DNC files: those released by [[w:Guccifer 2.0|Guccifer 2.0]] and those published by [[WikiLeaks]]. Both studies, based on insights gleaned from file metadata and internet transfer speeds, point to the files&#039; having been downloaded to a thumb drive or a storage device rather than transmitted over the internet in a Russian cyber attack. &lt;br /&gt;
*Binney’s findings support the WikiLeaks account of how the files were delivered to them. Former British Ambassador [[w:Craig Murray|Craig Murray]] has stated that he met with someone who was not a Russian state actor at American University in Washington, D.C. and received a thumb drive of files.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:William Binney (intelligence official)|Bill Binney]]:[https://larouchepac.com/20190304/mr-president-listen-bill-binney-russiagate-worse-hoax-you-thought  Mr. &#039;&#039;President—Listen to Bill Binney, Russiagate is a Worse Hoax than You Thought&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;LarouchPAC&#039;&#039;] (Video 46 min, 23 secs) (6 March 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia&#039;s only real geostrategic option - the option that would give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself - is Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The key point to bear in mind is that Russia cannot be in Europe without Ukraine also being in Europe, whereas Ukraine can be in Europe without Russia being in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], &#039;&#039;The Grand Chessboard&#039;&#039; (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===C===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Матрёшка-Russian leaders マトリョーシカ Shimada22.jpg|thumb|275px|A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. ~ [[Winston Churchill]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 24 May 2001-3.jpg|thumb|275px|Russia’s long [[authoritarian]] traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Wikipedia:Christian Caryl|Christian Caryl]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians have sometimes said one thing and done another... The Russians have been way off track since the very beginning. They have not done what they said they were going to do and they are not doing what is in their interest to do in terms of fighting... Thinking of Russia as a competitor was not something that we had to do, and now... We &#039;&#039;are&#039;&#039; going to have a competitor in Russia... Sadly, Russian conduct in Europe makes that necessary... But, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s in the long-term interest of the Russian people... Russia&#039;s a [[Countries|country]] I&#039;ve worked with a lot over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ash Carter|Ashton B. Carter]], [http://www.charlierose.com/ interview with Charlie Rose] (February 2016){{fix cite}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This faith in the power of schmoozing has deep roots in American politics, where a lot depends on negotiation, dialogue and dealmaking. But Moscow doesn’t work that way. Russia’s long authoritarian traditions condition it to view its relations with other countries in terms of pure [[power]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Russia does not have friends. It has competitors and it has vassals. Vassals are countries that pay rhetorical tribute to Moscow and follow its lead on everything that matters — usually because they are deeply dependent on Russia for security, economic support or energy supplies. It’s no coincidence that its current vassal states — such as [[Belarus]], [[Armenia]] and [[Kazakhstan]] — are themselves [[corrupt]] autocracies, which makes it easier for the Kremlin to work with them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Christian Caryl, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/democracy-post/wp/2017/07/05/with-friends-like-putin-who-needs-enemies/ &amp;quot;Trump wants to be Putin&#039;s friend; Putin doesn&#039;t have friends&amp;quot;] (5 July 2017), &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Never mind,&amp;quot; he repeated. &amp;quot;Yours is not the worst of sorrows. Life is long, there will be good and bad to come, there will be everything. Great is mother Russia,&amp;quot; he said, and looked round on each side of him. &amp;quot;I have been all over Russia, and I have seen everything in her, and you may believe my words, my dear. There will be good and there will be bad. I went as a delegate from my village to Siberia, and I have been to the [[w:Amur River|Amur River]] and the [[w:Altai Mountains|Altai Mountains]] and I settled in Siberia; I worked the land there, then I was homesick for mother Russia and I came back to my native village. […]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anton Chekhov]], &amp;quot;[[w:In the Ravine|In the Ravine]]&amp;quot;, (1900) [[s:The Witch and Other Stories/In the Ravine#228|ch. 7, p. 228]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;We all know that if [[Russia]] or [[China]] were guilty of what we have done in [[Vietnam War|Vietnam,]] we would be exploding with moral indignation at these [[war crimes|monstrous crimes]].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]] quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19671207.htm On Resistance]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;The New York Review of Books,&#039;&#039; December 7, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Did the Russians interfere in our elections? An issue of overwhelming concern in the media. I mean, in most of the world, that’s almost a joke. First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support. [[Israel|Israeli]] intervention in U.S. elections vastly overwhelms anything the Russians may have done, I mean, even to the point where the [[w:Prime Minister of Israel|prime minister of Israel]], [[Benjamin Netanyahu|Netanyahu]], goes directly to [[United States Congress|Congress]], without even informing the [[President of the United States|president]], and speaks to Congress, with overwhelming applause, to try to undermine the president’s policies—what happened with [[Barack Obama|Obama]] and Netanyahu in 2015. Did Putin come to give an address to the joint sessions of Congress trying to—calling on them to reverse U.S. policy, without even informing the president? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]]  [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039;]  (27 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[President Trump] is]... perfectly right when he says we should have better relations with Russia. Being dragged through the mud for that is outlandish... Russia shouldn’t refuse to deal with the United States because the U.S. carried out the worst crime of the century in the invasion of Iraq, much worse than anything Russia has done But they shouldn’t refuse to deal with us for that reason, and we shouldn’t refuse to deal with them for whatever infractions they may have carried out, which certainly exist. This is just absurd. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;We have to move towards better—right at the Russian border, there are very extreme tensions, that could blow up anytime and lead to what would in fact be a [[W:Nuclear holocaust|terminal nuclear war]], terminal for the species and life on Earth. We’re very close to that... First of all, we should do things to ameliorate it. Secondly, we should ask why. Well, it’s because [[NATO]] expanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in violation of verbal promises to Mikhail Gorbachev, mostly under Clinton, partly under first Bush, then Clinton expanded right to the Russian border, expanded further under Obama... The fate of... organized human society, even of the survival of the species, depends on this. How much attention is given to these things as compared with, you know, whether Trump lied about something? &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Noam Chomsky]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2018/7/27/noam_chomsky_on_mass_media_obsession &#039;&#039;Noam Chomsky on Mass Media Obsession with Russia &amp;amp; the Stories Not Being Covered in the Trump Era, Democracy Now&#039;&#039; ]  (27 July 2018) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a [[mystery]], inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Winston Churchill]], BBC radio address “The Russian Enigma” (October 1, 1939) ([http://www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/RusnEnig.html partial text]); in Robert Rhodes James, ed., &#039;&#039;Winston S. Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897–1963&#039;&#039; vol. 6 (1974), p. 6161.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Across the world academics still clung to the words and ideas of [[Karl Marx|Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels|Engles]] and even Lenin. Fools. There were even those who said that Communism had been tried in the wrong country; that Russia had been too far backward to make those wonderful ideas work.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Tom Clancy]], &#039;&#039;[[Rainbow Six (novel)|Rainbow Six]]&#039;&#039; (1998), p. 515&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Soviet Union is dead and gone and replaced by the Russian Federation, which is a country we can be friends with now, thank God; and we want the Russians to prosper, and should help the Russians prosper in every way we can within reason... Fifteen years ago, there was this country called the Soviet Union that had over 10,000 nuclear warheads pointed at us... they&#039;re not there anymore. That&#039;s a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Tom Clancy]], [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/26/lklw.00.html &#039;&#039;Larry King Live Weekend&#039;&#039;] (27 August 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The new US-Russian [[Cold War]] is more dangerous than was its 40-year predecessor that the world survived. The chances are even greater that this one could result, inadvertently or intentionally, in actual war between the two nuclear superpowers... For most mainstream-media outlets, [[w:Russiagate|Russiagate]]... [has become]...a kind of cult journalism that no counterevidence or analysis could dent and thus itself increasingly a major contributing factor to the new Cold War. ...no convincing evidence—nor any precedent in American history. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen F. Cohen|Stephen F. Cohen]] in [https://www.thenation.com/article/cold-war-russia/ &#039;&#039;War With Russia? The Nation&#039;&#039;] (3 December 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The degradation of [[Mainstream media|mainstream American press]] coverage of Russia, a country still vital to [[national security|US national security]], has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines — particularly about the [[w:2014 Winter Olympics|Sochi Olympics]], [[Ukraine]] and, unfailingly, [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]] — is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Stephen F. Cohen]], in [https://www.thenation.com/article/distorting-russia/ &#039;&#039;Distorting Russia How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine&#039;&#039;], [[w:The Nation|&#039;&#039;The Nation&#039;&#039;]] (February 12, 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Space Brothers have now trained scientists in the US and USSR in a technology that can monitor every movement on earth -- of armies, tanks, planes and even submarines beneath the sea. There is thus good reason behind the Russians&#039;... confident calls for major disarmament. For not only does this technology (a sophisticated extension of the Star Wars concept) make pin-point surveillance possible, it can also be used to control men and machines.  For instance, if a terrorist was located on a plane thousands of feet in the air, holding a gun or a bomb, he could be &#039;frozen&#039; in the act of terrorism. A submarine beneath the waves could be drained of energy and rendered powerless.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Maitreya is sending a clear message to the world&#039;s political leaders: no wars can now be won, and spending vast amounts of money on international arms programmes is a complete waste. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Our prime task... is to look after the environment... Our energies [should] be spent in making it healthy again. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Many experiments with the Technology of Light are being undertaken in Russia. This is because the Space Brothers set up a community in that country 15 years ago. Russia was chosen because it was such a closed society, where commercial pressures did not affect scientific research. Today, says Maitreya, &#039;&#039;&#039;the Russians are well ahead of the rest of the world&#039;&#039;&#039; in this field. That is why Russia leads the way in calling for arms reductions.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]] in [http://www.share-international.org/archives/Science-tech/sci_Mt_sci-med-tech.htm  &#039;&#039;Science, medicine and technology in the Age of Light, Share International&#039;&#039;]  (July 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*People experienced in the 10 to 12 years before [[September 11 attacks|9/11]] an extraordinary transformation of the world. For the people involved, some of these were tremendous, climactic: the changes that occurred in the Soviet Union, the collapse of the political system, the demands of millions of people for a better and easier lifestyle, and the rise into prominence of the now mega-rich oilmen of Russia...as a whole [[China]] has come out of the agonizing poverty which it knew before. Likewise, most of the Russian people are finding life easier... People in the West — America, Europe — have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale. People... have found a growing interdependence, a recognition of the oneness of humanity and the necessity of seeing the world as one, and that real changes are possible only on a global scale... [[Maitreya (Theosophy)|His]] influence opened up the Soviet Union to glasnost, welcoming the Soviet Union into the community of nations, and hence the transformation of the old, angry nyetsounding bear into a friendly, co-operative federation of nations. It is a tremendous transformation.  p. 18/19&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]],   [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]], (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no such thing as specifically American, Russian, or British interests. There are world interests, human interests, and unless these are solved, there will be no humans in the world. That is what we have to grasp.... That is the soul talking. That is how the soul sees the world. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Russia... The plan there is for a grouping of nations to come together. Russia is even more huge than the United States, one-sixth of the world’s surface. There is Russia as we know it, up to about Moscow, and then as far as you can look from an aeroplane, as far east as you can go through country after country, and south to the Ukraine and all the different countries. All these were part of the Soviet Union, before it was broken up. Each is now an independent country, part of a federation of nations. That federation will be all these different people living together in harmony, eventually, not seeking to intermarry or fuse or blend as you are doing here (in the USA).  p.65&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Benjamin Creme]], [[The World Teacher for All Humanity|&#039;&#039;The World Teacher for All Humanity&#039;&#039;]],  2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===D===&lt;br /&gt;
*For more than five hundred years the cardinal problem in defining Europe has centred on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Norman Davies|Norman Davies]], &#039;&#039;Europe: A History&#039;&#039; (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
*My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again, don&#039;t you let them roll up their sleeves again on fidgety nights.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько правды в глазах государственных шлюх!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Боже, сколько веры в руках отставных палачей!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Ты не дай им опять закатать рукава, ты не дай им опять закатать рукава суетливых ночей.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:ru:Родина (песня)|Rodina]], by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]], 1992.&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia was a slave in Europe but would be a master in Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fyodor Dostoevsky]], reported in Dominic Livien (April 1999). &amp;quot;Dilemmas of Empire 1850-1918: Power, Territory, Identity&amp;quot;. Journal of Contemporary History 34 (2): p. 180.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Charge of inferiority is an old dodge. It has been made available for oppression on many occasions... When Russia wanted to take possession of a part of the [[w:Ottoman Empire|Ottoman Empire]], the Turks were “an inferior race.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Frederick Douglass]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/what-the-black-man-wants/ &amp;quot;What the Black Man Wants&amp;quot;], speech in Boston, Massachusetts (1865).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of misanthropic ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of spirituality, and immorality. It differs from the well-known forms of fascism, racism, nationalism, in its particular cruelty, both to man and to nature ... Possessing a slave psychology, it parasitizes using false history, on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [http://chechenews.com/1-12398/ 1994]&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not a single misanthropic ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more cruelly and cynically than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no moral principles - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.mk.ru/editions/daily/article/2004/02/09/119563-izderzhki-velikih-del.html April 1995], during the [[Wikipedia:First Chechen War|First Chechen War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Freedom and independence are life or death for us. Because it would be possible to live with people, among people, with a neighbor, in a state where some of your rights are protected. Where the state fulfills its duty to you. It doesn&#039;t. Russia does not fulfill any obligations to the people, to the state. So, they simply offer us: They put a wild bear, caught in a forest, in a cage and say : &amp;quot;Go into the cage and live with him, be friends. Give him a paw. Live with this beast and play nice.&amp;quot; That&#039;s what Russia is.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russische beer, NG-505-87.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;&#039;Arise, Russia, from thy prison of slavery,&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Victory&#039;s spirit calls: time for battle!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rise thy battle flags&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;For Faith, Love, and Good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ Popular lyrics for the march [[Wikipedia:Farewell of Slavianka|Farewell of Slavianka]], written in 1997.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Latvijas—Krievijas miera līguma parakstīšana Rīgā (1920).jpg|thumb|The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. &#039;&#039;&#039;As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; It isolates the weakest and tortures them. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: Signing of the [[Wikipedia:Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty|Latvian-Soviet Peace Treaty]], in which the [[USSR]] pledged to recognize the inviolability of [[Latvia]]&#039;s borders – [[Wikipedia:Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940|which they did for less than 20 years.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russia gathers all kinds of criminal gangs [in Russia]. They&#039;re given the nickname &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. They arm them heavily, pay them big money. &#039;&#039;&#039;Countless funds are spent on this. It&#039;s unthinkable to a normal person&#039;s imagination.&#039;&#039;&#039; Tanks, armored personnel carriers, planes, Grads, Smerches, Uragans. Their training happens outside the republic, on Russian territory, at special bases. Russian military specialists, Russian special services. Plus a few criminals of Chechen ethnicity – and they call this whole mixture &amp;quot;opposition&amp;quot;. Opposition in the Russian way. In fact, [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]]. Typical Russism. Worse than [[fascism]], [[Nazism]], [[racism]], all individual-hating ideologies. Raised to the rank of Russian state policy. Russism is worse than fascism.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Throughout the history of Russia, it chooses the most helpless victim. To a complete physical destruction, and realistic intimidation of the world – saying: &amp;quot;here is how strong, powerful we are, what we can do, how insidious, evil, predatory.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Nagorno-Karabakh|Nagorno-Karabakh]] – [[Wikipedia:First Nagorno-Karabakh War|isolated and completely destroyed]]. It&#039;s the training.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;They went further: [[Wikipedia:War in Abkhazia (1992–1993)|Abkhazia]] - isolated from the Caucasus, from Georgia. Destroyed all potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:Georgian Civil War|War]] with [[Georgia (country)|Georgia]]. [[Armenia]] with [[Azerbaijan]] – in fact [the conflict involves] Russian special services, Russian troops, Russian weapons, Russian equipment.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Wikipedia:1991–1992 South Ossetia War|South Ossetia]] - isolated, destroyed. [[Wikipedia:North Ossetia|North Ossetia]], [[w:Ingushetia|Ingushetia]] – [[Wikipedia:East Prigorodny conflict|isolated]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And the physical destruction of entire nations. [[Violence]], [[death]], [[blood]]. Destruction of nation&#039;s potential.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The Russian leadership, throughout its history, when it got difficult, fled to sign agreements that it has never respected and will never respect, and does not think [of respecting]. As soon as it gets stronger, it starts again. It isolates the weakest and tortures them.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;That&#039;s what Russia is – empire of evil.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Империя зла&amp;quot; can be translated as &amp;quot;an empire of evil&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the empire of evil&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As it was, is, and remains. Its rapacity... greed, ruthlessness, lack of spirituality, immorality it has demonstrated in Chechnya. 250 000 armed forces. 5600 units of armored vehicles on the territory. An unheard number in history against [a handful of] mountain people. Against a territory for which you need a microscope to look for it on a map. They reassured the world community, they made a statement from the Russian President that there will be no forceful solution. There will be only a peaceful solution [they said]. And when on the [[New Year|New Year&#039;s Eve]]... on the New Year&#039;s Eve, [[Wikipedia:Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)|they mixed sand, earth, sky, human blood and flesh]]. Mixed and made a bloody mess. And they are not going to move from this policy, they are not going to move from it. That&#039;s what Russia is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;If the world, I declare responsibly, if the whole world does not stop this plague, or do not – at least – make it follow [[rule of law]] (there will never be [[democracy]], and never was) If – at least in legal terms – they do not comply with the norms of international law, the world will be subject to severe shock.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O7ZX092Lms interview by the Estonian film group &amp;quot;Oxide film&amp;quot;, 1995.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is especially important to introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Dugin]], &#039;&#039;[[w:Foundations of Geopolitics|Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia]]&#039;&#039; (1997), [https://web.archive.org/web/20160607175004/https:/www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/demokratizatsiya%20archive/GWASHU_DEMO_12_1/John%20Dunlop%20Aleksandr%20Dugin&#039;s%20Foundations%20of%20Geopolitics.pdf translation by John B. Dunlop.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E===&lt;br /&gt;
*We are inclined to overemphasize the material influences in history. The Russians especially make this mistake. Intellectual values and ethnic influences, tradition and emotional factors are equally important. If this were not the case, Europe would today be a federated state, not a madhouse of nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Albert Einstein]], [http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/wp-content/uploads/satevepost/what_life_means_to_einstein.pdf &amp;quot;What Life Means to Einstein: An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;The [[w:Saturday Evening Post|Saturday Evening Post]]&#039;&#039; (26 October 1929)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It would appear that the natural frontier of Russia runs from Dantzic or perhaps Stettin to Trieste.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friedrich Engels]], &amp;quot;The Real Issue in Turkey&amp;quot;, Karl Marx and Engels, Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 16 (1979). This article was originally published in The &#039;&#039;[[w:New York Daily Tribune|New York Daily Tribune]]&#039;&#039;, April 12, 1853, p. 4, and since that paper&#039;s European correspondent was at that time Karl Marx, it has generally been assumed the author was Marx. Collected Works, vol. 12, p. 639, note 17, makes it clear that Engels was the author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===F===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:00 novodevichy wall.JPG|thumb|275px|In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy. ~ [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In a Russian tragedy, everybody dies. In a Russian comedy, everybody dies, too. But they die happy.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[w:Barry Farber|Barry Farber]], radio talk-show host in [[New York City]], during a program on radio station [[w:WMCA|WMCA]]; reported in &#039;&#039;Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations&#039;&#039; (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian leaders and regular citizens have felt increasingly insecure... They have a sense that Russia is under siege from without and has been robbed of its rightful status as a world power... Europeans at least have recourse at the ballot box; they can angrily vote in or out whoever they like. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy. Russians do not enjoy the luxury of democracy... The U.S. is many times more powerful and influential than Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Max Fisher]], [http://www.vox.com/2014/12/1/7313443/vladimir-putin-merkel &amp;quot;This quote about Putin&#039;s machismo from Angela Merkel is just devastating&amp;quot;] (20 May 2015), &#039;&#039;Vox&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think the idea people had after 1991 that there would be a quick transition is clearly wrong... A lot of it has to do with relationships with economic growth because I think in really high-growth countries with a large middle class, with lots of educated people, there is a tendency to demand greater political participation... I think what you are seeing with the rise of Putinism in Russia and in parts of [[East/Central Europe|Eastern Europe]] is in a way the failure of that kind of modernization to produce a really broad middle-class society... His model is based on a narrow energy-dependent economic model which right now is falling apart... I think what is happening in Russia right now as global commodity prices have fallen is the exposure of the hollowness of this and we will see after another decade of economic failure whether Russians really think this is such a great alternative to the kind of both freedom and prosperity that is seen in Western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
**Francis Fukuyama, as quoted in [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), by Charles Recknagel, &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===G===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volgodonsk 1999.jpg|thumb|[[Wiktionary:меньше знаешь — крепче спишь|The less you know, the better you sleep.]] &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Russian proverb&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Pictured: the [[Wikipedia:Russian apartment bombings|1999 apartment bombings.]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shevshuk3.jpg|thumb|200px|&#039;&#039;My God, how much truth in the eyes of government whores!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;My God, how much faith in the hands of retired executioners!&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:ru:Родина (песня)|&amp;quot;Родина&amp;quot;]] (Homeland), by the rock band [[Wikipedia:DDT (band)|DDT]].&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen to it [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFJi3RieXS4 here].&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Маргарита Симоньян и Владимир Путин.jpg|thumb|We are hurtling back into a [[Soviet]] [[abyss]], into an information vacuum that spells death from our own [[ignorance]]. All we have left is the [[internet]], where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a [[journalist]], it&#039;s total [[servility]] to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.  ~ [[Anna Politkovskaya]], 2004]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:There are flowers and candles near the site of the murder of Boris Nemtsov.jpg|thumb|250px|Russia has become an [[assassination]]-happy state.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel Gerecht]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg|thumb|200px|Only in Russia is [[poetry]] respected – it gets people killed.  &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[Osip Mandelstam]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is a new phenomenon in Europe: a state defined and dominated by former and active-duty security and intelligence officers. Not even fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, or the Soviet Union – all undoubtedly much worse creations than Russia; were as top-heavy with intelligence talent... There is no historical precedent for a society so dominated by former and active-duty internal-security and intelligence officials; men who rose up in a professional culture in which murder could be an acceptable, even obligatory, business practice... Those who operated within the Soviet sphere were the most malevolent in their practices. These men mentored and shaped Putin and his closest friends and allies. It is therefore unsurprising that Putin&#039;s Russia has become an assassination-happy state where detention, interrogation, and torture; all tried and true methods of the Soviet KGB; are used to silence the voices of untoward journalists and businessmen who annoy or threaten Putin&#039;s FSB state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Reuel Marc Gerecht|Reuel M. Gerecht]], [http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.25917/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;A Rogue Intelligence State? Why Europe and America Cannot Ignore Russia&amp;quot;] (6 April 2007), AEI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the more interesting aspects of the nauseating impeachment trial in the [[w:United States Senate|Senate]] was the repeated vilification of [[Russia]] and its [[Vladimir Putin|President Vladimir Putin]]. To hate Russia has become dogma on both sides of the political aisle, in part because no politician has really wanted to confront the lesson of the [[w:2016 United States presidential election|2016 election]], which was that most Americans think that the federal government is basically incompetent and staffed by career politicians like [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] who should return back home and get real jobs. Worse still, it is useless, and much like the one trick pony the only thing it can do is steal money from the taxpayers and waste it on various types of self-gratification that only politicians can appreciate. That means that the United States is engaged is fighting multiple wars against make-believe enemies while the country’s infrastructure rots and a host of officially certified grievance groups control the public space.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://councilforthenationalinterest.org/?p=5202  Why Both Republicans and Democrats Want Russia to Become the Enemy of Choice],&#039;&#039;The Council for the American Interest&#039;&#039;] (6 Feb 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Soros|Soros]] particularly hates President [[Vladimir Putin]] and Russia. He revealed that he is far from a benevolent figure fighting for justice in his March &#039;&#039;Financial Times&#039;&#039; op-ed (behind a pay wall) entitled “Europe Must Stand With Turkey Over Putin’s War Crimes in Syria.” The op-ed is full of errors of fact and is basically a call for aggression against a Russia that he describes as engaged in bombing schools and hospitals. It starts with, “Since the beginning of its intervention in Syria in September 2015, Russia has not only sought to keep in place its most faithful Arab ally, [[Bashar al-Assad|Syrian President Bashar al-Assad]]. It has also wanted to regain the regional and global influence that it lost since the fall of the Soviet Union.”  First of all, Russia did not “intervene” in Syria. It was invited there by the country’s legitimate government to provide assistance against various groups, some of which were linked to al Qaeda and the Islamic State, that were seeking to overthrow President al-Assad.  And apart from Soros, few actual experts on Russia would claim that it is seeking to recreate the “influence” of the Soviet Union. Moscow does not have the resources to do so and has evinced no desire to pursue the sort of global agenda that was characteristic of the Soviet state...  Note that none of Soros’s assertions are supported by fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi|Philip Giraldi]], in [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/02/some-conspiracy-theories-are-for-real/ Some Conspiracy Theories Are for Real, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture&#039;&#039;]  (July 2, 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is particular danger at the moment that powerful political alignments in the United States are pushing strongly to exacerbate the developing crisis with Russia. &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;, which broke the story that the Kremlin had been paying the Afghan [[Taliban]] bounties to kill American soldiers, has been particularly assiduous in promoting the tale of perfidious Moscow. Initial Times coverage, which claimed that the activity had been confirmed by both intelligence sources and money tracking, was supplemented by delusional nonsense from former Obama National Security Advisor [[Susan Rice]], who asks “Why does Trump put Russia first?” before calling for a “swift and significant U.S. response.” Rice, who is being mentioned as a possible Biden choice for [[w:Vice President of the United States|Vice President]], certainly knows about swift and significant as she was one of the architects of the destruction of [[Libya]] and the escalation of U.S. military and intelligence operations directed against a non-threatening [[Syria]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] in [https://ahtribune.com/us/4275-russia-baiting.html Russia-Baiting Is the Only Game in Town Washington again becomes hysterical, &#039;&#039;American Herald Tribune&#039;&#039;], (7 July 2020) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All this saber-rattling is despicable. Neither [[Russia]] nor [[Iran]] threaten the U.S. and there is no reason why the U.S. should be eager to defend [[Taiwan]] or [[Ukraine]] (and also [[Israel]]). [[China]]’s military budget is miniscule compared to the U.S. and the only real threat it represents is as a competitor on world markets, where it is already dominant in a number of key sectors. The U.S. has to get off this global dominance militarism wagon but how do we do it when both major parties embrace it?&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Philip Giraldi]] quoted in [https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/467760/In-truth-the-U-S-has-become-a-weak-and-therefore-dangerous-country In truth the U.S has become a weak and therefore dangerous country, By Martin Love, &#039;&#039;Tehran Times&#039;&#039;], December 5, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
===H===&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite the [[Robert Mueller]] report’s conclusion that [[Donald Trump]] and his campaign did not collude with Russia during the 2016 presidential race, the new [[Cold War]] with [[Moscow]] shows little sign of abating. It is used to justify the expansion of [[NATO]] to Russia’s borders, a move that has made billions in [[profits]] for [[w:arms manufacturers|U.S. arms manufacturers]]... It is used to demonize domestic critics and [[Alternative media|alternative media outlets]] as agents of a foreign power. It is used to paper over the [[Democratic Party|Democratic Party’s]] [[betrayal]] of the working class and the party’s subservience to [[corporate power]]. It is used to discredit détente between the world’s two largest nuclear powers. It is used to justify both the curtailment of civil liberties in the United States and [[w:Foreign interventions by the United States|U.S. interventions overseas]]—including in countries such as [[Syria]] and [[Venezuela]]. This new Cold War predates the Trump presidential campaign. It was manufactured over a decade ago by a [[Military-industrial complex|war industry]] and intelligence community that understood that, by fueling a conflict with Russia, they could consolidate their [[power]] and increase their [[profits]]. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]] in [https://www.truthdig.com/articles/manufacturing-war-with-russia/ &#039;&#039;Manufacturing War With Russia, TruthDig&#039;&#039; ]]  (3 June 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bill... of the (U.S.) House Foreign Affairs Committee... demands that the administration “not cede to the demands of the Russian Federation regarding [[NATO]] membership or expansion.” NATO expansion to Ukraine along Russia’s borders is the central issue for Moscow. Removing this for discussion obliterates a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Sanctions under the legislation can be imposed for any act, no matter how minor, deemed by Ukraine to be hostile. The sanctions cannot be lifted until an agreement is reached between the government of Ukraine and Russia, meaning Ukraine would be granted the authority to determine when the US sanctions will end. The proposed sanctions, which target Russian banks, the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, state-owned enterprises and leading members of the government and military, including President Vladimir Putin, also calls for blocking Russia from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]], the international financial transaction system that uses the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;“The legislation would grant at least $500 million in foreign military assistance to Ukraine, in addition to the $200 million in new assistance sent over the last month,” writes Marcus Stanley.  “This makes Ukraine the third leading recipient of US military assistance globally, after Israel, and Egypt. While it wouldn’t come close to giving Ukraine the ability to combat Russia on its own, it may come with US military advisors that would increase the danger the US would be drawn into a conflict. The bill also takes steps to directly involve countries bordering Russia in negotiations to end the crisis, which would make it much more difficult to reach an agreement.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*While cutting Russia off from [[W:Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication|SWIFT]] will be catastrophic, at least in the short term, for the Russian economy, pushing Russia into the arms of China to create an alternative global financial system that no longer relies on the US dollar will cripple the American empire.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-democrats-effective-evil/279654/ Democrats, the More Effective Evil, &#039;&#039;MintPressNews&#039;&#039;], (14 February 2022)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was in Eastern Europe in 1989, reporting on the revolutions that overthrew the ossified communist dictatorships that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a time of hope. NATO, with the breakup of the Soviet empire, became obsolete. President [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] reached out to Washington and Europe to build a new security pact that would include Russia. Secretary of State [[James Baker]] in the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan administration]], along with the West German Foreign Minister Hans-[[W:Dietrich Genscher|Dietrich Genscher]], assured the Soviet leader that if Germany was unified NATO would not be extended beyond the new borders. The commitment not to expand NATO, also made by Great Britain and France, appeared to herald a new global order. We saw the peace dividend dangled before us, the promise that the massive expenditures on weapons that characterized the Cold War would be converted into expenditures on social programs and infrastructures that had long been neglected to feed the insatiable appetite of the military. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;There was a near universal understanding among diplomats and political leaders at the time that any attempt to expand NATO was foolish, an unwarranted provocation against Russia that would obliterate the ties and bonds that happily emerged at the end of the Cold War.  How naive we were. The war industry did not intend to shrink its power or its profits. It set out almost immediately to recruit the former Communist Bloc countries into the European Union and NATO... The expansion of NATO swiftly became a multi-billion-dollar bonanza for the corporations that had profited from the Cold War. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Chris Hedges]],  [https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Once NATO expanded into Eastern Europe, the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton administration]] promised Moscow that NATO combat troops would not be stationed in Eastern Europe, the defining issue of the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations. This promise again turned out to be a lie. Then in 2014, the U.S. backed a coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych who sought to build an economic alliance with Russia rather than the European Union. Of course, once integrated into the European Union, as seen in the rest of Eastern Europe, the next step is integration into NATO.  Russia, spooked by the coup, alarmed at the overtures by the EU and NATO, then annexed Crimea, largely populated by Russian speakers. And the death spiral that led us to the conflict currently underway in Ukraine became unstoppable.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The war state needs enemies to sustain itself. When an enemy can’t be found, an enemy is manufactured. Putin has become, in the words of Senator Angus King, the new Hitler, out to grab Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe. The full-throated cries for war, echoed shamelessly by the press, are justified by draining the conflict of historical context, by elevating ourselves as the saviors and whoever we oppose, from Saddam Hussein to Putin, as the new Nazi leader. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-ukraine-soviet-union-russia-war/279793/ Chris Hedges: Russia, Ukraine and the Chronicle of a War Foretold, &#039;&#039;MintPress News&#039;&#039;,] Feb 25, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*One of the deceptive clichés of Western accounts of post World War II history is that NATO was constructed  as a defensive arrangement to block the threat of  a Soviet attack on Western Europe.  This is false. It is true that Western propaganda played up the Soviet menace, but many key U.S. and Western European statesmen recognized that a Soviet invasion was not a real threat.  The Soviet Union had been devastated, and while in possession of a large army it was exhausted and needed time for recuperation. The United States was riding high, the war had revitalized its economy, it suffered no war damage, and it had the atomic bomb in its arsenal, which it had displayed to  the Soviet Union by killing a quarter of  a million Japanese civilians at [[Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|Hiroshima and Nagasaki]]. Hitting the Soviet Union before it recovered or had atomic weapons was discussed in Washington, even if rejected in favor of “containment,”  economic warfare, and other forms of  destabilization. [[w:NSC 68|NSC 68]], dated April 1950, while decrying the great Soviet menace, explicitly called for a program of destabilization aimed at regime change in that country, finally achieved in 1991...&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;In reality, NATO, as an aggressive global arm of  U.S. and other local affiliated [[Imperialism|imperialisms]], poses a serious threat to global peace and security. It is about to celebrate its 60th anniversary, and while it should have been liquidated back in 1991, it has instead expanded,  taking on a new and threatening role traced out in  its 1999 Strategic Concept and enjoying  a frighteningly malignant growth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Edward S. Herman|Edward S. Herman]] [https://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-the-imperial-pitbull/11989  &#039;&#039;NATO: the Imperial Pitbull, Global Research&#039;&#039;], (23 January 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is enlightening to see how pugnacious the U.S. [[establishment]]...has been in dealing with the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ukraine crisis&#039;&#039;&#039;. The crisis arguably began when the Yanukovich government rejected an EU bailout program in favor of one offered by Russia. The [[Mainstream media|mainstream media (MSM)]] have virtually suppressed the fact that the EU proposal was not only less generous than the one offered by Russia, but that, whereas the Russian plan did not preclude further Ukrainian deals with the EU, the EU plan would have required a cut-off of further Russian arrangements. And whereas the Russian deal had no military clauses, that of the EU required that Ukraine affiliate with NATO. Insofar as the MSM dealt with this set of offers, they not only suppressed the exclusionary and militarized character of the EU offer, they tended to view the Russian deal as an improper use of economic leverage, “bludgeoning,” but the EU proposal was “constructive and reasonable” (Ed., NYT, November 20, 2014). Double standards seem to be fully internalized within the U.S. establishment. The protests that ensued in Ukraine were surely based in part on real grievances against a corrupt government, but they were also pushed along by right-wing groups and by U.S. and allied encouragement and support that increasingly had an anti-Russian and pro-accelerated regime change flavor. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good,&#039;&#039;&#039; Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The sniper killings of police and protesters in Maidan [Ukraine]  on February 21, 2014 brought the crisis to a new head.  This violence overlapped with, and eventually terminated, a negotiated settlement of the struggle brokered by EU members that would have ended the violence, created an interim government, and required elections by December. The accelerated violence ended this transitional plan, which was replaced by a coup takeover along with the forced flight of [[w:Victor Yanukovich|Victor Yanukovich]]. There is credible evidence that the sniper shootings of both protesters and police were carried out by a segment of the protesters in a false-flag operation that worked exceedingly well, “government” violence serving as one ground for the ouster of Yanukovich. Most telling was the intercepted phone message between Estonia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Urmas Paet, and EU Foreign Policy chief Catherine Upton, in which Paet regretfully reported compelling evidence that the shots killing both police and protesters came from a segment of the protesters. This account was almost entirely suppressed in the [[Mainstream media|MSM]]... There is also every reason to believe that the coup and establishment of a right-wing and anti-Russian government were encouraged and actively supported by U.S. officials.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Edward S. Herman]] in [https://zcomm.org/zmagazine/war-is-our-business-and-business-looks-good/   &#039;&#039;War is Our Business and Business Looks Good, Z Magazine&#039;&#039;] (28 June 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Our attitude towards Europe and Europeans is still that of provincials towards the dwellers in a capital: we are servile and apologetic, take every difference for a defect, blush for our peculiarities and try to hide them, and confess our inferiority by imitation. The fact is that we are intimidated: we have never got over the sneers of Peter the Great and his coadjutors, or the superior airs of French tutors and Germans in our Civil Service. Western nations talk of our duplicity and cunning: they believe we want to deceive them, when we are only trying to make a creditable appearance and pass muster. A Russian will express quite different political views in talking to different persons, without any ulterior object, and merely from a wish to please: the bump of complaisance is highly developed in our skulls. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexander Herzen]], &#039;&#039;Childhood, Youth and Exile&#039;&#039; (first published 1923)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As sons and daughters of the Russian Orthodox Church, we are all citizens of Holy Russia. When we speak of Holy Russia, we are not talking about the Russian Federation or any civil society on earth; rather, it is a way of life that has been passed down to us through the centuries by such great saints of the Russian Land as the Holy Great Prince Vladimir and Great Princess Olga, Venerable Sergius of Radonezh, Job of Pochaev, Seraphim of Sarov, and more recently, the countless New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th century. These saints are our ancestors, and we must look to them for instruction on how to bravely confess the Faith, even when facing persecution. There is no achievement in simply calling oneself &amp;quot;Russian:&amp;quot; in order to be a genuine Russian, one must first become Orthodox and live a life in the Church, as did our forebears, the founders of Holy Russia!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Wikipedia:Hilarion (Kapral)|Metropolitan Hilarion]] of the [[w:ROCOR|Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia]], &#039;&#039;[http://www.synod.com/synod/eng2013/20130619_enmhappeal1025.html Appeal by Metropolitan Hilarion on the celebration of the 1,025th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus]&#039;&#039; (19 June 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The World Bank|The World Bank&#039;s]]  ... job is to do in the financial sphere what, in the past, was done by military force... Instead of bullets, it uses financial maneuvering... The World Bank engages in economic warfare that is just as destructive as military warfare. At the end of the [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]] period [[Vladimir Putin|Russia’s President Putin]] said that American neoliberalism destroyed more of Russia’s population than did World War II. Such [[neoliberalism]], which basically is the doctrine of American supremacy and foreign dependency, is the policy of the World Bank and IMF.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Michael Hudson (economist)|Michael Hudson]] quoted in   [https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/07/05/the-imf-and-world-bank-partners-in-backwardness/ The IMF and World Bank: Partners in Backwardness, - Bonnie Faulkner, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;,] (5 July 2019)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*With regard to [[nuclear weapons]], the situation is far more dangerous than the last [[Doomsday Clock]] report. New weapons systems under development are much more effectively dangerous. The [[Joe Biden|Biden administration]], expanding upon Trump’s confrontational approach, has [[Noam Chomsky|Chomsky]] at a loss for words to describe the danger at hand. Only recently, [[Joe Biden|Biden]] met with [[NATO]] leaders and instructed them to plan on two wars, [[China]] and Russia. According to Chomsky: “This is beyond [[insanity]].” Not only that, the group is carrying out provocative acts when [[diplomacy]] is really needed. This is an extraordinarily dangerous situation.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/07/12/a-world-of-total-illusion-and-fantasy-an-interview-with-noam-chomsky/ A World of Total Illusion and Fantasy: Noam Chomsky on the Future of the Planet, Robert Hunziker, &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;] (12 July 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India... The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**A. Hitler, attributed and quoted in Michael Burleigh, Nazi Europe: what if, in Niall Ferguson, Virtual History, 1998, p. 330, also in Elst, K. (2010). The saffron swastika: The notion of &amp;quot;Hindu fascism&amp;quot;. I.525&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I===&lt;br /&gt;
* Western European humanity moves by will and reason. A Russian person lives first of all with his heart and imagination, and only then with his will and mind. Therefore, the average European is ashamed of sincerity, conscience and kindness [regarding it] as &amp;quot;stupidity&amp;quot;; A Russian person, on the contrary, expects from a person, first of all, kindness, conscience and sincerity. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Западноевропейское человечество движется волею и рассудком. Русский человек живет прежде всего сердцем и воображением и лишь потом волею и умом. Поэтому средний европеец стыдится искренности, совести и доброты как «глупости»; русский человек, наоборот, ждет от человека прежде всего доброты, совести и искренности.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ivan Ilyin]], [https://gorenka.org/index.php/publikatsii-i/16674-evropa-ne- &amp;quot;Europe does not know Russia&amp;quot;] (28 September 1948), published in [https://modernlib.net/books/ilin_ivan_aleksandrovich/nashi_zadachi_tom_i/ Our tasks, Articles from 1948-1956, Tome I.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ever since [[Mikhail Gorbachev|Gorbachev]] naïvely ended the [[Cold War]], the hugely over-armed United States has been actively surrounding Russia with weapons systems, aggressive military exercises, NATO expansion. At the same time, in recent years the demonization of Vladimir Putin has reached war propaganda levels. Russians have every reason to believe that the United States is preparing for war against them, and are certain to take defensive measures. This mixture of excessive military preparations and propaganda against an “evil enemy” make it very easy for some trivial incident to blow it all up.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;As is so often the case, [[Hillary Clinton|Hillary]] doesn’t say what is true, but grabs the chance to show how anti-Putin she is. She is ready to push every adversary as far as possible, apparently certain that the “bad guy” will back down—even if it happens to be nuclear-armed Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Diana Johnstone|Diana Johnstone]] - quoted in  [https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III by Maidhc O&#039; Cathail]   (March 10, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===K===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2013-05-25 Twisp, WA.jpg|thumb|Russia’s economic, information, and diplomatic powers are highly contextual and often geographically limited. ~ Michael Kofman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There can be nothing more pro-Russian than to bring much-needed accountability to those who violate the rights of Russian citizens and steal the money of Russian taxpayers — and continue to spend that money, buy real estate and park their families in the West. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2018/05/18/the-kremlin-revives-a-soviet-style-law-against-dissent/ &amp;quot;The Kremlin revives a Soviet-style law against dissent&amp;quot;] (18 May 2018), &#039;&#039;[[w:The Washington Post|The Washington Post]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No matter how powerful the forces against them, when people are prepared to stand up for what they believe, they succeed... [T]hat’s the basis of my hope for the future of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Vladimir V. Kara-Murza]], as quoted in [https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/04/russian-patriot-and-his-country-part-i-vladimir-kara-murza/ &amp;quot;A Russian Patriot and His Country, Part I&amp;quot;] (10 April 2017), by [[Jay Nordlinger]], &#039;&#039;[[w:National Review|National Review]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think Russian people are learning that democracy is not an alien thing; it&#039;s not a western invention. It&#039;s probably the most affordable mechanism to solve problems inside the country, inside the society because Putin proved to all of us that democracy has a world of alternatives, security forces and police and power abuse and that&#039;s why I think eventually the people of Russia will embrace democracy as the least costly institution to help them to solve their daily problems.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Garry Kasparov]], statement in interview: Monica Attard (April 3, 2005). &amp;quot;[http://www.abc.net.au/sundayprofile/stories/s1335618.htm Gary Kasparov]&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;Sunday Profile&#039;&#039;, Australian Broadcasting Company.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Millions like me in Russia want a [[Freedom of the press|free press]], the [[rule of law]], [[social justice]], and [[w:Free and fair elections|free and fair elections]]. My new job is to fight for those people and to fight for these [[w:fundamental rights|fundamental rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Garry Kasparov]] &#039;&#039;How Life Imitates Chess&#039;&#039; (2007), Part III, Endgame, p. 195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I think many Russians, but also a lot of Westerners, make a very serious mistake in trying to look for… a better person to become president. They are searching for such a person in [Alexei] Navalny, in myself, but that’s a mistake. Anyone who replaces Putin is going to take Russia along the same imperialist route. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;[...] It is a very large and very diverse country, and if you want to manage it from one central spot, you have to have a very strong bureaucratic apparatus.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; To have such a huge apparatus at the centre has to be explained by having to protect the country from an outside enemy – there is no other explanation that people will accept.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wikipedia:Mikhail Khodorkovsky|Mikhail Khodorkovsky]], [https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/ukraine/2022/05/he-has-embarked-on-a-war-he-cant-stop-mikhail-khodorkovsky-on-putins-next-move “He has embarked on a war he can’t stop”: Mikhail Khodorkovsky on Putin’s next move], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:New Statesman|The New Statesman]]&#039;&#039;, 3 May 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russia]], all you have to do to get a house is to be born.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Nikita Khrushchev]], [http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/the-kitchen-debate/ &#039;&#039;The Kitchen Debate&#039;&#039;] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of [[Russia]] is of a great spiritual and cultural value – not only for you and me, but for all humanity. And we are calling for the preservation of the people of Russia, for the birth of our new compatriots, not only and not so much because these people are needed by the country, but also to a great extent because this country is needed by people. Russia must exist and play its irreplaceable role in our destiny with you, in the destiny of our descendants and throughout world history.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The special value of Russia, its special vocation is to be a stronghold of Orthodox Christianity. To preserve the Orthodox faith, Orthodox tradition and culture, Christian moral principles intact. Maybe that is why the powers that be are so ganged up on the Russian Orthodox Church, wanting to tear away the Greek Orthodox world from the Russian Church, wanting to destroy the unity of the Orthodox Church. We possess reliable information that everything that is happening now in world Orthodoxy is not an accident, not just the whim of a religious figure whose mind has become clouded. This is the implementation of a very specific plan that aims to tear the Greek world away from Russia. According to the perpetrators — I cannot describe these strategists in any other way — the Russian Church appears to be some kind of “soft power”, through which Russia influences the world around it. But &#039;&#039;&#039;why can’t Russia share its spiritual gifts?&#039;&#039;&#039; Is it criminal? This can be criminal only in the view of those who seek to weaken, and if possible to destroy the influence of Russia. In this whole story related to the problem of recognition or non-recognition of [[Ukrainian]] schismatics by the Local Orthodox Churches, there is something that is not declared, but which is the main goal of the forces behind the scenes that unleashed this schismatic activity. We in the Russian Church understand this clearly, but today our brothers in Greece and other Orthodox Churches also understand this. We are being asked to resist, not to flinch, to continue the struggle to maintain the spiritual independence of the Russian Orthodox Church from all these centres of world influence, and most importantly – to maintain the unity of Universal Orthodoxy. This is not a simple task. The Church has no army. The Church has no material means. So it is not easy without material means to build the spiritual defense.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Patriarch Kirill of Moscow]], Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church. [https://orthochristian.com/125041.html 18th Sunday after Pentecost, 20 October 2019]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVTvJXroA0g Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[W]hat makes Russia’s war on truth so ominous is that it transcends [[ideology]]. Once Moscow had [[w:Pravda|&#039;&#039;Pravda&#039;&#039;]] and espoused the virtues of the international [[proletariat]]. Today it uses “[[fake news]]” as part of a long-term strategy to transform Western publics into [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracy]]-addled zombies. &lt;br /&gt;
**James Kirchick, [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/russias-plot-against-the-west-214925 &amp;quot;Russia&#039;s Plot Against the West&amp;quot;] (March 2017), &#039;&#039;[[Politico]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Russia stamp no. 1441 - 65th anniversary of end of WW II.jpg|thumb|...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call... ~  [[Daniel Kovalik]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fosse commune de Saadi-Kotar.jpg|thumb|270px|[[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] is a special form of [[misanthropic]] ideology based on [[Wikipedia:Great Russian chauvinism|great-power chauvinism]], complete lack of [[spirituality]], and [[immorality]]. It differs from the well-known forms of [[fascism]], [[racism]], [[nationalism]], in its particular [[cruelty]], both to man and to nature ... Possessing a [[slave]] psychology, it parasitizes using false [[history]], on occupied territories and oppressed peoples.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Few countries in history have started more wars or caused more turmoil than Russia in its eternal quest for security and status. It is also true, however, that at critical junctures Russia has saved the world’s equilibrium from forces that sought to overwhelm it: from the [[Mongol invasions and conquests|Mongols]] in the [[w:16th century|16th century]], from [[Sweden]] in the [[w:18th century|18th century]], from [[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] in the [[19th century]], and from [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] in the [[20th century]]. In the contemporary period, Russia will be important in overcoming [[Islamic extremism|radical Islam]], partly because it is home to some 20 million [[Muslim|Muslims]], particularly in the [[w:Caucasus|Caucasus]] and along Russia’s southern border. Russia will also be a factor in the equilibrium of [[Asia]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Henry Kissinger]], as quoted in [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/11/kissinger-order-and-chaos/506876/ &amp;quot;World Chaos and World Order: Conversations With Henry Kissinger&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;[[w:The Atlantic|The Atlantic]]&#039;&#039;, November 10, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*Unfortunately, it’s US [[Diplomacy|“diplomacy”]] which brought the [[United States|US]], Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[NATO]] to the current standoff.  As the [[W:Warsaw Pact|Warsaw Pact]] disintegrated and the [[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Soviet Union collapsed]], US encouragement for those events included pledges that the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] wouldn’t take advantage of the situation to expand eastward. Since then, NATO has inexorably pushed in that direction, nearly doubling the number of member states. Thanks, US “diplomacy.”... Things began coming to a head with the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup)|US-sponsored coup in Ukraine]] that replaced its [[Viktor Yanukovych|“Russia-friendly” regime]] with a [[W:Arseniy Yatsenyuk|“US/Europe-friendly” regime]] in 2014, courtesy of [[Barack Obama]]. Thanks, US “diplomacy.” &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;Then in 2019, the US withdrew from the [[w:Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty|Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty]], which forbade the US to place missiles within surprise strike distance of Russia, and Russia to place similar missiles within surprise strike distance of NATO. The US followed up by placing exactly such missiles in [[Poland]], courtesy of Donald Trump. Some “diplomacy.”... Then the US went into overdrive (courtesy of Trump and Biden) against the opening of a pipeline ([[W:Nord Stream 2|Nord Stream 2]]) which would have supplied Russian natural gas to Germany.  The pipeline would have been a force for peace insofar as Russia likes to sell natural gas (at a fraction of prices the US can offer), and Germans like to not freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/02/23/ukraine-us-diplomacy-is-the-problem-can-it-become-the-solution/ Ukraine: US “Diplomacy” is the Problem. Can it Become the Solution? Thomas Knapp,]  &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, February 23, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...I am simply baffled by what appears to be the prevailing view in this country... that [[Russia]] is somehow a threat to the United States....While I certainly understand it is in the interest of the [[military-industrial complex]]... to continue to vilify Russia in order to justify our already-bloated military spending... Russia was our ally in WWII in defeating the Nazis. And, contrary to what most Americans are taught, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/05/08/dont-forget-how-the-soviet-union-saved-the-world-from-hitler/ it was Russia that truly won that war in Europe], having [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties lost over 20 million people to the war.].. 80 percent of the... Nazi[&#039;s] kills... [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties USA lost ~400,000]]... certainly since 1960 and up to the present time, the U.S. has been much more brutal and blood-thirsty than Russia. It is not even a close call...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Russia Is Not Our Enemy&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is these U.S. wars, along with the [http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/us-military-bases-around-the-world-119321 U.S.’s over 800 military bases in more than 70] countries ([http://www.vox.com/2016/3/14/11224544/putin-syria-russia-withdraw Russia has bases in only one country (Syria)] outside the former Soviet Union) which has led to the U.S. rightly being viewed in a poll of people in 65 countries as by far the greatest threat to world peace... President Trump’s expressed desire to stop antagonizing Russia and to work with it... should be welcomed as eminently reasonable and indeed necessary to avoid a possible nuclear confrontation. This should also be welcome by an American public whose resources have been drained by the greatest military-spending spree by far on the planet....Certainly, liberals, who at least once stood for peace and for greater social spending, should be in the lead in cheering such overtures instead of drumming up anti-Russian hatred which can only lead to more war and more impoverishment of our society.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Daniel Kovalik]] in [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/listen-liberals-russia-is-not-our-enemy_us_58a4ba39e4b0fa149f9ac0c8  &#039;&#039;Listen Liberals: Russia Is Not Our Enemy, Huffington Post&#039;&#039;] (15 February 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* For the first 500 years of its existence, Russia did not have a coat of arms, or a national flag or anthem. &lt;br /&gt;
**Anatoly Korolyov, [https://archive.is/IWCU9#selection-35.52-35.161 &amp;quot;The Russian flag: a tricolor icon&amp;quot;] (31 May 2005), &#039;&#039;[[w:RIA Novosti|RIA Novosti]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The predominance of the intelligence services and mentality is a core feature of Putin’s Russia that marks a major and critical discontinuity from not only the 1990s but all of Soviet and Russian history. During the Soviet period, the [[w:Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Communist Party]] provided the glue holding the system together. During the 1990s, there was no central organizing institution or ideology. Now, with Putin, it is “former” [[w:KGB|KGB]] professionals who dominate the Russian ruling elite. This is a special kind of brotherhood, a mafia-like culture in which only a few can be trusted. The working culture is secretive and nontransparent.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Andrew C. Kuchins|Andrew Kuchins]], [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071214-russia_2017-web.pdf &amp;quot;Alternative Futures for Russia to 2017 A Report of the Russia and Eurasia Program&amp;quot;], &#039;&#039;Center for Strategic and International Studies&#039;&#039; (November 2007), p. 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===L===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In case you’ve been living in a cave the last few weeks, here’s latest news scoop riling the United States: Russia has been paying the Afghan Taliban bounties for American scalps.  How do we know? Because the &#039;&#039;New York Times&#039;&#039; tells us so, and the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; is not the kind of paper to make stuff up. But how does the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; know it’s true? Because sources say so, sources so super-sensitive and high up that it can’t reveal their names. All it can say according to in a front-page exposé that ran on June 26 is that they consist of “officials briefed on the matter” and “officials [who] spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the delicate intelligence and internal deliberations.” ..It’s all true even though the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; can’t say who its sources are because … because … well, just because it can’t... Still, the &#039;&#039;Times&#039;&#039; wants us to believe since the effect is to discredit two of its top [[w:bêtes noires|bêtes noires]], [[Donald Trump|Trump]] and [[Vladimir Putin]].  Meanwhile, not only has U.S. intelligence compiled a record of accuracy over the last two decades that couldn’t be more dismal, but [[Mike Pompeo|Secretary of State Mike Pompeo]], who ran the CIA for fifteen months in 2017-18, actually bragged about the agency’s skill in misleading the public. As he put it, “We lied, we cheated, we stole … we had entire training courses.” &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So after lying about everything from weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to “golden showers” in the Moscow Ritz Carlton, why should we believe the “intelligence community” now when it says it’s telling the truth?...  In any case, why not play along...?  But we can’t for one simple reason: the chances of the story being true... are somewhere between zero and one percent.   Why? Let’s start with the most obvious. An assertion by some spook or other is not the same thing as evidence... Rather, it’s an opinion... the report doesn’t even make sense. Not only have the [[Taliban]] been at war with the United States since 2001, they’re winning. So why should Russia pay them to do what they’ve been happily doing on their own for close to two decades? Contrary to what the Times wants us to believe, there’s no evidence that Russia backs the Taliban or wants the U.S. to leave with its tail between its legs. Quite the opposite as a quick glance at a map will attest.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Lazare Daniel Lazare] in   [https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/06/russian-bounties-here-we-go-again/ Russian Bounties: Here We Go Again, &#039;&#039;Strategic Culture Foundation&#039;&#039;] (6 July 2020)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If I see that the Russians are amassing their planes for an attack, I&#039;m going to knock the shit out of them before they take off the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Curtis LeMay]], conversation with presidential commissioner Robert Sprague (September 1957), quoted in Kaplan, F. (1991). &#039;&#039;The Wizards of Armageddon&#039;&#039;. Stanford University Press, p. 134. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Farewell, unwashed Russia|Farewell, unwashed Russia]], &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Land of slaves, land of masters, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, blue uniforms, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; And you, people, devoted to them. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Perhaps beyond the wall of the Caucasus, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; I will hide from your pashas, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From their all-seeing eye, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; From their all-hearing ears.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Mikhail Lermontov]], in his final exile in the Caucasus, 1841. Published by [[Wikipedia:Russky Arkhiv|Russky Arkhiv]]. Historical and literary collection (1890) Translation by [[Wikipedia:Anatoly Liberman|Anatoly Liberman]].&lt;br /&gt;
***Original: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Прощай, немытая Россiя, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Страна рабовъ, страна господъ, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И вы, мундиры голубые, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  И ты, имъ преданный народъ. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Быть можетъ, за стѣной Кавказа &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Сокроюсь отъ твоихъ пашей, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; Отъ ихъ всевидящаго глаза, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  Отъ ихъ всеслышащихъ ушей.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Autocrat of all the Russias will resign his crown, and proclaim his subjects free republicans sooner than will our American masters voluntarily give up their slaves. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], letter to George Robertson (15 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As a nation, we began by declaring that &#039;all men are created equal.&#039; We now practically read it &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes.&#039; When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read &#039;all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.&#039; When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty — to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be take pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Abraham Lincoln]], Letter to Joshua F. Speed (24 August 1855)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mairead Maguire, Shirin Ebadi and Tawakkol Karman talk about rohingya issues during Bangadesh on March 2018 (1).jpg|thumb|...Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO?...The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today... It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. ~[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:George Orwell, c. 1940 (41928180381) (cropped).jpg|thumb|200px|In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of [[socialism]] as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[George Orwell]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===M===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin-5 edit.jpg|thumb|Putin’s major address [March 2018]... was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which...no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on arms control...[In the USA] All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...[[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Uncle Sam (pointing finger).jpg|thumb|[The U.S. Democrat&#039;s] accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016...could not withstand close scrutiny... two... former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. ~ [[Ray McGovern]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Под одеялом из облаков.jpg|thumb|310px|From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God! &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ [[w:National Anthem of Russia|National anthem of the Russian Federation]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As we watch the [[Mainstream media|media]] today, we are spoon fed more and more propaganda and fear of the unknown, that we should be afraid of the unknown and have full faith that our government is keeping us safe from the unknown. But by looking at media today, those of us who are old enough will be reminded of the era of [[Cold War]] news articles, hysteria of how the Russians would invade and how we should duck and cover under tables in our kitchens for the ensuing nuclear war. Under this mass hysteria all Western governments were convinced that we should join Western allies to fight the unknown evil that lies to the east.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Through my travels in Russia during the height of the Cold War with a peace delegation, we were shocked by the poverty of the country, and questioned how we ever were led to believe that Russia was a force to be afraid of. We talked to the Russian students who were dismayed by their absolute poverty and showed anger against [[NATO]] for leading their country into an arms race that they could not win. Many years later, when speaking to young Americans in the US, I was in disbelief about the fear the students had of Russia and their talk of invasion. This is a good example of how the unknown can cause a deep rooted paranoia when manipulated by the right powers.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Firstly, I must say, that I personally believe that Russia is not by any means without faults. But the amount of anti-Russian propaganda in our media today is a throwback to the Cold War era. We must ask the question: Is this leading to more arms, a bigger NATO? Possibly to challenge large powers in the [[Middle East]] and Asia, as we see the US approaching the [[South China Sea|South China seas]], and NATO Naval games taking place in the Black Sea. Missile compounds are being erected in [[Romania]], Poland and other ex-Soviet countries, while military games are set up in Scandinavia close to the Russian border to practice for a cold climate war scenario. At the same time, we see the US President arriving in Europe asking for increased military spending. At the same time the USA has increased its budget by 300 billion in one year. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today. The scapegoating of Russia is an inexcusable game that the West is indulging in. &#039;&#039;&#039;It is time for political leaders and each individual to move us back from the brink of catastrophe to begin to build relationships with our Russian brothers and sisters. Too long has the elite financially gained from war while millions are moved into poverty and desperation. &#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**[[w: Mairead Maguire|Mairead Maguire]] in [https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/09/14/demonization-russia-new-cold-war-era &#039;&#039;Demonization of Russia in a New Cold War Era, Inventing a foe to sell military ambitions is still the most dangerous of games, Common Dreams&#039;&#039;]   (14 September 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Only in Russia poetry is respected – it gets people killed. Is there anywhere else where poetry is so common a motive for murder?&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Osip Mandelstam]], quoted by [[w:Nadezhda Mandelstam|Nadezhda Mandelstam]], &#039;&#039;Hope Against Hope: A Memoir&#039;&#039; (1970), ch. 35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The problems with Russia are not just [[NATO]] expansion. There were also a process that began with the second Bush administration of withdrawing from all of the arms control — almost all of the arms control agreements that we had concluded with the Soviet Union, the very agreements that had brought the first Cold War to an end.... In effect, what the United States did after the end of the Cold War was they reversed the [[diplomacy]] that we had used to end the Cold War, and started sort of doing anything, everything the opposite way. We started, in effect, trying to control other countries, to bring them into what we called the [[New world order (politics)|“new world order,”]] but it was not very orderly. And we also sort of asserted the right to use military whenever we wished. We bombed Serbia in the ’90s without the approval of the U.N. Later, we invaded Iraq, citing false evidence and without any U.N. approval and against the advice not only of Russia but of Germany and France, our allies. So, the United States — I could name a number of others — itself was not careful in abiding by the [[International law|international laws]] that we had supported.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jack F. Matlock Jr.]], [https://www.democracynow.org/2022/2/17/jack_matlock_ukraine_russia_nato_us Ex-U.S. Ambassador to USSR: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO], [[W:Democracy Now!|&#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]], February 17, 2022 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...while the Russians adopted [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Byzantine religion]] they did not adopt [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine civilisation]]. They acquired a rich heritage, but their timidity led them to bury the talent in the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
** {{citation&lt;br /&gt;
|title=The Spirit of Russia&lt;br /&gt;
|volume = II&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1919&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|last=Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
|author-link=Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator-first =Eden&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-last =Paul&lt;br /&gt;
| translator2-first =Cedar&lt;br /&gt;
| pages=489&lt;br /&gt;
|url=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Putin&#039;s Russia is our adversary and moral opposite. It is committed to the destruction of the post-war, rule-based, world order built on [[American exceptionalism|American leadership]] and the primacy of [[American empire|our political and economic values]]… There is no placating Putin. There is no transforming him from a gangster to a responsible statesman. Previous administrations have tried and failed not because they didn’t try hard enough, but because Putin wants no part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John McCain]], [http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/02/13/trump-gets-it-wrong-on-putin-russia-moral-equals-john-mccain-column/97822770/ &amp;quot;Russia dissidents are our moral equals&amp;quot;] (13 February 2017), &#039;&#039;[[w:USA Today|USA Today]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let me just start with [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]’s major address [1 March 2018]... It was really something. Not only did he advertise a whole new generation of strategic weaponry, which he claimed, and no one has disproved, would render the billions of dollars that we have wasted on antiballistic missile defenses useless. They’re useless to begin with, most scientists and engineers say, but these new weapons that he advertised, and some of which he said are operational, would upend that... he also said, Now, we tried to get you to listen to us. You wouldn’t listen to us. Now, hopefully, you will listen to us. Let’s get together at the appropriate time with experts and figure out how we address these problems, in other words, talks on [[arms control]]...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, &#039;&#039;Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039; (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, a couple days later he’s talking about the strategic relationship and somebody says, Now, Mr. Putin — this is in an interview... six days later—somebody says, Hey, listen, Mr. Putin...would you destroy the whole world? If there were a first strike on Russia, would you really respond? It would be too late to save Russia.... Look, He says, yes, this would be a global catastrophe, but “as a citizen of Russia and as the head of the Russian state, I ask, What need will we have for a world if there was no Russia?” So he’s saying, Look, you’ve got to take this stuff seriously. Yes, we would retaliate, even if it meant that the rest of the world would be blown up as well as Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Two days later, four senior senators, okay, three Democrats—let’s see if I can remember them — Feinstein, Wyden, the fellow up there in Massachusetts, and [[Bernie Sanders]]—they issue a call, a letter to then Secretary of State [[Rex Tillerson]], Look, this is really getting out of hand. We don’t like the fact that Putin is brandishing these weapons that we really haven’t ever heard of before, but he’s calling for [[arms control]] talks, so let’s talk. Let’s talk. Guess what? That appeal appeared on all those four senators’ websites but was totally—totally — ignored by what passes for the [[mainstream media]]. So one suspects that this is an unwelcome subject, and there is proof positive... we&#039;re talking about four senior senators appealing for arms control talks on their websites but it never getting past their websites, no publicity for it. I’m thinking that [[Chuck Schumer]] said, No, no. Arms control, no, no... Don’t mention arms control talks. So that’s the reality in the mainstream media.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*...Putin’s looking at all this. He knows who “the crazies” are and he knows that Bolton has a lot of influence. So this is a very destabilizing thing, because when the Russians keep telling us, Look, we’ve got these new weapons, well, you know, the press says, Ah, they’re faking it, they’re probably faking it. You know, I don’t know if they’re faking it or not. But, my God, if we knew about all this, why is it not in the annual intelligence briefing that is given to both the House and to the Senate early each year? It’s missing. All we get is rhetoric about how bad the Russians are, just as if they were the old Soviet Union, ideologically determined to bury us...&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern|Ray McGovern]]: Russia and U.S. Senators Want Disarmament, U.S. Media Does Not, Foreign Policy Journal (2 May 2018) [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/05/02/ray-mcgovern-russia-and-u-s-senators-want-disarmament-u-s-media-does-not/ Full text online] (2 May 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump had been calling for better relations with [[Russia]] during his presidential campaign... Stooping to a new low, Friday’s (New York) Times headline screamed: “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia.”  For those interested in evidence — or the lack of it— regarding collusion between Russia and the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, we can thank the usual Russia-gate promoters at [[Mainstream media|The New York Times and CNN]] for inadvertently filling in some gaps in recent days....NYT readers had to get down to paragraph 9 to read: “No evidence has emerged...”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2019/01/15/russia-gate-evidence-please/ &#039;&#039;Ray McGovern: Russia-gate Evidence, Please,&#039;&#039;] (15 January 2019) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of [The Democrat&#039;s] &#039;&#039;&#039;accusations that Russia hacked into the U.S. election&#039;&#039;&#039; in 2016, it could be because those charges could not withstand close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel [[Robert Mueller]] appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate... &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]] (VIPS) — including two “alumni” who were &#039;&#039;&#039;former National Security Agency technical directors — have long since concluded that [[Julian Assange]] did not acquire what he called the “emails related to [[Hillary Clinton]]” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else.&#039;&#039;&#039; They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to President [[Barack Obama]]. Clinton’s PR chief... later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions &#039;&#039;&#039;“to get the press to focus on... the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help [[Donald Trump]] and hurt [[Hillary Clinton]].”&#039;&#039;&#039;  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ray McGovern]] in [https://consortiumnews.com/2018/06/07/still-waiting-for-evidence-of-a-russian-hack/ &#039;&#039;Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack Consortium News&#039;&#039;]   (7 June 2018)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It&#039;s the principle of... freedom is better than non-freedom. These words are the quintessence of the human experience.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: Это принцип &amp;quot;свобода лучше, чем несвобода&amp;quot;. Эти слова - квинтэссенция человеческого опыта.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Dmitry Medvedev]], at the 5th Krasnoyarsk economic forum (21 February 2008). [https://rg.ru/2008/02/21/svoboda.html As published] by the &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Rossiiskaya Gazeta|Rossiiskaya Gazeta]]&#039;&#039;. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the southern seas to the polar lands. Spread are our forests and fields. You are unique in the world, one of a kind. This native land protected by God!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Sergey Mikhalkov|Sergey Mikhalkov]], [[w:National Anthem of Russia|&#039;&#039;National Anthem of the Russian Federation&#039;&#039;]] (December 2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===N===&lt;br /&gt;
*I hate to say it [...] but, after the novelty wore off, I had this cliché moment of a Russian émigré abroad: I really missed black bread. I know it’s stupid, but I really missed it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Alexey Navalny]], as quoted in [http://archive.is/FGqQE &amp;quot;Net Impact: One man&#039;s cyber-crusade against Russian corruption&amp;quot;] (4 April 2011), by [[w:Julia Ioffe|Julia Ioffe]], &#039;&#039;The New Yorker&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*A cocktail of patriotism, chauvinism, imperialism could for some time replace many essential nutrients for Russians. Like how for alcoholics vodka replaces everything, including toothpaste. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Original: &#039;&#039;Коктейль из патриотизма, шовинизма, империализма на какое-то время может заменить россиянам многие необходимые питательные вещества. Как алкоголикам водка заменяет все, включая зубную пасту.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Alexander Nevzorov|Alexander Nevzorov]], as quoted in [https://censor.net/ru/resonance/277589/nevzorov_rossiya_maroder_likovat_eyi_rano &amp;quot;Russia is a marauder. It&#039;s too early for her to rejoice&amp;quot;] (25 March 2014), &#039;&#039;[[w:uk:Цензор.нет|Cenzor.net]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===O===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The past year and a half of [[Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia]] have been driven by the “bitter clingers” of Hillary’s failed national political ambitions, the military-industrial complex, corporate interests, corporate [[Mainstream media|media]], the Washington/New York/[[Hollywood]] commentariat, and foreign lobbyists. Too many of them profit from an endless state of war—throughout the world and, in particular, with [[Russia]]. &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; Washington and its clients are terrified that the war gravy train will be slowed or stopped. Our NATO clients are afraid of carrying their own national defense burdens. Washington neocons are perfectly willing to continue to waste the lives of our devoted military to protect both their funding and a world order that the West’s victory in the Cold War has rendered moot.&lt;br /&gt;
**George D. O&#039;Neill Jr in [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/for-peace-with-putin-end-americas-pointless-wars/&#039;&#039;For Peace With Putin, End America’s Pointless Wars, The American Conservative&#039;&#039;] (9 July 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, nothing has contributed so much to the corruption of the original idea of socialism as the belief that Russia is a socialist country and that every act of its rulers must be excused, if not imitated.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[George Orwell]], in [http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/Orwell.html Preface to the Ukrainian edition] of &#039;&#039;[[Animal Farm]]&#039;&#039;, as published in &#039;&#039;The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell : As I please, 1943-1945&#039;&#039; (1968).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Last spring the hoopla about Russia invading Ukraine died an ignominious death when nothing happened. This autumn, the latest Russia-will-invade boogeyman was already on life-support when the pro-western Ukrainian president decided to goose it November 26 with the breathless proclamation that Moscow intended to overthrow him “next week.” When that didn’t happen, on December 4, the Washington Post hyperventilated about Russia igniting a war, like, any day, in an anonymously sourced piece of exemplary CIA stenography, worthy of the fantasies published in the run-up to the U.S. 2003 invasion of Iraq.... So Russia hesitates and the U.S. screams. What else is new? Don’t get me wrong: NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust.... In early November CIA chief William Burns trekked to the Kremlin amid worries about a Russian troop buildup. As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSzy on his nose.jpg|thumb|200px|NATO and the U.S.’s idiotic brinksmanship on Russia’s borders could yet cause real damage. But wild-eyed speculation about the Kremlin’s intentions has so far run aground on Russia’s apparent reluctance to engage in a shooting war that could spiral into a full-on nuclear holocaust [...] As if Russia can’t move its military around  WITHIN ITS OWN BORDERS without catapulting the west to high alert.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;~ &amp;quot;Eve Ottenberg&amp;quot;, [[Wikipedia:CounterPunch|CounterPunch]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2011. День Победы в Донецке 003.jpg|thumb|170px|We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering. ~ [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Z symbol flash mob at Platinum Arena in Khabarovsk.jpg|thumb|The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.  ~ [[Timothy D. Snyder]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*How likely is doomsday? Well back to Ukraine, regarding which, on December 1, Russian President Putin asked the west for legal guarantees that it would cease eastward expansion. This request, made because Washington’s word is worthless (vide just for starters, the Iran nuclear pact, and President George H.W. Bush’s promise that NATO would never, ho, ho, expand to Russia’s borders) and met with scoffs by the white house, comes amid complicated tensions. The Kiev military recently claimed it used Turkish attack drones “in combat against ethnic Russian rebels,” Finian Cunningham reported October 28 in Information Clearing House. This is not good. Turkey is in NATO. If Turkey gets tangled up in the Ukraine imbroglio, that substantially escalates things. According to Anatol Lieven in &#039;&#039;Responsible Statecraft&#039;&#039; on November 24, “Moscow is especially alarmed by Ukraine’s acquisition of Turkish Bayraktar combat drones,” used to such deadly effect by Azerbaijan in its 2020 conquest of Armenian territory. Unlike the F-35, these things actually work. &lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/10/dangerous-games-western-militaries-on-the-doorsteps-of-russia-and-china/ Dangerous Games: Western Militaries on the Doorsteps of Russia and China], by [https://truthout.org/authors/eve-ottenberg/ Eve Ottenberg], &#039;&#039;CounterPunch&#039;&#039;, December 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===P===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vladimir Putin 28 February 2002-2.jpg|thumb|280px|Russia is not corrupt. Corruption is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows. ~ [[Wikipedia:Andrei Piontkovsky|Andrei Piontkovsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Békegong.jpg|thumb|Russia is in favor of a multipolar world, a [[democratic]] world order, strengthening the system of [[international law]], and for developing a legal system in which any small country, even a very small country, can feel itself secure, as if behind a stone wall. ~[[Vladimir Putin]]{{Fact}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with the heads of governments of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia in Kyiv. (51941490410).jpg|thumb|315px|There is not a single [[misanthropic]] ideology in the world, even in theory, acting more [[cruel]]ly and [[cynic]]ally than [[Wikipedia:Rashism|Russism]] ... There are no [[moral]] [[principles]] - they are all like animals. I don&#039;t want this war to stop. I need this war, its continuation. This war will go to the territory of Russia - whether Russia wants it or not ... And the Western countries, the world community will not let it stop, in order to completely isolate Russia and destroy it as a state, so that this predatory beast on earth no longer exists. ~ [[Wikipedia:Dzhokhar Dudayev|Dzhokhar Dudayev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They&#039;re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Sarah Palin]], to Charles Gibson, ABC News, September 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
***&#039;&#039;This was parodied as &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;I can see Russia from my house&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;, on &amp;quot;Saturday Night Live&amp;quot;, a comedy television show, two days later, by [[Tina Fey]].&#039;&#039; Fey resembled Palin in appearance, and was portraying Palin, and so the latter quote is often misattributed to Palin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukraine]] is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the &#039;&#039;New York Times, the Washington Post&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;Guardian,&#039;&#039; and mainstream broadcasters such as the &#039;&#039;BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN&#039;&#039; have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous [[Cold War II|cold war]].  All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the [[W:2014 Ukrainian coup|coup in Ukraine in 2014]] was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and [[NATO]].  This inversion of [[reality]] is so pervasive that Washington&#039;s military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the [[Cold War|first cold war]]. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], whom &#039;&#039;The Economist&#039;&#039; depicts as the devil. The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the [[Fascism|fascists]] in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many in the [[Mainstream media|Western media]] have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.   There is almost the joie d&#039;esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the &#039;&#039;Washington Post&#039;&#039; inciting [[war]] with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[John Pilger]],  [http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45752.htm Inside the Invisible Government: War, Propaganda, Clinton &amp;amp; Trump], &#039;&#039;Information Clearing House&#039;&#039;, October 28, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is not corrupt. [[Corruption]] is what happens in all countries when businessmen offer officials large bribes for favors. Today’s Russia is unique. The businessmen, the politicians, and the bureaucrats are the same people. They have privatized the country’s wealth and taken control of its financial flows.&lt;br /&gt;
** Andrei Pionkovsky, [http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&amp;amp;id=4852 &#039;&#039;Another Look Into Putin&#039;s Soul&#039;&#039;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We are hurtling back into a Soviet abyss, into an information vacuum that spells death from our own ignorance. All we have left is the internet, where information is still freely available. For the rest, if you want to go on working as a journalist, it&#039;s total servility to Putin. Otherwise, it can be death, the bullet, poison, or trial - whatever our special services, Putin&#039;s guard dogs, see fit.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &amp;quot;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/09/russia.media Poisoned by Putin: The horror of Beslan was made still worse by the intimidation of Russia&#039;s servile media]&amp;quot; (9 September 2004), &#039;&#039;The Guardian&#039;&#039;, United Kingdom: Guardian News and Media Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* My heroes are those people who want to be individuals but are being forced to be cogs again. In an Empire there are only cogs. &lt;br /&gt;
** [[Anna Politkovskaya]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/anna-politkovskaya-putin-poison-and-my-struggle-for-freedom-535250.html Anna Politkovskaya: Putin, poison and my struggle for freedom]&#039;&#039; (15 October 2004), &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Independent|The Independent]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In contemporary Russia, unlike the old [[USSR]] or present-day [[North Korea]], the stage is constantly changing: the country is a dictatorship in the morning, a democracy at lunch, an oligarchy by suppertime, while, backstage, oil companies are expropriated, journalists killed, billions siphoned away. &#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Vladislav Surkov|Surkov]] is at the centre of the show, sponsoring nationalist skinheads one moment, backing human rights groups the next. It&#039;s a strategy of power based on keeping any opposition there may be constantly confused, a ceaseless shape-shifting that is unstoppable because it&#039;s indefinable.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Peter Pomerantsev|Peter Pomerantsev]], &amp;quot;[https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v33/n20/peter-pomerantsev/putin-s-rasputin Putin&#039;s Rasputin]&amp;quot; (20 October 2011), &#039;&#039;[[w:London Review of books|London Review of Books]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* We can only pity the Poles. We are too powerful to hate them, the war that will break out will be a war of extermination – or at least it should be. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Original:&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Nous ne pouvons que plaindre les Polonais. Nous sommes trop puissants pour les haïr, la guerre qui va s’ouvrir sera une guerre d’extermination — ou du moins devrait l’être.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Alexander Pushkin]], on the Polish [[Wikipedia:November Uprising|November Uprising]], letter to [https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A5%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE,_%D0%95%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0 Elizaveta Khitrovo], 9 December 1830. As quoted in [https://rvb.ru/pushkin/01text/10letters/1815_30/01text/1830/1558_375.htm &#039;&#039;A. S. Pushkin. Collected works in 10 volumes.&#039;&#039;] Moscow: &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:Khudozhevestnnaya literatura|Khudozhevestnnaya literatura]]&#039;&#039;, 1959-1962. Volume 9. Letters 1815–1830.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===R===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:French invasion of Russia collage.jpg|thumb|right|Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ~ Pastor Richards, &#039;&#039;[[w:GTA Vice City|GTA: Vice City]]&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Try to tell a [[w:Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic|Russian]] housewife, who trudges miles on foot in sub-zero weather in order to spend hours standing in line at a state store dispensing [[w:Rationing in the Soviet Union|food rations]], that [[United States|America]] is defiled by [[w:Shopping mall|shopping centers]], [[w:Expressway|expressways]] and family cars.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Ayn Rand]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution&#039;&#039; (1971).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*History shows that the process of modernization leads societies to form liberal democracies with market systems. Yet some leaders insist on trying to create alternative models, even though those models are unstable and retrograde. Putin&#039;s authoritarian effort to create a managed democracy in Russia offers a good example... After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 many people expected Russia to make a rapid transition from communism to democracy... However, what followed in Russia was a period of experimentation with relatively greater [[liberalism]] under President Boris Yeltsin that led not to democracy, but the rise of Putin and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] system... Putin&#039;s authoritarian system does not mean that he has built a successful alternative to liberal democracy. Instead, the system owes its existence in part to the slow development of a middle class in Russia that normally would demand a share of power. That slow development, in turn, is largely thanks to the state&#039;s monopolization of the country&#039;s most lucrative business activities: the export of energy and other natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
**Charles Recknagel, [http://www.rferl.org/content/fukuyama-putinism-islamic-state-liberal-democracy/27518924.html &amp;quot;Fukuyama: &#039;Putinism&#039;, Radical Islam No Alternative To Liberal Democracy&amp;quot;] (30 January 2016), &#039;&#039;Radio Free Europe: Radio Liberty&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rule of law]] is not consistent with [[Iraq War|state-sponsored brutality]]. When the Russian government attacks civilians in [[w:Second Chechen War|Chechnya]], [[Vietnam War|killing innocents]] without discrimination or accountability, neglecting orphans and refugees, it can no longer expect aid from international lending institutions. Moscow needs to operate with civilized self-restraint.&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://web.archive.org/web/20150421074248/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25849 &#039;&#039;Republican Party Platform of 2000&#039;&#039;] (31 July 2000), United States of America: Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Look at Russia. They keep trying help each other out, extend a hand to a neighbor, and guess what? Every ten years, some one is invading, burning down their homes and taking their toilet paper. Napoleon, Stalin, [[w:Attila the Hun|Attila the Hun]], all of them. After you read my book you will understand. I may have been born in the see, but I&#039;m no dummy!&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Pastor Richards|Pastor Richards]], as quoted in [http://nl.wikigta.org/wiki/Pressing_Issues_%28morality%29 &#039;&#039;Grand Theft Auto: Vice City&#039;&#039;] (October 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We had a moment in history, between 1988 and 1991, where we could have worked with [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] to make his vision of perestroika succeed. Instead, we allowed him to fail, without any real plan on how we would live with what emerged from the ruins of the Soviet Union. Save for a short period of time during the [[World War II|Second World War]] where we needed the [[Soviet Union]] to defeat Germany and Japan, we have been in a continual state of political conflict with the Soviet Union. Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, we viewed the [[Russia|Russian Federation]] more as a defeated enemy that we needed to keep down, than a friend in need of a helping hand up. Yeltsin’s Russia was useful to the US and NATO only to the extent that we could exploit it economically while controlling its domestic politics in a manner that kept Russia in a perpetual state of weakness. The [[Barack Obama|Obama]] “reset” was simply a ploy to remove [[Vladimir Putin]], who rejected the vision of Russia projected by the west, and replace him with [[Dmitry Medvedev|Dmitri Medvedev]], whom Obama believed could be remade in the figure of [[Boris Yeltsin|Yeltsin]]. The fact that Putin believes in a strong Russia has upset the plans of the US, NATO, and Europe for post-Cold War hegemony, predicated as they were on a weak, compliant Russian state.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]] as quoted in [https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/02/personal-interview-scott-ritter/ What Are The Prospects For Peace?  by John Rachel, &#039;&#039;Dissident Voice&#039;&#039;] / February 24th, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The bottom line is that Russia has set forth a cognizable claim under the doctrine of anticipatory collective [[Self-defense|self defense]], devised originally by the U.S. and NATO, as it applies to [[w:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51| ([[Charter of the United Nations]]) Article 51]] which is predicated on fact, not fiction.  While it might be in vogue for people, organizations, and governments in the West to embrace the knee-jerk conclusion that Russia’s military intervention constitutes a wanton violation of the United Nations Charter and, as such, constitutes an illegal war of aggression, the uncomfortable [[truth]] is that, of all the claims made regarding the legality of pre-emption under [[W:Chapter_VII_of_the_United_Nations_Charter#Article_51|Article 51 of the United Nations Charter]], Russia’s justification for invading Ukraine is on solid legal ground.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Scott Ritter]], [https://consortiumnews.com/2022/03/29/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/ Russia, Ukraine &amp;amp; the Law of War: Crime of Aggression]], [[W:Consortium News|&#039;&#039;Consortium News&#039;&#039;]],  March 29, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [U.S.] military/security complex has resurrected its Cold War enemy so necessary for its outsized budget and power and intends to keep Russia as The Enemy. The Democrats have an interest in the villification of Russia as “Russiagate” explains Hillary’s loss of the 2016 Presidential election and gives Democrats hope of removing President Trump from office. The [[Mainstream media|media]] lacks independence, knowledge, and integrity and is the tool used by the military/security complex to control explanations... As strategic and Russian studies are largely funded by the military/security complex, the universities are also complicit in the march toward nuclear war. Republicans are as dependent as Democrats on funding from the military/security complex and the Israel Lobby.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*All of this self-serving is driving America and its vassals to war with Russia, which might also mean with China. The war would be nuclear and be the end of the West, an act of self-genocide. The US national security establishment is so crazed that Trump’s efforts to get off the war track and onto a peace track are characterized as treason and a threat to US national security. &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Russians are aware that the accusations and demonization that they experience are fabrications. They no longer see the problem as one of misunderstandings that diplomacy can overcome. What they see now is the West preparing its populations for war. It is this perception for which the West is solely responsible that makes the situation today far more dangerous than it ever was during the long Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Paul Craig Roberts]] in  [https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/12/28/the-self-genocide-of-the-west/  &#039;&#039;The Self-Genocide of the West, Foreign Policy Journal&#039;&#039;]  (26 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===S===&lt;br /&gt;
*​&#039;&#039;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, А кто вашъ родимый?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Нашъ родимый – Царь непобѣдимый, Вотъ кто нашъ родимый.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, ​Есть​ у васъ родная?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  ​– Есть​ родная, мать намъ дорогая, Наша Русь святая.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваша слава?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  – Наша слава — Русская держава, Вотъ гдѣ наша слава.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Солдатушки​, бравы ребятушки, Гдѣ же ваши дѣды?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; – Наши дѣды — ​славные​ побѣды, Вотъ гдѣ наши дѣды.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Translation&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;​Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And who is your esteemed?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our esteemed, the invincible Tsar&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s who our esteemed is.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you have a darling?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– There&#039;s a darling, our dear mother,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Our Holy Rus&#039;.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Little soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is your glory?&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our glory is the Russian state – That&#039;s where our glory is.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Soldiers, brave little guys,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where are your grandfathers? &#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;– Our grandfathers are [the] glorious victories, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That&#039;s where our grandfathers are.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; * &#039;&#039;[https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8 Soldatushki] (little soldiers)&#039;&#039;, [[w:Russian Imperial Army|Imperial army]] song popular in the 19th century. Note that many different versions exist, although always with similar format and pace.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Victory Day Parade 2005-5.jpg|thumb|We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke nationalist hysteria. ~ [[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Президент РФ на базе ОМОН «Зубр»..jpeg|thumb|Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police. ~ Ivan Sukhov]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Silvio Berlusconi and Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 (2).jpg|thumb|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2O7dYlabc Freedom is better than non-freedom.]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These words are the quintessence of the human experience. ~ [[Dmitry Medvedev]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia has become very authoritarian. It doesn’t accept [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] or real elections anymore.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mikheil Saakashvili]], as quoted in [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/magazine/19WWln-q4-t.html &amp;quot;An American Friend&amp;quot;] (19 October 2008), &#039;&#039;The New York Times&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding China...you have both the Democrats and Republicans taking an increasingly hostile posture... if you look at the recent comments of Xi Jinping, particularly after his virtual summit with Joe Biden, he has been really hitting the talking point that what is happening is that the United States is taking this neo-Cold War posture. I think he is entirely right. But I sort of see it in the same vein as you. China, the United States and Russia in particular are engaged in a classic capitalist battle for control of natural resources all throughout the world.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;What I think is happening as a result of NATO expansion, of Biden being a tremendously hawkish figure on Ukraine and basically daring Vladimir Putin to stand up to NATO expansion, is that you run the risk of what is ultimately the elite business class of the world having their battles spilling over into overt military conflict. I think China in particular is very concerned about the aggressive U.S. stance because I think China would be very happy to find a way to just sort of divvy up the world for domination in various regions. The United States is not going to accept that. The U.S. posture is pushing China and Russia into an even closer alliance akin to the relationship during the Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Jeremy Scahill]] in [https://www.democracynow.org/2021/11/24/war_party_us_military_spending “The War Party”: Jeremy Scahill on How U.S. Militarism Unifies Democrats &amp;amp; Republicans, &#039;&#039;Democracy Now!&#039;&#039;]  (24 November 2021) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We have now seen the weakness of Russia&#039;s democratic institutions, the ease with which a Russian leader can stoke [[Nationalism|nationalist]] hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Stephen Sestanovich|Stephen Sestanovich]], [http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/04/14/could-it-have-been-otherwise/ &amp;quot;Could It Have Been Otherwise?&amp;quot;] (14 April 2015), &#039;&#039;The American Interest&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Russia we only had two T.V. channels. Channel One was [[propaganda]]. Channel Two consisted of a KGB officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yakov Smirnoff|Yakov Smirnoff]], reported in Bob Fenster (2005). &#039;&#039;Laugh Off: The Comedy Showdown Between Real Life And The Pros&#039;&#039;. Andrews McMeel Publishing, p. 101. {{ISBN|0740754688}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although [[Wikipedia:Ivan Ilyin|Ilyin]] dressed up his idea of contemplation in several books, it really was no more than that: he saw his own [[nation]] as righteous, and the purity of that vision was more important than anything Russians actually did. The nation, “pure and objective,” was what the philosopher saw when he blinded himself.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Innocence took a specific biological form. What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like [[fascists]] and other [[authoritarians]] of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, “an organism of nature and the soul,” an animal in [[Wikipedia:Eden|Eden]] without [[Wikipedia:Original sin|original sin]]. &#039;&#039;&#039;Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body.&#039;&#039;&#039; Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought “fraternal union” wherever Russian power extended. Ilyin wrote of “Ukrainians” in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of [[Ukraine]] was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. Ilyin took for granted that a post-Soviet Russia would include Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], &#039;&#039;[[Wikipedia:The Road to Unfreedom|The Road to Unfreedom]]&#039;&#039;, 2018. Read it online [https://willzuzak.ca/cl/bookreview/Snyder2018RoadToUnfreedom.pdf here].&lt;br /&gt;
*The symbol Z, the rallies, the propaganda, the war as a cleansing act of violence and the death pits around Ukrainian towns make it all very plain. &#039;&#039;&#039;The war against Ukraine is not only a return to the traditional [[fascist]] battleground, but also a return to traditional fascist language and practice.&#039;&#039;&#039; Other people are there to be colonized. Russia is innocent because of its ancient past. The existence of Ukraine is an international conspiracy. War is the answer.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Timothy D. Snyder]], [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opinion/russia-fascism-ukraine-putin.html We Should Say It. Russia Is Fascist.], &#039;&#039;[[The New York Times]]&#039;&#039; (19 May 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1944, investigator, proud of his faultless logic [...] told Babitsh: &amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;Investigation and the process are merely juridical figaration, that can&#039;t change your destiny, which has been determined before. If it is necessary to shoot you, you&#039;ll be shot, even if you&#039;re completely innocent.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;We forget everything. What we remember is not what actually happened, not history, but merely that hackneyed dotted line they have chosen to drive into our memories by incessant hammering.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]], &#039;&#039;[[The Gulag Archipelago]]&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The idea of a [[concentration camp]] is excellent.&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joseph Stalin]] on ideas of eradicating [[w:Commune of the Working People of Estonia|&#039;counter-revolutionaries and traitors&#039;]] in [[Estonia]], as quoted in &#039;&#039;Stalin : A Biography&#039;&#039; (2004) by Robert Service, p. 158; also in &#039;&#039;Bol&#039;shevistskoe rukovodstvo. Perepiska, 1912-1927&#039;&#039;, p. 36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Listen, there&#039;s been a campaign, a war against Russia going on for a long time. It started again in the United States around 2006, &#039;07, when he made that speech in Munich, but I think there&#039;s no evidence really of the aggressiveness of Russia. The aggressiveness is truly coming from the [[NATO|NATO forces]] that have encircled Russia and that are also, by the way, encircling China. You know, this is a big policy point, huge, of huge importance... If you look at the reporting from all of our major networks, it&#039;s very hostile when it comes to people who we deem to be enemies, whether it&#039;s Chávez or whether it&#039;s [[Fidel Castro|Castro]] or [[Vladimir Putin|Putin]]. I&#039;ve never seen an interview done from the American perspective where they allow the subject to express himself in what he was seeking to do, what his purpose was.  &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2021/05/12/transcript-conversation-with-oliver-stone/ Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone,]   (streamed live [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5pgnQ2M9tg on youtube])  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*Castro was very articulate, and so was Chavez, and so was Putin in his way, and I think I gave them a chance to talk and also in their native language. We never hear Putin speak in his native Russian, and we had a very good translator, interpreter working with him. I think it&#039;s crucial to understand Putin&#039;s point of view as it was Castro&#039;s, Chávez&#039;s. And also, Yasser Arafat, too.. It&#039;s not necessary to be their enemy. It&#039;s necessary to get them to express themselves. That&#039;s my point of view, and I guess you could say I&#039;m a dramatist. And I think they&#039;re great stories. I&#039;m very proud of those movies. I took a lot of heat, flack for the last one for Putin, but frankly, I&#039;m very proud of it. It&#039;s a record for all time of a man who very few people have gotten to. Even the Russians tell me they&#039;ve never seen their president so frank as he was on that interview.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Oliver Stone]],  Transcript: A Conversation with Oliver Stone, (streamed live on youtube)  &#039;&#039;The Washington Post&#039;&#039; (12 May  2021)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*In the West today, supporting engagement with Moscow cannot be discussed openly without inspiring immediate [[w:hysteria|hysteria]]. But we should try to understand the historical background to the tensions between Russia and the West before they spiral out of control... Once we do that, and start treating Russia with the respect and dignity it deserves, we may reach the real peace that we have failed to achieve since the end of the first Cold War.&lt;br /&gt;
**Tom Switzer in [http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/russiaphobia-perils-new-cold-war/  Russiaphobia and the Perils of a New Cold War, Australia Institute of International Affairs] (18 April 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian society as a whole does not care if its leading scholars and scientists have a way to publish their research and discoveries and that nobody has the power to prevent abuses and torture by the police... Russians have been more united during these last 18 difficult months than during the whole of the post-Soviet period. As they say, the person who holds the flag determines what is written on it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Ivan Sukhov|Ivan Sukhov]], [http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-russian-apathy-is-worrisome-op-ed/525719.html &amp;quot;Why Russian Apathy Is Worrisome&amp;quot;] (15 July 2015), &#039;&#039;The Moscow Times&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interview With [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]] on Ukraine (May 1994)===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.forbes.com/2008/08/05/solzhenitsyn-forbes-interview-oped-cx_pm_0804russia.html by Paul Klebnikov, in the (9 May 1994), issue] of [[w:Forbes magazine|&#039;&#039;Forbes magazine&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]], [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]], [historian] [[Richard Pipes]] and many other American politicians... are frozen... with unchanging blindness and stubbornness they keep repeating... this theory about the supposed age-old aggressiveness of Russia, without taking into consideration today&#039;s [[reality]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Imagine that one not very fine day two or three of your states in the [[w:Southwestern United States|Southwest]], in the space of 24 hours, declare themselves independent of the [[United States|U.S.]]... declare themselves a fully sovereign nation, decreeing that [[Spanish language|Spanish]] will be the only language. All [[English language|English]]-speaking residents, even if their ancestors have lived there for 200 years, have to take a test in the Spanish language within one or two years and swear [[allegiance]]... Otherwise they will not receive [[citizenship]] and be deprived of... (their) rights. Today Russia faces precisely this scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:History of Russia (1991–present)|In 24 hours]] she lost eight to 10 purely Russian provinces, 25 million ethnic Russians who have ended up in this very way--as &amp;quot;undesirable aliens.&amp;quot; In places where their fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers have lived since way back--even from the 17th century--they face persecution in their jobs and the suppression of their culture, education and language...&lt;br /&gt;
*[[W:Dissolution of the Soviet Union|Russia today]] is terribly sick... But even so, have a [[conscience]] and don’t demand that – just to please America – Russia throw away the last vestiges of her concern for her security and her unprecedented collapse. After all, this concern in no way threatens the United States....&lt;br /&gt;
*Why does the [[w:United States Department of State|(U.S.) State Department]] decide who should get [[w:Sevastopol|Sevastopol]]?... &lt;br /&gt;
*As a result of the sudden and crude fragmentation of the intermingled Slavic peoples, the borders have torn apart millions of ties of family and friendship. Is this acceptable? The [[W:2004 Ukrainian presidential election|recent elections in Ukraine]], for instance, clearly show the [Russian] sympathies of the Crimean and Donets populations. And a [[democracy]] must respect this....&lt;br /&gt;
*I myself am nearly half Ukrainian. I grew up with the sounds of Ukrainian speech. I love her culture and genuinely wish all kinds of success for Ukraine--but only within her real ethnic boundaries, without grabbing Russian provinces. ...&lt;br /&gt;
*And not in the form of a &amp;quot;great power,&amp;quot; the concept on which Ukrainian nationalists have placed their bets. They are acting out and trumpeting a cult of force, persistently inflating [[Russia]] into the image of an &amp;quot;enemy.&amp;quot; Militant slogans are proclaimed. And the Ukrainian army is being indoctrinated with the propaganda that war with Russia is inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*For every country, [[W:Superpower|great power status]] deforms and harms the national [[character]]. I have never wished great power status for [[Russia]], and do not wish it for the [[United States]]. I don&#039;t wish it for Ukraine. She would not be able to perform even the cultural task required to achieve great power status: In her current borders, 63% of the population consider Russian to be their native language... And all these people will have to be re-educated in the Ukrainian language...&lt;br /&gt;
*Before the [[Russian Revolution|Russian revolution]], they [U.S. and Russia] were natural allies. You know that during the American Civil War, Russia supported Lincoln and the North [in contrast to Britain and France, which supported the Confederacy]. Then, we were effectively allies in the First World War. But beginning with communism, Russia ceased to exist. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yet an official U.S. document from 1959, the Law 86-90, does not include Russia in the list of nations oppressed by [[communism]]. On the contrary, &amp;quot;Russian [[imperialism]],&amp;quot; not communism, is held responsible for the conquest of some 20 countries--even China, Tibet and some made-up place called &amp;quot;Kazakia.&amp;quot; One is amazed that this silly law is still on the books, even today....This was not Russian imperialism, which in the past only expanded its borders somewhat. This was communist imperialism, which aimed to take over the whole world... This is complete delirium! When was Russia ever in Africa? When did Russia ever want to snatch Angola or Cuba? When was she ever in Latin America? The historical Russia has never tried to take over the world, whereas the communists had precisely this aim...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one recalls the tactless declaration of [[George H. W. Bush|President Bush]] about supporting [[Ukrainian]] sovereignty even before the referendum on that matter, one must conclude that all this stems from &#039;&#039;&#039;a common aim: to use all means possible, no matter what the consequences, to weaken Russia&#039;&#039;&#039;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If one looks far into the future, one can foresee in the [[21st century]] such a time when the U.S. together with Europe will be in dire need of Russia as an ally. ...It is puzzling only for those who don&#039;t look into the future and do not see what kind of new powers are arising in the world...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Russian Empire for private use (1914–1917).svg|thumb|Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. ~ [[Leon Trotsky]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* After weeks of dancing around the issue, the Obama administration has expressed concern about “heightened military activity” by Russia in Syria. But what if we are facing something more than “heightened military activity?” What if Moscow is preparing to give Syria the full Putin treatment? For years, Russia has been helping Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad cling to a diminishing power structure in a shrinking territorial base without trying to impose an overall strategy. Now, however, there are signs that Russia isn&#039;t content to just support Assad. It wants to control Syria. The Putin treatment is reserved for countries in Russia’s “near neighborhood” that try to break out of Moscow’s orbit and deprive it of strategic assets held for decades. In such cases, unable to restore its past position, Russia tries to create a new situation in which it keeps a sword dangling above the head of the recalcitrant nation. Russia’s military intervenes directly and indirectly, always with help from a segment of the local population concerned. Russia starts by casting itself as protector of an ethnic, linguistic or religious minority that demands its military intervention against a central power vilified with labels such as “fascist” and “terrorist.”&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Get ready for Russia to cast itself as the protector, not only of the [[w:Alawite|Alawites]] but also of other minorities such as [[w:Turcoman|Turcoman]], [[w:Armenians|Armenians]] and, more interestingly for Moscow, Orthodox Christians who have fled [[Islamic terrorism|Islamist terror]] groups such as [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|ISIS]]. Russia has always seen itself as the “Third Rome” and the last standard-bearer of [[Christianity]] against both [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] “deviation” and [[Islamism|Islamist]] menace. By controlling a new mini-state, as a “safe haven for minorities,” Russia could insist that if Syria returns to some normality it be reconstituted as a highly decentralized state. This is what Putin is also demanding in Georgia and Ukraine. The Syrian coast will become another Crimea, if not completely annexed, at least occupied. Unless stopped, the Putin treatment will not end in Syria. The two next candidates could be Moldova and Latvia, both of which have large Russian-speaking minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amir Taheri]], [http://nypost.com/2015/09/19/putin-is-turning-the-syrian-coast-into-another-crimea/ Putin is turning the Syrian coast into another Crimea], &#039;&#039;New York Post&#039;&#039; (September 19, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Russian is self-assured just because he knows nothing and does not want to know anything, since he does not believe that anything can be known. The German&#039;s self-assurance is worst of all, stronger and more repulsive than any other, because he imagines that he knows the truth--science--which he himself has invented but which is for him the absolute truth.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leo Tolstoy]], &#039;&#039;War and Peace&#039;&#039;, (1865-1869). Book 9, Chapter 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Let a man find himself, in distinction from others, on top of two wheels with a chain — at least in a poor country like Russia — and his vanity begins to swell out like his tires. In America it takes an automobile to produce this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Leon Trotsky]], &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039; (1930). See edition: [[Leon Trotsky]]; Max Eastman (1957). &#039;&#039;The History of the Russian Revolution&#039;&#039;. University of Michigan Press, p. 213.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are like us... They are fine people. They got along with our soldiers in Berlin very well. As far as I am concerned, they can have whatever they want just so they don&#039;t try to impose their system on others.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to a group of four congress freshmen (2 July 1947), as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Russians are liars; you can&#039;t trust them. At [[w:Potsdam Conference|Potsdam]] they agreed to everything and broke their word. It&#039;s too bad the second world power is like this, but that&#039;s the way it is, and we must keep our strength.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Harry S. Truman]], statement to [[Richard Nixon]] and his wife Pat in 1969, as quoted in &#039;&#039;The Memoirs of Richard Nixon&#039;&#039;, p. 44&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal Russophobia has become a powerful force responsible for deterioration of U.S.-Russia relations. The coalition of liberal Russophobes include those in Congress, [[Mainstream media|media]] and think tanks who believe that Russia aims to destroy the U.S.-centered “liberal” international order and that President Donald Trump’s attempts to negotiate with the Kremlin do more harm than good. Those sharing these views also...  want to take away from the president the prerogative of conducting relations with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
**Andrei P. Tsygankov in [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/12/important-us-russia-dialogue-takes-a-hit-in-the-cu/ &#039;&#039;Playing the Russophobia card, The Washington Times&#039;&#039;] (12 December 2018)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===T===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===V===&lt;br /&gt;
*Dear [[Joe Biden|President Biden]], We last communicated with you on December 20, 2020... we alerted you to the dangers inherent in formulating a policy toward Russia built on a foundation of Russia-bashing. While we continue to support the analysis contained in that memorandum... We wish to draw your attention to the dangerous situation that exists in Ukraine today, where there is growing risk of war unless you take steps to forestall such a conflict... 1. It must be made clear to Ukrainian President Zelensky that there will be no military assistance from either the US or [[NATO]] if he does not restrain Ukrainian hawks itching to give Russia a bloody nose — hawks who may well expect the West to come to Ukraine’s aid in any conflict with Russia.... . We recommend that you quickly get back in touch with Zelensky and insist that Kiev halt its current military buildup in eastern Ukraine. Russian forces have been lining up at the border ready to react if Zelensky’s loose talk of war becomes more than bravado.... 3. It is equally imperative that the U.S. engage in high-level diplomatic talks with Russia to reduce tensions in the region and de-escalate the current rush toward military conflict. Untangling the complex web of issues that currently burden U.S.-Russia relations is a formidable task that will not be accomplished overnight. This would be an opportune time to work toward a joint goal of preventing armed hostilities in Ukraine and wider war.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[W:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity|Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity]], [https://worldbeyondwar.org/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Letter to President Biden: On Avoiding War in Ukraine],  [[W:World Beyond War|&#039;&#039;World Beyond War&#039;&#039;]], April 07, 2021,  [https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/04/06/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Antiwar.com&#039;&#039;], [http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/april/07/veteran-intelligence-professionals-for-sanity-on-avoiding-war-in-ukraine/ Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity], (April 2021)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Y===&lt;br /&gt;
*A poet in Russia is more than a poet.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[w:Yevgeny Yevtushenko|Yevgeny Yevtushenko]], as quoted in [https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obituaries/ct-yevgeny-yevtushenko-dead-20170401-story.html &amp;quot;Acclaimed Russian poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko dies in Oklahoma&amp;quot;] (1 April 2017), by Ken Miller, &#039;&#039;Associated Press&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*We don&#039;t appreciate what we have until it&#039;s gone. Freedom is like that. It&#039;s like air. When you have it, you don&#039;t notice it.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Boris Yeltsin]], as quoted in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0806524766 &#039;&#039;The 100 Greatest Heroes&#039;&#039;], by H. Paul Jeffers, Citadel Press, p. 60&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoly Antonov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Lavrov]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vladimir Putin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{commons}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikiversity|Comparative law and justice/{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{wikibooks|Wikijunior:Europe/Russia}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikisource|Portal:{{PAGENAME}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wikivoyage}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Wiktionary}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote:Votes_for_deletion/FakeWikipedia&amp;diff=3119862</id>
		<title>Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/FakeWikipedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiquote:Votes_for_deletion/FakeWikipedia&amp;diff=3119862"/>
		<updated>2022-06-01T12:31:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spafky: /* FakeWikipedia */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Wikiquote| |{{error:not substituted|vfd-new2}}&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;display:none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Foreword: (Please ask yourself - What makes it fake?  Nothing other than HOC&#039;s word. He is very aggressively pushing his POV here. He is very clearly using fair words in a vain attempt cloak his foul deeds. Beware!)  HOC wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FakeWikipedia ==  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fake Wikipedia articles where one-sided opinions are presented as facts. Blocked POV-pushing editors created all these. Not one notable quote among them, nor is there likely to be on these topics. — [[User:HouseOfChange|HouseOfChange]] ([[User talk:HouseOfChange|talk]]) 22:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Vote closes&#039;&#039;&#039;: 23:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socks created some articles that can be rescued by adding good quotes. But these &amp;quot;fake Wikipedia articles,&amp;quot; we should delete, because the topics are not suited to Wikiquote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;[[United States embargo against Cuba]] created by GaneshaSis&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[United States sanctions]] created by GaneshaSis&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Information Warfare Community]] created by Alphabravo2022&lt;br /&gt;
* [[USS Liberty incident]] created by Will-SeymoreIII&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blocked user Om777om has not been shown by Checkuser to be the same as the socks above, but he created 3 articles in this category that were later edited by the socks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;[[H.R. 40 - Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act]]  created by Om777om&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]] created by Om777om&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Crimes Against Humanity Initiative]]  created by Om777om&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I apologize in advance if I&#039;m not making this complex suggestion correctly. [[User:HouseOfChange|HouseOfChange]] ([[User talk:HouseOfChange|talk]]) 22:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, &#039;&#039;&#039;delete them all&#039;&#039;&#039;. I think doing these as a group is the best way to handle this problem. [[User:Antandrus|Antandrus]] ([[User talk:Antandrus|talk]]) 04:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oppose:&lt;br /&gt;
:* I am not familiar with the term Fake Wikipedia articles&lt;br /&gt;
:* To my knowledge we do not delete pages because &amp;quot;the topics are not suited to Wikiquote&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Comment: I doubt anyone will check carefully all the articles the OP has suggested in one swift stroke of the keyboard, but hope the deleting admin will [[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 04:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::{{re|Ottawahitech}} Real Wikipedia articles achieve NPOV by relying on fact-checked RS before making assertions. These articles use quote selection, images, and bolding to imply that one point of view is endorsed by wikivoice. I have spent hours trying to improve other &amp;quot;sock&amp;quot; articles, where the topic is deep enough to inspire notable quotes. Wikiquote has an article on [[Crimes against humanity]], it doesn&#039;t need one for [[Crimes Against Humanity Initiative]] . And so on. [[User:HouseOfChange|HouseOfChange]] ([[User talk:HouseOfChange|talk]]) 23:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Keep them all!  Those are exellent pages that all who inquire should know about. Why hide or cover-up the truth? Do you calling for deletion  wish to help tyrants and harm the people?  It is sad that so many are so very afraid of the truth and want to hide it. They should be sent to the doctor&#039;s office.  They should be advised that truth is the people&#039;s best friend and the worst enemy of tyrants. Real winners never lie and liars never win. Bless their hearts, eventually they&#039;ll know what i mean and see that hiding the truth is very wrong and that it will eventually set us all free! [[Special:Contributions/66.190.126.146|66.190.126.146]] 17:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Keep [[United States embargo against Cuba]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, a notable topic that can likely be improved by adding quotes reflecting other perspectives; &#039;&#039;&#039;delete&#039;&#039;&#039; the rest, as the topics covered are on a smaller scale or are less cohesive as topics. [[User:BD2412|&amp;lt;font style=&amp;quot;background:#F2E6CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;BD2412&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] [[User talk:BD2412|&#039;&#039;&#039;T&#039;&#039;&#039;]] 07:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
*:::Some may want to consider that this particular page has clearly had significantly more interest than the others, as reflected below: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt; 1) Information Warfare Community, Created 8 Apr 2022, total pageviews: 450; 17 days; Avg pageviews per day: 26 &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;The topic is extremely relevant to the current events, as nearly everyone witnesses the actions of this group, once known as the &amp;quot;Information Dominance Corps&amp;quot;.  ~anon [[Special:Contributions/24.214.70.31|24.214.70.31]] 22:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Comment, I removed from this list one long article that I believe contains useful and good material we should retain: &#039;&#039;&#039;[[H.R. 40 - Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. I nominated it because I thought that our article on the more general topic [[Reparations]] could be used to save any useful contents there. But in retrospect, that specific collection would be a useful resource and should be kept. My apologies for being too hasty. I am also removing the US embargo article in deference to the suggestion of {{user|BD2412}}. [[User:HouseOfChange|HouseOfChange]] ([[User talk:HouseOfChange|talk]]) 18:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Oppose&#039;&#039;&#039; I object to this, because it is too vaguely worded. How do you even define a &amp;quot;fake Wikipedia article&amp;quot;? --[[User:Spafky|Spafky]] ([[User talk:Spafky|talk]]) 12:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
===This deletion attempt is a scam===&lt;br /&gt;
:Please Keep All these articles for the benefit of the present and future generations. The pages fit into the broadminded, anti-jerk wikipedia vision that promoted by [[Jimmy Wales|Jimbo Wales]], and should not be censored. HOC&#039;s heavy handed attempts to [[Information Dominance Corps|dominate information]] here calling for deletion of these articles, and his deceptive use of words is clearly a sham &amp;amp; should be so recognized. These articles were all approved, years ago in some cases, and months ago in others by regular admins and bureaucrats here.  The articles have valid quotes, have father WP pages, and include multiple, some would say very informative/telling  views and opinions, from multiple, educated, notable, thoughtful people, and are presented as QUOTATIONS, not  facts. HOC&#039;s absurd claim that &amp;quot;one-sided opinions are presented as facts is ridiculous, and is NOT supported by the facts at hand.  It should also be noted that HOC&#039;s constant derogatory references to other volunteer editors speak more about him than those whom he  targets. Strong leadership, would warn him against breaking the rules here, and give him a significant pause to reflect.  Apparently  He is the biggest disruption here ever. Be careful not to fall under his spell. Thinkers should remember that there are  many professors and students of the &amp;quot;Art of Deception&amp;quot; in our government.  Although they may have good intentions, they should be recognized whenever possible for what they are, so you can consciously avoid falling into their traps like the unquestioning/gullible masses.&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone here should know that lying, manipulating, and cheating  for any reason is wrong. Those who don&#039;t know, do not deserve to have any power over others. Responsible adults who see this should take stand for what you think is right. Stand for the growth, development, &amp;amp; the integrity of wikiquotes. If you want to run around mindlessly, barking like a rat terrier hell bent on barking up a storm, that&#039;s your right too. Thank you[[Special:Contributions/47.48.129.234|47.48.129.234]] 17:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[United States embargo against Cuba]]  &lt;br /&gt;
* [[United States sanctions]]  &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Information Warfare Community]]  &lt;br /&gt;
* [[USS Liberty incident]]  &lt;br /&gt;
* [[H.R. 40 - Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act]]  &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Russian sentiment]]  &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Crimes Against Humanity Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;B&amp;gt;I support freedom of expression. A lot of people I disagree with also support freedom of expression. If that&#039;s controversial, then someone will have to explain to me why.&amp;lt;/B&amp;gt;  ~ [[Jimmy Wales]] {{unsigned|47.48.129.234}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Spafky</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>